Chaudhary Charan Singh a True Champion of the Indian

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chaudhary Charan Singh a True Champion of the Indian Chaudhary Charan Singh A True Champion of the Indian Farmer: (23 December 1902 – 29 May 1987) served as the 5th Prime Minister of India between 28 July 1979 and 14 January 1980. Charan Singh was born on 23 December 1902 in a rural peasant Jat family of village Noorpur, District Hapur (Erstwhile District Meerut), Uttar Pradesh (Erstwhile United Provinces of Agra and Oudh).[2] Charan Singh entered politics as part of the Independence Movement motivated by Mohandas Gandhi. He was active from 1931 in the Ghaziabad District Arya Samaj as well as the Meerut District Indian National Congress for which he was jailed twice by the British. Before independence, as a member of Legislative Assembly of the United Provinces elected in 1937, he took a deep interest in the laws that were detrimental to the village economy and he slowly built his ideological and practical stand against the exploitation of tillers of the land by landlords. Charan Singh was the first 'kisan' prime minister, played a pivotal role in re- organising the political economy of agriculture in Uttar Pradesh by drafting and enacting different bills for agricultural reforms. Charan Singh’s character, personality and his intellectually sophisticated positions on rural India were based on three major influences – a rural upbringing in a poor, self-cultivating peasant family in the Meerut district of agrarian Uttar Pradesh in the 1910s-20s; the impact of the social reformist Arya Samaj and its religious-moral underpinning in the 1920s-1930s; and the struggle to throw off the yoke of the British under the leadership of Mohandas Gandhi and the Indian National Congress from the 1930s-1950s. The issues of rural India, and the solutions to the development of India, remain in many ways as they were in the decades immediately following Independence from the British – an increasingly entrenched urban and privileged caste elite that allocates scarce capital and other resources towards its interests and ignores the issues of village life where there are no jobs and very little hope. This Archive will add strength to the voices that yet argue in favor of a reorientation of our development paradigm towards the village, while seeking to reform its backward social structure. In 1939, he introduced the Debt Redemption Bill in order to give relief to the peasantry from moneylenders. Born in a village in a farmer family, Charan Singh had seen the plights of farmers and the ways in which money lenders exploited them. Like merchant’s capital, it bears more heavily on the poor farmers than on rich, but is significant, nevertheless, for middle and small farmers. This was one of the significant steps in making of the farmers’ life better. Further, in April 1939, he drafted a Land Utilisation Bill, whose aim was to ‘transfer … the proprietary interest in agricultural holdings of UP to such of the tenants or actual tillers of the soil who chose to deposit an amount equivalent to ten times the annual rent in the government treasury to the account of the landlord’. Charan Singh started his battle against the landlords. Following that in June, he published a newspaper article which discussed the blueprint of the land reform he would pursue after Independence. That land reform had at its core the abolition of landlordism in UP. By 1945, he had prepared a draft Congress manifesto on land and agriculture, which provided for that abolition, and it was approved by the All-India Congress Working Committee at its meeting in Calcutta in December 1945. By this time Charan Singh was fully convinced about his battle and he started preparing himself politically and ideologically as the kisan champion. It was after 1947, however, that the small and middle farmers found in him a representative of power, political skill and effectiveness. Still, in 1947, landlords remained masters of the Indian countryside, in UP as elsewhere. Now his fighting against landlords took a decisive turn. On July 11, 1952, as agriculture minister, he led Uttar Pradesh in abolishing the zamindari system. He had himself drafted the UP Zamindari and Land Reforms Bill. The aim was to strike a moral blow at the landlord class. However, it was not easy to get it through legislation since the landlord class opposed it and put all efforts to ensure its delay. Being a lawyer and a successful politician, Charan Singh bided his time and saw the legislation through to a successful conclusion in terms of enactment. It was a landmark achievement in the peasant history of India. This changed the life and actions of small and middle farmers and produced a class of rich farmers in western UP and in other parts of India. However, initially this Act did not work as it was envisaged since the patwari (lekhpal) system helped the zamindar class. The important issue was precisely which portions of a zamindar’s holdings were to be classified as sir and khudkasht. It was upon the patwari’s records that the enforcement of land law depended. Since the patwari had worked closely with the zamindars, their favoring of zamindars was not surprising. This became an established source of considerable discontent for the UP farmers and not least for Charan Singh’s essential constituents, the small and middle farmers. However, poor farmers and landless labourers were too weak to be capable of deriving substantial benefit from the Act. At this point, Charan Singh stepped in decisively. He had become Congress minister for revenue and agriculture in 1952, and was aware of the malpractices of patwaris in fudging village records. When in 1952 the government initiated reforms, the patwaris launched a state- wide hartal. Singh, with a stroke of pen, dismissed from service about 28,000 patwaris. The farmers felt a great relief and afterwards that led to the reorganization of the patwari system. Charan Singh did not end here but his efforts and support for farmers continued. He is responsible for another important piece of legislation for the small and middle farmers in UP. In 1953, he got the Consolidation of Holdings Act passed, and implemented it successfully in 1954. This represented a programme of land consolidation for individual peasant holdings. A scattered holding is feature of rural UP and Indian countryside. The existence of operational holdings in more than one plot – often significantly more than one plot – was rife in UP. It is still pervasive in most of India. Further, he exempted fertilizer from sales tax. He framed a policy for redistribution of land obtained by imposition of ceiling on large farmers to Scheduled Castes. He exempted the land revenue for farmers owning land up to three and half acres. Charan Singh always gave priority to agriculture and supported cottage, village, small-scale and hand-made goods. Having influenced by Gandhi, Charan Singh relentlessly struggled for the prosperity of Indian agriculture and farmers and making rural people self-reliant. Being an organic intellectual, he always encouraged farmers’ participation in politics and their sharing of political power. He continuously fought for the sake of the Indian farmer, which endeared him to the agrarian communities throughout the nation, particularly in his native Uttar Pradesh. Charan Singh served twice as chief minister of Uttar Pradesh, but for short periods. During the emergency he was jailed. After the emergency, in the election of 1977 his party gave support to Morarji Desai’s government. After Desai resigned, Charan Singh was sworn in as prime minister in 1979 with the support of the Congress party. But a day before the meeting of Parliament, the Congress party withdrew their support. He resigned from office. Thereafter he continued to lead the Lok Dal in opposition till his death in 1987. .
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 43 Electoral Statistics
    CHAPTER 43 ELECTORAL STATISTICS 43.1 India is a constitutional democracy with a parliamentary system of government, and at the heart of the system is a commitment to hold regular, free and fair elections. These elections determine the composition of the Government, the membership of the two houses of parliament, the state and union territory legislative assemblies, and the Presidency and vice-presidency. Elections are conducted according to the constitutional provisions, supplemented by laws made by Parliament. The major laws are Representation of the People Act, 1950, which mainly deals with the preparation and revision of electoral rolls, the Representation of the People Act, 1951 which deals, in detail, with all aspects of conduct of elections and post election disputes. 43.2 The Election Commission of India is an autonomous, quasi-judiciary constitutional body of India. Its mission is to conduct free and fair elections in India. It was established on 25 January, 1950 under Article 324 of the Constitution of India. Since establishment of Election Commission of India, free and fair elections have been held at regular intervals as per the principles enshrined in the Constitution, Electoral Laws and System. The Constitution of India has vested in the Election Commission of India the superintendence, direction and control of the entire process for conduct of elections to Parliament and Legislature of every State and to the offices of President and Vice- President of India. The Election Commission is headed by the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners. There was just one Chief Election Commissioner till October, 1989. In 1989, two Election Commissioners were appointed, but were removed again in January 1990.
    [Show full text]
  • Application Employee of High Sr No
    Application Employee of High Sr No. Seq No Rollno Applicant Full Name Father's Full Name Applicant Mother Name DOB (dd/MMM/yyyy) Domicile of State Category Sub_Category Email ID Gender Mobile Number Court Allahabad Is Present Score 1 1000125 2320015236 ANIL KUMAR SHIV CHARAN ARYA MAHADEVI 6/30/1990 Uttar Pradesh OBC Sports Person (S.P.)[email protected] Male 9911257770 No PRESENT 49 2 1000189 2320015700 VINEET AWASTHI RAM KISHOR AWASTHI URMILA AWASTHI 4/5/1983 Uttar Pradesh General NONE [email protected] 8423230100 No PRESENT 43 3 1000190 2110045263HEMANT KUMAR SHARMA GHANSHYAM SHARMA SHAKUNTALA DEVI 3/22/1988 Other than Uttar Pradesh General [email protected] 9001934082 No PRESENT 39 4 1000250 2130015960 SONAM TIWARI SHIV KUMAR TIWARI GEETA TIWARI 4/21/1991 Other than Uttar Pradesh General [email protected] Male 8573921039 No PRESENT 44 5 1000487 2360015013 RAJNEESH KUMAR RAJVEER SINGH VEERWATI DEVI 9/9/1989 Uttar Pradesh SC NONE [email protected] Male 9808520812 No PRESENT 41 6 1000488 2290015053 ASHU VERMA LATE JANARDAN LAL VERMA PADMAVATI VERMA 7/7/1992 Uttar Pradesh SC NONE [email protected] Male 9005724155 No PRESENT 36 7 1000721 2420015498 AZAJUL AFZAL MOHAMMAD SHAHID NISHAD NAZMA BEGUM 2/25/1985 Uttar Pradesh General NONE [email protected] 7275529796 No PRESENT 27 8 1000794 2250015148AMBIKA PRASAD MISHRA RAM NATH MISHRA NIRMALA DEVI 12/24/1991 Uttar Pradesh General NONE [email protected] Male 8130809970 No PRESENT 36 9 1001008 2320015652 SATYAM SHUKLA PREM PRAKASH
    [Show full text]
  • Cornerstone Forum a Conversation on Religious Freedom and Its Social Implications No
    Cornerstone Forum A Conversation on Religious Freedom and Its Social Implications No. 87. June 30, 2016 Reflections from the Margins on Independence Day John Dayal Human rights and peace activist On this day, Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi visits the United States for the first time since his visa ban was lifted. On this momentous occasion, Cornerstone revisits the implications of Modi's rise to power. ​ ​ --- It is not a jubilee year for independent India, but it is nonetheless a landmark anniversary. Not since Mrs. Indira Gandhi lost office and Mr. Morarji Desai assumed power at the head of the Janata Party has there been such a drastic change, even a reversal, of ideologies, policies, and a vision for the future. The factors that led to the defeat of Mrs. Gandhi in 1977 are now well known. She halted democracy in its tracks and gifted the country’s governance to her son Mr. Sanjay Gandhi, who emerged as the undisputed extra-constitutional center of power and authority. For all practical purposes, the Constitution was suspended, and an unofficial dictatorship came into being. I mention the Emergency [1975-1977] for two reasons. The first reason for the total recall is that the Emergency shattered the belief that the foundations of Indian democracy are so strong and rooted in the Freedom Struggle that they cannot be shaken even momentarily. The second is that a “popular” and “strong” leader with a mass following and little opposition—and perhaps assisted by extra-constitutional power centers—can if she or he wants to, do just about anything with the governance machinery.
    [Show full text]
  • Politics of Coalition in India
    Journal of Power, Politics & Governance March 2014, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 01–11 ISSN: 2372-4919 (Print), 2372-4927 (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). 2014. All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development Politics of Coalition in India Farooq Ahmad Malik1 and Bilal Ahmad Malik2 Abstract The paper wants to highlight the evolution of coalition governments in india. The evaluation of coalition politics and an analysis of how far coalition remains dynamic yet stable. How difficult it is to make policy decisions when coalition of ideologies forms the government. More often coalitions are formed to prevent a common enemy from the government and capturing the power. Equally interesting is the fact a coalition devoid of ideological mornings survives till the enemy is humbled. While making political adjustments, principles may have to be set aside and in this process ideology becomes the first victim. Once the euphoria victory is over, differences come to the surface and the structure collapses like a pack of cards. On the grounds of research, facts and history one has to acknowledge india lives in politics of coalition. Keywords: india, government, coalition, withdrawal, ideology, partner, alliance, politics, union Introduction Coalition is a phenomenon of a multi-party government where a number of minority parties join hands for the purpose of running the government which is otherwise not possible. A coalition is formed when many groups come into common terms with each other and define a common programme or agenda on which they work. A coalition government always remains in pulls and pressures particularly in a multinational country like india.
    [Show full text]
  • Failure of the Mahagathbandhan
    ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 Failure of the Mahagathbandhan In the Lok Sabha elections of 2019 in Uttar Pradesh, the contest was keenly watched as the alliance of the Samajwadi Party, Bahujan Samaj Party, and Rashtriya Lok Dal took on the challenge against the domination of the Bharatiya Janata Party. What contributed to the continued good performance of the BJP and the inability of the alliance to assert its presence is the focus of analysis here. In the last decade, politics in Uttar Pradesh (UP) has seen radical shifts. The Lok Sabha elections 2009 saw the Congress’s comeback in UP. It gained votes in all subregions of UP and also registered a sizeable increase in vote share among all social groups. The 2012 assembly elections gave a big victory to the Samajwadi Party (SP) when it was able to get votes beyond its traditional voters: Muslims and Other Backward Classes (OBCs). The 2014 Lok Sabha elections saw the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) winning 73 seats with its ally Apna Dal. It was facilitated by the consolidation of voters cutting across caste and class, in favour of the party. Riding on the popularity of Narendra Modi, the BJP was able to trounce the regional parties and emerge victorious in the 2017 assembly elections as well. But, against the backdrop of anti-incumbency, an indifferent economic record, and with the coming together of the regional parties, it was generally believed that the BJP would not be able to replicate its success in 2019. However, the BJP’s performance in the 2019 Lok Sabha elections shows its continued domination over the politics of UP.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Participating Political Parties and Abbreviations
    Election Commission of India- State Election, 2008 to the Legislative Assembly Of Rajasthan LIST OF PARTICIPATING POLITICAL PARTIES PARTY TYPE ABBREVIATION PARTY NATIONAL PARTIES 1 . BJP Bharatiya Janata Party 2 . BSP Bahujan Samaj Party 3 . CPI Communist Party of India 4 . CPM Communist Party of India (Marxist) 5 . INC Indian National Congress 6 . NCP Nationalist Congress Party STATE PARTIES - OTHER STATES 7 . AIFB All India Forward Bloc 8 . CPI(ML)(L) Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist) (Liberation) 9 . INLD Indian National Lok Dal 10 . JD(S) Janata Dal (Secular) 11 . JD(U) Janata Dal (United) 12 . RLD Rashtriya Lok Dal 13 . SHS Shivsena 14 . SP Samajwadi Party REGISTERED(Unrecognised) PARTIES 15 . ABCD(A) Akhil Bharatiya Congress Dal (Ambedkar) 16 . ABHM Akhil Bharat Hindu Mahasabha 17 . ASP Ambedkar Samaj Party 18 . BHBP Bharatiya Bahujan Party 19 . BJSH Bharatiya Jan Shakti 20 . BRSP Bharatiya Rashtravadi Samanta Party 21 . BRVP Bhartiya Vikas Party 22 . BVVP Buddhiviveki Vikas Party 23 . DBSP Democratic Bharatiya Samaj Party 24 . DKD Dalit Kranti Dal 25 . DND Dharam Nirpeksh Dal 26 . FCI Federal Congress of India 27 . IJP Indian Justice Party 28 . IPC Indian People¿S Congress 29 . JGP Jago Party 30 . LJP Lok Jan Shakti Party 31 . LKPT Lok Paritran 32 . LSWP Loktantrik Samajwadi Party 33 . NLHP National Lokhind Party 34 . NPSF Nationalist People's Front ASSEMBLY ELECTIONS - INDIA (Rajasthan ), 2008 LIST OF PARTICIPATING POLITICAL PARTIES PARTY TYPE ABBREVIATION PARTY REGISTERED(Unrecognised) PARTIES 35 . RDSD Rajasthan Dev Sena Dal 36 . RGD Rashtriya Garib Dal 37 . RJVP Rajasthan Vikas Party 38 . RKSP Rashtriya Krantikari Samajwadi Party 39 . RSD Rashtriya Sawarn Dal 40 .
    [Show full text]
  • Dissolution of the Lok Sabha
    DISSOLUTION OF THE LOK SABHA Tanusri Prasanna* Introduction The dissolution of the twelfth Lok Sabha on the twenty sixth day of April, 1999, by the President Mr. K.R. Narayanan, and the role of the latter in the intense political decision making preceding the same, have thrown open afresh the debate as to the exact role of the President as envisaged in the Constitution in the matter of dissolution. This paper attempts to analyse this issue in light of various controversial views on the subject. Pre-independence constitutional debates in India were influenced by two models of democratic government: the British Parliamentary system, and the Presidential system of the United States. In the final analysis the British model being closer home, "every instalment of constitutional reform was regarded as a step towards the establishment of a democratic and responsible government as it functioned in Britain."' Thus, it is widely accepted by various scholars that the founding fathers of the Constitution had opted for the parliamentary system of government. Working on this premise, the concepts such as executive decision making as well as delineating limits and laying a system of checks and balances on the different wings of the government as provided by the inherent federal structure, have been debated over and over again. However, when the Constitution actually came into force, a reading of its provisions sparked off a new line of thought as to the very nature of government, and the Presidential model of the United States which had been earlier rejected was now compared and contrasted.2 These discussions and debates were mainly concerned with the respective powers of the President and the Prime minister in the Constitution and in cases where both entities were strong the clash of opinions was soon recognised.
    [Show full text]
  • Congratulations!
    Congratulations! JULY 2021 - New World Team A V INDDU , KANCHIPURAM ABAJI KHANVILKAR ANITA , MUMBAI ADHIKARI MADHUMITA & PATIT PABAN ADHIKARI, BIRBHUM ADIB HUTAIB , RAIGARH MH ADRI PANKAJA & CHANDRAKANT ADRI, BAGALKOT AGARKAR SHITAL PANKAJ , AMRAVATI AGARWAL ANKIT , JAIPUR AGARWAL REENA , JAIPUR AGGARWAL LAVI & ANKUR AGARWAL, SAHARANPUR AGLAWE SAMPADA ARUN & ARUN EKNATH AGALAVE, THANE AGRAWAL AMIT KUMAR & PURNIMA AGRAWAL, PATAN AGRAWAL SHEETAL , SAMBALPUR AGRAWAL SWETA & ROHIT AGRAWAL, SULTANPUR AHAMED B ZAMEER , HOSPET AHMED MOHAMMAD AKHIL , UDUPI AHMED RAEES & NASEEM BEGAM, NAINITAL AHMED TAFHEEM , BHADERWAH DODA AHUJA MALA & SANJAY AHUJA, YAMUNA NAGAR AJAYKUMAR CK & SUPRIYA M, DODDABALLAPUR ALAGURAJ POOMALAI & A DEIVAM, PUDUKKOTTAI ALI KHAN SORAF & TANUJA BEGUM, HOOGHLY ALI MOHAMMED SHOUKATH & SHANAZ BANU, DAVANGERE ALLIBHAI ABBASALI DAVALASAB , GADAG ALTHAF S , PUNGANUR AMBADAS PAWAR PRATIKSHA , AURANGABAD AMLA ASHISH , JAMMU ANANDHARAJ C , NAGAPATTINAM ANKUR , BHARATPUR ANU , TOHANA APPAJI TARATE MADHUKAR , PHALTAN ARCHANA & HARDEEP KUMAR, AHMEDABAD ARORA PALAK , JALLANDHAR ARUN KAMBLE ANITA & ARUN HARIBHAU KAMBLE, SANGLI ARVIND PAWAR KAVITA , AHMED NAGAR ASAD RABIA & ABBAS ASAD, LUCKNOW ASHFAK M M & SAFRINA, KASARGOD ASHIMA & PARVESH KUMAR ASPAL, JALANDHAR ASHTARIAN SAMAANEH & MOHAMMED MESUM ABU, KHAIRATABAD ASMABI , PONNANI AWATE NARENDRA CHANDRAKANT , PUNE B AMARESH & VIJAYLAXMI, RAICHUR BAANGA SONIA , FARIDKOT BABAIAH DUDEKULA & VAHIDA BANU DUDEKULA, CUDDAPAH BABU V J PRASANTH & REJITHA, NEDUMANGAD BABULAL , HANUMANGARH Congratulations!
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Prime Ministers of India - Captivating GK Questions for Class 3
    10 Prime Ministers of India - Captivating GK Questions For Class 3 Answer the following GK Questions on 10 Prime Ministers of India: Q1. Name the first Prime Minister of India who served office (15 August 1947 - 27 May 1964) until his death. a) Gulzarilal Nanda b) Jawaharlal Nehru c) Rajendra Prasad d) Lal Bahadur Shastri Q2. _____________________ is the current Prime Minister of India (26 May 2014 – present). a) Narendra Modi b) Atal Bihari Vajpayee c) Manmohan Singh d) Ram Nath Kovind Q3. Who was the Prime Minister of India (9 June 1964 - 11 January 1966) until his death? a) Gulzarilal Nanda b) Charan Singh c) Lal Bahadur Shastri d) Morarji Desai Q4. Who served as Prime Minister of India from 24 January 1966 - 24 March 1977? a) Jawaharlal Nehru b) Gulzarilal Nanda c) Gopinath Bordoloi d) Indira Gandhi Q5. Name the Prime Minister of India who served office from 28 July 1979 - 14 January 1980. a) Jyoti Basu b) Morarji Desai c) Charan Singh d) V. V. Giri Q6. _______________________ served as the Prime Minister of India (21 April 1997 - 19 March 1998). a) Inder Kumar Gujral b) Charan Singh c) H. D. Deve Gowda d) Morarji Desai Q7. Name the Prime Minister of India who served office from 21 June 1991 - 16 May 1996. a) H. D. Deve Gowda b) P. V. Narasimha Rao c) Atal Bihari Vajpayee d) Chandra Shekhar Q8. ____________________________ was the Prime Minister of India (31 October 1984 - 2 December 1989). a) Chandra Shekhar b) Indira Gandhi c) Rajiv Gandhi d) P. V. Narasimha Rao Q9.
    [Show full text]
  • RTI Handbook
    PREFACE The Right to Information Act 2005 is a historic legislation in the annals of democracy in India. One of the major objective of this Act is to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority by enabling citizens to access information held by or under the control of public authorities. In pursuance of this Act, the RTI Cell of National Archives of India had brought out the first version of the Handbook in 2006 with a view to provide information about the National Archives of India on the basis of the guidelines issued by DOPT. The revised version of the handbook comprehensively explains the legal provisions and functioning of National Archives of India. I feel happy to present before you the revised and updated version of the handbook as done very meticulously by the RTI Cell. I am thankful to Dr.Meena Gautam, Deputy Director of Archives & Central Public Information Officer and S/Shri Ashok Kaushik, Archivist and Shri Uday Shankar, Assistant Archivist of RTI Cell for assisting in updating the present edition. I trust this updated publication will familiarize the public with the mandate, structure and functioning of the NAI. LOV VERMA JOINT SECRETARY & DGA Dated: 2008 Place: New Delhi Table of Contents S.No. Particulars Page No. ============================================================= 1 . Introduction 1-3 2. Particulars of Organization, Functions & Duties 4-11 3. Powers and Duties of Officers and Employees 12-21 4. Rules, Regulations, Instructions, 22-27 Manual and Records for discharging Functions 5. Particulars of any arrangement that exist for 28-29 consultation with or representation by the members of the Public in relation to the formulation of its policy or implementation thereof 6.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of RECOGNISED NATIONAL PARTIES (As on 11.01.2017)
    LIST OF RECOGNISED NATIONAL PARTIES (as on 11.01.2017) Sl. Name of the Name of President/ Address No. Party General secretary 1. Bahujan Samaj Ms. Mayawati, Ms. Mayawati, Party President President Bahujan Samaj Party 4, Gurudwara Rakabganj Road, New Delhi –110001. 2. Bharatiya Janata Shri Amit Anilchandra Shri Amit Anilchandra Shah, Party Shah, President President Bharatiya Janata Party 11, Ashoka Road, New Delhi – 110001 3. Communist Party Shri S. Sudhakar Reddy, Shri S. Sudhakar Reddy, of India General Secretary General Secretary, Communist Party of India Ajoy Bhawan, Kotla Marg, New Delhi – 110002. 4. Communist Party Shri Sitaram Yechury, Shri Sitaram Yechury, of General Secretary General Secretary India (Marxist) Communist Party of India (Marxist) ,A.K.Gopalan Bhawan,27-29, Bhai Vir Singh Marg (Gole Market), New Delhi - 110001 5. Indian National Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Smt. Sonia Gandhi, Congress President President Indian National Congress 24,Akbar Road, New Delhi – 110011 6. Nationalist Shri Sharad Pawar, Shri Sharad Pawar, Congress Party President President Nationalist Congress Party 10, Bishambhar Das Marg, New Delhi-110001. 7. All India Ms. Mamta Banerjee, All India Trinamool Congress, Trinamool Chairperson 30-B, Harish Chatterjee Street, Congress Kolkata-700026 (West Bengal). LIST OF STATE PARTIES (as on 11.01.2017) S. No. Name of the Name of President/ Address party General Secretary 1. All India Anna The General Secretary- No. 41, Kothanda Raman Dravida Munnetra in-charge Street, Chennai-600021, Kazhagam (Tamil Nadu). (Puratchi Thalaivi Amma), 2. All India Anna The General Secretary- No.5, Fourth Street, Dravida Munnetra in-charge Venkatesware Nagar, Kazhagam (Amma), Karpagam Gardens, Adayar, Chennai-600020, (Tamil Nadu).
    [Show full text]
  • Eminent Indians in Medicine
    138 THE NATIONAL MEDICAL JOURNAL OF INDIA VOL. 3, NO.3 Eminent Indians in Medicine Dr Sushila Nayar Sushila Nayar (b. 26 December 1914) was born and brought up in the era of Mahatma Gandhi. Influenced by Gandhiji and his ideals, she took an active part in the Quit India Movement and was under detention during 1942-44. She did her MB,BS from Lady Harding Medical College, Panjab University, Lahore and went to the USA for further studies. She took her doctorate in Public Health from the Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore. Dr Sushila Nayar's has keen a rich and varied career in medicine, social work and politics. On the advice of Mahatma Gandhi, she founded the Kasturba Hospital at Sevagram, Wardha in 1945. She has been Director, Mahatma Gandhi Institute of Medical Sciences, Sevagram since 1969; President, Indian Council of Medical Research (1962-67); President, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (1964-67) and President, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh (1977-79). Dr Sushila Nayar has had an equally illustrious career in politics. She was a member of Delhi State Assembly (1950-56); Health Minister, Delhi State (1952-55): Speaker, Delhi Vidhan Sabha (1955-56); Member, Lok Sabha (1957-71 and 1977-79) and Union Minister of Health, Local Self-government, Country and Town Planning and Family Planning (1962-67). As a social worker, she has been associated with many national and international societies including the Indian Red Cross Society (1964-67); Indian Council of Child Welfare; Indian Society for the Rehabilitation of the Handicapped; Association for Moral and Social Hygiene in India and Women's International League for Peace and Freedom.
    [Show full text]