2.0 Water Quality and Quantity

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

2.0 Water Quality and Quantity VERMONT N.H. 8A 142 BERNARDSTON HEATH LEYDEN 63 COLRAIN 112 10 TTHEHE CCONNECTICUTONNECTICUT RRIVERIVERNORTHFIELD GILL GREENFIELD SHELBURNE ERVING 91 5 2 BUCKLAND SSTRATEGICTRATEGIC PP2 LANLAN 112 63 WENDEL VOLUME ONE MONTAGUE CONWAY ASHFIELD DEERFIELD 116 47 112 River LEVERETT SHUTESBU 63 5 GOSHEN SUNDERLAND WHATELY 116 WILLIAMSBURG 3 HATFIELD ERFIELD PELHAM 9 9 Connecticut HADLEY AMHERST NORTHAMPTON 116 91 47 N WESTHAMPTON 66 BELCHERTO EASTHAMPTON GRANBY 202 141 SOUTH HADLEY SOUTHAMPTON 10 TG OMERY 21 PREPARED BY HOLYOKE 33 Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 202 LUDLOW CHICOPEE 391 IN COOPERATION WITH L 90 141 Connecticut River Watershed Council 20 Connecticut River Watershed Team 20 WESTFIELD WEST SPRINGFIELD 291 Franklin Regional Council of Governments WILBRAHAM Massachusetts Water Watch Partnership SPRINGFIELD University of Massachusetts Extension 21 PREPARED FOR EAST SOUTHWICK 57 AGAWAM 5 LONG- HAMPDEN Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs LONG- MEADOW 147 MEADOW 10 83 202 91 July 2001 CONNECTI THE CONNECTICUT RIVER STRATEGIC PLAN Massachusetts Watershed Initiative Volume I July 1, 2001 Pioneer Valley Planning Commission In cooperation with Connecticut River Watershed Team Connecticut River Watershed Council Franklin Regional Council of Governments Massachusetts Water Watch Partnership University of Massachusetts Extension Prepared for: The Massachusetts Executive Office of Environmental Affairs, Robert Durand, Secretary This project has been financed primarily with funds from the Executive Office of Environmental Affairs (EOEA) under a Watershed Initiative Comprehensive Planning Grant. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of EOEA. Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 26 Central Street West Springfield, MA 01089 ❖ The Connecticut River Strategic Plan Acknowledgements The Connecticut River Strategic Plan was guided by the involvement of hundreds of residents who partici- pated in workshops and public surveys throughout the planning process. A Watershed Survey was com- pleted in 1999 of civic leaders in all Massachusetts communities in the Connecticut River mainstem water shed to establish the top priority problems and goals for the watershed. A large watershed-wide public forum was held in Hadley, Massachusetts in November, 1998 to identify priority problems and to brainstorm possible solutions. Ideas from this public involvement were organized and refined in this report by the following organizations and staff: Franklin Regional Council of Governments Peggy Sloan, Janice Stone Connecticut River Watershed Council Whitty Sanford, Peg McDonough Massachusetts Water Resources Research Center Jerry Schoen, Francoise Walk University of Massachusetts Extension Scott Jackson Pioneer Valley Planning Commission Christopher Curtis, Carl Mailler Executive Office of Environmental Affairs John O’Leary MA Dept. of Fisheries, Wildlife and Russell Cohen Environmental Law Enforcement, Riverways Program Connecticut River Watershed Team John O’Leary is the Team Leader for the Connecticut River Watershed Team. Other regular Team members include: • Russ Cohen, Mass. Department of Fisheries, Wildlife, and Environmental Law Enforcement • Scott Jackson, University of Massachusetts Extension • Whitty Sanford, Connecticut River Watershed Council • Chris Curtis, Pioneer Valley Planning Commission • Joe Dunn, Franklin Regional Council of Governments • Jerry Schoen, Mass. Water Watch Program, University of Massachusetts • Bob McCollum and Larry Golonka, Mass. Department of Environmental Protection • Oliver Miranda, Diane Leone, Rita Thibedeau, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service • Dan Burke, Connecticut River Navigator • Jennifer McDonald, Jerzy Pietrzak, Dave Clark, Mass. Department of Environmental Management • Beth Goettel and Janice Rowan, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service • Gene Mills, Hampshire, Hampden, Franklin County Conservation Districts Photographs by Christopher Curtis and Terry Blunt ❖ The Connecticut River Strategic Plan The Connecticut River Strategic Plan Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................ i 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ i 2. Water Quality and Quantity ................................................................................................................ i 3. Preservation of Streams and Wildlife Habitat .................................................................................... ii 4. Land Use, Growth Trends and Economic Development .................................................................... iv 5. Public Access, Recreation and Greenways .......................................................................................... v 6. Coordination and Watershed Management Partnership ..................................................................... v 7. Summary of Volume II of Connecticut River Strategic ...................................................................... vi Volume I. The Connecticut River Strategic Plan .............................................................................. 1 1.0 Introduction......................................................................................................................................1 1.1 Public Response and Participation……………………………………………….……. ....................1 1.2 Overall Goals for the Strategic Plan…………………………………….………………….................. 1.3 Organization of the Plan ...................................................................................................................1 1.4 The Connecticut River Watershed....................................................................................................2 1.5 The Massachusetts Watershed Initiative...........................................................................................2 1.6 Purpose of the Connecticut River Initiative and Strategic Plan .......................................................4 1.7 Regulatory Role in the Watershed Approach: The Clean Water Strategy .............................................................................................................................................4 1.8 Agency and Organization Roles ........................................................................................................4 1.9 EOEA Basin Team .............................................................................................................................5 2.0 Water Quality and Quantity ........................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Public Response and Participation ...................................................................................................7 2.2 Assessment of the Current Situation ................................................................................................8 2.20 Water Quality Improvements in Past 25 Years .......................................................................8 2.21 Water Quality Data .................................................................................................................8 2.22 Current Water Quality Status .................................................................................................8 2.23 Results from the “Swimming Hole Project” .........................................................................10 2.24 Water Quality Data for Connecticut River Tributary Streams ..............................................13 2.25 Other Impaired Water Bodies ...............................................................................................15 2.3 Water Quality Assessment by Segment...........................................................................................16 2.30 Stream Segment Assessments ...............................................................................................16 2.31 Aquatic Life Use ...................................................................................................................16 2.32 Fish Consumption Use .........................................................................................................16 2.33 Recreational Use ...................................................................................................................16 2.34 Aesthetics Use.......................................................................................................................17 2.35 Summary of DEP Connecticut River Basin Assessment Report ................................................. 17 2.4 Priority Water Quality Issues..........................................................................................................18 2.40 Combined Sewer Overflows .................................................................................................18 2.41 Streambank Erosion .............................................................................................................19 2.42 PCBs.....................................................................................................................................20 2.43 Other Water Quality Priorities .............................................................................................20 2.5 Strategies for Water Quality and Quantity .....................................................................................20 3.0
Recommended publications
  • The Nayigation of the Connecticut River
    1903.] The Navigation of the Connecticut River. 385 THE NAYIGATION OF THE CONNECTICUT RIVER. BY W. DELOSS LOVE. THE discovery of the Connecticut river has been generally attributed hy histoi'ians to Adriaen Block. If Giovanni da Verrazano in 1524 or Estovan Gomez in 1525 sailed by its mouth, we have no record of the fact ; and it is very doubtful whether a river, whose semicircle of sand bars must have proclaimed it such, would have attracted much attention from any navigator seeking a northwest passage. In 1614, Block, having completed his yacht the Onrust [Restless], set sail from Manhattan to explore the bays and rivers to the. eastward. His vessel was well adapted to his purpose, being of sixteen tons burden, forty-four and a half feet long and eleven and a half feefc wide. He was able thus to obtain a more exact knowledge of the coast, as may be seen by the "Figurative Map," which is sup- posed to exhibit the results of his explorations.^ At the mouth of the Connecticut river he found the water quite shallow, but the draught of his yacht enabled him to cross the bar Avithout danger and the white man was soon for the first time folloAving northward the course of New Eng- land's longest river. There were few inhabitants to be seen near the mouth, but at a point which is thought to have been just above the bend near Middletown, he came upon the lodges of. the Sequins, located on both banks of thé river. Still farther up he saw an Indian village "resembling a fort for protection against the attacks of their enemies." This was in latitude 41° 48', and was, > De Laet's " Description of the New Netherlands," x: Y:,met.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of South Hadley Annual Town Report July 1, 2008
    TOWN OF SOUTH HADLEY ANNUAL TOWN REPORT JULY 1, 2008 – JUNE 30, 2009 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Ambulance Service ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Animal Control Department ................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Appointed Officials for Fiscal Year 2009 ............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Assessors ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Board of Appeals ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 14 Board of Health .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 14 Building Commissioner ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 15
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Town Report
    ANNUANNUALAL TOWNTOWN REPORTREPORT JJULYULY 1,1, 20182017 –– JUNEJUNE 30,30, 20192018 TOWN OF SOUTH HADLEY ANNUAL TOWN REPORT JULY 1, 2018 – JUNE 30, 2019 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Annual Town Meeting Warrant 50 Appointed Officials for Fiscal Year 2019 6 Assessors 11 Bike/Walk Committee 12 Boards & Committees 8-9 Cable Studio 12 Canal Park Committee 13 Conservation Commission 14 Council on Aging 14 Directory and Calendar – Board Meetings, Officials, Services 4 Elected Officials – April 9, 2019 5 Emergency Management 18 Employee Gross Wages – Calendar Year 2019 31-39 Facts of Interest about South Hadley 3 Golf Commission 19 GROSouth Hadley (Community Garden) 19 Health Department 19 Human Resources 21 Inspection Services 21 Libraries 22 Master Plan Implementation Committee 23 Memoriam 9 National, State and County Officials 3 Planning Board 23 Police Department 24 Public Health Nurse 20 Public Works 15-18 Recreation Commission 25 Redevelopment Authority 25 Retirements 9 School Committee 28 School Superintendent 26 Selectboard 10 Special Town Meeting Warrant – May 8, 2019 79 Special Town Meeting Warrant – Nov. 20, 2019 82 Sustainability & Energy Commission 29 Town Accountant (Change in Fund Balance/Combined Balance Sheet) 40-44 Town Clerk 28 Town Election – April 9, 2019 45-49 Town Meeting Members – April 9, 2019 7 Treasurer / Collector 30 Zoning Board of Appeals 29 2 Population Facts of Interest about South Hadley Federal Census 2010-17,514 Federal Census 2000-17,196 South Hadley area was first part of Old Hadley. 2017 Local Census – 17,682 1675-1719 Individual grants of land were made by Hadley for Form of Government settlement south of the Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update
    The Town of South Hadley, Massachusetts 2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Mission To reduce or eliminate the loss of life, property and government disruption to all natural hazards. Draft March 9, 2016 2 2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Prepared by: South Hadley Hazard Mitigation Planning Committee The Pioneer Valley Planning Commission 60 Congress Street First Floor Springfield MA 01104 (413) 781-6045 www.pvpc.org Jamie Caplan Consulting LLC 351 Pleasant Street, Suite B #208 Northampton, MA 01060 (413) 586-0867 www.jamiecaplan.com This project was funded by a grant received from the Massachusetts Emergency Management Agency (MEMA) and the Massachusetts Department of Conservation Services (formerly the Department of Environmental Management) 2016 Hazard Mitigation Plan Update Draft March 9, 2016 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS SOUTH HADLEY HAZARD MITIGATION COMMITTEE Mark Aiken, Water Superintendent, District 2 Scott Brady, Fire Captain, District 2 Todd Calkins, Assistant Chief, Fire District 2 Jeff Cyr, Water Superintendent, District 1 Erica Faginski, Director of Curriculum & Grants, School Department Richard Harris, Town Planner Sharon Hart, Emergency Management Director Jason Houle, Lieutenant, Fire District 1 David Keefe, Fire Chief, Fire District 2 David LaBrie, Police Chief Bruce Mailhott, Facilities Director, School Department Andy Orr, Engineer, South Hadley Electric Light Department Alec Plotnikiewicz, Intern, Fire District 1 Jim Reidy, Supervisor, Department of Public Works Janice Stone, Conservation Commission The South Hadley Selectboard
    [Show full text]
  • Pre Application Document Adequacy Review Checklist
    Pre-Application Document (PAD) Turners Falls Hydro Project Project No: 2622 Applicant: Turners Falls Hydro LLC Date: February 28, 2016 PRE-APPLICATION DOCUMENT Applicants must file a Pre-Application Document (PAD) (18 C.F.R. § 5.6) that provides existing information relevant to the project that is in the applicant's possession or that the applicant can obtain with the exercise of due diligence. This existing, relevant, and reasonably available information is distributed in the form of the PAD to the Commission and interested stakeholders to enable these entities to identify issues and related information needs, develop study requests and study plans, and prepare documents analyzing any license application that may be filed with the Commission. In summary, the PAD must contain the following information: A description of the project's facilities and operation; A description of the existing environment and any known and potential project effects on specific resources including: geology and soils; water resources; fish and aquatic resources; wildlife and botanical resources; wetlands, riparian, and littoral habitats; rare, threatened, and endangered species; recreation and land use; aesthetic resources; cultural resources; socioeconomic resources; tribal resources; and a description of the river basin; A list of preliminary issues and studies that may be needed at the project; An appendix summarizing contacts with stakeholders sufficient to enable the Commission to determine if due diligence has been exercised in obtaining relevant information; A process plan and schedule for consulting stakeholders, gathering information, developing and conducting studies, obtaining permits and completing all pre-filing licensing activities; and If applicable, a statement of whether or not the applicant will seek benefits under section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA).
    [Show full text]
  • Ocm03633500.Pdf (5.630Mb)
    t7. 7 GEOGRAPHICAL and STATISTICAL VIEW or MASSACHUSETTS PROPER. »Y RODOLPHUS DICKINSON, Eso. GREENFIELD, PR.IHTED BY DENIO AND PHELPS. 1813. : GREENriELD, MasS. MAUCH, 1813. THE following view comprises the principal part of a work, for the pubK- cation of which a subscription was attempted, that proved unsuccessful.* For the more convenient insertion of the tables, it is offered to the public in the present it interesting, and found to something form ; with a hope that may be add to the means of geographical and statistical information. Several states have been minutely and philosophically described ; but were some gentleman to furnish even as limited a sketch as this, of every other section of the union, it would not per- haps be deemed vain to presume, that with such aids, and the materials already in possession, a native or foreign geographer would be enabled to prepare a more extensive and satisfactory description of our country, thap any that has hith- erto been published. The author aspires at least to the merit of impartiality. The citizens of Massachusetts will here find no ungenerous discriminations to ex- effort cite their regret ; and to them, this humble is respectfully inscribed. R. D. * The writer sincerely thanks his friends and fellow citizens, Who encourag- ed his proposals, and informs them that they are discharged from all responsibili- ty as subscribers. Their patronage of this work, however, will be gratefully accepted. DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, to wit : DISTRICT clerk's OFFICE. Be it remembered, That on the twentieth day of October, A. D. 1812, year of the the States t.
    [Show full text]
  • 7:00 PM AGENDA Note: Not All the Topics Listed in This
    SELECTBOARD MEETING TUESDAY JUNE 7, 2016 SELECTBOARD MEETING ROOM – 7:00 P.M. AGENDA Note: Not all the topics listed in this notice may actually be reached for discussion. In addition, the topics listed are those which the chair reasonably expects will be discussed as of the date of this notice. 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of May 17, 2016 Regular Selectboard Meeting 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS/OPEN FORUM Recognition of Girl Scout Silver Award Recipient – Kylie Biron Recognition of Boy Scout Eagle Scout Award Recipient – Joshua Virgil McKeever Introduction of Council on Aging Director Leslie Hennessey 4. CONSENT AGENDA A. ONE DAY BEER AND WINE LICENSE REQUEST: Marilyn Ishler for Lion’s Club 70th Anniversary – June 18, 2016 – Buttery Brook Park 5. NEW BUSINESS A. Annual Appointments B. Applicants: Jeremy Ramondetta – Application for Appointment to Municipal Golf Commission (There are two openings for alternates with term expirations of 2018 and 2019.) Richard Matteson – Application for Appointment to Council on Aging (As of 7/1/16, there will be two openings for full members with terms expiring 6/30/2019.) Chris Collins – Application for Appointment to Municipal Golf Commission (See above.) Dave Baldwin – Application for Appointment to Agricultural Commission (seat with term expiring 6/30/2017) Denise Presley – Application for Appointment to Cable TV Advisory Committee (One-year appointment, so term expires 6/30/2017) A.J. Provost – Application for Appointment to Recreation Commission (One vacancy as of 7/1/16 with term expiring 6/30/2019) David Mendoza – Application for Appointment to Recreation Commission (See above.) C.
    [Show full text]
  • Thinking Like a Floodplain: Water, Work, and Time in the Connecticut River Valley, 1790-1870 by (C) 2016 Jared S
    Thinking Like a Floodplain: Water, Work, and Time in the Connecticut River Valley, 1790-1870 By (c) 2016 Jared S. Taber Submitted to the graduate degree program in History and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________________________________ Chairperson Sara M. Gregg ________________________________ Gregory T. Cushman ________________________________ Edmund P. Russell ________________________________ Robert J. Gamble ________________________________ Peggy A. Schultz ________________________________ Dorothy M. Daley Date Defended: 28 April 2016 The Dissertation Committee for Jared S. Taber certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Thinking Like a Floodplain: Water, Work, and Time in the Nineteenth Century Connecticut River Valley ________________________________ Chairperson Sara M. Gregg Date approved: 28 April 2016 ii Abstract Residents of the nineteenth-century Connecticut River Valley learned the character of the river, and water more broadly, through their labor. Whether they encountered water in the process of farming, shipping, industrial production, or land reclamation, it challenged them to understand its power as both an object outside their control and a tool that facilitated their work. This awareness of water's autonomy and agency necessitated attention to how water's flow varied across timescales ranging from seasons, through historical precedents in working with water, and into the geological processes whereby the river shaped the contours of the Connecticut River floodplain and the valley as a whole. Communities mobilized this knowledge when explaining the limitations that ought to circumscribe novel water uses and trying to maintain the river's status as a common tool shared among diverse bodies of users.
    [Show full text]
  • Holyoke Gas & Electric Department Hydroelectric System Lihi Application
    HOLYOKE GAS & ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM LIHI APPLICATION VOLUME 1 Prepared for: LOW IMPACT HYDROPOWER INSTITUTE Portland, Maine Prepared by: CITY OF HOLYOKE GAS & ELECTRIC DEPARTMENT Holyoke, Massachusetts APRIL 2010 HOLYOKE GAS & ELECTRIC HYDROELECTRIC SYSTEM LIHI APPLICATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Page No. VOLUME 1 1 LOW IMPACT HYDRO QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................ 1-1 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTIONS AND MAPS ................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Hadley Falls Station .................................................................................................. 2-2 2.1.1 Hadley Falls Dam ......................................................................................... 2-2 2.1.2 Hadley Falls Station Units ............................................................................ 2-2 2.1.3 Impoundment ................................................................................................ 2-3 2.1.4 Bypass Reach ................................................................................................ 2-3 2.2 Holyoke Canal System Stations ................................................................................ 2-3 2.2.1 Boatlock Station (FERC No. 2004) .............................................................. 2-5 2.2.2 Beebe-Holbrook Station (FERC No. 2004) .................................................. 2-5 2.2.3 Skinner Station (FERC No. 2004) ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 31 Section 4
    SECTION 4 - ENVIRONMENTAL INVENTORY AND ANALYSIS 4.1 GEOLOGY & SOILS The geological history of South Hadley is both dramatic and significant. Continental drift, the formation of the Appalachian Mountain chain, volcanoes and glacial scouring, have all played a role in the physical development of the Connecticut River Valley. These factors have influenced the topography and soils which, in turn, have determined surface and ground-water characteristics, forest cover and finally land use. During the Triassic Period (220 to 180 million years ago), two faults formed on either side of what is now the Connecticut Valley. The forces of continental drift pulled these faults apart causing the land between to drop and form the Triassic basin (the Connecticut Valley). The subsequent geological activity formed the topography, rocks and soils of the Valley have given present day South Hadley its landscape characteristics . Figure 2 shows a cross section of the sedimentary and igneous rocks in the Range and Valley and is to be used as a reference for the following discussion. Sugarloaf Arkose Sugarloaf arkose was the first deposit in the Triassic basin. It arrived from streams in the east which first deposited larger rocks in the eastern portion of the Valley and then dropped smaller rocks gradually westward as the streams slowed. It is a buff to pale red arkose (a sandstone with a high percentage of feldspar fragments) that gets its color from both iron found throughout the cement of this sediment and the pinkish to orange grains of orthoclase feldspar. Hitchcock Volcanics The Triassic era was unusually active with volcanism.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment for Hydropower Licenses
    ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FOR HYDROPOWER LICENSES Holyoke Number 1 Hydro Project, FERC Project No. 2386-004 Holyoke Number 2 Hydro Project, FERC Project No. 2387-003 Holyoke Number 3 Hydro Project, FERC Project No. 2388-004 Massachusetts Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Office of Energy Projects Division of Hydropower Licensing 888 First Street, NE Washington, D.C. 20426 November 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................. xii ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ......................................................................... xiii 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Applications ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose of Action and Need For Power ........................................................ 5 1.2.1 Purpose of Action ............................................................................ 5 1.2.2 Need for Power ................................................................................ 5 1.3 Statutory and Regulatory Requirements ....................................................... 6 1.3.1 Federal Power Act ........................................................................... 6 1.3.2 Clean Water Act .............................................................................. 7 1.3.3 Endangered Species Act .................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Montague
    HISTORY OF MONTAGUE Q ^^ (*, at Ex] W Q t t a h a v a j GILL E R V I N G G VI ,, HISTORY of MONTAGUE A TYPICAL PURITAN TOWN [Illustrated] By Edward Pearson Pressey INTRODUCTORY By Robert P. Clapp. i Including SHORT HAND NOTES of CONVERSATIONS with the OLDEST INHABITANTS, AD. 1895 By Mr. Clapp <s a HISTORY of the GUNN FAMILY By Mrs. Lyman 0. Gunn Published by THE NEW CLAIRVAUX PRESS Montague, Mass., 1910 Copyright, 1910, by EDWARD P. PRESSEY • fa P? % Contents BOOK I. Invocation Inspired by other New England historians, and by the charms and legends of "Hunting Hills," Mr. P. undertakes the History of Montague. BOOK II. Introductory A discourse treating Montague history in a general way to beguile a summer's afternoon; Montague field day of the P. V. M. A. F September 10, 1895. BOOK III. The First Inhabitants Reveals some knowledge of the creatures that left footprints in the red sandstone. BOOK IV. Indians Since the Indian always behaved himself in Montague, we let you know how on the whole, he laughed, prayed, sung, wrought, and spun yarns of magic. BOOK V. Pioneers History of the lumber camp that supplied Sunderland with boards for its first houses in 1714 and of the first settlers of the land. BOOK VI. Winning Democracy Just how the Congregational church hatched modern democracy when the Baptists and Unitarians cracked its shell. BOOK VII. Causes and Conduct of the Revolution How Montague helped save the democracy she had won and avoided paying tribute money to George III.'s favorites.
    [Show full text]