Preventive Sequential Stripping (Or Disking) of Deciduous Teeth
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Deciduous Teeth Overview
Deciduous Teeth Overview: ● Deciduous teeth are the first set of teeth a person has. They are a total of 20. ● It is important to learn about the teething stage to help make it a less painful and irritating experience for children. ● Most common problems for deciduous teeth: Caries (cavities), pain and infection, thumb sucking and using a pacifier for longer than the average age. ● A child’s face and teeth may also be injured, affecting the permanent tooth that would replace the injured primary tooth. ● Care guidelines for children’s teeth and mouths should be followed and taken seriously. What are primary teeth? They are the first set of teeth a person has and they remain until it is time for them to fall and be replaced by permanent teeth. Number: 20 teeth Other names: Baby teeth, shed teeth, temporary teeth, primary teeth, milk teeth. Importance of deciduous teeth: ● They help the child chew food. ● They aid speed and enunciation. ● Primary teeth occupy a place in the mouth so they can later allow permanent teeth to appear in their correct place. When a child loses a primary tooth prematurely, this may affect the shape and order of the permanent teeth. ● They help with a child’s aesthetic and increase confidence while smiling When do deciduous teeth appear and when do they shed? Deciduous teeth start appearing gradually starting the age of 6-7 months, beginning with the lower jaw. They are fully developed at the age of 2.5. Development of deciduous teeth (teething): Teething is when a child starts to develop his/her first teeth. -
Tooth Size Proportions Useful in Early Diagnosis
#63 Ortho-Tain, Inc. 1-800-541-6612 Tooth Size Proportions Useful In Early Diagnosis As the permanent incisors begin to erupt starting with the lower central, it becomes helpful to predict the sizes of the other upper and lower adult incisors to determine the required space necessary for straightness. Although there are variations in the mesio-distal widths of the teeth in any individual when proportions are used, the sizes of the unerupted permanent teeth can at least be fairly accurately pre-determined from the mesio-distal measurements obtained from the measurements of already erupted permanent teeth. As the mandibular permanent central breaks tissue, a mesio-distal measurement of the tooth is taken. The size of the lower adult lateral is obtained by adding 0.5 mm.. to the lower central size (see a). (a) Width of lower lateral = m-d width of lower central + 0.5 mm. The sizes of the upper incisors then become important as well. The upper permanent central is 3.25 mm.. wider than the lower central (see b). (b) Size of upper central = m-d width of lower central + 3.25 mm. The size of the upper lateral is 2.0 mm. smaller mesio-distally than the maxillary central (see c), and 1.25 mm. larger than the lower central (see d). (c) Size of upper lateral = m-d width of upper central - 2.0 mm. (d) Size of upper lateral = m-d width of lower central + 1.25 mm. The combined mesio-distal widths of the lower four adult incisors are four times the width of the mandibular central plus 1.0 mm. -
Third Molar (Wisdom) Teeth
Third molar (wisdom) teeth This information leaflet is for patients who may need to have their third molar (wisdom) teeth removed. It explains why they may need to be removed, what is involved and any risks or complications that there may be. Please take the opportunity to read this leaflet before seeing the surgeon for consultation. The surgeon will explain what treatment is required for you and how these issues may affect you. They will also answer any of your questions. What are wisdom teeth? Third molar (wisdom) teeth are the last teeth to erupt into the mouth. People will normally develop four wisdom teeth: two on each side of the mouth, one on the bottom jaw and one on the top jaw. These would normally erupt between the ages of 18-24 years. Some people can develop less than four wisdom teeth and, occasionally, others can develop more than four. A wisdom tooth can fail to erupt properly into the mouth and can become stuck, either under the gum, or as it pushes through the gum – this is referred to as an impacted wisdom tooth. Sometimes the wisdom tooth will not become impacted and will erupt and function normally. Both impacted and non-impacted wisdom teeth can cause problems for people. Some of these problems can cause symptoms such as pain & swelling, however other wisdom teeth may have no symptoms at all but will still cause problems in the mouth. People often develop problems soon after their wisdom teeth erupt but others may not cause problems until later on in life. -
Morphological Characterization of Deciduous Enamel and Dentin in Patients Affected by Osteogenesis Imperfecta
applied sciences Article Morphological Characterization of Deciduous Enamel and Dentin in Patients Affected by Osteogenesis Imperfecta Uros Josic 1, Tatjana Maravic 1, Maurizio Bossù 2, Milena Cadenaro 3,4 , Allegra Comba 1 , Gaetano Ierardo 2, Antonella Polimeni 2 , Federica Florenzano 1, Lorenzo Breschi 1 and Annalisa Mazzoni 1,* 1 Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, DIBINEM, University of Bologna-Alma Mater Studiorum, 40125 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (U.J.); [email protected] (T.M.); [email protected] (A.C.); federica.fl[email protected] (F.F.); [email protected] (L.B.) 2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Science, “Sapienza” University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (M.B.); [email protected] (G.I.); [email protected] (A.P.) 3 Department of Medical Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy; [email protected] 4 Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS “Burlo Garofolo”, 34137 Trieste, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 26 September 2020; Accepted: 3 November 2020; Published: 5 November 2020 Abstract: The purpose of this study was to clarify the structural and ultrastructural alterations of the enamel and dentin collagen network in the deciduous teeth of children affected by osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) using field-emission in-lens scanning electron microscopy (FEI-SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses. Exfoliated primary teeth were collected from children with a diagnosis of OI and from healthy individuals (N = 24). Tooth slices containing both dentin and enamel were fixed, dehydrated and dried, gold sputtered, and observed using FEI-SEM. Additional dentin fragments were decalcified, dehydrated, embedded in resin, cut, and processed for TEM analysis. -
Unusual Anatomy of a Second Maxillary Molar - a Rare Four- Root Configuration Case Report
ARC Journal of Dental Science Volume 1, Issue 2, 2016, PP 13-15 ISSN No. (Online): 2456-0030 http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2456-0030.0102003 www.arcjournals.org Unusual Anatomy of a Second Maxillary Molar - a Rare four- Root Configuration Case Report Dr. Thiago de Almeida Prado Naves Carneiro,DDS, MSc PhD student, Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prostheses, and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais Brazil. [email protected] Abstract: Although it is a very rare situation, four-rooted maxillary second molars can occur. The existence of two palatal roots is extremely rare and ranges about only 0.4%. The aim of this study is to present and document a very rare anatomic configuration of a four-rooted maxillary second molar. Anatomic variation in the number of roots and root canals can occur in any tooth, although some cases can be extremely rare as the one presented here.Clinicians should be aware of this possibility before considering any kind of treatment. Keywords: Molar, Dental Anatomy, Anatomical Variation 1. INTRODUCTION Usually the maxillary second molars are described in the literature as a teeth that have 3 roots with 3 or 4 root canals. Understanding of the presence of additional roots and unusual root canals is essential and determines the success of endodontic treatment1. The existence of maxillary second molars with 4 roots (2 buccal and 2 palatal) is extremely rare and ranges about only 0.4%.This information comes from a study that showed, after the examination of two different horizontally angled radiographs of 1,000 maxillary second molars, just four with four roots2. -
Two Sets of Teeth in a Lifetime
Two sets of teeth in a lifetime Two sets of teeth in a lifetime Deciduous teeth: They are the first set of teeth we have and there are altogether 20 of them. They usually start to erupt from around the age of six months until 3 years of age. Permanent teeth: At the age of 6, they sequentially erupt to replace the deciduous teeth which become loose and shed. Deciduous teeth: Space retainer for permanent teeth Normally, underneath the root of each deciduous tooth, there is a developing permanent successor tooth. When it is time for the permanent successor tooth to erupt, the root of the deciduous tooth will resorb and the deciduous tooth will become loose. The place is then taken up by its permanent successor tooth. Deciduous tooth retains the space for its permanent successor tooth. No tooth is dispensable If the deciduous tooth, especially the second deciduous molar, is lost early due to tooth decay, the consequences can be serious: Poor alignment of the teeth The second deciduous molar is already lost The first permanent molar Since the first permanent molar erupts behind the second deciduous molar at the age of 6, the space of the lost second deciduous molar will gradually close up as the first permanent molar moves forward. The permanent tooth is crowded out of the arch when it erupts Later, when the second permanent premolar erupts to replace the second deciduous molar, the permanent tooth will either be crowded out of the dental arch or be impacted and is unable to erupt, leading to poor alignment of the teeth. -
A Comparative Study of One Implant Versus Two Replacing a Single Molar Thomas J
JOMI on CD-ROM, 1996 Mar (372-378 ): A Comparative Study of One Implant Versus … Copyrights © 1997 Quinte… A Comparative Study of One Implant Versus Two Replacing a Single Molar Thomas J. Balshi, DDS, FACP/Ramon E. Hernandez, DMD/Maria Claudia Pryszlak, DMD/Bo Rangert, PhD, MechEng A comparative study between one and two Brånemark implants replacing a single molar was conducted. Forty-seven individuals comprised two groups of 22 patients treated with one implant and 25 with two implants. A total of 72 implants were placed, 66 (92%) in the mandible and six (8%) in the maxilla. After the first year of function, the success rate was 99%, with only one implant lost. Between the second- and third-year follow-ups, 100% of the implants continued to function in the remaining 46 patients, giving a 3-year cumulative success rate of 99%. The marginal bone loss between 1 and 3 years of function was 0.10 mm (SD 0.20) for the group with one implant and 0.24 mm (SD 0.20) for the group with two implants. No changes were observed in the Sulcus Bleeding Index during the 3-year follow-up. Prosthesis mobility or screw loosening was the most frequent complication and was predominant in the group using one implant (48%), but was substantially reduced in the group using two implants (8%). These mechanical problems, using one implant only, seem to be preventable using a stronger screw joint (CeraOne abutment). Precise centric occlusal contact was established and maintained over the study period, which was thought to contribute to the very high success rate for the single-implant-supported molars, despite their high degree of mechanical problems. -
Formation Ability of Secondary Dentin in Deciduous Teeth
Formation Ability of Secondary Dentin in Deciduous Teeth by Sohiti ISOKAWA* and Yoshihisa TODA* Histological researches of teeth which have been published so far are concerned with permanent teeth in most cases. Consequently, milk teeth are not so often employed as a material, because most dentalhistologists have ignored the significance of deciduous teeth up to date. It is not too much to say thatopresent knowledge of dental histology is chiefly derived from that of permanent teeth. Of late, teeth ofchildren have come to receive a new notice with the rapid strides in the realm of pedodontics. Also in the field of dental histology, deciduous teeth have been gradually brought into the limelight by manyinvestigators from various points of view. Some items regarding deciduous dentition were investigated byt present authors. One of them which deals with the formation ability ofsecondary dentin isreported in this paper. In spite of the significance of formation ability of secondary dentin in the operative dentistry on children, this problem has not hitherto been given any attention on the part of dentists and dental investigators. That is the reason why most of them have followed opinions of CHURCHILLand others. Theseopinions maintain that the pulp tissue of deciduous teeth reacts without bringing about any formation ofprotective dentin to external stimuli. The authors have regarded a possibility very important whether or not the formation ability of secondarydentin takes place in deciduous teeth. Therefore, this problem had been examinedfrom thestatistical viewpoint. As a result of this examination, the following conclusion is obtained that theformation ability of secondary dentin in deciduous teeth is all the same with that of permanent teeth. -
Dental Numbering System Primary Teeth
DENTALDENTALN NUMBERINGUMBERINGS YSTEMSSYSTEMS Primary (Deciduous) Teeth ThereThere are arethree three different different numbering numbering systems systems used used to identifyto identify the theteeth primary in dentistry. teeth in dentistry. 1.TheThe Universal Primary NumberingUniversal Numbering System has System been adoptedwas adopted by the by ADA the ADAand is in in 1968 use byand most is in generaluse bydentists most generaltoday. and pedodontists dentists today.Tooth letter A is the farthest back on the Toothright number side of 1 the is themouth tooth in thefarthest upper back (maxillary) on the jaw.Theright side letters of your continue mouth alongin the the upper upper (max- teeth illary)toward jaw. Numberingthe front and continues across toalong the your tooth upper farthest teeth back toward on the the top front left and side across letter to J.The the letters toothcontinue farthest by back dropping on the down top leftto theside lower number (mandibular) 16.The numbers jaw. Letter continue K is the by toothdropping farthest down back to theon lowerthe left (mandibular) side of the mouthjaw. Number on the 17bottom. is the Letterstooth farthest continue back again on towardthe left theside front of your and mouthacross on tothe the bottom. tooth Numberingfarthest back continues on the bottomagain toward right sidethe frontof the and mouth across letter to theT. Some tooth dentist farthestuse the back alternative on the bottom version right which side is ofthey you number mouth thenumber teeth 32. from In this1 – 20system, in the the same teeth procedure that shouldstated be abovethere arebut numbered.they place a If loweryou are case missing d (deciduous) your third right molars, after your to the first number. -
CHAPTER 5Morphology of Permanent Molars
CHAPTER Morphology of Permanent Molars Topics5 covered within the four sections of this chapter B. Type traits of maxillary molars from the lingual include the following: view I. Overview of molars C. Type traits of maxillary molars from the A. General description of molars proximal views B. Functions of molars D. Type traits of maxillary molars from the C. Class traits for molars occlusal view D. Arch traits that differentiate maxillary from IV. Maxillary and mandibular third molar type traits mandibular molars A. Type traits of all third molars (different from II. Type traits that differentiate mandibular second first and second molars) molars from mandibular first molars B. Size and shape of third molars A. Type traits of mandibular molars from the buc- C. Similarities and differences of third molar cal view crowns compared with first and second molars B. Type traits of mandibular molars from the in the same arch lingual view D. Similarities and differences of third molar roots C. Type traits of mandibular molars from the compared with first and second molars in the proximal views same arch D. Type traits of mandibular molars from the V. Interesting variations and ethnic differences in occlusal view molars III. Type traits that differentiate maxillary second molars from maxillary first molars A. Type traits of the maxillary first and second molars from the buccal view hroughout this chapter, “Appendix” followed Also, remember that statistics obtained from by a number and letter (e.g., Appendix 7a) is Dr. Woelfel’s original research on teeth have been used used within the text to denote reference to to draw conclusions throughout this chapter and are the page (number 7) and item (letter a) being referenced with superscript letters like this (dataA) that Treferred to on that appendix page. -
Mammalian Molar Complexity Follows Simple, Predictable Patterns
Mammalian molar complexity follows simple, predictable patterns Keegan R. Seliga,1, Waqqas Khalida, and Mary T. Silcoxa aDepartment of Anthropology, University of Toronto Scarborough, Toronto, ON M1C 1A4, Canada Edited by Nils Chr. Stenseth, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, and approved November 19, 2020 (received for review May 4, 2020) Identifying developmental explanations for the evolution of com- been demonstrated that there are strong genetic controls that plex structures like mammalian molars is fundamental to studying account for the developmental cascade, with research linking the phenotypic variation. Previous study showed that a “morphoge- ICM and the sonic hedgehog (Shh) gene, among others (10). It netic gradient” of molar proportions was explained by a balance should be noted that there are cases where the ICM does between inhibiting/activating activity from earlier developing mo- not seem to account for molar size covariation. For example, lars, termed the inhibitory cascade model (ICM). Although this Roseman and Delezene (11) found that gorillas do not meet any model provides an explanation for variation in molar proportions, of the predictions of the ICM, and Carter and Worthington (12) what remains poorly understood is if molar shape, or specifically demonstrate that some hominoids and cercopithecins do not complexity (i.e., the number of cusps, crests), can be explained by meet all of the predictions either. However, Evans et al. (2) also the same developmental model. Here, we show that molar com- analyzed the ICM in apes and hominids and considered both the plexity conforms to the ICM, following a linear, morphogenetic deciduous premolars and a reversal of the inhibitory cascade gradient along the molar row. -
Microstructure of Primary Tooth Dentin
Scientific Article Microstructure of primary tooth dentin David A. Sumikawa, DDS, MS Grayson W. Marshall, DDS, MPH, PhD Lauren Gee, MPH Sally J. Marshall, PhD Dr. Sumikawa is in private pediatric dental practice in Honolulu, Hawaii. Dr. G. Marshall is Professor and Chair, Division of Biomaterials and Bioengineering, Ms. Gee is with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Dr. Sally Marshall is Professor and Vice-Chair for Research, Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco, California. Abstract Purpose: This study was performed to determine variations in Restoration of primary teeth, particularly anterior teeth, is dentin microstructure from primary anterior teeth at specific ar- often difficult because of their small size, thinness of enamel, eas and depths in relation to the dentin enamal junction, (DEJ). enamel morphology, pulpal anatomy, and rapid spread and Methods: Ten freshly extracted, non-carious primary maxil- extent of decay.4 lary anterior teeth were sectioned to provide two 1.0 mm x 1.0 Dentin bond strength comparisons between primary and mm matchsticks extending from the DEJ to the pulp chamber— permanent teeth have shown mixed results. Salama and Tao5 one each from the central and distal regions of each tooth. Slices found lower bond strength to primary dentin, Bordin-Aykroyd were prepared at distances of 0.15, 0.8, and 1.45 mm from the et al.1 found higher bond strengths, while others.6,7 found no DEJ. Following polishing, each slice was examined in a wet scan- significant differences. ning election microscope, (SEM) and tubule density, tubular Tubule diameters and tubule numerical density increase diameter, and peritubular width were determined at nine grid from the dentinoenamel junction (DEJ), towards the pulp, with locations.