Green-Spring-Line-Route.Pdf
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
FHWA Feb 2003
SECTION V: Design No national standards or guidelines dictate rail-with-trail facility design. Guidance must be pieced together from standards related to shared use paths, pedestrian facilities, rail road facilities, and/or roadway crossings of railroad rights-of-way. Trail designers should work closely with railroad operations and maintenance staff to achieve a suitable RWT de sign. Whenever possible, trail development should reflect standards set by adjacent rail roads for crossings and other design elements. Ultimately, RWTs must be designed to meet both the operational needs of railroads and the safety of trail users. The challenge is to find ways of accommodating both types of uses without compromising safety or function. The recommendations in this section are based on: •Extensive research into all existing RWTs. •In-depth case studies of 21 existing and planned RWTs. •Interviews withrailroad officials, trail managers, and law enforcement officials. •Review ofexisting train and trail safety literature. •Analysis ofpubl icly-accessible trespassing and crash data. •Input from a panel ofrailro ad officials and experts, trail developers and managers, trail users, lawyers, railroad operators, and others. •Extrapolation from relevant State transportation manuals, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities (1999) (hereafter referred to as the AASHTO Bike Guide), Ameri cans with Disabilities Act (ADA) publications for trails and pedestrian facilities, the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD, 2000), and numerous Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) and other Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) documents. •Theexperience and expertise of researchers and reviewers, including experienced railroad and trail design engineers, landscape architects, safety specialists, trail de velopers and managers, trail users, lawyers, railroad operators, operations officials, and others involved in this study. -
Resent: Maryland Railway Robert B.Hoover
Reflections on the Western resent: Maryland Railway Robert B.Hoover S THE BLACKTOPbends and winds through the hills,the railroad's — A bridges deck-plate girder bridges painted black or a fading silver-gray — appear suddenly, come at you, and then loom overhead at angles as you pass on the road below. Bigwhite "speed-lettering" on the bridges announce WESTERN MARYLANDRAILWAY.Then they angle away once more, crossing the line of the Baltimore &Ohio Railroad, rivers, and entire valleys. There isno mistaking that this railroad had purpose, and its viaduct looms even larger than life,dominating the lush gold and green fallin the Casselman River Valley, which stretches out allaround me; husky, faded green-painted steel girders stride across the valley; then at the end of the bridge, far offfrom the line ofsight: a cut in the hillside. Standing on the eastern edge ofwhat was once the railroad's Salisbury Viaduct near Meyersdale insouth-central Pennsylvania, Istand atop a giant monument to the past. There willbe no trains running on this bridge today, or any other day, or ever again. Ina few years, bicyclists and joggers and hikers willpartake ofthe remote and wildviews ofthe Casselman and Youghiogheny valleys previously enjoyed onlyby trainmen and trespassers likeme. For the last 12 years, Robert B.Hoover is a paralegal withStrassburger McKenna Gutnick &Potter. He grew up inZelienople and has been interested inrailroads ever since. 27 after a chance encounter on an abandoned trestle outside of the footage, as a small child,riding the scale steam train at the Connellsville,inFayette County, Pa., Ihave slowly, thoughtfully, company's Pen-Mar amusement park in the summer of 1940. -
History of the Pere Marquette Railway
History of the Pere Marquette Railway Local History at the St. Thomas Public Library 1900: The Pere Marquette Railroad (PM) is formed by merging three small railroads in the United States: Chicago & West Michigan; Flint & Pere Marquette; and the Detroit, Grand Rapids & Western Railways. The PM is named after Père Jacques Marquette, the French Jesuit missionary who founded Michigan’s first European settlement, Sault St. Marie. 1901: Car ferry Pere Marquette 17 is placed in Lake Michigan service. The PM used car ferries on Lake Michigan to avoid the terminal and interchange delays in the area. Later, they were used on Lake Erie, the Detroit River, and in Port Huron. Car Ferry Pere Marquette 17 1902: Car ferry (first) Pere Marquette 18 is placed into Lake Michigan service. January 1903: PM acquires the Lake Erie & Detroit River Railway (LE&DRR), with main lines running from Walkerville, Windsor to St. Thomas, Ontario, as well as from Sarnia to Chatham and Erieau. This begins the Pere Marquette’s presence in Canada. 1904: The Pere Marquette secures running rights from Buffalo, New York and Niagara Falls, New York over the Canadian Southern railway lines to reach St. Thomas, where the PM’s main Canadian facilities will be located. 1905: Shop facilities are constructed in St. Thomas. December 1905: The first receivership begins, meaning that the company is controlled by others in order to make the best decision based on its finances, whether that is stabilizing or selling the company. The Pere Marquette has struggled financially for much of its operating life, and will continue to do so. -
DEC 0 1 2003 Termination of Coverage
B.C.D. 08-45.27 EMPLOYER STATUS DETERMINATION DEC 0 1 2003 Termination of Coverage This is the determination of the Railroad Retirement Board concerning the continued coverage as employers under the Railroad Retirement Act (45 U.S.C. § 231 et seq.) (RRA) and the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (45 U.S.C. § 351 et seq.) (RUIA) of 45 covered entities. The Board’s Audit and Compliance Section has identified these 45 employers which were never assigned a BA number. These entities were formerly operated by a covered rail carrier employer or formerly provided creditable service to a covered employer. In each case, the railroad operator or service recipient no longer operates and has been terminated as a covered employer. Since the operating/service recipient companies have ceased railroad or rail related operations and, in many instances, have ceased to exist, and no railroad or rail related operation is conducted by or on behalf of any of these 45 entities, their employer status is terminated as explained in more detail below. Union Lumber Company Service for Union Lumber Company was credited to the California Western Railroad and Navigation Company (BA Number 2703), which was a covered employer from June 30, 1905 to January 1, 1948, when its name was changed to California Western Railroad. California Western Railroad retained BA Number 2703 and was a covered employer until it ceased operations June 30, 1976. The Board’s records indicate that the service of train and engine crews engaged in the operation of the logging railroad of Union Lumber Company was creditable as service to the California Western Railroad & Navigation Company from December 1, 1917. -
Pa-Railroad-Shops-Works.Pdf
[)-/ a special history study pennsylvania railroad shops and works altoona, pennsylvania f;/~: ltmen~on IndvJ·h·;4 I lferifa5e fJr4Je~i Pl.EASE RETURNTO: TECHNICAL INFORMATION CENTER DENVER SERVICE CE~TER NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ~ CROFIL -·::1 a special history study pennsylvania railroad shops and works altoona, pennsylvania by John C. Paige may 1989 AMERICA'S INDUSTRIAL HERITAGE PROJECT UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I NATIONAL PARK SERVICE ~ CONTENTS Acknowledgements v Chapter 1 : History of the Altoona Railroad Shops 1. The Allegheny Mountains Prior to the Coming of the Pennsylvania Railroad 1 2. The Creation and Coming of the Pennsylvania Railroad 3 3. The Selection of the Townsite of Altoona 4 4. The First Pennsylvania Railroad Shops 5 5. The Development of the Altoona Railroad Shops Prior to the Civil War 7 6. The Impact of the Civil War on the Altoona Railroad Shops 9 7. The Altoona Railroad Shops After the Civil War 12 8. The Construction of the Juniata Shops 18 9. The Early 1900s and the Railroad Shops Expansion 22 1O. The Railroad Shops During and After World War I 24 11. The Impact of the Great Depression on the Railroad Shops 28 12. The Railroad Shops During World War II 33 13. Changes After World War II 35 14. The Elimination of the Older Railroad Shop Buildings in the 1960s and After 37 Chapter 2: The Products of the Altoona Railroad Shops 41 1. Railroad Cars and Iron Products from 1850 Until 1952 41 2. Locomotives from the 1860s Until the 1980s 52 3. Specialty Items 65 4. -
Get on Board! New Freedom, Pa
GET ON BOARD! NEW FREEDOM, PA Recently re-branded from www.NorthernCentralRailway.com VISION Northern Central Railway aspires to be the most unique railroad experience in the Eastern United States. MISSION Northern Central Railway will enhance the economic engine of York County by delivering historical, educational and entertaining experiences on an excursion railroad. CASE FOR SUPPORT & GOAL Northern Central Railway (originally Steam into History) was founded by William “Bill” Simpson, a deeply involved NORTHERN CENTRAL RAILWAY WILL CONTINUE TO ENHANCE York community business leader and philanthropist. For THE ECONOMIC VITALITY OF YORK COUNTY BY: ten years prior to his death in 2012, Bill and his life-long ➣ Sharing family experiences on memorable themed rides friend, Reed Anderson combined their vision, love of York like our holiday Tannenbaum and Santa Express excursions, beautiful Fall Foliage rides, the annual Pennsylvania Cowboy County, and passion for trains to rally businesses and Weekend, and other experiences for kids of all ages such as major donors to develop and launch Steam into History. Easter Bunny, Princess, and Superhero events Steam Into History grew over the next seven years, offering ➣ Offering a truly unique experience for railroad aficionados much more than the original historical vision. The organization riding authentic steam and diesel trains on a beautiful, historic recently updated the brand to Northern Central Railway rail line that played an important role in our Nation’s history in order to more closely reflect -
California State Railroad Museum Railroad Passes Collection MS 855MS 855
http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c89g5tx2 No online items Guide to the California State Railroad Museum Railroad Passes Collection MS 855MS 855 CSRM Library & Archives Staff 2019 California State Railroad Museum Library & Archives 2019 Guide to the California State MS 855 1 Railroad Museum Railroad Passes Collection MS 855MS 855 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: California State Railroad Museum Library & Archives Title: California State Railroad Museum Railroad Passes Collection Identifier/Call Number: MS 855 Physical Description: 12 Linear Feet(12 postcard boxes) Date (inclusive): 1856-1976 Abstract: The CSRM Passes collection consists of railroad passes that were used by railroad employees and their families to travel for free. The passes vary geographically to include railroads across the United States as well as from the late 1850s through the 1970's. The collection has been developed by donations from individuals who believed the passes had relevance to railroads and railroading. Language of Material: English Statewide Musuem Collection Center Conditions Governing Access Collection is open for research by appointment Other Finding Aids See also MS 536 Robert Perry Dunbar passes and cards Preferred Citation [Identification of item], California State Railroad Museum Railroad Passes Collection, MS 855, California State Railroad Museum Library and Archives, Sacramento, California. Scope and Contents The CSRM Passes collection consists of railroad passes that were used by railroad employees and their families to travel for free. The passes vary geographically to include railroads from across the United States as well as from the late 1850's through the 1970's. Many of the passes are labeled the names of employees as well as their family members who are entitled to the usage of the pass. -
Surviving Maryland Railroad Stations
Surviving Maryland Railroad Stations Baltimore : The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad's Mount Royal Station, Camden Station and Mount Clare Station all still stand. Also, two former B&O office buildings remain. Also, two former Pennsylvania Railroad and one Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington Railroad (PRR subsidiary) passenger station still stand. Lastly, a Maryland & Pennsylvania Railroad freight depot remains. Aberdeen : Originally built by the B&O, to be restored (last known wooden depot standing designed by architect Frank Furness). Also, the former PRR passenger station here still stands, used as an Amtrak/MARC stop. Airey : Originally built by the Dorchester & Delaware Railroad, privately owned. Alesia : Originally built by the Western Maryland Railway, used as apartments. Antietam Station : Originally built by the Norfolk & Western Railway, used as a museum. Barclay : Originally built by the Queen Anne & Kent Railroad, privately owned and moved to Sudlersville. Bethlehem : Originally built by the Baltimore, Chesapeake & Atlantic Railway, privately owned. Blue Mount : Originally built by the Pennsylvania Railroad, privately owned. Boring : Originally built by the Western Maryland Railway, used as a post office. Bowie : Originally built by the PRR, used as a museum. Also, the former PRR freight depot here still stands, used as a museum. Brooklandville : Originally built by the PRR, privately owned. Also, the former Baltimore & Susquehanna Railroad depot here still stands, used as a business. Brunswick : Originally built by the B&O, used as a MARC stop. Bynum : Originally built by the Ma & Pa, privately owned. Cambridge : Originally built by the Dorchester & Delaware Railroad, used as a business. Centreville : The original Queen Anne & Kent Railroad freight depot here still stands. -
Interstate Commerce Commission Washington
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION WASHINGTON REPORT NO. 3332 WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY IN RE ACCIDENT NEAR PEARRE, MD., ON iiAY 15, 1950 - 2 - Report No. 3332 SUMMARY Date: May 15, 1950 Railroad: 7/ e s t e rn Ma ry 1 an d Locati on: Fearre, Md. Kind of accident: Derailment Train involved: Freight Train number: Extra 1411 West Engine number: 1*11 Consist: 110 cars, caboose Estimated speed: 35 m. p. h. Operati on: Tinetable, train orders and automatic clock-signal system Track: Single; 3°30' curve; 0.24 percent ascending grade westward Weather: Raining Time: 3:35 a. c. Casualti es: 3 Injured Cause: Rock slide INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION REPORT NO. 3332 IN THE MATTER OF MAKING ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORTS UNDER THE ACCIDENT REPORTS ACT OF MAY 6, 1910. WESTERN MARYLAND RAILWAY COMPANY July 24, 1950 Accident near Pearre, lid., on May 15, 1950, caused by a rock slide. 1 REPORT OF THE COMMISSION PATTERSON, Commissioner: On May 15, 1950, there was a derailment of a freight train on the Western Maryland Railway near Pearre, Md., which resulted in the injury of three train-service employees, "Sjnder authority of section 17 (2) of the Interstate Com merce Act the above-entitled proceeding was referred by the Commission to Commissioner Patterson for consideration and di sposi tion. - 4 - P'.'T. * 1,534 Sig. Hagerstown, lid. 18,20 mi. p.c, Patrolman's -—n Big Pool Jet, 2° o 22.00 mi. shelter ft. -p 644 u Pearre p 2.01 .mi. ."T."? Point of accident ^ ft. o 34.99 ni. -
This Is an Adaptation of the Report Currently in the HAER Collection at the Library of Congress to Illustrate the Outline Format: Engineering Structures
NOTE: This is an adaptation of the report currently in the HAER collection at the Library of Congress to illustrate the outline format: engineering structures. HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD ADDENDUM TO POTOMAC EDISON COMPANY, CHESAPEAKE & OHIO CANAL BRIDGE (Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Lift Bridge) HAER No. MD-23 Location: Spanning Chesapeake & Ohio Canal just south of U.S. 11, Williamsport, Washington County, Maryland. The C&O Canal Lift Bridge is located at latitude 39.6283, longitude -77.8269. The coordinate represents the approximate location of the bridge; the DRG does not show the feature clearly. This coordinate was obtained on 10 December 2008 by plotting its location on the Williamsport, MD USGS Digital Raster Graphic in ESRI ArcGIS 9.2. The accuracy of the coordinates is +/- 12 meters. The coordinate datum is North American Datum 1927 CONUS. Present Owner: Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historical Park Present Use: Currently out of service Significance: The Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Lift Bridge is significant as a rare surviving example of a short-span railroad vertical lift bridge, for its unusual design elements to allow unimpeded passage of canal boats pulled by animals treading the canal’s towpath, and for the economy of its design. It is the only such structure built across the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal. Historian: J. Lawrence Lee, Ph.D., P.E. Project Information: Recording of the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Lift Bridge was completed during 2007-2008 by the Historic American Engineering Record (HAER) for the Chesapeake & Ohio Canal National Historic Park (CHOH, Kevin Brandt, Superintendent). It was conducted under the general direction of Richard O'Connor, Chief, Historic Documentation Programs (HDP) and Acting Chief, HAER. -
Donald W. Furler Collection
Donald W. Furler Collection Finding Aid to the Collection at the Center for Railroad Photography & Art Prepared by Adrienne Evans Last updated: 06/19/19 Collection Summary Title: Donald W. Furler Collection Accession Number: 2017.1 Span Dates: 1931-1956 Bulk Dates: 1938-1952 Creator: Furler, Donald Ward, 1917-1994 Extent: 25 archival binders (8.34 linear feet) Language: English Repository: Center for Railroad Photography & Art, Madison, WI Abstract: This collection is composed of photographic images shot by Donald Ward Furler (1917-1994). The bulk of the collection was photographed by Furler, but it also includes work he collected from other rail photographers. Images in the collection primarily depict American railroads, mainly located in New Jersey, New York and Pennsylvania. Selected Search Terms Country: Canada United States State: Alabama New York California North Dakota Colorado Ohio Connecticut Ontario (Canada) District of Columbia Pennsylvania Georgia Quebec (Canada) Illinois Saskatchewan (Canada) Iowa Tennessee Kansas Texas Maryland Vermont Massachusetts Virginia Minnesota West Virginia Missouri Montana Montreal (Canada) New Hampshire New Jersey Donald W. Furler Collection 2 Railroad Name: Franklin and Carolina Railroad (Camp A.A. Morrison and Company, Inc. Manufacturing Company) Adirondack Railway Grand Trunk Western Railroad Alton and Southern Railway Company Grand Trunk Railway Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Gifford-Hill and Company Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Harlem Transfer Company Atlantic and North Carolina Railroad -
America's Rails-With-Trails
America’s Rails-with-Trails A Resource for Planners, Agencies and Advocates on Trails Along Active Railroad Corridors About Rails-to-Trails Conservancy Rails-to-Trails Conservancy (RTC) has helped develop more than 21,000 miles of rail-trail throughout the country and provide technical assistance for thousands of miles of potential rail-trails waiting to be built. Serving as the national voice for more than 100,000 members and supporters, RTC has supported the tremendous growth and development of rail-trails since opening our doors on February 1, 1986, and remains dedicated to the creation of a nationwide network of trails and connecting corridors. RTC is committed to enhancing the health of America’s environment, transportation, economy, neighborhoods and people — ensuring a better future made possible by trails and the connections they inspire. Orange Heritage Trail, N.Y. (Boyd Loving) Acknowledgements The team wishes to recognize and thank RTC staff who contributed to the accuracy and utility of this report: Barbara Richey, graphic designer, Jake Lynch, editor, and Tim September 2013 Rosner, GIS specialist. Report produced by Rails-to-Trails The team is also grateful for the support of other RTC staff and interns who assisted Conservancy with research and report production: LEAD AUTHORS: Priscilla Bocskor, Jim Brown, Jesse Cohn, Erin Finucane, Eileen Miller, Sophia Kuo Kelly Pack, Director of Trail Development Tiong, Juliana Villabona, and Mike Vos Pat Tomes, Program Manager, RTC extends its gratitude to the trail managers and experts who shared their Northeast Regional Office knowledge to strengthen this report. A complete list of interview and survey participants is included in the Appendix, which is available online at www.