Congenitally Missing Mandibular Premolars — Treatment Options for Space Closure

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Congenitally Missing Mandibular Premolars — Treatment Options for Space Closure CONTINUING EDUCATION Congenitally missing mandibular premolars — treatment options for space closure Dr. Mark W. McDonough discusses recognition and treatment planning for congenitally missing second premolars Introduction The orthodontist often identifies missing Educational aims and objectives second premolars in the mixed dentition This article aims to direct the orthodontist through a diagnostic sequence of recognizing and treatment planning for congenitally missing second premolars. using routine panoramic radiographs. The early decisions that orthodontists make for Expected outcomes the congenitally missing teeth often have an Orthodontic Practice US subscribers can answer the CE questions on page 22 to impact on dental health for the rest of their earn 2 hours of CE from reading this article. Correctly answering the questions will demonstrate the reader can: patient’s life. Therefore, this finding should • Realize some diagnoses of missing mandibular premolars. result in a comprehensive set of diagnostic • Realize some treatment options for mandibular premolars. records in order to evaluate the patient in all three planes of space and establish a • Identify critical factors to consider to avoid complications. problem list and treatment alternatives. • Identify three different methods of space closure from the case studies presented. These records often need to be shared with the restorative dentist and other specialists in order to consider all viable alternatives and formulate a proper treatment plan. General concepts about missing more complex problem is if the patient would The clinician must make the proper deci- mandibular premolars not normally require extractions. Since the sion at the appropriate time regarding the Diagnosis of missing mandibular premolars introduction of temporary anchorage devices maintenance of the primary molar, the pros- Congenitally missing mandibular second (TADs), the unilateral space closure without thetic replacement of the missing second premolars are the second-most frequent other extractions has become more popular premolar, or the closure of the space from type of agenesis, after the third molar, with since the midline can be maintained while the the missing premolar. an incidence of 2.5% to 5% of the population space is closed. If the primary second molar The objectives of this review are to in the United States and Europe.1 Agenesis is to be maintained, the goal is to maintain direct the orthodontist through a diagnostic of the second premolars can usually be reli- the tooth with the alveolar bone for possible sequence of recognizing and treatment plan- ably diagnosed around age 9 on a panorex, future implant and prosthetic reconstruction. ning for congenitally missing second premo- but there have been reports in the literature lars. The emphasis of this article is the most of slow development of this tooth. Alexander- Critical factors to consider appropriate time and cost-effective way for Abt2 reported a case of a 12-year-old female 1. Dental and skeletal age of the patient closing the space for the missing premolar. whose panoramic radiographs revealed Treatment to close the space before or Three different methods of space closure will apparent agenesis of tooth No. 20. The prog- close to the peak of the pubertal growth be highlighted. ress panorex 13 months later revealed initial spurt will be more successful. Since crown formation of tooth No. 20. Unilateral definitive diagnosis of agenesis of the Mark W. McDonough, DMD, has a Bachelor of Science in Biology agenesis has been reported to consist in second premolar cannot be made until from Fordham University in New York, New York, and a Doctorate up to 60% of the agenesis cases.3 Missing the patient is 9 years old, the ques- of Dental Medicine from the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia. He completed his General Practice Residency at second premolars are more common in the tion arises, When is it too late to close Lenox Hill Hospital in New York and Postgraduate Orthodontic mandible than the maxilla. the space? It has been shown that if Training at Albert Einstein Medical Center in Philadelphia. He the primary molar is extracted prior to is a board-certified orthodontist with the American Board of Orthodontics (ABO) and has earned the esteemed designation Treatment options age 11, and the second molar has not of Diplomate of the ABO. He has been a clinical instructor at Upon the diagnosis of agenesis, two erupted, about 80% of the space will be Albert Einstein Medical Center in Philadelphia since 1995. He is main options are usually considered: extrac- closed through “driftodontics” within 4 also an active member of the following professional societies: Greater Philadelphia Society of Orthodontists (President 2016– tion of the primary second molar or its main- years, leaving a residual space of about 2017), Mercer Dental Society (President 2002–2003), Society tenance in the arch. If the primary second 2 mm.4 of Educators for the American Association of Orthodontists molar is extracted, the goal is usually to mesi- 2. Gender Female facial growth is gener- (2013–present), American Association of Orthodontists, Middle Atlantic Society of Orthodontists, Pennsylvania Association of alize the first permanent molar in conjunc- ally complete around age 17 and males Orthodontists, New Jersey Association of Orthodontists, American tion with the orthodontic treatment. If the not until around age 21.5 It is important Dental Association, and the New Jersey Dental Association. Dr. other three premolars can be extracted as to note that these ages are averages, McDonough also has authored articles and is on the educational advisory board of Orthodontic Practice US. well due to crowding or procumbent inci- and it is always best to confirm cessa- sors, the agenesis is a minor finding. The tion of vertical facial growth with annual Volume 8 Number 4 Orthodontic practice 23 CONTINUING EDUCATION serial cephalometric radiographs prior to there will be a more favorable bone for quadrant, which may be found in 48% of placement of implants. This is a critical the implant.6 This may result in longer patients.9 Usually, third molars have their role the orthodontist can provide to the orthodontic treatment time but a better initial calcification at age 9 and would be interdisciplinary team since orthodontists final result for the implant. considered missing only after age 14. are best able to evaluate cephalometric 5. Maintaining the primary second This also creates a treatment planning radiographs. These age differences molar Primary molars are shorter than dilemma in the mandibular arch since between male and female patients make permanent molar crowns, and therefore the decision to close the space may be prosthetic replacement more favorable in a marginal ridge discrepancy is to be made prior to definitive knowledge of the females since it can often be completed expected and is not an automatic indi- presence of the third molar. If the space prior to leaving for college or entering cation of ankylosis. If the primary molars is closed in the mandibular arch, the the workforce. For male patients who have healthy roots with no carious lesions maxillary second molar may not have a are away at college, it is often difficult to or large restorations and are not anky- vertical stop if the mandibular third molar coordinate implant placement and pros- losed, the decision may be made to is congenitally missing or does not erupt. thetic treatment. Many times, finances maintain these teeth into adulthood — 7. The overall malocclusion In general, are limited upon completion of college, many case reports of primary posterior patients with minimal crowding, deep and the patients are often no longer teeth surviving until the patient attains 40 overbites, retrusive incisors, decreased covered by their parents’ insurance, to 60 years of age.8 However, there is a lower facial heights, or flat mandib- further limiting the ability to have costly lack of long-term studies for the survival ular planes may be best managed by prosthetic replacement. rate of retained primary molars from nonextraction. These patients should 3. Ankylosis of the primary second molar adolescence to adulthood. Maintaining maintain the primary molars for as long Percussion of the primary second molar the primary molar can create an antero- as possible. Patients with significant is often used to diagnose ankylosis, but posterior arch-length discrepancy since crowding, dental protrusion, minimal it can be inaccurate. The most reliable the primary molars are 2 mm-3 mm larger overbites or open bites, and increased method to diagnose primary molar anky- than their permanent successor and facial heights often benefit from extrac- losis is to evaluate the interproximal bone results in an “end-on” molar relationship tion and space closure. levels on a bitewing radiograph. Flat bone when the canines are Class I. This has 8. Cost considerations Orthodontics to levels between the primary molar and the led to some clinicians to slenderize the close an edentulous premolar space is adjacent permanent teeth indicate the primary molar mesially and distally. The more cost-effective and is often more primary molar is erupting evenly with key is to remove sufficient tooth structure periodontally sound. When the space is the adjacent teeth. If there is an oblique to create space but not enough to cause closed, the patient incurs only the cost of angle, the primary tooth is ankylosed.6 pulpal necrosis. A bitewing radiograph is orthodontic treatment. When the space 4. The condition of the primary second useful to determine the width of the pulp is maintained, the patient incurs the cost molar Root resorption of the primary horns. In general, 2 mm per side can be of orthodontic treatment, possible pre- second molar or large restorations and/ removed resulting in a 7 mm-8mm-wide prosthetic bone grafting, implant place- or decay often lead to the decision to tooth. It is recommended that light-cured ment, and prosthetic restoration costs.
Recommended publications
  • Root Canal Treatment of Permanent Mandibular First Molar with Six Root Canals: a Rare Case
    CASE REPORT Turk Endod J 2016;1(1):52–54 doi: 10.14744/TEJ.2016.65375 Root canal treatment of permanent mandibular first molar with six root canals: a rare case Ersan Çiçek,1 Neslihan Yılmaz,1 Murat İçen2 1Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey 2Department of Oral Radiology, Faculty of Dentistry, Bülent Ecevit University, Zonguldak, Turkey This case report aims to present the management of a mandibular first molar with six root canals, four in mesial and two in distal root. A 16-year-old male patient who has suffered from localized dull pain in his lower left posterior region for a long time was referred to the endodontic clinic. On clinical examina- tion, neither caries lesion nor restoration was observed on the mandibular molar teeth; but the occlu- sal surface of the teeth had pathologic attrition. The mandibular and maxillary molars were tender to percussion due to bruxism, but there was no tenderness towards palpation. All of the molars revealed normal responses to the vitality tests. It was suggested that he should use the night-guard against brux- ism. After three months, his pain almost completely relieved, but the percussion of the left mandibular molar was still going on. After access cavity preparation, careful examination of the pulp chamber floor with dental loupe and endodontic explorer (DG 16 probe) showed six canal orifices, four of mesially and two of distally. CBCT scan was performed in order to confirm the presence of six canals. Following one year, it was observed that he had no pain.
    [Show full text]
  • Endodontic Therapy of Maxillary Second Molar Showing an Unusual Internal Anatomy
    ISSN: Printed version: 1806-7727 Electronic version: 1984-5685 RSBO. 2012 Apr-Jun;9(2):213-7 Case Report Article Endodontic therapy of maxillary second molar showing an unusual internal anatomy Carlos Eduardo Fontana1 Carolina Davoli Macedo Ibanéz2 Felipe Davini1 Alexandre Sigrist De Martin1 Cláudia Fernandes de Magalhães Silveira1 Daniel Guimarães Pedro Rocha1 Carlos Eduardo da Silveira Bueno1 Corresponding author: Carlos Eduardo Fontana Avenida 02, n.º 1.220 CEP 13500-411 – Rio Claro – SP – Brasil E-mail: [email protected] 1 Department of Endodontics, São Leopoldo Mandic Post-graduation Center – Campinas – SP – Brazil. 2 Private practice – São Paulo – SP – Brazil. Received for publication: October 10, 2011. Accepted for publication: November 11, 2011. Abstract Keywords: internal anatomy; endodontic Introduction: The knowledge of the complex anatomy of maxillary treatment; maxillary molars and location of extra canals are essential for diagnosis second molar; dental and endodontic treatment success. Objective: The purpose of this operating microscope. study was to report a clinical case showing a varying number of palatal roots in a second maxillary molar with the aid of operating microscope (OM). Case report: A four-rooted maxillary permanent second molar with 2 separated palatal canals undergone endodontic therapy. After endodontic access, examination of the chamber floor using an operating microscope revealed two distinct palatal canals orifices. A radiograph was taken after the working lengths of each canal were estimated by means of an electronic apex locator which clearly identified the four roots with independent four canals. The canals were instrumented with ProTaper™ rotatory instruments under irrigation with 5% sodium hypochlorite, obturated with Pulp Canal Sealer® and continue wave technique.
    [Show full text]
  • Endodontic Therapy in a 3-Rooted Mandibular First Molar: Importance of a Thorough Radiographic Examination
    C LINICAL P RACTICE Endodontic Therapy in a 3-Rooted Mandibular First Molar: Importance of a Thorough Radiographic Examination • Juan J. Segura-Egea, DDS, MD, PhD • • Alicia Jiménez-Pinzón, DDS • • José V. Ríos-Santos, DDS, MD, PhD • Abstract This case report describes endodontic therapy on a mandibular first molar with unusual root morphology. In the initial treatment the working length had been determined with only an apex locator; no periapical radiographs had been obtained because the patient was pregnant. The root canal into an additional distolingual root had not been found and was therefore left untreated, which led to treatment failure after 11 months. The radiographic examina- tion performed in a subsequent endodontic treatment allowed detection of the anomalous root and completion of the root canal treatment. The distolingual root canal would have been identified during the initial endodontic therapy if a thorough radiographic examination had been carried out. This report highlights the importance of radiographic examination and points out the need to look for additional canals and unusual canal morphology associated with a mandibular first molar. Radiographic examination during pregnancy is also discussed. MeSH Key Words: dental care; molar/anatomy and histology; tooth root/anatomy and histology; pregnancy © J Can Dent Assoc 2002; 68(9):541-4 This article has been peer reviewed. oot canals may be left untreated during endodontic Thai origin had a third distolingual root. The additional therapy if the dentist fails to identify their presence, root is generally located on the lingual aspect and has a particularly in teeth with anatomical variations or Vertucci type I canal configuration.2 Such a variant has not R 1 extra root canals.
    [Show full text]
  • Tooth Size Proportions Useful in Early Diagnosis
    #63 Ortho-Tain, Inc. 1-800-541-6612 Tooth Size Proportions Useful In Early Diagnosis As the permanent incisors begin to erupt starting with the lower central, it becomes helpful to predict the sizes of the other upper and lower adult incisors to determine the required space necessary for straightness. Although there are variations in the mesio-distal widths of the teeth in any individual when proportions are used, the sizes of the unerupted permanent teeth can at least be fairly accurately pre-determined from the mesio-distal measurements obtained from the measurements of already erupted permanent teeth. As the mandibular permanent central breaks tissue, a mesio-distal measurement of the tooth is taken. The size of the lower adult lateral is obtained by adding 0.5 mm.. to the lower central size (see a). (a) Width of lower lateral = m-d width of lower central + 0.5 mm. The sizes of the upper incisors then become important as well. The upper permanent central is 3.25 mm.. wider than the lower central (see b). (b) Size of upper central = m-d width of lower central + 3.25 mm. The size of the upper lateral is 2.0 mm. smaller mesio-distally than the maxillary central (see c), and 1.25 mm. larger than the lower central (see d). (c) Size of upper lateral = m-d width of upper central - 2.0 mm. (d) Size of upper lateral = m-d width of lower central + 1.25 mm. The combined mesio-distal widths of the lower four adult incisors are four times the width of the mandibular central plus 1.0 mm.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Arch Space Changes Following Premature Loss of Primary First Molars
    PEDIATRIC DENTISTRY V 30 / NO 4 JUL / AUG 08 Scientific Article Dental Arch Space Changes Following Premature Loss Of Primary First Molars: A Systematic Review William Tunison, BSc1 • Carlos Flores-Mir, DDS, DSc2 • Hossam ElBadrawy, DDS, MSc3 • Usama Nassar, DDS, MSc4 • Tarek El-Bialy, DDS, MSc OSci, PhD5 Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study was to consider the available evidence regarding premature loss of primary molars and the implications for treatment planning. Methods: Electronic database searches were conducted—including published information available until July 2007—for available evidence. A methodological quality assessment was also applied. Results: Although a significant number of published articles had dealt with premature primary molar loss, only 3 studies (including a total combined sample of 80 children) had the minimal methodological quality to be considered for this systematic review. Conclusion: A reported immediate space loss of 1.5 mm per arch side in the mandible and 1 mm in the maxilla—when normal growth changes were considered—was found. The magnitude, however, is not likely to be of clinical significance in most cases. Nevertheless, in cases with incisor and/or lip protrusion or a severe predisposition to arch length deficiency prior to any tooth loss, this amount of loss could have treatment implications. (Pediatr Dent 2008;30:297-302) Received June 5, 2007 | Last Revision August 30, 2007 | Revision Accepted August 31, 2007 KEYWORDS: PREMATURE TOOTH LOSS, MIXED DENTITION, SPACE LOSS, TOOTH MIGRATION, SPACE
    [Show full text]
  • Root Canal Morphology and Configuration of 123 Maxillary
    OPEN International Journal of Oral Science (2017) 9,33–37 www.nature.com/ijos ORIGINAL ARTICLE Root canal morphology and configuration of 123 maxillary second molars by means of micro-CT Thomas Gerhard Wolf1, Frank Paqué2, Anja-Christin Woop1, Brita Willershausen1 and Benjamín Briseño-Marroquín1 The aim of this study was to investigate the root canal configuration, accessory canals and number of main foramina of 123 maxillary second molars by means of micro-computed tomography. The teeth were scanned and reproduced with 3D software imaging. The root canal configuration and number of main foramina were evaluated by means of a four-digit system. The morphological complexity of human maxillary second molars is depicted by the number of accessory and connecting canals. The most frequently observed root canal configurations in the mesiobuccal root were 2-2-2/2 (19.5%), 2-2-1/1 (14.6%) and 2-1-1/1 (13.0%). A 1-1-1/1 configuration was observed in 93.5% and in 96.7% in the distobuccal and palatal roots, respectively. The MB1 root canal had one accessory canal (18.7%), and 8.9% of the MB2 root canal had one or two accessory canals. The distobuccal (11.3%) and palatal (14.6%) root canals had at least one accessory canal, and connecting canals were observed in 16.3% of mesiobuccal roots. The MB1, MB2, distobuccal and palatal root canals had one main foramen in 99.2%, 43.1%, 98.4% and 99.2% of samples, respectively. In the mesiobuccal root, one accessory foramen was detected in 14.6%, two were detected in 7.3%, and three were detected in 5.7%.
    [Show full text]
  • Third Molar (Wisdom) Teeth
    Third molar (wisdom) teeth This information leaflet is for patients who may need to have their third molar (wisdom) teeth removed. It explains why they may need to be removed, what is involved and any risks or complications that there may be. Please take the opportunity to read this leaflet before seeing the surgeon for consultation. The surgeon will explain what treatment is required for you and how these issues may affect you. They will also answer any of your questions. What are wisdom teeth? Third molar (wisdom) teeth are the last teeth to erupt into the mouth. People will normally develop four wisdom teeth: two on each side of the mouth, one on the bottom jaw and one on the top jaw. These would normally erupt between the ages of 18-24 years. Some people can develop less than four wisdom teeth and, occasionally, others can develop more than four. A wisdom tooth can fail to erupt properly into the mouth and can become stuck, either under the gum, or as it pushes through the gum – this is referred to as an impacted wisdom tooth. Sometimes the wisdom tooth will not become impacted and will erupt and function normally. Both impacted and non-impacted wisdom teeth can cause problems for people. Some of these problems can cause symptoms such as pain & swelling, however other wisdom teeth may have no symptoms at all but will still cause problems in the mouth. People often develop problems soon after their wisdom teeth erupt but others may not cause problems until later on in life.
    [Show full text]
  • Endodontic Management of Mandibular First Molars with Three
    Case Report Adv Dent & Oral Health Volume 9 Issue 4- August 2018 Copyright © All rights are reserved by Yousef Hamad Al-Dahman DOI: 10.19080/ADOH.2018.09.555768 Endodontic Management of Mandibular First Molars with Three Distal Root Canals-A Report of Two Cases Al-Hawwas Abdullah Yousef1, Al-Dahman Yousef Hamad2, Aldosary Khalid M3, Al-Dakheel Majed D3, Al-Zuhair Hind4 and Al-Jebaly Asma Suliman4 1Endodontist, Head of Endodontic Division, Dental Department, King Abdulaziz University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 2Endodontist, Ministry of Health, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 3Consultant in Restorative Dentistry, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 4General Practitioner, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Submission:June 28, 2018 Published: August 28, 2018 *Corresponding author: Yousef Hamad Al-Dahman, Endodontist, Ministry of Health, P. O. Box: 84891, Riyadh 11681, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Email: Abstract The proper knowledge of root canal anatomy of teeth and its variation is necessary for successful endodontic treatment. Permanent case reports in the literature. However, the presence of three distal canals in distal root is rare. This paper describes two case reports of root canal therapymandibular of permanent first molars mandibular are usually molars having with two mesialthree distal canals root and canals. one or two distal canals. Moreover, middle mesial canal was present in different Keywords: Root canal anatomy; Mandibular molar; Root canal treatment Introduction macroscopic or scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation The knowledge of the anatomy of root canal system and its [20,21], computed tomography (CT) [20], spiral computed endodontic treatment [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Unusual Anatomy of a Second Maxillary Molar - a Rare Four- Root Configuration Case Report
    ARC Journal of Dental Science Volume 1, Issue 2, 2016, PP 13-15 ISSN No. (Online): 2456-0030 http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2456-0030.0102003 www.arcjournals.org Unusual Anatomy of a Second Maxillary Molar - a Rare four- Root Configuration Case Report Dr. Thiago de Almeida Prado Naves Carneiro,DDS, MSc PhD student, Department of Occlusion, Fixed Prostheses, and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Minas Gerais Brazil. [email protected] Abstract: Although it is a very rare situation, four-rooted maxillary second molars can occur. The existence of two palatal roots is extremely rare and ranges about only 0.4%. The aim of this study is to present and document a very rare anatomic configuration of a four-rooted maxillary second molar. Anatomic variation in the number of roots and root canals can occur in any tooth, although some cases can be extremely rare as the one presented here.Clinicians should be aware of this possibility before considering any kind of treatment. Keywords: Molar, Dental Anatomy, Anatomical Variation 1. INTRODUCTION Usually the maxillary second molars are described in the literature as a teeth that have 3 roots with 3 or 4 root canals. Understanding of the presence of additional roots and unusual root canals is essential and determines the success of endodontic treatment1. The existence of maxillary second molars with 4 roots (2 buccal and 2 palatal) is extremely rare and ranges about only 0.4%.This information comes from a study that showed, after the examination of two different horizontally angled radiographs of 1,000 maxillary second molars, just four with four roots2.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Sets of Teeth in a Lifetime
    Two sets of teeth in a lifetime Two sets of teeth in a lifetime Deciduous teeth: They are the first set of teeth we have and there are altogether 20 of them. They usually start to erupt from around the age of six months until 3 years of age. Permanent teeth: At the age of 6, they sequentially erupt to replace the deciduous teeth which become loose and shed. Deciduous teeth: Space retainer for permanent teeth Normally, underneath the root of each deciduous tooth, there is a developing permanent successor tooth. When it is time for the permanent successor tooth to erupt, the root of the deciduous tooth will resorb and the deciduous tooth will become loose. The place is then taken up by its permanent successor tooth. Deciduous tooth retains the space for its permanent successor tooth. No tooth is dispensable If the deciduous tooth, especially the second deciduous molar, is lost early due to tooth decay, the consequences can be serious: Poor alignment of the teeth The second deciduous molar is already lost The first permanent molar Since the first permanent molar erupts behind the second deciduous molar at the age of 6, the space of the lost second deciduous molar will gradually close up as the first permanent molar moves forward. The permanent tooth is crowded out of the arch when it erupts Later, when the second permanent premolar erupts to replace the second deciduous molar, the permanent tooth will either be crowded out of the dental arch or be impacted and is unable to erupt, leading to poor alignment of the teeth.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Study of One Implant Versus Two Replacing a Single Molar Thomas J
    JOMI on CD-ROM, 1996 Mar (372-378 ): A Comparative Study of One Implant Versus … Copyrights © 1997 Quinte… A Comparative Study of One Implant Versus Two Replacing a Single Molar Thomas J. Balshi, DDS, FACP/Ramon E. Hernandez, DMD/Maria Claudia Pryszlak, DMD/Bo Rangert, PhD, MechEng A comparative study between one and two Brånemark implants replacing a single molar was conducted. Forty-seven individuals comprised two groups of 22 patients treated with one implant and 25 with two implants. A total of 72 implants were placed, 66 (92%) in the mandible and six (8%) in the maxilla. After the first year of function, the success rate was 99%, with only one implant lost. Between the second- and third-year follow-ups, 100% of the implants continued to function in the remaining 46 patients, giving a 3-year cumulative success rate of 99%. The marginal bone loss between 1 and 3 years of function was 0.10 mm (SD 0.20) for the group with one implant and 0.24 mm (SD 0.20) for the group with two implants. No changes were observed in the Sulcus Bleeding Index during the 3-year follow-up. Prosthesis mobility or screw loosening was the most frequent complication and was predominant in the group using one implant (48%), but was substantially reduced in the group using two implants (8%). These mechanical problems, using one implant only, seem to be preventable using a stronger screw joint (CeraOne abutment). Precise centric occlusal contact was established and maintained over the study period, which was thought to contribute to the very high success rate for the single-implant-supported molars, despite their high degree of mechanical problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphologic Variations of Maxillary Molars Palatal Root and the Importance of Its Knowledge for Endodontic Practice: a Case Series
    10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1024 RobertaCASE REPORT Kochenborger Scarparo et al Morphologic Variations of Maxillary Molars Palatal Root and the Importance of Its Knowledge for Endodontic Practice: A Case Series Roberta Kochenborger Scarparo, Letícia Pereira, Diana Moro, Grasiela Gründling Maximiliano Gomes, Fabiana Soares Grecca ABSTRACT treated of root canals greatly decreases the chances of 1-5 Aim: The present report describes and discusses root canal treatment success. The maxillary first molar usually variations in the internal morphology of maxillary molars. presents three roots and four canals (one canal in the palatal 4 Background: Dental internal anatomy is directly related to all root, two in the mesiobuccal root and one in the distal root). the technical stages of the endodontic treatment. Even though, On the contrary, the maxillary second molar often shows in some situations a typical anatomical characteristics can be three roots and three canals (one canal in the palatal root, faced, and the professional should be able to identify them. one in the mesiobuccal root and one canal in the distobuccal Case descriptions: This clinical report describes five cases 4 with different pulpar and periapical diagnostics where the root). However, due to the complexity of the root canal 1-6 endodontic treatment was performed, in which during the system, some variations have been reported. treatment the unusual occurrence of two or three canals in the Clinical studies confirm the presence of four root canals palatal root ‘or even two distinct palatal roots’ of first and second on maxillary first molars as the anatomical feature most maxillary molars, were described and important details for 7 achieving treatment success were discussed.
    [Show full text]