The Streaming Wars+: an Analysis of Anticompetitive Business Practices in Streaming Business
UCLA UCLA Entertainment Law Review Title The Streaming Wars+: An Analysis of Anticompetitive Business Practices in Streaming Business Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8m05g3fd Journal UCLA Entertainment Law Review, 28(1) ISSN 1073-2896 Author Pakula, Olivia Publication Date 2021 DOI 10.5070/LR828153859 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California THE STREAMING WARS+: An Analysis of Anticompetitive Business Practices in Streaming Business Olivia Pakula* Abstract The recent rise of streaming platforms currently benefits consumers with quality content offerings at free or at relatively low cost. However, as these companies’ market power expands through vertical integration, current anti- trust laws may be insufficient to protect consumers from potential longterm harms, such as increased prices, lower quality and variety of content, or erosion of data privacy. It is paramount to determining whether streaming services engage in anticompetitive business practices to protect both competition and consumers. Though streaming companies do not violate existing antitrust laws because consumers are not presently harmed, this Comment thus explores whether streaming companies are engaging in aggressive business practices with the potential to harm consumers. The oligopolistic streaming industry is combined with enormous barriers to entry, practices of predatory pricing, imperfect price discrimination, bundling, disfavoring of competitors on their platforms, huge talent buyouts, and nontransparent use of consumer data, which may be reason for concern. This Comment will examine the history of the entertainment industry and antitrust laws to discern where the current business practices of the streaming companies fit into the antitrust analysis. This Comment then considers potential solutions to antitrust concerns such as increasing enforcement, reforming the consumer welfare standard, public util- ity regulation, prophylactic bans on vertical integration, divestiture, and fines.
[Show full text]