DOCSLIB.ORG

Housing Needs of Native Hawaiians: a Report from the Assessment of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Housing Needs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Housing Needs of Native Hawaiians: a Report from the Assessment of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Housing Needs Housing Needs of Native Hawaiians: A Report From the Assessment of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Housing Needs U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | Office of Policy Development and Research Visit PD&R’s website huduser.gov to find this report and others sponsored by HUD’s Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R). Other services of HUD User, PD&R’s research information service, include listservs, special interest reports, bimonthly publications (best practices, significant studies from other sources), access to public use databases, and a hotline (800-245-2691) for help accessing the information you need. Housing Needs of Native Hawaiians: A Report From the Assessment of American Indian, Alaska Native, and Native Hawaiian Housing Needs Prepared for: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Office of Poicy Development and Research Washington, D.C. Prepared by: Kristen Corey, Econometrica, Inc. Jennifer Biess, Urban Institute Nancy Pindus, Urban Institute Doray Sitko, Econometrica, Inc. May 2017 Acknowledgments The authors thank the many people in Hawaii, including individuals on the waiting list for a home land lease who participated in the household survey, homestead associations, and other organizational stakeholders who agreed to talk with us. The success of this research depended on their participation and forthright responses. Everyone’s contributions were richer in detail than it was possible to reflect in this report. The State of Hawaii Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) was a partner throughout this effort. The authors thank DHHL Director Jobie M.K. Masagatani and Dreana Kalili for providing input to survey questions, assisting in outreach, and facilitating access to DHHL staff and reports. Econometrica, Inc., conducted initial outreach, secondary data analysis, and stakeholder interviews. Their knowledge of Hawaii’s history, geography, and housing market was critical to this report. The authors acknowledge Charles Hanson, who led the Econometrica team, and Richard Hilton, James Hedrick, Priscilla Prunella, and Katie Relihan, who contributed to the study design, analysis, and earlier drafts of this report. NORC at the University of Chicago was responsible for the household survey that provides new information about Hawaiian Homes Commission Act beneficiary households on the waiting list for a Hawaiian home land lease. This complex effort was completed successfully and with cultural sensitivity. The authors thank Carol Hafford (project director), Suzanne Bard (survey director), Steven Pedlow (statistician), Joan Lipiec (field manager), Beth Fisher (survey director and analyst), Eram Khan (survey specialist), Ed Sipulski (production manager), and the Native Hawaiian community field interviewers for the important roles they played in outreach, sampling design, questionnaire development, survey administration, quality control, and analysis. The authors also thank Urban Institute colleagues who contributed to this report. Chris Hayes advised the survey analysis team and provided ongoing technical review. Jasmine Simington and Lily Posey were key contributors to the survey analysis, and Eric Burnstein contributed to the analysis and to earlier drafts of this report. Tom Kingsley served as an advisor and reviewer throughout this study. A panel of experts made valuable contributions to the research design and to this final report. Panel members included Laura R. Appelbaum (FirstPic, Inc.), Kauila Clark (Native Hawaiian Traditional Healing Center), Marvin Jones (Community Services at the Cherokee Nation— retired), Miriam Jorgensen (The University of Arizona and The Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development), Patricia Nie (Wells Fargo & Company), Deana K. O’Hara (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD], Office of Native American Programs [ONAP]), Don Shircel (Tanana Chiefs Conference), Pamala Silas (National American Indian Housing Council), and Malia Villegas (National Congress of American Indians). Early comments were also provided by Blake Kazama (Tlinglit-Haida Regional Housing Authority- retired) and Peter Morris (National Congress of American Indians). Finally, Elizabeth Rudd and Paul Joice, the study’s government technical representatives from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s Office of Policy Development and Research, provided excellent guidance and oversight during this research effort. The authors also thank the staff of HUD ONAP and Kaiini Kimo Kaloi and Katrina Durbak of the U.S. Department of the Interior, Office of Native Hawaiian Relations, who provided helpful comments on drafts of the report. Disclaimer The contents of this report are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development or the U.S. government. Preface In response to Congress’s 2009 mandate to assess Native American housing needs, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) commissioned the Assessment of American Indian, Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian Housing Needs. The study produced five separate reports that together contain a comprehensive and authoritative body of information on the current state of housing conditions in Native American communities. The report on Native Hawaiians in Hawaii includes a wealth of specific information on housing conditions, including county-level differences, findings on housing and community preferences, and differences between Native Hawaiian households on the Hawaiian home lands and elsewhere in Hawaii. The report’s principal finding is of a significant need for affordable housing among Native Hawaiians, especially among Native Hawaiians waiting for a lease on the Hawaiian home lands. Among households already living on the Hawaiian home lands, nearly all own their own homes and there is a much lower rate of cost burden than among Native Hawaiian households statewide. By contrast, compared with Native Hawaiian households statewide, households on the waiting list for a home lands lease are substantially worse off economically and much more likely to be cost burdened, to be overcrowded, and to lack complete plumbing and kitchens. The assessment also found that many Native Hawaiians strongly prefer housing and communities that support multigenerational and extended family (“ohana”) living and socializing, which is part of traditional Native Hawaiian culture. Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................xi Study Approach and Data Sources .......................................................................................................xii Key Findings .....................................................................................................................................................xiv Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................................xviii Section 1. Introduction .......................................................................................1 This Report and the Overall Study .........................................................................................................2 The Structure of This Report ....................................................................................................................3 Section 2. Population Growth and Distribution .............................................5 Historical Perspective ...................................................................................................................................5 Defining Native Hawaiian ............................................................................................................................6 The Total Native Hawaiian Population ...................................................................................................6 Hawaii’s Geography .......................................................................................................................................6 Population Trends by County ....................................................................................................................10 Mobility ...............................................................................................................................................................11 Section 3. Demographic, Social, and Economic Conditions ........................13 Key Findings ....................................................................................................................................................13 Age Distribution ..............................................................................................................................................13 Household Size ................................................................................................................................................15 Household Type .............................................................................................................................................15 Educational Attainment ...............................................................................................................................16 Labor Force Characteristics .......................................................................................................................17 Income and Poverty ......................................................................................................................................20
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2010 Census Tract Names and Their Population, Housing and Land Area for the State of Hawaii
    HSDC 2010-2 2010 Census Tract Names and Their Population, Housing and Land Area for the State of Hawaii State of Hawaii Department of Business, Economic Development & Tourism Research and Economic Analysis Division Hawaii State Data Center May 2011 This report has been cataloged as followed: Hawaii. Dept. of Business, Economic Development and Tourism. Research and Economic Analysis Division. Statistics and Data Support Branch. Hawaii State Data Center. 2010 census tract names and their population, housing and land area for the State of Hawaii. Honolulu: 2011. Hawaii State Data Center Report Number 2010-2. 1. Census districts-Hawaii-Statistics. 2. United States -- Census, 2010. HA4007.U89.2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION……………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………2 HIGHLIGHTS OF THE DATA………………………………………………………………………………………………...…3 CENSUS TRACT NUMBERING CHANGES BETWEEN 2000 AND 2010………………………………………………...6 Table 1.-- Resident Population and Households by County and Island, State of Hawaii: 2010……….............……...7 Table 2.-- Housing Occupancy by County and Island, State of Hawaii: 2010…………………..……….......................8 Table 3.-- Resident Population, Land Area and Density by County and Island, State of Hawaii: 2010……...............9 Table 4.-- Number of Census Tracts by Island, State of Hawaii: 1990 to 2010……..……………….............…….….10 Table 5.-- Types of Census Tracts by Island, State of Hawaii: 2010…..…………………………….............…………11 Table 6.-- Resident Population and Households by Island and Census Tract: 2010………….…………............…...12
    [Show full text]
  • 20082008 Annualannual Reportreport DEPARTMENTDEPARTMENT OFOF HAWAIIANHAWAIIAN HOMEHOME LANDSLANDS
    2008 ANNUAL REPORT DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS OF HAWAIIAN DEPARTMENT REPORT ANNUAL 2008 DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS OFFICE 91-5420 Kapolei Parkway Kapolei, HI 96707 MAILING P.O. Box 1879 Honolulu, HI 96805 PHONE 808-620-9500 2008 Annual Report MICAH A. KĀNE LINDA LINGLE CHAIRMAN GOVERNOR HAWAIIAN HOMES COMMISSION STATE OF HAWAI‘I KAULANA H. PARK DEPUTY TO THE CHAIRMAN STATE OF HAWAI‘I DEPARTMENT OF HAWAIIAN HOME LANDS ROBERT J. HALL P.O. BOX 1879 EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT HONOLULU, HAWAI‘I 96805 March 4, 2009 The Honorable Linda Lingle Governor, State of Hawai‘i State Capitol 415 South Beretania Street Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96813 Dear Governor Lingle: I am pleased to submit the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands’ 2008 Annual Report covering the period from July 1, 2007 to June 30, 2008. This time-frame saw the continuation of the implementation of our planning. Our master-planned communities of Kaupe‘a, consisting of 326 homes in Kapolei, 98 homes in Waiehu Kou 4 and 104 homes in Leiali‘i, Maui were completed during this period. A total of 1,006 single-family, residential lots were under construction during this time-frame--164 lots in Kēōkea/ Waiohuli, Maui; 359 lots in La‘i ‘Ōpua, Hawai‘i; 80 lots in Anahola, Kaua‘i and 403 lots at Kānehili in Kapolei. Most importantly, our Home Ownership Assistance Program (HOAP) has grown to now include job training and drug treatment as part of this critical program. The ability and knowledge to manage one’s own finances is the key to homeownership and financial independence.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Census Demographic Profile Summary File
    2010 Census Demographic Profile Summary File Issued April 2011 2010 Census of Population and Housing DPSF/10-1 Technical Documentation U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU For additional information concerning the files, contact the Customer Liaison and Marketing Services Office, Customer Services Center, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, or phone 301-763-INFO (4636). For additional information concerning the technical documentation, contact the Administrative and Customer Services Division, Electronic Products Development Branch, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington, DC 20233, or phone 301-763-8004. 2010 Census Demographic Profile Summary File Issued April 2011 2010 Census of Population and Housing DPSF/10-1 Technical Documentation U.S. Department of Commerce Gary Locke, Secretary Rebecca M. Blank, Acting Deputy Secretary Economics and Statistics Administration Rebecca M. Blank, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Robert M. Groves, Director SUGGESTED CITATION FILES: 2010 Census Demographic Profile � Summary File— � [machine-readable data files]/ � prepared by the � U.S. Census Bureau, 2011. TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION: � 2010 Census Demographic Profile � Summary File— � Technical Documentation/ � ECONOMICS prepared by the � U.S. Census Bureau, 2011. AND STATISTICS ADMINISTRATION Economics and Statistics Administration Rebecca M. Blank, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Robert M. Groves, Director Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Arnold A. Jackson, Associate Director for Decennial Census Howard R. Hogan, Associate Director for Demographic Programs Marilia A. Matos, Associate Director for Field Operations Daniel H. Weinberg, Assistant Director for ACS and Decennial Census CONTENTS CHAPTERS 1. Abstract ............................................... 1-1 � 2.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles Technical Documentation
    TIGER/Line® Shapefiles 2017 Technical Documentation SUGGESTED CITATION FILES: 2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles (machine- readable data files) / prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 U.S. Department of Commerce Economic and Statistics Administration Wilbur Ross, Secretary TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION: Mark Doms, 2017 TIGER/Line Shapefiles Technical Under Secretary for Economic Affairs Documentation / prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau, 2017 U.S. Census Bureau Ron Jarmin, Lisa Blumerman, Director Associate Director for Decennial Census Programs Enrique Lamas Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer GEOGRAPHY DIVISION Deirdre Dalpiaz Bishop, Chief Andrea G. Johnson, Michael R. Ratcliffe, Assistant Division Chief for Assistant Division Chief for Address and Spatial Data Updates Geographic Standards, Criteria, Research, and Quality Monique Eleby, Assistant Division Chief for Gregory F. Hanks, Jr., Geographic Program Management Deputy Division Chief and External Engagement Laura Waggoner, Assistant Division Chief for Geographic Data Collection and Products 1-0 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 What is a Shapefile? .................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 What are TIGER/Line Shapefiles? ............................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Relationship of the TIGER/Line Shapefiles
    [Show full text]
  • Census 2000 Geographic Terms and Concepts
    Appendix A. Census 2000 Geographic Terms and Concepts CONTENTS Page Alaska Native Regional Corporation (ANRC) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land) .......................................................................... A–4 Alaska Native Village (ANV) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land)..................................................................................... A–5 Alaska Native Village Statistical Area (ANVSA) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land).................................................................... A–5 AmericanIndianArea,AlaskaNativeArea,HawaiianHomeLand.............................A–4 American Indian Off-Reservation Trust Land (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land).................................................................... A–5 American Indian Reservation (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land)..................................................................................... A–5 American Indian Tribal Subdivision (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land) .......................................................................... A–6 American Samoa (See Island Areas of the United States)....................................... A–15 AreaMeasurement..............................................................................A–7 Barrio (See Puerto Rico) ......................................................................... A–19 Barrio-Pueblo
    [Show full text]
  • Geography Glossary
    Appendix A. Census 2000 Geographic Terms and Concepts CONTENTS Page Alaska Native Regional Corporation (ANRC) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land) .......................................................................... A–4 Alaska Native Village (ANV) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land)..................................................................................... A–5 Alaska Native Village Statistical Area (ANVSA) (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land).................................................................... A–5 AmericanIndianArea,AlaskaNativeArea,HawaiianHomeLand.............................A–4 American Indian Off-Reservation Trust Land (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land).................................................................... A–5 American Indian Reservation (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land)..................................................................................... A–5 American Indian Tribal Subdivision (See American Indian Area, Alaska Native Area, Hawaiian Home Land) .......................................................................... A–6 American Samoa (See Island Areas of the United States)....................................... A–15 AreaMeasurement..............................................................................A–7 Barrio (See Puerto Rico) ......................................................................... A–19 Barrio-Pueblo
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. House Report 32 for H.R. 4221 (Feb 1959)
    86TH CONoRESS L HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES REPORT 1st Session No. 32 HAWAII STATEHOOD FEBRUARY 11, 1959.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. AsPINALL, from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 4221] The Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, to whom was referred the bill (H.R. 4221) to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii into the Union, having considered the same, report favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that the bill do pass. The purpose of H.R. 4221, introduced by Representative O'Brien of New York, is to provide for the admission of the State of Hawaii into the Union. This bill and its two companions-H.R. 4183 by Delegate Burns and H.R. 4228 by Representative Saylor-were introduced following the committee's consideration of 20 earlier 86th Congress bills and include all amendments adopted in connection therewith. These 20 bills are as follows: H.R. 50, introduced by Delegate Burns; H.R. 324, introduced by Representative Barrett; H.R. 801, introduced by Representative Holland; H.R. 888, introduced by Representative O'Brien of New York; H.R. 954, introduced by Representative Saylor; H.R. 959, introduced by Representative Sisk; H.R. 1106, introduced by Representative Berry; H.R. 1800, introduced by Repre- sentative Dent; H.R. 1833, introduced by Representative Libonati; H.R. 1917, introduced by Representative Green of Oregon; H.R. 1918, introduced by Representative Holt; H.R. 2004, introduced by Representative Younger; .H.R.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. House Report 32 for H.R. 4221
    2d Session No. 1564 AMENDING CERTAIN LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES IN LIGHT OF THE ADMISSION OF TIlE STATE OF HAWAII INTO THE UNION MAY 2, 1960.-Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed Mr. O'BRIEN of New York, from the Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, submitted the following REPORT [To accompany H.R. 116021 The Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs, to whom was re- ferred the bill (H.R. 11602) to amend certain laws of the United States in light of the admission of the State of Hawaii into the Union, and for other purposes, having considered the same, report favorably thereon without amendment and recommend that the bill do pass. INTRODUCTION IT.R. 11602 was introduced by Representative Inouye after hearings on five predecessor bills (H.R. 10434 by Representative. Aspinall, H.R. 10443 by Congressman Inouye, H.R. 10456 by Representative O'Brien of New York, H.R. 10463 by Representative Saylor, and H.R. 10475 by Representative Westland). H.R. 11602 includes the amend- ments agreed upon in committee when H.R. 10443 was marked up. All of the predecessor bills except H.R. 10443 were identical and were introduced as a result of an executive communication from the Deputy Director of the Bureau of the Budget dated February 12, 1960, en- closing a draft of a bill which he recommended be enacted. This draft bill had been prepared after consultation with all agencies of t.th executive branch administering Federal statutes which were, or might be thought to have been, affected by the admission of Iawaii into the Union on August 24, 1959.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of HAWAII DEPARTMENT of LAND and NATURAL RESOURCES Land Division Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 June 23, 2017 Board of Land and Na
    STATE OF HAWAII DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES Land Division Honolulu, Hawaii 96813 June 23, 2017 Board of Land and Natural Resources PSF No.: 16SD-160 State of Hawaii Honolulu, Hawaii OAHU Issuance of Right-of-Entry Permit to United States on Encumbered Land Onshore at Makua Beach and Unencumbered Submerged Lands Offshore of Makua Beach at Kahanahaiki, Waianae, Island of Oahu, Tax Map Key: (1) 8-1-001 :portion of 008 and seaward of 008. APPLICANT: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Honolulu District LEGAL REFERENCE: Sections 171-55, Hawaii Revised Statutes, as amended. LOCATION: Portion of Government fast lands at Makua Beach, Kaena Point State Park, and submerged lands offshore of Makua Beach, Kahanahaiki, Waianae, Island of Oahu, identified by Tax Map Key: (1) 8-1-001: portion of 008 and (1) 8-1-001: seaward of 008, as shown on the attached map labeled Exhibit A. AREA: Fast lands: 6.9 acres, more or less, TMK (1) 8-1-008-1:portion of 008. Submerged lands: 20 acres, more or less, seaward of TMK (1) 8-1-008-1:008. ZONING: State Land Use District: Conservation City & County of Honolulu CZO: N A D-9 BLNR - Issuance of ROE to Page 2 June 23, 2017 United States for Submerged Land TRUST LAND STATUS: Section 5(b) lands of the Hawaii Admission Act. DHHL 3000 entitlement lands pursuant to the Hawaii State Constitution: YES NO X CURRENT USE STATUS: Fast lands: Set aside by Governor’s Executive Order 3338 for Kaena Point State Park. Submerged lands: Unencumbered.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Level Sequence Chart
    Chapter 4. Summary Level Sequence Chart Summary levels specify the content and hierarchical relationships of the geographic elements that are required to tabulate and summarize data. In the Summary Level Sequence Chart that follows, the summary level code precedes the summary level area, and symbols are used with special meaning for summary levels: Hyphen “-” separates the elements of a hierarchy. Slash “/” denotes equivalent elements that have different names. Parentheses “( )” are not used in the specification for summary levels, but are used occasionally in the usual and customary manner in statements of clarification. State Summary File 1 Geographic Summary level component 00, 89–95, A0– 040 State1 A2, C0–C2, E0– E2, G0, H0 00 050 State-County2 00 060 State-County-County Subdivision 00 070 State-County-County Subdivision-Place/Remainder 00 080 State-County-County Subdivision-Place/Remainder-Census Tract 00 091 State-County-County Subdivision-Place/Remainder- Census Tract-Block Group 00 101 State-County-County Subdivision-Place/ Remainder-Census Tract-Block Group-Block 00 067 State-County-County Subdivision-Subminor Civil Division3 00 140 State-County-Census Tract 00 144 State-County-Census Tract-American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Home Land 00 150 State-County-Census Tract-Block Group 00 154 State-County-Census Tract-Block Group-American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Home Land 00 160 State-Place 00 155 State-Place-County 00 158 State-Place-County-Census Tract 00 170 State-Consolidated City 00 172 State-Consolidated City-Place Within Consolidated City 00 280 State-American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Home Land 00 282 State-American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Home Land-County 00 261 State-American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Home Land-County-County Subdivision 00 263 State-American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area/Hawaiian Home Land-County-County Subdivision-Place/Remainder 00 283 State-American Indian Area/Alaska Native Area (Reservation or Statistical Entity Only)4 See footnotes at end of table.
    [Show full text]
  • Audit Report
    U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General AUDIT REPORT FOLLOWUP OF RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING THE HAWAIIAN HOMES COMMISSION, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY REPORT NO. 00-I-500 JUNE 2000 U.S. Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Followup of Recommendations Concerning the Hawaiian Homes Commission, Office of the Secretary Report No. 00-I-500 June 2000 BACKGROUND The Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920 (42 Stat. 108) was enacted in July 192 1 “to rehabilitate native Hawaiians on lands given the status of Hawaiian home lands.” The Act was administered by the Hawaii territorial government until the Hawaiian Islands became a state in 1959. At that time, the State of Hawaii assumed responsibility for the administration of the Home Lands Program through the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL), which was headed by the Hawaiian Homes Commission, a policy-making board. Additional State and Federal legislation related to Hawaiian home lands was enacted in 1995. As of June 30,1998, the DHHL owned about 197,673 acres of land on the islands of Kauai, Oahu, Molokai, Maui, and Hawaii and had issued 5,189 residential leases; 1,057 agricultural leases; 30 1 pastoral leases; 118 general leases; and 94 revocable permits, which included permits for agricultural, pastoral, and commercial purposes. For the fiscal year ended May 3 1, 1999, the DHHL had total revenues of $126.4 million and expenditures of $55.7 million. In addition, the DHHL reported outstanding direct loans of $48.9 million and guaranteed loans of $127.8 million. OBJECTIVE The objective of our audit was to determine whether the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Assistance Programs
    During the past 5 years, the Department of Housing and Urban Development has expanded homeownership, increased access to affordable housing, strengthened communities through economic development, fought housing discrimination, and tackled chronic homelessness. HUD has implemented innovative solutions to address our nation’s housing needs and has achieved great results. Despite its many accomplishments, HUD recognizes that challenges remain to be addressed. Despite achieving the highest homeownership rate in American history, minorities are still less likely than non-Hispanic whites to own their homes. Opening doors to homeownership is a core aspect of HUD’s mission. The most significant barriers to homeownership are downpayment and closing costs. To overcome this barrier, HUD’s American Dream Downpayment Initiative (ADDI) provides low- and moderate-income individuals with funds needed to purchase their first home. In this respect, since its inception in Fiscal Year 2004, ADDI has already helped thousands of Americans, nearly half of whom were minority families. While increasing homeownership is a top priority, HUD knows it is not a viable option for everyone. Therefore, providing decent affordable rental housing is a central part of HUD’s mission. HUD’s largest program, the Housing Choice Voucher program, promotes affordable rental housing for families and individuals. The program currently provides rental assistance to more than four million households through public and assisted housing programs. The mission of HUD also includes strengthening communities. The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program is HUD’s most important community development program and it is one of the most flexible programs provided to localities by the federal government.
    [Show full text]