DOCSLIB.ORG

Hurun Global Rich List 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hurun Global Rich List 2018 - alle 2.694 Milliardäre Rank Net Worth Country of Rank Name % change Main Company Age Industry Change (US$Bn) Residence 1 2 Jeff Bezos 123 71% Amazon 54 USA Online Retail 2 0 Warren Buffett 102 31% Berkshire Hathaway 87 USA Investments 3 -2 Bill Gates 90 11% Microsoft 62 USA Investments 4 1 Mark Zuckerberg 79 36% Facebook 33 USA Technology 5 6 Bernard Arnault 78 105% LVMH 68 France Single Brand Retailing 6 -2 Amancio Ortega 73 6% Inditex 81 Spain Single Brand Retailing 7 0 Carlos Slim Helu & Family 67 46% America Movil 78 Mexico Investments 8 -2 Larry Ellison 54 13% Oracle 73 USA Technology 9 3 Larry Page 50 35% Google 44 USA Technology 10 0 Michael Bloomberg 49 17% Bloomberg 76 USA Media 11 5 Alice Walton 48 55% Walmart 68 USA Multi Brand Retailing 11 -3 Charles Koch 48 12% Koch Industries 82 USA Energy 11 -3 David Koch 48 12% Koch Industries 77 USA Energy 11 5 Jim Walton 48 55% Walmart 69 USA Multi Brand Retailing 15 23 Pony Ma Huateng 47 114% Tencent 47 China IT 15 1 Robson Walton 47 52% Walmart 73 USA Multi Brand Retailing 17 New Francoise Bettencourt-Meyers 46 New L'Oreal 64 France Cosmetics 17 -3 Sergey Brin 46 28% Google 44 USA Technology 19 10 Mukesh Ambani 45 73% Reliance 60 India Oil & Gas 20 0 Bertrand Puech & Family 41 41% Hermes 82 France Single Brand Retailing 20 78 Xu Jiayin 41 242% Evergrande 60 China Real Estate, Investments 22 3 Steve Ballmer 38 41% Microsoft 61 USA Technology 23 -3 Phil Knight 35 21% Nike 80 USA Footwear Retail 23 11 Sheldon Adelson 35 46% Las Vegas Sands 84 USA Casinos 25 9 Lee Shau Kee 34 42% Henderson Land 90 China Real Estate,Investments 26 -6 Jack Ma Yun & Family 32 10% Alibaba 54 China E-commerce, fintech 26 126 Yang Huiyan 32 268% Country Garden 37 China Real Estate 28 34 Francois Pinault & Family 31 107% Kering 81 France Multi Brand Retailing 28 -5 Jacqueline Mars 31 11% Mars 78 USA Food & Beverages 28 -5 John Mars 31 11% Mars 82 USA Food & Beverages 28 1 Jorge Paulo Lemann 31 19% 3G Capital 78 Switzerland Investments 32 20 Georg Schaeffler 30 76% Schaeffler Group 53 Germany Manufacturing 32 0 Li Ka-Shing 30 20% Cheung Kong 90 China Real Estate,Energy,Investments 34 73 He Xiangjian & He Jianfeng 29 164% Midea 76, 51China Home appliances 34 4 Maria Franca Fissolo 29 32% Ferrero Rocher 76 Monaco Food & Beverages 36 -17 Wang Jianlin & Family 27 -10% Wanda 64 China Real Estate 37 -12 Dieter Schwarz 26 -4% Schwarz Group 78 Germany Multi Brand Retailing 37 -3 James & Arthur Irving 26 8% Irving Group 89 Canada Energy 39 8 Leonardo Del Vecchio 25 39% Luxottica 82 Italy Luxury Goods 40 35 Elon Musk 24 71% Tesla Motors 46 USA Automobiles & Auto Components 40 16 Serge Dassault & Family 24 50% Dassault System 92 France Aviation 42 14 Michael Dell 23 44% Dell 53 USA Technology 42 -2 Paul Allen 23 10% Vulcan 65 USA Investments 42 -1 Susanne Klatten 23 15% BMW 55 Germany Automobiles & Auto Components 42 20 Thomas Peterffy 23 53% Interactive Brokers 73 USA Financial Services 46 -5 Carl Icahn 22 10% Icahn Enterprises 82 USA Investments 46 -21 Wang Wei 22 -19% SF Express 47 China Express delivery 48 14 Charoen Sirivadhanabhakdi 21 40% Thai Beverage 73 Thailand Food & Beverages 48 -1 Ding Lei 21 17% Netease 47 China IT, Entertainment 48 -11 Gérard Mulliez & Family 21 -9% Auchan 86 France Multi Brand Retailing 48 -16 Masayoshi Son 21 -16% Softbank 60 Japan Investments 48 -1 Stefan Quandt 21 17% BMW 51 Germany Automobiles & Auto Components 48 38 Takemitsu Takizaki 21 62% Keyence 72 Japan Technology 54 21 Alexey Mordashov 20 43% Severstal 52 Russia Steel 54 -7 Elaine Marshall & Family 20 11% Koch Industries 75 USA Investments 54 -10 Galen Weston & Family 20 5% George Weston 77 Canada Food & Beverages 54 -10 Leonard Blavatnik 20 5% Lyondellbasell 60 UK Energy 54 21 Li Yanhong & Ma Dongmin 20 43% Baidu 50, 48China TMT 59 -15 David Thomson & Family 19 0% Thomson Reuters 60 Canada Media 59 3 Henry Cheng Kar-Shun & Family 19 27% Chow Tai Fook 70 China Jewellery, Real Estate, Investments 59 27 Vladimir Lisin 19 46% Novolipetsk Steel 61 Russia Steel 59 3 Vladimir Potanin 19 27% Interros 57 Russia Steel 59 16 Yan Hao & Family 19 36% China Pacific Construction 32 China Roads 59 94 Zhang Zhidong 19 121% Tencent 46 China IT, Entertainment 65 -3 Hugh Grosvenor 18 20% Grosvenor 27 UK Real Estate 65 21 Joseph Lau Luen Hung 18 38% Chinese Estates 67 China Real Estate,Art Collection 65 21 Joseph Safra 18 38% Safra Bank 79 Brazil Banking 65 10 Lee Kun Hee 18 29% Samsung 76 South Korea Electronics 65 -9 Ray Dalio 18 13% Bridgewater Associates 68 USA Hedge Funds 65 10 Viktor Vekselberg 18 29% Renova 60 Russia Energy 65 -3 Yao Zhenhua 18 20% Baoneng 48 China Investments, Real estate 65 33 Lakshmi N Mittal 18 50% ArcelorMittal 67 UK Steel 73 -26 Donald Bren 17 -6% Irvine Company 85 USA Real Estate 73 76 Ernesto Bertarelli & Family 17 87% Serono 52 Switzerland Pharmaceuticals 73 -11 James Simons 17 13% Renaissance Technologies 79 USA Hedge Funds 73 -21 Khalifa Bin Zayed Al Nahyan & Family 17 0% SBK Holdings 70 UAE Energy 73 196 Li Shufu & Li Xingxing 17 198% Geely 55, 33China Car manufacturing 73 52 Lui Che Woo 17 70% Galaxy Entertainment 89 China Gaming 73 -11 Ronald Perelman 17 13% Scientific Game 75 USA Investments 80 18 Hans Rausing 16 33% Tetra Pak 91 UK Packaging 80 -18 Harold Hamm 16 7% Continental Resources 72 UK Energy 80 65 Lei Jun 16 72% Xiaomi 49 China Manufacturing 80 -18 Leonid Mikhelson 16 7% Novatek 62 Russia Energy 80 27 Marcel Herrmann Telles 16 45% 3G Capital 68 Brazil Investments 80 27 Zhang Jindong 16 45% Suning 55 China Retail 80 -24 Zong Qinghou & Family 16 0% Wahaha 73 China Drinks 87 20 Charlene Carvalho 15 36% Heineken 63 UK Food & Beverages 87 11 Dietrich Mateschitz 15 25% Red Bull 73 Austria Food & Beverages 87 -12 Dilip Shanghvi 15 7% Sun Pharma 62 India Pharmaceuticals 87 45 Dustin Moskovitz 15 52% Facebook 33 USA Technology 87 11 Eric Schmidt 15 25% Google 62 USA Technology 87 -1 Gennady Timchenko 15 15% Gunvor 65 Switzerland Energy 87 -25 Hassanal Bolkiah & Family 15 0% Brunei Investment Agency 71 Brunei Energy 87 97 James Ratcliffe 15 108% Ineos 65 UK Chemicals & Petrochemicals 87 56 Lucas Walton 15 60% Walmart 31 USA Multi Brand Retailing 87 0 Robert Kuok 15 15% Wilmar, Shangri La 94 China Palm Oil 87 -46 Stefan Persson 15 -25% Hennes & Mauritz 70 Sweden Single Brand Retailing 98 42 Aliko Dangote 14 46% Dangote Cement 60 Nigeria Cement 98 -42 Alwaleed Bin Talal Alsaud 14 -13% Kingdom Holding 62 Saudi Arabia Investments 98 -42 Charles Ergen 14 -13% Dish Networks 64 USA Entertainment 98 110 Gautam Adani 14 109% Adani Enterprises 55 India Diversified 98 27 Klaus-Michael Kuhne 14 40% Kuehne & Nagel 80 Switzerland Shipping 98 0 Lu Zhiqiang & Family 14 17% Oceanwide 66 China Real Estate 98 0 Rupert Murdoch 14 17% News Corp 86 USA Media 98 886 Seo Jung Jin 14 536% Celltrion 60 South Korea Pharmaceuticals 98 0 Shiv Nadar 14 17% HCL 72 India Software & Services 98 -12 Tadashi Yanai 14 8% Fast Retailing 69 Japan Multi Brand Retailing 108 -22 Alain Wertheimer 13 0% Chanel 69 France Single Brand Retailing 108 New Beate Heister 13,0 New Aldi Sued 66 Germany Retail 108 -22 Gerard Wertheimer 13 0% Chanel 67 USA Single Brand Retailing 108 197 Gong Hongjia & Chen Chunmei 13 145% Hikvision Digital Technology 53, 53 China Video surveillance products 108 -34 Iris Fontbona & Family 13 -24% Quinenco 75 Chile Mining 108 27 Jim Kennedy 13 34% Cox Enterprise 70 USA Media 108 -79 Karl Albrecht Jr & Family 13 -50% Aldi Sued 69 Germany Multi Brand Retailing 108 17 Kwong Siu Hing 13 30% Sun Hung Kai 89 China Real Estate 108 -1 Michael Otto & Family 13 18% Otto Group 74 Germany Multi Brand Retailing 108 45 Mikhail Fridman 13 51% Alfa 53 UK Energy 108 186 Pollyanna Chu Yuet Wah 13 141% Kingston Financial 60 China Investments 108 57 Reinhold Wurth & Family 13 65% Wurth Group 82 Germany Automobiles & Auto Components 108 New Sara Mota De Larrea 13 New Grupo Mexico - Mexico Conglomerate 108 -33 Stephen Schwarzman 13 -7% Blackstone 71 USA Investments 108 -33 Steve Cohen 13 -7% Sac Capital 61 USA Hedge Funds 108 -1 Vagit Alekperov 13 18% Lukoil 67 Russia Energy 108 122 Wang Wenxue 13 106% Fortune Land Development 50 China Real Estate 108 27 Wang Wenyin & Liu Jiehong 13 34% Amer 50 China Cable and copper products 108 37 Zhang Shiping & Family 13 40% Weiqiao Pioneering 72 China Textiles, aluminum 127 -41 Abigail Johnson 12 -8% Fidelity 56 USA Investments 127 374 Acharya Balakrishna 12 224% Patanjali Ayurved 45 India FMCG 127 8 Azim Premji 12 24% Wipro 72 India Software & Services 127 30 Carlos Alberto Sicupira 12 43% 3G Capital 69 Brazil Investments 127 -20 Cyrus Poonawalla 12 9% Serum 76 India Pharmaceuticals 127 -20 Donald Newhouse 12 9% Discovery Communication 88 USA Media 127 -52 Emilio Alves Odebrecht & Family 12 -14% Odebrecht 73 Brazil Petrochemical 127 -20 Gina Rinehart 12 9% Hancock Prospecting 63 Australia Mining 127 13 Hasso Plattner 12 25% SAP 74 Germany Software 127 63 Joseph Tsai Chung-Hsin 12 69% Alibaba 54 China TMT 127 66 Liu Qiangdong 12 71% JD 44 China TMT 127 -20 Massimiliana Landini Aleotti & Family 12 9% Menarini 74 Italy Pharmaceuticals 127 35 Mohammed Al Amoudi 12 48% Corral Petroleum 71 Saudi Arabia Energy 127 -2 Peter Woo Kwong-Ching & Pao Pui Yung 12 20% Wheelock 72 China Real Estate 127 -2 Petr Kellner 12 20% Ppf Group 53 Czech Republic Banking 127 -20 Philip Anschutz 12 9% Anschutz Entertainment 78 USA Entertainment 127 18 Pierre Castel 12 29% Castel Freres 91 Switzerland Food & Beverages 127 New Richard B Cohen 12 New C&S Wholesalers 65 USA Retail 127 -41 Stefano Pessina
Recommended publications
  • What's Next for Ukpound Shops?

    What's Next for Ukpound Shops?

    February 3, 2015 February 3, 2015 What’s Next For UK Pound Shops? Major UK pound shop chains have seen revenues surge in the post-recession years. The economic slump and the Woolworths failure paved the way for this segment’s rapid expansion of stores. With further expansion expected, we think the segment is looking increasingly crowded. Some players are now eying international markets in their bid for growth. DEBORAH WEINSWIG Executive Director–Head Global Retail & Technology Fung Business Intelligence Centre [email protected] New york: 646.839.7017 Fung Business Intelligence Centre (FBIC) publication: UK POUND SHOPS 1 Copyright © 2015 The Fung Group, All rights reserved. February 3, 2015 What’s Next For UK Pound Shops? THE POUND SHOP BOOM Variety-store retailers have proliferated rapidly in the UK, mirroring the store-expansion boom of discount grocery chains (notably Aldi and Lidl), as the low-price, no-frills formula has found particular resonance in Britain’s era of sluggish economic growth. This retail segment encompasses chains like Poundland, 99p Stores and Poundworld, which sell all of their products at fixed price points. Similar to the dollar chains Dollar General and Family Dollar in the US, everything in the pound stores sells for £1 (or 99p) and the goods are bought cheaply in bulk. The group also includes chains with more flexible pricing schemes. Those include B&M Bargains, Home Bargains and Poundstretcher. For both types of stores, the offerings are heavy on beauty and personal care, household fast-moving consumer goods (FMCGs) and food and beverages (particularly confectionery). Other categories typically include do-it-yourself (DIY) and automotive accessories, pet products and seasonal goods.
  • Shoen V. Shoen, 167 Ariz

    Shoen V. Shoen, 167 Ariz

    Shoen v. Shoen, 167 Ariz. 58, 804 P.2d 787 (Ariz. App., 1990) Page 787 804 P.2d 787 167 Ariz. 58, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,683 Samuel W. SHOEN, M.D.; Mary Anna Shoen-Eaton; Cecilia M. Shoen Hanlon; Katrina M. Shoen; Theresa M. Shoen; Leonard S. Shoen; and the following Arizona corporations: Samwill, Inc.; Cemar, Inc.; Kattydid, Inc.; Thermar, Inc.; and L.S.S., Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Edward J. SHOEN; Paul F. Shoen; James P. Shoen; Aubrey K. Johnson; William E. Carty; John M. Dodds; Gary B. Horton; Henry E. Martin; Harry B. DeShong, Jr.; Gary V. Klinefelter; Amerco, a Nevada corporation; Jim White I-X; John Does I-X; XYZ Corporations I-X; and ABC Partnerships I-X, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1 CA-CV 89-140. Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B. Sept. 18, 1990. Review Denied Feb. 20, 1991. Page 788 [167 Ariz. 59] Lesher & Borodkin, P.C. by [167 Ariz. 60] Robert O. Lesher, Tucson, Marvin Johnson, P.C. by Marvin Johnson, Phoenix, for plaintiffs- OPINION appellants. KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge. Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher by Dean J. Kitchens, Wayne W. Smith, Robert H. Fairbank, This case arises out of a struggle for control Gail E. Lees, Los Angeles, Cal., and Myers & of Amerco Corporation. It is an appeal from the Barnes by Stephen W. Myers, Phoenix, for trial court's denial of a preliminary injunction defendants-appellees Edward J. Shoen, Paul F. sought by a group of Amerco shareholders to Shoen, James P. Shoen, Aubrey K. Johnson, cancel the issuance of certain voting stock, to William E.
  • Prospectus Front and Back 2016

    Prospectus Front and Back 2016

    IMPORTANT NOTICE THE PROSPECTUS (THE “PROSPECTUS”) FOLLOWING THIS PAGE MAY ONLY BE DISTRIBUTED TO PERSONS WHO ARE EITHER (1) QUALIFIED INSTITUTIONAL BUYERS (“QIBs”) WITHIN THE MEANING OF RULE 144A (“RULE 144A”) UNDER THE U.S. SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 (THE “SECURITIES ACT”), OR (2) NON-U.S. PERSONS OUTSIDE THE UNITED STAT ES WITHIN THE MEANING OF REGULATION S (“REGULATION S”) UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT. IMPORTANT: You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to the Prospectus following this page, and you are therefore advised to read this carefully before reading, accessing or making any other use of this document. In accessing the Prospectus, you agree to be bound by the following terms and conditions, including any modifications to them any time you receive any information from us as a result of such access. RESTRICTIONS: NOTHING IN THIS ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION CONSTITUTES AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITAT ION OF AN OFFER TO BUY THE NOTES IN ANY JURISDICTION WHERE IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DO SO. ANY NOTE TO BE ISSUED HAS NOT BEEN AND WILL NOT BE REGISTERED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT, OR WITH ANY SECURITIES REGULATORY AUTHORITY OF ANY STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OR OTHER JURISDICTION. THE NOTES MAY NOT BE OFFERED, SOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY WITHIN THE UNITED STAT ES OR TO, OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OR BENEFIT OF, U.S. PERSONS (AS DEFINED IN REGULATION S) EXCEPT PURSUANT TO AN EXEMPTION FROM, OR IN A TRANSACTION NOT SUBJECT TO, THE REGISTRATION REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT AND APPLICABLE STATE OR LOCAL SECURITIES LAWS.
  • Notice of Designation of TJ Morris Limited Under the Groceries (Supply Chain Practices) Market Investigation Order 2009

    Notice of Designation of TJ Morris Limited Under the Groceries (Supply Chain Practices) Market Investigation Order 2009

    Notice of designation of TJ Morris Limited under the Groceries (Supply Chain Practices) Market Investigation Order 2009 3 September 2019 Introduction and background 1. The Competition Commission (CC) investigated the supply of groceries, following a reference from the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) in May 2006. On 30 April 2008 the final report was published and set out the CC’s findings from the investigation (CC Report). The CC found adverse effects on competition arising in several areas including the exercise of buyer power by certain grocery retailers with respect to their suppliers of groceries through the adoption of supply chain practices that transfer excessive risks and unexpected costs to those suppliers, impairing their willingness to invest or innovate. To address these concerns, the CC made the Groceries (Supply Chain Practices) Market Investigation Order 2009 (the Order). The Order imposes a series of obligations on ‘Designated Retailers’, including to comply with the Groceries Supply Code of Practice (GSCOP). 2. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) actively monitors and enforces the remedies within its remit, including the Order, and works closely with the Groceries Code Adjudicator (GCA).1 As part of this role, the CMA has considered the evidence available to it regarding whether there are additional retailers that should be designated under the Order and responded to requests in this area. 3. In October 2016, the Government launched a formal Call for Evidence to explore the case for extending the remit of the GCA. In February 2018, it published the response to the Call for Evidence, in which it made several changes that affect the sector, but did not extend the scope of the GCA.
  • 2007 Proxy Voting Report 3M Company Ticker Security ID: MMM

    2007 Proxy Voting Report 3M Company Ticker Security ID: MMM

    2007 Proxy Voting Report 3M Company Ticker Security ID: Meeting Date Meeting Status MMM CUSIP9 88579Y101 05/08/2007 Voted Issue Mgmt For/Agnst No. Description Proponent Rec Vote Cast Mgmt 1.1 Elect Linda Alvarado Mgmt For For For 1.2 Elect George Buckley Mgmt For For For 1.3 Elect Vance Coffman Mgmt For For For 1.4 Elect Michael Eskew Mgmt For For For 1.5 Elect W. James Farrell Mgmt For For For 1.6 Elect Herbert Henkel Mgmt For For For 1.7 Elect Edward Liddy Mgmt For For For 1.8 Elect Robert Morrison Mgmt For For For 1.9 Elect Aulana Peters Mgmt For For For 1.10 Elect Rozanne Ridgway Mgmt For For For 2 Ratification of Auditor Mgmt For For For Amendment to Eliminate Supermajority 3 Voting Requirements Mgmt For For For Amendment to Eliminate Fair-Price 4 Provision Mgmt For For For 5 Executive Annual Incentive Plan Mgmt For For For Approve Material Terms of 6 Performance Unit Plan Mgmt For For For Shareholder Proposal Regarding Pay- 7 for-Superior-Performance ShrHoldr Against Against For Abbott Laboratories Inc Ticker Security ID: Meeting Date Meeting Status ABT CUSIP9 002824100 04/27/2007 Voted Issue Mgmt For/Agnst No. Description Proponent Rec Vote Cast Mgmt 1.1 Elect Roxanne Austin Mgmt For For For 1.2 Elect William Daley Mgmt For For For 1.3 Elect W. James Farrell Mgmt For For For 1.4 Elect H. Laurance Fuller Mgmt For For For 1.5 Elect Richard Gonzalez Mgmt For For For 1.6 Elect David Owen Mgmt For For For 1.7 Elect Boone Powell, Jr.
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN

    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
  • Representations of Cities in Republican-Era Chinese Literature

    Representations of Cities in Republican-Era Chinese Literature

    Representations of Cities in Republican-era Chinese Literature Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Hao Zhou, B.A. Graduate Program in East Asian Languages and Literatures The Ohio State University 2010 Thesis Committee: Kirk A. Denton, Advisor Heather Inwood Copyright by Hao Zhou 2010 Abstract The present study serves to explore the relationships between cities and literature by addressing the issues of space, time, and modernity in four works of fiction, Lao She’s Luotuo xiangzi (Camel Xiangzi, aka Rickshaw Boy), Mao Dun’s Ziye (Midnight), Ba Jin’s Han ye (Cold nights), and Zhang Ailing’s Qingcheng zhi lian (Love in a fallen city), and the four cities they depict, namely Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing, and Hong Kong, respectively. In this thesis I analyze the depictions of the cities in the four works, and situate them in their historical and geographical contexts to examine the characteristics of each city as represented in the novels. In studying urban space in the literary texts, I try to address issues of the “imaginablity” of cities to question how physical urban space intertwines with the characters’ perception and imagination about the cities and their own psychological activities. These works are about the characters, the plots, or war in the first half of the twentieth century; they are also about cities, the human experience in urban space, and their understanding or reaction about the urban space. The experience of cities in Republican era fiction is a novel one, one associated with a new modern historical consciousness.
  • WIC Template 13/9/16 11:52 Am Page IFC1

    WIC Template 13/9/16 11:52 Am Page IFC1

    In a little over 35 years China’s economy has been transformed Week in China from an inefficient backwater to the second largest in the world. If you want to understand how that happened, you need to understand the people who helped reshape the Chinese business landscape. china’s tycoons China’s Tycoons is a book about highly successful Chinese profiles of entrepreneurs. In 150 easy-to- digest profiles, we tell their stories: where they came from, how they started, the big break that earned them their first millions, and why they came to dominate their industries and make billions. These are tales of entrepreneurship, risk-taking and hard work that differ greatly from anything you’ll top business have read before. 150 leaders fourth Edition Week in China “THIS IS STILL THE ASIAN CENTURY AND CHINA IS STILL THE KEY PLAYER.” Peter Wong – Deputy Chairman and Chief Executive, Asia-Pacific, HSBC Does your bank really understand China Growth? With over 150 years of on-the-ground experience, HSBC has the depth of knowledge and expertise to help your business realise the opportunity. Tap into China’s potential at www.hsbc.com/rmb Issued by HSBC Holdings plc. Cyan 611469_6006571 HSBC 280.00 x 170.00 mm Magenta Yellow HSBC RMB Press Ads 280.00 x 170.00 mm Black xpath_unresolved Tom Fryer 16/06/2016 18:41 [email protected] ${Market} ${Revision Number} 0 Title Page.qxp_Layout 1 13/9/16 6:36 pm Page 1 china’s tycoons profiles of 150top business leaders fourth Edition Week in China 0 Welcome Note.FIN.qxp_Layout 1 13/9/16 3:10 pm Page 2 Week in China China’s Tycoons Foreword By Stuart Gulliver, Group Chief Executive, HSBC Holdings alking around the streets of Chengdu on a balmy evening in the mid-1980s, it quickly became apparent that the people of this city had an energy and drive Wthat jarred with the West’s perception of work and life in China.
  • (Public Section) Padma Awards Directory (1954-2009) Year-Wise List Sl

    (Public Section) Padma Awards Directory (1954-2009) Year-Wise List Sl

    MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS (Public Section) Padma Awards Directory (1954-2009) Year-Wise List Sl. Prefix First Name Last Name Award State Field Remarks 1954 1 Dr. Sarvapalli Radhakrishnan BR TN Public Affairs Expired 2 Shri Chakravarti Rajagopalachari BR TN Public Affairs Expired 3 Dr. Chandrasekhara Raman BR TN Science & Eng. Expired Venkata 4 Shri Nand Lal Bose PV WB Art Expired 5 Dr. Satyendra Nath Bose PV WB Litt. & Edu. 6 Dr. Zakir Hussain PV AP Public Affairs Expired 7 Shri B.G. Kher PV MAH Public Affairs Expired 8 Shri V.K. Krishna Menon PV KER Public Affairs Expired 9 Shri Jigme Dorji Wangchuk PV BHU Public Affairs 10 Dr. Homi Jehangir Bhabha PB MAH Science & Eng. Expired 11 Dr. Shanti Swarup Bhatnagar PB UP Science & Eng. Expired 12 Shri Mahadeva Iyer Ganapati PB OR Civil Service 13 Dr. J.C. Ghosh PB WB Science & Eng. Expired 14 Shri Maithilisharan Gupta PB UP Litt. & Edu. Expired 15 Shri Radha Krishan Gupta PB DEL Civil Service Expired 16 Shri R.R. Handa PB PUN Civil Service Expired 17 Shri Amar Nath Jha PB UP Litt. & Edu. Expired 18 Shri Malihabadi Josh PB DEL Litt. & Edu. 19 Dr. Ajudhia Nath Khosla PB DEL Science & Eng. Expired 20 Shri K.S. Krishnan PB TN Science & Eng. Expired 21 Shri Moulana Hussain Madni PB PUN Litt. & Edu. Ahmed 22 Shri V.L. Mehta PB GUJ Public Affairs Expired 23 Shri Vallathol Narayana Menon PB KER Litt. & Edu. Expired Wednesday, July 22, 2009 Page 1 of 133 Sl. Prefix First Name Last Name Award State Field Remarks 24 Dr.
  • Coming Back Home After the Sun Rises: Returnee Entrepreneurs and Growth of High Tech Industries

    Coming Back Home After the Sun Rises: Returnee Entrepreneurs and Growth of High Tech Industries

    G Model RESPOL-2772; No. of Pages 17 ARTICLE IN PRESS Research Policy xxx (2012) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Research Policy jou rnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/respol Coming back home after the sun rises: Returnee entrepreneurs and growth of high tech industries a,b c,∗ d Martin Kenney , Dan Breznitz , Michael Murphree a Department of Human and Community Development, University of California, Davis, United States b Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, United States c The Scheller College of Business, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States d Sam Nunn School of International Affairs, Georgia Institute of Technology, United States a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Recently, the role of returnees in the economic development of various East Asian nations has received Received 6 November 2011 much attention. The early literature on the relocation of the most highly trained individuals from a devel- Received in revised form 30 July 2012 oping nation to a developed nation viewed the phenomena as a “brain drain.” Since the 1990s, a new Accepted 4 August 2012 strand of thinking has suggested that for developing nations this was actually a positive phenomenon; as Available online xxx these expatriates studied and then worked abroad, they absorbed technical expertise, managerial, and entrepreneurial skills. These theories stipulated that these expatriates then returned home, and ignited Keywords: a virtuous circle of technological entrepreneurship leading to rapid economic development. Much of this High skilled immigrants Innovation literature gives returnees a critical role in the home country’s take-off period of the local information and communications technology (ICT) industry.
  • NHL MEDIA DIRECTORY 2012-13 TABLE of CONTENTS Page Page NHL DIRECTORY NHL MEDIA NHL Offices

    NHL MEDIA DIRECTORY 2012-13 TABLE of CONTENTS Page Page NHL DIRECTORY NHL MEDIA NHL Offices

    NHL MEDIA DIRECTORY 2012-13 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE PAGE NHL DIRECTORY NHL MEDIA NHL Offices ...........................................3 NHL.com ...............................................9 NHL Executive .......................................4 NHL Network .......................................10 NHL Communications ............................4 NHL Studios ........................................11 NHL Green ............................................6 NHL MEDIA RESOURCES .................. 12 NHL MEMBER CLUBS Anaheim Ducks ...................................19 HOCKEY ORGANIZATIONS Boston Bruins ......................................25 Hockey Canada .................................248 Buffalo Sabres .....................................32 Hockey Hall of Fame .........................249 Calgary Flames ...................................39 NHL Alumni Association ........................7 Carolina Hurricanes .............................45 NHL Broadcasters’ Association .........252 Chicago Blackhawks ...........................51 NHL Players’ Association ....................16 Colorado Avalanche ............................56 Professional Hockey Writers’ Columbus Blue Jackets .......................64 Association ...................................251 Dallas Stars .........................................70 U.S. Hockey Hall of Fame Museum ..249 Detroit Red Wings ...............................76 USA Hockey Inc. ...............................250 Edmonton Oilers ..................................83 NHL STATISTICAL CONSULTANT Florida
  • Jpmorgan Chase London Whale D: Risk-Management Practices

    Jpmorgan Chase London Whale D: Risk-Management Practices

    The Journal of Financial Crises Volume 1 Issue 2 2019 JPMorgan Chase London Whale D: Risk-Management Practices Arwin G. Zeissler Yale University Andrew Metrick Yale University Follow this and additional works at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/journal-of-financial-crises Part of the Accounting Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics Commons, Business Organizations Law Commons, Corporate Finance Commons, Finance Commons, Organizational Behavior and Theory Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Recommended Citation Zeissler, Arwin G. and Metrick, Andrew (2019) "JPMorgan Chase London Whale D: Risk-Management Practices," The Journal of Financial Crises: Vol. 1 : Iss. 2, 92-102. Available at: https://elischolar.library.yale.edu/journal-of-financial-crises/vol1/iss2/5 This Case Study is brought to you for free and open access by the Journal of Financial Crises and EliScholar – A Digital Platform for Scholarly Publishing at Yale. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JPMorgan Chase London Whale D: Risk-Management Practices1 Arwin G. Zeissler2 Andrew Metrick3 Yale Program on Financial Stability Case Study 2014-2d-V1 December 1, 2014, Revised: July 20, 2015 Abstract JPMorgan Chase (JPM) prided itself on having the best risk-management practices in the financial industry, having survived the 2007-09 financial crisis in better shape than many competitors. Chief Executive Officer Jamie Dimon often spoke of the bank’s “fortress balance sheet.” A keen focus on risk management is vital to JPM’s longevity, as is the case with all highly leveraged financial institutions.