Sakai: Building an Open Source Community

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sakai: Building an Open Source Community Sakai: Building an Open Source Community A Retrospective Diary Version 0.8 Charles Severance Copyright ©2011- All Rights Reserved, Charles Severance. ISBN-13: 978-1494273675 ISBN-10: 1494273675 CreateSpace Title: 4541576 Front Cover Photography: Town Square Photo, Mason MI Back Cover Photography: HJ Seeley Sakaiger Art: www.sakaiger.com Draft 0.0.1 Printing: January 2011, Michigan Library Espresso Book Machine Draft 0.0.2 Printing: March 2011, Michigan Library Espresso Book Machine First Printing (Alpha 0.7.1) : May 2011, Amazon CreateSpace Second Printing (Alpha 0.7.2) : January 2012, Amazon CreateSpace Third Printing : January 2014, Amazon CreateSpace Preface Writing software that supports teaching, learning and collaboration is far more than just a job. Since teaching and learning are some of the most fundamental human activities, we all have a vested interest in teaching and learning software. Discussions about the design of teaching and learning software can evoke passions from virtually everyone involved in the pro- cess. Passions run high and the stakes are high. On most college cam- puses, the software to support teaching and learning (Blackboard, Moodle, Sakai, etc.) is used more often than any other campus software. Student and teacher lives revolve around the software. A significant outage of a course management system in the last few weeks of class is likely to produce howls of anger from students, teachers, and administrators alike. Building an open source product and community around the Sakai Learning Management System was far from a mere technical activity. This book is about that journey of making open source software and deriving and chang- ing the rules as to how we would make that software as we went along. It is about software developers, managers, designers, and end users all dropped into a crucible and put under pressure to make something great and do so in record time. Charles Severance www.dr-chuck.com Ann Arbor, MI, USA May 8, 2011 Charles Severance is a Clinical Associate Professor at the University of Michigan School of Information. About the Book My intention in writing this book is to give a first-person account of the effort and passion that goes into an open source project. I think that society oversimplifies open source as a bunch of altruistic nerds working in their iii iv basements around the world. Open source projects are often as complex, exciting, rich, and stressful as commercial efforts. In some ways, open source is more complex than commercial activities because there are so many moving parts and there is no real “boss” to make final decisions. Decisions are made based on long discussions that search for the group’s consensus position, often with strong passions on all sides. I hope to cap- ture some of the emotion behind the scenes in the Sakai project that was launched in 2004. Many people participated in the leadership of Sakai and they have their own stories. This book presents my story and perspective as chief architect in the project. Others are likely to have different perspectives on the events I describe. You can find errata, links to supporting materials, images, videos, and a full timeline of my involvement in Sakai at: http://www.dr-chuck.com/sakai-book/ You can also find me on Twitter as @drchuck. You can add ’@drchuck’ to a tweet and I will see it. Feel free to send me comments, reviews, typos, factual errors, or any other reaction as you read the book. Since it takes a village to find and fix my mistakes, I need to thank all of the many people who looked at early versions of the book including: Brad Wheeler, Glenn Golden, Seth Theriault, Anthony Whyte, Rob Lowden, Lance Speelmon, Craig Counterman, Lois Brooks, Shoji Kajita, Vivie Sinou, Ian Dolphin, John Norman, Ian Boston, Robert Crouchley, Adrian Fish, RJ (Robert) Allan, Stephen Marquard, David Horwitz, Alan Berg, David Barroso, Alexandre Balleste,´ Joseph Hardin, Susan Hardin, Mark Norton, Greg Gay, Steve Swinsburg, Joel Greenberg, John Williams, Shawn Mehan, Beth Kirschner, John Leasia, Noah Botimer, Jim Eng, David Haines, Gonzalo Silverio, Matthew Jones, Marc Alier, Eva de Lera, Francesc Santanach Delisau, Llu´ıs Vicent, Pablo Casado Arias, Megan May, Tom Finholt, Jan Posten Day, John Fontaine, George Kroner, Erin Knight, Nathan Gandomi, Andrew Krumm, Nicola Monat-Jacobs, Sam Ottenhoff, Scott Siddall, Kazou Yana, Russell Severance, Richard Wiggins, Judy Matthews, and Mary Miles. The book was written on a Macintosh using the “vi” editor and format- ted using LaTeX. Early drafts of the book were printed on the Espresso Book Machine at the University of Michigan Library with help from Terri Geitgy. Contents 1 Before Sakai 1 2 Forming the Sakai Coalition 9 3 The Sakai Project Begins 17 4TheFirstSummerofSakai 29 5 The Big Meeting 37 6 The Little Project That Could 43 7 FrameworkII—TheSequel 47 8 The Devil is in the Details 55 9 Sakai 2.0: A Star is Born 65 10 Lost in Transition 73 11 The Great Beyond 87 12 Finishing on a High Note 103 13 Beyond the Mellon Grant 113 14 To Be or Not to Be 125 15 Onwards, Upwards, and Down Under 131 16 V-Day 147 17 Family “Vacation” Time 153 18 Educational Community License 161 v vi CONTENTS 19 U.S. Patent No. 6,988,138 175 20 The Fall 181 21 The Winter 195 22 The Tipping Point 199 23 After the Fall 211 24 The End of an Era 219 25 Epilogue 223 26 Reflection 229 Chapter 1 Before Sakai I have been developing computer software since the 1970’s. While tech- nology and connectivity have improved greatly since then, in a sense there has been little change in why I love to write software. From the beginning I loved to write software that would surprise and delight the users of that soft- ware. The more people who found the software to be helpful, the happier I was. For someone who was a nearly invisible nerd through high school, it was pretty exciting to have an audience of users that waited anxiously for me to announce the next feature to be developed and released. Finally, I mattered to a bunch of people — even if they did not know who I was. Even if I was not so cool as a person, the software I produced was pretty cool. For those of us close to the emerging Internet and World-Wide-Web between 1985 and 1995, it seemed as though we needed to educate everyone so they could be part of the growing worldwide community connected by the network. In 1994, East Lansing, Michigan was one of the first communities in the country to rollout high speed 10 Megabit per second cable modems. I helped set up the connection between Michigan State University and the TCI Cable network infrastructure. Based on the friendships that were de- veloped during that project, I was asked to co-host a talk show about the Internet with my good friend and fellow Michigan State employee Richard Wiggins. TCI Cable would produce the program with John Liskey as the Executive Producer and Amy Leahey as the Producer and Director. The purpose of the program was to use TCI Cable modems on our show and regularly remind our viewers how much faster our connection was when compared to their measly 56 Kilobit per second telephone-based modems. The Internet:TCI program was produced monthly in East Lansing and tapes were shipped to TCI Cable stations around the country to be aired on their “Local Origination” channel. At its peak, Internet:TCI was aired in about 15 markets including Chicago, San Francisco, and others. The program pre-dated any other technology program airing nationally. We won 1 2 CHAPTER 1. BEFORE SAKAI a number of regional and national awards for programming produced by the cable industry in 1996. Internet:TCI had a brief moment in the sun because by 1996 it was clear that the Internet and World-Wide-Web were big business. Well-financed na- tional programs like TechTV were quickly produced and delivered daily or weekly via satellite. Also in the late 1990’s there was a lot of consolidation and horse-trading in the cable industry. Our show moved from TCI Cable to MediaOne and then to AT&T Cable Television. In each transition, we lost momentum and other programming in the market made a talk show with two middle-aged geeks talking about computer technology pretty much ir- relevant. John Liskey, our long-time executive producer and cheerleader, convinced TechTV to take a look at our audition tape in 2003 to see if we could do a few pieces now and then for one of their programs. But by then even TechTV had decided that smart geeks were no longer relevant in a market increasingly interested in attracting teenagers by doing video game previews. Even though the Internet:TCI program did not result in a television ca- reer for me, it did give me an excellent excuse to interview pretty much anyone in the emerging Internet field. Back in the mid-1990s when things were just getting started, everyone would talk to you. We interviewed Tim Berners-Lee, Richard Stallman, Jeff Bezos, and many others. Since both Rich and I were technologists before we were journalists, our interviews often tried to get the interviewees to look forward into the future and share their visions of where things might go. In one interview with James Wells of the RealAudio (now Real Net- works) company, he posited that someday we would be using the Internet to teach courses using streaming audio and 28 Kilobits per second modems.
Recommended publications
  • Lifecycle Management in Government-Driven Open Source Projects – Practical Framework
    ISSN (print):2182-7796, ISSN (online):2182-7788, ISSN (cd-rom):2182-780X Available online at www.sciencesphere.org/ijispm Lifecycle management in government-driven open source projects – practical framework Katja Henttonen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Tietotie 3, 02150 Espoo Finland www.shortbio.org/[email protected] Jukka Kääriäinen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Kaitoväylä 1, 90530 Oulu Finland www.shortbio.org/[email protected] Jani Kylmäaho National Land Survey of Finland (NLS) Opastinsilta 12C, 00521 Helsinki Finland www.shortbio.org/[email protected] Abstract: In many parts of the world, public sector organizations are increasingly interested in collaborating across organizational (and even national) boundaries to develop software solutions under an open licence. However, without sound lifecycle management practices, the full benefits of open collaboration are not achieved and projects fail to achieve sustained success. This paper introduces a lifecycle management model and framework for government-driven open-source projects and reports about its use in a real-life case study. Our focus is on lifecycle management activities which take place between deployment and end-of-life. The framework was developed iteratively through a series of focus group discussions with representatives of public sector organizations. After the framework had been taken into use in our real-life case project, individual qualitative interviews were conducted to collect experiences on its benefits and weaknesses. According to the initial evidence, the deployment of the framework seems to have brought concrete benefits to the project, e.g. by contributing positively to community growth, software quality and inter-organizational learning.
    [Show full text]
  • LMS Data Quadrant Report
    November 2019 DATA QUADRANT REPORT Education Learning Management Systems 846 8 Reviews Vendors Evaluated Education Learning Management Systems Data Quadrant Report How to Use the Report Table of Info-Tech’s Data Quadrant Reports provide a comprehensive evaluation of popular products in the Education Learning Management Systems market. This buyer’s guide is designed to help Contents prospective purchasers make better decisions by leveraging the experiences of real users. The data in this report is collected from real end users, meticulously verified for erv acity, Data Quadrant...................................................................................................................7 exhaustively analyzed, and visualized in easy to understand charts and graphs. Each product is compared and contrasted with all other vendors in their category to create a holistic, unbiased view Category Overview ......................................................................................................8 of the product landscape. Use this report to determine which product is right for your organization. For highly detailed reports Vendor Capability Summary................................................................................ 9 on individual products, see Info-Tech’s Product Scorecard. Vendor Capabilities.................................................................................................... 12 Product Feature Summary................................................................................. 24 Product Features........................................................................................................26
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Distance Learning and Learning Management Systems
    Chapter 1 A Review of Distance Learning and Learning Management Systems Mümine Kaya Keleş and Selma Ayşe Özel Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/65222 Abstract In recent years, rapid developments in technology and the web have led to many changes in education. One of the most important changes in education is in the form of distance learning. Distance learning, which is used to define education where educators and learners are physically separated, is not a new concept; however, emerging technologies and the web allow web‐based distance learning and therefore increase its popularity. As a result of these developments, many universities have started to use web‐based distance learning systems to provide flexible education that is independent of time and place. In this chapter, we review all popular, widely used, and well‐known learning management systems and include detailed comparison of some of these systems to allow institutions to choose the right system for their distance education activities. Keywords: distance learning, literature review, educational research, learning manage- ment systems, Moodle 1. Introduction Distance education, which is now also referred to as distance learning or e‐learning, has existed for centuries. Although as Keegan says “the ideas surrounding the educational endeavor are somewhat similar” [1], it is not easy to find a single definition of distance education. While according to North [2], a few definitions even look to define it in terms of a single technology, according to long‐distance teaching [3], others display distance education simply as a recent development of the class into a remote location [4].
    [Show full text]
  • FOSS Philosophy 6 the FOSS Development Method 7
    1 Published by the United Nations Development Programme’s Asia-Pacific Development Information Programme (UNDP-APDIP) Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia www.apdip.net Email: [email protected] © UNDP-APDIP 2004 The material in this book may be reproduced, republished and incorporated into further works provided acknowledgement is given to UNDP-APDIP. For full details on the license governing this publication, please see the relevant Annex. ISBN: 983-3094-00-7 Design, layout and cover illustrations by: Rezonanze www.rezonanze.com PREFACE 6 INTRODUCTION 6 What is Free/Open Source Software? 6 The FOSS philosophy 6 The FOSS development method 7 What is the history of FOSS? 8 A Brief History of Free/Open Source Software Movement 8 WHY FOSS? 10 Is FOSS free? 10 How large are the savings from FOSS? 10 Direct Cost Savings - An Example 11 What are the benefits of using FOSS? 12 Security 13 Reliability/Stability 14 Open standards and vendor independence 14 Reduced reliance on imports 15 Developing local software capacity 15 Piracy, IPR, and the WTO 16 Localization 16 What are the shortcomings of FOSS? 17 Lack of business applications 17 Interoperability with proprietary systems 17 Documentation and “polish” 18 FOSS SUCCESS STORIES 19 What are governments doing with FOSS? 19 Europe 19 Americas 20 Brazil 21 Asia Pacific 22 Other Regions 24 What are some successful FOSS projects? 25 BIND (DNS Server) 25 Apache (Web Server) 25 Sendmail (Email Server) 25 OpenSSH (Secure Network Administration Tool) 26 Open Office (Office Productivity Suite) 26 LINUX 27 What is Linux?
    [Show full text]
  • Open Source Learning Management Systems
    Open Source Learning Management Systems Emerging open source LMS markets Recommended LMS for each market Getting off on the right foot By Mark Aberdour Epic Technical Producer, Epic 52 Old Steine Brighton, BN1 1NH United Kingdom [email protected] www.epic.co.uk t: +44 (0) 1273 728686 f: +44 (0) 1273 821567 All rights reserved. You agree that by downloading and accessing this publication that no part of it maybe reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of Epic. Full acknowledgement of author and source must be given. ©2007 Epic Reproduction without written permission is strictly forbidden - 2 - An Epic White Paper Contents Executive summary 4 A changing market 4 The oppor tunity for Open Source 5 Emerging open source LMS markets 6 Large enterprise 6 Small and medium sized business (SMB) 6 Government and public sector 7 Primary and secondary education 7 Rapid rollout 8 Market feature matrix 8 The open source landscape 10 Benefits of Open Source 10 Risks of Open Source 11 Myths of Open Source 12 Selecting an open source LMS 13 Market recommendations 15 Large enterprise 15 Small and medium sized business 17 Government and public sector 19 Primary and secondary education 21 Rapid rollout 23 A detailed look at each LMS 24 Atutor 24 DotLRN 25 Ilias 26 Moodle 27 Sakai 28 Getting off on the right foot 30 Appendix A: Active open source LMS projects 32 References 33 Other Epic e-learning white papers 35 Epic Thinking 37 Epic Arena 38 ©2007 Epic Reproduction without written permission is strictly forbidden - 3 - An Epic White Paper Executive summary If you thought that “Open source learning management system (LMS) equals Moodle”, then think again.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Preface . ix 1. Open Source Licensing, Contract, and Copyright Law . 1 Basic Principles of Copyright Law 1 Contract and Copyright 3 Open Source Software Licensing 4 Issues with Copyrights and Patents 7 The Open Source Definition 8 Warranties 11 2. The MIT, BSD, Apache, and Academic Free Licenses . 14 The MIT (or X) License 14 The BSD License 15 The Apache License, v1.1 and v2.0 17 The Academic Free License 24 Application and Philosophy 30 3. The GPL, LGPL, and Mozilla Licenses . 34 GNU General Public License 35 GNU Lesser General Public License 49 The Mozilla Public License 1.1 (MPL 1.1) 62 Application and Philosophy 81 4. Qt, Artistic, and Creative Commons Licenses . 85 The Q Public License 85 Artistic License (Perl) 90 Creative Commons Licenses 98 vii 5. Non-Open Source Licenses . 114 Classic Proprietary License 114 Sun Community Source License 120 Microsoft Shared Source Initiative 144 6. Legal Impacts of Open Source and Free Software Licensing . 147 Entering Contracts 148 Statutory Developments Related to Software Contracts 150 The Self-Enforcing Nature of Open Source and Free Software Licenses 151 The Global Scope of Open Source and Free Software Licensing 153 The “Negative Effects” of Open Source and Free Software Licensing 154 Community Enforcement of Open Source and Free Software Licenses 158 Compatible and Incompatible Licensing: Multiple and Cross Licensing 159 7. Software Development Using Open Source and Free Software Licenses . 164 Models of Open Source and Free Software Development 164 Forking 171 Choosing an Open Source or Free Software License 174 Drafting Open Source Licenses 176 Appendix: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs License .
    [Show full text]
  • Spying on Students: School Issued Devices and Student Privacy (EFF)
    Spying on Students SCHOOL-ISSUED DEVICES AND STUDENT PRIVACY Frida Alim, Bridge Fellow Na e Cardo!o, Se"ior Sta## A or"e$ %e""ie Ge&'art, Re(ear)'er *are" Gullo, Media Relatio"( Anal$( Amul Kalia, Anal$( A-ril 1/, 21.2 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION EFF3OR% 1 Authors: Frida Alim, Nate Cardozo, Gennie Gebhart, Karen Gullo, Amul Kalia With assistance from: Sophia Cope, Hugh D’Andrade, Jeremy Gillula, Rainey Reitman A publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2017. “Spying on Students: School-Issued Devices and Student Privacy” is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION EFF3OR% 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary..................................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................................. 7 Part 1: Survey Results................................................................................................................................................. 8 Methods..................................................................................................................................................................... 9 Respondents and Overall Trends....................................................................................................................10 Findings..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sakai Overview (At Michigan State University)
    Sakai Overview Charles Severance Chief Architect, Sakai Project www.sakaiproject.org [email protected] www.dr-chuck.com KYOU / sakai Boundary, Situation The Sakai Project “The University of Michigan, Indiana University, MIT, Stanford, the uPortal Consortium, and the Open Knowledge Initiative (OKI) are joining forces to integrate and synchronize their considerable educational software into a pre- integrated collection of open source tools.” Sakai Project receives $2.4 million grant from Mellon Sakai Funding • Each of the 4 Core Universities Commits – 5+ developers/architects, etc. under Sakai Board project direction for 2 years – Public commitment to implement Sakai – Open/Open licensing – “Community Source” • So, overall project levels – $4.4M in institutional staff (27 FTE) – $2.4M Mellon, $300K Hewlett – Additional investment through partners What is Sakai? • Sakai is a project - a grant for two years. • Sakai is an extensible framework - provides basic capabilities to support a wide range of tools and services • Sakai is a set of tools - written and supported by various groups • Sakai is a product - a released bundle of the framework and a set of tools which have been tested and released as a unit The Sakai Project Goals of the Sakai Project • Develop an open-source collaborative learning environment – Suitable for use as a learning management system – Suitable for use as a small group collaboration system – Suitable for building research collaboratories – Improve teaching and learning by providing a rich and extensible environment –
    [Show full text]
  • View Booklet
    VIRTUAL THE LATEST TRENDS IN TECH NETWORK WITH YOUR PEERS SHARE YOUR EXPERIENCE WELCOME Welcome to the 2021 West Virginia Statewide Wednesday’s sessions will begin at 9am, with the Technology Conference! We are very pleased that you closing keynote session by Dr. John Spencer. After a could join us for this virtual event. short break for lunch, we will resume sessions at 1pm and end the conference at 4pm. The conference will begin on Monday morning, with a wide selection of round table and panel sessions to The vendor sites will be available throughout the choose from. We will have a lunch break from 12-1pm, conference, so please take the time to visit them at your and at 1pm, we will hear from our opening keynote leisure. speaker, Dr. Alec Couros, after a short introduction from WVNET Director, Dr. Carl Powell. Monday afternoon, we We wish you a very successful and productive will continue with a variety of sessions to choose from. conference experience, and hope you will join us for a face-to-face conference in 2022! Tuesday’s agenda will consist of sessions from 9am until 12pm, with poster sessions from 11-12. We will break Best Regards, for lunch at noon and resume with sessions scheduled West Virginia Statewide Technology Conference from 1-4pm. Committee 2021 4 Sarah Barnes Tracey Beckley Lisa Bridges Harmony Garletts 2021 WVSTC CONFERENCE Tiffany Goff Nathan Justice Michelle Liga Annaliza Marks Cory Morrison Suma Ponnam MEMBERS Phil Snitz COMMITTEE 5 CONTENTS Sponsor Acknowledgments/Special Thanks to Our Premium Level Sponsors ...................7 Keynote Speakers ........................................................................................................................9 Sessions Schedule ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LMS Task Force Final Report
    REPORT LMS Exploratory Task Force, 2010-2011 August 13, 2011 Task Force Members: Lorna Wong (Chair), UW System Administration Barbara Barnet, UW-Platteville Jeff Bohrer, UW-Madison Rovy Branon, UW-Extension Jane Henderson, UW-Stout Peter Mann, UW-Madison Sharon McCarragher, UW-Milwaukee Andy Speth, UW-Green Bay Dan Voeks, UW-Madison Jim Winship, UW-Whitewater Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................ 3 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................................ 5 LMS Landscape ..................................................................................................................... 7 Faculty Needs Assessment ............................................................................................ 11 Student Needs Assessment ........................................................................................... 15 Emerging Trends .............................................................................................................. 18 Acknowledgement ........................................................................................................... 25 Appendix 1 – Learn@UW Usage .................................................................................. 26 Appendix 2 – LMS Market Share for Number of Students ................................... 27 Appendix 3 – LMS Market Share for All Institutions ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lms Market Dynamics
    BIG PICTURE LMS MARKET DYNAMICS Spring 2016 Edition Provided by MindWires LLC http://www.mindwires.com/ Powered by: by © 2016, MindWires LLC. All rights reserved. Unauthorized reproduction or sharing is strictly prohibited (see http://mfeldstein.com/lms-subscription-terms-conditions/ for details). Information is based on best available resources. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. MindWires is a trademark of MindWires LLC. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. To purchase additional subscriptions for access to this report, go to http://mfeldstein.com/lms-subscription/. LMS MARKET DYNAMICS | 2 CONTENTS Introduction 3 Purpose and Organization of Report 3 Executive Summary 4 Past to Present 5 Section Summary 5 The Past: The Shaping of a Market 5 The Road to Now: A Market in Transition 10 Market Share Today 16 Some Open Questions 20 Drivers of Change 22 Section Introduction and Summary 22 Changes In Product Design 23 New Markets Bring New Opportunities and Threats 30 Further Out on the Horizon 34 The Next Twelve Months 36 Will There Be More Elective Migration? 36 Will There Be Different Winners and Losers? 37 Will the Growth in Other Markets Change Platform Sustainability? 38 Appendix: Data-Gathering Methodology 39 © 2016, MindWIres LLC. Unauthorized reproduction or sharing is strictly prohibited. LMS MARKET DYNAMICS | 3 INTRODUCTION PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION OF REPORT This report is designed help you understand the ongoing changes in adoption patterns for higher education Learning Management Systems (LMSs, also known as “Course Management Systems” or “Virtual Learning Environments”). It analyzes who is moving to or away from which platforms and how quickly they are moving.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Study, 2015 Note: the Online Version of This Survey May Be Shorter Due to Question Branching Or Question Skipping
    Student Study, 2015 Note: The online version of this survey may be shorter due to question branching or question skipping. Welcome to the 2015 ECAR Student Technology Survey! Study Description Technology is a critical part of undergraduate students’ experiences in higher education. This study explores technology ownership, use patterns, and expectations as they relate to the student experience. The results of this study can be used by colleges and universities to better engage students in the learning process. Furthermore, institutions can use the data to improve IT services, increase technology- enabled productivity, prioritize strategic contributions of IT to higher education, plan for technology shifts that impact students, and become more technologically competitive among peer institutions. We ask questions about your experiences with and attitudes toward technology and your academic experiences. Your responses will help people on your campus and beyond understand how to use technology more effectively to benefit students. There are no right or wrong answers; we would just like you to answer as honestly as you can. Participation in the survey is completely voluntary, and you can choose to exit the survey at any point. Your responses are anonymous. Required questions are indicated with an asterisk (*). This survey might take you up to 30 minutes to complete. Please use the survey’s navigation buttons below to go back or forward within the survey. Using your browser’s navigation buttons may result in lost answers. Conditions and Stipulations 1. I agree to complete this online survey for research purposes and that the data derived from this anonymous survey may be made available to my academic institution in unitary and aggregate formats and/or to the general public in the form of public presentations, reports, journals or newspaper articles, and/or in books.
    [Show full text]