West Virginia Multi-Modal LRTP

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

West Virginia Multi-Modal LRTP Acknowledgements The West Virginia Department of Transportation (WVDOT) gratefully acknowledges the commitment, cooperation, and professional contributions of the following: Core Team Paul Mattox, Secretary of Transportation, WVDOT Marvin Murphy, State Highway Engineer, WVDOT, Division of Highways Danny Ellis, Business Manager, WVDOT Robert Pennington, Director, WVDOT Program Planning and Administration Division Policy Committee Paul Mattox Patrick Donovan Jeff Blanton William Phipps Keith Wood Marvin Murphy Cindy Cramer Ed Compton Bob Muransky Bill Robinson Danny Ellis Lisa Dooley Harry Bergstrom Mark Felton Robert Plymale Robert Pennington Michele Craig Richard Thompson James Mylott William Raney Steven Cole Greg Bailey Earl Ray Tomblin Fred Rader Fred Durham Darrell Allen Ben Hark Michael Clowser John Brown Joe Denault Cindy Butler Greg Barr Steve Roberts Robert Gordon Darrell Buttrick Susan O’Connell Alice Taylor Patricia Hamilton Bill Austin Dennis Strawn Susan Chernenko Richard Warner Randy Durst Kelly Goes Modal Executives Paul Mattox, Commissioner of Highways, WVDOT Cindy Butler, Executive Director, West Virginia State Rail Authority Susan O’Connell, Director, WVDOT Division of Public Transit Susan Chernenko, Director, WVDOT Aeronautics Commission Patrick Donovan, Director, West Virginia Public Port Authority Federal Highway Administration Jeff Blanton, Planning Engineer, Federal Highway Administration Ed Compton, Director of Engineering and Operations, Federal Highway Administration Kevin Burgess, Planning and Research Engineer, Federal Highway Administration Other Participating Staff Robert Pennington, Director, WVDOT Program Planning and Administration Division Robert Watson, Special Programs, WVDOT Program Planning and Administration Division Perry Keller, Statewide and Urban Planning Unit Leader, WVDOT Program Planning and Administration Division Consulting Team Wilbur Smith Associates Geary Plaza, Suite 210 700 Washington Street, East Charleston, WV 25301 Table of Contents Section 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1 Background .................................................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Stakeholder and Public Participation .......................................................................................... 1-2 1.2.1 Core Team ................................................................................................................................. 1-2 1.2.2 Plan Policy Committee.............................................................................................................. 1-3 1.2.3 Public Meetings ........................................................................................................................ 1-4 1.2.4 Project Website ......................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.3 Plan Visions and Goals .................................................................................................................. 1-7 Section 2. Historic Funding and Expenditures ...................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2 Funds Used to Finance Programs ................................................................................................ 2-1 2.3 WVDOT Transportation Programs ............................................................................................. 2-2 2.3.1 Division of Motor Vehicles ....................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.2 Division of Highways ............................................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.3 State Rail Authority .................................................................................................................. 2-2 2.3.4 Division of Public Transit ......................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3.5 Public Port Authority ................................................................................................................ 2-3 2.3.6 Aeronautics Commission .......................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3.7 West Virginia Turnpike ............................................................................................................ 2-3 2.3.8 Budget Summary....................................................................................................................... 2-3 2.4 Historical Revenue Trends............................................................................................................ 2-4 2.4.1 Source of Information ............................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.2 Revenue Sources ....................................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4.3 Key Observations ...................................................................................................................... 2-8 2.5 Historical Expenditure Trends ..................................................................................................... 2-9 2.5.1 Expenditure Types .................................................................................................................... 2-9 2.5.2 Key Observations .................................................................................................................... 2-12 2.6 Impact of Inflation ....................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.6.1 Inflation Factors ...................................................................................................................... 2-13 2.6.2 Revenues ................................................................................................................................. 2-16 2.6.3 Expenditures ........................................................................................................................... 2-18 2.7 Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 2-18 Section 3. Revenue Forecast and Gap Analysis ..................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Transportation Funding Sources ................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Historic Trends in Highway Funding ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.2 Transportation Revenue Forecast ................................................................................................ 3-3 3.2.1 Forecast Revenue from Motor Fuels Tax .................................................................................. 3-3 3.2.2 Forecast Revenue from Federal Sources ................................................................................... 3-3 3.2.3 Forecast Revenue from Privilege Tax ....................................................................................... 3-4 3.2.4 Forecast Revenue from Registration, License Taxes and Other Sources.................................. 3-4 3.2.5 Impacts of Inflation ................................................................................................................... 3-4 3.3 Alternative Funding Levels ........................................................................................................... 3-6 3.4 Revenues to Achieve FY1999 Funding Levels ............................................................................. 3-7 3.5 Policy Committee Revenue Scenario ........................................................................................... 3-9 3.6 Potential Role of Toll Roads to Fund Select Corridors .............................................................. 3-9 3.6.1 Overview of Prior Studies ......................................................................................................... 3-9 3.6.2 West Virginia Eastern Panhandle Corridors Traffic and Revenue Report .............................. 3-10 3.6.3 West Virginia U.S. Route 35 Corridor Traffic and Revenue Report ...................................... 3-11 3.6.4 Applicability of Prior Studies ................................................................................................. 3-12 3.6.5 Analysis of Prior Studies......................................................................................................... 3-13 3.6.6 Potential Contribution of Toll Studies to the Plan .................................................................. 3-13 Section 4. Highway and Bridge Needs .................................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Highway Assets .............................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Highway Needs ............................................................................................................................... 4-2
Recommended publications
  • Fema) Final Exercise Report for the May 15, 16, and June 27, 2000, Beaver Valley Power Station Plume Exposure Pathway Exercise
    January 24, 2001 Mr. L. W. Myers Senior Vice President FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Company Beaver Valley Power Station Post Office Box 4 Shippingport, Pennsylvania 15077 SUBJECT: FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FINAL EXERCISE REPORT FOR THE MAY 15, 16, AND JUNE 27, 2000, BEAVER VALLEY POWER STATION PLUME EXPOSURE PATHWAY EXERCISE Dear Mr. Myers: Enclosed is a letter from Ms. Rita A. Calvan, Director, FEMA Region III, dated November 9, 2000, transmitting the FEMA report for the subject exercise to Mr. Hubert J. Miller, Regional Administrator, NRC Region I. There was one Deficiency identified during the June 27, 2000 plume exposure pathway exercise, which was immediately corrected. Also, there were 17 Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCAs) identified. Please provide assistance to offsite officials as they address and resolve the identified items on a timely basis. If you have any questions concerning this enclosure, please contact David Silk at (610) 337 5372. Sincerely, /RA/ Richard J. Conte, Chief Operational Safety Branch Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 05000334, 05000412 License Nos. DPR-66, NPF-73 Enclosure: FEMA Final Exercise Report for Beaver Valley Power Station Mr. L. W. Myers -2 cc w/encl: L. W. Pearce, Plant General Manager R. Fast, Director, Plant Maintenance F. von Ahn, Director, Plant Engineering R. Donnellon, Director, Projects and Scheduling M. Pearson, Director, Plant Services T. Cosgrove, Manager, Licensing J. A. Hultz, Manager, Projects and Support Services, FirstEnergy M. Clancy, Mayor, Shippingport, PA Commonwealth of Pennsylvania State of Ohio State of West Virginia cc w/o encl: R. Calvan, Regional Director, FEMA Region III Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Long Range Transportation Plan Cumberland Area
    Prepared for: Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Prepared by: with Crossroads Transportation Financial Assistance Provided By: February 26, 2016 MPO Adopted: March 24, 2016 Federal Concurrence: Table of Contents Chapter 1: The Process, Purpose, and the Plan ..................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.1 What is Transportation Planning? ....................................................................................................................................... 1‐2 1.2 What Is the Role of an MPO in Regional Transportation Planning? .................................................................................... 1‐2 1.3 Why are MPOs required? .................................................................................................................................................... 1‐3 1.4 What is the Cumberland Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (CAMPO)? ................................................................. 1‐4 1.5 Where is the CAMPO Region? ............................................................................................................................................. 1‐4 1.6 What is CAMPO’s Organizational Structure? ...................................................................................................................... 1‐6 1.7 What is Plan 2040? .............................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Highway Facilities Inventory
    NON-HIGHWAY FACILITIES INVENTORY The BHJ region has traditionally relied heavily upon different modes of transportation for the movement of both people and goods. Industries throughout the valley have utilized rail, river barge, and highways to ship and receive goods and supplies. There has also been a long history of public transportation within the region. The integration of all possible modes of transportation is vitally important for the future growth and development of the region. As the transportation network develops and stakeholders grapple with fundamental funding and environmental constraints, it has become increasingly important to make the most efficient use of the entire transportation system. Intermodal diversification and integration provides time and cost efficiencies while preserving the existing transportation system. This section is an inventory of the non-highway means of transporting people and goods within the BHJ region through railroads, water ports, airports, public transit, human services transportation, and shared ride alternatives. Although these modes have historically played an important role in the region’s past in one form or another, an interconnected “seamless” transportation network will help conserve energy, financial, and other environmental resources. In turn, such conservation measures will promote future growth and economic development. RIVER PORTS The region’s Ohio River Navigation System consists of two project pools. From the north, the New Cumberland Pool stretches 14.3 river miles through the region along the shores of Hancock County, WV, and Columbiana County, OH beginning at Mile 40, the Pennsylvania Stateline, and ending at River Mile 54.3, the New Cumberland Locks & Dam. The Ohio River then flows over the New Cumberland Dam into the Pike Island Pool ending at Mile 84.2, the Pike Island Locks & Dam just south of the Jefferson County line at Yorkville, OH.
    [Show full text]
  • CSX Baltimore Division Timetable
    NORTHERN REGION BALTIMORE DIVISION TIMETABLE NO. 4 EFFECTIVE SATURDAY, JANUARY 1, 2005 AT 0001 HOURS CSX STANDARD TIME C. M. Sanborn Division Manager BALTIMORE DIVISION TABLE OF CONTENTS GENERAL INFORMATION SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS DESCRIPTION PAGE INST DESCRIPTION PAGE 1 Instructions Relating to CSX Operating Table of Contents Rules Timetable Legend 2 Instructions Relating to Safety Rules Legend – Sample Subdivision 3 Instructions Relating to Company Policies Region and Division Officers And Procedures Emergency Telephone Numbers 4 Instructions Relating to Equipment Train Dispatchers Handling Rules 5 Instructions Relating to Air Brake and Train SUBDIVISIONS Handling Rules 6 Instructions Relating to Equipment NAME CODE DISP PAGE Restrictions Baltimore Terminal BZ AV 7 Miscellaneous Bergen BG NJ Capital WS AU Cumberland CU CM Cumberland Terminal C3 CM Hanover HV AV Harrisburg HR NI Herbert HB NI Keystone MH CM Landover L0 NI Lurgan LR AV Metropolitan ME AU Mon M4 AS Old Main Line OM AU P&W PW AS Philadelphia PA AV Pittsburgh PI AS.AT Popes Creek P0 NI RF&P RR CQ S&C SC CN Shenandoah SJ CN Trenton TN NI W&P WP AT CSX Transportation Effective January 1, 2005 Albany Division Timetable No. 5 © Copyright 2005 TIMETABLE LEGEND GENERAL F. AUTH FOR MOVE (AUTHORITY FOR MOVEMENT) Unless otherwise indicated on subdivision pages, the The authority for movement rules applicable to the track segment Train Dispatcher controls all Main Tracks, Sidings, of the subdivision. Interlockings, Controlled Points and Yard Limits. G. NOTES STATION LISTING AND DIAGRAM PAGES Where station page information may need to be further defined, a note will refer to “STATION PAGE NOTES” 1– HEADING listed at the end of the diagram.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENTAL, STATISTICAL and GENERAL INFORMATION ✩
    Section 11 2012:Section 11 6/21/13 2:32 PM Page 759 Section Eleven ✩ DEPARTMENTAL, STATISTICAL and GENERAL INFORMATION ✩ The American Flag Highways ___________ ___________ Pledge of Allegiance Legal Holidays ___________ ___________ Hospitals State Flag, Seal, Day, ___________ Songs, Colors, Tree, Bird, Flower, Animal, Fish, Libraries Fruit, Butterfly, Soil, ___________ Insect, Gem, Locomotive, Mines and Mining Reptile, Fossil ___________ and Exhibition Coal Mine ___________ Oil and Gas ___________ Statistical Summary ___________ Parks and Forests ___________ Aeronautics ___________ Taxation and Finance Census Data ___________ Geographical Section 11 2012:Section 11 6/21/13 2:32 PM Page 760 THE AMERICAN FLAG The Flag of the United States has 13 horizontal stripes-7 red and 6 white-the red and white stripes alternating, and a union which consists of white stars of five points on a blue field placed in the upper quarter next to the staff and extending to the lower edge of the fourth red stripe from the top. The number of stars is the same as the number of States in the Union. The canton or union now contains 50 stars. On the admission of a State into the Union, a star will be added to the union of the Flag and such addition will take effect on the 4th day of July next succeeding such admission. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands, one Nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. STATE FLAG Before the design of the present State Flag was officially adopted by the Legislature on March 7, 1929, by Senate Joint Resolution No.
    [Show full text]
  • Maryland State Rail Plan
    Larry Hogan, Governor Boyd Rutherford, Lt. Governor Pete K. Rahn, Secretary of Transportation April 2015 www.camsys.com Maryland Statewide Rail Plan prepared for Maryland Department of Transportation prepared by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. 4800 Hampden Lane, Suite 800 Bethesda, MD 20814 date April 2015 Maryland Statewide Rail Plan Table of Contents 1.0 About the Plan ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Plan Development ...................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Plan Organization ....................................................................................... 1-3 1.3 Purpose of the Rail Plan ............................................................................. 1-3 1.4 Federal Compliance .................................................................................... 1-4 2.0 Maryland’s Rail History .................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Amtrak and Conrail ................................................................................... 2-3 2.2 MARC ........................................................................................................... 2-3 2.3 Short Lines ................................................................................................... 2-4 2.4 Summary ...................................................................................................... 2-5 3.0 Mission, Vision, and Goals ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA Beaver Valley Power Station
    Beaver Valley Power Station After Action Report/ Improvement Plan Drill Date - May 17, 2011 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program (:W FEMA Published July 26, 2011 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan Beaver Valley Power Station This page is intentionally blank. Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan Beaver Valley Power Station Beaver Valley Power Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published July 26, 2011 Contents Executive Summary 3 Section 1: Exercise Overview 7 1.1 Exercise Details 7 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership 7 1.3 Participating Organizations 10 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 11 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design 11 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 11 2.3 Scenario Summary 12 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 13 3.1 Drill Evaluation and Results 13 3.2 Summary Results of Drill Evaluation 13 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 15 3.3.1 Risk Jurisdictions 15 3.3.1.1 Hancock County, New Cumberland Ambulance 15 Services 3.3.1.2 Hancock County, Weirton Medical Center 15 Section 4: Conclusion 16 Appendix A: Drill Evaluators and Team Leaders 17 Appendix B: Acronyms and Abbreviations 18 Appendix C: Exercise Plan 19 Appendix D: Improvement Plan 64 1 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan Beaver Valley Power Station This page is intentionally blank. 2 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan Beaver Valley Power Station EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On December 7, 1979, the President directed FEMA to assume the lead responsibility for all offsite nuclear planning and response.
    [Show full text]
  • FEMA, Submittal of After Action Report/Improvement Plan Drill for Beaver
    U.S. Department of Homeland Security Region III One Independence Mall, 6th Floor 615 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19106-4404 0FEMA JUN 2 6 2013 NRC Headquarters' Document Control Desk U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 To Whom It May Concern: Enclosed is the After Action Report for the Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS) Weirton Medical Center MS-I Drill that was evaluated on March 20, 2013. There were no "Deficiencies" or "Areas Requiring Corrective Action (ARCA)" identified during the drill. Based on the review of the offsite radiological emergency response plans and procedures submitted, FEMA Region III has determined they are adequate and there is reasonable assurance they can be implemented, as demonstrated during the Beaver Valley Power Station (BVPS) Weirton Medical Center, 2013 MS-1 Drill. If you have any questions, please contact John Price at (215) 931-5570. Sincerely, MaryAnn Tierney Regional Administrator Enclosure -WAm- .6ov Beaver Valley Power Station After Action Report/ Improvement Plan Drill Date - March 20, 2013 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program , FEMA .. Published June 1 , 2013 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan Beaver Valley Power Station This page is intentionally blank. Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP) After Action Report/Improvement Plan Beaver Valley Power Station Beaver Valley Power Station After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published June 10, 2013 Contents Executive
    [Show full text]
  • Military Life: from the Barnyard to the Strip
    Military Life: From the Barnyard to the Strip i ii to Adam & Katie Military Life: From the Barnyard to the Strip Edwin F. Flowers Edited by James Matthew Jarrett iii Edwin F. Flowers EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHERS a division of Edco, Inc. P.O. Box 4162, Star City, WV 26504 COPYRIGHT © 2016 All rights reserved. Published 2016. Printed in the United States of America iv Table of Contents Preface Chapter 1- Wars And Between Wars The Home Front: Deprivation, Regulation, and Participation 11 A Farm Boy During World War II - Prewar Attitudes 12 The Draft 13 Grade School Farmers and Pearcy’s Bull 15 On “Patrol” for Junk 16 The “Pughtown” Militia 17 The End of the War 19 Chapter 2- Into Uniform After the War—Another War (or “Police Action”) 21 Off to College and ROTC 21 InThe Regimental Band 23 My Younger Brothers 23 24 Creation of Air Force ROTC at WVU 25 A Medal Without a Shot Being Fired 25 No Summer Camp 27 My “Command” 27 Choose Your Assignment 30 v Chapter 3- JAG School—But When? Enough of the ‘Kid Stuff’ 33 But then—I Win 34 Finally, Active Duty—But Wait! 35 Money 36 JAG School at Maxwell AFB 36 Satisfied with Military Life 38 Military Travels 39 More Law School 40 Rosa Parks and Sam Jackson 41 Holiday Time Off 44 Chapter 4- “Off We Go” Arrival at Nellis Air Force Base, Nevada 48 Christmas Eve, 1954 49 The Real Work Begins 50 Culture Shock 51 The Gravel Claim 53 The Case of James Igoe 56 Disarming a Sentry 57 Marriage and Housekeeping 58 Wherry Housing 59 Mount Charleston 60 Mushroom Clouds 61 B-25 Crashed into the Monongahela River 62 Crash of Fighter Pilot Instructor 63 The B-25 Crash at McCarran 64 Return of the Victors 64 Golf Tournament of Champions 65 Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia, the Series 2011 Bonds Are Cumstances Shall This Exempt from All Taxation by the State of West Virginia Or Any Political Subdivision Thereof
    PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 10, 2011 NEW ISSUE Rating: Standard & Poor’s BOOK-ENTRY ONLY (See “Rating” herein) In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing laws, regulations, published rulings and judicial decisions of the United States of America, as presently written and applied, interest on the Series 2011 Bonds is excludable from gross income of the owners thereof for federal income tax purposes and is not an item of tax preference for purposes of the federal alternative minimum tax imposed on individuals and corporations, upon the conditions and subject to the limitations set forth under the caption "TAX MATTERS” herein. In the opinion of Bond Counsel, under existing laws of the State of West Virginia, the Series 2011 Bonds are cumstances shall this exempt from all taxation by the State of West Virginia or any political subdivision thereof. See "TAX MATTERS" herein of these securities in any $37,000,000 The Board of Education of the ities lawsof such jurisdiction. County of Hancock (West Virginia) Public School Bonds, Series 2011 Dated: Date of Delivery Due: May 1, as shown below The Board of Education of the County of Hancock (West Virginia), Public School Bonds, Series 2011 (the “Series 2011 Bonds”) are general obligations of The Board of Education of the County of Hancock, West Virginia (the "Board"), which Board amendment. Under no cir has the power and is obligated to levy ad valorem taxes upon all the taxable property within the Hancock County School District to pay the Series 2011Bonds and the interest thereon, without limitation as to rate or amount.
    [Show full text]
  • Rar-80-9.Pdf
    TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE rr-RSpert-No- 2 Government Accession No 3.Reelpient's Catalog No ^NTSB-RAR-80-9 , k Title and Subtitle "Railroad Accident Reportr-ftead-©n~ 5 Report Date Collision of Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company Freight September 16, 1980 Trains Extra 6474 East and Extra 4367 West, Orleans Road, 6 Performing Organization West Virginia, February 12, 1980 Code 7 Author(s) 8 Performing Organization Report No 9 Performing Organization Name and Address 10.Work Uni t 'No. 2892A ^National Transportation Safety Board , ^' ^' 11 Contract or Grant No °Bureau of Accident Investigation ut Washington, D.C. 20594 13 Type of Report and Per i od Covered 12 Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Railroad Accident Report February 12, 1980 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Washington, D C 20594 \ ]h Sponsoring Agency Code 15 Supplementary Notes •. j'•"''l ( i 16 Abstract About 5:55 a.m., on February 12, 1980, two freight trains operated by the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad Company collided head-on at Orleans Road, West Virginia. Extra 6474 East was on track No. 2 traveling at 38 miles per hour as it passed the stop-and-stay signal at Orleans Road and entered a compound curve to the right, where Extra 4367 West was approaching at a speed of 32 mph. The fireman of Extra 4367 West was killed and the engineer and head brakeman were injured; the engineer, conductor, and brakeman of Extra 6474 East were injured. Property damage was estimated to be $1,688,200. The National Transportation Safety Board determines that the probable cause of this accident was the failure of the conductor of Extra 6474 East to see that the train was operated in accordance with the operating rules and the failure of the engineer and head breakman to control the train as required by the signal at Orleans Road.
    [Show full text]
  • Departmental, Statistical & General Information
    Section Eleven Departmental, Statistical & General Information National Symbols Legal Holidays State Symbols Hospitals Statistical Summary Libraries Aeronautics Mines & Mining Census Data Oil & Gas Geographical Parks & Forests Highways Taxation & Finance 1044 WEST VIRGINIA BLUE BOOK NATIONAL SYMBOLS The American Flag The flag of the United States has 13 horizontal stripes, seven red and six white-the red and white stripes alternating, and a union which consists of white stars of five points on a blue field placed in the upper quarter next to the staff and extending to the lower edge of the fourth red stripe from the top. The number of stars is the same as the number of states in the union. The canton or union now contains 50 stars. On the admission of a state into the union, a star will be added to the union of the flag and such addition will take effect on the fourth day of July next succeeding such admission. Pledge of Allegiance I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. OFFICIAL STATE SYMBOLS State Flag Before the design of the present state flag was officially adopted by the Legislature on March 7, 1929, by Senate Joint Resolution No. 18, West Virginia had been represented by several flags which proved impractical. Prominently displayed on the pure white field of today’s flag and emblazoned in proper colors is the coat of arms, the lower half of which is wreathed by rhododendron.
    [Show full text]