DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Scan Edmonton Metropolitan Region Board Final Technical Report ISL Engineering and Land Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Scan Edmonton Metropolitan Region Board Final Technical Report ISL Engineering and Land Services Inspiring sustainable thinking islengineering.com Metropolitan Region Servicing Plan Environmental Scan Edmonton Metropolitan Region Board Final Technical Report ISL Engineering and Land Services February 2019 This page is intentionally left blank. Metropolitan Region Servicing Plan – Environmental Scan Edmonton Metropolitan Region Board – Final Report Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction and Background ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Edmonton Metropolitan Region Board and the Growth Plan 1 1.2 Metropolitan Region Servicing Plan 3 1.3 Environmental Scan 4 1.4 Context 4 2.0 Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Background Reports 5 2.2 GIS 5 2.3 Survey Data 5 2.4 Meetings/Communications 5 2.5 Acknowledgments 6 3.0 Water Servicing ................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Overview – Water Servicing 7 3.2 Current Water Servicing Agreements and Collaboration 7 3.3 Regional Map 9 3.4 Existing Water Infrastructure and Current Service Capacity 10 3.5 Existing Service Level 13 3.6 Current Service Costs 14 3.7 Summary Observations 14 3.8 For Discussion 14 4.0 Wastewater Servicing ........................................................................................................ 15 4.1 Overview – Wastewater Servicing 15 4.2 Current Wastewater Servicing Agreements and Collaboration 15 4.3 Regional Map 17 4.4 Existing Wastewater Infrastructure and Current Service Capacity 18 4.5 Existing Service Level 20 4.6 Current Service Costs 21 4.7 Summary Observations 21 4.8 For Discussion 21 5.0 Stormwater Servicing ......................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Overview – Stormwater Servicing 23 5.2 Current Stormwater Servicing Agreements and Collaboration 23 5.3 Regional Map 25 5.4 Existing Stormwater Infrastructure and Current Service Capacity 26 5.5 Existing Service Level 27 5.6 Current Service Costs 27 5.7 Summary Observations 28 5.8 For Discussion 28 6.0 Transportation – Roads ..................................................................................................... 29 6.1 Overview – Regional Transportation Network 29 6.2 Current Transportation Agreements and Collaboration 31 6.3 Regional Maps 36 6.4 Existing Transportation Infrastructure and Current Service Capacity 39 6.5 Existing Transportation Concerns 40 6.6 Current Service Costs 41 6.7 Summary Observations 42 6.8 For Discussion 42 islengineering.com February 2019 This page is intentionally left blank. Metropolitan Region Servicing Plan – Environmental Scan Edmonton Metropolitan Region Board – Final Report 7.0 Transportation – Transit ..................................................................................................... 44 7.1 Overview – Regional Transit Network 44 7.2 Current Transit Agreements and Collaboration 47 7.3 Regional Map 49 7.4 Existing Regional Transit Infrastructure and Current Service Capacity 50 7.5 Existing Service Level 52 7.6 Current Service Costs 59 7.7 Summary Observations 60 7.9 For Discussion 62 8.0 Solid Waste ....................................................................................................................... 64 8.1 Overview – Solid Waste Servicing 64 8.2 Current Solid Waste Agreements and Collaboration 68 8.4 Regional Map 70 8.5 Existing Solid Waste Infrastructure and Current Service Capacity 71 8.6 Existing Service Level 74 8.7 Current Service Costs 76 8.8 Summary Observations 77 8.9 For Discussion 78 9.0 Emergency Services – Fire ................................................................................................ 80 9.1 Overview – Emergency Services (Fire) 80 9.2 Current Emergency Service Agreements and Collaboration 83 9.3 Regional Map 83 9.4 Existing Emergency Services (Fire) Infrastructure and Current Service Capacity 85 9.5 Existing Service Level 87 9.6 Current Service Costs 89 9.7 Summary Observations 89 9.8 For Discussion 91 10.0 Service Area Profiles ......................................................................................................... 92 10.1 Introduction 92 10.2 Municipal Profiles 92 10.3 Regional Profile 105 10.4 Service Area Profiles 106 islengineering.com February 2019 This page is intentionally left blank. Metropolitan Region Servicing Plan – Environmental Scan Edmonton Metropolitan Region Board – Final Report TABLES Table 3.1: Water Treatment Plants ................................................................................................................................. 10 Table 3.2: Water Pumping Facilities – WTP & Regional Systems ................................................................................ 10 Table 3.3: Water Transmission Mains Servicing Regional Systems ............................................................................ 11 Table 3.4: Water Reservoirs............................................................................................................................................ 12 Table 4.1: Wastewater Treatment Plants ....................................................................................................................... 18 Table 4.2: Wastewater Pumping Facilities Servicing Regional Systems...................................................................... 19 Table 4.3: Wastewater Trunks Servicing Regional Systems......................................................................................... 20 Table 6.1: Projects Ready for Construction .................................................................................................................... 31 Table 6.2: Projects Ready for Design ............................................................................................................................. 32 Table 6.3: Project Functional Planning or Study ............................................................................................................ 33 Table 6.4: Roadway Classification Capacity .................................................................................................................. 39 Table 6.5: Transportation Concerns ............................................................................................................................... 40 Table 6.6: Federal and Provincial Fuel Taxes ................................................................................................................ 41 Table 7.1: Existing Bus Routes ....................................................................................................................................... 50 Table 7.2: Existing Park and Ride Inventory .................................................................................................................. 51 Table 7.3: Frequency Service Levels ............................................................................................................................. 52 Table 7.4: Daily Schedule Service Levels ...................................................................................................................... 53 Table 7.5: Frequency and Scheduling ............................................................................................................................ 53 Table 7.6: Transit to Auto Time Service Levels ............................................................................................................. 55 Table 7.7: Peak Transit to Auto Time ............................................................................................................................. 55 Table 7.9: Park and Ride LOS Tables ............................................................................................................................ 57 Table 7.10: Park and Ride Service Levels ....................................................................................................................... 57 Table 7.11: Peak Utilization Service Levels ..................................................................................................................... 58 Table 7.12: Transit Utilization Service Level .................................................................................................................... 58 Table 7.13: Current Service Costs .................................................................................................................................... 60 Table 8.1: Some Policy Summary................................................................................................................................... 68 Table 8.2: Solid Waste Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................. 71 Table 8.3: Curbside Collection Programs ....................................................................................................................... 74 Table 8.4: Solid Waste – Metrics .................................................................................................................................... 76 Table 8.5: Solid Waste – Expenditures .......................................................................................................................... 77 Table 9.1: Fire Services – Municipal Context ................................................................................................................. 82 Table 9.2:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CO00425 U-Pass Options for Spring and Summer Terms 2021 Report.Pdf
    U-Pass Options for Spring and Summer Terms . 2021 Recommendation That Executive Committee recommend to City Council: That a temporary exemption to City Policy C451H Edmonton Transit Service Fare Policy, for the period April 30, 2021 to August 31, 2021, to allow for fare program eligibility expansions, as outlined in the March 22, 2021, City Operations report CO00425, be approved. Executive Summary The regional Universal Transit Pass (U-Pass) provides eligible students at participating post-secondary institutions with unlimited travel on Edmonton Transit Service (ETS) and participating regional transit providers at a discounted rate for the school term. As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, post-secondary institutions are continuing to deliver learning online and holding a limited number of classes and labs on campus into the spring and summer 2021 terms. Consequently, U-Pass was paused for the fall and winter terms, and that arrangement is recommended to be extended to the spring and summer terms in 2021. Effective September 2020, temporary measures were put in place to support students affected by the pause on U-Pass. These include access to the Ride Transit Program for qualifying students and an expansion of the age eligibility for youth fare products for post-secondary students as well as seniors fare products. Extending these temporary measures for the spring and summer terms would continue to address the gap for affected students. Report The regional Universal Transit Pass (U-Pass) is provided through contractual agreements between Edmonton Transit Service (ETS), St. Albert Transit, Strathcona Transit, Leduc Transit, Fort Saskatchewan Transit, and Spruce Grove Transit and four post-secondary institutions in Edmonton: University of Alberta, MacEwan University, NAIT and NorQuest College.
    [Show full text]
  • Council of Representatives
    Concordia Student Union – Council of Representatives CSU Special Council Meeting – Agenda Thursday, February 27, 2019 CSU Conference Room, 11h30, S.G.W. Campus Updated Agenda 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 3. Establishing Rules for Impeachment Trial 4. Anti-Discrimination Definition and Strategy 5. Exam Conflict Recommendation to Administration 6. Elections Rules 7. UPass (Universal Transit Pass) 8. Adjournment Adjournment Meeting officially called by CSU Councillors James Hanna, Mathew Kaminski and Peter Zhuang as per By-Law 6.6.3. 1. CALL TO ORDER Eduardo calls meeting to order at 11h58 . James Hanna appoints Eduardo Malorni as interim Chair. Seconded. We would like to begin by acknowledging that Concordia University is located on unceded Indigenous lands. The Kanien’kehá:ka Nation is recognized as the custodians of the lands and waters on which we gather today. TiohEá:ke/Montreal is historically known as a gathering place for many First Nations. Today, it is home to a diverse population of Indigenous and other peoples. We respect the continued connections with the past, present, and future in our ongoing relationships with Indigenous and other peoples within the Montreal community. 2. ROLL CALL Council Chairperson: Caitlin Robinson Council Minute Keeper: S Shivaane Executives present for the meeting were: Eduardo Malorni (Student Life Coordinator), Patrick Quinn (Academic & Advocacy Coordinator) Councilors present for the meeting were: Mitchell Schecter (John Molson School of Business), Peter Zhuang (Fine Arts), Hannah Jamet-Lange (Arts & Science), Christiane Sakr (Arts & Science), Lauren Perozek (John Molson School of Business), Sean Howard (Gina Cody School of Engineering & Computer Science), Tzvi Hersh Filler (Gina Cody School of Engineering & Computer Science), Mathew Levitsky-Kaminski (John Molson School of Business), James Hanna (Gina Cody School of Engineering & Computer Science), Jeremya Deneault (John Molson School of Business), Salman Fahim Syed (Gina Cody School of Engineering & Computer Science).
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Cochrane Transit Task Force Local Transit
    TOWN OF COCHRANE TRANSIT TASK FORCE LOCAL TRANSIT SERVICE RECOMMENDATION TO TOWN COUNCIL August 30, 2018 Contents Section 1: INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 Section 2: THE TRANSIT TASK FORCE ....................................................................................................... 8 Section 3: BACKGROUND.......................................................................................................................... 10 3.1 GreenTRIP Funding & Allocation .................................................................................................... 10 3.2 GreenTRIP Funding Conditions ....................................................................................................... 11 Section 4: FINANCIAL RISK ASSESSMENT .............................................................................................. 12 Section 5: PREVIOUS FIXED ROUTE OPTIONS ......................................................................................... 15 Section 6: THE RATIONAL OF PUBLIC TRANSIT ...................................................................................... 18 6.1 Local Transit Initial Assessment of Other Municipalities .............................................................. 18 6.2 Economic Rational for Transit ........................................................................................................ 21 6.3 Regional Traffic Congestion & Time and Fuel Savings ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Transit Report Card of Major Canadian Regions
    2016 Transit Report Card of Major Canadian Regions Commuter rail icons made by Freepik from www.flaticon.com is licensed by CC 3.0 BY. Other icons made by Scott de Jonge from www.flaticon.com is licensed by CC 3.0 BY. Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ About the Author: Nathan has been writing, researching, and talking about issues that affect the livability of Metro Vancouver, with a focus on the South of Fraser, for over 8 years. He has been featured in local, regional, and national media. In 2008, Nathan co-founded South Fraser OnTrax —a sustainable transportation advo- cacy organization— and the Greater Langley Cycling Coalition in 2009. He was recently elected to City of Langley Council earlier this year. Nathan previously published his research on land use and the ALR in his report, “Decade of Exclusions? A Snapshot of the Agricultural Land Reserve from 2000-2009 in the South of Fraser” (2010). He also co-authored “Leap Ahead: A transit plan for Metro Vancouver” with Paul Hills- don in 2013. This plan was a precursor to the Mayors’ Council on Regional Transporta- tion Transit Plan for Metro Vancouver. He also authored last year’s Transit Report Card. Nathan has served on various municipal committees including the Abbotsford Inter-regional Transportation Select Committee and City of Langley Parks and Environ- ment Advisory Committee. Nathan would like to recognize Paul Hillsdon who provided the original concept of this report, and provided research early on in the process.
    [Show full text]
  • Metrobus Market Assessment and Strategic Direc Ons Study
    Metrobus Market Assessment and Strategic Direcons Study FINAL REPORT 2011 St. John’s Transportation Commission (Metrobus) 2011 Market Assessment and Strategic Directions Study – Executive Summary EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STUDY PROCESS Metrobus engaged Dillon Consulting Limited to provide a Market Assessment and Strategic Directions Study for the St. John’s transit system. The need for this study was precipitated by the decline in reported transit ridership since the major service changes in 2007. Both the accuracy of ridership reporting and the integrity of the revenue collection and handling systems were reviewed. As well, a major onboard passenger survey was conducted on March 23rd, 2010 to understand the characteristics of current transit users and to probe their reactions to the recent service changes. Additional surveys were conducted with post secondary students, local businesses and the general public (through the Metrobus web site). Individual stakeholder meetings and focus groups with system personnel and transit users also contributed valuable input to the study. The current services were reviewed by an experienced team of consultants and suggestions offered for system enhancements and productivity improvements. Future transit market opportunities were identified for their potential to generate ridership growth and assessed for the resulting implications on Metrobus. Finally, the material gathered and analyzed was used to assist Metrobus management staff in updating their existing Five Year Strategic Plan for the period 2011 to 2015. KEY FINDINGS Concerning the integrity of the revenue collection and handling systems, the review indicated that there is no cause for concern. Duties are clear and separated, secure processes are in place and revenue is protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report I Action Taken Following the Recommendations from the First Annual Report, September 2011
    Progress Report I Action taken following the recommendations from the First Annual Report, September 2011 November 2012 Progress Report I: Action taken following the recommendations from the First Annual Report. Table of Content I. OC Transpo Universal Transit Pass (U-Pass) • Initial response from SFUO • Update from the Vice President, University Affairs at SFUO, Elizabeth Kessler (October 2012) II. Issue of procedural fairness in the examination of complaints of discrimination • Initial response from Vice-President Academic and Provost of the University, François Houle (August 2011) • Update from the Office of the Vice-President Academic and Provost of the University (October 2012) III. The full participation of students with an auditory disability • Initial response from the Vice-President Academic and Provost of the University, François Houle (August 2011) • Initial response from SFUO • Update from the Office of the Vice-President Academic and Provost of the University (October 2012) • Update from the President of SFUO, Ethan Plato (October 2012) 2 Progress Report I: Action taken following the recommendations from the First Annual Report. I. OC Transpo Universal Transit Pass (U-PASS) The Ombudsperson’s recommendations: 1. Given the complexity of negotiating a single U-Pass between two different service providers, two municipalities in two different provinces, it is recommended that the Student Associations with the support of the University, approach the STO with the goal of negotiating an agreement to procure a U-Pass for Quebec residents within the STO territory. The proposed agreement should then be put to a vote by referendum for Québec STO residents only. 2. Given that the small minority of students residing in Québec but outside the STO territory could not, by virtue of their small number, have a reasonable expectation of influencing the overall vote, and given that they are unlikely to use the U-Pass, they should be given the option to opt-out of the program or should be exempted.
    [Show full text]
  • Committee-Of-The-Whole Meeting Agenda Monday, March 19, 2018 at 5:00 P.M
    COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 AT 5:00 P.M. LEDE ROOM, LEDUC CIVIC CENTRE 1 ALEXANDRA PARK, LEDUC, ALBERTA PAGE 1 Admin. Est. of Time I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA II. ADOPTION OF PREVIOUS NOTES a) Approval of Notes of the Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting held Monday, March 12, 2018 III. DELEGATIONS & PRESENTATIONS IV. BUSINESS ARISING FROM PRESENTATIONS V. IN-CAMERA ITEMS M. Pieters / a) Edmonton International Airport Accord Transit Services and 30 minutes J. Cannon Funding FOIP s. 21, 24 & 25 M. Pieters b) High School Site in Crystal Creek 20 minutes FOIP s. 16, 21, 24 & 25 VI. RISE AND REPORT FROM IN-CAMERA ITEMS VII. REPORTS FROM COMMITTEE & ADMINISTRATION R. Baxter, Principal-In- a) Facilities Master Plan 45 minutes Charge / (FIRST ITEM OF BUSINESS) C. Kjinserdahl, Project Lead / A. Lumby, Urban Designer, HOK, Inc. J. Cannon b) 2018 Tax Review 15 minutes (SECOND ITEM OF BUSINESS) K. Wenzel / c) Leduc Transit Commitment for Smart Fare 10 minutes M. Pieters M. Hay d) 2017 City of Leduc Annual Report 10 minutes I. Sasyniuk / e) Service Level Review Initiatives 20 minutes J. Cannon COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING AGENDA MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2018 AT 5:00 P.M. LEDE ROOM, LEDUC CIVIC CENTRE 1 ALEXANDRA PARK, LEDUC, ALBERTA PAGE 2 C. Chisholm / f) Cannabis Update – Public Use 30 minutes D. Melvie S. Losier g) Cannabis Report – Land Use 45 minutes VIII. GOVERNANCE IX. COUNCIL CALENDAR UPDATES X. INFORMATION ITEMS Councillor a) Oilfield Site 10 minutes T. Lazowski XI. ADJOURNMENT I. APPROVAL OF AGENDA This is your opportunity to make an addition, deletion or revision to the Agenda I c1rvoJ I' UNCONFIRMED Leuuc COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING NOTES MONDAY, MARCH 12, 2018 PAGE19 Present: Mayor B.
    [Show full text]
  • March 24, 2015 9:00 A.M
    Media Release: Friday, March 20, 2015 4:30 p.m. Regional Municipality of Waterloo Planning and Works Committee Agenda Tuesday, March 24, 2015 9:00 a.m. Regional Council Chamber 150 Frederick Street, Kitchener 1. Declarations Of Pecuniary Interest Under The Municipal Conflict Of Interest Act 2. Delegations a) TES-DCS-15-04, Fountain Street Improvements, From Kossuth 1 Road / Fairway Road to Cherry Blossom Road, City of Cambridge – Recommended Design Alternative i. Dan Weinhardt and Dave Harvey, Royal Oak Road Neighbourhood Association 3. Presentations Transportation and Environmental Services Departmental Overview – Thomas Schmidt (Transportation and Transit Services) Consent Agenda Items Items on the Consent Agenda can be approved in one motion of Committee to save time. Prior to the motion being voted on, any member of Committee may request that one or more of the items be removed from the Consent Agenda and voted on separately. 1798720 P&W Agenda - 2 - March 24, 2015 4. Request to Remove Items from Consent Agenda 5. Motion to Approve Items or Receive for Information a) PDL-CPL-15-15, Monthly Report of Development Activity for 35 February 2015 (Approval) b) PDL-CPL-15-16, Year-End 2014 Population and Household 38 Estimates for Waterloo Region (Information) c) PDL-CPL-15-17, 2014 Building Permit Activity and Growth 45 Monitoring (Information) d) TES-TRS-15-06, City of Cambridge - Conestoga College U-Pass 60 Request (Information) e) TES-TRS-15-08 Update on Bike Sharing Initiatives in the Region of 62 Waterloo (Information) f) TES-WAS-15-09.1, Water Efficient Restaurant Certification Program 65 (Approval) g) TES-WAS-15-10.1, Water Efficiency Advisory Committee Terms of 70 Reference 2015 (Approval) Regular Agenda Resumes 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Agenda – Standing Policy Committee on Infrastructure Renewal and Public Works – November 4, 2019
    Agenda – Standing Policy Committee on Infrastructure Renewal and Public Works – November 4, 2019 REPORTS Item No. 3 Negotiation of U-Pass Agreements with University of Manitoba, University of Winnipeg and Red River College WINNIPEG PUBLIC SERVICE RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City enter into four year agreements with the University of Manitoba and the University of Manitoba Students’ Union, the University of Winnipeg and the University of Winnipeg Students’ Association, and Red River College and the Red River College Students’ Association (the “U-Pass Agreements”) for the term September 1, 2020 – May 31, 2024 on the basis of the existing agreements with University of Manitoba, University of Winnipeg and their student associations, as modified by the recommendations set out in this report; 2. That the 2020/2021 U-Pass rate be approved at a rate of $160.75 per term and increase by the rate of inflation annually thereafter; 3. That a second opt-out boundary area defined as outside of the City Boundaries and/or outside of the Perimeter Highway, excluding the area commonly known as St. Norbert, be added as an option for each of the U-Pass Agreements and that each student association be allowed to select either the original or the amended opt-out area that is best suited for their campus for inclusion in their U-Pass Agreement. 4. That a new post-secondary 14-day rolling pass fare product be established and priced at 80% of the cost of a full fare 14-day rolling pass; 5. That, Winnipeg Transit be authorized to increase its staff complement by 4.95 FTE’s for bus operators, maintenance staff and related Inspector/Supervisory/Support staff required for the additional service hours needed from the addition of Red River College students to the U-Pass program; 6.
    [Show full text]
  • City of Spruce Grove 2016 Transit Fare Review
    City of Spruce Grove 2016 Transit Fare Review Prepared by: Patrick Inglis Senior Sustainability Advisor Planning & Infrastructure Table of Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................................2 Current Fare Structure .......................................................................................................................5 Review of Other Fares ........................................................................................................................8 Analysis of Fare Structure ................................................................................................................. 11 The Universal Transit Pass (U-Pass) ................................................................................................... 15 Seniors and Low Income Fares .......................................................................................................... 17 Proposed Fare Structure and Rationale ............................................................................................. 18 1 | P a g e Introduction The primary purpose of collecting transit fares is to have the users pay a portion of the cost of operating and providing the service. The key phrase is “paying a portion”, because very few transit systems achieve full cost recovery from transit fares (Figure 1); costs of capital equipment and operations exceed the recovery of revenue from transit riders. It is also universally agreed by governments
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Commuter Service Assessment Final Report
    Attachment 2 - CR_3564 Regional Commuter Service Assessment Final Report August 2016 Table of Contents 1. Overview 4 2. Key Conclusions and Recommendations 5 3. The Case for Regionalization - Cost and Benefits of Regional Transit 6 4. Elements of Transit Governance 7 5. Governance in Metro Edmonton – Building on a Strong Foundation 9 6. Lessons Learned – Assessment of Peer Regions 12 7. Principles - Good Governance and Entity Design 15 7.1 Principles for Good Transit Governance 16 7.2 Principles for Entity Design 16 8. Proposal for Commuter Service Entity 17 8.1 Service Concept (Long and Near Term) 17 8.2 Entity Mandate, Governance and Cost Sharing 19 8.3 Delivery Model 21 8.4 Phasing and Transition 22 2 List of Tables and Figures Table 1 – Accountability Framework for Transit 8 Table 2 – Decision Accountabilities Under Various Delivery Models 9 Table 3 – Status Quo Governance Model in Metro Region – Accountability Division 10 Figure 4 – Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats Assessment for Metro Region Transit 12 Table 5 – Jurisdiction Assessment 15 Table 6 – Principles for Good Transit Governance 16 Table 7 – Possible Regional Services 18 3 1. Overview The Metro Edmonton Region is growing rapidly, and with the growth comes the need to proactively manage how regional services are delivered. Transportation is one of the most critical services requiring regional coordination. Travel does not respect jurisdictional boundaries. To minimize the negative impacts of growth – sprawl, congestion, emissions and quality of life – and set the Metro Region up to be livable, efficient and globally competitive, requires regional integration of transportation. In March 2016, the Councils of the Cities of St.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release
    U-Pass welcomes three new municipalities November 24, 2016 Starting January 1, 2017, hundreds of post-secondary students from Fort Saskatchewan, Leduc and Spruce Grove will be included in the Universal Transit Pass (U-Pass) program. Post-secondary students who live in the new partner municipalities will now have access to all partner transit services without having to purchase separate fares. Students enrolled in most credit courses at the University of Alberta, MacEwan University, the Northern Alberta Institute of Technology (NAIT) and NorQuest College are eligible for the U-Pass program. “Students who attend a participating post-secondary institution in Edmonton but live outside of the city faced additional daily transit fees in order to reach classes. On the flipside, all students faced the same barrier if they needed to reach surrounding communities for practicums, classes or other activities. Expanding the U- Pass program means more affordable and convenient transit for these students," said Robyn Paches, vice president operations and finance of the University of Alberta Students’ Union. “As our communities continue to grow, participating in the U-Pass program was an easy choice for the municipalities joining the program. It supports the students in our communities who are traveling across city boundaries to create life-changing opportunities for themselves,” said Mayor Gale Katchur of Fort Saskatchewan. “Edmonton is a hub of highly recognized post-secondary institutions. Tens of thousands of students rely on public transit every day, many of them transferring between municipal providers. Expanding the program participation is a great example of the type of regional collaboration we want to see,” noted Edmonton Mayor, Don Iveson.
    [Show full text]