DOCSLIB.ORG

Law and the Extension of the Human Presence with Moon 2.0

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Law and the Extension of the Human Presence with Moon 2.0 Law and the Extension of the Human Presence with Moon 2.0 – Update to Global Compact 2.0? Jan Helge Mey Institute of Air and Space Law McGill University, Montreal August 2008 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master in Laws (LL.M.) © Jan Helge Mey 2008 Acknowledgements Thanks to the global knowledge pool into which it is so much easier to tap through the Internet and the World Wide Web. It is constantly enriched through a myriad of individual contributions strengthening the communicative and collaborative fabric of the global community. However, the access to a flood of information is useless without personal guidance. My particular appreciation therefore belongs to Prof. Ram Jakhu for his supervision and support of the thesis. I will especially keep the long and at times rather philosophical discussions in my memory. For his kind and constructive review of the thesis, I also want to thank Prof. Jonathan F. Galloway. I would like to thank Catherine Doldirina for her feedback on my first conception of the thesis. Victoria Prince and Véronique Schlemmer have smoothed the text over with their incredible language skills. I am indebted to Pleotian Uttarachai and Peter Devinsky for their logistical support. Without the wonderful times and the sustained mutual support among the inhabitants of the cubicles at the McGill Nahum Gelber Law Library, the process of writing this thesis would not have been the same. I am grateful to have met all these extraordinary people at the Institute of Air and Space Law in Montreal. Thanks to the IASL Class of 2008 and the many interesting and friendly people of Montreal and at McGill University who have made the LL.M. program a unique experience for me. i Abstract / Résumé In 1969, humans set foot on the lunar surface for the first time. The space race of the cold war era was at its peak with Moon 1.0. Almost four decades later, there is renewed interest in returning to the Moon and going beyond. This time, the extension of the human presence into outer space is meant to be permanent and sustainable. Space exploration is to be brought into the economic sphere with Moon 2.0. The activities of the public sector mainly represented in the Global Exploration Strategy and those of the private sector, which have been highlighted by the Google Lunar X PRIZE are surveyed and contrasted against the core international legal framework. Arguing that the private sector can play a unique role in reconciling inclusive social interests for the benefit of mankind with their current exclusive economic priorities, the United Nations Global Compact is offered as a suitable gateway. C’est en 1969 que l’homme a mis pieds sur la lune pour la première fois. La course vers l’espace à l’époque de la guerre froide était a son apogée avec Lune 1.0. Près de quatre décades plus tard, l’intérêt de retourner vers la lune et d’aller même encore plus loin est de nouveau réveillé. Cette fois-ci, on a l’intention d’assurer l’extension de la présence humaine dans l’espace de façon permanente et durable. L’exploration spatiale doit gagner une dimension économique avec Lune 2.0. Les activités du secteur public représentées surtout par la Stratégie mondiale d’exploration et celles secteur privé qui ont été mises en évidence par le concours Google Lunar X PRIZE, sont examinées et comparées au principes fondamentales du droit international. Invoquant l’argument que le secteur privé peut jouer un rôle unique en conciliant les intérêts sociaux pour le bienfait de l’humanité et les priorités économiques actuelles excluantes, le Pacte Mondial des Nations Unies est proposé comme moyen d’accès approprié. ii Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... i Abstract / Résumé ................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ............................................................................................................... iii Table of Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................... vi Table of Figures .................................................................................................................. ix A. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 B. Evolution of Space Activities – From Moon 1.0 to 2.0 ............................................... 3 I. Historical Evolution: From Independent States to Global Community .................. 3 II. Main Actors – Who? ............................................................................................. 11 1. From Public Duo-Pole to Public-Private Space Economy ................................. 11 2. Status of Non-State Actors .................................................................................. 14 III. Main Activities and Applications – What? ........................................................... 16 IV. Organisational Setup – How? ............................................................................... 19 V. Geocentric Activities vs. Leaving the Cradle of Mankind – Why? ...................... 22 VI. Forms, Levels and Timing of Regulation – Freedoms or Limits? ........................ 25 VII. Interim Conclusion: Continuation of Major Trends and a New Chapter .............. 28 C. Public Sector: The Global Exploration Strategy (GES)............................................. 30 I. National Space Exploration Initiatives and Policies ............................................. 30 1. ASI (Italy) ........................................................................................................... 30 2. BNSC (United Kingdom) ................................................................................... 31 3. CNES (France) .................................................................................................... 32 4. CNSA (China) ..................................................................................................... 33 5. CSA (Canada) ..................................................................................................... 34 6. CSIRO (Australia) .............................................................................................. 35 7. DLR (Germany) .................................................................................................. 35 8. ESA (European Space Agency) .......................................................................... 36 9. ISRO (India) ........................................................................................................ 39 10. JAXA (Japan) ...................................................................................................... 39 11. KARI (Republic of Korea) .................................................................................. 41 12. NASA (USA) ...................................................................................................... 41 iii 13. NSAU (Ukraine) ................................................................................................. 46 14. Roscosmos (Russia) ............................................................................................ 47 II. The Global Exploration Strategy .......................................................................... 48 1. Origins and Background ..................................................................................... 48 2. The Underlying Vision ....................................................................................... 49 3. The International Coordination Mechanism: ISECG.......................................... 53 III. Core International Legal Framework for Space Exploration ................................ 58 1. Freedom of Exploration and Use ........................................................................ 58 2. Non-appropriation ............................................................................................... 60 3. Benefit and Interest of Mankind ......................................................................... 67 4. Mere Technicalities or Legal Issues at Stake? .................................................... 69 IV. Interim Conclusion ................................................................................................ 71 D. Private Sector: The Google Lunar X PRIZE – Moon 2.0 .......................................... 73 I. Google Lunar X PRIZE ........................................................................................ 73 1. History and Theory of Prizes .............................................................................. 73 2. The Challenge: A privately funded Moon 2.0? .................................................. 75 3. The Foundation: Education and Outreach or Interpretative Predominance? ...... 76 4. The Sponsor: Brand, Profit and Philanthropy? ................................................... 78 5. The Teams: Globalization in Practice? ............................................................... 79 II. Towards a Business-Friendly Stable Regulatory Framework .............................. 81 1. Definition ............................................................................................................ 81 2. National Approach .............................................................................................. 81
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration
    1 ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY Burlington House, Piccadilly London W1J 0BQ, UK T: 020 7734 4582/ 3307 F: 020 7494 0166 [email protected] www.ras.org.uk Registered Charity 226545 Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration Professor Frank Close, OBE Dr John Dudeney, OBE Professor Ken Pounds, CBE FRS 2 Contents (A) Executive Summary 3 (B) The Formation and Membership of the Commission 6 (C) The Terms of Reference 7 (D) Summary of the activities/meetings of the Commission 8 (E) The need for a wider context 8 (E1) The Wider Science Context (E2) Public inspiration, outreach and educational Context (E3) The Commercial/Industrial context (E4) The Political and International context. (F) Planetary Science on the Moon & Mars 13 (G) Astronomy from the Moon 15 (H) Human or Robotic Explorers 15 (I) Costs and Funding issues 19 (J) The Technological Challenge 20 (J1) Launcher Capabilities (J2) Radiation (K) Summary 23 (L) Acknowledgements 23 (M) Appendices: Appendix 1 Expert witnesses consulted & contributions received 24 Appendix 2 Poll of UK Astronomers 25 Appendix 3 Poll of Public Attitudes 26 Appendix 4 Selected Web Sites 27 3 (A) Executive Summary 1. Scientific missions to the Moon and Mars will address questions of profound interest to the human race. These include: the origins and history of the solar system; whether life is unique to Earth; and how life on Earth began. If our close neighbour, Mars, is found to be devoid of life, important lessons may be learned regarding the future of our own planet. 2. While the exploration of the Moon and Mars can and is being addressed by unmanned missions we have concluded that the capabilities of robotic spacecraft will fall well short of those of human explorers for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • Americans and the Moon Treaty Nancy L
    Journal of Air Law and Commerce Volume 46 | Issue 3 Article 6 1981 Americans and the Moon Treaty Nancy L. Griffin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc Recommended Citation Nancy L. Griffin, Americans and the Moon Treaty, 46 J. Air L. & Com. 729 (1981) https://scholar.smu.edu/jalc/vol46/iss3/6 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at SMU Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Air Law and Commerce by an authorized administrator of SMU Scholar. For more information, please visit http://digitalrepository.smu.edu. Comments AMERICANS AND THE MOON TREATY NANCY L. GRIFFIN O N JULY 20, 1969, the United States successfully completed a technological space maneuver to place man on the moon for the first time.' Man's physical presence on the lunar surface represented such significant progress that the existing international law governing activities in outer space was no longer adequate to deal with the consequent legal questions.' The United States had taken a major step toward making the future occupation and ex- ploitation of the moon a reality. This event created a particular 1 TIME, July 25, 1969, at 10. SIn 1969, the international law governing states' activities in outer space consisted of United Nations General Assembly resolutions and two treaties: the Outer Space Treaty of 1967, 18 U.S.T. 2410, T.I.A.S. No. 6347, 610 U.N.T.S. 206, and the Rescue and Return Agreement of 1969, 19 U.S.T. 7570, T.IA.S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Space Programmes 2012 - 2013
    National Space Programmes 2012 - 2013 Introduction projects – a massive injection of innovation into the blood stream of the UK’s space sector. Meanwhile, the Welcome to the second edition of the UK Space programme of scientific instruments has reached a Agency’s National Space Programmes brochure. milestone with the delivery of MIRI for the James Webb This document contains financial and management Space Telescope, the result of over a decade’s hard information about our suite of National Space work by the UK-led European consortium. The national Programmes, provided in order to give you an insight exploration and the Earth observation technology into the wide range of investment we are making in programmes have also made good progress, while the UK’s space sector. both UKube-1 and TechDemoSat-1 are preparing for launch in 2013. It is going to be another exciting year. It is now approaching two years since the Agency’s full establishment. During this time the UK space sector We hope you find the brochure valuable. It’s hard has continued to grow, as has its contribution to the to capture the huge range of projects that the UK economy as a whole, currently thought to be £9.1 Space Agency has underway in a few pages. For billion a year and directly employing 28,900 people. further information and also to download our other The average growth rate of the UK space sector is publications, please see our website: almost 7.5%; the National Space Programmes are in http://www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency place to complement our investments in a range of European Space Agency, European Commission and And don’t forget to sign up for our monthly newsletter bilateral projects in order to further this growth in line and follow us on Twitter - @spacegovuk ! with the six themes of our civil space strategy: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report
    The 2008 Annual Report of the International Space Exploration Coordination Group Released March 2009 International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) – Annual Report:2008 THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK 1 International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) – Annual Report:2008 CONTENTS Introduction …………………………………………………………………………… 4 Part 1: The Role of the ISECG 1.1 Overview …………………………………………………………………………. 6 1.2 Working Groups of the ISECG …………………………………………………… 7 1.2.1 Enhancement of Public Engagement …………………………………………… 7 1.2.2 Establishment of Relationships with Existing International Working Groups …. 7 1.2.3 The International Space Exploration Coordination Tool (INTERSECT) ……. 8 1.2.4 The Space Exploration Interface Standards Working Group (ISWG) ………….. 8 1.2.5 Mapping the Space Exploration Journey ………………………………………... 8 Part 2: Current and Near-Term Activities of ISECG Members 2.1 Low Earth Orbit (LEO) …………………………………………………………… 10 2.1.1 The International Space Station (ISS) …………………………………………… 10 2.1.2 Emerging Government Capabilities …………………………………………….. 10 2.1.3 Emerging Commercial Providers ……………………………………………….. 11 2.2 Beyond LEO – The Moon and Mars ……………………………………………….. 11 2.2.1 Moon ……………………………………………………………………………… 11 2.2.2 Mars ………………………………………………………………………………. 12 Part 3: Progress in 2008 towards Opportunities for Integrated and Collaborative Space Exploration 3.1 Robotic Network Science – The International Lunar Network ……………………… 16 3.2 Joint Development for Robotic Exploration – Mars Sample Return ………………………… 17 3.3 Collaborative
    [Show full text]
  • Owning Outer Space Ezra J
    Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business Volume 20 Issue 1 Fall Fall 1999 Owning Outer Space Ezra J. Reinstein Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njilb Part of the Air and Space Law Commons Recommended Citation Ezra J. Reinstein, Owning Outer Space, 20 Nw. J. Int'l L. & Bus. 59 (1999-2000) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business by an authorized administrator of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. Owning Outer Space Ezra J. Reinstein * I. INTRODUCTION What do we want from space? We want the knowledge we can gain from scientific research; we can learn much about the Earth and its inhabitants, as well as the universe around us, by studying space. We want to explore, to satisfy the thirst for adventure and conquest imagined in countless science fiction books and films. We want to improve our collective lot down here on Earth. Space offers the potential for practically limitless wealth, some already being exploited, some we may only harness in the distant future, and un- doubtedly some we cannot begin to guess. Already the wealth of space is being developed in the form of telecommunications and remote satellite ob- servation. The private-sector investment in telecommunications satellites alone was projected to total $54.3 billion (including launch) between 1996 and 20001 -- and this figure doesn't include other commercial space ven- tures, nor does it include investment in Russian and Chinese satellites.
    [Show full text]
  • Gardini, Bruno; Ongaro, Franco; Vennemann, Dietrich
    Aurora Exploration Programme 7th ESAWorkshoponAdvancedSpaceTechnologiesforRoboticsandAutomation'ASTRA2002' ESTEC, Noordwijk,TheNetherlands,November19-21,2002 1 The Robotic Exploration Missions of the Aurora Programme 7th ASTRA Workshop, ESTEC 19-21 November 2002 ASTRA, 19-21 B.Gardini, F.Ongaro, D.Vennemann – ESA/ESTEC 1 November 2002 List of Contents 7th ESAWorkshoponAdvancedSpaceTechnologiesforRoboticsandAutomation'ASTRA2002' • Introduction • Objectives of the Aurora Programme ESTEC, Noordwijk,TheNetherlands,November19-21,2002 • Aurora Programme outline • Aurora Preparatory Period • Exploration Scenario • European Human/Robotic Exploration Scenario • Near term Planning • Near Term Missions Scenario 2 • Aurora candidate missions – Exobiology Mission (ExoMars) – Mars Sample Return Mission (MSR) – In Situ Resource Utilisation (ISRU) Mission – Lunar Mission – Advanced MSR – Arrow Missions • Aurora Mission Scenario • Conclusions. ASTRA, 19-21 2 November 2002 Introduction 7th ESAWorkshoponAdvancedSpaceTechnologiesforRoboticsandAutomation'ASTRA2002' • In the coming decades the scientific and human exploration of the solar ESTEC, Noordwijk,TheNetherlands,November19-21,2002 system is expected to progress further beyond the low Earth orbits. An international human mission to Mars may become a reality by the years 2020 – 2030. 3 • To decide in which areas of expertise Europe wants to have a lead in the future requires a detailed analysis of the European Technology strengths and an assessment of its strategic value. • The Aurora Programme, approved
    [Show full text]
  • Technologies for Exploration
    SP-1254 SP-1254 TTechnologiesechnologies forfor ExplorationExploration T echnologies forExploration AuroraAurora ProgrammeProgramme Proposal:Proposal: Annex Annex DD Contact: ESA Publications Division c/o ESTEC, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands Tel. (31) 71 565 3400 - Fax (31) 71 565 5433 SP-1254 November 2001 Technologies for Exploration Aurora Programme Proposal: Annex D This report was written by the staff of ESA’s Directorate of Technical and Operational Support. Published by: ESA Publications Division ESTEC, PO Box 299 2200 AG Noordwijk The Netherlands Editor/layout: Andrew Wilson Copyright: © 2001 European Space Agency ISBN: 92-9092-616-3 ISSN: 0379-6566 Printed in: The Netherlands Price: €30 / 70 DFl technologies for exploration Technologies for Exploration Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Exploration Milestones 3 3 Explorations Missions 3 4Technology Development and Associated Cost 5 5 Conclusion 6 Annex 1: Automated Guidance, Navigation & Control A1.1 and Mission Analysis Annex 2: Micro-Avionics A2.1 Annex 3: Data Processing and Communication Technologies A3.1 Annex 4: Entry, Descent and Landing A4.1 Annex 5: Crew Aspects of Exploration A5.1 Annex 6: In Situ Resource Utilisation A6.1 Annex 7: Power A7.1 Annex 8: Propulsion A8.1 Annex 9: Robotics and Mechanisms A9.1 Annex 10: Structures, Materials and Thermal Control A10.1 1 Table 1. Exploration Milestones for the Definition of Technology Readiness Requirements. 2005-2010 In situ resource utilisation/life support (ground demonstration) Decision on development of alternative
    [Show full text]
  • Implications of the Space Agreement; a Critique of the Statement of the American President to Exploit Space Resources
    ISSN: 2338 4638 Volume 4 Nomor 3 (2020) Implications of the Space Agreement; A Critique of the Statement of the American President to Exploit Space Resources Athari Farhani The Author is a graduate of the Faculty of Law University of Muhammadiyah Jakarta and an interest in Constitutional Law and Space Law 10.15408/adalah.v4i3.15624 Abstract: As the world’s population grows increasing demand for the planet’s limited resources, developed countries begin to explore outer space. One of them is the United States through its president statement Donald Trump who will explore and exploit space resources. While the law of space, including natural resources contained therein is a shared heritage of humanity. Whether said activities comply with the current provisions of international space law? Keywords: Outerspace, Natural Resources, Mining, Heritage of Mankind Abstrak: Ketika populasi dunia menumbuhkan permintaan akan sumber daya yang terbatas di planet ini, negara-negara maju mulai menjelajahi luar angkasa. Salah satunya adalah Amerika Serikat melalui pernyataan presidennya Donald Trump yang akan mengeksplorasi dan mengeksploitasi sumber daya ruang angkasa. Sedangkan hukum ruang, termasuk sumber daya alam yang terkandung di dalamnya adalah warisan kemanusiaan bersama. Apakah kegiatan tersebut memenuhi ketentuan hukum ruang angkasa internasional saat ini? Kata Kunci: Outerspace, Sumber Daya Alam, Penambangan, Warisan Manusia - 1 - ‘Adalah: Buletin Hukum dan Keadilan, Vol. 4, No. 3 (2020) Prolog The statement of US President Donald Trump, who has signed an agreement that America will explore natural resources in space, one of which on the moon. The Moon and other celestial bodies, such as Mars and asteroids, contain an abundant amount of re- sources that are scarce or non-existent on Earth, such as the isotope Helium-3 or useful metals like nickel and platinum.
    [Show full text]
  • CFE Final Report, 09 05
    CentreÿFrançaisÿsurÿlesÿEtats-Unisÿ(CFE) EUROPEANSÿINÿSPACE THEÿINTERACTIONSÿBETWEENÿTHEÿCONDUCTÿOFÿSPACEÿPROGRAMMES ANDÿTHEÿEUROPEANÿPROCESS SEPTEMBREÿ2005 [email protected]; [email protected] ExecutiveÿSummary Decisive choices for the future of European space exploration programmes will be made during the next meetings of the ESA ministerial council, in December 2005 and in 2008. The continuation of the Aurora programme, as well as cooperation ventures with the U.S. and Russia will be decided on, setting the stage for the next 5 to 25 years. The Automated Transfer Vehicle, human space flight, robotic missions to Mars and niche technologies are amongst the elements of the overall programme that will be defined. Budgets constraints, however, will be a limiting factor in the decision process. They point to the lack of political support for space exploration in Europe. Contrary to the U.S., manned exploration does not enjoy strong historical and cultural references in Europe. Moreover, past partnerships with NASA do not encourage new cooperative ventures. The two main drivers for space exploration in Europe are rather the preservation of high-tech industry and jobs, as well as the continuation of a successful European scientific presence. If an ambitious European space exploration programme is to be funded, a lobbying campaign targeting European decision-makers should be undertaken on the basis of these drivers. Space exploration remains a responsibility of ESA. The involvement of the EU would be a political and budgetary bonus for space exploration. This poses in fine the question of the evolving relationship between the two entities. 2 Introduction During its next Ministerial Meetings, in December 05 and in 2008, the European Space Agency (ESA) is expected to adopt its programme for the next seven years.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Space Exploration Programme
    MESSINA 9/2/03 2:04 PM Page 34 Strategy AuroraAurora – The European Space Exploration Programme 34 esa bulletin 115 - august 2003 www.esa.int MESSINA 9/2/03 2:04 PM Page 35 The Aurora Programme Pierro Messina & Franco Ongaro Directorate of Strategy and External Relations, ESA, Paris Introduction A manned mission to Mars is bound to become a reality over the next decades. It is very likely to be an international mission carried out by those players who have developed the technologies and expertise needed to master the challenges of landing humans on Mars and returning them safely to the Earth. Europe has been at the forefront of space endeavours for more than 30 years, with many successful missions and key contributions to international programmes. Its participation in the International Space Station, the experience acquired with the European astronauts, with leading-edge scientific missions and notably with the recently launched Mars Express and its Beagle 2 Lander, are all good examples of the degree of maturity that Europe, through ESA and its Members States, has gained as a result of its investment in space activities and the expertise developed within its work force and the scientific community. Exploring Mars is still a risky business, however, as the low success rate of the robotic missions conducted to date is a constant reminder. Less than a third of the unmanned missions so far launched to the Red Planet have fulfilled their goal. Consequently, there is still much to be done before we can feel sufficiently confident to commit to sending humans to explore the more distant bodies in the Universe and to land on Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • SPACE : Obstacles and Opportunities
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bstacles and Opportunities Rapporteur’s Report Alan Smith Canada -UK Colloquium, 19 -21 November 2015 The University of Strathclyde, Technology and Innovation Centre Glasgow Canada -UK Council School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University ii !"#$%&%'(&!$%'#) !"#$%&&#"'()* ' !"#$%&'()*% # %# # %#%*%#)%( ) %$( ()%($%%# %$%*( % #% ) %% $#% '$#$) !%"( % #%($" %)*% #"# % " '$)% #$ % $(%*)% % #% &#"# #% $ ($%% #)% '% &' #'% &)*% ! ) #"(#!% () $% )*% *% # % % )*% + #$% & #% !%$% #)% () % )*$"%% $) % ($% )*% ,)* "#$ % # % )*% #$% # ) * (( )% #$ % # % #$% ($ ) '$)% ($- )!% "( % # "% # % ($" % #% '($#-$% % )*$"%% " '$)% . #% $(%*)% *# # % $% + #$'% #$ % / (#$% #)""() 0'% 1)% '#$#%'$)% #$ % # ) * ( !% 2$% *% *% 1($ % $( ()% 3""%% $ $4 % 5""# % & #% &($% # #) '% ($(-#""% # % "# % % )) % * ( '%$)#""%'($%%( ) %#$ %"# %% # )'$)%.6**70!%2$%% *% # % '# % #% % % )) % * ( !%
    [Show full text]
  • Space Law: Selected Documents 2009 Volume 2: International Space Law Documents
    The University of Mississippi School of Law The National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Informational resources on the legal aspects of human activities using aerospace technologies Space Law: Selected Documents 2009 Volume 2: International Space Law Documents Compiled by P.J. Blount P.J. Blount, editor Joanne Irene Gabrynowicz, editor A supplement to the Journal of Space Law This page intentionally left blank. ii Disclaimer The information contained in this compilation represents information as of February 22, 2010. It does not constitute legal representation by the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law (Center), its faculty or staff. Before using any information in this publication, it is recommended that an attorney be consulted for specific legal advice. This publication is offered as a service to the Center's readership. The documents contained in this publication do not purport to be official copies. Some pages have sections blocked out. These blocked sections do not appear in the original documents. Blocked out sections contain information wholly unrelated to the space law materials intended to be compiled. The sections were blocked out by the Center's faculty and staff to facilitate focus on the relevant materials. iii National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law Founded in 1999, the National Center for Remote Sensing, Air, and Space Law is a reliable source for creating, gathering, and disseminating objective and timely remote sensing, space, and aviation legal research and materials. The Center serves the public good and the aerospace industry by addressing and conducting education and outreach activities related to the legal aspects of aerospace technologies to human activities.
    [Show full text]