DOCSLIB.ORG

Columbia-Pacific National Heritage Area Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Columbia-Pacific National Heritage Area Study September 2015 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Columbia-Pacific National Heritage Area Study TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 2 NPS Preparation of the Columbia-Pacific National Heritage Area Study ............................... 2 Study Area Description and Study Requirements ....................................................................... 3 Study Process and Public Involvement ......................................................................................... 3 Natural, Historic, and Cultural Context of the Study Area ..................................................... 6 Geographic Setting .......................................................................................................................... 6 The First Americans ........................................................................................................................ 7 Exploration and Mapping .............................................................................................................. 8 Coastal Navigation and Protection ............................................................................................. 10 Northwest Economies .................................................................................................................. 11 Tourism ........................................................................................................................................... 13 Proposed Themes of the Study Area ............................................................................................ 15 Response to Study Requirements ................................................................................................. 16 Summary of Findings ...................................................................................................................... 28 Background ..................................................................................................................................... 28 Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 28 Appendices ........................................................................................................................................ 30 Appendix A – Public Law 110-229 Columbia-Pacific National Heritage Area Study ...... 31 Appendix B – Registered Historic Places ............................................................................... 33 Appendix C – Public Lands, Private Conservation Land, and Historic Places ................. 44 Appendix D – Regional Trails .................................................................................................. 45 Appendix E – Recreational Lands, Historic Places, and Museums Open to the Public .. 46 Appendix F – Festivals and Cultural Events .......................................................................... 47 Appendix G – Parties Involved in the Study ......................................................................... 49 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Columbia-Pacific National Heritage The study process pulled together Area Study was prepared by the National previously compiled and newly collected Park Service (NPS) in response to Public information about the natural, historic and Law 110-229 which required analysis, cultural resources of the study area, as well documentation, and determination of as information about traditions and folk life, whether the area meets eight specific opportunities for conservation and requirements in the law for eligibility as a interpretation of natural, historic , cultural national heritage area, and analysis of the and scenic features, and recreational and potential impact of NHA designation on educational opportunities. The collected private land within or bordering the information demonstrates that the study proposed area at the time of the study. area contains resources that tell the story of The idea of a Columbia-Pacific National how a great river helped shape our nation. Heritage Area grew out the 2005-2006 Rich natural bounty in a strategic location bicentennial of the Lewis and Clark spawned a sophisticated and prosperous Expedition. Regional collaborative efforts Native American culture with influence in in the decade leading up to and including the region today. The search for America’s the bicentennial produced many regional western border led explorers to this unique quality-of-life improvements especially in corner of the continent, which fueled the transportation, parks and trails. Support young country’s robust industrial growth among local leaders and others in the region and heightened its status in the led to the study bill passed by Congress in international economy. In addition, May 2008, which directed the Secretary of proposals for a coordinating entity and the Interior, in consultation with the conceptual financial plan, as well as a managers of any federal land within the proposed heritage area boundary, were study area, appropriate state and local discussed at length. agencies, tribal governments and any interested organizations, to study the During the course of the study, however, a feasibility of designating the region at the severe national recession impacted the mouth of the Columbia River as the regional economy, strong opposition to a Columbia-Pacific National Heritage Area. national heritage area designation surfaced The Secretary delegated responsibility for among some private property interests, and the study preparation to the National Park the organization proposed as the heritage Service, which was to determine whether a coordinating entity decided, as a result of potential national heritage area would meet the public opposition, to step away from the requirements set forth by P.L. 110-229. that role. The study area was defined as the coastal areas of Clatsop and Pacific Counties (also NPS could not complete the analysis to known as the North Beach Peninsula), and determine that the study area fully meets areas relating to Native American history, the requirements of the legislation, and local history, Euro-American settlement instead found that adequate public support culture, and related activities of the for designation of a Columbia-Pacific Columbia River within a corridor along the National Heritage Area does not exist at Columbia River eastward in Clatsop, this time. Pacific, Columbia and Wahkiakum Counties. Columbia-Pacific National Heritage Area Study 1 INTRODUCTION As defined by the National Park System facilities including interpretation. Advisory Board in 2006, Participation in heritage area partnerships is voluntary; however, the success of an NHA National heritage areas are places where depends upon the active engagement of its natural, cultural, historic, and scenic partners in these activities to improve the resources combine to form a cohesive, regional quality of life. nationally distinctive landscape arising from patterns of human activity shaped by NATIONAL PARK SERVICE PREPARATION OF geography. These patterns make national THE COLUMBIA-PACIFIC NATIONAL heritage areas representative of the American HERITAGE AREA STUDY experience through the physical features that In 2006, community leaders from the lower remain and the traditions that have evolved Columbia region, including local elected in them. These regions are acknowledged by officials in Oregon and Washington, formed Congress for their capacity to tell important the nonprofit organization “Destination: stories about our nation. Continued use of The Pacific” with a mission to promote a national heritage areas by people whose national heritage area at the mouth of the traditions helped to shape the landscape Columbia River. enhances their significance. Subsequently, the Congressional delegation Since 1984 Congress has created 49 national from the two states introduced legislation heritage areas (NHA’s) on canals, rivers, and on May 8, 2008 Congress passed Public and coasts, in range land and factory towns, Law (P.L.) 110-229 directing the Secretary in farmland and battlefields from New of the Interior, in consultation with the England to Alaska. managers of any federal land within the study area, appropriate state and local Each NHA is designated by a separate Act agencies, tribal governments, and any of Congress and operates according to its interested organizations, to conduct a study legislated mandate. Although the heritage to determine the feasibility of designating area program is administered by the the region at the mouth of the Columbia National Park Service, NHA’s are different River as the Columbia-Pacific National from national parks because they are Heritage Area. (See bill text in Appendix A). managed by a local coordinating entity and The Secretary delegated responsibility for because designation of an NHA does not preparation of the study to the National impose additional regulations on private or Park Service, which was to determine public land, nor does it allow the use of whether a potential national heritage area at federal heritage area funds for land the mouth of the Columbia would meet the acquisition. requirements set forth by Congress in P.L. 110-229. Built on the recognition that people
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Long Trails Project USP 549: REGIONAL PLANNING and METROPOLITAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT
    The Long Trails Project USP 549: REGIONAL PLANNING and METROPOLITAN GROWTH MANAGEMENT Toulan School of Urban Studies and Planning College of Urban and Public Affairs Portland State University Fall, 2012 Table of Contents I. Introduction and Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 2 II. History of Long Trails and Regional Trail Networks ..................................................................................................... 6 III. Long Trails in Northwestern Oregon...............................................................................................................................20 IV. The Demand for Long Trails-based Recreation ...........................................................................................................36 V. Long Trails and Community Economic Development .............................................................................................52 VI. Long Trails Implementation ...............................................................................................................................................76 I. Introduction and Acknowledgements The Oregon Department of Forestry and the Oregon Parks Team 3: The Demand for trails-base recreation; analysis and Department are currently engaged in a joint assessment of a new critique of SCORP and similar surveys; trails in the context of trail extending from Garibaldi, on the Oregon coast, to the crest other recreational opportunities;
    [Show full text]
  • 2021-22 Budget in Brief
    2022 1 Letter from the Budget Officer To the great citizens of Clatsop County, Welcome to the County’s 2021-22 Budget in Brief. Each year Clatsop County produces a budget document to fulfill the community’s vision for where our resources should be directed. We strive for excellence in providing sound, Contents reasonable, honest, and transparent management of these resources. Letter from the Budget Officer……...2 This year’s budget is approximately 550 pages. While the entire budget document is available to view, county Our Community………………………….…3 management is hoping that by providing this Budget in Brief which summarizes the most essential elements of the County’s budget, we can provide an abbreviated document The Budget Process……………………...8 for convenience. We hope you find it useful. Our budget reflects the County Commissioners goals, Citizen Budget Committee….………..9 maintains the long-term financial health and stability of our General Fund and reserves, and continues the delivery of Organization Chart………………..…..10 high-quality services for our community. The 2021-22 budget allocates approximately $110 million, including approximately $24 million for capital projects such as the Tax Payment Breakdown……………11 construction of a new county jail facility. For a more detailed look at the County’s 2021-22 adopted Where the Money Comes From….12 budget, please visit the County’s website at http://www.co.clatsop.or.us/finance/page/clatsop-county- Where the Money Goes………………13 budget. Through sound fiscal management, we are able to continue The County’s General Fund…………14 delivering the high quality services our citizens expect and deserve.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)
    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping Summary Lewis and Clark National and State Historical Parks
    Geologic Resources Inventory Scoping Summary Lewis and Clark National and State Historical Parks, Oregon and Washington Geologic Resources Division Prepared by John Graham National Park Service January 2010 US Department of the Interior The Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) provides each of 270 identified natural area National Park System units with a geologic scoping meeting and summary (this document), a digital geologic map, and a Geologic Resources Inventory report. The purpose of scoping is to identify geologic mapping coverage and needs, distinctive geologic processes and features, resource management issues, and monitoring and research needs. Geologic scoping meetings generate an evaluation of the adequacy of existing geologic maps for resource management, provide an opportunity to discuss park-specific geologic management issues, and if possible include a site visit with local experts. The National Park Service held a GRI scoping meeting for Lewis and Clark National and State Historical Parks (LEWI) on October 14, 2009 at Fort Clatsop Visitors Center, Oregon. Meeting Facilitator Bruce Heise of the Geologic Resources Division (NPS GRD) introduced the Geologic Resources Inventory program and led the discussion regarding geologic processes, features, and issues at Lewis and Clark National and State Historical Parks. GIS Facilitator Greg Mack from the Pacific West Regional Office (NPS PWRO) facilitated the discussion of map coverage. Ian Madin, Chief Scientist with the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI), presented an overview of the region’s geology. On Thursday, October 15, 2009, Tom Horning (Horning Geosciences) and Ian Madin (DOGAMI) led a field trip to several units within Lewis and Clark National and State Historical Parks.
    [Show full text]
  • An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL
    An Independent Newspaper for the Pacific Northwest AUGUST 1997 VOL. 3 No. 3 Dear Reader early all the problems we face in Cascadia boil down to population. NAs Alan Durning and Christopher Crowther point out in their new book, Misplaced Blame: The Real Roots of Population Growth, the Pacific Northwest is growing nearly twice the North American rate and almost 50 percent faster than the global population. The Northwest population reached 15 million EDITORIAL in mid-1997 and is swelling by another 1 million every 40 months. Starting this month, with our cover story on growth pressures in the scenic Columbia River Gorge, Cascadia Times Boom Times The UnbearableRightness ot Breen will publish an occasional series on, Can the Columbia River Gorge survive the Life on the fault line of environmentally growth, growth management strategies demand for development? and what it all means. As senior editor correct energy Kathie Durbin reports from the Columbia by Kathie Durbin Page 9 Gorge, local politics threaten this national by Kevin Bell Page 7 treasure. This is true everywhere, because growth and land-use decisions are in varyingdegrees made at the local THE USUAL STUFF level. We aren't saying that local commu• FIELD NOTES: Green groups clash over Sierra REALITY CHECK: 16 nities cannot do a good job protecting places such as the Gorge, Snoqualmie logging. EPA fines big Alaska mine. toxic waste POINT OF VIEW: The ASARCO juggernaut and Pass, Whidbey Island, Lake Tahoe or the on crops. Oregon slams nuclear weapons plan 3 Muir Woods, to name just a few places of its proposed Rock Creek Mine.
    [Show full text]
  • PETITION to PROTECT the HUMBOLDT MARTEN (Martes Caurina Humboldtensis) UNDER OREGON’S ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT
    Attachment 2 PETITION TO PROTECT THE HUMBOLDT MARTEN (Martes caurina humboldtensis) UNDER OREGON’S ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Photo © Charlotte Eriksson Oregon State University June 26, 2018 PETITIONERS Cascadia Wildlands is a non‐profit, public interest environmental organization headquartered in Eugene, Oregon. Cascadia Wildlands educates, agitates, and inspires a movement to protect and restore Cascadia’s wild ecosystems, including the species therein. We envision vast old‐growth forests, rivers full of wild salmon, wolves howling in the backcountry, and vibrant communities sustained by the unique landscapes of the Cascadia bioregion. We have worked for over a decade on Pacific marten issues in the Pacific Northwest. The Center for Biological Diversity is a non‐profit conservation organization with more than 1 million members and supporters dedicated to the conservation of endangered species and wild places, including members throughout the Pacific Northwest. The Center has been working to protect the Humboldt marten and its habitat for more than a decade. Defenders of Wildlife is a national non‐profit conservation organization founded in 1947 to protect all native animals and plants in their natural communities. Defenders works on mesocarnivore conservation and habitat connectivity in the range of the Humboldt marten through our field offices in Oregon and California. Environmental Protection Information Center is a community based, non‐profit organization that advocates for science‐based protection and restoration of Northwest California’s Forests. EPIC was founded in 1977 when local residents came together to successfully end aerial applications of herbicides by industrial logging companies in Humboldt County. Klamath‐Siskiyou Wildlands Center is a non‐profit, public interest organization that protects and restores wild nature in the Klamath‐Siskiyou region of northern California and southern Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • City Council Meeting Packet with Applicants
    Monday, January 7, 2019 7:00 p.m. 2nd Floor Council Chambers 1095 Duane Street Astoria OR 97103 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. ROLL CALL 3. OATHS OF OFFICE (a) Mayor Bruce Jones (b) Councilor Roger Rocka, Ward 1 (c) Councilor Joan Herman, Ward 3 4. REPORTS OF COUNCILORS 5. CHANGES TO AGENDA 6. CONSENT CALENDAR The items on the Consent Calendar are considered routine and will be adopted by one motion unless a member of the City Council requests to have any item considered separately. Members of the community may have an item removed if they contact the City Manager by 5:00 p.m. the day of the meeting. (a) City Council Minutes of December 3, 2018 (b) Board and Commission Meeting Minutes (1) Draft Parks Board Meeting Minutes for December 5, 2018 (2) Draft Library Board Meeting Minutes for November 27, 2018 (3) Draft Historic Landmarks Commission Meeting Minutes for November 20, 2018 (4) Draft Astoria Planning Commission Meeting Minutes for November 27, 2018 (c) Change Monday Meeting Dates in 2019 that Fall on a Holiday (d) Authorization for Lease Agreement with the Astoria School District for Use of Gray School Facilities (e) Amendment to Emergency Services Consulting International Agreement 7. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS All agenda items are open for public comment following deliberation by the City Council. Rather than asking for public comment after each agenda item, the Mayor asks that audience members raise their hands if they want to speak to the item and they will be recognized. In order to respect everyone’s time, comments will be limited to 3 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Scorp & State Park Planning
    OREGON SCORP & STATE PARK PLANNING An Innovative Research Collaboration between Oregon State Parks and Oregon State University OREGON SCORP AND STATE PARK PLANNING Collaborative Planning Projects . State Park Survey Project & Economic Impact Analysis . SCORP In-State Outdoor Recreation Survey . In-State Trail User Survey OREGON SCORP AND STATE PARK PLANNING Early Visitor Survey Project Work . In 2009, OPRD worked with a university research team to develop an ongoing visitor survey project. Project purpose to improve understanding of visitors to better provide appropriate facilities, programs and services which they desire. Proposal included 5 day-use and 5 overnight parks per year for 4 years (450 completions per park). Total cost of $304,000 ($76,000 per year) or $7,600 per park report. Not a sustainable model. OREGON SCORP AND STATE PARK PLANNING 2010 Champoeg Pilot Test Background: . In the summer of 2010, OSU conducted a visitor survey at Champoeg State Heritage Area . Purpose was to test multiple survey approaches to inform future survey efforts for the entire state park system. Compared survey modes (onsite, internet, mail, phone) . Recommendations included final survey instruments & survey methods OREGON SCORP AND STATE PARK PLANNING Methodology Day Users . Onsite full survey (volunteers/ Camp Hosts) . Onsite short survey (contacts for full surveys) . Telephone full survey (Reservations NW) . Mail full survey (OSU) . Internet full survey (OSU) Overnight Users . Contacts from reservation system information . Telephone full survey (Reservations NW) . Mail full survey (OSU) . Internet full survey (OSU) Methodology Completed surveys (n) Response rate (%) Day Users Onsite 251 71 Mail 156 55 Internet 104 40 Telephone 56 29 Subtotal 567 52 Overnight Users Mail 298 60 Internet 265 52 Telephone 176 29 Subtotal 739 45 Total 1,306 47 OREGON SCORP AND STATE PARK PLANNING 2010 Champoeg Pilot Test Recommendations: .
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M
    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
    [Show full text]
  • Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents to Discover the Past and Imagine the Future
    Winter 2014-2015 LaThe Journal of the SanPeninsula Mateo County Historical Association, Volume xliii, No. 1 Portolá Trail and Development of Foster City Our Vision Table of Contents To discover the past and imagine the future. Is it Time for a Portolá Trail Designation in San Mateo County? ....................... 3 by Paul O. Reimer, P.E. Our Mission Development of Foster City: A Photo Essay .................................................... 15 To enrich, excite and by T. Jack Foster, Jr. educate through understanding, preserving The San Mateo County Historical Association Board of Directors and interpreting the history Paul Barulich, Chairman; Barbara Pierce, Vice Chairwoman; Shawn DeLuna, Secretary; of San Mateo County. Dee Tolles, Treasurer; Thomas Ames; Alpio Barbara; Keith Bautista; Sandra McLellan Behling; John Blake; Elaine Breeze; David Canepa; Tracy De Leuw; Dee Eva; Ted Everett; Accredited Pat Hawkins; Mark Jamison; Peggy Bort Jones; Doug Keyston; John LaTorra; Joan by the American Alliance Levy; Emmet W. MacCorkle; Karen S. McCown; Nick Marikian; Olivia Garcia Martinez; Gene Mullin; Bob Oyster; Patrick Ryan; Paul Shepherd; John Shroyer; Bill Stronck; of Museums. Joseph Welch III; Shawn White and Mitchell P. Postel, President. President’s Advisory Board Albert A. Acena; Arthur H. Bredenbeck; John Clinton; Robert M. Desky; T. Jack Foster, The San Mateo County Jr.; Umang Gupta; Greg Munks; Phill Raiser; Cynthia L. Schreurs and John Schrup. Historical Association Leadership Council operates the San Mateo John C. Adams, Wells Fargo; Jenny Johnson, Franklin Templeton Investments; Barry County History Museum Jolette, San Mateo Credit Union and Paul Shepherd, Cargill. and Archives at the old San Mateo County Courthouse La Peninsula located in Redwood City, Carmen J.
    [Show full text]
  • Hop-On-Hop-Off Included Tours
    HOP-ON-HOP-OFF INCLUDED TOURS Included on every American Queen® voyage are signature included shore excursions – your ticket to experience great river cities with selected admissions, narrated tours and our own dedicated fleet of hop-on hop-off Motorcoaches®. You’ll enjoy hassle-free access to some of the most historically and culturally significant attractions in America’s Heartland. Day 3: Clarkston, WA Experience the history and indigenous culture of the Nez Perce Tribe as we travel to the Nez Perce National Historical Park for a guided tour of their reservation. Learn about the historic and present-day way of life of these migratory Native Americans whose name is derived from the French “Pierced Nose.” The Nez Perce people are well known for their involvement and assistance with the Lewis and Clark Expedition and guests can learn first-hand how they were trusted by the Corps of Discovery through an exclusive presentation by a Nez Perce Native. A stop in downtown Lewiston, Idaho brings guests to the Nez Perce Country Historical Society and Museum, an institution which strives to preserve and interpret the history of local region and culture. Guests can delve deeper into the unique history of Nez Perce County and the Nez Perce Tribe. Gather information about the pioneers, geology, founding of Lewiston, Prairie Railroad and so much more. This tour departs at 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Day 4: Tri-Cities, Richland, WA Enjoy a day of exploration at Sacajawea State Park and Interpretive Center, a preserved site marking a significant period in American History.
    [Show full text]
  • SS Belfor TCPN Restoration Contract BOC 09-03-19
    7145 West Tidwell Road ~ Houston, Texas 77092 (713) 744-6835 www.esc4.net Publication Date: October 30, 2014 NOTICE TO OFFEROR SUBMITTAL DEADLINE: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 @ 2:00 PM CST Questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted in writing to Robert Zingelmann at [email protected] or (713)-744-6835 no later than December 3, 2014. All questions and answers will be posted to both www.esc4.net and www.tcpn.org under Solicitations. Offerors are responsible for viewing either website to review all questions and answers prior to submitting proposals. Please note that oral communications concerning this RFP shall not be binding and shall in no way excuse the responsive Offeror of the obligations set forth in this proposal. Request for Proposal (RFP) by Region 4 Education Service Center (“ESC”) For Disaster Restoration of Operations Services On behalf of itself, other government agencies and non-profits, made available through The Cooperative Purchasing Network “TCPN.” Solicitation Number 14-25 Note: Envelopes must be sealed, prominently marked with the RFP solicitation number, RFP title, RFP opening time/date and name of vendor. Electronic submissions of the RFP will not be accepted. Submissions must be received by the Region 4 ESC office at: 7145 West Tidwell Road, Houston, TX 77092 no later than 2:00 pm CST, at which time and place they will be opened publicly and recorded. 1 of 159 ATTENTION OFFERORS: Submission of a proposal confers NO RIGHT on a Offeror to an award or to a subsequent contract. Region 4 ESC, in its sole discretion and for any reason or no reason, reserves the rights to reject any or all proposals, accept only a part of any proposal, accept the proposal deemed most advantageous to Region 4 ESC, and waive any technicalities.
    [Show full text]