DOCSLIB.ORG

Brown Ferry, Units 1, 2 & 3, Responses to Requests for Additional Information and Updates Associated with Interconnection Sy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

L44 160527 001 Proprietary Information and Critical Energy Infrastructure Information Withhold from Public Disclosure Under 10 CFR 2.390 This letter is decontrolled when separated from Enclosures 1, 2, 3, and 8 Tennessee Valley Authority, 1101 Market Street, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 CNL-16-091 May 27, 2016 10 CFR 50.90 ATTN: Document Control Desk U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-33, DPR-52, and DPR-68 NRC Docket Nos. 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 Subject: Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 18, Responses to Requests for Additional Information and Updates Associated with Interconnection System Impact Study Modifications References: 1. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-15-169, “Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU),” dated September 21, 2015 (ML15282A152) 2. Letter from NRC to TVA, “Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 - Request for Additional Information Related to License Amendment Request Regarding Extended Power Uprate (CAC Nos. MF6741, MF6742, and MF6743),” dated April 4, 2016 (ML16064A286) 3. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-075, “Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 13, Responses to Requests for Additional Information,” dated April 22, 2016 4. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-15-261, "Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 3, Interconnection System Impact Study Information," dated December 18, 2015 (ML15355A413) U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CNL-16-091 Page 2 May 27, 2016 5. Letter from TVA to NRC, CNL-16-023, "Proposed Technical Specifications (TS) Change TS-505 - Request for License Amendments - Extended Power Uprate (EPU) - Supplement 4, Response to Requests for Additional Information," dated February 16, 2016 (ML16049A248) By the Reference 1 letter, Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for the Extended Power Uprate (EPU) of Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Units 1, 2 and 3. The proposed LAR modifies the renewed operating licenses to increase the maximum authorized core thermal power level from the current licensed thermal power of 3458 megawatts to 3952 megawatts. During their technical review of the LAR, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) identified the need for additional information. The Reference 2 letter provided NRC Requests for Additional Information (RAI) related to the environmental review of the BFN EPU LAR. The Reference 3 letter provides the responses to the RAIs included in the Reference 2 letter, with the exception of the responses to NRC RAIs RERP-GE-RAI 2 and RERP-GE-RAI 4. NRC RAIs RERP-GE-RAI 2 and RERP-GE-RAI 4 involve providing environmental information associated with transmission system upgrades identified in the interconnection system impact study (SIS). However, due to changes in the modifications associated with these transmission system upgrades and the time needed to achieve alignment and agreement among TVA stakeholders regarding these changes to the modifications, the due date for the responses to NRC RAIs RERP-GE-RAI 2 and RERP-GE-RAI 4 and the other revised portions of the BFN EPU LAR impacted by the changes to the transmission system upgrades was extended to June 10, 2016, per communication with the NRC Project Manager. TVA performed an interconnection SIS for the EPU of all three BFN units that was submitted to the NRC on December 18, 2015 (Reference 4). This interconnection SIS identified the need to replace six breaker failure relays at BFN, install 774 megavolt-ampere reactive (MVAR) capacitor banks in four locations throughout the TVA transmission system, and construct a new 500 kilovolt (kV) transmission line. Further study and evaluation of the transmission system modifications and alternatives resulted in a revision of the interconnection SIS. The revised interconnection SIS identifies the need to replace six breaker failure relays, install 764 MVAR capacitor banks in five locations throughout the TVA transmission system, and modify the excitation system of all three BFN main generators. Therefore, the new 500 kV transmission line will no longer be required to support BFN EPU and the impact of a new excitation system will be addressed in this BFN EPU LAR supplement in lieu of the transmission line. Enclosure 1 of this letter provides Revision 1 of the interconnection SIS. Enclosure 1 supersedes and replaces the interconnection SIS submitted by the Reference 4 letter, dated December 18, 2015. Enclosure 2 of this letter provides the updated BFN EPU Transmission System Stability Evaluation that has been revised to reflect the modifications resulting from the final interconnection SIS provided in Enclosure 1 of this letter. The BFN EPU Transmission System Stability Evaluation study evaluates the effect of BFN operation at EPU conditions with respect to continued compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, General Design Criterion (GDC) 17, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CNL-16-091 Page 3 May 27, 2016 Electric Power Systems. Enclosure 2 supersedes and replaces Attachment 43 of the BFN EPU LAR submitted by the Reference 4 letter, dated December 18, 2015. Enclosure 3 of this letter provides the updated response (Revision 1) to the NRC RAI EEEB-RAI 1. The update has been made to reflect the changes to the transmission system upgrades included in Revision 1 of the interconnection SIS. Enclosure 4 of this letter provides a public version of Revision 1 of NRC RAI EEEB-RAI 1 and updated response, with critical energy infrastructure information removed. Enclosures 3 and 4 of this letter supersede and replace Enclosures 3 and 4 of the Reference 5 letter, dated February 16, 2016. Enclosure 5 of this letter provides the responses to NRC RAIs RERP-GE 2 and RERP-GE-4. Enclosure 5 of this letter also provides the updated response (Revision 1) to NRC RAI RERP-GE 3. The update has been made to reflect the changes to the transmission system upgrades included in Revision 1 of the interconnection SIS. Revision 1 of NRC RAI RERP-GE 3 response provided in Enclosure 5 of this letter supersedes and replaces the response to NRC RAI RERP-GE 3 provided in the Reference 3 letter, dated April 22, 2016. Enclosure 6 of this letter provides Revision 1 to the BFN EPU Supplemental Environmental Report. The revised BFN EPU Supplemental Environmental Report reflects the transmission system upgrades included in Revision 1 of the interconnection SIS. Enclosure 6 supersedes and replaces Attachment 42 of the BFN EPU LAR (Reference 1), dated September 21, 2015. Enclosure 7 of this letter provides a supplement to the BFN EPU Probabilistic Risk Assessment. This supplement to the BFN EPU Probabilistic Risk Assessment addresses the effect of the main generator excitation system upgrade included in Revision 1 of the interconnection SIS. Enclosure 7 supplements, but does not supersede, Attachment 44 of the BFN EPU LAR (Reference 1), dated September 21, 2015. Enclosure 8 of this letter provides a supplement to Section 2.5.1.2.2 of the Power Uprate Safety Analysis Report (PUSAR) (NEDC-33860P, Revision 0). The supplement addresses the effect of the main generator excitation system upgrade included in Revision 1 of the interconnection SIS. Enclosure 9 of this letter provides a public version of the supplement to Section 2.5.1.2.2 of the Power Uprate Safety Analysis Report (PUSAR) (NEDO-33860, Revision 0). Enclosures 8 and 9 supersede and replace Section 2.5.1.2.2 of Attachments 6 and 7, respectively, of the BFN EPU LAR (Reference 1), dated September 21, 2015. Enclosure 10 of this letter provides Revision 1 to the BFN EPU List and Status of Plant Modifications. The BFN EPU List and Status of Modifications is revised to reflect the main generator excitation system upgrade included in Revision 1 of the interconnection SIS and modifications that have been completed since the BFN EPU LAR was submitted. Enclosure 10 supersedes and replaces Attachment 47 of the BFN EPU LAR (Reference 1), dated September 21, 2015. Enclosures 1, 2, and 3 contain critical energy infrastructure information that is considered sensitive, unclassified (non-safeguard) information. As a result, TVA requests that U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission CNL-16-091 Page4 May 27, 2016 Enclosures 1, 2, and 3 be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1 ). As stated above, Enclosure 8 to this letter provides a supplement to the PUSAR. GE-Hitachi Nuclear Energy Americas LLC (GEH) consider portions of the information provided in Enclosure 8 of this letter to be proprietary and, therefore, exempt from public disclosure pursuant to 10 CFR 2.390, Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding. An affidavit for withholding information, executed by GEH, is provided in Enclosure 11. Enclosure 9 is a non-proprietary version of the supplement to the PUSAR provided in Enclosure 8. Therefore, on behalf of GEH, TVA requests that Enclosure 8 be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with the GEH affidavits and the provisions of 10 CFR 2.390. TVA has reviewed the information supporting a finding of no significant hazards consideration and the environmental consideration provided to the NRC in the Reference 1 letter. The supplemental information provided in this submittal does not affect the bases for concluding that the proposed license amendment does not involve a significant hazards consideration. In addition, the supplemental information in this submittal does not affect the bases for concluding that neither an environmental impact statement nor an environmental assessment needs to be prepared in connection with the proposed license amendment.
Recommended publications
  • Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology

    Tennessee Archaeology Is Published Semi-Annually in Electronic Print Format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology

    TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Volume 3 Spring 2008 Number 1 EDITORIAL COORDINATORS Michael C. Moore TTEENNNNEESSSSEEEE AARRCCHHAAEEOOLLOOGGYY Tennessee Division of Archaeology Kevin E. Smith Middle Tennessee State University VOLUME 3 Spring 2008 NUMBER 1 EDITORIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE David Anderson 1 EDITORS CORNER University of Tennessee ARTICLES Patrick Cummins Alliance for Native American Indian Rights 3 Evidence for Early Mississippian Settlement Aaron Deter-Wolf of the Nashville Basin: Archaeological Division of Archaeology Explorations at the Spencer Site (40DV191) W. STEVEN SPEARS, MICHAEL C. MOORE, AND Jay Franklin KEVIN E. SMITH East Tennessee State University RESEARCH REPORTS Phillip Hodge Department of Transportation 25 A Surface Collection from the Kirk Point Site Zada Law (40HS174), Humphreys County, Tennessee Ashland City, Tennessee CHARLES H. MCNUTT, JOHN B. BROSTER, AND MARK R. NORTON Larry McKee TRC, Inc. 77 Two Mississippian Burial Clusters at Katherine Mickelson Travellers’ Rest, Davidson County, Rhodes College Tennessee DANIEL SUMNER ALLEN IV Sarah Sherwood University of Tennessee 87 Luminescence Dates and Woodland Ceramics from Rock Shelters on the Upper Lynne Sullivan Frank H. McClung Museum Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee JAY D. FRANKLIN Guy Weaver Weaver and Associates LLC Tennessee Archaeology is published semi-annually in electronic print format by the Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology. Correspondence about manuscripts for the journal should be addressed to Michael C. Moore, Tennessee Division of Archaeology, Cole Building #3, 1216 Foster Avenue, Nashville TN 37243. The Tennessee Council for Professional Archaeology disclaims responsibility for statements, whether fact or of opinion, made by contributors. On the Cover: Human effigy bowl from Travellers’ Rest, Courtesy, Aaron Deter-Wolf EDITORS CORNER Welcome to the fifth issue of Tennessee Archaeology.
  • 2016 Athens, Georgia

    2016 Athens, Georgia

    SOUTHEASTERN ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 ATHENS, GEORGIA BULLETIN 59 2016 BULLETIN 59 2016 PROCEEDINGS & ABSTRACTS OF THE 73RD ANNUAL MEETING OCTOBER 26-29, 2016 THE CLASSIC CENTER ATHENS, GEORGIA Meeting Organizer: Edited by: Hosted by: Cover: © Southeastern Archaeological Conference 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS THE CLASSIC CENTER FLOOR PLAN……………………………………………………...……………………..…... PREFACE AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS…………………………………………………………………….…..……. LIST OF DONORS……………………………………………………………………………………………….…..……. SPECIAL THANKS………………………………………………………………………………………….….....……….. SEAC AT A GLANCE……………………………………………………………………………………….……….....…. GENERAL INFORMATION & SPECIAL EVENTS SCHEDULE…………………….……………………..…………... PROGRAM WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 26…………………………………………………………………………..……. THURSDAY, OCTOBER 27……………………………………………………………………………...…...13 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 28TH……………………………………………………………….……………....…..21 SATURDAY, OCTOBER 29TH…………………………………………………………….…………....…...28 STUDENT PAPER COMPETITION ENTRIES…………………………………………………………………..………. ABSTRACTS OF SYMPOSIA AND PANELS……………………………………………………………..…………….. ABSTRACTS OF WORKSHOPS…………………………………………………………………………...…………….. ABSTRACTS OF SEAC STUDENT AFFAIRS LUNCHEON……………………………………………..…..……….. SEAC LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT AWARDS FOR 2016…………………….……………….…….…………………. Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin 59, 2016 ConferenceRooms CLASSIC CENTERFLOOR PLAN 6 73rd Annual Meeting, Athens, Georgia EVENT LOCATIONS Baldwin Hall Baldwin Hall 7 Southeastern Archaeological Conference Bulletin
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019

    Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019

    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
  • Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in Conjunction with Its Application for Renewal of the BFN Ols, As Provided for by the Following NRC Regulations

    Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in Conjunction with Its Application for Renewal of the BFN Ols, As Provided for by the Following NRC Regulations

    Biological Assessment Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant License Renewal Review Limestone County, Alabama October 2004 Docket Numbers 50-259, 50-260, and 50-296 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Rockville, Maryland Biological Assessment of the Potential Effects on Endangered or Threatened Species from the Proposed License Renewal for the Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant 1.0 Introduction The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licenses the operation of domestic nuclear power plants in accordance with the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended, and NRC implementing regulations. The Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) operates Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1, 2, and 3 (BFN) pursuant to NRC operating license (OL) numbers DPR-33, DPR-52, DPR-68, which expire on December 20, 2013, June 28, 2014, and July 2, 2016, respectively. TVA has prepared an Environmental Report (ER) (TVA 2003) in conjunction with its application for renewal of the BFN OLs, as provided for by the following NRC regulations: C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 54, “Requirements for Renewal of Operating Licenses for Nuclear Power Plants,” Section 54.23, Contents of application - environmental information (10 CFR 54.23). C Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 51, “Environmental Protection Regulations for Domestic Licensing and Related Regulatory Functions,” Section 51.53, Postconstruction environmental reports, Subsection 51.53(c), Operating license renewal stage (10 CFR 51.53(c)). The renewed OLs would allow up to 20 additional years of plant operation beyond the current licensed operating term. No major refurbishment or replacement of important systems, structures, or components are expected during the 20-year BFN license renewal term.

  • Redescription of Marstonia Comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a Poorly Known and Possibly Threatened Freshwater Gastropod from the Edwards Plateau Region (Texas)

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys Redescription77: 1–16 (2011) of Marstonia comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a poorly known and... 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.77.935 RESEARCH ARTICLE www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Redescription of Marstonia comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a poorly known and possibly threatened freshwater gastropod from the Edwards Plateau region (Texas) Robert Hershler1, Hsiu-Ping Liu2 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Smithsonian Institution, P.O. Box 37012, Washington, D.C. 20013- 7012, USA 2 Department of Biology, Metropolitan State College of Denver, Denver, CO 80217, USA Corresponding author : Robert Hershler ( [email protected] ) Academic editor: Anatoly Schileyko | Received 2 June 2010 | Accepted 13 January 2011 | Published 26 January 2011 Citation: Hershler R, Liu H-P (2011) Redescription of Marstonia comalensis (Pilsbry & Ferriss, 1906), a poorly known and possibly threatened freshwater gastropod from the Edwards Plateau region (Texas). ZooKeys 77 : 1 – 16 . doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.77.935 Abstract Marstonia comalensis, a poorly known nymphophiline gastropod (originally described from Comal Creek, Texas) that has often been confused with Cincinnatia integra, is re-described and the generic placement of this species, which was recently allocated to Marstonia based on unpublished evidence, is confi rmed by anatomical study. Marstonia comalensis is a large congener having an ovate-conic, openly umbilicate shell and penis having a short fi lament and oblique, squarish lobe bearing a narrow gland along its distal edge. It is well diff erentiated morphologically from congeners having similar shells and penes and is also geneti- cally divergent relative to those congeners that have been sequenced (mtCOI divergence 3.0–8.5%).
  • The Late Mississippian Period (AD 1350-1500) - Draft

    The Late Mississippian Period (AD 1350-1500) - Draft

    SECTION IV: The Mississippian Period in Tennessee Chapter 12: The Late Mississippian Period (AD 1350-1500) - Draft By Michaelyn Harle, Shannon D. Koerner, and Bobby R. Braly 1 Introduction Throughout the Mississippian world this time period appears to be a time of great social change. In eastern Tennessee, Dallas Phase sites further elaborated on the Mississippian lifeway, becoming highly organized and home to political leaders. Settlements were sometimes quite extensive (i.e., the Dallas, Toqua, and Ledford Island sites with deep middens, often a palisade wall, sometimes with bastions, densely packed domestic structures, and human interments throughout the village area and also in mounds. Elsewhere in the region, there is evidence that much of West Tennessee and parts of the Cumberland-Tennessee valley were either abandoned by Mississippian societies or so fundamentally reorganized that they were rendered archaeologically invisible. This abandonment appears to be part of a larger regional trend of large portions of the Central Mississippi Valley, often referred to as the vacant quarter. A number of motives for this abandonment have been provided including the dissolution of Cahokia, increased intra- regional warfare, and environmental shifts associated with the onslaught of the Little Ice Age (Meeks 2006; Cobb and Butler 2002; Williams 1983, 1990). This two sides of the continium is important since it gives us a more microscopic glimpse of what was being played out in the larger pan-Mississippian stage. Regional and temporal refinements that are currently in progress gives us a unique perspective into the similarities and differences in which Tennessee Mississippian societies reacted to this unstable period.
  • Microsoft Outlook

    Microsoft Outlook

    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
  • THE CHIRONOMIDAE of OTSEGO LAKE with KEYS to the IMMATURE STAGES of the SUBFAMILIES TANYPODINAE and DIAMESINAE (DIPTERA) Joseph

    THE CHIRONOMIDAE of OTSEGO LAKE with KEYS to the IMMATURE STAGES of the SUBFAMILIES TANYPODINAE and DIAMESINAE (DIPTERA) Joseph

    THE CHIRONOMIDAE OF OTSEGO LAKE WITH KEYS TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF THE SUBFAMILIES TANYPODINAE AND DIAMESINAE (DIPTERA) Joseph P. Fagnani Willard N. Harman BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION COOPERSTOWN, NEW YORK OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 20 AUGUST, 1987 BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA THIS MANUSCRIPT IS NOT A FORMAL PUBLICATION. The information contained herein may not be cited or reproduced without permission of the author or the S.U.N.Y. Oneonta Biology Department ABSTRACT The species of Chironomidae inhabiting Otsego Lake, New York, were studied from 1979 through 1982. This report presents the results of a variety of collecting methods used in a diversity of habitats over a considerable temporal period. The principle emphasis was on sound taxonomy and rearing to associate immatures and adults. Over 4,000 individual rearings have provided the basis for description of general morphological stages that occur during the life cycles of these species. Keys to the larvae and pupae of the 4 subfamilies and 10 tribes of Chironomidae collected in Otsego Lake were compiled. Keys are also presented for the immature stages of 12 Tanypodinae and 2 Diamesinae species found in Otsego Lake. Labeled line drawings of the majority of structures and measurements used to identify the immature stages of most species of chironomids were adapted from the literature. Extensive photomicrographs are presented along with larval and pupal characteristics, taxonomic notes, synonymies, recent literature accounts and collection records for 17 species. These include: Chironominae­ Paratendipes albimanus (Meigen) (Chironomini); Ortl10cladiinae ­ Psectrocladius (Psectrocladius) simulans (Johannsen) and I!ydrobaenus johannseni (Sublette); Diamesinae - Protanypus ramosus Saether (Protanypodini) and Potthastia longimana Kieffer (Diamesini); and Tanypodinae - Clinotanypus (Clinotanypus) pinguis (Loew) (Coelotanypodini), Tanypu~ (Tanypus) punctipennis Meigen (Tanypodini), Procladius (Psilotanypus) bellus (Loew); Var.
  • Bureau of Water Quality Annual Macroinvertebrate Community Report 2017

    Bureau of Water Quality Annual Macroinvertebrate Community Report 2017

    Indiana Scientific Purpose License Number: 17-149 Bureau of Water Quality Annual Macroinvertebrate Community Report 2017 Bureau of Water Quality 5150 W. Kilgore Ave. Muncie, IN 47304 Phone: 765-747-4896 Prepared by: Fax: 765-213-6444 Laura Bowley, Macroinvertebrate Biologist, BWQ March 2018 www.munciesanitary.org/bwq 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ 3 PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 West Fork White River and the Bureau of Water Quality ...................................................... 5 Mussels as Biomonitors ............................................................................................................... 6 Macroinvertebrates as Biomonitors ........................................................................................... 6 MUSSEL METHODS ................................................................................................................. 6 Mussels- Field Sampling.............................................................................................................. 6 Figure 1.— Macroinvertebrate and mussel sites, 2017. ................................................................ 7 Table 1.—mIBI submetrics and their response to disturbance
  • Limestone County Water and Sewer Authority Easement Project Number: 2012-01

    Limestone County Water and Sewer Authority Easement Project Number: 2012-01

    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Environmental Assessment Project Name: Limestone County Water and Sewer Authority Easement Project Number: 2012-01 LIMESTONE COUNTY WATER AND SEWER AUTHORITY EASEMENT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Limestone County, Alabama Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee Cooperating Agency: UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Nashville, Tennessee April 2013 This page intentionally left blank Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Scope of the Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ 4 1.4 Other Permits, Licenses, and Approvals .................................................................................. 4 CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES ........................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Description of Alternatives ....................................................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Alternative A – The No Action Alternative ......................................................................... 5 2.1.2 Alternative B – The Proposed
  • Geological Survey of Alabama

    Geological Survey of Alabama

    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF ALABAMA Berry H. (Nick) Tew, Jr. State Geologist ECOSYSTEM INVESTIGATIONS PROGRAM Patrick E. O’Neil Director AN ASSESSMENT OF FRESHWATER MOLLUSKS AND CRAYFISH FROM SELECTED WATERBODIES ON AND NEAR REDSTONE ARSENAL, MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA, 2008-09 OPEN-FILE REPORT 0922 By Stuart W. McGregor1, Elizabeth A. Wynn1, and Jeffrey T. Garner2 1Geological Survey of Alabama 2Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Prepared in cooperation with U. S. Army, Redstone Arsenal Environmental and Cultural Resources Directorate Under Contract No. W9124P-08-P-0094 Tuscaloosa, Alabama 2009 AN ASSESSMENT OF FRESHWATER MOLLUSKS AND CRAYFISH FROM SELECTED WATERBODIES ON AND NEAR REDSTONE ARSENAL, MADISON COUNTY, ALABAMA, 2008-2009 By Stuart W. McGregor, Elizabeth A. Wynn, and Jeffrey T. Garner ABSTRACT Sampling for freshwater mollusks and crayfish was conducted in springs, streams, swamps, and roadside ditches on and near Redstone Arsenal by the Geological Survey of Alabama in 2008 and 2009. Efforts yielded weathered dead valves of the Tennessee Clubshell, a species of highest conservation priority in Alabama, along with at least nine snail species, including species of highest and high conservation priority in Alabama, at least two taxa of fingernail clams, the Asian Clam, and eight crayfish species. INTRODUCTION The diversity of freshwater aquatic life in North America is centered in Alabama, owing to the geological antiquity of the state, the lack of glaciation, the abundance of large, discrete river basins, and a mild, stable climate, collectively providing ample time, separation, and ambient conditions for speciation (Boschung and Mayden, 2004; Williams and others, 2008). Freshwater mussels are considered one of the most imperiled faunal groups in North America based on the rapid extinction rate and preponderance of imperiled species (Master, 1993; Williams and others, 1993; Lydeard and Mayden, 1995) and drastic reductions in diversity and abundance of mussel populations are documented in many systems (Williams and others, 2008).
  • Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and Upstream From

    Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and Upstream From

    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service and Amistad National Recreation Area Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers In and Upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2005–7 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover Left. Dolan Falls on the Devils River, Texas. Cover Right. Photo was taken where the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) gaging station near Langtry is located. The wier dam where the gage sensor is located is in the picture. Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers In and Upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2005–7 By J. Bruce Moring Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service and Amistad National Recreation Area Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report.