Rapture Rhetoric: Prophetic Epistemology of the Left Behind
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
RAPTURE RHETORIC: PROPHETIC EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE LEFT BEHIND SUBCULTURE A Thesis by KRISTIN DAWN HILL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2007 Major Subject: Communication RAPTURE RHETORIC: PROPHETIC EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE LEFT BEHIND SUBCULTURE A Thesis by KRISTIN DAWN HILL Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, James Arnt Aune Committee Members, Kurt W. Ritter Rebecca Hankins Head of Department, Richard L. Street August 2007 Major Subject: Communication iii ABSTRACT Rapture Rhetoric: Prophetic Epistemology of the Left Behind Subculture. (August 2007) Kristin Dawn Hill, B.A., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. James Arnt Aune This thesis provides a rhetorical analysis of prophetic texts, non-fiction premillennialist dispensational studies, the fictional series, Left Behind and interviews with series’ readers. This thesis argues that prophetic rhetoric constitutes an epistemological position whereby Rapture believers create knowledge, cast knowledge as good or evil and finally act as gatekeepers to determine what can and should be known. Rapture subculture is composed of both a hard core and a set of narrative believers, those who have acquired the nomenclature, but perhaps not the dogmatic belief in a Rapture, Tribulation, Armageddon, and Millennium schema. The process of turning narrative believers into hard core believers relies on the use of a range of topoi, appeals to authority, evil and time. Rapture rhetoric, aimed at bolstering the beliefs of the hard core and cultivating the beliefs of those still undecided, relies on the process of transfer to gain acceptance for one claim based on acceptance of another and then relies on narrative plasticity to enlarge the basis for those accepted claims. These arguments are exchanged for stories in the fictional Left Behind series, whereby the characters, institutions and knowledge of the end-times becomes encapsulated in an easy-to-read and simple-to-relate tale that codes knowledge as either good knowledge revealed from God or evil knowledge iv acquired through human understanding. These narratives and arguments both get used among prophetic believers to explain their lives and their world, internally and externally to the prophetic subculture, in order to convince more narrative believers of the truth of their claims. Prophetic communities develop knowledge products, cultural entailments and cultural manifestations of prophetic belief to serve as symbols of the end-times narrative. Rapture subculture, based on prophetic beliefs, is not monolithic; however, this thesis is able to draw some broad generalizations about the prophetic community and the rhetoric they use to explain their claims within their ranks and to the outside world. v DEDICATION To my husband, David, my daughter Amelia, for indulging and challenging me simultaneously. To my mother, without whom I would have had no subject for this thesis. And to Gwendolyn, who I await with anticipation, and whose impending arrival has lent this project and its writer drive and focus vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. James Aune, for his unending support and eternal patience. I would also like to thank my committee members, Dr. Kurt Ritter and Rebecca Hankins for your thoughtful advice and practical wisdom on the thesis drafts. Thank you to my friends, professors and advisors in the Department of Communication, with undying gratitude due to Mary Haman and Danya Day, who have done their best to make sure I completed this thesis before my children graduated from high school, and that I enjoyed my life to the fullest outside of my studies. I also have to thank my colleagues at Cushing Memorial Library and Archives, who read early drafts, listened carefully to my arguments and sent me articles of interest. My debt of gratitude to all the interview participants cannot be overstated; they are the heart of this project. Finally, thank you to David, for being patient with me, Mia for teaching me to be a mom and making me laugh every day, Brooke for helping me out so I could write and to my mom, for teaching me to research, to search the Scriptures and prayerfully seek God’s will. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT.................................................................................................................... iii DEDICATION ................................................................................................................ v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………........... vi TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................ vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION – RAPTURE RHETORIC ........................................... 1 II EPISTEMOLOGICAL BREAK – RHETORICAL PARTING.................. 16 III KNOWLEDGE THAT PASSETH ALL UNDERSTANDING ................. 44 IV CULTURAL MANIFESTATIONS AND KNOWLEDGE........................ 68 PROUDCTS IN DISPENSATIONAL PREMILLENNIALISM V CONCLUSION – A FINAL NOTE ON FINAL THINGS......................... 98 REFERENCES................................................................................................................ 106 VITA ............................................................................................................................... 111 1 CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION – RAPTURE RHETORIC A few weeks ago, a question appeared on a Pentecostal Christian Families Message Board that caught my attention. The poll asked, “Do you all think that it is a good idea to have more babies during these End Times?” 1 This question, from a sincere poster, brought a variety of replies from self-identified fundamentalists. Most said “Yes,” they would bring more children into the world; Christians should “be fruitful and multiply;” they would be bringing more children into “God’s kingdom.” They did all express some concern over the state of the world, claiming that these “terrible times” were the same as the “end times.” While most of the women posting replies did advocate bearing subsequent children, they justified their answer and their belief in a literal reading of the Bible at the same time. One poster, Sweetpeama, took a historical approach: To answer I say that yes, it is ok if a couple wants to have more children to do so, even though these are the end times. I personally believe that the church that is living will be raptured pre-tribulation. Another thing to consider is we know not the day or the hour of the coming of the son of man, and while it does say in scripture that when the fig tree bears fruit again (some say this refers to Israel returning to the land) this generation shall not pass away -ok so are we looking at a life span of someone born in 1948- 80 years which would put it 2028- or are we looking at a period of a generation being 120 years (based on Genesis This thesis follows the style of Rhetoric Society Quarterly. 1 Mika145 asked “Do you think it is a good idea to have more babies in these End Times?” on the Pentecostal Christian Families Board, hosted by Baby Center, August 1, 2006, available at http://boards.babycenter.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?nav=messages&tsn=1&tid=204&webtag=bcus1379815. 2 where the Lord says that mans days shall be numbered at 120 years (that number puts it out to 2068) and it still being a generation not passing away. (All it takes is one person even making it to that age) Another interesting thing to remember is that in the late 14th century during the plague of the Black Death, many people thought that it was the end times, even to the point of selling possessions, not paying debts, etc. Well, we are here 6.5 centuries later. 2 Sweetpeama recognizes the long wait Christians have endured, and while cautiously optimistic for the future “Rapture” events, she does not set a date. She uses references to Israel’s statehood and a “generation,” a popular landmark on the time-line of Rapture believers, asserted by many pre-millennial apocalyptic prophets and dispensationalist scholars. Those who believe in Christ’s imminent return are genuinely invested in the answers to the type of poll question mika145 posts; they constantly have to navigate the world, planning for tomorrow while expecting to spend tomorrow with their Lord. I am familiar with the type of speculation, hope, and concern present in the question and subsequent answers from my upbringing in a Pentecostal home. There, I both feared and longed for the Rapture, just as the women corresponding on the Pentecostal Christian Families Board. In moving away from a strict, literal interpretation of the Bible, in carving out an academic Christian position for me and in trying to negotiate my present beliefs with the sermons I hear when I visit my family, I have grappled with question like: Can we know anything about the End Times? Why is there such fascination with the timeline of the end of the world? How does prophecy work? 2 Sweetpeama’s Response to poll question, August 1, 2006. Available at http://boards.babycenter.com/n/pfx/forum.aspx?nav=messages&tsn=1&tid=204&webtag=bcus1379815 3 How do Biblical literalists successfully argue for their worldview and end-of-the- worldview? What are the implications of accepting a literal interpretation of the Bible guided by a prophecy “scholar?” 3 In this master’s thesis, I will pull together