DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and Upstream From

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and Upstream From Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service and Amistad National Recreation Area Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers In and Upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2005–7 Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover Left. Dolan Falls on the Devils River, Texas. Cover Right. Photo was taken where the International Boundary and Water Commission (IBWC) gaging station near Langtry is located. The wier dam where the gage sensor is located is in the picture. Water Quality and the Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers In and Upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2005–7 By J. Bruce Moring Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service and Amistad National Recreation Area Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5038 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 This and other USGS information products are available at http://store.usgs.gov/ U.S. Geological Survey Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 To learn about the USGS and its information products visit http://www.usgs.gov/ 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Moring, J.B., 2012, Water quality and the composition of fish and macroinvertebrate communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2005-7: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2012–5038, 70 p. iii Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................................1 Introduction.....................................................................................................................................................2 Purpose and Scope .............................................................................................................................4 Description of Study Area ...................................................................................................................4 Methods of Investigation ..............................................................................................................................5 Collection and Analysis of Water-Quality Samples.........................................................................6 Collection and Processing of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Samples ..........................................7 Fish Community Surveys and Processing of Samples ....................................................................8 Macroinvertebrate Community Surveys and Processing of Samples .........................................8 Quality Control .......................................................................................................................................8 Water Quality in the Devils and Pecos Rivers ......................................................................................30 Total Dissolved Solids ........................................................................................................................30 Chloride.................................................................................................................................................30 Sulfate ..................................................................................................................................................30 Ammonia Plus Organic Nitrogen ......................................................................................................30 Nitrate Plus Nitrite Nitrogen .............................................................................................................33 Orthophosphate and Total Phosphorus ...........................................................................................33 Selenium ...............................................................................................................................................33 Pesticides .............................................................................................................................................33 Composition of Fish and Macroinvertebrate Communities in the Devils and Pecos Rivers ......................................................................................................33 Fish Communities ................................................................................................................................34 Devils River .................................................................................................................................34 Pecos River .................................................................................................................................34 Comparison between the Devils and Pecos Rivers ...................................................34 Macroinvertebrate Communities .....................................................................................................42 Summary .......................................................................................................................................................63 References ....................................................................................................................................................67 Appendix 1. Laboratory recovery of surrogate compounds from four sets analyzed concurrently with water-quality samples from U.S. Geological Survey stations 08449400 Devils River at Pafford Crossing near Comstock, Texas, and 08447410 Pecos River near Langtry, Tex., in the Amistad National Recreation Area, 2005 ................70 iv Figures 1. Map showing location of study area .......................................................................................3 2. Graph showing assessment of similarities among fish communities determined by using Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (first and second dimensions) for fish collected in 2006-7 at the Devils and Pecos Rivers sites in and upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas ..................................................................................................................................43 3. Graph showing assessment of similarities among macroinvertebrate communities determined by using Non-metric Multi-Dimensional Scaling (first and second dimensions) for aquatic insects collected in 2006 from sampling sites on the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas ............................................................................64 Tables 1. Sample-collection sites on the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2005–07 ...............................................6 2. Concentrations of total dissolved solids, selected major ions, and nutrients in water-quality samples collected at U.S. Geological Survey stations 08449400 Devils River at Pafford Crossing near Comstock, Texas, and 08447410 Pecos River near Langtry, Tex., in the Amistad National Recreation Area, Tex., 2005............................................................................................................................10 3. Concentrations of trace metals in water-quality samples collected at U.S. Geological Survey stations 08449400 Devils River at Pafford Crossing near Comstock, Texas and 08447410 Pecos River near Langtry, Tex., in the Amistad National Recreation Area, Tex., 2005 .......................................................................12 4. Concentrations of organic carbon and pesticides in water-quality samples collected at U.S. Geological Survey stations 08449400 Devils River at Pafford Crossing near Comstock, Texas, and 08447410 Pecos River near Langtry, Tex., in the Amistad National Recreation Area, Tex., 2005 ...........................................................14 5. Concentrations of selected major ions and nutrients measured in water-quality samples collected in 2005 at U.S. Geological Survey stations 08449400 Devils River at Pafford Crossing near Comstock, Texas, and 08447410 Pecos River near Langtry, Tex., in the Amistad National Recreation Area, with summary statistics from samples collected at station 08449400 during 1978–1995 as part of the U.S. Geological Survey Hydrologic Benchmark Network (U.S. Geological Survey, 2011), and summary statistics from samples collected at station 08447410 during 1974–2007 as part of U.S. Geological Survey National Stream Quality Accounting Network (U.S. Geological Survey, 2010)..................................................................................31 v 6. Presence or absence of fish taxa and total number of fish species collected from sites on the Devils and Pecos Rivers in and upstream from the Amistad National Recreation Area, Texas, 2006–7 ...............................................................................35 7. Fish species, number of individual specimens, native status, trophic group, tolerance
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Native Fish Fauna of Major Drainages East of The
    THE NATIVE FISH FAUNA OF MAJOR DRAINAGES EAST OF THE CONTINENTAL DIVIDE IN NEW MEXICO A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Faculty of Biology Eastern New Mexico University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements fdr -the7Degree: Master of Science in Biology by Michael D. Hatch December 1984 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction Study Area Procedures Results and Discussion Summary Acknowledgements Literature Cited Appendices Abstract INTRODUCTION r (t. The earliest impression of New Mexico's native fish fauna =Ems during the 1850's from naturalists attached to various government survey parties. Without the collections from these and other early surveys, the record of the native fish fauna would be severely deficient because, since that time, some 1 4 native species - or subspecies of fish have become extirpated and the ranges of an additionial 22 native species or subspecies have become severly re- stricted. Since the late Miocene, physiographical changes of drainages have linked New Mexico, to varying degrees, with contemporary ichthyofaunal elements or their progenitors from the Rocky Mountains, the Great Plains, the Chihuahuan Desert, the Mexican Plateau, the Sonoran Desert and the Great Basin. Immigra- tion from these areas contributed to the diversity of the state's native ichthyofauna. Over the millinea, the fate of these fishes waxed and waned in ell 4, response to the changing physical and _chenaca-l-conditions of the surrounding environment. Ultimately, one of the most diverse fish faunas of any of the interior southwestern states developed. Fourteen families comprising 67 species of fish are believed to have occupied New Mexico's waters historically, with strikingly different faunas evolving east and west of the Continental Divide.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species
    FEATURE: ENDANGERED SPECIES Conservation Status of Imperiled North American Freshwater and Diadromous Fishes ABSTRACT: This is the third compilation of imperiled (i.e., endangered, threatened, vulnerable) plus extinct freshwater and diadromous fishes of North America prepared by the American Fisheries Society’s Endangered Species Committee. Since the last revision in 1989, imperilment of inland fishes has increased substantially. This list includes 700 extant taxa representing 133 genera and 36 families, a 92% increase over the 364 listed in 1989. The increase reflects the addition of distinct populations, previously non-imperiled fishes, and recently described or discovered taxa. Approximately 39% of described fish species of the continent are imperiled. There are 230 vulnerable, 190 threatened, and 280 endangered extant taxa, and 61 taxa presumed extinct or extirpated from nature. Of those that were imperiled in 1989, most (89%) are the same or worse in conservation status; only 6% have improved in status, and 5% were delisted for various reasons. Habitat degradation and nonindigenous species are the main threats to at-risk fishes, many of which are restricted to small ranges. Documenting the diversity and status of rare fishes is a critical step in identifying and implementing appropriate actions necessary for their protection and management. Howard L. Jelks, Frank McCormick, Stephen J. Walsh, Joseph S. Nelson, Noel M. Burkhead, Steven P. Platania, Salvador Contreras-Balderas, Brady A. Porter, Edmundo Díaz-Pardo, Claude B. Renaud, Dean A. Hendrickson, Juan Jacobo Schmitter-Soto, John Lyons, Eric B. Taylor, and Nicholas E. Mandrak, Melvin L. Warren, Jr. Jelks, Walsh, and Burkhead are research McCormick is a biologist with the biologists with the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State, 2019
    NYSDEC SOP #208-19 Title: Stream Biomonitoring Rev: 1.2 Date: 03/29/19 Page 1 of 188 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Water Standard Operating Procedure: Biological Monitoring of Surface Waters in New York State March 2019 Note: Division of Water (DOW) SOP revisions from year 2016 forward will only capture the current year parties involved with drafting/revising/approving the SOP on the cover page. The dated signatures of those parties will be captured here as well. The historical log of all SOP updates and revisions (past & present) will immediately follow the cover page. NYSDEC SOP 208-19 Stream Biomonitoring Rev. 1.2 Date: 03/29/2019 Page 3 of 188 SOP #208 Update Log 1 Prepared/ Revision Revised by Approved by Number Date Summary of Changes DOW Staff Rose Ann Garry 7/25/2007 Alexander J. Smith Rose Ann Garry 11/25/2009 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 1.0 3/29/2012 Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 2.0 4/18/2014 • Definition of a reference site clarified (Sect. 8.2.3) • WAVE results added as a factor Alexander J. Smith Jason Fagel 3.0 4/1/2016 in site selection (Sect. 8.2.2 & 8.2.6) • HMA details added (Sect. 8.10) • Nonsubstantive changes 2 • Disinfection procedures (Sect. 8) • Headwater (Sect. 9.4.1 & 10.2.7) assessment methods added • Benthic multiplate method added (Sect, 9.4.3) Brian Duffy Rose Ann Garry 1.0 5/01/2018 • Lake (Sect. 9.4.5 & Sect. 10.) assessment methods added • Detail on biological impairment sampling (Sect.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management Program 2013-2018 Appendix A
    Appendix A 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) 2012 Texas Integrated Report - Texas 303(d) List (Category 5) As required under Sections 303(d) and 304(a) of the federal Clean Water Act, this list identifies the water bodies in or bordering Texas for which effluent limitations are not stringent enough to implement water quality standards, and for which the associated pollutants are suitable for measurement by maximum daily load. In addition, the TCEQ also develops a schedule identifying Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) that will be initiated in the next two years for priority impaired waters. Issuance of permits to discharge into 303(d)-listed water bodies is described in the TCEQ regulatory guidance document Procedures to Implement the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (January 2003, RG-194). Impairments are limited to the geographic area described by the Assessment Unit and identified with a six or seven-digit AU_ID. A TMDL for each impaired parameter will be developed to allocate pollutant loads from contributing sources that affect the parameter of concern in each Assessment Unit. The TMDL will be identified and counted using a six or seven-digit AU_ID. Water Quality permits that are issued before a TMDL is approved will not increase pollutant loading that would contribute to the impairment identified for the Assessment Unit. Explanation of Column Headings SegID and Name: The unique identifier (SegID), segment name, and location of the water body. The SegID may be one of two types of numbers. The first type is a classified segment number (4 digits, e.g., 0218), as defined in Appendix A of the Texas Surface Water Quality Standards (TSWQS).
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICO Las Moras Seco Creek K Er LAVACA MEDINA US HWY 77 Springs Uvalde LEGEND Medina River
    Cedar Creek Reservoir NAVARRO HENDERSON HILL BOSQUE BROWN ERATH 281 RUNNELS COLEMAN Y ANDERSON S HW COMANCHE U MIDLAND GLASSCOCK STERLING COKE Colorado River 3 7 7 HAMILTON LIMESTONE 2 Y 16 Y W FREESTONE US HW W THE HIDDEN HEART OF TEXAS H H S S U Y 87 U Waco Lake Waco McLENNAN San Angelo San Angelo Lake Concho River MILLS O.H. Ivie Reservoir UPTON Colorado River Horseshoe Park at San Felipe Springs. Popular swimming hole providing relief from hot Texas summers. REAGAN CONCHO U S HW Photo courtesy of Gregg Eckhardt. Y 183 Twin Buttes McCULLOCH CORYELL L IRION Reservoir 190 am US HWY LAMPASAS US HWY 87 pasas R FALLS US HWY 377 Belton U S HW TOM GREEN Lake B Y 67 Brady iver razos R iver LEON Temple ROBERTSON Lampasas Stillhouse BELL SAN SABA Hollow Lake Salado MILAM MADISON San Saba River Nava BURNET US HWY 183 US HWY 190 Salado sota River Lake TX HWY 71 TX HWY 29 MASON Buchanan N. San G Springs abriel Couple enjoying the historic mill at Barton Springs in 1902. R Mason Burnet iver Photo courtesy of Center for American History, University of Texas. SCHLEICHER MENARD Y 29 TX HW WILLIAMSON BRAZOS US HWY 83 377 Llano S. S an PECOS Gabriel R US HWY iver Georgetown US HWY 163 Llano River Longhorn Cavern Y 79 Sonora LLANO Inner Space Caverns US HW Eckert James River Bat Cave US HWY 95 Lake Lyndon Lake Caverns B. Johnson Junction Travis CROCKETT of Sonora BURLESON 281 GILLESPIE BLANCO Y KIMBLE W TRAVIS SUTTON H GRIMES TERRELL S U US HWY 290 US HWY 16 US HWY P Austin edernales R Fredericksburg Barton Springs 21 LEE Somerville Lake AUSTIN Pecos
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S
    Summary Report of Freshwater Nonindigenous Aquatic Species in U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4—An Update April 2013 Prepared by: Pam L. Fuller, Amy J. Benson, and Matthew J. Cannister U.S. Geological Survey Southeast Ecological Science Center Gainesville, Florida Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Southeast Region Atlanta, Georgia Cover Photos: Silver Carp, Hypophthalmichthys molitrix – Auburn University Giant Applesnail, Pomacea maculata – David Knott Straightedge Crayfish, Procambarus hayi – U.S. Forest Service i Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................................................ vi INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Overview of Region 4 Introductions Since 2000 ....................................................................................... 1 Format of Species Accounts ...................................................................................................................... 2 Explanation of Maps ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prize Bridge 1960 •
    PRIZE BRIDGE 1960 • Prize Bridges 1960 Steel b1'idges selected tn the annual national competition conducted by the Ame1'ican Insti­ tute of Steel Const1'uction as the most beautiful b~'idges opened to traffic in 1960. • AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF STEEL CONSTRUCTION, INC. 101 Park Avenue, New York 17, N. Y. • • ~ury of Award A. L. AYDELOTT, AlA A. L. Aydelott and Associates, Architects Memphis, Tennessee THOMAS S. BUECHNER Director The Brooklyn Museum Brooklyn, New YOl'k GLENN W. HOLCOMB President American Society of Civil Engineers Professor, Civil Engineering Oregon State University • Corvallis, Oregon GEORGE LINDSTROM Lundstrom & Skubic, Architects Chicago, Illinois GEOFFREY PLATT, FAIA Architect New York City, New York 'J ; • Beauty in Steel Bridges The enduring beauty of steel bridges is eloquent tribute to the vision and skill of the men who plan, design and build them. The bridge de igner of today is both artist and engineer. He understands the potential for strength and beauty which is inherent in steel structures, and he knows that aesthetic appearance can be achieved at no sacrifice of efficiency or economy. The simple grace of a highway overpass, no less than the majestic sweep of a river crossing reflects a creative integration of structure, func­ tion and form, skillfully executed in beautiful bridges of steel. To promote a more widespread appreciation of the aesthetics of steel bridges and to honor the architectural excellence of modern bridge design, the American Institute of Steel Construction sponsors an annual Prize Brid'ge Competition. Each year a distinguished Jury of Award, composed of leading art directors, architects and engineers, selects the steel bridges which it judges to be the most beautiful of those opened to traffic in the • United States during the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Sources, Loading and Salinity of the Pecos River
    INFLUENCE OF TRIBUTARIES ON SALINITY OF AMISTAD INTERNATIONAL RESERVOIR S. Miyamoto, Fasong Yuan and Shilpa Anand Texas A&M University Agricultural Research Center at El Paso Texas Agricultural Experiment Station An Investigatory Report Submitted to Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency In a partial fulfillment of A contract TSSWCB, No. 04-11 and US EPA, No. 4280001 Technical Report TR – 292 April 2006 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The study reported here was performed under a contract with the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board (TSSWCB Project No. 04-11) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA Project No. 4280001). The overall project is entitled “Basin-wide Management Plan for the Pecos River in Texas”. The materials presented here apply to Subtask 1.6; “River Salinity Modeling”. The cost of exploratory soil sample analyses was defrayed in part by the funds from the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture under Agreement No. 2005-34461-15661. The main data set used for this study came from an open file available from the U.S. Section of the International Boundary and Water Commission (US- IBWC), and some from the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR). Administrative support to this project was provided by the Texas Water Resource Institute (TWRI). Logistic support to this project was provided by Jessica N. White and Olivia Navarrete, Student Assistants. This document was reviewed by Nancy Hanks of the Texas Clean Rivers Program (TCRP), Gilbert Anaya of the US-IBWC, and Kevin Wagner of the Texas Water Resource Institute (TWRI).
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHIRONOMIDAE of OTSEGO LAKE with KEYS to the IMMATURE STAGES of the SUBFAMILIES TANYPODINAE and DIAMESINAE (DIPTERA) Joseph
    THE CHIRONOMIDAE OF OTSEGO LAKE WITH KEYS TO THE IMMATURE STAGES OF THE SUBFAMILIES TANYPODINAE AND DIAMESINAE (DIPTERA) Joseph P. Fagnani Willard N. Harman BIOLOGICAL FIELD STATION COOPERSTOWN, NEW YORK OCCASIONAL PAPER NO. 20 AUGUST, 1987 BIOLOGY DEPARTMENT STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE AT ONEONTA THIS MANUSCRIPT IS NOT A FORMAL PUBLICATION. The information contained herein may not be cited or reproduced without permission of the author or the S.U.N.Y. Oneonta Biology Department ABSTRACT The species of Chironomidae inhabiting Otsego Lake, New York, were studied from 1979 through 1982. This report presents the results of a variety of collecting methods used in a diversity of habitats over a considerable temporal period. The principle emphasis was on sound taxonomy and rearing to associate immatures and adults. Over 4,000 individual rearings have provided the basis for description of general morphological stages that occur during the life cycles of these species. Keys to the larvae and pupae of the 4 subfamilies and 10 tribes of Chironomidae collected in Otsego Lake were compiled. Keys are also presented for the immature stages of 12 Tanypodinae and 2 Diamesinae species found in Otsego Lake. Labeled line drawings of the majority of structures and measurements used to identify the immature stages of most species of chironomids were adapted from the literature. Extensive photomicrographs are presented along with larval and pupal characteristics, taxonomic notes, synonymies, recent literature accounts and collection records for 17 species. These include: Chironominae­ Paratendipes albimanus (Meigen) (Chironomini); Ortl10cladiinae ­ Psectrocladius (Psectrocladius) simulans (Johannsen) and I!ydrobaenus johannseni (Sublette); Diamesinae - Protanypus ramosus Saether (Protanypodini) and Potthastia longimana Kieffer (Diamesini); and Tanypodinae - Clinotanypus (Clinotanypus) pinguis (Loew) (Coelotanypodini), Tanypu~ (Tanypus) punctipennis Meigen (Tanypodini), Procladius (Psilotanypus) bellus (Loew); Var.
    [Show full text]
  • Pterygoplichthys Pardalis
    FULL ACCOUNT FOR: Pterygoplichthys pardalis Pterygoplichthys pardalis System: Freshwater Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia Chordata Actinopterygii Siluriformes Loricariidae Common name Amazon sailfin catfish (English, United States), carachama (Spanish, Ecuador, Peru), cascudo (Spanish, Peru), peru- riesenschilderwels (German, Germany), acari (Portuguese, Brazil), ajas (Spanish, Peru), pantterileväpleko (Finnish, Finland), cachpas (Spanish, Peru), cachga (Spanish, Peru), vieja (Spanish, Peru), acari bodó bodó (Portuguese, Brazil) Synonym Hypostomus pardalis , (Castelnau, 1855) Liposarcus jeanesianus , (Cope, 1874) Liposarcus pardalis , (Castelnau, 1855) Liposarcus varius , (Cope, 1872) Similar species Summary view this species on IUCN Red List Lifecycle Stages Growth of Pterygoplichthys is rapid during the first two years of life, with total lengths of many sailfin catfishes exceeding 300 mm by age 2. Specimens in aquaria may live more than 10 years. The size range for most of the adult species in the Loricariid family is 30–50 cm, but individuals have been observed to reach 70 cm. Pterygoplicthys spp. start reproducing at approximately 25 cm (Mendoza et al, 2009). Habitat Description Pterygoplichthys spp. can be found in a wide variety of habitats, ranging from relatively cool, fast- flowing and oxygen-rich highland streams to slow-flowing, warm lowland rivers and stagnant pools poor in oxygen. They are tropical fish and populations are typically limited only by their lower lethal temperature which has been found to be about 8.8-11°C in some species (Gestring, 2006). They can thrive in a range of acidic to alkaline waters in a range of about (pH 5.5.0 to 8.0) (Mendoza et al., 2009). They are often found in soft waters, but can adapt very quickly to hard waters.
    [Show full text]
  • Bureau of Water Quality Annual Macroinvertebrate Community Report 2017
    Indiana Scientific Purpose License Number: 17-149 Bureau of Water Quality Annual Macroinvertebrate Community Report 2017 Bureau of Water Quality 5150 W. Kilgore Ave. Muncie, IN 47304 Phone: 765-747-4896 Prepared by: Fax: 765-213-6444 Laura Bowley, Macroinvertebrate Biologist, BWQ March 2018 www.munciesanitary.org/bwq 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ 3 PREFACE .................................................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 5 West Fork White River and the Bureau of Water Quality ...................................................... 5 Mussels as Biomonitors ............................................................................................................... 6 Macroinvertebrates as Biomonitors ........................................................................................... 6 MUSSEL METHODS ................................................................................................................. 6 Mussels- Field Sampling.............................................................................................................. 6 Figure 1.— Macroinvertebrate and mussel sites, 2017. ................................................................ 7 Table 1.—mIBI submetrics and their response to disturbance
    [Show full text]