DOCSLIB.ORG

Masters Thesis: Liquid Rocket Analysis (Lira)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Masters Thesis: Liquid Rocket Analysis (Lira) Liquid Rocket Analysis (LiRA) Development of a Liquid Bi-Propellant Rocket Engine Design, Analysis and Optimization Tool R.R.L. Ernst supervisor: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen AE5810 Master of Science Thesis Space Systems Engineering Liquid Rocket Analysis (LiRA) Development of a Liquid Bi-Propellant Rocket Engine Design, Analysis and Optimization Tool Master of Science Thesis AE5810 For the degree of Master of Science in Spaceflight at Delft University of Technology R.R.L. Ernst Student nr. 1539833 supervisor: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen May 8, 2014 Faculty of Aerospace Engineering (AE) · Delft University of Technology Cover photo: Artist’s Impression of Copyright c R.R.L. Ernst an Ariane 5 ECA c ESA-D. Ducros All rights reserved. http://spaceinimages.esa.int/ Delft University of Technology Department of Space Systems Engineering (SSE) The undersigned hereby certify that they have read and recommend to the Faculty of Aerospace Engineering (AE) for acceptance a thesis entitled Liquid Rocket Analysis (LiRA): Development of a Liquid Bi-Propellant Rocket Engine Design, Analysis and Optimization Tool by R.R.L. Ernst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Dated: May 8, 2014 Chairman of thesis committee: Prof.dr. E.K.A. Gill Supervisor of thesis: Ir. B.T.C Zandbergen Member of thesis committee: Dr. A. Gangoli Rao Abstract The need to increase specific impulse of rocket launcher engines has lead design engineers to start development of ever more complex engine cycles starting from simple gas pressure fed engines to the very complex staged combustion cycle en- gines. Currently a wide range of different cycles does exist. These cycles not only differ in terms of performance, but also in terms of mass, cost, reliability etc., which in general makes it difficult to quickly determine which cycle is best suited for a certain mission or task. For this a tool that is capable of analysing different cy- cles and the impact of design choices has been developed. The tool, named LiRA, has as goal giving the user better system level understanding of the different pos- sible engine cycles and the functions of the components; it can therefore provide valuable and time saving assistance during design or in analysis and optimisation studies. A modular approach is applied where engine components are sized using a performance, dimension and mass model who make use of corrected ideal rocket theory and empirical relations. This work focuses mainly on the methodology and the construction of the models, and further includes the optimisation of an upper stage and a verification, validation and uncertainty and sensitivity analysis of the tool and the optimisation to assess its accuracy, precision and applicability. The completed program has proved to confirm known trends and known cycle character- istics like the mass savings that can be achieved when using turbo-pump fed engines instead of pressure fed engines for mid- to high-thrust booster applications. Further the superior performance of closed cycles, especially staged combustion cycles has been confirmed, and some cycle specific design choices like the need of bypasses in expander cycles have been explained. The tool however is not complete and should be expanded; the addition of a cost and reliability assessment model is for example strongly recommended. There also remain issues with the accuracy and uncertainty of certain estimates which make that the current version should only be used for comparative studies. Master of Science Thesis R.R.L. Ernst ii R.R.L. Ernst Master of Science Thesis Table of Contents Acknowledgements vii Glossary ix List of Acronyms..................................... ix List of Symbols..................................... x 1 Introduction 1 2 Literature Study and State of the Art Review5 2-1 Liquid Rocket Engine Cycle Theory........................... 5 2-2 Software Development and Existing Models with Similar Purpose........... 11 2-3 Conclusions on User Requirements and Plan of Approach............... 13 3 Performance Model 17 3-1 Substance Property and Combustion Thermodynamic Data Tables.......... 17 3-2 Thrust Chamber..................................... 20 3-2-1 Main Combustion Chamber and Nozzle.................... 21 3-2-2 Injector..................................... 28 3-3 Heat Exchanger..................................... 31 3-3-1 Enthalpy and Determination of State...................... 33 3-3-2 Heat Transfer.................................. 35 3-3-3 Cooling Channel Geometry, Pressure Loss and Wall Material......... 37 3-3-4 Impact of Number of Segments on Cooling Mechanism............ 38 3-4 Gas Generator or Pre-burner.............................. 38 3-5 Pump.......................................... 42 3-6 Turbine.......................................... 43 Master of Science Thesis R.R.L. Ernst iv Table of Contents 3-6-1 Turbine Power and Required Mass Flow.................... 44 3-6-2 Turbine Efficiency................................ 45 3-6-3 Turbine Pressure Ratio............................. 45 3-6-4 Turbine Functioning within Cycle........................ 46 3-6-5 Turbine Inlet Temperature........................... 46 3-7 Propellant Tanks.................................... 47 3-8 Pressurant Tank..................................... 48 3-9 Feed Lines........................................ 49 3-10 Additional Performance Parameters Calculated..................... 51 3-11 Validity of Performance Model............................. 52 4 Mass and Size Model 55 4-1 Size Model........................................ 55 4-1-1 Overall Engine Size............................... 55 4-1-2 Propellant and Propellant Tank Volume.................... 56 4-1-3 Pressurant and Pressurant Tank Volume.................... 57 4-1-4 Nozzle...................................... 59 4-1-5 Combustion Chamber.............................. 61 4-1-6 Gas Generator or Pre-burner.......................... 61 4-1-7 Turbo-pump................................... 62 4-2 Mass Model....................................... 62 4-2-1 Overall Engine Mass............................... 64 4-2-2 Propellant Tank and Pressurant Tank Mass.................. 64 4-2-3 Stage Dry Mass................................. 65 4-2-4 Propellant Mass................................. 66 4-2-5 Pressurant Mass................................. 66 4-2-6 Thrust Chamber................................. 66 4-2-7 Gas Generator or Pre-burner.......................... 67 4-2-8 Turbo-Pump................................... 68 4-3 Validity of Mass and Size Model............................ 69 5 Program Set-up 71 5-1 Engine Analysis Calculation Order........................... 71 5-2 Model Parameters.................................... 72 5-3 Overview of Typical, Calculated and Assumed Parameter Values Used in LiRA.... 74 5-4 Overview Components.................................. 74 5-5 Model Output...................................... 77 5-6 Balancing of Propulsion System............................. 78 5-6-1 Thrust Chamber Assembly Calculation Routine................ 78 5-6-2 Balancing of the Feed System in the Presure-fed Cycle............ 78 R.R.L. Ernst Master of Science Thesis Table of Contents v 5-6-3 Balancing of the Feed System in the Gas Generator Cycle........... 80 5-6-4 Balancing of the Feed System in the Staged Combustion Cycle........ 80 5-6-5 Balancing of the Closed Expander Cycle.................... 81 5-6-6 Balancing of the Feed System in the Bleed Expander Cycle.......... 81 5-7 Overview Developed Code................................ 82 5-8 Large Figures and Tables................................ 82 6 Important General Statistical Analysis Theory Used for Verification, Validation and Sensitivity Analysis 95 6-1 Verification and Validation............................... 96 6-2 Sensitivity Analysis................................... 97 6-3 Data Interpretation and Acceptance.......................... 97 6-4 Repeatability or reproducibility............................. 98 6-5 Large Figures and Tables................................ 98 7 Verification and Validation of LiRA 101 7-1 Verification........................................ 102 7-1-1 Checking of Model Code on Errors by Comparison of Results with Hand Calculations................................... 102 7-1-2 Tool Build-up Structure, Operation, Input and Output Comparison with Other Similar Software................................. 103 7-1-3 Comparison of test cases with other models.................. 103 7-2 Validation........................................ 111 7-3 Conclusions on Verification and Validation....................... 111 7-4 Large Figures and Tables................................ 113 8 Optimisation with LiRA 123 8-1 Optimisation Rationale................................. 124 8-2 Optimisation Methods.................................. 124 8-3 Optimisation Routine.................................. 125 8-4 Precision and Reproducibility of Results and Impact of Allowed Tolerance in Require- ments and Number of Samples Used on the Outcome................. 127 8-5 Example Optimisation of an Upper Stage....................... 128 8-5-1 Requirements and Constraints......................... 128 8-5-2 Results for a Stage with a Gas Generator Cycle................ 129 8-5-3 Results for Other Cycles............................. 134 8-5-4 Discussion of Results for All Cycles....................... 134 8-6 Validity of Optimisation................................. 138 8-7 Large Figures and Tables................................ 138 Master of Science
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-173 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) Numerical Investigation of a 7-Element GOX/GCH4 Subscale Combustion Chamber ? ? ? Daniel Eiringhaus †, Daniel Rahn‡, Hendrik Riedmann , Oliver Knab and Oskar Haidn‡ ?ArianeGroup Robert-Koch-Straße 1, 82024 Taufkirchen, Germany ‡Institute of Turbomachinery and Flight Propulsion (LTF), Technische Universität München (TUM) Boltzmannstr. 15, 85748 Garching, Germany [email protected] †Corresponding author Abstract For future liquid rocket engines methane has become the focus of several studies on alternative fuels in the western hemisphere. At ArianeGroup numerical simulation tools have been established as a powerful instrument in the design process. In order to achieve the same confidence level for CH4/O2 as for H2/O2 combustion, the applied numerical models have to be adapted and validated against sufficient test data. At the Chair of Space Propulsion at the Technical University of Munich (TUM) several combustion cham- bers have been designed and tests at different operating points have been conducted. In this paper one of these subscale combustion chambers with calorimetric cooling and seven shear coaxial injection elements running on gaseous methane and oxygen is used to examine ArianeGroup’s in-house tools for combustion chamber performance analysis. 1. Introduction Current development programs in many space-faring nations focus on launchers utilizing a propellant combination of liquid oxygen (LOX) and liquid methane (CH4). In Europe, hydrocarbons have been identified as an alternative fuel in the frame of the Future Launcher Preparatory Programme (FLPP).14, 23 Major industrial development of methane / oxy- gen rocket engines is ongoing in the United States at SpaceX with the Raptor engine (staged combustion), at Blue Origin with the BE-4 engine (staged combustion) and in Europe at ArianeGroup with the Prometheus engine (gas gen- erator).
    [Show full text]
  • Qualification Over Ariane's Lifetime
    r bulletin 94 — may 1998 Qualification Over Ariane’s Lifetime A. González Blázquez Directorate of Launchers, ESA, Paris M. Eymard Groupe Programme CNES/Arianespace, Evry, France Introduction Similarly, the RL10 engine on the Centaur stage The primary objectives of the qualification of the Atlas launcher has been the subject of an activities performed during the operational ongoing improvement programme. About 5000 lifetime of a launcher are: tests were performed before the first flight, and – to verify the qualification status of the vehicle 4000 during the subsequent ten years. – to resolve any technical problems relating to subsystem operations on the ground or in On-going qualification activities of a similar flight. nature were started for the Ariane-3 and 4 launchers in 1986, and for Ariane-5 in 1996. Before focussing on the European family of They can be classified into two main launchers, it is perhaps informative to review categories: ‘regular’ and ‘one-off’. just one or two of the US efforts in the area of solid and liquid propulsion in order to put the Ariane-3/4 accompanying activities Ariane-related activities into context. Regular activities These activities are mainly devoted to In principle, the development programme for a launcher ends with the verification of the qualification status of the qualification phase, after which it enters operational service. In various launcher subsystems. They include the practice, however, the assessment of a launcher’s reliability is a following work packages: continuing process and qualification-type activities proceed, as an – Periodic sampling of engines: one HM7 and extension of the development programme (as is done in aeronautics), one Viking per year, tested to the limits of the over the course of the vehicle’s lifetime.
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20160008869 2019-08-29T17:47:59+00:00Z CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost.
    [Show full text]
  • IAF Space Propulsion Symposium 2019
    IAF Space Propulsion Symposium 2019 Held at the 70th International Astronautical Congress (IAC 2019) Washington, DC, USA 21 -25 October 2019 Volume 1 of 2 ISBN: 978-1-7138-1491-7 Printed from e-media with permission by: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 Some format issues inherent in the e-media version may also appear in this print version. Copyright© (2019) by International Astronautical Federation All rights reserved. Printed with permission by Curran Associates, Inc. (2020) For permission requests, please contact International Astronautical Federation at the address below. International Astronautical Federation 100 Avenue de Suffren 75015 Paris France Phone: +33 1 45 67 42 60 Fax: +33 1 42 73 21 20 www.iafastro.org Additional copies of this publication are available from: Curran Associates, Inc. 57 Morehouse Lane Red Hook, NY 12571 USA Phone: 845-758-0400 Fax: 845-758-2633 Email: [email protected] Web: www.proceedings.com TABLE OF CONTENTS VOLUME 1 PROPULSION SYSTEM (1) BLUE WHALE 1: A NEW DESIGN APPROACH FOR TURBOPUMPS AND FEED SYSTEM ELEMENTS ON SOUTH KOREAN MICRO LAUNCHERS ............................................................................ 1 Dongyoon Shin KEYNOTE: PROMETHEUS: PRECURSOR OF LOW-COST ROCKET ENGINE ......................................... 2 Jérôme Breteau ASSESSMENT OF MON-25/MMH PROPELLANT SYSTEM FOR DEEP-SPACE ENGINES ...................... 3 Huu Trinh 60 YEARS DLR LAMPOLDSHAUSEN – THE EUROPEAN RESEARCH AND TEST SITE FOR CHEMICAL SPACE PROPULSION SYSTEMS ....................................................................................... 9 Anja Frank, Marius Wilhelm, Stefan Schlechtriem FIRING TESTS OF LE-9 DEVELOPMENT ENGINE FOR H3 LAUNCH VEHICLE ................................... 24 Takenori Maeda, Takashi Tamura, Tadaoki Onga, Teiu Kobayashi, Koichi Okita DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF BOOSTER STAGE LIQUID ROCKET ENGINE OF KSLV-II PROGRAM .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cryogenic Technology & Rocket Engines
    ISSN (O): 2393-8609 International Journal of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering Volume 2 – No.5, August 2015 Cryogenic Technology & Rocket Engines AKHIL GARG KARTIK JAKHU KISHAN SINGH ABHINAV B.Tech – Aerospace B.Tech – Aerospace B.Tech – Aerospace MAURYA Engg. Engg. Engg. B.Tech – Aerospace PUNJAB PUNJAB PUNJAB Engg. TECHNICAL TECHNICAL TECHNICAL PUNJAB UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY, TECHNICAL JALANDHAR JALANDHAR JALANDHAR UNIVERSITY, akhilgarg.313@g kartik.lphawk@g kishansngh1996 JALANDHAR mail.com mail.com @gmail.com abhinavguru123 @gmail.com ABSTRACT 3.2 What is Cryogenic Rocket Engine? This paper is all about the rocket engine involving the use of A cryogenic rocket engine is a rocket engine that cryogenic technology at a cryogenic temperature (123K). This uses a cryogenic fuel or oxidizer, that is, its fuel or basically uses the liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen as an oxidizer (or both) is gases liquefied and stored at oxidizer and fuel, which are very clean and non-pollutant very low temperatures. Notably, these engines were fuels compared to other hydrocarbon fuels like petrol, diesel, one of the main factors of the ultimate success in gasoline, LPG, CNG, etc., sometimes, liquid nitrogen is also reaching the Moon by the Saturn V rocket. used as an fuel. During World War II, when powerful rocket engines were first considered by the German, American and Keywords Soviet engineers independently, all discovered that Rocket engine, Cryogenic technology, Cryogenic temperature, rocket engines need high mass flow rate of both Liquid hydrogen and Oxygen. oxidizer and fuel to generate a sufficient thrust. At that time oxygen and low molecular weight 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Regenerative Cooling in Liquid Propellant Rocket Engines
    ANALYSIS OF REGENERATIVE COOLING IN LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINES A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF NATURAL AND APPLIED SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MUSTAFA EMRE BOYSAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DECEMBER 2008 Approval of the thesis: ANALYSIS OF REGENERATIVE COOLING IN LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINES submitted by MUSTAFA EMRE BOYSAN ¸ in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering Department, Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Canan ÖZGEN Dean, Gradute School of Natural and Applied Sciences Prof. Dr. Süha ORAL Head of Department, Mechanical Engineering Assoc. Prof. Dr. Abdullah ULAŞ Supervisor, Mechanical Engineering Dept., METU Examining Committee Members: Prof. Dr. Haluk AKSEL Mechanical Engineering Dept., METU Assoc. Prof. Dr. Abdullah ULAŞ Mechanical Engineering Dept., METU Prof. Dr. Hüseyin VURAL Mechanical Engineering Dept., METU Asst. Dr. Cüneyt SERT Mechanical Engineering Dept., METU Dr. H. Tuğrul TINAZTEPE Roketsan Missiles Industries Inc. Date: 05.12.2008 I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Mustafa Emre BOYSAN Signature : iii ABSTRACT ANALYSIS OF REGENERATIVE COOLING IN LIQUID PROPELLANT ROCKET ENGINES BOYSAN, Mustafa Emre M. Sc., Department of Mechanical Engineering Supervisor: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Abdullah ULAŞ December 2008, 82 pages High combustion temperatures and long operation durations require the use of cooling techniques in liquid propellant rocket engines.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Analysis of a LOX/Methane Expander Bleed Engine
    DOI: 10.13009/EUCASS2017-332 7TH EUROPEAN CONFERENCE FOR AERONAUTICS AND AEROSPACE SCIENCES (EUCASS) DOI: ADD DOINUMBER HERE Basic Analysis of a LOX/Methane Expander Bleed Engine ? ? ? Marco Leonardi , Francesco Nasuti † and Marcello Onofri ?Sapienza University of Rome Via Eudossiana 18, Rome, Italy [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] · · †Corresponding author Abstract As present trends in rocket engine development recommend overall simplicity and reliability as the main design driver, while preserving high performance, expander cycle engines based on the oxygen-methane pair have been considered as a possible upper stage option. A closed expander cycle is considered for Vega Evolution upper stage, while there are no studies published in the literature on methane-based expander bleed cycles. A basic cycle analysis is presented to evaluate the performance of an oxygen/methane ex- pander bleed cycle for an engine of 100 kN thrust class. Results show the feasibility of the system and its peculiarities with respect to the better known expander bleed cycle based on hydrogen. 1. Introduction The high chamber pressure required to achieve high specific impulse in liquid propellant rocket engines (LRE), has been efficiently obtained by pump-fed systems. Different solutions have been proposed since the beginning of space age and just a few of them has found its own field of application. In these systems the pumps are driven by gas turbines whose power comes from two possible sources: combustion or cooling system. The different needs for the specific applications (booster, sustainer or upper stage of different classes of rockets) led to classify pump-fed LRE systems in open and closed cycles, which differ because of turbine discharge pressure.14, 16 Closed cycles are those providing the best performance because the whole propellant mass flow rate is exploited in the main chamber.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Shuttle Main Engine Orientation
    BC98-04 Space Transportation System Training Data Space Shuttle Main Engine Orientation June 1998 Use this data for training purposes only Rocketdyne Propulsion & Power BOEING PROPRIETARY FORWARD This manual is the supporting handout material to a lecture presentation on the Space Shuttle Main Engine called the Abbreviated SSME Orientation Course. This course is a technically oriented discussion of the SSME, designed for personnel at any level who support SSME activities directly or indirectly. This manual is updated and improved as necessary by Betty McLaughlin. To request copies, or obtain information on classes, call Lori Circle at Rocketdyne (818) 586-2213 BOEING PROPRIETARY 1684-1a.ppt i BOEING PROPRIETARY TABLE OF CONTENT Acronyms and Abbreviations............................. v Low-Pressure Fuel Turbopump............................ 56 Shuttle Propulsion System................................. 2 HPOTP Pump Section............................................ 60 SSME Introduction............................................... 4 HPOTP Turbine Section......................................... 62 SSME Highlights................................................... 6 HPOTP Shaft Seals................................................. 64 Gimbal Bearing.................................................... 10 HPFTP Pump Section............................................ 68 Flexible Joints...................................................... 14 HPFTP Turbine Section......................................... 70 Powerhead...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions to the Time Lag Models for Practical Application to Rocket
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of Engineering EXTENSIONS TO THE TIME LAG MODELS FOR PRACTICAL APPLICATION TO ROCKET ENGINE STABILITY DESIGN A Dissertation in Mechanical Engineering by Matthew J. Casiano © 2010 Matthew J. Casiano Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2010 The dissertation of Matthew J. Casiano was reviewed and approved* by the following: Domenic A. Santavicca Professor of Mechanical Engineering Co-chair of Committee Vigor Yang Adjunct Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dissertation Advisor Co-chair of Committee Richard A. Yetter Professor of Mechanical Engineering André L. Boehman Professor of Fuel Science and Materials Science and Engineering Tomas E. Nesman Aerospace Engineer at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center Special Member Karen A. Thole Professor of Aerospace Engineering Head of the Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT The combustion instability problem in liquid-propellant rocket engines (LREs) has remained a tremendous challenge since their discovery in the 1930s. Improvements are usually made in solving the combustion instability problem primarily using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and also by testing demonstrator engines. Another approach is to use analytical models. Analytical models can be used such that design, redesign, or improvement of an engine system is feasible in a relatively short period of time. Improvements to the analytical models can greatly aid in design efforts. A thorough literature review is first conducted on liquid-propellant rocket engine (LRE) throttling. Throttling is usually studied in terms of vehicle descent or ballistic missile control however there are many other cases where throttling is important.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Study of the Combustion Efficiency in Multi-Element Gas
    energies Article Experimental Study of the Combustion Efficiency in Multi-Element Gas-Centered Swirl Coaxial Injectors Seongphil Woo 1,* , Jungho Lee 1,2, Yeoungmin Han 2 and Youngbin Yoon 1,3 1 Department of Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea; [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Y.Y.) 2 Korea Aerospace Research Institute, Daejeon 34133, Korea; [email protected] 3 Institute of Advanced Aerospace Technology, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 October 2020; Accepted: 16 November 2020; Published: 19 November 2020 Abstract: The effects of the momentum-flux ratio of propellant upon the combustion efficiency of a gas-centered-swirl-coaxial (GCSC) injector used in the combustion chamber of a full-scale 9-tonf staged-combustion-cycle engine were studied experimentally. In the combustion experiment, liquid oxygen was used as an oxidizer, and kerosene was used as fuel. The liquid oxygen and kerosene burned in the preburner drive the turbine of the turbopump under the oxidizer-rich hot-gas condition before flowing into the GCSC injector of the combustion chamber. The oxidizer-rich hot gas is mixed with liquid kerosene passed through combustion chamber’s cooling channel at the injector outlet. This mixture has a dimensionless momentum-flux ratio that depends upon the dispensing speed of the two fluids. Combustion tests were performed under varying mixture ratios and combustion pressures for different injector shapes and numbers of injectors, and the characteristic velocities and performance efficiencies of the combustion were compared. It was found that, for 61 gas-centered swirl-coaxial injectors, as the moment flux ratio increased from 9 to 23, the combustion-characteristic velocity increased linearly and the performance efficiency increased from 0.904 to 0.938.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shuttle Hypersonics Before
    Hypersonics Before the Shuttle A Concise History of the X-15 Research Airplane Dennis R. Jenkins Monographs in Aerospace History Number 18 June 2000 NASA Publication SP-2000-4518 Hypersonics Before the Shuttle A Concise History of the X-15 Research Airplane Dennis R. Jenkins Monographs in Aerospace History Number 18 June 2000 NASA Publication SP-2000-4518 National Aeronautics and Space Administration NASA Office of Policy and Plans NASA History Office NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C. 20546 The use of trademarks or names of manufacturers in this monograph is for accurate reporting and does not constitute an official endorsement, either expressed or implied, of such products or manufacturers by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Jenkins, Dennis R. Hypersonics before the shuttle A concise history of the X-15 research airplane / by Dennis R. Jenkins p. cm. -- (Monographs in aerospace history ; no. 18) (NASA history series) (NASA publication ; SP-2000-4518) Includes index. 1. X-15 (Rocket aircraft)--History. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: NASA history series IV. NASA SP ; 2000-4518. TL789.8.U6 X553 2000 629.133’38--dc21 00-038683 Table of Contents Preface Introduction and Author’s Comments . 4 Chapter 1 The Genesis of a Research Airplane . 7 Chapter 2 X-15 Design and Development . 21 Chapter 3 The Flight Research Program . 45 Chapter 4 The Legacy of the X-15 . 67 Appendix 1 Resolution Adopted by NACA Committee on Aerodynamics . 85 Appendix 2 Signing the Memorandum of Understanding . 86 Appendix 3 Preliminary Outline Specification . 92 Appendix 4 Surveying the Dry Lakes .
    [Show full text]
  • Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems
    CHAPTER 12 Materials for Liquid Propulsion Systems John A. Halchak Consultant, Los Angeles, California James L. Cannon NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, Huntsville, Alabama Corey Brown Aerojet-Rocketdyne, West Palm Beach, Florida 12.1 Introduction Earth to orbit launch vehicles are propelled by rocket engines and motors, both liquid and solid. This chapter will discuss liquid engines. The heart of a launch vehicle is its engine. The remainder of the vehicle (with the notable exceptions of the payload and guidance system) is an aero structure to support the propellant tanks which provide the fuel and oxidizer to feed the engine or engines. The basic principle behind a rocket engine is straightforward. The engine is a means to convert potential thermochemical energy of one or more propellants into exhaust jet kinetic energy. Fuel and oxidizer are burned in a combustion chamber where they create hot gases under high pressure. These hot gases are allowed to expand through a nozzle. The molecules of hot gas are first constricted by the throat of the nozzle (de-Laval nozzle) which forces them to accelerate; then as the nozzle flares outwards, they expand and further accelerate. It is the mass of the combustion gases times their velocity, reacting against the walls of the combustion chamber and nozzle, which produce thrust according to Newton’s third law: for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. [1] Solid rocket motors are cheaper to manufacture and offer good values for their cost. Liquid propellant engines offer higher performance, that is, they deliver greater thrust per unit weight of propellant burned.
    [Show full text]