DOCSLIB.ORG

Safbois S.P.R.L

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Safbois S.P.R.L SAFBOIS S.P.R.L. PROJECT DESIGN DOCUMENT (PDD) For validation at “CLIMATE, COMMUNITY & BIODIVERSITY ALLIANCE (CCBA)” March 2012 Jadora LLC Project Design Document (PDD) March 2012, v1.02 2 Jadora LLC Project Design Document (PDD) Table of Contents GENERAL INFORMATION ..................................................................................................... 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 13 GENERAL SECTION ............................................................................................................... 15 G1 Original Conditions in the Project Area .................................................................................. 15 G1.1 Project Area Location and Physical Parameters ............................................................................. 15 G1.2 Types and Condition of Vegetation at the Project Area ................................................................ 17 G1.3 Project Boundaries of the Project Area and the Project Zone ........................................................ 20 G1.4 Carbon Stocks within the Project Area ........................................................................................... 21 G1.5 Communities Located in the Project Zone ..................................................................................... 27 G1.6 Current Land Use and Land Tenure in the Project Zone ................................................................ 31 G1.7 Current Biodiversity within the Project Zone ................................................................................. 33 G1.8 Project Site High Conservation Values .......................................................................................... 36 G2 Baseline Projections................................................................................................................ 42 G2.1 Baseline Land Use .......................................................................................................................... 42 G2.2 Additionality .................................................................................................................................. 45 G2.3 Carbon Stock Changes ................................................................................................................... 47 G2.4 Community Impacts in Baseline Scenario ...................................................................................... 59 G.2.5 Biodiversity Impacts in Baseline Scenario .................................................................................... 60 G3 Project Design and Goals ......................................................................................................... 60 G3.1 Major Climate, Community, and Biodiversity Objectives ............................................................... 60 G3.2 Major Project Activities .................................................................................................................. 60 G3.3 Location of Project Activities ......................................................................................................... 63 G3.4 Time Frame and Project Accounting ............................................................................................. 63 G3.5 Project Risks and Mitigation Measures ......................................................................................... 63 G3.6 Maintenance of High Conservation Values ................................................................................... 64 G3.7 Measures to Enhance Climate, Community, and Biodiversity ....................................................... 65 G3.8 Involvement of Stakeholders ......................................................................................................... 65 G3.9 Publication of Public Comment Period .......................................................................................... 66 G3.10 Tools for Conflict Resolution ........................................................................................................ 66 G3.11 Project Financial Support ............................................................................................................ 67 G4 Management Capacity and Best Practices ............................................................................. 67 G4.1 Project Proponents ........................................................................................................................ 67 G4.2 Technical and Management Expertise .......................................................................................... 69 G4.3 Capacity Building ........................................................................................................................... 72 G4.4 Community Employment Opportunities ........................................................................................ 74 G4.5 Employment Laws ........................................................................................................................ 75 G4.6 Employee Safety ............................................................................................................................ 76 G4.7 Financial Health of Implementing Organizations .......................................................................... 77 G5 Legal Status and Property Rights ............................................................................................ 77 G5.1 Local Laws and Regulations .......................................................................................................... 77 G5.2 Documentation of Legal Approval ................................................................................................. 77 G5.3 Guarantees Regarding Property Encroachment/FPI Consent ....................................................... 78 G5.4 Involuntary Relocations ................................................................................................................. 78 G5.5 Illegal Activities ............................................................................................................................. 78 March 2012, v1.02 3 Jadora LLC Project Design Document (PDD) G5.6 Carbon Rights ................................................................................................................................ 78 CLIMATE SECTION ................................................................................................................ 79 CL1 Net Positive Climate Impacts................................................................................................. 79 CL1.1 Net Change in Carbon Stocks ....................................................................................................... 79 CL1.2 Net Changes in Non-CO2 Gases .................................................................................................... 82 CL1.3 Other GHG Emissions from Project Activities ............................................................................... 82 CL1.4 Positive Net Climate Impact ......................................................................................................... 82 CL1.5 Avoidance of Double Counting ..................................................................................................... 82 CL2 Offsite Climate Impacts ......................................................................................................... 82 CL2.1 Types of Leakage ........................................................................................................................... 82 CL2.2 Mitigation of Negative Offsite Impacts........................................................................................ 85 CL2.3 Unmitigated Negative Offsite Climate Impacts ........................................................................... 85 CL2.4 Unmitigated Negative Offsite Non-CO2 Climate Impacts ............................................................ 88 CL3 Climate Impact Monitoring ................................................................................................... 88 CL3.1 Carbon Pool Selection & Monitoring ............................................................................................ 88 CL3.2 Monitoring Plan ........................................................................................................................... 89 COMMUNITY SECTION ......................................................................................................... 91 CM1 Net Positive Community Impacts ........................................................................................ 91 CM1.1 Estimated Impacts on Communities ........................................................................................... 91 CM1.2 Impact on High Conservation Values ......................................................................................... 91 CM2 Offsite Stakeholder Impacts ................................................................................................ 91 CM2.1 Potential Negative Impacts on Offsite Stakeholders .................................................................. 91 CM2.2 Plans to Mitigate Potential Negative Offsite Impacts ................................................................ 92 CM2.3 No Net Negative Impacts on Offsite Stakeholders ..................................................................... 92 CM3 Community Impact Monitoring ..........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Isangi Redd+ Vcs-Ccb Project Description Summary
    ISANGI REDD+ VCS-CCB PROJECT DESCRIPTION SUMMARY Document prepared by: Project Name Isangi REDD+ Project Project Location Isangi territory, Yangambi District, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo Project Proponent Jadora, LLC. Contact: Donald Tuttle, CEO, +1 425 614-6191, [email protected] Document Prepared By Ecological Carbon Offsets Partners, LLC (ecoPartners) Auditor Rainforest Alliance. Contact: Janice O’Brien, +1-647-899-7214, [email protected] Project Start Date 01 – August – 2009 GHG accounting period and lifetime Starting 01 – August – 2009 and ending 31 – July – 2039 Project Implementation Period and August 1, 2009 – December 31, 2013 GHG Monitoring Period Validation Seeking full validation CCB Status History Undergoing Initial Validation and Verification CCB Standards Edition Used Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards, Second Edition, December 2008 CCB Benefits Summary The project seeks to address the issue of deforestation in the DRC on a local level, protecting the climate and biodiversity by maintaining and enhancing this tract of rainforest while enhancing the quality of life of the local communities through sustainable agriculture and economic development TODO Update this field Gold Level Criteria Biodiversity – The project will protect endangered and vulnerable floral species through forest conservation. Date of PD Completion 3/15/14 PD Version Number V1.3 (subject to change) Expected Verification Schedule April 17-25, 2014 1 CLIMATE, COMMUNITY AND BIODIVERSITY SUMMARY 1.1 Original Conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential and Legislative Elections in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Presidential and Legislative Elections in the Democratic Republic of the Congo November 28, 2011 Final Report Waging Peace. Fighting Disease. Building Hope. The Carter Center strives to relieve suffering by advancing peace and health worldwide; it seeks to prevent and resolve conflicts, enhance freedom and democracy, and protect and promote human rights worldwide. Presidential and Legislative Elections in the Democratic Republic of the Congo November 28, 2011 Final Report One Copenhill 453 Freedom Parkway Atlanta, GA 30307 (404) 420-5188 Fax (404) 420-5196 www.cartercenter.org The Carter Center Contents Foreword ..................................2 Postelection Developments ..................55 Executive Summary .........................4 Tabulation ..............................55 Presidential Election Results ................60 Historical and Political Background ...........13 Legislative Results .........................61 Electoral Institutions and Legal Framework for Electoral Dispute Resolution .................63 the Presidential and Legislative Elections ......16 Legal Framework .........................16 Conclusions and Recommendations . .66 Electoral System ..........................18 Appendix A: Acknowledgments . 73 Election Management ......................21 Appendix B: Terms and Abbreviations ........75 Boundary Delimitation .....................26 Appendix C: Letters of Invitation ............76 Pre-Election Developments ..................28 Appendix D: The Carter Center Observation Voter Registration .........................28
    [Show full text]
  • FIP Investment Plan for Democratic Republic of Congo
    FIP/SC.6/4 June 7, 2011 Meeting of the FIP Sub-Committee Cape Town, South Africa June 29 and 30, 2011 Agenda Item 5 INVESTMENT PLAN DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO Proposed Decision by FIP Sub-Committee The FIP Sub-Committee, having reviewed the Investment Plan for the Democratic Republic of Congo, (document FIP/SC.6/4), a) endorses the Investment Plan as a basis for the further development of the projects foreseen in the plan and takes note of the requested funding of USD60million in grant funding. The Sub-Committee reconfirms its decision on the allocation of resources, adopted at its meeting in November 2010, that a range of funding for the country should be used as a planning tool in the further development of project and program proposals to be submitted to the FIP Sub-Committee for FIP funding approval, recognizing that the minimum amount of the range is more likely and that the upper limit of the range will depend on availability of funding. The range of funding agreed for the Democratic Republic of Congo is USD 40-60 million in FIP resources. The Sub-Committee also recognizes that the quality of the proposed activities will be a significant factor in the funding to be approved by the Sub-Committee when project and program proposals are submitted for approval of FIP funding. b) approves a total of USD1.6million in FIP funding as a preparation grant for the following projects, i. USD300,000 for the project “Addressing Deforestation and Degradation in the Kinshasa Supply Area”, (World Bank) ii.
    [Show full text]
  • Kamalebo Etal 2019 Africanjo
    Received: 7 December 2017 | Revised: 15 October 2018 | Accepted: 17 January 2019 DOI: 10.1111/aje.12595 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Host plants and edaphic factors influence the distribution and diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal fruiting bodies within rainforests from Tshopo, Democratic Republic of the Congo Héritier Milenge Kamalebo1,2 | Hippolyte Nshimba Seya Wa Malale1 | Cephas Masumbuko Ndabaga3 | Léon Nsharwasi Nabahungu4 | Jérôme Degreef5,6 | André De KeseL5 1Faculté des sciences, Université de Kisangani, Kisangani, D R Congo Abstract 2Centre de Recherches Universitaires du Ectomycorrhizal fungi constitute an important component of forest ecosystems that Kivu (CERUKI)/ISP, Bukavu, D R Congo enhances plant nutrition and resistance against stresses. Diversity of ectomycorrhi‐ 3Faculté des sciences, Université Officielle de Bukavu, Bukavu, D R Congo zal (EcM) fungi is, however, affected by host plant diversity and soil heterogeneity. 4International Institute of Tropical This study provides information about the influence of host plants and soil resources Agriculture, IITA‐Kalambo, Bukavu, D R on the diversity of ectomycorrhizal fungal fruiting bodies from rainforests of the Congo Democratic Republic of the Congo. Based on the presence of fungal fruiting bodies, 5Meise Botanic Garden, Meise, Belgique 6Fédération Wallonie‐Bruxelles, Service significant differences in the number of ectomycorrhizal fungi species existed be‐ Général de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de tween forest stand types (p < 0.001). The most ectomycorrhizal species‐rich forest la Recherche Scientifique, Brussels, Belgium was the Gilbertiodendron dewevrei‐dominated forest (61 species). Of all 93 species of Correspondence ectomycorrhizal fungi, 19 demonstrated a significant indicator value for particular Héritier Milenge Kamalebo, Faculté des sciences, Université de Kisangani, Kisangani, forest stand types.
    [Show full text]
  • Biographical Information and Detail of Etienne Tshisekedi Wa Mulumba's Struggle for Democracy
    UNION POUR LA DÉMOCRATIE ET LE PROGRÈS SOCIAL [Page principale ] [ Home page ] Dear Editors, This is the first part of a two part e-mail which, together, comprise a complete english translation of the document already posted on the website in french under the title "FICHE BIOGRAPHIQUE ET COMBAT POUR LA DEMOCRATIE D'ETIENNE TSHISEKEDI WA MULUMBA , par Dr. E. Tshisekedi". At this time, when Dr. Tshisekedi contemplates visiting North America, I hope that this translation will prove useful to the UDPS membership, the readers of the website, and anyone seeking to understand better the struggle to end dictatorship and to establish the rule of law in the "Democratic" Republic of Congo. The People of Congo, united, can never be defeated ! ========================================================== Biographical information and detail of Etienne Tshisekedi wa Mulumba's struggle for democracy Index 1. Biographical information 2. Political struggle for democracy 1. BIOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION 1.1 IDENTITY a) Born at Luluabourg (Capital of the West Kasaï province) on December 14, 1932 b) Father: Alexis MULUMBA (deceased) c) Mother: Agnès KABENA MWAUKA (deceased) d) Married to Marthe KASALU e) Area of Origin in the Democratic Republic of Congo: - Territory: KABEYA KAMWANGA - District: TSHILENGE - Province: EAST KASAI l. 2 EDUCATION a) Primary: the Catholic mission of the Scheut Fathers at KABULUANDA (West Kasaï) b) Secondary: Greek/Latin Humanities at the Collège Saint Jean-Berchmans Secondary School at Kamponde in West Kasaï (1948 to 1955) c) University : Lovanium University School of Law, Leopoldville. I was the first Congolese to obtain, in 1961, the Doctor in Law diploma. 1.3 FIRST EXPERIENCE IN PUBLIC LIFE (1958 to 1978) 1° 1958 -1959 : While studying at the Faculty of Law, I was named "Counsel to the Congolese National Movement" (M.
    [Show full text]
  • Isangi Redd+ Vcs-Ccb Project Description
    PROJECT DESCRIPTION VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Second Edition ISANGI REDD+ VCS-CCB PROJECT DESCRIPTION Document prepared by: Project Name Isangi REDD+ Project Project Location Isangi territory, Yangambi District, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo Project Proponent Jadora, LLC. Contact: Donald Tuttle, CEO, +1 425 614-6191, [email protected] Document Prepared By Ecological Carbon Offsets Partners, LLC (ecoPartners) Auditor Rainforest Alliance. Contact: Janice O’Brien, +1-647-899-7214, [email protected] Project Start Date 01 – August – 2009 GHG accounting period and lifetime Starting 01 – August – 2009 and ending 31 – July – 2039 Project Implementation Period and August 1, 2009 – December 31, 2013 GHG Monitoring Period Validation Seeking full validation CCB Status History Undergoing Initial Validation and Verification CCB Standards Edition Used Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards, Second Edition, December 2008 CCB Benefits Summary The project seeks to address the issue of deforestation in the DRC on a local level, protecting the climate and biodiversity by maintaining and enhancing this tract of rainforest while enhancing the quality of life of the local communities through sustainable agriculture and economic development Gold Level Criteria Biodiversity – The project will protect endangered and vulnerable floral species through forest conservation. Date of PD Completion 3/19/2014 PD Version Number 1.26 Expected Verification Schedule April 17-25, 2014 v3.0 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION VCS Version 3, CCB Standards
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring & Implementation Isangi Redd+
    MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Second Edition MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION ISANGI REDD+ Document Prepared By Project Name Isangi REDD+ Project Project Location Isangi territory, Yangambi District, Orientale Province, Democratic Republic of the Congo Project Proponent Jadora, LLC. Contact: Donald Tuttle, CEO, +1 425 614-6191, [email protected] Auditor Rainforest Alliance. Contact: Janice O’Brien, +1-647-899-7214, [email protected] Project Start Date 01 – August – 2009 GHG accounting period and lifetime Starting 01 – August – 2009 and ending 31 – July – 2039 Project Implementation Period and August 1, 2009 – December 31, 2013 GHG Monitoring Period CCB Status History Undergoing Initial Validation and Verification CCB Standards Edition Used Climate, Community and Biodiversity (CCB) Standards, Second Edition, December 2008 CCB Benefits Summary The project seeks to address the issue of deforestation in the DRC on a local level, protecting the climate and biodiversity by maintaining and enhancing this tract of rainforest while enhancing the quality of life of the local communities through sustainable agriculture and economic development. Gold Level Criteria Biodiversity – The project will protect endangered and vulnerable floral species through forest conservation. Date of MIR Completion 3/10/14 MIR Version Number V1.21 Expected Verification Schedule April 17-25, 2014 v3.0 1 MONITORING & IMPLEMENTATION REPORT VCS Version 3, CCB Standards Second Edition Table of Contents CONTENTS 1 General ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Beyond the Illusion of Participation
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal Nature Conservation 33: 33–54 (2019)Moving beyond the illusion of participation... 33 doi: 10.3897/natureconservation.33.30781 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://natureconservation.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity conservation Moving beyond the illusion of participation in the governance of Yangambi Biosphere Reserve (Tshopo Province, Democratic Republic of Congo) Justin Kyale Koy1, Alphonse Maindo Monga Ngonga1, D. Andrew Wardell2 1 University of Kisangani, PO Box 2012, Kisangani, Democratic Republic of Congo 2 CIFOR, c/o CIRAD, Campus International de Baillarguet TA C-105/D, F-34398, Montpellier cedex 5, France Corresponding author: Justin Kyale Koy ([email protected]) Academic editor: J.M. Martínez-Paz | Received 23 October 2018 | Accepted 1 March 2019 | Published 22 April 2019 http://zoobank.org/8C8CBA52-0E54-4DE3-A84F-56EB1C0BE01C Citation: Koy JK, Ngonga AMM, Wardell DA (2019) Moving beyond the illusion of participation in the governance of Yangambi Biosphere Reserve (Tshopo Province, Democratic Republic of Congo). Nature Conservation 33: 33–54. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.33.30781 Abstract The participation of local communities in the governance of protected areas in the Democratic Republic of Congo is challenged by several external and local factors. This article aims to understand the representation of local communities and factors that influence their participation in the governance of the Yangambi Bio- sphere Reserve. Three principal sources of information (archival records, focus group and semi-structured interviews) were used to collect data. The results indicate a top-down participatory approach. The cumula- tive failure of several projects in the context of local development has led to different perceptions by local communities of their role in the participative governance of Yangambi Biosphere Reserve.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review
    International Journal of Applied Science and Engineering Review ISSN: 2582-6271 Vol.2 No.1; Jan-Feb 2021 CULTURAL VALUES AND SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN TURUMBU AREA, ISANGI TERRITORY, DR Congo (2018-2020) Jérôme WALIALA APATAKI ITINDI Sociologist, Second Term Assistant ISPT-Yangambi, researcher at Kisangani University. List of abbreviations ESU: Higher Education and University FSSAP: Faculty of Social Sciences, Administrative and Political Sciences. UNIKIS: Kisangani University D.E.S: Diploma of Study Of eerie E.T.D: Decentralized Territorial Entity B. M. S: Baptist Missionary Society. ABSTRACT In this reflection we have endeavored to analyse the issue of cultural values and sustainable rural development in a peripheral society. At this opportunity, we focused our analysis on the Turumbu sector, which is one of the three communities in the Isangi Territory in Tshopo Province to conduct our research. Since rural development remains a concern of peripheral societies, our concern in this reflection is to chart a new way out that could lead them towards permanent or sustainable development. In the end, we are reassured that once this model is applied in this reflection, the Turumbu sector will be part of the dynamics of sustainable rural development. KEYWORDS: values, cultural values, rural development, development, sustainable rural development. 1. INTRODUCTION the city or in the hinterland. This is due to many crises that contemporary societies face and the fragility of the solutions envisaged. The Republic of The Democratic Republic of Congo is located in this social configuration where particularly peripheral societies are going through innumerable difficulties in view of the living conditions that are rife there, we have, for our part, targeted the Turumbu sector, which is one of the three communities of the Isangi Territory in the Tshopo Province to conduct our research.
    [Show full text]
  • DR Congo ………………………………………….…Iv the Kele Travelling by River ………………………………………………………………………...V Kele Fishermen …………………………………………………………………………………………Vi
    A COLLECTION OF 100 KELE (D R CONGO) PROVERBS AND WISE SAYINGS By HONDI MUHIMANYI PLACIDE African Proverbs Working Group NAIROBI/ KENYA MAY 2017 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to thank sincerely all those who contributed towards the completion of this document. My greatest thanks go to Fr. Joseph G. Healey for the financial and moral support. My special thanks go to Cephas Agbemenu, to Margret Wambere Ireri, to Donald Anduvateh of Xavier-Project, who devotedly corrected the 100 Kele Proverbs. I also thank all the publishers of African Proverbs whose publications gave me good resource and inspiration to do this work. I appreciate the support of the African Proverbs Working Group for reviewing the progress of my work during their meetings. Find in this work all my gratitude. DEDICATION I dedicate this work to my late mother Ferdianne M’Nyakalaha for giving me birth, To my father Rusabunga Ladislas M. Lulyo, To my uncle Frumence Nyakalaha for showing me the true way to follow in my education, To my beloved wife who repeatedly encouraged me while tired with this research, To Prof. Nyandu Kasali for the connection, To all the members of my community and finally to Colonel Anicet Muhimuzi R, Capitaine Flory Mweze Mushiwalyahyage, Dr. Valentin Mugisho B, Fidele Lukwebo R, and Desire Zagabe R. 2 INTRODUCTION Location Province Orientale (formerly Haut-Zaire, then Haut-Congo) is one of the ten provinces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The province lies in the northeast of the country. It borders Equateur to the west, Kasai-Oriental province to the southwest, Maniema to the south, and North Kivu to the southeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Turumbu Indigenous Knowledge on Non-Cultivated Edible Plants
    Eating from the Wild: Turumbu Indigenous Knowledge on Non-Cultivated Edible Plants, Tshopo District, DRCongo Céline Termote1, Patrick Van Damme1 and Dhed’a Djailo Benoît² 1Laboratory of Tropical and Subtropical Agronomy and Ethnobotany, University of Ghent, Coupure links 653, 9000 Gent, Belgium, Tel: +32 92646089, [email protected], [email protected] ²Laboratory of Genetics, Pplant Iimprovement and Bbiotechnology, Faculty of Science, University of Kisangani, BP 2012 Kisangani, DRCongo, Tel : +243 998609315, [email protected] ABSTRACT Documenting and revalorizing the rapidly disappearing indigenous knowledge on wild edible plants is essential to promote health and preserve diversity. Focus group discussions were organized within 3 Turumbu-villages to document wild foods known, availability, preparation methods and uses. Preferences in taste, commercial, nutritional and cultural value, were discussed during participatory ranking exercises. Results show 85 species within 70 genera and 454 families. Fruits of Anonidium manni and Landolphia owariensis, and (unfolded) leaves of Megaphrynium macrostachyum and Talinum triangulare are most appreciated. Inventories and preference rankings should be completed with nutritional analyses and market studies to set priorities for participatory domestication. KEYWORDS Domestication, Ethnobotany, Wild Edible Plants, Under-Utilized Crops 1 INTRODUCTION Biodiversity conservation is of utmost importance for agriculture and world food supply. However, existing biodiversity is still under-utilized to expand food production. About 30,000 of the more than 250,000 currently described plant species are edible, whereas about 7,000 have been cultivated or collected by humans for food at one time or another (FAO, 1997). Several thousands of species may thus be considered to contribute to food security, but the value of many species is under-estimated.
    [Show full text]
  • Uses and Importance of Wild Fungi: Traditional Knowledge from the Tshopo Province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo
    Milenge Kamalebo et al. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (2018) 14:13 DOI 10.1186/s13002-017-0203-6 RESEARCH Open Access Uses and importance of wild fungi: traditional knowledge from the Tshopo province in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Héritier Milenge Kamalebo1,5*, Hippolyte Nshimba Seya Wa Malale1, Cephas Masumbuko Ndabaga2, Jérôme Degreef3,4 and André De Kesel3 Abstract Background: Wild mushrooms constitute an important non-timber forest product that provides diverse substances and services, especially food and income for local communities from many parts of the world. This study presents original ethnomycological documentation from the dense rainforests of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Methods: Ethnomycological surveys were made within local communities near the biosphere reserve of Yangambi and the Yoko forest reserve. The interviews involved 160 informants from six different ethnic communities (Bakumu, Turumbu, Topoke, Lokele, Ngelema, and Ngando). Specific reported use (RU), the relative importance (RI), and the cultural significance (CS) of wild edible fungi were calculated using quantitative data from enquiries. Results: The people from Tshopo use 73 species of wild mushrooms either for food (68 species), as medicine (9 species), in a recreational context (2 species), or related to myths and beliefs (7 species). Women are more involved in harvesting and are the main holders of cultural aspects related to fungi. The results show that knowledge of useful mushrooms differs between ethnic groups. The Ngando people have the highest ethnomycological expertise, which is expressed in their extensive cultural and practical use of fungi. Pleurotus tuber-regium is the most important species (MCSI = 1.9 and p value < 2.2e−16)asitisbeingusedforfood,as amedicine,andmore.Daldinia eschscholtzii is the most important (MUI = 0.86 and p value < 2.2e−16) for medicinal applications, while Schizophyllum commune, Auricularia cornea, A.
    [Show full text]