DOCSLIB.ORG

Conservation Genetics of Sclerocactus Brevihamatus Subsp. Tobuschii and an Assessment of Its Genetic Relationship with Sclerocactus Brevihamatus Subsp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Conservation Genetics of Sclerocactus Brevihamatus Subsp. Tobuschii and an Assessment of Its Genetic Relationship with Sclerocactus Brevihamatus Subsp Conservation genetics of Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii and an assessment of its genetic relationship with Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. brevihamatus By Niraj Rayamajhi, B.S. A Thesis In PLANT AND SOIL SCIENCE Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved Dr. Jyotsna Sharma Chair of Committee Dr. Mark Burow Dr. Matthew Olson Dr. Mark Sheridan Dean of the Graduate School August, 2015 © 2015 Niraj Rayamajhi All Rights Reserved Texas Tech University, Niraj Rayamajhi, August 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I wish to express my sincere appreciation to my advisor Dr. Jyotsna Sharma, for her affection, constant encouragement, guidance, support, advice, motivation, and most of all her patience. Her guidance helped me all the time in my research and writing this thesis. I also express my sincere regards to other members of the advisory committee, Dr. Matthew Olson and Dr. Mark Burow for their helpful advice, assistance, constructive comments, and helping me out with data analysis. I wish to extend my heartfelt thanks to Dr. Shannon Fehlberg and Jessica Allen at the Desert Botanical Garden and Dr. Ratan Chopra at Texas Tech University for guiding me with the methods. I would also like to thank all my lab mates for their cooperation during my research work in the laboratory. I am also highly obliged to all my professors at Texas Tech University for proving me quality education and enhancing my skills. I would like to thank the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Lady Bird Johnson Wildflower Center (Dr. Karen Clary) for providing funding to Dr. Sharma for this investigation. I also want to thank my parents Mr. Tanka Rayamajhi and Mrs. Indira Rayamajhi, and sister Srijana Rayamajhi for their constant support and motivation throughout my entire life. I must acknowledge my girlfriend Pragya, who has assisted in editing the thesis, and whose affection and encouragement are the source of my inspiration. ii Texas Tech University, Niraj Rayamajhi, August 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ................................................................................................ ii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. vi LIST OF FIGURES ......................................................................................................... viii I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ........................................................... 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................... 1 Biodiversity ................................................................................................... 1 Genetic diversity ........................................................................................... 3 Conservation genetics .................................................................................. 4 The genus Sclerocactus and study taxa ........................................................ 5 Why study these taxa? .................................................................................. 7 Microsatellite markers ................................................................................. 8 Background ....................................................................................................... 9 Objectives of the study.................................................................................... 15 Significance of the study ................................................................................. 15 Literature Cited ............................................................................................... 17 II. MICROSATELLITE DEVELOPMENT AND PRIMER SELECTION FOR GENETIC STUDY IN SCLEROCACTUS BREVIHAHAMATUS SUBSP. TOBUSCHII AND SCLEROCACTUS BREVIHAMATUS SUBSP. BREVIHAMATUS ................................................................................................. 24 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 24 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 25 Materials and methods .................................................................................... 27 iii Texas Tech University, Niraj Rayamajhi, August 2015 DNA extraction and microsatellite development ........................................ 27 Primer selection ......................................................................................... 28 Results ............................................................................................................. 29 Conclusions ..................................................................................................... 29 III. CONSERVATION GENETICS OF SCLEROCACTUS BREVIHAMATUS SUBSP. TOBUSCHII AND AN ASSESSMENT OF ITS GENETIC RELATIONSHIP WITH SCLEROCACTUS BREVIHAMATUS SUBSP. BREVIHAMATUS ................................................................................................. 38 Abstract ........................................................................................................... 38 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 40 Materials and Methods .................................................................................... 44 Sample collection ....................................................................................... 44 DNA extraction ........................................................................................... 45 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and genotyping .............. 45 Microsatellite analyses ............................................................................... 47 Results ............................................................................................................. 50 Diversity of the seven microsatellite loci ................................................... 50 Genetic diversity within populations of Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii ..................................................................................................... 51 Genetic diversity within a population of Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. brevihamatus .............................................................................................. 52 Genetic differentiation or strucuture of Sclerocactus brevihamatus .......... 53 Bottleneck test of all the ten populations of Sclerocactus brevihamatus .... 55 Discussion ....................................................................................................... 55 iv Texas Tech University, Niraj Rayamajhi, August 2015 Genetic diversity within populations .......................................................... 56 Heterozygosity of Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii in comparison to long-lived perennials, and plants with similar mating type and geographical distributions based on microsatellite markers .............. 57 Heterozygosity of Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii in comparison to other cacti ........................................................................... 58 Heterozygosity of Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii in comparison to other species of Sclerocactus based on microsatellite analysis ....................................................................................................... 62 Inbreeding coefficient of Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii in comparison to other cacti, congeners and conspecific taxa ...................... 63 Population genetic structure ...................................................................... 65 Literature Cited ............................................................................................... 69 IV. CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................... 97 Conservation implications .............................................................................. 98 Future directions ............................................................................................. 99 Literature Cited ............................................................................................. 100 APPENDIX ......................................................................................................... 101 v Texas Tech University, Niraj Rayamajhi, August 2015 LIST OF TABLES 2.1. Seven optimized polymorphic microsatellite loci for Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii...............................................................................33 3.1. Location and population code of ten populations of Sclerocactus brevihamatus..........................................................................................................75 3.2. Primer sequences and genetic diversity statistics of seven nuclear microsatellite markers isolated from Sclerocactus brevihamatus subsp. tobuschii (SBT)......................................................................................................77 3.3. Genetic diversity measures of ten Sclerocactus brevihamatus populations in the United States estimated based on seven nuclear microsatellites.................78 3.4. Pairwise geographic distances (kilometers) and pairwise Fst for ten populations of Sclerocactus brevihamatus based on seven nuclear microsatellites.............................................................................79
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CCCSS September 2010 Newsletter.Indd
    CENTRAL COAST CACTUS AND SUCCULENT SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Pismo Beach,CA93449 780 MercedSt. c/o MarkusMumper & SucculentSociety Central CoastCactus On the Dry Side September 2010 Inside this issue: CCCSS August Meeting Recap •Upcoming Speaker Gene Schroeder greeted about 100 members that showed up for our August meeting. He reminded everyone that our October - Nick Wilkinson meeting would be the 3rd Sunday of the month instead of the •Last Month’s 2nd so mark your calendars for the 17th. Our brag table had some very impressive plants which included a 1st prize “ Best - Meeting Minutes Echeveria” from the Paso Fair submitted by Tim Dawson. He won with his beautiful Echeveria subrigida. Rich Hart also showed us •Genus of the Month his awesome Brunsvigia josephinae. This South African bulb was in - Ferocactus flower that was almost 3 feet tall. He said this plant was 20 years - Adromischus old. He started it from seed and it finally bloomed after 17 years. Our raffle table keeps getting better and thanks to Mary Peracca and Gene Schroeder for donating some of their plants for the raffle table. Our team of Rob Skillen, Charles Spotts and Gene Schroeder all shared their specimens with us for the plants of the month: Thelocactus and Bromeliad. We are so fortunate to have these knowledgeable guys to be a part of our club. Also on that list is Nick Wilkinson who missed the meeting as he was selling at a show. We were honored to have Woody Minnich as our speaker this month from New Mexico. His presentation of Rio Grande Do Sol was informative with wonderful photos and a twist of humor.
    [Show full text]
  • Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto De Biología, UNAM September 17-23
    Caryophyllales 2018 Instituto de Biología, UNAM September 17-23 LOCAL ORGANIZERS Hilda Flores-Olvera, Salvador Arias and Helga Ochoterena, IBUNAM ORGANIZING COMMITTEE Walter G. Berendsohn and Sabine von Mering, BGBM, Berlin, Germany Patricia Hernández-Ledesma, INECOL-Unidad Pátzcuaro, México Gilberto Ocampo, Universidad Autónoma de Aguascalientes, México Ivonne Sánchez del Pino, CICY, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Mérida, Yucatán, México SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Thomas Borsch, BGBM, Germany Fernando O. Zuloaga, Instituto de Botánica Darwinion, Argentina Victor Sánchez Cordero, IBUNAM, México Cornelia Klak, Bolus Herbarium, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, South Africa Hossein Akhani, Department of Plant Sciences, School of Biology, College of Science, University of Tehran, Iran Alexander P. Sukhorukov, Moscow State University, Russia Michael J. Moore, Oberlin College, USA Compilation: Helga Ochoterena / Graphic Design: Julio C. Montero, Diana Martínez GENERAL PROGRAM . 4 MONDAY Monday’s Program . 7 Monday’s Abstracts . 9 TUESDAY Tuesday ‘s Program . 16 Tuesday’s Abstracts . 19 WEDNESDAY Wednesday’s Program . 32 Wednesday’s Abstracs . 35 POSTERS Posters’ Abstracts . 47 WORKSHOPS Workshop 1 . 61 Workshop 2 . 62 PARTICIPANTS . 63 GENERAL INFORMATION . 66 4 Caryophyllales 2018 Caryophyllales General program Monday 17 Tuesday 18 Wednesday 19 Thursday 20 Friday 21 Saturday 22 Sunday 23 Workshop 1 Workshop 2 9:00-10:00 Key note talks Walter G. Michael J. Moore, Berendsohn, Sabine Ya Yang, Diego F. Registration
    [Show full text]
  • Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167]
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 10/10/2019 and available online at https://federalregister.gov/d/2019-21478, and on govinfo.gov DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 [Docket No. FWS–HQ–ES–2019–0009; FF09E21000 FXES11190900000 167] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Review of Domestic and Foreign Species That Are Candidates for Listing as Endangered or Threatened; Annual Notification of Findings on Resubmitted Petitions; Annual Description of Progress on Listing Actions AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice of review. SUMMARY: In this candidate notice of review (CNOR), we, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), present an updated list of plant and animal species that we regard as candidates for or have proposed for addition to the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. Identification of candidate species can assist environmental planning efforts by providing advance notice of potential listings, and by allowing landowners and resource managers to alleviate threats and thereby possibly remove the need to list species as endangered or threatened. Even if we subsequently list a candidate species, the early notice provided here could result in more options for species management and recovery by prompting earlier candidate conservation measures to alleviate threats to the species. This document also includes our findings on resubmitted petitions and describes our 1 progress in revising the Lists of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants (Lists) during the period October 1, 2016, through September 30, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Reproductive Biology, Hybridization, and Flower Visitors of Rare Sclerocactus Taxa in Utah's Uintah Basin
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 70 Number 3 Article 10 10-11-2010 Reproductive biology, hybridization, and flower visitors of rare Sclerocactus taxa in Utah's Uintah Basin Vincent J. Tepedino Utah State University, Logan, [email protected] Terry L. Griswold Utah State University, Logan, [email protected] William R. Bowlin Utah State University, Logan Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Tepedino, Vincent J.; Griswold, Terry L.; and Bowlin, William R. (2010) "Reproductive biology, hybridization, and flower visitors of rare Sclerocactus taxa in Utah's Uintah Basin," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 70 : No. 3 , Article 10. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol70/iss3/10 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 70(3), © 2010, pp. 377–386 REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, HYBRIDIZATION, AND FLOWER VISITORS OF RARE SCLEROCACTUS TAXA IN UTAH’S UINTAH BASIN Vincent J. Tepedino1,2, Terry L. Griswold1, and William R. Bowlin1,3 ABSTRACT.—We studied the mating system and flower visitors of 2 threatened species of Sclerocactus (Cactaceae) in the Uintah Basin of eastern Utah—an area undergoing rapid energy development. We found that both S. wetlandicus and S. brevispinus are predominantly outcrossed and are essentially self-incompatible. A third presumptive taxon (unde- scribed; here called S. wetlandicus-var1) is fully self-compatible but cannot produce seeds unless the flowers are visited by pollinators.
    [Show full text]
  • Threatened, Endangered, Candidate & Proposed Plant Species of Utah
    TECHNICAL NOTE USDA - Natural Resources Conservation Service Boise, Idaho and Salt Lake City, Utah TN PLANT MATERIALS NO. 52 MARCH 2011 THREATENED, ENDANGERED, CANDIDATE & PROPOSED PLANT SPECIES OF UTAH Derek Tilley, Agronomist, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Loren St. John, PMC Team Leader, NRCS, Aberdeen, Idaho Dan Ogle, Plant Materials Specialist, NRCS, Boise, Idaho Casey Burns, State Biologist, NRCS, Salt Lake City, Utah Last Chance Townsendia (Townsendia aprica). Photo by Megan Robinson. This technical note identifies the current threatened, endangered, candidate and proposed plant species listed by the U.S.D.I. Fish and Wildlife Service (USDI FWS) in Utah. Review your county list of threatened and endangered species and the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Conservation Data Center (CDC) GIS T&E database to see if any of these species have been identified in your area of work. Additional information on these listed species can be found on the USDI FWS web site under “endangered species”. Consideration of these species during the planning process and determination of potential impacts related to scheduled work will help in the conservation of these rare plants. Contact your Plant Material Specialist, Plant Materials Center, State Biologist and Area Biologist for additional guidance on identification of these plants and NRCS responsibilities related to the Endangered Species Act. 2 Table of Contents Map of Utah Threatened, Endangered and Candidate Plant Species 4 Threatened & Endangered Species Profiles Arctomecon humilis Dwarf Bear-poppy ARHU3 6 Asclepias welshii Welsh’s Milkweed ASWE3 8 Astragalus ampullarioides Shivwits Milkvetch ASAM14 10 Astragalus desereticus Deseret Milkvetch ASDE2 12 Astragalus holmgreniorum Holmgren Milkvetch ASHO5 14 Astragalus limnocharis var.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    SYSTEMATICS OF TRIBE TRICHOCEREEAE AND POPULATION GENETICS OF Haageocereus (CACTACEAE) By MÓNICA ARAKAKI MAKISHI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2008 1 © 2008 Mónica Arakaki Makishi 2 To my parents, Bunzo and Cristina, and to my sisters and brother. 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I want to express my deepest appreciation to my advisors, Douglas Soltis and Pamela Soltis, for their consistent support, encouragement and generosity of time. I would also like to thank Norris Williams and Michael Miyamoto, members of my committee, for their guidance, good disposition and positive feedback. Special thanks go to Carlos Ostolaza and Fátima Cáceres, for sharing their knowledge on Peruvian Cactaceae, and for providing essential plant material, confirmation of identifications, and their detailed observations of cacti in the field. I am indebted to the many individuals that have directly or indirectly supported me during the fieldwork: Carlos Ostolaza, Fátima Cáceres, Asunción Cano, Blanca León, José Roque, María La Torre, Richard Aguilar, Nestor Cieza, Olivier Klopfenstein, Martha Vargas, Natalia Calderón, Freddy Peláez, Yammil Ramírez, Eric Rodríguez, Percy Sandoval, and Kenneth Young (Peru); Stephan Beck, Noemí Quispe, Lorena Rey, Rosa Meneses, Alejandro Apaza, Esther Valenzuela, Mónica Zeballos, Freddy Centeno, Alfredo Fuentes, and Ramiro Lopez (Bolivia); María E. Ramírez, Mélica Muñoz, and Raquel Pinto (Chile). I thank the curators and staff of the herbaria B, F, FLAS, LPB, MO, USM, U, TEX, UNSA and ZSS, who kindly loaned specimens or made information available through electronic means. Thanks to Carlos Ostolaza for providing seeds of Haageocereus tenuis, to Graham Charles for seeds of Blossfeldia sucrensis and Acanthocalycium spiniflorum, to Donald Henne for specimens of Haageocereus lanugispinus; and to Bernard Hauser and Kent Vliet for aid with microscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Clover's Cactus Transplant Data Review
    PETITION TO LIST THE Clover’s Cactus (Sclerocactus cloverae) UNDER THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Clover’s cactus. Photo: Robert Sivinski Petition Submitted to the U.S. Secretary of the Interior, Acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Petitioner: WildEarth Guardians Address correspondence to: Taylor Jones [email protected] (720) 443-2615 May 29, 2020 INTRODUCTION WildEarth Guardians (Guardians) respectfully requests that the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) list Clover’s cactus (Sclerocactus cloverae) as “threatened” or “endangered” under the U.S. Endangered Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. §§ 1531- 1544). Guardians also requests that the Service designate critical habitat for the species concurrent with listing. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AND IMPLEMENTING REGULATIONS The ESA, 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531-1544, was enacted in 1973 “to provide a means whereby the ecosystems upon which endangered species and threatened species depend may be conserved, [and] to provide a program for the conservation of such endangered species and threatened species.” 16 U.S.C. § 1531(b). The protections of the ESA only apply to species that have been listed as endangered or threatened according to the provisions of the statute. The ESA delegates authority to determine whether a species should be listed as endangered or threatened to the Secretary of Interior, who has in turn delegated authority to the Director of the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service. As defined in the ESA, an “endangered” species is one that is “in danger of extinction throughout all or a significant portion of its range.” 16 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Tucson Cactus and Succulent Society Guide to Common Cactus and Succulents of Tucson
    Tucson Cactus and Succulent Society Guide to Common Cactus and Succulents of Tucson http://www.tucsoncactus.org/c-s_database/index.html Item ID: 1 Item ID: 2 Family: Cactaceae Family: Cactaceae Genus: Ferocactus Genus: Echinocactus Species: wislizenii Species: grusonii Common Name: Fishhook Barrel Common Name: Golden Barrel Habitat: Various soil types from 1,000 Cactus to 6,000 feet elevation from grasslands Habitat: Located on rolling hills to rocky mountainous areas. and cliffs. Range: Arizona, southwestern New Range: Limited to small areas in Mexico, limited extremes of western Queretaro, Mexico. The popula- Texas, Sonora, northwest Chihuahua tion had become very low in num- and northern Sinaloa, Mexico bers over the years but is just Care: An extremely easy plant to grow now beginning to increase due to in and around the Tucson area. It re- protective laws and the fact that Photo Courtesy of Vonn Watkins quires little attention or special care as this plant is now in mass cultiva- ©1999 it is perfectly at home in almost any tion all over the world. garden setting. It is very tolerant of ex- Photo Courtesy of American Desert Care: The Golden Barrel has slow- Description treme heat as well as cold. Cold hardi- Plants ly become one of the most pur- This popular barrel cactus is noted ness tolerance is at around 10 degrees chased plants for home landscape for the beautiful golden yellow farenheit. Description in Tucson. It is an easy plant to spines that thickly surround the Propagation: Propagation of this cac- This plant is most recognized by the grow and takes no special care.
    [Show full text]
  • 12-Month Finding on a Petition to List Sclerocactus Brevispinus
    Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 180 / Tuesday, September 18, 2007 / Proposed Rules 53211 provide Congress, through OMB, pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping with the best available scientific explanations when the Agency decides requirements, Research, Vessels, information, we propose to recognize not to use available and applicable Warranties. the three distinct species: S. voluntary consensus standards. brevispinus, S. glaucus, and S. 40 CFR Part 1039 This proposed rulemaking does not wetlandicus. Because each of these three involve technical standards. Therefore, Environmental protection, species constitute the S. glaucus EPA is not considering the use of any Administrative practice and procedure, complex, we consider all three species voluntary consensus standards. Air pollution control, Confidential to be threatened under the Act. In business information, Imports, Labeling, J. Executive Order 12898: Federal addition, we propose common names Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping Actions To Address Environmental for S. glaucus and S. wetlandicus. requirements, Warranties. Justice in Minority Populations and DATES: The finding announced in this Low-Income Populations Dated: September 6, 2007. document was made on September 18, 2007. We will accept comments on the Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR Stephen L. Johnson, proposed taxonomic change from all 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes federal Administrator. interested parties until November 19, executive policy on environmental [FR Doc. E7–18163 Filed 9–17–07; 8:45 am] 2007. justice. Its main provision directs BILLING CODE 6560–50–P federal agencies, to the greatest extent ADDRESSES: Comments on Proposed practicable and permitted by law, to Taxonomic Change: If you wish to make environmental justice part of their DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR comment on the proposed rule to revise mission by identifying and addressing, the taxonomy of S.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Tree and Tree-Like Species of Mexico: Apocynaceae, Cactaceae
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad ISSN: 1870-3453 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Ricker, Martin; Valencia-Avalos, Susana; Hernández, Héctor M.; Gómez-Hinostrosa, Carlos; Martínez-Salas, Esteban M.; Alvarado-Cárdenas, Leonardo O.; Wallnöfer, Bruno; Ramos, Clara H.; Mendoza, Pilar E. Tree and tree-like species of Mexico: Apocynaceae, Cactaceae, Ebenaceae, Fagaceae, and Sapotaceae Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad, vol. 87, núm. 4, diciembre, 2016, pp. 1189-1202 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=42548632003 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 87 (2016) 1189–1202 www.ib.unam.mx/revista/ Taxonomy and systematics Tree and tree-like species of Mexico: Apocynaceae, Cactaceae, Ebenaceae, Fagaceae, and Sapotaceae Especies arbóreas y arborescentes de México: Apocynaceae, Cactaceae, Ebenaceae, Fagaceae y Sapotaceae a,∗ b a a Martin Ricker , Susana Valencia-Avalos , Héctor M. Hernández , Carlos Gómez-Hinostrosa , a b c Esteban M. Martínez-Salas , Leonardo O. Alvarado-Cárdenas , Bruno Wallnöfer , a a Clara H. Ramos , Pilar E. Mendoza a Herbario Nacional de México (MEXU), Departamento
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal for Amendment of Appendix I Or II for CITES Cop16
    Original language: English CoP17 Prop. XXX CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ____________________ Seventeenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties Johannesburg (South Africa), 24 September – 5 October 2016 CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSALS FOR AMENDMENT OF APPENDICES I AND II A. Proposal Transfer of fishhook cacti Sclerocactus spinosior ssp. blainei (= Sclerocactus blainei), Sclerocactus cloverae (CITES-listed synonym of Sclerocactus parviflorus), and Sclerocactus sileri from Appendix II to Appendix I, as per the outcome of the CITES Periodic Review of the Appendices, in accordance with Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16), Annex 1, paragraph B) iii): Populations are restricted and are characterized by a high vulnerability to intrinsic and extrinsic factors and an observed, inferred, or projected decrease in the number of subpopulations and the number of individuals. Nomenclature amendment to the Appendix-I listing of Sclerocactus glaucus, formerly treated as a complex, to three distinct species: Sclerocactus glaucus, Sclerocactus brevispinus, and Sclerocactus wetlandicus (the last two are CITES-listed synonyms of S. glaucus), as per the outcome of a Periodic Review of the Appendices. The three species continue to meet the criteria for Appendix I in accordance with Resolution Conf. 9.24 (Rev. CoP16), Annex 1, paragraph B) iii): Populations are restricted and are characterized by a high vulnerability to intrinsic and extrinsic factors and an observed, inferred, or projected decrease in the number of subpopulations and the number of individuals. B. Proponent United States of America* C. Supporting statement 1. Taxonomy 1.1 Class: Magnoliopsida 1.2 Order: Caryophyllales 1.3 Family: Cactaceae 1.4 Genus, species or subspecies, including author and year: The scientific names Sclerocactus blainei (CITES-listed Sclerocactus spinosior ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Reaction Norms for Water Stressed Seedlings of Succulent Cacti
    Developmental Reaction Norms for Water Stressed Seedlings of Succulent Cacti Ulises Rosas1*, Royce W. Zhou1, Guillermo Castillo2, Margarita Collazo-Ortega3 1 Center for Genomics and Systems Biology, New York University, New York City, New York, United States of America, 2 Instituto de Ecologı´a, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Me´xico Distrito Federal, Mexico, 3 Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Auto´noma de Me´xico, Me´xico Distrito Federal, Mexico Abstract Succulent cacti are remarkable plants with capabilities to withstand long periods of drought. However, their adult success is contingent on the early seedling stages, when plants are highly susceptible to the environment. To better understand their early coping strategies in a challenging environment, two developmental aspects (anatomy and morphology) in Polaskia chichipe and Echinocactus platyacanthus were studied in the context of developmental reaction norms under drought conditions. The morphology was evaluated using landmark based morphometrics and Principal Component Analysis, which gave three main trends of the variation in each species. The anatomy was quantified as number and area of xylem vessels. The quantitative relationship between morphology and anatomy in early stages of development, as a response to drought was revealed in these two species. Qualitatively, collapsible cells and collapsible parenchyma tissue were observed in seedlings of both species, more often in those subjected to water stress. These tissues were located inside the epidermis, resembling a web of collapsible-cell groups surrounding turgid cells, vascular bundles, and spanned across the pith. Occasionally the groups formed a continuum stretching from the epidermis towards the vasculature. Integrating the morphology and the anatomy in a developmental context as a response to environmental conditions provides a better understanding of the organism’s dynamics, adaptation, and plasticity.
    [Show full text]