DOCSLIB.ORG

Epacris Study Group

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS Inc. EPACRIS STUDY GROUP Group Leader: Gwen Elliot, P.O. Box 655 Heathmont Vic. 3135 No. S (ISSN 1038-6017) October f999 Greetings to all EPACRIS STUDY GROUP meders. Many have visited Queensland this year to attend the 20th Biennial ASGAP Conference in Brisbana and I regret that I was not able to be there. Congratulations toJan Sked of Queensland who has now taken over the task of ASGAP Study Group Co-ordinator, and thanks also to Helen Morrow, who has occupied this position in recent years. Rodger and I have been travelling in Europe and USA and we were able to see many Australian plants, in Botanic Gardens, private gardens and in nurseries. One of the highlights of our time away was to visit the garden of Epacvis Study Group member, Jeff Irons and his wife Betty, at Wirral in England. While there we attended a meeting of the AuFtralasian Plant Saciety which was held at the Ness Botanic Garden where we also saw many Australian plants in cultivation. ~effhas sent two separate items for our Newsletter, which we are delighted to be able to include. He has also sent a page on Vegetative Propagation which will be held for our ne& Newsletter. Special thanks to Study Group Member, Bill. Gunn of Ocean Grove Vic, who has very kindly supplied several Epacris illustrations for our Newsletters, including the delightful Epacris longiflora which has been used in the Species Profile in this issue. Bill atso makes mention of mycorrhizal association in regard to Epacris and their cultivation, which is a topic I hope we may be able to look at in one of our Newsletters next year. Any contributions from members on this aspect will be particularly welcome. Bill has inctuded the following item which is very much appreciated. "WHAT DETERMINES THAT AN EPACRIS IS AN EPACRIS ? The Epacris are erect or spreading shrubs. Most are less than 2.5 m high, but there are exceptions, eg. E. heteronema and E. coriacea.. The crowded leaves are alternate, arranged in a spiral.They are lanceotate, ovate or cordate, up to 1.5 cm long, and almost all end in a hard, sharp point. They have no stalk or a very short stalk and they have a prominent mid-rib on their under-surface. The flowers are white, pink or red. They are single and axillary, arising in the angle between the upper surface of a leaf and the stem to which the leaf is attached. The flower stalk is short or very short. Each flower has five (5) petals, which are fused to form a tube or a bell and shows five (5) corolla lobes. Each flower has five (5) sepals, which are free, not fused. Each flower has five (5) stamens which are separate, but become attached to their corresponding petal inside the tube or bell at its base. Each flower has five (5) carpels, which are fused to form the single style. The ovary is 'superior', i.e. it is above the point at which the flower parts join the flower stalk. A transverse section, cut through the ovary, shows five (5) chambem or loculi. Each chamber of loculus contains five (5) ovules, which contain the egg-cells and, after fertilisation, become seeds. " ~embemmay perhaps have heard of the proposal to incorporate the Epacridaceae family within the Ericaceae family, and this is a topic which we will look at in more detail in our March 2000 Newsletter. I trust you enjoy the contents uf this issue, and will welcome all contributions to future Newsletters. PAGE 2 NEWS AND NOTES FROM MEMBERS We welcome to our study group TRICIA ALLEN of McCrae Vic, HELEN DUNN of Hawthorn Vic, MARGARET GUENZEL of Boronia Vic, MAX McDOWALt, from Bulleen Vic., KAREN RUSSELL of Blackburn Vic, ANNE fi DAVID REES of Mirboo North Vic. Welcome also to ROSEY HAAS who is involved with the ST. KILDA INDIGENOUS NURSERY, Victoria (Ph/Fax 03) 9645 2477). This is a small co-operative nursery growing indigenous plants including the local Epacris impressq which is propagated from - cuttings. Rosie also tells us that the nursery has had great success growing some of their local plants from seed using the smoke germination technique. Margaret Guenzel is interested in propagating plants of the local Epacris impressa for the KNOX ENVIRONMENTAL SOCIEIY INDIGENOUS NURSERY. It's really great to see the current high level of interest in local plants and Indigenous Nurseries. Special thanks to new member,JOHN EMMS, from Loch in South Gippsland who has sent in the following item - Epacris sp. of Tasmania Members of the Study Group with access to The Net' may be interested in looking at the Flora species profile - Epacris. This can be found at - http://www.rfa.gov.au/cra/tas/env/ai~epac.r.html It profiles 15 Tasmanian Epacris species giving life history and population summaries covering rarely mentioned species such as E. graniticola, E. apsleyensis, E. curtisiae, E. grandis and E. libata. (It is somewhat of an update on those mentioned in Briggs fi Leigh 'Rare or Threatened Australian Plants', 1996). Those persons who like coloured pictures of Epacridaceae might like to try "The Flora of Mount Field" from the University of Tasmania at - http://info/utas/edu/au/docs/plant~science/field~botany/field/index.html.Look under Dicotyledons. DICK BURNS, former Secretary/Treasurer of the EPACRIS STUDY GROUP advises that the illustration of Epacris navicularis which featured in earlier Study Group Newsletters, and is included on page 3 here, was provided by Yvonne Menadue, who worked with Ron Crowden on the study of this genus. While many members have associated the successful cultivation of Epacris impressa with the presence of moisture in the garden, Dick reports that in his garden at Penguin, Tas. the site becomes 'bone dry' in summer. He has several forms growing including pink, red, double-flowered and 'Bega'. Dick also has a very old plant of E. longiflora, plus a form with dull-coloured flowers which originated from Earlwood in the Sydney area. BARBARA HENDERSON from Samsonvale Qld, is leader ofthe WALLUM and COASTAL HEATHLAND STUDY GROUP. Barbara writes - Our local Wallum (and montane heath) Epacris are microphylla, obtusifolia and pulchella. The first two definitely prefer moist to wet sites but the last one seems to be happy in a variety of situations. Ofthe three, I've so far tried growing E. obtusifolia, with little success up here in my hilly garden with its shaly loam - not enough wet for it. E. pulchella grows well, but doesn't flower anywhere near as prolifically as it does down on the coast in the Wallum areas. It will have either white or pink flowers, and last April at Beenvah it wasjust wonderful. Myplants so far have been "rescues'' from Sunshine Coast development sites. CHERREE DENSLEY writes that Epacris plants have proved difficult in the dark volcanic loam soil of her garden in Killarney Vic. She plans to try to concentrate on cutting-grown plants from regions with heavier soils. Do any members have suggestions for Cherree ? Cherree also sent the following in a recent letter - Epacris lanuginosa was just beautiful last year in a swampy area near Mt. Clay. It turned the area white where it grows with Melaleuca squamea and M. squarrosa, Hakea nodosa, Gahnia sieberiana and Sprengelia incarnata. The Epacris flowering is quite short, just a few weeks at the most in spring, followed by a soft pink and yellow hare over this dense swamp area, pink from the Sprengelia and yellow from the Melaleuca squarrosa. Later on in summer M. squamea will spot colour the area bright pink. It is a fascinating area, but I'm glad there are some tracks through there, as it is not the best place to wander and explore. Most vegetation is about head high and so dense you can't see where to put your feet - which is ankle to knee high water anyway. If you tripped and fell, you just might be lost forever! But even though Ihave been going through this area off and on for years it has only been in the last few that Ihave noticed this white flower blooming and actually found out that it was Epacris lanuginosa. It is almost impossible to spot when not flowering as the foliage blends in with everything else. So by my estimation it is quite a tall plant - head high anyway. Many thanks Cherree - and I'm sorry it took a couple of issues to include this item in our Newsletter. Page 3 The following is the first of the two items included in this Newsletter from overseas member, JEFF IRONS of Wirral in England. We thank Jeff sincerely for his contributions. In separate parts ofNewsletter 7 it was stated that Epacris need soil which is moist and which is acid. I wonder whether things are as simple as that. Having lost many Epacrids in my English garden Ihave come to the conclusion that they are best grown in pots, and that only 'spare' plants can be risked in the garden. My soil is acid. Ericaceae grow in it quite happily, so do a few Epacrids such as E. paludosa, Richea scopariaand Trochocarpa thymifolia. In general though, they die in late summer. A few die in winter. Though there is no proot I've concluded that at pH 5 - 5.5 mysoil is suficiently acid, and that most (Tasmanian) Epacris demand a soil no higher than pH 4.5. An indication that this may be a correct supposition comes from the Blue Mountains ofNSW.
Recommended publications
  • Cunninghamia Date of Publication: February 2020 a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia

    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: February 2020 a Journal of Plant Ecology for Eastern Australia

    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: February 2020 A journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia ISSN 0727- 9620 (print) • ISSN 2200 - 405X (Online) The Australian paintings of Marianne North, 1880–1881: landscapes ‘doomed shortly to disappear’ John Leslie Dowe Australian Tropical Herbarium, James Cook University, Smithfield, Qld 4878 AUSTRALIA. [email protected] Abstract: The 80 paintings of Australian flora, fauna and landscapes by English artist Marianne North (1830-1890), completed during her travels in 1880–1881, provide a record of the Australian environment rarely presented by artists at that time. In the words of her mentor Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, director of Kew Gardens, North’s objective was to capture landscapes that were ‘doomed shortly to disappear before the axe and the forest fires, the plough and the flock, or the ever advancing settler or colonist’. In addition to her paintings, North wrote books recollecting her travels, in which she presented her observations and explained the relevance of her paintings, within the principles of a ‘Darwinian vision,’ and inevitable and rapid environmental change. By examining her paintings and writings together, North’s works provide a documented narrative of the state of the Australian environment in the late nineteenth- century, filtered through the themes of personal botanical discovery, colonial expansion and British imperialism. Cunninghamia (2020) 20: 001–033 doi: 10.7751/cunninghamia.2020.20.001 Cunninghamia: a journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia © 2020 Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/science/Scientific_publications/cunninghamia 2 Cunninghamia 20: 2020 John Dowe, Australian paintings of Marianne North, 1880–1881 Introduction The Marianne North Gallery in the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew houses 832 oil paintings which Marianne North (b.
  • Bush Foods and Fibres

    Bush Foods and Fibres

    Australian Plants Society NORTH SHORE GROUP Ku-ring-gai Wildflower Garden Bush foods and fibres • Plant-based bush foods, medicines and poisons can come from nectar, flowers, fruit, leaves, bark, stems, sap and roots. • Plants provide fibres and materials for making many items including clothes, cords, musical instruments, shelters, tools, toys and weapons. • A fruit is the seed-bearing structure of a plant. • Do not eat fruits that you do not know to be safe to eat. Allergic reactions or other adverse reactions could occur. • We acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of this land and pay our respects to the Elders both past, present and future for they hold the memories, traditions, culture and hope of their people. Plants as food: many native plants must be processed before they are safe to eat. Flowers, nectar, pollen, Sugars, vitamins, honey, lerps (psyllid tents) minerals, starches, manna (e.g. Ribbon Gum proteins & other nutrients Eucalyptus viminalis exudate), gum (e.g. Acacia lerp manna decurrens) Fruit & seeds Staple foods Carbohydrates (sugars, starches, fibre), proteins, fats, vitamins Leaves, stalks, roots, apical Staple foods Carbohydrates, protein, buds minerals Plants such as daisies, lilies, orchids and vines Tubers, rhyzomes were a source of starchy tubers known as Carbohydrate, fibre, yams. The yam daisy Microseris lanceolata protein, vitamins, (Asteraceae) was widespread in inland NSW minerals and other states. The native yam Dioscorea transversa grows north from Stanwell Tops into Qld and Northern Territory and can be eaten raw or roasted as can those of Trachymene incisa. 1 Plant Description of food Other notes Acacia Wattle seed is a rich source of iron, Saponins and tannins and other essential elements.
  • Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)

    Comparative Floral Presentation and Bee-Pollination in Two Sprengelia Species (Ericaceae)

    Comparative floral presentation and bee-pollination in two Sprengelia species (Ericaceae) Karen A. Johnson* and Peter B. McQuillan School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 78, Hobart, Tasmania 7001, Australia. *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Pollination by sonication is unusual in the Styphelioideae, family Ericaceae. Sprengelia incarnata and Sprengelia propinqua have floral characteristics that suggested they might be adapted to buzz pollination.Both species have florally similar nectarless flowers except that the stamens ofSprengelia propinqua spread widely after the flower opens, while those of Sprengelia incarnata cohere in the centre of the flower. To test whether sonication occurs, we observed bee behaviour at the flowers of both plant species, documented potential pollinators, and examined their floral and pollen attributes. We found that Sprengelia incarnata had smaller and drier pollen than Sprengelia propinqua. We found that Sprengelia incarnata was sonicated by native bees in the families Apidae (Exoneura), Halictidae (Lasioglossum) and Colletidae (Leioproctus, Euryglossa). Sprengelia propinqua was also visited by bees from the Apidae (Exoneura) and Halictidae (Lasioglossum), but pollen was collected by scraping. The introduced Apis mellifera (Apidae) foraged at Sprengelia propinqua but ignored Sprengelia incarnata. The two Sprengelia species shared some genera of potential pollinators, but appeared to have diverged enough in their floral and pollen characters to elicit different behaviours from the native and introduced bees. Cunninghamia (2011) 12 (1): 45–51 Introduction species, some Leucopogon species, Richea milliganii (Hook.f.) F.Muell., and Sprengelia incarnata Sm. (Houston The interactions between plants and pollinators are thought & Ladd, 2002; Ladd, 2006).
  • Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and Related Scrub

    Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and Related Scrub

    Vegetation Benchmarks Rainforest and related scrub Eucryphia lucida Vegetation Condition Benchmarks version 1 Rainforest and Related Scrub RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum peatland facies Community Description: Athrotaxis cupressoides (5–8 m) forms small woodland patches or appears as copses and scattered small trees. On the Central Plateau (and other dolerite areas such as Mount Field), broad poorly– drained valleys and small glacial depressions may contain scattered A. cupressoides trees and copses over Sphagnum cristatum bogs. In the treeless gaps, Sphagnum cristatum is usually overgrown by a combination of any of Richea scoparia, R. gunnii, Baloskion australe, Epacris gunnii and Gleichenia alpina. This is one of three benchmarks available for assessing the condition of RPW. This is the appropriate benchmark to use in assessing the condition of the Sphagnum facies of the listed Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland community (Schedule 3A, Nature Conservation Act 2002). Benchmarks: Length Component Cover % Height (m) DBH (cm) #/ha (m)/0.1 ha Canopy 10% - - - Large Trees - 6 20 5 Organic Litter 10% - Logs ≥ 10 - 2 Large Logs ≥ 10 Recruitment Continuous Understorey Life Forms LF code # Spp Cover % Immature tree IT 1 1 Medium shrub/small shrub S 3 30 Medium sedge/rush/sagg/lily MSR 2 10 Ground fern GF 1 1 Mosses and Lichens ML 1 70 Total 5 8 Last reviewed – 2 November 2016 Tasmanian Vegetation Monitoring and Mapping Program Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment http://www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au/tasveg RPW Athrotaxis cupressoides open woodland: Sphagnum facies Species lists: Canopy Tree Species Common Name Notes Athrotaxis cupressoides pencil pine Present as a sparse canopy Typical Understorey Species * Common Name LF Code Epacris gunnii coral heath S Richea scoparia scoparia S Richea gunnii bog candleheath S Astelia alpina pineapple grass MSR Baloskion australe southern cordrush MSR Gleichenia alpina dwarf coralfern GF Sphagnum cristatum sphagnum ML *This list is provided as a guide only.
  • Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation

    Edition 2 from Forest to Fjaeldmark the Vegetation Communities Highland Treeless Vegetation

    Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark The Vegetation Communities Highland treeless vegetation Richea scoparia Edition 2 From Forest to Fjaeldmark 1 Highland treeless vegetation Community (Code) Page Alpine coniferous heathland (HCH) 4 Cushion moorland (HCM) 6 Eastern alpine heathland (HHE) 8 Eastern alpine sedgeland (HSE) 10 Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) 12 Western alpine heathland (HHW) 13 Western alpine sedgeland/herbland (HSW) 15 General description Rainforest and related scrub, Dry eucalypt forest and woodland, Scrub, heathland and coastal complexes. Highland treeless vegetation communities occur Likewise, some non-forest communities with wide within the alpine zone where the growth of trees is environmental amplitudes, such as wetlands, may be impeded by climatic factors. The altitude above found in alpine areas. which trees cannot survive varies between approximately 700 m in the south-west to over The boundaries between alpine vegetation communities are usually well defined, but 1 400 m in the north-east highlands; its exact location depends on a number of factors. In many communities may occur in a tight mosaic. In these parts of Tasmania the boundary is not well defined. situations, mapping community boundaries at Sometimes tree lines are inverted due to exposure 1:25 000 may not be feasible. This is particularly the or frost hollows. problem in the eastern highlands; the class Eastern alpine vegetation (undifferentiated) (HUE) is used in There are seven specific highland heathland, those areas where remote sensing does not provide sedgeland and moorland mapping communities, sufficient resolution. including one undifferentiated class. Other highland treeless vegetation such as grasslands, herbfields, A minor revision in 2017 added information on the grassy sedgelands and wetlands are described in occurrence of peatland pool complexes, and other sections.
  • Muelleria : an Australian Journal of Botany

    Muelleria : an Australian Journal of Botany

    Muelleria Volume 5 Number 1 March, 1982 NATIONAL HERBARIUM OF VICTORIA DEPARTMENT OF CROWN LANDS AND SURVEY Muelleria Volume 5, Number 1 March, 1982 CONTENTS Page A revision of the genus Templelonia R.Br. (Papilionaceae) — J. H. Ross 1 The nomenclature of some Australian lichens described as Lecanora and Placodium by Miiller-Argoviensis — R. W. Rogers 31 New Australian species of Nymphoides Seguier (Menyanthaceae) — Helen 1. Aston 35 Vegetation of East Gippsland — S. J. Forbes, N. G. Walsh and P. K. Gullan 53 A new Australian lichen: Cladonia sulcata — A. W. Archer 115 Editor: Helen 1. Aston Published by the National Herbarium of Victoria (MEL). Royal Botanic Gardens, South Yarra, Victoria 3141, Australia. D. M. Churchill, Director and Government Botanist. 43346/81 The date of publication of Volume 4, number 4, was 20 May 1981. A REVISION OF THE GENUS TEMPLETONIA R.Br. (PAPILIONACEAE) by J. H. Ross* ABSTRACT The endemic Australian genus Templetonia is revised. Eleven species are recognized and the uncertainty concerning the application of the name T. sulcata (Meissn.) Benth. is discussed. This discussion includes the selection ol a lectotype for Bossiaea rossii F. Muell., a possible synonym. Descriptions, a key to the identification of species, illustrations, and distribution maps are provided, together with notes on ecology and relationships. Two previous papers describing T. incana (.Muelleria 4: 247-249 (1980)) and T. negketa (loc. cit. 390-393 (1981)) should be used in conjunction with the present revision. INTRODUCTION Templetonia, a small genus of 1 1 species described by R. Brown in Ait. f Hort. , Kew. ed. 2, 4: 269 (1812), was named in honour of the Irish botanist John Templeton (1776-1825) ot Orange Grove, Belfast.
  • Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification

    Review of Selected Literature and Epiphyte Classification

    --------- -- ---------· 4 CHAPTER 1 REVIEW OF SELECTED LITERATURE AND EPIPHYTE CLASSIFICATION 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Literature (p. 5) Several important aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology that are not investigated as part of this work, are reviewed, particularly those published on more. recently. 1.2 Epiphyte Classification and Terminology (p.11) is reviewed and the system used here is outlined and defined. A glossary of terms, as used here, is given. 5 1.1 Review of Selected, Relevant Li.terature Since the main works of Schimper were published (1884, 1888, 1898), particularly Die Epiphytische Vegetation Amerikas (1888), many workers have written on many aspects of epiphyte biology and ecology. Most of these will not be reviewed here because they are not directly relevant to the present study or have been effectively reviewed by others. A few papers that are keys to the earlier literature will be mentioned but most of the review will deal with topics that have not been reviewed separately within the chapters of this project where relevant (i.e. epiphyte classification and terminology, aspects of epiphyte synecology and CAM in the epiphyt~s). Reviewed here are some special problems of epiphytes, particularly water and mineral availability, uptake and cycling, general nutritional strategies and matters related to these. Also, all Australian works of any substance on vascular epiphytes are briefly discussed. some key earlier papers include that of Pessin (1925), an autecology of an epiphytic fern, which investigated a number of factors specifically related to epiphytism; he also reviewed more than 20 papers written from the early 1880 1 s onwards.
  • Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids

    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids

    Pollination Ecology and Evolution of Epacrids by Karen A. Johnson BSc (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Tasmania February 2012 ii Declaration of originality This thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis, nor does the thesis contain any material that infringes copyright. Karen A. Johnson Statement of authority of access This thesis may be made available for copying. Copying of any part of this thesis is prohibited for two years from the date this statement was signed; after that time limited copying is permitted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Karen A. Johnson iii iv Abstract Relationships between plants and their pollinators are thought to have played a major role in the morphological diversification of angiosperms. The epacrids (subfamily Styphelioideae) comprise more than 550 species of woody plants ranging from small prostrate shrubs to temperate rainforest emergents. Their range extends from SE Asia through Oceania to Tierra del Fuego with their highest diversity in Australia. The overall aim of the thesis is to determine the relationships between epacrid floral features and potential pollinators, and assess the evolutionary status of any pollination syndromes. The main hypotheses were that flower characteristics relate to pollinators in predictable ways; and that there is convergent evolution in the development of pollination syndromes.
  • Epacris Study Group

    Epacris Study Group

    ASSOCIATION OF SOCIETIES FOR GROWING AUSTRALIAN PLANTS Inc. EPACRIS STUDY GROUP Group Leader: Gwen Elliot, P.O. Box 655 Heathmont Vic. 3135 NEWSLETTER No. XS (ISSN 103 8-6017) Qctaber zaQ4 Greetings as once again we begin to enjoy the longer days of spring-summer and the encouragement this provides for many of our flowering plants. Despite the generally dry conditions many Epacris species are putting on outstanding floral displays. How are you going with your recording of the flowering times of Epacris impressa in your garden, as well as in nearby bushland or in other areas as you travel within Australia? It really is quite an exciting project because together we, as Study Group members, can make a real contribution to the overall understanding of this species, adding to the knowledge and research of botanists who look in detail at the features of the plant under the microscope and in its natural habitat. It iis a species which occurs both atsea-level and at higher altitudes. How are the flowering times affected when highland plants are cultivated at lower altitudes? Are flowering times different when plants fiom New South Wales for example are gvown much further south in soulhern Victoria or Tasmania ? Epacris impressu seems like an excellent species for us to research in this way. If our project is successful we may perhaps be able to continue with looking at the flowering times of other Epacris which are relatively common in cultivation. In case you have misplaced the recording sheet from our October 2003 Newsletter, another is included in this issue.
  • ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    ACT, Australian Capital Territory

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
  • Post-Fire Recovery of Woody Plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion

    Post-Fire Recovery of Woody Plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion

    Post-fire recovery of woody plants in the New England Tableland Bioregion Peter J. ClarkeA, Kirsten J. E. Knox, Monica L. Campbell and Lachlan M. Copeland Botany, School of Environmental and Rural Sciences, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, AUSTRALIA. ACorresponding author; email: [email protected] Abstract: The resprouting response of plant species to fire is a key life history trait that has profound effects on post-fire population dynamics and community composition. This study documents the post-fire response (resprouting and maturation times) of woody species in six contrasting formations in the New England Tableland Bioregion of eastern Australia. Rainforest had the highest proportion of resprouting woody taxa and rocky outcrops had the lowest. Surprisingly, no significant difference in the median maturation length was found among habitats, but the communities varied in the range of maturation times. Within these communities, seedlings of species killed by fire, mature faster than seedlings of species that resprout. The slowest maturing species were those that have canopy held seed banks and were killed by fire, and these were used as indicator species to examine fire immaturity risk. Finally, we examine whether current fire management immaturity thresholds appear to be appropriate for these communities and find they need to be amended. Cunninghamia (2009) 11(2): 221–239 Introduction Maturation times of new recruits for those plants killed by fire is also a critical biological variable in the context of fire Fire is a pervasive ecological factor that influences the regimes because this time sets the lower limit for fire intervals evolution, distribution and abundance of woody plants that can cause local population decline or extirpation (Keith (Whelan 1995; Bond & van Wilgen 1996; Bradstock et al.
  • Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary: Port Phillip and Westernport, Victoria

    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.