DOCSLIB.ORG

Patriarchs and Kings the Genesis 5 Patriarchs and the Sumerian King

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Patriarchs and Kings the Genesis 5 Patriarchs and the Sumerian King Patriarchs and Kings The Genesis 5 Patriarchs and the Sumerian King List Is There a Commonality? Pertinent Points . The Sumerian King List contains pre-flood and post-flood kings who (presumably) ruled in southern Mesopotamia from no earlier than 4800 BC to roughly 2000 BC. Seventeen copies have been discovered. Many of the kings are non-Sumerian. Until 2371 BC the official language was Sumerian then became Semitic Akkadian. Pertinent Points . Most Near East historians find Sumerians interesting and act as if no other people group was important. Historians avoid any mention of Bible personalities – especially Adam and Noah. Theologians concentrate on biblical characters and events and proceed as if the nearby Sumerians didn’t exist. Pertinent Points • Historians do accommodate a people group who spoke a Semitic tongue and lived in the same region with the Sumerians. They also recognize Semites. They do not recognize Adamites! Maybe all Akkadians stem from Adam. Or it may be that Adamites comprised only some of the Akkadian population. Akkadians may contain Ubaidan elements. And some Akkadians may have married Sumerians. Pertinent Points • Dated to 4800 BC the oldest city, Eridu, was excavated in 1941-42. Pottery fragments discovered at the bottom were identified as Ubaid with an unidentified pottery they called “Eridu ware.” • Although Ubaid pottery had been found in settlements further north dated to an earlier period, this new pottery may be indicative of an Adamite population that moved in. Relevant Time Periods in the Near East Paleolithic (Old Stone Age) 20,000 to 10,000 years ago. Natufian 10,000 to 8000 BC Neolithic (New Stone Age) 8000 to 5000 BC Hassuna 6000 to 5250 BC Samarra, Halaf, Eridu 5500 to 4700 BC - Adam, Ubaid 4500 to 3500 BC - Cain, Seth Uruk (Erech, Enoch) 3500 to 3100 BC - Noah Jemdet Nasr 3100 to 2900 BC - Flood Early Dynastic (Bronze Age) 2900 to 2370 BC - Shem to Peleg Sumer and Accad 2500 to 2000 BC - Tower of Babel Old Babylonia, Larsa 2000 to 1600 BC - Abraham Cassite, early Assyrian (Iron Age) 1600 to 911 BC Assyrian 911 to 612 BC Neo Babylonian 625 to 539 BC Relevant Time Periods in the Near East Eridu 5500 to 4700 BC - Adam Ubaid 4500 to 3500 BC - Cain, Seth Uruk (Erech) 3500 to 3100 BC - Noah Jemdet Nasr 3100 to 2900 BC - Flood Early Dynastic 2900 to 2370 BC - Shem to Peleg Sumer and Accad 2500 to 2000 BC - Babel Old Babylonia 2000 to 1600 BC - Abraham Relevant Time Periods in the Near East Eridu 5500 to 4700 BC - Adam Ubaid 4500 to 3500 BC - Cain, Seth Uruk (Erech) 3500 to 3100 BC - Noah Jemdet Nasr 3100 to 2900 BC - Flood Early Dynastic 2900 to 2370 BC - Shem to Peleg Sumer and Accad 2500 to 2000 BC - Babel Old Babylonia 2000 to 1600 BC - Abraham Relevant Time Periods in the Near East Eridu 5500 to 4700 BC - Adam Ubaid 4500 to 3500 BC - Cain, Seth Uruk (Erech) 3500 to 3100 BC - Noah Jemdet Nasr 3100 to 2900 BC - Flood Early Dynastic 2900 to 2370 BC - Shem to Peleg Sumer and Accad 2500 to 2000 BC - Babel Old Babylonia 2000 to 1600 BC - Abraham Relevant Time Periods in the Near East Eridu 5500 to 4700 BC - Adam Ubaid 4500 to 3500 BC - Cain, Seth Uruk (Erech) 3500 to 3100 BC - Noah Jemdet Nasr 3100 to 2900 BC - Flood Early Dynastic 2900 to 2370 BC - Shem to Peleg Sumer and Accad 2500 to 2000 BC - Babel Old Babylonia 2000 to 1600 BC - Abraham Four rivers and three lands pertain to the Garden of Eden. - Genesis 2:11-14 “And a river went out of Eden to water the garden … “ - Genesis 2:10 Early settlers (Ubaidans) in the region diverted water from the Euphrates down an ancient dry river bed to furnish fresh water to Eridu, the Garden, Ubaid, and Ur probably in that order. “Below let the fountain of the deep be stopped, that the flood (water) rise not at the source.” – Atrahasis Albert T. Clay, A Hebrew Deluge Story in Cuneiform “In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up …” - Genesis 7:11 “When kingship was lowered from heaven … it was in Eridu ...” - The Sumerian King List “Babylonian tradition places the Garden of Eden near Eridu.” - Archibald Sayce, Lectures on the Growth of Religion, 1880 There are at least a dozen commonalities between Adam of Genesis and the Legend of Adapa. According to legend Adapa was a priest in the city of Eridu. “And Cain went out from the presence of the Lord, and dwelt in the land of Nod …” - Genesis 4:16 “… and he (Cain) builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son, Enoch.” Genesis 4:17 Is anybody here from Minnesota? Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta “City, majestic bull bearing vigour and great awesome splendour, Kulaba ...., breast of the storm, where destiny is determined; Unug, great mountain …There the evening meal of the great abode of An was set. In those days of yore, when the destinies were determined, the great princes allowed Unug Kulaba's E- ana to lift its head high. Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta … rain which brings forth dappled barley were then increased in Unug Kulaba. Before the land of Dilmun yet existed, the E-ana of Unug Kulaba was well founded, and the holy jipar of Inana in brick-built Kulaba shone forth like the silver in the lode.” - ETCSL, Oxford, England Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta “City, majestic bull bearing vigour and great awesome splendour, the twin city ......, breast of the storm, where destiny is determined; Enoch, great mountain … There the evening meal of the great abode of the Sumerian father god was set. In those days of yore, when the destinies were determined, the great princes allowed the sacred precinct of Enoch, the twin city to lift its head high. Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta … rain which brings forth dappled barley were then increased in Enoch, the twin city. Before the land of Bahrain yet existed, the sacred precinct of Enoch, the twin city was well founded, and the holy cloister of the fertility goddess in the brick-built twin city shone forth like the silver in the lode.” - adapted from ETCSL, Oxford, England W-B 444 W-B 62 City 1 Alulim 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna 3 -kidunnu Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna 4 -alimma " 5 Dumuzi 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensibzianna 6 Ensipazianna Larak ----- 6a Enmenluanna ----- 7 Enmenduranna 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubardudu 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak ----- 9 Su-Kur-Lam " ----- 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ W-B 444 W-B 62 City 1 Alulim 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna 3 -kidunnu Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna 4 -alimma " 5 Dumuzi 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensibzianna 6 Ensipazianna Larak ----- 6a Enmenluanna ----- 7 Enmenduranna 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubardudu 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak ----- 9 Su-Kur-Lam " ----- 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ W-B 444 W-B 62 City 1 Alulim 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna 3 -kidunnu Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna 4 -alimma " 5 Dumuzi 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensibzianna 6 Ensipazianna Larak ----- 6a Enmenluanna ----- 7 Enmenduranna 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubardudu 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak ----- 9 Su-Kur-Lam " ----- 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ Composite King List City 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna " 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensipazianna Larak 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak 9 Su-Kur-Lam " 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ Composite King List City 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna " 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensipazianna Larak 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak 9 Su-Kur-Lam " 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ “Eridu was smitten with weapons Kingship was carried to Badtabira” - Sumerian King List Composite King List City 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna " 5 Dumuzi, the shepherd " 6 Ensipazianna Larak 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak 9 Su-Kur-Lam " 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ o The prophet Ezekiel had a vision where he was "brought to the door of the gate of the Lord's house," and "there sat women weeping for Tammuz" - Ezekiel 8:14 o “Badtabira was smitten with weapons Kingship was carried to Larak” - Sumerian King List Composite King List City 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna " 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensipazianna Larak 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak 9 Su-Kur-Lam " 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ “Larak was smitten with weapons Kingship was carried to Sippar” - Sumerian King List Composite King List City 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna " 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensipazianna Larak 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak 9 Su-Kur-Lam " 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ “Sippar was smitten with weapons Kingship was carried to Shuruppak” - Sumerian King List Composite King List City 1 Alulim Eridu 2 Alalgar " 3 Enmenluanna Badtabira 4 Enmengalanna " 5 Dumuzi " 6 Ensipazianna Larak 7 Enmenduranna Sippar 8 Ubartutu Shuruppak 9 Su-Kur-Lam/Suruppak " 10 Ziusudra " ------------ The Flood ------------ “After the flood had swept over, and the kingship had descended from heaven, the kingship was in Kish.” Twenty-three kings ruled until, “Kish was defeated and the kingship was taken to E-ana.” - The Sumerian King List “In E-ana, Meskiagasher, the son of Utu, became lord and king; he entered the sea and disappeared. Enmerkar, the son of Meskiagasher, the king of Unug, who built Unug became king ... “ - The Sumerian King List Comp. King List Berossus 1 Alulim 1 Alorus 2 Alalgar 2 Alaparos 3 Enmenluanna 3 Amelon 4 Enmengalanna 4 Ammenon ----- 5 Amegalaros 5 Dumuzi 6 Daonus 6 Ensipazianna 8 Amempsinos 7 Enmenduranna 7 Edoranchus 8 Ubartutu 9 Otiartes 9 Su-Kur-Lam ----- 10 Ziusudra 10 Xisuthros ------------ The Flood -------- o Patriarch Comp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Epic of Gilgamesh Humbaba from His Days Running Wild in the Forest
    Gilgamesh's superiority. They hugged and became best friends. Name Always eager to build a name for himself, Gilgamesh wanted to have an adventure. He wanted to go to the Cedar Forest and slay its guardian demon, Humbaba. Enkidu did not like the idea. He knew The Epic of Gilgamesh Humbaba from his days running wild in the forest. He tried to talk his best friend out of it. But Gilgamesh refused to listen. Reluctantly, By Vickie Chao Enkidu agreed to go with him. A long, long time ago, there After several days of journeying, Gilgamesh and Enkidu at last was a kingdom called Uruk. reached the edge of the Cedar Forest. Their intrusion made Humbaba Its ruler was Gilgamesh. very angry. But thankfully, with the help of the sun god, Shamash, the duo prevailed. They killed Humbaba and cut down the forest. They Gilgamesh, by all accounts, fashioned a raft out of the cedar trees. Together, they set sail along the was not an ordinary person. Euphrates River and made their way back to Uruk. The only shadow He was actually a cast over this victory was Humbaba's curse. Before he was beheaded, superhuman, two-thirds god he shouted, "Of you two, may Enkidu not live the longer, may Enkidu and one-third human. As king, not find any peace in this world!" Gilgamesh was very harsh. His people were scared of him and grew wary over time. They pleaded with the sky god, Anu, for his help. In When Gilgamesh and Enkidu arrived at Uruk, they received a hero's response, Anu asked the goddess Aruru to create a beast-like man welcome.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing and City Life
    29 THEME2 writing and city life CITY life began in Mesopotamia*, the land between the Euphrates and the Tigris rivers that is now part of the Republic of Iraq. Mesopotamian civilisation is known for its prosperity, city life, its voluminous and rich literature and its mathematics and astronomy. Mesopotamia’s writing system and literature spread to the eastern Mediterranean, northern *The name Syria, and Turkey after 2000 BCE, so that the kingdoms of Mesopotamia is that entire region were writing to one another, and to the derived from the Pharaoh of Egypt, in the language and script of Mesopotamia. Greek words mesos, Here we shall explore the connection between city life and writing, and then look at some outcomes of a sustained meaning middle, tradition of writing. and potamos, In the beginning of recorded history, the land, mainly the meaning river. urbanised south (see discussion below), was called Sumer and Akkad. After 2000 BCE, when Babylon became an important city, the term Babylonia was used for the southern region. From about 1100 BCE, when the Assyrians established their kingdom in the north, the region became known as Assyria. The first known language of the land was Sumerian. It was gradually replaced by Akkadian around 2400 BCE when Akkadian speakers arrived. This language flourished till about Alexander’s time (336-323 BCE), with some regional changes occurring. From 1400 BCE, Aramaic also trickled in. This language, similar to Hebrew, became widely spoken after 1000 BCE. It is still spoken in parts of Iraq. Archaeology in Mesopotamia began in the 1840s. At one or two sites (including Uruk and Mari, which we discuss below), excavations continued for decades.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sumerian King List the Sumerian King List (SKL) Dates from Around 2100 BCE—Near the Time When Abram Was in Ur
    BcResources Genesis The Sumerian King List The Sumerian King List (SKL) dates from around 2100 BCE—near the time when Abram was in Ur. Most ANE scholars (following Jacobsen) attribute the original form of the SKL to Utu-hejel, king of Uruk, and his desire to legiti- mize his reign after his defeat of the Gutians. Later versions included a reference or Long Chronology), 1646 (Middle to the Great Flood and prefaced the Chronology), or 1582 (Low or Short list of postdiluvian kings with a rela- Chronology). The following chart uses tively short list of what appear to be the Middle Chronology. extremely long-reigning antediluvian Text. The SKL text for the following kings. One explanation: transcription chart was originally in a narrative form or translation errors resulting from and consisted of a composite of several confusion of the Sumerian base-60 versions (see Black, J.A., Cunningham, and the Akkadian base-10 systems G., Fluckiger-Hawker, E, Robson, E., of numbering. Dividing each ante- and Zólyomi, G., The Electronic Text diluvian figure by 60 returns reigns Corpus of Sumerian Literature (http:// in harmony with Biblical norms (the www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/), Oxford bracketed figures in the antediluvian 1998-). The text was modified by the portion of the chart). elimination of manuscript references Final versions of the SKL extended and by the addition of alternative the list to include kings up to the reign name spellings, clarifying notes, and of Damiq-ilicu, king of Isin (c. 1816- historical dates (typically in paren- 1794 BCE). thesis or brackets). The narrative was Dates.
    [Show full text]
  • Seminary Studies
    ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES VOLUME VI JANUARI 1968 NUMBER I CONTENTS Heimmerly-Dupuy, Daniel, Some Observations on the Assyro- Babylonian and Sumerian Flood Stories Hasel, Gerhard F., Sabbatarian Anabaptists of the Sixteenth Century: Part II 19 Horn, Siegfried H., Where and When was the Aramaic Saqqara Papyrus Written ? 29 Lewis, Richard B., Ignatius and the "Lord's Day" 46 Neuffer, Julia, The Accession of Artaxerxes I 6o Specht, Walter F., The Use of Italics in English Versions of the New Testament 88 Book Reviews iio ANDREWS UNIVERSITY BERRIEN SPRINGS, MICHIGAN 49104, USA ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES The Journal of the Seventh-day Adventist Theological Seminary of Andrews University, Berrien Springs, Michigan SIEGFRIED H. HORN Editor EARLE HILGERT KENNETH A. STRAND Associate Editors LEONA G. RUNNING Editorial Assistant SAKAE Kos() Book Review Editor ROY E. BRANSON Circulation Manager ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES publishes papers and short notes in English, French and German on the follow- ing subjects: Biblical linguistics and its cognates, textual criticism, exegesis, Biblical archaeology and geography, an- cient history, church history, theology, philosophy of religion, ethics and comparative religions. The opinions expressed in articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors. ANDREWS UNIVERSITY SEMINARY STUDIES is published in January and July of each year. The annual subscription rate is $4.00. Payments are to be made to Andrews University Seminary Studies, Berrien Springs, Michigan 49104, USA. Subscribers should give full name and postal address when paying their subscriptions and should send notice of change of address at least five weeks before it is to take effect; the old as well as the new address must be given.
    [Show full text]
  • The Purchasing Power of Silver in the Seleucid Empire and Beyond
    Academy Colloquium “The efficiency of Markets in Pre-industrial societies: the case of Babylonia (c. 400-60 BC) in comparative perspective” (19 – 21 May 2011) Introduction. The relevance of the Babylonian price data for the study of market integration and market efficiciency. (provisional paper; not to be quoted) Bert van der Spek 0. Prolegomena The purpose of this paper is to introduce the topic of the conference. Because the point of departure is a new corpus of data from Babylonia in the first millennium BC, I shall first present some information on this corpus and on Babylonian economy in general. The paper by Michael Jursa shall provide a deeper insight into the Babylonian economy. For much more detailed information I recommend his magnum opus (2010), which is the result of a great research project in Vienna on the character of the Babylonian economy in the first millennium BC. In an appendix I present some basic historical facts and information on weights and measures, which may be of help for people who are not acquainted with the history of the Near East in Antiquity. My second point of attention will be a short introduction to the points of discussion which I regard as basic for this conference. 1. Introduction The aim of this conference is to include the history of Antiquity into the discussions on market efficiency which has been a major topic of research for the last decades. This topic has gained more attention since the study of economic institutions and structures necessary for economic growth has been brought further and further back in time.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Is the Daughter of Babylon?
    WHO IS THE DAUGHTER OF BABYLON? ● Babylon was initially a minor city-state, and controlled little surrounding territory; its first four Amorite rulers did not assume the title of king. The older and more powerful states of Assyria, Elam, Isin, and Larsa overshadowed Babylon until it became the capital of Hammurabi's short-lived empire about a century later. Hammurabi (r. 1792–1750 BC) is famous for codifying the laws of Babylonia into the Code of Hammurabi. He conquered all of the cities and city states of southern Mesopotamia, including Isin, Larsa, Ur, Uruk, Nippur, Lagash, Eridu, Kish, Adab, Eshnunna, Akshak, Akkad, Shuruppak, Bad-tibira, Sippar, and Girsu, coalescing them into one kingdom, ruled from Babylon. Hammurabi also invaded and conquered Elam to the east, and the kingdoms of Mari and Ebla to the northwest. After a protracted struggle with the powerful Assyrian king Ishme-Dagan of the Old Assyrian Empire, he forced his successor to pay tribute late in his reign, spreading Babylonian power to Assyria's Hattian and Hurrian colonies in Asia Minor. After the reign of Hammurabi, the whole of southern Mesopotamia came to be known as Babylonia, whereas the north had already coalesced centuries before into Assyria. From this time, Babylon supplanted Nippur and Eridu as the major religious centers of southern Mesopotamia. Hammurabi's empire destabilized after his death. Assyrians defeated and drove out the Babylonians and Amorites. The far south of Mesopotamia broke away, forming the native Sealand Dynasty, and the Elamites appropriated territory in eastern Mesopotamia. The Amorite dynasty remained in power in Babylon, which again became a small city-state.
    [Show full text]
  • Sumerian Disputation Poems
    chapter i.2 Sumerian Disputation Poems A total of six Sumerian poems fulfil the five characteristics of the genre outlined above: Hoe and Plow (csl 5.3.1), Ewe and Grain (csl 5.3.2), Summer and Winter (csl 5.3.3), Tree and Reed (csl 5.3.4), Bird and Fish (csl 5.3.5), and Silver and Copper (csl 5.3.6). These six poems are called in their final doxologies a- da-mìn, “disputation” (see above). They are, however, not the only Sumerian poems so classified: at least two other texts are called adamin by their rubrics: Enmerkar and the Lord of Aratta (csl 1.8.2.3) and Enmerkar and Ensuḫkešdana (csl 1.8.2.4).25 In addition, the poem Dumuzi and Enkimdu (csl 4.8.31)26 is classified by its rubric as a balbale (a rubric often used for love poetry), but a line towards the end represents it as a “disputation held between a shepherd and a farmer.”27 These three poems, which have been normally described as either “epics” (thus the two texts featuring Enmerkar) or “love poems” (thus Dumuzi and Enkimdu), have been shown by several authors to have the same basic structure as other disputation poems, and also to contain indicators that suggest that they were performed.28 Although they belong to the same emic category as the six poems men- tioned, and although they display the same basic tripartite structure, these three poems differ from them in a number of ways. First, none of them con- tains a cosmogonic prologue, which appears in five of the six disputation poems (all except Hoe and Plow).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms
    McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms McDONALD INSTITUTE CONVERSATIONS The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms Edited by Norman Yoffee with contributions from Tom D. Dillehay, Li Min, Patricia A. McAnany, Ellen Morris, Timothy R. Pauketat, Cameron A. Petrie, Peter Robertshaw, Andrea Seri, Miriam T. Stark, Steven A. Wernke & Norman Yoffee Published by: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research University of Cambridge Downing Street Cambridge, UK CB2 3ER (0)(1223) 339327 [email protected] www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, 2019 © 2019 McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 (International) Licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ISBN: 978-1-902937-88-5 Cover design by Dora Kemp and Ben Plumridge. Typesetting and layout by Ben Plumridge. Cover image: Ta Prohm temple, Angkor. Photo: Dr Charlotte Minh Ha Pham. Used by permission. Edited for the Institute by James Barrett (Series Editor). Contents Contributors vii Figures viii Tables ix Acknowledgements x Chapter 1 Introducing the Conference: There Are No Innocent Terms 1 Norman Yoffee Mapping the chapters 3 The challenges of fragility 6 Chapter 2 Fragility of Vulnerable Social Institutions in Andean States 9 Tom D. Dillehay & Steven A. Wernke Vulnerability and the fragile state
    [Show full text]
  • CAMBRIDGE LIBRARY COLLECTION Books of Enduring Scholarly Value
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-108-07901-3 - The Chaldean Account of Genesis: Containing the Description of the Creation, the Deluge, the Tower of Babel, the Desruction of Sodom, the Times of the Patriarchs, and Nimrod George Smith Frontmatter More information CAMBRIDGE LIBRARY COLLECTION Books of enduring scholarly value Archaeology The discovery of material remains from the recent or the ancient past has always been a source of fascination, but the development of archaeology as an academic discipline which interpreted such finds is relatively recent. It was the work of Winckelmann at Pompeii in the 1760s which first revealed the potential of systematic excavation to scholars and the wider public. Pioneering figures of the nineteenth century such as Schliemann, Layard and Petrie transformed archaeology from a search for ancient artifacts, by means as crude as using gunpowder to break into a tomb, to a science which drew from a wide range of disciplines - ancient languages and literature, geology, chemistry, social history - to increase our understanding of human life and society in the remote past. The Chaldean Account of Genesis The Assyriologist George Smith (1840–76) was trained originally as an engraver, but was enthralled by the discoveries of Layard and Rawlinson. He taught himself cuneiform script, and joined the British Museum as a ‘repairer’ or matcher of broken cuneiform tablets. Promotion followed, and after one of Smith’s most significant discoveries among the material sent to the Museum – a Babylonian story of a great flood – he was sent to the Middle East, where he found more inscriptions which contained other parts of the epic tale of Gilgamesh.
    [Show full text]
  • Mesopotamian Epic."
    ' / Prof. Scott B. Noege1 Chair, Dept. of Near Eastern Languages and Civilization University of Washington "Mesopotamian Epic." First Published in: John Miles Foley, ed. The Blackwell Companion to Ancient Epic London: Blackwell (2005), 233-245. ' / \.-/ A COMPANION TO ANCIENT EPIC Edited by John Miles Foley ~ A Blackwell '-II Publishing ~"o< - -_u - - ------ @ 2005 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd BLACKWELL PUBLISHING 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford OX4 2DQ, UK 550 Swanston Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia The right ofJohn Miles Foley to be identified as the Author of the Editorial Material in this Work has been asserted in accordance with the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher. First published 2005 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd 1 2005 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data A companion to ancient epic / edited by John Miles Foley. p. cm. - (Blackwell companions to the ancient world. Literature and culture) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 1-4051-0524-0 (alk. paper) 1. Epic poetry-History and criticism. 2. Epic literature-History and criticism. 3. Epic poetry, Classical-History and criticism. I. Foley, John Miles. II. Series. PN1317.C662005 809.1'32-dc22 2004018322 ISBN-13: 978-1-4051-0524-8 (hardback) A catalogue record for this title is available from the British Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Forgetting the Sumerians in Ancient Iraq Jerrold Cooper Johns Hopkins University
    “I have forgotten my burden of former days!” Forgetting the Sumerians in Ancient Iraq Jerrold Cooper Johns Hopkins University The honor and occasion of an American Oriental Society presidential address cannot but evoke memories. The annual AOS meeting is, after all, the site of many of our earliest schol- arly memories, and more recent ones as well. The memory of my immediate predecessor’s address, a very hard act to follow indeed, remains vivid. Sid Griffiths gave a lucid account of a controversial topic with appeal to a broad audience. His delivery was beautifully attuned to the occasion, and his talk was perfectly timed. At the very first AOS presidential address I attended, the speaker was a bit tipsy, and, ten minutes into his talk, he looked at his watch and said, “Oh, I’ve gone on too long!” and sat down. I also remember a quite different presi- dential address in which, after an hour had passed, the speaker declared, “I know I’ve been talking for a long time, but since this is the first and only time most of you will hear anything about my field, I’ll continue on until you’ve heard all I think you ought to know!” It is but a small move from individual memory to cultural memory, a move I would like to make with a slight twist. As my title announces, the subject of this communication will not be how the ancient Mesopotamians remembered their past, but rather how they managed to forget, or seemed to forget, an important component of their early history.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire and Ruins in Nineteenth-Century Egypt
    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont Pomona Senior Theses Pomona Student Scholarship 2020 Empire and Ruins in Nineteenth-Century Egypt Adin Becker Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses Part of the Arabic Studies Commons, Architectural History and Criticism Commons, and the Near Eastern Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Becker, Adin, "Empire and Ruins in Nineteenth-Century Egypt" (2020). Pomona Senior Theses. 232. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/pomona_theses/232 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Pomona Student Scholarship at Scholarship @ Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in Pomona Senior Theses by an authorized administrator of Scholarship @ Claremont. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Empire and Ruins in Nineteenth-Century Egypt Adin Becker An essay submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Middle Eastern Studies at Pomona College Sunday, May 3, 2020 Becker 2 EMPIRE AND RUINS IN NINETEENTH-CENTURY EGYPT Modern Egypt began as a site for academic exploration and exploitation. Its tremendous archeological riches, indisputable centrality within the world of Islam, and complex multifaceted cultural makeup have piqued the interests of academics worldwide. For centuries, scholars have fantasized about “what lay beyond the water,” a land where they knew “colossal relics of the oldest-known human civilization were concentrated along the Nile in crumbling piles between 1 two vast, usurping deserts, amidst a modern population that professed faith in Islam.” Absent​ ​ material motives, however, Egypt long remained a land of mystery for the West, ripe for discovery and exploration.
    [Show full text]