Destroyer Squadron 21 by Ernest A

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Destroyer Squadron 21 by Ernest A Destroyer Squadron 21 By Ernest A. Herr Forward: The considerable amount of effort required to put this story together was expended by naval historian David McComb who surely qualifies as the most knowledgeable source of Destroyer Squadron 21 information. Since Dave hadn’t yet made his presence in the world at the time the squadron was formed, he was unable to be present at the birth of the squadron. Those of us who were there know that at least he was there with us in spirit. Stories of destroyer squadrons rarely make the news and the name of one usually means little to the general public. This occurs usually because the squadron designation or identification is used by naval commanders and after a short period of time the squadron is either dissolved, destroyed or its ships attached to other units. Not so for Destroyer Squadron 21, its name would endure long enough to make it into the history books. Initially more widely known by the name Cactus Striking Force, it became one of the most celebrated naval forces in the Guadalcanal area, mainly because it endured. When the island of Guadalcanal was secured, it fought its way up the remaining islands in the Solomons until they too were in American hands. But, in the battle of Vella Lavella, the squadron took such heavy losses that it could go no further and Destroyer squadrons 22 and 23 finished off the last island and held until relief forces finally arrived. Listed here to honor their memory, are all of the ships of that force with special respect for those ships lost early in the conflict with heavy casualties and therefore with few survivors to keep the memory of their memory alive. The record of Destroyer Squadron 21 in World War II—twelve of the most battle tested ships in United States naval history—reflected the entire conduct of the war in the Pacific from Guadalcanal in late 1942 through the Allied victory and repatriation of prisoners-of-war in 1945. Ten destroyers—six built at Bath Iron Works, Bath, Maine and four from Shipbuilding and Drydock Co., Kearny, New Jersey—were commissioned at the rate of three per month beginning on June 4, 1942, the same day as the Battle of Midway. The first of 175 units of the 2100-ton Fletcher class— which proved to be one of the most successful all-around destroyer designs of World War II—they were all sent to Guadalcanal, where they went into combat on arrival. In 1943, after the last-built among them was lost, the remaining ships—the first nine Fletchers commissioned—were formed into DesRon 21. Their ensuing records—and the records of the two replacement ships that joined the squadron later—reflected the varying fortunes of war: Two were nicknamed "Lucky…” while two others were lost before they acquired any nickname. Two of the six Bath-built ships (O’Bannon and Taylor) lost no men killed throughout the war; one (Nicholas) lost only two. The other three (DeHaven, Strong and Chevalier) were all sunk in 1943 with heavy loss of life. All four Federal-built ships (Fletcher, Radford, Jenkins and La Vallette) survived that year, but then sustained damage and took casualties in 1945. Two more ships (Hopewell and Ross) joined the squadron in 1944; both were damaged and lost men. Four DesRon 21 ships (O’Bannon, Nicholas, Fletcher and Taylor) were among the nine destroyers navy-wide that earned 15 or more battle stars in World War II. All seven of the original squadron’s survivors earned ten or more stars for an average of fourteen stars, a pace matched by the other ships when in service. A great strength was the intensity and dedication of their crews. “Each old sailor cherishes his own private inner shrine that is filled with the memories of those great old guys he knew so long ago,” wrote A1 Grimes of the Strong. “They did what was needed when it was needed, regardless of the hours and risk—and it was no big deal. Each of us knew many like this; they were everywhere.” While three ships (Radford, Nicholas and O’Bannon) were awarded individual Presidential Unit Citations and one (Taylor) a Navy Unit Commendation, all their crews were deserving and all could take pride in their collective accomplishments. They were the first heavyweights—the Nicholas, (O’Bannon, Fletcher, Chevalier, Radford, Jenkins, Strong, La Vallette, Taylor, and DeHaven were the first ships of the big new Fletcher class to be launched, commissioned and sent off to war. Admired for their speed, advanced weapons systems and rakish design, the arrival of these first 2100 tonners in the “SoPac” was a big boost to the naval war effort. As a result, there developed an esprit de corps among the officers and men, both for their own ships and for their squadron. The first three Fletchers—the Nicholas, O’Bannon and Fletcher—arrived at Guadalcanal as convoy escorts in the fall of 1942. Due to the desperate shortage of ships there, they were not organized into a division, but assigned individually to cope with the exigencies of the moment. Then as the others appeared, they were combined into the “Cactus Striking Force” (Cactus was the code name for Guadalcanal), which became DesRon 21, with the Nicholas as flagship. The DeHaven, Strong and Chevalier were lost in 1943 and the La Vallette and O’Bannon went home early for repairs, but the surviving ships returned to California for refit late that year. Later, even as the addition of the Hopewell and Ross brought squadron strength back up to nine ships, five were damaged in the Philippines and one off Borneo, which left only three to serve out the war before returning home. The ten original ships arrived in the South Pacific to face an adversary with torpedoes and night fighting tactics so advanced that their flag officers—Callaghan, Wright, Briscoe, Mclnerney, Ryan and Ainsworth—did not at first appreciate the threat. The torpedo was a destroyer’s most potent weapon, but American torpedoes at the time were faulty—they tended to run too deep and their exploders fired prematurely if at all—while Japanese torpedoes not only worked reliably but packed a more explosive punch, ran much faster and farther, and even could be reloaded during battle. As for tactics, American destroyers were initially mixed in columns with cruisers, which prevented them from striking effectively or evading independently. For crewmembers aboard in 1942 and ‘43, before reinforcements arrived and before their own tactics and equipment could be refined by battle experience, it seemed only a matter of time until their own ship would be the one blown out of the water by a more numerous and better equipped enemy, like so many others they all had seen. Every destroyer screened convoys, bombarded shore targets and was shot at from land, sea and air. Privately, every man in his own individual way had to face standing out into “Ironbottom Sound” or probing up “the Slot,” where pure luck—more than gallantry or preparedness—would determine which ships would be sunk and which ones would survive. At times they did this nightly without sleep, with only the effectiveness of their radar and guns to save them from much more severe losses. Eventually, the peril they faced at Guadalcanal and New Georgia translated to tactics that Moosebrugger, Merrill and Burke's DesRon 23—armed at last with torpedoes that worked— applied with devastating effect in the northern Solomon Islands. As the enemy found himself matched and then surpassed in effectiveness, cut off from resources, and eventually overwhelmed by force of numbers, he turned his tactics from stealth to suicide. In response, ships were refitted to counter the changing threat and sent back out to meet it. The overall costs were great: DesRon 21 ships were torpedoed three times, mined four times, and hit four times by shore batteries, with a total of 372 crewmembers killed and many more wounded. But the benefits were also great: they sank or helped sink ten submarines and numerous surface ships, shot down many dozens of aircraft, and rescued more than 1,800 sailors and downed airmen. Meanwhile, the Navy assimilated their experiences into destroyer doctrine, culminating in deadly torpedo attacks by DesRons 24 and 54 at Surigao Strait that helped sink two battleships in less than an hour. “The record of the Nicholas is in a sense the record of one entire phase of the Pacific war,” said Admiral Nimitz in 1944. Her unwritten record also reflected the spectrum of wartime experiences aboard a destroyer. There were horrifying moments: the torpedoes that passed below without hitting, the bombs that narrowly missed and the splinters that penetrated metal in the Solomons found sequels in the kamikaze that clipped only the radar and the typhoon that brought green water crashing over the bridge. But there were also good times: the Esther Williams movies on the foredeck or the fantail, the monkey smuggled aboard that escaped up the mast, the baseball games and the “steak break” with the hospital ship nurses in Subic Bay, the ice cream that came over from the Yorktown in return for downed pilots. For all the ships of DesRon 21, there was always the tropical heat, the boredom of day-to-day life far from home, the never-ending tasks such as chipping paint only to paint it over again, replenishment, gunnery drill, and spam. Perhaps only two aspects of these ships’ histories were dissimilar to those of other contemporary destroyers: that none of them was seriously damaged or sunk by a kamikaze, and that the three luckiest of them were given the place of honor in the vanguard of the ships entering Tokyo Bay to end the war.
Recommended publications
  • ACRONYMS A2/AD – Anti-Access/Area Denial
    ACRONYMS A2/AD – Anti-Access/Area Denial CAS - Collaboration At Sea AAR - After Action Review/Report CAP - Crisis Action Planning AAV - Approach and Assist Visits CAPT - Captain AC2 – Assured Command and Control CATF - Commander, Amphibious Task Force ACE – Air Combat Element CCC - Coalition Coordination Center AG - Arabian Gulf CCDR – Combat Commanders ALERTORD - Alert Order CCIR – Commander’s Critical Information Requirement AMCM - Airborne Mine Countermeasures CDR - Commander AO - Area of Operations CDRE - Commodore AOR - Area of Responsibility CDO - Command Duty Officer APAN - All Partners Access Network CENTCOM - U.S. Central Command ASRAAM - Advanced Short Range Air-Air Missile CFMCC - Combined Force Maritime Component Command ASW - Antisubmarine Warfare CIC - Combat Information Center ATFP - Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection CIED- Counter Improvise Explosive Device BAH – Kingdom of Bahrain CIWS - Close-in Weapons System BANS - Bahraini Amiri Naval Ship CMF - Combined Maritime Forces BLDG – Building CNO - Chief of Naval Operations BLUF – Bottom Line Up Front CO - Commanding Officer BR – Battle Rhythm COA - Course of Action BWC - Battle Watch Captain COCOM - Combatant Command (command C2 - Command and Control authority) COMSEC - Communications Security EW – Electronic Warfare CONPLAN – Concept Plan EXDIR - Exercise Directive COP – Common Operational Picture EXCON - Exercise Control COPS - Current Operations FAC - Fast Attack Craft CoS - Chief of Staff FDO - Foreign Disclosure Officer CPX – Command Post Exercise FFIR - Friendly Forces Intelligence Requirement CR - Critical Requirement FIAC - Fast Inshore Attack Craft CSG - Carrier Strike Group FIT - Force Integration Training CTF - Commander, Task Force FLC - Fleet Logistics Center CTP – Common Tactical Picture FMR - Floating Mine Response CUSNC - Commander U.S. NAVCENT FOPS - Future Operations CV - Critical Vulnerability FOUO - For Official Use Only C5F - Commander, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • January Cover.Indd
    Accessories 1:35 Scale SALE V3000S Masks For ICM kit. EUXT198 $16.95 $11.99 SALE L3H163 Masks For ICM kit. EUXT200 $16.95 $11.99 SALE Kfz.2 Radio Car Masks For ICM kit. KV-1 and KV-2 - Vol. 5 - Tool Boxes Early German E-50 Flakpanzer Rheinmetall Geraet sWS with 20mm Flakvierling Detail Set EUXT201 $9.95 $7.99 AB35194 $17.99 $16.19 58 5.5cm Gun Barrels For Trumpter EU36195 $32.95 $29.66 AB35L100 $21.99 $19.79 SALE Merkava Mk.3D Masks For Meng kit. KV-1 and KV-2 - Vol. 4 - Tool Boxes Late Defender 110 Hardtop Detail Set HobbyBoss EUXT202 $14.95 $10.99 AB35195 $17.99 $16.19 Soviet 76.2mm M1936 (F22) Divisional Gun EU36200 $32.95 $29.66 SALE L 4500 Büssing NAG Window Mask KV-1 Vol. 6 - Lubricant Tanks Trumpeter KV-1 Barrel For Bronco kit. GMC Bofors 40mm Detail Set For HobbyBoss For ICM kit. AB35196 $14.99 $14.99 AB35L104 $9.99 EU36208 $29.95 $26.96 EUXT206 $10.95 $7.99 German Heavy Tank PzKpfw(r) KV-2 Vol-1 German Stu.Pz.IV Brumbar 15cm STuH 43 Gun Boxer MRAV Detail Set For HobbyBoss kit. Jagdpanzer 38(t) Hetzer Wheel mask For Basic Set For Trumpeter kit - TR00367. Barrel For Dragon kit. EU36215 $32.95 $29.66 AB35L110 $9.99 Academy kit. AB35212 $25.99 $23.39 Churchill Mk.VI Detail Set For AFV Club kit. EUXT208 $12.95 SALE German Super Heavy Tank E-100 Vol.1 Soviet 152.4mm ML-20S for SU-152 SP Gun EU36233 $26.95 $24.26 Simca 5 Staff Car Mask For Tamiya kit.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation Dominic I
    OPERATION DOMINIC I United States Atmospheric Nuclear Weapons Tests Nuclear Test Personnel Review Prepared by the Defense Nuclear Agency as Executive Agency for the Department of Defense HRE- 0 4 3 6 . .% I.., -., 5. ooument. Tbe t k oorreotsd oontraofor that tad oa the book aw ra-ready c I I i I 1 1 I 1 I 1 i I I i I I I i i t I REPORT NUMBER 2. GOVT ACCESSION NC I NA6OccOF 1 i Technical Report 7. AUTHOR(.) i L. Berkhouse, S.E. Davis, F.R. Gladeck, J.H. Hallowell, C.B. Jones, E.J. Martin, DNAOO1-79-C-0472 R.A. Miller, F.W. McMullan, M.J. Osborne I I 9. PERFORMING ORGAMIIATION NWE AN0 AODRCSS ID. PROGRAM ELEMENT PROJECT. TASU Kamn Tempo AREA & WOW UNIT'NUMSERS P.O. Drawer (816 State St.) QQ . Subtask U99QAXMK506-09 ; Santa Barbara, CA 93102 11. CONTROLLING OFClCC MAME AM0 ADDRESS 12. REPORT DATE 1 nirpctor- . - - - Defense Nuclear Agency Washington, DC 20305 71, MONITORING AGENCY NAME AODRCSs(rfdIfI*mI ka CamlIlIU Olllc.) IS. SECURITY CLASS. (-1 ah -*) J Unclassified SCHCDULC 1 i 1 I 1 IO. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES This work was sponsored by the Defense Nuclear Agency under RDT&E RMSS 1 Code 6350079464 U99QAXMK506-09 H2590D. For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, VA 22161 19. KEY WOROS (Cmlmm a nm.. mid. I1 n.c...-7 .nd Id.nllh 4 bled nlrmk) I Nuclear Testing Polaris KINGFISH Nuclear Test Personnel Review (NTPR) FISHBOWL TIGHTROPE DOMINIC Phase I Christmas Island CHECKMATE 1 Johnston Island STARFISH SWORDFISH ASROC BLUEGILL (Continued) D.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Collection
    A, AIR & SPA ID SE CE MU REP SEU INT M AIRCRAFT COLLECTION From the Avenger torpedo bomber, a stalwart from Intrepid’s World War II service, to the A-12, the spy plane from the Cold War, this collection reflects some of the GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN MILITARY AVIATION. Photo: Liam Marshall TABLE OF CONTENTS Bombers / Attack Fighters Multirole Helicopters Reconnaissance / Surveillance Trainers OV-101 Enterprise Concorde Aircraft Restoration Hangar Photo: Liam Marshall BOMBERS/ATTACK The basic mission of the aircraft carrier is to project the U.S. Navy’s military strength far beyond our shores. These warships are primarily deployed to deter aggression and protect American strategic interests. Should deterrence fail, the carrier’s bombers and attack aircraft engage in vital operations to support other forces. The collection includes the 1940-designed Grumman TBM Avenger of World War II. Also on display is the Douglas A-1 Skyraider, a true workhorse of the 1950s and ‘60s, as well as the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk and Grumman A-6 Intruder, stalwarts of the Vietnam War. Photo: Collection of the Intrepid Sea, Air & Space Museum GRUMMAN / EASTERNGRUMMAN AIRCRAFT AVENGER TBM-3E GRUMMAN/EASTERN AIRCRAFT TBM-3E AVENGER TORPEDO BOMBER First flown in 1941 and introduced operationally in June 1942, the Avenger became the U.S. Navy’s standard torpedo bomber throughout World War II, with more than 9,836 constructed. Originally built as the TBF by Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corporation, they were affectionately nicknamed “Turkeys” for their somewhat ungainly appearance. Bomber Torpedo In 1943 Grumman was tasked to build the F6F Hellcat fighter for the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Heroic Men and Ships of World War II's Most Decorated Navy
    Naval War College Review Volume 71 Article 14 Number 3 Summer 2018 Tin Can Titans: The eH roic Men and Ships of World War II’s Most Decorated Navy Destroyer Squadron Blake I. Campbell John Wukovits Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Campbell, Blake I. and Wukovits, John (2018) "Tin Can Titans: The eH roic Men and Ships of World War II’s Most Decorated Navy Destroyer Squadron," Naval War College Review: Vol. 71 : No. 3 , Article 14. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol71/iss3/14 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 154 CampbellNAVAL WAR and Wukovits:COLLEGE REVIEWTin Can Titans: The Heroic Men and Ships of World War II’s Most D historical study—like all history—is, at its core, a story about people� Wukovits tells the story of DesRon 21 Tin Can Titans: The Heroic Men and Ships of World War II’s Most Decorated Navy Destroyer and the sailors who served on its vessels Squadron, by John Wukovits� Boston: Da Capo, in their various battles and campaigns 2017� 352 pages� $18�99� in the Pacific� He introduces the reader In this, his newest work, distinguished to the squadron and its sailors circa naval historian John Wukovits traces mid-1942, in the midst of a gloomy the history
    [Show full text]
  • The New York Commandery of the Naval Order of the United States
    Contact: William H. Schmidt, Esq. Co-Chairman RADM Samuel Eliot Morison Morison Award Committee New York Commandery Naval Order of the United States [email protected] 201-370-6344 (Cell) *** FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE *** The New York Commandery of the Naval Order of the United States announces JohnWukovits as the winner of the RADM Samuel Eliot Morison Award for Naval Literature for his book Tin Can Titans: the Heroic Men and Ships of World War II’s Most Decorated Navy Destroyer Squadron, published by Da Capo Press, March 15, 2017. NEW YORK, N.Y., September 10, 2018—The New York Commandery of the Naval Order of the United States announced today the winner of the 2018 Samuel Eliot Morison Award for Naval Literature. John Wukovits author of Tin Can Titan: the Heroic Men and Ships of World War II’s Most Decorated Navy Destroyer Squadron, published by Da Capo Press, March 15, 2017, will be honored by the Naval Order of the United States as the recipient of this year’s prestigious RADM Samuel Eliot Morison Award for Naval Literature. The remaining four finalists for the 2018 RADM Samuel Eliot Morison AwarD for Naval Literature (listeD in alphabetical orDer, not by stanDing) are highly commenDed for their outstanDing contribution to naval literature. They are: Cox, Jeffrey - Morning Star, Midnight Sun: The Early Guadalcanal- Solomons Campaign of World War II, publisher: Osprey Publishing, February 20, 2018 Bowden, Mark - Hue 1968: A Turning Point of the American War in Vietnam, publisher: Atlantic Monthly Press, June 6, 2017 Cleaver, Thomas McKelvey - Pacific Thunder: The US Navy's Central Pacific Campaign, August 1943–October 1944, publisher: Osprey Publishing, October 24, 2017 Ohls, Gary J.
    [Show full text]
  • MOD Formations, Vessels and Aircraft Report: 2014
    Statistical Series 4 – Equipment Bulletin 4.01 Formations, Vessels & Aircraft Annual: 2014 edition Statistical release Bulletin 4.01 is an annual publication which provides information on the numbers and types of formations, vessels and aircraft of the UK Armed Forces. Published 19 February 2015 This bulletin provides statistics for 2008 to 2014 (at 1 April each year), with the exception of Table 4.01.03 and 4.01.04 which are for 2008 to Issued by: 2013 (at 31 December each year). This bulletin updates figures Defence Statistics released in the 2013 release of Statistical Bulletin 4.01. (Web Development and Surveys), Ministry of Defence, Floor 3 Zone K, Main Building, Key Points and Trends Whitehall, London, At April 2014 there were 11 submarines and 65 ships in the Royal SW1A 2HB. Navy, and 13 vessels in the Royal Fleet Auxiliary Service. The numbers of Armour Regiments in the Regular Army and Army Reserves has remained unchanged, at ten and four respectively, The Responsible Statistician for this since April 2000. publication is the Web Development and Surveys Head of Branch. There has been a slight decrease in the total number of squadrons in Tel: 020 7807 8792 the RAF, from 47 in 2013 to 44 in 2014, due to the disbandment of Email: [email protected] two Tornado squadrons and one Air Transport / Air Refuelling squadron. The number of combat aircraft in the RAF’s Forward Available Fleet The Background Quality Report for this (FAF) has decreased from 164 in 2013 to 149 in 2014, (with a publication can be found here.
    [Show full text]
  • The Submarine Force in Joint Operations
    AU/ACSC/145/1998-04 AIR COMMAND AND STAFF COLLEGE AIR UNIVERSITY THE SUBMARINE FORCE IN JOINT OPERATIONS by Christopher J. Kelly, LCDR, USN A Research Report Submitted to the Faculty In Partial Fulfillment of the Graduation Requirements Advisor: CDR William K. Baker Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama April 1998 Disclaimer The views expressed in this academic research paper are those of the author(s) and do not reflect the official policy or position of the US government or the Department of Defense. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 51-303, it is not copyrighted, but is the property of the United States government. ii Contents Page DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................ ii PREFACE...................................................................................................................... iv ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................... v INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 6 BLUE WATER CAPABILITIES.................................................................................... 9 Nuclear Deterrence ................................................................................................... 9 Anti-Submarine Warfare ......................................................................................... 10 Anti-Surface Warfare.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • USS Taylor (DD/DDE 468) World War II History — 1941–1946
    USS Taylor (DD/DDE 468) World War II History — 1941–1946 USS Taylor DD/DDE 468 was named for Rear Admiral William Rogers Taylor (1811-1889). She was laid down on 28 August 1941 at Bath, Maine, by the Bath Iron Works CorP. Sponsored by Mrs. H.A. Baldridge, Taylor was launched on 7 June 1942. She was commissioned on 28 August 1942 at the Charlestown Navy Yard in Boston, Massachusetts, LCDR Benjamin KatZ commanding. Between the time Taylor’s keel was laid down and her commissioning on 28 August 1942 the Japanese navy attacked the United States Naval Station at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Taylor, and the country she served, were immediately at war. She began her career with the Atlantic Fleet. Assigned to Destroyer Squadron 20. Taylor did her initial training at Casco Bay, Maine, and made her shakedown cruise in the northern Atlantic. She was then assigned to coastwise convoy escort duty which lasted until Mid- November 1942 when she escorted a transatlantic convoy to a point off Casablanca. The transit was uneventful, except for the intercePtion of a Spanish merchantman, SS Darro. Taylor sent a boarding party to the neutral shiP. The boarding party then sent the Darro to Gibraltar to prevent her from transmitting information about the convoy to the enemy. With the convoy safely at its destination, Taylor returned to the United States at Norfolk, VA. Receiving orders to transfer to the Pacific theater, Taylor departed HamPton Roads in comPany with Task Force 13. After transiting the Panama Canal and stoPPing at Tutuila in the Samoan Islands, Taylor rePorted at Noumea, New Caledonia, on 20 January 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the US Navy Into an Effective
    The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 A dissertation presented to the faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of Ohio University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy Jeff T. Reardon August 2008 © 2008 Jeff T. Reardon All Rights Reserved ii This dissertation titled The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942 - 1943 by JEFF T. REARDON has been approved for the Department of History and the College of Arts and Sciences by Marvin E. Fletcher Professor of History Benjamin M. Ogles Dean, College of Arts and Sciences iii ABSTRACT REARDON, JEFF T., Ph.D., August 2008, History The Evolution of the U.S. Navy into an Effective Night-Fighting Force During the Solomon Islands Campaign, 1942-1943 (373 pp.) Director of Dissertation: Marvin E. Fletcher On the night of August 8-9, 1942, American naval forces supporting the amphibious landings at Guadalcanal and Tulagi Islands suffered a humiliating defeat in a nighttime clash against the Imperial Japanese Navy. This was, and remains today, the U.S. Navy’s worst defeat at sea. However, unlike America’s ground and air forces, which began inflicting disproportionate losses against their Japanese counterparts at the outset of the Solomon Islands campaign in August 1942, the navy was slow to achieve similar success. The reason the U.S. Navy took so long to achieve proficiency in ship-to-ship combat was due to the fact that it had not adequately prepared itself to fight at night.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Accidents 1945-1988, Neptune Papers No. 3
    -- Neptune Papers -- Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945 - 1988 by William M. Arkin and Joshua Handler Greenpeace/Institute for Policy Studies Washington, D.C. June 1989 Neptune Paper No. 3: Naval Accidents 1945-1988 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Overview ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nuclear Weapons Accidents......................................................................................................... 3 Nuclear Reactor Accidents ........................................................................................................... 7 Submarine Accidents .................................................................................................................... 9 Dangers of Routine Naval Operations....................................................................................... 12 Chronology of Naval Accidents: 1945 - 1988........................................................................... 16 Appendix A: Sources and Acknowledgements........................................................................ 73 Appendix B: U.S. Ship Type Abbreviations ............................................................................ 76 Table 1: Number of Ships by Type Involved in Accidents, 1945 - 1988................................ 78 Table 2: Naval Accidents by Type
    [Show full text]