Missed Opportunities in the Ukraine: U.S.S.R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Missed Opportunities in the Ukraine: U.S.S.R 79 Missed Opportunities in the Ukraine: U.S.S.R. and Nazi Occupation in the Inter-War and World War II MICHAEL HUMENIUK During the height of Nazi Germany’s militaristic expansion in World War II, it occupied a vast amount of the European continent, consisting of twenty-two countries from France to Lithuania. However, Nazi Germany—and Hitler—had a vested interest in occupying the Ukrainian state held by the Soviet Union prior to World War II more than any other. German leaders such as Otto von Bismarck, Kaiser Wilhelm II, and Hitler all considered the “conquest of the Ukraine as offering the surest road to a more abundant German life,”1 and Wilhelm had even tried to bring this to fruition before the First World War. Many Germans saw the Ukraine as a potential “breadbasket”2 and “one of the loveliest gardens of the world . a Paradise,”3 for Germany’s cultivation. The Ukraine—after the beginning of Operation Barbarossa—seemed willing to co-operate with the Germans. The majority of the Ukrainian state showed a willingness to “support the New Order,”4 demonstrating that there were high hopes for the impending Nazi invasion. However, as the war continued, the enthusiasm of the Ukraine towards the Nazi occupation slowly shifted to dissatisfaction. By examining the interwar-era Ukraine under Soviet and Polish occupation, the Ukraine’s hope in regard to the Nazi invasion can be uncovered. Then, by moving into an examination of the Nazi occupation of the Ukraine during the Second World War, it is possible to analyze how Nazi Germany lost favour among the Ukrainian population, and ultimately failed to capitalize on a state willing to assist its cause against communism. This paper will argue that the Soviet’s interwar mistreatment and brutal policies towards the Ukraine—policies that led to terrible collectivization, a suppression of federal autonomy, and the Red Famine of 1933—created the initial hope of the Ukrainian state regarding the Nazi invasion. Furthermore, this paper will go on to argue that Germany failed to capitalize on the potential of its occupation by focusing on the Ukraine as a colony for mining resources and supplies for the expanding German Reich. By doing this, Germany ultimately continued the occupation where the Soviets had left off rather than fostering more active collaboration and calls for federal autonomy against the Soviets during Operation Barbarossa. Had Germany done so, they might have been able to create an active and willing ally to their offensive against communism during 1 Joachim Joesten, “Hitler’s Fiasco in the Ukraine,” Foreign Affairs 21 (January 1943): 331. 2 Ibid., 331. 3 Mark Mazower, Dark Continent: Europe's Twentieth Century (New York: Vintage Books, 1998), 144. 4 Marcus Eikel and Valentina Sivaieva, “City Mayors, Raion Chiefs and Village Elders in Ukraine, 1941–4: How Local Administrators Co-operated with the German Occupation Authorities,” Contemporary European History 23, no. 3 (2014): 406. 80 World War II. To examine all this information in an effective manner, this paper will be split into sections. The first will focus on the interwar Soviet and Polish occupation of the Ukraine, outlining the importance of the independence movement among the Ukrainian population from World War I onward. The section will then move into discussing Soviet politics that result in the suppression of Ukrainian independence and a manmade famine that some historians consider genocide. This will ultimately show that the hope for the Nazi invasion during the Second World War was due to the interwar occupation by the Soviets and Polish. The second section of the paper will first focus on the failure of the Nazis to capitalize on the potential of their invasion. The section will then discuss the Nazis’ policies regarding governance and autonomy, including the idea that these policies were in fact a façade to hide Hitler’s and the Nazis’ real intentions regarding the Ukrainian state. Finally, this section will discuss how the Nazis’ policies in the Ukraine began to resemble those of the Soviet occupiers during the interwar era, ultimately leading to dissatisfaction among the Ukrainian population. * * * In 1938 during the prelude to World War II, on “December 9, a Ukrainian Autonomist Bill was submitted to the Sejm in Poland.”5 This was the last of numerous bills seen in states after the Munich agreement in September 1938—The agreement that gave Germany the annexed Sudetenland. However, “at no time in history” have all the countries and nations that are comprised of Ukrainian-speaking people “been united within a single Ukrainian national State.”6 This determination by the Ukraine to achieve autonomy is a large part of the narrative surrounding the interwar era and World War II, and plays a key role in the hatred of the Soviet Union and Poland in the interwar era. At the end of World War I, U.S President Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points called for “autonomy for all the peoples of the Austria-Hungary,” which consisted of a largely Ukrainian population.7 However, it is important to note that many people within this empire understood “autonomy to mean national self-determination or independence.”8 Wilson’s statement caused the Ukrainian peoples to organize around a common goal of achieving power by autonomy in the final years after World War I. The Ukrainian people—of the “East Galician Republic” and “Ukrainian Republic”—rallied together to fight a campaign against the Poles and Red armies invading the Ukrainian state established between these groups.9 This was to help establish the independence and “self-determination” that the people of the Ukraine understood as being essential in the “future peace” of Europe, according to Wilson.10 However, in 1920 “with the establishment of Bolshevik rule in Dnieper Ukraine . efforts to create a sovereign Ukrainian state . came to an end.”11 This new governmental rule established over the Ukraine created long- 5 E.P., “The Ukrainian Problem,” Bulletin of International News 16, no. 1 (January 14, 1939): 3. 6 Ibid., 3. 7 Paul R. Magocsi, A History of Ukraine (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996), 512. 8 Ibid., 512. 9 E.P., “The Ukrainian Problem,” 8. 10 Magocsi, A History of Ukraine, 512. 11 Ibid., 520. 81 standing resentment due to the disregard for the determined future peace of Europe that Wilson had expressed and the Ukraine had tried to follow. From this brief history of Ukrainian attempts at federal autonomy—attempts that were continually suppressed—the seed of resentment towards the interwar occupiers was planted. This resentment was fostered not only by the defeat of their autonomy movement, but also by the Polish betrayal of the Galician Republic, who had “abandoned [their] claim to Eastern Galicia in exchange for Polish recognition of the Ukrainian Republic and military assistance against the Bolsheviks.”12 The Polish—who could not stand against the Soviets—came to an agreement in 1920 recognizing a Ukrainian state “under Bolshevik occupation, and which eventually became a constituent member of the U.S.S.R.”13 Despite ongoing attempts at independence and autonomy by the Ukrainian state, it was continually repressed by outside powers even after Wilson’s statements in 1918, which the Ukraine took seriously. This disregard for Ukrainian independence created the basis for the resentment and distaste felt for the interwar era occupiers by the Ukrainian state. The resentment established shortly after World War I within the larger Ukrainian state— now occupied by both Poland and the Soviet Union—was only exacerbated by the policies of the occupying countries, especially the Soviet Union. The Ukraine continually resisted the Soviets’ policies, “urging concessions to the localities and limitations on the powers of the central government” even as the centralization process began.14 The leading authorities within the Ukrainian S.S.R. held the belief that the Union’s strength was held within its multiple republic states and that “the Union would grow powerful as it encouraged wide independence at the local level.”15 However, the Soviet Union rejected these ideas, embarking—in later years—on “programs of state industrialization” and “farm collectivization” that would help to enlarge “central authority” within the Soviet Union.16 In suppressing the ideas held by leading officials within the Ukraine, the Soviets created further resentment towards themselves in the state. In the 1920s the Ukraine firmly opposed collectivization of farmland. It “passed a law embodying the principle that all land should belong to those who work it.”17 However, these ideas did not last long, as they were in direct opposition to Stalin’s future policies. When Stalin rose to power in 1924, he quickly embarked on attaining “uncontested political power.”18 In 1928, Stalin implemented the “concept of a planned command economy. All decisions were to be made at the center in Moscow and implemented throughout the Soviet Union,” which, from this point on, was considered “a single economic unit.”19 Through the enactment of these policies by Stalin and other Bolshevik leaders, the Ukrainian agenda for independence and autonomy—along with the state’s objection to centralized government—was suppressed, furthering the resentment felt among 12 E.P., “The Ukrainian Problem,” 8. 13 Ibid., 8. 14 Robert S. Sullivant, Soviet Politics and the Ukraine 1917-1957 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1962), 80. 15 Ibid., 80. 16 Sullivant, Soviet Politics and the Ukraine 1917-1957, 83. 17 Magocsi, A History of Ukraine,
Recommended publications
  • Hungry Bengal: War, Famine, Riots, and the End of Empire 1939-1946
    Hungry Bengal: War, Famine, Riots, and the End of Empire 1939-1946 By Janam Mukherjee A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Anthropology and History) In the University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor Barbara D. Metcalf, Chair Emeritus Professor David W. Cohen Associate Professor Stuart Kirsch Associate Professor Christi Merrill 1 "Unknown to me the wounds of the famine of 1943, the barbarities of war, the horror of the communal riots of 1946 were impinging on my style and engraving themselves on it, till there came a time when whatever I did, whether it was chiseling a piece of wood, or burning metal with acid to create a gaping hole, or cutting and tearing with no premeditated design, it would throw up innumerable wounds, bodying forth a single theme - the figures of the deprived, the destitute and the abandoned converging on us from all directions. The first chalk marks of famine that had passed from the fingers to engrave themselves on the heart persist indelibly." 2 Somnath Hore 1 Somnath Hore. "The Holocaust." Sculpture. Indian Writing, October 3, 2006. Web (http://indianwriting.blogsome.com/2006/10/03/somnath-hore/) accessed 04/19/2011. 2 Quoted in N. Sarkar, p. 32 © Janam S. Mukherjee 2011 To my father ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank first and foremost my father, Dr. Kalinath Mukherjee, without whom this work would not have been written. This project began, in fact, as a collaborative effort, which is how it also comes to conclusion. His always gentle, thoughtful and brilliant spirit has been guiding this work since his death in May of 2002 - and this is still our work.
    [Show full text]
  • The War of Famine: Everyday Life in Wartime Beirut and Mount Lebanon (1914-1918)
    The War of Famine: Everyday Life in Wartime Beirut and Mount Lebanon (1914-1918) by Melanie Tanielian A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Beshara Doumani Professor Saba Mahmood Professor Margaret L. Anderson Professor Keith D. Watenpaugh Fall 2012 The War of Famine: Everyday Life in Wartime Beirut and Mount Lebanon (1914-1918) © Copyright 2012, Melanie Tanielian All Rights Reserved Abstract The War of Famine: Everyday Life in Wartime Beirut and Mount Lebanon (1914-1918) By Melanie Tanielian History University of California, Berkeley Professor Beshara Doumani, Chair World War I, no doubt, was a pivotal event in the history of the Middle East, as it marked the transition from empires to nation states. Taking Beirut and Mount Lebanon as a case study, the dissertation focuses on the experience of Ottoman civilians on the homefront and exposes the paradoxes of the Great War, in its totalizing and transformative nature. Focusing on the causes and symptoms of what locals have coined the ‘war of famine’ as well as on international and local relief efforts, the dissertation demonstrates how wartime privations fragmented the citizenry, turning neighbor against neighbor and brother against brother, and at the same time enabled social and administrative changes that resulted in the consolidation and strengthening of bureaucratic hierarchies and patron-client relationships. This dissertation is a detailed analysis of socio-economic challenges that the war posed for Ottoman subjects, focusing primarily on the distorting effects of food shortages, disease, wartime requisitioning, confiscations and conscriptions on everyday life as well as on the efforts of the local municipality and civil society organizations to provision and care for civilians.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RECENT HİSTORY of the RHODES and KOS TURKS “The Silent Cry Rising in the Aegean Sea”
    THE RECENT HİSTORY OF THE RHODES and KOS TURKS “The Silent Cry Rising in the Aegean Sea” Prof. Dr.Mustafa KAYMAKÇI Assoc. Prof. Dr.Cihan ÖZGÜN Translated by: Mengü Noyan Çengel Karşıyaka-Izmir 2015 1 Writers Prof. Dr. Mustafa KAYMAKÇI [email protected] Mustafa Kaymakçı was born in Rhodes. His family was forced to immigrate to Turkey for fear of losing their Turkish identity. He graduated from Ege University Faculty of Agriculture in 1969 and earned his professorship in 1989. He has authored 12 course books and over 200 scientific articles. He has always tried to pass novelties and scientific knowledge on to farmers, who are his target audience. These activities earned him many scientific awards and plaques of appreciation. His achievements include •“Gödence Village Agricultural Development Cooperative Achievement Award, 2003”; •“TMMOB Chamber of Agricultural Engineers Scientific Award, 2004”; and •“Turkish Sheep Breeders Scientific Award, 2009”. His name was given to a Street in Acıpayam (denizli) in 2003. In addition to his course books, Prof. Kaymakçı is also the author of five books on agricultural and scientific policies. They include •Notes on Turkey’s Agriculture, 2009; •Agricultural Articles Against Global Capitalization, 2010; •Agriculture Is Independence, 2011; •Famine and Imperialism, 2012 (Editor); and •Science Political Articles Against Globalization, 2012. Kaymakçı is the President of the Rhodes and Kos and the Dodecanese Islands Turks Culture and Solidarity Association since 1996. Under his presidency, the association reflected the problems of the Turks living in Rhodes and Kos to organizations including Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), the Parliamentary Association of the European Council (PA CE), the United Nations and the Federal Union of European Nationalities (FEUN).
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Fall of the 5/42 Regiment of Evzones: a Study on National Resistance and Civil War in Greece 1941-1944
    The Rise and Fall of the 5/42 Regiment of Evzones: A Study on National Resistance and Civil War in Greece 1941-1944 ARGYRIOS MAMARELIS Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy The European Institute London School of Economics and Political Science 2003 i UMI Number: U613346 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U613346 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 9995 / 0/ -hoZ2 d X Abstract This thesis addresses a neglected dimension of Greece under German and Italian occupation and on the eve of civil war. Its contribution to the historiography of the period stems from the fact that it constitutes the first academic study of the third largest resistance organisation in Greece, the 5/42 regiment of evzones. The study of this national resistance organisation can thus extend our knowledge of the Greek resistance effort, the political relations between the main resistance groups, the conditions that led to the civil war and the domestic relevance of British policies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Long Run Effects of WWII Destruction on German Households
    The Long Run Effects of WWII Destruction on German Households Preliminary Version- Please Do Not Cite Mevlude Akbulut-Yuksel 1 University of Houston April 2008 Abstract: This paper presents causal evidence on the long run consequences of WWII destruction on educational attainment and health status of German households. I combine a unique dataset on WWII bombing intensity in Raumordnungsregionen (Regional Policy Regions) level with the individual survey data, German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) to study the long-lasting effects of WWII devastation. The identification strategy exploits exogenous variation in the intensity of WWII destruction across regions and across birth cohorts. I show that Allied Air Forces bombing during WWII had a detrimental effect on years of schooling and health outcomes such as height and health satisfaction, even 40 years after the war. Additional analysis also suggests that inter-generational transfers are prominent in determining one’s education and the negative impact of war destruction is mitigated through parental human capital endowment. These results survive after alternative sample specifications and estimation strategies and are not driven by individual or regional omitted variables. My findings suggest that, consequences of wars along human dimensions could be more substantial and longer lasting than any physical capital impacts. JEL Codes: N34, N44, J24 Key words: World War II, destruction, households 1 Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Economics, University of Houston, 204 McElhinney Hall, TX 77204 (email:[email protected]). I am especially grateful to my advisors, Aimee Chin, Adriana Kugler and Chinhui Juhn for very useful comments and discussions. I also thank Joshua Angrist and Mutlu Yuksel as well as seminar participants at University of Houston Workshop for their helpful comments and suggestions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Irish Famine in History-Writing and Prose Fiction ”The Mutual Interplay of Two Narrative Genres”
    This interdisciplinary study analyses three 20th century fictional representa- tions of the Great Irish Famine in relation to nationalist, revisionist, and post-revisionist historical interpretations of the event. It examines how writers of history and fiction respectively portray the causes and consequences of the famine, and particularly how they view the question of responsibility, which is still a matter of contention. Gunilla Bexar asks to what extent the fictional representations reflect or resist | 2016 in History-Writing Fiction Irish and Prose Great The Famine Gunilla Bexar | the interpretations of the historians, and how the two genres attempt to make the experiences of the victims visible to readers. The study provides further Gunilla Bexar historical context by incorporating contemporary eye-witness accounts, offi- cial correspondence, and newspaper reports in the analyses. Drawing on Paul Ricoeur’s theory of the interweaving of history and fiction, Bex- The Great Irish Famine in ar argues that literature plays an important part in the shaping of historical con- sciousness. History and fiction should not be seen as mutually antithetical dis- History-Writing and Prose Fiction courses in the representation of the past since fiction, through its focus on the vic- tims, who are often reduced to statistics in history-writing, can mediate a deeper “The Mutual Interplay of Two Narrative Genres” understanding of the human tragedy that epitomizes the Great Irish Famine. 9 789517 658249 ISBN 978-951-765-824-9 Gunilla Bexar has an MA degree in English literature from San Francisco State University. Recently retired, she has worked as a language teacher in adult education.
    [Show full text]
  • Dodecanese Campaign from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Dodecanese Campaign From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Dodecanese Campaign of World War II was an attempt by Allied forces, mostly Navigation Dodecanese Campaign British, to capture the Italian-held Dodecanese islands in the Aegean Sea following the Part of the Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of Main page surrender of Italy in September 1943, and use them as bases against the German- World War II Contents controlled Balkans. The Allied effort failed, with the whole of the Dodecanese falling to Featured content the Germans within two months, and the Allies suffering heavy losses in men and Current events ships.[3] The operations in the Dodecanese, lasting from 8 September to 22 November Random article 1943, resulted in one of the last major German victories in the war.[4] Donate to Wikipedia Contents 1 Background Interaction 2 Initial Allied and German moves — The Fall of Rhodes Help 3 Battle of Kos About Wikipedia 4 Battle of Leros Community portal 5 Naval operations Recent changes 6 Aftermath Map of the Dodecanese Islands (in dark blue) Contact Wikipedia 7 In popular culture Date September 8 – November 22, 1943 8 References Location Dodecanese Islands, Aegean Sea Toolbox 9 Sources 10 External links Result German victory What links here Territorial German occupation of the Dodecanese Related changes changes Background [edit] Upload file Belligerents Special pages Further information: Military history of Greece during World War United Kingdom Germany Permanent link II and Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of World War II Kingdom of Italy Republican State of Page information South Africa Italy The Dodecanese island group lies in the south-eastern Aegean Sea, and had been Data item Greece under Italian occupation since the Italo-Turkish War.
    [Show full text]
  • Penguin Publishing Group
    NEW TITLES • MILITARY HISTORY NEW TITLES • MILITARY HISTORY JEAN LARTÉGUY JAMES M. McPHERSON The Centurions Embattled Rebel PAID TRANSLATED BY XAN FIELDING • FOREWORD BY ROBERT D. KAPLAN Presort Std Jefferson Davis and the Confederate Civil War U.S. Postage MILITARY Permit No. 169 As relevant today as it was half a century ago, The Centurions is a gripping military Staten Island, NY From the Pulitzer Prize–winning author of Battle Cry of Freedom, a powerful new reckoning adventure, an extended symposium on waging war in a new global order, and an es- with Jefferson Davis as military commander of the Confederacy. sential investigation of the ethics of counterinsurgency. “The best concise book we have on the subject….McPherson is…our most distinguished “I first studied Lartéguy’s stunning reflection of modern war in 1974 at West Point. scholar of the Civil War era.”—The New York Times Book Review My notes served as a cautionary primer for the challenges I’d later see emerge time “Quietly persuasive….There is an economical grace to [McPherson’s] prose that makes the and again. The lands, languages, uniforms, and personalities were different—but the book a lightning-quick but lingering read.”—The Wall Street Journal themes and emotions were constant.”—General Stanley McChrystal HISTORY PENGUIN PAPERBACK • 320 PP. • 978-0-14-312775-8 • $17.00 "The depth of the principals and the author’s sure sense of their complex torment bring the soldiers’ world vibrantly to life...The Centurions rewards fast, consumptive reading as well as deeper engagement, offering provocative insights into military lead- CHRISTIAN G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Famine in Soviet Ukraine: Toward New Avenues Of
    THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Troy Philip Reisenauer In Partial Fulfillment for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS Major Department: History, Philosophy, and Religious Studies June 2014 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title THE GREAT FAMINE IN SOVIET UKRAINE: TOWARD NEW AVENUES OF INQUIRY INTO THE HOLODOMOR By Troy Philip Reisenauer The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Dr. John K. Cox Chair Dr. Tracy Barrett Dr. Dragan Miljkovic Approved: July 10, 2014 Dr. John K. Cox Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Famine spread across the Union of Social Soviet Republics in 1932 and 1933, a deadly though unanticipated consequence of Joseph Stalin’s attempt in 1928 to build socialism in one country through massive industrialization and forced collectivization of agriculture known as the first Five-Year Plan. This study uses published documents, collections, correspondence, memoirs, secondary sources and new insight to analyze the famine of 1932-1933 in Ukraine and other Soviet republics. It presents the major scholarly works on the famine, research that often mirrors the diverse views and bitter public disagreement over the issue of intentionality and the ultimate culpability of Soviet leadership. The original contribution of this study is in the analysis of newly published primary documents of the 1920s and 1930s from the Russian Presidential Archives, especially vis-à-vis the role of Stalin and his chief lieutenants at the center of power and the various representatives at the republic-level periphery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great Famine in Ukraine from 1930 to 1933
    THE GREAT FAMINE IN UKRAINE FROM 1930 TO 1933: AN INSTRUMENT OF NATIONALISM THEN AND TODAY By Helen Fisun Submitted to Professors Linda Gerstein and Paul Smith In partial fulfillment of the requirements of History 400: Senior Thesis Seminar 22 April 2011 ABSTRACT The Great Famine in the Soviet Union lasted between the years of 1930 and 1933. The devastation peaked in winter of 1932 and continued throughout 1933. Statistics which accurately represent the tragedy are impossible to find due to Stalin's deliberate erasure of records. These records would have depicted a scene of mass murder. It has been estimated that the Famine took around eight to ten million lives. Five to six million of these citizens belonged to the Ukrainian SSR. This occurred because of Stalin's direct targeting of the Ukrainian state in order to industrialize and modernize the Soviet Union in an unrealistic time frame. Thus, for maximum results, he instituted a system of collective farming throughout the USSR which most severely affected the peasants of the Ukrainian country side. When the peasants rebelled, refusing to be manipulated by the Soviet Regime, Stalin punished the peasantry for their defiance by instituting a man made famine through the exportation of harvested crops out of Ukraine. Furthermore, he prohibited the provision of aid, as well as the emigration of Ukrainian peasants from the countryside. This resulted in the mass starvation of the Ukrainian peasantry, killing millions of innocent victims More recently, the topic of Holodomor, the Famine in Ukraine, has resurfaced as a politically polarizing issue. Russia refuses to accept its role in the mass murder of Ukrainian people, while Ukraine asserts the Russian role as an intentional exploiter of Ukraine.
    [Show full text]
  • Feridun Demokan, Notes on the Great Famine in Greece
    EGE AKADEMİK BAKIŞ / EGE ACADEMIC REVIEW Vol: 11 • Number: 1 • January 2011 pp. 137 -153 A Savior Sent by an “Old Foe”; Feridun Demokan, Notes on the Great Famine in Greece Ulvi KESER1 ABSTRACT The Second World War has had a great and bitter impact upon the countries which participated in it. Unfortunately, one of those countries suffered tragic consequences of the war since it was invaded twice firstly by Italy, and then by Germany. Out of the military invasion, Greece also suffered from the starvation which lasted approximately 5 years in the country. This long and terrific period is known as “μεγάλος λιμός” or the Great Famine. The only country helping Greece during the period of invasion and famine was Tur- key, and a distinguished Turkish man named Feridun Demokan brought the Greek tragedy into the public attention and informed the entire world about this disaster. This article will focus on the period of Greek famine and the activities of Feridun Demokan who worked as the representative of the Turkish Red Crescent Society. Key Words: Greece, Turkey, red crescent, red cross, grand famine, starvation, WWII 1. INTRODUCTION portant but unknown historical person named Fe- ridun Demokan who was a dominant figure during World War II broke out just after Germany attacked WWII, and especially during all those assistance ac- against Poland on 1, September 1939. Similarly, Italy tivities. dreaming to expand its territories in the Eastern Me- diterranean and the Balkans invaded Albania in April 1939, just following the plans of Germany and made 2- ITALIAN AND GERMAN INVASION IN a bridgehead in the Balkans (Soysal, 1983; 591).
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did Ukrainian Red Army Men Go Over to the Germans? the Case of Defectors to the Wehrmacht’S 296 Infantry Division, 1942–1943*
    UDC 94(477) MARK EDELE Ph. D., Hansen Professor of History, Deputy Head of School, School of Historical and Philosophical Studies (SHAPS), The University of Melbourne (Melbourne, Australia), [email protected] ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1783-7662 WHY DID UKRAINIAN RED ARMY MEN GO OVER TO THE GERMANS? THE CASE OF DEFECTORS TO THE WEHRMACHT’S 296 INFANTRY DIVISION, 1942–1943* Abstract. The purpose of this study is to analyse the reasons for defection among Ukrainian Red Army men during World War II. The research methodology is a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods. We analyse interrogation reports of Red Army defectors created by the counter-intelligence officer of the German 296 ID both for the reasons defectors gave for crossing the frontline and for the frequency their reasons fell into certain categories. We compare these data with the larger group of Soviet defectors, including other Soviet nationalities. The scientific novelty consists in combining cultural history with quantification and extending a methodology developed for Red Army defectors as a whole to the subset of Ukrainians among them. The article’s source base is multi-archival, drawing on Ukrainian and Russian archives in addition to the German military archive. Conclusions. In the aggregate Ukrainians were not motivated in significantly different ways from Soviet defectors of other nationalities. Ukrainians were more often politicized than other nationalities, but the broad social and political grievances they expressed were shared by many Soviet citizens. Many of the Ukrainian defectors who were politicized enough to want to fight against the Soviets to liberate their «homeland» were imagining this home as the multi-national Soviet Union rather than a Ukrainian national territory.
    [Show full text]