DOCSLIB.ORG

A New Polypterid Fish: Polypterus Faraou Sp. Nov. (Cladistia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2006? 2006 146? 227237 Original Article A NEW POLYPTERID FROM THE LATE MIOCENE OF CHADO. OTERO ET AL. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 146, 227–237. With 10 figures A new polypterid fish: Polypterus faraou sp. nov. (Cladistia, Polypteridae) from the Late Miocene, Toros-Menalla, Chad OLGA OTERO1*, ANDOSSA LIKIUS2, PATRICK VIGNAUD1 and MICHEL BRUNET1 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/146/2/227/2631032 by guest on 26 October 2020 1Laboratoire de Géobiologie, Biochronologie et Paléontologie humaine, CNRS UMR 6046, Faculté des Sciences fondamentales et appliquées, Université Poitiers, 40 av. du Recteur Pineau, F-86 022 Poitiers cedex, France 2Département de Paléontologie, Université de N’Djaména, N’Djaména, Tchad Received June 2004; accepted for publication July 2005 Polypterus faraou sp. nov. (Cladistia, Polypteridae) from the Late Miocene of Toros-Menalla (western Djourab, Chad) is described on the basis of a subcomplete articulated skeleton preserved in three dimensions. This is the first time such a complete fossil polypterid skeleton has been described. It is the only verifiable fossil record for the genus Polypterus. P. faraou closely resembles P. bichir and P. endlicheri, extant fish found in the Chad–Chari system. Intrarelationships among the polypterids are not yet resolved: however, P. faraou shows a primitive shape of the body and a primitive shape of the opening of the lateral line on the scales, similar to that of three living species (P. bichir, P. endlicheri and P. ansorgii). © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 146, 227–237. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: anatomy – Anthracotheriid Unit – Polypteriformes – western Djourab. INTRODUCTION two extant genera, i.e. Polypterus, with ten species and 15 subspecies (Poll, 1941a, b, 1942; Hanssens, Teugels Palaeontological expeditions have been conducted in & Thys van der Audenaerde, 1995; Britz, 2004; there Chad since the early 1930s. In 1994, the MPFT are 11 species if P. polli is considered as a valid spe- (Mission Paléoanthropologique Franco-Tchadienne) cies), and the monotypic genus Erpetoichthys. Nine initiated a series of field missions to the Mio-Pliocene fossil genera have been described. Two have been sites of the eastern Djurab Desert in northern Chad described on the basis of isolated skull bones and (Brunet et al., 1995, 1998; Brunet & MPFT, 2000) and, scales (Meunier & Gayet, 1996; Gayet & Meunier, since 1997, to the Miocene sites of Toros-Menalla, 1991), and six others have been described on the basis western Djurab. The Anthracoteriid Unit in Toros- of the articular head of pinnules (Gayet & Meunier, Menalla has yielded a rich vertebrate fauna (Vignaud 1996; Werner & Gayet, 1997). Finally, Serenoichthys et al., 2002), the oldest known species of hominid, has been described on the basis of scale and finlet Sahelanthropus tchadensis (Brunet et al., 2002), as counts and distribution (Dutheil, 1999). Serenoichthys well as the first nearly complete and articulated skel- is the only other fossil articulated skeleton known so eton of a fossil polypterid. This polypterid belongs to a far, but the head is missing. These fossil genera are new species that is described here. The estimated age Cretaceous in age and African, except for Dagetella of the Anthracotheriid Unit is c. 7 Myr (Vignaud et al., and Latinopollia, which are of Late Cretaceous and 2002). Early Palaeocene age, respectively, and South Ameri- Polypterids (Cladistia) are basal actinopterygian can. Post-Palaeocene polypterid history is exclusively fishes (Rosen et al., 1981). They are represented by African. Isolated scales and skull bones attributed to Polypterus sp. testify to the presence of the genus in *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] African freshwaters since the Eocene. Moreover, two © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 146, 227–237 227 228 O. OTERO ET AL. types of African Cretaceous pinnules were tentatively bital space (as in P. bichir katangae and possibly in attributed to two fossil Polypterus species, P. dageti P. teugelsi, whereas it is more than 60% in P. ansorgii, (Gayet & Meunier, 1996) and P. sudanensis (Werner & and less than 45% in the other species) and orbit Gayet, 1997). The intrarelationships among poly- smaller than suboperculum width (as in P. bichir and pterids have yet to be clarified; indeed, the monophyly P. endlicheri only); prognathus lower jaw (as in and the intrarelationships among extant species have P. bichir and P. endlicheri only); at least 5–7 prespi- not been established. racular bones (the number of prespiracular bones is This paper provides the first description of a near possibly equal to or above seven only in P. weeksii, in complete fossil polypterid skeleton including cranium, P. bichir bichir and in P. endlicheri congicus); deep and it is the only clearly recognizable fossil record for body with approximately 23 transversal scales, 58–60 the genus Polypterus. The new species from the Late scale rows, and 14 predorsal scales (such body shape Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/146/2/227/2631032 by guest on 26 October 2020 Miocene of Toros-Menalla (western Djurab, Chad) is exists elsewhere only in P. ansorgii, P. bichir and assigned to the genus Polypterus based on its morpho- P. endlicheri); 15 finlets with successive pinnules of logical characteristics, which fall within the anatomi- the finlets overlapping the base of the following cal range of Recent species of the genus, from which it one (such dorsal fin mophology elsewhere only in differs by a unique combination of characters. We also P. ansorgii, P. bichir and P. endlicheri congicus); discuss the primitive or derived state of certain osteo- grooved lateral line scales with notched posterior mar- logical features observed in this species. gins (as in P. ansorgii, P. bichir and P. endlicheri only). The holotype is 590 mm in standard length. Such dimensions are also reached in P. bichir and SYSTEMATIC PALAEONTOLOGY P. endlicheri only. ACTINOPTERYGII COPE, 1887 Occurrence. Anthracotheriid Unit of Toros-Menalla, (SENSU ROSEN ET AL., 1981) Late Miocene of Chad. CLADISTIA COPE, 1871 POLYPTERIDAE GÜNTHER, 1870 MATERIAL AND METHODS POLYPTERUS ST HILAIRE, 1802 Type species. Polypterus bichir St Hilaire, 1802. Specimen TM090-001-039 was found lying on its back. It is preserved in three dimensions. The dorsal and lateral body surfaces have globally kept their living POLYPTERUS FARAOU SP. NOV. shape, whereas the ventral surface has collapsed (Fig. 1A–C). Most of the scales of the body are present Derivation of name. In Chadian Arabian, faraou and articulated with each other. All the bones of the means flattened. The name is given in reference to the right half of the skull are in natural position, whereas dorso-ventrally depressed head of the fish. some bones of the left side are slightly displaced. This Type specimen. TM090-001-039, housed in the Centre three-dimension preservation allows us to observe the National d’Appui à la Recherche (CNAR, N’Djamena, natural position of the bones and the shape of the cra- Chad). nium; it also allows us to measure the dimensions of the specimen (Fig. 2) and to compare some dimensions Diagnosis. A Polypterus species characterized by: and meristic data between the specimen and Recent depressed head (as in P. weeksii and P. endlicheri species. Jollie’s (1984) nomenclature of the bones is only), head length approximately 20% of body length followed. (less than 20% in other Polypterus species except P. ansorgii, P. bichir and P. endlicheri) and head width at the level of the preoperculum reaches 70% of its ANATOMICAL DESCRIPTION length (more than in any other Polypterus species); HEAD AND BODY SHAPE (FIGS 1–3) opening of the lateral line on the nasal 3 close to its posterior border (as in P. bichir and P. endlicheri, The standard length of the specimen is 59 cm (Fig. 2, whereas it is central in other species); large and a). We observe a natural dorso-ventral depression of rounded snout, shorter than the interorbital distance the head. The head length (from the front of the mouth (as in most Polypterus species except P. bichir and to the posterior level of the opercular bone) is equiva- P. palmas the snout of which is longer than the lent to about 20% of the standard length (Fig. 2, m). interorbital distance); superolateral position of the The width of the head, measured at the level of the orbit (as in P. ansorgii, P. weeksii, P. endlicheri and preoperculum, is around 70% of its length (Fig. 2, n). P. bichir, whereas the orbit is lateral in P. delhezi, The distance between the lateral border of the spira- P. ornatipinnis, P. senegalus, P. retropinnis and cular series at the level of the preoperculum is 45% of P. palmas); orbit length around the half the interor- the total length of the head (Fig. 2, o). The lower jaw is © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2006, 146, 227–237 A NEW POLYPTERID FROM THE LATE MIOCENE OF CHAD 229 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article/146/2/227/2631032 by guest on 26 October 2020 Figure 1. Photograph of specimen TM90-01-39, holotype of Polypterus faraou sp. nov., in A, dorsal, B, left lateral, and C, ventral views. Figure 2. Measurements in specimen TM90-01-39, holotype of Polypterus faraou sp. nov., and ratios used in the text. prognathus. The general shape of the snout is wide (nasals 3) meet in the midline. The suboperculum is and rounded, and it is shorter than the interorbital deeper than the orbit length. The gular plates are space is wide (Fig. 2, compare c and e).
Recommended publications
  • History of Fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification

    History of Fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification

    History of fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification AGNATHANS = Jawless • Class – Pteraspidomorphi • Class – Myxini?? (living) • Class – Cephalaspidomorphi – Osteostraci – Anaspidiformes – Petromyzontiformes (living) Major Groups of Agnathans • 1. Osteostracida 2. Anaspida 3. Pteraspidomorphida • Hagfish and Lamprey = traditionally together in cyclostomata Jaws = GNATHOSTOMES • Gnathostomes: the jawed fishes -good evidence for gnathostome monophyly. • 4 major groups of jawed vertebrates: Extinct Acanthodii and Placodermi (know) Living Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes • Living Chondrichthyans - usually divided into Selachii or Elasmobranchi (sharks and rays) and Holocephali (chimeroids). • • Living Osteichthyans commonly regarded as forming two major groups ‑ – Actinopterygii – Ray finned fish – Sarcopterygii (coelacanths, lungfish, Tetrapods). • SARCOPTERYGII = Coelacanths + (Dipnoi = Lung-fish) + Rhipidistian (Osteolepimorphi) = Tetrapod Ancestors (Eusthenopteron) Close to tetrapods Lungfish - Dipnoi • Three genera, Africa+Australian+South American ACTINOPTERYGII Bichirs – Cladistia = POLYPTERIFORMES Notable exception = Cladistia – Polypterus (bichirs) - Represented by 10 FW species - tropical Africa and one species - Erpetoichthys calabaricus – reedfish. Highly aberrant Cladistia - numerous uniquely derived features – long, independent evolution: – Strange dorsal finlets, Series spiracular ossicles, Peculiar urohyal bone and parasphenoid • But retain # primitive Actinopterygian features = heavy ganoid scales (external
  • Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals

    Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals

    Jelle Atema Richard R. Fay Arthur N. Popper William N. Tavolga Editors Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo JELLE ATEMA, Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Richard R. Fay, Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA ARTHUR N. POPPER, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA WILLIAM N. TAVOLGA, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida 33577, USA The cover Illustration is a reproduction of Figure 13.3, p. 343 of this volume Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Papers based on presentations given at an International Conference on the Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals held, June 24-28, 1985, at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Fla. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Aquatic animals—Physiology—Congresses. 2. Senses and Sensation—Congresses. I. Atema, Jelle. II. International Conference on the Sensory Biology - . of Aquatic Animals (1985 : Sarasota, Fla.) QL120.S46 1987 591.92 87-9632 © 1988 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. x —• All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York 10010, U.S.A.), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of Information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, Computer Software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc.
  • Bichir External Gills Arise Via Heterochronic Shift That Accelerates

    Bichir External Gills Arise Via Heterochronic Shift That Accelerates

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Bichir external gills arise via heterochronic shift that accelerates hyoid arch development Jan Stundl1,2, Anna Pospisilova1, David Jandzik1,3, Peter Fabian1†, Barbora Dobiasova1‡, Martin Minarik1§, Brian D Metscher4, Vladimir Soukup1*, Robert Cerny1* 1Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; 2National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic; 3Department of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia; 4Department of Theoretical Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria *For correspondence: Abstract In most vertebrates, pharyngeal arches form in a stereotypic anterior-to-posterior [email protected] progression. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying evolutionary changes in pharyngeal (VS); arch development, here we investigate embryos and larvae of bichirs. Bichirs represent the earliest [email protected] (RC) diverged living group of ray-finned fishes, and possess intriguing traits otherwise typical for lobe- Present address: †Eli and Edythe finned fishes such as ventral paired lungs and larval external gills. In bichir embryos, we find that Broad CIRM Center for the anteroposterior way of formation of cranial segments is modified by the unique acceleration of Regenerative Medicine and Stem the entire hyoid arch segment, with earlier and orchestrated development of the endodermal, Cell Research, University of mesodermal, and neural crest tissues. This major heterochronic shift in the anteroposterior Southern California, Los Angeles, developmental sequence enables early appearance of the external gills that represent key ‡ United States; The Prague breathing organs of bichir free-living embryos and early larvae. Bichirs thus stay as unique models Zoological Garden, Prague, for understanding developmental mechanisms facilitating increased breathing capacity.
  • Observations on Fish Scales

    Observations on Fish Scales

    OBSERVATIONS ON FISH SCALES By T. D. A. Cockerell University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado OBSERVATIONS ON FISH SCALES. By T. D. A. COCKERELL, University of Colorado, Bo~,lder, Colo • .;t. INTRODUCTION, In a paper on "The Scales of Freshwater Fishes" (Biological Bulletin of the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole, Mass., vol. xx, May, 19II) I have given an account of the recent work on teleostean fish scales and have discussed some of the problems presented by the scales of freshwater fishes. Until recently it has been impos­ sible to do much with the scales of marine fishes, owing to the difficulty of obtaining adequate materials. For the same reason very little was done on the spiny-rayed freshwater groups, the Percidre, Centrarchidre, etc. During the summer of 1911, however, I was enabled to continue the work in the laboratory of the Bureau of Fisheries at Woods Hole, where the director, Dr. F. B. Sumner, afforded me every possible facility and put at my disposal a large series of fishes representing many families. I have also been very greatly indebted to the Bureau of lfisheries, through Dr. Hugh M. Smith and Dr. B. W. Evermann, for numerous and important specimens from the collections at Washington. At the National Museum Mr. B. A. Bean and Mr. A. C. Weed gave me much help and supplied scales of some important genera, while other very valuable materials were secured from the Museum of Comparative Zoology, through the kindness of Dr. S. Garman. As in former years, I have been indebted to Dr. Boulenger for some of the rarest forms.
  • Title the Mitochondrial Phylogeny of an Ancient Lineage of Ray- Finned Fishes (Polypteridae) with Implications for the Evolution

    Title the Mitochondrial Phylogeny of an Ancient Lineage of Ray- Finned Fishes (Polypteridae) with Implications for the Evolution

    The mitochondrial phylogeny of an ancient lineage of ray- finned fishes (Polypteridae) with implications for the evolution Title of body elongation, pelvic fin loss, and craniofacial morphology in Osteichthyes. Author(s) Suzuki, Dai; Brandley, Matthew C; Tokita, Masayoshi Citation BMC evolutionary biology (2010), 10(1) Issue Date 2010 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/108263 c 2010 Suzuki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Right Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University Suzuki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:21 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/21 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The mitochondrial phylogeny of an ancient lineage of ray-finned fishes (Polypteridae) with implications for the evolution of body elongation, pelvic fin loss, and craniofacial morphology in Osteichthyes Dai Suzuki1, Matthew C Brandley2, Masayoshi Tokita1,3* Abstract Background: The family Polypteridae, commonly known as “bichirs”, is a lineage that diverged early in the evolutionary history of Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish), but has been the subject of far less evolutionary study than other members of that clade. Uncovering patterns of morphological change within Polypteridae provides an important opportunity to evaluate if the mechanisms underlying morphological evolution are shared among actinoptyerygians, and in fact, perhaps the entire osteichthyan (bony fish and tetrapods) tree of life. However, the greatest impediment to elucidating these patterns is the lack of a well-resolved, highly-supported phylogenetic tree of Polypteridae.
  • On the Authorship of Actinopteri and Actinopterygii

    On the Authorship of Actinopteri and Actinopterygii

    Ichthyological note On the authorship of Actinopteri and Actinopterygii by SFI © Werner SCHWARZHANS* (1), Gary STRINGER (2) & Ronald FRICKE (3) Submitted: 11 May 2019 Accepted: 14 Nov. 2019 Editor: R. Causse this citation for the Actinopterygii came into being. Indeed, the name ‘Actinopterygia’ was introduced by Cope (1887: 1017) and Résumé. – Taxonomie et taxinomie des taxons Actinopteri et Acti- was meant to be an amendment of his earlier name ‘Actinopteri’, nopterygii. albeit with a slight modification of the scope, i.e., by excluding the Chondrostei. Woodward (1889: xxiv and 1891: xxxviii and 423) Actinopteri a été décrit par Cope, 1871 et Actinopterygii est changed ‘Actinopterygia’ to ‘Actinopterygii’ but kept Cope’s origi- compris aujourd’hui sensu Goodrich, 1930. nal extent of the ‘Actinopteri’, e.g., including the Chondrostei and Key words. – Zoological nomenclature – Usage – Authorship. excluding the Cladistia. There seems to be no publication by Cope in 1891 mentioning ‘Actinopterygia’ or ‘Actinopterygii’. Apparent- ly the first to change the meaning of the Actinopterygii to encom- pass also the Cladistia was Goodrich (1930: xvii), as explained in Finding the correct authorship for higher taxonomic units in Rosen et al. (1981, who however erroneously listed on page 261 fishes (Pisces) can be difficult and involve significant literature th “Actinopterygii Cope, 1891”). Rosen et al. (1981) resurrected research. Most of the entities were introduced during the 19 cen- the term Actinopteri Cope (1871) for ray-finned fishes excluding tury, and alternative concepts and changes in scope and definition Cladistia and emended the Actinopterygii as a higher hierarchy to are common. The names ‘Actinopteri’ and ‘Actinopterygii’ rep- include Cladistia in the sense of Goodrich (1930).
  • On the Homology of the Posteriormost Gill Arch in Polypterids (Cladistia, Actinopterygii)

    On the Homology of the Posteriormost Gill Arch in Polypterids (Cladistia, Actinopterygii)

    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2003 1384 495503 Original Article POLYPTERUS GILL ARCH HOMOLOGYR. BRITZ and G. D. JOHNSON Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 138, 495–503. With 3 figures On the homology of the posteriormost gill arch in polypterids (Cladistia, Actinopterygii) RALF BRITZ1,2* AND G. DAVID JOHNSON2 1Lehrstuhl für Spezielle Zoologie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany 2Division of Fishes, National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C. 20560, USA Received October 2002; accepted for publication December 2002 Polypterids are unusual among ray-finned fishes in possessing only four rather than five gill arches. We review the two current hypotheses regarding the homology of the last gill arch in polypterids: that it represents (1) the fifth or (2) the fourth arch of other actinopterygians. Arguments for the alternative hypotheses drawn from different ana- tomical systems are compiled and evaluated. We conclude that in polypterids the last arch represents the fourth arch of other Actinopterygii and the fifth arch is absent. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 138, 495–503. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: branchial circulation – branchial muscles – branchial nerves – Erpetoichthys – Polypterus. INTRODUCTION cialized anatomy of the pectoral fins, a particular type of sexually dimorphic anal fin associated with a unique The African freshwater fish family Polypteridae com- mating behaviour, and a reduced number of gill arches prises two genera, Polypterus (bichirs), with ten spe- (Müller, 1846; Greenwood, 1984; Gardiner & Schaeffer, cies, and the monotypic Erpetoichthys (reedfish) (Poll 1989; Britz & Bartsch, 1998).
  • HANDBOOK of FISH BIOLOGY and FISHERIES Volume 1 Also Available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B

    HANDBOOK of FISH BIOLOGY and FISHERIES Volume 1 Also Available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B

    HANDBOOK OF FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES Volume 1 Also available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds Volume 2 Fisheries Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries VOLUME 1 FISH BIOLOGY EDITED BY Paul J.B. Hart Department of Biology University of Leicester AND John D. Reynolds School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia © 2002 by Blackwell Science Ltd a Blackwell Publishing company Chapter 8 © British Crown copyright, 1999 BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148‐5020, USA 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds to be identified as the Authors of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2002 Reprinted 2004 Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data has been applied for. Volume 1 ISBN 0‐632‐05412‐3 (hbk) Volume 2 ISBN 0‐632‐06482‐X (hbk) 2‐volume set ISBN 0‐632‐06483‐8 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 9/11.5 pt Trump Mediaeval by SNP Best‐set Typesetter Ltd, Hong Kong Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall.
  • Linnean 22(3) July 2006 Final.P65

    Linnean 22(3) July 2006 Final.P65

    NEWSLETTER AND PROCEEDINGS OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON VOLUME 22 • NUMBER 3 • JULY 2006 THE LINNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON Registered Charity Number 220509 Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0BF Tel. (+44) (0)20 7434 4479; Fax: (+44) (0)20 7287 9364 e-mail: [email protected]; internet: www.linnean.org President Secretaries Council Professor David F Cutler BOTANICAL The Officers and Dr Sandy Knapp Dr Louise Allcock Vice-Presidents Prof John R Barnett Professor Richard M Bateman ZOOLOGICAL Prof Janet Browne Dr Jenny M Edmonds Dr Vaughan R Southgate Dr Joe Cain Prof Mark Seaward Prof Peter S Davis Dr Vaughan R Southgate EDITORIAL Mr Aljos Farjon Dr John R Edmondson Dr Michael F Fay Treasurer Dr Shahina Ghazanfar Professor Gren Ll Lucas OBE COLLECTIONS Dr D J Nicholas Hind Mrs Susan Gove Mr Alastair Land Executive Secretary Dr D Tim J Littlewood Mr Adrian Thomas OBE Librarian & Archivist Dr Keith N Maybury Miss Gina Douglas Dr George McGavin Head of Development Prof Mark Seaward Ms Elaine Shaughnessy Deputy Librarian Mrs Lynda Brooks Office/Facilities Manager Ms Victoria Smith Library Assistant Conservator Mr Matthew Derrick Ms Janet Ashdown Finance Officer Mr Priya Nithianandan THE LINNEAN Newsletter and Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London Edited by Brian G Gardiner Editorial .......................................................................................................................1 Society News............................................................................................................... 1 The Linnean
  • Molecular Synapomorphies Resolve Evolutionary Relationships of Extant Jawed Vertebrates

    Molecular Synapomorphies Resolve Evolutionary Relationships of Extant Jawed Vertebrates

    Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates Byrappa Venkatesh*†, Mark V. Erdmann‡, and Sydney Brenner* *Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609; and ‡Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by Sydney Brenner, August 7, 2001 The evolutionary relationships of gnathostomes (jawed verte- brates), which comprise chondrichthyans (cartilaginous fishes), lobe-finned fishes (coelacanths and lungfishes), tetrapods, and actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes), have been debated for almost a century. Phylogenetic analyses based on fossils, morphology, and molecular sequences have generated different models of relation- ships that remain unresolved. We identified 13 derived shared molecular markers (synapomorphies) that define clades in the vertebrate lineage and used them to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of extant jawed vertebrates. Our markers include the presence or absence of insertions and deletions in coding se- quences, nuclear introns, and alternatively spliced transcripts. The synapomorphies identified by us are congruent with each other and give rise to a single phylogenetic tree. This tree confirms that chondrichthyans are basal to all living gnathostomes, that lung- fishes (Dipnoi) are the closest living relatives of tetrapods, and that bichirs (Cladistia) are the living members of the most ancient family of ray-finned fishes. Our study also provides molecular evidence to support the monophyly of living tetrapods and teleosts. Fig. 1. Alternative models of evolutionary relationships of gnathostomes he jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) fall into two major taxa, proposed by earlier studies (4–5). Model a proposes a lungfish ϩ tetrapod Tthe Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) and Osteichthyes clade, whereas model b supports a lungfish ϩ coelacanth clade (4).
  • A Strategic Approach to the Management of Ornamental Fish in Australia Communication Strategy and Grey List Review - a REPORT to OFMIG

    A Strategic Approach to the Management of Ornamental Fish in Australia Communication Strategy and Grey List Review - a REPORT to OFMIG

    A strAtegic ApproAch to the management of ornamental fish in australia communicAtion strAtegy And grey list review - A report TO oFmig A strategic approach to the management of ornamental fish in Australia Communication strategy and grey list review – a report to OFMIG Andy Moore, Nicholas Marton and Alex McNee March 2010 © Commonwealth of Australia 2010 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Commonwealth Copyright Administration, Attorney General’s Department, Robert Garran Offices, National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 or posted at http://www.ag.gov.au/cca. The Australian Government acting through the Bureau of Rural Sciences has exercised due care and skill in the preparation and compilation of the information and data set out in this publication. Notwithstanding, the Bureau of Rural Sciences, its employees and advisers disclaim all liability, including liability for negligence, for any loss, damage, injury, expense or cost incurred by any person as a result of accessing, using or relying upon any of the information or data set out in this publication to the maximum extent permitted by law. Postal address: Bureau of Rural Sciences GPO Box 858 Canberra, ACT 2601 Copies available from: www.brs.gov.au ISBN: 1-921192-37-2 ii Acknowledgements This report was made possible through financial support from the Ornamental Fish Management Implementation Group (OFMIG) which is funded by state, teritory and federal government agencies.
  • 2003. Fish Biodiversity: Local Studies As Basis for Global Inferences

    2003. Fish Biodiversity: Local Studies As Basis for Global Inferences

    Fish Biodiversity: Local Studies as Basis for Global Inferences. M.L.D. Palomares, B. Samb, T. Diouf, J.M. Vakily and D. Pauly (Eds.) ACP – EU Fisheries Research Report NO. 14 ACP-EU Fisheries Research Initiative Fish Biodiversity: Local Studies as Basis for Global Inferences Edited by Maria Lourdes D. Palomares Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Birane Samb Centre de Recherches Océanographiques de Dakar-Thiaroye, Sénégal Taïb Diouf Centre de Recherches Océanographiques de Dakar-Thiaroye, Sénégal Jan Michael Vakily Joint Research Center, Ispra, Italy and Daniel Pauly Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada Brussels December 2003 ACP-EU Fisheries Research Report (14) – Page 2 Fish Biodiversity: Local Studies as Basis for Global Inferences. M.L.D. Palomares, B. Samb, T. Diouf, J.M. Vakily and D. Pauly (eds.) The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers or boundaries. Copyright belongs to the European Commission. Nevertheless, permission is hereby granted for reproduction in whole or part for educational, scientific or development related purposes, except those involving commercial sale on any medium whatsoever, provided that (1) full citation of the source is given and (2) notification is given in writing to the European Commission, Directorate General for Research, INCO-Programme, 8 Square de Meeûs, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium. Copies are available free of charge upon request from the Information Desks of the Directorate General for Development, 200 rue de la Loi, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium, and of the INCO-Programme of the Directorate General for Research, 8 Square de Meeûs, B-1049 Brussels, Belgium, E-mail: [email protected].