Download Judicial Notice Issue 8

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Judicial Notice Issue 8 JUDICIAL NOTICE TABLE CONTENTS ɄȘ ISSUE 8 SPRING 2012 pg 3 pg 14 pg 28 pg 39 FEATURED ARTICLES Pg 3 Kaye on Jay: New York’s First Chief The Family Man by Judith S. Kaye Pg 14 New York Justice in Civil War Louisiana by John D. Gordan, III Pg 28 New York’s Assembly Indicts a Political Party by Henry M. Greenberg Pg 39 Forward to The Nature of the Judicial Process by Andrew L. Kaufman DEPARTMENTS Pg 2 From the President Pg 48 The David A. Garfinkel Essay Contest Pg 55 A Look Back...and Forward Pg 58 Society Officers and Trustees Pg 58 Society Membership Pg 62 Become a Member Back inside cover Courthouse Art JUDICIAL NOTICE 1 DearFROM THE PRESIDENT Members embership in this Society brings with it not only the spoken word—in M terms of our stellar programs and speakers—but the written word as well. We call this Judicial Notice, which, as a good deal more than a newsletter, has given our readers some wonderful articles. This issue is no exception, featuring four lively pieces. The first has an alphabetical ring to it: Kaye on Jay, aptly named for an essay by former Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye on the domestic side of an uncommonly worldly man. The two have much in common beyond the ring of their names. Jay was our first Chief Judge and Kaye our last, before the present Chief, Jonathan Lippman. Beyond that, Jay and Kaye occupy prominent positions at 20 Eagle Street, as they face one another, by way of oil paintings, in the courtroom of the New York Court of Appeals. Family is family. John D. Gordan, III, our in-house scholar, has unearthed an interesting chapter in Civil War history and jurisprudence as he describes the judicial journeys of a New York judge who for several years after a political tussle in 1856 was President Lincoln’s appointee to the United States Provisional Court for Louisiana. Our own Editor-In-Chief, Henry M. Greenberg, takes a fascinating look at politics in 1920 when the New York State Assembly expelled some members for “disloyalty” to the United States and the State of New York for their affiliation with the Socialist Party. The issue concludes with a favorite author writing about a favorite judge as we present Professor Andrew L. Kaufman’s introduction to Benjamin Cardozo’s The Nature of the Judicial Process. Read on… Albert M. Rosenblatt, President BOARD OF EDITORS SOCIETY PRODUCTION STAFF DESIGN EDITORIAL OFFICES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF MANAGING EDITOR NYS UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, 140 Grand Street, Suite 701 Henry M. Greenberg Marilyn Marcus GRAPHICS DEPT. White Plains, New York 10601 Teodors Ermansons [email protected] ASSOCIATE EDITOR Judith S. Kaye Patricia Everson Ryan 914.824.5717 PICTURE EDITOR Albert M. Rosenblatt Michael Benowitz PRINTING Frances Murray New York State Bar ASSISTANT EDITORS Association, Printing David L. Goodwin Services Jacqueline Guidarelli-Wu 2 JUDICIAL NOTICE ǸɴȐ ɄȽ Ǹɴ 5,>@692»:-09:;*/0,-, ( ;OL-HTPS`4HU 1\KP[O:2H`L everal years ago at the ;/,7<)30*7,9:65 John Jay Homestead, John Jay was an end- 6I had the privi- lessly fascinating public fig- lege of delivering the ure. Indeed, he played at Goodhue Lecture hon- least five key roles in the oring the late Senator formation of our State Mary Goodhue, with and nation. whom I worked to The first is as secure state and feder- lawyer turned guerilla ally funded services and spymaster. By the for young children at early 1770s, he had risk of developmental built one of the most delay. She was at the successful private law time the Chair of the practices in New York. Senate Committee on Jay’s superb reason- Children and Families, ing and writing skills and I was the Chief were well known to his Judge. I have over the colleagues, and he was years tinkered a bit with my frequently called upon to script, and we have found the serve on committees and draft images you now see, making it important documents, such as the a particular pleasure now to share Address to the People of Great Britain, these remarks with you.* which outlined the Colonists’ grievances.1 1VOU1H` 5L^@VYR*V\Y[VM(WWLHSZ*VSSLJ[PVU 0HTLZWLJPHSS`WSLHZLK[VW\ISPZO[OPZLZZH`HZH[YPI\[L[VT`ILSV]LKMVYTLY3H^*SLYR:[L]LU*2YHUL^OV^HZHTLTILYVM [OL1VOU1H`/VTLZ[LHK)VHYKVM;Y\Z[LLZMYVT\U[PSOPZ\U[PTLS`KLH[OPUHUK^OVPUZWPYLK[OL/VTLZ[LHK»ZPU]P[H [PVU[VTL(ZOPZ,HNSL:JV\[WYVQLJ[:[L]L»ZZVU*HTLYVUKLZPNULKHUKI\PS[H)\[[LYMS`.HYKLUH[[OL/VTLZ[LHKOVUVYPUN OPZMH[OLY0L_[LUKZWLJPHS[OHURZHZ^LSS[V1VOU1H`*VSSLNL7YLZPKLU[1LYLT`;YH]PZ>OLU0^HZYLJLU[S`H[[OL*VSSLNL7YLZP KLU[;YH]PZZWVRLVM1VOU1H`HZHWLYZVU¸^OVRUL^OV^[VMPNO[MVY5L^@VYR¹^OPJOJH\ZLKTL[VKPNV\[T`YLTHYRZHUK WVSPZO[OPZHY[PJSLMVYW\ISPJH[PVU4`NYH[P[\KLPZIV\UKSLZZHZ^LSS[V[OLL_[YHVYKPUHY`6MMPJLVM*V\Y[(KTPUPZ[YH[PVUSH^`LYZ^OV OH]LHZZPZ[LKTLPU[OLWYLWHYH[PVUVM[OPZHY[PJSLZ[HY[PUN^P[OHUV[OLYILSV]LKMVYTLY3H^*SLYR1LYLT`-LPUILYN"OPZJVSSLHN\L 3H\YH:TP[O"HUKV\YWOLUVTLUHS*V\Y[VM(WWLHSZ3PIYHYPHU-YHUJLZ4\YYH` JUDICIAL NOTICE 3 ɄȽ ,ǸɴȐ (Ǹɴ His resourcefulness and enterprise brought him to Chief sits front and center behind the bench, in the front lines in 1776. Jay headed a small band that salmon robes, leading the parade of judges’ portraits sought to harass British ships on the Hudson River, that decorate the walls of our magnificent Court of and he rode to Connecticut to obtain cannons and Appeals courtroom. Regrettably, we know few details ammunition, an assignment that drew heavily on of the actual work of the Court back then, given the his powers of persuasion. And as later immortalized absence of reported decisions (in marked contrast to in a novel by James Fenimore Cooper, Jay worked today). After the United States Constitution went into with spies to infiltrate and collect information on operation in 1789, Jay was given his choice of posts British loyalists. Jay’s involvement in espionage likely in the federal government, and opted for Chief Justice exposed him to the risk of execution as a traitor at of the Supreme Court of the United States.6 In his the time, but ultimately gained him (much belated) recent memoir, Justice John Paul Stevens states that, recognition by the CIA as one of the three Founding of the twelve Chief Justices who pre-dated his term Fathers of American Intelligence.2 of service on the U.S. Supreme Court, John Jay ranks A second key role was as an architect of the among the five who “stand out as national leaders original New York State Constitution, an extraor- entitled to our highest respect.”7 dinary document that was largely Jay’s work. That Finally, Jay was a shrewd diplomat for a Constitution established our three discrete branches powerless New World. Both under the Articles of of government and spelled out their authority— Confederation and on behalf of the new United including a bicameral legislature, a popularly elected States, he was several times sent on tough diplomatic governor to head the executive branch, and an inde- missions, including negotiation of Jay’s Treaty, which pendent judiciary. It included not only the structural was widely criticized in the United States.8 framework of our State and nation but also such As we have seen, Jay amassed quite a record of enduring values as the guarantee of religious freedom, public service, particularly for a person barely into the right to trial by jury, the right to counsel and the his thirties at the time of the American Revolution. right to vote. Many of the core provisions of that My focus, however, will be on the private side of this 1777 document survive to this very day in our State extraordinary individual. and Federal Constitutions.3 Third, John Jay was a key advocate for New York’s ;/,-(403@4(5 ratification of the United States Constitution. With The constant backdrop for John Jay’s many the vote extremely close in the pivotal states of New public roles was the push and pull of family obliga- York, Massachusetts and New Hampshire, narrow pas- tions—not an unfamiliar tension for so many of us sage here was due in large part to Jay’s advocacy. Jay to this day. Jay was repeatedly called away from his argued forcefully that a single, united nation would family to attend to affairs of state, and at the same be better able to demand respect from other nations; time he was called away from historic moments to that a second effort was unlikely to produce better support and comfort relatives in times of need. The results; that the carefully negotiated compromise importance of family is particularly striking in the would allow the states to remain strong and united; life of John Jay, as is the importance of letter-writing and that the people “should give the proposed to maintaining these close ties across the miles. A Constitution a fair trial” and “mend it as time, occa- few of those letters accompany this article, and many sion and experience may dictate.”4 His Address to the more support the work of the historians and scholars People of the State of New York has been called “Jay’s I have cited. While we have far more communica- major contribution toward the ratification of the tions options today, I was intrigued to see Jay’s advice Constitution.”5 to his son Peter about written communications. Jay Fourth, Jay was the very first Chief Justice of urged Peter to write frequently while they were apart, both New York’s high court and the United States but also to be “always mindful” of the possibility that Supreme Court.
Recommended publications
  • 15/18/22 Liberal Arts and Sciences Political Science Clarence A
    The materials listed in this document are available for research at the University of Record Series Number Illinois Archives. For more information, email [email protected] or search http://www.library.illinois.edu/archives/archon for the record series number. 15/18/22 Liberal Arts and Sciences Political Science Clarence A. Berdahl Papers, 1920-88 Box 1: Addresses, lectures, reports, talks, 1941-46 American Association of University Professors, 1945-58 AAUP, Illinois Chapter, 1949-58 Allerton Conference, 1949 Academic freedom articles, reports, 1950-53 American Political Science Association, 1928-38 Box 2: American Political Science Association, 1938-58 American Political Science Review, 1940-53 American Scandinavian Foundation, 1955-58 American Society of International Law, 1940-58 American Society for Public Administration, 1944-59 Autobiographical, Recollections, and Biographical, 1951, 1958, 1977-79, 1989 Box 3: Beard (Charles A.) reply, 1939-41 Blaisdell, D. C., 1948-56 Book Reviews, 1942-58 Brookings Institution, 1947-55 Chicago broadcast, 1952 College policy Commission to study the organization of peace, 1939-58 Committee on admissions from higher institutions, 1941-44 Committee of the Conference of Teachers of International Law, 1928-41 Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies, 1940-42 Committee on School of Journalism, 1938-47 Box 4: Conference of Teachers of International Law, 1946, 1952 Correspondence, general, 1925-58 Council on Foreign Relations, 1946-57 Cosmos Club, 1942-58 Department of Political Science, 1933-39 Box 5: Department of Political Science, 1935-50 DeVoto, Bernard, 1955 Dial Club, 1929-58 Dictionary of American History, 1937-39 Dilliard, Irving, 1941-58 Document and Readings in American Government, 1938-54 Douglas, Sen.
    [Show full text]
  • SEWER SYNDICALISM: WORKER SELF- MANAGEMENT in PUBLIC SERVICES Eric M
    \\jciprod01\productn\N\NVJ\14-2\NVJ208.txt unknown Seq: 1 30-APR-14 10:47 SEWER SYNDICALISM: WORKER SELF- MANAGEMENT IN PUBLIC SERVICES Eric M. Fink* Staat ist ein Verh¨altnis, ist eine Beziehung zwischen den Menschen, ist eine Art, wie die Menschen sich zu einander verhalten; und man zerst¨ort ihn, indem man andere Beziehungen eingeht, indem man sich anders zu einander verh¨alt.1 I. INTRODUCTION In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, municipal govern- ments in various US cities assumed responsibility for utilities and other ser- vices that previously had been privately operated. In the late twentieth century, prompted by fiscal crisis and encouraged by neo-liberal ideology, governments embraced the concept of “privatization,” shifting management and control over public services2 to private entities. Despite disagreements over the merits of privatization, both proponents and opponents accept the premise of a fundamental distinction between the “public” and “private” sectors, and between “state” and “market” institutions. A more skeptical view questions the analytical soundness and practical signifi- cance of these dichotomies. In this view, “privatization” is best understood as a rhetorical strategy, part of a broader neo-liberal ideology that relies on putative antinomies of “public” v. “private” and “state” v. “market” to obscure and rein- force social and economic power relations. While “privatization” may be an ideological definition of the situation, for public service workers the difference between employment in the “public” and “private” sectors can be real in its consequences3 for job security, compensa- * Associate Professor of Law, Elon University School of Law, Greensboro, North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • IN the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the NORTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK KENNETH TYSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 9:17-CV-0
    Case 9:17-cv-00874-DNH-DEP Document 32 Filed 08/06/18 Page 1 of 47 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KENNETH TYSON, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 9:17-CV-0874 (DNH/DEP) v. JOSEPH VASILE and TODD COMPO, Defendants. APPEARANCES: OF COUNSEL: FOR PLAINTIFF: KENNETH TYSON, Pro Se 15-A-2954 Elmira Correctional Facility P.O. Box 500 Elmira, NY 14902 FOR DEFENDANTS: HON. BARBARA UNDERWOOD TIMOTHY MULVEY, ESQ. New York State Attorney General Assistant Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224 DAVID E. PEEBLES CHIEF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE Case 9:17-cv-00874-DNH-DEP Document 32 Filed 08/06/18 Page 2 of 47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Pro se plaintiff Kenneth Tyson, a New York State prison inmate, has commenced this action against two corrections employees stationed at the prison facility in which plaintiff was confined at the relevant times pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging the deprivation of his civil rights. Specifically, plaintiff asserts a First Amendment retaliation cause of action against defendants based on his claim that defendant Compo planted a weapon in his cell and issued plaintiff a misbehavior report concerning the matter, and defendant Vasile presided over an ensuing disciplinary hearing and found plaintiff guilty as charged, all allegedly in retaliation for plaintiff having previously filed grievances against other corrections employees. Currently pending before the court is a summary judgment motion brought by defendants seeking the dismissal of plaintiff's remaining retaliation claims. In their motion defendants argue that no reasonable factfinder could conclude plaintiff's protected conduct bore a causal relationship to the alleged retaliatory acts, principally because defendants were not implicated in the grievances filed by plaintiff prior to defendants' alleged retaliatory acts.
    [Show full text]
  • VILLA I TAT TI Via Di Vincigliata 26, 50135 Florence, Italy
    The Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies VILLA I TAT TI Via di Vincigliata 26, 50135 Florence, Italy Volume 30 E-mail: [email protected] / Web: http://www.itatti.it Tel: +39 055 603 251 / Fax: +39 055 603 383 Autumn 2010 or the eighth and last time, I fi nd Letter from Florence to see art and science as sorelle gemelle. Fmyself sitting on the Berenson gar- The deepening shadows enshroud- den bench in the twilight, awaiting the ing the Berenson bench are conducive fi reworks for San Giovanni. to refl ections on eight years of custodi- In this D.O.C.G. year, the Fellows anship of this special place. Of course, bonded quickly. Three mothers and two continuities are strong. The community fathers brought eight children. The fall is still built around the twin principles trip took us to Rome to explore the scavi of liberty and lunch. The year still be- of St. Peter’s along with some medieval gins with the vendemmia and the fi ve- basilicas and baroque libraries. In the minute presentation of Fellows’ projects, spring, a group of Fellows accepted the and ends with a nostalgia-drenched invitation of Gábor Buzási (VIT’09) dinner under the Tuscan stars. It is still a and Zsombor Jékeley (VIT’10) to visit community where research and conver- Hungary, and there were numerous visits sation intertwine. to churches, museums, and archives in It is, however, a larger community. Florence and Siena. There were 19 appointees in my fi rst In October 2009, we dedicated the mastery of the issues of Mediterranean year but 39 in my last; there will be 31 Craig and Barbara Smyth wing of the encounter.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Friendship in Early America
    CAMPBELL, THERESA J., Ph.D. Political Friendship in Early America. (2010) Directed by Dr. Robert M. Calhoon. 250 pp. During the turbulent decades that encompassed the transition of the North American colonies into a Republic, America became the setting for a transformation in the context of political friendship. Traditionally the alliances established between elite, white, Protestant males have been most studied. These former studies provide the foundation for this work to examine the inclusion of ―others‖ -- political relationships formed with and by women, persons of diverse ethnicities and races, and numerous religious persuasions -- in political activity. From the outset this analysis demonstrates the establishment of an uniquely American concept of political friendship theory which embraced ideologies and rationalism. Perhaps most importantly, the work presents criteria for determining early American political friendship apart from other relationships. The central key in producing this manuscript was creating and applying the criteria for identifying political alliances. This study incorporates a cross-discipline approach, including philosophy, psychology, literature, religion, and political science with history to hone a conception of political friendship as understood by the Founding Generation. The arguments are supported by case studies drawn from a wide variety of primary documents. The result is a fresh perspective and a new approach for the study of eighteenth century American history. POLITICAL FRIENDSHIP IN EARLY AMERICA by Theresa J. Campbell A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate School at The University of North Carolina at Greensboro in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Greensboro 2010 Approved by Robert M.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett
    Spring Grove Cemetery, once characterized as blending "the elegance of a park with the pensive beauty of a burial-place," is the final resting- place of forty Cincinnatians who were generals during the Civil War. Forty For the Union: Civil War Generals Buried in Spring Grove Cemetery by James Barnett f the forty Civil War generals who are buried in Spring Grove Cemetery, twenty-three had advanced from no military experience whatsoever to attain the highest rank in the Union Army. This remarkable feat underscores the nature of the Northern army that suppressed the rebellion of the Confed- erate states during the years 1861 to 1865. Initially, it was a force of "inspired volunteers" rather than a standing army in the European tradition. Only seven of these forty leaders were graduates of West Point: Jacob Ammen, Joshua H. Bates, Sidney Burbank, Kenner Garrard, Joseph Hooker, Alexander McCook, and Godfrey Weitzel. Four of these seven —Burbank, Garrard, Mc- Cook, and Weitzel —were in the regular army at the outbreak of the war; the other three volunteered when the war started. Only four of the forty generals had ever been in combat before: William H. Lytle, August Moor, and Joseph Hooker served in the Mexican War, and William H. Baldwin fought under Giuseppe Garibaldi in the Italian civil war. This lack of professional soldiers did not come about by chance. When the Constitutional Convention met in Philadelphia in 1787, its delegates, who possessed a vast knowledge of European history, were determined not to create a legal basis for a standing army. The founding fathers believed that the stand- ing armies belonging to royalty were responsible for the endless bloody wars that plagued Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN MANHOOD in the CIVIL WAR ERA a Dissertation Submitted
    UNMADE: AMERICAN MANHOOD IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Notre Dame in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor in Philosophy by Michael E. DeGruccio _________________________________ Gail Bederman, Director Graduate Program in History Notre Dame, Indiana July 2007 UNMADE: AMERICAN MANHOOD IN THE CIVIL WAR ERA Abstract by Michael E. DeGruccio This dissertation is ultimately a story about men trying to tell stories about themselves. The central character driving the narrative is a relatively obscure officer, George W. Cole, who gained modest fame in central New York for leading a regiment of black soldiers under the controversial General Benjamin Butler, and, later, for killing his attorney after returning home from the war. By weaving Cole into overlapping micro-narratives about violence between white officers and black troops, hidden war injuries, the personal struggles of fellow officers, the unbounded ambition of his highest commander, Benjamin Butler, and the melancholy life of his wife Mary Barto Cole, this dissertation fleshes out the essence of the emergent myth of self-made manhood and its relationship to the war era. It also provides connective tissue between the top-down war histories of generals and epic battles and the many social histories about the “common soldier” that have been written consciously to push the historiography away from military brass and Lincoln’s administration. Throughout this dissertation, mediating figures like Cole and those who surrounded him—all of lesser ranks like major, colonel, sergeant, or captain—hem together what has previously seemed like the disconnected experiences of the Union military leaders, and lowly privates in the field, especially African American troops.
    [Show full text]
  • "Amiable" Children of John and Sarah Livingston Jay by Louise V
    The "Amiable" Children of John and Sarah Livingston Jay by Louise V. North © Columbia's Legacy: Friends and Enemies in the New Nation Conference at Columbia University and The New-York Historical Society, Dec. 10, 2004 Sarah Jay wrote her husband [Oct. 1801]: "I have been rendered very happy by the company of our dear children . I often, I shd. say daily, bless God for giving us such amiable Children. May they long be preserved a blessing to us & to the community." Who were these 'amiable' children, and what were they like? The happy marriage of John and Sarah Jay produced six children: Peter Augustus, born in Elizabeth, New Jersey, in 1776; Susan, born and died in Madrid after only a few weeks of life, in 1780; Maria, born in Madrid in 1782; Ann, born in Paris in 1783, William and Sarah Louisa, born in NYC in 1789 and 1792 respectively. As you can see by the birthplaces of these children, their parents played active parts on the stage of independence, doing what needed to be done, wherever it needed to be done, at the end of a colonial era and the birth of a new nation. John Jay held a greater variety of posts than any other Founding Father, posts he insisted he did not seek but felt it his duty to his country to assume. Sarah Livingston Jay, brought up in a political household, was a strong support to her husband, astutely networking with the movers and shakers of the time (as a look at her Invitation Lists of 1787–1788 shows).
    [Show full text]
  • Some Aspects of Life and Politics in the United States of America in 19321)
    M. S. VENKATARAMANI SOME ASPECTS OF LIFE AND POLITICS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN 19321) To the present generation of young Americans the so-called two party system appears to be an almost unshakeable and permanent feature of the nation's polity. Several well-known American liberals (as, for instance, Senator Paul Douglas of Illinois and Walter Reuther, head of the powerful United Automobile Workers), who, in earlier years had reposed little faith in the Republican and Democratic parties, have gradually veered round to the view that the quest for reform must be pursued within the framework of the two major political parties. "Third parties" on the American scene have become virtually skele- tonized for various reasons and their plans and platforms receive scant notice at the hands of the media of mass communication. With the advent of good times during the war and post-war years, organizations advocating a radical reconstruction of the social and economic order have found a progressively shrinking audience. Radicalism among the intelligentsia has become a factor of minor significance. Will there be any important changes in such a state of affairs if the current business "recession" continues much longer or intensifies? Do "bad times" favor the growth of militant parties of protest and dissent? Few students of the American scene expect that in the foreseeable future there will be any widespread move away from the two traditional parties. It is interesting in this connection to examine the developments in the United States a quarter of a century ago when the nation was plunged into one of the most serious economic crises in its annals.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening Brief of State Petitioners and Amici
    UNITED STAT~S COURT OF APPEALS ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULEEFOB DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS IFILED MAR 1 0 20,08 FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCU~ AMERICAN FARM B~~~-~, ~., ) CLERK Petitioners, V. Docket No. 06-1410 (and consolidated cases) ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, Respondent. On Petitions for Review of Final Actions of the United States Environmental Protection Agency FINAL OPENING BRIEF OF STATE PETITIONERS and STATE AMICI Petitioners New York, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Rhode Island, and Vermont, the District of Columbia, and the South Coast Air Quality Management District, and Amici Arizona, Maryland, and Massachusetts ANDREW M. CUOMO KATHERINE KENNEDY Attorney General of New York Special Deputy Attorney General BARBARA UNDERWOOD MICHAEL J. MYERS Solicitor General Assistant Attorney General DENISE A. HARTMAN Environmental Protection Bureau Assistant Solicitor General The Capitol Albany, New York 12224 (518) 402-2594 (additional counsel for State Petitioners listed in signature pages) Dated: March 7, 2008 CERTIFICATE AS TO PARTIES, RULINGS, AND RELATED CASES Pursuant to Circuit Rule 28(a)(1), the undersigned counsel of record certify as follows: A. PARTIES AND AMICI Petitioners The following parties appear in these consolidated cases as petitioners: In case no. 06-1410, filed December 14, 2006, the American Farm Bureau Federation and National Pork Producers Council. In case no. 06-1411, filed December 15, 2006, American Lung Association, Environmental Defense, and National Parks Conservation Association ( "Environmental Petitioners"). In case no. 06-1413, filed December 18, 2006, the National Mining Association (NMA).
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NATIONAL
    NPS Form 10-900 0MB No. 10344019 (R«v. 646) "-T fP 1—— United States Department of the Interior '••: M ' n ,/ !_*, | jj National Park Service * i . National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NATIONAL This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for Individual properties or districts. See instructions In QuideHnea for Completing National Register Forma (National Register Bulletin 18). Complete each Item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable," For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategorles listed in the Instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name_______TCane. .Tnhn Tnne.c;. other names/site number "Breakwater" 2. Location street & number off southeast RT•\d of Hannonk Street N 4V not for publication City, town p^ r Harhnr N m vicinity state Maine code ME county Hancock code QQ9 zip code 04609 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property FY] private 2L building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local district 3___ ____ buildings I I public-State site ____ sites I I public-Federal structure ____ structures object ____ objects 0 Total Name of related multiple property listing: N/A Number of contributing resources previously listed In the National Register __0____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ED nomination EH request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties In the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Underwood Acting Attorney General Office of the Attorney General the Capitol Albany, NY 12224-0341 Dear Attorney Genera
    www.commoncause.org/ny July 9, 2018 Barbara Underwood Acting Attorney General Office of the Attorney General The Capitol Albany, NY 12224-0341 Dear Attorney General Underwood: We are writing to bring to your attention and request prompt investigation by the Office of Attorney General under Not-for-profit Corporation Law § 112 of apparent illegal political activities by the Lincoln Civic Block Association, Inc., a New York not-for-profit corporation under the control of New resources to benefit his campaign. April 18, 2018.1 Our own review has found some additional troubling problems. Apparent illegal use of LCBA resources: LCBA is apparently allowing Sen. Hamilton to operate a political office in an apartment it owns but charging him far below market rate rent. Property records indicate that the LCBA apartment Sen. Hamilton is using is subject to a mortgage that limits its use to a residence for a low income family, and that the apartment zoned for residential use only. in kind contribution to Sen. Hamilton that exceeds the amount that a corporation is allowed contribute to a candidate for a New York public office 1 W. Bredderman, “Brooklyn pol runs campaign out of his nonprofit’s housing,” Crain’s New York Business (April 10, 2018); Available at http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article/20180410/POLITICS/180409914/brooklyn-state-sen-jesse-hamilton- runs-campaign-out-of-his-nonprofits-housing 1 Dereliction of Corporate Officer Duty: to operate the corporation within the law. with the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development. Questionable Use of Corporate Assets The building at 284 New York should provide LCBA substantial annual rent income but the use of this income is unknown because LCBA has not made a public financial disclosure since 2006 and provided only limited public financial information for 2004, 2005, and 2006.
    [Show full text]