Monthly Accident Details: January - September 2019
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Law of the Land - Real Estate Litigation Newsletter
Law of the Land - Real Estate Litigation Newsletter June 7, 2021 Volume 1, Issue VII CASE HIGHLIGHT PLAINTIFFS MAKE WAVES FOR HARBOR PLAN Foundation, et al. v. Theoharides, et al., 1884 CV02144-BLS1 (April 1, 2021) In a recent decision, the Massachusetts Superior Court granted partial summary judgment to Plaintiffs in two companion cases, challenging the validity of certain Waterways Regulations and the City of Boston’s Downtown Waterfront District Municipal Harbor Plan (the “MHP”). The Superior Court determined that the sections of the Waterways Regulations, which required the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (“DEP”) to follow the parameters approved by the Secretary of Energy and Environmental Affairs (the “Secretary”) in a municipal harbor plan when making licensing determinations for projects built on tidelands, are an improper delegation of DEP’s authority and thus invalid and ultra vires. Plaintiffs who are Members of the Harbor Towers condominium community in Boston and the Conservation Law Foundation brought their respective lawsuits to challenge the MHP and the plans of RHDC 70 East India, LLC, an affiliate of the Chiofaro Company, to build a 600-foot-tall tower on the waterfront at the current site of the Harbor Garage. The MHP, which was approved by the Boston Planning and Development Agency in May 2017 and by the Secretary on April 30, 2018, encompasses approximately 42 acres of tidelands on the Boston waterfront running along Atlantic Avenue and near the Rose Kennedy Greenway. The MHP allowed the Harbor Garage parcel a height limitation of 600 feet, approximately eleven times the standard foot height limit permitted by the applicable regulations absent a municipal harbor plan. -
November 2020, Sidler: Inside Reflections
Preferences NOVEMBER 2020 Micro living in a compact home? Storage solutions to consider! You don’t have to give up storage and functional space to live in a smaller home! In 2007, there was an emergence of the tiny- house movement or the "small-house” movement within North America, which is an architectural and social movement advocating living simply in small homes. By 2012, these tiny homes eventually evolved into even smaller spaces as these 'homes on MICRO-HOME UNDER 1000 SQ FT wheels' with under 400 square feet or even less in living space. Living in these smaller spaces are appealing to some prospective homebuyers due to affordability and also the desire to create a more minimalist lifestyle. So the question is, is there still a surging trend for tiny homes? And if so, why does this trend exist and how has it evolved in the current real estate market climate? In the current North America real estate market, the tiny house on wheels is still a home option for TINY HOUSE ON WHEELS UNDER 300 SQ FT some, but issues such as getting bank financing, having the assurance of quality, solid and safe construction and also, where to park the home given inhibitive zoning laws are all unappealing to a percentage of prospective home buyers who want to or can only afford to live in a smaller space. Given this, new more practical and appealing trends for this percentage of the home buyer population is emerging, which encompasses the ideology of 'micro living' with micro-homes or micro-condo living spaces. -
P L a I N F I E L D G I O R N E I N R R E I D , ^ IIATS, CAPS,A T Etand P E
PLAINFIELD By William M. Drake & Son. Freedom to all opinions oandidly expressed. One Dollar and twenty-five cents per year. w h o l e n o . 88- V O LUM E H. NO. 31. PLAINFIELD, ESSEX COUNTY, N. J., THURSDAY, JULY 18, 1850. - a - ly. “And,” said Nate, when Wiling thi* story, “ot UNITED WE STAND. The Lying Servant. the course of a winding river. Bnt nothing j THE PLAINFIELD GAZETTE. all th* tight tights’ that ***r I had, that h’fled snow A unity of opinion seems to prevail in regard to There lived in Swabia a certain lord, piotu, just of the sort could he discern, so that his spirit began gave me th* d—ndeet *o*! I was so tight that I I> PUBLISHED EVERT THURSDAY, BT the Hats and Caps sold by Mills, all agree as to their and wise, to whose lot it fell to have a serfing-man, to revive, and be was fcin to join in discourse with good qualities and low prices, which are caused by couldn’t op*n my eyes or month tor two days, and William M. Drake & Son. a great rogne, and above all, addicted to the vice of the lord. Bat the lord held his peace, and looked a strict adherance to the Cash system. as on* who excepts an evil thing. when ray eyes did op*n, I was so tight that I expect tBT Printing Office in Front-*t. opposite the 2nd JOHN MILLS, lying. The name of the lord is not in the story, Suddenly the way became steep, and they descen ed every moment te see my head bai* *pe«M d$y Presbyterian Church. -
Dime Savings Bank, First Floor Interior
Landmarks Preservation Commission July 19 , 1994; Designation List 259 LP-1908 DIME SAVINGS BANK, FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR consisting of the eastern DeKalb Avenue entrance vestibule and lobby; the banking room , including the rotunda and dome; the mezzanine above said DeKalb Avenue entrance lobby; and the fixtures and interior floor surfaces; windows; doors; chandeliers and lighting fixtures; decorative metalwork; balustrades; clocks; tellers' counters; and attached furnishings and decorative elements; 9 DeKalb Avenue, a/k/a 9-31 DeKalb Avenue and 86 Albee Square (formerly Fleet Street), Brooklyn. Built 1906-08; Mowbray & Uffinger, architects. Enlarged 1931-32; Halsey, McCormack & Helmer, architects. Landmark Site: Borough of Brooklyn Tax Map Block 149, Lot 75 in part, consisting of the property encompassed by a line beginning at the southeast corner of the lot, running 173 '-4 1/2 11 west along DeKalb A venue, then continuing along the outer edge of the southeast side of the portico, then running 46' -103/4 11 northwest along the front of the portico, then continuing along the outer edge of the northwest edge of the portico, then running 202'-2 11 northeast along Albee Square (Fleet Street), then continuing 89'-9 1/2 11 southeast, 25 '-0 11 southwest, 9'-4 11 northwest, 17'-2 11 southwest, 9'-4 11 southeast, 80'-9 5/8 11 southeast, and 68 '-0 3/4 11 south, to the point of beginning, as indicated on the Site Map. On June 15 , 1993, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as an Interior Landmark of the Dime Savings Bank FIRST FLOOR INTERIOR, consisting of the eastern DeKalb Avenue entrance vestibule and lobby; the banking room , including the rotunda and dome; the mezzanine above said DeKalb A venue entrance lobby; and the fixtures and interior floor surfaces; windows; doors; chandeliers and lighting fixtures; decorative metalwork; balustrades; clocks; tellers' counters; and attached furnishings and decorative elements; and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. -
STATED MEETING of Monday, December 11, 2017, 1:57 P.M
THE COUNCIL Minutes of the Proceedings for the STATED MEETING of Monday, December 11, 2017, 1:57 p.m. The Public Advocate (Ms. James) Acting President Pro Tempore and Presiding Officer Council Members Melissa Mark-Viverito, Speaker Adrienne E. Adams David G. Greenfield Antonio Reynoso Inez D. Barron Barry S. Grodenchik Donovan J. Richards Joseph C. Borelli Corey D. Johnson Ydanis A. Rodriguez Fernando Cabrera Ben Kallos Deborah L. Rose Margaret S. Chin Andy L. King Helen K. Rosenthal Andrew Cohen Peter A. Koo Rafael Salamanca, Jr Costa G. Constantinides Karen Koslowitz Ritchie J. Torres Robert E. Cornegy, Jr Rory I. Lancman Mark Treyger Elizabeth S. Crowley Bradford S. Lander Eric A. Ulrich Laurie A. Cumbo Stephen T. Levin James Vacca Chaim M. Deutsch Mark Levine James G. Van Bramer Daniel Dromm Alan N. Maisel Jumaane D. Williams Rafael L. Espinal, Jr Steven Matteo Mathieu Eugene Carlos Menchaca Daniel R. Garodnick I. Daneek Miller Vincent J. Gentile Annabel Palma Vanessa L. Gibson Bill Perkins Absent: Council Members Ferreras-Copeland, Mealy, Mendez, and Vallone. The Public Advocate (Ms. James) assumed the chair as the Acting President Pro Tempore and Presiding Officer for these proceedings. 4472 December 11, 2017 After consulting with the City Clerk and Clerk of the Council (Mr. McSweeney), the presence of a quorum was announced by the Public Advocate (Ms. James). There were 47 Council Members marked present at this Stated Meeting held in the Council Chambers of City Hall, New York, N.Y. INVOCATION The Invocation was delivered by Rev. Dr. Jacques Andre DeGraff, Associate Pastor, Canaan Baptist Church, 132 W. -
Monthly Accident Details: January - August 2019
Monthly Accident Details: January - August 2019 Incident Date Borough Address Number Street Fatalities Injuries EOC Final Description DOB Action ECB Violation Numbers DOB Violation Numbers Permit Permit No Incident Type Owner's Name Contractor Name 1/2/2019 Bronx 4215 PARK AVENUE 0 1 A DOB inspector reported that a worker in the cellar fell ECB Violation 35367408M 010319CE06WG01 Other Construction Related Incidents NOT ON FILE JOY CONSTRUCTION CORP approximately five feet from a ladder. The worker was sent to a hospital. An ECB Violation was issued for the improper use of a ladder. 1/2/2019 Queens 147-40 ARCHER AVENUE 0 1 The Site Safety Manager reported that an electrician was No Dispatch NEW BUILDING 420654508 Other Construction Related Incidents HP JAMSTA HOUSING DEV. FUND CO CNY CONSTRUCTION LLC preparing to pull wires through a pipe when he stepped backwards on the same floor and lost his balance. The electrician cut his left hand while trying to reach for something to grab to prevent himself from falling. The worker went to an urgent care center on his own to receive treatment. 1/3/2019 Brooklyn 1797 BROADWAY 0 1 A DOB inspector reported that a worker was guiding ECB Violation 35374959Y 010318CNEGS01 NB 32156883 Excavation/Soil Work 1797 REALTY ASSOCIATES W Developers Corp piles into place when a pile shifted and the worker suffered an injury to his right leg. The worker was in stable condition and was taken to an area hospital. The extent and severity of the worker's injuries were not known as of the time of inspection. -
Emergency Response Incidents
Emergency Response Incidents Incident Type Location Borough Utility-Water Main 136-17 72 Avenue Queens Structural-Sidewalk Collapse 927 Broadway Manhattan Utility-Other Manhattan Administration-Other Seagirt Blvd & Beach 9 Street Queens Law Enforcement-Other Brooklyn Utility-Water Main 2-17 54 Avenue Queens Fire-2nd Alarm 238 East 24 Street Manhattan Utility-Water Main 7th Avenue & West 27 Street Manhattan Fire-10-76 (Commercial High Rise Fire) 130 East 57 Street Manhattan Structural-Crane Brooklyn Fire-2nd Alarm 24 Charles Street Manhattan Fire-3rd Alarm 581 3 ave new york Structural-Collapse 55 Thompson St Manhattan Utility-Other Hylan Blvd & Arbutus Avenue Staten Island Fire-2nd Alarm 53-09 Beach Channel Drive Far Rockaway Fire-1st Alarm 151 West 100 Street Manhattan Fire-2nd Alarm 1747 West 6 Street Brooklyn Structural-Crane Brooklyn Structural-Crane 225 Park Avenue South Manhattan Utility-Gas Low Pressure Noble Avenue & Watson Avenue Bronx Page 1 of 478 09/30/2021 Emergency Response Incidents Creation Date Closed Date Latitude Longitude 01/16/2017 01:13:38 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 10/29/2016 12:13:31 PM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 11/22/2016 08:53:17 AM 11/14/2016 03:53:54 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 10/29/2016 05:35:28 PM 12/02/2016 04:40:13 PM 40.71400364095638 -73.82998933154158 11/25/2016 04:06:09 AM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 12/03/2016 04:17:30 AM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 11/26/2016 05:45:43 AM 11/18/2016 01:12:51 PM 12/14/2016 10:26:17 PM 40.71442154062271 -74.00607638041981 -
Analysis of Technical Problems in Modern Super-Slim High-Rise Residential Buildings
Budownictwo i Architektura 20(1) 2021, 83-116 DOI: 10.35784/bud-arch.2141 Received: 09.07.2020; Revised: 19.11.2020; Accepted: 15.12.2020; Avaliable online: 09.02.2020 © 2020 Budownictwo i Architektura Orginal Article This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-SA 4.0 Analysis of technical problems in modern super-slim high-rise residential buildings Jerzy Szołomicki1, Hanna Golasz-Szołomicka2 1 Faculty of Civil Engineering; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego st., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland, [email protected] 0000-0002-1339-4470 2 Faculty of Architecture; Wrocław University of Science and Technology; 27 Wybrzeże Wyspiańskiego St., 50-370 Wrocław; Poland [email protected] 0000-0002-1125-6162 Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to present a new skyscraper typology which has developed over the recent years – super-tall and slender, needle-like residential towers. This trend appeared on the construction market along with the progress of advanced struc- tural solutions and the high demand for luxury apartments with spectacular views. Two types of constructions can be distinguished within this typology: ultra-luxury super-slim towers with the exclusivity of one or two apartments per floor (e.g. located in Manhattan, New York) and other slender high-rise towers, built in Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Hong Kong, Bangkok, and Melbourne, among others, which have multiple apartments on each floor. This paper presents a survey of selected slender high-rise buildings, where structural improvements in tall buildings developed over the recent decade are considered from the architectural and structural view. -
Draft EIS ECF 80 Flatbush Avenue Part 4
WILLOUGHBY STFLEET PL 2/5/2018 FLEET ST Fort Greene University Park Place FLATBUSH AVE EXTENSION DE KALB AVE HUDSON AVE Albee Square SOUTH PORTLAND AVE ASHLAND PL BOND ST SOUTH ELLIOTT PL HANOVER PL GROVE PL 230 Ashland Place POPS FULTON ST LIVINGSTON ST ST FELIX ST ROCKWELL PL Theatre for a New Audience Fowler Square VE TTE A FAYE Rockwell Place Bears LA SCHERMERHORN ST Community Garden Seating Sixteen Sycamores Area 2 Playground 300 Ashland Place Plaza FT GREENE PL STATE ST NEVINS ST FLATBUSH AVE HANSON PL North Pacific Plgd ATLANTIC AVE 3 AVE Atlantic PACIFIC ST Terminal Mall Plaza Barclay's Center DEAN ST Plaza 4 AVE E V A 5 BERGEN ST WYCKOFF ST Greenstreet Wykoff ST MARK'S PL Gardens Open Space Project Site 0 400 FEET Traffic Analysis Location Traffic Analysis Locations ECF 80 FLATBUSH AVENUE Figure 11-4 Chapter 11: Transportation Table 11-8 Traffic Level 2 Screening Analysis Results—Analysis Locations Incremental Vehicle Trips (Weekday) Intersection AM Midday PM Analysis Locations Fulton Street and DeKalb Avenue 0 0 0 Livingston Street and Bond Street 4 1 4 Schermerhorn Street and Bond Street 35 9 23 Flatbush Avenue and DeKalb Avenue 57 14 57 ✓ Flatbush Avenue and Fulton Street 72 19 92 ✓ Flatbush Avenue and Nevins Street 37 9 52 Livingston Street and Nevins Street 30 6 32 Schermerhorn Street and Nevins Street 61 13 51 ✓ State Street and Nevins Street 51 8 49 ✓ Atlantic Avenue and Nevins Street 32 7 36 Pacific Street and Nevins Street 10 0 7 DeKalb Avenue and Hudson Avenue 6 0 1 Hudson Avenue and Fulton Street 35 13 58 Flatbush -
200 Amsterdam Ave.Pdf
Appeals Court Decision Saves 200 Amsterdam Ave. from Chopping Block New York City developers collectively sighed with relief when 200 Amsterdam Avenue, a mixed-use, high-rise building on Manhattan’s Upper West Side, was saved from the guillotine when a New York State intermediate appellate court reversed a lower court’s decision that retroactively revoked the developer’s building permit for an as-of-right development. The affirmance of the controversial ruling, issued by the New York County Supreme Court on February 27, 2020, would have resulted in the demolition of more than 20 top floors of the fully-constructed 668 feet high 55-story tower. The affirmance of the controversial ruling, issued by the New York County Supreme Court on February 27, 2020, would have resulted in the demolition of more than 20 top floors of the fully-constructed 668 feet high 55-story tower. On September 27, 2017, the New York City Department of Buildings (DOB) issued a building permit to Amsterdam Avenue Redevelopment Associates LLC, a joint venture between SJP Properties and Mitsui Fudosan, to construct 200 Amsterdam. After the validity of the permit was twice approved by the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals (BSA), the Committee for Environmentally Sound Development (CFESD) commenced a special proceeding in the New York County Supreme Court seeking to annul BSA’s determination, vacate the DOB-issued permit, and remove a bulk of the skyscraper’s top floors. On February 27, 2020, the Court granted CFESD’s request and, on March 3, 2020, the developer appealed. On appeal, the developer, one of the appellants in the proceeding, sought review of the February 27th decision to determine whether a DOB-issued building permit that was affirmed by BSA can be retroactively invalidated by a trial court based on the court’s new interpretation of Section 12-10(d) of the New York City Zoning Resolution. -
Retail Mid-Q2 2019
Manhattan Retail Market MID-2ND QUARTER 2019 REPORT Pictured: 915 Broadway Shops & Restaurants at Hudson Yards Shops & Restaurants at Hudson Yards Makes its Far West Side Debut Opening day arrived on Friday, March 15th for the highly anticipated 7-story, 1 million-square-foot retail center within the multi-building Hudson Yards complex. Anchored by Neiman Marcus, which has made its New York City debut in the 3-story, 250,000-square-foot space the Dallas, TX-based high-end department store leased back in 2014, the vertical mall adds a wide variety of retailers and food offerings to the burgeoning Far West Side neighborhood. Developed by Related Companies and Oxford Properties Group, the retail component that straddles the 10 and 30 Hudson Yards offi ce towers sits along 10th Avenue between West 30th and 33rd Streets. About 90% leased at opening, there are 100 stores and 25 restaurants from fast-casual to fi ne dining spread throughout, with several of the restaurants operated by well-known chefs including the 35,000-square-foot Mercado Little Spain, a Spanish-themed foot court operated by chef José Andrés located in the base of 10 Hudson Yards; as well as the casual all-day restaurant Cedric’s at the Shed by Danny Meyer’s Union Square Hospitality Group that opened in April within the arts and culture venue. In addition the entire 2nd fl oor dubbed Floor of Discovery is an experimental concept that offers a mix of “fi rst locations for digitally native brands and experiential shopping offerings from modern brands;” while the permanent Snark Park exhibition space operated by design studio Snarkitecture will feature a rotating schedule of design environments and unique retail experiences. -
June 5, 2018 Testimony of Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer 200 Amsterdam Avenue Board of Standards and Appeals Good Mo
June 5, 2018 Testimony of Manhattan Borough President Gale A. Brewer 200 Amsterdam Avenue Board of Standards and Appeals Good morning Vice Chair Chanda and Commissioners. My name is Gale Brewer and I am the Manhattan Borough President. Previously, I served as the City Councilmember for the Upper West Side for twelve years. In March, Councilmember Rosenthal, my office, and hundreds of concerned citizens and advocates testified against the gerrymandering of the zoning lot at 200 Amsterdam Avenue. At that time, I emphasized the importance of DOB’s reversal of their own position, correcting a 40 year mistake in their interpretation of the Zoning Resolution. The kind of community action, legal challenge, and formal review over this project is the exact process by which bad interpretation of laws are changed and public policy mistakes are corrected. I argued that the Board should back up the DOB’s revised position and prohibit the gerrymandering of zoning lots now and in the future, starting with 200 Amsterdam. All of that remains true, and our community and excellent legal team will continue working to ensure that 200 Amsterdam becomes a precedent for good policy rather than a monument to an old mistake. But I also wanted to take time today to talk about the broader implications of gerrymandered zoning lots. Allowing a developer to cobble together portions of different tax lots in order to make up one Page 2 of 2 zoning lot would not only create unwarranted confusion and a general lack of transparency. It would also create loopholes that will have very real consequences for communities far beyond the Upper West Side.