DOCSLIB.ORG

ASTORIA PARKS & RECREATION Comprehensive Master Plan 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ASTORIA PARKS & RECREATION Comprehensive Master Plan 2016 - 2026 Adopted July 18, 2016 by Ordinance 16-04 Acknowledgments Parks & Recreation Staff City Council Angela Cosby.......... Director Arline LaMear.......... Mayor Jonah Dart-Mclean... Maintenance Supervisor Zetty Nemlowill....... Ward 1 Randy Bohrer........... Grounds Coordinator Drew Herzig............ Ward 2 Mark Montgomery... Facilities Coordinator Cindy Price............. Ward 3 Terra Patterson........ Recreation Coordinator Russ Warr................ Ward 4 Erin Reding............. Recreation Coordinator Parks Advisory Board City Staff Norma Hernandez... Chair Brett Estes............... City Manager Tammy Loughran..... Vice Chair Kevin Cronin........... Community Josey Ballenger Development Director Aaron Crockett Rosemary Johnson... Special Projects Planner Andrew Fick John Goodenberger Historic Buildings Eric Halverson Consultant Jim Holen Howard Rub Citizen Advisory Committee Jessica Schleif Michelle Bisek......... Astoria Parks, Recreation, and Community Foundation Community Members Melissa Gardner...... Clatsop Community Kenny Hageman...... Lower Columbia Youth College Drafting and Baseball Historic Preservation Jim Holen................. Parks Advisory Board Program Craig Hoppes.......... Astoria School District Workshop attendees, survey respondents, Zetty Nemlowill....... Astoria City Council focus group participants, and volunteers. Jan Nybakke............ Volunteer Kassia Nye............... MOMS Club RARE AmeriCorps Ed Overbay............. Former Parks Advisory Ian Sisson................ Planner, Project Manager Board Member Megan Smith........... Program Director Brooke Stanley......... North Coast Watershed Association Titus Tomlinson....... Program Coordinator Dulcye Taylor.......... Astoria Downtown Historic District Association Scott Tucker............. National Parks Service Patrick Wingard...... Oregon Department of University of Oregon Land Conservation and Resource Assistance for Rural Environments Development (RARE) AmeriCorps Program Executive Summary The 2016 Astoria Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Master Plan is the first known parks and recreation plan for the City of Astoria. The process involved substantial community input to evaluate current facilities and services, and create a vision and strategy for the future of the Astoria Parks and Recreation Department. This document is intended to be used and updated regularly, and to serve as the foundational guide for decision-making bodies, including Department staff, the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, and Astoria City Council. The Plan’s first three sections give an overview of the planning process, profile of the community, and state of the Department. Section 1 describes the planning process, methods used, objectives, sources of input, and related planning documents. Section 2 provides an overview of the City of Astoria’s population and economic demographics and trends, public health issues, zoning relative to parkland, and transportation network relative to parkland, to provide context for the Plan. Section 3, State of the Department, outlines the Astoria Parks and Recreation Department’s organization, staffing, and budget relative to its inventory of programs and services, parkland, trails, indoor facilities, and other properties it manages. The Plan’s next two sections evaluate the Astoria Parks and Recreation Department’s level of service and identify its needs. Section 4 measures Astoria’s facilities and services against recommendations established by the State of Oregon such as parkland per capita, and provides information regarding recreation programs typically offered by municipal parks and recreation departments. Section 5 extends the comparison analysis to more specific planning issues in peer communities, as well as state and nation-wide. Community input from over 1,200 users of Astoria Parks and Recreation’s facilities and services is also summarized in Section 5. The final sections of the Astoria Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Master Plan outline recommended actions and a strategy for funding and implementation of the plan. Section 6 describes recommendations for maintenance, planning, communications and marketing, partnerships, operations, and capital projects. Each recommendation includes background and reference information that ties back to previous sections. Section 7, the Implementation Strategy, organizes the recommendations into a matrix that includes estimated costs, target completion dates, and responsible parties. Key findings: • Astorians rate parks and recreation facilities as extremely important to their quality of life. • Despite a cost recovery rate of nearly double the national average, and a top-quartile standing for revenue generated per capita, the Department struggles to achieve the most basic level of maintenance and safety for its facilities, and personnel to support its programs. • Major cuts to staffing in 2011, combined with a rapidly growing inventory of facilities and programs, high expectations from the community, and decreasing general fund tax support, have contributed to a significant maintenance deficit and high staff turnover. • Astoria’s parks system includes nearly double the amount of parkland per capita than peer communities nation-wide, yet operates with 25% fewer full time employees and spends 23% less per acre of parkland. • The community prioritizes proper maintenance levels of the Department’s existing facilities over new development. • The highest priority recommendations of this plan, as identified by the Master Plan Citizen Advisory Committee, Parks Advisory Board, and the community, include: increasing staff capacity to meet level of service expectations, increasing revenues to meet level of service expectations, developing a system-wide maintenance plan, developing and connecting the trail system, and improving communications and marketing. • Many recommendations outlined in the plan will not be possible to implement without additional staff capacity and reliable funding sources. The Astoria Parks and Recreation Department looks forward to improving Astoria’s parks and recreation system through the recommendations of this plan, and would like to thank the community it serves for an incredible level of engagement throughout the process, the Citizen Advisory Committee for its thoughtful guidance and attention to detail, the Parks Advisory Board for their support and input, and RARE participant Ian Sisson for facilitating the planning process and producing this document. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 1.1 Summary 2 1.2 Purpose 2 1.3 Sources of Input 3 1.4 Related Plans 4 2. Community Profile 2.1 Population, Growth Rate, and Projections 8 2.2 Economic Indicators 8 2.3 Race, Origin, and Language 9 2.4 Public Health and Related Factors 9 Map: City of Astoria Zoning 10 Map: Astoria’s Transportation Network 12 3. State of the Department 3.1 Organization, Staffing, and Funding 16 3.2 Programs and Services Inventory 20 3.3 Parkland Managed by Astoria Parks and Recreation 24 3.4 Additional Land Managed by Astoria Parks and Recreation 25 3.5 Indoor Facilities Managed by Astoria Parks and Recreation 25 3.6 Trails Managed by Astoria Parks and Recreation 25 Map: City of Astoria Parks, Trails, and Facilities 26 4. Level of Service 4.1 Introduction 30 4.2 Parkland: Level of Service 34 4.3 Trails: Level of Service 35 4.4 Park Amenities: Level of Service 35 4.5 Additional Facilities Within 5 Miles of Astoria 35 4.6 Recreation Level of Service 36 5. Needs Assessment 5.1 Community Input 40 5.2 National, State, and Local Trends 44 5.3 Peer Community Analysis 48 6. Recommendations 6.1 Introduction 54 6.2 Maintenance 54 6.3 Planning 55 6.4 Communications and Marketing 57 6.5 Partnerships 58 6.6 Operations 59 6.7 Capital Projects 60 7. Implementation and Funding Strategy 7.1 Introduction 65 Table: Implementation and Funding Strategy 66 Appendix: A.1 Inventory and Existing Conditions Report: Parks, Facilities, and Trails A.2 Community Input Results A.3 Historical Report: Parks, Facilities, and Trails Adopted July 18, 2016 by Ordinance 16-04 1. Introduction 1.1 Summary 1.2 Purpose 1.3 Sources of Input 1.4 Related Plans 1 1.1 Summary 1.2 Purpose The creation of a City of Astoria Parks & The Plan establishes a short and long-term Recreation Comprehensive Master Plan (the vision, and priorities for the Department “Plan”) was adopted as a City Council Goal by assessing the need for improvements, for the 2015-16 fiscal year. changes, and future development. The scope The need for a system-wide parks and of the Plan includes all parks, trails, facilities recreation master plan was identified as a and programs managed by the Astoria priority by the City Council and Parks & Parks and Recreation Department, as well as Recreation Department (the “Department”) maintenance and operations. staff. The Department has not had a master The use of, and regular updates to this Parks plan in place that provides guidance and and Recreation Comprehensive Master Plan policy direction in the past. will allow the Department and City to make The Plan assesses the current inventory decisions based on a clear, community-shared and conditions of parkland and facilities, vision for the Department, ensuring facilities measures the level of service provided by and services meet the needs and interests of the Department, identifies community needs, the community throughout time and changes and establishes a set of recommendations on in leadership. This plan will also
Recommended publications
  • Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)

    Oregon Historic Trails Report Book (1998)

    i ,' o () (\ ô OnBcox HrsroRrc Tnans Rpponr ô o o o. o o o o (--) -,J arJ-- ö o {" , ã. |¡ t I o t o I I r- L L L L L (- Presented by the Oregon Trails Coordinating Council L , May,I998 U (- Compiled by Karen Bassett, Jim Renner, and Joyce White. Copyright @ 1998 Oregon Trails Coordinating Council Salem, Oregon All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Printed in the United States of America. Oregon Historic Trails Report Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Project history 3 Introduction to Oregon's Historic Trails 7 Oregon's National Historic Trails 11 Lewis and Clark National Historic Trail I3 Oregon National Historic Trail. 27 Applegate National Historic Trail .41 Nez Perce National Historic Trail .63 Oregon's Historic Trails 75 Klamath Trail, 19th Century 17 Jedediah Smith Route, 1828 81 Nathaniel Wyeth Route, t83211834 99 Benjamin Bonneville Route, 1 833/1 834 .. 115 Ewing Young Route, 1834/1837 .. t29 V/hitman Mission Route, 184l-1847 . .. t4t Upper Columbia River Route, 1841-1851 .. 167 John Fremont Route, 1843 .. 183 Meek Cutoff, 1845 .. 199 Cutoff to the Barlow Road, 1848-1884 217 Free Emigrant Road, 1853 225 Santiam Wagon Road, 1865-1939 233 General recommendations . 241 Product development guidelines 243 Acknowledgements 241 Lewis & Clark OREGON National Historic Trail, 1804-1806 I I t . .....¡.. ,r la RivaÌ ï L (t ¡ ...--."f Pðiräldton r,i " 'f Route description I (_-- tt |".
  • Coast Guard Festival

    Coast Guard Festival

    the QUARTERDECK LOG Membership publication of the Coast Guard Combat Veterans Association. Publishes quarterly— Spring, Summer, Fall and Winter. Not sold on a subscription basis. The Coast Guard Combat Veterans Association is a Non-Profit Association of Active Duty, Retired, Reserve and Honorably Discharged Former Members of the United States Coast Guard who served in, or provided direct support to, combat situations recognized by an appropriate military award while serving as a member of the United States Coast Guard. Volume 33, Number 3 Fall 2018 USS SERPENS (AK 97) SUNK BY ENEMY ACTION OR THROUGH ACCIDENT THE SINGLE LARGEST LOSS OF COAST GUARD PERSONNEL OF ANY WAR In This Issue: On Monday, January 29, 1945, the USS SERPENS (AK 97), Cover Story Pages 1, 8-10 an EC-2 Liberty-type vessel, blew up at 2318 local time while From The President Page 2, 3 moored at Berth Number 24, Lunga Point, Guadalcanal, From the Vice President Page 4 British Solomon Islands. 197 Coast Guardsmen, six Army and From the Secretary/Treasurer Page 5 one Public Health Service personnel lost their lives as the Auxiliary News Page 6-7 result of the explosion, the single largest loss of Coast Guard Convention information Pages 12-17 personnel of any war. First believed that the sinking was from Notices & Association News Pages 18-24 Featured Articles Pages 25-28 enemy action, it was later concluded that the explosion was Sea Stories Page 29 possibly the result of the rough handling of high explosive Ship’s Store Page 30 cargo. There remains unanswered questions that have some CGCVA Membership Form Inside back-cover rethinking this decision.
  • United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922

    United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922

    Cover: During World War I, convoys carried almost two million men to Europe. In this 1920 oil painting “A Fast Convoy” by Burnell Poole, the destroyer USS Allen (DD-66) is shown escorting USS Leviathan (SP-1326). Throughout the course of the war, Leviathan transported more than 98,000 troops. Naval History and Heritage Command 1 United States Navy and World War I: 1914–1922 Frank A. Blazich Jr., PhD Naval History and Heritage Command Introduction This document is intended to provide readers with a chronological progression of the activities of the United States Navy and its involvement with World War I as an outside observer, active participant, and victor engaged in the war’s lingering effects in the postwar period. The document is not a comprehensive timeline of every action, policy decision, or ship movement. What is provided is a glimpse into how the 20th century’s first global conflict influenced the Navy and its evolution throughout the conflict and the immediate aftermath. The source base is predominately composed of the published records of the Navy and the primary materials gathered under the supervision of Captain Dudley Knox in the Historical Section in the Office of Naval Records and Library. A thorough chronology remains to be written on the Navy’s actions in regard to World War I. The nationality of all vessels, unless otherwise listed, is the United States. All errors and omissions are solely those of the author. Table of Contents 1914..................................................................................................................................................1
  • Trade and Change on the Columbia Plateau 1750-1840 Columbia Magazine, Winter 1996-97: Vol

    Trade and Change on the Columbia Plateau 1750-1840 Columbia Magazine, Winter 1996-97: Vol

    Trade and Change on the Columbia Plateau 1750-1840 Columbia Magazine, Winter 1996-97: Vol. 10, No. 4 By Laura Peers Early Europeans saw the Columbia Plateau as a walled fortress, isolated and virtually impossible to penetrate through the Rocky Mountain and Cascade ranges that formed its outer defenses. Fur traders and missionaries saw it as a last frontier, virgin and unspoiled. But this was an outsider's view. To the native people of the region, the Plateau was the center of the world, linked to the four corners of the continent by well-worn paths and a dense social and economic network. In fact, the Plateau was a crossroads for trade, one that became increasingly busy between 1750 and 1850. During this pivotal century, the quickening pace of trade became an uncontrolled torrent, a flash flood of new goods, new ideas and new diseases, an explosion of change, sometimes beneficial and sometimes deadly. By the late prehistoric era there were two major trade centers on the Plateau: at The Dalles, on the middle Columbia River, and at Kettle Falls, several hundred miles away on the upper Columbia. Members of tribes from across the Plateau and from the West Coast to the Missouri River converged on these sites every year. An astonishing quantity and variety of goods were exchanged at these sites, including dried fish from the Columbia; baskets, woven bags and wild hemp for fishnets from the Plateau region; shells, whale and seal oil and bone from the West Coast; pipestone, bison robes and feather headdresses from the Plains; and nuts and roots from as far away as California.
  • CLATSOP COUNTY Scale in Mlles

    CLATSOP COUNTY Scale in Mlles

    CLATSOP COUNTY Scale In Mlles 81 8 I A 0,6 O 6 Secmide 0 10 6 7 WASV INGTON T I L LAMOOK COUNTY CO Clatsop County Knappa Prairie U. S. Army Fort Stevens, Ruth C. Bishop Dean H. Byrd (1992) Janice M. Healy (1952) Oregon Burial Site Guide Clatsop County Area: 873 square miles Population (1998): 35,424 County seat: Astoria, Population: 10,130 County established: 22 June 1844 Located on the south bank of the lower Columbia River where it enters the Pacific Ocean. Clatsop County was the site of the first white trading post in Oregon and therefore the earliest established cemetery. This was Fort Astoria founded in the spring of 1811 for the fur trade. It was occupied by the British in the fall of I 813 during the War of 1812 and was renamed Fort George. Returned to the Americans in 1818 and once again called Fort Astoria, the name was gradually transferred to a small civilian settlement as Astoria. The earliest burials after 1811 and those dating from the 1850's to about 1878 are now built over. Eventually most of Astoria's known burials were transferred to Ocean View which was established in 1872. The Clatsop Plains Pioneer Cemetery was begun in 1846 and is the earliest organized cemetery outside of Astoria. By the 1870's there were at least four other organized cemeteries. There were many family burial sites and still some Indian burials sites and a United States Military cemetery begun as early as 1868 at Fort Stevens. The most prominent ethnic nationalities from Europe were Finns and Swedes who are scattered through many cemeteries and family burial sites.
  • Coast Guard Connection

    Coast Guard Connection

    VOL 2, No . 4, WINTER 2019 A quarterly newsletter for retired senior leaders COAST GUARD from the U.S. Coast Guard providing a focused sampling of current events and service initiatives. The product can be repurposed for a wider CONNECTION audience as necessary. The product is collated and championed by CG-0923. Introduction Thank you for your continued interest in Coast Guard Connection. We appreciate and encourage the strong engagement of our retired senior leaders and fellow Coast Guard stakeholders. Your interest and advocacy are critical to our Service’s continued success. Earlier in February, we hosted a very successful Retired Senior Leadership Conference at Coast Guard Headquarters. Approximately 40 attendees—including the 21st and 24th Commandants—joined us for a day of discussion on the current state of your Coast Guard. The conversations were n Coast Guard CAPT Greg Fuller, Sector Humboldt Bay commander, lively and informative, with great dialogue between our current Rep. Jared Huffman (CA-2), CAPT James Pruett, 11th District chief of senior leader cohort and our retired senior leaders. We took staff, and Mayor Susan Seaman of Eureka, CA, (from left to right) pose the opportunity to recognize the leadership and impact of as they re-designate Eureka a Coast Guard City, Feb. 22, 2019 in Eureka. (U.S. Coast Guard) RADM Cari Thomas (USCG, Ret.) for her incredible work with Coast Guard Mutual Assistance (CGMA) during the 35-day On Friday, March 29, we join the rest of the nation in honoring government furlough. CGMA provided more than $8.4M in National Vietnam War Veterans Day.
  • 155891 WPO 43.2 Inside WSUP C.Indd

    155891 WPO 43.2 Inside WSUP C.Indd

    MAY 2017 VOL 43 NO 2 LEWIS AND CLARK TRAIL HERITAGE FOUNDATION • Black Sands and White Earth • Baleen, Blubber & Train Oil from Sacagawea’s “monstrous fish” • Reviews, News, and more the Rocky Mountain Fur Trade Journal VOLUME 11 - 2017 The Henry & Ashley Fur Company Keelboat Enterprize by Clay J. Landry and Jim Hardee Navigation of the dangerous and unpredictable Missouri River claimed many lives and thousands of dollars in trade goods in the early 1800s, including the HAC’s Enterprize. Two well-known fur trade historians detail the keelboat’s misfortune, Ashley’s resourceful response, and a possible location of the wreck. More than Just a Rock: the Manufacture of Gunflints by Michael P. Schaubs For centuries, trappers and traders relied on dependable gunflints for defense, hunting, and commerce. This article describes the qualities of a superior gunflint and chronicles the evolution of a stone-age craft into an important industry. The Hudson’s Bay Company and the “Youtah” Country, 1825-41 by Dale Topham The vast reach of the Hudson’s Bay Company extended to the Ute Indian territory in the latter years of the Rocky Mountain rendezvous period, as pressure increased from The award-winning, peer-reviewed American trappers crossing the Continental Divide. Journal continues to bring fresh Traps: the Common Denominator perspectives by encouraging by James A. Hanson, PhD. research and debate about the The portable steel trap, an exponential improvement over snares, spears, nets, and earlier steel traps, revolutionized Rocky Mountain fur trade era. trapping in North America. Eminent scholar James A. Hanson tracks the evolution of the technology and its $25 each plus postage deployment by Euro-Americans and Indians.
  • Journal of Arizona History Index, M

    Journal of Arizona History Index, M

    Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 NOTE: the index includes two citation formats. The format for Volumes 1-5 is: volume (issue): page number(s) The format for Volumes 6 -54 is: volume: page number(s) M McAdams, Cliff, book by, reviewed 26:242 McAdoo, Ellen W. 43:225 McAdoo, W. C. 18:194 McAdoo, William 36:52; 39:225; 43:225 McAhren, Ben 19:353 McAlister, M. J. 26:430 McAllester, David E., book coedited by, reviewed 20:144-46 McAllester, David P., book coedited by, reviewed 45:120 McAllister, James P. 49:4-6 McAllister, R. Burnell 43:51 McAllister, R. S. 43:47 McAllister, S. W. 8:171 n. 2 McAlpine, Tom 10:190 McAndrew, John “Boots”, photo of 36:288 McAnich, Fred, book reviewed by 49:74-75 books reviewed by 43:95-97 1 Index to the Journal of Arizona History, M Arizona Historical Society, [email protected] 480-387-5355 McArtan, Neill, develops Pastime Park 31:20-22 death of 31:36-37 photo of 31:21 McArthur, Arthur 10:20 McArthur, Charles H. 21:171-72, 178; 33:277 photos 21:177, 180 McArthur, Douglas 38:278 McArthur, Lorraine (daughter), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Lorraine (mother), photo of 34:428 McArthur, Louise, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Perry 43:349 McArthur, Warren, photo of 34:428 McArthur, Warren, Jr. 33:276 article by and about 21:171-88 photos 21:174-75, 177, 180, 187 McAuley, (Mother Superior) Mary Catherine 39:264, 265, 285 McAuley, Skeet, book by, reviewed 31:438 McAuliffe, Helen W.
  • Source Water Assessment Report

    Source Water Assessment Report

    Source Water Assessment Report Youngs River-Lewis & Clarl( Water District, Oregon PWS #4100062 December 11, 2000 Prepared for Youngs River-Lewis & Clark Water District Prepared by � rt: I •1 =<•1 Stale of Oregon Departmentof Environmental Quality Water Quality Division Drinking Water Protection Program Department of Human Services Oregon Health Division Drinking Water Program Department of Environmental Quality regon 811 SW Sixth Avenue Portland, OR 97204-1390 John A. Kitzhaber, ivf.D.,Governor (503) 229-5696 TDD (503) 229-6993 December 11, 2000 Mr. Ric Saavedra - Superintendent Youngs River-Lewis & Clark Water District 810 US Highway IOI Astoria, OR 97013 RE: Source Water Assessment Report Youngs River-Lewis & Clark Water District PWS # 4100062 Dear Mr. Saavedra: Enclosed is Youngs River-Lewis & Clark Water District's Water Assessment Report. The assessment was prepared under the requirements and guidance of the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act and the US Environmental Protection Agency, as well as a detailed Source Water Assessment Plan developed by a statewide citizen's advisory committee here in Oregon over the past two years. The Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) and the Oregon Health Division (OHD) are conducting the assessments for all public water systems in Oregon. The purpose is to provide information so that the public water system staff/operator, consumers, and community citizens can begin developing strategies to protect your source of drinking water. As you know, the 1996 Amendments to the SafeDrinking Water Act requires Consumer ConfidenceReports (CCR) by community water systems. CCRs include information about the quality of the drinking water, the source of the drinking water, and a summary of the source water assessment.
  • In New York City

    In New York City

    Outdoors Outdoors THE FREE NEWSPAPER OF OUTDOOR ADVENTURE JULY / AUGUST / SEPTEMBER 2009 iinn NNewew YYorkork CCityity Includes CALENDAR OF URBAN PARK RANGER FREE PROGRAMS © 2009 Chinyera Johnson | Illustration 2 CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION www.nyc.gov/parks/rangers URBAN PARK RANGERS Message from: Don Riepe, Jamaica Bay Guardian To counteract this problem, the American Littoral Society in partnership with NYC Department of Parks & Recreation, National Park Service, NYC Department of Environmental Protection, NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Jamaica Bay EcoWatchers, NYC Audubon Society, NYC Sierra Club and many other groups are working on various projects designed to remove debris and help restore the bay. This spring, we’ve organized a restoration cleanup and marsh planting at Plum Beach, a section of Gateway National Recreation Area and a major spawning beach for the ancient horseshoe crab. In May and June during the high tides, the crabs come ashore to lay their eggs as they’ve done for millions of years. This provides a critical food source for the many species of shorebirds that are migrating through New York City. Small fi sh such as mummichogs and killifi sh join in the feast as well. JAMAICA BAY RESTORATION PROJECTS: Since 1986, the Littoral Society has been organizing annual PROTECTING OUR MARINE LIFE shoreline cleanups to document debris and create a greater public awareness of the issue. This September, we’ll conduct Home to many species of fi sh & wildlife, Jamaica Bay has been many cleanups around the bay as part of the annual International degraded over the past 100 years through dredging and fi lling, Coastal Cleanup.
  • Youth Guide to the Department of Youth and Community Development Will Be Updating This Guide Regularly

    Youth Guide to the Department of Youth and Community Development Will Be Updating This Guide Regularly

    NYC2015 Youth Guide to The Department of Youth and Community Development will be updating this guide regularly. Please check back with us to see the latest additions. Have a safe and fun Summer! For additional information please call Youth Connect at 1.800.246.4646 T H E C I T Y O F N EW Y O RK O FFI CE O F T H E M AYOR N EW Y O RK , NY 10007 Summer 2015 Dear Friends: I am delighted to share with you the 2015 edition of the New York City Youth Guide to Summer Fun. There is no season quite like summer in the City! Across the five boroughs, there are endless opportunities for creation, relaxation and learning, and thanks to the efforts of the Department of Youth and Community Development and its partners, this guide will help neighbors and visitors from all walks of life savor the full flavor of the city and plan their family’s fun in the sun. Whether hitting the beach or watching an outdoor movie, dancing under the stars or enjoying a puppet show, exploring the zoo or sketching the skyline, attending library read-alouds or playing chess, New Yorkers are sure to make lasting memories this July and August as they discover a newfound appreciation for their diverse and vibrant home. My administration is committed to ensuring that all 8.5 million New Yorkers can enjoy and contribute to the creative energy of our city. This terrific resource not only helps us achieve that important goal, but also sustains our status as a hub of culture and entertainment.
  • Hop-On-Hop-Off Included Tours

    Hop-On-Hop-Off Included Tours

    HOP-ON-HOP-OFF INCLUDED TOURS Included on every American Queen® voyage are signature included shore excursions – your ticket to experience great river cities with selected admissions, narrated tours and our own dedicated fleet of hop-on hop-off Motorcoaches®. You’ll enjoy hassle-free access to some of the most historically and culturally significant attractions in America’s Heartland. Day 3: Clarkston, WA Experience the history and indigenous culture of the Nez Perce Tribe as we travel to the Nez Perce National Historical Park for a guided tour of their reservation. Learn about the historic and present-day way of life of these migratory Native Americans whose name is derived from the French “Pierced Nose.” The Nez Perce people are well known for their involvement and assistance with the Lewis and Clark Expedition and guests can learn first-hand how they were trusted by the Corps of Discovery through an exclusive presentation by a Nez Perce Native. A stop in downtown Lewiston, Idaho brings guests to the Nez Perce Country Historical Society and Museum, an institution which strives to preserve and interpret the history of local region and culture. Guests can delve deeper into the unique history of Nez Perce County and the Nez Perce Tribe. Gather information about the pioneers, geology, founding of Lewiston, Prairie Railroad and so much more. This tour departs at 8:30 a.m. and 9:30 a.m. Day 4: Tri-Cities, Richland, WA Enjoy a day of exploration at Sacajawea State Park and Interpretive Center, a preserved site marking a significant period in American History.