DOCSLIB.ORG

On the Authorship of Actinopteri and Actinopterygii

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Ichthyological note On the authorship of Actinopteri and Actinopterygii by SFI © Werner SCHWARZHANS* (1), Gary STRINGER (2) & Ronald FRICKE (3) Submitted: 11 May 2019 Accepted: 14 Nov. 2019 Editor: R. Causse this citation for the Actinopterygii came into being. Indeed, the name ‘Actinopterygia’ was introduced by Cope (1887: 1017) and Résumé. – Taxonomie et taxinomie des taxons Actinopteri et Acti- was meant to be an amendment of his earlier name ‘Actinopteri’, nopterygii. albeit with a slight modification of the scope, i.e., by excluding the Chondrostei. Woodward (1889: xxiv and 1891: xxxviii and 423) Actinopteri a été décrit par Cope, 1871 et Actinopterygii est changed ‘Actinopterygia’ to ‘Actinopterygii’ but kept Cope’s origi- compris aujourd’hui sensu Goodrich, 1930. nal extent of the ‘Actinopteri’, e.g., including the Chondrostei and Key words. – Zoological nomenclature – Usage – Authorship. excluding the Cladistia. There seems to be no publication by Cope in 1891 mentioning ‘Actinopterygia’ or ‘Actinopterygii’. Apparent- ly the first to change the meaning of the Actinopterygii to encom- pass also the Cladistia was Goodrich (1930: xvii), as explained in Finding the correct authorship for higher taxonomic units in Rosen et al. (1981, who however erroneously listed on page 261 fishes (Pisces) can be difficult and involve significant literature th “Actinopterygii Cope, 1891”). Rosen et al. (1981) resurrected research. Most of the entities were introduced during the 19 cen- the term Actinopteri Cope (1871) for ray-finned fishes excluding tury, and alternative concepts and changes in scope and definition Cladistia and emended the Actinopterygii as a higher hierarchy to are common. The names ‘Actinopteri’ and ‘Actinopterygii’ rep- include Cladistia in the sense of Goodrich (1930). This is opposed resent one such instance, both being frequently used, particularly to the original establishment of the Actinopterygii by Cope (1887) the latter. The authorship for the Actinopteri is variably given by as a replacement of ‘Actinopteri’ and of a lower hierarchical sense authors as Cope (1870), Cope (1871) or Cope (1872). A quick and (see also Patterson, 1982). by no means exhaustive research into the authorships given for the We consider the determination of the correct authorship and Actinopterygii brought to light: von Klein (1885), Cope (1887), date as essential for the availability of names in higher �oological Cope (1891), Woodward (1891) and sensu Goodrich (1930). Pri- nomenclature, in line with Dubois (2006 and 2015). In our view, mary and original references available to the authors were used in the name ‘Actinopterygii’ should probably be seen as an unneces- this research followed with online searches. The complex history of the two names and their circumscriptions was traced by Rosen et sary substitute for ‘Actinopteri’. If being used for ray-finned fishes al. (1981) and was comprehensively discussed by Patterson (1982). including Cladistia, which is the established usage today and has The scientific name Actinopteri was first introduced by Cope been for a long time, it should in our opinion be referred to as: (1871: 149) for the “Teleostei and Ganoidea of Müller, minus Actinopterygii sensu Goodrich, 1930. Polypterus”. He created the higher taxon Cladistia for the Polypteri- dae and placed it into the Crossopterygia in the same paper. The REFERENCES work was apparently read at the American Philosophical Society in 1870, as stated in the heading of the article. In 1872, Cope (1872: COPE E.D., 1871. – Contribution to the ichthyology of the Lesser Antilles. Trans. Am. Phil. Soc. (n.s.), 14(3): 445-483. 162) used the name Actinopteri again with the same meaning and wording (i.e., same circumscription). We conclude that the name COPE E.D., 1872. – Observations on the systematic relations of the fishes.Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (ser. 4), 9(19): 155-168. Actinopteri, meaning ray-finned fishes without Cladistia, has Cope COPE E.D., 1887. – General notes: geology and palaeontology. IV. (1871) as authorship. Am. Nat., 21(11): 1016-1019. The earliest authorship mentioned for the ‘Actinopterygii’ is DU�oiS A., 2006. – Proposed Rules for the incorporation of nomi- von Klein (1885) and it is rarely referenced in literature, but when, na of higher-ranked �oological taxa in the International Code of it is usually given as Klein, E.F. (or E.E.), 1885, �eitr�ge �ur �ilil-- Zoological Nomenclature. 2. The proposed Rules and their dung des Schädels der Knochenfische II.Jh. Ver. vaterländ. Naturk. rationale. Zoosystema, 28(1): 165-258. Württemberg, 41: 107-261. However, this article does not include DUBOIS A., 2015 – The Duplostensional Nomenclatural System any mentioning of ‘Actinopterygii’. Furthermore, the name is given for higher �oological nomenclature. Dumerilia, 5: 1-108. as ‘Dr. von Klein’ in the heading of the original article. A ‘General- EICHLER J., 1915. – General-Register �u den Jahrg�ngen 40-70, Register’ of all articles published in the ‘Verein für vaterl�ndische 1884-1914 der Jahreshefte des Vereins für vaterl�ndische Naturkunde in Württemberg’ for the years 1884 to 1914 (Eichler, Naturkunde in Württemberg. Jh. Ver. Vaterländ. Naturk. Würt- 1915: 25) mentions ‘Klein, Adolph’ as author, without the nobil- temberg, 71, �eilage: 88 p. ity attribute ‘von’. Anyway, ‘Klein, A. (1885)’ or ‘von Klein, A. GOODRICH E.S., 1930. – Studies on the Structure & Develop- (1885)’ obviously cannot be regarded as the authorship of the Acti- ment of Vertebrates. Macmillan and Co., London. XXX + nopterygii. Unfortunately, we were unable to find, how and when 837 p. (1) Zoological Museum, Natural History Museum of Denmark, Universitetsparken 15, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark. [wwschwar�@aol.com] (2) Professor Emeritus of Geology, University of Louisiana at Monroe, Monroe, Louisiana 71209, USA. [[email protected]] (3) Im Ramstal 76, 97922 Lauda-Königshofen, Germany. [[email protected]] Cybium 2020, 44(1): 7-8. https://doi.org/10.26028/cybium/2020-441-001 On the authorship of Actinopteri and Actinopterygii SCHWARZHAN S ET AL . PATTERSON C., 1982. – Morphology and interrelationships of WOODWARD A.S., 1889. – Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the primitive Actinopterygian fishes.Am. Zool., 22(2): 241-259. �ritish Museum (Natural History), Part I. �ritish Museum ROSEN D.E., FOREY P.L., GARDINER �.G. & PATTERSON C., (Natural History), London: XLVII + 474 p., 17 pls. 1981. – Lungfishes, tetrapods, paleontology, and plesiomorphy. WOODWARD A.S., 1891. – Catalogue of the Fossil Fishes in the Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist., 167(4): 159-276. �ritish Museum (Natural History). Part II. �ritish Museum VON KLEIN A., 1885. – �eitr�ge �ur �ildung des Sch�dels der (Natural History), London. XLV + 567 p., 16 pls. Knochenfische. II.Jh. Ver. vaterländ. Naturk. Württemberg, 41: 107-261. 8 Cybium 2020, 44(1).
Recommended publications
  • History of Fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification

    History of Fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification

    History of fishes - Structural Patterns and Trends in Diversification AGNATHANS = Jawless • Class – Pteraspidomorphi • Class – Myxini?? (living) • Class – Cephalaspidomorphi – Osteostraci – Anaspidiformes – Petromyzontiformes (living) Major Groups of Agnathans • 1. Osteostracida 2. Anaspida 3. Pteraspidomorphida • Hagfish and Lamprey = traditionally together in cyclostomata Jaws = GNATHOSTOMES • Gnathostomes: the jawed fishes -good evidence for gnathostome monophyly. • 4 major groups of jawed vertebrates: Extinct Acanthodii and Placodermi (know) Living Chondrichthyes and Osteichthyes • Living Chondrichthyans - usually divided into Selachii or Elasmobranchi (sharks and rays) and Holocephali (chimeroids). • • Living Osteichthyans commonly regarded as forming two major groups ‑ – Actinopterygii – Ray finned fish – Sarcopterygii (coelacanths, lungfish, Tetrapods). • SARCOPTERYGII = Coelacanths + (Dipnoi = Lung-fish) + Rhipidistian (Osteolepimorphi) = Tetrapod Ancestors (Eusthenopteron) Close to tetrapods Lungfish - Dipnoi • Three genera, Africa+Australian+South American ACTINOPTERYGII Bichirs – Cladistia = POLYPTERIFORMES Notable exception = Cladistia – Polypterus (bichirs) - Represented by 10 FW species - tropical Africa and one species - Erpetoichthys calabaricus – reedfish. Highly aberrant Cladistia - numerous uniquely derived features – long, independent evolution: – Strange dorsal finlets, Series spiracular ossicles, Peculiar urohyal bone and parasphenoid • But retain # primitive Actinopterygian features = heavy ganoid scales (external
  • Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals

    Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals

    Jelle Atema Richard R. Fay Arthur N. Popper William N. Tavolga Editors Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals Springer-Verlag New York Berlin Heidelberg London Paris Tokyo JELLE ATEMA, Boston University Marine Program, Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA Richard R. Fay, Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60626, USA ARTHUR N. POPPER, Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA WILLIAM N. TAVOLGA, Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, Florida 33577, USA The cover Illustration is a reproduction of Figure 13.3, p. 343 of this volume Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Sensory biology of aquatic animals. Papers based on presentations given at an International Conference on the Sensory Biology of Aquatic Animals held, June 24-28, 1985, at the Mote Marine Laboratory in Sarasota, Fla. Bibliography: p. Includes indexes. 1. Aquatic animals—Physiology—Congresses. 2. Senses and Sensation—Congresses. I. Atema, Jelle. II. International Conference on the Sensory Biology - . of Aquatic Animals (1985 : Sarasota, Fla.) QL120.S46 1987 591.92 87-9632 © 1988 by Springer-Verlag New York Inc. x —• All rights reserved. This work may not be translated or copied in whole or in part without the written permission of the publisher (Springer-Verlag, 175 Fifth Avenue, New York 10010, U.S.A.), except for brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis. Use in connection with any form of Information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, Computer Software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed is forbidden. The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, etc.
  • Bichir External Gills Arise Via Heterochronic Shift That Accelerates

    Bichir External Gills Arise Via Heterochronic Shift That Accelerates

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Bichir external gills arise via heterochronic shift that accelerates hyoid arch development Jan Stundl1,2, Anna Pospisilova1, David Jandzik1,3, Peter Fabian1†, Barbora Dobiasova1‡, Martin Minarik1§, Brian D Metscher4, Vladimir Soukup1*, Robert Cerny1* 1Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic; 2National Museum, Prague, Czech Republic; 3Department of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia; 4Department of Theoretical Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria *For correspondence: Abstract In most vertebrates, pharyngeal arches form in a stereotypic anterior-to-posterior [email protected] progression. To gain insight into the mechanisms underlying evolutionary changes in pharyngeal (VS); arch development, here we investigate embryos and larvae of bichirs. Bichirs represent the earliest [email protected] (RC) diverged living group of ray-finned fishes, and possess intriguing traits otherwise typical for lobe- Present address: †Eli and Edythe finned fishes such as ventral paired lungs and larval external gills. In bichir embryos, we find that Broad CIRM Center for the anteroposterior way of formation of cranial segments is modified by the unique acceleration of Regenerative Medicine and Stem the entire hyoid arch segment, with earlier and orchestrated development of the endodermal, Cell Research, University of mesodermal, and neural crest tissues. This major heterochronic shift in the anteroposterior Southern California, Los Angeles, developmental sequence enables early appearance of the external gills that represent key ‡ United States; The Prague breathing organs of bichir free-living embryos and early larvae. Bichirs thus stay as unique models Zoological Garden, Prague, for understanding developmental mechanisms facilitating increased breathing capacity.
  • Observations on Fish Scales

    Observations on Fish Scales

    OBSERVATIONS ON FISH SCALES By T. D. A. Cockerell University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado OBSERVATIONS ON FISH SCALES. By T. D. A. COCKERELL, University of Colorado, Bo~,lder, Colo • .;t. INTRODUCTION, In a paper on "The Scales of Freshwater Fishes" (Biological Bulletin of the Marine Biological Laboratory at Woods Hole, Mass., vol. xx, May, 19II) I have given an account of the recent work on teleostean fish scales and have discussed some of the problems presented by the scales of freshwater fishes. Until recently it has been impos­ sible to do much with the scales of marine fishes, owing to the difficulty of obtaining adequate materials. For the same reason very little was done on the spiny-rayed freshwater groups, the Percidre, Centrarchidre, etc. During the summer of 1911, however, I was enabled to continue the work in the laboratory of the Bureau of Fisheries at Woods Hole, where the director, Dr. F. B. Sumner, afforded me every possible facility and put at my disposal a large series of fishes representing many families. I have also been very greatly indebted to the Bureau of lfisheries, through Dr. Hugh M. Smith and Dr. B. W. Evermann, for numerous and important specimens from the collections at Washington. At the National Museum Mr. B. A. Bean and Mr. A. C. Weed gave me much help and supplied scales of some important genera, while other very valuable materials were secured from the Museum of Comparative Zoology, through the kindness of Dr. S. Garman. As in former years, I have been indebted to Dr. Boulenger for some of the rarest forms.
  • Title the Mitochondrial Phylogeny of an Ancient Lineage of Ray- Finned Fishes (Polypteridae) with Implications for the Evolution

    Title the Mitochondrial Phylogeny of an Ancient Lineage of Ray- Finned Fishes (Polypteridae) with Implications for the Evolution

    The mitochondrial phylogeny of an ancient lineage of ray- finned fishes (Polypteridae) with implications for the evolution Title of body elongation, pelvic fin loss, and craniofacial morphology in Osteichthyes. Author(s) Suzuki, Dai; Brandley, Matthew C; Tokita, Masayoshi Citation BMC evolutionary biology (2010), 10(1) Issue Date 2010 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2433/108263 c 2010 Suzuki et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Right Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Type Journal Article Textversion publisher Kyoto University Suzuki et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:21 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/21 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The mitochondrial phylogeny of an ancient lineage of ray-finned fishes (Polypteridae) with implications for the evolution of body elongation, pelvic fin loss, and craniofacial morphology in Osteichthyes Dai Suzuki1, Matthew C Brandley2, Masayoshi Tokita1,3* Abstract Background: The family Polypteridae, commonly known as “bichirs”, is a lineage that diverged early in the evolutionary history of Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish), but has been the subject of far less evolutionary study than other members of that clade. Uncovering patterns of morphological change within Polypteridae provides an important opportunity to evaluate if the mechanisms underlying morphological evolution are shared among actinoptyerygians, and in fact, perhaps the entire osteichthyan (bony fish and tetrapods) tree of life. However, the greatest impediment to elucidating these patterns is the lack of a well-resolved, highly-supported phylogenetic tree of Polypteridae.
  • On the Homology of the Posteriormost Gill Arch in Polypterids (Cladistia, Actinopterygii)

    On the Homology of the Posteriormost Gill Arch in Polypterids (Cladistia, Actinopterygii)

    Blackwell Science, LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082The Lin- nean Society of London, 2003 1384 495503 Original Article POLYPTERUS GILL ARCH HOMOLOGYR. BRITZ and G. D. JOHNSON Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 138, 495–503. With 3 figures On the homology of the posteriormost gill arch in polypterids (Cladistia, Actinopterygii) RALF BRITZ1,2* AND G. DAVID JOHNSON2 1Lehrstuhl für Spezielle Zoologie, Universität Tübingen, Auf der Morgenstelle 28, D-72076 Tübingen, Germany 2Division of Fishes, National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C. 20560, USA Received October 2002; accepted for publication December 2002 Polypterids are unusual among ray-finned fishes in possessing only four rather than five gill arches. We review the two current hypotheses regarding the homology of the last gill arch in polypterids: that it represents (1) the fifth or (2) the fourth arch of other actinopterygians. Arguments for the alternative hypotheses drawn from different ana- tomical systems are compiled and evaluated. We conclude that in polypterids the last arch represents the fourth arch of other Actinopterygii and the fifth arch is absent. © 2003 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2003, 138, 495–503. ADDITIONAL KEYWORDS: branchial circulation – branchial muscles – branchial nerves – Erpetoichthys – Polypterus. INTRODUCTION cialized anatomy of the pectoral fins, a particular type of sexually dimorphic anal fin associated with a unique The African freshwater fish family Polypteridae com- mating behaviour, and a reduced number of gill arches prises two genera, Polypterus (bichirs), with ten spe- (Müller, 1846; Greenwood, 1984; Gardiner & Schaeffer, cies, and the monotypic Erpetoichthys (reedfish) (Poll 1989; Britz & Bartsch, 1998).
  • HANDBOOK of FISH BIOLOGY and FISHERIES Volume 1 Also Available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B

    HANDBOOK of FISH BIOLOGY and FISHERIES Volume 1 Also Available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B

    HANDBOOK OF FISH BIOLOGY AND FISHERIES Volume 1 Also available from Blackwell Publishing: Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries Edited by Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds Volume 2 Fisheries Handbook of Fish Biology and Fisheries VOLUME 1 FISH BIOLOGY EDITED BY Paul J.B. Hart Department of Biology University of Leicester AND John D. Reynolds School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia © 2002 by Blackwell Science Ltd a Blackwell Publishing company Chapter 8 © British Crown copyright, 1999 BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148‐5020, USA 108 Cowley Road, Oxford OX4 1JF, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right of Paul J.B. Hart and John D. Reynolds to be identified as the Authors of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2002 Reprinted 2004 Library of Congress Cataloging‐in‐Publication Data has been applied for. Volume 1 ISBN 0‐632‐05412‐3 (hbk) Volume 2 ISBN 0‐632‐06482‐X (hbk) 2‐volume set ISBN 0‐632‐06483‐8 A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library. Set in 9/11.5 pt Trump Mediaeval by SNP Best‐set Typesetter Ltd, Hong Kong Printed and bound in the United Kingdom by TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall.
  • Molecular Synapomorphies Resolve Evolutionary Relationships of Extant Jawed Vertebrates

    Molecular Synapomorphies Resolve Evolutionary Relationships of Extant Jawed Vertebrates

    Molecular synapomorphies resolve evolutionary relationships of extant jawed vertebrates Byrappa Venkatesh*†, Mark V. Erdmann‡, and Sydney Brenner* *Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, 30 Medical Drive, Singapore 117609; and ‡Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by Sydney Brenner, August 7, 2001 The evolutionary relationships of gnathostomes (jawed verte- brates), which comprise chondrichthyans (cartilaginous fishes), lobe-finned fishes (coelacanths and lungfishes), tetrapods, and actinopterygians (ray-finned fishes), have been debated for almost a century. Phylogenetic analyses based on fossils, morphology, and molecular sequences have generated different models of relation- ships that remain unresolved. We identified 13 derived shared molecular markers (synapomorphies) that define clades in the vertebrate lineage and used them to resolve the phylogenetic relationships of extant jawed vertebrates. Our markers include the presence or absence of insertions and deletions in coding se- quences, nuclear introns, and alternatively spliced transcripts. The synapomorphies identified by us are congruent with each other and give rise to a single phylogenetic tree. This tree confirms that chondrichthyans are basal to all living gnathostomes, that lung- fishes (Dipnoi) are the closest living relatives of tetrapods, and that bichirs (Cladistia) are the living members of the most ancient family of ray-finned fishes. Our study also provides molecular evidence to support the monophyly of living tetrapods and teleosts. Fig. 1. Alternative models of evolutionary relationships of gnathostomes he jawed vertebrates (gnathostomes) fall into two major taxa, proposed by earlier studies (4–5). Model a proposes a lungfish ϩ tetrapod Tthe Chondrichthyes (cartilaginous fishes) and Osteichthyes clade, whereas model b supports a lungfish ϩ coelacanth clade (4).
  • Actinopterygii

    Actinopterygii

    Lecture 9 • Origin of Actinopterygii (ray-finned fishes) • Late Silurian - Early Devonian - 400 mya • Monophyly of large assemblage > 23,000 species – we accept monophyly but interrelationships less well established. • Many confusing attempts to comprehend/classify lower Actinopterygian fishes • But - if only living members - relationships are, with few exceptions, reasonably well established. Actinopterygii 1 Historical Context • Agassiz (1833-44) compendium fossil fish & Muller's (1845) classification living actinopterygians - 3 major assemblages: Chondrostei (sturgeon/paddlefish), Holostei (Gars/Amia), Teleostei • Basic divisions of Actinopterygian more-or-less accepted until phylogenetic systematics in late 1960's. • One of most influential publications - "Interrelationships of fishes” (1973) - Molded contemporary views of Actinopterygian interrelationships by Greenwood, P. H., Miles, S., Patterson, C. eds, J. Linn. Soc. (London) 53 Supplement 1. Academic Press, New York, New York. Louis Agassiz • “I have devoted my whole life to the study of Nature, and yet a single sentence may express all that I have done. I have shown that there is a correspondence between the succession of Fishes in geological times and the different stages of their growth in the egg, -- that is all. It chanced to be a result that was found to apply to other groups and has led to other conclusions of a like nature.” Louis Agassiz, 1869 2 • Problems associated with poorly preserved fossil taxa - Schaeffer's on Chondrostean interrelationships. Concluded many of old groups – “chondrostei" were paraphyletic but unable to do much more • Gardiner& Schaeffer reanalyzed major lower Actinopterygian – "Interrelationships of lower Actinopterygian fishes" 1989 Z. J. Linn. Soc. 97:135-187. • Mammoth work - array of fossils - previously grouped in various "chondrosteans and paleoniscids" • Basically see: Basal actinopterygians – (1) Cheirolepis (fossil Paleonisciformes), (2) Cladistia, (3) Chondrosteans=Acipenseriformes , (4) Neopterygians.
  • Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts Honoring Gloria Arratia

    Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts Honoring Gloria Arratia

    Origin and Phylogenetic Interrelationships of Teleosts Honoring Gloria Arratia Joseph S. Nelson, Hans-Peter Schultze & Mark V. H. Wilson (editors) TELEOSTEOMORPHA TELEOSTEI TELEOCEPHALA s. str. Leptolepis Pholidophorus † Lepisosteus Amia †? †? † †Varasichthyidae †Ichthyodectiformes Elopidae More advanced teleosts crown- group apomorphy-based group stem-based group Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil • München Contents Preface ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgments ........................................................................................................................................... 9 Gloria Arratia’s contribution to our understanding of lower teleostean phylogeny and classifi cation – Joseph S. Nelson ....................................................................................... 11 The case for pycnodont fi shes as the fossil sister-group of teleosts – J. Ralph Nursall ...................... 37 Phylogeny of teleosts based on mitochondrial genome sequences – Richard E. Broughton ............. 61 Occipito-vertebral fusion in actinopterygians: conjecture, myth and reality. Part 1: Non-teleosts – Ralf Britz and G. David Johnson ................................................................................................................... 77 Occipito-vertebral fusion in actinopterygians: conjecture, myth and reality. Part 2: Teleosts – G. David Johnson and Ralf Britz ..................................................................................................................
  • Unravelling the Complex Duplication History of Deuterostome Glycerol Transporters

    Unravelling the Complex Duplication History of Deuterostome Glycerol Transporters

    cells Article Unravelling the Complex Duplication History of Deuterostome Glycerol Transporters Ozlem Yilmaz 1,2 , François Chauvigné 3, Alba Ferré 3, Frank Nilsen 1, Per Gunnar Fjelldal 2, Joan Cerdà 3 and Roderick Nigel Finn 1,3,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Bergen High Technology Centre, University of Bergen, 5020 Bergen, Norway; [email protected] (O.Y.); [email protected] (F.N.) 2 Institute of Marine Research, NO-5817 Bergen, Norway; [email protected] 3 IRTA-Institute of Biotechnology and Biomedicine (IBB), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), Spain; [email protected] (F.C.); [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (J.C.) * Correspondence: nigel.fi[email protected] Received: 18 June 2020; Accepted: 8 July 2020; Published: 10 July 2020 Abstract: Transmembrane glycerol transport is an ancient biophysical property that evolved in selected subfamilies of water channel (aquaporin) proteins. Here, we conducted broad level genome (>550) and transcriptome (>300) analyses to unravel the duplication history of the glycerol-transporting channels (glps) in Deuterostomia. We found that tandem duplication (TD) was the major mechanism of gene expansion in echinoderms and hemichordates, which, together with whole genome duplications (WGD) in the chordate lineage, continued to shape the genomic repertoires in craniates. Molecular phylogenies indicated that aqp3-like and aqp13-like channels were the probable stem subfamilies in craniates, with WGD generating aqp9 and aqp10 in gnathostomes but aqp7 arising through TD in Osteichthyes. We uncovered separate examples of gene translocations, gene conversion, and concerted evolution in humans, teleosts, and starfishes, with DNA transposons the likely drivers of gene rearrangements in paleotetraploid salmonids.
  • Fishes of the World

    Fishes of the World

    Fishes of the World Fishes of the World Fifth Edition Joseph S. Nelson Terry C. Grande Mark V. H. Wilson Cover image: Mark V. H. Wilson Cover design: Wiley This book is printed on acid-free paper. Copyright © 2016 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. Published simultaneously in Canada. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, (201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions. Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and author have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with the respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be createdor extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation.