DOCSLIB.ORG

Lawyers and Revolution: Legal Ethos in the History…

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lawyers and Revolution: Legal Ethos in the History… ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВА И ГОСУДАРСТВА РОССИЙСКАЯ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ LAWYERS AND REVOLUTION: LEGAL ETHOS IN THE HISTORY… NEVEROV E. D. LAWYERS AND REVOLUTION: LEGAL ETHOS IN THE HISTORY OF THE JURIDICAL COUNCIL IN 1917 E. D. NEVEROV* The following article considers the history of the Ju- ridical Council of the Provisional Government from a biographical methodological perspective. The Juridical Council was established in March 1917 after the February Revolution in the system of the Provisional Government as a governmental body of legal expertise. The paper provides a summary of biographical information about lawyers of the Juridical Council (Vasily Maklakov, Fy- odor Kokoshkin, Nikolay Lazarevsky, Vladimir Nabokov, Moisey Adzhemov and Baron Boris Nolde), their origin, education, political career, professional and academic interests. Most of lawyers in the Council were descen- dants of noble Moscow and St. Petersburg families and belonged to big city intelligentsia circles. They gradu- ated from Moscow University and St. Petersburg Univer- Evgeniy D. Neverov, assistant, National Research University sity in 1890s during golden era of Russian legal university Higher School of Economics, education and their views concerning law, government, Russia liberalism, parliamentarism and public role of legal pro- fession were formed under a great influence of liberal professorate and in the atmosphere, when a university seemed to be the most liberal institute of the conservative era. The analysis of biographical information leads to a con- clusion that lawyers of the Council developed a new legal ethos, the characteristic feature of which was the adherence to the ideology of rule of law and civil society. KEYWORDS: liberal, lawyer, professorate, Constitutional Democratic Party, the Provisional Government, the Juridical Council, legal ethos. НЕВЕРОВ Е. Д. ЮРИСТЫ И РЕВОЛЮЦИЯ: ПРАВОВОЙ ЭТОС В ИСТОРИИ ЮРИДИЧЕ- СКОГО СОВЕЩАНИЯ 1917 ГОДА В статье с позиций биографического подхода рассматривается история Юридиче- ского совещания, которое было официально учреждено 22 марта 1917 г. актом Вре- менного правительства в качестве экспертного совета для подготовки различных юридических заключений, прежде всего о тех нормативных правовых актах, которые требуется издать Временному правительству для надлежащего правового сопрово- ждения мероприятий новой власти. Автор проанализировал биографии членов Юри- дического совещания (Василий Маклаков, Федор Кокошкин, Николай Лазаревский, Владимир Набоков, Михаил Аджемов и барон Борис Нольде), в том числе их проис- * Неверов Евгений Дмитриевич — ассистент, Национальный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики». E-mail: [email protected] © Неверов Е. Д., 2018 УДК 340.132:342.395.2(47)“1917” https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu25.2018.106 118 LAWYERS AND REVOLUTION: LEGAL ETHOS IN THE HISTORY… NEVEROV E. D. хождение, образование, политическую карьеру, профессиональные и академиче- ские интересы. Большинство юристов совещания были представителями знатных московских и петербургских фамилий, принадлежали к кругам столичной интел- лигенции. Они получили университетское юридическое образование в 1890-х гг., в период расцвета русской юридической школы. Взгляды юристов совещания на парламентский строй, права и свободы личности, независимость судебной власти и бессословную правовую систему, а также воззрения на общественную роль юри- дической профессии сформировались под влиянием либеральной профессуры, в период, когда университет был пространством наибольшего свободомыслия на фоне консервативной эпохи. Анализ биографий юристов совещания позволяет сде- лать вывод, что они были носителями нового правового этоса, т. е. специфической системы воззрений о праве, государственном управлении и месте юристов в обще- стве. Его характерной чертой являлась приверженность идее верховенства права, идеологии правового государства и гражданского общества. КЛЮЧЕВЫЕ СЛОВА: либерал, юрист, профессура, Конституционно-демократиче- ская партия, Временное правительство, Юридическое совещание, правовой этос. In the 20th century a new methodological approach to analysis of social processes appeared. The methodology was based on the idea that professional groups have their own unique moral identities. The theory that professional communities have specific moral recognition and collective consciousness was first proposed by French sociologist and philosopher Emil Durkheim in his “The Division of Labor in Society”: “functional diversity entails a moral diversity that nothing can prevent, and it is inevitable that the one should grow at the same time as the other”1. In 1960s this idea had gained influence in different fields of social knowl- edge2. In the sphere of Russian historical science and legal history the concept of specific moral identity of professional communities was introduced by American historian Richard Wortman in “The Development of Russian Legal Conscious- ness”, first published in 19763. This study focuses on the preconditions for the Great Reforms of Alexander II. R. Wortman makes an emphasis on the legal con- sciousness of top bureaucracy, which elaborated the strategy of the Reforms and conducted them. The author concludes that the real foundation for the Great Re- forms was a unique legal ethos, i. e. specific views concerning law, government and place of profession in society, which was cultivated among leading officials of key ministries. A cradle for this ethos was the Imperial School of Jurisprudence (Uchilishche Pravovedeniia), which was the most prestigious school for boys in St. Petersburg and the best start for an excellent career in public service at the time. Lawyers who studied there in 1830s — 1840s absorbed special beliefs on how law and state should be organized: ideas of civil equity and freedoms, division of powers and independent judiciary, trial by jury and due process, etc. In the late 1850s these lawyers obtained senior positions in the administrative 1 Durkheim E. The Division of Labor in Society. New York, 1964. P. 361. 2 Keller S. Beyond the Ruling Class. New York, 1963. P. 135. 3 Уортман Р. С. Властители и судии: Развитие правового сознания в императорской России. М., 2004. 119 ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВА И ГОСУДАРСТВА РОССИЙСКАЯ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ apparatus of Russian Empire and got an opportunity to implement liberal legal ethos on political practice. The research by R. Wortman was a turning point in understanding of the Great Reforms and theory of legal reforms in general. The idea of specific professional identities in legal culture studies has proved its applicability to various epochs and historical conditions4. Nancy Kollmann analyzes legal culture and professional legal consciousness in early modern Russia5. David Wartenweiler studies the legal consciousness of liberal professorate in the early 20th century and concludes that in this social group the ideas of human rights and civil liberties were predominant6. William Pomeranz argues that a breakthrough in the level of trial defense and emergence of great Russian trial lawyers was related to the development of professional ethos in advokatura community7. Analyzing peasant legal culture and post-reform development of judicial system, Jane Burbank proves that the legal culture of lawyers, bureaucracy and elite was very separated from peasants’ legal beliefs8. Burbank argues that ideas of non-estate court, unified citizenship and rule of law (pravovoe gosudarstvo) for all parts of empire prospered among lawyers and officials, while generally were not accepted in other social groups9. This lead to subcultural nature of legal consciousness in late-imperial Russia. Peter Holquist in his work, devoted to a prominent Russian lawyer Baron Boris Nolde (1876–1948), argues that in the early 20th century legal ethos and moral identity of lawyers under certain circumstances could be stronger than political self-determination. Holquist claims that “in Nolde’s case, I mean the homology that is often constructed between his outlook and the supposed lib- eralism (or, better, ‘liberalisms’) of the Constitutional Democratic Party. I do not mean to argue that party identity was irrelevant. But party affiliation is better understood as an instrument actors’ identity formation than as a clear-cut diag- nostic tool for divining what people believed”10. In Russian political system of the early 20th century there was no strong linkage between adherence to a specific 4 For an overview, see: Туманова А. С. Правовая культура общества позднеимпер- ской России в ракурсе историко-юридических исследований: подходы последних лет // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Юридические науки. 2014. № 4. С. 33–40. 5 Kollmann N. By Honor Bound: State and Society in Early Modern Russia. Ithaca, London, 1999. 6 Wartenweiler D. Civil Society and Academic Debate in Russia 1905–1914. Oxford, 1999. 7 Pomeranz W. ‘Profession or Estate’? The Case of the Russian Pre-Revolutionary ‘Ad- vokatura’ // The Slavonic and East European Review. 1999. Vol. 77. N 2. P. 240–268. 8 Burbank J. Discipline and Punish in Moscow Bar Association // The Russian Review. 1995. Vol. 54, N 1. P. 44–64. 9 Burbank J. 1) Legal Culture, Citizenship, and Peasant Jurisprudence: Perspectives from the Early Twentieth Century // Reforming Justice in Russia, 1864–1996: Power, Culture and the Limits of Legal Order. Armonk, New York, 1997. P. 82–106; 2) Thinking Like an Empire: Estate, Law and Rights in the Early Twentieth Century // Russian Empire: Space, People, Power, 1700–1930. Bloomington, Indianapolis, 2007. P. 196–217. 10 Holquist
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2. Maxim Vinaver and the First Russian State Duma ————————————
    ———————————— 2. Maxim Vinaver and the First Russian State Duma ———————————— 2. Maxim Vinaver and the First Russian State Duma The name, Maxim Vinaver, became associated with the First Russian State Duma. He wrote two books on the subject, Conflicts in the First Duma (Konflikty v pervoi Dume) (1907) and The History of the Vyborg Ap- peal [Memoirs] (Istoriia vyborgskogo vozzvaniia [vospominaniia]) (written in 1910 and published in 1913). This output, emerging in the years fol- lowing the closure of the First Duma, memorializes the short period between spring and fall of 1906. At the same time, these two memoirs reflect the time in which they were written, and allude to new realities in Russian political life between 1906 and the First World War. They are redolent of internecine disputes within the Russian Constitutional Democratic Party (Kadet), the difficulties of organizing a unified Jewish politics, and the relentless struggle with the government. In this essay I discuss the content of Vinaver’s memoirs while trying to reconstruct the political context in which they were written. My goal is not to provide an exhaustive description of Vinaver’s activities in the Duma or to provide a full description of the memoirs’ content. Rather, I outline Vinaver’s perception of the First Duma and illuminate the politi- cal goals contained in these two books. Lawyer, politician, and memoirist, Maxim Vinaver was born to a middle-class Jewish family in 1862, in Warsaw. After graduating with a degree in law from the University of Warsaw, he settled in St. Petersburg, where he was active both as a trial lawyer and editor of and contributor to the most prestigious legal journals in Russia, including Iuridicheskii vestnik and Vestnik prava.
    [Show full text]
  • Construction and Tradition: the Making of 'First Wave' Russian
    Construction and Tradition: The Making of ‘First Wave’ Russian Émigré Identity A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the Department of History from The College of William and Mary by Mary Catherine French Accepted for ____Highest Honors_______________________________ (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) ________________________________________ Frederick C. Corney, Director ________________________________________ Tuska E. Benes ________________________________________ Alexander Prokhorov Williamsburg, VA May 3, 2007 ii Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part One: Looking Outward 13 Part Two: Looking Inward 46 Conclusion 66 Bibliography 69 iii Preface There are many people to acknowledge for their support over the course of this process. First, I would like to thank all members of my examining committee. First, my endless gratitude to Fred Corney for his encouragement, sharp editing, and perceptive questions. Sasha Prokhorov and Tuska Benes were generous enough to serve as additional readers and to share their time and comments. I also thank Laurie Koloski for her suggestions on Romantic Messianism, and her lessons over the years on writing and thinking historically. Tony Anemone provided helpful editorial comments in the very early stages of the project. Finally, I come to those people who sustained me through the emotionally and intellectually draining aspects of this project. My parents have been unstinting in their encouragement and love. I cannot express here how much I owe Erin Alpert— I could not ask for a better sounding board, or a better friend. And to Dan Burke, for his love and his support of my love for history. 1 Introduction: Setting the Stage for Exile The history of communities in exile and their efforts to maintain national identity without belonging to a recognized nation-state is a recurring theme not only in general histories of Europe, but also a significant trend in Russian history.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawyers and Revolution: Legal Ethos in the History of the Juridical Council in 1917
    ИСТОРИЯ ПРАВА И ГОСУДАРСТВА РОССИЙСКАЯ ЮРИСПРУДЕНЦИЯ LAWYERS AND REVOLUTION: LEGAL ETHOS IN THE HISTORY… NEVEROV E. D. LAWYERS AND REVOLUTION: LEGAL ETHOS IN THE HISTORY OF THE JURIDICAL COUNCIL IN 1917 E. D. NEVEROV* The following article considers the history of the Ju- ridical Council of the Provisional Government from a biographical methodological perspective. The Juridical Council was established in March 1917 after the February Revolution in the system of the Provisional Government as a governmental body of legal expertise. The paper provides a summary of biographical information about lawyers of the Juridical Council (Vasily Maklakov, Fy- odor Kokoshkin, Nikolay Lazarevsky, Vladimir Nabokov, Moisey Adzhemov and Baron Boris Nolde), their origin, education, political career, professional and academic interests. Most of lawyers in the Council were descen- dants of noble Moscow and St. Petersburg families and belonged to big city intelligentsia circles. They gradu- ated from Moscow University and St. Petersburg Univer- Evgeniy D. Neverov, assistant, National Research University sity in 1890s during golden era of Russian legal university Higher School of Economics, education and their views concerning law, government, Russia liberalism, parliamentarism and public role of legal pro- fession were formed under a great influence of liberal professorate and in the atmosphere, when a university seemed to be the most liberal institute of the conservative era. The analysis of biographical information leads to a con- clusion that lawyers of the Council developed a new legal ethos, the characteristic feature of which was the adherence to the ideology of rule of law and civil society. KEYWORDS: liberal, lawyer, professorate, Constitutional Democratic Party, the Provisional Government, the Juridical Council, legal ethos.
    [Show full text]
  • A Child of Christian Blood
    A Child of Christian Blood The Beilis Blood Libel by Edmund Levin, … Published: 2014 J J J J J I I I I I Table of Contents Dedication Preface Cast of Characters & Chapter 1 … “Why Should I Be Afraid?” Chapter 2 … “The Vendetta of the Sons of Jacob.” Chapter 3 … “A Certain Jew Mendel.” Chapter 4 … “Andrusha, Don’t Scream.” Chapter 5 … “You Are a Second Dreyfus.” Chapter 6 … “Cheberyak Knows Everything.” Chapter 7 … “Who Is a Hero?” Chapter 8 … “The Worst and Most Fearful Thing.” Chapter 9 … “Yes, a Jew!” Chapter 10 … “We Have Seen the Killer.” Chapter 11 … “Gentlemen of the Jury!” Chapter 12 … “The Smell of Burning, Blood, and Iron.” Acknowledgements Source Notes Bibliography Abbreviations Footnotes J J J J J I I I I I To the Memory of Selene and Martin Levin There was in Asia, in a great city, Among Christian folk, a street of Jewry, Sustained by a lord of that country For foul usury and lucre of villainy, Hateful to Christ and to his company; And through the street men might ride and wend For it was free and open at either end. A little school of Christian folk there stood Down at the farther end, in which there were Many children, born of Christian blood . —from “The Prioress’s Tale,” The Canterbury Tales, Geoffrey Chaucer Preface In the spring of 1911, a young boy was found stabbed to death in a cave on the desolate outskirts of the city of Kiev, then part of the Russian Empire, his body riddled with some fifty puncture wounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Vasily Shulgin (1878–1976): the Grandfather of Russian Nationalism
    Vasily Shulgin (1878–1976): The Grandfather of Russian Nationalism Giovanni Savino IERES Occasional Papers, no. 8, November 2020 “Transnational History of the Far Right” Series Vasily Shulgin (1878–1976): The Grandfather of Russian Nationalism Giovanni Savino IERES Occasional Papers, no. 8, November 2020 “Transnational History of the Far Right” Series Cover photo: Photo of Vasily Shulgin in 1976, just before his death, by Igor Palmin. This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Generic license. @IERES2020 Transnational History of the Far Right A Collective Research Project led by Marlene Laruelle At a time when global political dynamics seem to be moving in favor of illiberal regimes around the world, this research project seeks to fill in some of the blank pages in the contemporary history of the far right, with a particular focus on the transnational dimensions of far-right movements in the broader Europe/Eurasia region. www. https://www.historyofthefarright.org/ Giovanni Savino is Senior lecturer of Late Modern History at the School of Public Policy, The Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), Moscow In 1925 in Leningrad, the journal Byloe published a little book, The Knight of the Black Hundreds, devoted to Vasily Shulgin (1878–1976). This “knight,” herald of a virulent anti-Semitic Russian nationalism and fervent monarchism, was at the time of writing an exiled man, who, just eight years before, had played a critical role in trying to change the course of history: on a cold day in February 1917, Vasily Shulgin went to Pskov to convince the last Romanov tsar, Nicholas II, to abdicate, with the hope—which would ultimately fail—of saving the monarchy from the Revolution.1 After the October Revolution, Shulgin fled Russia and became deeply involved in the cultural and political life of the White emigration.
    [Show full text]
  • Around the February Revolution
    THE FEBRUARY REVOLUTION: A WIDER PERSPECTIVE INTRODUCTION Neither the revolutionaries nor the Tsarist authorities expected that the almost daily signs of unrest in January and February 1917 – industrial strikes, street protests, mutinous soldiers and sailors – would escalate into a full-scale revolution capable of overthrowing the regime [NOTE: Russia at that time like most Eastern Orthodox countries still used the Old Style Julian Calendar while the rest of the world had adopted the Gregorian Calendar which was 13 days ahead. As a result some Western historians refer to the March Revolution of 1917]. Lenin, in exile in Zurich, told a meeting of young socialists a month before that “we of the older generation may not live to see the decisive battles of this coming revolution.” He was 46 years-old at the time. Nikolai Sukhanov, a pro-Menshevik journalist said “Not one party was prepared for the great overturn”. On 18 February, workers at the Putilov steel works, the largest producer of military armaments within the Empire, went on strike for higher wages because of the rising cost of living. The strike continued for five days and other workers joined in the protest. Then, on 23 February, 7000 women textile workers came out on the streets demanding ‘More Bread!’. By the afternoon the protesters had grown to nearly 100 000 and some were breaking into food shops to ‘liberate’ the food. Even so, neither the authorities nor the Mensheviks and Bolsheviks believed that these events were particularly significant. On that day, for example, the Tsar was content to leave his Imperial residence at Tsarkoïe-Selo, just south of the capital, and travel by train to the Military Headquarters at Mogilev 650 km from Petrograd.
    [Show full text]
  • Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty of Russia ANSWER KEY
    Name: _________________________________________ Date: ________________________ Class: ___ Decline and Fall of the Romanov Dynasty of Russia ANSWER KEY Directions: Select the best possible answer from the given options. 1. What Russian tsar ruled Russia during 5. What Russian tsar was assassinated in the Napoleonic wars? 1881 by Narodnaya Volya (People’s a. Alexander I Will), a nihilist group? b. Catherine the Great a. Alexander II c. Nicholas I b. Alexander III d. Paul I c. Nicholas I d. Nicholas II 2. What Russian tsar, who ruled from 1825 until 1855, introduced the 6. A local governing body, granted power principles of “Autocracy, Orthodoxy, under Tsar Alexander II, was known and Nationality”? as what? a. Alexander I a. pogrom b. Alexander II b. politburo c. Nicholas I c. soviet d. Nicholas II d. zemstvo 3. Following Russia’s defeat in the 7. Which of the following statements Crimean War (1853-1856), what tsar does not describe Alexander II? initiated universal military a. Assassinated by nihilists conscription? b. Emancipated the serfs a. Alexander I c. Established a police force b. Alexander II d. Put down Decembrist Revolt c. Alexander III d. Nicholas I 8. This group was blamed and persecuted for the assassination of 4. In 1861, Tsar Alexander II abolished Alexander II. _____. a. boyars a. nihilism b. Chechens b. Russia’s boyar class c. Jews c. serfdom d. nihilists d. universal military conscription Check out www.studenthandouts.com for free interactive test-prep games and more! © Student Handouts, Inc. Name: _________________________________________ Date: ________________________ Class: ___ 9. What Russian tsar, who ruled from 13.
    [Show full text]
  • War of the Dark Forces with Humanity and Christianity
    Nikolay Markov Duma speeches & Wars of the Dark Forces RUSSIAN RESISTANCE A series of the most remarkable books by prominent figures of the Russian national movement dedicated to the struggle of the Russian people against the forces of world evil, Russophobia and racism: Averkiev D.V. Aivazov I. G. E.P. Akvilonov I. S. Aksakov Anthony (Khrapovitsky), Met. Bashilov B. Bondarenko V. G. Borodin L. I. Bulatsel P. F. Butkevich T. I. Butmy G.V. Velichko V.L. Vinberg F.V. Vorobievsky Yu.Yu. Vostorgov I.I. Vyazigin A.S. Golitsyn D.P. Gringmut V.A. Derzhavin G.R.Dostoevsky F.M. Dubrovin A.I. Dudko D.S. Zhevakhov N. D. Zamyslovsky G. G. Ivanov V. F. Ilyin I. A. The Book of Russian Sorrow Krupin V.N. Krushevan P.A.Kuzmin A.G. Kunyaev S. Yu. Lyubomudrov M. N. Markov N. E. Menshikov M. O. Merzheevsky V. D. Mironov B. S. Nechvolodov A. D. Nikolsky B. V. Nilov V. V. Nilus S.A. Osipov V.N. Paskhalov K.N. A. A. Prokhanov Rogozin D.O. V. V. Rozanov Semanov S.N. A. A. Senin Soloukhin V.A. Suvorin A.S. Photius (Spassky), archim. V. V. Khatyushin Tsikunov A. K. Chvanov M. A. Chivilikhin V. A. Sharapov S. F. Shafarevich I. R. Shevtsov I. M. Shipunov F. Ya. Shmakov A. S. The book contains the works of Nikolai Evgenievich Markov (1866–1945), an outstanding Russian public figure, publicist, State Duma deputy, one of the leaders of the Black Hundred. In his works, Markov defended the national interests of the Russian people, showed the destructive activities of Masonic lodges and Zionist organizations for Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Kshesinskaia's Mansion: High Culture and the Politics of Modernity In
    Kshesinskaia’s Mansion: High Culture and the Politics of Modernity in Revolutionary Russia A Dissertation submitted to the Division of Research and Advanced Studies of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) in the Department of History of the College of Arts and Sciences 2009 by Krista Sigler M.A., University of Cincinnati 2001 H.A.B., Xavier University 1998 Committee chair: Dr. Willard Sunderland Abstract This dissertation is a biography of a house, utilizing a particular building as a prism through which to see Russian modernity. The Kshesinskaia mansion, a founding work of the Art Nouveau in Russia, was originally a St. Petersburg socialite’s salon. Through 1917, it became the center of one of the most famous lawsuits in the country and the headquarters of the Bolsheviks as well. In the aftermath of the Revolution, the house was dedicated to a number of social service causes and as of the 1930s became what it is today, a museum dedicated to the revolutionary past. This saga of this building, with its extraordinary links to the central players of the Russian Revolution, thus allows us a rare stage on which to see the revolutionary era unfold. This dissertation therefore speaks to the Russian Revolution and in particular, Russia’s experience with modernity. While historians have tended to trace Russia’s steps to 1917 through the eyes of particular groups, in this work, I show that “modern society” was a vision multiple groups embraced, although they understood that term differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolution Revolution
    ב"ה RESOLUTION IN A TIME OF REVOLUTION THE REBBE RASHAB’S BATTLES FOR YIDDISHKEIT IN THE LAST YEARS OF THE TSARIST REGIME Three Essays by Eli Rubin Marking 100 Years Since the Russian Revolution of 1917 1 the Russian Revolution of 1917 Introduction The early decades of the twentieth century mark a period of tremendous upheaval in the Russian Empire, socially, culturally, and politically. Ultimately they would climax in the successful overthrow of the Tsarist regime in February 1917, followed by the Bolshevik revolution in October of the same year. It was precisely during this time that Rabbi Shalom DovBer Schneersohn, the Rebbe Rashab of Lubavitch, built the famous yeshiva, Tomchei Temimim, and composed his masterly serializations of Chassidic discourses (maamarim), including Samach Vov and Ayin Beis. At the very same time the Rebbe Rashab was deeply invested in the fight for Torah true yiddishkeit on a national level. He was an activist par excellence, and whenever he saw a need would mobilize rabbis and philanthropists across the Empire to lobby the government and / or to raise necessary funds. His battles on behalf of Yiddishkeit took him right into the heart of the struggle for Russia’s future. He was not a spectator to history but a participant in the making of history, and in the making of the Jewish future. The three essays collected here were first published on Chabad.org as unconnected articles under different titles. They are collected and published here in honor of the marriage of my sister, Zeldy Rubin, to Mendy Schwei. May they build an everlasting edifice on the foundation of Torah and Mitzvot as illuminated by the teachings and examples of the successive rebbes of Chabad.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Idea• Jewish Presence
    ———————————————————— Introduction ———————————————————— RUSSIAN IDEA• JEWISH PRESENCE — 1 — ———————————————————— Introduction ———————————————————— — 2 — ———————————————————— Introduction ———————————————————— RUSSIAN IDEA• JEWISH PRESENCE Essays on Russian-Jewish Intellectual Life BRIAN HOROWITZ Boston 2013 — 3 — ———————————————————— Introduction ———————————————————— Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data: A catalog reference for this title is available from the Library of Congress. ISBN 978‐1‐936235‐61‐2 (hardback) ISBN 978-1-618110-52-7 (electronic) Copyright © 2013 Academic Studies Press All rights reserved Cover design by Ivan Grave Book design by Adell Medovoy On the cover: Synagogue at Preobrazhenskoe Jewish Cemetery. Photograph by William Brumfield. Published by Academic Studies Press in 2013 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com — 4 — Effective December 12th, 2017, this book will be subject to a CC-BY-NC license. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. Other than as provided by these licenses, no part of this book may be reproduced, transmitted, or displayed by any electronic or mechanical means without permission from the publisher or as permitted by law. The open access publication of this volume is made possible by: This open access publication is part of a project supported by The Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Humanities Open Book initiative, which includes the open access release of several Academic Studies Press volumes. To view more titles available as free ebooks and to learn more about this project, please visit borderlinesfoundation.org/open. Published by Academic Studies Press 28 Montfern Avenue Brighton, MA 02135, USA [email protected] www.academicstudiespress.com ———————————————————— Introduction ———————————————————— To Benjamin, Rebecca, and Sophia, whom I love.
    [Show full text]
  • User:Taksen/Sandbox/2
    User:Taksen/sandbox/2 < User:Taksen | sandbox "Rasputin" redirects here. For other uses, see Rasputin (disambiguation). In this Eastern Slavic naming convention, the patronymic is Yefimovich and the family name is Rasputin. Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin (Russian: Григорий Ефимович Taksen/sandbox/2 Распутин, IPA: [ɡrʲɪˈɡorʲɪj (j)ɪˈfʲiməvʲɪtɕ rɐˈsputʲɪn];[1] 21 January [O.S. 9 January] 1869 – 30 December [O.S. 17 December] 1916[2]) was a Russian peasant, an experienced traveler,[3] a mystical faith healer, and trusted friend of the family of Nicholas II, the last Tsar of the Russian Empire. He became an influential figure in Saint Petersburg, especially after August 1915 when Nicholas took command of the army fighting in World War I. Advising his wife, Alexandra Feodorovna, in countless spiritual and political issues, Rasputin became an easy scapegoat for Russian nationalists, aristocrats and liberals. There is uncertainty over much of Rasputin's life and the degree of influence that he exerted over the extremely shy Tsar and the strong-willed Tsarina.[4] Accounts are often based on dubious memoirs, hearsay, and legend.[note 1] While his influence and position may have been exaggerated by society gossip and his own drunken boasting[8] his presence played a significant role in the increasing unpopularity of the Imperial couple.[9] Rasputin was Born 21 January 1869 murdered by monarchists who hoped to save Tsarism by ending Pokrovskoe, Siberia, his sway over the royal family. Russian Empire Died 30 December 1916 (aged 47) Contents Petrograd, Russian Empire Early life Cause of Assassination Turn to religious life death Healer to Alexei Occupation Peasant, pilgrim, Controversy healer, adviser Assassination attempt Spouse(s) Praskovia Fedorovna Yar restaurant incident Dubrovina The Memoirs by M.
    [Show full text]