Richard Bradley's Illicit Excursion Into Medical Practice in 1714

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Richard Bradley's Illicit Excursion Into Medical Practice in 1714 RICHARD BRADLEY'S ILLICIT EXCURSION INTO MEDICAL PRACTICE IN 1714 by FRANK N. EGERTON III* INTRODUCTION The development of professional ethics, standards, practices, and safeguards for the physician in relation to society is as continuous a process as is the development of medicine itself. The Hippocratic Oath attests to the antiquity of the physician's concern for a responsible code of conduct, as the Hammurabi Code equally attests to the antiquity of society's demand that physicians bear the responsibility of reliable practice." The issues involved in medical ethics and standards will never be fully resolved as long as either medicine or society continue to change, and there is no prospect of either becoming static. Two contemporary illustrations will show the on-going nature of the problems of medical ethics. The first is a question currently receiving international attention and publicity: what safeguards are necessary before a person is declared dead enough for his organs to be transplanted into a living patient? The other illustration does not presently, as far as I know, arouse much concern among physicians: that medical students carry out some aspects of medical practice on charity wards without the patients being informed that these men are as yet still students. Both illustrations indicate, I think, that medical ethics and standards should be judged within their context. If and when a consensus is reached on the criteria of absolute death, the ethical dilemma will certainly be reduced, if not entirely resolved. If and when there is a favourable physician-patient ratio throughout the world and the economics of medical care cease to be a serious problem, then the relationship of medical students to charity patients may become subject to new consideration. In such ways, conditions influence ethics and standards. Armed with this perspective, one will not judge those involved in medicine in the early years of the eighteenth century according to present-day criteria. That was a time when even the best physicians might do more harm than good for their patients; when apothecaries prescribed medicines as well as preparing them; when a medical degree from a British university was not a guarantee of first-hand medical ex- perience; when charlatans and self-made practitioners were often tolerated or con- doned by society; when there were not nearly enough physicians; when many members * I wish to thank Gilman D. Grave, M.D., The National Institutes of Health, for reading this paper and providing many helpful suggestions, and Professor Edward 0. Doughtie, Rice University, for checking several citations for me at the British Museum after my return from there. 1 Henry E. Sigerist, 'The history of medical licensure', J. Am. med. Ass., 1935, 104, 1056-60; reprinted by Milton I. Roemer, ed., Henry E. Sigerist on the Sociology of Medicine, New York, MD Publications, 1960, 308-18. Benjamin Spector, 'The growth of medicine and the letter of the law', Bull. Hist. Med., 1952, 26, 499-525. Richard Harrison Shryock, Medical Licensing in America, 1650-1965, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1967, ch. 1. 53 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.234, on 29 Sep 2021 at 16:44:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300015131 Frank N. Egerton III of the Royal College ofPhysicians were more concerned with establishing an exclusive and profitable guild than they were in raising standards of practice; and when even the flimsy regulations governing medical practice in Britain applied primarily to London and its environs.2 THE BACKGROUND OF BRADLEY'S EXPERIENCE The case of Richard Bradley (1688?-5 November 1732) practising medicine without having had any medical training was not unusual for the times, but it is noteworthy because Bradley was already a Fellow of the Royal Society and was later appointed the first Professor of Botany at Cambridge University. Furthermore, he was later to make significant contributions to biology.3 This case is also interesting because knowledge of it comes from candid private letters rather than from either the public proclamations of a quack or the complaints of physicians or society. As evident from his letters quoted below, Bradley apparently took the role of physician without premeditation because he was susceptible to the flattery of status, he needed money, and the opportunity arose from little effort on his part. Having assumed the role of physician, he did the best he could for the few patients he acquired. Very little is known about Bradley's early years. He apparently came from a middle class family. He spent most of-his adult life in and around London, and it is likely that he was born in that area. If 1688 is his birth date, he must have married before the age of24, because he sent his blessing to his children in a letter dated 11 May O.S. 1714, when he was presumably 26 years old.4 In one of his books he wrote that he had been interested in gardening since childhood,5 but nothing definite is known about his education. Thomas Martyn (1735?-1825), whose father, John Martyn (1699-1768), succeeded Bradley as Professor of Botany at Cambridge University, wrote that 'Bradley was never of any university, and had no education ....'.6 Anything that either of the Martyns said about Bradley is suspect, because John Martyn was jealous of Bradley's professorship and maliciously denigrated both him 'Leter S. King, The Medical World of the Eighteenth Century, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1958. George Clark, A History ofthe Royal College ofPhysicians ofLondon, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1966, vol. 2, chs. 22-27. Cecil Wall, A History of the Worshipful Society of Apothecaries of London 1617-1815, ed. by H. Charles Cameron, revised by E. Ashworth Underwood, London, New York, Toronto, Oxford University Press for The Wellcome Historical Medical Museum, 1963. ' Gordon D. Rowley, 'Introduction', in Richard Bradley, Collected writings on Succulent Plants, London, Gregg Press, 1964, vii-xxiv. Frank N. Egerton, 'Richard Bradley's understanding of biological productivity: a study of 18th century ecological ideas', J. Hist. Blol., 1969, 2, 391-410. Frank N. Egerton, 'Richard Bradley's relationship with Sir Hans Sloane', Notes Rec. R. Soc. Lond., 1970, 5, in press. His birth year is given as 1688 by Donald McDonald, Agricultural Writers, from Sir Walter of Henley to Authur Young, 1200-1800 . ., London, Horace Cox, 1908, 170. The Bradley letters are in the Sloane Manuscripts of the British Museum. Cf. Sloane 3322 fol. 50. The Gregorian Calendar replaced the Julian Calendar throughout Holland by 1700, but not in Britain until 1752. While in Holland Bradley dated his letters either O.S. (Old Style) or N.S. (New Style), indicating respectively the calendars used in Britain and Holland. To minmize confusion, his dating is preserved here. To convert from Old to New Style, add 11 days to the Old Style date. 6 Bradley, New Improvements ofPlanting and Gardening, both Philosophical andPractical; explaining the motion of sap and generation ofplants; with other discoveries..., 3rd ed., 3 pts., London, W. Mears, 1719-20, [viii]. IsLeiter from Thomas Martyn to James Edward Smith, dated 12 April 1818, published by Lady Smith in Memoir and Correspondence of the late Sir James Edward Smith, M.D., 2 vols., London, Longman, 1832, vol. 2, p. 387. 54 Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.234, on 29 Sep 2021 at 16:44:39, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025727300015131 Richard Bradley's Illicit Excursion into Medical Practice in 1714 and others;7 but it is probably true that Bradley attended no university. His writings attest to his having received a fairly good education, but he probably was not an outstanding student; had he been, he might have been granted a university fellowship. Although he wanted to be neither gardener nor farmer, plants remained a dominant interest throughout his life. The main reasons for studying plants at that time were either medicinal or agricultural, but Bradley was one of a growing number of people who were interested in plants primarily for aesthetic and scientific reasons. He probably became a member of the informal Temple Coffee House Botany Club that seems to have orignated in 1689 and persisted until 1717.8 It may have been through this group that he met the affluent apothecary, James Petiver (c. 1663-20 April 1718), who became his mentor. Petiver, a bachelor, was an insatiable collector of res naturae. He was the one most likely responsible for getting Bradley into the Royal Society, which favour was probably granted in hopes that Bradley would repay it by adding to Petiver's collections. This possibility is suggested by the fact that Petiver got Patrick Blair(1666?-1728) into theRoyal Society on the date Bradley joined (1 December 1712), after Blair had added to Petiver's collections.9 In 1714 Bradley went to Holland to obtain biological specimens for himself, Petiver, and others. It is from the letters written during this trip that we gain an insight into Bradley's practice of medicine.10 On this trip he followed in the footsteps of Petiver, who had gone there as the agent of another collector, Dr.Hans Sloane. The contacts Petiver made in 1711 were to be useful to Bradley three years later. In Leiden Petiver made the acquaintance of Dr. Herman Boerhaave (1668-1738), who probably was the one who persuaded the University to confer upon Petiver a Doctor of Medicine degree."1 In Amsterdam Petiver met Dr.
Recommended publications
  • Richard Bradley's Illicit Excursion Into Medical Practice in 1714
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by PubMed Central RICHARD BRADLEY'S ILLICIT EXCURSION INTO MEDICAL PRACTICE IN 1714 by FRANK N. EGERTON III* INTRODUCTION The development of professional ethics, standards, practices, and safeguards for the physician in relation to society is as continuous a process as is the development of medicine itself. The Hippocratic Oath attests to the antiquity of the physician's concern for a responsible code of conduct, as the Hammurabi Code equally attests to the antiquity of society's demand that physicians bear the responsibility of reliable practice." The issues involved in medical ethics and standards will never be fully resolved as long as either medicine or society continue to change, and there is no prospect of either becoming static. Two contemporary illustrations will show the on-going nature of the problems of medical ethics. The first is a question currently receiving international attention and publicity: what safeguards are necessary before a person is declared dead enough for his organs to be transplanted into a living patient? The other illustration does not presently, as far as I know, arouse much concern among physicians: that medical students carry out some aspects of medical practice on charity wards without the patients being informed that these men are as yet still students. Both illustrations indicate, I think, that medical ethics and standards should be judged within their context. If and when a consensus is reached on the criteria of absolute death, the ethical dilemma will certainly be reduced, if not entirely resolved. If and when there is a favourable physician-patient ratio throughout the world and the economics of medical care cease to be a serious problem, then the relationship of medical students to charity patients may become subject to new consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Occasional Papers from the Lindley Library © 2011
    Occasional Papers from The RHS Lindley Library IBRARY L INDLEY L , RHS VOLUME FIVE MARCH 2011 Eighteenth-century Science in the Garden Cover illustration: Hill, Vegetable System, vol. 23 (1773) plate 20: Flower-de-luces, or Irises. Left, Iris tuberosa; right, Iris xiphium. Occasional Papers from the RHS Lindley Library Editor: Dr Brent Elliott Production & layout: Richard Sanford Printed copies are distributed to libraries and institutions with an interest in horticulture. Volumes are also available on the RHS website (www. rhs.org.uk/occasionalpapers). Requests for further information may be sent to the Editor at the address (Vincent Square) below, or by email ([email protected]). Access and consultation arrangements for works listed in this volume The RHS Lindley Library is the world’s leading horticultural library. The majority of the Library’s holdings are open access. However, our rarer items, including many mentioned throughout this volume, are fragile and cannot take frequent handling. The works listed here should be requested in writing, in advance, to check their availability for consultation. Items may be unavailable for various reasons, so readers should make prior appointments to consult materials from the art, rare books, archive, research and ephemera collections. It is the Library’s policy to provide or create surrogates for consultation wherever possible. We are actively seeking fundraising in support of our ongoing surrogacy, preservation and conservation programmes. For further information, or to request an appointment, please contact: RHS Lindley Library, London RHS Lindley Library, Wisley 80 Vincent Square RHS Garden Wisley London SW1P 2PE Woking GU23 6QB T: 020 7821 3050 T: 01483 212428 E: [email protected] E : [email protected] Occasional Papers from The RHS Lindley Library Volume 5, March 2011 B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century Yota Batsaki Dumbarton Oaks
    University of Dayton eCommons Marian Library Faculty Publications The aM rian Library 2017 The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century Yota Batsaki Dumbarton Oaks Sarah Burke Cahalan University of Dayton, [email protected] Anatole Tchikine Dumbarton Oaks Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/imri_faculty_publications eCommons Citation Batsaki, Yota; Cahalan, Sarah Burke; and Tchikine, Anatole, "The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century" (2017). Marian Library Faculty Publications. Paper 28. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/imri_faculty_publications/28 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The aM rian Library at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Library Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century YOTA BATSAKI SARAH BURKE CAHALAN ANATOLE TCHIKINE Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection Washington, D.C. © 2016 Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Batsaki, Yota, editor. | Cahalan, Sarah Burke, editor. | Tchikine, Anatole, editor. Title: The botany of empire in the long eighteenth century / Yota Batsaki, Sarah Burke Cahalan, and Anatole Tchikine, editors. Description: Washington, D.C. : Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, [2016] | Series: Dumbarton Oaks symposia and colloquia | Based on papers presented at the symposium “The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century,” held at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., on October 4–5, 2013. | Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Champions from Normandy 2017
    CHAMPIONS FROM NORMANDY RAFE DE CRESPIGNY CHAMPIONS FROM NORMANDY AN ESSAY ON THE EARLY HISTORY OF THE CHAMPION DE CRESPIGNY FAMILY 1350-1800 AD BY RAFE DE CRESPIGNY SAINT BARBARY LILLI PILLI, NEW SOUTH WALES AUSTRALIA 2017 © Copyright Richard Rafe Champion de Crespigny 2017 FOR THE MEMBERS OF A MOST ENTERPRISING AND ENTERTAINING FAMILY EPIGRAPH: A NOTE ON PRONUNCIATION The "pig" is silent – as in pork: attributed to Constantine Trent Champion de Crespigny (1882-1952) FOREWORD In December 1988 I prepared Champions in Normandy; being some remarks on the early history of the Champion de Crespigny family. Since that time, the internet has made a great deal more material available, and there have been useful publications on French and British history. I have therefore revised and rewritten the earlier work with a slightly different title. While the book is substantially longer, and extends through the eighteenth century, the essentials of the argument in the previous version remain the same: this is the story of a long- lived but essentially minor family in France, just within the fringes of the gentry, whose lineage can be traced in the male line back to the mid-fourteenth century, who prospered from their Huguenot connection, but acquired their greatest good fortune when they were forced into exile in England. Richard Rafe Champion de Crespigny CONTENTS INTRODUCTION: Surname and Shield, Place and Lineage 1 The surname and the shield 1 The sites of Crespigny 6 On genealogy, lineage and family 10 Acknowledgements 10 CHAPTER ONE: The Material
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Virgil's Georgics As a Scientific Text: the Eighteenth
    5HDGLQJ9LUJLO V*HRUJLFVDVD6FLHQWLILF7H[W7KH(LJKWHHQWK&HQWXU\ 'HEDWHEHWZHHQ-HWKUR7XOODQG6WHSKHQ6ZLW]HU )UDQV'H%UX\Q ELH, Volume 71, Number 3, Fall 2004, pp. 661-689 (Article) 3XEOLVKHGE\-RKQV+RSNLQV8QLYHUVLW\3UHVV DOI: 10.1353/elh.2004.0035 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/elh/summary/v071/71.3bruyn.html Access provided by University of Ottawa (22 Apr 2015 19:40 GMT) READING VIRGIL’S GEORGICS AS A SCIENTIFIC TEXT: THE EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY DEBATE BETWEEN JETHRO TULL AND STEPHEN SWITZER BY FRANS DE BRUYN Of all the literary works of classical antiquity, Virgil’s Georgics, a didactic poem on the subject of husbandry written in the years 37–30 B.C., was deemed by eighteenth-century British writers an unparal- leled model of literary perfection. John Dryden esteemed the Georgics “the divinest part of all [Virgil’s] writings,” and Joseph Addison judged it “the most Compleat, Elaborate, and finisht Piece of all Antiquity.”1 The poem prompted a vogue of formal imitations (John Philips’s Cyder [1708], John Dyer’s The Fleece [1757], James Grainger’s Sugar-Cane [1764], among others), but more importantly, it lent classical sanction to two defining trends in eighteenth-century po- etry: its turn to description and to didacticism. The presence of the georgic was also registered in literary forms far beyond poetry, from travelogues, scientific treatises, and manuals of husbandry, to essays, novels, and conduct books. In an age that professed a via media in its ethics, enthusiasms, and allegiances, the georgic proved indispens- able as a mode of literary and cultural mediation, reconciling pastoral ease and epic seriousness, sensory appeal and plain instruction, retirement and engagement, cyclical return and historical progress.
    [Show full text]
  • Authorial Agency in Encyclopedias, Print to Digital
    Textual Curators and Writing Machines: Authorial Agency in Encyclopedias, Print to Digital A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Krista A. Kennedy IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Dr. Laura J. Gurak and Dr. John Logie, Advisors July 2009 © Krista A. Kennedy, July 2009 Creative Commons License: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works Acknowledgments This project would not have been possible without the support and assistance of many people. My advisers, Laura Gurak and John Logie, welcomed me to the department and provided steady support throughout my studies. Their sound advice and quick response times were especially invaluable throughout the dissertation process. This research began in Dr. Logie’s Spring 2005 Authorship seminar during a spirited debate about the impact of technology on authorship constructs, and continued in Dr. Gurak’s seminar on Theory and Research in Internet Studies. Richard Graff’s always smart questions on aspects of rhetorical theory, his own research into material aspects of delivery, and his great attention to detail continue to push me. Michael Hancher pointed me toward the Chambers Cyclopædia and kept his door open to me as I first began to consider the ways it might be compared to Wikipedia. His expertise on book history and the eighteenth century, along with his kindness and unending curiosity, are lasting influences. The department’s Directors of Graduate Study, Art Walzer and Bernadette Longo, have been wonderful advocates. The Writing Studies staff is among the best I’ve known, and I especially thank Mary Wrobel and Shannon Klug for their patience and good humor.
    [Show full text]
  • The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century Yota Batsaki Dumbarton Oaks
    University of Dayton eCommons The aM rian Library/International Marian Research Marian Library/IMRI Faculty Publications Institute 2017 The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century Yota Batsaki Dumbarton Oaks Sarah Burke Cahalan University of Dayton, [email protected] Anatole Tchikine Dumbarton Oaks Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/imri_faculty_publications eCommons Citation Batsaki, Yota; Cahalan, Sarah Burke; and Tchikine, Anatole, "The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century" (2017). Marian Library/IMRI Faculty Publications. Paper 28. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/imri_faculty_publications/28 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the The aM rian Library/International Marian Research Institute at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marian Library/IMRI Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century YOTA BATSAKI SARAH BURKE CAHALAN ANATOLE TCHIKINE Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection Washington, D.C. © 2016 Dumbarton Oaks Trustees for Harvard University, Washington, D.C. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Batsaki, Yota, editor. | Cahalan, Sarah Burke, editor. | Tchikine, Anatole, editor. Title: The botany of empire in the long eighteenth century / Yota Batsaki, Sarah Burke Cahalan, and Anatole Tchikine, editors. Description: Washington, D.C. : Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, [2016] | Series: Dumbarton Oaks symposia and colloquia | Based on papers presented at the symposium “The Botany of Empire in the Long Eighteenth Century,” held at Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, D.C., on October 4–5, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Proc. BSBI 6, 305-324
    tJNIVERSITY O:F BIRMINGHA,M JOHN MARTYN'S BOTANI~Jf&lr~~!El"JCES 305 THE GATEWAY SHREWSBURY JOHN MARTYN'S BOTANICAL SOCIETYI A BIOGRAPHICAL ANALYSIS OF THE MEMBERSHIP By D. E. ALLEN INTRODUCTION The middle years of the eighteenth century, from 1715 to 1770, after the death of Ray and Petiver and before the great surge of interest brought about by the Linnaean System and the Romantic Movement, constitute a relatively little-known period in the history of British botany and indeed a notably quiescent time for the biological science~ in general. It is therefore of considerable moment to discover more about the small Botanical Society that flourished in London between 1721 and 1726, under the secretary­ ship of John Martyn, later Professor of Botany at Cambridge. For not only was this apparently the first formally-constituted body of any stature devoted specifically to botany to exist in Britain, and perhaps even· in the world, but it came into being at a time when interest in the field sciences had at last become sufficiently widespread for its devotees to meet and work in groups, thereby making possible the engendering of a common tradition in field methods, equipment and terminology. It is necessary to qualify the claim made for this Society with the words 'first formally-constituted', in order to take account of the earliest body known to have existed in this field, the Temple Coffee House Botanic Club, lately brought to notice by the re­ searches of Pasti (1950) and Stearns (1953). Unlike the Society examined in this paper, this club appears to have lacked any formal organization and was evidently never more than a loose coterie of friends.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History Bernard Quaritch Ltd Bernard Quaritch Ltd 36 BEDFORD ROW, LONDON, WC1R 4JH
    Natural History Bernard Quaritch Ltd Bernard Quaritch Ltd 36 BEDFORD ROW, LONDON, WC1R 4JH Tel.: +44 (0)20 7297 4888 Fax: +44 (0)20 7297 4866 Email: [email protected] / [email protected] Web: www.quaritch.com Bankers: Barclays Bank PLC 1 Churchill Place London E14 5HP Sort code: 20-65-90 Account number: 10511722 Swift code: BUKBGB22 Sterling account: IBAN GB71 BUKB 2065 9010 5117 22 Euro account: IBAN GB03 BUKB 2065 9045 4470 11 U.S. Dollar account: IBAN GB19 BUKB 2065 9063 9924 44 VAT number: GB 322 4543 31 © Bernard Quaritch Ltd 2020 ANCIENT ANIMAL ANECDOTES 1| AELIANUS, Claudius, Conrad GESSNER (translator), and Pierre GILLES (editor). Περι ζωων ιδιοτητος βιβλιον ιζ … De animalium natura libri XVII … accessit index locupletissimus. Cologny, Philippe Albert, 1616. 16mo, pp. [8], 1018, [94]; text printed in 2 columns, in Latin and Greek, woodcut device to title; lightly browned with a few spots, a few creased corners, several leaves misbound; a good copy in contemporary vellum over boards, borders triple-ruled in blind, spine blind-ruled in compartments and lettered in ink, yapp fore-edges, edges stained red, sewn on 3 thongs; spine lightly dust-stained; contemporary ink inscription ‘Tscherning’ to title. £300 Uncommon Geneva edition of Aelianus’s De animalium natura, the Greek printed in parallel with Gessner’s Latin translation. A third-century work on natural history, Aelianus’s text offers accounts and anecdotes of animals, ‘an appealing collection of facts and fables about the animal kingdom that invites the reader to ponder contrasts between human and animal behaviour’ (Scholfield).
    [Show full text]