DOCSLIB.ORG

Cell Signaling: an Overview

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cell Signaling: an Overview Oncogene (1998) 17, 1329 ± 1330 1998 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0950 ± 9232/98 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/onc Cell Signaling: An overview N Dhanasekaran Fels Institute for Cancer Research and Molecular Biology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19140 USA Keywords: signal transduction; receptors; G proteins; recount the mechanisms through which the receptor GTPases; kinases; oncogenes tyrosine kinase accomplishes the same goal by recruiting both similar and dierent sets of signaling molecules. In another article Tamir and Cambier Signal transduction is one of the fundamental processes describe how antigen receptors transmit signals of living cells being second in importance only to cell primarily by using the non-receptor tyrosine kinases division. From the unicellular organism to multicellular belonging to the Src-family of non receptor kinases. organism, evolution has molded a diverse array of Cell proliferation, dierentiation, and apoptosis often novel motifs and mechanisms to ensure that cells can involve changes in cell adhesion properties and eciently adapt to their environment. A multitude of modulation of cell volume and cell shape. Integrin signaling circuits has evolved to process the signals receptors play a cardinal role in regulating the involved in extra-, intra- and inter-cellular communica- cytoskeletal responses involved in these processes. In tions. Cells respond to some types of signals by starting his review, Chandra Kumar narrates the various to proliferate, to others by initiating dierentiation, signaling mechanisms through which the integrin and to a few by committing themselves to die. Thus, receptors modulate dierent cytoskeletal components. the signaling mechanisms that are present in a cell play As highlighted by these reviews, it is interesting to note a major role in all phases of its life. A basic biological that the diverse signaling pathways regulated by the signaling unit consists of three distinct functional respective receptors utilize unique as well as over- components: a signal-receiver/discriminator, a signal- lapping sets of signaling molecules. While the unique transducer, and a signal-ampli®er. A schematic picture sets of regulatory molecules insulate the respective of cell signaling pathways often depicts these functional signaling pathway from the `noise' of adjacent path- components as being organized as dierent discrete ways, the overlapping sets of regulatory molecules signaling units, each of them involved in a speci®c (such as small GTPases, tyrosine kinases, and kinase pathway. However, recent studies from several signaling-modules) integrate cell signaling between laboratories have broadened this view. The emerging these dierent signaling pathways. The next series of map of the signaling pathways identi®es a myriad of articles describe molecular mechanisms mediated by molecules that interact and interface with dierent `signal insulators' and `signal integrators.' signaling pathways to form a signaling network Signaling by the heterotrimeric G proteins appears integrating multiple receptors, signal-transducers, and to be predominantly used by the GPCRs whereas small second messengers. The major theme of the collection GTPase such Ras, Rac, and Rho are universally used of reviews presented here focuses on the mechanisms by many dierent receptor systems. Therefore, to a by which dierent receptors and signal-transducers certain extent, one can categorize the heterotrimeric G regulate signal-integration to form the well coordinated proteins as signal insulators and the small GTPase as signaling networks involved in cell proliferation, signal integrators. The critical and unique signaling oncogenesis, and apoptosis. Each author traces this roles played by the dierent a-subunits of the signaling-network from his/her own unique vantage heterotrimeric G proteins are detailed in the article point. presented by Oermanns and Simon. In this review, Regulation of cell growth can be mediated by the authors describe the role of individual a-subunits in receptors belonging to dierent super families that regulating both developmental and behavioral re- include G protein-coupled receptors, receptor tyrosine sponses derived from the recently carried-out gene kinases, cytokine receptors, cell adhesion receptors, knock-out studies from several laboratories including and antigen receptors. Cell signaling mechanisms that theirs. In the following article, the possible mechanisms originate from these diverse receptors are presented in by which the a- and the bg-subunits of the the ®rst four articles of this issue. Although the authors heterotrimeric G proteins regulate small GTPases and of these articles look at signaling from its origin (i.e. non-receptor kinases, thus interfacing with the signal- cell surface receptors), by no means are their views ing-modules that are activated by receptor tyrosine limited to receptors alone. In fact, all of these articles kinases are described. All these reviews unequivocally trace the signaling routes from the cell surface point to the Ras- and Rho- family of small GTPases as receptors to the nuclear events leading to cell the critical signaling terminals through which signals to proliferation through the maze of small GTPases, dierent target-destinations are shuttled and relayed kinase signaling-modules, non-receptor tyrosine ki- through other signaling modules. Channing Der and nases, and transcription factors. In the ®rst article, his colleagues, in two articles, describe how the diverse Silvio Gutkind describes the diverse mechanisms by mechanisms by which Ras- and Rho-family of which G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate GTPases virtually regulate all the phases of cell signal transduction and signal integration to promote growth. Not surprisingly, being such an essential cell growth. In the next article, Porter and Vaillancourt conduit for multiple signaling pathways, these Cell signaling: An overview NDhanasekaran 1330 GTPases have remained for many years as the and oncogenesis. However, it has been noticed that the potential targets of several drug discovery programs. deprivation of proliferative/survival signals or the The articles by Campbell et al. as well as Lebowitz and asynchronous activation of some of these signals have Prendergast discuss the probability of success in using been known to commit cells to programmed cell death these loci as therapeutic targets for drug discovery. or apoptosis. In addition, the novel family of death The small GTPases transmit their signals to the receptors such as Fas and Trail are speci®cally involved nucleus through sequentially phosphorylating kinases in the activation of apoptosis. While dierent sets of collectively known as kinase signaling-module. A signaling-molecules belonging to the BCL2-family of typical kinase-module consists of a central dual- proteins and caspases play a predominant role in speci®city kinase ¯anked by Ser/Thr kinases on its apoptotic signaling, it is noteworthy that the JNK- upstream and downstream. To date, only three distinct signaling module, especially the upstream kinase kinase-modules namely JNK-, ERK- and p38MAPK- MEKK, plays a major role in the initiation as well modules have been fully characterized in mammalian as the progression of apoptosis. In their article, Gary cells. However, the identi®cation of several dierent Johnson and his colleagues summarize these inter- isoforms of the constituent kinases of these signaling relationships between cell survival-, proliferative- and modules attest to the fact that there may be more apoptotic-pathways. In the last article, Ronai describes hitherto uncharacterized kinase-modules. The current how `targeted-ubiquitination' and degradation of state of our knowledge regarding these kinase signaling proteins can play a signi®cant role in cell signaling-modules is discussed in the article by signaling. Dhanasekaran and Reddy. Of these kinase modules, A critical survey of cell signaling often reveals the the archetypal kinase module is that of ERK. ERK- presence of functional and molecular redundancy along signaling module consists of a Ser/Thr kinase Raf, a with apparent co-incidental signaling, signaling cross- middle dual speci®city kinase MEK, and a downstream talk and signal overlapping. However, a closer look at kinase ERK (belonging to the family of MAP kinases). the individual signaling pathways as presented by the Raf, the upstream kinase in the ERK-module is authors in these articles indicates that the mechanisms predominantly activated by Ras through its physical involved in signal integration (between dierent path- interaction. Subsequent sequential phosphorylation of ways) is as important as the mechanism of signal the constituent kinases of the ERK module and the transduction. Considering the complex machinery activation of TCFs ultimately leads to cell prolifera- needed to be activated during the dierent phases of tion. Although the mechanism through which Ras cell growth, some of the observed co-incidental activates ERK-signaling module has been known for a signaling, signal overlapping, and molecular redun- while, only recent studies have indicated that signals dancy may be intended mechanisms involved in signal- from Raf-MEK-ERK module are translated into integration. Furthermore, the observations that the growth promotion via the activation of cell-cycle multiple eector molecules can be activated by a single proteins. The review by Kerkho and Rapp illustrates
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in Cancer
    Oncogene (2010) 29, 5346–5358 & 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0950-9232/10 www.nature.com/onc REVIEW Extracellular adenosine triphosphate and adenosine in cancer J Stagg and MJ Smyth Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) is actively released in the mulated the hypothesis of purinergic neurotransmission extracellular environment in response to tissue damage (Burnstock, 1972). Burnstock’s hypothesis that ATP and cellular stress. Through the activation of P2X and could be released by cells to perform intercellular P2Y receptors, extracellular ATP enhances tissue repair, signaling was initially met with skepticism, as it seemed promotes the recruitment of immune phagocytes and unlikely that a molecule that acts as an intracellular dendritic cells, and acts as a co-activator of NLR family, source of energy would also function as an extracellular pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes. messenger. Nevertheless, Burnstock pursued his work The conversion of extracellular ATP to adenosine, in and, together with Che Su and John Bevan, reported contrast, essentially through the enzymatic activity of the that ATP was also released from sympathetic nerves ecto-nucleotidases CD39 and CD73, acts as a negative- during stimulation (Su et al., 1971). Three decades later, feedback mechanism to prevent excessive immune responses. following the cloning and characterization of ATP and Here we review the effects of extracellular ATP and adenosine adenosine cell surface receptors, purinergic signaling is a on tumorigenesis. First, we summarize the functions of well-established concept and constitutes an expanding extracellular ATP and adenosine in the context of tumor field of research in health and disease, including cancer immunity.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid Metabolic Reprogramming: Role in Melanoma Progression and Therapeutic Perspectives
    cancers Review Lipid metabolic Reprogramming: Role in Melanoma Progression and Therapeutic Perspectives 1, 1, 1 2 1 Laurence Pellerin y, Lorry Carrié y , Carine Dufau , Laurence Nieto , Bruno Ségui , 1,3 1, , 1, , Thierry Levade , Joëlle Riond * z and Nathalie Andrieu-Abadie * z 1 Centre de Recherches en Cancérologie de Toulouse, Equipe Labellisée Fondation ARC, Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées, Université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier, Inserm 1037, 2 avenue Hubert Curien, tgrCS 53717, 31037 Toulouse CEDEX 1, France; [email protected] (L.P.); [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (C.D.); [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (T.L.) 2 Institut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, CNRS, Université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier, UMR 5089, 205 Route de Narbonne, 31400 Toulouse, France; [email protected] 3 Laboratoire de Biochimie Métabolique, CHU Toulouse, 31059 Toulouse, France * Correspondence: [email protected] (J.R.); [email protected] (N.A.-A.); Tel.: +33-582-7416-20 (J.R.) These authors contributed equally to this work. y These authors jointly supervised this work. z Received: 15 September 2020; Accepted: 23 October 2020; Published: 27 October 2020 Simple Summary: Melanoma is a devastating skin cancer characterized by an impressive metabolic plasticity. Melanoma cells are able to adapt to the tumor microenvironment by using a variety of fuels that contribute to tumor growth and progression. In this review, the authors summarize the contribution of the lipid metabolic network in melanoma plasticity and aggressiveness, with a particular attention to specific lipid classes such as glycerophospholipids, sphingolipids, sterols and eicosanoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives
    Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation de Andrade Mello, Paola, Robson Coutinho-Silva, and Luiz Eduardo Baggio Savio. 2017. “Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives.” Frontiers in Immunology 8 (1): 1526. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01526. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ fimmu.2017.01526. Published Version doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.01526 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:34493041 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA REVIEW published: 14 November 2017 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01526 Multifaceted Effects of Extracellular Adenosine Triphosphate and Adenosine in the Tumor–Host Interaction and Therapeutic Perspectives Paola de Andrade Mello1, Robson Coutinho-Silva 2* and Luiz Eduardo Baggio Savio2* 1 Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States, 2Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Cancer is still one of the world’s most pressing health-care challenges, leading to a high number of deaths worldwide. Immunotherapy is a new developing therapy that Edited by: boosts patient’s immune system to fight cancer by modifying tumor–immune cells Salem Chouaib, interaction in the tumor microenvironment (TME).
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Signaling and Regulation of Metabolism Objectives
    Cell Signaling and Regulation of Metabolism Objectives By the end of this lecture, students are expected to: • Differentiate different steps in signaling pathways • Describe the second messenger systems • Recognize the function of signaling pathways for • Signal transmission • Amplification • Discuss the role of signaling pathways in regulation and integration of metabolism No cell lives in isolation • Cells communicate with each other • Cells send and receive information (signals) • Information is relayed within cell to produce a response Signaling Process • Recognition of signal – Receptors • Transduction – Change of external signal into intracellular message with amplification and formation of second messenger • Effect – Modification of cell metabolism and function General Signaling Pathway Signaling Cascades Recognition • Performed by receptors • Ligand will produce response only in cells that have receptors for this particular ligand • Each cell has a specific set of receptors Different Responses to the Same Signaling Molecule. (A) Different Cells Different Responses to the Same Signaling Molecule. (B) One Cell but, Different Pathways Hypoglycemia Glucagon secretion Hepatocyte: Glucagon/receptor binding Second messenger: cAMP Response: Enzyme phosphorylation P P Glycogen synthase Glycogen phosphorylase (Inactive form) (Active form) Inhibition of glycogenesis Stimulation of glycogenolysis GTP-Dependant Regulatory Proteins (G-Proteins) G-Proteins: Trimeric membrane proteins (αβγ) G-stimulatory (Gs) and G-inhibitory (Gi) binds to GTP/GDP
    [Show full text]
  • The Regulatory Role of Key Metabolites in the Control of Cell Signaling
    biomolecules Review The Regulatory Role of Key Metabolites in the Control of Cell Signaling Riccardo Milanesi, Paola Coccetti * and Farida Tripodi Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (R.M.); [email protected] (F.T.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-6448-3521 Received: 8 May 2020; Accepted: 3 June 2020; Published: 5 June 2020 Abstract: Robust biological systems are able to adapt to internal and environmental perturbations. This is ensured by a thick crosstalk between metabolism and signal transduction pathways, through which cell cycle progression, cell metabolism and growth are coordinated. Although several reports describe the control of cell signaling on metabolism (mainly through transcriptional regulation and post-translational modifications), much fewer information is available on the role of metabolism in the regulation of signal transduction. Protein-metabolite interactions (PMIs) result in the modification of the protein activity due to a conformational change associated with the binding of a small molecule. An increasing amount of evidences highlight the role of metabolites of the central metabolism in the control of the activity of key signaling proteins in different eukaryotic systems. Here we review the known PMIs between primary metabolites and proteins, through which metabolism affects signal transduction pathways controlled by the conserved kinases Snf1/AMPK, Ras/PKA and TORC1. Interestingly, PMIs influence also the mitochondrial retrograde response (RTG) and calcium signaling, clearly demonstrating that the range of this phenomenon is not limited to signaling pathways related to metabolism. Keywords: Snf1/AMPK/SnRK1; Ras/PKA; TORC1; RTG; calcium; glucose; glycolysis; TCA; amino acids; protein-metabolite interaction 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Plasma Membrane Receptors for Steroid Hormones in Cell Signaling and Nuclear Function
    Chapter 5 / Plasma Membrane Receptors for Steroids 67 5 Plasma Membrane Receptors for Steroid Hormones in Cell Signaling and Nuclear Function Richard J. Pietras, PhD, MD and Clara M. Szego, PhD CONTENTS INTRODUCTION STEROID RECEPTOR SIGNALING MECHANISMS PLASMA MEMBRANE ORGANIZATION AND STEROID HORMONE RECEPTORS INTEGRATION OF MEMBRANE AND NUCLEAR SIGNALING IN STEROID HORMONE ACTION MEMBRANE-ASSOCIATED STEROID RECEPTORS IN HEALTH AND DISEASE CONCLUSION 1. INTRODUCTION Steroid hormones play an important role in coordi- genomic mechanism is generally slow, often requiring nating rapid, as well as sustained, responses of target hours or days before the consequences of hormone cells in complex organisms to changes in the internal exposure are evident. However, steroids also elicit and external environment. The broad physiologic rapid cell responses, often within seconds (see Fig. 1). effects of steroid hormones in the regulation of growth, The time course of these acute events parallels that development, and homeostasis have been known for evoked by peptide agonists, lending support to the con- decades. Often, these hormone actions culminate in clusion that they do not require precedent gene activa- altered gene expression, which is preceded many hours tion. Rather, many rapid effects of steroids, which have earlier by enhanced nutrient uptake, increased flux of been termed nongenomic, appear to be owing to spe- critical ions, and other preparatory changes in the syn- cific recognition of hormone at the cell membrane. thetic machinery of the cell. Because of certain homo- Although the molecular identity of binding site(s) logies of molecular structure, specific receptors for remains elusive and the signal transduction pathways steroid hormones, vitamin D, retinoids, and thyroid require fuller delineation, there is firm evidence that hormone are often considered a receptor superfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • Cellular Metabolism
    CST SIGNALING PATHWAY DIAGRAMS FOR Cellular Metabolism Insulin Receptor Signaling © 2003–2015 Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Insulin Receptor SNARE TNF Glucose Complex GLUT4 p85 FlotillinCav PTEN PI3K Gab1 p110 SOCS3 Synip CAP TNFR1 Cbl PIP3 IRS Shc APS SHIP Akt2 SHP-2 PTP1B GLUT4 Crkll EHD1 GRB2 Nck Translocation TC10 C3G EHBP1 IRS-1 Crkll λ/ζ CIP4/2 PKC Fyn SOS PDK1 Rac1 mTORC2 PKCθ GRB10 Jnk GLUT4 PKCλ/ζ IKK vesicle Ras PP2A FFA 14-3-3 LKB1 NO iNOS GLUT4 AS160 Exocytosis Akt ROS c-Raf TBC1D1 AMPK PDK1 14-3-3 TSC2 PDE3B TSC1 Bad SIK2 GSK-3 PRAS40 Rheb [cAMP] MEK1/2 SGK Apoptosis SREBP CBP/p300 mTORC1 PKA Torc2 p70 Erk1/2 PP1 GS Lipin1 4E-BP1 S6K ATP-citrate Degradation ENaC lyase eIF4E HSL Glycogen Synthesis Protein Synthesis, Fatty Acid Growth, and SREBP-1 Sodium Synthesis Proliferation Lipolysis Transport Cytoplasm Erk1/2 SGK Akt2 Fatty Acid and Cholesterol Disruption of Nucleus Synthesis CBP/Torc2/CREB Complex FoxO3 FoxO4 FoxO1 Erk1/2 SREBP LXRα USF Gluconeogenesis Transcription Apoptosis, mTORC1 mTORC2 Autophagy, Lipin1 Glucose and Raptor Sin1 PRR5 GβL Lipid Metabolism Growth mTOR Rictor GβL DEPTOR mTOR DEPTOR Warburg Effect © 2010–2015 Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. Macropinocytosis and other scavenging pathways Glycolysis Growth Factors Glucose Glucose Transporters Ras Hexokinase PI3K Amino Acids NADPH NADP Ras Pentose and Lipids c-Myc Phosphate 6-P- Glucose-6-P Akt Shunt Gluconolactone 6-P- MEK1/2 NADP Ras Amino Acids Gluconate TIGAR Fructose-6-P NADPH p53 LKB1 SREBP PFK Erk1/2 Ribulose-5P AMPK Fructose mTOR Bisphosphate Nucleotide
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Signaling 1- Cell Biology
    Cell Signaling 1- Cell Biology Dr Kirsty Walters [email protected] Objectives • Understand main types of signaling mechanisms • Understand concept of receptor and ligand • Understand membrane, cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors • Brief understanding of steroid hormone pathway • Brief understanding protein growth factor pathway • Understand differences between select membrane receptors (G protein structure, tyrosine kinases) Cell signaling basics Signal molecule Specific receptor Target cell Initiates a response in the target cell Signaling molecules and their receptors • Many different kinds of molecules transmit information between the cells of multicellular organisms. • These molecules act as ligands that bind to receptors expressed by their target cells. • There is considerable variation in the structure and function of the different types of molecules that serve as signal transmitters. • Some molecules carry signals over long distances, whereas others act locally to convey information between neighbouring cells. • Some signaling molecules are able to cross the plasma membrane and bind to intracellular receptors in the cytoplasm or nucleus, whereas others bind to receptors expressed on the target cell surface. Cell Communication • Cells in higher animals communicate by means of hundreds of kinds of signal molecules. • These include proteins, small peptides, amino acids, nucleotides, steroids, retinoids, fatty acid derivatives, and even dissolved gases such as nitric oxide and carbon monoxide. Contact Mediated Communication • display molecules on cell surface, recognized by receptor on another cell Non-Contact Mediated Communication • chemical signal, nearby or at a distance Modes of Signaling Direct Cell-Cell Signaling Direct cell contact Example - integrins and cadherins are cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). CAMs are located on the cell surface and are involved in binding with other cells or with the extracellular matric in the process called cell adhesion.
    [Show full text]
  • Pparγ Regulated Fatty Acid Metabolism Antibody Sampler
    PPARγ Regulated Fatty Acid Metabolism Antibody Sampler Kit Store at -20°C 3 n 1 Kit Orders n 877-616-CELL (2355) (7 x 20 µl) [email protected] Support n 877-678-TECH (8324) [email protected] Web n www.cellsignal.com rev. 06/16 #8660 For Research Use Only. Not For Use In Diagnostic Procedures. Storage: Supplied in 10 mM sodium HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 Products Included Product # Quantity Mol. Wt. Isotype mM NaCl, 100 µg/ml BSA, 50% glycerol and less than 0.02% Phospho-AMPKα (Thr172) (40H9) Rabbit mAb 2535 20 µl 62 kDa Rabbit IgG sodium azide. Store at –20°C. Do not aliquot the antibody. AMPKα (D5A2) Rabbit mAb 5831 20 µl 62 kDa Rabbit IgG Recommended Antibody Dilutions: CBP (D6C5) Rabbit mAb 7389 20 µl 300 kDa Rabbit IgG Western blotting 1:1000 Please visit www.cellsignal.com for validation data GCN5L2 (C26A10) Rabbit mAb 3305 20 µl 94 kDa Rabbit IgG and a complete listing of recommended companion PPARγ (C26H12) Rabbit mAb 2435 20 µl 53, 57 kDa Rabbit IgG products. SirT1 (C14H4) Rabbit mAb 2496 20 µl 120 kDa Rabbit IgG RXRα (D6H10) Rabbit mAb 3085 20 µl 53 kDa Rabbit IgG Anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked Antibody 7074 100 µl Goat See www.cellsignal.com for individual component applications, species cross-reactivity, dilutions and additional application protocols. Description: PPARγ Regulated Fatty Acid Metabolism preferentially expressed in adipocytes as well as in vascular Source/Purification:Monoclonal antibodies are produced Antibody Sampler Kit provides an economical means to smooth muscle cells and macrophage (12).
    [Show full text]
  • Fatty Acid Oxidation Is a Dominant Bioenergetic Pathway in Prostate Cancer
    Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2006) 9, 230–234 & 2006 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 1365-7852/06 $30.00 www.nature.com/pcan REVIEW Fatty acid oxidation is a dominant bioenergetic pathway in prostate cancer Y Liu Nuclear Medicine Service, Department of Radiology, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ, USA Most malignancies have increased glycolysis for energy requirement of rapid cell proliferation, which is the basis for tumor imaging through glucose analog FDG (2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose) with positron emission tomography. One of significant characteristics of prostate cancer is slow glycolysis and low FDG avidity. Recent studies showed that prostate cancer is associated with changes of fatty acid metabolism. Several enzymes involved in the metabolism of fatty acids have been determined to be altered in prostate cancer relative to normal prostate, which is indicative of an enhanced b-oxidation pathway in prostate cancer. Increased fatty acid utilization in prostate cancer provides both ATP and acetyl-coenzyme A (CoA); subsequently, increased availability of acetyl-CoA makes acceleration of citrate oxidation possible, which is an important energy source as well. Dominant fatty acid metabolism rather than glycolysis has the potential to be the basis for imaging diagnosis and targeted treatment of prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases (2006) 9, 230–234. doi:10.1038/sj.pcan.4500879; published online 9 May 2006 Keywords: glycolysis; fatty acid metabolism; b-oxidation Introduction cells forms the theoretic basis for cancer detection through uptake of the glucose analog, fluorine-18-labeled Metabolic changes during malignant transformation 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (F18-FDG) with positron have been noted for many years.
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Communications Among Microorganisms, Plants, and Animals: Origin, Evolution, and Interplays
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Cell Communications among Microorganisms, Plants, and Animals: Origin, Evolution, and Interplays Yves Combarnous 1,* and Thi Mong Diep Nguyen 2 1 Physiologie de la Reproduction & des Comportements Laboratory, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique & Environnementale (INRAe), University of Tours, 37380 Nouzilly, France 2 Faculty of Natural Sciences, Quy Nhon University, Quy Nhon City 55000, Binh Dinh, Vietnam; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-(0)-247427650 Received: 25 September 2020; Accepted: 27 October 2020; Published: 28 October 2020 Abstract: Cellular communications play pivotal roles in multi-cellular species, but they do so also in uni-cellular species. Moreover, cells communicate with each other not only within the same individual, but also with cells in other individuals belonging to the same or other species. These communications occur between two unicellular species, two multicellular species, or between unicellular and multicellular species. The molecular mechanisms involved exhibit diversity and specificity, but they share common basic features, which allow common pathways of communication between different species, often phylogenetically very distant. These interactions are possible by the high degree of conservation of the basic molecular mechanisms of interaction of many ligand–receptor pairs in evolutionary remote species. These inter-species cellular communications
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptual Evolution of Cell Signaling
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Conceptual Evolution of Cell Signaling 1, 1, 1, 2, Arathi Nair y , Prashant Chauhan y , Bhaskar Saha * and Katharina F. Kubatzky * 1 National Center for Cell Science (NCCS), Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India 2 Zentrum für Infektiologie, Medizinische Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 324, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] (B.S.); [email protected] (K.F.K.) Indicates Equal Contribution. y Received: 11 April 2019; Accepted: 28 June 2019; Published: 4 July 2019 Abstract: During the last 100 years, cell signaling has evolved into a common mechanism for most physiological processes across systems. Although the majority of cell signaling principles were initially derived from hormonal studies, its exponential growth has been supported by interdisciplinary inputs, e.g., from physics, chemistry, mathematics, statistics, and computational fields. As a result, cell signaling has grown out of scope for any general review. Here, we review how the messages are transferred from the first messenger (the ligand) to the receptor, and then decoded with the help of cascades of second messengers (kinases, phosphatases, GTPases, ions, and small molecules such as cAMP, cGMP, diacylglycerol, etc.). The message is thus relayed from the membrane to the nucleus where gene expression ns, subsequent translations, and protein targeting to the cell membrane and other organelles are triggered. Although there are limited numbers of intracellular messengers, the specificity of the response profiles to the ligands is generated by the involvement of a combination of selected intracellular signaling intermediates. Other crucial parameters in cell signaling are its directionality and distribution of signaling strengths in different pathways that may crosstalk to adjust the amplitude and quality of the final effector output.
    [Show full text]