E11bc4d8744a464a3505

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

E11bc4d8744a464a3505 1 2 Belgrade, 2017 3 FIREARMS MISUSE AND GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE Authors: Danijela Spasić PhD Marina Tadić Research Associates: Jelena Šapić Filip Stojanović Reviewers: Marina Hughson PhD Vladimir Bilandžić PhD Editor: Branka Anđelković Published by: Association CENTER. Public Policy Research Centre Proofreading: Antigona Andonov Translation: Uroš Vasiljević Design and prepress: Žolt Kovač The Public Policy Research Centre (CENTER) is a non-governmental Printed by: think tank established in July 2010 with the objective of examining Mala Knjiga the effects of public policies on security and the social and Print run: economic status of citizens. The CENTER’s goal is to enhance the 200 copies implementation of such policies or bring about changes to them. The publication of this study was made possible by the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to Serbia. The views expressed in this publication are solely those of the CENTER and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Embassy of the Kingdom of the Netherlands to Serbia. 4 Danijela Spasić, PhD Marina Tadić FIREARMS MISUSE AND GENDER-BASED VIOLENCE 5 6 FOREWORD The research presented in this report was con- accession to the European Union, as well as the ceived by Svetlana Đurđević Lukić+, one of the implementation of activities envisaged under the co-founders and for many years the Director of National Action Plan (NAP) to implement Unit- the Public Policy Research Centre (CENTER), an ed Nations Security Council Resolution 1325 on expert in small arms and light weapons and Women, Peace, and Security in Serbia, 2017-2020. human security. As a noted expert and member of the Govern- ment’s Working Party to draft the NAP, Svetlana In her research and analytical work Svetlana significantly contributed to addressing these is- continuously underscored the necessity and sues of strategic significance and developing the significance of controlling the proliferation and concept of the NAP. ownership of firearms, especially in a post-con- flict environment and with regard to the secu- Thanks are also due to our reviewers, Marina rity of particular vulnerable groups. Continuing Hughson PhD and Vladimir Bilandžić PhD, whose her research efforts, the CENTER’s team, headed proposals and suggestions contributed to shap- professionally by Danijela Spasić PhD, has in this ing the final content of the study. study highlighted the issues that hinder the effi- cient prevention of gender-based and family vi- The project ”Firearms Misuse and its Impact on olence involving firearms. In addition, the study Gender-Based Violence through Civic Action and provides a number of policy proposals that the Public Policy Advocacy“ was supported by the CENTER believes could contribute to the perfor- Royal Netherlands Embassy as part of its MATRA mance of obligations undertaken by action plans programme. for negotiating chapters 23 and 24 for Serbia’s Note: Words/terms used in this report in the masculine gender are to be understood as including persons of both male and female gender they refer to. 7 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS CAHVIO Istanbul Convention LGBT Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community MATRA (Maatschappelijke Transformatie) Social Transformation Programme Mol Ministry of Interior MoJ Ministry of Justice MoD Ministry of Defence MP Member of Parliament GP General Practitioner CO Case Officer CSO Civil society organization NAP National Action Plan GBV Gender-based violence SALW Small Arms and Light Weapons UNSC United Nations Security Council UNDP-SEESAC United Nations Development Programme South Eastern and Eastern Europe Clearinghouse for the Control of Small Arms and Light Weapons UNECE United Nations Economic Commission for Europe WHO World Health Organisation 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword . 5 Abbreviations and Acronyms . 6 Table of Contents . 7 Summary . 9 Introduction . 11 Scope and objectives of the research . 13 Methodology . 15 Methodological limitations . 16 I CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK . 19 II CONTEXTUAL FRAMEWORK . 37 1. Femicide . 21 1. Quantitative findings . 39 1.1 Risk factors for lethal family and partner violence against 1.1. Firearms and femicide in Serbia . 39 women . 21 2. Qualitative findings . 43 2. Firearms and GBV . 23 2.1. Opinions of vulnerable groups . 43 2.1 Firearms misuse in the context of GBV and family violence . 23 2.1.1. Perceptions of GBV and family violence . 43 2.1.2. Perceptions of firearms possession and GBV (femicide) . 47 3. Firearms in Serbia . 25 2.2. Opinions of institutional representatives . 51 3.1. Legal framework governing firearms possession in Serbia . 25 2.2.1. Gender-based and family violence in Serbia . 51 3.2. How many firearms are there in Serbia? . 28 2.2.2. Opinions of institutional performance . 52 2.2.3. Role of the media . 53 4. Gender-based violence . 30 2.2.4. Firearms misuse and GBV and family violence . 54 4.1 Family violence . 30 4.2 Factors of family and partner violence . 30 4.3 Legal framework for protection from family violence in Conclusions . 57 Serbia . 31 Recommendations . 59 4.4 Law on Preventing Family Violence . 33 Literature . 63 4.5 State of play in Serbia . 35 9 10 SUMMARY Of the nearly 875 million pieces of small arms vant the sex of the victim – the fact that the victim and light weapons (SALW) globally, more than 75 is a woman.2 percent are to be found in the possession of indi- viduals and entities other than government-con- In view of these facts, the Public Policy Research trolled armed or police forces (private security Centre (CENTER) has continued the research contractors, private armies, paramilitary groups, efforts and professional expertise of its late etc.), or concealed in private homes. Research Director, Svetlana Đurđević Lukić, and conducted has revealed that women throughout the world research into firearms misuse and its impact on are not most at risk of injury and violent death gender-based violence (GBV) in a study entitled from SALW in the streets or battlefields, but rather ”Firearms Misuse and its Impact on Gender-Based in their own homes. The demographics of lethal Violence through Civic Action and Public Policy family violence involving SALW show that murder Advocacy“. The ultimate aim of this project was in the family is the only form of homicide where to mainstream this issue into relevant strategies women are victims much more often than men. and debates, and to formulate specific policy According to studies conducted by the World recommendations in connection with GBV and Health Organisation (WHO), murders of women firearms misuse in the context of European in- by their intimate partners account for between tegration, through Chapter 24 negotiations, the 40 and 70 percent of all murders of women.1 For new Law on Preventing Family Violence, Firearms every woman killed or exposed to physical vio- and Ammunition Law, etc., as well as through the lence involving firearms, there are far more wo- National Action Plan (NAP) to implement United men who face intimidation by firearms. ations Security Council (UNSC) Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and Security in Serbia in the Findings of research into the impact of SALW period 2017-2020. on family violence indicate that firearms posse- ssion and family violence are linked. By collecting This research was complementary in character, and analysing newspaper articles, the Women and used both quantitative and qualitative ap- against Violence Network, co-ordinated by the proaches. The quantitative segment relied on Autonomous Women’s Centre of Belgrade identi- secondary analysis of data from statistical data- fied 33 murders of women in Serbia in a family/ bases held by government authorities (Ministries partner setting in 2016 (as compared to 35 such of the Interior and Justice) and civil society or- murders in 2015). In its quantitative and narrative ganisations (Women against Violence Network). Femicide Report, the Network stated that posse- In addition, documents making up the current ssion of and access to firearms were indicators of national legal framework in this area were also 1 L L Dahlberg, E G Krug, A J Mercy, high risk of lethal violence. Femicide is defined as reviewed. The qualitative approach entailed ex- A Zwi and R Lozano, World report on gender-based murder, committed against women, pert interviews with representatives of relevant violence and health. Geneva, World Health Organisation, 2002. young women, girls, or even female infants, by per- public authorities and civil sector institutions (a 2 Available online at http://www. sons of the male sex. For a murder to be characte- total of 14) and local focus-group interviews with zeneprotivnasilja.net/femicid-u-srbiji, rised as femicide, the perpetrator must see as rele- members of vulnerable groups (five in total) de- accessed on 29.5.2017. 11 voted to GBV and firearms misuse. We identified particularly in cases where firearms are not con- vulnerable groups as groups of individuals that fiscated, and underscored the importance of per- differ from the general population by a particular sonal accountability of professionals for action, characteristic that makes them especially vulner- or lack thereof, in the event violence is reported. able to various forms of discrimination – in this case, violence, as the most pronounced and most These examples show that, in spite of the widely dangerous form of discrimination. held belief that family violence and GBV are not commonly perpetrated using firearms, wide- The CENTER’s research revealed that economic spread firearms possession is a specific marker insecurity, poverty, unemployment, pressure ex- in assessing the risk of family violence and the erted by the patriarchal environment, violence institutional response to it under the Law on as ‘behavioural model’, risks specific to the local Preventing Family Violence. Moreover, it can be context, and mistrust of organisations and insti- concluded that family violence, as a form of GBV, tutions that ought to provide security, all con- is a complex phenomenon requiring tailor-made tribute to feelings of insecurity amongst women measures to prevent and combat.
Recommended publications
  • Women in Parliaments Global Forum (Wip) at the World Bank / Imf Annual Meeting 2014
    WOMEN IN PARLIAMENTS GLOBAL FORUM (WIP) AT THE WORLD BANK / IMF ANNUAL MEETING 2014 8 - 11 OCTOBER 2014 WASHINGTON D.C, UNITED STATES FIRST DRAFT PROGRAMME EVENT OVERVIEW The Women in Parliaments Global Forum (WIP) is gathering in Washington D.C, from 8-11 October 2014, on the occasion of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund Annual Meeting 2014. From 8 to 9 October, WIP Delegates will join the Parliamentary Network Meeting of the World Bank and the IMF. This meeting will give female Parliamentarians a unique opportunity to engage with senior management and experts of the IMF and the World Bank Group, to discuss current issues related to international finance and development. The Managing Director of the IMF, Christine Lagarde, will introduce the 2-day meeting. Discussions will address issues like climate and energy pricing, youth employment solutions, gender equality and global economy. On Friday 10 October, within the framework of the World Bank/IMF Civil Society Forum, WIP will co-host the Special Session “How does economic empowerment of women enhance stability in fragile and transition contexts?”. This Session will be followed by a WIP Community Workshop and a WIP Community reception, gathering WIP Delegates and members of the WIP Advisory Board. On Saturday 11, WIP Delegates have been invited to visit the National Museum of Women in the Arts, the only major museum in the world dedicated exclusively to recognizing the achievements of women artists. FIRST DRAFT PROGRAMME WORLD BANK/IMF ANNUAL MEETING THE PARLIAMENTARY NETWORK
    [Show full text]
  • AS/Ega (2018) PV 07 ADD / Minutes
    Declassified1 AS/Soc (2018) PV 06 add. AS/Ega (2018) PV 07 add. 14 December 2018 Original: English Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Committee on Equality and Non-Discrimination Minutes of the joint hearing on “Protecting the rights of persons with psychosocial disabilities with regard to involuntary measures in psychiatry”, held in Strasbourg, on 9 October 2018, from 8.30 to 10 am Mr Schennach, Chairperson of the Committee Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development opened the meeting, welcoming members of the two committees and the distinguished guests who had accepted to participate in the hearing. He set the background for the hearing: in its Recommendation 2091 (2016), the Assembly had asked the Committee of Ministers to instruct the Committee on Bioethics to withdraw the proposal to draw up an Additional Protocol to the Oviedo Convention concerning the protection of human rights and dignity of persons with mental disorder with regard to involuntary placement and involuntary treatment, which was at the time at the initial stage of drafting. The drafting process had, however, continued. The Assembly was now being consulted on the draft Additional Protocol in the context of an informal procedure. This hearing would provide food for thought for the comments to be prepared by the Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development and the Committee on Equality and Non- Discrimination. Ms Ioan, Chairperson of the Council of Europe Committee on Bioethics (DH-BIO) explained that the draft Additional Protocol was needed due to legal gaps in certain member states regarding measures for involuntary placement or treatment, and the increasing number of human rights violations found by the European Court of Human Rights in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • AS/Soc (2019) PV 06Add 5 December 2019 Asocpv06add 2019
    Declassified1 AS/Soc (2019) PV 06add 5 December 2019 Asocpv06add_2019 Committee on Social Affairs, Health and Sustainable Development Minutes Public hearing on “Combating trafficking in human tissues and cells”, held in Paris, on Friday, 13 September 2019 In the framework of the report currently in preparation on “Combating trafficking in human tissues and cells” (Rapporteur: Mr Serhii Kiral, Ukraine, EC), the Committee held a public hearing with the participation of: ✓ Mr Jacinto Sánchez Ibáñez, Director – Tissue Establishment and Cryobiology Unit, University Hospital, A Coruña (Spain) ✓ Mr Givi Javashvili, Chairman of the National Council on Bioethics of Georgia; Professor and Head of Family Medicine Department – Tbilisi State Medical University (Georgia) In the absence of the Rapporteur, the Chairperson introduced the preliminary draft report, and warmly welcomed Mr Jacinto Sánchez Ibáñez, Director of the Tissue Establishment and Cryobiology Unit of the University Hospital in A Coruña (Spain). Mr Givi Javashvili, Chairman of the National Council on Bioethics; Professor and Head of the Family Medicine Department of Tbilisi State Medical University (Georgia), was delayed due to the public transport strike, and arrived later on during the exchange of views. Mr Sánchez Ibáñez pointed out that tissue and cell donations played an important role in health care, research and the pharmaceutical industry. One donor could improve up to 100 lives. An absence of financial gain was paramount. The only area where profits were allowed was the production of medicinal products, because developing such products involved extensive manipulation and was very costly. Donors should give explicit consent for this type of use. In other areas, prices should reflect the operational costs of the tissue establishments, and there should be no profit.
    [Show full text]
  • World E-Parliament Conference 2016 FINAL LIST of PARTICIPANTS
    World e-Parliament Conference 2016 Valparaiso, Chile 28-30 June 2016 Co-organized by the Inter-Parliamentary Union and the Chamber of Deputies of Chile #eParliament FINAL LIST OF PARTICIPANTS 6 July 2016 World e-Parliament Conference 2016 - Final list of participants – 6 July 2016 National parliaments AFGHANISTAN - AFGANISTÁN Mr. Aimal FAIZYAR Mediapool Officer Mr. Ahmad Shoaib FETRY General Director of ICT Department Mr. Abdul Raziq PAYKAR Software Engineer Mr. Obaidullah SAYEDI IT Officer ARGENTINA Mr. Mauro AYALA Desarrollador Mr. Daniel AYOROA Subdirector Digesto Jurídico Mr. Emiliano GAMBONE Desarrollador Ms. Maria Isabel GIMENEZ DIAZ Directora Información Parlamentaria Mr. Matias GRANARA Director de Informática Ms. Maria Dolores MARTINEZ Dirección de Modernización Mr. Luis NASSO Director Sistemas Electrónicos Mr. Ignacio SERRACANT Coordinador de Sistema de Gestión Ms. María Agustina SOTIJ Redes Sociales y Web Ms. Constanza SOZZANI Coordinadora Contenidos Web Ms. Luciana TERMINE Directora de Relaciones Internacionale s Ms. Patricia VACA Subdirectora Prensa y Difusiòn AUSTRIA Mr. Peter REICHSTÄDTER Head of the IT Department BENIN Mr. Mitokpe DOSSOUGUL Member of Parliament Mr. Parfait AHOYO Parliamentary Staff BOLIVIA Mr. Alberto MORENO CUELLAR Representante de Bolivia ante Organismos Parlamentarios Supraestatales Ms. Mery Elina Zabala MONTENEGRO Titular y miembro de la UIP por Bolivia Mr. Hebert CHOQUE TARQUE Representante de Bolivia ante Organismos Parlamentarios Supraestatales BRAZIL – BRASIL Mr. Sheridan ANCHIETA Federal Deputy Mr. Gladson CAMELI Senator Mr. Jefferson CAMPOS Federal Deputy Mr. Sergio PETECÃO Senator 2 World e-Parliament Conference 2016 - Final list of participants – 6 July 2016 Mr. Cristiano FERRI Director, Hacker Laboratory, Chamber of Deputies Mr. William FRANÇA Director Mr. Romulo MESQUITA Director-General CABO VERDE Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Table of Contents
    2014– 2015 Annual Report Table of Contents Message from Our Chief Executive Officer 1 GOPAC’s Commitment to Fighting Grand Corruption 2 Our Members on the Ground 4 Our Members’ Proven Track Record 10 GOPAC International Anti-Corruption Award 12 Spreading our Message Across the World 13 Furthering Anti-Corruption Knowledge 17 It Takes a Global Village 19 Our Funders and Partners 21 Our Leadership 23 Our Global Task Forces 24 Our Dedicated Staff 25 Independent Auditors’ Report 26 Financial Summary 27 Message from Our Chief Executive Officer GOPAC’s members come from different cultures, speak different languages, profess different faiths, pursue different political philosophies, and have been on opposite sides of history and warfare. But we are united by a common conviction: that corruption is now the single greatest threat to the development of societies, to the security of nations, and to the rights of all mankind. During the fourteen years that GOPAC has been leading the fight against corruption, that conviction has become part of the global consensus. The UN Development Programme now estimates that the developing world loses €10 to corruption for every €1 it receives in official aid. GOPAC estimates that corruption now kills more people than war and famine combined. And the UN’s new Sustainable Development Goals now include Goal 16, which acknowledges that nations must combat corruption as a precondition to achieving social and economic development. We believe that the solution to corruption is simple to describe, though difficult to achieve: a vigilant, relentless, and fearless community of parliamentarians, standing between our leaders and the levers of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights and Democracy Violation Early Warning Weekly Newsletter No
    YUCOM Komitet pravnika za ljudska prava / Lawyers’ Committee for Human Rights 17 Svetogorska Street, 11000 Belgrade, Republic of Serbia Tel/Fax: +381 11 33 44 235; 33 444 25; e-mail yucomoffice@ gmail.com www.yucom.org.rs Human Rights and Democracy Violation Early Warning Weekly Newsletter No. 42 ICTY Sentence in the Milan and Sredoje Lukić Case On the 20th of July 2009 Court Chambers of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) with Patrick Robinson as a Presiding Judge, has sentenced Milan Lukić for a life term of imprisonment and his cousin Sredoje Lukić to a prison sentence of 30 years. Milan and Sredoje Lukić were sentenced for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed against Bosnian Muslims in the Eastern-Bosnian town of Višegrad during the period from June 7th, 1992 until October 10th, 1994. Milan Lukić was found guilty for: persecution, murder, extermination, inhumane acts and cruel treatment as crimes against humanity and war crimes, while Sredoje Lukić was found guilty for committing and aiding and abetting crimes of: persecution, murder, cruel treatment and inhumane acts. Milan Lukić has committed the above named crimes in connection with six separate incidents : 1. Killing of 5 Bosnian Muslim men on the bank of River Drina on or about June 7 th , 1992; 2. Killing of 7 Bosnian Muslims in “Varda” furniture factory on or about June 10 th , 1992; 3. Burning alive 59 people (including women and children) in a barricaded house in Pionirska street in Višegrad on or about the June 14 th , 1992; 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Telekoma-Ne-Sme-U-Potrosnju Novac Od "Telekoma" Ne Sme U Potrošnju
    ŠTA SU GOVORILI I PISALI O TELEKOMU (2) http://www.glas-javnosti.rs/clanak/ekonomija/glas-javnosti-09-04-2010/novac-od- telekoma-ne-sme-u-potrosnju Novac od "Telekoma" ne sme u potrošnju Ekonomista Stojan Stamenkovi ć ocenjuje da je jedan od mogu ćih motiva za prodaju "Telekoma" održavanje stabilnosti kursa dinara, jer će u slu čaju dodatnog priliva kapitala iz inostranstva taj problem biti rešen, bar za neko vreme BEOGRAD - Ve ćinski udeo "Telekoma Srbija" ne bi trebalo zadržavati u državnom vlasništvu, ve ć ga prodati, ali bi bilo nedopustivo da sredstva od prodaje odu u teku ću potrošnju, izjavio je Stojan Stamenkovi ć, urednik biltena "Makroekonomske analize i trendovi". Subvencionisani krediti slabe dinar Subvencionisani dinarski krediti za gra ñane ne će doprineti ostvarivanju ciljeva ekonomske politike u ovoj godini, niti će postaviti osnove za novi model ravnoteže privrednog razvoja Srbije, ocenio je Stojan Stamenkovi ć. Prema njegovim re čima, ponovno prebacivanje težišta ekonomske politike na potrošnju izuzetno je štetno. - U fokusu vlade trebalo bi da bude podsticanje investicija, a ne teku će potrošnje. Osim toga, iako su krediti namenjeni kupovini doma će robe, usled visoke izvozne zavisnosti proizvo ñača, eventualno ve ća proizvodnja zna čila bi i ve ći uvoz. Deo gotovinskih kredita će biti utrošen za turisti čka putovanja u inostranstvo i kupovinu deviza, što je ekvivalentno uvozu robe - ukazao je Stamenkovi ć i naglasio da su efekti subvencionisanih kredita za gra ñane na industrijsku proizvodnju i privredni rast "u najmanju ruku neizvesni". U slu čaju realizacije planiranih potroša čkih kredita, tražnja se može raspršiti na razli čite proizvode, pa je teško o čekivati znatan impuls novoj proizvodnji i upošljavanju kapaciteta, napomenuo je Stamenkovi ć.
    [Show full text]
  • The Serbian Orthodox Church in Serbia's Raška After 2000
    Südosteuropa 61 (2013), H. 3, S. 432-452 OPEN ISSUES OF DECENTRALISATION IN SERBIA ALEKSANDER ZDRAVKOVSKI New Ecclesiastical (Dis)order: The Serbian Orthodox Church in Serbia’s Raška after 2000 Abstract. The contemporary confl icts in the Balkans have brought about a genuine growth of religiosity among the people and increased the importance of spiritual organizations. The Serbian Orthodox Church and its leaders closely cooperated with the political parties and governments of both the left and the right. This article surveys the career of Bishop Filaret who is the head of the Mileševa see. It aims to provide evidence that this cleric was able to retain a powerful position in post–Milošević Serbia even though he had been very close to that regime during the 1990’s. Lastly, the analysis will illustrate the negative consequences of the fusion of politics and religion in this part of South-eastern Europe. Ale ksander Zdravkovski is a PhD Candidate at the Department of Sociology and Political Science at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim. Introduction The end of the twentieth century was marked by a revitalization of religiosity among the peoples of the Balkans. In Serbia, nationalist ideology became preva- lent and was frequently accompanied by a zealous and aggressive manifestation of new political muscle by certain ecclesiastic hierarchs. The Serbian Orthodox Church1 (SPC) is an organization that is prone to corruption, controversies and perilous political manipulations. The activities of the ecclesiastic representatives have created obstacles to the process of building a civic and inclusive society in Serbia. Nevertheless, the Orthodox Church is presently one of the most trusted institutions in Serbia.
    [Show full text]
  • 1356 Th Meeting
    Information documents SG-AS (2019) 08 7 October 2019 ———————————————— Communication by the Secretary General of the Parliamentary Assembly to the 1356th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies1 (09 October 2019) ———————————————— 1 This document covers past activities of the Assembly since the meeting of the Bureau on 30 September 2019 (Strasbourg) and future activities up to the end of the year. I. Fourth part-session of 2019 (30 September – 4 October 2019) A. Personalities 1. The following personalities addressed the Assembly (in chronological order): - Ms Amélie de Montchalin, Secretary of State attached to the Minister for Europe and Foreign Affairs of France, in charge of European Affairs, representing the French Presidency of the Committee of Ministers - Mr Emmanuel Macron, President of the French Republic - Ms Marija Pejčinović Burić, Secretary General of the Council of Europe - Mr Rolf Wenzel, Governor of the Council of Europe Development Bank 2. Their speeches can be found on the web site of the Assembly: http://assembly.coe.int. B. Debate under urgent procedure 3. The Assembly held a debate under urgent procedure on Saving persons in the Mediterranean Sea: the need for an urgent answer. C. Current affairs debate 4. The Assembly held a current affairs debate on Democratic rights violations and suppression of peaceful protests in the Russian Federation against the background of elections to the Moscow City Council introduced by Mr Martin Poliačik (Slovak Republic, ALDE). D. Election of a judge to the European Court of Human Rights 5. On 2 October 2019, the Assembly elected Ms Ana Maria Guerra Martins as a judge to the European Court of Human Rights in respect of Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • Wip) at the World Bank / Imf Annual Meeting 2014
    WOMEN IN PARLIAMENTS GLOBAL FORUM (WIP) AT THE WORLD BANK / IMF ANNUAL MEETING 2014 8 - 11 OCTOBER 2014 WASHINGTON D.C, UNITED STATES FIRST DRAFT PROGRAMME EVENT OVERVIEW The Women in Parliaments Global Forum (WIP) is gathering in Washington D.C, from 8-11 October 2014, on the occasion of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund Annual Meeting 2014. From 8 to 9 October, WIP Delegates will join the Parliamentary Network Meeting of the World Bank and the IMF. This meeting will give female Parliamentarians a unique opportunity to engage with senior management and experts of the IMF and the World Bank Group, to discuss current issues related to international finance and development. The Managing Director of the IMF, Christine Lagarde, will introduce the 2-day meeting. Discussions will address issues like climate and energy pricing, youth employment solutions, gender equality and global economy. On Friday 10 October, within the framework of the World Bank/IMF Civil Society Forum, WIP will co-host the Special Session “How does economic empowerment of women enhance stability in fragile and transition contexts?”. This Session will be followed by a WIP Community Workshop and a WIP Community reception, gathering WIP Delegates and members of the WIP Advisory Board. On Saturday 11, WIP Delegates have been invited to visit the National Museum of Women in the Arts, the only major museum in the world dedicated exclusively to recognizing the achievements of women artists. FIRST DRAFT PROGRAMME WORLD BANK/IMF ANNUAL MEETING THE PARLIAMENTARY NETWORK
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMIT 2015 New Leadership for Global Challenges 23–25 March 2015 | Addis Ababa
    REPORT Co-funded by Co-hosted by WOMEN IN PARLIAMENTS GLOBAL FORUM SUMMIT 2015 New Leadership for Global Challenges 23–25 March 2015 | Addis Ababa THE SPIRIT OF WOMEN IN SOCIETY: ADVANCING SOCIETY 23–25 March 2015 | African Union Headquarters | Addis Ababa, Ethiopia About WIP The Women in Parliaments Global Forum (WIP) is the global network of female Parliamentarians at national level, including the European Parliament, of whom there currently are around 9000. WIP is an independent, international and post-partisan foundation established with the purpose of advancing society by building a network between Women in Parliaments. Elected political decision-makers have a unique perspective on the issues relevant to people, as they are in permanent direct exchange with their electorate. Parliamentarians have privileged insight into, and influence on legislative issues as a result of continuous contact and exchange with their electorate and stakeholders. Women need three things to fulfil their potential: communication, connection, community. At WIP, optimizing the power of communication and connection builds new communities of support for women in politics everywhere. Co-funded by Co-hosted by Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. The 2015 Women in Parliaments Global Forum (WIP) Declaration 3. Overview: Keynote speeches and Video Messages 4. WIP Awards 5. Reports from Plenary Sessions 6. Reports from Parallel Panel Sessions Monday 23 March 7. Reports from Working Groups Tuesday 24 March 8. Annexe: Speeches INTRODUCTION The Women in Parliaments Global Forum (WIP) Summit 2015 was held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia on 23-25 March and focused on the theme of New Leadership for Global Challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Observation of the Early Parliamentary Elections in Belarus (17 November 2019)
    http://assembly.coe.int Doc. 15012 13 December 2019 Observation of the early parliamentary elections in Belarus (17 November 2019) Election observation report Rapporteur: Lord David BLENCATHRA, United Kingdom, European Conservatives Group and Democratic Alliance Contents Page 1. Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Political context ........................................................................................................................................ 2 3. Legal framework and electoral system .....................................................................................................3 4. Election administration ............................................................................................................................. 4 5. Voter lists and candidate registration ....................................................................................................... 6 6. Election campaign, funding and the media ...............................................................................................8 7. Complaints and appeals .........................................................................................................................10 8. Citizen and international observers ........................................................................................................ 10 9. Voting and counting ................................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]