Strong Families New Mexico Legislative Report Card

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Strong Families New Mexico Legislative Report Card STRONG FAMILIES NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE REPORT CARD 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS / TABLA DE CONTENIDO Executive Summary 2 Resumen ejecutivo 4 Introduction 6 Introducción 7 Conversations with Families Across 8 New Mexico Conversaciones con familias a través de 9 todo Nuevo México Methodology on Chamber and 10 Legislator Grades Strong Families Policy Criteria 11 Criterios de política que apoyan Strong Families 11 Civil Rights 12 Criminal Justice 15 Economic Justice 19 Education Equity 24 Health Equity 28 Anti-Family Legislation 32 Conclusion 32 Votes and Grades of Legislators 33 Votos y calificaciones de los legisladores 33 Endnotes 38 Acknowledgments 44 ARTIST: MELANIE CERVANTES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Strong Families New Mexico (SFNM), a program of Forward Together, works to shift culture and create policies that recognize the many kinds of families in our state. We are a network of over 20 organizations and thousands of individuals working to build a better life for all of our families and for generations to come. Strong Families’ vision is that every family has the rights, recognition, and resources they need to thrive. Issue Committee House Senate Governor Enacted Area Strong Families Legislation into Law SB 19: Place foster youth in safe family environment ✘ SB 120: Allow changes to gender markers on a birth certificate ✘ SB 224: Allow more days for residents to register to vote Civil RightsCivil HJR 4: Automatic voter registration ✘ SB 293: Implement new policies to support breastfeeding in prisons ✘ SB 263: Assess the cost of incarceration to the state SB 78: “Ban the Box” — Jobs for previously incarcerated people ✘ HB 306: Support people with a behavioral health diagnosis ✘ HB 242: Prohibit solitary confinement for youth, pregnant women, and ✘ Criminal Justice Criminal people with mental illness HB 86: Allow workers to take sick days to care for family members ✘ HB 179: Basic accommodations for pregnant workers ✘ SB 308: Provide Internet expansion for rural areas ✔ HB 347: Reduce interest rates charged by loan companies ✔ HB 27: Raise minimum wage to $15 an hour ✘ Economic Justice Economic HB 136: Help people stay in permanent housing ✘ SB 115: Update bullying prevention programs in schools HJR 1: State funds for early childhood education SB 213: Support for transferring students ✔ HB 208: Funds for schools to purchase NM-grown produce ✘ Education Equity Education SB 35: Adequate funding for public education ✘ HB 370: Provide overdose education and medication ✔ SB 175: Medicaid coverage of home visits for young children ✘ HB 284: Easier access to contraception SB 33: Funds for local and tribal health needs for mothers and children ✘ Health Equity Health HB 160: Full-time school nurse in every school district ✘ Passed and moved to next step ✔ Enacted into law Did not make it to this stage of the bill process ✘ Stopped (died in committee, not passed by House or Senate, or vetoed by Governor) 2 2017 LEGISLATIVE REPORT CARD The Strong Families New Mexico Legislative The following recommendations for state law- Report Card examines 25 pieces of legislation makers are based on the policies we tracked in introduced during the 2017 legislative session the 2017 session and on our vision for all families and grades individual legislators. The legisla- to thrive in New Mexico. tion selected reflects a wide range of issues with 1. Enact policies that support ALL families, in- a focus on the needs of communities across the cluding under-resourced families most im- state, impacts on families of many formations, pacted by the issues. New Mexico is a mostly and alignment with our Strong Families policy rural state. The majority of its residents are criteria. people of color. In this state, place and race impact people’s everyday lives, including their We evaluated legislation in six categories. access to healthcare, good jobs with a living 1. Civil rights wage, voting rights, housing, transportation, 2. Criminal justice and educational opportunities. 3. Economic justice 2. Partner with community groups to create 4. Education equity stronger policies. We are each experts in our 5. Health equity own lives. Community organizations are ready 6. Anti-family and willing to share their expertise and part- Anti-family legislation, which Strong Families ner with legislators to craft policy solutions. New Mexico opposes, harms New Mexico families Strong Families New Mexico works with over by creating or exacerbating inequities in our state. 20 partner organizations and many more allied In 2017, very few anti-family bills made their organizations. Our work spans every issue way to the House or Senate floor; therefore, no affecting families, and each organization holds anti-family bills were included in the following data, stories, insights, and solutions for how to summary table or in that section of this report. improve the lives of people in New Mexico. 3. Use our Strong Families Policy Criteria Both the House and Senate received an A+. No when crafting or revising legislation. Our anti-family bills tracked by Strong Families New five-question policy criteria can be used by Mexico in 2017 passed on the House or Senate policymakers to ensure the wellbeing of and floor and many bills that benefit families did equitable outcomes for all families. pass. Therefore, both the House and the Senate 4. In times of budget crisis, our state cannot received a high mark. afford to divest from New Mexico families. Policies that provide funding for education, Individual legislators are also graded for this healthcare, food, housing, and violence pre- report card. Their grades are based on how they vention with an eye on long-term solutions voted on Strong Families New Mexico priority will have impacts for generations in our state. legislation that reached a floor vote. Our state needs to invest in families now in order to improve our economy and wellbeing. While many proactive bills were passed by the Even in a budget crisis, we are a state with House and Senate, only 4 bills were signed into abundance. We have abundant wisdom, re- law. Of the 25 pieces of legislation featured in this sources, and ideas that can be used now to report card, 8 died in committees, 5 passed only solve the problems of today with a vision for one chamber, and 8 were vetoed or pocket vetoed the future. by the Governor. STRONG FAMILIES NEW MEXICO 3 RESUMEN EJECUTIVO Strong Families New México (SFNM) es un programa de Forward Together que tra- baja para cambiar la cultura y crear políticas que reconocen toda la diversidad de fa- milias que tenemos en nuestro estado. Somos una red de más de 20 organizaciones y miles de individuos que trabajan juntos por crear una vida mejor para todas nuestras familias y las generaciones futuras. La visión de Strong Families es que cada familia tenga los derechos, el reconocimiento, y los recursos necesarios para prosperar. Legislación que apoya familias fuertes Tema Comité Cámara de Representantes Senado Gobernadora Establecida como ley SB 19: Ubicar a jóvenes en hogares de crianza en ambiente de familia saludable ✘ SB 120: Permitir cambios en características de género en las actas de nacimiento ✘ civiles SB 224: Permitir más días para que los residentes se inscriban para votar Derechos Derechos HJR 4: Inscripción automática para votantes ✘ SB 293: Implementar nuevas políticas para apoyar que las mujeres en prisión ✘ amamanten a sus hijos SB 263: Evaluar el costo de encarcelamiento para el estado SB 78: “Prohibir la caja” que pregunta sobre antecedentes penales — empleos para ✘ personas previamente encarceladas Justicia penal HB 306: Apoyar a las personas con diagnosis de salud de conducta ✘ HB 242: Prohibir el encierro en aislamiento solitario de jóvenes, mujeres ✘ embarazadas, y personas con enfermedades mentales HB 86: Permitir a los trabajadores tomar licencia por enfermedad para cuidar a familiares ✘ HB 179: Ajustes básicos para trabajadoras embarazadas ✘ SB 308: Proporcionar una expansión de Internet para zonas rurales ✔ HB 347: Reducir las tasas de interés que cobran las compañías de préstamos ✔ HB 27: Aumentar el sueldo mínimo a $15 la hora ✘ Justicia económica HB 136: Ayudar a la gente a permanecer en viviendas permanentes ✘ SB 115: Actualizar los programas de prevención de acoso (bullying) en las escuelas HJR 1: Fondos estatales para programas de educación temprana SB 213: Apoyo para estudiantes de transferencia ✔ HB 208: Fondos para que las escuelas compren frutas y verduras cultivadas en Nuevo México ✘ Equidad educativa Equidad SB 35: Financiamiento adecuado para la educación pública ✘ HB 370: Proporcionar educación sobre y medicamentos para los casos de sobredosis ✔ SB 175: Cobertura de Medicaid para visitas a domicilio para niños ✘ HB 284: Acceso más fácil para anticonceptivos Equidad en SB 33: Fondos para las necesidades de salubridad para madres y niños de tribus locales ✘ servicios salud de HB 160: Una enfermera escolar de tiempo complete en cada distrito escolar ✘ Aprobada y continuó al siguiente paso ✔ Establecida como ley No llegó a esta etapa en el proceso legislativo ✘ Detenida (murió en comité, no fue aprobada por la Cámara o el Senado, o fue vetado por la Gobernadora) 4 2017 LEGISLATIVE REPORT CARD La boleta de calificaciones legislativas de Strong Las siguientes recomendaciones para los legisladores Families examina 25 iniciativas presentadas du- estatales están basadas sobre políticas que rastreamos rante la sesión legislativa de 2017, y le da una en la sesión de 2017 y en nuestra visión para que todas calificación individual a los legisladores. Las ini- las familias en Nuevo México prosperen. ciativas de ley escogidas reflejan un espectro amplio 1. Establecer políticas que apoyen a TODAS las famil- de temas con un enfoque en las necesidades de las ias, incluyendo las familias con pocos recursos, comunidades en todo el estado, el impacto sobre los las cuales son las más afectadas para estos temas. diferentes tipos de familias, y el alineamiento con Nuevo México es un estado principalmente rural.
Recommended publications
  • 2018 Corporate Political Contributions to State Candidates and Committees
    Corporate Political Contributions¹ to State Candidates and Committees Alabama 2018 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount STATE SENATE Tim Melson R-01 $1,000 Greg Reed R-05 $1,000 Steve Livingston R-08 $1,000 Del Marsh R-12 $1,000 Jabo Waggoner R-16 $1,000 Greg Albritton R-22 $1,000 Bobby Singleton D-24 $1,000 Chris Elliott R-32 $1,000 Vivian Davis Figures D-33 $1,000 Jack Williams R-34 $1,000 David Sessions R-35 $1,000 STATE HOUSE Lynn Greer R-02 $500 Kyle South R-16 $500 Laura Hall D-19 $500 Nathaniel Ledbetter R-24 $500 David Standridge R-34 $500 Jim Carns R-48 $500 Harry Shiver R-64 $500 Elaine Beech D-65 $500 Pebblin Warren D-82 $500 Paul Lee R-86 $500 Chris Sells R-90 $500 Mike Jones R-92 $1,000 Steve Clouse R-93 $500 Joe Faust R-94 $500 Steve McMillian R-95 $500 Matt Simpson R-96 $500 Aldine Clarke D-97 $500 Napoleon Bracy D-98 $500 Sam Jones D-99 $500 Victor Gaston R-100 $500 Chris Pringle R-101 $500 Shane Stringer R-102 $500 Barbara Drummond D-103 $500 Margie Wilcox R-104 $500 Corporate Political Contributions¹ to State Candidates and Committees Alabama 2018 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount STATE HOUSE cont’d. Chip Brown R-105 $500 OTHER Will Ainsworth R-Lt. Governor $1,000 Kay Ivey R-Governor $5,000 California 2018 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount STATE SENATE Susan Rubio D-22 $1,000 Patricia Bates R-36 $2,500 Ben Hueso D-40 $2,500 STATE ASSEMBLY Brian Dahle R-01 $2,500 Jim Cooper D-09 $2,000 Jim Frazier D-11 $2,000 Tim Grayson D-14 $2,000 Catharine Baker R-16 $1,000
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Protection Voters-‐Political Action Committee Issues 2016
    Animal Protection Voters-Political Action Committee Issues 2016 Primary and Early General Election Endorsements for New Mexico Legislature Voters are urged to support the candidates who will do the best job of standing up for the protection of animals in their districts. Santa Fe, N.M. – Animal Protection Voters (APV), the leading political and legislative advocacy organization for animal protection in New Mexico, works via APV-PAC, its political action committee, to support humane candidates for elected office. APV-PAC announced today its endorsement of 19 candidates facing contested races in the primary election on June 7, and early endorsement of 56 candidates seeking election or re-election in the general election on November 8. Incumbents won endorsements for consistently showing animal advocacy and leadership through votes and other actions in the state legislature. New challengers and candidates received endorsements based on their past activity involving animal issues, as well as their responses to a questionnaire on topics including wildlife protection, anti-whistleblower legislation, horse slaughter and funding for animal-related programs. APV-PAC endorsement decisions emphasized two APV priority bills expected to be reintroduced in the 2017 legislative session: a ban on coyote killing contests, and a ban on traps and poisons on public lands. A growing majority of New Mexicans oppose traps and killing contests as unethical and ineffective wildlife management and a danger to public safety. “Most New Mexicans support stronger animal protection laws, and we are delighted to endorse a diverse, bipartisan slate of candidates who will represent the humane vision and values of their constituents,” said Jessica Johnson, Chief Legislative Officer for APV.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Almanac App Legislative Leadership
    Compliments of Legislative New Mexico’s Rural Electric Almanac Cooperatives 201853rd Legislature | Second Session Table of Contents Legislative Almanac App Legislative Leadership ..................................................................... New Mexico House of Representatives ................................ Search for NMRECA Legislative Almanac in the Constitutional Offi cers ..................................................................... New Mexico House Seating Chart .......................................... app stores to download to your electronic device. New Mexico Public Regulation Commission .................... New Mexico House Standing Committees ...................... New Mexico U.S. Congressional Delegation ..................... New Mexico House Electoral Districts ................................. New Mexico Senate .......................................................................... How to Pass a Bill in New Mexico ........................................... New Mexico Senate Standing Committees ....................... Legislative Session on the Web ............................................... New Mexico Senate Seating Chart .......................................... Members of the New Mexico Rural Electric New Mexico Senate Electoral Districts .................................. Cooperative Association .................................................... & New Mexico Senate Legislative Leadership Senate Democrats Republicans John A. Sanchez (R) Peter Wirth (D) Stuart Ingle (R) Lt. Governor & President
    [Show full text]
  • Committee Handbook New Mexico Legislature
    COMMITTEE HANDBOOK for the NEW MEXICO LEGISLATURE New Mexico Legislative Council Service Santa Fe, New Mexico 2012 REVISION prepared by: The New Mexico Legislative Council Service 411 State Capitol Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 (505) 986-4600 www.nmlegis.gov 202.190198 PREFACE Someone once defined a committee as a collection of people who individually believe that something must be done and who collectively decide that nothing can be done. Whether or not this definition has merit, it is difficult to imagine the work of a legislative body being accomplished without reliance upon the committee system. Every session, American legislative bodies are faced with thousands of bills, resolutions and memorials upon which to act. Meaningful deliberation on each of these measures by the entire legislative body is not possible. Therefore, the job must be broken up and distributed among the "miniature legislatures" called standing or substantive committees. In New Mexico, where the constitution confines legislative action to a specified number of calendar days, the work of such committees assumes even greater importance. Because the role of committees is vital to the legislative process, it is necessary for their efficient operation that individual members of the senate and house and their staffs understand committee functioning and procedure, as well as their own roles on the committees. For this reason, the legislative council service published in 1963 the first Committee Handbook for New Mexico legislators. This publication is the sixth revision of that document. i The Committee Handbook is intended to be used as a guide and working tool for committee chairs, vice chairs, members and staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Biennial Report 2016-2018
    Thirty-Third Biennial Report July 1, 2016 through June 30, 2018 New Mexico Legislative Council and Legislative Council Service New Mexico Legislative Council Service New Mexico Legislative Council Service 411 State Capitol Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 (505) 986-4600 www.nmlegis.gov 202.210961 CONTENTS OVERVIEW The 2016-2018 Biennium in Brief Interims ........................................................................................................................ 3 Sessions ........................................................................................................................ 5 THE NEW MEXICO LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL Membership ............................................................................................................................. 11 Historical Background ............................................................................................................. 13 Duties .................................................................................................................................... 13 Policy Changes ........................................................................................................................ 15 Interim Committees Permanent Legislative Education Study Committee .................................................................... 19 Legislative Finance Committee .................................................................................. 20 Statutory and New Mexico Legislative Council-Created Courts, Corrections and Justice Committee ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Guide Catron I Doña Ana I Grant Hidalgo I Lincoln I Luna Otero I Sierra I Socorro
    SOUTHWEST NEW MEXICO 2019 LEGISLATIVE GUIDE CATRON I DOÑA ANA I GRANT HIDALGO I LINCOLN I LUNA OTERO I SIERRA I SOCORRO SENATE ROSTER PAGE 21 REPRESENTATIVE ROSTER PAGE 35 COUNTY PROFILES PAGE 53 New Mexico’s Future Starts Here New Mexico State University shapes the future of our state, just as we always have. For decades, NMSU minds have drawn from New Mexico’s unique geography, cultures and knowledge to drive our state forward. We will continue to stretch our understanding of the possible and to think and work boldly. Under our leadership and with statewide support, NMSU will improve student success, elevate research and creativity, and amplify our outreach and economic development efforts. We will fortify education, create healthy borders and modernize critical infrastructure. TOGETHER, WE SHAPE THE COURSE OF OUR OWN SUCCESS. BE BOLD. Shape the Future. New Mexico State University Our patients fight cancer with everything they have. So do we. Dr. Cherie Hayostek Director of Radiation Oncology We know that fighting cancer is a serious battle. That’s why, over the past two decades, we have assembled a world-class program and care team. As the only nationally-accredited cancer program in the region, we access the latest research and utilize the most current treatments. When you choose Memorial Cancer Center, you know we are 100% in your corner. Memorial is the only Our Radiation Oncology Our partnership with All of our registered nurses cancer program in Center is the only UNM Comprehensive have achieved Oncology Southern New Mexico program in the region, Cancer Center gives our Certified Nurse status.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New Mexico County of Bernalillo First Judicial District Court
    STATE OF NEW MEXICO COUNTY OF BERNALILLO FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT STATE OF NEW MEXICO EX REL. THE HONORABLE MIMI STEWART, THE HONORALBE SHERYL WILLIAMS STAPLETON, THE HONORABLE HOWIE C. MORALES, THE HONORALBE LINDA M. LOPEZ, THE HONORABLE WILLIAM P. SOULES, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS— NEW MEXICO, ALBUQUERQUE FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, JOLENE BEGAY, DANA ALLEN, NAOMI DANIEL, RON LAVANDOSKI, TRACEY BRUMLIK, CRYSTAL HERRERA, and ALLISON HAWKS, Plaintiffs, v. No. ____________________ NEW MEXICO PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMENT and SECRETARY-DESIGNEE HANNA SKANDERA in her official capacity, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF COME NOW, Plaintiffs, by and through the undersigned, and for their Complaint against Defendants state as follows: I. INTRODUCTION 1. Plaintiffs bring this action against the Public Education Department and its Secretary-Designee, in her official capacity only, because Defendants have implemented a fundamental change in the manner in which teachers are evaluated in New Mexico. As detailed in this Complaint, that change is based on a fundamentally, and irreparably, flawed methodology which is further plagued by consistent and appalling data errors. As a result, teachers are being evaluated, and employment decisions made, based on a process that is, at best, arbitrary and capricious. 2. Due to the problems with the evaluation methodology detailed herein, Defendants have or are about to violate Plaintiffs’ constitutional rights, violate the statutory authority under which they operate, and violate other provisions of law. Plaintiffs seek declaratory and injunctive relief. II. PARTIES, JURISDICTION, AND VENUE 3. Plaintiff the Honorable Senator Mimi Stewart is the elected Senator from District 17 (Bernalillo County).
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 INTERIM FINAL REPORT Legislative Council Service 411 State Capitol Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 (505) 986-4600 TABLE of CONTENTS
    New Mexico Legislature PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPITAL OUTLAY OVERSIGHT TASK FORCE 2016 INTERIM FINAL REPORT Legislative Council Service 411 State Capitol Santa Fe, New Mexico 87501 (505) 986-4600 www.nmlegis.gov TABLE OF CONTENTS Interim Summary Background Membership, 2016 Interim Statutory Authority and Duties Work Plan and Meeting Schedule Agendas and Minutes Endorsed Legislation INTERIM SUMMARY Public School Capital Outlay Oversight Task Force 2016 Interim Summary State statute allows the Public School Capital Outlay Oversight Task Force (PSCOOTF) to hold a maximum of four meetings during each interim in addition to one organizational meeting. In 2016, meetings were scheduled to be held in Santa Fe at the State Capitol on June 10, July 22, September 19, October 4 and November 14, with Senator John M. Sapien as chair and Representative Dennis J. Roch as vice chair. During the June 10 organizational meeting, members approved a work plan for the 2016 interim for approval by the New Mexico Legislative Council. In addition to the task force's statutory duties, members agreed to include the following issues: • the continuing Zuni lawsuit, including information about the upcoming district court hearing; • an examination of the cost of ownership and operation of school facilities; • charter school facilities; • progress on implementation of the Broadband Deficiencies Correction Program; • an assessment of the efficacy of the public school capital outlay funding formula; and • cost-effective disposal of unused or under-used public school facilities. The task force also heard testimony during the June meeting from economists from the University of New Mexico's Bureau of Business and Economic Research regarding their assessment of the efficacy of the public school capital outlay funding formula, which was conducted in late 2015 and early 2016.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Political Corporate Contributions 2-19-2015.Xlsx
    2014 POLITICAL CORPORATE CONTRIBUTIONS Last Name First Name Committee Name State Office District Party 2014 Total ($) Alabama 2014 PAC AL Republican 10,000 Free Enterprise PAC AL 10,000 Mainstream PAC AL 10,000 Collins Charles Charlie Collins Campaign Committee AR Representative AR084 Republican 750 Collins‐Smith Linda Linda Collins‐Smith Campaign Committee AR Senator AR019 Democratic 1,050 Davis Andy Andy Davis Campaign Committee AR Representative AR031 Republican 750 Dotson Jim Jim Dotson Campaign Committee AR Representative AR093 Republican 750 Griffin Tim Tim Griffin Campaign Committee AR Lt. Governor AR Republican 2,000 Rapert Jason Jason Rapert Campaign Committee AR Senator AR035 Republican 1,000 Rutledge Leslie Leslie Rutledge Campaign Committee AR Attorney General AR Republican 2,000 Sorvillo Jim Jim Sorvillo Campaign Committee AR Representative AR032 Republican 750 Williams Eddie Joe GoEddieJoePAC AR Senator AR029 Republican 5,000 Growing Arkansas AR Republican 5,000 Senate Victory PAC AZ Republican 2,500 Building Arizona's Future AZ Democratic 5,000 House Victory PAC AZ Republican 2,500 Allen Travis Re‐Elect Travis Allen for Assembly 2014 CA Representative CA072 Republican 1,500 Anderson Joel Tax Fighters for Joel Anderson, Senate 2014 CA Senator CA038 Republican 2,500 Berryhill Tom Tom Berryhill for Senate 2014 CA Senator CA008 Republican 2,500 Bigelow Frank Friends of Frank Bigelow for Assembly 2014 CA Representative CA005 Republican 2,500 Bonin Mike Mike Bonin for City Council 2013 Officeholder Account CA LA City Council
    [Show full text]
  • Separation of Powers and the Judicial Rule-Making Power in New Mexico: the Need for Prudential Constraints
    Volume 15 Issue 3 Summer 1985 Summer 1985 Separation of Powers and the Judicial Rule-Making Power in New Mexico: The Need for Prudential Constraints Michael B. Browde University of New Mexico - Main Campus Ted Occhialino Recommended Citation Michael B. Browde & Ted Occhialino, Separation of Powers and the Judicial Rule-Making Power in New Mexico: The Need for Prudential Constraints, 15 N.M. L. Rev. 407 (1985). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nmlr/vol15/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The University of New Mexico School of Law. For more information, please visit the New Mexico Law Review website: www.lawschool.unm.edu/nmlr SEPARATION OF POWERS AND THE JUDICIAL RULE-MAKING POWER IN NEW MEXICO: THE NEED FOR PRUDENTIAL CONSTRAINTS MICHAEL B. BROWDE* and M. E. OCCHIALINO** I. INTRODUCTION Separation of powers among the "co-equal" branches of government is fundamental to our constitutional system. True to the eighteenth century political theory of John Locke,' from which it derives, the separation of powers doctrine is designed to prevent any one branch from dominating the other two, thereby serving as a check against the tyranny of concen- trated governmental power.' *Professor of Law, University of New Mexico School of Law; B.A. Brown University, 1965; J.D. Georgetown University Law Center, 1968. **Professor of Law, University of New Mexico School of Law; B.A., Siena College, 1964; J.D. Georgetown University Law Center, 1967. The authors wish to thank a number of past students who assisted in the development of this article.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Exxonmobil Political Contributions
    Corporate Political Contributions¹ to State Candidates and Committees California 2019 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount STATE SENATE Steve Glazer D-07 $1,500 Anna Caballero D-12 $1,000 Shannon Grove R-16 $1,500 Susan Rubio D-22 $1,000 Bob Archuleta D-32 $1,000 Lena Gonzalez D-33 $1,000 Steve Bradford D-35 $1,000 Toni Atkins D-39 $2,500 STATE ASSEMBLY Ken Cooley D-08 $1,000 Jim Cooper D-09 $1,500 Jim Frazier D-11 $1,500 Tim Grayson D-14 $1,000 Adam Gray D-21 $1,500 Rudy Salas D-32 $1,500 Jordan Cunningham R-35 $1,000 James Ramos D-40 $1,000 Blanca Rubio D-48 $1,000 Freddie Rodriguez D-52 $1,500 Eduardo Garcia D-56 $1,000 Ian Calderon D-57 $1,000 Sabrina Cervantes D-60 $1,000 Jose Medina D-61 $1,000 Anthony Rendon D-63 $4,400 Mike Gipson D-64 $1,500 Marie Waldron R-75 $1,000 Tom Daly D-69 $1,500 Patrick O’Donnell D-70 $1,000 Lorena Gonzalez-Fletcher D-80 $2,000 Colorado 2019 Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Total Amount OTHER Senate Majority Fund R $30,000 Corporate Political Contributions¹ to State Candidates and Committees Illinois 2019 Total Candidate or Committee Name Party-District Amount STATE SENATE Dan McConchie R-26 $1,000 Chuck Weaver R-37 $1,000 Sue Rezin R-38 $1,000 John Curran R-41 $1,000 Bill Brady R-44 $5,000 STATE HOUSE Sonya Harper D-06 $1,000 Arthur Turner D-09 $1,000 Justin Slaughter D-27 $1,000 Thaddeus Jones D-29 $1,000 Andre Thapedi D-32 $1,000 Nick Smith D-34 $1,000 Keith Wheeler R-50 $1,000 Anthony DeLuca D-80 $1,000 Jim Durkin R-82 $5,000 John Connor D-85 $1,000 Lawrence Walsh, Jr.
    [Show full text]
  • NM's Working Families Tax Credit
    FiscalFiscal PolicyPolicy ProjectProject NM’s Working Families Tax Credit Improving the Credit’s Benefits to the State, Its Businesses, and Its People By Amber Wallin, MPA January 2017 Our economy is strongest when people have money to spend and, while the rest of the nation is recovering from the recession, New Mexico is still struggling to attract good-paying jobs. When people work full time and still don’t earn enough money to cover the basics, our economy is not at its healthiest. Tax credits for low- and moderate-income working families are one common-sense way to spur economic activity and put money in the hands of consumers who will spend it, particularly when wages are low. In New Mexico, the Working Families Tax Credit first passed with bipartisan support under President is one of the most sensible parts of our tax code: it Gerald Ford in 1975. In 1986, the EITC was indexed encourages work, helps to raise hard-working families to rise with inflation under President Ronald Reagan out of poverty, and benefits almost 300,000 children, who called the program “the best anti-poverty, the best while also pumping millions of dollars back into pro-family, the best job-creation measure to come out local communities. Increasing the credit is a smart of Congress.”1 investment in New Mexico’s businesses, working families, and future. Since its passage, the EITC has been strongly supported by both Republican and Democratic lawmakers on both the national and state level, and 26 states plus The History of the Credits the District of Columbia have modeled state credits after the EITC in order to help offset regressive state The Working Families Tax Credit (WFTC) is the state’s taxes for low-income workers while also improving equivalent of the federal Earned Income Tax Credit conditions for families in their states and encouraging (EITC).
    [Show full text]