DOCSLIB.ORG

Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 92, Volume 2013/2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 92, Volume 2013/2 Legal Affairs 2013 N uclear Law Bulletin Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 92 – Volume 2013/2 Bulletin No. 92 – Volume Nuclear Law No. 92 Volume 2013/2 NEA Legal Affairs ISSN 0304-341X Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 92 © OECD 2013 NEA No. 7154 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 34 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This work is published on the responsibility of the OECD Secretary-General. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries. NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY The OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) was established on 1 February 1958. Current NEA membership consists of 31 countries: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission also takes part in the work of the Agency. The mission of the NEA is: – to assist its member countries in maintaining and further developing, through international co-operation, the scientific, technological and legal bases required for a safe, environmentally friendly and economical use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, as well as – to provide authoritative assessments and to forge common understandings on key issues, as input to government decisions on nuclear energy policy and to broader OECD policy analyses in areas such as energy and sustainable development. Specific areas of competence of the NEA include the safety and regulation of nuclear activities, radioactive waste management, radiological protection, nuclear science, economic and technical analyses of the nuclear fuel cycle, nuclear law and liability, and public information. The NEA Data Bank provides nuclear data and computer program services for participating countries. In these and related tasks, the NEA works in close collaboration with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Vienna, with which it has a Co-operation Agreement, as well as with other international organisations in the nuclear field. Also available in French under the title: Bulletin de droit nucléaire n° 92 LEGAL NOTICE The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development assumes no liability concerning information published in this bulletin. This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Corrigenda to OECD publications may be found online at: www.oecd.org/publishing/corrigenda. © OECD 2013 You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts from OECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations, blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgment of the OECD as source and copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights should be submitted to [email protected]. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this material for public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) at [email protected] or the Centre français d'exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) [email protected]. Cover photos: Mining machine at Jachymov Czech uranium mine (Pavel Kosek, Czech Republic); An initial design image of Turkey’s first nuclear power plant in the coastal town of Akkuyu (Turkish Atomic Energy Authority, Turkey). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgements In addition to the authors of the articles, the NEA would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions to this edition of the Nuclear Law Bulletin: Mr. F. Chennoufi (Algeria), Mr. A. Martirosyan (Armenia), Ms. H. Cook (Australia), Ms. D. Fischer (Brazil), Ms. F. Touïtou-Durand, Mr. O. Guézou and Mr. S. Manson (France), Prof. N. Pelzer (Germany), Ms. V. Tafili (Greece), Ms. I. Bolger (Ireland), Mr. P. Majerus (Luxembourg), Mr. K. Sieczak (Poland), Mr. M. Sousa-Ferro (Portugal), Mr. M. Pospíšil (Slovak Republic), Mr. A. Škraban (Slovenia), Mr. V. Shvytai (Ukraine), Ms. F. Portmann-Bochsler (Switzerland), Mr. S. Clark and Mr. T. Rothschild (United States), Prof. D. Puig, (Uruguay), Ms. A. Durand (EC), Ms. S. Rivera (IAEA), Mr. P. Reyners (INLA), the Nuclear Transparency Watch (NTW) Secretariat and Ms. V. Ryan-Taix (WNU). The information submitted to the NEA by these individuals represents the opinions of the authors alone and does not purport to represent the official views or the policies of their governments or any other entity. NUCLEAR LAW BULLETIN No. 92/VOL. 2013/2, ISSN 0304-341X, © OECD 2013 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of contents ARTICLES Uranium mining and production: A legal perspective on regulating an important resource by Lisa Thiele ......................................................... 9 Turkish nuclear legislation: Developments for a nuclear newcomer by Erinç Ercan and Horst Schneider ....................................................................................... 29 Nuclear law and environmental law in the licensing of nuclear installations by Christian Raetzke ............................................................................................................... 55 CASE LAW France .................................................................................................................................... 89 Conseil d’État decision, 28 June 2013, refusing to suspend operation of the Fessenheim nuclear power plant ..................................................................................... 89 Slovak Republic ................................................................................................................... 89 New developments including the Supreme Court’s judgment in a matter involving Greenpeace Slovakia’s claims regarding the Mochovce nuclear power plant ............................................................................................................ 89 New developments in the matter involving Greenpeace’s demands for information under the Freedom of Information Act ................................................ 91 Switzerland .......................................................................................................................... 91 Judgment of the Federal Supreme Court in the matter of the Département fédéral de l’environnement, des transports, de l’énergie et de la communication (DETEC) against Ursula Balmer-Schafroth and others on consideration of admissibility of a request to withdraw the operating licence for the Mühleberg nuclear power plant ............................................................................................................ 91 United States ........................................................................................................................ 92 Judgment of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit granting petition for writ of mandamus ordering US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to resume Yucca Mountain licensing ............................................................................... 92 Judgment of the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit invalidating two Vermont statutes as pre-empted by the Atomic Energy Act ................................. 93 Judgment of the NRC on transferring Shieldalloy site to New Jersey’s jurisdiction .. 94 NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE AND REGULATORY ACTIVITIES Algeria ................................................................................................................................... 97 Nuclear security ................................................................................................................... 97 Armenia ................................................................................................................................ 97 Nuclear safety and radiological protection ...................................................................... 97 Brazil .....................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 69
    STUDIES The 2002 Amendment to the German Atomic Energy Act Concerning the Phase-out of Nuclear Power by Dr. Axel Vorwerk* I. Introduction One of the German Government’s main legislative projects in the 14th legislative period of the German Bundestag was the legal regulation of the phase-out of the use of nuclear power. The Act on the structured phase-out of nuclear power for the commercial production of electricity entered into force on 27 April 2002.1 Section 1 of this Act contains amendments to the Act on the Peaceful Utilisation of Atomic Energy and the Protection against its Hazards (Atomic Energy Act) of 23 December 1959 (the 1985 consolidated text of this Act is reproduced in the Supplement to Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 36);2 Sections 2 and 3 contain amendments to the Ordinance on Financial Security Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 25 January 1977 (the text of this Ordinance is reproduced in the Supplement to Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 18);3 and the Cost Ordinance Pursuant to the Atomic Energy Act of 17 December 1981.4 According to the decision of the German Government and the legislator, the further use of nuclear energy for commercial electricity production will only be permitted for a limited period due to the high risks associated with it, despite the high standard of safety at German installations in an international comparison. Even though, pursuant to the German Atomic Energy Act, precautionary action is to be taken against possible damage resulting from the operation of nuclear installations in accordance with the state of the art in science and technology, it is not possible to fully rule out the possibility of accidents resulting in major releases of ionising radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Value of Nuclear Energy in Turkey
    Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting 14(1): 28-38, 2020; Article no.AJEBA.54625 ISSN: 2456-639X Strategic Thinking in Resource Diversification: Assessing the Value of Nuclear Energy in Turkey Nurettin Altundeğer1* 1Governance and Technology for Sustainability, University of Twente, Building Ravelijn, Drienerlolaan 5, 7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands. Author’s contribution The sole author designed, analysed, interpreted and prepared the manuscript. Article Information DOI: 10.9734/AJEBA/2020/v14i130184 Editor(s): (1) Dr. Fang Xiang, International Business School, University of International and Business Economics, China. Reviewers: (1) Hussin Jose Hejase, Al Maaref University, Lebanon. (2) Imam Mukhlis, Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia. (3) P. A. Murad, USA. Complete Peer review History: http://www.sdiarticle4.com/review-history/54625 Received 06 December 2019 Policy Article Accepted 11 February 2020 Published 18 February 2020 ABSTRACT Turkey is an energy dependent country with more than 75 percent of its energy being imported from foreign countries. The level of dependency is increasing every year because of the rising energy needs and the lack of national production. Among all forms of energy, increase in demand for electricity is the highest. At a time that some countries are announcing their decision to phase out nuclear power plants (NPPs) in favor of renewable energy sources, Turkey appears to be determined to proceed with its decision to acquire nuclear technology despite safety concerns. A country that has seen domestic opposition towards nuclear energy has already made significant progress towards acquiring one. This article uses a policy analysis framework to assess the value of nuclear energy in Turkey from an energy security perspective.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Legislation in OECD Countries
    N uclear Legislation in OECD and NEA Countries Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities United States Nuclear Legislation in OECD and NEA Countries © OECD 2016 United States I. General Regulatory Regime ...................................................... 3 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 3 2. Mining regime ........................................................................................ 4 3. Radioactive substances, nuclear fuel and equipment ................................... 5 a) Special nuclear material ...................................................................... 5 b) Source material .................................................................................. 6 c) By-product material ............................................................................ 6 d) Agreement State programmes ............................................................. 7 4. Nuclear installations................................................................................ 8 a) Initial licensing ................................................................................... 8 i) “Two-Step” licensing under 10 CFR Part 50 ...................................... 8 ii) Licensing under 10 CFR Part 52 ...................................................... 9 b) Operation and inspection, including nuclear safety ................................ 11 c) Operating licence renewal .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Akkuyu Nuclear Power Plant
    ISSN: 2147 3390 DOI: Year: 2017 Spring Issue:16 LOOKING FOR A COMMON GROUND ON CONSTRUCTION OF A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN TURKEY: A REVIEW ON AKKUYU NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Nazım Uğur Aytekin1 ABSTRACT The term nuclear energy has entered our lives more than 100 years ago and always split people into two. Some believe it will be the end of human race as we know while others think it will help human race thrive in the future. Different Turkish governments have tried to build a nuclear power plant but many projects failed due to varying reasons. Akkuyu project is the most serious one so far and not surprisingly people have different opinions. This study will use stakeholders approach. Sides will be introduced and their points will be presented. Then the arguments will be boiled down to ethical theories and the paper will try to find a common ground for all parties involved. Keywords: Nuclear Power Plant, Akkuyu, Stakeholders Jel Code: Q4 1 Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Mechanics, Department of Mechanical Engineering, [email protected] İstanbul Journal of Social Sciences (2017) Spring: 16 1. Introduction Usage of nuclear energy always divided people since the beginning of the 20th century. Environmentalist groups strongly oppose the idea of a nuclear power plant whereas some people believe it’s our inevitable future. The idea of constructing a nuclear power plant is not new in Turkey. There have been multiple failed attempts for the last 40 years, but the topic became trending again with Akkuyu NPP project. The public has different opinions and so does the academics.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Nuclear Law
    Introduction to Nuclear Law Lisa Thiele Senior General Counsel, Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission July 11, 2018 26 June – 3 August, 2018 SUMMER INSTITUTE Busan and Gyeongju, 2018 South Korea What We Will Cover • What is nuclear law and why do we need it? • Essential components and principles • International nuclear legal framework – overview of subject areas and instruments • International law requirements for national nuclear law • The example of Canada’s regulatory framework • Concluding thoughts and references for further discussion nuclearsafety.gc.ca 2 What is nuclear law? Why do we need it? nuclearsafety.gc.ca 3 What Is Nuclear Law? … the set of special legal rules created to regulate the conduct of those who engage in activities related to fissionable materials, and other activities involving ionizing radiation • Public law – law that governs ‒ Relations between the State and its population in matters of public order ‒ Relations between States; relations between States and international bodies • Both international and national in its scope ‒ Reflects the international law instruments to which State has committed ‒ Reflects the national view on nuclear nuclearsafety.gc.ca 4 What’s So Special About Nuclear? • Nuclear energy brings significant benefits (clean electricity, medical diagnosis and treatment, industrial and agricultural uses) and poses special risks (environment, health and safety, proliferation) ‒ Nuclear law is regulatory – if risks outweighed benefits, the law would prohibit the activity ‒ The focus is on balancing
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Report
    Corporate Report 2020 2 3 Today, as power from Calder Hall begins Contents to flow into the national grid, all of us here know that we are at the making of history. For many years now, we have been aware that atomic scientists, by a series of brilliant discoveries, have brought us to a threshold of a new age. Today, we are seeing a solution as this new power is harnessed for the first time Introduction for the common good of our community. 4 Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II opening Calder Hall on 17 October 1956. Calder Hall was Nuclear landscape the world’s first nuclear power station to generate electricity on an industrial scale. 6 12 Our role in nuclear 20 Areas of work 15 Nuclear Insurance Pools 25 Leadership 17 Our history 29 Company highlights 31 Events 32 Contact us 4 5 Introduction As we look back on 2019, the nuclear energy market is clearly in a very different place than when Nuclear Risk Insurers (NRI) was established in 1956. I hope that you enjoy reading NRI’s first annual Corporate Report. With change come new risks and opportunities in the sector. Against the challenging market conditions of the last decade, low-carbon nuclear energy is an important element of the energy mix required to meet the emissions reduction commitments of the Paris Agreement and the growing need to satisfy carbon net zero commitments into the 2020s and beyond. In anticipation of this year’s United Nations Climate Change Conference Low-carbon nuclear in Glasgow, COP26, our trust in the potential for nuclear power, as a reliable component of a low-carbon energy mix, remains.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Turkey's Nuclear Energy Policy
    Assessment of Turkey’s Nuclear Energy Policy By Mustafa YAVUZDEMIR 2017 1 Outline 1. Introduction 2. Past and Current Energy Context 3. Challenges to Achieve Sufficient Nuclear Capacity 4. Current Legal Framework on Nuclear Energy in Turkey 5. Assessment and Recommendations 6. Conclusion 2 1. Introduction • By the second half of the 20th century, obtaining energy from reliable resources has become the most significant concern of almost every country in the world. • Especially the energy crises of the 1970s accelerated the search for reliable energy resources and highlighted nuclear power plants. • Currently, there are over 440 commercial nuclear power reactors operable in 31 countries. 3 1. Introduction Electricity Generation by Fuel Type in the World (IEA,2016) • Nuclear power stations provide almost 11 % of the world's electricity as continuous and reliable base-load power, without any carbon dioxide emissions (World Nuclear Association, 2017). 4 1. Introduction • Technical and economic advantages of NPPs can be summarized as follows: 1. Fuel is a low proportion of power cost, (5%) compared to Natural Gas Power Plants (40-60 %), 2. The fuel (uranium) is on site (not depending on continuous delivery), 3. They have relatively quick ramp-up capacity, 4. They contribute to clean air and low-CO2 objectives while producing good voltage support for grid stability. 5 1. Introduction Reliance on Nuclear Energy to Supply Electricity in Selected Countries Country Reliance (%) Reactors Country Reliance (%) Reactors France 76.3 58 Finland 33.7 4 Ukraine 56.5 15 Switzerland 33.5 5 Slovakia 55.9 4 Czech Republic 32.5 6 Hungary 52.7 4 South Korea 31.7 25 Slovenia 38 1 Bulgaria 31.3 2 Belgium 37.5 7 U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation on Nuclear Energy Policy in Turkey and Public Perception
    EPJ Web of Conferences 128, 05001 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/ epjconf/201612805001 TESNAT 2016 Mehmet Burhanettin Coskun¹, Banu Tanriover² ¹Department of Politics and Public Administration, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey ²Department of Economics, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey Turkey, which meets nearly 70 per cent of its energy demands with import, is facing the problems of energy security and current account deficit as a result of its dependence on foreign sources in terms of energy input. It is also known that Turkey is having environmental problems due to the increases in CO2 emission. Considering these problems in Turkish economy, where energy input is commonly used, it is necessary to use energy sources efficiently and provide alternative energy sources. Due to the dependency of renewable sources on meteorological conditions (the absence of enough sun, wind, and water sources), the energy generation could not be provided efficiently and permanently from these sources. At this point, nuclear energy as an alternative energy source maintains its importance as a sustainable energy source that providing energy in 7 days and 24 hours. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the nuclear energy subject within the context of negative public perceptions emerged after Chernobyl (1986) and Fukushima (2011) disasters and to investigate in the economic framework. Globalization in the area where the production of energy spending and economic competition with Quest created by the growing need for sustainable countries has been diligently calculated deficits and energy in Turkey has started to highlight the dependencies. It is able to show growth without various renewable energy needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal and Regulatory Development of Nuclear Energy in Bangladesh
    energies Article Legal and Regulatory Development of Nuclear Energy in Bangladesh Ridoan Karim 1,2,* , Firdaus Muhammad-Sukki 3,* , Mohammad Ershadul Karim 1 , Abu Bakar Munir 1, Imtiaz Mohammad Sifat 4 , Siti Hawa Abu-Bakar 5, Nurul Aini Bani 6,* and Mohd Nabil Muhtazaruddin 6 1 Faculty of Law, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia; [email protected] (M.E.K.); [email protected] (A.B.M.) 2 School of Business Administration, East Delta University, Chittagong 4209, Bangladesh 3 School of Engineering, Robert Gordon University, Garthdee Road, Aberdeen AB10 7GJ, Scotland, UK 4 Department of Finance, Kulliyyah of Economics and Management Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 53100, Malaysia; [email protected] 5 Universiti Kuala Lumpur British Malaysian Institute, Batu 8, Jalan Sungai Pusu, Gombak 53100, Selangor, Malaysia; [email protected] 6 Razak Faculty of Technology and Informatics, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur 54100, Malaysia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (R.K.); [email protected] (F.M.-S.); [email protected] (N.A.B.) Received: 4 September 2018; Accepted: 19 October 2018; Published: 21 October 2018 Abstract: The adequacy of legal and regulatory framework relating to nuclear energy in Bangladesh has sparked many questions since the government took the formal decision to establish a nuclear power plant (NPP) at Rooppur. Consequently, the government has taken some measures to make a comprehensive and robust framework to ensure safe and secure nuclear energy production in the country. Even though these initiatives are highly appreciable, there remain certain regulatory concerns which this paper has attempted to reflect.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Legislation in OECD and NEA Countries
    N uclear Legislation in OECD and NEA Countries Regulatory and Institutional Framework for Nuclear Activities Germany Nuclear Legislation in OECD Countries © OECD 2011 GGermany I. General regulatory regime ................................................................ 4 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................... 4 2. Mining regime ................................................................................................... 8 3. Radioactive substances, nuclear fuel and equipment .............................................. 9 a) Definitions ................................................................................................ 9 b) Licensing requirements ............................................................................... 9 4. Nuclear installations .......................................................................................... 10 a) Licensing regime....................................................................................... 10 b) Protection of the environment against radiation effects .................................. 12 c) Emergency response ................................................................................. 13 d) Surveillance of installations and activities .................................................... 13 5. Trade in nuclear materials and equipment ............................................................ 14 6. Radiation protection .........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 98
    Legal Affairs 2016 N uclear Law Bulletin No. 98 Volume 2016/2 NEA Legal Affairs Nuclear Law Bulletin No. 98 © OECD 2016 NEA No. 7313 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 35 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This work is published on the responsibility of the OECD Secretary-General. The opinions expressed and arguments employed herein do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Organisation or of the governments of its member countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Asse II Mine Licence to Handle Radioactive Substancesaccording To
    Asse II Mine - Licensing according to § 7 StrlSchV 1 Note: This is a translation of the statement entitled “Schachtanlage Asse II - Genehmigung des Umgangs mit radioaktiven Stoffen gemäß § 7 StrlSchV - Stellungnahme der Strahlenschutzkommission und der Entsorgungskommission”. In case of discrepancies between the English translation and the German original, the original shall prevail. Commission on Radiological Protection Nuclear Waste Management Commission Geschäftsstelle der Strahlenschutzkommission bzw. Entsorgungskommission Postfach 12 06 29 D-53048 Bonn http://www.ssk.de http://www.entsorgungskommission.de/ __________________________________________________ Asse II Mine Licence to handle radioactive substances according to § 7 of the Radiation Protection Ordinance (StrlSchV) Statement by the Commission on Radiological Protection and the Nuclear Waste Management Commission __________________________________________________ Adopted at the 242nd meeting of the Commission on Radiological Protection on 1/2 July 2010 and by way of circulation by the Nuclear Waste Management Commission on 2 July 2010 Asse II Mine - Licensing according to § 7 StrlSchV 2 Table of contents 1. Advisory request................................................................................. 3 2. Meetings held …………….................................................................... 4 3. Procedure and topics dealt with by the SSK.................................... 4 4. State of affairs and assessment by the SSK .......................................... 5 4.1.
    [Show full text]