DOCSLIB.ORG

Meeting with Transneft Management

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ПРОЕКТ 01/04/19 Meeting with Transneft management to discuss IFRS financial results for 2018 April 2019 IMPORTANT NOTICE 2 The information contained in this presentation has been This presentation does not constitute an offer to sell, or solicit prepared by the Company. The conclusions presented here are any offer of subscription to, or purchase of any securities. It is based on general information collected at the time of preparation hereby understood that no provision of this presentation shall of the material, and are subject to change without notice. The create the basis of any contract or obligation of any nature. company relies on information obtained from sources that it The information contained in this presentation should not for any considers reliable; however, it does not guarantee its accuracy or purpose be relied upon as complete, accurate or impartial. The completeness. All indicators in this document are presented with information in this presentation is subject to review, finalization rounding, and therefore the sum of rounded indicators may differ and modification. The content of this presentation has not been from the rounded amount of actual indicators. verified by the Company. Accordingly, we did not and do not give These materials may contain statements regarding future events on behalf of the Company, its shareholders, directors, officers or and explanations representing a forecast of such events. Any employees, or any other persons, any assurances or guarantees, statements in these materials that are not a statement of whether express or implied, regarding the accuracy, historical facts are forward-looking statements, with known and completeness or objectivity of the information or opinions unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, in connection contained herein. None of the directors of the Company, its with which our actual results, results and achievements may shareholders, officers or employees, or any other persons shall differ significantly from any future results, results or be liable for any losses of any kind that may be incurred as a achievements, reflected or implied by such forward-looking result of any use of this presentation or its content, or otherwise statements. The Company do not undertakes any obligation to in conjunction with this presentation. update any forward-looking statements contained herein so that they reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in factors affecting such statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS 3 KEY EVENTS MANAGEMENT’S CURRENT PRIORITIES Ensuring efficient and smooth operation of the system KEY OPERATING AND FINANCIAL RESULTS Tariff regulation Capex optimization CONSOLIDATION OF NCSP Opex and its optimization Environmental protection KEY INVESTMENT PROJECTS Dividends Increasing market capitalization 01. Key events KEY EVENTS 5 August 7 October – November Full repayment of foreign-currency Completion of the following denominated debt of Transneft: early investment projects: repayment of a USD loan from China Development Bank and redemption of . “Sever - 25” project eurobonds* on schedule . “Yug” project, 2nd stage (railway loading rack) 2018 2019 October 24 June 30 September 27 February 13 March 29 Start-up of the JSC “RED” Decision on record Acquisition of controlling Raising of Moody’s amount of dividends for plant for the production of Publication of stake in NCSP, increase credit rating to Baa2, 2017 of RUB 82.5 bln high-voltage electric IFRS financial of stake in NCSP Group with a Stable outlook (incl. interim dividends of RUB 27.6 bln)** engines in the city of statements for from 37% to 63%*** Chelyabinsk 2018 (project realized according to import substitution program) * As a result of the acquisition of NSCP Group in 4Q18, Transneft Group has foreign-currency denominated debt obligations as of December 31, 2018. ** 50% of normalized consolidated net income under IFRS *** effective share under IFRS 02. Key operating and financial results KEY 2018 RESULTS 7 3Q18 4Q18 QoQ 4Q17 4Q18 QoQ 2017 2018 YoY Oil transportation, mt 122 122 ►0% 121 122 ▲1% 478 480 ▲0.5% Oil freight turnover, bln tkm 309 313 ▲1% 305 313 ▲3% 1,211 1,217 ▲1% Petroleum products 10.5 9.0 ▼14% 8.0 9.0 ▲13% 33.1 39.2 ▲18% transportation, mt RUB bln Revenues 253 264 ▲4% 227 264 ▲17% 884 980 ▲11% Revenues * 195 210 ▲7% 186 210 ▲13% 744 780 ▲5% EBITDA * 106 119 ▲12% 91 119 ▲31% 409 433 ▲6% Net income to shareholders 79 53 ▼33% 25 53 ▲112% 192 224 ▲17% of Transneft Operating cash flow 70 124 ▲78% 124 124 ►0% 327 347 ▲6% (minus) Capex -66 -76 ▲15% -85 -76 ▼10% -306 -268 ▼12% Free cash flow 4 48 ▲by 11x 39 48 ▲23% 21 79 ▲by 3x * Not including purchase and sale of crude oil under contracts with Rosneft and China National United Oil Corporation ANALYSIS OF OIL AND PETROLEUM PRODUCTS TRANSPORTATION VOLUMES 8 Oil transportation volumes 51.0% 52.0% In 2018, Transneft Group ensured transportation of % 477.5 +0.5% 479.8 > 83 MLN T MLN T of oil produced in Russia 49.0% 48.0% 2017 2018 Petroleum products transportation volumes 29.0% 27.0% In 2018, Transneft Group transported % 33.1 +18.4% 39.2 > 30 MLN T MLN T of light petroleum products 71.0% 73.0% produced in Russia 2017 2018 Domestic market Export ANALYSIS OF THE GROUP’S REVENUE 9 Structure of revenue from sales for 2018, % Factor analysis of changes in revenue of Transneft Group, RUB bln 980.0 +59.5 +14.4 884.3 +20.4 +6.1 -1.5 -3.4 21.7% 2.9% 1.5% 980.0 RUB BLN 7.4% 66.5% +10.8% REVENUE OIL TRANSPORTION OILPETROLEUM PRODUCTS EXPORT SALE SALE OF OIL STEVEDORING OTHER REVENUE 2017 TRANSPORTATIONPRODUCTS OF OIL PETROLEUMPRODUCTS AND SERVICES, REVENUE* 2018 TRANSPORTATION PRODUCTSOTHER ANDOIL ADDITIONAL OTHER OIL PORT SERVICES AND FLEET SERVICES Oil transportation Petroleum products transportation * Other revenues includes revenues from oil compounding services, oil and petroleum products storage, Stevedoring services, additional port services and fleet services telecommunication services, diagnostic services, construction services, technological connection services to main pipelines, information services related to oil transportation, property leasing, resale of goods, organization of transport Other revenue* of goods, and revenues from the provision of other services. Sale of oil and petroleum products FACTOR ANALYSIS OF TRANSNEFT GROUP EBITDA DYNAMICS, RUB BLN 10 +14.4 +26.6 +10.1 433.4 408.7 -4.9 -14.3 -7.2 +6.1% EBITDA REVENUEREVENUE FROMFROM OILOIL AND AND STEVEDORING SERVICES, INCOME FROM INFLATION TAXES OPERATING EXPENSES EBITDA 2017 PETROLEUMOIL PRODUCTS PRODUCTS ADDITIONAL OTHER (OTHER THAN EXCLUDING TAXES 2018 TRANSPORTATIONTRANSPORTATION PORT SERVICES ACTIVITIES INCOME) SERVICESSERVICES AND FLEET SERVICES ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INCOME GENERATED BY TRANSNEFT GROUP, RUB BLN 11 +21.8 225.4 +24.7 +25.4 191.8 +0.9 -26.0 -1.9 -5.7 -5.6 +17.5% NET INCOME EBITDA DEPRECIATION AND RESULTS FROM INCOME TAX NETNET FINANCE FINANCIAL SHARE OF PROFIT REVALUATION OF OTHEROTHER INCOME/ INCOME/ NET INCOME 2017 AMORTIZATION OIL SALE EXPENSES EXPENDITURES/COSTS/ FROM ASSOCIATES STAKE IN EXPENDITURES,EXPENSES, 2018 TO CHINA INCOMEINCOME AND JOINTLY PJSC NCSP AS OF THE NET**NET** CONTROLLED ENTITIES DATE OF CONTROL ACQUISITION* * Income of RUB 25.4 bln formed as a result of revaluation to fair value of the Group's already owned share in NCSP (Omirico Limited) as of the date of acquisition of control under IFRS 3 ** An increase in the balance of other income and expenses is mainly due to the fact that the provision for impairment of fixed assets worth RUB 23.5 bln was recorded in 2017 ANALYSIS OF CASH FLOW GENERATED BY TRANSNEFT GROUP IN 2018, RUB BLN 12 +178.6 +22.0 -25.4 -43.6 347.2 -53.2 -9.0 277.7 +101.6 79.2 -59.5 -268.0 -108.0 13.2 PROFIT BEFORE DEPRECIATION REVALUATION CHANGES IN AMOUNT OF INTEREST OTHER CASH FLOW ACQUISITIONPURCHASE OF FREE OTHER ATTRACTION/RAISING/ DIVIDENDS NET INCOMETAX TAX AND OF OPERATING INCOME TAX PAID ADJUSTMENTS FROM FIXEDPROPERTY, ASSETS CASH INVESTMENT REPAYMENTREPAYMENT OF OF PAID AND CASH AMORTIZATION STAKE IN ASSETS PAYMENTS OPERATIONS PLANT(NET) AND FLOW ACTIVITIES** LOANSLOANS AND AND OTHER FLOW PJSC NCSP* AND (NET) EQUIPMENT BORROWINGSBORROWINGS FINANCIAL LIABILITIES ACTIVITIES * Profit of RUB 25.4 bln formed as a result of revaluation to fair value of the Group's already owned share in NCSP (Omirico Limited) as of the date of acquisition of control under IFRS 3. ** The main increase of RUB 88.9 bln associated with the net effect of operations with debt, equity securities and from placing funds on deposits/closing deposits. BORROWING STRUCTURE AND COST OF DEBT (INCLUDING NCSP GROUP) 13 Debt structure by maturity, RUB bln Leverage ratios 688.9 662.6* 1.7 109.7 88.1 225.0 Total debt / 311.3 EBITDA ** 1.4 Less than 1 year 349.4 267.9 Fron 1 to 5 years Over 5 years 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 31.12.2017 31.12.2018 Cost of debt (weighted-average rates), % FX structure of debt,% 9.29 8.29 51% 6.21 5.47 89% Ruble debt 49% Russian ruble FX debt US dollar 11% 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 12/31/2017 12/31/2018 * Without debt of Omirico and Novoport before Torresant amounted to RUB 10.4 bln ** EBITDA includes NCSP numbers for the full FY 2018 03. Consolidation of NCSP IMPACT OF NCSP GROUP ON TRANSNEFT’S FINANCIALS 15 NCSP consolidation NCSP Transneft Group Share of NCSP Group Key indicators for 2018 . In September 2018, Transneft Group Group* with NCSP Group in Transneft Group acquired 50% of the charter capital of Omirico Limited, which indirectly controls Revenue, RUB bln 15.9 980.0 1.6% a 50.1% stake in NCSP.
Recommended publications
  • "Waves" of the Russia's Presidential Reforms Break About Premier's "Energy-Rocks"

    "Waves" of the Russia's Presidential Reforms Break About Premier's "Energy-Rocks"

    AFRICA REVIEW EURASIA REVIEW "Waves" of the Russia's Presidential Reforms Break About Premier's "Energy-Rocks" By Dr. Zurab Garakanidze* Story about the Russian President Dmitry Medvedev’s initiative to change the make-up of the boards of state-owned firms, especially energy companies. In late March of this year, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev demanded that high-ranking officials – namely, deputy prime ministers and cabinet-level ministers that co-ordinate state policy in the same sectors in which those companies are active – step down from their seats on the boards of state-run energy companies by July 1. He also said that October 1 would be the deadline for replacing these civil servants with independent directors. The deadline has now passed, but Medvedev‟s bid to diminish the government‟s influence in the energy sector has run into roadblocks. Most of the high-level government officials who have stepped down are being replaced not by independent managers, but by directors from other state companies in the same sector. Russia‟s state-owned oil and gas companies have not been quick to replace directors who also hold high-ranking government posts, despite or- ders from President Dmitry Medvedev. High-ranking Russian officials have made a show of following President Medvedev‟s order to leave the boards of state-run energy companies, but government influence over the sector remains strong. This indicates that the political will needed for the presidential administration to push eco- nomic reforms forward may be inadequate. 41 www.cesran.org/politicalreflection Political Reflection | September-October-November 2011 Russia's Presidential Reforms | By Dr.
  • Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time

    Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time

    International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy ISSN: 2146-4553 available at http: www.econjournals.com International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 2016, 6(4), 782-788. Geopolitical Impact on Transformation of Territorial Organization of Russian Pipeline Transport in the Post-Soviet Time Tatyana I. Pototskaya1*, Alexander P. Katrovskiy2, Vladimir I. Chasovskiy3 1Department of Geography, Natural-Geographical Faculty, Smolensk State University, Smolensk Oblast, Russia, 2Department of Service and Tourism, Smolensk Humanitarian University, Smolensk, Russia, 3Department of Geography, Land Use and Spatial Planning, Institute of Environmental Management, Territorial Development and Urban Construction, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Russia. *Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The article presents the research on transformation of territorial organization of Russian pipeline transport in the post-Soviet time, considering its relations with neighbouring countries. The research identifies general ways of such transformation: The influence of Russia’s desire to escape from the dictate of the transit countries exporting energy; the impact of Russia’s struggle for the transportation of gas and oil extracted in the Caspian Sea basin; the influence of the struggle for the transportation of oil and gas in the Asia-Pacific region. A new database including the main pipelines and sea ports in Russia, revealed correlations in the development of pipeline transport in the post-Soviet period with the development of infrastructure of the country’s sea transport. The article identifies positive changes in the transport infrastructure (construction of Russian alternative pipeline projects), which will reduce the degree of Russian dependence on relations with neighbouring countries, as well as negative changes (construction of alternative Russian pipeline projects).
  • Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS

    Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS

    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody April 5, 2018 Issue No. 2018/12 Company News Commercial Port of Vladivostok’s shares rise 0.5% on April 3, 2018 On April 3, 2018 shares of Commercial Port of Vladivostok, a unit of Far Eastern Shipping Company (FESCO) of Russian multi-industry holding Summa Group, rose 0.48% as of 10.12 a.m. Moscow time after a 21.72% slump on April 2. On March 31, the Tverskoi District Court of Moscow sanctioned arrest of brothers Ziyavudin and Magomed Magomedov, co-owners of Summa Group, on charges of RUB 2.5 bln embezzlement. It also arrested Artur Maksidov, CEO of Summa’s construction subsidiary Inteks, on charges of RUB 669 mln embezzlement. On April 2, shares of railway container operator TransContainer, in which FESCO owns 25.07%, fell 0.4%, and shares of Novorossiysk Commercial Sea Port (NCSP), in which Summa and oil pipeline monopoly Transneft own 50.1% on a parity basis, lost 1.61%. Cherkizovo plans common share SPO, to change dividends policy On April 3, 2018 it was reported that meat producer Cherkizovo Group would hold a secondary public offering (SPO) of common shares on the Moscow Exchange to raise USD 150 mln and change the dividend policy to pay 50% of net profit under International Financial Reporting Standards. The shares grew 1.67% to RUB 1,220 as of 10:25 a.m., Moscow time, on the Moscow Exchange. Under the proposal, the current shareholders, including company MB Capital Europe Ltd, whose beneficiaries are members of the Mikhailov- Babayev family (co-founders of the group), will sell shares.
  • 11771987 01.Pdf

    11771987 01.Pdf

    EXCHANGE RATE 1 Euro = 1.238 US dollar = 3.44 Lytas = 130 Yen (as of end of January 2004) PREFACE In response to a request from the Government of the Republic of Lithuania (hereinafter referred to as “GOL”), the Government of Japan decided to conduct a Study on the Port Development Project in the Republic of Lithuania and entrusted the study to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA selected and dispatched a study team to Lithuania three times between March 2003 and June 2004, which was headed by Mr. Kiyokuni Okubo of Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. (NK). The team held discussion with the officials concerned of the GOL and conducted the field surveys at the study area. Upon returning to Japan, the team conducted studies and prepared this report. I hope that this report will contribute to the promotion of the project and to the enhancement of the friendly relationship between our two countries. Finally, I wish to express my sincere appreciation to the officials concerned of GOL for their close cooperation extended to the team. September 2004 Kazuhisa Matsuoka Vice President Japan International Cooperation Agency LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL September 2004 Mr. Kazuhisa Matsuoka Vice President Japan International Cooperation Agency Dear Mr. Matsuoka It is my great pleasure to submit herewith the Final Report of “The Study on the Port Development Project in the Republic of Lithuania”. The study team comprised of Nippon Koei Co. Ltd. (NK) conducted surveys in the Republic of Lithuania over the period between March 2003 and June 2004 according to the contract with the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA).
  • Information on IRC – R.O.S.T., the Registrar of the Company and the Acting Ballot Committee of MMC Norilsk Nickel

    Information on IRC – R.O.S.T., the Registrar of the Company and the Acting Ballot Committee of MMC Norilsk Nickel

    Information on IRC – R.O.S.T., the registrar of the Company and the acting Ballot Committee of MMC Norilsk Nickel IRC – R.O.S.T. (former R.O.S.T. Registrar merged with Independent Registrar Company in February 2019) was established in 1996. In 2003–2015, Independent Registrar Company was a member of Computershare Group, a global leader in registrar and transfer agency services. In July 2015, IRC changed its ownership to pass into the control of a group of independent Russian investors. In December 2016, R.O.S.T. Registrar and Independent Registrar Company, both owned by the same group of independent investors, formed IRC – R.O.S.T. Group of Companies. In 2018, Saint Petersburg Central Registrar joined the Group. In February 2019, Independent Registrar Company merged with IRC – R.O.S.T. Ultimate beneficiaries of IRC – R.O.S.T. Group are individuals with a strong background in business management and stock markets. No beneficiary holds a blocking stake in the Group. In accordance with indefinite License No. 045-13976-000001, IRC – R.O.S.T. keeps records of holders of registered securities. Services offered by IRC – R.O.S.T. to its clients include: › Records of shareholders, interestholders, bondholders, holders of mortgage participation certificates, lenders, and joint property owners › Meetings of shareholders, joint owners, lenders, company members, etc. › Electronic voting › Postal and electronic mailing › Corporate consulting › Buyback of securities, including payments for securities repurchased › Proxy solicitation › Call centre services › Depositary and brokerage, including escrow agent services IRC – R.O.S.T. Group invests a lot in development of proprietary high-tech solutions, e.g.
  • ROSNEFT Focused on Delivering Value

    ROSNEFT Focused on Delivering Value

    ROSNEFTROSNEFT FocusedFocused onon DeliveringDelivering ValueValue Peter O’Brien, Member of Management Board Vice-President, Finance & Investments Investor Roadshow Highlights from Q3 2008 December 2008 Important Notice The information contained herein has been prepared by the Company. The opinions presented herein are based on general information gathered at the time of writing and are subject to change without notice. The Company relies on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness. These materials contain statements about future events and expectations that are forward-looking statements. Any statement in these materials that is not a statement of historical fact is a forward-looking statement that involves known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We assume no obligations to update the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions or changes in factors affecting these statements. This presentation does not constitute an offer or invitation to sell, or any solicitation of any offer to subscribe for or purchase any securities and nothing contained herein shall form the basis of any contract or commitment whatsoever. No reliance may be placed for any purposes whatsoever on the information contained in this presentation or on its completeness, accuracy or fairness. The information in this presentation is subject to verification, completion and change. The contents of this presentation have not been verified by the Company. Accordingly, no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made or given by or on behalf of the Company or any of its shareholders, directors, officers or employees or any other person as to the accuracy, completeness or fairness of the information or opinions contained in this presentation.
  • Position and Recommendations of the Board of Directors of PJSC “LUKOIL” on Items on the Agenda of the Extraordinary General Shareholders Meeting of PJSC “LUKOIL”

    Position and Recommendations of the Board of Directors of PJSC “LUKOIL” on Items on the Agenda of the Extraordinary General Shareholders Meeting of PJSC “LUKOIL”

    Position and recommendations of the Board of Directors of PJSC “LUKOIL” on items on the agenda of the Extraordinary General Shareholders Meeting of PJSC “LUKOIL” On item 1 on the agenda of the Meeting: ‘On payment (declaration) of dividends based on the results of the first nine months of 2017’ Position: The current legislation provides for payment of dividends to shareholders of PJSC “LUKOIL” more than once a year. According to the Regulations on the Dividend Policy of PJSC “LUKOIL” (the Regulations), to ensure steady dividend payouts, the Company seeks to pay dividends to its shareholders at least twice a year: based on its results for the first nine months of the reporting year (the “Interim Dividends”), and based on the reporting year results (the “Final Dividends”). The Company’s interim dividend payment practice contributes to increase market value of its securities and attract strategic investors. Under the Regulations, the Company seeks to ensure that the amount of the Interim Dividends is at least 50% of the amount of the Final Dividends paid for the preceding reporting year1. The Board of Directors believes that the recommended interim dividend payment based on the Company’s results for the first nine months of 2017 in the amount of 85 roubles per ordinary share appears optimal, as it: • Complies with all the interim dividend calculation guidelines stipulated by the Regulations; • Reflects the Company’s financial performance in the reporting period and is economically relevant; • Will be welcomed by the investment community; • Allows the Company to maintain an optimum balance of its investment requirements and the competitive level of dividend payments; • Increases steadiness of dividend distribution.
  • Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS LETTER Weekly

    Company News SECURITIES MARKET NEWS LETTER Weekly

    SSEECCUURRIIITTIIIEESS MMAARRKKEETT NNEEWWSSLLEETTTTEERR weekly Presented by: VTB Bank, Custody December 5, 2019 Issue No. 2019/46 Company News Freight One converts shares in papers with higher face value On November 28, 2019 Russian railway cargo operator Freight One, part of Fletcher Group of tycoon Vladimir Lisin, converted 31.346 bln ordinary shares with a face value of RUB 1 into 208.976 mln ordinary shares with a face value of RUB 150. The shareholder equity remained unchanged at RUB 31.346 bln. The old shares were cancelled. Subsidiary says to sell RUB 15 bln new shares to Russian Railways On November 28, 2019 the board of directors of Federal Passenger Company, a long-distance passenger subsidiary of Russian Railways, approved the sale of RUB 15 bln of additional shares in favor of the parent company. The shareholder will consider the decision on December 6. Federal Passenger Company plans to use the money to buy rolling stock under a long-term contract. MGTS board appoints executive director Medvedev as general director On November 29, 2019 the board of directors of Moscow City Telephone Network (MGTS), a fixed line unit of mobile operator MTS, appointed Executive Director Vladislav Medvedev as general director. At the top position, Medvedev replaced Pavel Kuznetsov, who moved to MTS in mid-September as a vice president and combined the powers. The staff changes are explained by a functional merger of MGTS and MTS in the Moscow Region, which was triggered earlier in 2019. As a result, MTS will receive commercial aspects of the business and MGTS technical ones.
  • To 'BB+/B' and Assigned a Negative Outlook

    To 'BB+/B' and Assigned a Negative Outlook

    Various Rating Actions Taken On Russian Corporations Following The Downgrade Of Russia Primary Credit Analyst: Alexander Griaznov, Moscow (7) 495-783-4109; [email protected] Secondary Contacts: Sergei Gorin, Moscow (7) 495-783-4132; [email protected] Svetlana Ashchepkova, Moscow +7 495 783-4014; [email protected] Andrey Nikolaev, CFA, Paris (33) 1-4420-7329; [email protected] OVERVIEW • On Jan. 26, 2015, Standard & Poor's lowered its foreign currency ratings on Russia to 'BB+/B' and assigned a negative outlook. The transfer and convertibility (T&C) assessment was revised to 'BB+'. • As a result, we have reviewed our ratings on Russian corporations in the commodity exports, telecommunications, and infrastructure and utility sectors. • We are consequently lowering our ratings on 14 companies and subsidiaries, affirming the ratings on 10 companies and subsidiaries, and revising several outlooks to negative. • We are removing the ratings on these companies from CreditWatch where they were placed Dec. 30, 2014, following a similar action on the Russian sovereign. MOSCOW (Standard & Poor's) Feb. 4, 2015--Standard & Poor's Ratings Services said today that it has taken various actions on Russian corporations in the commodity exports, telecom, and infrastructure and utility sectors following the downgrade of Russia on Jan. 26, 2015 (see "Russia Foreign Currency Ratings Lowered To 'BB+/B'; Outlook Negative" published on RatingsDirect). At the same time, we removed all the ratings from CreditWatch, where we placed them with negative implications on Dec. 30, 2014 (for a full list of rating actions see the Ratings List below). WWW.STANDARDANDPOORS.COM/RATINGSDIRECT FEBRUARY 4, 2015 1 1382392 | 301103021 Various Rating Actions Taken On Russian Corporations Following The Downgrade Of Russia (We will be hosting a Webcast on Feb.
  • US Sanctions on Russia

    US Sanctions on Russia

    U.S. Sanctions on Russia Updated January 17, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R45415 SUMMARY R45415 U.S. Sanctions on Russia January 17, 2020 Sanctions are a central element of U.S. policy to counter and deter malign Russian behavior. The United States has imposed sanctions on Russia mainly in response to Russia’s 2014 invasion of Cory Welt, Coordinator Ukraine, to reverse and deter further Russian aggression in Ukraine, and to deter Russian Specialist in European aggression against other countries. The United States also has imposed sanctions on Russia in Affairs response to (and to deter) election interference and other malicious cyber-enabled activities, human rights abuses, the use of a chemical weapon, weapons proliferation, illicit trade with North Korea, and support to Syria and Venezuela. Most Members of Congress support a robust Kristin Archick Specialist in European use of sanctions amid concerns about Russia’s international behavior and geostrategic intentions. Affairs Sanctions related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine are based mainly on four executive orders (EOs) that President Obama issued in 2014. That year, Congress also passed and President Rebecca M. Nelson Obama signed into law two acts establishing sanctions in response to Russia’s invasion of Specialist in International Ukraine: the Support for the Sovereignty, Integrity, Democracy, and Economic Stability of Trade and Finance Ukraine Act of 2014 (SSIDES; P.L. 113-95/H.R. 4152) and the Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014 (UFSA; P.L. 113-272/H.R. 5859). Dianne E. Rennack Specialist in Foreign Policy In 2017, Congress passed and President Trump signed into law the Countering Russian Influence Legislation in Europe and Eurasia Act of 2017 (CRIEEA; P.L.
  • Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport

    Argus Nefte Transport Oil transportation logistics in the former Soviet Union Volume XVI, 5, May 2017 Primorsk loads first 100,000t diesel cargo Russia’s main outlet for 10ppm diesel exports, the Baltic port of Primorsk, shipped a 100,000t cargo for the first time this month. The diesel was loaded on 4 May on the 113,300t Dong-A Thetis, owned by the South Korean shipping company Dong-A Tanker. The 100,000t cargo of Rosneft product was sold to trading company Vitol for delivery to the Amsterdam-Rotter- dam-Antwerp region, a market participant says. The Dong-A Thetis was loaded at Russian pipeline crude exports berth 3 or 4 — which can handle crude and diesel following a recent upgrade, and mn b/d can accommodate 90,000-150,000t vessels with 15.5m draught. 6.0 Transit crude Russian crude It remains unclear whether larger loadings at Primorsk will become a regular 5.0 occurrence. “Smaller 50,000-60,000t cargoes are more popular and the terminal 4.0 does not always have the opportunity to stockpile larger quantities of diesel for 3.0 export,” a source familiar with operations at the outlet says. But the loading is significant considering the planned 10mn t/yr capacity 2.0 addition to the 15mn t/yr Sever diesel pipeline by 2018. Expansion to 25mn t/yr 1.0 will enable Transneft to divert more diesel to its pipeline system from ports in 0.0 Apr Jul Oct Jan Apr the Baltic states, in particular from the pipeline to the Latvian port of Ventspils.
  • 2020 Annual Report

    2020 Annual Report

    Online Annual Report Gazprom Neft Performance review Sustainable 2020 at a glance 62 Resource base and production development CONTENTS 81 Refining and manufacturing 4 Geographical footprint 94 Sales of oil and petroleum products 230 Sustainable development 6 Gazprom Neft at a glance 114 Financial performance 234 Health, safety and environment (HSE) 8 Gazprom Neft’s investment case 241 Environmental safety 10 2020 highlights 250 HR Management 12 Letter from the Chairman of the Board of Directors 254 Social policy Technological Strategic report development Appendices 264 Consolidated financial statements as at and for the year ended 31 December 2020, with the 16 Letter from the Chairman of the Management Board 122 Innovation management independent auditor’s report About the Report 18 Market overview 131 2020 highlights and key projects 355 Company history This Report by Public Joint Stock Company Gazprom Neft (“Gazprom 28 2020 challenges 135 Import substitution 367 Structure of the Gazprom Neft Group Neft PJSC”, the “company”) for 2020 includes the results of operational activities of Gazprom Neft PJSC and its subsidiaries, 34 2030 Strategy 370 Information on energy consumption at Gazprom collectively referred to as the Gazprom Neft Group (the “Group”). 38 Business model Neft Gazprom Neft PJSC is the parent company of the Group and provides consolidated information on the operational and financial 42 Company transformation 371 Excerpts from management’s discussion and performance of the Group’s key assets for this Annual Report. The analysis of financial condition and results of list of subsidiaries covered in this Report and Gazprom Neft PJSC’s 44 Digital transformation operations interest in their capital are disclosed in notes to the consolidated Governance system IFRS financial statements for 2020.