The Biology of Papilio Indra Nevadensis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Biology of Papilio Indra Nevadensis VOLUME 28, NUMBER 2 107 would be assigned, we propose to discuss the relationships between ecology and taxonomy of the insect in a separate paper. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We would like to gratefully acknowledge aid, particularly in pinpointing E. editha population locations and flight times, from the following people: Ralph Wells, Fred Thorne, J. Tilden, William Swisher, Michael Smith, Oakley Shields, Harriet Reinhard, Paul Opler, James Mori, Andrew Moldenke, David McCorkle, Sterling Mattoon, Chris Henne, Lawrence Gilbert, Clifford Ferris, Thomas Emmel, Paul R. Ehrlich, Helen Cox, and David L. Bauer. This work was supported by NIH traineeships 000-365-06 through 000-365-11; NSF grants GB 8038, 8174, 19686, 22853, and 35259; and by a grant from the Ford Foundation. LITERATURE CITED BASSETT, 1. J. & B. R. BAUM. 1969. Conspecificity of Plantago fastigiata of North America with P. ovata of the Old World. Can. J. Bot. 47: 1865-68. DOWNEY, J. C. & W. C. FULLER. 1961. Variation in Plebejus icarioides (Lycaenidae). 1. Food plant specificity. J. Lepid. Soc. 15: 34-42. LABINE, P. A. 1968. The population biology of the butterfly, Euphydryas editha. VIII. Oviposition and its relation to patterns of oviposition in other butterflies. Evolution 22: 799-805. MUNZ, P. A. & D. D. RECK. 1959. A California Flora. Univ. Calif. Press, Berkeley. SINGER, M. C. 1971. Evolution of food-plant preferences in the butterfly, Euphydryas editha. Evolution 25: 383-89. THORNE, F. 1970. Habitat: Euphydryas editha wrighti. J. Res. Lepid. 7: 167. WHITE, R. R. 1973. Community relationships of the butterfly, Euphydryas editha. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University. THE BIOLOGY OF PAPILlO INDRA NEVADENSIS (PAPILIONIDAE) IN NEVADA THOMAS C. EMMEL Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32601 AND JOHN F. EMMEL 1117 9th Street, Santa Monica, California 90403 In the late 1960's, a new race of Papilio indra Reakirt was discovered in at least two isolated mountain ranges of the Great Basin state of Nevada. Described by Emmel & Emmel (1971), Papilio indra nevadensis is differentiated in the adult stage from all other known 108 JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY BOX ELDER HUMBOLDT ELKO WASHOE TOOELE LANDER CHURCHILL HEY DA • MILLARD •• •• • BEAVER o WASHINGTON MOHAVE KERN SAN BERNARDINO Fig. 1. Map of the known distribution of Papilio indra nevadensis Emmel & Emmel, including closely related segregates in Nevada, California, and Utah referred to in the text. The central area in Lander and Nye counties is the Toiyabe Range referred to in the text. • - closed circles = nevadensis populations in the Toiyabe Range and Toquima Range; 0 - open circle = Humboldt Range, Pershing Co., population; • - closed square = Westgard Pass, Inyo Co., California, population; 0-open square = Pine Valley Mountains, Washington Co., Utah, population; !::::. - open triangles = Grant Range and Quinn Canyon Range, Nye Co., popu­ lations; ... - closed triangles = Spring Mountains, Clark Co., population. VOLUME 28, NUMBER 2 109 indra subspecies by the character combination of a wide postmedian yellow band on the forewing and hind wing, long tails, large size and elongated wings. The purpose of the present paper is to describe the distribution, habitat, behavior, foodplants, and life history of this dis­ tinctive Nevada subspecies. Distribution, Habitat, and Habits Papilio indra nevadensis has been found in fair numbers in a series of canyons (especially Jett, Kingston, Peavine Creek, Summit, and Twin River Canyons) along the east side of the Toiyabe Range in Nye and Lander counties, Nevada. It also occurs to the east in the Toquima Range (Nye Co.) which runs parallel to the Toiyabe Range. Peter J. Herlan of the Nevada State Museum has taken two P. indra specimens in the Humboldt Range, Pershing Co., which represent either spring brood specimens of nevadensis or a population intermediate in adult characters between typical indra and nevadensis. This mountain range is approximately 100 miles NNW of the Toiyabe Range. To the west of the Toiyabe Range, at Westgard Pass at the south end of the White Mountains in Inyo Co., California, a P. indra popu­ lation is found which appears intermediate between nevadensis and typical indra. It utilizes the same Pteryxia petraea foodplant as nevaden­ sis. Southeast of the Toiyabe Range, several P. indra segregates which show a close affinity to nevadensis have been studied. P. indra larvae were collected on Lomatium parryi (Wats.) Macbr. (Umbelliferae) in the Grant Range and Quinn Canyon Range, Nye Co., in 1969, but the resulting pupae died, so the adult phenotype of these populations is not known. The coloration of these larvae appeared closest to that of P. i. martini. Farther south, in the Spring Mountains of Clark Co., adults and immatures of P. indra have been collected which show characters of both nevadensis and martini. The adults of this popu­ lation are large with elongated wings as in nevadensis. The postmedian band of yellow spots tends to be intermediate in width between that of martini and nevadensis, and on the secondaries it tapers posteriorly as in martini. The color pattern of larvae from the Spdng Mountains appears to be closest to that of martini. Another atypical P. indra segregate is found in the Pine Valley Mountains in extreme southwestern Utah. Adults and larvae of this population seem closest to those of the Spring Mountains' populations. However, pupae from this locality are closest to those of P. i. kaibabensis. The locations of these populations are shown on the accompanying map (Fig. 1). llO JOURNAL OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY Figs. 2-5. Habitat and foodplants of Papilio indra nevadensis: 2-3, Jett Canyon, from the east side of the Toiyabe Range, Nye County, Nevada; 4, canyon wall with scattered Pteryxia plants at Jett Canyon; 5, Pteryxia petraea at Kingston Canyon in the Toiyabe Range, Lander County, Nevada. The typical semi-arid, lower montane habitat where P. i. nevadensis occurs is exemplified by the Jett Canyon area in the Toiyabe Range. This canyon is located on the eastern slope near the southern end of the range (Fig. 2). The entrance to the canyon is very narrow, with steep walls on both sides of the narrow, 4-wheel-drive road going up the defile. The Canyon bottom is well watered by a permanent stream (Fig. 3) . Typical vegetation within the canyon includes pinyon pine, willows (Salix exigua Nutt.), sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt. ), Prunus virginiana L. var. demissa (Nutt.) Sarg., Purshia tri­ dentata (Pursh) DC., and H olodiscus boursieri ( Carr. ) Rehd. The umbelliferous foodplants of this butterfly grow on the steep, rocky slopes and canyon walls (Figs. 4, 5). At present, we have only scant data regarding the spring brood. Based on our observations of immatures in June and July, we suspect that the spring brood flies in late May and June. The size of the sum­ mer brood is variable; in 1967, 25 adults were collected in Jett Canyon in one day in August. In 1968, no adults were seen when the area VOLUME 28, NUMBER 2 111 was visited on 10 August, while on 3 August 1969, only one adult was taken. Males were taken feeding on Cirsium species (thistles) and at mud or wet sand, and occasionally they visited blooms of Clematis vines. Females frequented Cirsium flowers and one was observed feeding on a Convolvulus (morning glory); several were flying along the canyon bottom. Other Papilio species actively flying at this time in these Toiyabe Range canyons are P. zelicaon Lucas, P. bairdii bairdii Edwards and P. b. form brucei Edwards, P. multicaudatus Kirby, and P. rutulus Lucas. Only the first species uses the same larval foodplant as P. i. nevadensis. The altitudinal span inhabited by P. i. nevadensis in the Toiyabe Range is 6200 to at least 7200 ft., with most specimens being taken between 6300 and 6800 ft. Undoubtedly hilltopping males ascend to the highest peaks of the Toiyabes, which are over 11,000 ft. Foodplant and Life History Throughout the Toiyabe Range and in the Toquima Range in central Nevada, Papilio indra nevadensis uses Pteryxia petraea (Jones) C. & R. (Umbelliferae) as a larval host. Females have been observed to oviposit on these plants in the field, and larvae of all five instars have been found on the Pteryxia in these mountain ranges. Pteryxia petraea is also found in the Humboldt Range, Pershing County, and doubtless serves as the foodplant for the P. indra population there. Egg: Globular in shape, smooth, about 1 mm. in diameter, and creamy white; laid singly on underside of foodplant leaf. Early instars black with white and light orange or yellow markings and closely resembling those of P. i. minori and P. i. kaibabensis. Fifth-instar Larva: Length: 40-45 mm. at maturity. Head; Width of head capsule, 4.0 mm. Head capsule pattern in most examples (Fig. 10) distinct from patterns of all other P. indra subspecies. Ground color black. Inverted "V" of light orange occurs on adfrontal margins, and low inverted "U" of similar color occurs laterally. On P. i. indra, minori, kaibabensis, and pergamus, these lateral marks extend dorsally to or near to top of head capsule. In P. i. martini and fordi, they are absent. Body (Figs. 6-9); Ground color black. In more common morph, each segment with narrow transverse cream colored band with pinkish tint, of a width covering two-thirds of anterior half of segment (not all the way to anterior edge) and ending on either side at level of spiracles (thoracic segments) or well below spiracles (abdominal segments). These bands yellowish to light pink in P. i. indra Reakirt (see Emmel & Emmel, 1973), white to pinkish gray in P. i. pergamus Hy. Edwards (see Comstock, 1928, and Emmel & Emmel, 1973), white, bluish white, or pale pink in P. i. fordi Comstock & Martin (see Comstock & Martin, 1955, and Emmel & Emmel, 1973), dull pink or salmon in P.
Recommended publications
  • HISTORY of the TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST a Compilation
    HISTORY OF THE TOIYABE NATIONAL FOREST A Compilation Posting the Toiyabe National Forest Boundary, 1924 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Chronology ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Bridgeport and Carson Ranger District Centennial .................................................................... 126 Forest Histories ........................................................................................................................... 127 Toiyabe National Reserve: March 1, 1907 to Present ............................................................ 127 Toquima National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ....................................................... 128 Monitor National Forest: April 15, 1907 – July 2, 1908 ........................................................ 128 Vegas National Forest: December 12, 1907 – July 2, 1908 .................................................... 128 Mount Charleston Forest Reserve: November 5, 1906 – July 2, 1908 ................................... 128 Moapa National Forest: July 2, 1908 – 1915 .......................................................................... 128 Nevada National Forest: February 10, 1909 – August 9, 1957 .............................................. 128 Ruby Mountain Forest Reserve: March 3, 1908 – June 19, 1916 ..........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Papilio Series) @17 2006
    (NEW April 28 PAPILIO SERIES) @17 2006 PROPOSALS FOR A NEW INSECT STUDY, COMMERCE, AND CONSERVATION LAW THAT DEREGULATES DEAD INSECTS, AND PROPOSALS FOR FIXING THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT AS APPLIED TO INSECTS By Dr. James A. Scott, 60 Estes St., Lakewood, Colorado, 80226 (Ph.D. in entomology, University of California, Berkeley) Why Do We Need New Insect Laws? The current laws regulating insects (and plants) in the U.S. are very bad. They were made for deer, and are only incidentally being applied to insects, because no legislators ever thought to make laws specifically targeted at insects that are not agricultural pests. These laws are not serving the conservation of insects well, and the laws are retarding the taxonomic study of insects, and are making criminals out of harmless hobbyist insect collectors. Basically, large animals like deer and Bighorn Sheep can be managed by controlling the numbers hunted using bag limits and exclusion areas etc., and roping and corraling them and transporting them to new sites. Large animals tend to have low population numbers, so might need to be protected from hunting (after all, at the end of the shooting spree in the late 1800s, the U.S. reached a low of population numbers for Bison and deer and nearly every other large animal, and their numbers have gradually recovered since). But insects are tiny by comparison, and their population sizes are huge by comparison. The average insect may be a thousand or a million times more numerous than your average deer'. Insect population sizes cannot be "managed" like deer, because population sizes vary hugely mostly depending on the weather and other uncontrollable factors, and their survival depends on the continued survival of their habitat, rather than useless government intervention.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taxonomic Report of the INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY
    Volume 7 1 February 2010 Number 3 The Taxonomic Report OF THE INTERNATIONAL LEPIDOPTERA SURVEY TIPS ON COLLECTING AND REARING IMMATURES OF 375 BUTTERFLY AND SKIPPER TAXA JACQUE WOLFE 459 East 2700 South Apt 16, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 JACK HARRY 47 San Rafael Court, West Jordan, UT 84088 TODD STOUT 1 1456 North General Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84116 ABSTRACT: Rearing techniques are discussed for 375 different butterfly and skipper taxa from Utah and beyond. Additional keywords: ova, larvae, pupae, over wintering, obtaining and caring for immatures INTRODUCTION The authors of this paper, Jacque Wolfe, Jack Harry, and Todd Stout, with contributions from Dale Nielson have over 100 years combined experience collecting and rearing butterflies. This publication includes natural and lab host plants. We hope that this information will help you avoid some of the mistakes and losses we have experienced. We also hope that this publication will encourage someone who has only collected adults to give rearing a try. For those new to rearing we encourage starting small. Not only can rearing provide perfect specimens but also provide knowledge regarding the life histories of butterflies, which includes how to find caterpillars or how to entice live females to lay eggs. The advantages justify the time and effort it requires. Another advantage of rearing is that some species, like Papilio indra and Megathymus species, are difficult to collect as adults. Therefor, rearing them can be much easier. For example, collecting larvae or netting a single live female can result in obtaining a nice series of perfect specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • F I N a L Mineral Assessment Report
    BLM F I N A L MINERAL ASSESSMENT REPORT Battle Mountain District Office - Nevada J A N U A R Y 2 0 1 2 This page intentionally left blank Bureau of Land Management Mineral Assessment Report SUMMARY The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Battle Mountain District Office (BMDO) is in the process of revising the district’s Resource Management Plan (RMP). As part of the RMP revision process, the BLM is required to prepare a Mineral Assessment Report providing information regarding mineral occurrences and potential within the BMDO Planning Area (planning area). This report provides an intermediate level of detail for mineral assessment as prescribed in BLM Manual 3060 (BLM 1994). Information presented in this report will be summarized and incorporated into an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the proposed RMP and into the final RMP. The geologic history of central and southern Nevada and the planning area is very complex and includes two major cycles of sedimentation (western and eastern facies sources), episodic thrust faulting, mountain building, and associated intrusive and igneous activity. More recent geologic history includes a period of crustal extension that was accompanied by bimodal (rhyolite-basalt) volcanism, large volume caldera volcanism, and basin and range block-faulting resulting in high-levels of shallow crustal heat flow. The regional and local geologic setting has been instrumental in the location of and potential for numerous economic metallic mineral deposits in the planning area, as well as development of economic geothermal resources. MINING AND MINERAL ACTIVITY IN NEVADA Mineral exploration, particularly for gold, is an ongoing enterprise in Nevada by both operators of existing mines and by other exploration companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Larval Hostplants of Butterflies in Nevada
    HOLARCTIC LEPIDOPTERA Editor: Andrei Sourakov Assoc. Editor: Thomas C. Emmel ASSOCIATION FOR TROPICAL VOLUME 12 NUMBER 1-2 August 2008 LEPIDOPTERA Founded 1989 ADVISORY COUNCIL LARVAL HOSTPLANTS James K. Adams (USA) Martin Krüger (South Africa) Andrés O. Angulo (Chile) Tosio Kumata (Japan) OF BUTTERFLIES IN NEVADA Yutaka Arita (Japan) Jean-Francois Landry (Canada) George T. Austin (USA) Torben B. Larsen (England) Jorge Llorente B. (Mexico) Vitor O. Becker, Planaltina, Brazil by Zsolt Bálint (Hungary) Martin Lödl (Austria) Henry S. Barlow (Malaysia) Wolfram Mey (Germany) George T. Austin Dubi Benyamini (Israel) Kauri Mikkola (Finland) Ronald Boender (USA) Scott E. Miller (USA) and Keith S. Brown Jr. (Brazil) Joël Minet (France) José A. Clavijo A. (Venezuela) Eugene G. Munroe (Canada) Patrick J. Leary Charles V. Covell Jr. (USA) K.-T. Park (South Korea) U. Dall’Asta (Belgium) Rod E. Parrott (Canada) Philip J. DeVries (USA) Amnuay Pinratana (Thailand) Julian P. Donahue (USA) Rimantas Puplesis (Lithuania) CONTENTS Eric Garraway (Jamaica) Jozef Razowski (Poland) Dale H. Habeck (USA) M. Alma Solis (USA) INTRODUCTION 1 NYMPHALIDAE 95 Christoph Häuser (Germany) Dieter Stüning (Germany) METHODS 1 Libytheinae 95 Lowell N. Harris (USA) Gerhard Tarmann (Austria) Toshiya Hirowatari (Japan) Paul Thiaucourt (France) LARVAL HOSTPLANTS 2 Heliconiinae 96 Hiroshi Inoue (Japan) Jürgen H. R. Thiele (Germany) HESPERIIDAE 2 Nymphalinae 99 Daniel H. Janzen (USA) Antonio Vives M. (Spain) Kurt Johnson (USA) Hsiau-Yue Wang (Taiwan) Eudaminae 2 Limenitidinae 119 Roger L. Kitching (Australia) Per O. Wickman (Sweden) Pyrginae 2 George O. Krizek (USA) Allen M. Young (USA) Apaturinae 124 Hesperiinae 8 Satyrinae 124 PAPILIONIDAE 14 OFFICERS Danainae 126 President: Ulf Eitschberger, Germany Parnassiinae 14 DISCUSSION 127 Vice-President: Thomas C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Signal Environment Is More Important Than Diet Or Chemical Specialization in the Evolution of Warning Coloration
    The signal environment is more important than diet or chemical specialization in the evolution of warning coloration Kathleen L. Prudic†‡, Jeffrey C. Oliver§, and Felix A. H. Sperling¶ †Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and §Interdisciplinary Program in Insect Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721; and ¶Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2E9 Edited by May R. Berenbaum, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, Urbana, IL, and approved October 11, 2007 (received for review June 13, 2007) Aposematic coloration, or warning coloration, is a visual signal that in ref. 13). Prey can become noxious by consuming other organisms acts to minimize contact between predator and unprofitable prey. with defensive compounds (e.g., refs. 15 and 16). By specializing on The conditions favoring the evolution of aposematic coloration re- a particular toxic diet, the consumer becomes noxious and more main largely unidentified. Recent work suggests that diet specializa- likely to evolve aposematic coloration as a defensive strategy tion and resultant toxicity may play a role in facilitating the evolution (reviewed in ref. 13). Diet specialization, in which a consumer feeds and persistence of warning coloration. Using a phylogenetic ap- on a limited set of related organisms, allows the consumer to tailor proach, we investigated the evolution of larval warning coloration in its metabolism to efficiently capitalize on the specific toxins shared the genus Papilio (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Our results indicate that by a suite of related hosts. Recent investigations suggest that diet there are at least four independent origins of aposematic larval specialization on toxic organisms promotes the evolution of apose- coloration within Papilio.
    [Show full text]
  • Repeated Reticulate Evolution in North American Papilio Machaon Group Swallowtail Butterflies
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Repeated Reticulate Evolution in North American Papilio machaon Group Swallowtail Butterflies Julian R. Dupuis*, Felix A. H. Sperling Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada * [email protected] Abstract Hybridization between distinct populations or species is increasingly recognized as an important process for generating biodiversity. However, the interaction between hybridiza- tion and speciation is complex, and the diverse evolutionary outcomes of hybridization are OPEN ACCESS difficult to differentiate. Here we characterize potential hybridization in a species group of Citation: Dupuis JR, Sperling FAH (2015) Repeated swallowtail butterflies using microsatellites, DNA sequences, and morphology, and assess Reticulate Evolution in North American Papilio whether adaptive introgression or homoploid hybrid speciation was the primary process machaon Group Swallowtail Butterflies. PLoS ONE leading to each putative hybrid lineage. Four geographically separated hybrid populations 10(10): e0141882. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0141882 were identified in the Papilio machaon species group. One distinct mitochondrial DNA clade Editor: Igor V Sharakhov, Virginia Tech, UNITED from P. machaon was fixed in three hybrid taxa (P. brevicauda, P. joanae, and P. m. kahli), STATES while one hybrid swarm (P. zelicaon x machaon) exhibited this hybrid mtDNA clade as well Received: March 10, 2015 as widespread parental mtDNA haplotypes from both parental species. Microsatellite mark- Accepted: October
    [Show full text]
  • North American Butterfly Association
    NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY ASSOCIATION 4 Delaware Road, Morristown, NJ 07960 tel. 973-285-0907 fax 973-285-0936 web: www.naba.org ANNUAL NABA BUTTERFLY COUNT - INSTRUCTIONS (USA) This printed count forms is for field use only. All counts must submit their results using the online data entry system. Please contact the NABA Count Program if you have questions or concerns. Please report your count results directly to NABA Timing/Requirements for United through our online count form at www.butterflycounts.org. Stated Counts The online form allows compilers to enter all data for their Count NABA 4th of July Butterfly Count: A minimum of four counts through the Web and also allows the regional editors adult observers AND 6 party-hours per count are Date of REQUIRED for all counts started after 2008; and, to review and edit the reports efficiently. Most importantly, June or except in extenuating circumstances, ALL counts should Butterfly Count information will be entered and stored in a July expend at least 6 party-hours of effort. database which in the future will allow it to be available Count online to NABA members and the public. If entering your Date other NABA Seasonal Butterfly Count: A minimum of four adult observers AND 6 party-hours per count is data through the online count form presents any difficulty, than June REQUIRED. please contact NABA for assistance. or July COUNT PROGRAM OVERVIEW DATE OF NEXT YEAR'S COUNT In order to encourage increased participation in the Please contact NABA (at address/phone above, or e-mail NABA Butterfly Count Program and to encourage even more to ) with the date of your next year's monitoring possibilities, the NABA Board of Directors [email protected] authorized the introduction of Seasonal Butterfly Counts in count and information on how to contact the compiler.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 7 - Number 1 February 1997
    Utah Lepidopterist Bulletin of the Utah Lepidopterists' Society Volume 7 - Number 1 February 1997 UTAH LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY HOSTS 43rd MEETING OF THE LEPIDOPTERISTS' SOCIETY PACIFIC SLOPE SECTION Initiated by President John Richards during the January, 1995 U.L.S. Meeting and then orchestrated by member Joel Johnson, the Utah Lepidopterists' Society hosted the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Pacific Slope Section of The Lepidopterists' Society. The successful gathering was held between 19 and 21 July, 1996 at the Great Basin Environmental Education Center in Ephraim Canyon, Sanpete County, Utah. Nestled at an elevation of 8600' in the Manti-La Sal National Forest, the Great Basin Environmental Education Center was originally built as a Forest Service Experimental Station. Today, it is managed by Snow College, which currently oversees the many workshops and seminars held there during the summer months. The forested scenery of the camp for the three-day meeting was breathtaking. Those who attended the meeting had plenty of opportunities to collect both at GBEEC as well as along Skyline Drive-- the popular north-south road traversing the Wasatch Plateau. Some of the species of lepidoptera encountered in the area were C. cephalica, C. barnesi, G. williamsi, G. vermiculata, L. weidemeyeri, S. atlantis, E. anicia, N. menapia, as well as others. Although the preparation for the meeting was handled by Joel, a number of other U.L.S. members participated as well. Tom Spalding and John Richards headed up the welcoming committee and handled registration for the meeting at Snow College on Friday afternoon. Friday night activities included a Turkey barbeque and a "bring-your-own" slide presentation.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic Tectonic Domains of Nevada: an Interpretive Discussion to Accompany the Geologic Map of Nevada
    Paleozoic tectonic domains of Nevada: An interpretive discussion to accompany the geologic map of Nevada A. Elizabeth Jones Crafford GeoLogic, 9501 Nettleton Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99507, USA ABSTRACT contain rocks unlike those from the adjacent tectonic domains is to help characterize and dis- margin or other terranes and suggest they are tinguish groups of rocks by the distinct tectonic The Paleozoic geologic history of Nevada far traveled. A change in the plate boundary histories that have (or have not) impacted them. can be viewed in terms of tectonic domains confi guration in the Middle Pennsylvanian Traditional interpretations of Paleozoic tec- derived from the newly interpreted digi- led to the development of a new margin that tonic events in Nevada have primarily relied tal geologic map of Nevada. These domains refl ected the effects of a new plate boundary on pre-plate tectonic or early plate tectonic reveal that Paleozoic tectonic events were farther to the west. Accretion to the margin ideas of displacement of the Earth’s crust that shaped by complex interactions between the of upper Paleozoic oceanic terranes at the do not necessarily address the complexity of continental margin in Nevada and accreted close of the Paleozoic redefi ned the margin structural and stratigraphic evidence that has terranes outboard of the margin. once again as it changed from a transpres- been observed since they were fi rst proposed Ten domains are described. They include sive accretion regime to a true backarc plate (Brueckner and Snyder, 1985; Burchfi el and lower Paleozoic domains based on paleogeo- tectonic setting in the Mesozoic.
    [Show full text]
  • Book Review, of Systematics of Western North American Butterflies
    (NEW Dec. 3, PAPILIO SERIES) ~19 2008 CORRECTIONS/REVIEWS OF 58 NORTH AMERICAN BUTTERFLY BOOKS Dr. James A. Scott, 60 Estes Street, Lakewood, Colorado 80226-1254 Abstract. Corrections are given for 58 North American butterfly books. Most of these books are recent. Misidentified figures mostly of adults, erroneous hostplants, and other mistakes are corrected in each book. Suggestions are made to improve future butterfly books. Identifications of figured specimens in Holland's 1931 & 1898 Butterfly Book & 1915 Butterfly Guide are corrected, and their type status clarified, and corrections are made to F. M. Brown's series of papers on Edwards; types (many figured by Holland), because some of Holland's 75 lectotype designations override lectotype specimens that were designated later, and several dozen Holland lectotype designations are added to the J. Pelham Catalogue. Type locality designations are corrected/defined here (some made by Brown, most by others), for numerous names: aenus, artonis, balder, bremnerii, brettoides, brucei (Oeneis), caespitatis, cahmus, callina, carus, colon, colorado, coolinensis, comus, conquista, dacotah, damei, dumeti, edwardsii (Oarisma), elada, epixanthe, eunus, fulvia, furcae, garita, hermodur, kootenai, lagus, mejicanus, mormo, mormonia, nilus, nympha, oreas, oslari, philetas, phylace, pratincola, rhena, saga, scudderi, simius, taxiles, uhleri. Five first reviser actions are made (albihalos=austinorum, davenporti=pratti, latalinea=subaridum, maritima=texana [Cercyonis], ricei=calneva). The name c-argenteum is designated nomen oblitum, faunus a nomen protectum. Three taxa are demonstrated to be invalid nomina nuda (blackmorei, sulfuris, svilhae), and another nomen nudum ( damei) is added to catalogues as a "schizophrenic taxon" in order to preserve stability. Problems caused by old scientific names and the time wasted on them are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Risk Assessment
    Ecological Sustainability Analysis of the Kaibab National Forest: Species Diversity Report Ver. 1.2 Prepared by: Mikele Painter and Valerie Stein Foster Kaibab National Forest For: Kaibab National Forest Plan Revision Analysis 22 December 2008 SpeciesDiversity-Report-ver-1.2.doc 22 December 2008 Table of Contents Table of Contents............................................................................................................................. i Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 PART I: Species Diversity.............................................................................................................. 1 Species List ................................................................................................................................. 1 Criteria .................................................................................................................................... 2 Assessment Sources................................................................................................................ 3 Screening Results.................................................................................................................... 4 Habitat Associations and Initial Species Groups........................................................................ 8 Species associated with ecosystem diversity characteristics of terrestrial vegetation or aquatic systems ......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]