DOCSLIB.ORG

The Arab Conquest of Egypt

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Arab Conquest of Egypt The Arab Conquest of Egypt Available from http://CopticChurch.net © Oxford University Press 1978 Map I. The Delta to illustrate the Conquest. Page iii The Arab Conquest of Egypt And the Last Thirty Years of the Roman Dominion By Alfred J. Butler D. Litt., F.S.A. Containing also The Treaty of Misr in Tabari (1913) and Babylon of Egypt (1914) Edited by P.M. Fraser with a critical bibliography and additional documentation SECOND EDITION Page iv Oxford University Press, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX2 6DP Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogota Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paolo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press Published in the United States by Oxford University Press Inc., New York © Oxford University Press 1978 Special edition for Sandpiper Books Ltd., 1998 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press. Within the UK, exceptions are allowed in respect of any fair dealing for the purpose of research or private study, or criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act, 1988, or in the case of reprographic reproduction in accordance with the terms of the licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside these terms and in other countries should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the address above British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Data available ISBN 0-19-821678-5 1 3 5 7 9 10 8 6 4 2 Printed in Great Britain on acid-free paper by Bookcraft (Bath) Ltd., Midsomer Norton Page v Introduction to the Revised Edition A.J. BUTLER'S The Arab Conquest of Egypt, published in 1902, went out of print in 1945, and has been in steady demand since that time as the most comprehensive and authoritative treatment of its subject. The decision to republish it with some additional matter is therefore fully justified. The conquest of Egypt was but one event in the Arab Conquest of the Middle East and North Africa, and it was not in isolation, but as part of the general history of the reign of Heraclius on the one hand, and, on the other, of the great wave of Muslim conquest that Butler treated it. This gives his work its outstanding value, and that value is heightened by the lively style and robust learning with which it is informed. Butler brought to his task of writing the history of the Conquest the background of a Classical scholar whom residence in Egypt as tutor to the Prince Tewfik in 1880-I (to which his reminiscences, Court Life in Egypt (1887), bear entertaining witness) had provided with familiarity both with the antiquities of Christian and Muslim Egypt — documented in his early work, The Ancient Coptic Churches of Egypt (1884, reprinted by the Clarendon Press, 1970) — and with Arabic sources. The Arab Conquest, the historical link between the two aspects of Egyptian history that most interested Butler, had not iously been the subject of a full critical work, and, Page vi as Butler said in his Preface, his work `needed no apology'. The Conquest was indeed in need of critical treatment, and this Butler provided with admirable acumen, establishing for the first time, within a wide framework, the true value of the non-Greek sources both for the Conquest and for the preceding Sassanian conquest of the Middle East, and of Heraclius' triumphant but short-lived reconquest. Of these events, no less than of the Conquest, Butler gave a highly individual and independent account, in which he showed himself at once a master of the critical use of sources and of historical writing. The high praise accorded to his treatment of the subject by Ignaz Goldziher in his review in the Byzantinische Zeitschrift is in itself a lasting guarantee of its worth. Nevertheless, our knowledge of the reign of Heraclius, and in particular of his wars with Persia, of the Conquest itself, and, above all, of the nature of early Muslim rule in Egypt, has altered considerably in the last two generations, and a critical reader turning to Butler's narrative today may reasonably expect some guidance as to more recent work in these fields. This I have attempted to provide in the Additional Bibliography (see pp. xliii-lxxxi), which covers in some detail works relating to Egypt in the seventh century A.D. In particular, I have tried to provide fairly full lists of Greek and Arabic papyri of the reign of Heraclius and of the early years of Muslim rule respectively, and also of the very relevant, but slightly later, correspondence of the Ummayad governor of Egypt, Qurrah b. Sharik, with the pagarch Basilius of Page vii Aphrodito. In general, the reader is referred to these bibliographies, where he will also find some indication of the major points at issue. In this context one point of general significance in an estimate of Butler's work may be made. Though conversant with the relevant Arabic sources, Butler, as he himself admitted (see p. iv), was in no sense a specialist in Arabic literature and, more particularly, in the vast field of Arabic historiography. It is the burden of the criticism made against Butler by Leone Caetani, Prince of Teano, in his monumental Annali dell'Islam (see the bibliography to chs. xiv-xxii, below, p. lxvi) that he had not given due weight to the traditional element, the hadith, reaching back in a chain of authorities, the so-called isnad, to eye-witnesses of particular historical events, by virtue of which the Traditions recorded by later writers have value only in so far as their source provides it, and must therefore be judged as statements of tradition, frequently of a tendentious nature, and not of an independent inquiry. This criticism, which was also made by K. Vollers in his review of Butler's work in the Historische Zeitschrift, must stand — and Butler himself tacitly accepted it, for in his later work, The Treaty of Misr in Tabari, Clarendon Press, 1913 (reprinted here), he carefully sets out his material in the form of the isnad — but since the Arab historians play in any case but a secondary role compared with the narrative of John of Nikiou and some of the Patriarchal and Monastic Coptic and Arabic texts, the defect does not seriously vitiate the narrative. Butler's own major departures from the fable convenue of the Conquest — his Page viii estimate of the decisive role of Cyrus in facilitating the Conquest, and his defence of the Copts against the charge of betraying Egypt to the Arabs on sectarian and political grounds — derive essentially from his interpretation of John and of Severus Ibn Moqaffa`'s History of the Patriarchs. I have already mentioned the growth of documentary evidence from Egypt, relating both to the reign of Heraclius and also to the first half-century of Muslim rule, culminating in the richly documented governorship of Qurrah b. Sharik. Butler could have no knowledge of most of this material, Greek or Arabic, and consequently his picture of Muslim administration is theoretical rather than actual; based, that is to say, on the accounts of the principles of Muslim administration in the conquered territories recorded by the Arab historians and jurists, and not on the contemporary documents which alone indicate the extent of the debt of Muslim to Byzantine in this field. (For an earlier epoch we might compare the picture of the economic regime of Ptolemaic Egypt given by Félix Robiou in his Mémoire sur l'économie politique, l'administration et la législation de l'Égypte au temps des Lagides in 1876 with that given by Professor Claire Préaux in her L'Économie royale des Lagides in 1939.) The years between 1900 and 1939 saw the publication of a hitherto undreamed-of quantity of documentary material from Egypt — Greek, Arabic, and Coptic — on a scale that is not likely to be repeated — and the present time is not unsuitable for taking stock in this respect. Butler himself returned to some central issues of the Arab Conquest in two pamphlets which he Page ix published on the eve of the First World War, and which have become excessively rare: The Treaty of Misr in Tabari (Clarendon Press, 1913) and Babylon of Egypt (ibid. 1914). In justice to Butler, but at the possible loss of a certain unity of treatment, these two pamphlets are republished after the main text of this edition, with their original pagination and indexes. In addition to publishing these two pamphlets, Butler's own hand-copy of The Arab Conquest contains a large number of additions, corrections, and observations in the light of reviews, subsequently published material, etc., expressly for inclusion in a second edition. Quite apart from considerations of the cost involved in resetting so much material, the incorporation of these scholia into the text would have created major difficulties, since many of them are inconclusive notes of the type any author makes in his hand-copy, and others have themselves been overtaken by still later material; with a few exceptions the additions appear mostly to be earlier than 1918. It may, however, be worth while to indicate the main items, publication of which provoked the major marginalia (often of considerable length); they are (except (v)) included in the Additional Bibliography below, in the relevant place, and the major reviews are noted below, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Domitian's Dacian War Domitian'in Daçya Savaşi
    2020, Yıl 4, Sayı 13, 75 - 102 DOMITIAN’S DACIAN WAR DOMITIAN’IN DAÇYA SAVAŞI DOI: 10.33404/anasay.714329 Çalışma Türü: Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article1 Gökhan TEKİR* ABSTRACT Domitian, who was one of the most vilified Roman emperors, had suf- fered damnatio memoriae by the senate after his assassination in 96. Senator historians Tacitus and Cassius Dio ignored and criticized many of Domitian’s accomplishments, including the Dacian campaign. Despite initial setbacks in 86 and 87, Domitian managed to push the invading Dacians into the Dacian terri- tory and even approached to the Dacian capital in 88. However, the Saturninus revolt and instability in the Chatti and Pannonia in 89 prevented Domitian from concluding the campaign. The peace treaty stopped the Dacian incursions and made Dacia a dependent state. It is consistent with Domitian’s non-expansionist imperial policy. This peace treaty stabilized a hostile area and turned Dacia a client kingdom. After dealing with various threats, he strengthened the auxiliary forces in Dacia, stabilizing the Dacian frontier. Domitian’s these new endeavors opened the way of the area’s total subjugation by Trajan in 106. Keywords: Domitian, Roman Empire, Dacia, Decebalus, security 1- Makale Geliş Tarihi: 03. 04. 2020 Makale Kabül Tarihi: 15. 08. 2020 * Doktor, Email: [email protected] ORCID ID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3985-7442 75 DomItIan’s DacIan War ÖZ Domitian 96 yılında düzenlenen suikast sonucunda hakkında senato tarafından ‘hatırası lanetlenen’ ve hakkında en çok karalama yapılan Roma imparatorlarından birisidir. Senatör tarihçilerden olan Tacitus ve Cassius Dio, Domitian’ın bir çok başarısını görmezden gelmiş ve eleştirmiştir.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Development of the Office of Agoranomos in Greco- Roman Egypt
    New England Classical Journal Volume 46 Issue 1 Pages 37-61 2019 The Rise and Development of the Office of Agoranomos in Greco- Roman Egypt Susan Rahyab Hunter College Follow this and additional works at: https://crossworks.holycross.edu/necj Part of the Classics Commons Recommended Citation Rahyab, Susan (2019) "The Rise and Development of the Office of Agoranomos in Greco-Roman Egypt," New England Classical Journal: Vol. 46 : Iss. 1 , 37-61. Available at: https://crossworks.holycross.edu/necj/vol46/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by CrossWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in New England Classical Journal by an authorized editor of CrossWorks. Abstract This article traces the evolution of the office of agoranomos in Greco-Roman Egypt and ​ ​ compares such developments with those of the official’s counterparts in the rest of the Greek world. I argue that the office’s third century transformation into a liturgical position in Egypt mirrors identical changes in Greece, Asia Minor, and Roman Palestine in the Hellenistic and Roman periods, as seen through the papyrological, epigraphic, and historical record. This comparative approach reveals a wider trend in the Greek East and demonstrates the importance in considering the Egyptian evidence in treatments of the office in the rest of the Greco-Roman world as the office in Egypt was not an anomaly. Keywords: Agoranomos, Greco-Roman Egypt, agora, market, notarial tradition, public office, market controller, public notary, euergetism KATZ CONTEST WINNER New
    [Show full text]
  • The Other Face of Augustus's Aggressive Inclination to Egypt
    Journal of Association of Arab Universities for Tourism and Hospitality Volume 12 - June 2015 - No 1 - Pages: (35 : 56) The Other Face of Augustus’s Aggressive Inclination to Egypt Wahid Omran Lecturer in Tourist Guidance Dep., Faculty of Tourism and Hotels, Fayoum University Introduction The initial attitude of Octavian against Egypt is proved by his speech to his troops on the evening before the battle of Actium. Pride in his Roman birth is compared to the despicability of an Egyptian woman as an opponent, who is supported by Dio Cassius reference.1 "Alexandrians and Egyptians- what worse or what truer name could one apply to them?- who worship reptiles and beasts as gods, who embalm their own bodies to give them semblance of immortality, who are most reckless in effrontery but most feeble in courage, and worst of all are slaves to a woman and not to a man". Since The Roman poet Virgile (70- 19 B.C), 2 the Romans opposed the animal – cult of the Egyptians, and considered these gods as monsters.3 The Egyptian character of the Augustus's opponents is related to the Augustan propaganda, represented the Augustus's war against Antony and Cleopatra not only a civil war between Rome and Egypt, but like a struggle between the West and the East. Whose Mark Antony was a traitor joined the powers of the East, whereas Octavian's victory in Actium was not only for himself, but basically for Rome and the Romans. This struggle was described in literature's documents as a civil strife or a foreign war.4 Augustus also knew he had a compensated war against Antony and Cleopatra as a republican magistrate crushing Oriental despotism.5 He is supported by the Roman society ethics and the star of the sacred Caesar, on the other hand, Antony, once a great Roman commander-in-chief, but now supported by a foreign army and followed by unnamed Egyptian spouse.6 The Romans considered the battle not only a military, but either a religious one between the Roman and the Egyptian Pantheons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ptolemies: an Unloved and Unknown Dynasty. Contributions to a Different Perspective and Approach
    THE PTOLEMIES: AN UNLOVED AND UNKNOWN DYNASTY. CONTRIBUTIONS TO A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE AND APPROACH JOSÉ DAS CANDEIAS SALES Universidade Aberta. Centro de História (University of Lisbon). Abstract: The fifteen Ptolemies that sat on the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (the date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII) are in most cases little known and, even in its most recognised bibliography, their work has been somewhat overlooked, unappreciated. Although boisterous and sometimes unloved, with the tumultuous and dissolute lives, their unbridled and unrepressed ambitions, the intrigues, the betrayals, the fratricides and the crimes that the members of this dynasty encouraged and practiced, the Ptolemies changed the Egyptian life in some aspects and were responsible for the last Pharaonic monuments which were left us, some of them still considered true masterpieces of Egyptian greatness. The Ptolemaic Period was indeed a paradoxical moment in the History of ancient Egypt, as it was with a genetically foreign dynasty (traditions, language, religion and culture) that the country, with its capital in Alexandria, met a considerable economic prosperity, a significant political and military power and an intense intellectual activity, and finally became part of the world and Mediterranean culture. The fifteen Ptolemies that succeeded to the throne of Egypt between 305 B.C. (date of assumption of basileia by Ptolemy I) and 30 B.C. (death of Cleopatra VII), after Alexander’s death and the division of his empire, are, in most cases, very poorly understood by the public and even in the literature on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Zhuk Outcover.Indd
    The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Sergei I. Zhuk Number 1906 Popular Culture, Identity, and Soviet Youth in Dniepropetrovsk, 1959–84 The Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies Number 1906 Sergei I. Zhuk Popular Culture, Identity, and Soviet Youth in Dniepropetrovsk, 1959–84 Sergei I. Zhuk is Associate Professor of Russian and East European History at Ball State University. His paper is part of a new research project, “The West in the ‘Closed City’: Cultural Consumption, Identities, and Ideology of Late Socialism in Soviet Ukraine, 1964–84.” Formerly a Professor of American History at Dniepropetrovsk University in Ukraine, he completed his doctorate degree in Russian History at the Johns Hopkins University in 2002 and recently published Russia’s Lost Reformation: Peasants, Millennialism, and Radical Sects in Southern Russia and Ukraine, 1830–1917 (2004). No. 1906, June 2008 © 2008 by The Center for Russian and East European Studies, a program of the University Center for International Studies, University of Pittsburgh ISSN 0889-275X Image from cover: Rock performance by Dniepriane near the main building of Dniepropetrovsk University, August 31, 1980. Photograph taken by author. The Carl Beck Papers Editors: William Chase, Bob Donnorummo, Ronald H. Linden Managing Editor: Eileen O’Malley Editorial Assistant: Vera Dorosh Sebulsky Submissions to The Carl Beck Papers are welcome. Manuscripts must be in English, double-spaced throughout, and between 40 and 90 pages in length. Acceptance is based on anonymous review. Mail submissions to: Editor, The Carl Beck Papers, Center for Russian and East European Studies, 4400 Wesley W. Posvar Hall, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
    [Show full text]
  • The Religion of Ancient Palestine in the Light of Archaeology the God of Beth-Shan the Religion of Ancient Palestine in the Light of Archaeology
    THE SCHWEICH LECTURES ON BIBLICAL ARCHAEOLOGY, 1925 THE RELIGION OF ANCIENT PALESTINE IN THE LIGHT OF ARCHAEOLOGY THE GOD OF BETH-SHAN THE RELIGION OF ANCIENT PALESTINE IN THE LIGHT OF ARCHAEOLOGY BY STANLEY A. COOK, M.A., LITT.D. FELLOW OF GONVILLE AND CAIUS COLLEGE, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY LECTURER IN HEBREW AND ARAMAIC THE SCHWEICH LECTURES OF THE BRITISH ACADEMY LONDON PUBLISHED FOR THE BRITISH ACADEMY BY HUMPHREY MILFORD, OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AMEN HOUSE, E,C. 1930 OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS AMEN HOUSE, E.C. 4 LONDON EDINBURGH GLASGOW LEIPZIG NEW YOR~ TORONTO MELBOURNE CAPETOWN BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS SHANGHAI HUMPHREY MILFORD PUBLISHER TO THE UNIVERSITY Printed in Great Britain PREFACE HE title and subject of this book will recall the in­ T auguration of the Schweich Lectures more than twenty years ago, when the late Samuel Rolles Driver gave an account of the contribution of archaeology and the monu­ ments to Biblical study. Modern Research as illustrating the Bible, the title of his lectures, was a subject to which that great and many-sided scholar felt himself closely drawn; and neither that book nor any of his other writings on the subject can be ignored to-day in spite of the time that has elapsed. For although much has been done, especially since the War, in adding to our knowledge of Oriental archaeo­ logy and in the discussion of problems arising therefrom, Dr. Driver performed lasting service, not only in opening up what to many readers was a new world, but also in setting forth, with his usual completeness and clearness, both the real significance of the new discoveries and the principles to be employed when the Biblical records and the 'external' evidence are inter-related.1 When, therefore, I was asked, in 1925, to deliver the Schweich Lectures, the suggestion that some account might be given of the work subsequent to 1908 encouraged the wish I had long entertained: to reconsider the religion of Palestine primarily and mainly from the point of view of archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion: Christianity and Zoroastrianism
    This page intentionally left blank ROME AND PERSIA IN LATE ANTIQUITY The foundation of the Sasanian Empire in ad 224 established a formidable new power on the Roman Empire’s Eastern frontier, and relations over the next four centuries proved turbulent. This book provides a chronological narrative of their relationship, supported by a substantial collection of translated sources illustrating important themes and structural patterns. The political goals of the two sides, their military confrontations and their diplomatic solutions are dis- cussed, as well as the common interests between the two powers. Special attention is given to the situation of Arabia and Armenia, to economic aspects, the protection of the frontiers, the religious life in both empires and the channels of communication between East and West. In its wide chronological scope, the study explores the role played by the Sasanians in the history of the ancient Near East. The book will prove invaluable for students and non-specialists interested in late antiquity and early Byzantium, and it will be equally useful for specialists on these subjects. beate dignas is Fellow and Tutorin Ancient History at Somerville College, Oxford. Her recent publications include Economy of the Sacred in Hellenistic and Roman Asia Minor (2002) and she has edited a forthcoming book Practitioners of the Divine: Greek Priests and Religious Officials from Homer to Heliodorus. engelbert winter is Professor of Ancient History at the Uni- versity of Munster.¨ He has participated in numerous field surveys and excavations in Turkey and published many books and articles on Roman–Persian relations and the history and culture of Asia Minor.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI 14/03/18, 755 PM
    On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See by Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI 14/03/18, 7*55 PM HOME TRADITIONAL CATHOLIC FAITH MASS LOCATIONS PUBLICATIONS CMRI LINKS STORE PHOTOS CONTACT US CMRI Home > Article Index > Sedevacantist Position On the Vacancy of the Apostolic See By Bishop Mark A. Pivarunas, CMRI Our conference on the vacancy of the Apostolic See, the sedevacantist position, is most important, for it is a theological position which is very misunderstood, often misrepresented, and emotionally difficult for many groups. But before we proceed on this topic, it is paramount to stress that it is because of our belief in the Papacy and in Papal Infallibility that we necessarily must reject Paul VI, John Paul II and Benedict XVI as legitimate Popes. Many accuse us of rejection of the papacy. That is furthermost from the truth. In our earlier conference, we made reference to the main errors of religious indifferentism, false ecumenism and religious liberty which have infected the Conciliar Church of Vatican II. It is for us to demonstrate that the true Catholic Church—the Pope and the Bishops in union with him—could not promulgate such errors to the universal Church, and that no true Pope could promulgate a defective liturgy (Novus Ordo Missae) and a sacrilegious law (1983 Code of Canon Law 844.3 and 4 Communion to non-Catholics). It is for us to demonstrate that men who promulgate heresy are heretics; and as such, they lose the authority in the Church Although we can consider many different aspects of our position with the papacy, it will be sufficient for us today to limit our studies to a few main premises upon which our conclusion (the vacancy) rests.
    [Show full text]
  • (1993) 187–206 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt Gmbh, Bonn
    STEVEN K. ROSS THE LAST KING OF EDESSA: NEW EVIDENCE FROM THE MIDDLE EUPHRATES aus: Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik 97 (1993) 187–206 © Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn 187 THE LAST KING OF EDESSA: NEW EVIDENCE FROM THE MIDDLE EUPHRATES1 The preliminary publication of a batch of 21 documents from the Middle Euphrates dating to the middle of the third century of the Christian era increases significantly the number of such documents known from the Levant, and offers potential for a better understanding of the social, economic and political history of that place and time. The documents, whose precise provenance is unknown, are mostly in Greek but include two in Syriac. One of these has been published in full, and the other in part, by Javier Teixidor. In addition to their language these two differ from the others also in being written on parchment (most of the others are on papyrus) and in showing the political influence of the metropolis of Edessa. They antedate slightly the parchment from Edessa which was discovered at Dura-Europos during the American-French excavations there and was, until now, the oldest known piece of writing in Syriac on a perishable material.2 These two Syriac documents, thus, enable the student to check and refine theories about this very disturbed period in the life of the Roman Empire, and specifically, about Edessa itself.3 Analysis of the documents largely vindicates the theories of the first publishers of DP 28 conceming Edessene political history and the brief reestablishment of Edessa's native monarchy under Gordian III, and casts some doubt on details of more recent accounts of Gordian's policy and activities on the eastern frontier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kipling Reader, by Rudyard Kipling 1
    The Kipling Reader, by Rudyard Kipling 1 PART I<p> I have done one braver thing PART II<p> So let us melt and make no noise, The Kipling Reader, by Rudyard Kipling The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Kipling Reader, by Rudyard Kipling This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: The Kipling Reader Selections from the Books of Rudyard Kipling Author: Rudyard Kipling Release Date: August 21, 2005 [EBook #16578] The Kipling Reader, by Rudyard Kipling 2 Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE KIPLING READER *** Produced by Roy Brown THE KIPLING READER SELECTIONS FROM THE BOOKS OF RUDYARD KIPLING NEW AND REVISED EDITION MACMILLAN AND CO, LIMITED ST. MARTIN'S STREET, LONDON 1923 COPYRIGHT First Edition 1900. Reprinted with corrections 1901. Reprinted 1907, 1908, 1910, 1912, 1914, 1916, 1918 (twice), 1919 (twice), 1920, 1921, 1923. PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN CONTENTS PROSE 'RIKKI-TIKKI-TAVI' WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR PART I WILLIAM THE CONQUEROR PART II WEE WILLIE WINKIE A MATTER OF FACT MOWGLI'S BROTHERS The Kipling Reader, by Rudyard Kipling 3 THE LOST LEGION NAMGAY DOOLA A GERM-DESTROYER 'TIGER! TIGER!' TODS' AMENDMENT THE STORY OF MUHAMMAD DIN THE FINANCES OF THE GODS MOTI GUJ--MUTINEER POETRY THE NATIVE BORN THE FLOWERS MUNICIPAL THE COASTWISE LIGHTS THE ENGLISH FLAG ENGLAND'S ANSWER THE OVERLAND MAIL IN SPRING TIME 'RIKKI-TIKKI-TAVI' At the hole where he went in Red-Eye called to Wrinkle-Skin.
    [Show full text]
  • Three Centuries of Hellenistic Terracottas 277
    THREE CENTURIES OF HELLENISTICTERRACOTTAS PART III: THE LATE THIRD CENTURY B.C. (PLATES 72-78) III A: THE KOMOS CISTERN CHRONOLOGY A few meters to the west up the slope of the Areopagus from the Satyr Cistern,' a reservoir was excavated in 1947 that has been called the Komos Cistern. It was so named from the incised word KOMOYon a lamp,2which probably refers to the owner. To judge from the abundant duplicate pieces of pottery, the quantities of moulds for making Megarian bowls, and many warped and misfired fragments, the filling was probably drawn from the shop of a potter. Two coroplast's moulds (Nos. 18, 24) and four terracotta quivers (No. 31) that had never been attached to figures imply that he also made figurines. This deposit cannot be considered in any strict sense limited, but most of the pottery and all the stamped amphora handles date within the 3rd century.3 The Athenian coins are of the same date. A supplementary filling presumably occurred before the middle of the 2nd century. In it was a hoard of one bronze and seven silver coins of Histiaia.4 Most unusual also are fragments of a faience oinochoe with the relief figure of a Ptolemaic queen, apparently Arsinoe III (217-205 B.C.).5 We should expect, then, that the figurines belong to the late 3rd century, but that any one piece might come from the supplementary filling. We must therefore check all the pieces against dated comparative material. 1 Hesperia, XXXI, 1962, pp. 244-262. Professor G. R. Edwards wishes to correct the dating of the pottery as suggested on p.
    [Show full text]