Landslide Nature and Distribution on the Lincoln 1:50K Geological Sheet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Landslide Nature and Distribution on the Lincoln 1:50K Geological Sheet Landslide nature and distribution on the Lincoln 1:50k geological sheet Land Use and Development Programme Internal Report OR/09/047 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME INTERNAL REPORT OR/09/047 The National Grid and other Ordnance Survey data are used with the permission of the Landslide nature and distribution Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. Licence No: 100017897/ 2009. on the Lincoln 1:50k geological Keywords sheet Landslides, Lincoln, Triassic, Jurassic, Lias Group, Great Oolite Group, Inferior Oolite Group. K A Booth & G O Jenkins National Grid Reference SW corner 483300,354400 Centre point 498000,364000 NE corner 513100,373800 Map Sheet 114, 1:50 000 scale, Lincoln Front cover Landslide on the escarpment at Harmston, Lincolnshire [496996 362452]. Bibliographical reference BOOTH, K. A., JENKINS, G. O., G. O. 2009. Landslide nature and distribution on the Lincoln 1:50k geological sheet . British Geological Survey Report, OR/09/047. 11pp. Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided a full acknowledgement is given of the source of the extract. Maps and diagrams in this book use topography based on Ordnance Survey mapping. © NERC 2009. All rights reserved Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 2009 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of our publications is available from BGS shops at British Geological Survey offices Nottingham, Edinburgh, London and Cardiff (Welsh publications only) see contact details below or shop online at www.geologyshop.com BGS Central Enquiries Desk Tel 0115 936 3143 Fax 0115 936 3276 The London Information Office also maintains a reference collection of BGS publications, including maps, for consultation. email [email protected] We publish an annual catalogue of our maps and other publications; this catalogue is available online or from any of the Kingsley Dunham Centre, Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG BGS shops. Tel 0115 936 3241 Fax 0115 936 3488 email [email protected] The British Geological Survey carries out the geological survey of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (the latter as an agency service for the government of Northern Ireland), and of the Murchison House, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3LA surrounding continental shelf, as well as basic research projects. Tel 0131 667 1000 Fax 0131 668 2683 It also undertakes programmes of technical aid in geology in email [email protected] developing countries. The British Geological Survey is a component body of the Natural Environment Research Council. London Information Office at the Natural History Museum (Earth Galleries), Exhibition Road, South Kensington, London SW7 2DE Tel 020 7589 4090 Fax 020 7584 8270 Tel 020 7942 5344/45 email [email protected] Columbus House, Greenmeadow Springs, Tongwynlais, Cardiff CF15 7NE Tel 029 2052 1962 Fax 029 2052 1963 Forde House, Park Five Business Centre, Harrier Way, Sowton EX2 7HU Tel 01392 445271 Fax 01392 445371 Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford OX10 8BB Tel 01491 838800 Fax 01491 692345 Geological Survey of Northern Ireland, Colby House, Stranmillis Court, Belfast BT9 5BF Tel 028 9038 8462 Fax 028 9038 8461 www.bgs.ac.uk/gsni/ Parent Body Natural Environment Research Council, Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon SN2 1EU Tel 01793 411500 Fax 01793 411501 www.nerc.ac.uk Website www.bgs.ac.uk Shop online at www.geologyshop.com OR/09/047; FINAL Last modified: 2009/12/16 11:21 Foreword This report is the published product of the British Geological Survey’s Land Use and Development Programme’s Landslide Hazards and Research Project, part of the Shallow Geohazards team. The report describes the landslides that have affected the geological formations in the Lincoln 1:50 000 map sheet area. Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Dr C Foster and Dr A Cooper for their advice and editing of this report. Contents Foreword .................................................................................................................................. i Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. i Contents .................................................................................................................................... i Summary ................................................................................................................................. ii 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 2 Study area ........................................................................................................................ 1 3 Geology ............................................................................................................................. 3 3.1 Triassic Mudstones .................................................................................................. 4 3.2 Early Jurassic mudstones ......................................................................................... 4 3.3 Jurassic Oolites ........................................................................................................ 4 3.4 Mid – Late Jurassic mudstones ................................................................................ 4 4 Landslide distribution ..................................................................................................... 5 4.1 New landslide records ............................................................................................. 5 5 Landslide analysis ........................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Geology and landslide frequency ............................................................................ 8 5.2 Style and mechanism of landsliding ........................................................................ 8 5.3 Landslide age and activity ....................................................................................... 9 5.4 Landsliding and slope aspect ................................................................................... 9 6 Conclusions .................................................................................................................... 10 Appendix 1 ............................................................................................................................ 11 Classification of landslide types (Varnes, 1978) ............................................................. 11 References ............................................................................................................................. 12 i OR/09/047; FINAL Last modified: 2009/12/16 11:21 FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the Lincoln 1:50 000 geological map sheet 114 .................................... 2 Figure 2. NextMap shaded relief digital terrain model (DTM) of the Lincoln sheet area. [red = high; blue = low]. The Jurassic escarpment forms a marked feature dominating the Lincoln sheet area. .......................................................................................................................... 2 Figure 3. DiGMapGB-V5, 1:50 000 bedrock and superficial geology of the Lincoln Sheet (114). ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Figure 5. Vertical cracks in brickwork of a house walls indicating ground movement. Carline Road, Lincoln [497147 371869]. ....................................................................................... 7 Figure 6. Typical single rotational slide on the Lincolnshire escarpment, exhibiting backscarp and subdued degraded features [497149 363607] ............................................................. 7 Figure 7. Subdued, degraded landslide features along the Lincolnshire escarpment, Lincoln cathedral visible in the distance [497569 366310]. ........................................................... 8 Figure 8. Frequency of landslides relating to aspect on the Lincoln sheet. ............................. 10 Summary This report describes the extent and character of the landslides and the mass movement processes in the area covered by the 1:50 000 scale BGS map of Lincoln (Sheet 114). The work includes the identification of 29 new landslide records to be added to the National Landslide Database. The work has assisted the continuing study of landslides and mass movements in Great Britain. ii OR/09/047; FINAL Last modified: 2009/12/16 11:21 1 Introduction The Lincoln 1:50 000 geological map (Sheet 114) district lies to the east of the Trent Valley and encompasses the River Witham. The city of Lincoln lies in the north of the district. The district was originally surveyed in 1878 and further surveys, focussing on the central area around Nocton, occurred in 1937 and 1941. This work concentrated on the Lincolnshire escarpment and the Lincolnshire Limestones of the Inferior Oolite Group. A new compilation map was published in 1971. The existing map was published in 1973. As part of the resurveying of the Lincoln sheet by
Recommended publications
  • Conceptualising Groundwater Flow Systems at a National (British Mainland) Scale
    Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale Brighid Ó Dochartaigh and BGS Hydro-JULES team 11 September 2019 Seeking answers to 2 questions: How can an integrated & holistic approach to modelling terrestrial hydrology – including groundwater – improve: 1. Simulation of major flooding events, such as 2013-14 floods? 2. Assessment of water resources under drought conditions? Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 2 British mainland (WP4.1) 3D Parameterising Deep geological Saturated GW domain – Unsaturated framework Zone code technique Zone code model Conceptual FY18/19 models of groundwater (GW) flow Parameterising Model Sub-surface GW domain – instance code application FY19/20 Results Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 3 Britain’s diverse geology and hydrogeology Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 4 3D Geological Framework Model +1.5 km to -15 km 1:625,000 scale mapping Newell 2019 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 5 Model includes 3D information from: borehole geology & geophysics; pre-existing cross sections; geological history & structure; seismic data Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 6 Geology: a physical framework for groundwater flow Centre for Ecology & Hydrology | Hydro-JULES Conceptualising groundwater flow systems at a national (British mainland) scale 7 Key groundwater conceptual model parameters Geology Geography Surface water Groundwater Aquifer Chemistry Flow Aquifer Topographic relief Recharge quantity, Groundwater flow Aquifer properties: e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosaurs British Isles
    DINOSAURS of the BRITISH ISLES Dean R. Lomax & Nobumichi Tamura Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett (Natural History Museum, London) Skeletal reconstructions by Scott Hartman, Jaime A. Headden & Gregory S. Paul Life and scene reconstructions by Nobumichi Tamura & James McKay CONTENTS Foreword by Dr Paul M. Barrett.............................................................................10 Foreword by the authors........................................................................................11 Acknowledgements................................................................................................12 Museum and institutional abbreviations...............................................................13 Introduction: An age-old interest..........................................................................16 What is a dinosaur?................................................................................................18 The question of birds and the ‘extinction’ of the dinosaurs..................................25 The age of dinosaurs..............................................................................................30 Taxonomy: The naming of species.......................................................................34 Dinosaur classification...........................................................................................37 Saurischian dinosaurs............................................................................................39 Theropoda............................................................................................................39
    [Show full text]
  • TMS-01 04 Butler (To D) 14/10/05 10:42 Am Page 43
    TMS-01 04 Butler (to_d) 14/10/05 10:42 am Page 43 The Ravenscar Group: a coeval analogue for the Middle Jurassic reservoirs of the North Sea and offshore Mid-Norway N. BUTLER1, M. A. CHARNOCK2, K. O. HAGER2,3 & C. A. WATKINS1 1Robertson Research International Ltd., Llanrhos, Llandudno LL30 1SA, UK (e-mail [email protected]) 2Norsk Hydro AS, Research Centre, N-5020, Bergen, Norway 3Norsk Hydro AS, N-0246, Oslo, Norway Abstract: A palynostratigraphical study of the Middle Jurassic Ravenscar Group, Cleveland Basin, northern England involving the integration of miospore and microplank- ton data with sedimentary facies data has resulted in improvements in the stratigraphical resolution of offshore hydrocarbon-bearing strata in the North Viking Graben and Mid- Norway. The Dogger Formation is of ‘earliest’ Aalenian age and is correlative with the uppermost Dunlin Group, Drake Formation and Båt Group, Ror Formation. The overly- ing Aalenian Saltwick and Eller Beck formations correlate with the Brent Group, Broom–Rannoch–Etive–Ness and the Fangst Group, Ile–Not–‘lower’ Garn genetic packages. The Cloughton Formation is either unrepresented or condensed in the Brent Province and Mid-Norway due to a regional unconformity, which truncates lower Bajocian sediments. The Scarborough Formation is of ‘latest’ early to ‘earliest’ late Bajocian age and correlative with the older part of the Tarbert–Heather and the ‘upper’ Garn–Melke genetic packages. These interpretations contrast markedly with the majority of those published. Despite their maturity of exploration and Methodology and techniques development, Middle Jurassic sandstones of the North Sea and offshore Mid-Norway still repre- The analyses were concentrated on three key sent some of the most prolific hydrocarbon sections near Whitby, Ravenscar and Scar- reservoirs in northwest Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Geodiversity Action Plan for Oxfordshire’S Lower and Middle Jurassic
    Local Geodiversity Action Plan for Oxfordshire’s Lower and Middle Jurassic Supported by Oxfordshire’s Lower and Middle Jurassic Geodiversity Action Plan has been produced by Oxfordshire Geology Trust with funding from the ALSF Partnership Grants Scheme through Defra’s Aggregates Levy Sustainability Fund. Oxfordshire Geology Trust The Geological Records Centre The Corn Exchange Faringdon SN7 7JA 01367 243 260 www.oxfordshiregt.org [email protected] © Oxfordshire Geology Trust, June 2006 Lower and Middle Jurassic Local Geodiversity Action Plan, Edition 1 Page 1 of 25 © Oxfordshire Geology Trust March 2007 Contents Introduction 3 What is Geodiversity? 4 The Conservation of our Geodiversity National Geoconservation Initiatives 5 Geoconservation in Oxfordshire 6 Local Geodiversity Action plans – Purpose and Process The Purpose of LGAPs 7 The Geographical Boundary 7 Preparing the Plan 8 Geodiversity Audit 8 Oxfordshire’s Lower and Middle Jurassic Geodiversity Resource Lower Lias 10 Middle Lias 11 Upper Lias 12 Inferior Oolite 12 Great Oolite 12 Oxford Clay 16 Fossils 16 Geomorphological Features 17 Building Stone 18 Museum Collections 18 History of Geological Research 19 Implementation Relationships with other Management Plans 21 Future of the LGAP 22 The Action Plan 23 Lower and Middle Jurassic Local Geodiversity Action Plan, Edition 1 Page 2 of 25 © Oxfordshire Geology Trust March 2007 Introduction Oxfordshire’s geology has long been admired by geologists and utilised by industry. In fact, it was a driving force for the industrialization of the nation through the exploitation of ironstone. Our geodiversity however, extends beyond our exposures of rocks and fossils to include landscape and geomorphology, building stones, museums collections and soils.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphical Framework for the Middle Jurassic Strata of Great
    Stratigraphical framework for the Middle Jurassic strata of Great Britain and the adjoining continental shelf Geology and Landscape Programme Research Report RR/11/06 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY RESEARCH REPORT RR/11/06 The National Grid and other Stratigraphical framework for the Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database rights 2012. Ordnance Survey Licence Middle Jurassic strata of Great No. 100021290 Britain and the adjoining Key words Geology, stratigraphy, lithostratigraphy, Inferior Oolite continental shelf Group, Great Oolite Group, Ravenscar Group, Great Estuarine Group, Sutherland Group, Ancholme Group, Jurassic. A J M Barron, G K Lott, J B Riding Front cover Hilltop Quarry, Leckhampton Hill, Cheltenham, Glos.: the Birdlip Limestone Formation overlain by the Aston Limestone Formation. (P775213, A J M Barron) Bibliographical reference BARRON, A J M, LOTT, G K, AND RIDING, J B. 2012. Stratigraphical framework for the Middle Jurassic strata of Great Britain and the adjoining continental shelf. British Geological Survey Research Report, RR/11/06. 187pp. ISBN 978 0 85272 695 2 Copyright in materials derived from the British Geological Survey’s work is owned by the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) and/or the authority that commissioned the work. You may not copy or adapt this publication without first obtaining permission. Contact the BGS Intellectual Property Rights Section, British Geological Survey, Keyworth, e-mail [email protected]. You may quote extracts of a reasonable length without prior permission, provided
    [Show full text]
  • A New Large−Bodied Theropod Dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Warwickshire, United Kingdom
    A new large−bodied theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Warwickshire, United Kingdom ROGER B.J. BENSON and JONATHAN D. RADLEY Benson, R.B.J. and Radley, J.D. 2010. A new large−bodied theropod dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of Warwickshire, United Kingdom. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 55 (1): 35–42. Previously undocumented postcranial material from the Chipping Norton Limestone Formation (Middle Jurassic: Lower Bathonian) of Cross Hands Quarry, near Little Compton, Warwickshire represents a new large−bodied theropod dinosaur, distinct from the contemporaneous Megalosaurus bucklandii. Cruxicheiros newmanorum gen. et sp. nov. is diagnosed by a single autapomorphy, the presence of a proximomedially inclined ridge within the groove that marks the lateral extent of the posterior flange of the femoral caput (trochanteric fossa). C. newmanorum shows three tetanuran features: widely separated cervical zygapophyses, a swollen ridge on the lateral surface of the iliac blade and an anterior spur of the caudal neural spines. However, due to fragmentary preservation its affinities within Tetanurae remain uncertain: phylogenetic analysis places it as the most basal tetanuran, the most basal megalosauroid (= spinosauroid) or the most basal neotetanuran. Key words: Dinosauria, Theropoda, Tetanurae, Megalosaurus, Cruxicheiros, Bathonian, Chipping Norton Limestone Formation, England. Roger B.J. Benson [[email protected]], Department of Earth Science, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cam− bridge, UK, CB2 3EQ; Jonathan D. Radley [[email protected]], Warwickshire Museum, Market Place, Warwick, UK CV34 4SA; School of Geography, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK B15 2TT. Received 8 July 2009, accepted 18 November 2009, available online 20 November 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrocarbon Prospectivity of the Weald and Eastern English Channel: Volume 1 Introduction
    HYDROCARBON PROSPECTIVITY OF THE WEALD AND EASTERN ENGLISH CHANNEL: VOLUME 1 INTRODUCTION DISCLAIMER This report is for information only. It does not constitute legal, technical or professional advice. The Department of Trade and Industry does not accept any liability for any direct, indirect or consequential loss or damage of any nature, however caused, which may be sustained as a result of reliance upon the information contained in this report. All material is copyright. It may be produced in whole or in part subject to the inclusion of an acknowledgement of the source, but should not be included in any commercial usage or sale. Reproduction for purposes other than those indicated above requires the written permission of the Department of Trade and Industry. Requests and enquiries should be addressed to: Geoff Swann Senior Geologist- UK Onshore Email: mailto:[email protected] Phone: +44 (0) 20 7215 5062 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7215 5070 Or Jackie Banner Principal Geoscientist - Knowledge Email: mailto:[email protected] Phone: +44 (0) 20 7215 5135 Fax: +44 (0) 20 7215 5070 1 Copyright DTI 2004 Report No. 83/3/1 Hydrocarbon prospectivity of the Weald and eastern English Channel Volume 1 : Introduction INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES Natural Environment Research Council Deep Geology Unit Hydrocarbon prospectivity of the Weald and eastern English Channel Volume 1 : Introduction I. E. Penn Crown Copyright 1983 CONTENTS Page No. TITLE PAGE INTRODUCTION STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT CONDUCT OF THE WORK BIBLIOGRAPHY LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Location map of area of prospectvity study Figure 1.2 Location of seismic map areas LIST OF TABLES Table 1.1 Key to enclosure numbers of seismic time and depth map coverage Table 1.2 List of enclosures HYDROCARBON PROSPECTIVITY OF THE WEALD AND EASTERN ENGLISH CHANNEL: VOLUME 2 HYDROCARBON PROSPECTIVITY DISCLAIMER This report is for information only.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Classic Geological Sections in the Inferior Oolite Formation
    Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association 127 (2016) 132–145 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pgeola Conserving classic geological sections in the Inferior Oolite Formation, Middle Jurassic of the Wessex Basin, south-west England a, b Jonathan G. Larwood *, Robert B. Chandler a Natural England, Unex House, Bourges Boulevard, Peterborough PE1 1NG, UK b Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: Over 200 years since the publication of William Smith’s 1815 geological map, we explore the Received 3 February 2016 conservation of the Inferior Oolite Formation including Dundry Hill in Somerset which was visited by, Received in revised form 28 March 2016 and critical to Smith’s work. In particular, the network of nationally important Sites of Special Scientific Accepted 31 March 2016 Interest (SSSI) that encompass the Middle Jurassic Aalenian-Bajocian sequence in the Wessex Basin are Available online 20 April 2016 considered. A number of examples of conserving disused Inferior Oolite quarries are used to illustrate these challenges and benefits of geoconservation, including Frogden Quarry SSSI and Horn Park Quarry Keywords: National Nature Reserve (NNR) in Dorset, and South Main Road Quarry SSSI on Dundry Hill. This paper Geoconservation briefly reflects on John Callomon’s critical contribution to understanding the Inferior Oolite Formation, Aalenian Bajocian and the shared challenge faced by William Smith and John Callomon. ß Site of Special Scientific Interest 2016 The Geologists’ Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Warwickshire's Jurassic Geology
    Warwickshire’s Jurassic geology: past, present and future Jonathan D. Radley Abstract. Jurassic strata were extensively quarried in Warwickshire, during the 19th and early to mid 20th centuries, but much of the succession is now poorly exposed. Selected sites are afforded statutory and non-statutory protection as Sites of Special Scientific Interest and Regionally Important Geological and Geomorphological Sites. Warwickshire’s Jurassic history is outlined, demonstrating the value and purpose of the currently protected sites as repositories of stratigraphic, palaeontological and palaeoenvironmental data. The fields, hills and villages of southern and eastern structural hinge throughout much of Lower and Warwickshire, central England, conceal a marine Middle Jurassic time (Horton et al., 1987). This sedimentary succession of Lower and Middle separated the London Platform and East Midlands Jurassic age (Figs 1 and 2). This is at least 400 Shelf in the east from the Severn (or ‘Worcester’) metres thick (Williams & Whittaker, 1974) and Basin in the west (Sumbler, 1996). West of the Axis, spans about 40 million years of Earth history. The in south-western Warwickshire, the Lower Jurassic beds demonstrate a gentle regional dip towards the succession features a laminated, calcilutite- south-east and are affected by numerous normal dominated Hettangian development (Wilmcote faults (Institute of Geological Sciences, 1983), as Limestone Member), a more arenaceous facies well as cambering, landslipping and periglacial development of the Pliensbachian Marlstone Rock cryoturbation (Fig. 3). Unconsolidated Quaternary deposits locally cover the Jurassic sediments, notably in the Dunsmore area of eastern Warwickshire (British Geological Survey, 1984). The latest Triassic-early Jurassic Wilmcote Limestone Member (Blue Lias Formation, Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincolnshire Borehole Proves Greater Extent of the Scarborough Formation (Jurassic : Bajocian)
    J.micropalaeontol., 1: 141-147, July 1982 Lincolnshire borehole proves greater extent of the Scarborough Formation (Jurassic : Bajocian) M.J. BRADSHAW & R.H. BATE Department of Geological Sciences, University of Aston, Birmingham, B4 7ET & Department of Palaeontology, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD ABSTRACT-The ostracod fauna of a thin unit of shelly mudstones encountered directly beneath the Great Oolite Group in a recently drilled borehole in north Lincolnshire confirms the presence of the Scarborough Formation, formerly thought of as being confined to the Cleveland Basin. Sandstones and coals separating the Scarborough Formation from typical upper Lincolnshire Limestone calcarenites were probably deposited by delta progradation and are correlated with the regressive Yons Nab Beds and lower Gristhorpe Member of the Cleveland Basin. Discovery of the Gristhorpe Member and the Scarborough Formation beneath the basal Great Oolite unconformity on the East Midlands Shelf suggests that the youngest limestone facies of the Lincolnshire Limestone can be no younger than earliest sauzei Zone, and that the erosional event which preceded deposition of the Great Oolite is of late humphriesianum Zone or younger age. A revised palaeogeography for Scarborough Formation times envisages that following initial westward marine transgression along the axis of the Cleveland Basin, the sea broadened and at its maximum extent covered much of the Market Weighton Block. INTRODUCTION Between the early Aalenian Dogger Formation and article, Zone or Subzone used without qualification the early Callovian Cornbrash Limestone in the Cleve- refers to ammonite biozones which are regarded as land Basin is a series of thick fluvio-deltaic sandstones tantamount to chronozones; Torrens, 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Megalosaurus' Hesperis (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Inferior Oolite (Bajocian, Middle Jurassic) of Dorset, United Kingdom
    Zootaxa 1931: 57–67 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) A redescription of 'Megalosaurus' hesperis (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Inferior Oolite (Bajocian, Middle Jurassic) of Dorset, United Kingdom ROGER B. J. BENSON1,2 1Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, CB2 3EQ, UK. E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Palaeontology, Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, UK, SW7 5BD Abstract ‘Megalosaurus’ hesperis from the Inferior Oolite (Bajocian, Middle Jurassic) of Dorset, UK is redescribed. Several fea- tures of ‘M.’ hesperis demonstrate that it is distinct from the lectotype dentary of Megalosaurus: an enlarged, subcircular third alveolus and subcylindrical, anteriorly inclined anterior dentary teeth; an anterior Meckelian foramen located almost directly anterior to the posterior Meckelian foramen; low interdental plates; and a prominent lip bounding the Meckelian groove ventrally, anterior to the Meckelian fossa. Therefore a new genus, Duriavenator, is erected to form the new combination D. hesperis. D. hesperis possesses two autapomorphies of the maxilla: a deep groove on dorsal surface of the jugal process containing numerous pneumatic foramina; and an array of small foramina in the ventral part of the articular surface for the premaxilla. Several features confirm the tetanuran affinities of D. hesperis: a prominent anterior process of the maxilla; the presence of band-like dental enamel wrinkles; the maxillary 'fenestra' is present but takes the form of an imperforate fossa (a spinosauroid synapomorphy); and the paradental groove is wide anteriorly, defining a distinct gap between the interdental plates and the medial wall of the dentary (a synapomorphy of Spinosauridae + Meg- alosauridae).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dentition of Megalosaurid Theropods
    The dentition of megalosaurid theropods CHRISTOPHE HENDRICKX, OCTÁVIO MATEUS, and RICARDO ARAÚJO Hendrickx, C., Mateus, O., and Araújo, R. 2015. The dentition of megalosaurid theropods. Acta Palaeontologica Polo- nica 60 (3): 627–642. Theropod teeth are particularly abundant in the fossil record and frequently reported in the literature. Yet, the dentition of many theropods has not been described comprehensively, omitting details on the denticle shape, crown ornamentations and enamel texture. This paucity of information has been particularly striking in basal clades, thus making identification of isolated teeth difficult, and taxonomic assignments uncertain. We here provide a detailed description of the dentition of Megalosauridae, and a comparison to and distinction from superficially similar teeth of all major theropod clades. Megalosaurid dinosaurs are characterized by a mesial carina facing mesiolabially in mesial teeth, centrally positioned carinae on both mesial and lateral crowns, a mesial carina terminating above the cervix, and short to well-developed in- terdenticular sulci between distal denticles. A discriminant analysis performed on a dataset of numerical data collected on the teeth of 62 theropod taxa reveals that megalosaurid teeth are hardly distinguishable from other theropod clades with ziphodont dentition. This study highlights the importance of detailing anatomical descriptions and providing additional morphometric data on teeth with the purpose of helping to identify isolated theropod teeth in the future. Key words: Theropoda, Tetanurae, Megalosauridae, dentition, teeth, morphometry. Christophe Hendrickx [[email protected]] and Octávio Mateus [[email protected]], Universidade Nova de Lisboa, GeoBioTec (formerly CICEGe), Departamento de Ciências da Terra, Faculdade de Ciências e Tec- nologia, Quinta da Torre, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal; Museu da Lourinhã, 9 Rua João Luis de Moura, 2530-158, Lourinhã, Portugal.
    [Show full text]