DOCSLIB.ORG

4Th Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
4Th Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management 4th Joint Convention on the Safety of Spent Fuel Management and on the Safety of Radioactive Waste Management May 14 to 23 May 2012, VIC, Vienna IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 JOINT CONVENTION ON THE SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT AND ON THE SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 COUNTRY GROUP 5 Cyprus Italy Germany Ireland Switzerland Luxembourg Korea, Republic of Austria Portugal Nigeria April 12th, 2012 Country Group 5, CYPRUS page 1 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 Synopsis of the National Report of CYPRUS COUNTRY GROUP 5 1. Brief description of the Country situation Cyprus doesn’t operate a NPP nor a research reactor or other nuclear installations or uranium/thorium mines. Ionizing radiation in Cyprus is used mainly in medicine, some used in industry and research. No spent fuel and only a few amount of non-power radioactive waste were produced. Long-term Funding of Current practices / Planned Management Policy Liabilities Facilities Facilities Spent Fuel None None None None Nuclear Fuel None None None None Cycle Waste Non-power waste Export Licensee; Decay (interim None State budget storage and retention of short lived wastes); Interim storage Decommissioning None None None None Liabilities Disused Sealed Return to supplier or Licensee; Interim storage; None Sources manufacturer; State budget Return to supplier or Export for disposal manufacturer; Export for disposal Country Group 5, CYPRUS page 2 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 2. Overview of Questions/Comments and Answers 2.1 Countries Submitting Questions/Comments and Answered: Total questions or comments posted: 36 The list of countries submitting questions/comments, and the number of submitted questions/comments are: Questions posted to Cyprus No. of Country Article questions Switzerland General 2 25 2 27 1 32 3 32.2.3 1 32.2.4 1 10 Czech Republic 21 1 26 1 32 2 32.1.1 1 5 France 19 1 26 2 32 1 4 USA 22 1 26 1 27 1 28 1 4 Luxembourg General 1 12 1 28 1 3 Ireland General 2 11 1 3 Portugal 21 1 22 1 32 1 3 Austria 22 1 32 1 2 Germany 22 1 1 Korea 28 1 1 36 36 Country Group 5, CYPRUS page 3 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 2.2. Areas of most interest, based on the number of questions/ comments With regard to Joint Convention articles, the 36 questions are distributed as follows: Articles Articles Articles Articles Articles General 5 Article 11 1 Article 12 1 Article 19 1 Article 21 2 Article 22 4 Article 25 2 Article 26 4 Article 27 2 Article 28 3 Article 32 11 2.3. Selection of themes or key issues arising from the questions/comments or answers that could be discussed in the Group 5 session Article 32 – Reporting 5 countries raised 11 questions on article 32: Switzerland (5), Czech Republic (3), Austria, France and Portugal. The focus of the questions for article 32 was: Storage conditions of short lived RAW Disposal of RAW abroad RAW inventory information missing Return of disused sealed sources Responsibility of licensee for disused sources Licensed temporary storage facility Definition and categorization of RAW General Article 3 countries raised 5 questions on general article: Ireland (2), Switzerland (2) and Luxembourg The focus of the questions for the general article was: HASS sources in use and provisions for orphan sources Minimization of RAW policy Final disposal of RAW abroad Storage conditions of short lived RAW Country Group 5, CYPRUS page 4 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 Article 26 – Decommissioning 3 countries raised 4 questions on article 26: France (2), Czech Republic and USA The focus of the questions for article 26 was: Qualified staff and adequate financial resources for decommissioning Storage of disused sources in a temporary storage Regulatory requirements of a licensed temporary storage facility Article 22 – Human and financial resources 4 countries raised 4 questions on article 22: USA, Portugal, Austria and Germany. The focus of the questions for article 22 was: Training for radiation protection and control staff International cooperation for training of the staff Funding of nuclear safety activities Article 28 – Disused sealed sources 3 countries raised 3 questions on article 28: USA, Luxembourg, and Korea. The focus of the questions for article 28 was: Management of disused sources after returned to manufacturer Other articles All other articles have less than 3 questions and are not listed yet. Country Group 5, CYPRUS page 5 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 3. Main points of interest The questions to the National Report cover wide spectra of issues to all articles of JC. Because similar issues refer to different articles of JC, the following text summarizes some main points of interest according their frequency of occurrence. 3.1 Disposal of RAW abroad Return of disused sealed sources Final disposal of RAW about handling of legacy sources 3.2 Management of disused sources Handling of legacy orphan sources Responsibility of licensee HASS sources in use 3.3 License of temporary storage facility Storage of disused sealed sources Regulatory requirements of licensed storage facility 3.4 Qualification and financing of staff International cooperation for training of staff Adequate financial resources for decommissioning 3.5 Conditioning and storage conditions Minimization of RAW Storage conditions of short lived RAW 4. Challenges and / or good practices Cyprus does not operate or plan to operate in the medium term nuclear power plants, research reactors or other nuclear installations or uranium and/or thorium mines. Ionizing radiation in Cyprus is used mainly in medicine, either for diagnostic or for therapeutic purposes All disused sources such as cobalt units and small sources from medical applications, lightning rods, smoke detectors, small sources for educational purposes etc. have been collected in a licensed temporary storage until a final solution (e.g. shipment abroad for disposal) is decided Country Group 5, CYPRUS page 6 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 JOINT CONVENTION ON THE SAFETY OF SPENT FUEL MANAGEMENT AND ON THE SAFETY OF RADIOACTIVE WASTE MANAGEMENT Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 COUNTRY GROUP 5 Cyprus Italy Germany Ireland Switzerland Luxembourg Korea, Republic of Austria Portugal Nigeria April 12th, 2012 Country Group 5, ITALY page 1 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 Synopsis of the National Report of ITALY COUNTRY GROUP 5 1. Brief description of the Country situation In Italy 4 NPP’s (Garigliano, Latina, Trino und Caorso) have been operated since 1980ies. At present in stage of decommissioning, established in the the late 1990ies. SF shipped abroad, some SF still present in Italy. Further installations are 4 research centers ITREC, CCR ISPRA, EUREX and IPU, OPEC. A research Triga reactor LENA and a fuel fabrication facility in Bosco Marengo. Long-term Management Funding of Liabilities Current practices / facilities Planned Facilities Policy Spent Fuel Contract with France for Governmental fund (Levy SF pool of CAORSO NPP site No decision by now, reprocessing, CAORSO on rise of electricity) transferred to France, SF pool interim storage NPP-SF shipped in June transferred to SOGIN, at Trino NPP, AVOGADRO foreseen 2010, SF from responsible organization, SF storage facility, waste AVOGADRO AFR Nov. 2010 assessment transfer to Ule in 2003 – storage pool and Trino, approx. € 6,5 Bill. 2005. SF pool at ITREC NPP will be transferred by facility and on 2 research 2012 reactor sites. SF is stored in NPP’s, fuel cycle facilities and research reactors Nuclear Fuel Most SF will be See SF See SF Licensing Cycle Waste reprocessed abroad, only procedures for SF at ITREC plant for dry construction of SF interim storage dry storage facility at ITREC will be performed Non-power waste Few authorized operators Not declared Only waste management For long time for industrial, medical and facilities are stored in existing storage a near research L-ILW, e.g. nuclear installations except surface storage NUCLECO NUCLECO facility is in planning stage Decommissioning Under responsibility of Financing was allocated See long term management, Activities related to Liabilities SOGIN a decommissioning activities treatment of existing decommissioning plan in are conducted waste a 20 year-period for ENEA facilities and BOSCO MARENGO fuel fabric. facilities Disused Sealed All activities under A new legislative decree Return to manufacturer or A central site in Sources legislative decree no. no. 52/2007 includes transfer e.g. to NUCLECO at early procedures 230/1995 financial security ENEA, research center of considered CASACCIA Country Group 5, ITALY page 2 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 2. Overview of Questions/Comments and Answers 2.1 Countries Submitting Questions/Comments and Answered: Total questions or comments posted: 47 The list of countries submitting questions/comments, and the number of submitted questions/comments are: Questions posted to Italy No. of Country Article questions Switzerland 19 2 25 3 32 9 14 Czech Republic General 1 4 1 5 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 28 1 32 2 9 France 25 1 28 1 32 3 5 USA 18 1 21 1 32 3 5 Ireland General 1 6 1 20 1 32 1 4 Germany 21 1 32 1 32.2.2. 1 3 Luxembourg 20.1 2 28 1 3 Austria 4 1 20 1 2 Korea 26 2 2 47 47 Country Group 5, ITALY page 3 Coordinator: G. Hillebrand IAEA Joint Convention Fourth Review Meeting, May 2012 2.2. Areas of most interest, based on the number of questions/ comments With regard to Joint Convention articles, the 47 questions are distributed as follows: Articles Articles Articles Articles Articles General 2 Article 4 2 Article 5 1 Article 6 1 Article 11 1 Article 12 1 Article 13 1 Article 18 1 Article 19 2 Article 20 4 Article 21 2 Article 25 4 Article 26 2 Article 28 3 Article 32 20 2.3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 92, Volume 2013/2
    Legal Affairs 2013 N uclear Law Bulletin Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 92 – Volume 2013/2 Bulletin No. 92 – Volume Nuclear Law No. 92 Volume 2013/2 NEA Legal Affairs ISSN 0304-341X Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 92 © OECD 2013 NEA No. 7154 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 34 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This work is published on the responsibility of the OECD Secretary-General. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 98
    Legal Affairs 2016 N uclear Law Bulletin No. 98 Volume 2016/2 NEA Legal Affairs Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 98 © OECD 2016 NEA No. 7313 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 35 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This work is published on the responsibility of the OECD Secretary-General. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Asse II Mine Licence to Handle Radioactive Substancesaccording To
    Asse II Mine - Licensing according to § 7 StrlSchV 1 Note: This is a translation of the statement entitled “Schachtanlage Asse II - Genehmigung des Umgangs mit radioaktiven Stoffen gemäß § 7 StrlSchV - Stellungnahme der Strahlenschutzkommission und der Entsorgungskommission”. In case of discrepancies between the English translation and the German original, the original shall prevail. Commission on Radiological Protection Nuclear Waste Management Commission Geschäftsstelle der Strahlenschutzkommission bzw. Entsorgungskommission Postfach 12 06 29 D-53048 Bonn http://www.ssk.de http://www.entsorgungskommission.de/ __________________________________________________ Asse II Mine Licence to handle radioactive substances according to § 7 of the Radiation Protection Ordinance (StrlSchV) Statement by the Commission on Radiological Protection and the Nuclear Waste Management Commission __________________________________________________ Adopted at the 242nd meeting of the Commission on Radiological Protection on 1/2 July 2010 and by way of circulation by the Nuclear Waste Management Commission on 2 July 2010 Asse II Mine - Licensing according to § 7 StrlSchV 2 Table of contents 1. Advisory request................................................................................. 3 2. Meetings held …………….................................................................... 4 3. Procedure and topics dealt with by the SSK.................................... 4 4. State of affairs and assessment by the SSK .......................................... 5 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Reversibility and Retrievability in Planning for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste
    Radioactive Waste Management 2012 Reversibility and Retrievability in Planning for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Proceedings of the “R&R” International Conference and Dialogue 14-17 December 2010, Reims, France Reims 2010 14 - 17 December 2010 An international conference and dialogue organised by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency, European Commission DG-Energy and EDRAM, and hosted by Andra www.r-r-reims2010.com NEA Radioactive Waste Management ISBN 978-92-64-99185-9 Reversibility and Retrievability in Planning for Geological Disposal of Radioactive Waste Proceedings of the “R&R” International Conference and Dialogue 14-17 December 2010 Reims, France © OECD 2012 NEA No. 6993 Nuclear Energy Agency Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 34 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Cost and Financing of the Disposal of Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste
    Report on the cost and financing of the disposal of spent fuel and radioactive waste August 2015 In the event of discrepancies between this translation and the original German version, the latter shall prevail. Preamble 2 Preamble Contents Preamble .................................................................................................................. 4 1 Public sector ...................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Cost ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Financing .............................................................................................................. 7 2 Private operators ............................................................................................... 8 2.1 Cost ...................................................................................................................... 8 2.2 Financing ............................................................................................................ 10 3 Cost of disposal................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Konrad disposal facility ....................................................................................... 10 3.2 Morsleben disposal facility .................................................................................. 11 3.3 Asse II mine .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Microbial Effects in the Context of Past German Safety Cases
    KIT SCIEntific REPOrts 7744 Microbial Effects in the Context of Past German Safety Cases Bernhard Kienzler and Juliet S. Swanson Bernhard Kienzler and Juliet S. Swanson Microbial Effects in the Context of Past German Safety Cases Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT SCIENTIFIC REPORTS 7744 Microbial Effects in the Context of Past German Safety Cases by Bernhard Kienzler Karlsruhe Institute for Technology (KIT) | Institute for Nuclear Waste Disposal (INE) Juliet S. Swanson Los Alamos National Laboratory Report-Nr. KIT-SR 7744 Funding for the Los Alamos Actinide Chemistry and Repository Science Program contribution to this report was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Carlsbad Field Office. This report was approved for public release with unlimited distribution as LA-UR-17-27144. Impressum Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) KIT Scientific Publishing Straße am Forum 2 D-76131 Karlsruhe KIT Scientific Publishing is a registered trademark of Karlsruhe Institute of Technology. Reprint using the book cover is not allowed. www.ksp.kit.edu This document – excluding the cover, pictures and graphs – is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en The cover page is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-ND 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.en Print on Demand 2017 – Gedruckt auf FSC-zertifiziertem Papier ISSN 1869-9669 ISBN 978-3-7315-0712-3 DOI 10.5445/KSP/1000073559 Abstract Microbes can be found virtually everywhere including deep geological disposals for radioactive wastes.
    [Show full text]
  • THE WORLD NUCLEAR WASTE REPORT 2019 Focus Europe. PARTNERS & SPONSORS
    THE WORLD NUCLEAR WASTE REPORT 2019 Focus Europe. PARTNERS & SPONSORS Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Lüchow-Dannenberg This report would have not been possible without the generous support of a diverse group of friends and partners, in particular – listed in alphabetical order – the Altner-Combecher Stiftung, Bäuerliche Notgemeinschaft Trebel, Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz (BUND), Bürgerinitiative Umweltschutz Lüchow-Dannenberg e.V., Climate Core and Green/EFA MEPs Group in the European Parliament, Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung (HBS) and its offices in Berlin, Brussels, Paris, Prague, and Washington DC, KLAR! Schweiz, Annette und Wolf Römmig, and the Swiss Energy Foundation. Thank you all for making this possible! THE WORLD NUCLEAR WASTE REPORT — 2019 3 FOREWORD More than 40 years ago in my home region, the forest near the village of Gorleben was chosen as the location for the German National Nuclear Waste Disposal Center. The site, which is now at the country’s center but at the time was located directly on the border between East and West Germany, was meant to host all facilities for reprocessing, treatment, storage, and a deep geological repository. The company responsible (which has long since closed) intended to open the repository for spent fuel in the salt dome named Gorleben-Rambow in 1999. After Fukushima, the German government decided to phase out nuclear energy for the second time. The experience of the nuclear catastrophe in Japan in 2011 also set in motion the review of the plans for the repository at Gorleben. After around 40 years of debating and fighting over Gorleben, the German government and parliament decided in favor of a new participatory site selection process for the repos- itory for high-level nuclear waste.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives of Radioactive Waste Disposal in Germany – 10448 Rev
    WM 2010 Conference, March 7-11, 2010 Phoenix, AZ Perspectives of Radioactive Waste Disposal in Germany – 10448 rev. Peter W. Brennecke Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz, Salzgitter, Germany ABSTRACT In the Federal Republic of Germany the disposal of all types of solid and solidified radioactive waste in deep geological formations is still the preferred option. Within the last decade the principal issues in radioactive waste disposal may be subdivided into activities further developing and detailing the revised German radioactive waste disposal concept as well as activities concerning the operation of the Konrad, Gorleben, Morsleben and Asse II sites. Of this, the Safety Requirements on the Disposal of Heat-Generating Radioactive Waste presented by the Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU - Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und Reaktorsicherheit) in July 2009, the licensing of the Konrad repository in May 2002 and, subsequent to the rejection of all lawsuits, the start of its construction in May 2007, as well as taking over of the responsibility for the Asse II mine by the Federal Office for Radiation Protection (BfS - Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz) in January 2009 are the most important topics. Future developments in the German radioactive waste disposal policy are indicated in the October 2009 coalition agreement of the new Federal Government. INTRODUCTION In the Federal Republic of Germany, the agreement between the Federal Government and the nuclear utilities which was initialled on June 14, 2000, and signed on June 14, 2001, served as basis for nuclear energy use and radioactive waste management issues during the last decade. According to this document, the former Government and the utilities agreed to limit the future utilization of the existing nuclear power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Frequency in the Samtgemeinde Asse Statement by the German Commission on Radiological Protection
    Strahlenschutzkommission Geschäftsstelle der Strahlenschutzkommission Postfach 12 06 29 D-53048 Bonn http://www.ssk.de Cancer Frequency in the Samtgemeinde Asse Statement by the German Commission on Radiological Protection Adopted at the 260th meeting of the German Commission on Radiological Protection on 28 February/1 March 2013 The German original of this English translation was published in 2013 by the Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety under the title: Krebshäufigkeit in der Samtgemeinde Asse Stellungnahme der Strahlenschutzkommission This translation is for informational purposes only, and is not a substitute for the official statement. The original version of the statement, published on www.ssk.de, is the only definitive and official version. Cancer frequency in the Samtgemeinde Asse 3 Contents 1 Background ......................................................................................................... 4 2 Epidemiological findings ..................................................................................... 4 3 Statistical analysis of regional differences .......................................................... 7 4 Risk factors for leukaemia and thyroid cancer .................................................... 8 4.1 Leukaemia .................................................................................................. 8 4.2 Thyroid cancer ............................................................................................ 9 5 Exposure of the population to
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Analogues for Safety Cases of Repositories in Rock Salt, Salt
    NEA/RWM/R(2013)10 Integrity of rock salt formations under static and dynamic impact W. Minkley, M. Knauth Institut fur Gebirgsmechanik GmbH, Leipzig, Germany Natural analogues from potash and rock salt mining are unique opportunities to support reasoning and validation of geom echanical m odelling as essential tools to prove the integrity of saliferous barriers. Salt form ations are naturally gas- and w ater-tight but can lose their geom echanical integrity and leak tightness under two circum stances: i) if the groundwater pressure or a gas pressure becom es higher than the acting minimal stress in the salt formation; ii) under dilatant conditions. The first process seems to be the most relevant process for the overall barrier integrity. The stress may be low ered due to the acting extensional conditions either by convergence processes around a cavity or by therm o-m echanically-induced elevations of the structure. Based on practical examples, which are classified in geological and industrial analogues, the geom echanical conditions resulting in a loss of tightness will be discussed and supported by means of geom echanical computation models. Introduction Salt deposits have been used for the extraction of mineral resources for millennia. In the 20th century new fields of application have been added, such as the storage of hydrocarbons in caverns and the disposal of toxic and radioactive waste in domal and bedded salt formations. The disposal of chemo-toxic and radioactive waste in salt rock benefits mainly from the tightness of the salt rocks ensuring the principle of complete enclosure of the waste away from the biosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Regulatory Issues and Main Developments in Germany
    Nuclear Regulatory Issues and Main Developments in Germany 15 May 2021 Contents 1. General Topics a) Organisational restructuring of nuclear waste management sector b) Establishment of the Federal Radiological Situation Centre (RLZ) c) Nuclear Power Phase Out d) Electricity Production and Nuclear Share 2. Laws and Regulations a) Matters under International Law b) National Legislation c) National Regulation and KTA safety standards d) Programme for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste e) Recommendations by RSK, ESK and SSK 3. Operation and Decommissioning of German Nuclear Power Plants a) Event Registration b) Evaluation of operating experience c) Licensing, Supervisory Issues and Decommissioning Licenses d) Safety Reviews and Peer Reviews 4. Research Reactors 5. Site Selection for Disposal of High-Level Waste 6. Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management a) Disposal Facilities and Disposal Projects for Radioactive Waste b) Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel c) Nuclear Fuel Fabrication and Reprocessing d) Transports Abbreviations ARTEMIS Integrated Review Service for Radioactive Waste and Spent Fuel Management, Decommissioning and Remediation BASE Federal Office for the Safety of Nuclear Waste Management (former BfE) BDEW Federal Association of the Energy and Water Industry BfS Federal Office for Radiation Protection BGE Federal Company for Radioactive Waste Disposal BGZ Company for Radioactive Waste Storage BMU Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety BWR Boiling Water Reactor ENSREG European Nuclear Safety Regulators Group IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IRRS Integrated Regulatory Review Service KTA German Nuclear Safety Standards Commission MWe Megawatt electrical power NPP Nuclear Power Plant OECD/NEA Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development / Nuclear Energy Agency PWR Pressurized Water Reactor RLZ Federal Radiological Situation Centre TWh Terawatt hour 15 May 2021 3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Actinide and Brine Chemistry in a Salt-Based Repository (ABC-Salt III)
    LA-UR-15-21114 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Actinide and Brine Chemistry in a Salt-Based Repository (ABC-Salt III) WIPP Facility and Stratigraphic Sequence The funding for this document is provided by the U.S. Department of Energy, Carlsbad Field Office. Cover illustration: WIPP TRU Repository Los Alamos National Laboratory, an affirmative action/ equal opportunity employer, is operated by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, for the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC52-06NA25396. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the U.S. Government. Neither Los Alamos National Security, LLC, the U.S. Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by Los Alamos National Security, LLC, the U.S. Government, or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of Los Alamos National Security, LLC, the U.S. Government, or any agency thereof. Los Alamos National Laboratory strongly supports academic freedom and a researcher’s right to publish; as an institution, however, the Laboratory does not endorse the viewpoint of a publication or guarantee its technical correctness.
    [Show full text]