UK Mars Research and Priorities in the Aurora Programme

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UK Mars Research and Priorities in the Aurora Programme View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Stirling Online Research Repository BRIDGES, HAGERMANN: MEETING REPORT UK Mars research and priorit ies in the Aurora programme MEETING REPORT John Bridges and clastic solifluction lobes. The low density of through the atmosphere; its currently envisaged Axel Hagermann summarize an impact craters suggests these terrains formed orbital inclination of 72° will allow coverage of in a geologically recent era. Kate Goddard et al. about 95% of the planet. Much of the motiva- RAS Special Discussion Meeting (Imperial College) presented a study of youthful tion behind this mission comes from the reports in January 2011, which looked gullies and depositional fans on Mars in Mojave of seasonally and latitudinally variable meth- Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article-abstract/52/2/2.34/206693 by University of Stirling user on 13 February 2019 at the prospects for the UK Crater. Understanding the role of water or other ane plumes at concentrations between 10 and exploring Mars. processes, including CO2 ice sublimation, in 60 ppb. These are based on both ground-based the formation of such gullies is a crucial way of infrared observations (Mumma et al. 2009) and reaching a more accurate understanding of mar- on Mars Express orbiter measurements igh-resolution imaging and near-infra- tian climate variations within the last few mil- (Formisano et al. 2004). As methane red mapping of the martian surface, lion years. Balme and Gallagher speculated that is a known potential biomarker there Htogether with detailed studies of mar- because perchlorates (identified at the Phoenix has been much discussion about the tian meteorites and exobiology research, have landing site) have eutectic temperatures below significance of this data. Our knowl- revealed an increasing amount of detail about 240 K and can remain liquid at temperatures far edge on the encapsulation and reten- how climate and surface processes have changed below the freezing point of water, perchlorate tion of methane in rocks is poor. over the history of Mars. The exploration of brines may explain freeze–thaw processes and Current research at the University of Mars is now being planned through a joint could cause geomorphological changes. Aberdeen focuses on the potential NASA–ESA programme. New missions such of methane-rich rocks to support as the Mars Science Laboratory in 2012 and Climate life. John Parnell et al. described the Trace Gas Orbiter in 2016 will also improve The ancient climate was studied by Peter Grin- how mass spectrometer measure- our understanding about the evolution of Mars. drod (University College London) using the ments could be used to learn more Mission planning is being guided by recent near-infrared surface-mapping instrument about how methane is trapped reports of methane in the Mars atmosphere CRISM, which is on board the Mars Recon- and released in rocks, thereby and the identification of minerals and landforms naissance Orbiter. This work was able to dem- contributing towards predict- associated with water such as the Eberswalde onstrate that a set of sediments in part of the ing the habitability of martian Delta. Mars research is also acting as a spur for Coprates Chasma system of rifts (figure 1) has rocks on future missions. the development of mission concepts and ana- preserved a record of changing aqueous environ- However, Zahnle et al. lytical techniques such as new XRD techniques, ment and chemistry. In another example of the (2010) recently suggested microRaman and a Life Marker Chip. use of CRISM, Kathryn Hill and John Bridges et that methane from the ter- The second UK in the Aurora Programme al. (Leicester) showed that other interior layered restrial atmosphere might meeting was held on 14 January 2011 at Bur- sediments (ILD) in craters of the Arabia Terra have obscured ground- lington House, London. The aim was to bring region had an anhydrous mineralogy, consist- based data on Mars and together researchers, particularly in the field of ent in this case with deposition from air rather thus confused the iden- Mars research and instrumentation, in order to than water. Nicholas Warner et al. (Imperial) tification of martian provide a platform to show our research and to used new high-resolution imagery and digital trace gases. They also discuss what the priorities for future missions terrain models (DTMs) to show that some of the noted the current within Aurora should be. The Aurora pro- terrains associated with floods such as Ares Val- absence of gramme encapsulates Europe’s current plans, lis (near the 1997 Pathfinder landing site) had aiming to send unmanned spacecraft to explore undergone multiple floods rather than single, our neighbouring world to examine its climate, isolated events. Thus current research is show- search for evidence of past or present life, and ing the complexity and variability of past depo- learn how conditions there relate to those on sitional environments. We are moving on from 1 Earth. The meeting was introduced by Freder- considering Mars as divided simply into a warm 1: Perspective view of light-toned layered deposits ick Taylor (Oxford). and wet ancient (Noachian) era, pre-3.7 Ga, and at the base of a 3.5 km deep trough in Coprates High-resolution imagery of some of the surface a cold and dry Mars after that. Uncertainty in Catena. The 1 m digital elevation model was made by of Mars using the HiRise camera on the Mars the ages of some of the landforms, including the combining stereo HiRISE images of ~0.25 m/pixel. Image is approximately 7 km wide, with no vertical Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) at 25 cm/pixel Eberswalde Delta which is one of the Mars Sci- exaggeration. has changed our view of the evolution of its sur- ence Laboratory (MSL) candidate landing sites face and climate. One of the ways our view of and considered to have formed through influx 2: Sky Crane: proposed landing system for ExoMars Mars has changed is the recognition of the influ- of sediment into a standing body of water (Matt and Max-C (and MSL). ence of glacial and periglacial activity in shap- Golombek, Jet Propulsion Laboratory), is part 3: Martian meteorite alteration: Fe-carbonate, ing landscapes. Matt Balme (Open University) of this change in our view of the martian past. phyllosilicate (smectite and serpentine) with an and Peter Gallagher (Trinity College Dublin) One set of presentations at the RAS meet- amorphous gel in the middle. presented new observations of periglacial land- ing concentrated on instruments for the 2016 forms that appear to have been formed by water ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter (TGO). This will as part of freeze–thaw cycles: self-organized have a 400 km, near-circular orbit with solar patterns of stone stripes, polygons, circles and occultation and near-nadir measurements 2.34 A&G • April 2011 • Vol. 52 BRIDGES, HAGERMANN: MEETING REPORT UK Mars research and priorit ies in the Aurora programme a plausible model to explain how methane could dimensional dust transport, water cloud aerosol TGO is to monitor active geological processes be released and trapped on short timescales. and chemical species, as discussed by Stephen on Mars. This is a response both to the poten- Thus the abundance and variability of meth- Lewis et al. (Open University). tial existence of active trace gas seeps and to ane on Mars remains uncertain, and its true The ExoMars TGO Mars Climate Sounder the recent identification of active geological nature will not be established without detailed (EMCS), with key components provided by processes, in particular dune systems, recent Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/astrogeo/article-abstract/52/2/2.34/206693 by University of Stirling user on 13 February 2019 mapping of the atmosphere by TGO at parts- Oxford, Reading and Cardiff universities, impact sites, avalanches, gullies and CO2 gas per-trillion levels, together with more accurate will perform continuous observations of the jets. The colour capabilities of HiSCI are well global circulation models that include three- atmosphere, described by Patrick Irwin et al. suited to this task. (Oxford). This is a development of the suc- Nick Thomas (University of Bern), who is co- cessful EMCS already in orbit about Mars PI of the instrument with the University of Ari- on NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. zona, described how the HiSCI camera (High EMCS will continue the monitoring of Resolution Stereo Colour Imager) will enable Mars global temperature/pressure/aero- increased coverage of Mars at 2 m/pixel. There sol field, and will also be able to meas- is also a need for increased coverage of Mars ure the vertical profile of water vapour with high-resolution DTMs as HiRise will only across the planet up to 50 km alti- cover a small fraction of the planet’s surface; tude. Another instrument selected HiSCI is designed to meet this requirement as for TGO is NOMAD, the “Nadir well. As well as analysing the geomorphology and Occultation for MArs Dis- of the planetary surface, these will allow future covery” spectrometer suite. landing site planning. The instrument is designed for spectroscopic measurements Rovers of features associated with The University of Leicester is leading a UK team hydrocarbons, including with MSSL/UCL and the British Geological methane, in the UV, vis- Survey to collaborate on the HiSCI instrument ible and IR range in solar planning and science exploitation of the upcom- occultation, nadir and ing generation of rover missions. Part of this limb modes. The Open involves developing improved and more auto- University is involved mated techniques for the production of DTMs in this instrument from different datasets and the extraction of and plans to provide data such as surface roughness, described by the UVIS channel, Jan-Peter Muller et al.
Recommended publications
  • Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration
    1 ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY Burlington House, Piccadilly London W1J 0BQ, UK T: 020 7734 4582/ 3307 F: 020 7494 0166 [email protected] www.ras.org.uk Registered Charity 226545 Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration Professor Frank Close, OBE Dr John Dudeney, OBE Professor Ken Pounds, CBE FRS 2 Contents (A) Executive Summary 3 (B) The Formation and Membership of the Commission 6 (C) The Terms of Reference 7 (D) Summary of the activities/meetings of the Commission 8 (E) The need for a wider context 8 (E1) The Wider Science Context (E2) Public inspiration, outreach and educational Context (E3) The Commercial/Industrial context (E4) The Political and International context. (F) Planetary Science on the Moon & Mars 13 (G) Astronomy from the Moon 15 (H) Human or Robotic Explorers 15 (I) Costs and Funding issues 19 (J) The Technological Challenge 20 (J1) Launcher Capabilities (J2) Radiation (K) Summary 23 (L) Acknowledgements 23 (M) Appendices: Appendix 1 Expert witnesses consulted & contributions received 24 Appendix 2 Poll of UK Astronomers 25 Appendix 3 Poll of Public Attitudes 26 Appendix 4 Selected Web Sites 27 3 (A) Executive Summary 1. Scientific missions to the Moon and Mars will address questions of profound interest to the human race. These include: the origins and history of the solar system; whether life is unique to Earth; and how life on Earth began. If our close neighbour, Mars, is found to be devoid of life, important lessons may be learned regarding the future of our own planet. 2. While the exploration of the Moon and Mars can and is being addressed by unmanned missions we have concluded that the capabilities of robotic spacecraft will fall well short of those of human explorers for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • National Space Programmes 2012 - 2013
    National Space Programmes 2012 - 2013 Introduction projects – a massive injection of innovation into the blood stream of the UK’s space sector. Meanwhile, the Welcome to the second edition of the UK Space programme of scientific instruments has reached a Agency’s National Space Programmes brochure. milestone with the delivery of MIRI for the James Webb This document contains financial and management Space Telescope, the result of over a decade’s hard information about our suite of National Space work by the UK-led European consortium. The national Programmes, provided in order to give you an insight exploration and the Earth observation technology into the wide range of investment we are making in programmes have also made good progress, while the UK’s space sector. both UKube-1 and TechDemoSat-1 are preparing for launch in 2013. It is going to be another exciting year. It is now approaching two years since the Agency’s full establishment. During this time the UK space sector We hope you find the brochure valuable. It’s hard has continued to grow, as has its contribution to the to capture the huge range of projects that the UK economy as a whole, currently thought to be £9.1 Space Agency has underway in a few pages. For billion a year and directly employing 28,900 people. further information and also to download our other The average growth rate of the UK space sector is publications, please see our website: almost 7.5%; the National Space Programmes are in http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency place to complement our investments in a range of European Space Agency, European Commission and And don’t forget to sign up for our monthly newsletter bilateral projects in order to further this growth in line and follow us on Twitter - @spacegovuk ! with the six themes of our civil space strategy: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    The 2008 Annual Report of the International Space Exploration Coordination Group Released March 2009 International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) – Annual Report:2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) – Annual Report:2008 CONTENTS Introduction …………………………………………………………………………… 4 Part 1: The Role of the ISECG 1.1 Overview …………………………………………………………………………. 6 1.2 Working Groups of the ISECG …………………………………………………… 7 1.2.1 Enhancement of Public Engagement …………………………………………… 7 1.2.2 Establishment of Relationships with Existing International Working Groups …. 7 1.2.3 The International Space Exploration Coordination Tool (INTERSECT) ……. 8 1.2.4 The Space Exploration Interface Standards Working Group (ISWG) ………….. 8 1.2.5 Mapping the Space Exploration Journey ………………………………………... 8 Part 2: Current and Near-Term Activities of ISECG Members 2.1 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) …………………………………………………………… 10 2.1.1 The International Space Station (ISS) …………………………………………… 10 2.1.2 Emerging Government Capabilities …………………………………………….. 10 2.1.3 Emerging Commercial Providers ……………………………………………….. 11 2.2 Beyond LEO – The Moon and Mars ……………………………………………….. 11 2.2.1 Moon ……………………………………………………………………………… 11 2.2.2 Mars ………………………………………………………………………………. 12 Part 3: Progress in 2008 towards Opportunities for Integrated and Collaborative Space Exploration 3.1 Robotic Network Science – The International Lunar Network ……………………… 16 3.2 Joint Development for Robotic Exploration – Mars Sample Return ………………………… 17 3.3 Collaborative
    [Show full text]
  • Gardini, Bruno; Ongaro, Franco; Vennemann, Dietrich
    Aurora Exploration Programme 7th ESAWorkshoponAdvancedSpaceTechnologiesforRoboticsandAutomation'ASTRA2002' ESTEC, Noordwijk,TheNetherlands,November19-21,2002 1 The Robotic Exploration Missions of the Aurora Programme 7th ASTRA Workshop, ESTEC 19-21 November 2002 ASTRA, 19-21 B.Gardini, F.Ongaro, D.Vennemann – ESA/ESTEC 1 November 2002 List of Contents 7th ESAWorkshoponAdvancedSpaceTechnologiesforRoboticsandAutomation'ASTRA2002' • Introduction • Objectives of the Aurora Programme ESTEC, Noordwijk,TheNetherlands,November19-21,2002 • Aurora Programme outline • Aurora Preparatory Period • Exploration Scenario • European Human/Robotic Exploration Scenario • Near term Planning • Near Term Missions Scenario 2 • Aurora candidate missions – Exobiology Mission (ExoMars) – Mars Sample Return Mission (MSR) – In Situ Resource Utilisation (ISRU) Mission – Lunar Mission – Advanced MSR – Arrow Missions • Aurora Mission Scenario • Conclusions. ASTRA, 19-21 2 November 2002 Introduction 7th ESAWorkshoponAdvancedSpaceTechnologiesforRoboticsandAutomation'ASTRA2002' • In the coming decades the scientific and human exploration of the solar ESTEC, Noordwijk,TheNetherlands,November19-21,2002 system is expected to progress further beyond the low Earth orbits. An international human mission to Mars may become a reality by the years 2020 – 2030. 3 • To decide in which areas of expertise Europe wants to have a lead in the future requires a detailed analysis of the European Technology strengths and an assessment of its strategic value. • The Aurora Programme, approved
    [Show full text]
  • Technologies for Exploration
    SP-1254 SP-1254 TTechnologiesechnologies forfor ExplorationExploration T echnologies forExploration AuroraAurora ProgrammeProgramme Proposal:Proposal: Annex Annex DD Contact: ESA Publications Division c/o ESTEC, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands Tel. (31) 71 565 3400 - Fax (31) 71 565 5433 SP-1254 November 2001 Technologies for Exploration Aurora Programme Proposal: Annex D This report was written by the staff of ESA’s Directorate of Technical and Operational Support. Published by: ESA Publications Division ESTEC, PO Box 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Editor/layout: Andrew Wilson Copyright: © 2001 European Space Agency ISBN: 92-9092-616-3 ISSN: 0379-6566 Printed in: The Netherlands Price: €30 / 70 DFl technologies for exploration Technologies for Exploration Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Exploration Milestones 3 3 Explorations Missions 3 4Technology Development and Associated Cost 5 5 Conclusion 6 Annex 1: Automated Guidance, Navigation & Control A1.1 and Mission Analysis Annex 2: Micro-Avionics A2.1 Annex 3: Data Processing and Communication Technologies A3.1 Annex 4: Entry, Descent and Landing A4.1 Annex 5: Crew Aspects of Exploration A5.1 Annex 6: In Situ Resource Utilisation A6.1 Annex 7: Power A7.1 Annex 8: Propulsion A8.1 Annex 9: Robotics and Mechanisms A9.1 Annex 10: Structures, Materials and Thermal Control A10.1 1 Table 1. Exploration Milestones for the Definition of Technology Readiness Requirements. 2005-2010 In situ resource utilisation/life support (ground demonstration) Decision on development of alternative
    [Show full text]
  • CFE Final Report, 09 05
    CentreÿFrançaisÿsurÿlesÿEtats-Unisÿ(CFE) EUROPEANSÿINÿSPACE THEÿINTERACTIONSÿBETWEENÿTHEÿCONDUCTÿOFÿSPACEÿPROGRAMMES ANDÿTHEÿEUROPEANÿPROCESS SEPTEMBREÿ2005 [email protected]; [email protected] ExecutiveÿSummary Decisive choices for the future of European space exploration programmes will be made during the next meetings of the ESA ministerial council, in December 2005 and in 2008. The continuation of the Aurora programme, as well as cooperation ventures with the U.S. and Russia will be decided on, setting the stage for the next 5 to 25 years. The Automated Transfer Vehicle, human space flight, robotic missions to Mars and niche technologies are amongst the elements of the overall programme that will be defined. Budgets constraints, however, will be a limiting factor in the decision process. They point to the lack of political support for space exploration in Europe. Contrary to the U.S., manned exploration does not enjoy strong historical and cultural references in Europe. Moreover, past partnerships with NASA do not encourage new cooperative ventures. The two main drivers for space exploration in Europe are rather the preservation of high-tech industry and jobs, as well as the continuation of a successful European scientific presence. If an ambitious European space exploration programme is to be funded, a lobbying campaign targeting European decision-makers should be undertaken on the basis of these drivers. Space exploration remains a responsibility of ESA. The involvement of the EU would be a political and budgetary bonus for space exploration. This poses in fine the question of the evolving relationship between the two entities. 2 Introduction During its next Ministerial Meetings, in December 05 and in 2008, the European Space Agency (ESA) is expected to adopt its programme for the next seven years.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Space Exploration Programme
    MESSINA 9/2/03 2:04 PM Page 34 Strategy AuroraAurora – The European Space Exploration Programme 34 esa bulletin 115 - august 2003 www.esa.int MESSINA 9/2/03 2:04 PM Page 35 The Aurora Programme Pierro Messina & Franco Ongaro Directorate of Strategy and External Relations, ESA, Paris Introduction A manned mission to Mars is bound to become a reality over the next decades. It is very likely to be an international mission carried out by those players who have developed the technologies and expertise needed to master the challenges of landing humans on Mars and returning them safely to the Earth. Europe has been at the forefront of space endeavours for more than 30 years, with many successful missions and key contributions to international programmes. Its participation in the International Space Station, the experience acquired with the European astronauts, with leading-edge scientific missions and notably with the recently launched Mars Express and its Beagle 2 Lander, are all good examples of the degree of maturity that Europe, through ESA and its Members States, has gained as a result of its investment in space activities and the expertise developed within its work force and the scientific community. Exploring Mars is still a risky business, however, as the low success rate of the robotic missions conducted to date is a constant reminder. Less than a third of the unmanned missions so far launched to the Red Planet have fulfilled their goal. Consequently, there is still much to be done before we can feel sufficiently confident to commit to sending humans to explore the more distant bodies in the Universe and to land on Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Law: Selected Documents 2009 Volume 2: International Space Law Documents
    The University of Mississippi School of Law The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Informational resources on the legal aspects of human activities using aerospace technologies Space Law: Selected Documents 2009 Volume 2: International Space Law Documents Compiled by P.J. Blount P.J. Blount, editor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, editor A supplement to the Journal of Space Law This page intentionally left blank. ii Disclaimer The information contained in this compilation represents information as of February 22, 2010. It does not constitute legal representation by the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law (Center), its faculty or staff. Before using any information in this publication, it is recommended that an attorney be consulted for specific legal advice. This publication is offered as a service to the Center's readership. The documents contained in this publication do not purport to be official copies. Some pages have sections blocked out. These blocked sections do not appear in the original documents. Blocked out sections contain information wholly unrelated to the space law materials intended to be compiled. The sections were blocked out by the Center's faculty and staff to facilitate focus on the relevant materials. iii National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Founded in 1999, the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law is a reliable source for creating, gathering, and disseminating objective and timely remote sensing, space, and aviation legal research and materials. The Center serves the public good and the aerospace industry by addressing and conducting education and outreach activities related to the legal aspects of aerospace technologies to human activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Science-Driven Scenario for Space Exploration Report from the European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC)
    ESSC-ESF POSITION PAPER Science-Driven Scenario for Space Exploration Report from the European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC) www.esf.org The European Science Foundation (ESF) was estab- The European Space Sciences Committee (ESSC), lished in 1974 to create a common European platform established in 1975, grew out of the need for a col- for cross-border cooperation in all aspects of scien- laborative effort that would ensure European space tific research. scientists made their voices heard on the other side With its emphasis on a multidisciplinary and pan- of the Atlantic. More than 30 years later the ESSC European approach, the Foundation provides the has become even more relevant today as it acts as leadership necessary to open new frontiers in Euro- an interface with the European Spa ce Agency (ESA), pean science. the European Commission, national space agencies, Its activities include providing science policy and ESF Member Organisations on space-related advice (Science Strategy); stimulating cooperation aspects. The mission of the ESSC is to provide an between researchers and organisations to explore independent European voice on European space new directions (Science Synergy); and the admin- research and policy. istration of externally funded programmes (Science The ESSC is non-governmental and provides an Management). These take place in the following independent forum for scientists to debate space areas: Physical and engineering sciences; Medical sciences issues. The ESSC is represented ex officio sciences; Life, earth and environmental sciences; in ESA’s scientific advisory bodies, in ESA’s High- Humanities; Social sciences; Polar; Marine; Space; level Science Policy Advisory Committee advising Radio astronomy frequencies; Nuclear physics.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Space Exploration Programme: Current Status of ESA's
    Acta Astronautica 57 (2005) 156–160 www.elsevier.com/locate/actaastro The European space exploration programme: Current status of ESA’s plans for Moon and Mars exploration Piero Messinaa,∗, Dietrich Vennemannb aEuropean Space Agency, Headquarters, France bEuropean Space Agency, ESTEC, The Netherlands Abstract After a large consultation with the scientific and industrial communities in Europe, the Aurora Space Exploration Programme was unanimously approved at the European Space Agency (ESA) Council at ministerial level in Edinburgh in 2001. This marked the start of the programme’s preparation phase that was due to finish by the end of 2004. Aurora features technology development robotic and crewed rehearsal missions aimed at preparinga human mission to Mars by 2033. Due to the evolvingcontext, both international and European, ESA has undertaken a review of the goalsand approach of its exploration programme. While maintaining the main robotic missions that had been conceived during Aurora, the European Space Exploration Programme that is currently being proposed to the Aurora participating states and other ESA Member States has a reviewed approach and will feature a greater synergy with other ESA programmes. The paper will present the process that led to the revision of ESA’s plans in the field of exploration and will give the current status of the programme. © 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 1. Introduction have contributed to raise the expectations towards fu- ture robotic missions to Mars by the scientific com- munity and beyond to the public at large. Recent events have resulted in an increased atten- Space exploration is not new for ESA. We pursue tion for Mars and the future plans for space explo- several missions in solar system exploration, such ration, notably towards the Moon and the Red Planet.
    [Show full text]
  • European-Russian Space Cooperation in 2030: from Commercial Partnerships to Common Exploration Programmes?
    European-Russian Space Cooperation in 2030: From Commercial Partnerships to Common Exploration Programmes? E S P I PERSPECTIVES 65 European-Russian Space Cooperation in 2030: From Commercial Partnerships to Common Exploration Programmes? Eva AVRILLON Space utilisation and space activities in general reflect the terrestrial balance of powers. As it was the case during the Cold War, these factors still show the political, economic, scientific and financial capacities of a state or organisation because they require significant funding and efficiency in strategic and technological execution. Related to missile and defence issues since the end of the Second World War, space technologies are part of the so-called “strategic technologies” and give the government that masters them an advantage and great political weight on the international stage, making space activities an important factor in international relations. Nowadays they have a huge economic impact on diverse activities as they give access to advanced telecommunication capabilities and a large set of vital data and information. The current economic crisis makes decision makers aware of the economic and social dimension of the use of space. In the past few years, the economic crisis has led some governments to cut their space budget. At the same time, some countries and organisations have refocused their space policies and strategies for the period until 2030 on space applications, which are easier to justify to the public than exploration programmes. Cuts in public funding and the huge costs for long term and complex programmes highlight the necessity of international cooperation in space activities. International space cooperation will be the subject of this Perspective, more precisely European-Russian cooperation in the 2030 timeframe.
    [Show full text]
  • Landing Site Users Manual
    ExoMars 2018 Landing Site Selection User’s Manual Ref: EXM-SCI-LSS-ESA/IKI-003 Version 1.0, 17 December 2013 1 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION AND SCOPE ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.1 ExoMars 2018 Mission Summary ................................................................................................................... 4 2 SCIENTIFIC CONSTRAINTS FOR EXOMARS 2018 LANDING SITES .............................................................. 5 2.1 Rover Surface Mission ................................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Surface Platform Surface Mission .................................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Landing Site Scientific Constraints ................................................................................................................. 6 2.3.1 Depositional Age of Terrain ..................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.2 Preservation of Organics ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.3 Signatures of Past Aqueous Activity ........................................................................................................ 6 2.3.4 Availability and Distribution of Outcrops .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]