Foreword Ninety Years and Growing: How Birdlife Went from a Council of Experts to Everybody’S Global Partnership

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Foreword Ninety Years and Growing: How Birdlife Went from a Council of Experts to Everybody’S Global Partnership Foreword Ninety years and growing: how BirdLife went from a council of experts to everybody’s global Partnership Presentation by Peter J. Schei The years 2012 and 2013 mark important anniversaries in the history of bird conser- vation. Ninety years ago, in 1922, BirdLife International, then under the name of the International Committee for Bird Preservation (ICBP) was founded, creating the first truly global conservation organisation. 1992 saw the publication of the first volume of the Handbook of the Birds of the World, which 20 years later has grown into the first work ever to illustrate and describe in detail all the living species of birds, and also the first to present every member of an entire Class of the Animal Kingdom. The year 2013 will be the twentieth year of the BirdLife Partnership, which in 1993 sprang from the foundations laid by the ICBP. Millions of people all over the world have a special relationship with birds. Birds are actors in many fairy tales and embedded in culture and religion as omens, symbols and mythical creatures that can bring peace, good or bad luck, or even bring the Holy Spirit down to Earth. They are important elements of lives and livelihoods, and remain crucial links between man and nature in those parts of the world that are rapidly losing this contact today. They are increasingly important as entry points to understanding that our own species is mistreating our precious planet with accelerating speed. In 1883, the first organisation of concerned citizens was established to work for the protection of birds and nature in the broader context. This was the Bombay Natu- ral History Society in what is now Mumbai, India. The world’s largest national bird organisation, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, was established in the UK in 1889, but it was not until 1922 that the first global organisation appeared, when the International Committee for Bird Preservation was formally established in London. This was renamed the International Council for Bird Preservation in 1959. In 1993, the whole organisation was totally transformed, and BirdLife International, as we know it today, emerged. BirdLife is today a true global conservation organisation. We are a Partnership with national representatives in 116 countries and territories, and activities and influ- ence on a planetary scale. The total number of personal members and supporters of the Partnership is around 10 million, constituting the largest force for nature conservation in the world. About half the Partner organisations have a broader conservation target than birds alone. Today linked human well-being is understood to be fundamental for achieving biodiversity and bird conservation objectives and is therefore an essential part of BirdLife’s strategy. Ninety years after the creation of BirdLife’s predecessor, the need for biodiversity and bird conservation is greater than ever. The governments of the world seem to be unable to establish and implement sustainable management of nature, and the threats to biodiversity get worse by the year. Although we can note many successes due to BirdLife’s efforts through the years, the number of bird species being added to the IUCN Red List of threatened species continues to grow, and the Red List Index shows that there has been a steady and continuing deterioration in the conservation status of the world’s birds since 1988, when the first complete global assessment was carried out. Of the more than 10,000 bird species recognised, 1313 are threatened with extinc- tion, and a further 880 are listed as Near Threatened. BirdLife has for many years been the world authority on birds and their conserva- tion status, and puts great emphasis on scientific credibility in all its work. We are therefore highly respected among governments, which in many cases are dependent on information from the Partnership in their management of nature. Constructive col- laboration with governments, but also sharp criticisms when necessary, are strong characteristics of BirdLife work. BirdLife also enters relationships with businesses whose activities have a great impact on nature, like CEMEX and Rio Tinto, in order to find constructive solutions, but without compromising the public and open promotion of best environmental practice. The global work of BirdLife is focused around nine conservation programmes: Preventing Extinctions; Seabirds and Marine Conservation; Migratory Birds and Chinese Crested Tern Flyways; Important Bird Areas (IBAs); Forests of Hope; Climate Change; the Local Thalasseus bernsteini Empowerment Programme; Capacity Development; and Invasive Alien Species. The [by Chris Rose] Partnership’s regional and national strategies and programmes to a large extent follow 16 HANDBOOK OF THE BIRDS OF THE WORLD these, but are of course adapted to the challenges and circumstances found in those regions and countries. One of BirdLife’s most successful programmes has been its work on IBAs, and to- day more than 11,000 IBAs are registered all over the world. Of these, approximately half are covered by formal legal protection, and there is a lot of lobbying and hard work still to do by the whole Partnership. Another success of the BirdLife Partnership has been to establish Local Conservation Groups to look after and monitor the IBAs. To engage local people in practical conservation work, and to introduce them to nature education through birds and bird behaviour, has also been key to the work of BirdLife and its network of dedicated, active Partners. For many years, BirdLife has had close cooperation with the Handbook of the Birds of the World, and as this monumental work now is close to being finalised, I would like to express the Partnership’s great appreciation and thanks to Josep del Hoyo and his team at Lynx Edicions for their remarkable efforts and achievement. When I bought the first volume in 1992, I was extremely impressed, and my admira- tion has grown with each volume. The Handbook of the Birds of the World is a mar- vellous treasure for everyone interested in birds and nature, and I am convinced that this unprecedented work will contribute greatly to the understanding and conservation of this fantastic class of organisms. To save the bird species of the world you need to appeal both to the brain and the heart. HBW indeed has this double appeal! Peter J. Schei Chair of the BirdLife International Council The world’s largest civil society Partnership for nature BirdLife International is a global Partnership of national civil society conservation organisations that work together across national boundaries, to address the increas- ingly globalised issues that affect biodiversity, especially birds, and the ecosystems that all life, including human life, depends on. Since 1993, when it evolved out of the International Council for Bird Preservation, BirdLife has grown into an impressive coalition of 117 Partners worldwide. Many other organisations, nurtured and some- times founded by BirdLife, are working to meet the criteria to join the Partnership. From large countries like the USA and Brazil to small and remote Pacific island states, the BirdLife Partnership can count on 2·7 million active members, 10 million supporters, 7000 staff, 2000-plus Local Conservation Groups and 250,000 volunteers around the world. Each Partner is an independent not-for-profit, non-governmental or- ganisation (NGO), and each maintains its individual national identity within the global Partnership. Many are well-known and highly respected organisations in their own right. There are four distinct characteristics that set the BirdLife Partnership apart from all other international conservation organisations: • “Local to Global” structure with coordinated on-the-ground action. Partners represent the concerns of the citizens of their country. This enhances the credibility and legitimacy of each Partner when working with the private and public sectors and international organisations. While Partners act locally, they are also united by the shared BirdLife vision, strategies, and programmes, and high performance stand- ards they have jointly developed as part of the Partnership. These are coordinated by the Global Secretariat which allows the Partnership to speak with one voice and influence international policies and agreements. Through this unique “local to global” structure and approach, BirdLife ensures that the international programmes are informed by on-the-ground experience and that local action is supported by international advocacy efforts. This not only results in high conservation impact but crucially also in long-term sustainability. • Science-driven policy and action. Because of its scientific rigour, innovative methodologies, and the depth and breadth of its data resources, BirdLife is the ac- knowledged authority on the world’s birds and bird conservation. Continuous on- the-ground observation by thousands of BirdLife Partner staff, supporters, members and volunteers, both professionals and “citizen scientists”, guarantees the most ac- curate and up-to-the-minute information about the condition of birds and nature even in remote parts of the globe. • Work with local communities. The Partnership strongly believes that working with local communities and local empowerment are the foundations of lasting, high-impact nature conservation achievements. This includes the recognition that conservation has to enhance human well-being tangibly in order to be fully em- braced by local people. Projects parachuted in from abroad, often short-term in nature, are unlikely to produce any lasting impact, and run the risk of undermining relationships with local people. BirdLife Partners are very well positioned to engage with local communities in their countries. • Very cost-effective conservation action. One major conservation organisation that knows the Partnership well calls BirdLife “the best bang for buck in the conservation world”. This efficiency is a result of the cost-effectiveness of the Partners as well as the Partnership’s coordinated efforts and the sharing of best practices and experience. These four distinct characteristics are combined with the Partners’ passion for the future of nature and humankind.
Recommended publications
  • Distribution, Natural History and Conservation Status of Two
    Bird Conservation International (2008) 18:331–348. ª BirdLife International 2008 doi:10.1017/S0959270908007491 Printed in the United Kingdom Distribution, natural history and conservation status of two endemics of the Bolivian Yungas, Bolivian Recurvebill Simoxenops striatus and Yungas Antwren Myrmotherula grisea SEBASTIAN K. HERZOG, A. BENNETT HENNESSEY, MICHAEL KESSLER and VI´CTOR H. GARCI´A-SOLI´Z Summary Since their description in the first half of the 20th century by M. A. Carriker, Bolivian Recurvebill Simoxenops striatus and Yungas Antwren Myrmotherula grisea have been regarded as extremely poorly known endemics of the Bolivian Yungas and adjacent humid foothill forests. They are considered ‘Vulnerable’ under the IUCN criteria of small population, predicted population decline (criterion C2a) and, in the case of Bolivian Recurvebill, small extent of occurrence (criteria B1a+b). Here we summarise the information published to date and present extensive new data on the distribution (including the first records for extreme southeast Peru), natural history, population size and conservation status of both species based on field work in the Bolivian Andes over the past 12 years. Both species primarily inhabit the understorey of primary and mid-aged to older regenerating forest and regularly join mixed-species foraging flocks of insectivorous birds. Bolivian Recurvebill has a strong preference for Guadua bamboo, but it is not an obligate bamboo specialist and persists at often much lower densities in forests without Guadua. Yungas Antwren seems to have a preference for dense, structurally complex under- storey, often with Chusquea bamboo. Both species are distributed much more continuously at altitudes of mostly 600–1,500 m, occupy a greater variety of forest types (wet, humid, semi- deciduous forest) and have a much greater population size than previously thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone Rockfowl and Upper Guinea Specials 21St February to 7Th March 2022 (15 Days)
    Sierra Leone Rockfowl and Upper Guinea Specials 21st February to 7th March 2022 (15 days) White-necked Rockfowl by Adam Riley RBL Sierra Leone Itinerary 2 Sierra Leone is a core West African destination, offering visitors a diverse range of exciting Upper Guinea forest birds and mammals. Rockjumper pioneered this tour during reconnaissance trips in 2005 and then led three successful tours in the course of 2006; these being the first-ever birding tours to the country. Sierra Leone’s biologically rich rainforests support no less than 15 of the 16 Upper Guinea endemic bird species, including the fabled White-necked Rockfowl that will form the basis of our tour. Forest specialties abound and we will focus on finding the rare Gola Malimbe, Sierra Leone Prinia, Black-headed Rufous Warbler, Hartlaub’s Duck, Brown-cheeked Hornbill, Sharpe’s Apalis, Kemp’s Longbill, White-breasted Guineafowl and Red-cheeked Wattle-eye; while the wooded savannas are home to the stunning Emerald Starling, Crimson Seedcracker and Turati’s Boubou, to name but a few. THE TOUR AT A GLANCE… THE ITINERARY Day 1 Arrival in Freetown Day 2 Freetown and Western Peninsula Forest Reserve Day 3 Regent Forest and transfer to Tiwai Island Day 4 Tiwai Island Day 5 Tiwai Island to Kenema Day 6 Kenema to Lalehun and walk in to Gola North (Tourist Camp) Day 7 Gola North (Tourist Camp) Day 8 Gola North to Lalehun and transfer to Kenema Day 9 Kenema to Koidu Day 10 Koidu to Loma Mountains and walk to camp 1 Day 11 Loma Mountains – camp 1 Day 12 Loma Mountains – camp 1 to Koidu Day 13 Koidu to Makeni via Bumbuna area Day 14 Bumbuna area Day 15 Makeni to Lungi International airport and departure RBL Sierra Leone Itinerary 3 TOUR MAP… THE TOUR IN DETAIL… Day 1: Arrival in Freetown.
    [Show full text]
  • Northeast Brazil Supreme Tour 28 Days
    (Ceará, Bahia, Alagoas, Pernambuco, Sergipe, Tocantins, Goiás, Minas Gerais) Guide: To Be Defined… Day Location (state) Comments 1 Fortaleza – Icapuí (200Km) Arrival and transfer. 2 Icapuí – Quixadá (240Km) AM Birding and transfer 3 Quixadá – Guaramiranga (120Km) AM Birding. Transfer. PM Birding. 4 Guaramiranga – Sobral (250Km) AM Birding. Transfer. PM Birding. 5 Sobral – Potengi (520Km) AM Birding and transfer. 6 Potengi – Crato – Canudos (430Km) Transfer. AM Birding. Transfer. 7 Canudos – União dos Palmares (500Km) AM Birding and transfer. 8 Murici Full Day Birding. 9 U. Palmares – Jaqueira - Tamandaré (200Km) AM Birding. Transfer. PM Birding. 10 Tamandaré – Estância (500Km) Transfer and PM Birding. 11 Estância – Lençóis (540Km) AM Birding and transfer. 12 Chapada Diamantina Full Day Birding. 13 Lençóis – Barreiras (470KmKm) AM Birding and transfer. 14 Barreiras – São Desidério – Palmas (580Km) AM Birding and transfer. 15 Palmas – Miranorte – Pium (300Km) AM Birding and transfer. 16 Canguçu Research Center (Pium) Full Day Birding. 17 Pium – São Domingos (700Km) Transfer and PM Birding. 18 São Domingos – Januária (600Km) AM Birding and transfer. 19 Januária – Botumirim (370Km) AM Birding and transfer. 20 Botumirim Full Day Birding. 21 Botumirim – Boa Nova (600Km) Transfer and PM Birding. 22 Boa Nova Full Day Birding. 23 Boa Nova – Itacaré (200Km) AM Birding and transfer. 24 Itacaré – Camacan (200Km) AM Birding and transfer. 25 Serra Bonita Reserve (Camacan) Full Day Birding. 26 Camacan – Porto Seguro (220Km) AM Birding and transfer. 27 Porto Seguro Full Day Birding. 28 Departure Departure Suggested period: From September to January Fortaleza (A), Icapuí (B), Quixadá (C) Guaramiranga (D), Sobral (E), Potengi (F), Crato (G), Canudos (H), União dos Palmares (I), Tamandaré (J), Estância (K), Lençóis (L), Barreiras (M), São Desidério (N), Palmas (O), Miranorte (P), Pium (Q), São Domingos (R), Januária (S), Botumirim (T), Boa Nova (U), Itacaré (V) , Camacan (W), Porto Seguro (X).
    [Show full text]
  • Download TRI News Vol 10 No 1
    TROPICAL RESOURCES INSTITUTE Spring 1991 Volume 10, Number 1 DEFORESTATION: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE and the general citizenry. William R. Bentley, Director The specifics in tropical nations are not the same, but the broad issues are. Similar social processes and time periods Tropical deforestation continues to attract the attention of the to our own experience are required to resolve specific Western press and television. The subject is visual and problems. Most of the leadership and solutions must come vivid. Many North American and European environmental from people in tropical nations. Advice from outsiders will organizations have capitalized on this visual appeal by be resisted, and western money may do as much harm as asking for funds and political support. Concerned citizens in good. developed nations feel they understand the basics, and they will save the tropical forests from greed and destruction. Conservation, at its heart, has always been an argument about equity. The obvious argument is between today's But do they understand? I am concerned that we have generation and future generations. The less obvious argu­ simplified the problems in our mass appeals. Also, I fear ments are between rich and poor. Who will pay and who most Westerners are ignoring their own historical experience will benefit are central questions of conservation policy. with deforestation. Our planet will be a sustainable system when local people The problems are not simple. Deforestation is not simply the see their advantage in conserving forests and other natural story of greedy capitalists mining a society's natural heritage. resources. Telling people how to use their resources for our Nor is deforestation the story of poor people destroying the benefit is a futile effort.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Molecular Tools to Guide Management of Invasive Alien
    Diversity and Distributions, (Diversity Distrib.) (2015) 1–14 BIODIVERSITY Using molecular tools to guide RESEARCH management of invasive alien species: assessing the genetic impact of a recently introduced island bird population J. van de Crommenacker1,2*, Y. X. C. Bourgeois3, B. H. Warren4, H. Jackson2, F. Fleischer-Dogley1, J. Groombridge2 and N. Bunbury1 1Seychelles Islands Foundation, La Ciotat ABSTRACT Building, Mont Fleuri, Mahe, Victoria, Aim Biological invasions are a major threat to island biodiversity and are Seychelles, 2Durrell Institute of Conservation responsible for a large proportion of species declines and extinctions world- and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, wide. The process of hybridization between invasive and native species is a Marlowe Building, Canterbury, Kent, UK, major factor that contributes to the loss of endemic genetic diversity. The issue 3Zoologisches Institut, Evolutionsbiologie, of hybridization is often overlooked in the management of introduced species A Journal of Conservation Biogeography University of Basel, Vesalgasse 1, 4051 Basel, because morphological evidence of hybridization may be difficult to recognize Switzerland, 4Institute of Systematic Botany, in the field. Molecular techniques, however, facilitate identification of specific University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, hybridization events and assessment of the direction and timing of introgres- 8008 Zurich, Switzerland sion. We use molecular markers to track hybridization in a population of an island endemic bird, the Aldabra fody (Foudia aldabrana), following the recent discovery of a co-occurring population of non-native Madagascar fodies (Foudia madagascariensis). Location Aldabra Atoll, Seychelles. Methods We combine phylogenetic analyses of mitochondrial and nuclear markers to assess whether hybridization has occurred between F.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Multilocus Phylogeny of the Neotropical Cotingas
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 81 (2014) 120–136 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A comprehensive multilocus phylogeny of the Neotropical cotingas (Cotingidae, Aves) with a comparative evolutionary analysis of breeding system and plumage dimorphism and a revised phylogenetic classification ⇑ Jacob S. Berv 1, Richard O. Prum Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology and Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208105, New Haven, CT 06520, USA article info abstract Article history: The Neotropical cotingas (Cotingidae: Aves) are a group of passerine birds that are characterized by Received 18 April 2014 extreme diversity in morphology, ecology, breeding system, and behavior. Here, we present a compre- Revised 24 July 2014 hensive phylogeny of the Neotropical cotingas based on six nuclear and mitochondrial loci (7500 bp) Accepted 6 September 2014 for a sample of 61 cotinga species in all 25 genera, and 22 species of suboscine outgroups. Our taxon sam- Available online 16 September 2014 ple more than doubles the number of cotinga species studied in previous analyses, and allows us to test the monophyly of the cotingas as well as their intrageneric relationships with high resolution. We ana- Keywords: lyze our genetic data using a Bayesian species tree method, and concatenated Bayesian and maximum Phylogenetics likelihood methods, and present a highly supported phylogenetic hypothesis. We confirm the monophyly Bayesian inference Species-tree of the cotingas, and present the first phylogenetic evidence for the relationships of Phibalura flavirostris as Sexual selection the sister group to Ampelion and Doliornis, and the paraphyly of Lipaugus with respect to Tijuca.
    [Show full text]
  • Disaggregation of Bird Families Listed on Cms Appendix Ii
    Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals 2nd Meeting of the Sessional Committee of the CMS Scientific Council (ScC-SC2) Bonn, Germany, 10 – 14 July 2017 UNEP/CMS/ScC-SC2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II (Prepared by the Appointed Councillors for Birds) Summary: The first meeting of the Sessional Committee of the Scientific Council identified the adoption of a new standard reference for avian taxonomy as an opportunity to disaggregate the higher-level taxa listed on Appendix II and to identify those that are considered to be migratory species and that have an unfavourable conservation status. The current paper presents an initial analysis of the higher-level disaggregation using the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World Volumes 1 and 2 taxonomy, and identifies the challenges in completing the analysis to identify all of the migratory species and the corresponding Range States. The document has been prepared by the COP Appointed Scientific Councilors for Birds. This is a supplementary paper to COP document UNEP/CMS/COP12/Doc.25.3 on Taxonomy and Nomenclature UNEP/CMS/ScC-Sc2/Inf.3 DISAGGREGATION OF BIRD FAMILIES LISTED ON CMS APPENDIX II 1. Through Resolution 11.19, the Conference of Parties adopted as the standard reference for bird taxonomy and nomenclature for Non-Passerine species the Handbook of the Birds of the World/BirdLife International Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, Volume 1: Non-Passerines, by Josep del Hoyo and Nigel J. Collar (2014); 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Action Plan for the Azores Bullfinch Pyrrhula Murina in the European Union (2009 - 2019)
    Species Action Plan for the Azores bullfinch Pyrrhula murina in the European Union (2009 - 2019) Prepared by: On behalf of the European Commission Species action plan for the Azores bullfinch Pyrrhula murina in the European Union The present action plan was commissioned by the European Commission and prepared by BirdLife International as subcontractor to the “N2K Group” in the frame of Service Contract N#070307/2007/488316/SER/B2 “Technical and scientific support in relation to the implementation of the 92/43 ‘Habitats’ and 79/409 ‘Birds’ Directives”. Compilers Joaquim Teodósio, SPEA, [email protected] Ricardo Ceia, [email protected] Luis Costa, SPEA, [email protected] List of Contributors Boris Barov, BirdLife International Nelson Santos DRA Rui Botelho SPEA Frederico Cardigos DRA, Hugo Laborda SPEA Catarina Quintela DRRF Jaime Ramos IMAR/Univ. de Coim- Sheila da Luz Univ. De Açores bra Paulo Cabral CMN Carlos Silva SPEA Filipe Figueiredo SPEA Sérgio Timóteo Univ. de Coim- Miguel Ferreira SPR Açores bra/SPEA Carlos Pato DRT Ruben Heleno Bristol University José Pedro Tavares RSPB Milestones in the Production of the Plan First SAP was adopted by the EU in 1996 Two evaluations of the implementation were made (2001 and 2004) 28 - 30 January 2009, Workshop LIFE Laurissilva Sustentável/ Priolo SAP, Nordeste 26 May 2009, scientific meeting on the SAP, Lisboa First draft submitted to EC: 30 June 2009 Second draft submitted to EC: 01 November 2009 Consultation workshop with main stakeholders, Ponta Delgada: 17 November 2009 Final draft: 31 January 2010 International Species Working Group n/a Reviews This Action Plan should be reviewed and updated every ten years (first review in 2019).
    [Show full text]
  • Forests of Hope Site - Gola Rainforest National Park, Sierra Leone
    Search Forests of Hope site - Gola Rainforest National Park, Sierra Leone A river in Gola Forest, RSPB photos Site name: Gola Rainforest National Park Country: Sierra Leone Location: Kailahun, Kenema and Pujehun Districts, SE Sierra Leone Site area: Over 70,000 ha National Park, and its surroundings Partners: Conservation Society of Sierra Leone (national partner); working in Partnership with RSPB (BirdLife in UK) and the Forestry Division of the Government of Sierra Leone, This site is part of a block of forests that extends into Liberia , with significant and coordinated activity by the BirdLife Partnership in both countries. For more information on Gola Forest region in Sierra Leone visit www.golarainforest.org Values of the site The project area covers a 110 km stretch of land within seven Gola Forest chiefdoms. The importance of these forests as a timber reserve has been recognised for over 100 years, with Forest Reserves first declared in 1926–1930 and extended in the 1950s to over 70,000 hectares. The Gola Forest is a remnant of the Upper Guinea Forest of West Africa, one of the 25 biodiversity hotspots identified by Conservation International, and a major Endemic Bird Area. Gola is home to over 330 bird species, and is one of the few areas that holds an almost complete selection of the endemic birds of the Upper Guinea Forests, including several bird species of conservation concern. It is one of the last strongholds for the Endangered Gola Malimbe Malimbus ballmanni, whose numbers have dwindled to an estimated 6,000–15,000 individuals, and is also important for the Vulnerable (and extraordinary) White-necked Picathartes Picathartes gymnocephalus and White-breasted Guineafowl Agelastes meleagrides.
    [Show full text]
  • Tinamiformes – Falconiformes
    LIST OF THE 2,008 BIRD SPECIES (WITH SCIENTIFIC AND ENGLISH NAMES) KNOWN FROM THE A.O.U. CHECK-LIST AREA. Notes: "(A)" = accidental/casualin A.O.U. area; "(H)" -- recordedin A.O.U. area only from Hawaii; "(I)" = introducedinto A.O.U. area; "(N)" = has not bred in A.O.U. area but occursregularly as nonbreedingvisitor; "?" precedingname = extinct. TINAMIFORMES TINAMIDAE Tinamus major Great Tinamou. Nothocercusbonapartei Highland Tinamou. Crypturellus soui Little Tinamou. Crypturelluscinnamomeus Thicket Tinamou. Crypturellusboucardi Slaty-breastedTinamou. Crypturellus kerriae Choco Tinamou. GAVIIFORMES GAVIIDAE Gavia stellata Red-throated Loon. Gavia arctica Arctic Loon. Gavia pacifica Pacific Loon. Gavia immer Common Loon. Gavia adamsii Yellow-billed Loon. PODICIPEDIFORMES PODICIPEDIDAE Tachybaptusdominicus Least Grebe. Podilymbuspodiceps Pied-billed Grebe. ?Podilymbusgigas Atitlan Grebe. Podicepsauritus Horned Grebe. Podicepsgrisegena Red-neckedGrebe. Podicepsnigricollis Eared Grebe. Aechmophorusoccidentalis Western Grebe. Aechmophorusclarkii Clark's Grebe. PROCELLARIIFORMES DIOMEDEIDAE Thalassarchechlororhynchos Yellow-nosed Albatross. (A) Thalassarchecauta Shy Albatross.(A) Thalassarchemelanophris Black-browed Albatross. (A) Phoebetriapalpebrata Light-mantled Albatross. (A) Diomedea exulans WanderingAlbatross. (A) Phoebastriaimmutabilis Laysan Albatross. Phoebastrianigripes Black-lootedAlbatross. Phoebastriaalbatrus Short-tailedAlbatross. (N) PROCELLARIIDAE Fulmarus glacialis Northern Fulmar. Pterodroma neglecta KermadecPetrel. (A) Pterodroma
    [Show full text]
  • High Survival Rate of a Critically Endangered Species, the Azores
    High survival rate of a critically endangered species, the Azores Bullfinch , as a contribution to population recovery David Monticelli, Ricardo Ceia, Ruben Heleno, Hugo Laborda, Sergio Timóteo, Daniel Jareño, Geoff M. Hilton, Jaime A. Ramos To cite this version: David Monticelli, Ricardo Ceia, Ruben Heleno, Hugo Laborda, Sergio Timóteo, et al.. High survival rate of a critically endangered species, the Azores Bullfinch , as a contribution to population recov- ery. Journal für Ornithologie = Journal of Ornithology, Springer Verlag, 2010, 151 (3), pp.627-636. 10.1007/s10336-010-0501-4. hal-00570023 HAL Id: hal-00570023 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00570023 Submitted on 26 Feb 2011 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. J Ornithol (2010) 151:627–636 DOI 10.1007/s10336-010-0501-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE High survival rate of a critically endangered species, the Azores Bullfinch Pyrrhula murina, as a contribution to population recovery David Monticelli • Ricardo Ceia • Ruben Heleno • Hugo Laborda • Sergio Timo´teo • Daniel Jaren˜o • Geoff M. Hilton • Jaime A. Ramos Received: 12 May 2009 / Revised: 30 November 2009 / Accepted: 1 February 2010 / Published online: 26 February 2010 Ó Dt.
    [Show full text]
  • Dacninae Species Tree, Part I
    Dacninae I: Nemosiini, Conirostrini, & Diglossini Hooded Tanager, Nemosia pileata Cherry-throated Tanager, Nemosia rourei Nemosiini Blue-backed Tanager, Cyanicterus cyanicterus White-capped Tanager, Sericossypha albocristata Scarlet-throated Tanager, Sericossypha loricata Bicolored Conebill, Conirostrum bicolor Pearly-breasted Conebill, Conirostrum margaritae Chestnut-vented Conebill, Conirostrum speciosum Conirostrini White-eared Conebill, Conirostrum leucogenys Capped Conebill, Conirostrum albifrons Giant Conebill, Conirostrum binghami Blue-backed Conebill, Conirostrum sitticolor White-browed Conebill, Conirostrum ferrugineiventre Tamarugo Conebill, Conirostrum tamarugense Rufous-browed Conebill, Conirostrum rufum Cinereous Conebill, Conirostrum cinereum Stripe-tailed Yellow-Finch, Pseudochloris citrina Gray-hooded Sierra Finch, Phrygilus gayi Patagonian Sierra Finch, Phrygilus patagonicus Peruvian Sierra Finch, Phrygilus punensis Black-hooded Sierra Finch, Phrygilus atriceps Gough Finch, Rowettia goughensis White-bridled Finch, Melanodera melanodera Yellow-bridled Finch, Melanodera xanthogramma Inaccessible Island Finch, Nesospiza acunhae Nightingale Island Finch, Nesospiza questi Wilkins’s Finch, Nesospiza wilkinsi Saffron Finch, Sicalis flaveola Grassland Yellow-Finch, Sicalis luteola Orange-fronted Yellow-Finch, Sicalis columbiana Sulphur-throated Finch, Sicalis taczanowskii Bright-rumped Yellow-Finch, Sicalis uropigyalis Citron-headed Yellow-Finch, Sicalis luteocephala Patagonian Yellow-Finch, Sicalis lebruni Greenish Yellow-Finch,
    [Show full text]