FEDERAL REGISTER VOLUME 34 • NUMBER 215 Friday, November 7,1969 • Washington, D.C. Pages 17995-18079

Agencies in this issue— Agricultural Research Service Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service Atomic Energy Commission Business and Defense Services Administration Coast Guard Consumer and Marketing Service Defense Department Education Office Federal Aviation Administration Federal Communications Commission Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Federal Maritime Com m ission Federal Power Commission Federal Reserve System Fish and Wildlife Service Food and Drug Administration Government National Mortgage Association Health, Education, and Welfare Department Interstate Commerce Commission Labor Standards Bureau Maritime Administration Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Bureau Securities and Exchange Com m ission Wage and Hour Division Detailed list of Contents appears inside. Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States

Annual volumes containing the public messages and statements, news conferences, and other selected papers released by the White House. Volumes for the following years are now available:

H ARRY S. TRUMAN 1945 _ _ _ $5.50 1949 _ $6.75 1946 ' $6. 00 1950 _ _ _ . _ $7.75 1947 $5. 25 1951 ______$6.25 1948 $9. 75 1952-53 ______$9.00

DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER 1953 ___ $6. 75 1957 _ _ $6. 75 1954 $7. 25 1958 $8.25 1955 _ $6. 75 1959 $7.00 1956 $7. 25 1960-61 . __ $7.75

JOHN F. KENNEDY 1961______$9.00 1962 ___ $9.00 1963 _ _ $9.00

LYNDON B. JOHNSON 1963-64 (Book I)- $6. 75 1966 (Book I) _____ $6. 50 1963-64 (Book II) _ $7.00 1966 (Book II) _ ' __ $7.00 1965 (Book I). $6. 25 1967 (Book I) ____ $8. 75 1965 (Book II). $6. 25 1967 (Book II) ______$8.00

Published by Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration

Order from Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402

ts v E T I i r n \ 1¿C WMMC O E P 'I tT E B Published daily, Tuesday through Saturday (no publication on Sundays, Mondays, or rJIrn/ll I ou the day after an official Federal holiday), by the Office of the Federal Register, National # Archives and Records Service, General Services Administration, Washington, D.C. 20408, Area Co e 202 phono 6 -8626 pursuant to the authority contained in the Federal Register Act, approved July 26, 1936 (49 Stat. 500, as amended; 44 U.S.C., Ch. 15), under regulations prescribed by the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register, ap­ proved by the President (1 CFR Ch. I). Distribution is made only by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. T he F ederal Register will be furnished by mail to subscribers, free of postage, for $2.50 per month or $25 per year, payable in advance. The charge for individual copies is 20 cents for each issue, or 20 cents for each group of pages as actually bound. Remit check or money order, made payable to the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. . The regulatory material appearing herein is keyed to the Code of Federal R egulations, which is published, under 50 titles, pursuant to section 11 of the Federal Register Act, as amended (44 U.S.C. 1510). The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of books and pocket supplements are listed in the first F ederal Register issue of each month. There are no restrictions on the republication of material appearing in the F ederal Register or th e Code of F ederal regulations. Contents

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CONSUMER AND MARKETING Notices Coastal Auto Parts, Inc., and SERVICE SERVICE Coastal Utilities, Inc.; hearing, Rules and Regulations Rules and Regulations e t c ______18058 Hops, domestic; advance pay­ Common carrier services informa­ Domestic quarantine; Japanese ments by equity holders of tion ; domestic public radio beetle; regulated areas------17999 pooled reserve hops______18003 services applications accepted Overtime services relating to im­ Oranges and grapefruit grown in for filing______18059 ports and exports; commuted Texas; expenses, rate of assess­ traveltime allowances-----_------18001 ment, and carryover of unex­ FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE Viruses, serums, toxins, and anal­ pended funds______18002 CORPORATION ogous products; miscellaneous Raisins produced from grapes amendments _•------18003 grown in California; expenses Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making and rate of assessment______18003 Federal crop insurance, 1969 and succeeding crop years; discon­ Soil samples from areas regulated Proposed Rule Making tinuance of potato crop insur­ because of Japanese and white- Grapefruit grown in Florida; ex­ ance in certain counties______18002 fringed beetles, European chaf­ penses, and rate of assessment, er, imported fire ant, golden 1969-70 fiscal period______18043 FEDERAL MARITIME and soybean cyst nematodes, Prunes, dried, produced in Cali­ andwitchweed------— 18042 fornia; modification of salable COMMISSION and reserve percentages for Notices AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION 1969-70 crop year______*__ 18043 Agreements filed : AND CONSERVATION SERVICE Notices Continental North Atlantic Humanely slaughtered livestock; Westbound Freight Confer­ Rules and Regulations identification of carcasses; ence ______18061 Sugar in Puerto Rico; approved changes in lists of establish­ Universal Terminal & Stevedor­ local producing areas for 1968- ments ___ 18048 ing Corp. and Pacific Far East 69 crop______18002 Line, Inc______18062 DEFENSE DEPARTMENT WSUP allocation agreement-__ 18062 AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT Rules and Regulations FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION See Agricultural Research Service; Homeowners assistance program; Notices Agricultural Stabilization and application processing______18031 Hearings, etc.: Conservation Service; Consumer General Crude Oil Co. et al------18062 and Marketing Service; Federal EDUCATION OFFICE McComas, Edgar, et al______18066 Crop Insurance Corporation. Notices Construction of academic facili­ FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION ties and improvement of under­ Notices graduate instruction; promul­ Notices First National Rancorporation; re­ gation of allotment ratios_____ 18049 quest and order for hearing___ 18070 Picker Corp.; reconvening of evi­ dentiary hearing-______’____ ' 18058 FEDERAL AVIATION FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE ADMINISTRATION BUSINESS AND DEFENSE Rules and Regulations Rules and Regulations Horicon National Wildlife Refuge, SERVICES ADMINISTRATION Alterations: Wis.; hunting______18041 Notices Federal airway------— ------18005 Notices Transition area______18005 Duty-free entry of scientific Douglas E. Swanberg; loan appli­ Standard instrument approach cation ______18049 articles: procedures ; miscellaneous Beth Israel Hospital______18047 amendments______18006 FOOD AND DRUG Hanover Borough School .Dis­ Notices ADMINISTRATION trict, Pa., et al______18047 U.S. national aviation standard for VORTAC system; proposed Proposed Rule Making COAST GUARD selection______18050 Antibiotic and antibiotic-contain­ ing drugs; tests regarding resid- Rules and Regulations FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS ual quaternary amines------18045 Coast Guard Reserve; miscellane- COMMISSION Notices °us amendments______18034 Gibberellic acid; establishment of Rules and Regulations Proposed Rule Making temporary tolerance______18049 Community antenna television Reports of hazardous materials systems; correction______18041 GOVERNMENT NATIONAL incidents; correction______18046 Radio ^broadcast services; VHF television broadcast channel, MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION COMMERCE DEPARTMENT Mount Vernon, HI ______18036 Rules and Regulations See Business and Defense Serv- Proposed Rule Making Guaranty of mortgage-backed se­ curities ______18030 ices Administration; Maritime Community antenna television Administration. systems; extension of time— 1_ 18043 (Continued on next page) 17997 17998 CONTENTS

HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT Diversified Fund of State Bond and Mortgage Co. and State WELFARE DEPARTMENT See Narcotics and Dangerous Bond and Mortgage Co_____ 18071 See also Education Office; Food Drugs Bureau. Electronic Memories & Mag­ and Drug Administration. LABOR DEPARTMENT netics Corp. (2 documents) __ 18072 Notices General Public Utilities Corp. See Labor Standards Bureau; (Pennsylvania) ______*___ 18072 General Counsel et al.; authority Wage and Hour Division. Leasco Data Processing Equip - delegation______18049 ment Corp. (2 documents) __ 18072, LABOR STANDARDS BUREAU 18073 HOUSING AND URBAN Proposed Rule Making Progress Fund, Inc., and State DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Bond and Mortgage Co___ _ 18073 Radiation safety and health stand­ Rohr Corp. and Amerada Hess See Government National Mort­ ards; application in North C orp______„______18074 gage Association. Dakota and South Carolina___ 18043 Security Benefit Life Insurance Co. and SBL Variable An­ INTERIOR DEPARTMENT MARITIME ADMINISTRATION nuity. Account______18074 University Computing Co_____ 18075 See Fish and Wildlife Service- Rules and Regulations Subsidized vessels and operators; TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENT INTERSTATE COMMERCE modifications, alterations, ad­ ditions, and betterments__ 18035 See Coast Guard; Federal Aviation COMMISSION Administration. Rules and Regulations NARCOTICS AND DANGEROUS WAGE AND HOUR DIVISION Fees for services performed in DRUGS BUREAU Rules and Regulations connection with licensing and related activities______18041 Proposed Rule Making Retailing, wholesaling, and ware­ Practices of motor common car­ Depressant and stimulant drugs; housing industry in Puerto riers of household goods; de­ requirements for exportation of Rico; wage order______18031 termination of weights______18041 controlled substances______18042 Proposed Rule Making Proposed Rule Making Industry committees for fabri­ SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE cated plastic products and cer­ Motor carriers of household tain other industries in Puerto goods ------— ------,______18046 COMMISSION Rico; conditions and wages; Notices Notices hearing ______18044 Fourth section application for re­ Hearings, etc.: Notices lie f------— ------18076 Common Stock Fund of State Certificates authorizing employ­ Motor carrier temporary authority Bond and Mortgage Co. and ment of learners at special mini­ applications______18077 State Bond and Mortgage Co_ 18070 mum wages__ !______18076 List of CFR Parts Affected The following numerical guide is a list of the parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published in today s issue» A cumulative list of parts affected» covering the current month to date, appears at the end of each issue beginning with the second issue of the month. A cumulative guide is published separately at the end of each month. The guide lists the parts and sections affected by documents published since January 1, 1969, and specifies how they are affected.

7 CFR 21 CFR 46 CFR 301______17999 P roposed R ules : 272______' 18035 354______18001 141______18045 P roposed R ules: 401______18002 320______18042 847______— 18002 146 ______.. 18046 906______1£002 24 CFR 989______18003 47 CFR 1665______991______18003 18030 7 3 ______a ______18036 18041 P roposed R ules : 29 CFR 7 4 ______. 301— ______18042 P roposed R ules: 683______18031 912______18043 74______. 18043 993______18043 P roposed R ules : 613______18044 49 CFR 9 CFR 616______18044 1002______. 18041 112______18004 688______18044 18041 113 ______18004 690______loU44 1056 114 _ — 18005 P roposed R ules: 32 CFR 1056 . 18046 14 CFR 239_____ 18031 71 (2 docum ents)______18005 50 CFR 97— ______t ______;_18006 33 CFR 32 18041 8______18034 41 CFR P roposed R ules: 50-204______18043 17999 Rules and Regulations

to the point of beginning; and that portion the Lake Michigan shoreline; thence south­ of Georgia Militia District 1342 lying south eastward along the Lake Michigan shore­ Title 7— AGRICULTURE of Interstate Highway 285. line to its intersection with East 79th Street; Chapter ill— Agricultural Research Fannin County. Georgia Militia Districts thence west on East 79th Street to its inter­ 1027, 1242, 1488, and 1308, and that portion section with Commercial Avenue; thence Service, Department of Agriculture of Georgia Militia District 913 lying east of south along Commercial Avenue and its ex­ PART 301— DOMESTIC QUARANTINE State Highway 60, including the city of tension to the intersection with East 95th Morgantown. Street; thence west along East 95th Street NOTICES Fayette County. That portion of the county to its intersection with Stoney Island Ave­ nue; thence south along Stoney Island Ave­ Subpart— Japanese Beetle lying within Georgia Militia Districts 1248, 709, and 1262, and that portion of Georgia nue to its intersection with the Calumet Expressway (Interstate 94) ; thence gener­ R egulated Areas Militia District 496 lying north of State High­ way 54, including the city of Fayetteville. ally south along Calumet Expressway (Inter­ Under the authority of § 301.48-2 of Forsyth County. The entire county. state 94) to its intersection with 167th Street the Japanese Beetle Quarantine regula­ Franklin County. Georgia„Militia Districts (in some instances, this street is known as 211, 812, and 212, and that portion of Georgia 170th Street) ; thence wèst along 167th Street tions, 7 CFR 301.48-2, as amended, 33 and its extensions to its intersection with F.R. 11888, a supplemental regulation Militia Districts 1686, 263, and 264 lying north of State Highway 59, including the Cicero Avenue (State Highway 50); thence designating regulated areas is hereby is­ north along Cicero'Avenue (State Highway sued to appear in 7 CPR 301.48-2a as city of Carnesville. 50) to its intersection with Tri-State Toll­ Fulton County. The entire county, ex­ way (Interstate 294) ; thence in a north­ follows: cluding Georgia Militia Districts 1165, 757, westerly direction along Tri-State Tollway §301.48-2a Regulated areas; suppres­ and 652. (Interstate 294) to its intersection with Gilmer County. Georgia Militia Districts sive and generally infested areas. La Grange Road (Highway TJH. 45); thence 864, 932, 1355; 1498, and 1091. northwest and north along La Grange Road The civil divisions, and parts of civil Gwinnett County. That portion of the divisions, described below, are designated (Highway U.S. 45) to its intersection with county lying within Georgia Militia Districts Joliet Road (Highway U.S. 66) ; thence north­ as Japanese beetle regulated areas within 406, 550, 1263, 1604, 1587, 1749, 1397, and east on Joliet Road (Highway U.S. 66) to the meaning of the; provisions of this that portion of 444 north of State Highway its intersection with First Avenue (State subpart; and such regulated areas are 124. Highway 171 ) ; thence north on First Ave­ hereby divided into generally infested Habersham County. The entire county. nue (State Highway 171) to the point of Hall County. The en tire county. beginning. areas or suppressive areas as indicated Jackson County. That portion of the Iroquois County. That portion of the coun­ below: county lying north of Interstate Highway ty lying east of State Highway 49. Connecticut 85 and that portion of Georgia Militia Dis­ La Salle County. Secs. 13, 14, 23, 24, 25. (1) Generally infested area. The entire trict 1765 lying south of Interstate Highway 26, 35, and 36, T. 31 N., R. 3 E.; and secs. 18, State. 85. (2) Suppressive area. N one Lumpkin County. The entire county. 19, 30, and 31, T. 31 N„ R. 4. E. Madison County. That portion of the (2) Suppressive area. Delaware county lying within Georgia Militia District Madison County. T. 3 N„ R. 9 W., including (1) Generally infested area. The entire 262. the cities of Granite City, Madison, and Ven­ State. Pickens County. That portion of the ice; and T. 3 N., R. 10 W. (2) Suppressive area. None. county lying east of State Highway 5, includ­ St. Clair County. That portion of the coun­ ing* the city of Jasper; and that portion of ty lying north of U.S. Highway 40; and that District of Columbia Georgia Militia Districts 1129 and 1492 west area bounded on the west by Kings Highway (1) Generally infested area. The entire of State Highway 5. (Hlinois No. Ill), on the south by Bunkum District. Rabun County. The entire county. Road, on the east by Black Lane Road, and (2) Suppressive area. None. Richmond County. That portion of the on the north by the Madison-St. Clair County county lying north of Butler Creek and that line. Georgia area lying north of Spirit Creek between the I ndiana (1) Generally infested area. Savannah River and State Highway 56. ( 1 ) Generally infested area. Banks County. The entire county. Stephens County. T he entire county. Allen County. The entire county. Barrow C ounty. That portion of the county Towns County. The entire county. Benton County. The entire county. lying within Georgia Militia Districts 1744, Union County. Georgia Militia Districts Boone County. The entire county. 243, and 1743, and th a t p ortion of Georgia 994,995,1241, and 834. Carroll County. The entire county. Militia Districts 1740 and 316 lying north White County. The entire county. Cass County. The entire county. of U.S. Highway 29, including the cities of (2) Suppressive area. Clark County. That portion of the county Auburn and Carl. Spalding County. That portion of the bounded by a line beginning at a point where Cherokee C ounty. Georgia Militia Districts county lying within the corporate limits of State Highway 62 intersects the Floyd-Clark 1031,1000, 818, 1174, 1010, and 1015. the city of Griffin. County line; thence extending northeastward Clayton County. Georgia Militia Districts I llinois along said highway to the point where it 548,1189, 1406, 1446, 1644, and 1088. junctions with State Highway 131; thence c°bb County. That portion of the county (1) Generally infested area. northeastward along said highway to the lying south of State Highway 120, including Coles County. Secs. 1, 2, 3, and the portions point where it intersects Interstate Highway Ml the area within the corporate limits of of secs. 11 and 12 located outside the city 1-65; thence continuing in a northeastward the city of Marietta, and that portion of lim its o f M attoon, T. 12 N., R. 7 E.; secs. 25, direction along the bituminous surfaced road Georgia Militia Districts 1319, 1679, and 897 34, 35, and 36, T. 13 N„ R. 7 E.; sec. 6, T. 12 N., located on the northern boundary of secs. 20 ying north of State Highway 120. R. 8 E.; secs. 30 and 31, T. 13 N., R. 8 E.; secs. and 21 to the point where it Junctions with Dawson County. The entire county. 2, 3, and that portion of sec. 11 outside the Allison Lane; thence southeastward along De Kalb County. That portion of the city limits of Charleston, T. 12 N., R. 9 E.; said lane to the Ohio River; thence westward unty bounded by a line beginning at a and secs. 34 and 35, T. 13 N., R. 9 E. along the Ohio River to the point where it Point where the Fulton-Gwinnett-De Kalb Cook County. That portion of the city of intersects the Floyd-Clark County line; ounty lines intersect and extending south- Chicago and vicinity bounded by a line begin­ thence north along said line to the point t . n ^*6 De Kalb-Gwinnett County line ning at a point where First Avenue (State of beginning. Ht k ^unction of said line and Interstate Highway 171) intersects with Cermak Road; Clinton County. T he en tire county; thence southwest along Inter- thence east along Cermak Road to South Daviess County. Secs. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, t<>rc+ f lghway 85 to its intersection with In- Halsted Street; thence south on South Hal- 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, ainn r Hiehway 285, thence south and west sted Street to its intersection with West 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36, T. 3 N„ R. 7 W.; and £ interstate Highway 285 to its inter- 31st Street; thence east along West 31st secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, T. 2 N„ R. 7 W. 1,J°* with the De Kalb-Fulton County Street and East 31st Street to the point where De Kalb County. T he en tire cou n ty. ’ thence north and east along said line an extension of 31st Street would intersect Elkhart County. The entire county.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18000 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Fulton County. The entire county. singer Lane; thence south on Hunsinger Lane (2) Suppressive area. None. Huntington County. The entire county. to Fredericks Lane; thence south on Fred­ Jasper County. The entire county. ericks Lane to Bardstown Road; thence New Hampshire Kosciusko County. The entire county. southeast on Bardstown Road to the Jef- (1) Generally infested area. The entire Lagrange County. The entire county. ferson-Bullitt County line; thence west on State. Lake County. The entire county. the Jefferson County line to Pendleton Road; (2) Suppressive area. None. La P orte C ou n ty. The entire county. thence northwest on Pendleton Road to Dixie Lawrence County. T. 4 N., R. 2 W.; secs. Highway; thence southwest on the Dixie New J ersey 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, Highway to Watson Lane; thence northwest 17, and 18, T. 3 N., R. 2 W. on Watson Lane and its extension to the Ohio (1) Generally infested area. The entire Marion County. The entire county. River; and thence northeast up the river to State. Marshall County. The entire county. the point of beginning at the Sherman (2) Suppressive area. None. Martin County. The entire county. Milton Bridge. New York Miami County. The entire county. Johnson County. The entire county. s Montgomery County. T h e entire county. Kenton County. The entire county. (1) Generally infested area. The entire Newton County. The entire county. Knott County. The entire county. State. Noble County. The entire county. Knox County. The entire county. (2) Suppressive area. None. Orange County. Secs. 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, Laurel County. The entire county. 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36, Lawrence County. T he en tire county. North Carolina T. 3 N„ R. 2 W. Leslie County. The entire county. Porter County. The entire county. (1) Generally infested area. The entire Letcher County. The entire county. State. Pulaski County. The entire county. Lewis County. The entire county. Putnam County. Secs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, T. 16 Martin County. The entire county. (2) Suppressive area. None. N„ R. 3 W.; secs. 1, 2, 3, 10, 11, and 12, T. 16 Mason County. The entire county. N„ R. 4 W. Ohio Menifee County. The entire county. St. Joseph County. T he en tire cou n ty. Perry County. The entire county. ( 1 ) Generally infested area. Starke County. The entire county. Pike County. The entire county. Adams County. The entire county. Steuben County. The entire county. Powell County. The entire county. Ashland County. T he entire county. Tippecanoe County. The entire county. Rowan County. The entire county. Ashtabula County. T he entire county. Vanderburgh County. The entire county. Athens bounty. The entire county. Vigo County. The entire county. Whitley County. The entire county. (2) Suppressive area. None. Belmont County. The entire county. Wabash County. The entire county. Brown County. The entire county. Wayne County. The entire county. Maine Butler County. The tow nships of Fairfield, Wells County. The entire cou n ty. Hanover, Liberty, Morgan, Reily, Ross, St. (1) -Generally infested area. White County. The entire county. Clair, and Union; and cities of Fairfield and Whitley County. The entire county. Androscoggin County. The entire county. H am ilton. (2) Suppressive area. Cumberland County. The entire county. Carroll County. The entire county. Jefferson County. Secs. 12, 13, 24, and 25, Kennebec County. The entire county. Clermont County. The entire comity. T. 3 N„ R. 9 E.; secs. 5, 6, 7, 8, 17, 18, 19, 20, Lincoln County. The entire county. Columbiana County. The entire county. Oxford County. The entire county. 29, and 30, T. 2 N., R. 10 E.; secs. 2, 3, 4, 5, Coshocton County. The entire county. 6, 7, 8, 18, 19, 30, 31, and 32, T. 3 N., R. Sagadahoc County. The entire county. Crawford County. The townships of Au­ 10 E.; and secs. 32, 33, 34, and 35, T. 4 N., York County. The entire county. burn, Chatfield, Cranberry, Jackson, Jeffer­ R .1 0 E . (2) Suppressive area. None. son, Liberty, Polk, Sandusky, Vernon, and Switzerland County. Sec. 6, T. 1 N„ R. 1 Maryland Whetstone; and the cities of Bucyrus, Crest­ line, and Gallon. W.; secs. 27, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33, and 34, T. (1) Generally infested area. The entire 2 N., R. 1 W.; secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and Cuyahoga County. The entire county. State. Erie County. The entire county. 18, T. 1 N„ R. 2 W.; and secs. 1, 9, 10, 11, (2) Suppressive area. None. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 27, and 28, T. Fairfield County. The townships of Berne, 2 N., R. 3 W. Massachusetts Greenfield, Hocking, Liberty, Madison, Pleas­ ant, Richland, Rush Creek, and Walnut; and Kentucky (1) Generally infested area. The entire the city of Lancaster. (1) Generally infested area. State. Franklin County. The tow nships of Blen- Bath County. The entire county. (2) Suppressive area. None. don, C linton, Jefferson, Mifflin, Plain, Sharon, Bell County. The entire county. and Truro; and the cities of Bexley, Colum­ Michigan Boone County. The entire county. bus, Grandview Heights, Marble Cliff, Reyn­ Boyd County. T he entire county. (1) Generally infested area. oldsburg, Upper A rlington, Westerville, Campbell County. The entire county. Barry County. Johnstown Township, secs. Whitehall, and Worthington. Carroll County. The entire county. 25, 26, 35, and 36. Fulton County. The townships of Amboy Carter County. The entire county. Calhoun County. The city of Battle Creek and Fulton. Clay County. The entire county. and the townships of Pennfield, Bedford, Gallia County. The entire county. Elliott County. The entire county. Battle Creek, and Emmett; in Leroy Town­ Geauga County. The entire county. Estill County. The entire county. ship, secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, Guernsey County. The entire county. Fleming County. The entire county. 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, Hamilton County. The entire oounty. Floyd County. T he entire county. 29, 32, and 33; in Newton Township, secs. Hancock County. T he tow nship of Wash­ Gallatin County. That portion of the I, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, ington; and the city of Foetoria. county bounded by a line beginning at the 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, and 30; In Fredonia Town­ Harrison County. The entire county. intersection of the Carroll-Gallatin County ship, secs. 6 and 7; in Marshall Township, Hocking County. The entire county. line and the Ohio River; thence east along secs. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, Holmes County. T he entire county. the Ohio River to a point where the extension 21, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33; in Convis Town­ Huron County. The entire county. of County Road 184 meets the Ohio River; ship, secs. 19, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, and 35. Jackson County. The entire county. thence south along the extension of County Kalamazoo County. Ross Township, secs. 1, Jefferson County. The entire oounty. Road 184 and County Road 184 to its inter­ 12, 13, 14, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35, and 36; in Knox County. The entire county. section with the Carroll-Gallatin County Charleston Township, secs. 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, 11, Lake County. The entire county. line; thence north along the Carroll-Gallatin 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, Lawrence County. The entire county. County line to the point of beginning. 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36; in Climax Township, L ickin g C ou n ty. The entire county. Grant County. The entire county. secs. 1, 2, 3 ,11, and 12. Lorain County. The entire county. Greenup County. The entire county. Lenawee County. Secs. 25 and 36, T. 8 S., Lucas County. The townships of Adams, Harlan County. The entire county. R. 4 E.; sec. 1, T. 9 S., R. 4 E.; secs. 1, 2, 3, Harding, Monclova, Oregon, Ottawa Hill®’ Jefferson County. That portion of the 4, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, Providence, Richfield, Spencer, Springfield. county bounded by a line beginning at the 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, Swan ton, Sylvan! a, Washington, and Water- Sherman Milton Bridge over the Ohio River; 34, 35, and 36, T. 8 S., R. 5 E.; secs. 1, 2, 3, ville; and the cities of Maumee, Orego , thence extending northeast along the Ohio 4, 5, and 6, T. 9 S„ R. 5 E. Sylvania, and Toledo. River to a point opposite Blankenbaker Lane; Monroe County. Secs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, Mahoning County. The entire county. thence south on Blankenbaker Lane to Inter­ II, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, Marion County. The townships of Big state Highway 71; thence east on Interstate 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, Island, Claridon, Marion, and Tully; and the Highway 71 to the Henry Watterson Express­ and 36, T. 8 S., R. 6 E.; secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, city of Marion. way; thence south on Henry Watterson Ex­ and 6, T. 9 S., R. 6 E.; secs. 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, pressway to Breckenridge Lane; thence south 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, Medina County. The entire county. on Breckenridge Lane to Taylorsville Road; 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, and 36, T. 8 S., R. 7. E.; Meigs County. The entire county. thence east on Taylorsville Road to Hun- secs. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, T. 9 S., R. 7 E. Monroe County. The entire oounty.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18001

Morgan County. The entire county. T ennessee likely to exist in the civil divisions and Muskingum C ou n ty. The entire county. (1) Generally infested area. parts of civil divisions listed above, or Noble County. The entire county. Carter County. That portion of the county that it is necessary to regulate such lo­ Perry C ounty. The entire county. bounded by a line beginning at the inter­ calities because of their proximity to in­ Pike County. The entire county. section of Walnut Mountain Road and the festations or their inseparability for Portage County. The entire county. south shoreline of Watauga Lake; thence Preble County. The township of Jefferson. quarantine enforcement purposes from extending in an easterly direction along infested localities. Richland County. The entire county. the shoreline of Watauga Lake to its inter­ Ross County!*, The townships of Colerain, section with the Carter-Johnson County The Director has further determined Franklin, Green, Harrison, Huntington, Jef­ line and extending southeast along said line that each of the quarantined States, ferson, Liberty, Paxton, Scioto, Springfield, to the Tennessee-North Carolina State line; wherein only portions of the State havé and Twin; and the city of Chillicothe. thence southwest along said State line to its been designated as regulated areas, is Sandusky County. The city of Bellevue. intersection with Walnut Mountain Road; enforcing a quarantine or regulation with Seneca County. The townships of Jackson thence northwest along Walnut Mountain and Louden; and th e city of Postoria. restrictions on intrastate movement of Road to the point of beginning. the regulated articles substantially the Scioto County. The entire county. Johnson County. The entire county. Stark County. The entire county. Loudon County. The entire county ex­ same as the restrictions on interstate Summit County. The entire county. cept the southeast corner lying east of the movement of such articles imposed by the Trumbull County. The entire county. Little Tennessee River and lying south of quarantine and regulations in this sub­ Tuscarawas County. The entire county. Federal Aid Secondary Road 2423. part, and that designation of less than Vinton County. The entire county. Roane County. That portion of the county the entire State as a regulated area will Warren County. The townships of Deer­ bounded by a line beginning at the inter­ otherwise be adequate to prevent the in­ field, Hamilton, Harlan, Salem , and Union; section of U.S. Highway 70 and Federal terstate spread of the Japanese beetle. and the city of Loveland. Aid Secondary Road 2555; thence easterly Washington County. The entire county. Therefore, such civil divisions and parts along U.S. Highway 70 to the Roane-Loudon of civil divisions listed above, are des­ Wayne County. The entire county. County line; thence south along said line Wood County. The townships of Lake, to its intersection with the Tennessee River; ignated as Japanese beetle regulated Perry, Perrysburg, Ross, and Rossford; and thence in a westerly direction along the areas. the cities of Posteria and Perrysburg. north shoreline of said river to its inter­ The purpose of this revision is to add (2) Suppressive area. None. section with Wolf Creek; thence north along to the regulated areas all or parts of the Pennsylvania said creek to its intersection with Federal following counties: Barrow, Fayette, Aid Secondary Road 2555; thence north (1) Generally infested area. The entire Jackson, and Madison in Georgia; Jeffer­ along said road to the point of beginning. son, Orange, and Switzerland in Indiana; State. Sullivan County. That portion of the (2) Suppressive area. None. Clay, Gallatin, and Powell in Kentucky; county bounded by a line beginning at the Hancock and Seneca in Ohio; and Lou­ R hode Island intersection of the Tennessee-Virginia State line and the western city limits of Bristol; don, Roane, Sullivan, and Washington in (1) Generally infested area. The entire thence easterly along said State line to its Tennessee. It also extends the regulated State. intersection with the Sullivan-Johnson areas in some previously regulated (2) Suppressive area. None. County line; thence southwesterly along said counties. South Carolina county line to its intersection with the Right This document imposes restrictions Prong Hatcher Creek; thence northwesterly (1) Generally infested area. that are necessary in order to prevent along said creek to its intersection with the dissemination of Japanese beetles Aiken C ounty. The entire county. Federal Aid Secondary Road 2373; thence Cherokee County. The entire county. westerly and northerly along said road to its and should be made effective promptly Dillon County. T he entire county. intersetcion with the Bristol City limits; to accomplish its purposes in the public Florence County. The entire county. thence westerly and north along said city interest. Accordingly, it is found upon Greenville County. The entire county. limits to the point of beginning. good cause under the administrative pro­ Horry County. That portion of the county That portion of the county lying within the cedure provisions of 5 U.S.C. 553, that bounded by a line beginning at a point incorporated city boundary and the un­ notice and other public procedure with where State Secondary Highway 215 junc­ incorporated urban boundary of the city of tions with Bryant Road, th en ce exten d ing respect to the foregoing regulation are K ingsport. impracticable and contrary to the public northeast along said road to its intersection Washington County. That portion of the with 29th Avenue extension, th en ce so u th ­ county lying within the incorporated city interest, and good cause is found for east along said extension to its Junction with boundary and the unincorporated urban making it effective less than 30 days af­ the corporate limits of the city of Myrtle boundary of the city of Johnson City. ter publication in the F ederal R e g ister . Beach, thence in a westerly direction along (2) Suppressive area. None. said corporate limits to its intersection with Done at Hyattsville, Md., this 3d day State Secondary H ighw ay 215, th en ce north Vermont of November 1969. along said highway to the point of beginning, (1) Generally infested area. The entire D. R . S h e ph e r d , Lancaster County. That area bounded by State. Director, a line beginning at a point where State (2) Suppressive area. None. Primary Highway 9 (B u sin ess) jun ction s Plant Pest Control Division. with U.S. Highway 521 (B u sin ess) and State Virginia [F.R. Doc. 69-13300; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; Primary Highway 200, said Jun ction being (1) Generally infested area. The entire 8:48 a.m .] approximately l mile southeast of the in­ State. tersection of S tate Prim ary H ighw ay 9 (B y­ (2) Suppressive area. None. pass) and U.S. Highway 521, thence extend- PART 354— OVERTIME SERVICES RE­ West Virginia ln8 south and sou th w est along S ta te Pri­ LATING TO IMPORTS AND EXPORTS mary Highway 200 to its Junction with State (1) Generally infested area. The entire Primary Highway 914 and State Secondary State. Commuted Traveltime Allowances Highway 25, th en ce n orthw est along State (2) Suppressive area. None. rimary Highway 914 to its junction with Pursuant to the authority conferred n **+ Primary Highway 9 (Business), thence (Secs. 8 and 9, 37 Stat. 318, sec. 106, 71 Stat. upon the Director of the Plant Quaran­ crtheast along said highway to the point 33; 7 U.S.C. 161, 162, 150ee; 29 F.R. 16210, as tine Division by § 354.1 of the regulations °f beginning. amended; 7 CFR 301.48-2) concerning overtime services relating to Lexington County. The entire county. Marion County. The entire county. This supplemental regulation shall be­ imports and exports (7 CFR 354.1), Marlboro C ounty. The entire county. come effective upon publication in the effective July 13, 1969 (34 F.R. 11548), McCormick County. The entire county. F ederal R eg ister when it shall supersede administrative instructions (7 CFR Oconee County. The entire county. 7 CFR 301.48-2a, effective December 28, 354.2), effective August 19, 1967, as sickens County. The entire county. 1968. amended February 9, 1968, April 19, uichland County. T he entire county. The Director of the Plant Pest Control 1968, July 25, 1968, December 14, 1968, *partanburg C ou n ty. T he entire county. Division has determined that Infesta­ February 19, 1969, June 6, 1969, July 12, (2) Suppressive area. None. tions of the Japanese beetle exist or are 1969, August 14, 1969, and October 9,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY. NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18002 RULES AND REGULATIONS

1969 (32 F.R. 11981, 33 F.R. 2757, 5987, were designated for potato crop insur­ Area Agricultural Stabilization and Con­ 10561, 18580, 34 F.R. 2351, 9025, 11547, ance for the 1970 crop year pursuant servation Service Office determines that 13148, 15636), prescribing the commuted to the authority contained in § 401.101 drought, flood, storm, disease, or insects traveltime that shall be included in each of the above-identified regulations. have damaged a substantial part of the period of overtime or holiday duty, are sugarcane crop in such area. California hereby amended by adding to and delet­ Modoc. The purpose of this supplement is to ing from the “lists” therein as follows: I daho set forth that the specified single wards § 354.2 Administrative instructions pre­ Bannock. Jefferson. have been determined to comprise local scribing commuted traveltime. B ingham . M inidoka. producing areas for the 1968-69 crop ***** Bonneville. Owyhee. which have qualified under the require­ Outside Metropolitan Area Canyon. Power. ments relating to crop damage. Any Cassia. Twin Palls. sugarcane producer on a farm which is TWO HOURS located in whole or in part in any one Oregon Add: Baytown, Tex. (served from Houston, of these local producing areas, and which T e x .). Jefferson. M alheur. is otherwise qualified, may apply for pay­ THREE HOURS K lam ath. ment accordingly, if he has not already Delete: Baytown, Tex. (served from Hous­ Washington done so. ton, Tex.). (Secs. 303, 403, 61 Stat. 930, 932; 7 U.S.C. Ii33 POUR HOURS Adams. Grant. Franklin. 1153) Add: Arecibo, P.R. (served from San Juan, P.R.). (Secs. 506, 516, 52 Stat. 73, as amended, 77, Effective date: Date of publication. as amended; 7 U.S.C. 1506, 1516) * * * * * Signed at Washington, D.C., on No­ vember 3,1969. These commuted traveltime periods [seal] R ichard H. Aslakson, have been established as nearly as may Manager, Federal Charles M. Cox, be practicable to cover the time neces­ Crop Insurance Corporation. Acting Deputy Administrator, sarily spent in reporting to and re­ [P.R. Doc. 69-13268; Piled, Nov. 6, 1969; State and County Operations. turning from the place at which the 8:46 a.m.} [P.R. Doc. 69-13264; Plied, Nov. 6, 1969; employee performs such overtime or 8:45 a m ] holiday duty when such travel is per­ formed solely on account of such over­ Chapter VIII— Agricultural Stabiliza­ time or holiday duty. Such establishment tion and Conservation Service Chapter IX— Consumer and Market­ depends upon facts within the knowl­ (Sugar), Department of Agriculture ing Service (Marketing Agreements edge of the Plant Quarantine Division. It and Orders; Fruits, Vegetables, is to the benefit of the public that this SUBCHAPTER F— DETERMINATION OF NORMAL YIELDS AND ELIGIBILITY FOR ABANDONMENT Nuts), Department of Agriculture amendment be made effective at the AND CROP DEFICIENCY PAYMENTS earliest practicable date. Accordingly, PART 906— ORANGES AND GRAPE­ pursuant to the provisions of 5 U.S.C. [Sugar Determination 847.2, Rev., Supp. 15] FRUIT GROWN IN LOWER RIO 553, it is found upon good cause that PART 847— PUERTO RICO notice and public procedure on this GRANDE VALLEY IN TEXAS amendment are impracticable, unneces­ Approved Local Producing Areas for Expenses and Rate of Assessment and sary, and contrary to the public interest, 1968—69 Crop and good cause is found for making Carryover of Unexpended Funds this amendment effective less than 30 Pursuant to the provisions of S.D. On October 2,1969, notice of rule mak­ 847.2, as revised (27 F.R. 6080), the fol­ days after publication in the F ederal ing was published in the F ederal Regis­ R egister. lowing determination is hereby issued: ter (34 F.R. 15361) regarding proposed (64 stat. 561; 7 U.S.C. 2260) § 847.17 Approved local producing areas expenses and the related rate of assess­ in Puerto Rico. ment for the period August 1, 1969, This amendment shall become effec­ For purposes of considering eligibility through July 31, 1970, and the carryover tive upon publication in the F ederal of unexpended funds, pursuant to the R egister. of farms for abandonment and crop de­ ficiency payments on the 1968-69 sugar­ marketing agreement, as amended, and Done at Hyattsville, Md„ this 3d day cane crop in Puerto Rico, the Director Order No. 906, as amended (7 CFR Part of November 1969. of the Caribbean Area Agricultural Sta­ 906), regulating the handling of oranges bilization and Conservation Service Of­ and grapefruit grown in the Lower Rio [ seal] F. A. Johnston, fice, has determined with respect to the Grande Valley effective under the appli­ Director, cable provisions of the Agricultural Plant Quarantine Division. local producing areas listed herein, that, due to flood, the actual yields of com­ Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as [P.R. Doc. 69-13299; Piled, Nov. 6, 1969; mercially recoverable sugar for the 1968- amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). After con­ 8:48 a.m .] 69 crop year from 10 percent or more of sideration of all relevant matters pre­ sented, including the proposals set forth the total number of farms or part of in such notice which were submitted by Chapter IV——Federal Crop Insurance farms; or from 10 percent or more of the total planted acreage of sugarcane the Texas Valley Citrus Committee Corporation, Department of Agri­ in each such local producing area were (established pursuant to said amended culture below 80 percent of the applicable farm marketing agreement and order), it is hereby found and determined that: PART 401— FEDERAL CROP normal yields: INSURANCE Single wards. Wards Cidra, Corcovada, § 906.209 Expenses and rate of assess­ Miraflores, and Playa, of the municipality of ment and carryover of u n ex p en d e Subpart— Regulations for the 1969 Anasco; and Ward Quebrada Vueltas, of the funds. and Succeeding Crop Years municipality of Fajardo. (a) Expenses. Expenses that are rea­ S tatement of B ases and Considerations sonable and likely to be incurred by the Appendix; D iscontinuance of Insur­ rexas Valley Citrus Committee during ance in Counties P reviously D esig­ One of the conditions of eligibility of ;he period August 1, 1969, through July nated for P otato Crop Insurance a farm in Puerto Rico for an acreage II, 1970, will amount to $660,000. The counties listed below are hereby abandonment or crop deficiency pay­ ment in connection with the production (b) Rate of assessment. The rate o deleted from the list of counties pub­ of sugar from sugarcane is that the farm issessment for said period, Payable 7 lished in the F ederal R egister on Au­ be located in a local producing area for :ach handler in accordance with § 906* > gust 26, 1969 (34 F.R. 13651), which which the Director of the Caribbean s fixed at $0.045 per %o bushel carto ,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATTONS 18003 or an equivalent quantity of oranges and of $132,600 are reasonable and likely to serve hops to cover expenses relative to grapefruit. be incurred by the Raisin Administrative such hops. This subpart is operative (c) Reserve. Unexpended assessment Committee during the crop year begin­ pursuant to Marketing Order No. 991, funds, in excess of expenses incurred ning September 1, 1969, for the main­ as amended (7 CFR Part 991), regulating during the fiscal period ended July 31, tenance and functioning of the Commit­ the handling of hops of domestic pro­ 1969, shall be carried over as a reserve in tee and the Raisin Advisory Board and duction, effective under the Agricultural accordance with applicable provisions of for such purposes as the Secretary may, Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as § 906.35(a) (2) of the said marketing in accordance with § 989.79, determine amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). agreement and order. to be appropriate. The notice afforded interested persons It is hereby further found that good (b) Rate of assessment. The rate ofopportunity to submit written data, cause exists tor not postponing the effec­ assessment for that crop year which each views, or arguments with respect to the tive date hereof until 30 days after pub­ handler is required, pursuant to § 989.80, proposal. None were received within the lication in the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. to pay to the Raisin Administrative Com­ prescribed time. 553) in that (1) the relevant provisions mittee as his pro rata share of the ex­ After consideration of all relevant of said marketing agreement and this penses is fixed at 85 cents per ton appli­ matter presented, including that in the part require that the rate of assessment cable to each of the following: notice, the information and recom­ fixed for a particular fiscal period shall (1) Free tonnage raisins acquired by mendations submitted by the Committee be applicable to all assessable fruit from the handler during the crop year, exclu­ and other available information, it is the beginning of such period, and (2) the sive of such quantity thereof as repre­ hereby found that amendment of the current fiscal period began on August 1, sents the assessable portions of other administrative rules and regulations, as 1969, and the rate of assessment being handlers’ raisins pursuant to subpara­ hereinafter set forth, will tend to ef­ fixed will automatically apply to all graph (3) of this paragraph; fectuate the declared policy of the act. assessable oranges and grapefruit begin­ (2) Reserve tonnage raisins released Therefore, § 991.205 of Subpart—Ad­ ning with such date. or sold to the handler for use as free ministrative Rules and Regulations is hereby amended to read as follows: (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. tonnage during the crop year; and 601-674) (3) Standard raisins (which he does’ § 991.205 Advance payments by equity not acquire) recovered by the handler holders o f pooled reserve hops. Dated: November 4, 1969. by the reconditioning of off-grade raisins P aul A . N ic h o l s o n , As a condition of accepting and in­ Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ but only to the extent of the aggregate cluding the reserve hops of any producer- etable Division, Consumer and quantity of the free tonnage portions handler in the reserve pool, the Com­ Marketing Service. of these standard raisins that are ac­ mittee may require advance payments quired by other handlers during the crop from equity holders of pooled reserve [F.R. Doc. 69-13303; Piled, Nov. 6, 1969; year. 8:48 a.m .] hops. Such advances shall be in an It is further found that good cause amount, as determined by the Commit­ exists for not postponing the effective tee, as will be necessary to meet all PART 989— RAISINS PRODUCED time of this action until 30 days after charges attributable to reserve pooling FROM GRAPES GROWN IN CALI­ publication in the F ederal R egister (5 but shall not exceed $4 per bale. FORNIA U.S.C. 553) in that: (1) The relevant It is found that good cause exists for provisions of said amended marketing not postponing the effective time of this Expenses of Raisin Administrative agreement and order require that the action until 30 days after publication in Committee and Rate of Assessment rate of assessment fixed for a particular the F ederal R egister (5 U.S.C. 553) in for 1969—70 Crop Year crop year which handlers are required that: (1) Producer-handlers are in the to pay shall be applicable to all free process of beginning to deliver reserve Notice was published in the October 18, tonnage raisins of the crop year and hops to the reserve pool; (2) should ad­ 1969, issue of the F ederal R egister to all reserve tonnage raisins released (34 P.R, 17032) regarding proposed ex­ vances be required, and, if so, in what or sold to handlers for use as free ton­ amount, equity holders should be in­ penses of the Raisin Administrative Com­ nage during the crop year; and (2) the mittee for the 1969-70 crop year and rate formed as soon as possible prior to such current crop year began on Septem­ deliveries; and (3) no useful purpose of assessment for that crop year, pursu­ ber 1, 1969, and the rate of assessment ant to §§ 989.79 and 989.80 of the mar­ would be served by delaying the effective fixed herein will automatically apply to time hereof. keting agreement, as amended, and all such raisins beginning with that date. Order No. 989, as amended (7 CFR Part (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 989), regulating the handling of raisins (Secs. 1-19, 48 Stat. 31, as amended; 7 U.S.C. 601-674) 601-674) produced from grapes grown in Califor­ Dated: November 3, 1968. nia. The marketing agreement and order Dated: November 3,1969. are effective under the Agricultural P aul A. N icholson, Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as P aul A. N icholson, Deputy Director, Deputy Director, Fruit and Fruit and Vegetable Division. amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). Vegetable Division, Con­ The notice afforded interested persons [F.R. Doc. 69-13266; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; opportunity to submit written data, sumer and Marketing Serv­ 8:45 a.m .] views, or arguments with respect to the ice. Proposal. None were received during the [F.R. Doc. 69—13265; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; Prescribed time. 8:45 a.m .] After consideration of all relevant Title 9— ANIMALS AND Matter presented, including that in the “Otice, the information and recom- PART 991— HOPS OF DOMESTIC ANIMAL PRODUCTS mendatûMis submitted by the Raisin PRODUCTION Chapter I— Agricultural Research Administrative Committee, and other Subpart— Administrative Rules and Service, Department of Agriculture available information, it is found that the Regulations expenses of the Raisin Administrative SUBCHAPTER E— VIRUSES, SERUMS, TOXINS, . ‘^j^ittee and the rate of assessment A dvance P a y m e n t s b y E q u it y H olders AND ANALOGOUS PRODUCTS; ORGANISMS inoA cr°P year beginning September 1, o f P ooled R eserve H o ps AND VECTORS 969, shall be as follows : Notice was published in the Octo­ MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS TO § 89.320 Expenses of the Raisin Ad­ ber 18, 1969, issue of the F ederal R eg­ SUBCHAPTER ministrative Committee and rate of ister (34 F.R. 17032) of a proposal based assessment for the 1969—70 crop year. upon the unanimous recommendation of On July 11, 1969, there was published the Hop Administrative Committee, in the F ederal R egister (34 F.R. 11489) n/ a-) Expenses. Expenses (other than whereby the Committee may require ad­ and on July 17 republished in the F ed­ ose specified in § 989.82) in the amount vances by equity holders of pooled re- eral R egister (34 F.R. 12042) a notice

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 No. 215------2 18004 RULES AND REGULATIONS of proposed rule making with respect to Sec. (iii) Desiccated products; samples proposed amendments to the regulations 112.6 Packaging desiccated products. shall be in final containers and shall be relating to viruses, serums, toxins, and 112.7 Special additional requirements. randomly selected if desiccated in the analogous products in Parts 112,113, and final container. Biological products 114 of Title 9, Code of the Federal Regu­ PART 113— STANDARD desiccated in bulk shall be sampled at lations, issued pursuant to the provi­ REQUIREMENTS the end of the filling operation. sions of the Virus-Serum-Toxin Act of (2) Each permittee shall select pre­ March 4, 1913 (21 U.S.C. 151-158) , A no­ 2. Chapter I of Title 9 of the Code of release samples so that each serial or tice extending the period to submit writ­ Federal Regulations Is amended by add­ subserial in each shipment shall be rep­ ten data, views, or arguments to Octo­ ing a new Part 113, reading as follows: resented. ber 17, 1969, was published in the Applicability (b) Reserve samples shall be selected September 10, 1969, issue of the F ederal Sec. from each serial and subserial of every R egister (34 F.R. 14224). 113.1 Compliance. biological product. Such samples shall After due consideration of all relevant 113.2 Ingredients of biological products. be selected at random from finished matters, including the proposals set forth 113.3 Sampling of biological products. 113.4 Outline of production. product by the licensee or permittee. in the aforesaid notice of rule making, 113.5 General testing. Each sample shall: and the comments and views submitted 113.6 Division testing. (1) Consist of 5 single dose or 2 multi­ by interested persons, and pursuant to 113.7 Multiple fractions. ple dose packages as the case may be; the authority contained in the Virus- 113.8 Virus titrations in lieu of test for (2) Be adequate in quantity for ap­ Serum-Toxin Act of March 4, 1913 (21 antigenicity. propriate examination and testing; U.S.C. 151-158), the proposed amend­ Authority: The provisions of this Part 113 (3) Be truly representative and in ments of Parts 112, 113, and 114 of Sub­ issued under 37 Stat. 832-833; 21 U.S.C. 151- final containers; chapter E, Chapter I, Title 9, of the Code 158. (4) Be held in a special compartment of Federal Regulations, as contained in or equivalent set aside by the licensee or the aforesaid notice are hereby adopted Applicability permittee, for holding these samples and are set forth in full herein, subject § 113.1 Compliance. under refrigeration at 35° to 45° F. for to the following noted modifications: The regulations in this part apply to 6 months after the expiration date stated The words “Standard Requirements” each serial or subserial of a licensed on the labels. These samples shall be have been deleted from the section head­ biological product manufactured in a stored in this manner and shall be de­ ings as being repetitious and superfluous. licensed establishment and to each serial livered to the Division upon request. The index has been changed accordingly. or subserial of a biological product in § 113.4 Outline o f production. Section 113.3(a)(1) has been clarified each shipment imported for distribution (a) The test methods and procedures by deleting the word “inactivation” and and sale. inserting “safety” in (i) and rewording contained in all applicable Standard Re­ (ii) and (iii) to provide for random se­ § 113.2 Ingredients of biological prod, quirements shall be complied with un­ lection. Subdivision (i) has also been ucts. less otherwise exempted by the Director changed to provide for samples of bulk All ingredients used in a licensed bio­ and provided that such exemption is material. logical product shall meet accepted noted in the approved outline. Section 113.3(b) (4) has been clarified standards of purity and quality; shall (b) To comply with the test require­ by deleting the words “the exclusive of” be sufficiently nontoxic so that the ments in § 114.8(b) of this chapter, each from the first sentence and rewording amount present in the recommended outline shall designate the test methods the second sentence. dose of the product shall not be toxic and procedures by which the biological Section 113.4(a) has been redesignated to the recipient; and in the combina­ product shall be evaluated for purity, § 113.4(b) and the proviso has been de­ tions used shall not denature the specific safety, and potency. leted. Section 113.4(b) has been redesig­ substances in the product below the min­ §113.5 General testing. nated § 113.4(a). imum acceptable potency within the dat­ Section 113.5 has been clarified by de­ ing period when stored at the recom­ (a) No biological product shall be re­ leting the words “of day” from the sec­ mended temperature. leased prior to the completion of required ond sentence of paragraph (b) ; by re­ tests necessary to establish the product to wording the second sentence of § 113.3 Sampling of biological products. be satisfactory for purity, safety, and paragraph (c) to provide for results of Each licensee and permittee shall fur­ potency. tests instead of test reports; and by re­ nish representative samples of each (b) Tests of biological products shall wording paragraph (e) to limit applica­ serial or subserial of a biological product be observed by a competent employee of bility to products not released and re­ manufactured in the United States or the manufacturer during all critical strict release to products found to be imported into the United States as pre­ periods. A critical period shall be the time satisfactory. scribed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of when certain specified reactions must The word “licensed” has been deleted this section. Additional samples may be occur in required tests to properly eval­ from § 113.6(a). purchased in the open market by a uate the results. Section 113.7(b) has been rewritten Division representative. (c) Records of all tests shall be kept for clarification. The words “at least” (a) Prerelease test samples for Divi­in accordance with Fart 116 of this have been inserted in § 113.7(d). sion use shall be forwarded to the place chapter. Results of all tests shall be designated by the Director and in the submitted to the Division. Blank forms The word “animal” has been substi­ number and quantity as prescribed. Com­ shall be furnished upon request to the tuted for the words “vaccination chal­ parable samples shall be used by the Veterinary Biologies Division. lenge” in §113.8 (a) and (b). Section licensee and permittee for similar tests. 113.8(c) has been deleted. (d) When a serial or subserial has not (1) Each licensee shall select prere­been found satisfactory by the test meth­ PART 112— LABELS lease samples as follows : ods and procedures designated in § 113.4. (i) . Nonviable liquid products—either and a repeat test is to be conducted, the 1. Part 112 is amended by deleting bulk or final container samples of com­ same test method shall be used. §§ 112.26 and 112.27. The heading and pleted product shall be used for purity, index is to read as follows: (e) When new test methods are de­ safety, or potency tests. Biological prod­ veloped and approved by the Division, L abels uct in final containers shall be used for biological products released thereafter Sec. sterility tests. 112.1 Containers. shall be evaluated by such methods, ana 112.2 Required and permitted information. (ii) Viable liquid products; samples if not found to be satisfactory when so 112.3 Diluent labels. shall be in final containers and shall be tested shall not be released. 112.4 Reference to distributors and permit­ randomly selected at the end of the tees. filling operation. Samples from bulk con­ §113.6 Division testing. 112.5 Review and approval of labels and tainers of completed product may be sub­ A biological product shall with rfas^ j other material. mitted when authorized by the Director. able certainty yield the results intena

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18005

PART 1 14— MISCELLANEOUS RE­ stituting “14 miles, 100 miles 50 MSL, when used as recommended or suggested Glasgow, Mont.; INT Glasgow 100° and In its labeling or proposed labeling prior QUIREMENTS FOR LICENSED Williston, N. Dak., 263° radiais, 22 miles, to the expiration date. ESTABLISHMENTS 33 miles 55 MSL, Williston;” therefor. (a) The Director is authorized to cause a biological product, manu­ 3. Part 114 is amended by deleting (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, factured in the United States or im­ §§ 114.5(c), 114.13,114.14, and 114.18. 49 U.S.C. 1348; sec. 6(c), Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) ported into the United States, to be ex­ Note: The reporting and/or recordkeeping amined and tested for one or more of requirements contained herein have been Issued in Washington, D.C., on Novem­ the following: purity, safety, potency, approved by the Bureau of the Budget in or effectiveness; in which case, the li­ accordance with the Federal Reports Act ber 3,1969. of 1942. H. B. H elstrom, censee or permittee shall withhold such Chief, Airspace and Air product from the market until a deter­ Effective date: Thirty days after pub­ Traffic Rules Division. mination has been made. lication in the F ederal R egister. (b) A serial or subserial of a biological [F.R. Doc. 69-13286; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; product which has not been found satis­ Done at Washington, D.C., this 3d day 8:47 a.m .] factory by applicable test methods or of November 1969. procedures is not in compliance with the R. J. Anderson, [Airspace Docket No. 69—SO—128] regulations in Parts 101 through 121 of Acting Administrator, this subchapter and shall not be released Agricultural Research Service. PART 71— DESIGNATION OF FEDERAL for market. [F.R. Doc. 69^-13301; F iled, Nov. 6, 1969: AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, § 113.7 Multiple fractions. 8:48 a.m.] AND REPORTING POINTS (a) When a biological product con­ Alteration of Transition Area tains more than one immunogenic frac­ tion, the completed product shall be The purpose of this amendment to evaluated by tests applicable to each Title 14— AERONAUTICS AND Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ fraction. tions is to alter the Aiken, S.C., transition (b) When similar potency tests are SPACE area. required for more than one fraction of Chapter I— Federal Aviation Adminis­ The Aiken transition area is described a combination biological product, dif­ in §71.181 (34 F.R. 4637). In the de­ ferent animals must be used to evaluate tration, Department of Transportation scription, an extension is predicated on each fraction except when written SUBCHAPTER E— AIRSPACE the 048° bearing from the Aiken RBN and has a designated width of 2 miles Standard Requirements or outlines of [Airspace Docket No. 69—CE—116] production make provisions and set each side of the bearing and a length of forth conditions for use of the same PART 71— designation o f fe d er a l 8 miles. animals for testing different fractions. AIRWAYS, CONTROLLED AIRSPACE, U.S. Standards for Terminal Instru­ (c) When the same safety test is re­ ment Procedures (TERPs), issued after quired for more than one fraction, re­ AND REPORTING POINTS extensive consideration and discussion quirements are fulfilled by satisfactory Alteration of Federal Airway with Government agencies concerned results from one test of the completed and affected industry groups, are now product. The purpose of this amendment to being applied to update the criteria for (d) Biological products containing one Part 71 of the Federal Aviation Regula­ instrument approach procedures. The or more chemically inactivated frac­ tions is to redesignate the segment of criteria for the designation of controlled tion (s) and one or more live virus or VOR Federal airway No. 430 between airspace protection for these procedures modified live virus fraction (s) shall be Havre, Mont., and Williston, N. Dak. was revised to conform to TERPs and prepared as recommended for use and V-430 airway is presently designated achieve increased and efficient utilization held at room temperature for at least from Havre via Glasgow, Mont., to Will­ of airspace. 30 minutes before initiating virus titra­ iston, with a south alternate segment be­ Because of this revised criteria, it is tions or potency tests. tween Glasgow and Williston. The FAA necessary to alter the description by (e) Virus titrations for a multivirus is relocating the Glasgow VOR to a new increasing the width of the transition product shall be conducted by methods site on the Glasgow International Air­ area extension from 2 to 3 miles each side which will quantitate each virus. port, (lat. 48° 12'48" N., long 106°37'07" and the length from 8 to 8.5 miles. § 113.8 Virus titrations in lieu o f test W.) to provide better instrument ap­ In consideration of the foregoing, no­ for antigenicity. proach procedures into the International tice and public procedure hereon are un­ Airport. The relocation of the VOR must necessary and Part 71 of the Federal (a) The Director may exempt a live be accomplished before inclement weath­ Aviation Regulations is amended, effec­ virus vaccine from a required animal er prohibits the moving of the VOR. Ac­ tive immediately, as hereinafter set forth. test for release if the efficacy can with cordingly, action is taken herein to re­ In § 71.181 (34 F.R. 4637), the Aiken, reasonable certainty be determined by: designate V-430 segment from Havre via S.C., transition area is amended as fol­ (1) Testing the seed virus for potency Glasgow; INT Glasgow 100° T (083° M) lows: All after “* * * longitude 81°41'- to a manner approved by the Director; and and Williston 263° T. (248° M ); to Willis­ 25" W.); * * *” is deleted and “* * * ton; within 3 miles each side of the 048° bear­ (2) Establishing the lowest satisfac­ Since the relocation of the VOR and ing from Aiken RBN (lat. 33°39'06" N., tory virus titer based on the minimum the redesignation of V-430 segment must long. 81°40'38" W.), extending from the protective does plus an adequate overage be accomplished before the onset of in­ 8-mile radius area to 8.5 miles northeast allowance for uncertain conditions; and clement weather and since the deviation of the RBN * * is substituted there­ (3) Conducting virus titrations on for. each serial or subserial in an accepted of the new alignment from the present titration test system. designation is minor in nature, notice (Sec. 307(a), Federal Aviation Act of 1958, (b) One or more serials or subserials and public procedure are impracticable 49 TT.S.C. 1348(a), sec. 6(c), Department of of a biological product which has been and unnecessary. Transportation Act 49 U.S.C. 1655(c)) exempted from a required animal test In consideration of the foregoing, Part Issued in East Point, Ga., on Octo­ Recording to the conditions in paragraph 71 of the Federal Aviation Regulations is ber 27, 1969. (a) of this section may be subjected to amended, effective 0901 g.m.t., Decem­ ber 11, 1969, as hereinafter set forth. J ames G. R ogers, said test by the Division or the licensee, Director, Southern Region. u found unsatisfactory, the biological In § 71.123 (34 F.R. 4509) V-430 is Product shall be removed from the amended by deleting all between “Havre, [F.R. Doc. 69-13262; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; market. Mont.;” and “Minot, N. Dak.;” and sub- 8:45 a n . ]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18006 RULES AND REGULATIONS

SUBCHAPTER F— AIR TRAFFIC AND GENERAL OPERATING RULES [Reg. Docket No. 9933; Amdt. 674] PART 97— STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURES Miscellaneous Amendments The amendments to the standard instrument approach procedures contained herein are adopted to become effective when indicated in order to promote safety. The amended procedures supersede the existing procedures of the same classification now in effect for the airports specified therein. For the convenience of the users, the complete procedure is republished in this amendment indicating the changes to the existing procedures. As a situation exists which demands immediate action in the interests of safety in air commerce, I find that compliance with the notice and procedure provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act is impracticable and that good cause exists for making this amendment effective within less than 30 days from publication. In view of the foregoing and pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the Administrator (24 F.R. 5662), Part 97 (14 CFR Part 97) is amended as follows: 1. By amending § 97.11 of Subpart B to amend low or medium frequency range (L/MF), automatic direction finding (ADF) and very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type NDB (ADF) Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. ) ^ If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an _approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition * Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum ------2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition 65 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots

Thousand Oaks In t------, ______Woodland I n t...... Direct 5000 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 #300-1 Twin Lakes Int...... Woodland Int______Direct. 5000 C-d*.______- 900-1)4 900-1)4 900-1M LAX V O R ...... BUR ILS LOM______Direct 4000 C-n*...... 900-2 900-2 900-2 Woodland I n t...... BUR ILS LOM (final)...... Direct. 2800 S-dn-7**...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 A-dn...... 900-2 900-2 900-2

Radar'available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 256° Outbnd, 076° Inbnd, 4000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 2800' at BUR ILS LOM. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 076°—5,7 miles LOM to LIM; 076°—0.4 mile LIM to airport.^ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, at BUR ILS LIM, make immediate right-climbing turn direct to LOM, climb via 256° bearing LOM to 4000' within 10 miles of LOM or, when directed by ATC: (1) Turn right, climb heading 105° to intercept and proceed via VNY R 096° to El Monte Int at 4500'. Positive Radar crs monitor required on alternate missed approach. Note: ADF and VOR receivers required for execution of this approach. Air Carrier Notes: Sliding scale not authorized. Air carriers will not reduce landing visibility due to local conditions. Air carrier reduction not authorized below % mile for takeoff Runways 7,15, and 33. ¿Procedure requires use of both BUR ILS Outer Compass Locator and Inner Compass Locator. #200-)4 authorized for takeoff on Runway 25 only. . " ♦Circling not authorized NE of airport between extended centerlines of Runways 15/33 and 7/25. Runway 25—Intercept approach centerline within 2 miles. %Northbound and southbound (270° CW through 240°) IFR departures: Must comply with published Burbank SID’s. , °*Inoperative table does not apply to HI RL or ALS Runway 7. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—8500'; 090°-180°—5100'; 180°-270°—4100'; 270°-360°—6Q00'. City, Burbank; State, Calif.; Airport name, Hollywood-Burbank; Elev., 775'; Fac. Class., LOM; Ident., BU; Procedure No. NDB (ADF)-, Amdt. 4; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; l ;______;______Sup. Amdt. No. ADF 1, Amdt. 3; Dated, 11 July 68______'______Meadow Int:. BD LOM...... ______Direct...... 3000 T-dn%_...... 300-1 300-1 200-H Bristol In t... Penwood Int...... ______Direct...... 2700 C-dn...... 600-1 600-1 600-1)4 Penwood Int. BD LOM (NOPT)______...... Direct______1800 S-dn-6...... 600-1 600-1 600-1 A-dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

ASR. Procedure turn S side of crs, 238° Outbnd, 058° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1800'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 058°—4.5 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.5 miles after passing BD LOM, make right-climbing turn to 2300' direct BD LOM. Hold SW of BD LOM, 058° Inbnd, 1 minilte, right turns. Note: Final approach from a holding pattern not authorized; procedure turn required. * Caution: 768' obstruction light on hills 2.4 miles W of airport. %Departures from Runway 33, make a right turn to 350°, as soon as practicable after takeoff and climb to 1500'. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—2800'; 090°-180°—2300'; 180°-270°—2600'; 270°-360°—3000'. City, Windsor Locks; State, Conn.; Airport name, Bradley International; Elev., 173'; Fac. Class:, LOM; Ident., BD; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 6, Amdt. 15; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF 1, Amdt. 14; Dated 14 Jan. 67

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7. 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18007

STANDARD INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE----T Y P E YOB Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles Unl^ an ?n stru m ^ Í^íM ^chCprocedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following iMtrament approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure tor such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes Mi"*™»™ altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Celling and visibility mínimums 2 -engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From- To— distance altitude Condition 66 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots

AMA VOR______.-.o------Direct. 5000 T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-)3 AM LOM- C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)4 S-dn-21*...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn._...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

ASR Procedure turn N side of crs, 028° Outbnd, 208° Inbnd, 5000' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 4600'. If'visual'contact’n o t e d ° u f x f n 8descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.5 miles after passing. AMA VOR, climb to 5000' on R 208° within 15 miles or, when directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 5000' on R 076° within 15 miles. Caution: 3764' grain elevator located adjalcent to SW boundary of airport. ♦Runway 21: 400-M authorized with operative HIRL, except for 4-engine turbojets. * MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-180°—4900'; 180°-360°—6000'. Citv Amarillo; State, Tex.; Airport name, Amarillo Air Terminal; Elev., 3605'; Fac. Class., H-BVORTAC; Ident., AMA; Procedure No. VOR Runway 21, Arndt. 16; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 15; Dated, 5 Dec. 68

FIM VORTAC. FIM. R 100°...... 5000 T-dn%...... 300-1 300-1 #300-1 Sherwood Int._i. . VTU R 057°...... 5000 C-d¿...... 900-1)3 900-1y¿ 900-1)3 Twin Lakes Int.. . Direct...... __. 5000 C-njL...... 900-2 900-2 900-2 Chatsworth Int.. , Direct...... 3000 S-dn-7*...... 500-1 500-1 500-1 A-dn...... 900-2 900-2 900-2

Radar available. < Procedure turn not authorized. Minimum Altitude over facility on final approach crs, 3000'. Crs and distance, facility to airport 089°, 6.3 miles. ... , ,, , _ ...... , , , If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 6.3 miles after passing VN Y VOR, turn right, climb toVNY VOR, then via R 255° to Susana Int at 4500' or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb heading 105° to intercept and proceed via VNY R 096 to El Monte Int at 4500'. Positive Radar crs monitor required on alternate missed approach...... , , „ Am Carrier N otes: Sliding scale not authorized. Air carriers will not reduce landing visibility due to local conditions. Air carrier reduction not authorized below % mile for takeoff Runways 7,15, and 33. ♦Inoperative table does not apply to H IRL or ALS Runway 7. %Northbound and southbound (270° CW through 240°) IF R departures: Must comply with published Burbank SID s. „ „ ¿Circling not authorized NE of airport between extended centerlines of Runways 15/33 and 7/26. Runway 25—Intercept approach centerline within 2 miles. #20043 authorized for takeoff on Runway 25 only. ■■ " / _____ * . . MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—8600'; 090°-180°—5100'; 180°-270°—4100'; 270°-360°—6100 . City, Burbank; State, Calif.; Airport name, Hollywood-Burbank; Elev., 775'; Fac. Class., L-BVOR; Ident., VNY; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No, VOR 1, Arndt. 1; Dated, 11 July 68

Berendalnt...... 1...... FAT VOR (final). Direct. 1900 T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 20043 C-d...... 600-1 500-1 500-1)3 C -n ...... 600-2 50Or2 500-2 S-d-11...... 600-1 500-1 500-1 S-n-11...... 500-2 500-2 500-2 A-dn__...... 800-2 800-2 800-2 If Gordon Int identified, the following miriiinuins apply: C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1)3 S-dn-11#...... 400-1 400-1 400-1

Radar available. Procedure turn W side of crs, 313° Outbnd, 133° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles. Minimum altitude over facility on final approach crs, 1900'; over Gordon Int, 832'. Crs and distance, facility to airport, 133°—7.1 miles; Gordon Int to airport, 133°—4.1miles. . ■ ^ ^ If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 7.1 miles after passing FAT VOR, climb to 2000' on R 133° within 20 miles of FAT VOR. #40043 authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. MSA within 25 miles of facility: 000°-090°—7200'; 090°-180°—4200'; 180°-270°—1900'; 270°-360°—5200'. City, Fresno; State, Calif.; Airport name, Fresno Air Terminal; Elev., 332'; Fac. Class., B-VORTAC; Ident., FAT; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 27 Nov.69; Sup. Arndt. No. VOR 1, Arndt. 1; Dated, 18 Sept. 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL.. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18008 RULES AND REGULATIONS

2. By amending § 97.11 of Subpart B to delete low or medium frequency range (L/MP), automatic direction finding (ADF) and very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures as follows: Fairbanks, Alaska—Fairbanks International, LFR 1, Amdt. 4, 1 Jan. 1966 (established under Subpart C). Allentown, Pa.—Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, NDB (ADF) Runway 6, Amdt. 6, 19 Dec. 1968 (established under Subpart C). Bristol, Tenn.—Tri-City, ADF 2, Amdt. 6, 14 May 1966 (established under Subpart C). Bristol, Tenn.—Tri-City, ADF 1, Amdt. 8, 16 Apr. 1966 (established under Subpart C). Fairbanks, Alaska—Fairbanks International, ADF 1, Amdt. 9, 1 Jan. 1966 (established under Subpart C). Allentown, Pa.—Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, VOR 1, Amdt. 4, 23 July 1966 (established under Subpart C). Dover-Cheswold, Del.—Delaware Airpark, VOR Runway 26, Amdt. 1, 16 Sept. 1967 (established under Subpart C). Dowagiac, Mich.—Cass County Memorial, VOR 1, Orig., 6 Nov. 1965 (established under Subpart C). Painesville, Ohio—Concord Airpark, VOR-1, Orig., 1 Apr. 1967 (established under Subpart C). Silver City, N. Mex.—Silver City-Grant County, VOR-1, Amdt. 2, 16 Dec. 1967 (established under Subpart C). 3. By amending § 97.11 of Subpart B to cancel low or medium frequency range (L/MF), automatic direction finding (ADF) and very high frequency omnirange (VOR) procedures as follows: Pago Pago, Tutuila Island, American Samoa, ADF 2, Amdt. 1, effective 20 Mar. 1965, canceled, effective 27 Nov. 1969. 4. By amending § 97.13 of Subpart B to delete terminal very high frequency omnirange (TerVOR) procedures as follows: Pago Pago, Tutuila Island, American Samoa, TerVOR (R-230), Amdt. 5, 28 Aug. 1965 (established under Subpart C). 5. By amending § 97.17 of Subpart B to amend instrument landing system (ILS) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype ILS Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum ------2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition 65 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots

Ventura V O R______ILS W crs__ 057°-16.9 miles___ 5000 T-dn<%_. 300-1 300-1 #300-1 Saugus In t __ : ______-, LOM___ .... Direct______. ___ 5600 C-d*___ 900-1% 900-1% 900-1H Fillmore VOR ...... ______... Woodland Int. Direct____ ;_____ 5000 C-n*.__ 900-2 900-2 900-2 Int LAX VOR R 276° and Lake Hughes VOR Woodland Int. Direct. '______5000 S-da-7** 300-1 300-1 300-1 R 170°. A-dn___ 900-2 900-2 900-2 Twin Lakes In t______Woodland Int. Direct______5000 Woodland In t...... LOM (final).. Direct______2800

Radar available. Procedure turn S side of crs, 256° Outbnd, 076° Inbnd, 4000' within 10 miles of LOM. Beyond 10 miles not authorized. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 2800'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 2738'—6.1 miles; at MM, 1355'—1.8 miles; at Inner Compass Locator, 924'—0.4 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minim urns or if landing not accomplished, make immediate right-climbing turn to 4000' on W crs BUB ILS within 10 miles W of LOM or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb heading 105° to intercept and proceed via VNY R 096° to El Monte Int at 4500'. Positive Radar crs monitor required on alternate missed approach. Caution: High terrain NE and E of airport. Air carrier notes: Sliding scale not authorized. Air carriers will not reduce landing visibility due to local conditions. Air carrier reduction not authorized below K mile for takeoff Runways 7,15, and 33. Notes: (1) Nonstandard installation. Localizer antenna at approach end of runway. %Northbound and southbound (270° GW through 240°) IFR departures: Must comply with published Burbank SID’s. #200-% authorized for takeoff on Runway 25 only. •Circling not authorized NE of airport between extended centerlines of Runways 15/33 and 7/25. Runway 25—Intercept approach centerline within 2 miles. p ••For minimums of 300-1 all components of ILS must be utilized. If glide slope not received, then minimums of 400-1 apply. Inoperative table does not apply to HI HD 0r ALS Runway 7. City, Burbank; State, Calif.; Airport name, Hollywood-Burbank; Elev., 775'; Fac. Class, ILS; Ident., I-BU R; Procedure No. ILS Runway 7, Amdt. 23; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. ILS-7, Amdt. 22; Dated, 11 July 68

Lexington LOM______Fayette Int...... Direot____ _ 2800 T-dn______300-1 300-1 200-H. R 191°, LEX VORTAC (CCW)______LEX LOC (BC) (Centerville Int)___ 14-müe Arc LEX 3000 C-dn____ :...... 400-1 500-1 fiOO-lH VORTAC, 020° lead radial. Centerville In t______Fayette Int (NOPT)___ ,...... Direct______2300 S-dn-22*...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 A-dn______800-2 800-2 800-2

Procedure turn W side of crs, 042° Outbnd, 222° Inbnd, 2800' within 10 miles of Fayette Int. Minimum altitude over Fayette Int, 2300'. Crs and distance, Fayette Int to airport, 222°—4.8 miles. If visual contact not establsihed upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.8 miles after passing Fayette Int, climb to mn on SW crs ILS to Lexington LOM. Hold SW, 1-minute left turns, 042° Inbnd. . Note: Procedure authorized only when aircraft equipped to receive ILS and VOR simultaneously. *400-% authorized, except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft, with operative high-intensity runway lights. City, Lexington; State, Ky.; Airport name, Blue Grass; Elev., 978'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-LEX; Procedure No. LOC (BC) Runway 22, Amdt. 6; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69, Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 26 June 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215—-FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7 , 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18009

Standard I n st ru m en t Approach P rocedure—T y pe LDA

Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles...... - . . . If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition 65 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots

T-dn...... 300-1 300-1 200-% C-dn...... NA NA NA LDIN-18*...... 1100-2 1100-2 1100-2 A-dn...... 1200-2 1200-2 1200-2 #V GS inoperative minimums: LDIN-18*...... 1100-2 1100-2. 1100-2

Radar required. . Radar vectors will be provided to intercept final approach crs NW of #V GS interception point. , Procedure turn not authorized. Final approach era, 146°. Minimum altitude at #VGS interception Inbnd, 2500'. . ___ _ „„ Altitude of #VGS and distance to a beam approach end of runway at Echo Park Int, 2500'—7.5 miles; at OM, 1822'—6.6 miles; at MM, 791'—2.4 miles. If visual contact not established upon descent to DH or 2.2 miles after passing OM, make right-climbing turn direct to Washington RBn at 1800'. Hold 8,1 minute, left turns, 001° Inbnd. #VGS unusable below 1115'MSL. . . ,,, ,, , ...... #VGS (Vertical Guidance System) This guidance is provided by standard glide slope equipment and is paired in frequency with the localizer. No special tuning required. *LDIN lights must be operational to execute this approach. Caution: 596' Washington Monument 1.7 miles N of airport. Inoperative components table does not apply to this procedure. Reductions for lighting aids not authorized. Supplementary charting information: Start profile at 7.5 miles from end of runway at MEA 2500'. City, Washington; State, D.C.; Airport name; Washington National; Elev., 15'; Facility, I-ASO; Procedure No. LDA Runway 18, Amdt. 2; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 14 Aug. 69 Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype ILS Bearings, headings, courses and radiate are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise Indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles...... , If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum 2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition 65 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots

Meadow Int...... ____ BD LOM______Direct...... 3000 T-dn%#_...... 300-1 300-1 200-% Bristol Int ...... Penwood In t______Direct______2700 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1% Penwood Int.... ______BD LOM (NOPT)______...... Direct...... 1800 S-dn-6#______200-% 200-% 200-% A-dn______600-2 600-2 600-2 With glide slope inoperative: S-dn-6*_...... 500-1 500-1 500-1

ASR. Procedure turn S side of crs, 238° Outbnd, 058° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of BD LOM. Minimum altitude at glide slope interception Inbnd, 1800'. Altitude of glide slope and distance to approach end of runway at OM, 1522'—4.5 miles; at MM, 392'—0.6 mile. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 4.5 miles after passing BD LOM, climb to 3000' on NE crs of ILS to CTR VOR R 149°, then SE on ORW VOR R 330° to Skylark Int. Hold E of Skylark Int, right turns, 1 minute, 276° Inbnd. Note: Final approach from a holding pattern not authorized; procedure turn required. Caution : 768' obstruction light on hills 2.4 miles W of airport. %Departures from Runway 33, make a right turn to 350°. as soon as practicable after takeoff and climb to 1500'. JRVR 2000', 4-engine turbojet, 1800' other aircraft authorized for Runway 6. Minimum altitude over BD LOM, 1800'; 500% Categories A, B, and C; 500% Category D with operative ALS. MSA within 25 miles of BD LOM: 000°-090°—2800'; 090°-180°—2300'; 180°-270°—26007; 270°-360°—3000'. City, Windsor Locks; State, Conn.; Airport name, Bradley International; Elev., 173'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-BDL; Procedure No. ILS Runway 6, Amdt. 17; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. ILS-6, Amdt. 16; Dated, 14 Jan. 67

Putnam VOR...... Redstone In t...... Direct...... 3000 T-dn%_...... 300-1 300-1 *200-% Redstone Int...... Thompson Int (final)...... Direct______1900 C-dn...... 500-1 500-1 500-1% Bradley int...... D L LM M ...... Direct______2700 S-dn-24#...... 400-1 400-1 400-1 Bristol Int______, ______: ______DLLMM______.. Direct...... 2700 A -dn...... 800-2 800-2 800-2

Radar required. Procedure turn S side of crs, 058° Outbnd, 238 Inbnd, 2700' within 13 miles of DL LMM, but NE of Thompson Int. Minimum altitude over Thompson Int on final approach crs, 1900'. crs and distance, Thompson Int to airport 238°—Smiles. tn contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished within 5 miles after passing Thompson Int, climb straight ahead 0 mud direct to BD LOM. Hold SW of BD LOM, 058° Inbnd, 1 minute, right turns. V nvr?N: IS?7 obstruction light on hills 2.4 miles W of airport. R 2000', 4-engine turbojet, 1800' other aircraft authorized for Runway 6. « rtures from Runway 33, make a right turn to 350°, as soon as practicable after takeoff and climb to 1500'. muu-% authorized except for 4-engine turbojet aircraft with operative high-intensity runway lights. City, Windsor Locks; State, Conn.; Airport name, Bradley International; Elev., 173'; Fac. Class., ILS; Ident., I-BDL; Procedure No. LOC (BC) Runway 24, Amdt. 5; EfL date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. ILS-24(BC), Amdt. 4; Dated, 9 Apr. 66

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18010 RULES AND REGULATIONS

6. By amending § 97.17 of Subpart B to delete Instrument landing system (ILS) procedures as follows: Allentown, Pa.—Allentown-Bethleh.em-Easton, ILS Runway 6, Arndt. 9, 19 Dec. 1968 (established under Subpart C). Allentown, Pa.—Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, ILS-24 (BO), Arndt. 7, 10 July 1965 (established under Subpart C)r. Bristol, Tenn.—Tri-City, ILS Runway 32, Arndt. 13, 14 Oct. 1967 (established under Subpart O). Fairbanks, Alaska—Fairbanks International, ILS-1, Arndt. 5, 16 Apr. 1966 (BC) (established under Subpart C). Fairbanks, Alaska—Fairbanks International, ILS Runway 19, Amdt. 10, 15 July 1967 (established under Subpart C). 7. By amending § 97.19 of Subpart B to amend radar procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype R adar Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are In nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles. If a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach Is conducted in accordance with a different procedure authorized for such airport by the Administrator. Initial approaches shall be made over specified routes. Minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be established with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final authorized landing minimums, the instructions of the radar controller are mandatory except when (A) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the authorized landing minimums, or (B) at pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach. Except when the radar con­ troller may direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more than 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B) directed by radar controller; (C) visual contact is not established upon de­ scent to authorized landing minimums; or (D) if landing is not accomplished.

Transition Ceiling and visibility minimums 2-engine or less More than Course and Minimum ------2-engine, From— To— distance altitude Condition 65 knots More more than (feet) or less than 65 65 knots knots

Surveillance approach Within: 342°. 007°...... 30 miles 7000 T-dn% _____ 300-1 300-1 ♦300-1 007°. 080°...... 30 miles. 10,500 C-d#______900-lJ^ 900-1H 900-1M 080°. 210°.______.____30 miles. 3000 C-n#_._-...... 900-2 900-2 900-2 210°. 270°...... 30 miles. 4000 S-dn-7**____ 500-1 500-1 500-1 270°. 342°______. ___1...... 30 miles. 6000 A-dn...... 900-2 900-2 900-2

Radar transitions and vectoring using Burbank Radar authorized in accordance with approved patterns. If visual contact not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums or if landing not accomplished, make immediate right-climbing turn, climb on W crs BUR ILS to 5000' within 10 miles W of LOM or, when directed by ATC, turn right, climb heading 105° to intercept and proceed via VN Y R 096° to El Monte Int at 4500'. Positive Radar crs monitor required on alternate missed approach. Air Carrier Note: Sliding scale not authorized. Air carriers will not reduce landing visibility due to local conditions. Air carrier reduction not authorized below H mile for takeoff Runways 7,15 and 33. *200-Mi authorized for takeoff on Runway 25 only. ♦♦Inoperative table does not apply to H IRL or ALS Runway 7. #Circling not authorized NE of airport between extended centerlines of Runways 15/33 and 7/25. Runway 25—Intercept approach centerline within 2 miles. %Northbound and southbound (270° CW through 240°) IFR departures; must comply with published Burbank BID’S. Caution: 2000' terrain 2.2 miles NE of airport rising to 3126' approximately 3.5 miles ENE of airport. City, Burbank; State, Calif.; Airport name, Hollywood-Burbank; Elev., 775'; Facility, Burbank Radar; Procedure No. Radar-1, Amdt. 7; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. Radar 1, Amdt. 6; Dated, 11 July 68 8. By amending § 97.19 of Subpart B to delete radar procedures as follows: Bristol, Tenn.—Tri-City, Radar 1, Amdt. 4, 18 Nov. 1967 (established under Subpart C). Fairbanks, Alaska—Fairbanks International, Radar 1, Amdt. 2, 7 May 1966 (established under Subpart C). 9. By amending § 97.21 of Subpart C to establish low or medium frequency range (L/MF) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type LFR Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach Is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established lbr en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach _ Minimum . r T From— To— Via altitudes MAP : 2.3 miles after passing FI Lr «• (feet)

FAI VORTAC...... F I L F R ...... ______Direct______4000 Climbing left turn to 3000' direct to FI FOX NDB______F I L FR ...... ______Direct______4000 LFR. i Supplementary charting information. Terrain rising to 1000' within 2 miles of airport. 1580' hill 3 miles SW of airport.

Procedure turn S side of crs, 060° Outbnd, 240° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of FI LFR. FAF, FI LFR. Final approach crs, 233°. Distance FAF to MAP, 2.3 miles. Minimum altitude over FI LFR, 1600'. MSA: NE—5500'; SE—4000'; SW—3500'; NW—4300'. N otes: (1) ASR. (2) Visual flight required from missed approach point to airport. ♦Circling not authorized W of Runways 1/19. » Day and Night Minimums

A B O D ______Cond. HAA MDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS 626 O*___ ...... 1060 1 626 1060 1 626 " 1060 1)4 626 1060 2 A...... ____ Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Fairbanks; State, Alaska; Airport name, Fairbanks International; Elev., 434'; Facility, FI LFR; Procedure No. LFR-1, Amdt. 5; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt LFR 1, Amdt. 4; Dated, 1 Jan. 66

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18011

10. By amending § 97.23 of Subpart C to establish very high frequency omnirange (VOR) and very high frequency- distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type VOR Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are inJeet above airport elevation Distances are in nautical miles unless Otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach m inim um altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 4.4 'miles after passing ABE (feet) VORTAC.

Climbing right turn to 2700' direct ETX VORTAC and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold W, 1 minute, right turns, 112° Inbnd. 745' powerline 1 mile SSE ABE VOR.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 360° Outbnd, 180° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of ABE VORTAC. FAF, ABE VORTAC. Final approach crs, 180°. Distance FAF to MAP, 4.1 miles. Minimum altitude over ABE VORTAC, 2200'. MSA: 000°-090°—3500'; 090°-180°—2300'; 180°-270°—2700'; 270°-360°—3500'.

Day and N ight M inimums

Cond. ------s— ______MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MD A VIS HAA

C...... 980 1 592 980 1 592 980 ltf 592 980 2 592 A—-...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—RVR 24', Runway 6; Standard all others. T over 2-eng.—RVR 24', Runway 6; Standard all others.

City, Allentown; State, Pa.; Airport name, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton; Elev., 388'; Facility, ABE; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 5; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sud Arndt. No VOR 1, Arndt. 4; Dated, 23 July 66

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: 3.6 miles after passing ENO From— To— Via altitudes VORTAC. (feet)

Bridgeton In t... ______ENO V O RTAC..______Direct...... 1600 Climbing right turn to 1500' direct to ENO Leesburg Int ...... ENO VORTAC (NOPT)______Direct...... 1500 VORTAC and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold E on R 087°, 1 minute, right turns, 267° Inbnd. Chart antenna 434' at 240° 2.9 miles from ENO. Only western 2000' of runway lighted. Runway 26, TDZ elevation, 50'.

One-minute holding pattern E of ENO VORTAC on R 087°, right turns, 267° Inbnd, 1500'. f-AF > ENO VORTAC. Final approach crs., 267°. Distance FAF to MAP, 3.6 miles.' Minimum altitude over ENO VORTAC, 1500'. MSA: 000°-090°—1600'; 090°-180°—1500'; 180°-270°—1600'; 270°-360°—1600'. Notes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Use Dover AFB altimeter setting.

D ay and Night Minimums

„ . A B O D Cond. ------MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS VIS

S~26-...... -...... - ...... - — 400 1 350 400 > 1 350 NA NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C------— ...... 460 1 410 500 1 450 NA NA Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Dover-Cheswold; State, Del.; Airport name, Delaware Airpark; Elev., 50'; Facility, ENO; Procedure No. VOR Runway 26, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup Arndti No. 1; Dated, 16 Sept. 67

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 No. 215— - 3 18012 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrum ent Approach P rocedure—T ype VOR—Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: 9 miles after passing ELX From— To— Via altitudes VORTAC. (feet)

Maire right-climbing turn to 2300* and re­ turn to ELX VORTAC.

Procedure tum W side of crs, 001° outbnd, 181° Inbnd, 2300' Within 10 miles of ELX VORTAC. FAF, ELX VORTAC. Final approach crs, 181°. Distance FAF to MAP, 9 miles. Minimum altitude over ELX VORTAC, 2300'.* (*1340' over 5-mile DME Fix.) MSA: 045°-225°—2400'; 225°-315°—2200'; 315°-045°—2300'. Note: Use South Bend altimeter setting. % Takeoff Runway 14 not authorized. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D Cond. MDAVISHAA MDA VISHAAMDAVIS HAA VIS

C...- ____ 1340 . 1 590 1340 1 590 1340 IX 590 NA VOR/DME Minimums: MDA VISHAA MDA VIS h a a T~ MDA VIS HAA c ...... ____ 1220 1 470 1220 1 470 1220 ix 470 ~ NA A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng.. or less— Standard. % T over 2-eng.-—Standard. %

City, Dowagiac; State, Mich.; Airport name, Cass County Memorial; Elev., 750'; Facility, ELX; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 1; Eft. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. VOR 1, Orig.; Dated, 6 Nov. 65

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— Via altitudes MAP: TUT VOR. (feet)

TU T NDB. TUT VOR. 4100 Climbing right turn to 4100' on R 210“ Return to T U T VOR. Supplementary charting information: Final approach crs lies 500' S of Runway 5 centerline at 3000' from threshold. Chart LOG NDB as stepdown fix 1.7miles to threshold. Terrain—1279', 1.4 miles NW; 1000', 1.3 miles NW; 1545', 2.1 miles W; 642', 1.1 miles N final approach crs.

Procedure turn right teardrop S side of crs, 210° Outbnd, 048° Inbnd, 2700' within 11 miles of TU T VOR. Final approach crs, 048°. Minimum altitude over LOG NDB, 960'. MSA: 000°-360°—4100'. Note: Air carrier will not reduce takeoff visibility due to local conditions Runway 23. ¿Circling to N of centerline Runways 5/23 not authorized. % Climb so as to cross facility 4100' or above. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D Cond. MDA VIS HAAMDA VISHAAMDA VISHAAMDA VIS HAA

C#...... 960 1H 930 960 i H 930 960 2 930 960 2 930 VOR/NDB Minimums: MDA VIS HAAMDA VISHAAMDAVIS HAAMDA VIS HAA C#...... 620 1 590 620 1 590 620 IX 590 740 2 710 A...... 1000-2. T 2-eng. or less—Landing weather minimums, Left Run­ T over 2-eng.—Landing weather minimums, Left Run­ way 23, Right Runway 5.% way 23, Right Runway 5.%

City, Pago Pago, Island, Tutuila Island; Territory, American Samoa; Airport name, Pago Pago International; Elev., 30'; Facility, TUT; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 6, E date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. Ter VOR (R-230), Arndt. 5; Dated, 28 Aug. 65

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18013

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype VOR—Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 9 miles after passing CXR VOR­ (feet) TAC.

Left climbing turn to 3000'; return to CXR VORTAC and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold S, 1 minute, left turns, 354° Inbnd. Final approach crs to intersection of Run­ ways 2 and 12.

Procedure tum W side of crs, 174° Outbnd, 354° Inbnd, 2900' within 10 miles of CXR VORTAC. FAF, CXR VORTAC. Final approach crs, 354°. Distance FAF to MAP, 9 miles. Minimum altitude over CXR VORTAC, 2900'; over 6-mile DME Fix, R 354°, I960'. MSA: 000°-090°—2300'; 090°-180°—2700';180°-270°—3000'; 270°-360°—2600'.' Notes: (1) Use Cleveland, Ohio, altimeter setting. (2) Night operations not authorized Runways 12/30. Day and Night Minimums

A B C Cond. MDA VISHAAMDA VISHAA VIS VIS

1960 \M 940 m 940 NA NA VOR/DME Minimums: MDA VIS ' HAA MDA VIS HAA 1660 1 640 1660 1 640 NA NA A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, PainesvUle; State, Ohio; Airport name, Concord Airpark; Elev., 1020'; Facility, CXR; Procedure No. VOR-1, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 27Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 1 Apr. 67

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: SVC VOR. (feet)

Climbing left turn to 8000' on R 128° within 20 miles of SVC VOR. Proceed to SVC VO R or as directed by ATC.

Procedure turn S side of crs 128° Outbnd, 308° Inbnd, 7300' within 10 miles of SVC VOR. Final approach crs 308°. Minimum altitude over SVC VOR, *5860'. MSA: 000°-090°—11,200'; 090°-180°—9500'; 180°-270°—9000'; 270°-360°—10,100'. . ‘When control zone not effective, the following limitations apply except for operators with approved weather reporting service: (1) Use Doming, N. Mex. altimeter setting; (2) alternate minimums not authorized; (3) MDA increased 140'. %IFR departures: Takeoff Runway 8, turn right; Runway 26, turn left; climb in the holding pattern on R 128°, SE of SVC VOR to m in im um crossing altitude for direc­ tion of flight. MCA for departing aircraft: 8400' southwestbound on V-202, 8700'; northeastbound on V-202.

Day and Night Minimums

A B C D Cond. MDAVISHAAMDAVISHAA VIS VIS c*.. 1 417 5960 1 517 NA NA A.. T 2-eng. or less—Standard.% T over 2-eng.—Standard.%

City, Silver City; State, N". Mex.; Airport name, Silver City-Grant County; Elev., 5443' Facility, SVC; Procedure No. VOR-1, Amdt. 3; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndts No. 2; Dated, 16 Dec. 67

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18014 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type VOR/DME Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— ' To— ' Via altitudes MAP: R 058° 4-mile DME. (feet)

FOX NDB— ...... _____ FAI VORTAC-...... — — .. Direct...... 4000 Climbing left turn to 4000' on R 100° within FAI L F R ______FAI VORTAC______— ... Direct------4000 15 miles; thence direct to FAI VORTAC R 100° FAI VORTAC CCW...... — . .... R 058° FAI VORTAC (NOPT)... .. 19-mile Are FAI R 065° lead 2100 Supplementary charting information: radial. Final approach crs to threshold of Run­ EIL TACAN...... FAI R 058° 19-mile Fix (NOPT)... .. Direct______2100 way 1. FAI VORTAC______-----...... 9-mile DME Fix (R 058° FA I)___ .. FAI, R 058°______2600 Terrain rising to 1000' within 2 miles W of airport. 1580' hill 3 miles SW of airport.

Procedure turn S side of crs, 058° Outbnd, 238° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles of 9-mile DME (R 068°). Final-approach crs, 238°. Distance FAF to MAP, 5 miles. Minimum altitude over 9-mile DME (FAF) 1200'. MSA: 000°-090°—3600'; 090°-180°—3500'; 180°-270°—4000'; 270°-360°—4300'. Note: ASR. •Circling not authorized W of Runways 1/19. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D COnd’ MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA

------840 1 406 900 - 1 466 900 1H 466 1000 2 566 A...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Fairbanks; State, Alaska; Airport name, Fairbanks International; Elev., 434'; Facility, FAI VORTAC; Procedure No. VORTAC-1, Arndt. Orig.; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 69 11. By amending § 97.23 of Subpart C to amend very high frequency omnirange (VOR) and very high frequency- distance measuring equipment (VOR/DME) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype VOR Bearings headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances aré in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: 9.2 miles after passing CGT VOR- From— To- Via altitudes TAC. (feet)

Steamboat In t------CGT VORTAC- J--:----...... Direct. 2300 Turn right, climbing to 2300' and proceed Peo tone VORTAC. Monee In t...... Direct. 2300 direct to CGT VORTAC. CGT VORTAC (NOPT)______Direct. 2300 Supplementary charting information. Monee I n t___ . . ___ 2 chimneys, 823'—(1) 4I°38'21"/87°24'25 , (2) 41°38'20"/87°24'23". Runway 2, TDZ elevation, 588'.

Procedure turn S side if crs, 226° Outbnd, 046° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of CGT VORTAC. FAF, CGT VORTAC. Final approach crs, 046°. Distance FAF to MAP, 9.2 miles. Minimum altitude over CGT VORTAC, 2300'; over Hammond Int., 1480'. MSA: 090°-180°—2200'; 180°-270°—2400'; 270°-090°—3100'. i A u n . . ' ‘ « / «ni N otes: (1) Radar vectoring. (2) Use Midway altimeter setting when control zone not effective; circling and straight-in MDA increased 80 #Altemate minimums not authorized when control zone not effective. Day and N ight Minimums A B C D Cond. MDA VIS HATMDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS

S-2___ ...... 1480 IK 892 1480 m 892 1480 IK 892 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA NA C ____ ...... 1480 VK 889 1480 m .889 1480 IK 889 VOR/DME or VOR/NDB Minimums: MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT NA S-2___ ...... 1100 1 512 1100 1 512 1100 1 512 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA NA C...... 1180 1 589 1180 1 589 1180 m 589 A...... Standard#. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.-—Standard.

City, Gary; State, Ind.; Airport name, Gary; Elev., 591'; Facility, CGT; Procedure No. VOR Runway 2, Arndt. 5; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 69: Sup. Arndt. No. 4, Dated,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18015

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype VOR-—Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP; 3.1 miles after passing JBR VOR. (feet)

ARGVORTAC...... JB E V O R ...... -...... Direct...... 2000 Climbing left turn to 2000' direct JBR Hillemann In t...... 1______JBR V O R ...... Direct...... 3000 VOR and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold NE of JBR VOR on R 042°-222° . Inbnd, right turns, 1 minute. - Runway 23, TDZ elevation, 258'.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 042° Outbnd, 222° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of JB R VO R. FA F, JBR VOR. Final approach crs, 222°. Distance FAF to MAP, 3.1 miles. Minimum altitude over JB R VOR, 1000'. MSA: 000°-360°—2000'. *When control zone not effective except for operators with approved weather service: (1) Use Blytheville AFB altimeter setting. (2) Increase circling and straight-in MDA 150'. (3) Alternate minimums not authorized. . Day and Night Minimums

Cond. MDA VISHATMDAVISHATMDA VIS HAT VIS

S-23...... 660 1 402 660 1 402 660 1 402 NA MDAVISHAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... 820 1 559 820 1 559 860 IM 599 NA A...... Standard.* T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Jonesboro; State, Ark.; Airport name, Jonesboro Municipal; Elev., 261'; Facility, JBR; Procedure No. VOR Runway 23, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated, 4 Sept. 69

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: LWV VOR. (feet)

Decker Int...... LWV VOR...... Direct______...... 2100 Climb to 2100' on LWV R 172° and return NewHebronlnt...... _...... LWV VOR...... -D irect...... 2100 to VOR. Supplementary charting information: Final approach crs intercept runway . centerline 5000'from threshold. TDZ elevation, 428'.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 352° Outbnd, 172® Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles of VOR. Final approach crs, 172°. . , MSA: 000°-090°—2600'; 180°-360°—2500'; 090°-180°—2100'. Note: Use Lawrenceville-Vincennes altimeter setting through UNICOM; when not available, use Terre Haute altimeter Setting and circling and straight-in MDA’s become 1160', straight-in visibility for Category C aircraft becomes 114 mile. ‘Standard alternate minimums authorized for operators with approved weather reporting service. Day and N ight Minimums

A B CD Cond. MDA VIS HAT MDA vis HAT MDA VIS HAT ^VIS

8-18. _ 1 532 960 1 532 960 1 532 NA MDAVISHAAMDAVIS HAAMDA VIS H A A ' C.. 1 532 960 1 532 960 IM 632 NA A...... T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Lawrenceville; State, 111.; Airport name, Lawrenceville-Vincennes Municipal; Elev., 428'; Facility, LWV: Procedure No. VOR Runway 18, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 12 Dec. 68

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18016 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype VOR—Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: LWV VOR. (feet)

Decker In t...... -...... — ...... -----...... LWV VOR...... -______Direct...... 2100 Climb to 2100' on LWV R 006° and return LWV V O R ...... — Direct—. ____ 2100 to VOR. New Hebron In t— ...... -----...... - Supplementary charting information: Final approach crs intercept runway centerline 3055' from threshold.

Procedure tum E side of crs 186° Outbnd 006° Inbnd 2100' within 10 miles of LWV VOR. Final approach crs 006°. MSA: 000°-090°—2600'; 180°-360°—2500'; 090°-180°—2100'. m x ' ... , ...... , . . ., . N ote: Use LawrenCeville-Vincennes altimeter setting tlirough UNICOM; when not available use Terre Haute altimeter setting and circling and straight-in MDA s be­ come 1100' straight-in visibility for Category C aircraft becomes Vi mile. ♦Standard alternate minimums authorized for operators with approved weather reporting service. D ay and Night Minimums

A B ______C ______D_ MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS

S-36...... 900 1 472 900 1 472 900 VA 472 NA MDA . VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA ' VIS HAA c ...... 900 1 472 900 1 472 900 1 472 NA X ...... _...... Not authorized." T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City Lawrenceville; State 111.; Airport Name Lawrenceville-Vincennes Municipal; Elev. 428'; facility LWV; Procedure No. VOR Runway 36, Arndt. 1; E£f. date27Nov.69; ’ Sup. Arndt. No. Orig.; Dated 12 Dec. 68

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: 4 miles after passing Nason Int. From— To— Via altitudes (feet)

ENL VORTAC. VNN VOR...... -...... Direct. 2100 Climb to 2100' direct to VNN VO R. VNN VOR-...... Direct,. 2100 Supplementary charting information: Cartter Int_____ 2300 Fined approach crs crosses threshold SAM VOR_____ VNN VOR...... -...... — - Direct. EW VORTAC. VNN VOR...... -...... -...... Direct. 2300 Runway 5. MWA VOR— — VNN VOR-...... -...... Direct. 2400 Runway 5, TDZ elevation, 469'. MWA VOR...... Waltonville Int...... —-...... V 179° . 2400 Waltonville Int„ . Nason Int (NOP.T)...... Direct. 1700 v ' 3 Procedure turn E side of crs, 223° Outbnd, 043° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles of Nason Int. FAF, Nason Int. Final approach crs, 043°. Distance FAF to MAP, 4 miles. Minimum altitude over Nason Int, 1700'. MSA: I80°-270°—2400°; 270°-180°—2100'. . N ote: Use Vandalia, 111., altimeter setting when control zone not effective. ♦Circîing^and straigM-h?MDA increased 200' when control zone not effective except operators with approved weather reporting service. #Alternate minimums not authorized when control zone not effective except operators with approved weather reporting service.

D ay and N ight Minimums

A B ______C______P ___ COnd‘ MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT g_6$...... 1000 1 5»1 1000 1 531 1000 1 631 1000 V i 531 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA _ ...... _*___*___ 1000 1 520 1000 1 520 1000 1A 520 1040 2 660 jL ______Standard.#______T 2-Eng. or less—Standard.______T over 2-Bng.—Standard.______----- — ---- Citv Mount Vernon; State, 111., Airport name, Mount Vernon-Outland; Elev., 480'; Facility, VNN; Procedure No. VOR Runway 6, Arndt. 2; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69, Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 25 Sept. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, YOL, 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18017

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype VOR—Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 5.3 miles after passing Ector Int. (feet)

Turn right, climbing to 5000' on MAF VORTAC R 235° within 20 miles. Supplementary charting information: Depict MAP at 1 mile from airport due circling restriction.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 051° Outbnd, 231° Inhnd, 4600'within 10 miles of MAF VORTACv FAF, Ector Int. Final approach crs, 231°. Distance FAF to MAP, 5.3 miles. Minimum altitude over MAF VORTAC, 4600'; over Ector Int, 3500'. MSA: 000°-180°—4300'; 180°-360°—5100'. Note: Use Midland approach control altimeter setting. ‘Night minimums authorized Runways 16-34 only. Circling not authorized SW of airport defined by Runway 16 and Runway 20 centerline extended. %400-1 required Runway 20 and Runway 16. Day and N ight Minimums

A BC D Cond. MDAVIS HAAMDAVISHAAMDA VIS HAA VIS

C‘...... 3360 1 381 3440 1 461 3440 ' m 461 NA A-.— ...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard.% T over 2-eng.—Standard.%

City, Odessa; State, Tex.; Airport name, Ector County; Elev., 2979'; Facility, MAF; Procedure No. VOR-1, Arndt. 1; Eft. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 16 Oct. 69

H Terminal routes______Missed approach

From- To- Via “S MAP: 1.8 miles after passing ARC VOR (feet) TAO-

Left turn climb to 2000' on R 015° within 20 miles.

Procedure turn 8 side of crs, 239® Outbnd, 059° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of ARQ VOR. FAF, ARQ VORTAC. Final approach crs, 050°. Distance FAF to MAP, 1.8 miles. Minimum altitude over ARQ VORTAC, 1000'. MSA: 000°-270°—1800'; 270°-360°—2300'. IWhen control zone not effective, the following limitations apply except for operators with approved weather reporting service. (1) Use Jonesboro, Ark., FSS altimeter setting when available and increase circling MDA 185'; or, use Blytheville AFB altimeter setting and increase circling MDA 320': (2) Alternate minimums not authorized. ‘ ‘Night landing minimums authorized Runways 17/35 only. D ay and Night Minimums

A B C D Cond. ------MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA VIS

°*#...... -...... 660 1 385 740 1 465 740 1}$ 465 NA *...... ------.Standard.# T 2-eng. or less—Standard. Tover2-eng.—Standard:

City, Walnut Ridge; State, Ark.; Airport name, Walnut Ridge Municipal; Elev., 275'; Facility, ARQ; Procedure No. VOR-1, Amdt. 6; Eff.date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 5; Dated, 21 Aug. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18018 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type VOR/DME Bearings, headings, courses and radiate are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R VR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. ^

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 5-mile DME Fix, R 147°. (feet)

FSD V O R TA C ...... Cliff 10-mile DME Fix:______.. ____ 3800 Climb to 3800* direct to VORTAC. R 046°, FSD VORTAC CW______...... R 135°, FSD VORTAC...... 16-mile DME Arc...... 4400 Supplementary charting information: R 135°, FSD VORTAC CW______...... Alvin 16-mile DME Fix...... 16-mile DME Arc...... ____ 3800 3444' tower 10 miles SE of airport at 48°29'- R 319°, FSD VORTAC CCW...... Alvin 16-mile DME Fix...... 16-mile DME Arc...... 3900 - 00"/96°38'20". Alvin 16-mile DME Fix...... ______Cliff 10-mile DME Fix (N O PT)...... FSD, R 147°______...... 2900 Runway 33, TDZ elevation, 1421'.

Procedure turn E side of crs, 147° Outbnd, 327° Inbnd, 3800' within 10 miles of Cliff 10-mlle DME Fix. Final approach crs, 327°. Minimum altitude over Cliff 10-mile DME Fix, 2900'. MSA: 000°-090°—3800': 090°-180°—4500'; 180°-360°—3100'. N ote: Final approach from holding pattern at the Cliff 10-mile DME Fix not authorized, procedure turirrequired. ‘ Sliding scale below % miie not authorized. % IF R departure procedures: Aircraft departing southeast bound when weather is below 2100-2, flight below 3900' beyond 5 miles E and SE of airport is prohibited between R 095° and R 135° of FSD VORTAC. Aircraft departing Runways 21 and 33 climb to 1800' on runway heading before turning on crs. D ay and Night Minimums

A B C D MDA Vis' HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT

B-33*...... 1920 I 499 1920 1 499 1920 1 499 1920 1 499 MDA' VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA^ MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C__...... 1960 1 532 1960 1 532 1960 1M 632 1980 2 552 A ______Standard. T 2-eng. or less—300-1, Runway 15; RVR 24', Runway 3, T over 2-eng.—300-1, Runway 15; RVR 24', Runway 3, Standard all others.% Standard all others.%

City. Sioux Falls: State, S. Dak.; Airport name, Joe Foss Field; Elev., 1428'; Facility, FSD; Procedure No. VOR/DME Runway 33, Arndt. 2; Eft. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt; No. 1: Dated, 28 Sept. 69

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 2.9-mfle DME Fix. (feet)

R 015°, ARG VORTAC CW...... R 051°, ARG VORTAC (NOPT)___14-mile Arc ARG, R 041° 2000 Climb to 2000' on ARG VORTAC R 230 lead radial. within 20 miles. R 140°, ARG VORTAC CCW...... R 051°, ARG VORTAC (NOPT)___14-mile Arc ARG, R 061 lead 2000 radial 14-mile DME Fix, R 051° ARG VORTAC. . . 6-mile DME Fix (NOPT)...... R 051*...... y— --...... 1800

Procedure turn N side of crs, 051° Outbnd, 231° Inbnd, 2000' within 10 miles of 6-mile DME (Kean Int). Final approach crs, 231°. * Minimum altitude over 6-mile DME (Kean Int), 1800'. MSA: 000°-270°—1800'; 270°-360°—2300'. #When control zone not effective, the following limitations apply except for operators with approved weather reporting service: (1) Use Jonesboro, Ark., FSS altimeter setting when available and increase circling and straight-in MDA 185'; or, use Blytheville AFB altimeter setting and increase ciruu** and straight-in MDA 320'. (2) Alternate minimums not authorized. •Night landing.minimums authorized Runways 17/35 only. Day and Night Minimums

A _B C D Cond. MDAVIS HAT MDA VISHATMDA VIS HAT VIS

S-22‘#...... 640 1 365 640 1 365 640 1 365 NA MDA VISHAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VISHAA C°#...... 660 1 385 740 1 465 740 m 465 NA A...... Standard.# T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Walnut Ridge; State, Ark.; Airport name, Walnut Ridge Municipal; Elev., 276'; Facility, ARG; Procedure No. VOR/DME Runway 22, Arndt. 2; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 6 , Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 21 Aug. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18019

12. By amending § 97.25 of Subpart C to establish localizer (LOC) and localizer-type directional aid (LDA) procedures as follows: Standard INSTRUMENT APPROACH PROCEDURE— TYPE LOC (BC) Bearings headings, courses and radlals are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are In feet MSL, except HAT, H A A, and BA; Ceilings are In feet above airport elevation. Distances are In nautical miles unless otherwise Indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet BVR; Banlnstrument approach procedure of the above type Is conducted at the below named airport. It shall be In accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach Is conducted In accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation In the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 3.7 miles after passing Bath Int. (feet)

Allentown VORTAC------______Bath I n t...... Direct___ ...... 2400 Climb to 3000' on LOC front crs to AB Allentown LOM______Bath Int..,...... _____Direct___ 2400 LOM, right turn direct to ETX VOR ...... Direct__ ...... 3000 TAC and hold. Nazareth Int------...... Bath Int (NOPT)______... _____Direct___ ...... 1400 Supplementary charting information: Hold W, 1 minute, right turns, 112° Inbnd. Runway 24, TDZ elevation, 387'.

Procedure tum E side of crs, 061° Outbnd, 241° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of Bath Int. FAF, Bath Int. Final approach crs, 241°. Distance FAF to MAP, 3.7 miles. Minimum altitude over Nazareth Int., 24007; over Bath Int, 1400'. Day and N ight Minimums

MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT '

S-24...... 800 M 413 800 % 413 800 M 413 800 1 413 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HA A MDA VIS HAA C...... 800 1 412 840 1 452 840 1Yt 452 940 2 552 A...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—BVR 24', Runway 6; Standard all others. T over 2-eng.—RVR 24', Runway 6; Standard all others.

City, Allentown; State, Pa.; Airport name, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton;.Elev., 388'; Facility, I-ABE; Procedure No. LOC (BC) Runway 24, Arndt. 8; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-24 (BC), Arndt. 7; Dated, 10 July 65 Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype LOG Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type Is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 4.7 miles after passing Cache Int. (feet)

FAI VORTAC.- FI LFR, _____ Direct______...... 2600 L F R .“ ENK VORTAC ______Wood Int______Direct______...___ 2600 Alternate missed approach: When directed Wood In t... ____ S crs LOC...... _____ 1500 by ATC, climbing right turn to 4000' to FAI R 168°, Ì5-miìe DMÈ Fix...... FAI LOC S crs (NOPT)...... FAI, R 168°. ______1500 FAI R 100°, thence direct to FAI VORTAC. Supplementary charting information: Terrain rising to 1000' within 2 miles W of airport. 158O' hill 3 miles SW of airport.

procedure tum E side of crs, 190° Outbnd, 010° Inbnd, 2600' within 10 miles of Cache Int. Cache Int. Final approach crs, 010°. Distance FAF to MAP, 4.7 miles. Minimum altitude over Cache Int. 1500'. Note: ASR. ‘Circling not authorized W of Runways 1/19. Day anh Night Minimums

AB C D Cond. MDAVISHAT MDAVISHAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT

8-1... % 346 780 M 346 780 % 346 780 1 346 MDAVIS HAAMDAVISHAA MDAVIS HAA MDAVIS HAA c*. 1 386 900 1 466 900 iyi 466 1000 2 566 Standard. T. 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

Fairbanks; State, Alaska; Airport name, Fairbanks International; Elev., 434'; Facility, I-FAI; Procedure No. LOC (BC) Runway 1, Arndt. 6; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69: Sup. Arndt. No. ILS-1 (BC), Arndt. 5; Dated, 16 Apr. 66

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 No. 215- 18020 RULES AND REGULATIONS

13. By amending § 97.25 of Subpart C to amend localizer (LOC) and localizer-type directional aid (LDA) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrum ent Approach P rocedure—T ype LOC Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. ' If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 3.7 miles after passing Renner Int. (feet)

FS LOM...... Renner Int______Direct...... 2800 Climb to 3200' on SW crs of ILS direct to FSD VORTAC...... Renner Int______...... Direct...... 2700 FS LOM, return to Renner Int. Sherman I n t...... FSD L O C ...... _____251° crs 2 m iles...... 2700 Supplementary charting information: 3444' DR Position LOC crs...... Renner Int (NOPT)...... ____ LOC crs...... 2500 tower 10 miles SE of airport at 43°29'00"/ R 202°, FSD VORTAC CW...... FSD LOC______9-mile Arc, 035° lead radial____ 3000 96°38'20"; 9_mile .. Renner Int (NOPT)...... LOC crs...... 2500 Runway 21, TDZ elevation, 1422' R 160°, FSD VORTAC CCW...... R 092°, FSD VORTAC______...... 12-mile A rc...... 4400 R 092°, FSD VORTAC CCW______.. R 051°, FSD VORTAC...... _____ 12-mile Arc...... 3000 12-mile DME Fix, R 051° FSD VORTAC__ .. FSD LOC...... 251° crs 2 m iles...... 2700

Procedure turn W side of crs, 026° Outbnd, 206° Inbnd, 2700' within 10 miles of Renner Int. .. FAF, Renner Int. Final approach crs, 206°. Distance FAF to MAP, 3.7 miles. Minimum altitude over Renner Int,. 2600'. Note: Dual VOR receivers required. •Reduction below % mile not authorized. % IFR departure procedures: Aircraft departing southeastbound when weather is below 2100-2, flight below 3900' beyond 5 miles E and SE of airport is prohibited between R 095° and R 135° of FSD VORTAC. Aircraft departing Runways 21 and 33 climb to 1800' on runway heading before turning on crs. Day and Night Minimums

Cond. ------:------i— ------MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT

S-21*...... 1760 54 338 1760 5i 338 1760 % 338 1760 1 338 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA Ç...... 1960 1 532 1960 1 532 1960 1H 532 1980 2 552 A...... —...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—300-1, Runway 15; RVR 24', Runway 3; T over 2-eng.—300-1, Runway 15; RVR 24', Runway 3; Standard all others.% Standard all others.%

City, Sioux Falls; State, S. Dak.; Airport name, Joe Foss Field; Elev., 1428'; Facility, I-FSD; Procedure No. LOC (BC) Runway 21, Amdt. 12; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 11; Dated, 18 Sept. 69 14. By amending § 97.27 of Subpart C to establish non directional beacon (automatic direction finder) (NDB/ADF) procedures as follows: Standard instrument Approach P rocedure—T ype NDB (ADF) Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation; Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR; If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum U . _ T From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 6.1 miles after passing AB bum. (feet)

Allentown VORTAC...... AB LOM...... Direct- 2400 Climbing left turn to 2500' direct to AB Lehigh In t...... AB LOM...... Direct.. 2700 LOM and hold. . , Coopersburg Int...... AB LOM...... Direct.. 2500 Supplementary charting infonnation: East Texas VORTAC...... AB LOM ..______Direct.. 2400 Hold SW, 1 minute, left turns, 061 mono. Pottstown VORTAC.______Shamrock In t______Direct., 2400 Runway 6, TDZ elevation, 386. Shamrock Int...... AB LOM (NOPT). Direct. 2000

Procedure turn N side of crs, 241° Outbnd, 061° inbnd 2400' within 10 miles of AB LOM. FAF, AB LOM. Final approach crs, 061°. Distance FAF to MAP, 6.1 miles. Minimum altitude over Shamrock Int., 2400'; over AB LOM, 2000'. MSA: 000°-090°—3500'; 090°-180°—2600'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—3500'. Day and Night Minimums

AB C D Cond. HAT MDAVISHAT MDAVISHAT MDAVIS HAT MDA VIS 574 S-6...... ____ 960 RVR 40 574 960 RVR 40 674 960 RVR 40 574 960 RVR 50 HAA MDA VIS HAAMDAVIS HAAMDAVISHAA MDA VIS 672 C...... 960 1 572 960 1 572 960 m 572 960 2 A...... ____ Standard. T 2-eng. or less—RVR 24'. Runway 6; Standard all others. T over 2-eng.--R V R 24', Runway 6; Standard all other«

City, Allentown; State, Pa.; Airport name, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton; Elev., 388'; Facility, AB; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 6, Amdt. 7; Eff. date, 27 Nov. W Sup. Amdt. No. 6; Dated, 19 Dec. 68

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18021

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type NDB (ADF) —rContinued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— * To— Via altitudes MAP: 3.9 miles after passing BON NDB . (feet)

HMV VORTAC. Piney In t______Direct..______6000 Climb to 3600' on crs 044° to T R LOM and Piney Int— ----- BON NDB...... Direct______:_____ 3600 hold; or, when directed by ATC, climb- Telford Int— BON NDB______Direct______3600 ing right turn to 3600' direct to BON Hilton In t....T— Weber Int______Direct...... i ...... 5000 NDB and hold SW, 1 minute, right turns, Weber Int...... BON NDB...... Direct______3600 044° Inbnd. ‘ Yuma Int...... BON N D B ...... Direct______4000 Supplementary charting information: Unicoi Int...... : Jay Int______Direct______6000 Hold NE, 1 minute, left turns, 224° Inbnd. Jay Int...... BON NDB...... Direct______3600 HIRLS Runways 9/27 and 4/22. BLA VOR____ Wallace Int...... Direct—-______5700 Runway 4, TDZ elevation, 1505'. Wallace Int...... BON NDB______Direct______3600 TR LOM...... BON NDB______Direct______3600 V 16°...... BON NDB (NOPT) Via BON bearing 224°.''. 2700

Procedure turn E side of crs, 224° Outbnd, 044° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles of BON N D B. FAF, BON NDB. Final approach crs, 044°. Distance FAF to MAP, 3.9 miles. Minimum altitude over BON NDB, 2700'. MSA: 000°-090°—6400'; 090°-180°—8300'; 180°-270°—7600'; 270°-360°—6300'. Note: ASR. •Circling not authorized N and W of centerline of Runways 4/22. Caution: Abrupt changes in terrain elevations immediately adjacent to procedure areas. Due to high terrain, aircraft within limited climb capability departing on routes yia HMV VORTAC should request clearance to climb on track of 044° from BON NDB or 224° from T R LOM to 4000' before continuing climb on crs. Day and Night Minimums

' a B CD Cond. MDAVISHATMDAVISHATMDAVISHAT MDA VIS HAT

8-4..... ___ 2080 1 575 2080 1 575 2080 1 575 2080 m 575 MDAVISHAAMDA V is HAAMDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C*...... ___ 2080 1 561 2080 i 561 2080 ' IK 561 2080 2 561 i ...... 1000-2. T 2-eng. or less—RVR 50', Runway 22; Standard all T over 2-eng.--R V R 2-1',, Runway 22; Standard aU others. others.

City, Bristol; State, Tenn.; Airport name, Tri-City; Elev., 1519'; Facility, BON; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 4, Amdt. 7; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No ADF 2, Amdt. 6; Dated, 14 May 66

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To—_ Via altitudes MAP: 6 miles after passing T R LOM. (feet)

HMV VORTAC. Silver In t______-. Direct...... -...... 6000 Climb to 3600' direct to BON NDB and Silver Int...... T R LOM______.. Direct...... 3600 hold; or, when directed by ATC, turn Telford Int. . T R LOM...... -. Direct...... 3600 right, climb to 4000' on R 293° HMV Yuma Int...... T R LOM...... Direct______3600 VORTAC to Yuma Int and hold NW, 1 Hilton Int...... T R LOM...... -. Direct______5000 minute, right turns, 113° Inbnd. Oreendale Int._ Wallace In t...... Direct...... 5000 Supplementary charting information: Wallace Int__... TR LOM (NOPT) .. Direct______... 3600 Hold SW, 1 minute, right turns, 044° Damascus Int Emmett Int...... 271° bearing to T R LOM. 6000 Inbnd. Emmett Int.. T R LOM...... -- Direct...... 3600 HIRLS Runways 9/27 and 4/22. BON NDB. T R LOM______•- Direct______3600 Chart: Silver, Wallace, and Emmett Int. Runway 22, TDZ elevation, 1518'.

frocedme turn E side of crs, 044° Outbnd, 224° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles of T R LOM. ir , ’ ™® LOM. Final approach crs, 224°. Distance FAF to MAP, 6 miles. Minimum altitude over T R LOM, 3600'; over Beaver Int., 2400'. MbA: 000°-090°—6300'; 090°-180°—8300'; 180°-270°—7300'; 270°-360°—6300'. Note: ASR. HMV vnS™ A brupt changes in terrain elevation immediately adjacent to procedure areas. Due to high terrain, aircraft with limited climb capability departing on routes via v u k i AC should request clearance to climb on a track of 044° from BON NDB or 224° from T R LOM to 4000' before continuing climb on crs.

Day and Night Minimums . -- A B C Cond. D MDA VIS HATMDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT 8-22. 1 882 2400 ik 882 2400 IK 882 2400 IK 882 MDA VIS HAA MDAVIS HAAMDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA 1 881 2400 m 881 2400 i k 881 2400 2 881 NDB/VOR Minimums: MDA VIS HATMDA VIS HAT MDAVIS HAT MDA VIS HAT ,8-22__ 1 802 2320 i 802 2320 IK 802 2320 m 802 MDAVIS HAA MDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA 1 801 2320 1 801 2320 m 801 2320 2 801 A...... ë T 2-eng. or less—RVR 50', Runway 22; Standard all T over 2-eng.--R V R 24', Runway 22; Standard all others. others.

' rtstd, State, Term.; Airport name, Tri-City; Elev. , 1519'; Facility, TR; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 22, Amdt. 9; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF 1, Amdt. 8; Dated, 16 Apr. 66

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18022 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard instrument Approach P rocedure—Type NDB (ADF)—Continued

Terminal routes . Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: 5.6 miles after passing FA LOM. (feet)

FAI VORTAC--...... ------FOX ND B...... Direct...... 4000 Climb to 40007 on 190° bearing from FA FI L FR ______::______..I ______FOXNDB ...... D ire c t...... 4000 LOM within 15 miles. Alternate missed approach: When directed by ATC, turn left, climb to 4000' on FAI VORTAC R-100° thence proceed direct to FAI VORTAC. Supplementary charting information: Terrain rising to 1000' within 2 miles W of airport. 1580' hUl 3 miles SW of airport.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 010° Outbnd, 190° Inbnd, 4000' within 10 miles of FOX NDB. FAF, FA LOM. Final approach crs, 190°. Distance FAF to MAP, 6.6 miles. Minimum altitude over FOX NDB, 4000'; over FA LOM, 2300'; over 3-müe Radar Fix, 1300'. MSA: 000°-090°—4600'; 090°-180°—3600'; 180°-270°—4000'; 270°-360°—4300'; within 25 miles of FA LOM. Note: ASR. * Circling not authorized W of Runways 1/19. Day and Night Minimums

AB C D Cond. MDAVISHATMDA VIS .HAT MDAVISHAT MDA VIS HAT

S-19...... ____ 1300 X 866 1300 1 866 1300 1 866 1300 1)4 866 MDAVIS HAA MDA VISHAAMDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C*...... 1300 1 866 1300 1H 866 1300 866 1300 2 866 Utilizing 3-mile Radar Fix: MDAVIS HAT MDA VISHAT MDAVISHAT MDA VIS HAT S-19___ ...... 920 X 486 920 X 486 920 X 486 920 1 486 MDAVIS HAA MDAVISHAAMDAVIS HAAMDA VIS HAA C*____ ...... 920 1 486 920 1 486 920 m 486 1000 2 566 A...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.-—Standard.

City, Fairbanks; State, Alaska; Airport name, Fairbanks International; Elev., 434'; Facility FA LOM; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 19, Amdt. 10; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. ADF 1, Amdt. 9; Dated 1 Jan. 66

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: LOG NDB. (feet) TUT NDB...... LOG NDB______... Direct__ Climbing right turn to 4100'on 205°- bearing.

TUT VOR.... ______LOG NDB...... Direct___ 8 8 Return to LOG NDB. ' Supplementary charting information: Terrain: 1279', 1.4 miles NE; 1000', 1.3 miles NW; 1545', 2.1 miles W; 642', 1.1 miles N of final approach crs.

Procedure turn right teardrop S side of crs, 205° Outbnd, 048° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of LO Q N D B. Final approach crs, 048°. Minimum altitude over LOO NDB, 1000'. MSA: 000°-360°—4100'. N ote: Air carrier will not reduce takeoff visibility due to local conditions Runway 23. ^Circling to N of centerline Runways 5/23 not authorized. %Climb so as to cross facility 4100' or above. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D J.__ Cond. ------_ .~7 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA

C * ..- - .- J —.l- 1000 2 970 1000 2 970 1000 2 970 1000 2 970 A...... 1000-2. T 2-eng.orless—1000-2, Right Runway 5; Left Runway 23.% Tover2-eng.—1000-2, Right Runway 6; Left Runway 23.%

City, Pago Pago, Island, Tutuila Island; Territory, American Samoa; Airport name, Pago Pago International; Elev., 30'; Facility LOG; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) h ■js Amdt. Orig.; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7. 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18023

15. By amending § 97.27 of Subpart C to amend nondirectional beacon (automatic direction finder) (NDB/ADP) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach Procedure—Type NDB (ADF) Bearings, headings, courses and radlals are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above?type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following Instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for ep route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: BVX NDB. (feet)

ARO VORTAG...... BVX NDB______Direct...... 2500 Climbing right turn to 2300' direct BVX NDB and hold. Supplementary charting information: ■ Hold E of BVX NDB on bearing 100°-280° Inbnd, right turns, 1 minute.

Procedure turn N side of crs, 100° Outbnd, 280° Inbnd, 2300' within 10 miles of BVX NDB. Final approach crs, 280°. Minimum altitude over BVX NDB, 1140'. MSA: 000°-180°—2000'; 186°-360o—2600'. Note: When Walnut Ridge, Ark., altimeter setting not available, use Jonesboro, Ark., FSS altimeter setting and increase MDA 40'; or, use Little Rock approach control altimeter setting and increase MDA SOO7. %Takeofl Runway 35: 300-1 required or water tank located %/t mile N of airport must be visible. Day and Night Minimums

A BC D MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA VISVIS C...... 1140 1 677 1140 1 677 NA NA A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard.% T over 2-eng.—-Standard.%

City, Batesville; State, Ark.; Airport name, Batesville Municipal; Elev., 463'; Facility, BVX; Procedure No. NDB (ADF)-1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 4 Sept. 69

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: PGR NDB. (feet)

ARG VORTAG___...... PGR NDB:...... Direct...... 2100 Climb to 2100', left turn direct PG R NDB and hold. Supplementary charting information: Hold S of PGR NDB on bearing 230°-050° Inbnd, 1 minute, left turns.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 230° Outbnd, 050° Inbnd, 2100' within 10 miles of PGR NDB. Final approach crs, 050°. Minimum altitude over PG R NDB, 1000'. MSA: 000°-360°—2000'. . ' Note: When Jonesboro, Ark., FSS altimeter setting not available, use Blytheville AFB altimeter setting and increase circling and straight-in MDA 100'. Day and Night Minimums

AB C ■: D Cond. MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS VIS v

S-05.. 1 709 1000 1 709 NA NA MDAVIS HAA MDAVIS HAA C. 1 709 1000 1 709 NA NA Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

•ly, Paragould; State, Ark.; Airport name, Paragould Municipal; Elev., 291'; Facility, PGR; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 5, Arndt. 3; Eft. date, 27 Nov. 69: Sup- Amdt. No. 2; Dated, 4 Sept. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215- ■FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18024 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type NDB (ADF)—Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum Prom— To— Via altitudes MAP: 4.6 miles after passing RO LOM. (feet)

ROW VORTAC. RO LOM-...... Direct. 6000 ' Climb to 6000' on crs 213°, left turn, direct Hope Int...... - RO LOM______Direct. 6600 to RO LOM and hold*. Hagerman Int___ RO LOM...... Direct. 6000 Supplementary charting information: Ranch Int______RO LOM (NOPT)___ ^..... Direct. 6000 ’Hold NE, 1 minute, right turns, 213* Nelson DME Fix. RO LOM...... Direct. 6000 Inbnd. Dexter DME Fix.. RO LOM______Direct. 6000 TDZ elevation, 3633'. Hondo DME Fix.. RO LOM______Direct. 6600 Dunlap DME Fix. RO LOM______Direct. 6600

Procedure turn N side of crs, 033° Outbnd, 213° Inbnd, 6000' within 10 miles of RO LOM. F a F, RO LOM. Final approach crs, 213*. Distance Fa F to MAP, 4.6 miles. Minimum altitude over RO LOM, ebOO7. MSA: 000°-180°—6200'; 180°-360°—7000'. N ote: Use Roswell FSS altimeter setting when control zone not effective. ‘Alternate minimums not authorized when control zone not effective except operators with approved weather reporting service. Day and Nioht Minimums

A B C ~ D Cond. MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT

S-21...... 3980 Ji 347 3980 V*. 347 3980 *A 347 3980 1 347 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... - - ...... 4120 1 461 4120 1 451 4120 l*g 451 4220 2 651 A...... Standard.* T 2-eng. or less—Standard. Tover2-eng.—Standard.

City, Roswell; State, N. Mex.; Airport name, Roswell Industrial Air Center; Elev., 3669'; Facility, RO; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 21, Arndt. 3; Eft. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 2; Dated, 3 Oct. 68

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From— To— Via altitudes MAP: AWM NDB. (feet)

Walls Int ...... AWMNDB...... D ire c t...... 1800 Climb to 18007 right turn direct to AWM Porter In t...... AWMNDB...... Direct...... 1800 NDB and hold. Kerrville Int ...... AWMNDB ...... : ...... Direct...... 1800 Supplementary charting information: Hold N of AWM NDB on bearing 347"- 167° Inbnd, right turns, 1 minute. TDZ elevation, 212'.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 347° Outbnd, 167° Inbnd, 18007 within 10 miles of AWM NDB. Final approach crs, 167°. Minimum altitude over AWM NDB, 700\ MSA: 045°-135°—2400'; 135°-045°—1700'. Notes: (1) Use Memphis altimeter setting. (2) Radar vectoring. Day and Night Minimums

MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS

8-17...... 700 1 488 700 1 488 700 1 488 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C ...... 700 1 488 700 1 488 700 1J^ 488 NA A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, West Memphis; State, Ark.; Airport name, West Memphis Municipal; Elev., 212'; Facility, AWM; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 17, Arndt. 2; Eff, date, 27 Nov. 69, Sup. Arndt. No. 1; Dated, 9 Oct. 69

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18025

Standard instrum ent Approach P rocedure—T ype NDB (ADE - Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum From—■ To— Via altitudes MAP: AWM NDB. (feet)

Walls I n t ______... AWM NDB______y______Direct______1800 Climb to 1800' left turn direct to AWM Porter ______AWM NDB______Direct______1800 NDB and hold. WpiTvilleInt___ . ______--- AWM NDB...... D irect...... 1800 Supplementary charting information: . ' Hold S of AWM NDB on bearing 182°-002° Inbnd, left turns, 1 minute. TDZ elevation, 212'.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 182° Outbnd, 002° Inbnd, 1800' within 10 miles of AWM NDB. Final approach crs, 002°. Minimum altitude over Island Int., 740'. MSA: 045°-135°—2400'; 135°-045°—1700'. Notes: (1) Use Memphis altimeter setting. (2) Radar vectoring. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT VIS

S-35...... 740 1 528 740 1 528 740 1 528 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA . MDA S» VIS HAA C...... 740 1 528 740 1 528 740 1H 528 NA NDB/VOR Minimums: MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT 8-35...... 660 1 448 660 1 448 660 1 .448 NA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C...... 660 1 448 680 1 468 680 ltf 468 NA A...... Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard'.

City, West Memphis; State, Ark.; Airport name, West Memphis Municipal; Elev., 212'; Facility, AWM; Procedure No. NDB (ADF) Runway 35, Amdt. 1; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. Orig.; Dated, 12 Dec. 68 16. By amending 97.29 of Subpart C to establish instrument landing system (ILS) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype ILS Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet R VR. If an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: ILS DH, 586'; LOC 6.1 miles after From— To— Via altitudes passing AB LOM. (feet)

Allentown VORTAC AB LOM______Direct. 2400 Climb to 3000' to Belfast Int via LOC back Lehigh Int...... AB LOM...... Direct. 2700 crs and ABE R 115° and hold. Coopersburg Int___ AB LOM...... Direct. 2500 Supplementary charting information- East Texas VORTAC. AB LOM...... Direct. 2400 Hold SE, 1 minute, right turns, 295° Inbnd. mtstown VORTAC Shamrock In t...... Direct. 2400 Runway 6, TDZ elevation, 386'. Shamrock Int AB LOM (NOPT)...... ^...... Direct. 2400

£r.°®®<îpre turn N side of crs, 241° Outbnd, 061° Inbnd, 2400' within 10 miles of AB LOM. r Ah, AB LOM. Final approach crs, 061°. Distance FAF to MAP, 6.1 miles. Minimum glide slope interception altitude, 2400'. Glide slope altitude at OM, 2390'; at MM, 603'. H!f*an®e to runway threshold at OM, 6.1 miles; at MM, 0.6 mile. mba: 000°-090°—3500'; 090°-180°—2600'; 180°-270°—2500'; 270°-360°—3500'.

Day and Night Minimums

„ . A B C , D Cond. ______:______1______DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT

586 RVR 24 200 586 RVR 24 200 586 RVR 24 200 586 RVR 24 200 MDAVIS HATMDAVIS HAT MDAVIS HAT MDA VIS HAT 720 RVR 24 334 720 RVR 24 334 720 RVR 24 334 720 RVR 40 334 MDA VISHAA MDAVIS HAA MDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA 740 1 352 840 1 452 840 Vd 452 940 2 552 Standard. T 2-eng. or less—RVR 24', Runway 6; Standard all others. T over 2-eng.—RVR 24',' Runway 6; Standard all others.

ty’Aflent0W11; State, Pa.; Airport name, Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton; Elev., 388'; Facility, I-ABE; Procedure No. ILS Runway 6, Amdt. 10; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 9; Dated, 19 Dec. 68

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215-r-FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18026 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype ILS—Continued Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: ILS DH, 1718'; LOC 6 miles after From— To— Via altitudes passing T R LOM. (feet) HMV VORTAC...... Silver In t______Direct...... 6000 Climb to 3600' direct to BON NDB and Silver In t...... TR LOM.....______..... Direct...... 3600 hold; or, when directed by ATC, turn Telford In t...!...... T R LOM...... Direct...... 3600 right climb to 4000' on R 293° HMV Yuma Int.______T R L O M ..______Direct...... 3600 VORTAC to Yuma Int; and hold NW Hilton In t...... T R LOM...... Direct...... -_>*___ ...... 5000 1 minute, right turns, 113° Inbnd. 4 Greendale Int______■___ Wallace Int______Direct...... 5000 Supplementary charting information: Wallace Int...... T R LOM (NOPT)_— . Direct...... 3600 Hold SW, 1 minute, right turns, 041s Damascus Int...... Emmett Int...... 271° bearing to TR LOM...... 6000 Inbnd. Emmett Int...... T R LOM______... Direct...... 3600 HIRLS Runways 9/27 and 4/22. BON NDB______...... T R LOM______L. Direct______„______3600 Chart: Silver, Wallace, and Emmett Int.' Runway 22, TDZ elevation, 1518'. Procedure turn E side of crs, 044° Outbnd, 224° Inbnd, 3600' within 10 miles of T R LOM. FAF, T R LOM. Final approach crs, 224°. Distance FAF to MAP, 6 miles. Minimum altitude over T R LOM, 3600'; over Beaver Int, 2400'. Minimum glide slope interception altitude, 3600'. Glide slope altitude at OM, 3462'; at MM, 1742'. Distance to runway threshold at OM, 6 miles; at MM, 0.5 mile. MSA: 000°-090°—6300'; 090°-180°—8300'; 180°-270°—7300'; 270°-360°—6300'. Notes: (1) ASR. (2) Localizer back crs unusable. Caution: Abrupt changes in terrain elevations adjacent to procedure areas. Due to high terrain, aircraft with limited climb capability departing on routes via HMV VORTAC should request clearance to climb on a track of 044° from BON NDB or 224° from T R LOM to 4000' before continuing climb on crs. Day and Night Minimums

A BC D Cond. DHVISHATDHVISHAT DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT

8-22___ ...... 1718 RVR 24 200 1718 RVR 24 200 1718 RVR 24 200 1718 RVR 24 200 LOC: MBA VIS HAT MDA VISHAT MDA VISHAT MDA VIS HAT S-22______2340 RVR 50 822 2340 RVR 50 822 2340 RVR 60 822 2340 m 822 MDA VIS HAAMDA VIS HAA MDAVISHAAMDA VIS HAA C...... 2340 1 821 2340 1 821 2340 m 821 2340 2 821 LOC/VO R Minimums: LOC: MDA VISHATMDAVISHAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT 8-22______2200 RVR 50 682 2200 RVR 50 682 2200 RVR 50 682 2200 RVR 60 682 MDA VIS HAA MDAVISHAAMDAVISHAAMDA VIS HAA C...... ____ 2260 1 741 2260 1 741 2320 m 801 2320 2 801 A...... Standard. T 2-cng. or less—RVR 50', Runway 22; Standard aU T over 2-eng.—RVR 24, Runway 22; Standard all others. others.

City, Bristol; State, Tenn.; Airport name, Tri-City; Elev., 1519'; Facility, I-TRI; Procedure No. ILS Runway 22, Arndt. 14; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 13; Dated, 14 Oct. 67

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: DH, 634'; LOC 5.6 miles after pass- From— To— Via altitudes ing FA LOM. (feet)

FAI VORTAC...... ______FOX NDB...... Direct___ ...... 4000 Climb to 4000' on S crs ILS LOC within FI L F R ...... - ...... FOX NDB...... ____ Direct___ ...... 4000 15 miles. „„ ... Alternate missed approach: When ajrectea by ATC, climbing left turn to 4006 w FAI R 100° thence direct to *A1 v u i u a o . , . Supplementary charting information. Terrain rising to 1000' within 2 miles w airport. 1580' hiH 3 miles SW of airport.

Procedure turn W side of crs, 010° Outbnd, 190° Inbnd, 4000' within 10 miles of FOX NDB. FAF, FA LOM. Final approach crs, 190°. Distance FAF to MAP, 5.6 miles. Minimum altitude over FOX NDB, 4000'; over FA LOM, 2300'; over 3-mile Radar Fix, 1020'; Minimum glide slope interception altitude, 2300'. Glide slope altitude at OM, 2310'; at MM, 660': Distance to runway threshold at OM, 6.6 miles; at MM, 0.6 mile. MSA: 000°-090°—4600'; 090°-180°—3600'; 180°-270°—4000*; 270°-360°—43007; within 25 miles FA LOM: Note: ASR. •Circling not authorized W Runways 1/19.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7 , 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18027

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type ILS—Continued Day and Night Minimums

A B C D Cond. DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT DH VISHAT

200 8-19-___ 634 K 200 634 200 634 H 200 634 A MDA VISHAA MDA VISHAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VISHAA C*...... 820 1 386. 900 1 466 900 m 466 1000 2 566 LOC: MDA VIS HATMDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HATMDA VISHAT S—19...... 1020 V t 586 1020 V 586 1020 V 586 1020 1 586 MDA - VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C*...... 1020 1 586 1020 1 586- 1020 i k 586 1020 2 586 Utilizing 3-mile Radar Fix: LOC: MDA VIS HATMDA VIS HAT MDA VISHAT MDÂ VISHAT S-19...... 760 V 326 760 A 326 760 H 326 760 H 326 MDA VIS HAAMDA VIS HAA MDA VISHAA MDA VIS HAA C*...... ___ 820 1 386 900 1 466 900 VA 466 1000 2 : 566 A...... ___ Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.-—Standard.

City. Fairbanks: State, Alaska; Airport name, Fairbanks International; Elev., 434'; Facility, I-FAI; Procedure No. ILS Runway 19, Arndt. 11; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 10; Dated, 15 July 67 17. By amending § 97.29 of Subpart C to amend instrument landing system (ILS) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—Type ILS Bearings, headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. _ II an instrument approach procedure of the above type is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument approach procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure for such airport authorized by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitudes shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below.

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: ILS DH 1978'; LOC 5.9 miles after From— To—: Via altitudes passing AB LOM. (feet)

ABI VORTAC - - .. ___AB LOM...... D irect...... 3900 Climb to 3300' on LOC ers 350° within 20 DYSVOR ...... AB LOM...... Direct...... 3900 miles; or, turn right, climb to 3300' on Clyde Int.."...... AB LOM...... Direct______3900 ABI VORTAC R 086° within 20 miles. Trussell I n t ...... AB LOM______..D ire c t______3900 Supplementary charting information: Nugent Int AB LOM...... Direct...... 3900 Runway 35L, TDZ elevation, 1778'. Oplinlnt...... AB LOM______.....Direct...... 3900

Procedure turn E side of ers, 170° Oütbnd, 350° Inbnd, 3900' within 10miles of AB LOM. FAF, AB LOM. Final approach ers, 350°. Distance FAF to MAP, 5.9 miles. Minimum glide slope interception altitude, 3500'. Glide slope altitude at OM, 3406'; at MM, 1966'. Distance to runway threshold at OM, 5.9 miles; at MM, 0.6 mile. MSA: 225°-315°—4600'; 315°-225°—3900'. Note:ASR. •Circling not authorized NW defined by Runway 35 centerline extended N and Runway 22 centerline extended SW. Day and Night Minimums

A . B C D E DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT DH VIS HAT

S-35L...... 1978 M 200 1978 Vt 200 1978 A 200 1978 A 200 1978 H 200 Ï'OC: . MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT _ MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT 8'35L...... 2160 V 382 2160 A 382 2160 Vi 382 2160 Va. 382 2160 % 382 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA c*...... 2160 1 382 2240 1 462 2240 VA 462 2340 2 562 2360 2 582 A...... -...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, Abilene; State, Tex.; Airport name, Abilene Municipal; Elev., 1778'; Facility, I-ABI; Procedure No. ILS Runway 35L, Arndt. 7; Efl. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. 6; Dated, 10 July 69' ' ■

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 No. 215------5 18028 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedures—^Tipio IL S— Continued

Terminal routes Missed approach Minimum MAP: ILS DH 209'; LOC 4.6 miles after From— T o - Via altitudes passing. SJ NDB/LOM. (feet)

SJUNDB ______.... Townsend Int______2200 Climb to 1600' on E crs of LOC within 15 Townsend Int______. ______... SJ NDB/LOM______y) 1400 miles. R 341°, SJU VO RTAC CCW______... LOC crs SJU, R 255°______...... ll-müe DME arc SJU R 265° 1800 Supplementary charting information: lead radial. TDZ elevation, 9'. LOC crs 11-mile DME Fix SJU, R 255°...... SJ N D B /LO M ...... LOC crs...... 1400

Procedure turn not authorized. Approach crs (profile) starts at Townsend Int. FAF, SJ NDB. Final approach crs, 075°. Distance FAF to MAP, 4.6 miles. Minimum altitude over Townsend Int, 2200'. Minimum glide slope interception altitude, 1400'.*Glide slope altitude at OM, 1317'; at MM, 194'. Distance to runway threshold at OM, 4.6 miles; at MM, 0.5 mile. MSA within 25 miles of SJ NDB/LOM: 000-090°—1300'; 090°-180°—5100'; 180°-270°—5100'; 270°-360°—1800' Note: ASR.

Day and Night Minimums

A B C Cond. D DH VISHAT DH VIS - HAT DH VIS HAT DH . VIS HAT

S-7...... 209 Vi 200 209 Vi 200 209 Vi 200 209 ' Vi 200 MDA VISHAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VISHAT MDA VIS HAT LOC: 520 X 511 520 X 511 520 X 511 520 X 511 MDAVIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA C ...... 520 1 511 520 1 511 520 m 511 560 2 651 A...... ____ Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.-—Standard.

City, San Juan; State, P.R.; Airport name, Puerto Rico International; Elev., 9'; Facility, I-SJU; Procedure No. ILS Runway 7, Arndt. 2; Eff. date 27 Nov 69" Sud Amdt. No. 1; Dated, 21 Nov. 68 ’ F’ 18. By amending § 97.31 of Subpart C to establish precision approach radar (PAR) and airport surveillance radar (ASR) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype R adar r B ® arings’ headings, courses and radials are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in feet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and RA. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. P in belo^sr named airport, it sh&ll be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure authorized for such airport by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en ?,ositlve identification must be established with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final author­ ised l a n d i n l ’= eontroller are mandatory except when (A) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the author- i.f,lt ,aPPears deSfrabte to discontinue the approach. Except when the radar controller may direct otherwise prior to final A ^ >e> ©xecuted as provided below when (A) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for ^ JH f Dii^ngSis ^ ? SacTOmpli*hedVel^anCe approach; (B) dlrected radar controller; (C) visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or

Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes (sectors and distances measured from radar antenna) Notes From— To— Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude

As established by Tri-City. Tenn, APC ASR minimum altitude vectoring chart. 1. Descend aircraft after passing FAF. , . All airway segments from 0 to 35 miles published MEA or sector altitudes whichever is lower. All sector azimuths are 2. Runway 22, FAF 6 miles from threshold. Mini­ clockwise with distance and altitudes based on antenna located on Tri-City airport. mum altitude over 3-mile radar Fix, 2400'. TDZ elevation, 1518'. Missed approach: 3. Runway 4, FAF 6 miles from threshold. Minimuni ?a crl ° T T R LOM and hold. Hold NE, 1 minute, left turns, 224° Inbnd. Alternate: altitude over 3-mile Radar Fix, 2400'. TDZ eleva­ Chmbmg left turn to 4000'to intercept R 293° HMV VO RTAC to Yuma Int. ' * tion, 1505'. r> n ^ ^ nWajif^t crs ®cn NDB and hold. Hold SW, 1 minute, right turns, 044° Inbnd. Alternate: Caution: Abrupt changes in terrain elevation Climbing .right turn to 4000'to intercept R 293° HMV VO RTAC to Yuma Int. adjacent to procedure areas. Due to high terrain, aircraft with limited climb capability departing on routes via HMV VO RTAC should request dur­ ance to clifnb on a track of 044° from Boone NDU or 224° from T R LOM to 4000' before continuing climb on crs. 4. Radar will provide 1500' vertical clearance within 3-mile radius of exceptionally high terrain or obstructions displayed on radar scope or depicted on MAV charts. Day and N ight Minimums

A Cond, B C D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT S-22._... RVR 50 742 2260 RVR 50 . 742 2260 RVR 50 742 2260 RVR 60 742 S~4...... 1 595 2100 1 595 2100 1 595 2100 IX 595 MDA VIS HAA MDA . VIS HAA MDAVIS HAA MDA ■ VIS HAA C...... 1 741 2260 1 741 2320 IX 801 2320 2 801 A...... T 2-eng. or less—RVR 50', Runway 22; Standard all T over 2-eng.--R V R 24',, Runway 22; Standard all others. others.

City, Bristol; State, Tenn.; Airport name, Tri-City; Elev., 1519'; Facility, Tri-City Radar; Procedure No. Radar-1, Arndt. 5; Eff. date 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. Radar 1, Arndt. 4; Dated, 18 Nov. 67

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 2 : C Ï-R.DAY, NOVEMBER 7 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18029

Standard in strum ent Approach P rocedure—T ype R adar— Continued

Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes (sectors and distances measured from radar antenna) Notes From— To— Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance. Altitude Distance Altitude

As established by FAI ASR minimum altitude vectoring chart. 1. Runway 1, FAF 4 miles from threshold. 2. Minimum altitude over 4-mile FAF, 1600'. 3. Terrain rising to 1000' within 2 miles W of airport. 4. 1580' hill 3 miles SW of airport. »Circling not authorized Wjaf Runways 1/19.

Missed approach: Climbing right turn to 3000* direct to FI LFR. Day and Night Minimums

A B C D MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT MDA VIS HAT

S-L— ...... 1160 H 726 1160 M 726 1160 1M 726 1160 iy2 726 MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS BAA MDA VIS HAA c * ...... 1160 1 726 1160 1 726 1160 1J3 726 1160 2 726 X ...... Standard. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng. —Standard.

C ity Fairbanks: State. Alaska: Airport name, Fairbanks International; Elev., 434'; Facility, Fairbanks Radar; Procedure No. Radar-1, Arndt. 3; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Arndt. No. Radar 1, Amdt. 2; Dated, 7 May 66 19. By amending § 97.31 of Subpart C to amend precision approach radar (PAR) and airport surveillance radar (ASR) procedures as follows: Standard I nstrument Approach P rocedure—T ype Radar Bearings, headings, courses and radiate are magnetic. Elevations and altitudes are in leet MSL, except HAT, HAA, and R.A. Ceilings are in feet above airport elevation. Distances are in nautical miles unless otherwise indicated, except visibilities which are in statute miles or hundreds of feet RVR. If a radar instrument approach is conducted at the below named airport, it shall be in accordance with the following instrument procedure, unless an approach is conducted in accordance with a different procedure authorized tor such airport by the Administrator. Initial approach minimum altitude(s) shall correspond with those established for en route operation in the particular area or as set forth below. Positive identification must be established with the radar controller. From initial contact with radar to final author­ ized landing minimums, the instructions of the radar controller are mandatory except when (A) visual contact is established on final approach at or before descent to the author­ ized landing minimums, or (B) at Pilot’s discretion if it appears desirable to discontinue the approach. Except when the radar controller may direct otherwise prior to final approach, a missed approach shall be executed as provided below when (A) communication on final approach is lost for more than 5 seconds during a precision approach, or for more thafi 30 seconds during a surveillance approach; (B) directed by radar controller; (C) visual contact is not established upon descent to authorized landing minimums; or (D) if landing is not accomplished.

Radar terminal area maneuvering sectors and altitudes (sectors and distances measured from radar antenna) Notes From— To— Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude Distance Altitude As established by MEM ASR minimum altitude vectoring chart. 1. Approach ers from 000° CW to 360°. 2. Descend aircraft to MDA after FAF 4 miles from airport. • 3. Missed approach point over airport.

Missed approach: Climb to 1800' reverse crs direct to AWM NDB and hold N on the 347° bearing, right turns, 1 minute, 167° Inbnd. Use Memphis approach control altimeter setting. D ay and Night Minimums

A B C D MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA MDA VIS HAA VIS

C...... 700 1 488 700 1 488 700 488 NA A...... 1.. Not authorized. T 2-eng. or less—Standard. T over 2-eng.—Standard.

City, West Memphis; State, Ark.; Airport name, West Memphis Municipal; Elev., 212'; Facility, MEM 1 ASR; Procedure No. ASR-1, Amdt. 4; Eff. date, 27 Nov. 69; Sup. Amdt. No. 3; Dated, 6 Nov. 69 These procedures shall become effective on the dates specified therein. (Secs. 307(c), 313(a), 601, Federal Aviation Act of 1958; 49 U.S.C. 1348 (c), 1354(a), 1421; 72 Stat. 749, 752, 775) Issued in Washington, D.C., on October 21, 1969. R. S. Sliff, Acting Director, Flight Standards Service. [F.R. Doc. 69-12860; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, V O L 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18030 RULES AND REGULATIONS

§ 1665.3 Eligible issuers of securities. (c) Face amount of securities: The Title 24— HOUSING AND Any mortgagee, including a State or face amount of any security cannot be local governmental instrumentality, less than $50,000. HOUSING CREDIT which has been approved by the Federal (d) Transferability. Securities are Housing Administration and which has transferable, but the share of the pro­ Chapter IV— Government National adequate experience and facilities to ceeds, collected on account of the pool Mortgage Association, Department issue mortgage-backed securities may be of mortgages may not be payable to approved for a guaranty by the Associa­ more than one holder with respect to of Housing and Urban Develop­ any security. ment tion, except that no guaranty shall be made of any security which is tax exempt (e) Disclosure. The issuer must dis­ PART 1665— GUARANTY OF under the Internal Revenue Code of 1954. close both the average and the total MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES No issue of securities will be approved for costs to the issuer of the mortgages in guaranty unless the issuer has net worth, the pool, whether the issuer acquired the On August 13, 1969 .(34 F.R. 13110), in assets acceptable to the Association, mortgages by origination or purchase. notice was given that the Government in a ratio of (a) not less than 3 percent § 1665.7 Mortgages. National Mortgage Association, under on the first $5 million of guaranteed the authority contained in section 309 securities outstanding after such issue, Each issue of guaranteed securities of the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. (b) not less than 2 percent on the suc­ must be backed by a separate pool of 1723a), was considering the addition of ceeding $5 million, and (c) not less than mortgages which: a new Part 1665 to Title 24 of the Code of 1 percent on all over $10 million, but in (a) Are insured under the National Federal Regulations. Although the pro­ no case need such net worth exceed Housing Act or title V of the Housing posed regulations relating to a guaranty $500,000. Act of 1949, or insured or guaranteed are not subject to the rule-making re­ under the Servicemen’s Readjustment quirements of 5 U.S.C. 553, interested § 1665.5 Securities. Act of 1944 or chapter 37 of title 38, persons were invited to submit written (a) Instruments. Securities to be is­ United States Code; comments, suggestions, or objections to sued pursuant to the provisions of this (b) Cover residential property; such regulations. After consideration of part may, at the option of the issuer, be - (c) Have been insured or guaranteed all relevant material submitted, the pro­ of one of the following types, but only no longer than 12 months prior to the posed regulations, modified as set forth one of such types may be issued against date on which the Association issues its below, are hereby adopted. any single pool of mortgages: (1) commitment to guarantee the securities; Part 1665- of Title 24 is established to Straight pass-through securities, which (d) Will be replaced by the issuer if read as follows: provide for the payment by the issuer to found defective by the Association at any time prior to 4 months after the Sec. the holders of a proportionate share of 1665.1 General. the proceeds of principal and interest, date on which the Association issues its 1665.3 Eligible issuers of securities. as collected, on account of a pool of mort­ guaranty- of the securities; and 1665.5 Securities. gages, less servicing fees and other speci­ (e) Meet such other standards of ac­ 1665.7 Mortgages. fied costs approved by the Association; ceptability as may be prescribed by the 1665.9 Pool administraton. and (2) modified pass-through securities, Association. 1665.11 Excess collateral. 1665.13 Guaranty. which provide either (i) for the payment § 1665.9 Pool administration. 1665.15 Fees. by the issuer to the holders of a propor­ tionate share of the proceeds of principal; The Association will not guarantee 1665.17 Audits and reports. securities if the pool arrangement pro­ 1665.19 Applications. as collected, together with a fixed rate of interest on the unpaid principal bal­ posed by the issuer does not satisfactorily Authority : The provisions of this Part 1665 provide for; issued under sec. 309, National Housing Act; ance, whether or not collected, or (ii) for (a) Servicing of the mortgages in the 12 U.S.C. 1723a. such payment, whether or not collected, of both specified principal installments pool; § 1665.1 General. and a fixed rate of interest on the unpaid (b) Segregation of the cash flow from The Association is authorized by sec­ principal balance, with all prepayments mortgages in the pool from the other tion 306(g) of the National Housing Act, being passed through to the holder. In assets of the issuer; upon such terms and conditions as it may the case of delinquent mortgages in a (c) Timely payment of principal and deem appropriate, to guarantee the pool backing modified pass-through se­ interest, in accordance with the terms timely payment of principal of and in­ curities, the issuer is required to make of the guaranteed securities; terest on securities which are based on advances if necessary to maintain the (d) Notification to the Association of and backed by a trust or pool composed specified schedule of payments to the an impending default, on the part of of mortgages which are insured by the holders, whether of interest only or of the issuer, in adequate time for the As­ Federal Housing Administration or the interest and principal, or at its option, at sociation to make timely payments on Farmers’ Home Administration, or in­ any time 90 days or more after default the securities; and sured or guaranteed by the Veterans’ Ad­ of any such mortgage, the issuer may re­ (e) Delivery to a designated custodial ministration. The Association’s guaranty purchase such mortgage. Both straight agent satisfactory to the Association of of mortgage-backed securities is backed pass-through and modified pass-through the mortgage notes or other evidences by the full faith and credit of the securities must specify the dates by which of indebtedness secured by the mort­ United States. This part is limited to payments are to be made to the holders gages in the pool and protection of the “pass-through” securities, including (a) thereof, and must indicate the account­ Association’s interest in all assets in the “straight pass-through” and (b) “modi­ ing period for collections on the pool’s pool as collateral for its guaranty. fied pass-through” types, and does not mortgages relating to each such pay­ purport to set forth all the procedures ment, and the securities must also specify § 1665.11 Excess collateral. and requirements that apply to the issu­ a date on which the entire principal to be The issuer shall maintain, for the ance and guaranty of such securities. All collected will have been paid or will be benefit of the Association, excess col­ such transactions are governed by the payable. lateral in assets acceptable to the Asso­ specific terms and provisions of the Asso­ (b) Issue amount. Each issue of guar­ ciation of 3 percent of the amount or ciation’s Mortgage-Backed Securities anteed securities must be in a minimum guaranteed securities outstanding, m Guide and contracts entered into by the face amount of $2 million. The total lieu of such excess collateral the Asso­ parties. Further information may be ob­ face amount of any issue of securities ciation may accept a bond or other as­ tained from the Government National cannot exceed the aggregate unpaid surance of the faithful performance o Mortgage Association, 451 Seventh Street principal balances of the mortgages in the fiduciary responsibilities of tn SW., Washington, D.C. 20414. the pool. issuer.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18031

§ 1665.13 Guaranty. With respect to straight pass-through Title 29— LABOR Title 32— NATIONAL DEFENSE securities, the Association guarantees the Chapter V— Wage and Hour Division, Chapter I— Office of the Secretary of timely payment to the security holder Department of Labor Defense of the proceeds of principal and in­ terest, as collected, as undertaken in PART 683— RETAILING, WHOLESAL­ SUBCHAPTER M— MISCELLANEOUS the Association’s guaranty appearing on ING, AND WAREHOUSING INDUS­ PART 239— HOMEOWNERS ASSIST­ the face of the security. With respect to TRY IN PUERTO RICO modified pass-through securities, the ANCE PROGRAM— APPLICATION Association guarantees the timely pay­ Wage Order PROCESSING ment, whether or not collected, of the Pursuant to sections 5, 6, and 8 of the Appendix A fixed rate of interest on the outstanding Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (52 principal balance, or the fixed rate of Stat. 1062, 1064, as amended; 29 U.S.C. The following agreement, approved by interest on such outstanding balance and the Secretary, Department of Housing 205, 206, 208) and Reorganization Plan and Urban Development and Assistant the specified principal installments, as No. 6 of 1950 (3 CFR 1949-53 Comp., p. undertaken in the Association’s guaranty Secretary of Defense (Installations and 1004), and by means of Administrative Logistics) on behalf of the Secretary of appearing on the face of the security. Order No. 607 (34 F.R. 9346), the Secre­ As to straight pass-through type securi­ Defense, is published as new Appendix tary ^f Labor appointed and convened A: ties, any failure or inability of the issuer Industry Committee No. 87-A for the re­ to make payment as due, to the holders tailing, wholesaling, and warehousing Appendix A— Agreement, Homeowners As­ of the securities, from the proceeds from industry in Puerto Rico, referred to the sistance Program Agreement Between the pool of mortgages which have been Committee the question of the minimum the Department of Defense and the collected, or because of failure to make Department of Housing and Urban wage rate or rates to be paid'Under sec­ Development collections, under reasonable and accept­ tion 6(c) of the Act to employees in the ed standards of mortgage servicing, shall ARTICLE I--- INTRODUCTION constitute a default of the issuer. As to industry, and gave notice of a hearing to be held by the Committee. Section 1. Section 1013 of the Demon­ modified pass-through securities, any stration Cities and Metropolitan Develop­ failure or inability of the issuer to make Subsequent to an investigation and a ment Act of 1966 (Public Law 89-754, en­ fixed or other payments as due shall be hearing conducted pursuant to the no­ acted Nov. 3, 1966) authorizes the Secretary deemed such a defaut. Upon any default tice, the Committee has filed with the of Defense to provide assistance to owners by the issuer and payment under its Administrator of the Wage and Hour of one- or two-family dwellings located at or guaranty by the Association, or any fail­ and Public Contracts Divisions of the near military installations, ordered to be Department of Labor a report contain­ closed in whole or in part subsequent to ure of the issuer to comply with the November 1, 1964, when certain determina­ terms of the guaranty transaction, the ing its findings of fact and recommenda­ tion with respect to the matters referred tions have been made with respect to eligi­ Association may institute a claim against bility. In certain instances this assistance the excess collateral or other assets of to it. may be rendered by acquiring title to the the issuer, or against any assurance in Accordingly, as authorized and re­ properties of such owners under terms and lieu of excess collateral, or may, pursu­ quired by section 8 of the Fair Labor conditions prescribed by the statute. ant to section 306(g) of the National Standards Act of 1938, Reorganization Sec. 2. Section 1013(d) of the Act pro­ Housing Act, extinguish all the owner­ Plan No. 6 of 1950, and 29 CFR 511.18, vides a fund for the purpose of this program, the recommendations of Industry Com­ which has been established as the Home- ship, control, or other interest of the owners Assistance Fund, Defense. Section issuer in the pooled mortgages, by mittee No. 87-A-are hereby published, to 1013(g) authorizes the Secretary of Defense letter directed to the issuer and making be effective November 23, 1969, in this to enter into agreement with the Secretary the mortgages the absolute property of order amending § 683.2 of Title 29, Code of Housing and Urban Development with re­ the Association, subject only to unsatis­ of Federal Regulations. As revised § 683.2 spect to administration of the program. This fied rights therein of the holders of the reads as follows: agreement is executed on behalf of the Sec­ retary of Defense by the Assistant Secretary securities, or the Association may do § 683.2 Wage rates. both. of Defense (Installations and Logistics) pur­ * * * * * suant to delegation of authority contained § 1665.15 Fees. in DoD Directive 5100.54, dated December 29, (b) Retailing 1961 coverage classifica­ 1967 (33 F.R. 2570) and by the Secretary of The Association may impose applica­ tion. (1) The minimum wage for this Housing and Urban Development. tion and guaranty fees, which may vary classification is $1.60 an hour. Sec. 3. For the purposes of this agreement, for straight pass-through and modified * * * * * the following definitions shall apply: pass-through issuances. (a) “Act” means section 1013 of the Dem­ (d) 1966 coverage classification. (1) onstration Cities and Metropolitan Develop­ § 1665.17 Audits and reports. ment Act of 1966, Public Law 89-754, enacted The minimum wage for this classification Novem ber 3, 1966. The Association may at any time audit is $1.15 per hour for the period ending (b) “Secretary of Defense” means the Sec­ the books and examine the records of any January 31, 1969; $1.30 per hour for the retary of Defense or an officer or employee of issuer, mortgage servicer, trustee, or period beginning February 1, 1969, and the Department of Defense empowered to agent or other person bearing on its exercise any of the functions of the Secretary guaranty of mortgage-backed securities, ending January 31, 1970; $1.45 per hour of Defense under the Act. and may require periodic reports from for the period beginning February 1, (c) “DOD” means the Department of such persons. 1970, and ending January 31, 1971; and D efense. (d) “Secretary, HUD” or “HUD” means § 1665.19 Applications. $1.60 per hour thereafter. the Secretary of Housing and Urban DeveT- * * * * * opment or an officer or employee of the De­ -Applications for guaranty should be partment of Housing and Urban Development submitted to the Association’s office lo­ (Secs. 5, 6 , 8 , 52 Stat. 1062, 1064, as amended; 29 U.S.C. 205, 206, 208) empowered to exercise any of the functions of cated at 451 Seventh Street SW., Wash­ the Secretary of Housing and Urban Develop­ ington, D.C. 20414. Signed at Washington, D.C. this 3d ment under the Act. day of November 1969. (e) “Corps” means the Office of the Chief , Effective date. This part shall be effec­ of Engineers, Department of the Army. tive upon publication in the F ederal R obert D. M oran, (f) “Division/District Engineer” means Register. Administrator, Wage and Hour either the Division Engineer of the Corps or the District Engineer of the Corps, as appli­ G eorge R o m n e y , and Public Contracts Divi­ cable under the circumstances, having mili­ Secretary of Housing and sions, United States Depart­ tary jurisdiction in the area in which the Urban Development. ment of Labor. property is located. [P-R. Doc. 69-13306; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; [F.R. Doc. 69-13307; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1960; (g) “FHA” means the Federal Housing 8:49 a.m.] 8:49 a.m.] Administration.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18032 RULES AND REGULATIONS

(h) “Assistant Commissioner-Comptrol­ quired. The FHA insuring office will assign Sec. 8 . In cases where properties are ac­ ler” means the Assistant Commissioner- an FHA identification number to the prop­ quired subject to existing leases, the leases Comptroller of the Federal Housing Adminis­ erty, insert this identification number on must be assigned and transferred to the tration. one copy of Form 1174 and promptly return U n ited States. Su ch leases w ill be delivered (i) “FHA Insuring Office” means the local this copy to the Division/District Engineer. to the FHA Insuring office with FHA Form insuring office of FHA having jurisdiction S ec. 3. Properties acquired pursuant td the 1174. All costs of eviction incurred by HUD/ over the area where the property is located. Act shall be conveyed to, and acquired in the FHA will be reimbursed by the Fund. Except (j) “Fund” means the Homeowners Assist­ name of, the United States. Title to the in cases involving a lease in which the un­ ance Fund, Defense, established pursuant to properties shall be of sufficient quality and expired portion is less than 1 year, no agree­ the authority contained in section 1013(d) standard as to be readily merchantable in ment shall be entered into with owners or of the Act. the locality. Encumbrances that do not affect occupants of properties to be acquired con­ (k) “Acquired property” means property the merchantability of the properties, such cerning their continued occupancy in the acquired pursuant to the Act. as easements for roads and utilities will not property without prior written approval of be required to be cleared from the title. In Article H-—P olicy and Objective th e Director o f th e FHA insuring office and the event HUD/FHA determines that there the tenure of any occupancy will be entirely Section 1. As more fully set forth below, is any encumbrance to title which, under at the option of the FHA insuring office. local custom and legal procedures of the Secretary, HUD will accept custody, subject Sec. 9. The Government will normally be a to funds made available by DOD, of prop­ situs of the property, would preclude or self-insurer of acquired properties and hazard erty acquired pursuant to the Act and main­ diminish HUD/FHA’s ability to dispose of insurance will be cancelled by HUD/FHA as tain, manage, and dispose of such properties the property, it is agreed that HUD/FHA may soon as possible after passing of title. Any on behalf of the Secretary of Defense. In remove the encumbrance and that the costs unearned premium will be the property of the event the Fund no longer has any monies of such removal will be borne by the Fund. the former owner who will be responsible In those instances where a defect in title available, the Secretary, HUD may terminate for claiming same from the insurer. The this Agreement and DOD shall in that is discovered, the Fund will be responsible for the cost of curing said defect. Department of Defense understands that the event assume custody and responsibility for decision as to whether or not hazard insur­ all properties accepted, and mortgage pay­ Sec. 4. As a prerequisite to acquisition of ance m u st be carried is th a t of the mortgagee ment liabilities assumed, by HUD pursuant the property, the Division/District Engineer and H UD/FHA m u st abide by the require­ to this agreement. It is the agreed objective will procure adequate title evidence cov­ ments of the mortgagee. In the event the that acquired properties will be held, man­ ering the property and will have the title mortgagee, pursuant to the terms of the aged and disposed of in such a way as to: evidence continued through the date and mortgage, requires that hazard insurance be (a) Avoid further depression of local real time of recording the deed to the United carried, HUD/FHA w ill ob tain a hazard insur­ estate market conditions in areas where the States. When the opinion of the Attorney ance policy on the property in an amount housing market is depressed, and General approving the title has been re­ sufficient to comply with the mortgage. In (b) Consistent with item (a) above and ceived, the Division/District Engineer will th e event hazard insurance is obtained, with the desirability of disposing of the transmit same by FHA Form 1175,1 Trans­ HUD/FHA will pay for such insurance and properties as rapidly as feasible, seek to mittal of Recorded Deed and Title Assembly, will be reimbursed from the Fund. obtain the best possible financial return to copy attached hereto and made a part hereof, the Fund. During the period properties are together with the recorded deed and other ARTICLE IV--- MAINTENANCE, MANAGEMENT AND held by FHA, and when it is feasible and muniments of title, to the FHA Assistant DISPOSAL Commissioner-Comptroller at his offices in in the best interest of the Government, con­ Section 1. To the extent not inconsistent Washington, D.C. sistent with HUD/FHA policy as to Secre­ w ith th e provisions of th is Agreement, tary, HUD-owned property in the areas Sec. 5. Where title to a property is acquired H UD/FH A w ill m aintain , m anage, renovate, acquired in the course of FHA mortgage in­ subject to the existing mortgage, the Govern­ rent, sell, and dispose of the acquired prop­ ment will assume and agree to pay said mort­ surance operations, properties will be rented erties in the same manner and under the gage in accordance with the terms of the to third parties at rates generally obtainable sam e procedures as are used by HUD/FHA mortgage. The mortgage will not be prepaid for comparable properties in the area. for properties acquired pursuant to FHA in­ unless HUD/FHA determines that prepay­ S ec. 2. The Secretary of Defense and the surance contracts. HUD/FHA will give neither ment is mandatory to enable HUD/FHA to Secretary, HUD will expedite action in all advantage nor disadvantage insofar as sale offices and at all levels of their organizations effectively manage and dispose erf the property. or other activity is concerned to properties relative to matters that are the subject of acquired pu rsu an t to th is Agreement. Sec. 6 . Any mortgage, other than a first this agreement, and each will use all avail­ HUD/FHA will treat such properties in the able means to assure that the purposes of mortgage, which is assumed by the Govern­ ment pursuant to the Act, will be paid off same manner as properties acquired pursu­ the Act are accomplished in accordance a n t to FHA insurance contracts. HUD/FHA with the spirit and intent of the Act. as a part of the closing of the purchase transaction. All mortgage arrears existing is hereby authorized to repair, renovate, re­ Article III—Acquisition and Assumption with respect to the first mortgage will be store, or take any protective maintenance op Custody brought current at the time of the property deemed necessary by HUD/FHA insofar as Section 1. As to properties acquired by acquisition. If HUD/FHA ascertains that any property covered by this Agreement is the Corps under this Act, acquisition will be mortgage arrears have not been brought cur­ concerned. The terms of rental, sale for cash accomplished by the Division/District En­ rent, HUD/FHA is authorized to make the or credit or by assumption of the existing gineer, who will negotiate with the owner necessary payment to restore the mortgage mortgage, or by other means of disposal of as to terms, will effect the closing, and will account to a current condition and the Fund any property covered by th is Agreement pay to the property owner such sums as may will bear the costs of same. w hich is contracted for or otherwise entered be due to him. The Division/District En­ Sec. 7. Possession of acquired properties into by FHA shall be final. gineer will obtain a merchantable title to the will normally be obtained at the time title is Sec. 2. While any acquired property is un­ property which meets the, title requirements vested in the United States and at the time der HUD/FHA’s custody, payments in lieu of of the Attorney General of the United States. FHA Form 1174 is forwarded to HUD/FHA. taxes will be made by the FHA Assistant Sec. 2. HUD/FHA, on behalf of the Fund, Properties will be delivered vacant to FHA, Commissioner-Comptroller to local taxing will assume custody of properties acquired except in the following circumstances: authorities in ahiounts equivalent to the taxes which would be payable were the as of the date that title in the property vests (a) HUD/FHA will accept custody of a in the United States, for the purpose of property occupied under a lease which can­ properties in private hands, except when holding, managing, renovating, renting, and not be terminated and has an unexpired por­ the Government is making expenditures for disposing of said properties. The District/ tion of less than 1 year provided all payments streets, utilities or other public services. In Division Engineer will file the deed for record due under the lease are current, and pro­ such cases, the Division/District Engineer promptly upon title vesting in the United vided, further, that the leasee will waive any will advise the FHA Assistant Commissioner- States, and on the same date will notify the right to exclusive extension of the lease, other Comptroller of such expenditures and spec­ FHA insuring office of the acquisition, using than month-to-month occupancy. ify what allowances are to be deducted. It FHA Form 1174,1 Notice of Military Acquisi­ shall be the responsibility of the Divi­ (b) Owners or tenants, on a month-to- tion, copy attached hereto and made a part sion/District Engineer to advise the FHA As­ hereof, and will on the same date forward month basis, of acquired properties may be sistant Commissioner-Comptroller in such the keys to the property and any other data permitted a 30-day period following acquisi­ cases sufficiently prior to the time that the concerning the property which is requested tion of title in the name of the United A ssistan t Com missioner-Com ptroller makes States to vacate the property. by FHA to the FHA insuring office. The payment of any tax bill received hy F» original and two copies of FHA Form 1174, (c) Upon agreement with the Director of on acquired properties. In the event tha completely executed, will be forwarded to the the FHA Insuring office, HUD/FHA will ac­ such notice is not received from the Div - FHA insuring office for each property ac- cept custody of properties occupied under sion/District Engineer by such time, the As­ leases in excess of a year’s duration. sistant Commissioner-Comptroller may P®y the amount of the net tax bill withou 1 Filed as part of original. 1 F iled as part of original. penalties.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18033

(a) Monthly, no later than 30 working Sec. 3. This agreement contemplates" that this Agreement requires any adjustment, disposal of the properties will be accom­ together with an estimate and explanation days after the end of each calendar month plished by the financing arrangements avail­ of the changes needed so as to permit the the FHA Form 1131, “Acquired Home Prop­ able to HUD/FHA and beneficial to DOD. The continued effective operation of the program erty, Maintenance Phase Trial Balance,” following financial arrangements will gen­ as contemplated under this agreement. The showing separate totals to date for items (c) through (1) of Article V, section 2, for each erally be used and FHA will be guided by the Corps of Engineers will arrange to provide same considerations that govern FHA sales for the necessary adjustment within its au­ FHA identification number. of its properties: thority. Where this is infeasible the Corps (b) Monthly, no later than 30 working 1. Sale of the property for cash or through of Engineers will submit the requirement days after the end of each calendar month the use of a conventional uninsured promptly to the Secretary of Defense. The a statement supporting an SF 1080 billing mortgage. Secretary of Defense will either provide the setting forth the following: 2. Sale of the property providing for as­ additional resources required or will directly (1) Net change in FHA expenses for ac­ sumption of the existing mortgage indebt­ advise FHA as to the course of action nec­ quired properties as reported on the current edness by th e buyer or sale o f th e prop­ essary to be taken pending the availability and prior month, Article V, section 3, item erty subject to th e existin g m ortgage of additional resources. (a) reports, separately for “on hand” and indebtedness. Sec. 2. The FHA will maintain in its auto­ for “sold” properties. 3. Sale of the property by use of FHA’s mated tape records an account for each ac­ (2) Sales proceeds, which will be detailed insured private financing program or FHA’s quired property. The account will separately by the gross sales price agreed to by FHA instant FNMA closing program if available. identify each of the following :<• less amount of mortgages assumed by buyers 4. Sale of the property by use of a pur­ (a) The FHA identification number, which less purchase money mortgages accepted by chase money m ortgage taken by th e Secre­ will be assigned by the FHA insuring office. FHA. tary, Departm ent o f H ousing and Urban D e­ The Corps will be advised of the FHA iden­ (3) Principal and interest collections sep­ velopment. In those cases where an existing tification number on the copy of the FHA arately on purchase money mortgages. Form 1174 returned tp the Corps per Article mortgage is assumed and the assumptor sub­ (4) FHA insuring office expenses directly III, section 2. sequently defaults, the Fund will be respon­ related to this agreement, developed on basis (b) Property address, entered by the Corps sible for all costs, expenses or losses su stain ed of reports received in accordance With FHA on the FHA Form 1174 within the space al­ by HUD/FHA in satisfying the Government’s Manual, Field Expense and Performance lotted in ADP records. liability on the mortgage. In the event it is Handbook, as may be amended from time to (c) Outstanding mortgage balance at advantageous to the Government to sell by time. This item will be supported by a sched­ acquisition. assumption and the sales price is less than ule showing total expenses incurred by each (d) Property acquired. Contra to (c) the outstanding mortgage balance, the Fund FHA insuring office. above, this will be established in the same shall be responsible for the money which is (5) FHA Headquarters expenses directly required to reduce th e ou tstand in g principal amount and will offset the outstanding mort­ gage balance. In the event a property is related to this agreement developed on basis balance of the mortgage. When, in order to sold with the purchaser assuming the mort­ of reports received in accordance with FHA facilitate the sale of acquired properties, FHA gage or with FHA taking a purchase money Manual, Departmental Expenses and Per­ insures the mortgage, the Fund will be re­ mortgage the outstanding balance assumed formance Handbook, as may be amended sponsible for all expenses incurred by FHA on by the purchaser or the amount of the pur­ from time to time. the first sale, including losses in connection chase money mortgage accepted will be re­ (6 ) HUD departmental level expenses di­ therewith, as computed by the FHA Assist­ rectly related to this program which will in­ ant Commissioner-Comptroller. corded as a reduction of the amount orig­ inally established. clude Automatic Data Processing (ADP) Article V—F inancing, Accounting, and (e) Principal payments including prepay­ services, printing and some other minor ex­ Reporting ments of the entire balance when necessary penses, which in the judgment of FHA are by FHA on the mortgage. appropriately chargeable under this Agree­ Section 1. The Corps w ill furnish to (f) Interest payments by FHA on the ment. ADP services will include the cost of HUD/FHA by June 1 of each year an esti­ m ortgage. magnetic tapes furnished the Corps under mate of th e num ber of h ou sin g u n its ex­ (g) Payments in lieu of taxes and insur­ Article V, section 3, item (c) and Article V, pected to be acquired and transferred to ance payments by FHA. The Corps will notify section 4, and personal service costs. HUD/FHA during the succeeding fiscal year FHA on the FHA Form 1174 of Escrow Ac­ Personal service costs included in items and those during the following budget year. counts retained by the mortgagee. (4), (5), and (6 ) will be limited to those The estimates will show the number of hous­ (h) Maintenance and operating expenses directly related to this program on the basis ing units, FHA in su rin g office jurisdiction, es­ paid by FHA including any special payments of time worked and, will consist of salary timated average monthly principal and in­ for evictions and removal of title impedi­ cost plus FICA and the Government contri­ terest paym ents and expected quarterly ments. Direct expense transactions of $100 or bution for health benefits, life insurance, phasing of transfer to FHA. more will be a direct charge to the affected and retirement funds. An additional 15.9 On August 1 of each year HUD/FHA will property account. All other expenses, gen­ percent of this total will be added to cover submit a budget estimate to the Corps set­ erally derived from net settlements with the cost of earned annual leave, sick leave ting forth the estimated financial require­ brokers, made pursuant to FHA 2570 Ac­ taken, and holiday leave. ments for the activities that FHA is to per­ counting Manual for Acquired Properties, as (7) Amount due FHA from the Fund or form for the Secretary of Defense pursuant may be amended from time to time, will be amount due the Fund from FHA. to the terms of this agreement covering the prorated monthly to all home properties in (c) Quarterly, not later than 30 Working then current fiscal year and the following FHA’s inventory, including those acquired days after the end of each calendar quarter budget year. The estimate, in terms of obli- pursuant to this agreement. Net settlement a duplicate of the FHA automated tape rec­ gations/expenditures, should be by FHA in­ means expenses paid by brokers less rental ord for all acquired properties. suring office jurisd iction and in th e sam e collections. cost categories as m aintain ed in th e au to­ (i) Sales expenses paid by FHA which will Sec. 4. Whenever FHA determines that they matic tape record as set forth in Article V, be for sales, closing costs, and discount on do not plan to offer properties for sale within section 2 , for each acquired property and as n otes.. 12 months after acquisition, the FHA will so advise the Secretary of Defense, with the ex­ included in the monthly reimbursement re­ (j) Net FHA incurred expense, which will quest set forth in Article V, section 3, for all pected prospects for such disposition. The be the net total of amounts recorded in items Secretary of Defense will consult with the other expenses. On May 1 of each year FHA (e) through (j) of this section. will furnish to the Corps in the same format FHA on alternative means of disposal in (k) Gross Sales Price agreed to by FHA. as the August 1 statement an updated esti­ such cases where such alternatives are con­ This is not the same as cash proceeds which sidered feasible. mate of obligations/expenditures then esti­ will be reported separately by FHA. mated to be incurred in the succeeding fiscal Sec. 5. FHA will not drop closed cases for year. (l) Net Expense or Collection on Sold properties acquired pursuant to the Act from Based on the estimated financial require­ Properties, which will be the gross sales price the automated tape records except by special ments, in consonance w ith budgetary and less adjustments to item (d) of this section agreement with the Corps, at which time a appropriation actions, the Corps will issue less item (j) of this section. duplicate of FHA’s automated tape record of to FHA on July 1 of each year a reimbursable (m) A Corps’ furnished base identification such cases will be furnished to the Corps. crder including an obligation/expenditure and homeowner classification code consisting Sec. 6 . It is agreed and understood that, in imitation as to the amount which the FHA of 7 digits (2 digits for State code and 4 digits performing the accounting and reporting may, on a net basis, obligate/expend in antic­ for installation number plus the number operations set out herein, FHA will accom­ ipation of reimbursement from the Fund “2 ” for civilian or the number “1” for mili­ plish the objectives using its existing auto­ or that fiscal year. FHA will promptly ad- tary homeowner). mated data processing routines and programs, ise the Corps whenever it determines that Sec. 3. FHA will furnish to the Corps the and that no special programming or detailed be performance of its responsibility under following reports: printouts will be required from FHA.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY,' NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18034 RULES AND REGULATIONS

Sec. 7. The Corps, within 6 working days after receipt of a monthly statement indi­ 4. Section 8.1003 is revised to read as cating an amount due FHA, will reimburse Title 33— NAVIGATION AND follows: PHA by check for the amount shown on the statement. The check will be made payable NAVIGABLE WATERS § 8.1003 Definitions. to the Federal Housing Administration and (a) “Active service” means service on will be forwarded to the FHA Assistant Com­ Chapter I— Coast Guard, Department active duty. missioner-Comptroller. of Transportation (b) “Active duty” means full-time Sec. 8 . In those instances where the state­ SUBCHAPTER A— GENERAL duty in the active military service of the ment indicates an amount due the Fund, a United States. It includes duty on the check payable to the Homeowners Assistance [CGFR 69-80] Fund, Defense, for such amount will accom­ active list, full-time training duty, an­ pany the monthly statement submitted to PART 8— REGULATIONS, UNITED nual training duty, and attendance while the Corps by FHA. STATES COAST GUARD RESERVE in the active military service, at a school Sec. 9. The following FHA issuances and designated as a service school by law or changes thereto will be furnished to the Miscellaneous Amendments by the Secretary. Corps : (c) “Federal service” includes all serv­ (a) FHA 2750, Accounting Manual for A c­ The purpose of this document is to ice as a member of any Armed Force, in­ quired. Properties; delete certain obsolete regulations in 33 cluding Regular and Reserve components, (b) FHA Manual, Field Expense and Per­ CFR Part 8 applicable to members of and the Army National Guard or Air formance Handbook; the U.S. Coast Guard Reserve and to National Guard when ordered ihto such (c) FHA Manual, Departmental Expense show the assignment of functions to the status by law. and Performance Handbook. U.S. Coast Guard in the Department of (d) “Active status” means member­ Sec. 10. FHA will maintain a separate docu­ Transportation, including deletions of ship in the Reserve, except the Standby ment file for each acquired property. The file references to Secretary of the Treasury Reserve (Inactive Status List) or the will contain at least the FHA Form 1174 and and the Treasury Department from the Retired Reserve. FHA Form 1175 and attachments thereto. existing regulations and substitution of (e) “Chief, Office of Reserve” is the Article VI—F inality o r Action the Secretary of Transportation and the officer of flag rank designated by the Department of Transportation therefor. Secretary as directly responsible to the Section 1. This agreement embodies the The amendments to 33 CFR Part 8 full understanding of the Department of De­ Commandant for Coast Guard Reserve fense and the Department of Housing and prescribed herein are considered to be affairs. Urban Development concerning their respon­ revisions to delete various provisions (f) “District Commander(r) ” is the sibilities and it is understood that all deci­ which are now obsolete or of an editorial officer on the staff of a District Com­ sions made and all actions taken by HUD/ nature and it is hereby found that com­ mander who is in charge of district Re­ FHA within the terms of this agreement with pliance with the Administrative Pro­ serve affairs as Chief, Reserve Division. respect to all aspects of clearing impedi­ cedure Act (5 U.S.C. 551—559) (respecting m en ts o f title, prepaym ent o f m ortgages, evic­ notice of proposed rule making, public § 8.1004 [Deleted] tion of occupants, prepayment of hazard in­ rule-making procedure thereon, and 5. Section 8.1004 is deleted. surance coverage premiums, and all other effective date requirements thereof) is matters relating to the maintenance, man­ § 8.1105 [Amended] agement, renovation, rental, sale, or other unnecessary to such changes. disposal of properties and the selection and By virtue of the authority vested in 6. The word “rating” in line 2 of use of brokers shall be final and conclusive me as Commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, § 8.1105 is corrected to the plural as fully as if made or taken by the Secretary by section 632 of title 14, United States “ratings”. of Defense. Code, and the delegation of authority in § 8.1202 [Amended] Article VII-—Delegation op Authority 49 CFR 1.4 (ar)(2), (f), and (g) to promulgate regulations in accordance 7. Section 8.1202(b) is amended by Section 1. The Secretary of Housing and with the laws cited with the regulations substituting the words “the Comman­ Urban Development is hereby authorized, dant” for “Headquarters” and “District with respect to acquired properties, to acquire below, the following amendments are title to, hold, manage, sell for cash or credit prescribed: Commander” for “district commander” by taking a purchase money mortgage in the 1. The authority citation following the therein. name of the Secretary of Housing and Urban table of sections of Part 8 is revised to § 8.1203 [Amended] Development, and, in connection therewith, read as follows: to execute deeds of conveyance and all other 8. Section 8.1203 is amended by substi­ instruments necessary to fulfill the purposes Authority: The provisions of this Part 8 tuting the words “the Commandant” for of section 1013 of the Demonstration Cities issued under sec. 4, 62 Stat. 605, as amended; “Headquarters” in the first sentence. and Metropolitan Development Act of 1966 sec. 633, 63 Stat. 545; sec. 280, 70A Stat. 14; (Public Law 89-754, enacted Nov. 3, 1966), to sec. 6 (b) (1), 80 Stat. 938; 50 U.S.C. app. 454; § 8.1204 [Amended] issue rules and regulations and to make any 14 U.S.C. 633; 10 U.S.C. 280; 49 U.S.C. 1655 ( b ) ( 1 ); 49 U.S.C. 1.4 (a)(2), (f), (g). 9. Section 8.1204 is amended by chang­ or all determinations and to take any or all ing “Coast Guard Headquarters” to read further actions in connection with acquired G eneral—A dministration and O rgani­ “the Chief, Office of Reserve” in the properties which the Secretary of Defense is' zation heading; remove the word “Headquar­ authorized to undertake pursuant to the provisions of the Act. The Secretary of Hous­ DEFINITIONS AND APPLICABILITY OF REGULA­ ters” in line 1 of paragraph (a) and in­ supervision ing and Urban Development is further au­ TIONS sert the words: “Under the. thorized to redelegate any of the functions, and direction of the Commandant, the powers and dut4*s delegated herein to officers § 8.1001 [Amended] flag officer serving as the Chief, Office and employees of HUD and to authorize suc­ 2. Section 8.1001 is am ended by of Reserve”; and in line 6 of paragraph cessive redelegations. changing the words “Treasury Depart­ (a) remove the word “Headquarters” and of Approved: Ju n e 18, 1968. ment” in lines 5 and 6 of paragraph (a) insert the words “the Chief, Office and in line 4 of paragraph (b) to read Reserve”. T homas D. Morris, Assistant Secretary of Defense (In ­ “Department of Transportation”. § 8.1504 [Amended] stallations and Logistics), Depart­ 3. Section 8.1002 is revised to read as 10. Section 8.1504 (a) and (b) is m e n t o f D efense. follows: amended by changing the word ^‘Head­ R obert C. Weaver, § 8.1002 Meaning o f terms ‘‘Secretary o f quarters” in both paragraphs to read Secretary, Department of Housing Transportation” and “Secretary”. “the Commandant”. and Urban Development. As used in this part, the terms “Secre­ § 8.1507 [Deleted] tary of Transportation” and “Secretary” aurice o c h e 11. Section 8.1507 is deleted. M W. R , mean the Secretary of Transportation Director, Correspondence and when the Coast Guard is operating as a § 8.1508 [Amended] Directives Division, OASD service in the Department of Transporta­ 12. Section 8.1508 (a) and jb> ^ A Administration). tion and the Secretary of the Navy when amended by changing the word “Heaa- [F.R. Doc. 69-13127; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; the Coast Guard is operating as a service quarters” in both paragraphs to rea 8:49 a.m.] in the Navy. “the Commandant”.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18035 § 8.1604 [Deleted] T r a n sfe r s Title 46— SHIPPING 13. Section 8.1604 is deleted. TRANSFERS BETWEEN SHIPS AND STATIONS Chapter II— Maritime Administration, § 8.4202 [Amended] A v ia tio n Department of Commerce § 8.1612 [Amended] 23. Section 8.4202 is amended by changing the word “Headquarters” to SUBCHAPTER C— REGULATIONS AFFECTING 14. Section 8.1612 is amended by read “the Commandant” in the last line. SUBSIDIZED VESSELS AND OPERATORS changing “reservists” to read “Reserv­ [General Order 20, Arndt. 6 ] ists” in the first line thereof. I n st r u c t io n and T r a in in g PART 272— POLICY AND PROCEDURE § 8.1612c [Amended] INSTRUCTION AND TRAINING POLICY AND AS­ REGA RD IN G CONDUCTING OF 15. Section 8.1612c is amended by SIGNMENT OF INSTRUCTORS FOR COAST Pi)Pinging “reservist” to read “Reservist” GUARD RESERVE SUBSIDY CONDITION SURVEYS AND ACCOMPLISHMENT OF SUBSIDIZED in line 4 thereof. § 8.5102 [Amended] VESSEL MAINTENANCE AND § 8.1613 [Amended] 24. Section 8.5102 is amended by REPAIRS 16. In § 8.1613, paragraph (a) is amending the heading to read “Respon­ amended by changing the word “Head­ sibility for Instruction and Training” Modifications, Alterations, Additions quarters” in line 14 to read “the and by changing the word “Headquar­ and Betterments Commandant”. ters” in line 1 of paragraph (a) to read “The Commandant” and changing the Effective upon the date of publication P ro curem ent word “Headquarters” in line 3 of § 8.5102 in the F ederal R eg ister, Part 272 is hereby amended by revising § 272.9 to GENERAL REQUIREMENTS (b) and line 4 of § 8.5102(c) to read “the Commandant”. read as follows: § 8.2103 [Amended] § 272.9 Modifications, alterations, addi­ 17. Section 8.2103(b) is amended by COMMANDING OFFICERS OF VESSELS AND tions and betterments. UNITS TO WHICH RESERVISTS REPORT FOR changing the word “Headquarters” to TRAINING DUTY: RESERVE INSTRUCTORS (a) Any modification, alteration, ad­ read “the Commandant” at the begin­ dition, or betterment (work of such na­ ning of the second sentence and by § 8.5401 [Amended] ture being herein called “improve­ changing the word “indorsement” to read ments”) effected during any one or a “endorsement” in the last line; para­ 25. Section 8.5401 is amended by series of repair periods, whether or not graph (d)(2) is amended by removing amending paragraph (a) by changing in conjunction with other repairs, the the words “on Form 2525-B” in line 3 and the word “Reservist” in line (5) to read aggregate cost of which does not exceed changing the word “Headquarters” to “Reservists”. $100,000, if otherwise eligible, shall be read “the Commandant (PTP)” in the § 8.5402 [Amended] considered for operating-differential last line; paragraph (g) (1) is amended subsidy participation, provided that the by changing the word “Reserves” to “Re­ 26. Section 8.5402(a) is amended by vessel is not permanently withdrawn serve” in line 4; and paragraph (h) is changing the word “Headquarters” in from the subsidy contract (except under amended by changing the word “Head­ lines (4) and (11) to read “the Com­ circumstances beyond the control of the quarters” to read “the Commandant” in mandant”. operator) within a period of 3 years af­ linel. .■'i ter completion of the work. § 8.2105 [Amended] INSTRUCTIONS AND TRAINING OF RESERVE (b) Any improvement effected during any one or series of repair periods in­ 18. Section 8.2105(b) is amended by § 8.5502 [Amended] volving an aggregate cost in excess of changing the word “Headquarters” to 27. Section 8.5502(a), (b), and (c) are $106,000 shall ordinarily be considered read “the Commandant” in lines 3 and amended by changing the word “Head­ capital expenditures; however, subject to 4; and paragraph (b) (3) is amended by quarters” to the words “the Comman­ findings in each instance that the work changing the word “Headquarters” to dant”. involved constitutes reconditioning or read “the Commandant” in line 4. reconstruction, expenditures of this na­ D is c ip l in e , D isch arg es, R esignations SPECIAL ENLISTMENT PROGRAMS ture in excess of $100,000 will be given and R e tir e m e n t s consideration for construction-differen­ § 8.2403 [Amended] tial subsidy, if application is made to the DISCHARGES 19. Section 8.2403(b) is amended by Assistant Administrator for Maritime changing the words “Secretary of the § 8.6201 [Amended] Aids for such subsidy under the provi­ Treasury” in lines 3 and 4 to read “Sec­ sions of Title V, Merchant Marine Act, retary of Transportation”. 28. Section 8.6201 is amended by delet­ 1936, as amended, and the Maritime Sub­ ing the words “of the Treasury” in para­ sidy Board grants such subsidy prior to P rom o tio n graph (a). the award of such work. PROMOTION OF “COMMISSIONED” OFFICERS (c) When the operator desires to § 8.6205 [Amended] spread the work incident to any improve­ § 8.3103 [Amended] 29. Section 8.6205 is amended by de­ ment over more than one repair period, 20. Section 8.3103 is amended by he shall notify the Chief, Division of Ship changing the words “6 or more” to read leting the words “of the Treasury” in Repair and Maintenance in writing, as “not less than 5” in line 2. paragraph (c )(1). to the scope of work involved, expected benefits, number of voyages over which § 8.3108 [Amended] Effective date. This revision shall be­ come effective on the date of its publica­ the work will be spread and the esti­ 21. Section 8.3108 is amended by mated total cost, and shall report the tion in the F ederal R eg ister . changing the words “district command- actual total cost of such work in the cr” to read “District Commander” in Dated: November 3,1969. Repair Summary, covering the repair pe­ lines 2, 6, and 10 of paragraph (b). riod in which it is finally completed, and W. J. S m it h , §8.3113 [Amended] Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard, shall attach a copy of the acknowledge­ Commandant. ment of the above mentioned notification 22. Section 8.3113 is amended by changing the words “of this subpart” to [F.R. Doc. 69-13261; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; to the appropriate Summary (Form read "in this part” in line 1. 8:45 a.m .] MA-140).

_ f e d e r a l REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 No. 215------6 1803$ RULES AND REGULATIONS

(d) The provisions of this section shall conclusions concerning UHF impact and that either there will be an air hazard not be applicable to improvements re­ available existing service to the area pro­ problem or the Commission will be under quired to alter, outfit, or otherwise equip posed to be served under the Soillcom pressure to waive the mileage separation a vessel for its intended subsidized serv­ proposal. Soillcom specified a tower rules. ice which in the opinion of the Adminis­ height of approximately 990 feet in its 5. The other six commenting parties tration should have been effected prior petition for rule making. In the sup­ oppose the Channel 13 assignment largely to the initial entry of the vessel into sub­ plementary engineering statement sub­ because of asserted impact on UHF, in sidized service. Such improvements shall mitted with its reply comments, overlap the Springfield-Decatur area of Central not be subsidizable, except in accordance was computed based on a tower height Illinois and the St. Louis area. Evans with section 501(c), Merchant Marine of 800 feet, as well as assuming the Broadcasting Co., permittee of Channel Act, 1936, as amended. earlier height. 30 (KDNL-TV), St. Louis, Mo., and Con­ (e) The procurement cost of furniture, 3. The chief and fundamental question tinental Summit Television Oorp., per­ furnishings, fixtures or any other item facing the Commission is whether this mittee of Channel 24 (KGSL-TV), St. in the category of expendable or portable VHF assignment—which admittedly Louis, Mo., filed comments stating that equipment utilized in connection with would provide a first Grade B signal to the Soillcom engineering studies con­ alterations or additions to a vessel is not substantial “white area”, a first Grade A cerning UHF-VHF overlap were based eligible for subsidy participation at the signal to a larger area, and a first local on their prior facilities, and that both maintenance and repair rate. ^television service to Mount Vernon—can now have substantially greater author­ (f) Any contract or work order in­ be made consistently with the Commis­ ized coverage. Thus, they claim that they volving an improvement, the aggregate sion’s policy of fostering UHF develop­ overlap areas as computed by Soillcom cost of which is in excess of $10,000, shall ment. and referred to in the notice herein are be supported in its respective repair sum­ 4. Eleven parties besides the petitioner substantially understated, and they con­ mary with an explanation by the opera­ (whose initial comments simply incorpo­ clude that the assignment of Channel 13 tor as to the reason for or purpose of, rated its petition by reference)* 'filed to Mount Vernon would have a substan­ such improvements, and anticipated initial comments in the proceeding, two tial impact on the operation of these St. benefits.. of them joining in an opposition. Three Louis UHF stations. KGSL-TV further parties—Association of Maximum Serv­ contends that the Mount Vernon area is Dated: November 4,1969. ice Telecasters, Inc. (AMST), Mid-Amer­ not underserved as alleged by Soillcom, By order of the Acting Maritime Ad­ ican Television Co. (KRCG-TV, Channel and that the area generally is not de­ ministrator. 13, Jefferson City, Mo.) and RKO Gen­ pressed economically, even though the J ohn M. O’Connell, eral, Inc. (WHBQ-TV, Channel 13, immediate Mount Vernon area may be Assistant Secretary. Memphis, Term.)—did not oppose the somewhat so. KGSL-TV further suggests [P.R. Doc. 69-13323; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; proposed assignment as such but ex­ that the Mount Vernon area should ex­ 8:49 ajn .] pressed views relating to the extremely amine the possibility of securing a low- close separation between Channel 13 at power community station in the Channel Mount Vernon as proposed by Soillcom 70-83 range. The main thrust of the and three cochannel stations (at Jeffer­ comments of KDNL-TV and KGSL-TV Title 47— TELECOMMUNICATION son City, Bowling Green (Ky.), and In­ is that the proposed assignment would dianapolis (Ind.)) and a possible offset have an adverse effect on UHF develop­ Chapter I— Federal Communications problem with a fourth at Memphis some ment in a UHF area. Commission 250 miles away (WHBQ-TV).2 Because 6. WAND (Channel 17), Decatur, III, [Docket No. 18453; FCC 69-1209] of the 250-mile distance between the pro­ filed comments in which it is stated that posed site and WHBQ-TV, WHBQ-TV the assignment would affect WAND be­ pa rt 73— RADIO BROADCAST requests that any construction permit be cause it would put a second VHF station SERVICES . made on condition that “very precise” into this UHF area. WAND states that frequency control equipment be specified; it would not oppose the issuance of a VHF Television Broadcast Channel; and WHBQ-TV states that it will also construction permit if the operation Mount Vernon, III. install such equipment to eliminate as would be directionalized away from the Report and order. In the matter of much interference as possible. KRCG- semi-UHF enclave in Illinois, or the au­ amendment of § 73.606(b) of the Com­ TV requests also that because of the thorization of a low-power community mission’s rules and regulations to add a limited area in which the assignment station to the Mount Vernon area. The VHP television broadcast channel to can be made consistent with our rules, All-Channel Television Society (ACTS) Mount Vernon, 111.; Docket No. 18453, any construction permit that is issued contends that the assignment would RM-1372. be in full compliance with all the Com­ have an adverse effect on UHF in the 1. Based on a petition of Soillcom, Inc., mission’s rules. MST simply requests that area and be contrary to the all-channel the Commission, on February 14, 1969, any construction permit be in compliance law and policies,” especially in view of issued a notice of proposed rule making with all the Commission’s rules. The the increased coverage of KDNL-TV, St. requesting comments on a proposal to State of Illinois and the Salem Airport Louis. assign VHP television Channel 13 to Authority filed comments not opposing 7. The most detailed comments were Mount Vernon, 111., FCC 69-147, 34 P.R. the assignment of Channel 13 as such but filed jointly by Plains Television Corp. objecting to the proposed site (about the (licensee of WICS, Channel 20, Spring- 2359. Following numerous extensions, all field, 111., and WICD, Channel 15, Cham­ comments were filed by June 17, 1969. only location where the station could be located and meet mileage separations) on paign, HI.) and Tumer-Farrar Associa­ Mount Vernon has no present TV as­ tion (licensee of WSIL-TV, Channel 3, signment, nor is there any commercial air hazard grounds^ since it would be some 6 miles due north of the Salem air­ Harrisburg, 111.). The joint comments assignment or station within about 50 rest on three premises: (1) Assignment miles.1 port. These objections were based on the original 990-foot proposal. The two reply of Channel 13 to Mount Vernon would 2. The comments filed in the proceed­ have a significant adverse effect on "Hi ing were lengthy and set forth different comments filed other than those of peti­ tioner (submitted by Mid-America and stations in the area; (2) the Mount Ver­ by the parties filing jointly mentioned non area does not have a sufficient eco­ 1 The closest commercial station is WSIL- below) relate to this matter, alleging nomic base to support a television sta­ TV, Harrisburg (VHF), some 50 miles south tion; and (3) there is ample television of Mount Vernon. VHF educational Station service to the area. WSIU, Carbondale, is some 25 miles from the 2 It appears that in order to meet the mini­ 8. The reply comments of Soillcom, city. The location actually proposed for mum 170-mile separation to the three sta­ Channel 13 use, some 30 miles north of tions mentioned (573.610(b) of the rules), Inc., include amended engineering data, Mount Vernon near Salem, is more than 70 the proposed station would have to be lo­ additional economic data and an afflda miles from any commercial station or assign­ cated in a very smaU area, a triangle with from an airspace consultant. Also su " ment, and about 45 miles from WSIU. sides of between 1 and 2 m iles. mitted is a lengthy petition, requesting

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18037 the assignment of Channel 13 to the area, propriate to consider these stations to­ much less;3 there would be none with from residents in the proposed service gether, as Soillcom does in its reply). It the Paducah UHF station. area. The amended engineering data is appears that as to KDNL-TV (operat­ 12. Soillcom makes two general lines based on a tower height of 800 feet, ing) , the B-to-B overlap area would in­ of argument to deprecate the extent of rather than the 990 feet altitude speci­ clude 3,510 square miles and 481,620 per­ this potential impact: (i) All but a very fied in the petition for rule making. Soill- sons if Channel 13 were operated with a small portion of the areas of overlap com therefore presents new overlap 990-foot tower or 3,210 square miles and which it would have with those stations figures which it contends reduces the im­ 220,106 persons if an 800-foot tower were already receives one or more VHF sig­ pact on UHF operations. The UHF im­ used; the A-to-A overlap area would in­ nals, so that it would not be intruding pact and air hazard matters are discussed clude 540 square miles and 26,240 persons into “UHF-only” areas; (2) in terms of below. Soillcom also reiterates its con­ or 365 square miles and 21,840 persons a technically comparable or superior tentions that the areals inimical to a on the same assumptions. The Grade B signal, the “overlap” population of the successful UHF operation in Mount Ver­ overlap would represent 31.5 percent or St. Louis stations is much smaller than non and again contends that the assign­ 28 percent of the KDNL-TV Grade B the above figures would indicate, since ment of VHF Channel 13 is the only coverage area and 20.3 percent or 9.3 the bulk of the “overlap” population is feasible assignment to the area because of percent of the population therein, which within the Grade A contours of the UHF the low ratio of all-channel receivers to is more than 2,370,000 persons. The stations and only within the Grade B total receivers. It is stated that petitioner Grade A overlap would be 540 square contour of Channel 13. In support of the will file an application for a construc­ miles and 26,420 persons or 365 square first contention, it is pointed out that tion permit for Channel 13 if the chan­ miles and 21,840 persons, which is 9.2 all of the Grade B coverage areas of the nel is assigned to Mount Vernon, as or 6.2 percent of the area and 1.2 or St. Louis stations receive Grade B signals proposed. 1.0 percent of the population within the from St. Louis VHP stations (three net­ 9. Impact on UHF. As pointed out in KDNL-TV Grade A contour. The work, a commercial independent and an the notice herein' (pars. 8-9), neither amounts of area and population are educational station).* It is shown that Mount Vernon itself nor the proposed slightly less in the case of KGSL, al­ in the case of WICS-WICD, Channel 13 transmitter site is within the Grade B though the Grade B area percentage would provide a Grade B signal to only contour of any UHF station; the closest would be slightly higher (32.1 percent). 257 or 222 square miles, containing 8,493 such stations are at St. Louis, some 70 The two St. Louis stations also showed or 7,068 persons, which now receives no miles away. However, within slightly the overlap between the principal-city VHF signals (the remainder receives sig­ more than 100 miles there are seven contour of Channel 13 (with a 990-foot nals from VHF stations at Champaign, operating commercial UHF stations (at antenna) and their coverage contours: Terre Haute, or St. Louis). This, in either St. Louis (Mo.) and Springfield, Cham­ 1,120 sqyare miles and 47,330 persons event, is less than 0.75 percent of the paign, Decatur, and Jacksonville (111.) within the KDNL-TV Grade B contour, population covered by these stations. and Evansville (Ind.)) . There are also and 870 square miles and 29,780 persons With respect to the Decatur and Jack­ three commercial UHF stations author­ within the KGSL Grade B contour (57 sonville stations and assuming a 990-foot ized but not yet operational (at St. Louis, square miles and 1,720 persons within tower, a first Grade B VHF signal would Owensboro, and Paducah), an applica­ the KGSL Grade A contour). There be provided to 20 square miles and 687 tion for Channel 66 at Terre Haute, Ind., would be no overlap of principal-city persons, and 170 square-miles and 6,626 unused commercial assignments in some contours. KGSL also gives the distance persons, respectively (0.1 and 0.79 per­ of these places and at Danville (111.), of overlap involved (assuming 990 feet cent of population).5 Cape Girardeau (Mo.), and Urbana for Channel 13): 47 miles Grade B, 12.5 13. In the second connection, it is (HI.), and educational UHF stations miles Grade A, and 4 and 19.5 miles pointed out that more than 75 percent operating at Olney, 111., and Vincennes, Channel 13 principal-city contour to of the populations within the Grade B Ind. The parties opposing the assign­ KGSL Grade A and Grade B respectively. overlap areas of the two St. Louis sta­ ment, particularly the two joining in the 11. As to WICS-WICD, Springfield andtions, or nearly 340,000 in one case and lengthy comments mentioned in para­ Champaign, the Grade B overlap would 320,000 in the other, receives a Grade A graph 7 above, vigorously urge that the be 2,720 or 2,040 square miles and 132,162 Channel 13 assignment should not be or 86,616 persons, or 14.8 or 11.1 percent made, because of the adverse impact of the area and 10.6 or 7.0 pereent of »The St. Louis stations and Soillcom also which an additional VHF signal in this the population within these stations’ made showings as to overlap between the area would, assertedly, have on these sta­ combined Grade B area. With a 990-foot proposed Grade B (990 feet) and UHF Grade tower, the Channel 13 Grade B contour A contours, and vice versa. The situation tions and assignments, as well as on the as to the St. Louis stations is indicated in cause of UHF generally. would penetrate to some 49 miles within the next paragraph. In the case of WICS 10. Channel 13 overlap with UHF. The the Grade B contour of WICS and 16 (based on its former lower power), the pro­ Parties discuss at length the extent of miles of that of WICD; the distance posed Grade B to UHF Grade A overlap area overlap between the coverage contours would be less with an 800-foot tower. As would be 520 square miles and 29,600 people, of the proposed Channel 13 station and to the Jacksonville and Decatur stations, with penetration to a distan ce o f 13 m iles; the various UHF stations. It appears that, the only specific information is that, in it would be less with Decatur and Jackson­ Soillcom’s petition, based on a 990-foot ville and there would be none with Evans­ under either the original 990-foot or re­ ville stations or Champaign. The Channel 13 vised 800-foot proposal, there would be tower: Grade B overlap of 1,268 square Grade A overlap with UHF Grade B areas Grade B overlap between Mount Vernon miles and 95,280 persons with Jackson­ would be slightly smaller (360 square miles, and the four operating Illinois stations ville and 1,224 square miles and 80,116 15,110 persons and 9-mile penetration for mentioned, and with the two St. Louis persons with Decatur, or 7.8 and 15.1 Springfield). and two Evansville stations. There would percent of their respective Grade B areas * From Soillcom’s maps it does not appear he overlap of the Channel 13 Grade A that this is true of Grade A signals as to and 11.3 and 12.1 percent of the popula­ KDNL-TV, Channel 30, though it is as to contour with the Grade A contours of the tion therein. The distances of penetra­ KGSL, Channel 24. The KDNL-TV Grade A two St. Louis stations only (under either tion (not specifically mentioned in the contour extends beyond that of the St. Louis Proposal). Data is submitted as to the VHF stations in some directions, including overlap area and population in the case record) would be less than in the case some areas within the proposed Channel 13 of the two St. Louis stations and the of WICS; it appears that the Grade B Grade A contour. operating Springfield and Champaign contour would come within about 12 0 As to the Evansville and Paducah UHF stations, their Grade A and Grade B con­ stations (WICS and WICD; since WICD miles of Decatur with a 990-foot tower tours in the pertinent directions lie entirely *s commonly owned with and operated as and 24 miles with 800 feet. The overlap within those of VHF stations assigned to the an auxiliary outlet for WICS, it is ap­ with the Evansville stations would be sam e city.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 196» 18038 RULES AND REGULATIONS

signal from them and would receive only tour with an 800-foot tower would in­ ful;9 (3) the small number of ARB diaries a Grade B signal from Channel 13. In clude 208,809 persons in 5,275 square used in the study (numbers per county the case of KDNL-TV, 8 percent of the miles, and nearly 90 percent of this pop­ ranging from five to 16) makes the show­ “overlap” population would receive a ulation and area—183,728 persons in ing doubtful on statistical grounds; (4) Grade B signal from both stations, 5 4,865 square miles—now receives no in some counties the viewing shown un­ percent would receive Grade A signals Grade A or better signals.7 This area in­ questionably represents CATV viewing from both, and 9 percent (41,420) would cludes Mount Vernon (which receives (four are mentioned as having wide receive a Grade A signal from Channel Grade B signals from Harrisburg, Cape CATV audience), and this is not the 13 and only a Grade B from KDNL-TV. Girardeau and (in part) Paducah VHF equivalent of local, off-air TV service.10 For KGSL, the corresponding percent­ stations) and the great bulk of the nine- 18. The parties also disagree as to the ages are 11, 5 and 8 percent. county area mentioned. extent of UHF development in this area, 14. Need for a VHF assignment at 16. The joint opposing comments as­ which is urged both in connection with Mount Vernon. Soillcom in its petition sert (on the basis of a statistical analysis the existence or absence of significant and reply comments urges the great need attached) that, despite the absence of UHF impact and as to the possibility of for the VHF station: (1) To provide addi­ predicted signals in terms of the Com­ UHF for a Mount Vernon station. In its tional service in the underserved area of mission’s rules, all of the proposed Chan­ petition Soillcom claimed that the per­ Southern Illinois;6 (2) to provide an nel 13 coverage area is now well served. centage of UHF homes was quite low additional TV outlet to this Southern This is asserted to be demonstrated by: (only about one-third); the joint opposi­ Illinois area, which now has only one (1) High TV set ownership in the area, tion shows it as considerably higher commercial station (WSIL-TV, Harris­ with all counties lying wholly or largely (based on ARB data). It is asserted that burg), and that not devoting any sub­ within the Grade B contour showing at in the 9-county area the percentage of stantial amount of time to local news or least 88 percent and nearly all 90 per­ UHF-equipped homes is 53 percent (41 other material of local significance; (3) cent or more, of total homes as TV percent in Jefferson County, where to provide a local TV outlet to Mount homes; (2) an analysis of American Re­ Mount Vernon is located), and that it Vernon. It is claimed that a UHF station search Bureau (ARB) data as to stations is 78.2 percent in the other counties with­ is out of the question because of the low which can be received in these counties in the Grade B contour and outside of UHF set circulation and VHP competi­ clearly enough for regular viewing. In the St. Louis area, and 60 percent in that tion which would be obstacles to such a the latter connection, it is asserted that area, for a total overall of 62.9 percent. station. The opposing parties, particu­ the average number of stations so receiv­ It is claimed that UHF net-weekly cir­ larly those filing jointly, claim that the able in the nine Grade A counties men­ culation is 46.3 percent in the Grade B area is now well provided with service, tioned above is 5.4; the average for the counties and 10.2 percent in the Grade and that UHF set circulation in it is 14 other counties entirely or largely A counties, with about a 17 percent over­ already fairly high and may be expected within the Grade B contour is 4.4, for all share of viewing in the entire area on to rise with additional UHF stations at an overall average of 4.8. All but about St. Louis and elsewhere. It is claimed 6 percent of the homes in these areas, an average quarter-hour basis. It is as­ that the particular needs of Mount it is asserted, can receive three or more serted that these figures will increase as Vernon and surrounding area could be stations; some (4.7 percent overall) can more UHF stations come on the air, par­ met. by a low-power “community” sta­ receive 10 or more.8 It is asserted (based ticularly the two new St. Louis stations. tion, CATV with program origination, or on the same data) that more than 90 In reply, Soillcom and its economic con­ a UHF station (particularly an educa­ percent of the TV homes in both the sultant question whether the homes tional one without the problem of initial Grade A and Grade B areas can now shown by ARB as “UHF-equipped” really viability), none of them involving the receive full network service; two-thirds same impact on UHF development as is of the TV homes in the Grade A counties are more than simply all-channel homes, entailed in the Channel 13 proposal. and 21.8 percent of those in the Grade without necessarily having the special 15. As to signals available in terms of B counties (outside of the 100 percent the Commission’s rules, Soillcom’s show­ served St.-Louis area) receive also service 9 It is noted that in four counties the num­ ing—which is not controverted—is as from an independent station; and a large ber of stations reported as viewable substan­ follows: It would provide a Grade B number (52.5 percent in the Grade A tially exceeds the number of Grade B sig­ or better signal to 526,614 persons in counties, 38.9 percent in the Grade B nals available off the air, while in four other 10,745 square miles assuming an 800-foot counties outside of the St. Louis area) cases the number reported is less th an the tower, or more using a 990-foot tower; number of Grade B signals available. It is can receive an educational TV station. concluded that what the opposing material in either event, it would provide a first 17. Soillcom in reply, including a state­ shows is that persons with a number of good Grade B or better signal to what is now ment by an economic consultant, at­ signals available regard others as unaccept­ “white area” including 47,483 persons in tacks the validity and significance of able (even when they are Grade B), whereas 1,056 square miles. It appears that this these showings. It is urged that: (1) The viewers with ifo good signals available regard “white area”—all of which would receive fact that persons report several stations all “fringe” signals as acceptable; b u t when a predicted Grade A signal—lies in the a good local signal becomes available they northern and eastern portion of the as viewable is of little significance, since will change their appraisal. nine-county area mentioned above, 15 it is well known that viewers unable to 10 Soillcom’s petition lists 15 CATV systems as of August 1967 within the proposed cov­ miles or further from Mount Vernon and get good TV service will go to great erage area, including seven (in six counties) including most of Marion and Fayette lengths to get, and will accept, poor within the nine-county area. Most of these Counties and parts of Clay, Effingham, service; the only objective standard, it (all of those in the nine-county area) are of and Wayne Counties. The Grade A con- nine-channel or greater capacity. The seven is said, is service as defined in the Com­ totaled some 9,250 subscribers as of February mission’s rules; (2) the absence of cor­ 1969 (Television Factbook, 1969, pp. 418-a— 8 Soillcom emphasizes its potential forrelation in some cases between the show­ 4 2 3 -a ). service to “Southern Illinois”, defined gen­ An analysis of Television Factbook (1969) erally as the area south of a line running ing for a particular county, and its actual data on reception of various stations tends to roughly east-northeast across the State from location with respect to signals, makes confirm the view that stations are received, north of Alton to north of Terre Haute, the real meaning of the showing doubt- in one way or another, beyond their Grade B approximately the route of Illinois State contours. Of the nine counties mentioned, Highway 16. It also emphasizes the “nine- viewers in two are shown as watching only county area” consisting of the nine counties 7 With a 990-foot tower, the operation, the four St. Louis stations; the others show all or most of which lie within the proposed would provide a first Grade A signal to 2 0 2 ,- six to 12 stations received in the county- Grade A contour and centering around Salem 878 persons in 5,569 square miles. However, it appears probable that this doe (Bond, Clay, Clinton, Effingham, Payette, 8 The figures for the individual counties represent CATV viewing to some extent, e.g-, Jefferson, Marion, Washington, and- Wayne in the nine-county Grade A area are shown the viewing of St. Louis stations in Effingham co u n ties). as ranging from 4.4 (Bond) to 6.4 (Wayne). County, well outside the Grade B contour.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18039 antenna usually necessary for UHF re­ 351 feet, requiring, at best, a change county), and the fact that any station ception at this distance.“ Soillcom again in instrument-flight procedures which in or near Mount Vernon would face asserts the great handicap which a po­ make FAA approval unlikely. As noted competition from numerous long-stand­ tential UHF station in the Mount Ver­ above, the State of Illinois and the local ing VHF stations (particularly those to non area would face, with only about 40 airport authority indicated objection to the south, and also those at St. Louis percent UHF circulation in its home the original proposal. and Terre Haute) we cannot conclude county and 53 percent in its Grade A 21. In reply, Soillcom submits an af­that an affirmative action here would area, and with all-VHF competition from fidavit from another aeronautical con­ impair a possibility of UHF development the stations to the south. sultant (Mr. Lowell Wright), describing in this area which would otherwise 19. With respect to the needs of the the situation. It is stated that in order exist. Mount Vernon area for a locally oriented to meet the problem with its original 24. As to impact on UHF generally, service, Soillcom attached to its origi­ proposal, Soillcom offered to give to the as mentioned in the Notice, circum­ nal petition letters from a number of airport authority a nondirectional bea­ stances have changed with the passage civic, political, and educational figures con, and (after this was' unacceptable of over 7 years since enactment of the in and around that city, and potential because of limited usability) a VOR all-channel receiver law, and over 5 advertisers, concerning the need for a (VHF omnidirectional ranging), which years since our rules implementing it local outlet and its advantages in im­ would serve all radio-equipped aircraft became effective (Apr. 30, 1964). Receiv­ proving the social, economic, cultural and permit lower IFR minimums. When ers with UHF capability are now in and educational aspects of the city’s there was still objection because the widespread use, their purchase being life. It is claimed that this will be an tower height of 990 feet would violate spurred by increased interest in color additional impetus to the economic de­ State criteria for joint financing of air­ TV and thus purchase of new sets. We velopment of what has been a “depressed port expansion, Soillcom amended its are aware that the VHF-UHF disparity area”, It is asserted that such TV serv­ proposal to specify an 800-foot tower, has not been entirely eliminated; this ice as is available does not adequately which (1,355 feet above MSL) would is the reason for our pending inquiry deal with local needs. WSIL-TV, the meet the State’s criteria and require­ proceeding looking toward improved only station in Southern Illinois and the ments. Mr. Wright states that in his UHF tuning mechanisms and processes only Illinois station providing a Grade opinion the amended proposal will not (Docket 18433). Until the disparity is B signal in or near Mount Vernon, is be a hazard to air navigation and (if eliminated and UHF becomes substan­ claimed to present very little material a suitable VOR site can be secured, tially equal and fully competitive, the pertaining to this area (for example, no which he believes is no problem) FAA question of “UHF impact” must con­ results of elections held in April 1969 in approval can be secured. The VOR which tinue to be of substantial concern. But 59 southern Illinois communities, no Soillcom will provide will be an added to say this is not to say that we must non-network news at all on weekends, benefit to air navigation generally. insulate every UHF station or potential no coverage of various area matters Conclusions. 22. In this case, as in station from any possible small wind of which were the subject of newspaper other situations involving a new VHF VHF impact, where there is a substantial stories recently, and only three an­ channel assignment or change in VHF service benefit involved in a different nouncements for Mount Vernon com­ facilities, we must weigh on the one course. The time when such caution mercial advertisers in a week). The op­ hand the possible impact to the develop­ was appropropriate has, in our judg­ ponents claim that such needs as exist ment of UHF, and on the other the need ment, passed. Therefore, we believe the may be met by a UHF educational sta­ for the service which the new assignment assignment here must be made unless tion (which would serve the cultural or facilities would provide. It is appropri­ there is some substantial specific impact needs mentioned), the numerous CATV ate to take into account in this evalu­ on UHF to be avoided. systems in Mount Vernon and elsewhere ation various forms which the adverse 25. We turn, then, to the second area which may be permitted to originate impact on UHF could possibly take: mentioned—effect on stations and pos­ program material, and/or a “commu­ (1) Impact on development in the pro­ sible stations at some distance from, but nity” type UHF station of the type pro­ posed city itself or its immediate area; with some signal contour overlap with, posed in Docket 14429, to operate with (2) impact on existing or potential UHF the proposed station. In this case, this low power and meet local TV needs. In stations further removed but involving is chiefly the stations in St. Louis and reply, Soillcom dismisses all of these some signal overlap, such as those dis­ central Illinois (Springfield, Decatur, alternatives as grossly inadequate; CATV cussed at length above; and (3) impact Jacksonville, and to a lesser extent is not a substitute for regular TV serv­ on the cause of UHF development in the Champaign). While there is substantial ice, particularly in sparsely settled rural nation generally, which we are commit­ contour overlap involved, we do not find areas such as that around Mount Ver­ ted to foster. Where there is any likeli­ the likely impact substantial enough to non; a UHF satellite would not provide hood of impact at all, we must also take warrant denial of the assignment. Turn­ local origination and would have limited into account possible alternative means ing first to the St. Louis situation, we coverage; and an educational station of achieving service benefits, particu­ note the substantial amount of Grade could not fulfill the need for a full- larly the possibility of using a UHF as­ B to B, B to A, A to A, and even some fledged local station and aid in economic signment instead. principal-city to Grade B and A, overlap development. 23. As to the first, we cannot con­which would be involved. We recognize 20. The air-hazard question. As men­ clude that there is any substantial likeli­ that the new VHF signal will come fairly tioned earlier, Channel 13 can be used hood that the proposed assignment close to St. Louis and its Illinois environs; in an extremely limited area consistent would have an adverse impact on UHF with the originally proposed 990-foot with our mileage separation rules, and development in the proposed Grade A tower the Grade B contour would reach objection to the proposed location was or Grade B coverage area, simply be­ to the Mississippi River and include raised because of the alleged danger to cause there appears no likelihood of places such as East St. Louis and Granite air navigation from a tower 6 miles such development in the near or medi­ City. As revised to 800 feet, the proposal 5prth of the Salem-Leckrone airport. um-range future. There are no UHF would put a Grade B contour some 8 This was based on the original 990-foot assignments now in Mount Vernon or miles short of the city, including Belle­ Proposal. As described in an affidavit the Soillcom proposed Grade A area, or ville but not the places mentioned. But it irom an aeronautical consultant (Mr. within the proposed Grade B area at must be remembered that the UHF sta­ Edward H. Cockerham) the proposed least using its later 800-foot proposal; tions here face already the competition structure would protrude into the estab­ and, while such assignments could of four St. Louis commercial VHF sta­ lished departure path to the extent of readily be made, no demand therefor tions (all networks and one independ­ has been evinced. In view of the rather ent) , as well as VHF signals from other low UHF set penetration in the area stations such as that at Cape Girardeau. The ARB diary question asks whether the We cannot conclude that the addition of set is equipped to receive any channels from except near the Central Illinois UHF 4 to 83. The data clearly does include homes stations to the north (no more than another signal to part of these stations’ receiving XJHP via CATV. about 40 percent in Mount Vernon’s areas, from a much smaller place such

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18040 RULES AND REGULATIONS as Mount Vernon, will add significantly need not take absolute, total heed of pos­ Since these communities constitute snmi’ to their burden, so as to warrant denial sible impact consequences. This is true m arkets w h ich for th e m ost part have exist­ of the proposal involved here, with its in areas such as Central Illinois, of long­ ing television reception service, and have obvious service benefits in terms of sec­ standing and advanced UHF develop­ low population density in their surrounding areas, they represent little realistic potential tion 307(b) of the Communications Act ment. But that does not mean that the for UHF in the near future. and our traditional allocations objec­ two areas of the television service are as tives as set forth in the sixth report and yet equal, so that UHF development in Also, in the Salina case there was an order. southern Illinois is likely in the near adverse factor not here present—the 26. With respect to the Central Illinois future. VHF assignment could not be made with- stations, again we believe the same con­ 28. With respect to the need for the out deleting a VHF educational assign­ clusion is required, even though the con­ service, the unquestioned advantages in­ ment which could not be replaced con­ siderations are somewhat different. Since volved need not be repeated here. We do sistent with the separation rules, whereas much of the area of possible impact re­ not believe the material concerning here Channel 13 can be assigned without ceives only one VHP signal at present viewing of Stations in the proposed Grade disturbing other assignments and would (usually that of WCIA, Champaign), the A and Grade B area is of substantial otherwise be wasted. Moreover, the serv­ addition of a second could conceivably merit in this connection; taking into ice benefits to be gained, in terms of first represent a competitively significant in­ account the extent to which it may repre­ service, were less than those here.“ crement, as WAND points out. But we sent CATV viewing and straining for 30. In making this assignment, we, of also note that the amount of contour “fringe” signals. We regard the provision course, do not pass on the economic overlap is less than with the St. Louis of a service meeting the m in im u m re­ viability of a station at Mount Vernon; stations, and the position of three of the quirement of our rules as important, that is initially for consideration in pass­ stations (WAND and WICS-WICD, the completely aside from and in addition ing on any application which is filed, as only stations whose licensees opposed the to the undoubted benefits to Mount to financial qualifications as in other re­ assignment) as well-established, net­ Vernon and its area of an additional TV spects, and later for the judgment of the work-affiliated, reasonably profitable station meeting local needs which appear marketplace. If a station in Mount Ver­ operations.“ Located in cities substan­ largely unsatisfied at present. Nor do we non cannot be supported (as the op­ tially larger than Mount Vernon, with regard the suggested alternatives as cap­ ponents claim), then it will simply fail high UHF circulation and established able of meeting those needs. CATV, and the adverse consequences claimed audiences, it is not likely that they will which is now permitted to originate pro­ will not occur. We note in this connection be unduly affected. We agree with the gram material, can do so only for those that it is not a matter of wasting an parties filing a joint opposition that im­ who are subscribers, in places large otherwise useable assignment; if Chan­ pact is not confined to the demise of the enough to warrant the installation of nel 13 is not assigned to Mount Vemon station affected, but can be manifested systems, and thus not in the many small or another community nearby, and used in other ways such as restrictions oh its places and rural areas of this region. A at the location to the north mentioned, facilities or program service. But in view “community” station would not bring the it cannot be used at all. We emphasize of the established character of these service benefits mentioned in terms of in this connection, however—and also in operations, we cannot conclude that the signal availability, particularly to the connection with the air hazard issue— likelihood of their being so affected is area north of Mount Vernon which is that we expect the station to be built, by great,“ so as to warrant denial to the where service is now lacking. An educa­ Soillcom or whatever other applicant Mount Vernon and southern Illinois area tional station would not fulfill the same ultimately becomes the grantee, in strict of the benefits which would accrue from function in many respects, as Soillcom compliance with the rules. If it cannot be the drop-in of Channel 13. points out, and, as we have indicated, the so constructed and successfully operated, 27. Thus, neither individually nor col­ establishment of a regular UHF station at such a location, it will have to go off lectively do we believe the possible im­ appears unlikely for the foreseeable the air. We are not making this assign­ pact warrants denial of the proposed as­ future. ment for the purpose of providing “an­ signment. The parties filing jointly 29. The joint opponents of the pro­ other St. Louis station”, as some of the accuse the Commission and Soillcom of posal cite a number of Commission deci­ opponents seem to fear. Also, in view of inconsistency, of emphasizing on the one sions denying VHF channel additions or Soillcom’s modification of its proposal— hand the “changed circumstances” of the moves of VHF stations, in urging that and the resulting alleviation of the two improved situation of UHF, and on the denial is appropriate here also. Of these, chief problems involved in it—we will other the remoteness of any future de­ the only one warranting discussion is give most careful scrutiny to any pro­ velopment of UHF in the Mount Vernon Salina, Kans. 11 F.C.C. 2d 255, 11 R.R. posal for a tower height of more than area. But this is a distinction which must 2d 1704 (January 1968). There we denied 800 feet. It appears that this height is be made, here as in other UHF-VHF de­ a request by the UHF station at Salina enough to provide the substantial service cisions. UHF is developing, though it has (which had been forced to suspend benefits mentioned and minimize possible not yet reached parity with VHF, to a operation) that a VHF channel be as­ adverse impact on UHF. point where, as mentioned, we believe we signed, largely on the ground that (with 31. Accordingly, pursuant to authority the all-channel law and rules now effec­ contained in sections 4(i), 303 (g) and tive for some tim e). the area appeared (r), and 307(b) of the Communications 12 WICS-WICD are the NBC affiliate, and WAND the ABC affiliate, for this central and likely to develop support for a UHF sta­ eastern Illinois area. WAND mentions a small tion. While the situation with respect 14 The other three Commission decisions profit in 1968 of about $25,000; hut to this to available VHF signals was roughly the cited are Hutchinson-W ichita, Kansas, 3 must be added a substantial expense item same as that here, there were two im­ F.C.C. 2d 556, 7 R.R. 2d 1577 (1966); Bloom- in the form of depreciation, in evaluating portant differences otherwise as far as ington-Indianapolis, Ind., 1 F.C.C. 2d 490, its economic situation. UHF potential is concerned: (1) The 5 R.R. 2d 1744 (1965); and Triangle Publica­ 13 These observations about established population of Salina is considerably tions, Inc., 37 F.C.C. 307, 3 R.R. 2d 37 (1964); position and network affiliation do not, of involving the move of the New Haven VHF course, apply to station WJJY-TV, Jackson­ greater than that of Mount Vernon (1960 station north toward Hartford and Spring- ville, which has just started operation. How­ Census populations 43,202 and 15,566, field. In the first case there would have been ever, it does have the benefit of high UHF respectively); and (2) a UHF station had no gain in service at all (no change in conversion in the Springfield area, and in any operated in Salina, whereas here there facilities was involved); in the others, tn event, with a highly directional east-west is no significant background of UHF ac­ UHF impact was on stations much closer pattern, features service to Springfield and tivity. Rather, we believe that here— the proposed VHF operation. In the Indian areas further west around Quincy, rather where there are very few communities of case it does not appear what service gain than to the southeast in the direction of loss would have been involved; in the Co - Mount Vernon. With respect to other UHF substantial size within a considerable necticut case, it appears that while the stations mentioned earlier—at Evansville distance of Mount Vernon—the situation would have been a net gain in popular and Paducah—the overlap involved is small is similar to that dealt with in KTTV covered, there would have been a Jossi or nonexistent, clearly not enough to war­ Television Co., 4 R.R. 2d 243, 247 (1965) needed service to what would become “wn rant denial of the proposal. where we observed that: areas.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 RULES AND REGULATIONS 18041

Act of 1934, as amended: It is ordered, Since no exceptions were filed to the That, effective December 10, 1969, § 73v- Title 49— TRANSPORTATION examiner’s recommended report and order and the Commission did not stay 606(b) of the Commission’s rules is Chapter X— Interstate Commerce or postpone the effect of the examiner’s amended by the addition of the follow­ Commission recommendations, the amendment to ing entry (offset will be supplied at a SUBCHAPTER A— GENERAL RULES AND § 1056.3 became effective, pursuant to later date); REGULATIONS Rule 97 of the Commission’s general Channel rules of practice (49 CFR 1100.97), on C ity No. [Ex P arte No. 246] October 13, 1969. Mount Vernon, 111______13 PART 1002— FEES § 1056.3 Determination of weights. * * * * * 32. It is further ordered, That this pro­ Services Performed in Connection With (d) The provisions of paragraphs (a), ceeding (Docket 18453) is terminated. Licensing and Related Activities (b), and (c) of this section shall not (Secs. 4, 303, 807, 48 Stat., as am ended, 1066, N ovember 3, 1969. apply to shipments consisting solely of 1082,1083; 47 U.S.C. 154, 303, 307) To reflect increased maximum rates machinery (including auxiliary and com­ ponent parts thereof) which are being Adopted: October 31,1969. for transcripts of testimony and oral argument purchased by the public from transported by household goods carriers Released: November 4,1969. the Commission’s official reporter, the pursuant to the definition of household heading and paragraph (h) of § 1002.1 of goods in § 1056.1(a) (3). F ederal C ommunications Chapter X of Title 49 of the Code of Fed­ (49 Stat. 546, as amended, 558, as amended, C o m m is s io n 15 eral Regulations are amended as follows: 560, as amended; 49 U.S.C. 304, 316, 317) [seal] B e n F . W a ple, [ se a l ] H . N e il G a r so n , Secretary. § 1002.1 Fees for copying, certification, and related services. Secretary. [P.R. Doc. 69-13289; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; s|c * * * * [F.R. Doc. 69-13295; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; 8:47 a.m.] 8:49 a.m .] (h) Transcript of testimony and of oral argument, or extracts therefrom, [Docket No. 18397] may be purchased by the public from the Commission’s official reporter, the CSA Title 50— WILDLIFE AND PART 74— EXPERIMENTAL, AUXIL­ Reporting Corporation, 300 Seventh Street SW., Washington, D.C. 20024. IARY, AND SPECIAL BROADCAST Transcripts will be furnished to the pub­ FISHERIES AND OTHER PROGRAM DISTRI­ lic at the following maximum rates per Chapter I— Bureau of Sport Fisheries BUTIONAL SERVICES page of approximately 200 words: and Wildlife, Fish and Wildlife 85 cents per page for regular copy and $1.75 Service, Department of the Interior Community Antenna Television per page for daily copy for hearings or PART 32— HUNTING Systems; Correction arguments held at Washington, D.C., and * * *. Horicon National Wildlife Refuge, In the matter of amendment of Part * * * * * Wis. 74, Subpart K, of the Commission’s rules These amendments are effective upon The following special regulation is is­ and regulations relative to community publication in the F ederal R eg ister. sued and is effective on date of publica­ antenna television systems; and inquiry (Sec. 501, 65 Stat. 290; 31 U.S.C. 483a) tion in the F ederal R e g ister . into the development of communications [ sea l] H . N eil G a r so n , § 32.32 Special regulations; big game; technology and services to formulate reg­ Secretary. for individual wildlife refuge areas. ulatory policy and rulemaking and/or [F.R. Doc. 69-13294; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; W is c o n s in legislative proposals; Docket No. 18397. 8:49 a.m.]' HORICON NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE The Commission’s first report and The public hunting of deer and foxes order in Docket No. 18397, released [Ex Parte No. MC-19 (Sub-No. 5) ] on the Horicon National Wildlife Refuge, Wis., is permitted only on the area desig­ October 27, 1969, FCC 6&-1170, and PART 1056— TRANSPORTATION OF nated by signs as open to hunting, during published in the F ederal R egister on HOUSEHOLD GOODS IN INTER­ the period November 22 through Novem­ October 31, 1969, 34 FJt. 17651, is STATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE ber 23, 1969, with designated firearms, and during the period December 6 corrected as follows: Practices of Motor Common Carriers through December 31,1969, with bow and 1. In footnote 18 to paragraph 29, the of Household Goods; Determina­ arrow. The open area, comprising 20,700 comma after “Tex.” in the last line is tion of Weights acres, is delineated on maps available at changed to a semicolon and the words refuge headquarters, Mayville, Wis., and N ovem ber 3, 1969. from the Regional Director, Bureau of “Gridtronics, Inc., New York, N.Y.” are This proceeding was initiated by notice Sport Fisheries and Wildlife, Federal inserted before “etc.” of proposed rule making published on Building, Fort Snelling, Twin Cities, 2. In the second line of paragraph 45 page 16301 of the November 6,1968, issue Minn. 55111. Hunting shall be in ac­ of the F ederal R eg ister . All household cordance with all applicable State the abbreviation “pp.” is changed to the goods carriers subject to the Interstate regulations. word “paragraphs”. Commerce Act were made respondents The provisions of this special regula­ and were invited to participate as parties. tion supplement the regulations which Released: November 3,1969. After parties filed verified statements, govern hunting on wildlife refuge areas F ederal C ommunications the proceeding was referred to a hearing generally, which are set forth in Title 50, examiner for recommendation of an ap­ Code of Federal Regulattbns, Part 32, C o m m is s io n , propriate order accompanied by the and are effective through January 1, [seal] B e n F . W aple, reasons therefor. Secretary. 1970. After consideration of all the evidence R obert S. P e r s o n iu s , lp.R. Doc. 69-13256; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; of record, the hearing examiner issued Refuge Manager, Horicon Na­ 8:45 a.m .] his report and order which was served tional Wildlife Refuge, May- September 12, 1969, and recommended mile, Wis. r ** ^onunissi°ner Robert E. Lee dissenting; that a new paragraph (d) be added to O ctober 31, 1969. iy,°^Inissioners Cox and Johnson concurring § 1056.3 of Chapter X of Title 49 of the [F.R. Doc. 69-13273; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; m the result. Code of Federal Regulations. 8:46 a.m .]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18042 Proposed Rule Making

country without the use of a “forwarding DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE agent.” A copy of the invoice describing DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE the controlled substance must be at­ Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous tached to each copy of the Shipper’s Ex­ Agricultural Research Service Drugs port Declaration and these documents [ 7 CFR Part 301 1 [ 21 CFR Part 320 1 must accompany the shipment. Form 7525-V may be obtained at a cost of $1 JAPANESE AND WHITE-FRINGED DEPRESSANT AND STIMULANT DRUGS per 100 from any local Customs or De­ BEETLES, EUROPEAN CHAFER, IM­ partment of Commerce Field Office, and PORTED FIRE ANT, GOLDEN AND Proposed Requirements for Exporta­ assistance in the execution of such Forms tion of Controlled Substances is also available at such offices. A “U.S. SOYBEAN CYST NEMATODES, AND WITCHWEED Notice is hereby given pursuant to the Exporter” may not, under any circum­ provisions of section 701 of the Pood, stances, release a shipment of controlled Soil Samples From Regulated Areas Drug, and Cosmetic Act, 52 Stat. 1055, substances to anyone, including the con­ as amended (21 U.S.C. 371); and under signee, or his agent, within the United Notice is hereby given under the ad­ the authority vested in the Attorney Gen­ States. ministrative procedure provisions in 5 eral by Reorganization Plan No. 1 of 1968 (2) The “U.S. Exporter” may ship the U.S.C. 553, that it is proposed, under the (33 F.R. 5611) and redelegated to the controlled substances to a “forwarding authority of sections 8 and 9 of the Plant Director, Bureau of Narcotics and Dan­ agent” as defined in 15 CFR 379.4(f), Quarantine Act of 1912, as amended, and gerous Drugs by § 0.200 of Title 28 of who will execute the required Shipper’s section 106 of the Federal Plant Pest Act the Code of Federal Regulations, that the Export Declaration and further act as (7 U.S.C. 161, 162, 150ee), to delete the regulations set forth in tentative form an exporting agent for the principal. supplemental regulations (7 CFR 301.- below are proposed to be prescribed by When a “forwarding agent” is utilized, 48-2b, 301.72-2b, 301.77-2b, 301.81-2b, the Director, Bureau of Narcotics and a copy of the invoice describing the con­ 301.85-2b, 301.79-2b, and 301.80-2b) per­ Dangerous Drugs in order to establish trolled substance must be attached to taining to the movement of soil samples definite procedures for the exportation of each copy of the Shipper’s Export Decla­ to laboratories for processing, testing, or controlled substances which will allow ration and these documents must ac­ analysis from areas regulated under the the efficient enforcement of the provi­ company the shipment. A “forwarding Federal domestic plant quarantines re­ sions of section 801(d) of the Act (21 agent” may not, under any circum­ lating to Japanese and white-fringed U.S.C. 381). stances, release a shipment of controlled beetles, European chafer, imported fire substances to anyone, including the con­ ant, golden and soybean cyst nematodes, It is proposed that Part 320 of Title 21 and witchweed, and to substitute new of the Code of Federal Regulations be signee, or his agent, within the United States. The “forwarding agent” must provisions in the regulations as described amended by adding to the existing sec­ below. tions the following new section: either deliver the controlled substances to the port or border, or deliver the con­ It is proposed to allow the interstate § 320.20 Exportation. trolled substances to a bonded carrier movement of soil samples of any size, (a) The provisions of section 801(d) approved by the principal for delivery to without a certificate or permit, from of the act (21 U.S.C. 381(d)), provide the border. areas regulated under said quarantines that a drug intended for export shall not (b) In the event that controlled sub­ provided the soil samples are shipped be deemed to be adulterated or mis­ stances intended for export by a “U.S. only to approved laboratories, and are branded but that if such an article is Exporter” or a “forwarding agent” are packaged so that no spillage or break­ sold or offered for sale in domestic com­ introduced or delivered into domestic age would result in transit; and to con­ merce, it is not exempt from control. The commerce before they are exported, such' dition laboratory approval on the agree­ provisions of Part 370 of Title 15 of the introduction or delivery shall be con­ ment by the laboratory operator to: Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR sidered a domestic sale, delivery, or other (1) Decontaminate soil residues and 370.2), contain the following definition: disposition of a controlled substance shipping containers by heating such soil “U.S. Exporter. That person who, as the under 21 U.S.C. 360a, and a prohibited and containers to a minimum tempera­ principal party in interest in the export act under 21 U.S.C 331 (q) (2). ture of 250° F. for 2 hours or by other transaction, has the power and respon­ All interested persons are invited to approved treatments; and sibility for determining and controlling submit their views in writing regarding ( 2 ) Decontaminate the effluent used in the sending of the commodities and tech­ this proposal. Views and comments soil sample processing by boiling for 1 nical data out of the United States.” should be submitted, preferably in quin- minute or by other approved treatments. Therefore, any manufacturer, com­ tuplicate, addressed to the Office of Chief Only laboratories agreeing to these pounder, processor, wholesaler, or dis­ Counsel, Bureau of Narcotics and Dan­ procedures and listed as approved lab­ tributor of controlled substances that gerous Drugs, Department of Justice, oratories by the Director of the Plant engages in exportation will be deemed Room 611, 1405 I Street NW., Washing­ Pest Control Division in the F ed e r a l the “U.S. Exporter” under 15 CFR 370.2, ton, D.C. 20537, within 30 days follow­ R egister would be allowed to receive soil and must comply with one of the fol­ ing the date of publication of this notice samples being shipped interstate from lowing alternative procedures in order in the F ederal R egister, and may be regulated areas. to insure that controlled substances “in­ accompanied by a memorandum or brief If the proposed amendments are tended for export” are in fact exported: in support thereof. adopted it is proposed to make them ef­ (1) The “U.S. Exporter” will execute Dated: October 31, 1969. fective 4 months after their final the Shipper’s Export Declaration, Form publication. 7225—V, if required by 15 CFR 379.1- J ohn E. I ngersoll, Director, Bureau of Any interested person who desires to 379.13, and have the controlled sub­ Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs, submit written data, views, or arguments stances shipped by bonded carrier di­ [F.R. Doc. 69-13260; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; on this proposal may do so by rectly to the consignee in the foreign 8:45 a.m .] the same with the Director of the Plant

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 18043

Pest Control Division, Agricultural Re­ ages previously established (§ 993.205; 2. In previous orders granting exten­ search Service, U.S. Department of Agri­ 34 F.R. 13697) for California dried sions of the times for filing comments culture, Federal Center Building, Hyatts- prunes for the 1969-7Q crop year from and reply comments on Part V, as well ville, Md. 20782, on or before January 2, 80 percent and 20 percent, respectively, as on other parts of this docket, the Com­ 1970. to 87 percent and 13 percent, respectively. mission has indicated its desire to re­ Done at Washington, D.C., this 4th The percentages as proposed to be modi­ ceive comments and reply comments on day of November 1960. fied would provide, based on the Octo­ Part V at an early date, because the ber 10, 1969, crop estimate of the USDA questions involved are pertinent to other [seal] R. J. A n d er so n , Crop Reporting Board, as near as pos­ portions of the proceeding which are now Acting Administrator, sible 113,199 tons, natural condition pending before the Commission. It has Agricultural Research Service. weight, of salable prunes from the 1969 also pointed out that no final action [F.R. Doc. 69-13302; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; California dried prune crop. The modi­ would be taken on Part V without fur­ 8:48 a.m.] fication of the percentages would be in ther proceedings in which all parties will accordance with the applicable provi­ have an opportunity to amplify their Consumer and Marketing Service sions of the marketing agreement, as views in light of the record already com­ amended, and Order No. 993, as amended piled. In the circumstances, and consid­ [ 7 CFR Part 912 1 (7 CFR Part 993), regulating the han­ ering the time that has already elapsed GRAPEFRUIT GROWN IN INDIAN dling of dried prunes produced in Cali­ since the issuance of the notice on De­ cember 13, 1969, it does not appear that RIVER DISTRICT IN FLORIDA fornia, effective under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as any substantial further extension would Approval of Expenses and Fixing of amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674). The pro­ be desirable or serve the public interest. Rate of Assessment for 1969—70 posed modification of percentages was However, in view of the recent issuance Fiscal Period unanimously recommended by the Prune of the first report and order (FCC 69- Administrative Committee. 1170) in this docket on October 27, 1969, Consideration is being given to the All persons who desire to submit writ­ the time for filing reply comments on following proposals submitted by the In­ ten data, views, or arguments in connec­ Part V will be extended for 3 weeks. dian River Grapefruit Committee, es­ tion with the aforesaid proposal should 3. Accordingly, it is ordered, Pursuant tablished pursuant to the marketing file the same, in quadruplicate, with the to § 0.289(c) (4) of the Commission’s agreement, as amended, and Order No. Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Ag­ rules and regulations, that the time for 912, as amended (7 CFR Part 912, 34 filing reply comments on Part V of this P.R. 12881), regulating the handling of riculture, Room 112, Administration Building, Washington, D.C. 20250, not proceeding is extended through Novem­ grapefruit grown in the Indian River ber 24, 1969. District in Florida, effective under the later than 7 days after publication of this notice in the F ederal R eg ister . All writ­ Adopted: October 29,1969. applicable provisions of the Agricultural ten submissions made pursuant to this Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, as Released: October 30,1969. amended (7 U.S.C. 601-674), as the notice will be made available for public agency to administer the terms and pro­ inspection at the office of the Hearing [ se a l ] S ol S c h il d h a u se , visions thereof: Cleric during official hours of business (7 Chief, CATV Task Force. CFR 1.27(b) ). (a) That the expenses that are rea­ [F.R. Doc. 69-13257; FUed, Nov. 6 , 1969; sonable and likely to be incurred by the Dated: November 4, 1969. 8:45 a.m.] Indian River Grapefruit Committee, P aul A. N ic h o l s o n , during the period August T, 1969 through Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ July 31, 1970, will amount to $25,000. etable Division, Consumer and (b) That the rate of assessment for Marketing Service. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR such period, payable by each handler in Bureau of Labor Standards accordance with § 912.41, be fixed at [F.R. Doc. 69-13304; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; $0,005 per standard packed box. 8:48 a.m .] [ 41 CFR Part 50-204 1 All persons who desire to submit writ­ ten data, views, or arguments in connec­ RADIATION SAFETY AND HEALTH tion with the aforesaid proposals shall STANDARDS file the same, in quadruplicate, with the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS Hearing Clerk, U.S. Department of Ag­ Application in North Dakota and riculture, Room 112, Administration COMMISSION South Carolina Building, Washington, D.C. 20250, not The States of North Dakota and South later than the 10th day after the publica­ [ 47 CFR Part 74 ] Carolina have each recently entered into tion of this notice in the F ederal R eg­ [Docket No. 18397] an agreement with the Atomic Energy ister. All written submissions made pur­ Commission (North Dakota Agreement suant to this notice will be made avail­ COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION published at 34 F.R. 13950, and South able for public inspection at the office of SYSTEMS Carolina Agreement published at 34 F.R. tne Hearing. Clerk during regular busi­ 15315) pursuant to section 274(b) of the ness hours (7 CFR 1.27(b) ). Order Extending Time for Filing Reply Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended Dated: November 3, 1969. Comments (42 U.S.C. 2021(b)). Each agreement makes that State’s program for control P aul A . N ic h o l s o n , In the matter of amendment of Part Deputy Director, Fruit and Veg­ 74, Subpart K, of the Commission’s rules of radiation sources effective pursuant to and regulations relative to community 41 CFR 50-204.34 (c) (1) and eligible for etable Division, Consumer and a determination pursuant to 41 CFR Marketing Service. antenna television systems; and inquiry into the development of communications 50-204.34(c) (2) that such program is [PR. Doc. 69-13267; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; currently compatible with the require­ 8:45 a.m.] technology and services to formulate reg­ ulatory policy and rulemaking and/or ments of the Department of Labor’s legislative proposals; Docket No. 18397. safety and health standards for Federal [ 7 CFR Part 993 ] 1. The Commission has received a re­supply contracts (41 CFR Part 50-204). DRIED PRUNES PRODUCED IN quest from Information Industry Asso­ Each agreement brings into com­ CALIFORNIA ciation, filed on October 22, 1969, for a pliance with 41 CFR Part 50-204 any em­ 30-day extension of the time for filing ployer in the respective State who pos­ Modification of Salable and Reserve reply comments on Part V of this pro­ sesses or uses source material, byproduct Percentages for 1969-70 Crop Year ceeding. Other parties have also inquired material, or special nuclear material, as informally as to whether some extension defined in the Atomic Energy Act of Notice is hereby given that the Depart­ could be granted. Reply comments bn 1954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), ment has under consideration a proposal Part V are presently scheduled to be filed and has registered such sources with the 0 revise the salable and reserve percent- on or before November 3, 1969. State involved or is operating under a

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 No. 215------7 18044 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

license issued by the appropriate State, Reorganization Plan No. 6 of 1950 (3 CFR 1949-1953 Comp. p. 1004), and 29 and in accordance with the requirements CFR 1949-1953 Comp. p. 1004), and 29 CFR Part 5111 hereby: of such State’s laws and regulations, in­ CFR Part 511,1 hereby appoint industry (a) Convene the above appointed in­ sofar as his possession and use,of such committees for the (1) Fabricated Plas­ dustry committees; material is concerned, unless thé Secre­ tic Products Industry in Puerto Rico (b) Refer to the industry committees tary of Labor after conference with the (Committee No. 90-A); (2) Button, the question of the minimum rates of Atomic Energy Commission, shall deter­ Jewelry, and Lapidary Work Industry wages to be fixed for the above-men­ mine that the State’s program for con­ in Puerto Rico (Committee No. 90-B); tioned industries in Puerto Rico as trol of these radiation sources is incom­ (3) Artificial Flower, Decoration and herein defined: patible with the requirements of 41 CFR Party Favor Industry in Puerto Rico (c) Give notice of the hearings to be Part 50-204. No such determination has (Committee No. 90-C); and (4) Straw, held by the several committees at the been made. Hair, and Related Products Industry in time and place indicated below. The com­ Each agreement shall also be deemed Puerto Rico (Committee No. 90-D). mittees shall investigate conditions in the to bring in compliance with 41 CFR Part These industries are defined as follows: industries, and the committees, or any 50-204 any employer who possesses or The fabricated plastic products indus­ authorized subcommittee thereof, shall uses radiation sources other than source try in Puerto Rico is defined as follows: hear witnesses and receive such evidence material, byproduct material, or special the molding, extrusion, lamination, or as may be necessary or appropriate to en­ nuclear material, as defined in the other forming, and the fabrication of able the committees to perform their Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended plastic products: Provided, however, duties and functions under the afore­ (42 U.S.C. 2011 et seq.), insofar as his That the industry shall not include the mentioned Act. possession and use of such material is manufacture of buttons, buckles, jewelry Industry Committee No. 90-A will meet concerned, if he has registered such (including rosaries), and jewelry find­ in executive session to commence its in­ sources with the appropriate State or is ings (including beads); the manufacture vestigation at 9:30 a.m. and begin its operating under a license issued by the from plastic materials (except plastic public hearings at 10:30 a.m. on Mon­ appropriate State and if his operation is molded to shape) of footwear and cut day, January 19, 1970. The investiga­ entirely in accordance with the require­ stock and findings for footwear; the tions and hearings of Industry Commit­ ments of such State’s laws and regula­ manufacture of apparel and apparel fur­ tees Nos. 90-B through 90-D will follow tions, if and when the State’s program nishings and accessories; and any activ­ in seriatim upon the termination of the for control of these radiation sources ity included in the artificial flower, deco­ previous committee hearing. is the subject of a currently effective ration, and party favor industry (29 CFR The hearings will take place in the of­ determination by the Secretary of Labor Part 688), the leather, leather goods, and fices of the Wage and Hour and Public that such program is compatible with related products industry (29 CFR Part Contracts Divisions on the seventh floor the requirements of 41 CFR Part 50-204. 602), the needlework and fabricated of the Condominio San Alberto Building, I hereby propose to make such a deter­ textile products industry (29 CFR Part 1200 Ponce de Leon Avenue, Santurce, mination. 612), and the chemical, petroleum, and Puerto Rico. I also propose to add the States of related products industry (29 CFR Part Each industry committee shall recom­ North Dakota and South Carolina to the 670), as defined in the wage orders for mend to the Administrator of the Wage list of States set forth in 41 CFR 50- those industries in Puerto Rico. and Hour and Public Contracts Divisions 204.34(c) (1) and (2). The button, jewelry, and lapidary work of the Department of Labor the highest Interested persons may submit written industry in Puerto Rico is defined as the minimum wage rates for the industry data, views, or argument, regarding this manufacture from any material of but­ which it determines, having due regard proposal by mailing them to the Director tons, buckles, jewelry (including rosa­ to economic and competitive conditions, of the Bureau of Labor Standards, U.S. ries) , jewelry findings (including beads), will not substantially curtail employment Department of Labor, Railway Labor and hair ornaments and accessories; and in the industry, and will not give any in­ Building, 400 First Street NW., Washing­ the processing of natural or synthetic dustry in Puerto Rico a competitive ad­ ton, D.C. 20212, within 30 days after this stones for jewelry or industrial use. vantage over any industry in the United States outside of Puerto Rico, the Virgin notice is published in the F ederal The artificial flower, decoration, and R eg ister. Islands, or American Samoa. However, party favor industry in Puerto Rico is no industry committee shall recommend (Secs. 1, 4, 49 Stat. 2036, 2038; 41 Ü.S.C. 35, defined as the manufacture of flowers, 38; 5 U.S.C. 556) minimum wage rates in excess of $1-60 buds, berries, foliage, leaves, fruits, an hour for work which would have been Signed at Washington, D.C., this 4th plants, stems, and branches which are covered by section 6 of the Act if it had day of November 1969. commonly or commercially known as been performed prior to the effective artificial; and the manufacture of party date of the Fair Labor Standards Amend­ G eorge P. S h u l t z , favors and ornaments and decorations Secretary of Labor. ments of 1966. Nor shall any committee for holidays, except those made of recommend minimum wage rates in ex­ [F.R. Doc. 69-13308; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; molded plastic or metal other than me­ cess of $1.45 an hour for the period 8:49 a.m.] tallic chenille, foil or tinsel. ending January 31, 1971, nor in excess The straw, hair, and related products of $1.60 per hour thereafter, for work industry in Puerto Rico is defined as the Wage and Hour Division brought within the purview of section 6 manufacture of products made wholly or of the Act by the Fair Labor Standards [ 29 CFR Parts 613, 616, 688, 690 ] chiefly of straw, raffia, sisal, maguey, Amendments of 1966. palm leaves, rushes, grasses, hair, hair [Administrative Order 611] Whenever an industry committee finds bristles, feathers, and similar materials: that a higher minimum wage may be INDUSTRY COMMITTEES FOR FABRI­ Provided, however, That the industry determined for employees engaged in cer­ CATED PLASTIC PRODUCTS; BUT­ shall not cover products or activities in­ tain activities in the industry than may cluded in the artificial flower, decora­ TON, JEWELRY AND LAPIDARY be determined for other employees in tion, and party favor industry (29 CFR that industry, the committee shall WORK; ARTIFICIAL FLOWER, DEC­ Part 688), the button, jewelry, and lapi­ recommend such reasonable classifica­ ORATION AND PARTY FAVOR; dary work industry (29 CFR Part 616), tions within that industry as it deter­ AND STRAW, HAIR AND RELATED the children’s dress and related products mines to be necessary for the purpose oi PRODUCTS INDUSTRIES IN PUERTO industry (29 CFR 610), the men’s and fixing for each classification the highest RICO boys’ clothing and related products in­ minimum wage rate that can be deter­ dustry (29 CFR Part 615), the shoe and mined for it under the principles set Appointment To Investigate Con­ related products industry (29 CFR Part forth herein and in 29 CFR 511.10 whicn ditions and Recommend Minimum 601), or the textile and textile products will not substantially curtail employme^ Wages; Notice of Hearing inustry (29 CFR Part 699). in such classification and which will not Pursuant to section 8 of the Fair Labor give a competitive advantage to any Pursuant to section 5 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 208), group in the industry. No classificatio Standards Act of 1938 (29 U.S.C. 205), Reorganization Plan No. 6 of 1950 (3 shall be made, however, and no minimu

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1569 PROPOSED RULE MAKING 18045 wage rate shall be fixed solely on a re­ lin G and the second in tetracycline mothymol blue and 150 milligrams of gional basis or on the basis of age or sex. antibiotics. After these proposed sec­ anhydrous sodium carbonate in 100 milli­ In determining whether there should be tions are adopted and become effective, liters of distilled water. classifications within an industry, in Parts 141 and 146 will be amended to (2) pH 9.0 buffer: Dissolve 84 grams making such classifications, and in de­ establish maximum limits of 100 parts of sodium bicarbonate in 800 milliliters termining the minimum wage rates for per million of quaternary ammonium of water. Adjust the pH to 9.0 with 1.0N such classifications, each industry com­ compounds for antibiotics to be used in sodium hydroxide and dilute to 1 liter mittee shall consider, among other rele­ the manufacturer of parenteral prod­ with distilled water. vant factors, the following: (1) Com­ ucts and 500 parts per million for anti­ (3) Concentrated hydrochloric acid. petitive conditions as affected by trans­ biotics to be used in the manufacture (4) 6.0N Hydrochloric acid. portation, living, and production costs; of oral formulations. (2) wages established for work of like Accordingly, pursuant to the pro­ (5) Chloroform. or comparable character by collective visions of the Federal Food, Drug, and (6) Benzethonium chloride standard labor agreements negotiated between Cosmetic Act (sec. 507, 59 Stat. 463, as solution: Dissolve 500 milligrams of employers and employees by representa­ amended; 21 U.S.C. 357) and under au­ benzethonium chloride (molecular tives of their own choosing; and (3) thority delegated to the Commissioner weight 466.09) in 1 liter of distilled water. wages paid for work of like or comparable (21 CFR 2.120), it is proposed that two (7) Bromophenol-blue indicator: Pre­ character by employers who voluntarily new sections be added to Part 141 as pare a 0.1 percent aqueous solution. maintain minimum wage standards in follows: (8) Sodium carbonate solution: Pre­ the industry. § 141.120 Microbiological agar diffu­ pare a 10 percent aqueous solution. The Administrator shall prepare an sion assay method for residues of (9) Sodium lauryl sulfate standard economic report for each industry com­ quaternary ammonium compounds solution: Dissolve 200 milligrams of mittee containing such data as he is in procaine penicillin G. sodium lauryl sulfate in 1 liter of dis­ able to assemble pertinent to the mat­ (a) Preparation of inoculated plates. tilled water. ters referred to them. Copies of such Proceed as directed in § 141.110(a), using (10) Alkyl (Cia-Cis) trimethyl ammo­ reports may be obtained at the national 10 milliliters of medium 11 for the base nium chloride standard solution: Use a and Puerto Rican offices of the Wage layer and 4 milliliters of medium 11, in­ preparation of alkyl trimethyl ammo­ and Hour and Public Contracts Divisions oculated with 0.3 to 0.4 milliliter of test nium chloride, the alkyl portion of which of the U.S. Department of Labor as soon organism D per 100 milliliters of media, is predominantly C«,. Prepare a solution as they are completed and prior to the for the seed layer. Incubate the plates containing 0.6 milligram per milliliter hearings. The industry committees shall at 32° C. of the alkyl (Cw) trimethyl ammonium take official notice of the facts stated in (b) Preparation of standard stock solu­ chloride compound in distilled water. the economic reports to the extent that tion and standard response line solutions. (b) Standardization of sodium lauryl they are not refuted at the hearing. Use the particular quaternary ammoni­ sulfate standard solution. Transfer 5 The procedures of the industry com­ um compound known to be used in the milliliters of benzethonium chloride mittees shall be governed by 29 CFR process of manufacturing the batch of standard solution into a 125-milliliter Part 511. Interested persons wishing to procaine penicillin G being tested. Pre­ separatory funnel. Add 3 milliliters of participate in the hearings shall file pre- pare a convenient standard stock solu­ chloroform, 1 milliliter of 10 percent hearing statements, as provided in 29 tion of the quaternary ammonium com­ sodium carbonate solution, three drops CFR 511.8 containing the data speci­ pound in 0.1 M potassium phosphate of bromophenol blue indicator and titrate fied in that section not later than 10 buffer, pH 8.0 (solution 3). Further with the sodium lauryl sulfate standard days before the hearing date set for dilute an aliquot of the standard stock solution. Shake after each addition of the committees as set forth in this notice solution with sufficient solution 3 to ob­ the sodium lauryl sulfate standard solu­ of hearing; i.e., January 9, 1970. tain the proper concentrations for the tion until the strong blue color in the Signed at Washington, D.C., this 3d standard response line. These concen­ chloroform layer disappears. Calculate day of November 1969. trations are 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0, and 40.0 the benzethonium chloride equivalent of micrograms per milliliter, with the 10.0 each milliliter of sodium lauryl sulfate G eorge P. S h u l t z , micrograms per milliliter solution as the standard solution as follows: Secretary of Labor. midpoint of the standard response line. 2.5 [F.R. Doc. 69-13269; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; (c) Preparation of sample for test. —. 8:46 a.m.] Accurately weigh approximately 200 V milligrams of the sample to be tested w h ere: into a glass-stoppered Erlenmeyer flask. W6=Benzethonium chloride equivalent (in Add 0.5 milliliter of sterile penicillinase milligrams) of each milliliter of DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, solution and sufficient solution 3 to make sodium lauryl sulfate standard a suspension containing 40 milligrams of solu tion . sample in each milliliter. Inactivate and V =Milliliters of sodium lauryl sulfate EDUCATION, AND WELFARE dissolve the procaine penicillin G by in­ standard solution used. Food and Drug Administration cubating the suspension for 3 to 4 hours' (c) Standardization of alkyl (Ci2-Ci8) at 37° C. with occasional shaking. trimethyl ammonium chloride standard E 21 CFR Part 141 1 (d) Procedure for assay. Proceed as solution. Transfer exactly 3 milliliters of directed in § 141.110(c). the alkyl (Ck-Cw) trimethyl ammonium ANTIBIOTIC AND ANTIBIOTIC- (e) Estimation of potency. Proceed as chloride stock solution to a 125-milliliter CONTAINING DRUGS directed in § 141.110(d). separatory funnel. Add 3 milliliters of chloroform, 1 milliter of sodium carbon­ Proposed Tests Regarding Residual (f) Calculation of content of quater­ nary ammonium compounds. Parts per ate solution, and 3 drops of the bromo­ Quaternary Amines million of quaternary ammonium com­ phenol blue solution and titrate with To establish limits for quaternary pounds =P x 25, where : sodium lauryl sulfate standard solution amines as a certification requirement P —Potency in terms of micrograms of (standardized as described in paragraph jor bulk antibiotics used in oral and quaternary ammonium compounds (b) of this section). Shake after each ad­ ^ r®n^eral products, the Commissioner per milliliter of assay solution. dition of the sodium lauryl sulfate stand­ ard solution until the strong blue color in m Food and Drugs proposes that the § 141.585 Colorimetric method for qua­ tests set forth below be added to Part the chloroform layer disappears. Deter­ ternary ammonium compounds in mine the equivalent number of milli­ of the antibiotic drug regulations, tetracycline antibiotics. grams as alkyl (Cw) trimethyl am­ he first test concerns quaternary am­ (a) Reagents. (1) Bromothymol blue monium chloride per milliliter by means monium compounds in procaine penicil­ solution: Dissolve 150 milligrams of bro- of the following calculation:

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18046 PROPOSED RULE MAKING

_ VXWbXMW of the chloroform layer at a wavelength (f ) Calculation. Determine the amount It A ---- J 3X466.09 of 420 millimicrons using chloroform as of quaternary ammonium compounds in where: a blank. - the sample by the following calculation: W«=Milligrams of alkyl (Cie) trimethyl ammonium chloride per milliliter. Quaternary ammonium compounds (parte per million) as alkyl (C1#) trimethyl ammonium MW —Molecular weight of alkyl (Cia-C18) Absorbance of sample solution X 100 trimethyl ammonium chloride chloride nr------—:-----: - - ...... —...... — - ...... standard (if compound used is Absorbance of standard solution x weight of sample in grams alkyl (C14) , MW = 3 1 9 .5 ). (d) Preparation of sample solution. Any interested person may, within 30 It appearing, that the date for filing From the following table select the ap­ days from the date of publication of this indications of desire to participate, propriate solvent for the particular anti­ notice in the F ederal R eg ister, file with namely, September 25, 1969, is now past, biotic to be tested. Transfer an accu­ the Hearing Clerk, Department of with various individual shippers and rately weighed sample of approximately Health, Education, and Welfare, Room household goods carriers, associations of 0.5 gram to a 125-milliliter separatory 5440, 330 Independence Avenue SW., movers and warehousemen, and a for­ funnel, dissolve with 8.0 milliliters of the Washington, D.C. 20201, written com­ warder association responding; designated solvent solution, and proceed ments (preferably in quintuplicate) re­ And it further appearing, that peti­ as directed in paragraph (e) of this garding this proposal. Comments may be tioner has under date of September 29 section. accompanied by a memorandum or brief and October 2, 1969 refused to submit in support thereof. A n tib io tic S olven t an amended rule for consideration as di­ Chlortetracycline____ 1. ON Sodium hy­ Dated: October 30, 1969. rected by the order instituting the in­ droxide. stant proceeding; which refusal has Chlortetracycline bi- Do. J . K . K ir k , prompted a demand dated October 2, su lfate. Associate Commissioner 1969, by the Household Goods Forward­ for Compliance. Chlortetracycline hy­ Do. ers Association of America, Inc., that the drochloride. [F.R. Doc. 69-13259; Filed, Not. 6 , 1969; proceeding be terminated; wherefore: Do. 8:45 a.m.] Demethylohlortetracy- Do. It is ordered, That in view of peti­ cline hydrochloride. tioner’s failure to comply with the re­ Tetracycline _.______Do. Tetracycline hydro­ Distilled water. INTERSTATE COMMERCE quirement imposed in the instituting chloride. order herein, which was in effect a con­ Oxytetracycline —:— 1. ON Sodium hy­ droxide. COMMISSION dition precedent to further consideration Oxytetracycline hy­ Distilled water. [ 49 CFR Part 1056 1 and disposition, this proceeding be, and drochloride. it is hereby, dismissed. [Ex Parte No. MC-19 (Sub-No. 7)] (e) Procedure. Acidify the sample so­ By the Commission, Division 2. lution with 2.0 milliliters of concen­ MOTOR CARRIERS OF HOUSEHOLD trated hydrochloric acid. Add 10.0 milli­ GOODS [ se a l ] H. N e i l G arson, Secretary. liters of chloroform and shake for 2 Notice of Proposed Rule Making minutes. Allow the phases to separate [F.R. Doc. 69-13298; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; and drain the chloroform layer into a N ovember 4, 1969. 8:48 a.m.] second separatory funnel. (When testing Order. At a session of the Interstate demethylchlortetracycline, it may be Commerce Commission, Division 2, held necessary to centrifuge in order to sepa­ at its office in Washington, D.C., on the rate the layers.) Wash the chloroform 23d day of October 1969. DEPARTMENT OF layer with 10.0 milliliters of 6.01V hydro­ Upon further consideration of a peti­ chloric acid and drain the chloroform tion filed on April 29, 1969 by the House­ TRANSPORTATION layer into a third separatory funnel. To hold Goods Carriers’ Bureau seeking ap­ the third separatory funnel, add 10.0 proval of a proposed rule prohibiting Coast Guard household goods carriers from partici­ milliliters of pH 9.0 buffer and 1.0 mil­ [ 46 CFR Part 146 1 liliter of bromothymol blue solution. pating in more than one level of rates Shake for 2 minutes, allow the phases to for the same transportation between the [CGFR 69-106] separate, and determine the absorbance same points in the same direction; and REPORTS OF HAZARDOUS of the chloroform layer at a wavelength the order of Division 2 entered herein on of 420 millimicrons using chloroform as August 8, 1969 directing the institution MATERIALS INCIDENTS a blank. Dilute an aliquot of the alkyl of a rule-making proceeding and requir­ Proposed Rule Making and Public (Ci2-Cw) trimethyl ammonium chloride ing petitioner to submit an amended pro­ Hearing standard solution in distilled water to a posed rule, as follows : concentration of exactly 100 micrograms It is further ordered, That the petitioner Correction of alkyl (C m) trimethyl ammonium chlo­ shall submit a rephrasing of the proposed In F.R. Doc. 69-12877 appearing at ride per milliliter and transfer 1.0 milli­ rule to except from the operation thereof page 17446 in the issue of Wednesday, liter to a separatory funnel. Add 10.0 the transportation of machinery of unusual milliliters of chloroform, 10.0 milliliters nature or value and the services of persons October 29, 1969, the date in the second of pH 9.0 buffer, and 1.0 milliliter of holding authority of the type authorized in .sentence of the third paragraph now bromothymol blue solution; shake for 2 Kingpak; Inc., Investigation of Operations, reading “January 12, 1969” should read minutes and determine the absorbance supra; “January 12,1970”.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18047 Notices

lar organelles in tissue and organ cul­ HANOVER BOROUGH SCHOOL department of co m m erce tures of various mammalian neoplasms. DISTRICT, PA., ET AL. Comments: No comments have been re­ Notice of Applications for Duty-Free Business and Defense Services ceived with respect to this application. Administration Decision: Application approved. No in­ Entry of Scientific Articles BETH ISRAEL HOSPITAL strument or apparatus of equivalent The following are notices of the receipt scientific value to the foreign article, for of applications for duty-free entry of Notice of Decision on Application for such purposes as this article is intended scientific articles pursuant to section 6(c) Duty-Free Entry of Scientific Article to be used, is being manufactured in the of the Educational, Scientific, and Cul­ United States. Reasons: (1) The foreign tural Materials Importation Act of 1966 The following is a decision on an ap­ article specifies a resolving capability of (Public Law 89-651; 80 Stat. 897). Inter­ plication for duty-free entry of a scien­ 3.5 angstroms at an accelerating voltage ested persons may present their views tific article pursuant to section 6(c) of of 20 kilovolts. The most closely compa­ with respect to the question of whether the Educational, Scientific, and Cultural rable domestic instrument is the Model an instrument or apparatus of equiva­ Materials Importation Act of 1966 (Pub­ EMU-4B formerly manufactured by the lent scientific value for the purposes for lic Law 89-651, 80 Stat. 897) and the Radio Corp. of America (RCA) and cur­ which the article is intended to be used regulations issued thereunder (32 F.R. rently being produced by the Forgflo is being manufactured in the United 2433etseqJ. f Corp. (Forgflo). The Model EMU-4B States. Such comments must be filed in A copy of the record pertaining to this specifies a resolving capability of five triplicate with the Director, Scientific In­ decision is available for public review Angstroms, but does not indicate strument Evaluation Division, Business during ordinary business hours of the whether this can be attained at 20-kilo­ and Defense Services Administration, Department of Commerce, at the Scien­ volt accelerating voltage. The Depart­ Washington, D.C. 20230, within 20 calen­ tific Instrument Evaluation Division, De­ ment of Health, Education, and Welfare partment of Commerce, Washington, dar days after date on which this notice (HEW) advises us that the additional of application is published in the F ederal D.C. resolving capability of the foreign article R e g ister . Docket No. 69-00542-33-46040. Appli­ is pertinent to the purposes for which the Regulations issued under cited Act, cant: Beth Israel Hospital, 330 Brook­ foreign article is intended to be used. published in the February 4,1967, issue of line Avenue, Boston, Mass. 02215. Article: (HEW memorandum dated July 19, the F ederal R eg ister , prescribe the re­ Electron microscope, Model EM 300. 1969.) (2) The foreign article provides a quirements applicable to comments. Manufacturer: Philips Electronic In­ continuous range from 200 to 500,000 A copy of each application is on file, struments, The Netherlands. Intended magnifications, whereas the Model and may be examined during ordinary use of article: The article will be used in EMU-4B provides a range from 400 to Commerce Department business hours at a large number of scientific investiga­ 220,000 magnifications. But for the the Scientific Instrument Evaluation Di­ tions which include the following: highest quality, low magnification elec­ vision, Department of Commerce, Wash­ a. Cytochemical localization of several tron micrographs, RCA specifies a ington, D.C. hydrolytic enzymes in smooth muscle change from the standard pole piece to Docket No. 70-00258-16-61800. Appli­ cells, and their alterations in response to a special wide, bore, long focal length cant: Hanover Borough School District, various physiologic, pharmacologic and pole piece. (RCA specifications for 190 East Walnut Street, Hanover, Pa. pathologic stimuli. EMU-4B Electron Microscope; SI-103A, 17331. Article: Planetariums arid auxil­ b. Cytochemical study of lysosomal July 1, 1968, page 1, specification 3(c).) iary projectors, Apollo model.. Manufac­ enzymes in platelets during aggregation. In this connection, HEW advises that a turer: Goto Optical Co., Japan. Intended c. Ionic movements in the turtle blad­ change in pole pieces requires breaking use of article: The article will be used for der preparation, including the effects of the vacuum in the lens column, thus in­ instruction in courses in astronomy, navi­ enzymatic poisons. ducing the contamination of the speci­ gation and weather for different grade d. Studies of experimental injury to men. Since the achievement of the appli-. levels and will be operated by both stu­ the gastrointestinal mucosa. In experi­ cant’s research purposes necessitates the dents and teachers. Application received mental injury to the gastric mucosa in­ capability to shift immediately from intensive scanning at low magnifications by Commissioner of Customs: October 16, duced by generalized stress situations or 1969. local increase in intraluminal pressure, to high magnification of selected areas Docket No. 70-00259-33-46070. Appli­ an ischemic factor appears important. of the specimen, HEW advises that the cant: U. S. Department of Agriculture, e. Analysis of the cellular transform a­ continuous magnification range of the ARS, Southern Administrative Division, tions involved in hyperplasia, metaplasia foreign article is a pertinent character­ Post Office Box 53326, 701 Loyola Avenue, and neoplasia of the gastrointestinal istic. For these reasons, we find that the Room T-12017, New Orleans, La. 70113. epithelium. Model EMU-4B is not of equivalent scientific value to the foreign article for Article: Scanning ’ electron microscope, f. Composition of tubular casts en­ such purposes as this article is intended model “Stereosgan”. Manufacturer: countered in experimental renal failure. Cambridge Scientific Instruments Co., to be used. g. Structure and function of various The Department of Commerce knows Ltd., United Kingdom. Intended use of subcellular fractions of myocardial cells of no other instrument or apparatus of article: The article will be used for a Jh normal and in experimental cardiac equivalent scientific value to the foreign wide variety of entomological investiga­ hypertrophy. article, for the purposes for which such tions. Location and identification of in­ h. Pathways and control mechanisms article is intended to be used, which is sect sensory structures will be studied, as „ mammalian epidermal protein syn­ being manufactured in the United well as surface architecture of the insect thesis. States. integument, its pores, and membranes. i. Effects of various humora C h a r ley M. D e n t o n , Application received by Commissioner of cellular enzymatic agents on ii Assistant Administrator for In­ Customs: October 16, 1969. Platelet organellar fractions. dustry Operations, Business Docket No. 70-00260-33-46040. Appli­ j. Effects of various Defense Services Administra­ cant: University of Florida, Gainesville, «gents on Mycoplasma. tion. Fla. 32601. Article: Electron microscope, h. Structural and functional altera- [F.R. Doc. 69-13255; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; Model HS-8. Manufacturer: Hitachi, u°ns in ribosomes and related subcellu­ 8:45 a.m.] Ltd., Japan. Intended use of article: The

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18048 NOTICES article will be used in a course in electron graduate and graduate students in the article: The article will be used for a microscopy. For teaching, the applicant biological sciences. As a teaching facil­ number of biological research projects requires an instrument that is simple and ity, it will be used in 13 biology courses by faculty members of the university and convenient to operate. In addition to the as outlined by the applicant and, in a 2- the staff of the hospital. Projects include teaching program, the electron micro­ week introductory training course in correlative chemical and electron micro­ scope will be used by graduate students techniques of electron microscopy. As a scope investigation of the various storage for thesis and dissertation research. Ap­ research facility, it will be used by both forms of iron, human tumors and mye­ plication received by Commissioner of graduate students and faculty. Applica­ linated nerve fibers. Application received Customs: October 16,1969. - tion received by Commissioner of Cus­ by Commissioner of Customs: October 21, Docket No. 70-00263-41-35550. Appli­ toms: October 20, 1969. 1969. cant: University of California, Santa Docket No. 70-00270-63-46500. Appli­ Docket No. 70-00272-33-46040. Appli­ Barbara, Santa Barbara, Calif. 93106. Ar­ cant: Western Illinois University, Ma­ cant: University of Virginia, School of ticle: Demonstration gyro. Manufactur­ comb, HI. 61455. Article: Ultramicro­ Medicine, Charlottesville, Va. 22901. Ar­ er: Phywe Aktiengesellschaft, West Ger­ tome, Model “Om U2.” Manufacturer: ticle: Electron microscope, Model AEI many. Intended use of article: The article C. Reichert Optische Werke A.G., Aus­ EM 801. Manufacturer: Associated Elec­ will be used to demonstrate problems of tria. Intended use of article: The article trical Industries Ltd., United Kingdom. nutation and precession due to wheel un­ will be used in a fine structure study of Intended use of article : The article will balance and gimbal masses. Application barley which is infected with the powdery be used for ultrastructural studies of received by Commissioner of Customs: mildew fungus, specifically the study con­ nerve tissues. Studies of brain will focus October 20,1969. cerning the events which occur in the on development of the cerebral cortex. Docket. No. 70-00264-33-46040. Appli­ initial penetration of the fungus into the Another project will be high resolution cant: Massachusetts General Hospital, host barley cell leading to fungal hausto- studies of membranes, microtubules, fila­ Fruit Street, Boston, Mass. 02114. Article: rial formation. Application received by ments, synapses, and myelin sheaths. Ap­ Electron microscope, Model 100B. Manu­ Commissioner of Customs: October 21, plication received by Commissioner of facturer: Japan Electron Optics Labora­ 1960. Customs: October 21, 1969. tory, Ltd., Japan. Intended use of article: Docket No. 70-00271-33-46040. Appli­ Charley M. Denton, The article will be used for long term cant: Northwestern University Medical Assistant Administrator for In­ on-going studies on the primary, second­ School, Chicago Wesley Memorial Hos­ dustry Operations, Business ary, and tertiary organization of struc­ pital, 303 East Chicago Avenue, Chicago, and Defense Services Admin­ tural macromolecules, principally colla­ 111. 60611. Article: Electron microscope, istration. gen and myosin. Application received by Commissioner of Customs: October 20, Model EM 300. Manufacturer: N. V. [P.R. Doc. 69-13254; Plied, Nov. 6 , 1969; 1969. Philips, The Netherlands. Intended use of 8:45 a.m .] Docket. No. 70-02265-33-46500. Appli­ cant: University of Connecticut, Health Center, School of Medicine, Hartford Plaza, Hartford, Conn. 06105. Article: Ul­ DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE tramicrotome, LKB 8800. Manufacturer: T.k b Produkter AB, Sweden. Intended Consumer and Marketing Service use of article: The article will be used as a research tool in a biomedical laboratory HUMANELY SLAUGHTERED LIVESTOCK concerned primarily with research in the Identification of Carcasses; Changes in Lists of Establishments cytology of the central nervous system. Application received by Commissioner of Pursuant to section 4 of the Act of August 27, 1958 (7 U.S.C. 1904), and Customs: October 20, 1969. the statement of policy thereunder in 9 CFR 381.1, the lists (34 F.R. 13378,14445, and Docket No. 70-00267-16-61800. Appli­ 16634) of establishments which are operated under Federal inspection pursuant to cant: Whitehall-Coplay School District, the Federal Meat Inspection Act (21 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) and which use humane 3126 Lehigh Street, Whitehall, Pa. 18052. methods of slaughter and incidental handling of livestock are hereby amended as follows: . Article: Planetarium, Venus model. The reference to swine with respect to Broadway Packing Co., Inc., Establishment Manufacturer: Goto Optical Manufac­ 2264, is deleted. The reference to calves with respect to Fort Plain Packing Co., Inc., turing Co., Japan. Intended use of Establishment 5074, is deleted. The reference to sheep with respect to White Packing article: The article will be used for pre­ Co., Establishment 6595, is deleted. The reference to cattle with respect to Western cision sky and apparent sky simulation Meat Packers, Inc., Establishment 7028, is deleted. for educational and public programs in­ The following table lists species at additional establishments and additional species cluding astronomy and navigation in­ at previously listed establishments that have been reported as being slaughtered ana struction. Application received by Com­ handled humanely. missioner of Customs: October 20, 1969. Name of establishment Establishment No. Cattle Calves Sheep Goats Swine Horses Mules Docket No. 70-00268-33-46040. Appli­ (*) cant: Tulane University, 6823 St. Charles 270 (*) 401 A (*) Avenue, New Orleans, La. 70118. Article: Rfifi (*) Electron microscope, Model 300. Manu­ Northwest Packing Co...... __ 2283...... (*) ...... -...... - facturer: Philips Electron Instruments. Bob Evans Farms, Inc...... 6785...... (*) ...... Metzger Packing Co., Inc...... 7306------..: ------(*) ------..------—- (*) The Netherlands. Intended use of article: Contris Packing Co...... 7438---- —'.------( ) The article will be used in research con­ New establishments reported: 8. cerning the isolated intraerythrocytic Fineberg Packing Co...... 428...... (*) — - viral particles, the reported transmission Downs Packing, Inc...... (*) — - of the small protozoan, and an ultra- M2 (*) Frosty Morn Meats...... 731.. i ...... — ...... (*) structural study of nematode gametes. Siouxland Dressed Beef Co...... 857F...... Application received by Commissioner of ... 886 ...... (*) ... 2281...... - (*) — ______—------Customs: October 20, 1969. Ralph. Packing Co., Inc______...... 5228...... — — (*) ...... 1 Docket No. 70-00269-99-46040. Ap­ Hershey Estates Abattoir...... 6388...... plicant: Whittier College, 13406 East Mount Vernon Meat Co., Inc...... 6039-...... - <*) — - Philadephia Street, Whittier, Calif. Species added: 11. 90608. Article: Electron microscope, Done at Washington, D.C., on November 4,1969. G . H. W ise , Model HS-8-1. Manufacturer: Hitachi, Deputy Administrator," Ltd.,. Japan. Intended use of article: The Consumer protection. article will function primarily as a teach­ ing and training instrument for under­ [FJR. Doc. 69-13305; P iled, Nov. 6 , 1960; 8:48 am.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18049

This action is taken pursuant to the R hode Islan d ______. . . .4820 provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and South Carolina______- . 6559 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR South Dakota______.5912 Cosmetic Act (sec. 408(j), 68 Stat. 512; T e n n e s s e e ______. 6245 Fish and Wildlife Service 21 U.S.C. 346a(j)) and under authority Texas ______. 5696 [Docket No. A-510] delegated to the Commissioner (21 CFR U tah ______.5799 2.120). V erm ont ______. 5588 DOUGLAS E. SWANBERG V ir g in ia ______,___ 5593 Dated: October 31,1969. Washington ______. 4548 ^ Notice of Loan Application R. E. D uggan, West Virginia______,___ . 6328 W isconsin ______1__ . 5012 N ovem ber 3,1969. Acting Associate Commissioner for Compliance. W yom ing ______. 5308 Douglas E. Swanberg, Box 296, Yaku- District of Columbia____ . 3445 tat, Alaska 99689, has applied for a loan [F.R. Doc. 69-13271; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; American Samoa______. 6667 from the Fisheries Loan Fund to aid in 8:46 a.m.] Canal Zone______financing the purchase of a used 35.0- G uam ______. 6667 foot registered léhgth wood vessel to en­ Puerto Rico______. 6667 gage in the fishery for salmon. Office of Education Virgin Islands______. 6667 Notice is hereby given pursuant to the CONSTRUCTION OF ACADEMIC FA­ Approved: November 3, 1969. provisions of Public Law 89-85 and Fisheries Loan Fund Procedures (50 CFR CILITIES AND IMPROVEMENT OF J a m es E. A l l e n , Jr., Part 250, as revised) that the above- UNDERGRADUATE INSTRUCTION U.S. Commissioner of Education. [F.R. Doc. 69-13288; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; entitled application is being considered Promulgation of Allotment Ratios by the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, 8:47 a.m .] Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of Pursuant to both section 103 of the the Interior, Washington, D.C. 20240. Higher Education Facilities Act of 1963, Any person desiring to submit evidence Public Law 88-204, 77 Stat. 363, which Office of the Secretary that the contemplated operation of such provides for grants for construction of GENERAL COUNSEL ET AL. vessel will cause economic hardship or academic facilities for public community injury to efficient vessel operators al-~ colleges and technical institutes, and Delegation of Authority To Certify ready operating in that fishery must sub­ section 602 of the Higher Education Act True Copies mit such evidence in writing to the Di­ of 1965, Public Law 89-329, 77 Stat. 1219, rector, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, which provides for financial assistance Under the authority vested in me by within 30 days from the date of publica­ for the improvement of undergraduate the Secretary, 34 F.R. 17346: tion of this notice. If such evidence is instruction, and on the basis of the aver­ 1. I hereby redelegate to the following received it will be evaluated along with age of the incomes per person of the the authority to certify true copies of any such other evidence as may be available States and of all the States for the three books, records, papers, or other docu­ before making a determination that the most recent consecutive calendar years ments on file within the Department, or contemplated operations of the vessel will for which satisfactory data are available extracts from such, to certify that true or will not cause such economic hardship from the Department of Commerce, the copies are true copies of the entire file or injury. of the Department, to certify the com­ iollowing allotment ratios for the States plete original record, or to certify the C. E. P e te r so n , are hereby promulgated, effective with Chief, nonexistence of records on file within the Division of Financial Assistance. respect to the allotment of such funds Department, and to cause the Seal of as may be appropriated for the fiscal the Department to be affixed to such [F.R. Doc. 69-13274; Filed, Nov. 6 , i960; year ending June 30, 1970: certifications. 8:46 a.m.] These same officials are authorized to A la b a m a ______—-- 0. 6547 A la s k a ______.4156 cause the Seal to be affixed to agree­ Arizona ______. 5681 ments, awards, citations, diplomas, and Arkansas ______. 6646 similar documents. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, C a lifo r n ia ______- — .4154 To whom delegated Area o f A u th o rity C o lo ra d o ______. 5069 General Counsel_____ Department. EDUCATION, AND WELFARE C o n n e c tic u t______. 3733 Executive Officer, Of­ Office of the Secre­ D e la w a r e _s ______.4119 fice of the Secretary. tary. Food and Drug Administration Florida ______. 5534 Administrator, Social Social and Reha­ G e o r g ia ______. 6020 and Rehabilitation bilitation Service. GIBBERELLIC ACID H a w a ii______.4769 Service. I d a h o ______.5844 Commissioner of Edu­ Office of Education. Notice of Establishment of Temporary I llin o is ______. 4041 cation. Tolerance for Pesticide Chemical I n d ia n a ______;___ . 4882 Commissioner of So­ Social Security Ad­ I o w a ______. 5015 cial Security. ministration. Notice is given that att the request of K ansas ______. 5157 Administrator, Con­ Consumer Protec- Amdal Co., Division of Abbott Labora­ K entucky ______. 6222 sumer Protection tection and En- tories, North Chicago, 111. 60064, a tempo­ L o u is ia n a ______. 6168 and Environmental vironmental M aine ______.5806 Health Service. Health Service. rary tolerance of 0.15 part per million is M aryland ______. 4560 Administrator, Health Health Services and ^tablished for negligible residues of the Massachusetts______.4437 Services and Mental Mental Health. Plant regulator gibberellic acid in or on M ich ig a n ______. 4535 Health Administra­ the raw agricultural commodity sugar­ M in n eso ta _____ .5110 tion. cane. The Commissioner of Food and M ississippi______. 6667 ’ Director, National In­ National Institutes urugs has determined that this tempo- M issouri ______. 5244 stitutes of Health. o f H ealth. M o n ta n a ______. 5573 Sth °^ eranCe protect the public Nebraska ______.5126 This authority may be redelegated. Nevada ______. 4157 2. I also redelegate to the Administra­ A condition under which this tempo- New Hampshire______. 5238 tive Assistant, Reviewing Authority tolerance is established is that the New Jersey______. 4161 (Civil Rights) Office of the Assistant Sec­ Plant regulator will be used in accord­ New M exico______. 6020 retary for Administration, the authority ance with the temporary permit issued by New York_:______. 4060 as official custodian of the files in all ^Ph-rtment of Agriculture. Dis- North Carolina______. 6196 matters pertaining to compliance pro­ noution will be under the Amdal Co. North Dakota______. 5950 name. O h io ______.4858 ceedings under title VI of the Civil Rights O klahom a ______. 5839 Act and as such custodian the authority temporary tolerance expires Oc­ Oregon ______. 5076 to certify true copies of any books, rec­ tober 31, 1970. Pennsylvania ______.4978 ords, papers, or other documents of the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VO!?. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18050 NOTICES

Department pertaining to such matters achieve conformance with the standard Issued in Washington, D.C., on Octo­ and to certify extracts from any such after it is adopted. ber 30, 1969. books, records, papers, or other docu­ Interested persons are invited to sub­ J. D. CONERLY, ments on file within the Department as mit such written data and comments on Acting Director, Systems Research true extracts and to certify that true the proposed selection order as they may and Development Service. copies are true copies of the entire file of desire. Communications should identify U.S. National Aviation Standard for the the Department in any such matters and the notice number and be submitted in VORTAC (VOR-TACAN-DME) System to cause the Seal of the Department to be duplicate to: Director, Systems Research affixed to such. certifications. This au­ and Development Service, Attention: 1. GENERAL thority may not be redelegated. RD-54, Federal Aviation Administration, Under Public Law 85-726, the FAA (Fed­ 3. Redelegations made under the pre­Department of Transportation, 800 In­ eral Aviation Administration) is charged vious redelegation of authority shall re­ dependence Avenue SW., Washington, with providing for the regulation and pro­ main in effect until appropriate new motion of civil aviation in such a m anner as D.C. 20590, on or before January 15,1970. to best foster its development an d safety, redelegations are made. All comments submitted will be avail­ and to provide for the safe and efficient use Dated: November 1,1969. able for examination in Room 720, 800 of the airspace by both civil and military Independence Avenue SW., Washington, aircraft, and for other purposes. Explicitly, J a m e s F armer, D.C., before and after the closing date the Administrator shall develop, modify, test, Assistant Secretary for comments. and evaluate systems, procedures, facilities, for Administration. The text of the proposed selection and devices, as well as define the perform­ ance characteristics thereof, to m eet the [F.R. Doc. 69-13287; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; order and the embodied U.S. National needs for safe and efficient navigation and 8:47 a.m .] Aviation Standard for the VORTAC sys­ traffic control of all civil and m ilitary avia­ tem is as follows: tion operating in a common Civil/Military 1. Purpose. This order establishes the System of Air Navigation and Traffic Control. VORTAC (VÔR-TACAN-DME) s t a n d a r d 1.1 The VORTAC (VOR-TACAN-DME) DEPARTMENT OF which defines the 'performance required of system characteristics. P ursuant to 1, the system and its components. this standard defines the VOR (VHF 2. Requirement. VORTAC (VOR-TACAN- Omnidirectional Radio Range) —TACAN TRANSPORTATION DME) is the primary short distance naviga­ (Tactical Air Navigation)—DME (Distance tion aid used in the National Airspace Sys­ Measuring Equipment) system in the United Federal Aviation Administration tem of air navigation and traffic control. States, its application and its performance [Notice 69-RD-l] Achievement of navigation system perform­ characteristics. For ground components of ance commensurate with the overall opera­ the system, the material identifies the U.S. NATIONAL AVIATION STAND­ tional use requirements necessitates defini­ functional, signal, and performance charac­ ARD FOR THE VORTAC SYSTEM tion of the functional and performance teristics provided and with which all air­ characteristics required of the system and borne components of the system must Notice of Proposed Selection its components. operate as specified. For airborne compo­ 3. Selection decision. The U.S. National nents, the material identifies signal charac­ The Federal Aviation Administration Aviation Standard for the VORTAC system teristics, where applicable, and functional is considering adopting a selection order described in paragraph 4 of this order is re­ and performance characteristics w hich are which establishes a U.S. National Avia­ sponsive to the requirement stated in para­ required to meet overall operational use tion Standard for the VORTAC (VOR- graph 2 hereof and is hereby selected pur­ requirements and to provide compatibility suant to section 312(c) of the Federal Avia­ between components of the system. TACAN-DME) System. This Standard tio n Act. The respective airborne component char­ defines the VORTAC system and the 4. Description. The standard attached to acteristics for VOR, TACAN, and DME apply performance required of its components this order defines those functional and op­ in entirety to those components used in air­ to the extent necessary to satisfy over­ erational characteristics of the VORTAC craft operations performed under IFR (In­ all operational use requirements and ( V OR-TAC AN-DME ) system and its compo­ strument Flight Rules). However, for other provide compatibility between com­ nents which are required to satisfy over­ aircraft operations the applicability Is ponents of the system. all operational use requirements and to pro­ limited to requirements as identified in vide compatibility between components of sections 4 and 6 hereof which are essential The vehicle used by the Federal Avia­ the system. For ground components, the to prevent impairment of services to other tion Administrator for "selection and standard Identifies the functional, signal, users of the airspace. It is recognized that adoption of a U.S. National Aviation and performance characteristics provided certain existing components do not comply Standard is a selection order. U.S. Na­ and with which all airborne components with all requirements of this standard. Since tional Aviation Standards issued by the must operate as specified. For airborne com­ such components may impair services to ponents, the standard identifies signal char­ other users of the system, degrade naviga­ Administrator in selection orders are acteristics, where applicable, and functional tional accuracy or otherwise adversely affect binding only on FAA. While not in them­ and performance characteristics which are operational use of the system, it is expected selves regulatory, U.S. National Aviation necessary to satisfy system use requirements that use of nonconforming components will Standards may serve as the basis for and to prevent impairment of services to be discontinued as soon as practicable. subsequent rulemaking actions. With other users of the airspace. 1.2 Revisions. This standard will be re­ respect to selection orders, a notice of 5. Implementation criteria. This standard vised as needs of the National Airspace proposed selection is issued, as a matter applies to all VOR, TACAN, and DME ground System warrant. and airborne components used in the Na­ of policy, in those instances where in­ 2. VOR-TACAN-D M E SYSTEM DESCRIPTION vitation of public comments is considered tional Airspace System. 6 . Directed action. The standard covered The VORr-TACAN-DME system is a short to be in the public interest. Such notice by this order will be used by elements of the distance rho-theta air navigation system is not a notice of proposed rule making FAA to define the VORTAC (VOR-TACAN- which provides properly equipped aircraft or other rulemaking action. With refer­ DME) system to identify the functional and with bearing, identification, and distance ence to any subsequent rulemaking ac­ performance characteristics required of the information referenced to selected ground tion, the rulemaking procedures provide system and its components. Subject to appli­ components. When the airborne component the opportunity for separate public com­ cable rule making, programing, and budg­ complement includes a suitable area navi­ ment on the proposed rulemaking. etary procedures, action shall be taken, by gation (RNAV) device operating from data the FAA elements concerned, to implement derived from the system, nonradial routes The FAA recognizes that certain exist­ this selection in accordance with the fore­ are afforded in addition to those correspond­ ing airborne components of the system going implementation criteria or such modi­ ing to radials from the selected ground com­ do not fully conform to the standard. fications thereof as may be hereafter ap­ ponent. The system provides all civil an Since use of such components may im­ proved by or on behalf of the Federal Avia­ military aviation with an aid to navigatio tion Administrator. for the safe and efficient conduct of aircra pair services to other users of the air­ operations, the safe and efficient exercise space, degrade navigational accuracy or This notice is issued under sections air traffic control and the efficient utilizati in other ways adversely affect opera­ 307(b) and 312(c) of the Federal Avia­ of airspace. tional use of the VORTAC system, the tion Act of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1348(b) and 2.1 Principal components of the . FAA may initiate rulemaking action to 1353(c)). 2.1.1 Ground components. The prmc p

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18051 ground components, which produce and elevation angles the azimuth signal informa­ ground component radiated power levels. The radiate signals as specified hereinafter, are: tion may not be usable. Components provid­ frequency-protected volume of airspace shall VOR providing ground to air communica­ ing distance information permit satisfactory at least be as great as the published opera­ tions and azim uth inform ation to all civil performance of airborne components from tional service volume limitations. aviation; TACAN providing azim u th infor­ the radio horizon to an elevation angle of Note: The protection ratios stated in th e mation to military users and distance infor­ n o t less th a n 60°. following subparagraphs are based on the mation to both civil and military users; and 2.1.1.3 Colocation of components. A VOR data, conditions and factors set forth for DME only providing distance information to and either TACAN or DME shall be consid­ VOR and TAOAN in the March 1967 Environ­ all users of th e airspace. ered as associated components only when: mental Science Services Administration 2.1.1.1 Facility type designations. Com­ (a) Operated on a standard frequency (ESSA) technical report IER 26—ITSA 26 en­ ponents com prising ground fa cilities of th e pairing in accordance with 2 .1 .1 .5; titled “Interference Predictions for VHP /UHP system are identified in the Airman’s Infor­ (b) Colocated within the limits prescribed Air Navigation Aids.” mation Manual by type designations as fol­ for associated facilities in 2.1.1.3.1; and 2.1.1.6.1 Geographical separation of VOR lows to identify the type of service provided. (c) Complying with the identification pro­ frequency assignments. The following inter­ VOR type designators are prefixed by the let­ visions of 2.I.I.7.2.2. ference protection is provided, within the ter “B” when the component provides sched­ 2.1.1.3.1 Colocation limits for associated frequency-protected service volume, by geo­ uled voice broadcasts, and are suffixed by the components. When either TACAN or DME graphical separation of VOR frequency letter “W” when the component does not pro­ components are associated with a VOR, the assignments. (a) The signal from an undesired cochan­ vide voice transmissions. components shall be colocated in accordance with the following: nel component will not exceed — 2 0 db of Designator Type of facility (a) Coaxial colocation. The VOR and the signal from the desired component; (b) The signal from an undesired first ad­ VOR______— VHP navigational facility! TACAN or DME antennas are located on the omnidirectional, azi­ same vertical axis; or jacent-channel component will not exceed the desired signal by more than +46 dB; m u th only. (b) Offset colocation. (1) Par those facil­ (c) The signals from other than cochannel DME______UHP navigational facility, ities used in terminal areas for approach pur­ distance only. poses or other procedures where the highest or first adjacent-channels will not exceed + 60 dB of the desired signal at any point TACAN______UHP navigational facility, position fixing accuracy of system capability omnidirectional, azi­ is required, the separation of the VOR and which is above the radio horizon and within muth, and distance. DME or TACAN antennas will not exceed 100 the operational service volume of the desired com ponent. VOR/DME___ _ Associated VOR and DME feet. However, at Doppler VOR components navigational facilities. the antennas will be separated by not more 2.1.1.6.2 Geographical separation of DME and TACAN frequency assignments. T he fo l­ VORTAC______Associated VOR and TA than 260 feet. CAN navigational facili­ . (2) For purposes other than those indi­ lowing interference protection is provided, ties. cated in (1), the separation of the VOR and within the frequency-protected service vol­ either DME or TACAN antennas will not ex­ ume, by geographical separation of DME and TACAN frequency assignments: 2.1.1.2 Facility operational classifications. ceed 2 ,0 0 0 feet. Each ground facility is identified as to the (a) The signal from an undesired cochan­ normally anticipated interference-free serv­ With the exception of a Doppler VOR at nel component will not exceed — 8 dB of th e ice volume by one of the following classifica­ which a TACAN antenna must be offset co­ signal from the desired component; tion letters applied in parentheses as a prefix located, the standard is a coaxial colocation (b) The signal from an undesired first ad­ to the applicable facility type designation. configuration. jacent-channel component will not exceed Such classification is without regard to the 2.1.1.4 Radiofrequency allocations. R adio­ the desired signal by more than +42 dB; fact that the frequency-protected service frequencies allocated for VOR, TACAN and (c) The signals from other than cochannel volume, operational requirements and use DME are those correspondingly designated or first adjacent-channels will not exceed limitations m ay vary betw een facilities at in Table A. + 50 dB of the desired signal at any point different locations, or that propagation 2.1.1.4.1 VOR radiofrequency assignments. which is above the radio horizon and within anomalies, m ultip ath propagation, and site Radiofrequency assignments shall be selected the operational service volume of the desired conditions may alter th e characteristics of from the VOR channel frequencies listed in com ponent. ground component signals available to air­ Table A. 2.1.1.6.3 Protection of components near craft within the normally anticipated inter­ No t e : The implementation of VOR chan­ Canadian and Mexican borders. In areas of ference-free service volum e. nels having frequencies ending in odd- the United States where facility congestion twentieths of a MHz has not been planned; creates a problem, components near the U.S. Normal usable altitudes and border may not be frequency-protected in Class radius distance however, those channels may be used in the futu re. any airspace volume that lies beyond the U.S. border. However, expanded service volume H---- Above 45,000 feet MSL and out to a 2.1.1.4.2 DME and TACAN radiofrequency radius o f 100 nautical miles; protection will be provided wherever specific assignments. Radiofrequency assignments airways, routes, or procedures beyond the Prom 18,000 feet to and including shall be selected from the DME and TACAN 45,000 feet MSL and out to a radius border are based on the component. ground transponder channel frequencies 2.1.1.7 Component identification signals. of 130 n au tical m iles; listed in Table A. Channels 1 through 16 and Prom 14,500 feet to 18,000 feet and Each ground component shall transmit an 60 through 69 shall not be assigned to compo­ identification signal consisting of three out to a radius of 100 nautical miles. nents of the common system. L-— Up to 18,000 feet MSL and out to a letters in the form of International Morse No t e : The implementation of DME and Code transmitted at a rate of approximately radius of 40 nautical miles. TACAN channels designated by the suffix “T ” T-----Up to and in clu d in g 12,000 feet MSL seven words per minute. In addition, voic^ has not been planned; however, those chan­ identification in accordance with 2.1.1.7.2.1 and out to a radius of 25 nautical nels may be used in the future. miles. through 2.1.1.7.2.3 may be provided by a VOR. 2.1.1.5 Radiofrequency channel pairing. 2.1.1.7.1 Identification code character­ H facilities also provide L and T service vol­ When a DME or TACAN component is in­ istics. The identification code characteristics umes and L facilities also provide T service tended to operate in association with a VHP shall conform to the following: volumes. To the extent that frequency pro­ component in the 108.0 to 117.95 MHz fre­ (a) The dots shall be a time duration of tection is in accordance w ith 2 .1.1 .6' and to quency band, the DME or TACAN operating 0.1 second to 0.125 second and the dashes 0.3 ne extent that the respective minimum sig­ channel shall be paired with the VHP chan­ second to 0.375 second; nal power densities of 3.3 and 5.3.2 are avail- nel as given in Table A. Nonassociated VOR, (b) The duration between dots and dashes a le to aircraft, facilities may also provide TACAN, and DME components shall not be of a code letter shall in each case be equal xpanded operational service volumes^which frequency paired in accordance with the to that of one dot plus or minus 10 percent; +f en5• (a) Beyond the normal service radius standard pairing of Table A when the com­ (c) The time duration between consecu­ a.iwf more than 110 nautical miles at MSL ponents provide overlapping frequency pro­ tive letters of the identification code group tudes below 18,000 feet or 185 nautical tected service volumes. shall not be less than three dots; and altitudes above 18,000 feet; or 2.1.1.6 Radiofrequency interference pro­ (d) The total period for transmission of 1 above the normal altitude; or both. tectio n . The usable distance and usable alti­ an identification code group shall not exceed timi*'1"2'!' Vertical angle coverage limita- tude of aeronautical navigation aids are de­ 5 seconds. s. Within the normally anticipated in- termined by the protection from radiofre­ 2.1.1.7.2 Identification cycle and synchro­ itv ere^1C€"^ree service volume of each facil- quency interference caused by cochannel or n iza tio n . The repetition and synchronization a#2 * signal information permitting adjacent-channel components. Geographical of component identification signals shall con­ n . af ory performance of airborne compo- separation of navigational aid components is form to the following. hori» ls normally provided from the radio used to provide this frequency protection 2.1.1.7.2.1 Independent components. W hen­ thanfino11*5 an elevation angle of not less from adjacent-channel and other cochannel ever a facility is operated as a VOR, a DME thnn !i/!I *** VOR components and not less assignments. The separation criterion takes or TACAN only, its identification signal shall 40 for TACAN components. At higher into account the permissible deterioration in be transmitted as follows:

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 No. 215------8 18052 NOTICES

(a) For VOR providing code and voice indicated by the ground component signal w hichever is greater (95 percent probability) identification signals, each 30-second interval at that same point. The radial signal error when the error values are combined by the is divided into four equal periods. The code is made up of ( 1 ) certain stable elements root-sum-square method. identification signal shall be transmitted such as course displacement and most site 2.5 Area navigation use accuracy. When during alternate periods and, subject to and terrain effect errors which may be con­ area navigation devices are used with inputs 2.1.1.7.2.3, voice identification signals will sidered as fixed for long periods of time, and from com ponents o f th e system , those devices, occur during the remaining periods. (2 ) certain random variable errors which must be implemented in such a manner that (b) For VOR providing only code identi­ can be expected to vary about the essentially route dimension requirements are not in­ fication signals, each 30-second interval is constant remainder. The radial signal error creased. Any errors introduced by area navi­ divided into five equal periods. The code is associated with the ground component gation devices may, therefore, necessitate a identification shall be transmitted "during only and excludes other error factors. compensating reduction in other error each period. (b) Airborne component error (Ea). Air­ elem ents. (c) When voice communication signals are borne component error is that error attribu­ 2.6 System functional and performance being transmitted by a VOR, the VOR code table to the inability of the equipment in the capabilities. T he fun ction al and performance identification signals shall not be suppressed. aircraft to translate correctly the bearing in­ characteristics set forth in this standard are (d) For DME and TACAN the Interna­ formation contained in the radial signal. This those needed to satisfy current system use tional Morse Code identification signal shall element embraces all factors in the airborne and performance requirements. Many ground be repeated at intervals of 30 seconds. component which introduces errors in the and airborne components used in the system 2.1.1.7.2.2 Associated components. W hen information presented to the pilot. (Errors afford accuracy valves appreciably better than in acocrdance with 2.1.1.3 a VOR and either resulting from the use of compass informa­ those stated in this standard. The VOR- a DME or TAOAN are operated as associated tion in some VOR and TAOAN displays are TACAN—DME system is inherently capable of components, the identification signals shall not included.) greater accuracies and additional functions conform to the respective requirements of (c) Aggregate error (E s). Aggregate error to meet future needs for safe and efficient 2.1.1.7.2.1 except that: is the difference between the magnetic air navigation, traffic control, and utilization (a) The identification letters shall be the bearing to a point of measurement from the of the airspace. same for each component; ground component and the bearing indicated 3. OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS TOR VOR (b) For VOR of 2.1.1.7.2.1(a), the DME by airborne components of. stated accuracy. GROUND COMPONENTS or TAOAN identification signal shall be This is the error in the information pre­ transmitted during one of the periods allo­ sented to the pilot (exclusive of any errors The subparagraphs hereto identify stand­ cated for VOR voice identification and the resulting from use of compass information) ard signal characteristics and tolerances for latter shall not be transmitted during that taking into account not only the ground VOR components of the system. Except as period; component and propagation path errors but noted these characteristics represent the (c) For VOR of 2.1.1.7.2.1(b), the DME or also the error contributed by the airborne performance which shall normally be pro­ TACAN identification signal shall be trans­ component and its instrumentation. The en­ vided by each facility su b ject to limitations mitted during one of the periods allocated tire radial signal error, both fixed and vari­ as noted under 2 .1.1 .2 and 2 .I.I.6 . for VOR code identification and the latter able, is used. 3.1 Polarization. T he ground component shall not be transmitted during that period; antenna shall radiate horizontally polarized (d) The International Morse Code identi­ Since the errors of (a) and (b), w hen con ­ signals. Azimuth error in airborne compo­ fication signals of VOR, DME, and TACAN sidered on a total system basis (not any in­ nents due to the vertically polarized compo­ shall be synchronized and interlocked such dividual radials or components) are inde­ nent of the radiated signal will not exceed that simultaneous transmission will not pendent variables, they may be combined by ± 2 .0 ° at aircraft attitudes encountered in occur; and the rodt-sum-square (RSS) method to cal­ normal operational use of the system. (e) When voice communications are being culate aggregate system error (Es) when the 3.2 Radiofrequency accuracy. The radio- transmitted on the VOR, the code identifi­ same probability is given to each element. frequency carrier shall be within ±0.005 cation signals of DME and TACAN shall not For purposes of this standard, each element percent o f th e assigned channel frequency. be suppressed. is considered to have a 95 percent probabil­ 3.3 Radiated power level. The effective ity. N o t e : Whenever one component is tem­ radiated power level shall not be less than porarily out of service, the remaining com­ In practice, based on hundreds of thou­ that necessary to provide a signal power den­ ponent, when operated, will transmit facility sands of accumulated data points, the radial sity of —111 d B w /m 2 at the minimum serv­ identification signals in accordance with signal error value (Eg) has been found to be ice altitu d e a t th e m axim um specified 2.1.1.7.2.2 without regard to the facility type ±1.9° (95 percent probability). Airways, operational service radius. routes and terminal area procedures in the designation. N ote: A t 118 MHz th e value —111 dBw/m1 2.1.1.7.2.3 Precedence of VOR voice com­ United States are designed on the basis of a system use accuracy of ±4.5° (95 percent corresponds to —114 dBw in an isotropic re­ munications. VOR voice identification sig­ ceiving antenna. nals shall be suppressed for the duration of probability). To satisfy that operational use voice communications or broadcasts. requirement, accuracies specified for airborne At the nearest aircraft position expected dur­ 2.1.1.8 VOR voice communication signals. components in sections 4 and 6 hereof pro­ in g flight, th e m axim um signal power density In accordance with the need for communica­ vide a nominal aggregate system azimuth available to aircraft will be of the order of tions, a VOR may provide ground to air voice error value (Es) of 3.5 degrees (95 percent —34 dBw/m2. communications. probability). ITie aggregate system error 3.4 Azimuth signal characteristics. The 2.1.2 Airborne components. Airborne com­ value is derived as follows. VOR shall radiate a radiofrequency carr*®J ponents of the system consist of a VOR com­ Radial Signal Error (Eg) : ±1.9° (95 percent with which are associated two separate 30 ponent conforming to section 4 hereof and probability). Hz modulations. One of these modulations TACAN and DME components conforming to Airborne Component Error (Ea): ± 3 .0 ° shall be such that its phase is independent the applicable requirements of section 6 of (95 percent probability). of th e azim u th of th e p oin t of observation (reference phase). The other modulation this Standard. Aggregate System Error (Es) =VEg 2-fE a2 (1) 2.2 System traffic handling capacity. Each (variable phase) shall be such that its phas® =V 192+3.02 ( 2) at the point of observation differs from tha VOR and TACAN ground component of the = V3.61+9.00 (3) system* provides azimuth and facility identi­ of the reference phase by an angle equ fication information to an unlimited number =V12.61 (4) to the magnetic bearing of the point of ob­ of airborne components. Under conditions in (Rounded) =3.5° (95 percent proba­ servation with respect to the VOR. Therad ' which, interrogating TACAN and DME com­ b ility) (5 ) frequency carrier as observed at any P0™" space shall be amplitude modulated by t ponents are in the track mode of operation With respect to the ±4.5° system use accu­ not less than 95 percent of the time, TACAN signals in accordance with the following. racy, the aggregate system error of ±3.5° 3.4.1 Subcarrier frequency modulation.. and DME ground components provide slant allows a factor for error in utilization of the range distance information adequate for the One signal component shall be a subcarn information presented to the pilot. This uti­ of 9,960 Hz of con stan t am plitude, frequency peak traffic or 100 interrogators, whichever is lization error, which is an independent var­ the lesser. modulated at 30 Hz and having a deviau iable and is attributable to the fact that a ratio of 16±1 (i.e., 15 to 17) as follows: 2.3 System azimuth accuracy. System pilot can not or does not keep the aircraft azimuth accuracy, expressed in terms of precisely centered on the radial or bearing (a) For the conventional VOR the 30 error, is a function of the error factors presented, is strictly a pilotage error contri­ component of the FM subcarrier is associated with the ground and airborne bution and does not include presentation without respect to azimuth and is termed components. For purposes of defining these errors. “reference phase”. . errors, the following terms are used with the 2.4 System distance accuracy. System (b) For the Doppler VOR the Pb^ff meanings indicated. distance accuracy is a function of the ground th e 30 Hz com ponent varies with^ azi (a) Radial signal error (Eg). Radial signaland airborne component accuracies. The and is termed the “variable phase”. _ error is the difference between the nominal component values in this Standard provide 3.4.1.1 Subcarrier frequency and accuracy magnetic bearing to a point of measurement a system distance accuracy of ±0.5 nautical The subcarrier modulation mid-freq from the ground component and the bearing mile or 3 percent of the slant range distance, shall be 9,960 Hz within ±1.0 percent.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRÎDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18053

3 4.1.2 Subcarrier modulation frequency (a) Monitor azimuth indication within a nents. The term “component”, as used herein, and accuracy. The modulation frequency 15 minute period shall not vary more than includes the complete aircraft installation shall be 30 Hz w ith in ± 1 .0 percent. 0.3“; of all items, such as the antenna and its 3.4.1.3 Subcarrier amplitude modulation. (b) Ground test error curves shall not de­ transmission line, the receiver, electrical Amplitude m odulation of th e subcarrier shall viate in excess of ± 1 .0 “ from the reference power source (s), identification and voice conform to th e follow ing: ground test error curve. The reference ground communications signal reproduction devices, (a) For the conventional VOR, the per­ test error curve is the average of three suc­ and selector and display instrumentation de­ centage of am plitude m odu lation of th e 9,960 cessive error curves taken immediately fol­ vices for bearing and course indication, which Hz subcarrier shall not exceed 5 percent. lowing a basic altitude flight inspection. are necessary to provide the required func­ (b) For the Doppler VOR, the percentage These curves shall not vary more than 0.3° tions and performance. All requirements of amplitude modulation of the 9,960 Hz from each other; apply to airborne components used in the subcarrier shall not exceed 40 percent when (c) The maximum error spread of any performance of aircraft operations under measured at a point at least 1,000 feet from ground test error curve shall not exceed 2 .0 °;- IFR. For other aircraft operations the re­ the VOR. and quirements are limited to those of this para­ 3.4.1.4 Sideband level of subcarrier har­ (d) The ground test error curves for each graph and 4.6. Components shall be capable monics. When 50 kHz VOR channel spacing of dual equipments shall not deviate from of performing as specified throughout the is implemented, the sideband level of the each other by more than 1 .0 °. advertised operational service volume of harmonics o f th e 9,960 Hz com ponent in th e 3.5 Code identification signal characteris­ ground facilities in which use is intended radiated signal shall not exceed the follow­ tics. The characteristics of the code identifi­ and under all expected aircraft and airborne ing levels referred to the level of the 9,960 cation signal shall conform to the following. component operating conditions. The re­ Hz sideband: 3.5.1 Tone modulation frequency and ac­ quirements shall be met under conditions curacy. The modulation frequency shall be in which the performance characteristics of Subcarrier Level 1,020 Hz±50 Hz. ground components are in accordance with* 9,960 Hz______0 dB reference. 3.5.2 Depth of modulation. The depth to sections 2 and 3 of this standard. 2d harmonic______—30 dB. which the radiofrequency carrier is modu­ 4.1 Receiver radio frequencies. For each 3d harmonic______—50 dB. lated by the code identification signal shall: channel in use, the center radiofrequency of 4th harmonic______—60 dB. (a) Normally be 5.0±1 percent at com­ the receiver shall be the corresponding 3.4.2 30 Hz amplitude modulation. The ponents where voice services are provided but ground facility frequency listed in Table A. other signal component shall be 30 Hz ampli­ shall not exceed 8 .0 percent; and 4.2 Sensitivity to VOR signals. Based on tude modulation as follows: (b) Be close to but not in excess of 10 the signal power densities of 3.3, the airborne (a) For the con ven tional VOR, th is com ­ percent at components where voice services component shall provide sensitivity as neces­ ponent results from a rotating field pattern, are not provided. sary for the display of navigation informa­ the phase of which varies with azimuth, and 3.6 Voice identification and communica­ tion to the accuracy specified and for clear is termed the “variable phase”. tions signal characteristics. The charac­ and distinct reproduction of communication (b) For the Doppler VOR, this component, teristics of voice identification and voice and identification signals. of constant phase with relation to azimuth communications signals, when provided, shall 4.3 Rejection of undesired signals. The and constant amplitude, is radiated omni­ conform to the following. airborne component shall provide undesired directionally and is term ed th e “reference 3.6.1 Voice channel frequency response. signal rejection characteristics adequate to phase”. Throughout the frequency range from 300 assure the specified performance. For co­ 3.4.2.1 Amplitude modulation frequency to 2,500 Hz, the frequency response charac­ channel and adjacent-channel signals, this and accuracy. The modulation frequency teristics for the voice channel shall be within requirement shall be met when the respective shall be 30 Hz w ith in ± 1 .0 percent. 3 dB of the response at 1,000 Hz. signals provide undesired to desired signal 3.4.3 Depth of reference and variable 3.6.2 Depth of modulation. The depth to ratios up to the maximum values stated in phase modulations. The depth of modulation which the radiofrequency carrier is modu­ 2 . 1. 1.6. 1. of the radiofrequency carrier due to the 30 lated by voice signals shall not be greater 4.4 Facility identification and voice sig­ Hz or 9,960 Hz signals sh all, for each signal, than 30 percent. nals. The airborne component shall provide be within the limits of (a) 28 to 32 percent 3.7 Monitoring. Continuous monitoring of the pilot with an inteliglble and unambigu­ at all elevation angles from 0° to 5° above the ground component shall be provided ous signal which permits positive identifica­ the horizon; and (b) 25 to 35 percent at all which causes the radiation of azimuth and tion, of the ground facility from which navi­ elevation angles betw een 5° and 60“ above identification signals to cease and a warning gation information is displayed. The repro­ the horizon. to be indicated at a control point when any duction and aural level of voice signals shall 3.4.4 Phase relationships of reference and one of a combination of the following fault be adequate to preserve and clearly convey variable phase signals. The reference and conditions are sensed by the monitor: to the pilot the intelligence transmitted by variable phase modulations shall be in phase (a) The bearing of the azimuth signal at ground components. along the radial corresponding to magnetic the monitored radial changes by ± 1.0 “ and 4.5 Beqring and aircraft position informa­ horth. The reference and variable phase all greater deviations from the normal value. tio n . The airborne component shall provide modulations are in phase w hen th e m axim um (b) The radiofrequency signal voltage level devices for unambiguous determination of value of the sum of the radiofrequency car­ at the monitored radial of either the sub­ the aircraft magnetic bearing with respect rier and the sideband energy due to the carrier or 30 Hz amplitude modulation signal tp each selected ground component and for amplitude m odulation sign al occurs a t th e components, or both, are reduced by 15 per­ display of the aircraft position with respect aame time as the highest instantaneous fre­ cent and all greater reductions from the to each selected course. quency of the frequency modulation signal. normal'value. 4.5.1 Course deviation indicator devices. 3.4.5 Radial signal characteristics. Cover­ (c) The 1,020 Hz code identification tone The response, readability, and resolution of age, course alignment and structure charac­ signal is absent. course deviation indicator devices shall be teristics are periodically exam ined through The faults of (a) and (b) may persist for such as to permit the pilot to determine the flight inspection to ascertain that radial a period not to exceed 15 seconds before direction and extent of the aircraft deviation signals conform to standards prescribed for radiation is interrupted. The fault of (c) from the selected course. the intended operational usage. However, may persist for an additional interval not 4.5.2 Warning function. The airborne 10 eomponent is commissioned for un­ to exceed 30 seconds before radiation is component shall provide a warning indica­ restricted use u n less radial signal errors are interrupted. tion which is clearly evident to the pilot within prescribed lim its. 3.7.1 Monitor failure. When the con­ whenever azimuth signals necessary for the 3.4.5.1 Ground test measurement. W hen tinuity of transmitter signal radiation is prescribed performance are not present. a ground test is m ade in th e near field of under the control of monitor equipment, 4.5.3 Accuracy of bearing and aircraft autenna for purposes of verifying the the absence of either monitor operating position informaiton. The total airborne com­ radial signal alignment accuracy, the meas­ power or the monitored signals at the fault ponent error in bearing and aircraft azimuth urement shall be m ade a t n o t less th a n 8 sensing circuits of the monitor shall auto­ position information, as displayed to the points each of which are in the horizontal matically cause radiation of the transmitter pilot, shall not at any bearing exceed ±3.0° ?0fne an<* ^ ^nal angular increments as signals to cease and result in a warning (95 percent probability). rerenced to the center,of th e an tenn a array. indication at a control point. 4.6 R a d ia tio n . Radiation from airborne 6 requirements of the following subpara­ Note: A high degree of fail-safe monitor­ components shall not result in derogation of graph shall apply. ing is provided. However, completely fail-safe operational use of this system to other users ..Note: ^ue to measurement limitations, the monitoring is not possible. or in the derogation of other aeronautical gnment error for Doppler VOR shall not services. determined through ground test. 4. OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR VOR AIRBORNE COMPONENTS 5. OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS FOR TACAN Ground test tolerances. T he AND DME GROUND COMPONENTS comP°nent shall meet the following Paragraphs hereunder specify in-use func­ C1, j 8,11* 68 when radial signal alignment ac- tional capability and performance charac­ The subparagraphs hereto identify stand­ u‘racJr is verified by ground tests. teristics required of VOR airborne compo­ ard signal and performance characteristics

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18054 NOTICES for TACAN and DME ground components of respond to other interrogation signals shall (b) 30.0 ±0.25 microseconds for channel the system. These characteristics represent normally be 60 microseconds. However, dead numbers ending in the suffix “Y”. the performance which shall normally be time may be increased when necessary to 5.3.7 Pulse power variation. The peat provided by each component subject to limi­ satisfy system performance requirements. power of the constituent pulses of any pair tations as noted under 2 .1.1 .2 and 2 .I.I.6 . 5.3 Transponder output signal charac­shall not differ by more than 1 dB. Except where a designation of either TACAN teristics. The radiofrequency output signals 5.3.8 Distance reply signals. Distance re­ or DME is used thus denoting that a require­ of the transponder shall conform to the ply signals shall consist of pulse pairs which, ment applies only to the designated compo­ follow ing. in accordance with the following, are trans­ nent, requirements apply to both TACAN 5.3.1 Transmitter radiofrequency and mitted in response to interrogations. and DME components. accuracy. The transponder shall transmit on 5.3.8.1 Reply efficiency. Reply efficiency is 5.1 Polarization. The ground component the reply frequency of Table A appropriate defined as th e percentage of interrogations antenna shall radiate and receive vertically to the assigned channel. The radiofrequency to which the transponder replies under spec­ polarized signals. TACAN azimuth error in of operation shall not vary more than ± 0 .0 0 2 ified load conditions. Except when limited airborne components due to the horizontally percent from the assigned frequency. by receiver dead time, the reply efficiency polarized component of the radiated signal 5.3.2 Radiated power level. The effective for interrogation sign als at and above the will not exceed ± 2 .0 ° at aircraft attitudes radiated power level at the peak of the RF minimum sensitivity levels of 5 .2.2 sh^n be encountered in normal operational use of pulse envelope shall not be less than that at least 70 percent for all values of interroga­ the system. necessary to provide a signal power density of tion loading up to the maximum for which 5.2 Transponder response to interrogation — 86 d B w /m 2 at the minimum service alti­ the transponder is designed. signals. The response of the transponder to tude at the maximum service radius. 5.3.8.2 Reply delay time. Reply delay time interrogation signals shall conform to the Note: At 1200 MHz, th e value of —86 is defined as the time in microseconds of all requirements of the following paragraphs. d B w /m 2 corresponds to —108.5 dBw in an delay introduced by the transponder com­ Note: The presence at the ground compo­ isotropic antenna. ponent in transmitting a pair of reply pulses nent antenna of CW signals within a fre­ in response to an interrogation signal. When At the nearest aircraft position expected dur­ airborne components are to indicate dis­ quency band of ±3.0 MHz with respect to ing flight, the maximum signal power density the interrogation frequency in use and which tance with respect to the transponder site, available to aircraft will be of the order of th e zero-distance reply delay tim e shall be have a signal power density of —113 dBw/m 2 — 17 d B w /m 2. and all higher values will normally derogate 50.0 microseconds as measured between the 5.3.3 Radio frequency signal spectrum. 50 percent voltage point on the leading edge the performance of the component and the The spectrum of the pulse modulated signal system . of the second constituent RF pulse of the shall be such that during the pulse the effec­ interrogation pulse pair and the correspond­ 5.2.1 Interrogation radio frequency. The tive radiated power contained in a 0.5 MHz receiver center frequency shall be the in­ ing point on the second constituent RF pulse band centered on frequencies 0.8 MHz above of the reply pulse pair. When airborne com­ terrogation frequency from Table A appro­ and 0.8 MHz below the nominal channel fre­ priate to the assigned operating channel. ponents are to indicate distance to a point quency in each case shall not exceed 20 0 which is remote from the transponder site, 5.2.2 Sensitivity to interrogation signals. milliwatts, and the effective radiated power Transponder sensitivity shall be measured the 50.0 microsecond time delay shall be re­ contained in a 0.5 MHz band centered on fre­ duced by a value corresponding to the off­ in terms of a triggering level which is defined quencies 2.0 MHz above and 2.0 MHz below as the peak pulse power level of the weakest set distance. the nominal channel frequency shall not Note : As referenced to th e first constituent interrogation signal measured at the input exceed 2.0 milliwatts. Any lobe of the spec­ of the receiver which will cause the trans­ RF pulse of interrogation and reply pulse trum shall be of less amplitude than the pairs, reply delay times of (a) 50.0 micro­ ponder to reply with a specified reply ef­ adjacent lobe nearer the nominal channel ficiency. For a reply efficiency of 70 percent, seconds for “X ” ch an n els and (b) 56.0 micro­ frequency. seconds for “Y ” ch an n els are considered to be the sensitivity shall conform to the following. 5.3.4 Spurious radiation. During the inter­ Note: Ground components may not re­ equivalent to the 50.0 microsecond value val between transmission of pulse pairs the stated above for timing referenced to the spond to interrogation as specified if the dif­ power level of signals radiated by the ground ference in level of the constituent pulses of second pulse of the respective pairs. component on any interrogation or reply fre­ 5.3.9 Random pulse pair signals. In addi­ interrogation pulse pairs is greater than 1 quency shall not exceed a level which is 50 dB. tion to distance reply pulse pairs, the ground dB below the maximum level during the component shall radiate randomly occurring 5.2.2.1 On-channel sensitivity. For inter­ pulses. rogation signals within ± 100 kHz of the p u lse pairs in a q u an tity as necessary to 5.3.5 Pulse shape. The following shall maintain a total pulse pair rate in accord­ assigned channel frequency, which have a apply to all radiated pulses. repetition rate not higher than 2 0 0 p u lse ance with the following. pairs per second and which have spacings 5.3.5.1 Pulse rise time. The time required 5.3.9.1 DME components. For ground com­ of the constituent pulses of a pair equal to for the leading edge of the pulse to rise from p on en ts providing DME service only, the the design center value for the channel in 10 to 90 percent of its maximum voltage total pulse pair rate, exclusive of code iden­ use, the sensitivity of the ground compo­ amplitude shall be nominally 2.5 microsec­ tification signal pulses, shall be of a value between the limits of 700 to 2,850 pulse pairs nent shall be not less than —122 dBw onds, but shall not exceed 3.0 microseconds. per second. ( — 101 dBw/m2) as referenced to a lossless The minimum rise time is governed by the 5.3.9.2 -TACAN components. For TACAN isotropic radiator. spectrum requirements of 5.3.3. 5.2.2.1.1 Sensitivity at other pulse spac­ 5.3.5.2 P ulse top. The instantaneous ground components, the total pulse pair rate, exclusive of code identification signal ings. Under conditions in which the spacing amplitude of the pulse shall not, at any in­ and reference burst pulses, shall be 2,700 of the constituent pulses of interrogation stant between the point on the leading jedge ±90 pulse pairs per second. For a trans­ pulse pairs vary from the design center value which is 95 percent of the maximum voltage ponder dead time of 60 microseconds, the for the channel in use by as much as ±0.5 amplitude and the point on the trailing edge microsecond, the sensitivity in the absence which is 95 percent of the maximum voltage distribution of random pulse pairs shall con­ of other interrogations shall not be reduced amplitude, fall below a value which is 95 form to Figure 1. by more than 1 dB. percent of the maximum voltage amplitude of 5.3.10 Distance accuracy. Exclusive of re­ 5.2.2.1.2 Sensitivity variation with inter­ th e pulse. ply delay time errors resulting from varia­ rogation loading. The sensitivity shall not 5.3.5.3 Pulse duration. The pulse duration, tion in the level of interrogation signals, the vary by more than 1 dB for interrogation as measured at the 50 percent maximum ground component shall not contribute more loadings between 0 to 90 percent of the maxi­ voltage amplitude points on the leading and than ±0.25 microsecond to overall system mum for which the component was designed. trailing edge of the pulse, shall be 3.5 ±0.5 error. When the interrogation loading exceeds 90 microseconds. 5.3.11 Code identification signal charac­ percent of the maximum design value, the 5.3.5.4 Pulse decay time. The time re­ teristics. S u b ject to th e provisions of 5.3.ll h sensitivity shall, for the duration of such quired for the trailing edge of the pulse to Code identification signals shall con sist o loading, be reduced the minimum amount decay from 90 to 10 percent of the maximum groups of two pulse pairs transmitted for the necessary to limit the reply pulse rate to voltage amplitude shall nominally be 2 .5 duration of dots and dashes in accordanc the maximum design value. microseconds, but shall not exceed 3.0 micro­ with 2.1.1.7.1. The spacing between the first 5.2 .2 .2 Sensitivity to adjacent channel in­ seconds. The minimum decay time is gov­ and second pulse pairs constituting eac terrogation. Interrogation signals 900 kTfz erned by the spectrum requirements of pulse group, as measured between the ^ removed from the assigned channel interro­ 5.3.3. percent voltage amplitude points on the lew*' gation frequency and having an amplitude up 5.3.6 Pulse coding. Transponder output ing edge of the first pulse of each pair- "V to 80 dB above the on-channel sensitivity signals shall consist of paired pulses. The be 100± 10 microseconds. The repetition of the component shall not trigger the spacing of the constituent pulses of each shall conform to the following. . transponder. pulse p’air, as measured between the 50 per­ 5.3.11.1 DME components. For 5.2.3 Transponder dead time. The trans­ cent maximum voltage amplitude points on components providing DME service oniy- . j ponder dead time immediately following the the leading edge of each RF pulse, shall be: identification signal may consist of Q j decoding of interrogation signal pulse pairs (a) 12.0±0.25 microseconds for channel either one or two pulse pairs. The repe and during which the transponder will not numbers ending in the suffix "X”; or rate shall be 1,350± 10 groups per second.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18055

5 3.11.2 TAG AN components. For- TACAN modulation depths will be within the range (a) The reply efficiency of the transponder ground components, the repetition rate shall from 7 to 35 percent and 135 Hz modulation to monitor interrogation signals at the min­ be 1,350 ±0.23 percent groups per second depths will be within the range from 7 to imum. sensitivity level of 5.2.2.1 is less than whicb are phase-locked within ±50.0 micro­ 45 percent. However, the sum of depths for 60 percent. seconds of the 10th harmonic of the 135 Hz both frequencies will not exceed 65 percept. (b) The reply delay time of the trans­ reference bearing signal. The first pulse of 5.3.12.2.3 Harmonic content. At all angles ponder to monitor interrogation signals dif­ each identification signal pulse group shall from 0° to 45° above the horizon: fers from the assigned value by ± 1 .0 m icro­ occur 740 ±50 microseconds after the first (a) The root-sum-square of the second second and all greater values. pulse of each 40° sector reference signal. through the seventh harmonics of the 15 Hz (c) The spacing of the constituent pulses 5.3.12 TACAN azimuth signal character­signal component will not exceed 30 percent of transponder output signal pillse pairs dif­ istics. TACAN azimuth signals consist of of the 15 Hz modulation coefficient; and fers from the design center value of 5.3.6 by 1 .0 microsecond and all greater values. north (main) and 40° sector (auxiliary) (to) T he root-sum -square of th e second bearing reference signals and 15 Hz (coarse) v through the fourth harmonics of the 135 Hz (d) The radiated power level of trans­ ponder output signals decreases from the nor­ and 135 Hz (fine) variable bearing signals. signal component will not exceed 2 0 percent mal level by 3 dB and all greater reductions. The azimuth signals radiated by the an­ of the 135 Hz modulation coefficient. 5.3.12.3 Relationships of reference and (e) The code identification signal of tenna shall conform to the following. 5.3.12.1 Bearing reference signals. variable bearing signals. On the magnetic 2.1.1.7. north radial from the antenna, the relation­ (1) Is transmitted as a continuous tone Transmission of th e north an d 40° sector ships of the reference and variable bearing (i.e., signals not in the form of dots or reference signals shall occur synchronously signals shall conform to the requirements of dashes) for a period of 5 seconds or more; with antenna pattern rotation. For each con­ the subparagraphs hereto. or secutive complete rotation of the antenna 5.3.12.3.1 Coarse bearing signal. The nega­ (2) Is not repeated within a nominal period pattern, one north reference signal shall be tive slope point of inflection of the 15 Hz of 75 seconds from the last transmission. transmitted and follow ed a t each of eigh t amplitude modulation component shall coin­ The faults of (a) through (e-1) may persist consecutive angular in crem ents of 40° by cide within ± 2 .0 azimuth degrees of: for a period not to exceed 8 seconds before the transmission of a 40° sector reference (a) The 10th pulse of the north reference radiation is interrupted. For fault (e-2) signal. A ninth 40° sector reference signal for channels ending in the suffix “X”; radiation shall be interrupted upon expira­ signal, which otherwise would coincide in or time with the north reference signal, shall (b) The sixth pulse of the north reference tion of the 75-second period. not be transmitted. The characteristics of Note: When radiation of signals com­ signal for channels ending in the suffix “Y”. mences, monitor action to interrupt radia­ reference signals shall be as follows. 5.3.12.3.2 Fine bearing signal. T he nega­ 5.3.12.1.1 North reference signal. T he tion in the event of a fault may be delayed tive slope point of inflection of the 135 Hz for approximately 40 seconds from the time north reference signal shall consist of: amplitude modulation component ' shall (a) A group of 12 pulse pairs having a coincide within ±0.33 azimuth degrees of radiation begins. 5.4.2 TACAN components. In addition to spacing of the constituent pulses of a pair the average position of: the conditions of 5.4.1, a fault condition shall in accordance with 5.3.6(a) and a pulse pair (a) The 12th pulse of the 40° reference spacing, as measured between the 50 percent signal for channels ending in the suffix “X”; exist when: voltage amplitude points on the leading edge (a) The sum of distance reply and ran­ or domly occurring pulse pairs deviates from of the first pulse of each pair, of 30.0±0.3 (b) The 11th pulse of the 40° reference the design center value of 5.3.9.2 by m ore th a n microseconds for ch an n el num bers ending in signal for channels ending in the suffix “Y”. the suffix “X ”; or 5.3.12.4 Radial signal characteristics. ±150 pulse pairs per seoond. The number of pulse pairs in either (b) A group o f 13 sin gle pu lses h avin g a Coverage, course alignment, and structure (b) spacing, as measured between the 50 percent characteristics are periodically examined the north or 40° reference signals, or both, voltage amplitude points on the leading edge through flight inspection to ascertain that are one or more pairs less than the numbers of oonsecutive pulses, of 30.0 ±0.3 microsec­ radial signals conform to standards pre­ respectively specified in paragraphs 5.3.12.1.1 onds for channel numbers ending in the scribed for the intended operational usage. and 5.3.12.1.2. suffix “Y”. However, no component is commissioned for (c) The fine bearing signal at the moni­ 5.3.12.1.2 40° sector reference signal. T h e unrestricted use unless, radial signal errors tored radial changes by ± 1 .0 ° and all greater 40° sector reference signal shall consist of: are within prescribed limits. deviations from the correctf value. (a) A group of six pulse pairs having a 5.3.13 Precedence of pulse transmissions. (d) The antenna pattern rotation rate spacing of the constituent pulses of a pair The order of precedence for transmission differs from the design center value of In accordance w ith 5.3.6(a) and a pu lse pair of transponder pulse signals shall be in ac­ 5.3.12.2.1.1 by a value greater than ±0.23 spacing, as measured between the 50 percent cordance with the following. percent. amplitude points on the leading edge of the 5.3.13.1 DME components. For ground The faults of (a), (b>, and (c) may persist first pulse of each pair, of 24.0 ±0.25 micro­ components providing DME service only, the for a period not to exceed 8 seconds before seconds for channel numbers ending in the precedence shall be: radiation is interrupted. Fault (d) may per­ suffix “X”; or 1. Code Identification Signals; sist for not more than 2 0 seconds before (b) A group of 13 single pulses having a 2. Distance Reply Signals; and radiation is interrupted. spacing, as measured between the 50 percent 3. Random Pulse Pair Signals. Note 1: When radiation of signals com­ voltage amplitude points on the leading edge Neither distance reply or random pulse pair mences, monitor action to interrupt radiation of consecutive pulses, of 15.0±0.25 micro­ in the event of a fault may be delayed for seconds for channel numbers ending in the signals shall be transmitted during the “key- suffix “Y”. down” interval of code identification signal approximately 40 seconds from the time radiation begins. 5.3.12.2 Variable bearing signals. T h e vari­ transmissions. able bearing signals shall be a rotating di­ 5.3.13.2 TACAN components. For TACAN Note 2: After the monitor has sensed one rectional antenna pattern which produces a components, the precedence shall be: or more of the above faults, radiation may be composite amplitude modulation of the 1. Bearing R eference Signals; restored to provide only distance and identi­ transponder radio frequency p u lse sign als a t 2. Code Identification Signals; fication signals. 15 and 135 Hz. T he characteristics of th e 3. Distance Reply Signals; and 5.4.3 Monitor failure. When the continu­ variable bearing signals shall be as follows. 4. Random Pulse Pair Signals. ity of transponder signal radiation is under 5.3.12.2.1 Amplitude modulation frequen­ Neither code identification, distance reply the control of monitor equipment the ab­ ces and accuracy. The amplitude modulation or random pulse pair signals shall be trans­ sence of either monitor operating power or frequencies shall n om in ally be 15.0 and 135.0 mitted during the interval required for the monitored signals at the fault sensing T2, Each frequency sh all vary from th e transmission of all pulses in each bearing circuits of the monitor shall automatically nominal value in exact synchronism with the reference signal. Distance reply and random cause radiation of the transponder signals to antenna pattern rotation rate. pulse pair signals shall not be transmitted cease and result in a warning indication at 5-3.12.2.1.1 Antenna pattern rotation rate. during the “key-down” interval of code a control point. be antenna radiation pattern shall rotate in identification signal transmission. Note: A high degree of fail-safe monitor­ clockwise direction as view ed from above 5.4 Monitoring. Continuous monitoring ing is provided. However, completely fail­ , b rate of 15.0 revolutions per second of the ground component shall be provided safe monitoring is not possible. ±0-23 percent. which causes the radiation of transponder output signals to cease and a warning to be 6. OPERATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS FOB TACAN Depth of modulation. W ithin AND DME AIRBORNE COMPONENTS h0HVertical an£l® from 0° to 40° above th e indicated at a control point when any one or normal range of 15 and 135 Hz a combination of the fault conditions identi­ Paragraphs hereunder specify in-use func­ MU h!tl0n dePths produced by the antenna fied in the subparagraphs hereto are sensed tional capability and performance charac­ with 60 ® percent for each frequency by the monitor. teristics required of DME and TACAN air­ less +h SUm for frequencies equal to or 5.4.1. DME and TACAN components. For borne components. The term “component” tw r™* 55 percent. At elevation angles be- DME and TACAN components, a fault con­ as used herein, includes the complete air­ fr 40° and 50° above th e horizon, 15 H z dition shall exist when: craft installation of all items, such as the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18056 NOTICES antenna and its transmission line, the inter­ 6 .1.4.1 Variation of repetition rate. T he cept during memory) exceed ±0.5 nautical rogator-receiver, electrical power source(s), variation in time between successive pairs of miles or 3 percent of the actual distant identification signal reproduction or dis­ Interrogation pulses shall be sufficient to pre­ w hichever is greater (95 percent probability) ! play devices, distance indicator and, when clude the airborne component from locking 6 .2.4.3 Memory function. The airborne applicable, selector and display instrumen­ on to distance reply pulses intended for an­ com p onent sh all provide a memory function tation devices for bearing and course indi­ other airborne component tuned to the same which upon loss of a suitable reply signal cation, which are necessary to provide the ground facility, and to preclude capture of while tracking, will cause continuation of the required functions and performance. the interrogations of one interrogator within display of distance information for a period All requirements apply to airborne com­ the ground facility transponder dead time not to exceed 15 seconds. The mini mum dis­ ponents used in the performance of aircraft caused by the interrogations of other tance memory shall be sufficient to cover operations under IFR. For other aircraft interrogators. the loss of distance reply signals during operations the requirements are limited to 6.1.5 Radiated power level. The effective transmission of the ground component iden­ those of this paragraph and paragraphs radiated power level at the peak of the RF tification signal. The distance displayed dur­ 6.1.4, 6 .1.4.1, and 6.1.7. Except where a des­ pulse envelope shall not be less than that in g m em ory sh all be w ith in th e range be­ ignation of either DME or TACAN is used, necessary, under line of sight conditions, to tw een ± 1 .0 nautical miles of the last indi­ thus denoting that the requirement applies provide a signal power density of — 101 cated distance and ± 1 .0 nautical miles of only to the designated component, require­ d b w /m 2 (95 percent probability) at the the distance indicated upon resumption of ments apply to both DME and TACAN com­ ground component antenna. The design cen­ th e tracking fu n ctio n on th e same signal. ponents. Components shall be capable of ter effective radiated power level, as refer­ 6.2.5 Tacan bearing and aircraft position enced to an isotropic radiator, shall not performing as specified throughout the ad­ information. The airborne component shall exceed a value of +33 dBw. vertised operational service volume of ground provide devices for unam biguous determina­ Note: EIRP levels higher than +33 dBw f acilities in which use is intended, and under tion of the aircraft magnetic bearing with may impair system performance. all expected aircraft and airborne component respect to each selected ground component operating conditions. The requirements shall 6.1.6 Radiofrequency signal spectrum. The spectrum of the RF interrogation signal shall and for display of the aircraft position with be met under conditions in which the per­ respect to each selected course. formance characteristics of ground compo­ be such that at least 90 percent of the energy in each pulse shall be within a 0.5 6.2.5.1 Course deviation indicator devices. nents are in accordance with sections 2 and The response, readability and resolution of 5 of this standard. MHz band centered on the nominal channel frequency. course deviation indicator devices shall be 6.1 Interrogator signal characteristics. such as to permit the pilot to determine the The subparagraphs hereto identify interro­ 6.1.7 Spurious radiation. At all frequen­ cies between 960 and 1215 MHz, the level of direction and extent of the aircraft deviation gation signal characteristics and tolerances from the selected course. therefor which are applicable to- the radiated CW signals, as referenced to an iso­ tropic radiator, shall not exceed —60 dBw. 6.2.5.2 Warning function. The airborne radiated radiofrequency signal. component shall provide a warning indica­ 6.1.1 Interrogation radio frequencies and Spurious radiation from airborne components shall not result in derogation of operational tion which is clearly evident to the pilot accuracy. The interrogator shall transmit use of this system to other users or in the whenever the azimuth signals necessary for interrogation signals on the frequency ap­ derogation of other aeronautical services. the prescribed operation of the component propriate to the channel in use. For each 6.2 Component functional capabilities are not present and when the component is channel in use, the center radiofrequency and performance. The subparagraphs hereto not operating in memory. of the interrogation signal shall be within identify functional and operational perform­ 6.2.5.3 Accuracy of bearing and aircraft ± 1 0 0 kHz of the channel interrogation ance requirements applicable to the airborne position information. The total airborne frequency listed in Table A. com ponent. component error in bearing and aircraft 6.1.2 Pulse shape. The radiofrequency 6.2.1 Receiver radio frequencies. For each azimuth position information, as displayed pulse envelope shall have a shape as follows. channel in use, the center radiofrequency of to the pilot, shall not at any bearing exceed 6.1.2.1 Pulse rise time. The time required the receiver shall be the corresponding ±3.0° (95 percent probability). for the leading edge of the pulse to rise ground component reply frequency listed in T able A from 10 to 90 percent of its maximum volt­ Table A. age amplitude shall be nominally 2.5 micro­ 6.2.2 Sensitivity to ground component VOR-TACAN-DME CHANNEL FREQUENCIES AND PAIRING seconds, but shall not exceed 3.0 microsec­ signals. Based on the signal power densities onds. The minimum rise time is governed of 5.3.2, the airborne component shall pro­ DME- DME- by the spectrum requirements of 6 .1 .6 . vide sensitivity as necessary for the acquisi­ DME- TACAN TACAN 6.1.2.2 P ulse top. The instantaneous am­ TACAN VHF channel interrogation transponder tion and display of navigation information channel frequency MHz ~ frequency reply plitude of the pulse shall not, at any instant to the accuracy specified and for clear and No.. MHz frequency between the point on the leading edge which distinct reproduction of identification signals. MHz is 9 5 percent of the maximum voltage am­ 6.2.3 Rejection of undesired signals. T he plitude and the point on the trailing edge airborne component shall provide undesired 1025 062 w h ich is 9 5 percent of the maximum voltage IX:.______1088 signal rejection characteristics adequate to 1Y______1025 amplitude, fall below a value which is 95 1026 963 assure the specified performance. For co­ 2X_._:.. 1089 percent of the maximum voltage amplitude channel and adjacent-channel signals, this 2Y...... 1026 3X...... 1027 964 of the pulse.. requirement shall be met when the respec­ 1027 1000 6.1.2.3. Pulse duration. The pulse dura­ 3 Y ____ 965 tive signals provide undesired to desired 4X ...... 1028 1891 tion, as measured at the 50 percent maxi­ signal ratios up to the maximum values 4 Y ...... 1028 1029- 966 mum voltage amplitude, points on the lead­ stated in 2.1.1.6.2. When the maximum range 5X___ 1092 ing and trailing edges of the pulse, shall be 5Y...... 1029 967 ©apability of the airborne component is such e x ...... 1030 3.5±0.5 microseconds. 1030 1093 as to permit receipt of two cochannel signals 6 Y ______968 6 .1.2.4 Pulse decay time , The time re­ 7X 1031 within the frequency protected service vol­ 1031 quired for the trailing edge of the pulse to ume of a selected ground component and 7Y BV» fan from 90 to 10 percent of the maximum 8X 1032 when one cochannel signal is 8 dB or greater 8Y 1032. voltage amplitude shall nominally be 2.5 in amplitude than the other, the navigation QX 1033 microseconds, but shall not exceed 3.5 micro­ information provided shall be that of the 9 Y 1033 seconds. The minimum decay time is gov­ IflX 1034 stronger signal and a positive identification 1034 erned by the spectrum requirements of 6 .1.6 . 1«Y 972 signal shall be provided to identify the rrx 1035 6.1.3 Pulse coding. Interrogation signals ground component from which navigational 11Y 1035 1036 973 shall consist of paired pulses. The spacing of information is provided. 12X 3899 the constituent pulses of each pulse pair, as T2Y 1036 6.2.4 Distance information. The airborne 1087 974 measured between the 50 percent maximum 13X 1100 component shall function to measure and 13Y 1037 975 voltage amplitude points on the leading edge 14X 1038 display the distance in nautical miles be­ 1038 1101 of each RFpulse, shall be: tween the aircraft and the selected ground 14Y 976 (a) 12.0±0.5 microseconds for channel 15X 1038 com p on en t. 1039 1102 numbers ending in the suffix “X”; or IfiY 977 6 .2.4.1 Warning function. The airborne IfiX 1040 1103 (b) 36.0±0.5 microseconds for channel 1040 ■^978 component shall provide an indication which IfiY 1041 numbers ending in the suffix “T”. L...... - 1104 is clearly evident to the pilot whenever the Ï7X ...... 108.0 1041 6.1.4 Interrogation signal repetition rate. 17Y . . . . 108,05 VOR ------979 airborne component is either not tracking 1042. 1105 The interrogator average pulse pair repeti­ 18X______108A ILS . . — 1042 a distance reply signal or is not in memory. I&Y______108.15 ELS...... 980 tion rate shall not exceed 30 pairs of pulses .1043 1106 6.2.4.2. Accuracy of distance information. I9X ...... 108.2VOR...... 1643 per second based on the assumption that at J9Y...... 108.25-VOR ------981 When the airborne component error is com­ 1044 1107 least 95 percent of the time is occupied for 20X______.. 108.3 ELS...... 1044 tracking reply signals. The repetition rate bined by root-sum-square with a ground 00 Y . 108.35 ILS ...... Th« fre- may be increased during search for replies, component error of 0 .1 nautical miles, the 1108.0 MHz is not scheduled *0» álities for but the maximum repetition rate shall not tbtal error in slant range distance informa­ quencies of channel 17X are assigned exceed, 150 pairs of pulses per second. tion, as displayed to the pilot, shall not (ex­ testing airborne system components.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER. 7 , 1969 NOTICES 18057

Table A— Continued T able A—Continued T able A— Continued vor- tacan- dme channel frequencies VOR-TACAN—DME CHANNEL FREQUENCIES VOR-TACAN—DME CHANNEL FREQUENCIES AND PAIRINO AND PAIRINO AND PAIRINO

DME- DME- DME- DME- DME- DME- DME. TACAN TACAN DME- TACAN TACAN DME- TACAN TACAN TACAN VHF channel interrogation transponder TACAN VHF channel interrogation transponder TACAN VHF channel interrogation transponder channel frequency MHz frequency reply channel frequency MHz frequency reply • channel frequency MHz frequency repiy w0 MHz frequency No. MHz frequency No. MHz frequency MHz MHz MHz

1045 »Oq 57X --.____ 112.00 V O R ____ 1081 1018 93X____ . 114.60 VOR___ 1117 1180 108.4 VOR.. 1144 108.45 VO R. 1045 110° 57 Y - ...___ 112.05 V O R ____ 1081 93Y...... 114.65 VOR...... 1117 1054 108.5 IL S ... 1046 983 5 8 X -.____ 112.10 V O R ____ 1082 1019 94X...... 114.70 VOR___ 1118 1181 108.55 ILS _ _ 1046 1109 58Y ______112.15 V O R ____ 1082 1145 94Y____ . 114.75 VOR___ 1118 1055 108.6VOR-. 1047 98’ 5 9 X -...... 112.20 V O R * .... 1083 1020 95X____ . 114.80 VOR___ 1119 1182 108.65 VOR. 1047 111« 59 Y ...... 112.25 V O R ____ 1083 1146 95Y...... 114.85 VOR___ 1119 1056 108.7 IL S ... 1048 985 60X ______1084 1021 96X...... 114.90 VOR___ - 1120 1183 108.75 ILS- . 1048 1111 60Y ______1084 1147 96Y...... 114.95 VOR___ 1120 1057 108.8 VOR-- 1049 986 61X ______1085 1022 97X____ . 115.00 VOR___ 1121 1184 108.85 VOR- 1049 1112 61Y ______1085 1148 97 Y____ . 115.05 VOR___ 1121 1058 108.9 ILS__ 1050 987 62X ______— 1086 1023 98X...... 115.10 VOR___ 1122 1185 108.96 ILS - - 1050 1113 62Y ______- 1086 1149 98 Y...... 115.15 VOR...... 1122 1059 109.0 VOR.- 1051 988 63X - —______1087 . 1024 99X____ . 115.20 VOR___ 1123 1186 109.05 VOR. 1051 1114 63Y ...... 1087 1150 99 Y ____ - 115.25 VOR___ 1123 1060 28X...... 109.10 ILS. 1052 989 64X ...... i ...... — 1088 1151 ÎOOX___ . 115.30 VOR___ 1124 1187 .. 109.15 IL S -- 1052 1115 64 Y ______1088 1025 ÎOOY___ . 115.35 VOR___ 1124 1061 ... 109.20 VOR. 1053 990 65X ______1089 1152 101X___ . 115.40 V O R ..:.. 1125 1188 ...109.15 VOR. 1053 1116 65Y _ ...... 1089 1026 101Y— . 115.45 VOR___ 1125 1062 ... 109.30 IL S -. 1054 991 66X ...... 1090 1153 102X___ . 115.50 VOR___ 1126 1189 ... 109.35 ILS. . 1054 1117 66 Y r-______1090 1027 102 Y ___ . 115.55 VOR___ 1126 1063 ... 109.40 VOR. 1055 992 6 7 X - ..: ...... :.. ____ 1091 1154 103X___ . 115.60 VOR___ 1127 1190 ... 109.45 VOR- 1055 1118 67 Y ...... 1091 1028 103 Y___ . 115.65 VOR___ 1127 1064 ... 109.50ILS. . 1056 99» 68X ______1092 1155 104X___ . 115.70 VOR...... 1128 1191 ... 109.55 ILS. . 1056 1119 68Y ...... 1092 1029 104 Y ___ . 115.75 VOR...... 1128 1065 ... 109.60VOR- 1057 994 69X ...... 1093 1156 105X-__ . 115.80 VOR___ 1129 1192 ... 109.65 VOR- 1057 1120 69 Y ______- 1093 JLQ30 105 Y___ . 115.85 VOR___ 1129 1066 ... 109.70 ILS. . 1058 995 7 0 X -...... 112.30 V O R ____ 1094 1157 106X___ . 115.90 VOR...... 1130 1193 ... 109.75 IL S .- 1068 1121 70 Y _____ 112.35 V O R ...... 1094 1031 106 Y___ . 115.95 VOR___ 1130 1067 ... 109.80 VOR. 1059 996 71X ______112.40 V O R ____ 1095 1158 107X___ . 116.00 VOR...... 1131 1194 ... 109.85 VOR- 1059 1122 71Y _____ 112.45 V O R ____ 1 1095 1032 107 Y ___ . 116.05 VOR___ 1131 1068 ... 109.90 ILS. . 1060 997 72X ______112.50 V O R ...... 1096 1159 108X___ . 116.10 VOR___ 1132 1195 ... 109.95 ILS. . 1060 1123 72Y ______112.55 V O R ...... 1096 1033 108 Y___ . 116.15 VOR___ 1132 1069 ... 110.00 VOR- 1061 73X ______112.60 V O R ____ 1097 1160 109X___ . 116.20 VOR___ 1133 1196 ... 110.05 VOR. 1061 1124 73Y ______112.65 V O R ____ 1097 1034 109 Y ___ . 116.25 VOR___ 1133 1070 ... 110.10 IL S .- 1062 999 74X ______112.70 V O R ____ 1098 1161 110X___ . 116.30 VOR___ 1134 1197 ... 110.15 IL S -. 1062 1125 74Y ______112.75 V O R ____ 1098 1035 110 Y ___ . 116.35 VOR___ 1134 1071 ... 110.20 VOR. 1063 1000 75X ______112.80 V O R __ ». 1099 1162 111X___ . 116.40 VOR___ 1135 1198 39Y- - ... 110.25 VOR- 1063 1126 75Y ______112.85 V O R ____ 1099 1036 111Y___ . 116.45 VOR___ 1135 1072 MX.. ... 110.30 ILS. . 1064 1001 7 6 X -...... 112.90 V O R ...... 1100 1163 112X___ . 116.50 VOR___ 1136 1199 « y .. —-110.35 IL S -. 1064 1127 76Y ______112.95 V O R .___ 1100 1037 112Y___ . 116.55 VOR___ 1136 1073 ax.. ... 110.40 VOR. 1065 1002 77X ______113.00 V O R ...... 1101 1164 113X___ . 116.60 VOR___ 1137 1200 « y .. — 110.45 VOR. 1065 1128 77 Y ...... 113.05 V O R _____ 1101 1038 113 Y ___ . 116.65 VOR___ 1137 1074 4 2 X -. — 110.50 IL S -. 1066 1003 78X ______113.10 V O R ...... 1102 1165 114X___ . 116.70 VOR...... 1138 1201 4 2Y -. .— 110.55 IL S ,. 1066 1129 78Y ______113.15 V O R — 1102 1039 114Y___ . 116.75 VOR___ 1138 1075 4 3X -. — 110.60 VOR. 1067 1004 79X ______113.20 V O R ____ 1103 1166 115X-___ . 116.80 VOR___ 1139 1202 « Y , . .... 110.65 VOR. 1067 1130 79Y ______113.25 V O R ...... 1103 1040 115Y___ . 116.85 V O R ..... 1139 1076 44X -. 110.70 ILS... 1068 1005 8 0 X -...... 113.30 V O R ____ 1104 1167 116X___ . 116.90 VOR...... 1140 1203 44Y. .... 110.75 ILS... 1068 1131 80 Y _____ 113.35 V O R ...... 1104 1041 116Y___ . 116.95 VOR...... 1140 1077 4 5 X - —. 110.80 VOR. 1069 1006 81X ...... 113.40 V O R ...... 1105 1168 117X___ . 117.00 VOR___ 1141 1204 45Y. 110.85 VOR. 1069 1132 81Y ______113.45 V O R ____ 1105 1042 117Y___ . 117.05 VOR...... 1141 1078 46X-- .... 110.90 ILS... 1070 1007 82X ______113.50 V O R ____ 1106 1169 118X- —_. 117.10 VOR___ 1142 1205 46Y. .— 110.95 ILS... 1070 1133 82Y ______113.55 V O R ____ 1106 1043 118Y___ . 117.15 VOR...... 1142 1079 47X -. .— 111.00 VOR. 1071 1008 8 3 X -...... 113.60 V O R ...... 119X___ . 117.20 VOR...... 1143 1206 47 Y . 111.05 VOR. 1071 1134 83 Y ...... 113.65 V O R ____ 1107 1044 48X -. 8 4 X -...... 113.70 V O R ____ 1108 1171 119Y___ . 117.25 VOR___ 1143 1080 —- 111.10 ILS... 1072 1009 1207 48Y. —. 111.16 ILS... 1072 1135 84Y ...... 113.75 V O R ____ 1108 1045 120X___ . 117.30 VOR___ 1144 49X- —. 111.20 VOR. 1073 1010 85X ______113.80 V O R ..... 1109 • 1172 120Y___ . 117.35 VOR___ 1144 1081 49Y- .... 111.25 VOR. 1073 1136 85Y ...... 113.85 V O R ____ 1109 1046 121X___ . 117.40 VOR___ 1145 1208 50X- 111.30 ILS... 1074 1011 8 6 X ...... 113.90 V O R ...... 1110 1173 121Y___ . 117.45 VOR___ 1145 1082 50Y —. 111.35 ILS... 1074 1137 86Y ______113.95 V O R -___ 51X- 87X ...... - 114.00 V O R ____ 1111 1174 122X___ . 117.50 VOR...... 1146 1209 —. 111.40 VOR. 1075 1012 122Y___ . 117.55 VOR...... 1146 1083 51Y , 111.45 VOR. 1075 1138 87Y _____ 114.05 V O R _____ 1111 1048 52X. — - 111.50 ILS... 1076 1013 88X ...... 114.10 V O R ____ 1112 1195 123X___ . 117.60 VOR___ 1147 1210 52Y — - 111.55 ILS— 1076 1139 88Y ______114.15 V O R ...... 1112 1049 123Y___ . 117.65 VOR___ 1147 1084 53X. — - 111.60 VOR 1077 1014 89X ______114.20 V O R ____ 1113 1176 124X___ 1 117.70 VOR...... 1148 1211 53Y —.,111.65 VOR. 1077 1140 89Y ______114.25 V O R ____ 1085 M X. 90X _____ 114.30 V O R ____ 1114 1177 124Y___ . 117.75 VOR___ 1148 111.70 ILS... 1078 1015 125X___ . 117.80 VOR___ 1149 1212 MY — - 111.75 ILS... 1078 1141 9 0 Y -.____ 114.35 V O R ____ 1114 1051 55X- —- 111.80 VOR 9 1 X ----_ . 114.40 V O R ...... 1115 1178 125Y___ . 117.85 VOR...... 1149 1086 55Y ' 1079 1016 — 111.85 VOR. 1079 1142 91Y ...... 114.45 V O R ____ 1115 1052 126X___ . 117.90 VOR...... 1150 1213 56X. 111.90 ILS... 1080 1017 92X ______114.50 V O R ____ 1116 1179 126Y___ . 117.95 VOR...... 1150 1087 56Y-. — 11L95ILS' 1080 1143 92Y______114.55 VOR ____ 1116 1053 - •

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 Î8058 NOTICES

500 600 1100 FIGURE 1 [F.R. Doc. 69-13236; Filed, Nov. 6 , 1969; 8:45 a.m.]

the conference therefore were urged to Issued: November 3, 1969, German­ ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION stipulate regarding a date convenient town, Md. [Docket No. P-153-1] for the hearing, after completion of the S a m u e l W. J ensch, preparation for hearing. This date sub­ Presiding Officer. PICKER CORP. mitted is February 16, 1970. [F.R. Doc. 69-13253; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; Order Reconvening Evidentiary As required by the Act and the direc­ 8:45 a.m.] tion of the Commission, the evidentiary Hearing hearing in this proceeding did initially By a notice of hearing issued on Sep­ convene on October 27, 1969, for a con­ tember 24, 1969, and published in the sideration of the readiness of the parties FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS F ederal R eg ister on September 26, 1969, to proceed to hearing and the presenta­ the Commission in accordance with the tion of evidence. Upon the basis of the requirements of section 153 of the Atomic statements and representations made at COMMISSION Energy Act, as amended (Act), set Octo­ the two sessions of the prehearing con­ [Docket No. 18706; FCC 69-1147] ; ber 27, 1969, as the date for the com­ ference, as well as the matters considered COASTAL AUTO PARTS, INC., AND mencement of the evidentiary hearing at the initial session of the evidentiary in this proceeding. At the prehearing con­ hearing, good cause has. been shown for COASTAL UTILITIES, INC. ference which commenced on October 17 a postponement of the evidentiary hear­ Memorandum Opinion a n d Order ing until February 16, 1970. Announce­ in accordance with the aforesaid notice Assigning Matter for Public Hearing of hearing, and also at a second session ment was.made at the October 27 hearing of the conference which was held on that the evidentiary hearing was recessed 1. The Commission has before it (a) October 24, both the Picker Corp., as to reconvene on February 16, 1970, in a complaint by Coastal Auto Parts, me.. applicant here for a patent license, and Washington, D.C., and that an Order (Coastal Auto), 109 Ryon Avenue, Htnes- the Nuclear-Chicago Corp., asserted that would be issued specifying the location ville, Ga., filed on May 29, 1969, stating they could not be fully prepared to pre­ for the hearing. that Coastal Auto had on or abou sent evidence at the hearing to com­ Wherefore, it'is ordered, In accord­ April 25, 1968, requested Coastal Utili­ mence on the required statutory date of ance with the Atomic Energy Act, as ties, Inc., Ryon Avenue, Hinesville, Ga, October 27.1 The parties2 appearing at amended, particularly sëction 181 there­ to provide a private line for interstate of, and the rules of practice of the Com­ communications usage. Coastal Auto i u - mission, particularly §§ 2.711 and 2.718 ther states that as of the date °f 1 1 The Atomic Energy Act, as amended, di­ thereof, and in conformance with the complaint no private line service ha rects the Commission to “* * * hold a hear­ announcement made at the first session ing within 60 days after the filing of such been instituted and that as a result o application.” thereof held on October 27,1969, the fur­ this failure to provide service it has sul- 2 The parties to the proceeding are Picker ther evidentiary hearing in this proceed­ fered damages; and (b) an answer an ing shall reconvene at 10 a.m. on Feb­ Corp., Nuclear-Chicago Corp., and Hal O. Coastal Ut i Anger, although Anger did not appear either ruary 16, 1970, in Room 117, Lafayette motion to dismiss filed by at the prehearing conference or at the Initial Building, 811 Vermont Avenue NW., ties, Inc., on July 10,1969, admitting t session of the evidentiary hearing. Washington, D.C. Coastal Auto had requested service u

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18059 alleging by way of defense that installa­ 4. As noted above, Coastal Utilities, Released: October 27,1969. tion of the necessary equipment was de­ Inc., has alleged a great increase in de­ layed by a shortage of carrier facilities mand for service. It further states that F ederal C ommunications and carrier channels resulting from a a Rural Electrification Administration C o m m is s io n , great influx of military and civilian per­ loan was obtained to purchase the equip­ [ sea l] B e n F . W aple, sonnel in the Hinesville area. Coastal ment necessary to meet the increased Secretary. Utilities, Inc., alleges that it had applied demand. However, a letter from Glenn [F.R. Doc. 69-13290; PTled, Nov. 6, 1969; for a Rural Electrification Administra­ E. Bryant, President of Coastal Utilities, 8:47 a.m .] tion loan on November 7, 1968, and be­ Inc., to the Commission dated Decem­ came eligible to draw on the approved ber 2, 1968, stated that no part of that [Report 464] loan on March 11,1969. It further alleges loan would be available to serve the COMMON CARRIER SERVICES that after securing approval of the loan, needs of Coastal Auto.1 That letter fur­ Coastal Utilities, Inc.’s engineers deter­ ther states: “if the amount involved (in INFORMATION 1 mined the equipment needed to serve serving Coastal Auto) is moderate the Domestic Public Radio Services Coastal Auto and placed orders for it. required facilities will be purchased Applications Accepted for Filing 2 The estimated date for installation of from funds that may be available for the cable facilities and carrier channel plant replacements.” Facts of this nature N ovember 3, 1969. facilities was scheduled for October 1, showing that 8 months after a request Pursuant to §§ 1.227(b) (3) and 21.26 1969, but it now appears that further for service the carrier had not pro­ (b) of the Commission’s rules, an appli­ delay has occurred. The motion to dis­ gressed far enough to know the cost of cation, in order to be considered with any miss requests dismissal of the complaint providing the service nor contemplated domestic public radio services applica­ for lack of legal sufficiency. obtaining funds for the necessary facili­ tion appearing on the list below, must 2. The gravamen of Coastal Auto’s ties raises a question as to whether be substantially complete and tendered complaint is that Coastal Utilities, Inc. Coastal Utilities, me., has satisfied the for filing by whichever date is earlier: has violated section 201 (a) of the Com­ requirements of section 201(a). In addi­ (a) The close of business 1 business day munications Act of 1934, as amended tion, there is posed a question as to preceding the day on which the Com­ (Act) by failing to provide interstate whether Coastal Utilities has been dis­ mission takes action on the previously communications service upon reasonable criminatory or prejudicial in its treat­ filed application; or (b) within 60 days request. All common carriers providing ment of private line customers. after the date of the public notice listing interstate communications service by 5. Accordingly, it is ordered, That pur­ the first prior filed application (with wire or radio are required by section suant to the provisions of sections 201 which subsequent applications are in 201(a) “to furnish such communications through 209 of the Communications Act conflict) as having been accepted for service upon reasonable request there­ of 1934, as amended, a public hearing filing. An application which is subse­ for.” A carrier’s obligation under that shall be held at a time and place to be quently amended by a major change will section is to furnish reasonably adequate hereinafter designated upon the follow­ be considered to be a newly filed appli­ -communications facilities to the public ing specific issues: cation. It is to be noted that the cutoff it serves. The types of services required Issues, a. Whether Coastal Utilities, dates are set forth in the alternative— to be furnished upon reasonable request me., has violated section 201(a) of applications will be entitled to considera­ include, by necessity, those services of­ the Communications Act of 1934, as tion with those listed below if filed by the fered in the carrier’s tariffs. Coastal Util­ amended, by failing to provide service to end of the 60-day period, only if the ities, Inc., as a “connecting carrier,” is Coastal Auto Parts, Inc., from on or Commission has not acted upon the ap­ not required to file tariffs with this Com­ about April 25,1968, to the present date; plication by that time pursuant to the mission. Its rates for the interstate serv­ b. Whether Coastal Utilities, me., has first alternative earlier date. The mutual ices it does offer, however, are filed by subjected Coastal Auto Parts, me., to exclusivity rights- of a new application the carrier to which it connects that does any undue or unreasonable prejudice are governed by the earliest action with provide the physical interstate service. or disadvantage within the meaning of respect to any one of the earlier filed In this case, Coastal Utilities, Inc., is a section 202(a) by not providing service conflicting applications. connecting carrier of Southern Bell Tele­ from on or about April 25, 1968, to the The attention of any party in interest phone and Telegraph Co. and its rates present date. desiring to file pleadings pursuant to and service offering are governed by c. If the Commission finds that there section 309 of the Communications Act A.T. & T. Tariff P.C.C. No. 260. That has been a violation of the Act, what of 1934, as amended, concerning any do­ tariff provides for the provision by the action should be taken with respect mestic public radio services application carrier of private lines of the type re­ thereto. 6. It is further ordered, That Coastal accepted for filing, is directed to § 21.27 quested by Coastal Auto. of the Commission's rules for provisions 3. The duty of a common carrier to Utilities, Inc., and Coastal Auto Parts, Inc., are hereby designated parties to governing the time for filing and other furnish the service offered in its tariff requirements relating to such pleadings. is not absolute. For example, a carrier is this proceeding; not liable to provide for unexpected or 1. It is further ordered, That a Hear­ F ederal C ommunications great demands which it had no reason to ing Examiner shall be designated to C o m m is s io n , apprehend would be made and which it preside in the proceeding herein, who [ se a l ] B e n F . W a ple, could not reasonably have been expected shall prepare an initial decision on all Secretary. to meet in full. But the carrier must care­ of the issues in the complaint proceed­ ing as provided in § 1.267 of the Com­ 1 All applications listed below are subject to fully anticipate demand and when the further consideration and review and may be unexpected situation arises, it must, in mission’s rules. returned and/or dismissed if not found to keeping with its obligation to the public, Adopted: October 22,1969. be in accordance with the Commission’s rules, regulations, and other requirements. ®Wve to meet that demand promptly. »The above alternative cutoff rules apply This may, of course, require the carrier 1The letter from Coastal Utilities, Inc., to those applications listed below as having to expend sufficient sums of money nec­ was part of the correspondence between the been accepted in Domestic Public Land Commission and the carrier with respect to Mobile Radio, Rural Radio, PoInt-to-PoInt essary for the purchase o f the required the informal complaint filed by Coastal Auto Microwave Radio, and Local Television Trans­ facilities. on Sept. 23, 1968. mission Services (Part 21 of the rules).

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 196? No. 216------9 Application Accepted for Filing DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICE—Continued 18060

DOMESTIC PUBLIC LAND MOBILE RADIO SERVICE 2280-C2-P-70—Mobile Radio Message Service, Inc. (KEA260), C.P. for additional facilities to operate on frequency 454.125 MHz located at Empire State Building, 350 Fifth Avenue, File No., Applicant, Call Sign, and Nature of Application New York, N.Y. 2161- C2-P-70—The Allied Companies, Inc. (KAL873), C.P. to change antenna system and 2357- C2-P-70—Edward C. Smith doing business as Answerite Professional Telephone Service antenna location to 1337 Lane Street, Topeka, Kans., operating on frequency 152.21 MHz. (KIY581), C.P. for additional channel to operate on frequency 152.180 MHz at location 2162- C2—P—(4) —70—The Redco Corp., Roy M. Teel & Lowry McKee doing business as No. 1: Park Plaza Hotel, 431 East Central Boulevard, Orlando, Fla. Mobllfone (KKJ459), C.P. for additional facilities to be located at a new site Identified 2358- C2-P-70—Telephone Secretarial Service (KEA263), C.P. for additional channel to as location No. 3: 2501 Suntide Road, Corpus Christ!, Tex., to operate on frequencies operate on frequency 454.125 MHz at Its station located at 1180 Raymond Boulevard, 454.175,454.225,454.275, and 454.325 MHz. Newark, N.J. 2163- C2-P-70—Wisconsin Telephone Co. (KSC871), C.P. to change frequency from: 152.51 Major Amendment MHz to 152.54 MHz at its station located at 5 miles northwest of Manitowoc, Wis. 3824-C2-P-69—Ark-La-Tex Mobile Radio Service (KLB494), Amend to read: To operate 2164- C2-MP—70—Louisville 2-way Radio Service, Inc. (KIF656), Modify C.P. to change on a frequency 152.15 MHz. All other particulars to remain the same as reported on public antenna location to: 800 South Fourth Street, Louisiville, Ky., operating on frequency notice dated Jan. 6,1969, Report No. 421, 158.70 MHz. Replace transmitter for same. 2165- O2-MP-70—LaVergne L. Bordelon, doing business as LaVergne’s Telephone Answering Correction N Service (KLF657), Modify C.P. to lower antenna located at *4-mile south of Donahue 5531-C2-P-69—Francis I. Lambert and Harry L. Brock, Jr., doing business as Advanced Ferry Road, 4 y2 miles northeast of Alexandria, La., operating on frequency 152.24 MHz. Communications Co. (New), Correct to read: 5531-C2-P-69 Francis I. Lambert and 2166- C2-MP- (3) -70—Intrastate Radio Telephone, Inc., of Los Angeles (KMA200), Modify Harry L. Brock, Jr., doing business as Advance Communitions Co. (KLF495), C.P. to CJP. to change antenna system at location No. 1: 8999 Alto Cedro Drive, Los Angeles, Calif, add a second channel to operate on base frequency 454.300 MHz. All other particulars and location No. 2: End of TV Row, Mount Wilson, Calif., operating on frequency 454.275 to remain thé same as reported on public notice dated Mar. 24, 1969, Report No. 432. MHz. 2167- C2—P—(2) —70—Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. (KKD289), C.P. to change antenna POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER) system and antenna location to: 5 miles northwest of Ardmore, Okla., operating on frequencies 152.51,152.63 MHz. Replace transmitter for same. 2169- C1-P-70—General Telephone Co. of Wisconsin (New), C.P. for a new fixed station to 2232- C2-P-70—General Telephone Co. of Wisconsin (New), C.P. for new 1-way station to be located at Rib Mountain, 3 miles south-southwest of junction of U.S. Highway No. be located at 3203 Lincoln Avenue, Two Rivers, Wis., to operate on frequency 152.840 MHz. 51 and State Highway No. 29, township of Rib Mountain, Wis. Frequency 11,200.0 MHz 2233— C2—P—70—General Telephone Co. of Wisconsin (New), C.P. for new 2-way station to be 4 toward Wausau, Wis. located at 3203 Lincoln Avenue, Two Rivers, Wis., to operate on frequency 152.690 MHz. 2170- C1-P-70—Minnesota Telephone Co. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station to be located 2334-C2-P-70—Edward C. Smith, doing business as Answer!te Professional (New), C.P. for at Park and Second Streets, Big Falls, Minn. Frequency 2168.4 MHz toward Little Fork, NOTICES new 2-way station to be located at Comer Avenue D and Fourth Street SW., Winter Haven, Minn. Fla., to operate on frequency 152.06 MHz. 2171- C1-P-70—Minnesota Telephone Co. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station to be located 2168- C2—AL-70—Lufkin Telephone Exchange, Inc. (KKX717), Consent to Assignment of at approximately 0.75 mile east of International Falls, Minn. Frequency 2174.8 MHz License from: Lufkin Telephone Exchange, Inc. Assignor To: Lufkin Telephone Exchange, toward Llttlefork, Minn. Inc. Assignee, a new corporation to be distinguished for assignor. 2172- C1-P—70—Minnesota Telephone Co. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station to be located 2244— C2—P—70—Land of Lincoln Mobile Telephone Co. (New), CP. for new 2-way station to near Llttlefork, Minn. Frequency 2118.4 MHz toward Big Falls, Minn, and 2124.8 MHz be located at 1841 North River Drive, Algonquin, 111., to operate on frequency 454.025 MHz. toward International Falls, Minn. 2245— C2—P—(3) —70—North Carolina Mobile Telephone Co. (New), C.P. for new 2-way station 2173- C1-P-70—The Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania (KYJ36), C.P. to change fre­ to be located at 102 West Trade Street, Charlotte, N.C., to operate on frequencies 454.025, quency from 6360.3 MHz to 11,445 MHz and add frequencies 6286.19 and 6404.79 MHz 454.225,454.325 MHz. toward Manada, Pa. Location: 210 Pine Street, Harrisburg, Pa. 22462—C2—P—70—Telephone Answering Service, Inc., doing business as Paducah Radio 2174- Cl—P—70—The Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania (KYJ37), C.P. to change frequency Telephone Service (KJU799), C.P. to change antenna system and replace transmitter op­ 6137.9 MHz to 10,995 MHz and add frequencies 6034.15 and 6152.75 MHz toward Harris­ erating on frequency 152.03 MHz at its station located at 231 South Seventh Street, burg, Pa., and add frequencies 5945.20 and 6063.80 MHz toward Millbach, Pa. Location: Paducah, Ky. Manada, 2.7 miles northwest of Grantville, Pa. 2247—C2—P—70—Lewis M. Kelley, doing business as Seattle Radiotelephone Service (KOA733), 2175- C1-P-70—The Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania (New), C.P. for a new fixed station C.P. for additional facilities to be located at a new site identified as location No. 2: to be located at Millbach, 2 miles south of Newmanstown, Pa. Frequencies 6197.24 and Seattle-First National Bank Building, Seattle, Wash., to operate on frequency 454.30 MHz. 6315.84 MHz toward Manada, Pa., and 6286.19 and 6404.79 MHz toward Haafsvllle, Pa. 2252—C2—P—70—Harry Tarbell, doing business as Pacific Union (KUA287), C.P. to replace 2176- C1-P-70—The Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania (New), C.P. for a new fixed station transmitter operating on frequency 43.58 MHz at station located at Council Crest Drive to be located at 0.9 mile southwest of Haafsvllle, Pa. Frequencies 11665 and 11425 m h z and Villard Drive SW., Portland, Oreg. toward Allentown and 6034.15 and 6152.75 MHz toward Millbach, Pa. 2254-C2—P-70—Albert M. Steiner, trading as Long Island Telephone Co. (KEJ885), C.P. for 2177- C1-P-70—The Bell Telephone Co. of Pennsylvania (KIK88), C.P. to add frequencies additional facilities to operate on frequency 454.25 MHz to be located at a new site 11175 and 10935 MHz toward Haafsvllle, Pa. Location: 110 North Hail street, Allentown, identified as location No. 3: Foot of Commercial Avenue, Garden City, N.Y. Pa. 2256-C2—AL-70—Chattanooga Venetian Blind Co., Inc. (KIK580), Consent to assignment 2235— Cl—P—70—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KGH33), C.P. to add frequencies of license from: Chattanooga Venetian Blind CO., Inc. Assignor to: Metro Radio, Inc., 3890 and 3970 MHz toward Winder, Pa. Location: 3.5 miles northwest of Jennerstown, Assignee. Pa. 2279—C2-P- (3) -70—Mobile Radio-Telephone Service, Inc. (KOE252), C.P. for additional 2236— Cl—P—70—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KGN82), C.P. to add 3930 arvi 4010 facilities at location No. 1: Coon Peak, Oquirrh Range, 5.2 miles south-southwest of MHz toward Jennerstown and 10755 and 10915 MHz toward Claysburg, Pa. Location: Garfield, Utah, to operate on frequencies 454.125, 454.225, 454.325 MHz. 8.8 miles east of Windber, Pa.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 2 1 5 ------FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER)---Continued POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (TELEPHONE CARRIER )— Continued. 2237— Ol—P—70—American Telephone & Telegraph (New), C.P. for a new fixed station to be 2267-C1-P—170—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New). C.P. for a new fixed located at 4.7 miles northwest of Claysburg, Pa. Frequencies 11285 and 11605 MHz toward station to be located at 301 East Oak Street, Douglas, Wyo. Frequencies 6271.4 and 6390.0 Windber and 11405 and 11565 MHz toward Altoona, Pa. MHz toward S ou th D ouglas, Wyo. 2238— C1-P-70—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. for a new fixed station 2271- C1-MP-70—United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co. (KJH26), Modification of C.P. to to be located at 1311 12th Avenue, Altoona, Pa. Frequencies 10875 and 11035 MHz toward add frequency 6338.1 MHz toward Sand Mountain, Va. Location: 175 South First Street, Claysburg, Pa. Wytheville, Va. 2239— C1—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPX68), C.P. to add 2272- Cl-MP-70—United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co. (KJH27), Modification Of C.P. to frequencies 6315.9 and 11155 MHz toward Humboldt Mountain, Ariz. Location: Mount add frequencies 6026.7 and 6145.3 MHz toward Galax, Va., via passive reflector and 6056.4 Ord, 23 miles south-southwest of Payson, Ariz. mttw toward Wytheville, Va.location: 3 miles south of Wytheville, at Sand Mountain, Va. 2240— C1—P—70—1The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPX85), OP. to add 2273- C1-P-70—United Inter-Mountain Telephone Co. (KJH28), C.P. to replace transmitters frequencies 11525 and 11285 MHz toward Phoenix, Ariz. Location: Shaw Butte, 10 miles operating on frequencies 6249.1 and 6367.7 MHz toward Sand Mountain, Va., via passive north of Phoenix, Ariz. reflector location : 107 East Center Street, Galax, Va. 2241— C1—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KOV63), C.P. to add 2277- C1-P-70—Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KJL30), C.P. to replace trans­ frequencies 10835 and 11075 MHz toward Shaw Butte, Ariz. Location: 228 West Adams mitter operating on frequency 2178.4 MHz toward Hilton Head Island, S.C. location: 322 Street, Phoenix, Ariz. Drayton Street, Savannah, Ga. 2242— C1—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. for a new , 2278- C1-P—70—Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KJW76), C.P. to replace trans­ fixed station to be located at Humboldt Mountain, 13.4 miles northeast of Cave Creek, mitter operating on frequency 2128.4 MHz toward Savannah, Ga. location: State High­ Ariz. Frequencies 6063.8 and 11605 MHz toward Mount Ord, Ariz. way No. 46, Hilton Head Island, S.C. 2248- C1-P-70—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KJH70), C.P. to add frequencies 2359- Cl—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPL23), C.P. to change 5974.8 and 6093.5 MHz toward Ojus, Fla. Location: 6 miles west-southwest of Pennsuco, frequencies from 10795 and 11035 MHz to 6382.6 and 6293.6 MHz toward Mingus Mountain, Ariz., qnri change the antenna system location: 140 North Marina Street, Prescott, Ariz. Fla. 2249- Cl—P—70—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KJJ68), C.P. to add frequencies 6226.9 2360- C1-P-70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPC70), C.P. to change and 6345.5 MHz toward Pennsuco and 6004.5 and 6123.1 MHz toward Fort Lauderdale, frequencies from 11245 and 11485 MHz to 6130.5 and 5982.3 MHz toward Prescott, Ariz.; change frequencies from 11325 and 11565 MHz to 6130.5 and 5982.3 MHz toward Mount Fla. Location: 3.5 miles northwest of Ojus, Fla. 2250- C1—P-70—American Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KJA62), C.P. to add frequencies Elden, Ariz., and change the antenna system location: Mingus Mountain, 7.5 miles south 6256.5 and '6375.2 MHz toward Ojus, Fla. Location: 3 miles west-northwest of Fort of Jerome, Ariz. 2361- C1-P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPC71), C.P. to change Lauderdale, Fla. frequencies from 10875 and 11115 MHz to 6241.7 and 6212.1 MHz toward Mingus Mountain, 2257- C1-P-70—Mount Rural Telephone Cooperative Corp., Inc. (New), C.P. for a new fixed NOTICES station to be located near West Liberty, Ky. Frequencies 6034.2 and 10755 MHz toward Ariz., change the antenna system location: Mount Elden, 3.7 miles northeast of Morehead, Ky. Flagstaff, Ariz. 2258— Cl—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPP34), C.P. to add POINT-TO-POINT MICROWAVE RADIO SERVICE (NONTELEPHONE) frequencies 6071.2 and 6130.5 MHz toward Price, Utah. Location: 8 miles north-northeast 2356—Cl-ML-70—West Texas Microwave Co. (KTR35), Modification of license to permit of Dragerton, Utah. 2259- C1—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co, (KPR35), C.P. to add carriage of audio programing of FM broadcast stations WRR-FM and KCWM-FM to frequencies 6323.3 and 6382.6 MHz toward Bruin Peak, Utah. Location: 107 East First Lubbock, Tex., for delivery to Lubbock Television Cable Co., Inc. North Street, Price, Utah. Corrections 2260— Cl—P-70—South Central Bell Telephone Co. (KIV67), C.P. to add frequencies 10815 and 11135 MHz toward Pikevllle, Ky. Location: Approximately 1.8 miles southwest of 1854-C1-P-70 thru 1858-C1-P-70—United Video, Inc., The informative note appearing on Pikeville, Ky. public notice dated October 13, 1969, should show the signal of KDTV rather than 2261— Cl—P—70—South Central Bell Telephone Co. (KVD77), C.P. to add frequencies 11225 KMEC-TV to be delivered to Pryor, Okla. and 11545 MHz toward Pikevllle, Ky. Location: 402 Second Street, Pikevllle, Ky. 1894—Cl-P-70—Mountain Microwave Corp. (KAQ88), Frequency 6586.2 MHz shown on public 2262- C1—MP—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KPQ57), Modification notice dated October 20, 1969, should be corrected to read 6286.2 MHz. of C.P. to add frequencies 6271.4 and 6390.0 MHz toward Casper Junction, Wyo., and [F.R. Doc. 69-13258; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; 8:45 a.m.] 2162.4 MHz toward Casper Mountain, Wyo., and change the antenna system location: 103 North Durbin Street, Casper, Wyo. 2263- C1—P-70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. for a new Interested parties may inspect and ob­ fixed station to be located at 2.8 miles south-southeast of Casper, Wyo. Frequencies 6019.3 FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION tain a copy of the agreement at the and 6137.9 MHz to 6004.5 and 6123.1 MHz toward Orpha, Wyo. i CONTINENTAL NORTH ATLANTIC Washington office of the Federal Mari­ 2264— Cl—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. for a new fixed time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., station to be located at*8 miles southwest of Orpha, Wyo. Frequencies 6256.5 and 6375.2 WESTBOUND FREIGHT CONFERENCE Room 1202; or may inspect agreement TvrTTv. toward Casper Junction, Wyo., and 6256.5 and 6375.2 MHz toward South Douglas, Notice of Agreement Filed at the offices of the District Managers, Wyo. i New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and 2265— Cl—MP—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (KKU78), Modification Notice is hereby given that the fol­ San Francisco, Calif. Comments with of CP. to add frequencies 6256.5 and 6375.2 MHz toward South Douglas and Chugwater, lowing agreement has been filed with the reference to an agreement including a Wyo., 6271.4 and 6390.0 MHz toward Wheatland, Wyo., and change the antenna system Commission for approval pursuant to request for hearing, if desired, may be location: 8 miles west-northwest of Wendover, Wyo. section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as submitted to the Secretary, Federal 2266- C1—P—70—The Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co. (New), C.P. for a new fixed amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 Maritime Commission, Washington, D.C. station to be located at 4.3 miles southeast of Douglas, Wyo. Frequencies 6004.5 and 6123.1 20573, within 20 days after publication of mttv. toward Orpha and Wendover, Wyo., ,and 6019.3 and 6137.9 MHz toward Douglas, Wyo. U.S.C. 814), 18061

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, 410. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18062 NOTICES this notice in the F ederal R eg ister . A (UTS) and Pacific Far East Line, Inc. formula provided for in Agreement No. copy of any such statement should also (PFEL) provides for the sublease to T-2188 as modified. be forwarded to the party filing the PFEL of certain marine terminal prop­ Dated: November 4,1969. agreement (as indicated hereinafter) erty in Alameda, Calif., which UTS leases and the comments should indicate that from Encinal Terminals. PFEL will use By order of the Federal Maritime this has been done. the premises for receiving, assembling, Commission. Notice of agreement filed by: and distributing containers, for non­ F rancis C. H u r n ey , Mr. Burton H. White, Burlingham, Under­ container cargo and for uses incidental Assistant Secretary. wood, Wright, White & Lord, 25 Broadway, thereto. As compensation, PFEL will pay [F.R. Tk>c. 69-13293; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; New York, N.Y. 10004. UTS full wharfage and dockage charges 8:48 a.m.] as set forth in Encinal’s tariff with a Agreement No. 8210-9, between the minimum payment of $172,000 per year. member lines of the Continental North If during any calendar year tariff charges Atlantic Westbound Freight Conference, are between $172,000 and $225,000, PFEL adds a new paragraph “e” to Article 2 FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION will pay UTS 50 percent of tariff charges [Docket No. RI70—308 etc.] of the basic agreement to provide (1) for containers and 75 percent of tariff that when an emergency demanding charges for noncontainer cargo; if GENERAL CRUDE OIL CO. ET AL. special rate flexibility is declared to exist, PFEL’s payments reach $225,000 then, the Conference may take special steps to during the remainder of the year, PFEL Order Providing for Hearings on and protect the situation, including the ap­ will pay UTS no further tariff charges Suspension of Proposed Changes in pointment of a Rate Committee to make for containers and only 65 percent of Rates 1 special emergency rates, alter tariff rules tariff charges for noncontainer cargo. and regulations, open and close rates and O ctober 24, 1969. permit independent action in accordance Dated: November 4,1969. The respondents named herein have with the powers from time to time By order of the Federal Maritime filed proposed increased rates and granted, and (2) that action by the Rate Commission. charges of currently effective rate sched­ ules for sales of natural gas under Com­ Committee may be authorized by a ma­ F rancis C. H u r n e y , jority vote of those present and entitled Assistant Secretary. mission jurisdiction, as set forth in Ap­ to vote at any Rate Committee meeting. pendix A hereof. Reports of all such actions shall be fur­ [F.R. Doc. 69-13292; Filed, Nov. 6, T969; The proposed changed rates and nished the Commission. 8:48 a.m.] charges may be unjust, unreasonable, Dated: November 4, 1969. unduly discriminatory, or preferential, or WSUP ALLOCATION AGREEMENT otherwise unlawful. By the Federal Maritime Commission. The Commission finds: F rancis C. H u r n e y , Notice of Agreement Filed for It is in the public interest an d con­ Assistant Secretary. Approval sistent with the Natural Gas Act that [F.R. Doc. 69-13291; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; Notice is hereby given that the follow­ the Commission enter upon hearings 8:47 a.m.] ing agreement has been filed with the regarding the lawfulness of the proposed Commission for approval pursuant to changes, and that the supplements herein section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as be suspended and their use be deferred UNIVERSAL TERMINAL & STEVEDOR­ amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 as ordered below. ING CORP. AND PACIFIC FAR EAST U.S.C. 814). The Commission orders: LINE, INC. Interested parties may inspect and ob­ (A) Under the Natural Gas Act, par­ tain a copy of the agreement at the ticularly sections 4 and 15, the regula­ Notice of Agreement Filed for Washington office of the Federal Mari­ tions pertaining thereto (18 CFR Ch. I), Approval time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., and the Commission’s rules of practice Room 1202, or may inspect agreement and procedure, public hearings shall be Notice is hereby given that the follow­ held concerning the lawfulness of the ing agreement has been filed with the at the offices of the District Managers, Commission for approval pursuant to New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and proposed changes. section 15 of the Shipping Act, 1916, as San Francisco, Calif. Comments with ref­ (B) Pending hearings and decisions amended (39 Stat. 733, 75 Stat. 763, 46 erence to an agreement including a re­ thereon, the rate supplements herein are U.S.C. 814). quest for hearing, if desired, may be sub­ suspended and their use deferred until mitted to the Secretary, Federal Mari­ Interested parties may inspect and ob­ date shown in the “Date Suspended tain a copy of the agreement at the time Commission, Washington, D.C. 20573, within 20 days after publication Until” column, and thereafter until Washington office of the Federal Mari­ made effective as prescribed by the Nat­ time Commission, 1405 I Street NW., of this notice in the F ederal R e g ister . Room 1202, or may inspect agreement A copy of any such statement should also ural Gas Act. at the offices of the District Managers, be forwarded to the party filing the (C) Until otherwise ordered by the New York, N.Y., New Orleans, La., and agreement (as indicated hereinafter), Commission, neither the suspended San Francisco, Calif. Comments with ref­ and the comments should indicate that supplements, nor the rate schedules erence to an agreement including a re­ this has been done. sought to be altered, shall be changed quest for hearing, if desired, may be Notice of agreement filed for approval until disposition of these proceedings or submitted to the Secretary, Federal Mar­ by: itime Commission, Washington, D.C. expiration of the suspension period. Mr, Edward D. Ransom, Lilllck, McHose, peti­ 20573, within 20 days after publication Wheat, Adams & Charles, 311 California (D) Notices of intervention or of this notice in the F ederal R e g ister . Street, San Francisco, Calif. 94104. tions to intervene may be filed with the A copy of any such statement should Federal Power Commission, Washington, also be forwarded to the party filing the Agreement No. T-2188-2 between Ha­ waiian stevedore companies (Employers) D.C. 20426, in accordance with the rules agreement (as indicated hereinafter), of practice and-procedure (18 CFR 1.8 and the comments should indicate that modifies the basic agreement which pro­ this has been done. vides for an allocation among the Em­ and 1.37(f)) on or before December 10, Notice of agreement filed for approval ployers of the costs of a Work Stabiliza­ 1969. by: tion and Utilization Program Fund for By the Commission. their employees. The purpose of the mod­ Mr. John F. Farrell, Jr., Vice President, Uni­ [ sea l] G ordon M . G rant, versal Terminal & Stevedoring Corp., 1 ification is to provide for an increase Secretary. Broadway, New York, N.Y: 10004. in benefits to the employees, resulting in Agreement No. T-2351 between Uni­ an increase in the amount of the funds 1 Does not consolidate for hearing or dis­ versal Terminal & Stevedoring Corp. to be raised pursuant to the method and pose of the several matters herein.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18063

Appendix A

Bate Sup­ Effective Cents per Mcf Bate in Docket sched- ple- Amount Date date Date — — effect sub- No. Despondent ole ment Purchaser and producing area of annual filing unless suspended Bate in Proposed in- ject to re- No. No. increase tendered suspended until— effect creased rate fund in dockets Nos.

RI7O-308-. General Crude Oil 8 5 West Lake Natural Gasoline $490 9-24-69 « 10-25-69 U - 1-70 9.0 ‘ •9.5 RI65-190. Co., Post Office Co.* (Nena Lucia Field, Box 2252, Houston, Noland County, Tex.) Tex. 77001. (BE. District No. 7-B). RI70-309.. Chevron Oil Co., 5 2 Montana-Dakota UtUities 4,745 9-29-69 712- 4-69 5- 4-70 15.384 8 9 16.384 Western Division, Co. (Muddy Bidge Field, Post Office Box Fremont County, Wyo.). 599, Denver, Colo. 80201. ___ do______6 2 Kansas-Nebrask a Natural 35,131 9-29-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 15.0 • « 16.0 Gas Co., Inc. (Lost Cabin and Waltman * Fields, Fremont and Natrona Counties, Wyo.). RI70-310.- M. J. Brannon, Jr., l 3 El Paso Natural Gas Co. 620 9-30-69 3 10-31-69 3-31-70 13.0 • 9 14.0 RI65-92. 4225 Glertwood Dr., (Undesignated Dakota Fort Worth, Tex. Field, San Juan County, 76109. N. Mex.) (San Juan Basin Area). RI70-311-- P & M Oil & Gas Co., ' 2 12 3 Equitable Gas Co. (Dodd­ 1,440 9-30-69 310-31-69 3-31-70 25. ff »° “ 27.0 406 Wood St., West ridge County, W. Va.). Union, W. Va. 26325. RI70-312.. Skelly Oil Co. (Oper- 33 7 Kansas-Nebraska Natural 128 9-29-69 7 10-30-69 3-30-70 16,0 *.» 17.0 RI69-327. ator)'et al., Post Gas Co., Inc. (Various Office Box 1650, Fields, Logan County, Tulsa, Okla. 74102. Colo.). RI70-313.. Shell Oil Co., 50 178 12 El Paso Natural Gas Co. 8,675 9-29-69 7 10-30-69 3-30-70 17.8549 8 9 M 22.1925 West 50th St., New (Aneth Area Fields, San York, N.Y. 10020. Juan County, Utah). - RI70-314.. Skelly OU Co., Post 165 8 Michigan Wisconsin Pipe 2,171 9-29-69 7 10-30-69 3-30-70 « 15.75 • » ‘0 17.75 Office Box 1650, Line. Co. (Cedardale and Tulsa, Okla. 74102. Northeast Cedardale Fields, Dewey, and Major Counties, Okla.) (Okla­ homa “Other” Area)...... do...... 214 3 Lone Star Gas Co. 270 9-25-69 7 10-26-69 3-26-70 15.0 • • w 17.0 (Pone Field, Busk County, Tex.) (BE. District No. 6)...... do...... 143 2 Panhandle Eastern Pipe 6,939 10-3-69 7 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 » 16.0 • » » 18.0 Line Co. (Hugoton Field, Texas County, (Pan­ handle Area) and Mohler Field, Meade County, Kans.)...... do______163 2 Northern Natural Gas Co. 135 10- 3-69 7 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 M 16.0 • 8 2o 16.0 RI69-158. (McKinney Field, Clark

County, Kans.). o ...... do...... 161 1 Texas Gas Transmission 226 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 1 M 2118.25 7 • 20 21 19. 75 Corp. (Sugar Creek Field, Claiborne Parish, La.) (North Louisiana Area). ----- do______u i 3 Panhandle Eastern Pipe 1,153 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 15.5 • 10 17.5 Line Co. (Meade County, Kans.)...... do...... 114 2 Northern Natural Gas Co. 336 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 2» 15.0 e is 20 17. o (Earns Unit, Ford County, Kans.)...... do______166 2 Colorado Interstate Gas’ 2,264 10- 1-69 * 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 20 12.0 • 1» 20 14. 5 R 161-320. Co. (Hugoton Field, Finney County, Kans.)...... do...... 191 2 Northern Natural Gas Co. 7,232 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 20 22 16. 0 0 8 20 22 17. 0 (Banner Block Area, Ste­ vens County, Kans.). R170-315.. Foree Co., 3700 First 2 ' 2 Transwestem Pipeline Co. 11,922 24 10- 1-69 711- 1-69 4- 1-70 2019.5 «8 20 23 26.0175 RI66-6. National Bank (Northwest Doby Spring Bldg., Dallas, Tex. Field, Harper County, 75202 Okla.) (Panhandle Area). RI70-316.. Charles J. Bichard i 3 Cities Service Gas Co.' 231 10- 3-69 7 1- 1-70 6- 1-70 20 14.0 • 8 20 15.0 B165-690. (Operator) et al., (Eureka Area, Grant 1329 First National County, Okla.) (Okla­ Bank Bldg., Okla- homa “ Other” Area). _ _ homa City, Okla. Alfred C. GlasseU, i 8 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 62,790 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 20 15.4248 • 8 20 16.4248 RI65-413. Jr. et al., 2300 First Co., a division of Tenneco City National Bank Inc. (Carthage Field, Bldg., Houston, Panola County, Tex.) tjt*7a Tex. 77002. (BR. District No. 6). "170-318.. Marathon Oil Co., 28 15 Texas Eastern Transmission 4 J9-29-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 2> 17.85Ï9 8 9 21 18.0570 RI69-164. 839 South Main St., Corp. (Andrews Unit, Findlay, Ohio Logansport Field, De Sota 45840. Parish, La.) (North Louisiana Area). — do...... 29 16 Texas Eastern Transmission 66 9-29-69 7 11-1-69 4- 1-70 2i 17.8519 8 9 21 18.0570 RT69-164. Corp. (Charlie No. 1 Well, Logansport Field, De Sota Parish, La.) (North Louisiana Area). ----d o ...... 69 16 Texas Eastern Transmission 88 9-29-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 21 17.8519 8 9 2i 18.0570 RI69-164. Corp. (Greenwood Waskom Field, Caddo Parish, La.) (North Louisiana Area). See footnotes a t en d of tab le.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18064 NOTICES

A i' p k n d ix A—-Continued

Cents per Mcf Rate in Docket Rate Sup- Amount Date Effective Date — effect sub- No. Respondent sched­ ple- Purchaser and producing area of annual filing date suspended Rate in Proposed in- ject to re­ ule ment increase tendered unless until— effeCt creased rate fund in No. No. suspended dockets Nos.

RI70-319. . Phillips Petroleum 400 1 El Paso Natural Cas Co. $155,855 9-26-69 ; 711-10-69 4-10-70 17.0 « 8 28 18.0675 Co. (Operator), (Dumas Plant, Hugoton- Bartlesville, Okla. \J Andarko Area, Moore 74003. County, Tex.) (RR. Dis­ trict No. 10). ___ do______447 4 Panhandle Eastern Pipe 190,875 9-26-69 7 10-27-69 3-27-70 38 17. 5050 6 26 27 2S 20.8893 Line Co. (Cimarron plant, 63, 018 . 1. 38 19. 8390 6 29 30 31 21.0060 Anadarko Basin Area, Ellis County, Okla. -(Pan- - handle Area) and Major County, Okla.) (Okla­ homa “ Other” Area). R 1.70-320. . Graham-Michaelis 35 4 Northern Natural Gas Co. 1,072 9-29-69 8 10-30-69 3-30-70 20‘17 , 5 8 8 20 18. 5 R 165-643. Drilling Co. et al., (Hansford Morrow Field, 211 North Broad­ Hansford County, Tex.) way Wichita, Kans. (RR. District No. 10). 67202. R 170-321:. Hassie Hunt Trust 4 25 Texas Eastern Transmission 3,076 9-29-69 111- 1-69 4- 1-70 3-1 17.8519 » » 21 18.0570 RI69-Ì73. (Operator) et al., Corp. (Northeast Lisbon 1401 Elm St., Field, Claiborne Parish, Dallas, Tex. 75202. La.) (North Louisiana Area). R170-322. . Hunt Oil Co. (Opera­ 28 19 Texas Eastern Transmis­ 1,641 9-29-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 21 17.8519 *s'2i 18.0570 R169-162. tor) et al., 1401 Elm sion Corp. (Greenwood- St., Dallas, Tex. Waskom Field, Caddo 75202. Parish, La.) (North Louisiana Area). R 170-323. . Mobil Oil Corp. 333 32 gì Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 60 9-29-69 710-30-69 3-30 70 15.0 8 8 ss 16.015 (Operator)-et al., (Red Oak Area, Le Flore Post Office Box 1774, County, Okla.) (Okla­ Houston, Tex. 77001. homa “ Other” Area). V ___ do______418 4 Texas Eastern Transmission 624 9-29-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 15,75 3116.30 B 168-660. Corp. (Greenwood- Waskom Field, Caddo Parish, La.) (North Louisiana Area). R170-324. . Mobil Oil Corp ...... 452 35 4 Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 912 9-26-69 - 710-27-69 3-27-70 15.0 8 so 16.0 (Kinta Field, Le Flore County, Okla.) (Okla­ homa “ Other” Area). RI70-325... Graham-Michaelis 23 10 Northern Natural Gas Co. 2,170 9-30-69 310-31-69 3-31-70 30 17.5 . 6 8 20 is. 5 R165-618. Drilling Co. (Op­ (Hansford Upper Morrow erator) et al. 211 and North Perry ton North Broadway, Fields, Hansford and Wichita, Kans. Ochiltree Counties, Tex.) 67202. (RR. District No. 10).- R170-326. . Atlantic Richfield 205^- h Kansas-Nebraska Natural 310 , 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 2« 18. 41 8 8 *6 18.61 RI69-156. Co., Post Office Box Gas Co., Inc. (Guymon- 2819, Dallas, Tex. Hugoton Field, Texas 75221. County, Okla.) (Pan­ handle Area). ___ do______433 10 H. L. Hunt et al.37 (North 419 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 38 16.1 6 8 38-16:37775 RI70-16. Lansing Field, Harrison Countv, Tex.) (RR. Dis­ trict No. 6). RI70-327--. Gulf Oil Corp. (Op­ 354 5 Lone Star Gas Co. (Doyle 16,200 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 15.0 8 39 19. 0 erator) et al., Post Field, Stephens County, Office Box 1589, Okla.) (Oklahoma Tulsa, Okla. 74102. “Other” Area). RI70-328-. Standard Oil Co. of 37 19 .Cimarron Transmission 51,889 10- 1-69 7 11- 1-69 4- 1-70 « 1115. 720 6 610 41 16. 767 RI68-267. Texas, a division of Co. (Southeast Marietta Chevron Oil Co. Unit Field, Love County, (Operator) et. al., Okla.) (Oklahoma Post Office Box “ O ther” Area)i 1249, Houston, Tex. 77001. R 170-329.. J. M. Huber Corp.. 62 2 Panhandle Eastern Pipe 2,211 10- 2-69 7 11- 2-69 4- 2-70 « <* « 15. 3Í3 6 33 42 43 44 45 17. 345 2300 West Loop, Line Co. (South Tegar- 703 ■: « 1» 17 15. 09 6 33 43 45 46 47 17. 105 Houston, Tex. den Field, Woods 77027. County, Okla.) (Okla­ homa “ Other” Area). RI70-330... Edwin L. Cox, 3800 35 6 Cimarron Transmission 234 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 23 1018 17.6175 0 8 2* io, « i s . 7175 R 168-129. First National Co. (Love County, Okla.) Bank Bldg., Dallas, (Oklahoma “Other” Tex. 75202. Area): ___ do~...... 37 7 ___ do______4,117 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 23 40 48 17. 6175 6 8 2> 40 48 18. 7175 RI68-129. ___ do...... 36, 6 ___ do.______-_____ 885 10- 2-69 3 11- 2-69 4- 2-70 28 10 50 15.7675 8 3» 40 4» 50 18.3925 RI68-129- ___ do...... 53 4 ___ do______90 10- 3-69 8 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 *> 22 16.0175 o 6 20 21 17.0175 RI68-129- ...... do______55 3 ___ do______10,692 10- 3-69 8 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 38 3316.0175 8 s 20 2» 17.0175 RI68-129. ___ do______38 1 Panhandle Eastern Pipe 123 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 2® 16.0 6 8 20 17. 0 Line Co. (Morton County, Kans.). ___ do______. 40 5 Lone Star Gas Co. (Bryan 229 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 15.015 8 » 17.916 RI68-129. County, Okla.) (Okla­ homa “ Other” Area). ___do______: ...... 52 3 Panhandle Eastern Pipe 261 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 «•17.01 6 s 40 18.01 RI68-129. Line Co., (Beaver County, Okla.) (Pan­ handle Area). ___ do______56 2 Lone Star Gas Co. 165 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-69 4- 3-70 15.01 8 8 16.01 RI68-129. (Stephens County, Okla.) (Oklahoma “ Other” Area). • 40 si lg. 015 R 168-129. ___ do— ...... - 66 6 Michigan Wisconsin Pipe 3,000 10- 3-69 3 11- 3-60 4- 3-70 «•15.015 Line Co. (Dewey County, Okla.) (Okla­ homa “ Other” Area). See footnotes at end of table.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215- -FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18065

Appendix A—Continued

Cents per Mcf Rate in Docket Rate Sup- Amount Date Effective Date — — effect sub­ No. Respondent sched- pie- Purchaser and producing area of annual filing date suspended Rate in Proposed in­ ject to re­ ule ment increase tendered unless until— effect creased rate fund in No. No. suspended dockets Nosj EI70-331— Gulf Oil Corp., Post 307 2 Cities Service Gas Co. $4,175 10- 1-69 711- 1-69 4- 1-70 *17.26 •*»18.72 Office Box 1589, (Granite Wash Field, RI68-167. Tulsa, Okla. 74102. Hemphill County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 10). RI70-332— Texaco, Inc. (Opera­ 166 13 Kansas-Nebraska Natural 3,350 10- 3-69 711- 7-69 4- 7-70 »18.2 • « » 18.4 tor) et al., Post Gas Co., Inc. (Camrick RI69-678. Office Box 2420, Field, Texas County, "Tulsa, Okla. 74102. Okla.) (Panhandle Area). BI70-333.. Edwin L. Cox 39 2 Panhandle Eastern Pipe 667 10- 3-69 »11- 3-69 4- 3-70 »16.0 M » 17.0 (Operator) et al., Line Co. (Seward 3800 First National County, Kans.). Bank Bldg., Dallas, rp « Y 7 K 0 0 9 RI70-334-. H. L .H unt'et al., 4 25 Texas Eastern Trans­ 3,013 9-29-69 711- 1-69 4- 1-70 16.67263 88 16.87360 RI68-129. 1401 Elm St.j mission Corp. (Whelan Dallas, Tex. 75202. Field, Harrison County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 6). RI70-336-. Texaco, Inc., Post 54 8 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 2,600 9-29-69 8911- 1-69 4- 1-70 »16.6 • 8 » 16.6 R166-333. Office Box 430, Co., a division of BeUaire, Tex. 77401. Tenneco, Inc. (Santellana Field, Hidalgo County, Tex,) (RR. District No. 4). -do. 65 11 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 20,000 9-29-69 8911- 1-69 4- 1-70 » 8916.6 e 8 20 ¿a iß, $ R166-333. Co., a division of 20,000 .. »•«16.0 • 8 20 M 17,’o RI66-333. Tenneco, Inc. (Raymond- ville Field, Willacy County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). .do. 69 10 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co., 400 9-29-69 89 11-1-69 4-1-70 »16.6 8 8 » 16.6 RI68-607. a division of Tenneco Inc. (Government Wells Field, Duval County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). .do. 130 £ Tennessee Gas Pipeline 9-29-69 89 11-1-69 4-1-70 » 15.6 8 8 » 16.6 RI66-333. Co., a division of Tenneco Inc. (Magnolia City Field, Jim Wells County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). -do. 138 6 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 2,600 9-29-69 «11-1 69 4-1-70 »16.6 88 » 16.6 RI66-333. Co., a division of Ten­ neco Inc. (North Rincon Field, Starr County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). -do. 193 6 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 300 9-29-69 89 11-1-69 4-1-70 »16.6 88 »16.6 R166-333. Co., a division of Ten­ neco Inc. (Seeligson Field, Jim Wells County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). -do. 260 9 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 9-29-69 89 11-1-69 4-1-70 »16.6 8 8 » 16.6 RI66-333. Co., a division of Ten­ neco Inc. (Plymouth Field, San Patricio County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). do-.„..i._.___... 261 9 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 1,130 9-29-60 89 11-1-69 4-1-70 »16.6 8 8 » 16.6 R166-333. Co., a division of Ten­ neco Inc. (Spartan Field, San Patricio County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). -do. 263 9 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 9-29-69 8911- 1-69 4- 1-70 »16.6 8 8 » 16.6 RI66-333. Co., a division of Tenneco Inc. (Seven Sisters Field, Duval County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). -do. 373 . 2 Tennessee Gas Pipeline 6,000 9-29-69 8911- 1-69 4- 1-70 * 8816.0 8 8 » 17.0 Co., a division of Tenneco Inc. (West Jennings Field, Zapata County, Tex.) (RR. District No. 4). RI70-336-. Sun Oil Cò., DX 80 6 United Gas Pipe Line Co. 633 9-29-69 711-24-69 4-24-70 21.5 8 9 23.0 RI68-424. Division, 907 South (Maxie-Pistof Ridge Detroit Ave., Tulsa, Field, Forrest, Lamar, Okla. 74120. and Pearl River Counties, Miss.).

No. l. 1 raso W8tural Gas Co. under West Lake’s FPC Gas Rate Schedule 17 Respondent is filing from initial certificated rate to second periodic increase under contract. 4 Thft nift6^affective date is the first day after expiration of the statutory notice, 18 Two-step periodic increase. r a t e Lakes increased rate of 19 cents becomes effective. West Lake’s 19 Subject to 0.5-cent deduction by buyer if buyer desulfurizes gas. * R J^ P en£ed Docket No. RI70-54 until Jan. 1,1970. 90 Subject to a downward B.t.u. adjustment. t p,1Tenue~,spring rate increase. 91 Includes 1.75-cent tax reimbursement. > mi6**®'5 base is 14.65 p.s.i.a. 99 Applicable only to gas produced below the Top of the Morrowan Series of the * PerinHf;*lei!ectlve dale ls the effective date requested by Respondent. Pennsylvanian System. 9 p™odle rate increase. 91 Includes 0.0175-cent tax reimbursement. >0 R ^ 5 e.b^ e is-15-025 P-s-i-a. . 94 Corrected notice of change replaces notices of change dated. Sept. 1, 1969, and 11 S e a t e d rate increase. Sept. 22,1969, filed on Sept.. 15,1969, and Sept. 24,1969, respectively. 12 f ” ® ® 8 base fe l 5-325 P-s.i.a. 98 Includes 0.0675-eent tax reimbursement. Proridino w tvis delivered after Feb. 1, 1969. Filing includes letter from the buyer 98 "Fractured” rate increase. Respondent filing from initial certificated rate and la a Prni j _lor the mcrease. contractually due 18 cents initial contract base rate. uTnorfotf6 .base is 16.4 p.s.i.a. 97 Oklahoma “Other” Area production. n from initial rate to contract rate. 98 Includes base rate of 15 cents plus upward B.t.u. adjustment before increase Mid Mcf. rale increase. Respondent contractually due base rate of 22 cents per 17.9 cents plus upward B.t.u. adjustment after increase. Base rate subject to upward and downward B.t.u. adjustment. to upw ard'at!uPyard B.t.u. adjustment (1,075 B.t.u. gas). Base rate subject vward and downward B.t.u. adjustment.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18066 NOTICES

29 Respondent filing from initial certificated rate to initial contract rate.' Includes base price of 15 cents plus 0.705-eent upward B.t.u. adjustment (1 w? 20 Oklahoma Panhandle Area production;' B.t.u. gas) plus 0.015-cent tax reimbursement before increase and base priee of 16 Includes base rate of 17 cents plus upward B.t.n. adjustment before Increase and cents plus 0.752-cent upward B.t.u. adjustment plus 0.015-cent tax reimbursement 18 cents plus upward B.t.u- adjustment after increase. Base rate subject to upward 43 Applicable to production from Loshbough No. 1 Gas Unit. and downward B.t.u. adjustment. 43 Filing from initial certificated rate to initial contract rate plus tax reimburse­ 32 Applicable only to acreage added by Supplement No. 28: ment. 33 Includes 0.015-cent tax reimbursement. 44 Includes 0.33-cent upward B.t.u. adjustment (1,033 B.t.u. gas). 34 “ Fractured” increase. Respondent contractually due base rate of 16i3070 cents 44 Base rate subject to upward and downward B.t.u. adjustment. plus 1.75 cents tax reimbursement. 44 Applicable to production from Piper No. 1 Gas Unit. 35 Applicable only to acreage added by Supplement No. 2. 47 Includes 0.09-cent upward B.t.u. adjustment (1,009 B.t.u. gas); 33 Respondent filing from initial certificated rate to initial contract rate: 48 Includes base price of 16 cents plus upward B.t.u. adjustment before increase 37 H. L. H unt et aL, resells the gas under its Rate Schedule No. 4 to Texas Eastern and base price of 17 cents plus upward B.t.u. adjustment after increase. Transmission Corp. at an effective rate of 16.6 cents subject to refund in Docket 49 Filing from initial certificated rate to first periodic increase. No. RI69-160. H unt filed a related increase to 16.87350 cents on Sept. 29, 1969, for 89 Includes base price of 15 cents plus upward B.t.u. adjustment before increase which a 5-month suspension period from Nov. 1, 1969, is ordered herein in Docket and base price of 17.5 cents plus upward B.t.u. adjustment after increase. No. RI70-334. si “ Fractured” rate increase. Respondent contractly due 19.5 cents per Mcf plus 38 Subject to a 0.75-cent per Mcf deduction by buyer for compression. reimbursement. ' 39 Filing from initial certificated rate to second periodic increase. 83 The stated effective date is the contractual effective date. 49 Subject taupward and downward B.t.u. adjustment. 83 For gas produced from basic acreage. 54 For gas produced from acreage added by Supplement No. 6. ss Initial rate. M. J. Brannon, Jr., requests that his pro­ creased rate ceiling for Texas Railroad Dis­ substantive Commission policies and re­ posed rate increase be permitted to become trict No. 6. They are suspended for 5 months quired by the public convenience and effective as of October 1, 1969. P & M Oil & from November 1, 1969, the proposed effec­ necessity. Gas Co. requests a retroactive effective date tiv e date. of February 1, 1969, for its proposed rate All of the producers’ proposed increased After due notice by publication in the increase. Foree Co. and Alfred C. Glassell, rates and charges exceed the applicable area F ederal R eg ister, petitions to intervene Jr., et al., request an effective date of Sep­ price levels for increased rates as set forth by Philadelphia Gas Works Division of tember 1, 1969, for their proposed rate in­ in the Commission’s statement of general UGI Corp., Consolidated Edison Com­ creases. Graham-Michaelis Drilling Co. policy No. 61-1, as amended (18 CFR 2.56) pany of New York, Inc., and Long Island (Operator) et al., request a retroactive ef­ with the exception of the rate increase filed fective date of May 21, 1969, for their rate by Shell Oil Co. in the Aneth Area of Utah Lighting Co. were filed in Docket No. increase. Edwin L. Cox requests retroactive for which there is no announced formal CI69-1175, in the matter of the applica­ effective dates of July 1, 1966, July 1, 1967, ceiling for the area involved, but exceeds the tion filed on June 10,1969, in said docket. June 1, 1968, and July 1, 1968, for his pro­ authorized initial rate. Said petitions have either been with­ posed rate increases. Edwin L. Cox (Oper­ drawn or are not in opposition to the ator) et al., also requests a retroactive effec­ [F.R. Doc. 69-13143; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; 8:45 a.m .] granting of the application, and no other tive date of October 1, 1966, for their pro­ petitions to intervene, notices of inter­ posed rate increase. Good cause has not been shown for waiving the 30-day notice require­ vention, or protests to the granting of any ment provided in section 4(d) of the Nat­ [Docket No. G-7588 etc.] of the applications have been filed. ^ ural Gas Act to permit earlier effective dates EDGAR McCOMAS ET AL. At a hearing held on October 23, 1969, for the aforementioned producers* rate filings the Commission in its own motion re­ and such requests are denied. Findings and Order ceived and made a part of the record in General Crude Oil Co.’s (General) proposes this proceeding all evidence, including a revenue-sharing rate increase to 9.5 cents O ctober 29, 1969. per Mcf for a sale of gas to West Lake Nat­ the applications and petitions, as sup­ ural Gasoline Co. (West Lake) in Nolan Findings and order after statutory plemented and amended, and exhibits County, Tex. The proposed increase is 50 per­ hearing issuing certificates of public thereto submitted in support of the cent of West Lake’s resale rate of 19 cents convenience and necessity, amending authorizations sought herein, and upon per Mcf to El Paso Natural Gas Co. which is orders issuing certificates, permitting consideration of the record. suspended in Docket No. RI70-54 until Janu­ and approving abandonment of service, The Commission finds: ary 1, 1970. Although General’s proposed in­ terminating certificates, and accepting creased rate is below the increased ceiling related rate schedules and supplements (1) Each applicant herein is a “nat­ rate for Texas Railroad District No. 7-B as for filing. ural-gas company” within the meaning announced in the Commission’s statement of of the Natural Gas Act as heretofore general policy No. 61-1, as amended, it is a Each of the applicants listed herein found by the Commission or will be en­ percentage portion of a suspended rate, and has filed an application pursuant to sec­ gaged in the sale of natural gas in inter­ consistent with prior Commission action we tion 7 of the Natural Gas Act for a cer­ state commerce for resale for ultimate conclude that it should be suspended until tificate of public convenience and neces­ public consumption, subject to the juris­ January 1, 1970, the expiration date of the sity authorizing the sale and delivery of suspension period for West Lake’s related diction of the Commission, and will, increase. natural gas in interstate commerce or therefore, be a “natural-gas company" Shell Oil Co.’s (Shell) proposed increased for permission and approval to abandon within the meaning of the Natural Gas rate of 22.1925 cents per Mcf is for a sale service or a petition to amend an order Act upon the commencement of service of gas in the Aneth Area of Utah that was issuing a certificate, all as more fully set under the authorizations hereinafter certificated in Opinion No. 335. No formal forth in the applications and petitions, granted. guideline prices have been announced by the as supplemented and amended. Commission for the Aneth Area. Since the (2) The sales of natural gas herein­ proposed rate exceeds the authorized Initial Applicants have filed related PTC gas before described, as more fully described rate we conclude that it should be suspended rate schedules or supplements thereto in the applications in this proceeding, for 5 months from October 30, 1969, the and propose to initiate, abandon, add to, will be made in interstate commerce proposed effective date. or discontinue in part natural gas serv­ subject to the jurisdiction of the Com­ M. J. Brannon, Jr. (Brannon), did not ice in interstate commerce as indicated mission; and such sales by applicants, include in his proposed rate increase the in the tabulation herein. All sales cer­ and 1 cent per Mcf minimum guarantee for together with the construction op­ tificated herein are at rates either equal eration of any facilities subject to tne liquids as provided by the contract. Bran­ to or below the ceiling prices established non is advised that a notice of change in jurisdiction of the Commission necessary rate will be required if he intends to collect by the Commission’s statement of gen­ therefor, are subject to the requirements the 1 cent minimum guarantee for liquids eral policy No. 61-1, as amended, or in­ of subsections (c) and (e) of section in the future. volve sales for which permanent certifi­ of thè Natural Gas Act. Supplement No. 10 to Atlantic Richfield cates have been previously issued; ex­ Co.’s (Atlantic) FTC Gas Rate Schedule No. (3) Applicants are able and willing cept that sales from areas for which properly to do the acts and to perfor 433 reflects a rate increase from 16.1 cents to area rates have been determined are 16.37775 cents per Mcf for a sale for resale authorized to be made at or below the the service proposed and to conform to H. L. Hunt, et al. (Hunt). Hunt processes the provisions of the Natural Gas a and resells the gas under its FPC Gas Rate applicable area base rates adjusted for and the requirements, rules, and regw - Schedule No. 4 at a present effective rate quality of the gas, and under the con­ tions of the Commissioner thereunder. ditions prescribed in the orders deter­ of 16.6 cents which is subject to refund in (4) The sales of natural gas by appli­ Docket No. RI69—160. Hunt has filed a re­ mining said rates. lated increase to 16.87350 cents per Mcf cants, together with the construction a which is suspended herein for 5 months in The Commission’s staff has reviewed operation of any facilities subject to Docket No. RI70-334. Both Atlantic and each application and recommends each jurisdiction of the Commission nec Hunt’s proposed rates exceed the area in- action ordered as consistent with all sary therefor, are required by the pu

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18067 convenience and necessity and certifi­ fully described in the applications and from the date of this order, with a copy cates therefor should be issued as here­ in the tabulation herein, served upon Transwestem Pipeline Co., inafter ordered and conditioned. (B) The certificates granted in para­ showing all amounts collected in excess (5) It is necessary and appropriate in graph (A) above are not transferable of the applicable area rate for each cate­ carrying out the provisions of the Natural and shall be effective only so long as ap­ gory of gas from September 1, 1966, the Gas Act that a certificate of public con­ plicants continue the acts or operations interest at the rate of 7 percent per an­ venience and necessity should be issued hereby authorized in accordance with num through September 30,1969. Trans­ in Docket No. CI61-1332 authorizing the provisions of the Natural Gas Act westem shall file With the C o m m issio n Cities Service Oil Co. (Operator) to con­ and the applicable rules, regulations, and its written concurrence or disagreement tinue the sales of natural gas heretofore orders of the Commission. with such report, and if it disagrees, the authorized in said docket to be made (C) The grant, of the certificates is­ reason for such disagreement, and serve pursuant to Presidio Operating Co. sued in paragraph (A) above shall not a copy thereof on applicant. (Operator) et al., PPC Gas Rate Sched­ be construed as a waiver of the require­ (c) Presidio Operating Co. (Operator) ule No. 1. ments of section 4 of the Natural Gas et al„ and Eugene E. Nearburg and Tom (6) It is necessary and appropriate in Act or of Part 154 or Part 157 of the L. Ingram, doing business as Nearburg & carrying out the provisions of the Nat­ Commission’s regulations thereunder and Ingram (Operator) are not relieved of ural Gas Act that a certificate of public is without prejudice to any findings or their obligation to refund monies col­ convenience and necessity should be is­ orders which have been or which may lected In excess of the ultimate rate de­ sued in Docket No. CI70-44 authorizing hereafter be made by the Commission in termined to be proper in Docket No. applicants to continue the sales of nat­ any proceedings now pending or here­ CI61-1332 for sales made under their ural gas heretofore authorized to be after instituted by or against applicants. temporary certificates from October 30, made pursuant to the predecessors’ cer­ Further, our action in this proceeding 1964, to September 1, 1966, for Presidio tificates in Dockets Nos. CI65-582, CI65- shall not foreclose nor prejudice any fu­ Operating Co. and from the date of ini­ 844, CI65-1224, and CI66-134; and that ture proceedings or objections relating tial delivery to October 30, 1964, for the certificates in the latter dockets to the operation of any price or related Nearburg & Ingram. should be terminated and the related provisions in the gas purchase contracts (d) The initial rates for sales author­ rate schedules canceled, except Humble herein involved. Nor shall the grant of ized in Docket No. CI69-1175 shall be Oil & Refining Co. FPC Gas Rate Sched­ the certificates aforesaid for service to 20 cents per Mcf at 15.025 p.s.i.a. (gas- ule No. 366 which will be redesignated as the particular customers involved imply well gas) and 18.5 cents per Mcf at 15.025 a rate schedule of applicants. approval of all of the terms of the con­ ps.l.a. (casinghead gas), the applicable (7) It is necessary and appropriate tracts, particularly as to the cessation area base, rates prescribed in Opinion No. in carrying out the provisions of the Nat­ of service upon termination of said con­ 546, as modified by Opinion No. 546-A, ural Gas Act and the public convenience tracts as provided by section 7(b) of the as adjusted for quality of gas, or the Con­ and necessity require that the orders Natural Gas Act. The grant of the cer­ tract rates, whichever are lower. If the issuing certificates of public convenience tificates aforesaid shall not be construed quality of the gas delivered by applicant and necessity in various dockets involved to preclude the imposition of any sanc­ deviates at any time from the quality herein should be amended as hereinafter tions pursuant to the provisions of the standards set forth in Opinion No. 546, ordered and conditioned. Natural Gas Act for the unauthorized as modified by Opinion No. 546-A, so as (8) The sales of natural gas proposed commencement of any sales of natural to require a downward adjustment of the to be abandoned as hereinbefore de­ gas subject to said certificates. existing rate, a notice of change in rate scribed and as more fully described in (D) The grant of the certificates is­ shall be filed pursuant to section 4 of the the applications and in the tabulation sued herein on certain applications filed Natural Gas Act: Provided, however, herein are subject to the requirements after July 1, 1967, is upon the condition That adjustments reflecting changes in of subsection (b) of section 7 of the that no increase in rate which would ex­ B.t.u. content of the gas shall be com­ Natural Gas Act. ceed the ceiling prescribed for the given puted by ’the applicable formula and (9) The abandonments proposed by area by paragraph (d) (3) of the Com­ charged without the filing of a notice of applicants herein are permitted by the mission’s statement of general policy No. change in rate. Within 90 days from the public convenience and necessity and 61-1, as amended, shall be filed prior to date of initial delivery applicant shall should be approved as hereinafter the applicable date indicated in the tab­ file a rate schedule quality statement in . ordered. ulation herein. (E) The certificates issued herein are the form prescribed in Opinion No. 546. (10) It is necessary and appropriate subject to the following conditions : (e) The initial rate for the sale au­ in carrying out the provisions of the Nat­ thorized in Docket No. CI66-489 (Okla­ ural Gas Act that the certificates hereto­ (a) The initial rates for sales author­ homa Panhandle area only) shall be 17 fore issued to applicants relating to the ized in Docket No. CI61-1332 shall be the cents per Mcf at 14.65 p.s.i.a. including abandonments hereinafter permitted and applicable area base rates prescribed in tax reimbursement and subject to B.t.u. approved should be terminated or that Opinion No. 468, as modified by Opinion adjustment. No. 468-A, as adjusted for quality of gas, the orders issuing said certificates should (f) The initial rate for the sale au­ be amended by deleting therefrom au­ or the contract rates, whichever are lower. If the quality of the gas delivered thorized in Docket No. CI66-489 (Okla­ thorization to sell natural gas from the homa “Other” area only) shall be 15 subject acreage. by applicant deviates at any time from the quality standards set forth in Opin­ cents per Mcf at 14.65 ps.i.a. including . (Hi It is necessary and appropriate ion No. 468, as modified by Opinion No. tax reimbursement and subject to B.t.u. in carrying out the provisions of the 468-A, so as to require a downward ad­ adjustment. In the event that the Com­ Natural Gas Act that the FPC gas rate justment of the existing rate, a notice of mission amends its statement of general schedules and supplements related to change in rate shall be filed pursuant to policy No. 61-1, by adjusting the bound­ the authorizations hereinafter granted section 4 of the Natural Gas Act: Pro­ ary between the Oklahoma Panhandle should be accepted for filing. vided, however, That adjustments re­ area and the Oklahoma “Other” area, so The Commission orders: flecting changes in B.t.u. content of the as to increase the initial wellhead price A) Certificates of public convenience gas shall be computed by the applicable for new gas, applicant thereupon may ana necessity are issued upon the terms formula and charged without the filing substitute the new rate reflecting the nd conditions of this order authorizing of a notice of change in rate. Within 45 amount of such increase and thereafter in* ?y S ca n ts of natural gas in days from the date of this order appli­ collect the new rate prospectively in lieu wifvf+ate commerce for resale, together cant shall file a rate schedule quality of the initial rate herein authorized in the construction and operation of statement in the form prescribed in said docket. facilities subject to the jurisdiction Opinion No. 468-A. (g) The initial rate for the sale au­ ail Commission necessary therefor, (b) Applicant in Docket No. CI61-1332 thorized in Docket No. CI69-1227 shall as hereinbefore described and as more shall file a refund report within 90 days be 15 cents per Mcf at 15.025 p.s.i.a.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 » 0. 215----10 18068 NOTICES

(h) The initial rate for the sale au­ FPO rate schedule to be accepted | thorized in Docket No. CI70-82 shall be Docket No. Applicant Purchaser, field, and 17 cents per Mcf at 14.65 p.s.i.a. subject and date filed location Description and date of No. Supp. to upward and downward B.t.u. adjust­ document ment. Applicant shall not require buyer G-7588______. „ Edgar McComas (sue- United Fuel Gas Co., R. H. Adkins, doing 1 to take-or-pay for an annual quantity of E 8-15-69 cessor to R. H. Ad- Laurel Hill District, business as John Gas gas during the first 2 contract years kins, doing business . Lincoln County, W. Co., FPC GRS No. 5. which is in excess of an average of 1 as John Gas Co.). Va. Supplement Nos. 1-2...... 1 . 1-2 Notice of succession Mcf per day for each 3,650 Mcf of de­ 8-15-69. termined gas reserves. Assignment 5-12-55 !.. ... 1 3 Effective date: 5-12-55____ (F) A certificate of public convenience G-8350 : ____ Rush Run Oil & Gas Consolidated Gas Supply (*)----...... —-...... 1 and necessity is issued in Docket No. Co. Corp., Washington District, Calhoun CI61-1332 authorizing Cities Service Oil County, W. Va. Co. (Operator) to continue the sales of C161-980_____ .. Roy C. and FreedaM. Equitable Gas Co., Henry C. Breck, FPC 3 natural gas heretofore authorized in E 8-19-69 Davisson (successor Freemans Creek Dis- GRS No. 1. to Henry C. Breck). trict, Lewis County, Notice of succession said docket to be made pursuant to W. Va. 8-6-69. Presidio Operating Co. (Operator) et al., Assignment 7-1-694. ____ 3 1 Effective date: 7-1-69_____ FPC Gas Rate Schedule No. 1. CI61-1024____ .. Mobil Oil Corp. (Oper- Natural Gas Pipeline Notice of partial cancel- 266 10 (G) A certificate of public conven­ D 8-18-69 ator) et al. Co. of America, North lation 8^14-69.8 Custer City Field, Notice of partial cancel- 266 11 ience and necessity is issued in Docket Custer County, Okla. lation 8^14-69.3 « No. CI70-44 authorizing applicants to C161-1024______do...... ___ do__...... Assignment 1-30-698____ 266 12 continue the sales of natural gas hereto­ D 2-17-69 Assignment 1-30-69 * 8___ 266 13 CI61-1332______. Cities Service Oil Co. Transwestern Pipeline Presidio Operating Co. 213 fore authorized to be made pursuant to A 3-13-61 (Operator)7 (succes- Co., Bluitt Plant, (Operator) et al., FPC the predecessors’ certificates in Dockets E 12-3-64 sor to Presidio Roosevelt County, GRS No. 1. E 9-19-66 Operating Co. N. Mex. Supplement Nos. 1-2...... 213 1-2 Nos. CI65-582, CI65-844, CI65-1224, and (Operator) et al.). Notice of succession CI66-134; the certificates in the latter 9-15-66. dockets are terminated and the related Assignment 9-1-66...... 213 3 CI62-1459____ .. Royal Oil & Gas Natural Gas Pipeline Patchin-Wilmoth Indus- 11 rate schedules are canceled, except E 8-14-69 Corp. et al. (successor Co. of America, Hebbron- tries, Inc., et al., FPC Humble Oil & Refining Co. FPC Gas to Patchin-Wilmoth ville Area, Jim Hogg GRS No. 1. Industries, Inc., et al.). County, Tex. Article of merger 12-18-68- 11 1 Rate Schedule No. 366 which is redesig­ Effective date: 1-1-69...... nated as J. Gregory Merrion et al., FPC CI63-1300...... Mobil Oil Corp. Natural Gas Pipeline Notice of partial cancel- 339 14 D 8-18-69 (Operator). Co. of America, West lation 8-14H39.3 8 Gas Rate Schedule No. 10. Crane and Putnam ¡isti s (H) The orders issuing certificates in Fields, Dewey County, Dockets Nos. CI61-1024, CI63-1300, Okla. CI63-1300... Mobil OÜ Corp...... do...... Assignment, 1-30-69 *____ 339 15 CI67-205, and CI88-1033 are amended D 2-17-69 (Operator) et al. Assignment 1-30-69 * 8___ 339 16 by adding thereto or deleting therefrom CI63-1524__ Royal Oil & Gas Corp. Consolidated Gas Supply Trojan Coal & Petroleum 3 ...... E .7-22-69 (successor to Trojan Corp.,.Elk District, Corp., FPC GRS No. authorization to sell natural gas as Coal & Petroleum Barbour County, 1. described in the tabulation herein. Corp.). W. Va. Supplement No. 1...... Article of merger 12-18-68— (I) The orders issuing certificates in Effective date: 1-1-69____ Dockets Nos. G-14369 and G-15052 are CI64-923__ D. W. Hamilton Lone Star Gas Co., W. H. Bryant (Operator) amended by deleting therefrom author­ E 8-20-69 (Operator) et al. Penn-Griffith Field, et al., FPC GRS No. 3. (successor to W. H. Rusk County, Tex. Supplement No. 1...... 1 1 ization to sell natural gas from acreage Bryant (Operator) Notice of succession assigned to applicants in Dockets Nos. et al.). 8-16-69. Assignment 10-22-68 •...... CI70-43 and CI70-172, respectively. Effective date: 10-1-68___- (J) The orders issuing certificates in CI65-645__ Royal Oil & Gas Corp. Consolidated Gas Supply Trojan Coal & Dockets Nos. G-7588, CI61-980, CI62- E 7-22-69 (successor to Trojan Corp., Center District, Petroleum Corp., FPC Coal & Petroleum Gilmer County, W. Va. GRS No. 2. 1459, CI63-1524, CI64-923, CI65-645, Corp.). Supplement No. 1— ...... 4 1 CI65-870, CI65-951, CI65-1344, CI66- Article of merger 4 2 12-18-68. 659, CI66-761, CI66-1201, and CI67-1164 Effective date: 1-1-69------are amended by substituting the succes­ CI65-870__ -do. Consolidated Gas Supply Trojan Coal & E 7-22-69 Corp., Glenville Petroleum Corp., FPC sors in interest as certificate holders. District, Gilmer GRS No. 3. (K) Royal Oil & Gas Corp. et al., County, W. Va. Supplement No. 1------1 shall be responsible for any refunds to Article of merger 5 2 12-18-68. Natural Gas Pipeline Company of Amer­ Effective date: 1-1-69------ica which may be ordered in Docket No. 0166-951---. -do_ Consolidated Gas Supply Trojan Coal & - E 7-22-69 Corp., Tròy District, Petroleum Corp., FPC CI62-1459 for the period subsequent to Gilmer County, W. Va. GRS No. 4. April 1,1963, and Cherosage Enterprises, Supplement No. 1...... Article of merger Inc., shall be responsible for refunds 12-18-68. prior to April 1, 1963. Effective date: 1-1-69------(L) Permission for an approval of the CI65-1344___ -do. Consolidated Gas Supply Trojan Coal & Petroleum 7 E 7-22-69 Corp., Center District, Corp., FPC GRS No. 6. abandonment of service by applicants, Gilmer County, W. Va. Article of merger 12-18-68- 7 as hereinbefore described, all as more Effective date: 1-1-69------CI66-489___ Phillips Petroleum Co. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Contract 10-25-65------421 " fully described in the applications and A 12-9-65 (Operator) et al.18 Line Co., Selling Field, in the tabulation herein are granted. Dewey County, Okla., (M) The certificates heretofore issued and Woodward County, Okla. in Dockets Nos. G-8350, G-12974, and CI66-659__ Royal Oil & Gas Corp. Consolidated Gas Supply Trojan Coal & Petroleum 8 ...... CI66-1280 are terminated. E 7-22-69 (successor to Trojan Corp., Center District, Corp., FPC GRS No. 6. Coal & Petroleum Gilmer County, W. Va. Article of merger 12-18-68 - 8 1 (N) Rush Rim Oil & Gas Co. FPC Corp.). Effective date: 1-1-69------Gas Rate Schedule No. 1 is canceled. C166-761___ ...... do...... do______Trojan Coal & Petroleum E 7-22-69 Corp., FPC GRS No. 7. (O) The rate schedules and rate Article of merger 12-18-68— 9 1 schedule supplements related to the authorizations granted herein are ac­ Filing code: A—Initial service. cepted for filing or are redesignated, all B — Abandonment. as described in the tabulation herein. C—Amendment to add acreage. D —Amendment to delete acreage. By the Commission, E —Succession: F —Partial succession. [ se a l ] G ordon M . G rant, Secretary. See footnotes at end of table.

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 F P C rate schedule to be accepted FPC rate schedule to be accepted Docket No. Purchaser, field, and Docket No. Applicant Purchaser, field, and and date filed location Description and date of N o. Supp. and date filed location Description and date of No. Supp. docum ent document

CI66-1201... Boyal OU & Gas Corp. Consolidated Gas Supply Patchin-Wilmoth Indus­ CI70-178...... Westrans Petroleum, ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 7-11-69 78...... 8 ...... E 7-22-69 (successor to Patchin- Corp., Glenville Dis­ tries, Inc., FPC GRS A 8-25-69 Inc. Corp., Cooper Creek Wilmoth Industries, trict, Gilmer County, No. 2. * Field, Kanawha Inc.). W. Va. Supplement No. 'l..r, ...... ■ County, W. Va. Article of merger 12-18-68 - CI70-182...___ . Phillips Petroleum Co. Southern Natural Gas Notice of canceUation 430 1 Effective date: 1-1-69...... (CI66-12S0) (Operator) et al. Co., KeUy Field, Jack- 8-22-69.8 88 CI67-205...... Dalco OU C o ...... ------Panhandle Eastern Pipe Amendment 2-14-69 12_... B 8-25-69 son Parish, La. C 7-17-69 ‘i Line Co., South Peek CI70-183...... Phillips Petroleum Co... Cities Service Gas Co., \ Notice of canceUation 297 a Field, Ellis County, (G-12974) Avard Field, Woods 8-22-69.»88 Okla. B 8-25-69 County, Okla. CI67-1164...... Royal OÜ & Gas Corp. Consolidated Gas Supply Trojan, Coal & Petroleum 10 CI70-186...... Royal Oil & Gas Corp.. ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 3-18-69 72...... 1 8 ...... E 7-22-69 et al. (successor to Trojan Corp., Center District, Corp., et al., FPC GRS No. A 8-26-69 » Corp., Center District, Coal & Petroleum Gilmer County, 1 Article of merger 12-18-68.. 10 Calhoun County, W. Corp.) et al. W. Va. Effective date: 1-1-69—___ Va. CI68-1038...... Tenneco OU Co...... f El Paso Natural Gas Supplemental agreement. ’223" CI70-187___1__ . Rockey Drilling Co. et ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 3-18-69 78...... 1 ...... C 8-4-69 77 Co., Pictured Cliffs 7-16-69.« A 8-26-69 » al. Corp., Elk District, Field, San Juan Harrison County, County, N. Mex. ' W. Va. CI69-1175...... GulíOÜCorp.“..í... Texas Gas Transmission Contract 5-9-69 12. CI70-188...... Winnie Fae Morris, ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 4-14-69 78...... 1 0 ...... A 6-10-69 78 Corp., Church Point A 8-26-69 » agent for Russell G. Corp., Murphy Dis­ Field, Acadia Parish, Beall et al. trict, Ritchie County, La. W. Va. CI69-1227___\__ Marathon OU Co. Kansas-N ebraska Natural Contract 4-1-69. 109 C 170-189...... Hershberger Explora- 1 ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 3-6-6978...... 1 ...... A 6-26-69 (Qperator).75 Gas Co., Inc., West A 8-26-69 » tions, Inc. Corp., Grant District, Sidney Area, Cheyenne Doddridge County, County, Nebr. W. Va. CI70-43...... J. Gregory Merrion et El Paso Natural Gas Co., Contract 11-25-5718___... C170-190______James F. Scott, agent Consolidated Gas Supply Contract 3-7-6978...... 14 ...... (G-14369) al. (successor to Bluff Field, San Juan Letter agreement 11-25-57. A 8-26-69 » for Hershberger Corp., Grant District, F 7-7-69 Humble Oil & County, Utah. Letter agreement 1-8-58... Explorations, Inc., Wetzel County, W. Va. Refining Co.). Letter agreement 12-15-58- et al. Assignment 4-17-69 17___i C170-192______Hays & Co., agent ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 3-19-6972...... 323 ...... Effective date: 5-1-69...... A 8-26-69 72 for Lee Scott. Corp., De Kalb Dis­

(G-14369) » Humble Oil & El Paso Natural Gas Co., Assignment 4-17-6917. ___ trict, Gilmer County, NOTICES Refining Có. Aneth Area, San Juan Effective date: 5-1-69____ W. Va. County, Utah. C170-193...... William K. Hinshaw, ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 3-4-6972...... 1 ...... CI70-44__ ¿ ...j J. Gregory Merrion Montana-Dakota Utilities Humble Oil & Refining A 8-26-69» agent for Robinson Corp., Clay District, E 7-7-69 et al. Co.. Poison Creek Co., FPC GRS No. 366. Gas Go. et al. Ritchie County, W. Va. (CI65-582) 7« Unit, Fremont County, Supplement No. 1...... C170-194______Hays & Co., agent for ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 2-12-6972...... 322 ...... (CI65-1224) » Wyo. 1 Notice of succession A 8-26-69 77 Ferrell L. Prior, Corp., Troy District, (CI66-134) 78 7-1-69. d.b.a. Prior OU WeU Gilmer County, W. Va. (CI65-844) 1» Assignments 4-17-6917...... Drilling Co. Effective date: 5-1-69...... C170-195...... James F. Scott, d.b.a., ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 2-11-6972...... 13...... Agreement 7-30-698 20...... ' A 8-26-69 ÌU Buffalo OU Co. Corp., Union District, Letter 4-30-69 » ...... Harrison County, 1 Letter 3-20-6922...... W. Va. Effective date: date of CI70-196...... H. E. Acker et al...... ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 2-24-69 72...... 2 ...... transfer of properties..... A 8-26-69 77 Corp., Freemans Creek Assignment 4-1-6928_____ District, Lewis County, Effective date: 7-1-69...... W. Va. CI70-82...... PetroDynamics, Inc. Northern Natural Gas Contract 6-17-69.i— C170-197...... Harold PhUlips, agent ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 2-28-6972...... 1 ...... A 7-28-69 » (Operator) et al. ,0o., acreage in Beaver Letter agreement 6-9-69... A 8-26-69 » for J. & H. Produc­ Corp., Coal District, 'County, Okla. Compliance 9-2-69 » 24___ tions. Harrison County, W. CI70-155...... W. G.BaUey...... United Fuel Gas Co., Contract 5-10-4826...... Va. A 8-12-69 fi Lincoln District, Wayne Letter agreement 12-15-52. C170-198...... Joseph H. Hager et al.... ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 2-11-69 78...... 8 ...... County, W. Va. Assignment 10-20-5426___ A 8-26-69 77 Corp., CoUins and CI70-159...... White Shield Oil & Gas Consolidated Gas Supply Contract 2-11-69 «...... Banks Districts, Lewis A 8-15-69» Corp. Corp., Center District, and Upshur Counties, Gilmer County and W. Va. Salt Lick and Otter C170-200...... AUegheny Land & ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 9-5-68 72 87...... 1 7 ...... Districts, Braxton A 8-26-69 77 Mineral Co. Corp., Union and Wash­ County, W. Va. ington Districts, Up­ CI70-162...... David A. Paschket. Consolidated Gas Supply Contract 5-19-69 72. shur County, W. Va. A 8-15-69» Corp., Hackers Creek C170-201...... Lloyd G. Jackson et al., ConsoUdated Gas Supply Contract 12-10-68 72...... 8 ...... District, Lewis County, A 8-26-69 77 d.b.a. J. & G. De­ Corp., Union District, < W. Va. velopment Co. Upshur and Barbour CI70-172___ Northeast Texas Pro­ Mississippi River Trans­ Contract 9-25-5127...... Counties, W. Va. (G-15052) duction Co. (successor mission Corp., Wood- Amendment 4-29-66____ C170-205______. Jones & Pellow Oil C o.. Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Contract 7-14-69...... 1 1 ...... F 8-19-69 to MAPCO Produc­ lawn Field, Harrison Letter agreement 2-16-672 A 8-27-69 » Line Co., Láveme Field, tion Co.). County, Tex. Assignment 12-1-6822...... Harper County, Okla. Effective date: 12-1-68.... See footnotes at end of table. 18069

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18070 NOTICES

1 Assigns acreage from R. H. Adkins, doing business as John Gas Co. to Edgar McComas; 2 No abandonment filing made by Applicant. By letter dated June 30, 1960, Consolidated states that Applicant’s Federal Reserve Station, Kansas City, gas purchase Contract No. 1042 dated Jan: 9, 1936, was cancèled because deliveries had declined to the point where Mo. 64198, on or before November 28, purchase thereof was no longer economical. Therefore, the certificate heretofore issued in Docket No. G-8350 will be terminated and the related-rate schedule canceled. 1969, a written request containing a 8 Effective date: Date of this order. statement of the nature of the petition­ 4 Assigns acreage from Henry C. Breck to Roy C. and Freeda M. Davisson. er’s interest in the proceeding, and a 5 Acreage being deleted due to cancellation or expiration of lease as identified by letter agreement with buyer sub­ mitted concurrently with filing (service never commenced). ’ summary of the matters concerning 6 Assigns acreage to Sun Oil Co. who drilled a dry hole and does not intend to develop thè acreage further; Assign­ which said petitioner wishes to give testi­ ment No. S-6030BA (Supp. No. 12) and Assignment No. S-6030BB (Supp. No. 13), respectively. 7 By letter dated Sept. 30, 1968, Applicant expressed willingness to accept a permanent certificate containing mony. Such requests will be present to Opinion No. 468 and 468-A conditions and by letter dated Aug. 25, 1969, expressed willingness to refund amounts the hearing examiner, and the persons in excess of applicable Opinion No. 468 rates. 8 Assigns acreage to Sun Oil Co. who drilled a dry hole and does not intend to develop the acreage further; Assign­ submitting the requests will be notified, ment No. S-6224-V (Supp. No. 15) and Assignment No. S-622A-W (Supp. No. 16), respectively. prior to the hearing, of his determina­ » Assigns acreage from W. H. Bryant (Operator) et al., to D. W. Hamilton (Operator) et al. tion thereon. The applications may be w By letter filed July 22,1969, Applicant advised willingness to accept a permanent certificate conditioned to initial rates of 17 cents per Mcf (Panhandle area) and 15 cents per Mcf (Other area), both including tax reimbursement and inspected at the Federal Reserve Bank subject to B.t.u. adjustment. of Kansas City, 925 Grand Avenue, Kan­ 11 Jan. 1, 1970, moratorium pursuant to the Commission’s statement of general policy No. 61-1, as amended. 12 Effective date: Date of initial delivery (Applicant shall advise the Commission as to such date). sas City, Mo., or at the Federal Reserve -13 Jan. 1, 1974, moratorium provided by Opinion No. 546-A. Building, 20th Street and Constitution 14 Applicant states its willingness to accept a permanent certificate conditioned to the provisions of Opinion Nos 546 and 546-A. Avenue NW., Washington, D.C. 15 Temporary certificate issued Aug. 22, 1969. By letter filed Sept. 8, 1969, Applicant advised willingness to accept a permanent certificate conditioned to an initial rate of 15 cents per Mcf at 15.025 p.s.i.a. Dated at Washington, D.C., this 31st « Between The Carter Oil Co. and El Paso Natural Gas Co.; on file as Humble Oil & Refining Co. FPC GRS day of October 1969. No. 212. 17 Assigns acreage, from Humble Oil & Refining Co. to Merrion and Bayless. By order of the Board of Governors. 18 No certificate filing made or necessary; only the related rate filing is being accepted for filing by this order. Applicants are filing to continue in toto the sales of natural gas heretofore authorized to be made pursuant to [ se a l ] R obert P. F orrestal, the predecessors’ certificates in Dockets Nos. CI65-582, CI65-844, CI65-1224, and CI66-134; therefore, said certificates will be terminated and the related rate schedules canceled except for Humble's FPC GRS No. 366 which is being Assistant Secretary. redesignated as that of Applicants. [F.R. Doc. 69-13270; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; 20 Ratification of the Humble contract by Merrion et al. 21 Preliminary assignment of Gulf Oil Corp. interest presently covered under its FPC GRS No 368 8:46 a.m.] 22 Preliminary assignment of Patrick A. Doheny et al., interest covered under its FPC GRS No. 5. " Assigns interest of Featherstone Farms Ltd., to Merrion et al., presently covered under its FPC GRS No. 1. ™^Porary certificate issued Aug. 29, 1969. Applicant states willingness to accept a permanent certificate conditioned to a take-or-pay obligation of 1 to 3,650 ratio of reserves for the first 2 years. 25 Between M. D. Bailey, seller and United Fuel Gas Co., buyer. _ From M. D. Bailey to W. G. Bailey. Sale being rendered on June 7, 1954, by predecessor; no certificate or rate SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE filings were made by predecessor. 27 Currently on file as MAPCO Production Co. (Operator) et al., FPC GRS No. 4. 28 Not previously filed by predecessor. Provides basis for connection of deficient wells (as defined in letter agree­ COMMISSION ment), at lower price. • * Conveys acreage from MAPCO Production Co. to Applicant (Gladys Davis Gas Unit No. 1 and Frank Davis [812-2592] Gas Unit No. 1). 32 Source of gas depleted. COMMON STOCK FUND OF STATE 31 Limited to gas produced from the Benson Sand and above. BOND AND MORTGAGE CO. AND [F.R. Doc. 69-13144; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; 8:45 a.m.] STATE BOND AND MORTGAGE CO. to this matter be held commencing on Notice of Filing of Application for FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM December 11, 1969, at 10 a.m. at the Order of Exemption Denver Branch of the Federal Reserve N ovember 3, 1969. FIRST NATIONAL BANCORPORATION Bank of Kansas City, 17th and Arapahoe Streets, Denver, Colo. 80217, before Notice is hereby given that Common Notice of Request and Order for Stock Fund of State Bond and Mort­ Hearing Leonard J. Ralston (whose address is Small Business Administration, 1441 L gage Co. (“Common Stock Fund”), an Notice is hereby given that request has Street NW., Washington, D.C. 20416), a open-end management investment com­ been made to the Board of Governors of hearing examiner selected by the Civil pany organized under the laws of the the Federal Reserve System, pursuant to Service Commission, pursuant to section State of Maryland and registered under section 4(c) (8) of the Bank HOlding 3344 of title 5 of the United States Code. the Investment Company Act of 1940 Company Act of 1956 <12 U.S.C. 1843(c) The hearing will be conducted according (“Act”), and State Bond and Mortgage (8)), and § 222.4(a) of the Board’s to the Board’s rules of practice for Co. (“State Bond and Mortgage”), 28 Regulation Y (12 CFR 222.4(a) ), by the formal hearings (12 CFR Part 263). The North Minnesota Street, New Ulm, Minn. First National Bancorporation, Denver, right is reserved to the Board or the hear­ 56073 (a registered face-amount certifi­ Colo., a bank holding company, for a ing examiner to designate any other date cate company organized under the laws determination that the planned in­ or place for such hearing or any part of the State of Minnesota), which acts surance activities of its proposed non­ thereof which may be determined to be as principal underwriter for and invest­ banking subsidiaries, Diversified In­ necessary or appropriate for the con­ ment adviser to Common Stock Fund surance, Inc. and Guaranty Insurors, (“Applicants”) , have filed an application venience of the parties. The Board’s rules pursuant to section 6(c) of the Act, re­ Inc., are of the kind described in the of practice for formal hearings provide, questing an order of the Commission, aforementioned sections of the Act and in part, “Unless otherwise specifically exempting from the provisions of section the regulation so as to make it unneces­ provided by statute or by rule of the 22(d) of the Act the sale by Applicants sary for the prohibitions of section 4 of Board, a hearing shall ordinarily be pri­ and any successor principal underwriter, the Act with*respect to the acquisition vate and shall be attended only by the of redeemable securities of Common or retention of shares in nonbanking parties, their representatives or counsel, Stock Fund without the usual sales organizations to apply in order to carry representatives of the Board, witnesses charge to officers, directors, salesmen, out the purposes of the Act. while testifying, and other persons hav­ and bona-fide full-time employees of Inasmuch as section 4(c) (8) of the Act ing an official interest in the proceeding: wholly owned subsidiaries of State Bond requires that any determination pursuant Provided, however, That, on written re­ and Mortgage who have been such for thereto be made by the Board after due quest by a party or a representative of more than 90 days. All interested persons notice and hearing and on the basis of the Board, or on the Board’s own mo­ are referred to the application on file the record made at such hearing: tion, the Board, in its discretion and to with the Commission for a statement of It is hereby ordered, That pursuant to the extent permitted by law, may permit the representations therein which are section 4(e)(8) of the Bank Holding other persons to attend or may order the summarized below: Company Act and in accordance with hearing to be public.” Shares of Common Stock Fund are or­ §§ 222.4(a) and 222.5(a) of the Board’s Any person desiring to give testimony dinarily offered to the general public at Regulation Y (12 CFR 222.4(a), 222.5 at the hearing should file with the Secre­ a public offering price which is the net (a) ), promulgated under the Bank Hold­ tary of the Board, directly or through the asset value per share at the time of pur­ ing Company Act, a hearing with respect Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, chase plus a maximum sales charge of

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18071

8 percent of the public offering price, above. Proof of such service (by affidavit Section 22(d) of the Act provides in reduced on a declining scale for sales in­ or in case of an attorney at law by cer­ substance that no registered investment volving larger amounts. tificate) shall be filed contemporaneously company shall sell any redeemable secu­ Section 22(d) of the Act provides in with the request. At any time after said rity issued by it, and no principal under­ substance that no registered investment dates, as provided by Rule 0-5 of the writer of such security shall sell any such company shall sell any redeemable rules and regulations promulgated under security except at a current public offer­ security issued by it, and no principal the Act, an order disposing of the ap­ ing price described in the prospectus. underwriter of such security shall sell plication herein may be issued by the Diversified Fund and State Bond and any such security except at a current Commission upon the basis of the infor­ Mortgage seek the exemption in order public offering price described in the mation stated in said application, unless to place employees, directors, and officers prospectus. an order for hearing upon said applica­ of wholly owned subsidiaries of State Common Stock Fund and State Bond tion shall be issued upon request or upon Bond and Mortgage in a position of and Mortgage seek the exemption in or­ the Commission’s own motion. Persons equality with employees, directors and der to place employees, directors, and of­ who request a hearing or advice as to officers of State Bond and Mortgage. The ficers of wholly owned subsidiaries of whether a hearing is ordered will re­ sales would be made pursuant to a uni­ State Bond and Mortgage In a position ceive notice of further developments in form offer described in the prospectus of equality with employees, directors and this matter, including the date of the of Diversified Fund and would be made officers of State Bond and Mortgage. The hearing (if ordered) and any postpone­ only upon the written representation of sales would be made pursuant to a uni­ ments thereof. the purchaser that the purchase is made form offer described in the prospectus For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ for investment purposes and th atk the of Common Stock Fund and would be gated authority). securities will not be resold except made only upon the written representa­ through redemption or repurchase by or tion of the purchaser that the purchase [ s e >a l ] Orval L. DtrBois, on behalf of the issuer. is made for investment purposes and Secretary. Applicants represent that the exemp­ that the securities will not be resold ex­ [F.R. Doc. 69-13275; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; tion would aid in improving relationships cept through redemption or repurchase 13:46 a.m.] with employees, promote internal har­ by or on behalf of the issuer. mony among the employees of wholly Applicants represent that the exemp­ owned subsidiaries of State Bond and tion would aid in improving relationships [812-2593] Mortgage, facilitate the coordination of with employees, promote internal har­ DIVERSIFIED FUND OF STATE BOND employee benefits, and provide for equal mony among the employees of wholly AND MORTGAGE CO. AND STATE treatment of all employees, the proper owned subsidiaries of State Bond and performance of whose duties are of prime Mortgage, facilitate the coordination of BOND AND MORTGAGE CO. concern to State Bond and Mortgage. employee benefits, and provide for equal Notice of Filing of Application for Applicants further state’ that no sales treatment of all employees, the proper Order of Exemption expense will be incurred in the sales of performance of whose duties are of prime shares for which exemption from the concern to State Bond and Mortgage. N ovember 3, 1969. provisions of section 22(d) is sought. Applicants further state that no sales Notice is hereby given that Diversified There will be no personal contact by expense will be incurred in the sales of Fund of State Bond and Mortgage Co. sales representatives in connection with shares for which exemption from the (“Diversified Fund”) , an open-end man­ such sales, announcement of the avail­ provisions of section 22(d) is sought. agement investment company organized ability of the shares will be made through There will be no personal contact by sales under the laws of the State of Maryland internal house publications, and invest­ representatives in connection with such and registered under the Investment ments will ordinarily be made through sales, announcement of the availability Company Act of 1940 (“Act”), and State a payroll deduction plan. of the shares will be made through inter­ Bond and Mortgage Co. (“State Bond Section 6(c) of the Act provides that nal house publications, and investments and Mortgage”), 28 North Minnesota the Commission, by order upon applica­ will ordinarily be made through a payroll Street, New Ulm, Minn. 56073 (a regis­ tion, may conditionally or uncondition­ deduction plan. : tered face-amount certificate company ally, exempt any person or transaction Section 6(c) of the Act provides that organized under the laws of the State from any provision of the Act or any the Commission, by order upon applica­ of Minnesota), which acts as principal regulation thereunder, if and to the ex­ tion, may conditionally or uncondi­ underwriter for and investment adviser tent such exemption is necessary or ap­ tionally, exempt any person or transac­ to Diversified Fund (“Applicants”) , have propriate in the public interest and tion from any provision of the Act or any filed an application pursuant to section consistent with the protection of inves­ regulation thereunder, if and to the ex­ 6(c) of the Act, requesting an order of tors and the purposes fairly intended by tent such exemption is necessary or the Commission, exempting from the the policy and provisions of the Act. * appropriate in the public interest and provisions of section 22(d) of the Act the Notice is further given that any in­ consistent with the protection of inves­ sale by Applicants and any successor terested person may, not later than tors and the purposes fairly intended by principal underwriter, of redeemable November 19, 1969, submit to the Com­ the policy and provisions of the Act. securities of Diversified Fund without the mission in writing a request for a hearing Notice is further given that any inter­ usual sales charge to officers, directors, on the matter accompanied by a state­ ested person may, not later than Novem­ salesmen, and bona-fide full-time emr ment as to the nature of his interest, the ber 19,1969, submit to the Commission in ployees of wholly owned subsidiaries of reason for such request and the issues ™ n g a request for a hearing on the State Bond and Mortgage who have been of fact or law proposed to be contro­ matter accompanied by a statement as such for more than 90 days. All in­ verted, or he may request that he be to the nature of his interest, the reason terested persons are referred to the notified if the Commission shall order a tor such request and the issues of fact application on file with the Commission hearing thereon. Any such communica­ or law proposed to be controverted, or for a statement of the representations tion should be addressed: Secretary, he may request that he be notified if the therein which are summarized below Securities and Exchange Commission, Commission shall order a hearing there- Shares of Diversified Fund are ordi­ Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of such °^Any such communication should be narily offered to the general public at a request shall be served personally or by addressed: Secretary, Securities and Ex- public offering price which is the net mail (airmail if the person being served ofmiife Commission, Washington, D.C. asset value per share at the time of pur­ is located more than 500 miles from the « A copy of such request shall be chase plus a maximum sales charge of point of mailing) upon Applicants at the served personally or by mail (airmail if address stated above. Proof of such serv­ jr® Person being served is located more 8 percent of the public offering price, ice (by affidavit or in case of an attorney nr^f150® “ttles from the point of mailing) reduced'on a declining scale for sales at law by certificate) shall be filed con­ pen> applicants at the address stated involving larger amounts. temporaneously with the request. At any

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18072 NOTICES time after said date, as provided by Rule [File No. 7-3269] listed and registered on one or more 0-5 of the rules and regulations promul­ other national securities exchange: gated under the Act, an order disposing ELECTRONIC MEMORIES & MAGNETICS CORP. General Public Utilities Corp. (Pennsyl­ of the application herein may be issued vania) , File No. 7-3275. by the Commission upon the basis of the NoHce of Application for Unlisted information stated in said application, Upon receipt of a request, on or before unless an order for hearing upon said Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ November 18, 1969, from any interested application shall be issued upon request tunity for Hearing person, the Commission will determine whether the application shall be set down or upon the Commission’s own motion. N ovember 3, 1969. Persons who request a hearing or advice for hearing. Any such request should as to whether a hearing is ordered will In the matter of application of the Bos­ state briefly the nature of the interest of receive notice of further developments ton Stock Exchange for unlisted trading the person making the request and the in this matter, including the date of the privileges in a certain security. position he proposes to take at the hear­ hearing (if ordered) and any postpone­ The above named national securities ing, if ordered. In addition, any inter­ ments thereof. exchange has filed an application with ested person may submit his views or any the Securities and Exchange Commission additional facts bearing on the said ap­ For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ pursuant to section 12(f)(1)(B) of the plication by means of a letter addressed gated authority). Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trading Commission, Washington 25, D.C., not Secretary. privileges in the preferred stock of the later than the date specified. If no one following company, which, security is [F.R. Doc. 69-13276; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; requests a hearing, this application will 8:46 a.m.] listed and registered - on one or more be determined by order of the Commis­ other national securities exchange-: sion on the basis of the facts stated Electronic Memories & Magnetics Corpora­ therein and other information contained [File No. 7-3268] tion, File No. 7-3269, $1.00 cumulative con­ in the official files of the Commission ELECTRONIC MEMORIES & vertible preferred stock, $1 par value. pertaining thereto. MAGNETICS CORP. Upon receipt of a request, on or be­ For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ fore November 18, 1969, from any inter­ gated authority). Notice of Application for Unlisted ested person, the Commission will deter­ [ seal] O rval L. DtrBois, Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ mine whether the application shall be Secretary. tunity for Hearing set down for hearing. Any such request should state briefly the nature of the in­ [F.R. Doc. 69-13281; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; N ovember 3,1969. terest of the person making the request 8:47 a.m .] in the matter of application of the and the position he proposes to take at Boston Stock Exchange for unlisted the hearing, if ordered. In addition, any JFile No. 7-3272] trading privileges in a certain security. interested person may submit his views The above named national securities or any additional facts bearing on the LEASCO DATA PROCESSING exchange has filed an application with said application by means of a letter EQUIPMENT CORP. the Securities and Exchange Commission addressed to the Secretary, Securities and pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B) of the Exchange Commission, Washington 25, Notice of Application for Unlisted Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule D.C., not later than the date specified. If Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trading no one requests a hearing, this applica­ tunity for Hearing tion will be determined by order of the privileges in the common stock of the N ovember 3, 1969. following company, which security is Commission on the basis of the facts listed and registered on one or more stated therein and other information In the matter of application of the other national securities exchange: contained in the official files of the Com­ Philadelphia - Baltimore ,r Washington mission pertaining thereto. Stock Exchange for unlisted trading Electronic Memories & Magnetics Oorp., File privileges in a certain security. No. 7-3268. For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ The above named national securities Upon receipt of a request, on or before gated authority). | exchange has filed an application with November 18, 1969, from any interested [ seal] O rval L. DtrBois, the Securities and Exchange Commis­ person, the Commission will determine Secretary. sion pursuant to section 12(f)(1)(B) of whether the application shall be set down [F.R. Doc. 69-13280; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and for hearing. Any such request should 8:47 a.m .] Rule 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trad­ state briefly the nature of the interest ing privileges in the preferred stock of of the person making the request and the following company, which, security the position he proposes to take at the [File No. 7-3275] is listed and registered on one or more hearing, if ordered. In addition, any in­ other national securities exchange: terested person may submit his views or GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. (PENNSYLVANIA) Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp., any additional facts bearing on the said File No. 7-3272, $2.20 Series B convertible application by means of a letter ad­ Notice of Application for Unlisted preferred stock, $1 par value. dressed to the Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Washington 25, Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ Upon receipt of a request, on or before D.C., not later than the date specified. tunity for Hearing November 18, 1969, from any interested person, the Commission will determ ine If no one requests a hearing, this appli­ N ovember 3, 1969. cation will be determined by order of the whether the application shall be set Commission on the basis of the facts In the matter of application of the Pa­ down for hearing. Any such request stated therein and other information cific Coast Stock Exchange for unlisted should state briefly the nature of the contained in the official files of the Com­ trading privileges in a certain security. interest of the person making the re­ mission pertaining thereto. The above named national securities quest and the position he proposes to exchange has filed an application with take at the hearing, if ordered. In aadi" For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ the Securities and Exchange Commis­ tion, any interested person may subnu gated authority). sion pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B) of his views or any additional facts bear­ [SEAL] ORVAL L. DUBOIS, ttie Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and ing on the said application by m eans o Secretary. Rule 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trad­ a letter addressed to the Secretary, [F.R. Doc. 69-13279; Filed, Nov. 6, 1960; ing privileges in the common stock of the Securities and Exchange Commission, 8:46 a.m .] following company, which security is Washington 25, D.C., not later than the

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18073 date specified. If no one requests a hear­ [812-2591] mony among the employees of wholly ing, this application will be determined PROGRESS FUND, INC., AND STATE owned subsidiaries of State Bond and by order of the Commission on the basis Mortgage, facilitate the coordination of of the facts stated therein and other BOND AND MORTGAGE CO. employee benefits, and provide for equal information contained in the official Notice of Filing of Application for treatment of all employees, the proper files of the Commission pertaining Order of Exemption performance of whose duties are of prime thereto. concern to State Bond and Mortgage. For the Commission (pursuant to N ovem ber 3,1969. Applicants further state that no sales delegated authority). Notice is hereby given that Progress expense will be incurred in the sales of Fund, Inc. (“Progress Fund”), an open- shares for which exemption from the [seal] O rval L. D u B o is , end management investment company provisions of section 22(d) is sought. Secretary. organized under the laws of the State of There will be no personal contact by sales [F.R. Doc. 69-13282; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; Maryland and registered under the In­ representatives in connection with such 8:47 a.m .] vestment Company Act of 1940 (“Act”) , sales, announcement of the availability and State Bond and Mortgage Co. (“State of the shares will be made through inter­ Bond and Mortgage”), 28 North Min­ nal house publications, and investments [File No. 7-3273] nesota Street, New Ulm, Minn. 56073 will ordinarily be made through payroll LEASCO DATA PROCESSING (a registered face-amount certificate deduction plan. EQUIPMENT CORP. company organized under the laws of Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the State of Minnesota) which acts as the Commission, by order upon applica­ Notice of Application for Unlisted principal underwriter for and investment tion, may conditionally or uncondition­ Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ adviser to Progress Fund (“Applicants”) , ally, exempt any person, or transaction tunity for Hearing have filed an application pursuant to sec­ from any provision of the Act or any tion 6(c) of the Act, requesting an order regulation thereunder, if and to the ex­ N ovember 3, 1969. of the Commission, exempting from the tent such exemption is necessary or In the matter of application of the provisions of section 22(d) of the Act appropriate in the public interest and Philadelphia - Baltimore - Washington - the sale by Applicants and any successor consistent with the protection of inves­ Stock Exchange for unlisted trading principal underwriter, of redeemable tors and the purposes fairly intended by privileges in a certain security. securities of Progress Fund without the the policy and provisions of the Act. The above named national securities usual sales charge to officers, directors, Notice is further given that any inter­ exchange has filed an application with salesmen and bona-fide full-time em­ ested person may, not later than Novem­ the Securities and Exchange Commis­ ployees of wholly owned subsidiaries of ber 19, 1969, submit to the Commission sion pursuant to section 12(f) (1) (B) of State Bond and Mortgage who have been in writing a request for a hearing on the the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 such for more than 90 days. All inter­ matter accompanied by a statement as and Rule 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted ested persons are referred to the applica­ to the nature of his interest, the reason trading privileges in the warrants to tion on file with the" Commission for a for such request and the issues of fact purchase common stock of the following statement of the representations therein or law proposed to be controverted, or he company, which security is listed and which are summarized below: may request that he be notified if the registered on one or more other national Shares of Progress Fund are ordinarily Commission shall order a hearing securities exchanges: offered to the general public at a public thereon. Any such communication offering price which is the net asset value should be addressed: Secretary, Secu­ Leasco Data Processing Equipment Corp., per share at the time of purchase plus a File No. 7-3273, warrants (expiring June 4, rities and Exchange Commission, 1978). maximum sales charge of 8 percent of the Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of public offering price, reduced on a declin­ such request shall be served person­ Upon receipt of a request, on or before ing scale for sales involving larger ally or by mail (airmail if the per­ November 18, 1969, from any interested amounts. son being served is located more than person, the Commission will determine Section 22(d) of the Act provides in 500 miles from the point of mail­ whether the application shall be set substance that no registered investment ing) upon Applicants at the address down for hearing. Any such request company shall sell any redeemable secu­ stated above. Proof of such service (by should state briefly the nature of the rity issued by it, and no principal under­ affidavit or in case of an attorney at law interest of the person making the re­ writer of such security shall sell any such by certificate) shall be filed contempo­ quest and the position he proposes to security except at a current public offer­ raneously with the request. At any time take at the hearing, if ordered. In addi­ ing price described in the prospectus. ' tion, any interested person may submit after said date, as provided by Rule 0-5 Progress Fund and State Bond and of the rules and regulations promulgated his views or any additional facts bearing Mortgage seek the exemption in order to on the said application by means of a place employees, directors, and officers under the Act, an order disposing of the letter addressed to the Secretary, Securi­ of wholly owned subsidiaries of State application herein may be issued by the ties and Exchange Commission, Wash­ Bond and Mortgage in a position of Commission upon the Commission’s own ington 25, D.C., not later than the date equality with employees, directors and motion. Persons who request a hearing or specified. If no one requests a hearing, officers of State Bond and Mortgage. The this application will be determined by advice as to whether a hearing is ordered sales would be made pursuant to a uni­ will receive notice of further develop­ order of the Commission on the basis form offer described in the prospectus of of the facts stated therein and other in­ Progress Fund and would be made only ments in this matter, including the date formation contained in the official files upon the written representation of the of the hearing (if ordered) and any post­ of the Commission-pertaining thereto. purchaser that the purchase is made for ponements thereof. For the Commission (pursuant to investment purposes and that the secu­ For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ delegated authority). rities will not be resold except through gated authority). redemption or repurchase by or on behalf [seal] O rval L. D u B o is , of the issuer. [ sea l] O rval L. D u B o is, Secretary. Applicants represent that the exemp­ Secretary. [PR. Doc. 69-13283; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; tion would aid in improving relationships [F.R. Doc. 69-13277; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; 8:47 a.m.] with employees, promote internal har­ 8:46 ajm.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18074 NOTICES

[Pile Nos. 7-3270, 7-3271] Act of 1940 (“Act”) (hereinafter called objectives of one of which might well be ROHR GORP. AND AMERADA HESS “Applicants”) , have filed an application more suitable to a Contract holder’s re­ pursuant to sections 6(c) and 11(c) of tirement needs than would be the ob­ CORP. the Act for an order of the Commission jectives of the other. Notice of Applications for Unlisted permitting an offer of exchange and ex­ Applicants request exemption from the empting Applicants from certain provi­ following provisions of the Act to the Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ sions of sections 12(d>(l), 22(d), 26(a) extent stated below: tunity for Hearing (2)*, and 27(c) (2) of the Act, as described Section 12(d)(1), in pertinent part, below. All interested persons are referred provides in substance that it shall be un­ N ovember 3, 1969. to the application on file with the Com­ lawful for any registered investment In the matter of applications of the mission for a statement of the represen­ company (VAA) to purchase any se­ Midwest Stock Exchange for unlisted tations therein which are summarized curity issued by any other investment trading privileges in certain securities. below. company (Funds) if such registered in­ The above named national securities VAA was established by SBL on No­ vestment company will, as a result oi exchange has filed applications with the vember 8, 1968, in connection with the that purchase, own more than 3 percent Securities and Exchange Commission proposed sale to individuals and to groups of the outstanding voting stock of the pursuant to section 12(f)(1)(B) of the of tax qualified variable annuity con­ other investment company, unless the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule tracts (“Contracts”) designed to pro­ registered investment company owns at 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trading vide retirement, annuity benefits. least 25 percent of the outstanding vot­ privileges in the common stocks of the VAA was established pursuant to the ing stock of such other investment com­ following companies, which securities laws of Kansas. Under these laws the pany. Section 12(d) (1)(B) of the Aet are listed and registered on one or more income, gains, and losses of VAA may be provides, in substance, that such restric­ other national securities exchanges: credited to or charged against the tion is not applicable with respect to amounts allocated to it in accordance securities purchased with the proceeds P ile No. with the Contracts without regard to the Rohr Corp______7—3270 of payments on periodic payment plan Amerada Hess Corp______7—3271 other income, gains or losses of SBL, certificates* pursuant to the terms of the and the assets of VAA are not chargeable trust indenture under which such certifi­ Upon receipt of a request, on or before with liabilities arising out of any other cates are issued. November 18, 1969, from any interested account or business SBL may conduct. VAA, which does not own at least 25 person, the Commission will determine Net purchase payments under Con­ percent of the outstanding voting stock whether the application with respect to tracts will be allocated to VAA and in­ of either of Funds, may acquire more any of the companies named shall be set vested in shares of either Security Equity than 3 percent of the outstanding voting down for hearing. Any such requests Fund, Inc., or Security Investment Fund, stock of either or both of Funds with the should state briefly the title of the se­ Inc. (“Funds”), both of which are open- proceeds of payments on periodic pay­ curity in which he is interested, the end, diversified management investment ment plan certificates which are not is­ nature of the interest of the person mak­ companies registered under the Act. Net sued pursuant to the terms of a trust ing the request, and the position he pro­ purchase payments under Series E Con­ indenture. Applicants state that an ex­ poses to take at the hearing, if ordered. tracts will be invested in Security Equity emption from section 12(d) (1) is appro­ In addition, any interested person may Fund, Inc., and net purchase payments priate because the terms of Contracts submit his views or any additional facts under Series I Contracts will be invested together with the provisions of the appli­ bearing on any of the said applications in Security Investment Fund, Trie. cable custodian agreement provide sub­ by means of a letter addressed to the Applicants propose to offer at retire?- stantially the same framework as is Secretary, Securities and Exchange Com­ ment to holders of Series E Contracts normally contained in a corporate trust mission, Washington 25* DC., not later the right to exchange their Contracts for indenture, and the investment of the pro­ than the date specified. If no one re­ Series I Contracts and holders of Series ceeds of such payments does not result in quests a hearing with respect to any par­ I Contracts the right to exchange their the abuses which section 12(d)(1) was ticular application, such application will Contracts for Series E Contracts at the designed to prevent. be determined by order of the commis­ relative net asset values of the Contracts Section 22(d) provides, in pertinent sion on the basis of the facts stated which are equal to the net asset value part, that no registered investment com­ therein and other information contained of the underlying Fund shares. pany shall sell any redeemable security in the official files of the Commission Section 11 (a) of the Act provides that issued by it to any person except at a pertaining thereto. it shall be unlawful for any registered current public offering price described in For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ open-end company or any principal un­ the prospectus. gated authority). derwriter for such a company to make Applicants offer a redeemable security or cause to be made an offer to the holder in the form of a Pension Trust Variable [ seal] O rval L. D uB o is , of a security of such company or of any Annuity Contract which has a sales and Secretary. other open-end investment company to administrative deduction of 8.5 percent [F.R. Doc. 69-13284; Piled, Nov. 6, 1969; exchange his security for a security in Applicants request an exemption to per­ 8:47 ajm.] the same or another such company on mit the sale of SBL’s Group Variable any basis other than the relative net as­ Contract with a 6 percent sales deduc­ set values of the respective securities to tion to any employer described in section [812-2422] be exchanged, unless the terms of the 403(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of SECURITY BENEFIT LIFE INSURANCE offer have first been submitted to and 1954, as amended, if the sale is made pur­ CO. AND SBL VARIABLE ANNUITY approved by the Commission. Section suant to a uniform offer described in the 11(c) provides that, irrespective of the prospectus and the same offer is also ACCOUNT basis of exchange, the provisions of sub­ made to all organizations listed in Rule section (a) shall be applicable to any 22d-l(e). Notice of Application To Permit Offer type of offer of exchange of the securities Variable Contracts issued by SBL ww of Exchange and for Exemption of registered unit investment trusts for not participate in the surplus of SBL. N ovember 3, 1969. the securities of any other investment However, whenever expenses relating to Notice is hereby given that Security company. Variable Contracts are less than ex­ Benefit Life Insurance Co. (“SBL”), a Applicants represent that if an ex­ pected or the mortality of the partici­ mutual life insurance company orga­ change at retirement between Series E pants is more favorable to SBL than an­ nized under the laws of the State of Kan­ Contracts and Series I Contracts or be­ ticipated, the directors of SBL may, at tween Series I Contracts and Series E their discretion, increase the number oi sas, and SBL Variable Annuity Account Contracts is permitted, Contract holders accumulation units standing to the credit (“VAA”), 700 Harrison Street, Topeka, will have the opportunity to choose be­ of the owner or the participants’ individ* Kans. 66603, a unit investment trust reg­ tween shares of underlying Funds hav­ ual accounts or increase the number o istered under the Investment Company ing different investment objectives, the annuity units standing to the credit o

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18075 participants. Any such adjustment and the assets of the VAA, those assets will case of an attorney at law by certificate) credit does not lend itself to a determina­ be in the possession of the bank as cus­ shall be filed contemporaneously with the tion or specific allocation as between todian, will be deposited for safekeeping request. At any time after said date, as sales expense and administrative and in its vaults and will be physically segre­ provided by Rule 0-5 of the rules and reg­ other expense, nor is it possible to deter­ gated and held separately from the prop­ ulations promulgated under the Act, an mine in advance the amount of such erties of any other persons; that SBL and order disposing of the application herein adjustments. Applicants request an ex­ the administration of the VAA are sub­ may be issued by the Commission upon emption from the provisions of section ject to the comprehensive regulatory su­ the basis of the information stated in said 22(d) to permit such adjustments and pervision and control of the Commis­ application unless an order for hearing credits without any deduction for sales sioner of Insurance for Kansas; and that upon said application shall be issued and administrative expenses, since any any basic protective measures contem­ upon request or upon the Commission’s applicable expenses would already have plated by sections 26(a) and 27(c) (2) are own motion. Persons who request a hear­ been made against the payments giving substantially provided by the custodian ing, or advice as to whether a hearing is rise to such surplus. arrangement and the extensive super­ ordered, will receive notice of further de­ Under the fixed Annuity Contracts is­ vision of the Kansas Commissioner of velopments in this matter, including the sued by SBL, an election may be made to Insurance. An exemption is requested date of the hearing (if ordered) and any change the allocation from fixed to from the provisions of sections 26(a) (2) postponements thereof. variable payments at the maturity date. and 27(c) (2) so as to make the require­ For the Commission (pursuant to dele­ The Applicants state that the sales ex­ ment of a separate trust not applicable gated authority). pense described in the prospectus will al­ to the custodial arrangements of the ready have been paid in connection with VAA. The Applicants have consented that [ se a l ] O rval L. D tjB o is , the purchase of the fixed annuity and it the requested exemption may be subject Secretary. is not proposed to make any additional to the conditions (1) that the charges to [F.R. Doc. 69-13278; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; sales charge. An exemption is accord­ Variable Annuity Contract owners for 8:46 a.m.] ingly requested to permit the elimination administrative services shall not exceed of any requirement of a sales load with such reasonable amounts as the Commis­ respect to the exercise of an option in sion shall prescribe, jurisdiction being re­ [File No. 7-3274] a fixed annuity to change the allocation served for such purpose; and (2) that the UNIVERSITY COMPUTING CO. from fixed to variable payments. payment of sums and charges out of the The Variable Annuity Contracts per­ assets of the VAA shall not be deemed Notice of Application for Unlisted mit the beneficiary of an individual who to be exempted from regulation by the Trading Privileges and of Oppor­ has died prior to the commencement of Commission by reason of the requested tunity for Hearing annuity payments to elect to have the order: Provided, That the Applicants’ proceeds applied, without reduction for consent to this condition shall not be N ovem ber 3, 1969. sales and administrative expenses, to an deemed to be a concession to the Com­ In the matter of application of annuity in lieu of a lump sum payment, mission of authority to regulate the pay­ the Philadelphia-Baltimore-Washington and for this purpose Applicants request ment of sums and charges out of such Stock Exchange for unlisted trading an exemption from section 22(d). Appli­ assets other than the charges for ad­ privileges in a Certain security. cants also propose to eliminate the ministrative services, and Applicants re­ The above-named national securities charges for sales and administrative ex­ serve the right in any proceeding before exchange has filed an application with penses where amounts otherwise payable the Commission or in any suit or action the Securities and Exchange Commission as a lump sum cash settlement by SBL in any court to assert that the Commis­ pursuant to section 12(f)(1)(B) of the under a life insurance policy issued by sion has no authority to regulate the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule SBL are applied, at the election of the payment of such other sums and 12f-l thereunder, for unlisted trading contract holder or the beneficiary, to pro­ charges. privileges in the common stock of the vide a single payment immediate Vari­ Section 6(c) provides that the Com­ following company, which security is able Annuity Contract. The Applicants mission, by order upon application, may listed and registered on one or more other state that in all such cases a sales charge conditionally or unconditionally exempt national securities exchange: will already have been paid with respect any person, security, or transaction or University Computing Co., File No. 7-3274. to the life insurance policy and assert any class or classes of persons, securi­ that the elimination of a second sales ties, or transactions from any provision Upon receipt of a request, on or before charge under such circumstances would or provisions of the Act and the rules November 18, 1969, from any interested appear to involve no unfair discrimina­ promulgated thereunder, if and to the person, the Commission will determine tion as between contract holders. extent such exemption is necessary or whether the application shall be set down Sections 26(a)(2) and 27(c)(2) pro­ appropriate in the public interest and for hearing. Any such request should vide, in pertinent part, that a registered consistent with the protection of inves­ state briefly the nature of the interest of investment company and any depositor tors and the purposes fairly intended by the person making the request and the or underwriter for such company are the policy and provisions of the Act. position he proposes to take at the hear­ Prohibited from selling periodic payment Notice is further given that any inter­ ing, if ordered. In addition, any inter­ Plan certificates unless the proceeds are ested person may, not later than Novem­ ested person may submit his views or any deposited with a qualified bank as trustee ber 18, 1969, at 5:30 p.m., submit to the additional facts bearing on the said ap­ or custodian and held under an inden­ Commission in writing a request for a plication by means of a letter addressed ture or agreement containing certain hearing on the matter accompanied by to the Secretary, Securities and Ex­ specified provisions. Section 26(a) (2) re­ a statement as to the nature of his inter­ change Commission, Washington 25, quires that the trustee or custodian shall est, the reason for such request and the D.C., not later than the date specified. have possession of all securities and prop­ issues, if any, of fact or law proposed to If no one requests a hearing, this appli­ erties of a unit investment trust and shall be controverted, or he may request that cation will be determined by order of segregate and hold the same in trust. he be notified if the Commission shall the Commission on the basis of the facts VAA has entered into a Custodian order a hearing thereon. Any such com­ stated therein and other information Agreement with First National Bank of munication should be addressed: Secre­ contained in the official files of the Com­ VA^a’ ^ans*» covering the assets of tary, Securities and Exchange Commis­ mission pertaining thereto. .VAA- The Custodian Agreement does not sion, Washington, D.C. 20549. A copy of For the Commission (pursuant to technically create a trust with respect to such request shall be served personally or delegated authority). the assets. SBL, under Kansas insurance by mail (airmail if the person being 18 reWired to retain the ownership served is located more than 500 miles [ sea l] O rval L. D u B o is , hd control of disposition of its property. from the point of mailing) upon the Ap­ Secretary. r f Applicants state that although a plicants at the address stated above. [F.R. Doc. 69-13285; Filed, Nov. 6. 1969; ict trust is not created with respect to Proof of such service (by affidavit or in 8:47 eun.]

No. 215-----11 FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215—.FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18076 NOTICES

Newport News Children’s Dress Co., New­ piration dates, learner rates, occupa­ DEPARTMENT OF LABOR port News, Va.; 10-20-69 to 10-19-70 (chil­ tions, learning periods and the number dren’s and girls’ dresses and playsuits). of learners authorized to be employed, Wage and Hour Division Oshkosh B’Gosh, Inc., Celina, Tenn.; 10-8-69 to 10-7-70 (men’s pants and shirts). are indicated. * CERTIFICATES AUTH O RIZIN G EM­ Pella Manufacturing Carp., Pella, Iowa; Bayuk Caribe, Inc., dales, P.R.; 9-3-69 to PLOYMENT OF LEARNERS AT SPE­ 10-14-69 to 10-13-70; 10 learners (men’s 9-2-70; 10 learners for norm al labor turnover work clothing). purposes in the occupations of cigar nr>«Wwg CIAL MINIMUM WAGES Rappahannock Sportswear Co., Inc., Fred­ and packing, each for a learning period of Notice is hereby given that pursuant ericksburg, Va.; 10-9-69 to 10-8-70 (men’s 320 hours at the rates of $1.26 an hour for p a n ts). the first 160 hours and $1.36 an hour for the to section 14 of the Fair Labor Standards Red Hill Apparel Co., Red Hill, Pa.; 16-6-69 remaining 160 hours (cigars). Act of 1938 (52 Stat. 1060, as amended, to 10-5-70 (children’s dresses). dales Manufacturing Corp., dales, P.R., 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) and Administrative J. H. Rutter Rex Manufacturing Co., Inc., 8- 27—69 to 8—26—70; 13 learners for normal Order No. 595 (31 F.R. 12981) the firms New Orleans, La.; 10-11-69 to 10-10-70 labor turnover purposes in the occupation of listed in this notice have been issued (men’s and boys’ work pants and shirts). sew ing m ach ine operating, for a learning special certificates authorizing the em­ Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., South Fulton, period of 320 hours at the rate of $1.23 an ployment of learners at hourly wage Tenn.; 10-14r-69 to 10-13-70 (men’s and hour (women’s underwear). rates lower than the minimum wage rates boys’ pants) . Consolidated Caguas Corp., Caguas, PR.; Southern Garment Co., Robbins, N.C.; 9- 8-69 to 9—7—70; 22 learners for normal labor otherwise applicable under section 6 of 10-12-69 to 10-11—70; 10 learners (women’s turnover purposes in the occupations of cigar the act. For each certificate, the effective d resses). m aking an d packing, each for a learning and expiration dates, number or propor­ Southland Manufacturing Co., Inc., Wil­ period of 320 horns at the rates of $1.26 an tion of learners and the principal prod­ mington, N.C.; 10-14-69 to 10-13-70 (men’s hour for the first 160 hours and $1.36 an hour uct manufactured by the establishment and boys’ shirts). for the remaining 160 hours (cigars). are as indicated. Conditions on occupa­ Sullcraft Manufacturing Co., Inc., Dushore, Consolidated Cigar Corp., Caguas, P.R.; tions, wage rates, and learning periods Pa.; 10-4-69 to 10-3-70 (boys’ pajamas). 9-8-69 to 9-7-70; 68 learners for normal labor which are provided in certificates issued Tioga Sportswear, Fall River, Mass.; 10-4-69 turnover purposes in the occupations of cigar to 10-3-70 (men’s and boys’ sport jackets). m akin g and packing, each for a learning under the supplemental industry regula­ Tom & Huck Togs, Inc., Amory, Miss.; period of 320 hours a t th e rates of $1.26 an tions cited in the captions below are as 10-15-69 to 10-14-70 (men’s, boys’ and ladies’ hour for th e first 160 hours and $1.36 an established iri those regulations; such slacks and walking shorts). hour for the remaining 160 hours (cigars). conditions in certificates not issued under Tracy City Manufacturing Co., Tracy City, Corozal K nitting Mills, Inc., Corozal, PR.; the supplemental industry regulations Tenn.; 10-17-69 to 10-16-70 (men’s and boys’ 9-3-69 to 9-2-70; 10 learners for normal labor are as listed. * sport shirts). turnover purposes in the occupations of The Van Heusen Co., Clayton, Ala.; 10-4-69 finger knitting and finger closing, each for Apparel Industry Learner Regulations to 10-3-70 (men’s shirts). a learning period of 320 hours at the rate (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9, as amended and The Van Heusen Co., Geneva, Ala.; 10-4-69 of $1.30 an hour (knitted gloves and 29 CFR 522.20 t6 522.25, as amended). to 16-3-70 (men’s shirts). m itte n s ). The following normal labor turnover The Van Heusen Co., Hartford, Ala.; 10-4-69 Puerto Rico Knitting Mills, Inc., Corozal, certificates authorize 10 percent of the to 10-3-70 (men’s shirts). P.R.; 9-3—69 to 9-2—70; 10 learners for normal total number of factory production work­ The Van Heusen Co., Ozark, Ala.; 10-4-69 labor turnover purposes in the occupation to 10-3-70 (pajamas). of machine stitching, for a learning period ers except as otherwise indicated. J. M. Wood Manufacturing Co., Inc., Dub­ of 320 hours at the rate of $1.30 an hour Apco Manufacturing Co., Brodhead, Wis.; lin, Tex.; 10-5-69 to 10-4-70 (men’s work (sewing leather palms on knitted gloves). 10-11-69 to 10-10-70 (infants’ and children’s p a n ts). knit shirts and pajamas)^ Each learner certificate has been issued Blue Bell, Inc., Arab, Ala.; 10-17-69 to The following plant expansion certifi­ upon the representations of the employer 10-16-70 (men’s, boys’, ladies’ and girls’ cates were issued authorizing the num­ which, among other things, were that dungarees). ber of learners indicated. employment of learners at special min­ Blue Bell, Inc., Oneonta, Ala.; 10-17-69 to B. & D. Manufacturing Co., Inc., Sanford, imum rates is necessary in order to pre­ 10-16-70 (men’s and boys’ work clothing) . Fla.; 10-13-69 to 4-12-70; 10 learners (men’s vent curtailment of opportunities for Cluett, Peabody & Co., Inc., Carbon Hill, sport shirts). employment, and that experienced work­ Ala,.; 10-15-69 to 10-14-70 (m en ’s dress Don Juan Manufacturing Corp., Hertford, ers for the learner occupations are not sh irts). N.C.; 10-20-69 to 4-19-70; 40 learners (men’s Ely & Walker of Kennett, Inc., Kennett, and boys’ shirts). available. Any person aggrieved by the Mo.; 10-12-69 to 10-11—70 (men’s and boys’ Kellwood Co., Coffeeville, Miss.; 10-3-69 to issuance of any of these certificates may dress shirts and swim suits). 4-2-70; 40 learners (boys’ pants). seek a review or reconsideration thereof Ephrata Apparel Co., Ephrata, Pa.; 10-6-69 So-Neet, Inc., Somerset, Pa.'; 10-15-69 to within 15 days after publication of this to .10-5-70 (children’s dresses). 4-14-70; 10 learners (girl’s coats). notice in the F ederal R egister pursuant Form-O-TTth Brassiere Co., Inc., Pampa, to the provisions of 29 CFR 522.9. The T$x.; . 10-14-69 to 10-13—70 (women’s Glove Industry Learner Regulations lin g erie). (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9, as amended and certificates may be annulled or with­ Greensboro Manufacturing Corp., Greens­ 29 CFR 522.60 to 522.65, as amended). drawn, as indicated therein, in the man­ boro, N.C.; 10-19-69 to 10-16-70 (women’s ner provided in 29 CFR Part 528. and children’s nightwear). The Glove Carp., Heber Springs, Ark.; Hagale Garment Manufacturing Co., Reeds 10-8-69 to 10-7-70; 10 learners for normal Signed at Washington, D.C., this 31st Spring, Mo.; 10-10-69 to 10-9-70 (men’s labor turnover purposes (combination leather day of October 1969. p a n ts ). and cotton work gloves). Irene Sportswear Co., Inc., Plant No. 2, The Glove Corp., Heber Springs, Ark.; R obert G . G ronew ald, Dalton, Pa.; 10-10-69 to 10-9-70; 10 learners 10-18-69 to 4-17-70; 20 learners for plant Authorized Representative (women’s blouses and dresses). expansion purposes (combination leather and of the Administrator. cotton work gloves). Joyner Fields, Inc., Sherman, Miss.; 10-15- [PR. Doc. 69-13272; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; 69 to 10-14-70 (men’s shirts). Monte Glove Co., Inc., Maben, Miss.; 8:46 am.] Kellwood Co., Alamo, Tenn.; 10-9-69 to 10- 10-20-69 to 10-19-70; 10 learners for normal 6-70 (women’s foundation garments). labor turnover purposes (work gloves). Kenrose Manufacturing Co., Inc., Roanoke, Hosiery Industry Learner Regulations Va,; 10-19-69 to 10-18-70 (women’s dresses). Lexington Sportswear Co., Lexington, S.C.; (29 CFR 522.1 to 522.9, as amended and INTERSTATE COMMERCE 10LL17-69 to 10-16-70 (men’s and boys’ outer­ 29 CFR 522.40 to 522.43, as amended). wear jackets), ~ Amos Hosiery Mills, Inc., High Point, N.C.; * Logan Manufacturing Co., Russellville, Ky.; 10-12-69 to 10-11-70; 5 percent of the total COMMISSION 10t-2t-69 to 10-1-70 (men’s work pants), number of factory production workers far FOURTH SECTION APPLICATION FOR Mitchell Manufacturing Inc., Corlnith, normal labor turnover purposes (seamless Miss.; 10-20-69 to 10-18-70 (men’s sport h osiery). RELIEF sh ir ts), i N ovember 4,1969. . Murcel Manufacturing Corp., Glennville, The following learner certificates were Ga.; 10-12-69 to 10-11-70 (nurses’ and maids’ issued in Puerto Rico to the companies Protests to the granting of an uniforms).' hereinafter named. The effective and ex­ tion must be prepared in accordance

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 NOTICES 18077 with Rule 1100.40 of the general rules No. MC 8973 (Sub-No. 17 TA) , filed Street, Los Angeles, Calif. 90042; Jet of practice (49 CFR 1100.40) and filed October 27, 1969. Applicant: METRO­ Forwarding, Inc., 2945 Columbia Street, within 15 days from the date of pub­ POLITAN TRUCKING, INC., 2424 95th Torrance, Calif.; Mollerup Freight For­ lication of this notice in the F ederal Street, North Bergen, N.J. 07047. Appli­ warding Co., 2900 South Main Street, Register. cant’s representative: George A. Olsen, Salt Lake City, Utah 84115. Send pro­ 69 Tonnele Avenue, Jersey City, N.J. tests to: C. R. Flemming, District Super­ Long- and-S hort Haul 07306. Authority sought to operate as a visor, Interstate Commerce Commission, FSA No. 41795—Class and commodity common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Bureau of Operations, 225 Federal Build­ rates from and to Robertson, Ala. Filed irregular routes, transporting: Plastic ing, Lansing, Mich. 48933. by O. W. South, Jr., agent (No. A6139), articles, hardware, building materials, No. MC 94350 (Sub-No. 247 TA), filed for interested rail carriers. Rates on equipment, and supplies (except in bulk), October 28, 1969. Applicant: TRANSIT property moving on class and commodity from the warehouse and plant facilities HOMES, INC., Post Office Box 1628, rates, between Robertson, Ala. (when in of Alcan Aluminum Corp., located at Greenville, S.C. 29602. Applicant’s repre­ connection with Arrow Transportation Woodbridge, N.J., on the one hand, and, sentative: G. P. Apperson, Jr. (same ad­ Co.), on the one hand, and points in the on the other, points in New Jersey, New dress as above). Authority sought to United States and Canada, on the other. York, Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, operate as a common carrier" by motor Grounds for relief—New station and Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Connecti­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ grouping. cut, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Delaware, ing: Trailers designed to be drawn by Maryland, Virginia, and the District of passenger automobiles in initial move­ By the Commission. Columbia, restricted against shipments ments, from points in Williams County, [seal] H. N eil Garson, when originating at Woodbridge, N.J., Ohio, to points in Youngstown, Ports­ Secretary. and destined to points in New York, New mouth, Cincinnati, Dayton, Columbus, [F.R. Doc. 69-13296; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; Jersey, and Connecticut within 150 miles Cleveland, and Toledo, Ohio; Mayfield, 8:48 a.m.] of Columbus Circle, New York, N.Y., for Bowling Green, Lexington, Louisville, 150 days. Supporting shipper: Alcan and Nashville, Ky.; Evansville, Terre Alu m in u m Corp., 100 Erieview Plaza, Haute, South Bend, Indianapolis, Gary, [Notice 936] Cleveland, Ohio 44101. Send protests to: and Fort Wayne, Ind.; Detroit, Lansing, District Supervisor Walter J. Gross- Grand Rapids, Ishpeming, and Flint, MOTOR CARRIER TEMPORARY mann, Bureau of Operations, Interstate AUTHORITY APPLICATIONS Mich.; Rockford, Chicago, Peoria, St. Commerce Commission, 970 Broad Louis, and Springfield, 111.; and Superior, N ovember 4, 1969. Street, Newark, N.J. 07102. Eau Claire, Green Bay, Madison, and Mil­ The following are notices of filing of No. MC 29886 (Sub-No. 252 TA), filed waukee, Wis., for 180 days. Supporting applications for temporary authority October 20, 1969. Applicant: DALLAS & shipper: Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., under section 210a (a) of the Interstate MAVIS FORWARDING CO., iNC., 4000 Post Office Box 7638, Riverside, Calif. Commerce Act provided for under the West Sample Street, South Bend, Ind. 92503. Send protests to: Arthur B. Aber­ new rules of Ex Parte No. MC-67 (49 46621. Applicant's representative: Paul E. crombie, District Supervisor, Interstate CFR, Part 1131), published in the F ed­ LaRose (same address as above). Au­ Commerce Commission, Bureau of Oper­ eral Register, issue of April 27, 1965, thority sought to operate as a common ations, 601A Federal Building, 901 Sum­ effective July 1, 1965. These rules pro­ carrier, by motor vehicle, over irregular ter Street, Columbia, S.C. 29201. vide that protests to the granting of an routes, transporting: Motor vehicles, No. MC 106398 (Sub-No. 430 TA), application must be filed with the field from South Bend, Ind., to points in Ala­ filed October 30. 1969. Applicant: NA­ official named in the F ederal R egister bama, Arkansas, Georgia, Florida, Louisi­ TIONAL TRAILER CONVOY, INC., publication, within 15 calendar days ana, Mississippi, New Mexico, North 1925 National Plaza, Tulsa, Okla. 74151. after the date of notice of the filing of Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Applicant’s representative: Irvin Tull the application is published in the Texas, for 180 days. Supporting shipper: (same address as above). Authority Federal Register. One copy of such pro­ William A. Roe, Traffic Manager, Pro­ sought to operate as a common carrier, tests must be served on the applicant, curement Division, Post Office Depart­ by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, or its authorized representative, if any, ment, Bureau of Facilities, Washington, transporting: Buildings, buildings in and the protests must certify that such D.C. 20260. Send protests to: District sections, building panels, building parts, service has been made. The protests must Supervisor J. H. Gray, Bureau of Opera­ and accessories, from plantsite of be specific as to the service which such tions, Interstate Commerce Commission, Crown, Inc., Bristol, Conn., to points in Protestant can and will offer, and must 345 West Wayne Street, Room 204, Fort Pennsylvania, Kentucky, North Caro­ consist of a signed original and six Wayne, Ind. 46802. lina, South Carolina, West Virginia, copies. No. MC 61417 (Sub-No. 1 TA), filed Oc­ Ohio, Michigan, and Indiana, for 180 A copy of the application is on file, tober 27, 1969. Applicant: FIREPROOF days. Supporting shipper: Karl Schwartz, and can be examined at the Office of the STORAGE COMPANY, 728 East Shia­ Crown, Inc., Post Office Box 98, Cross Secretary, Interstate Commerce Com­ wassee Street, Lansing, Mich. 48902. Ap­ Street, Bristol, Conn. 06010. Send pro­ mission, Washington, D.C., and also in plicant’s representatives: Alan F. Wohl- tests to: C. L. Phillips, District Super­ field office to which protests are to be stetter and Joseph F. Mullins, Jr., 1 Far- visor, Interstate Commerce Commis­ transmitted. ragut Square South, Washington, D.C. sion, Bureau of Operations, 240 Old Post 20006. Authority sought to operate as a Motor Carriers of P roperty Office Building, 215 Northwest Third, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over Oklahoma City, Okla. 73102. No. MC 3094 (Sub-No. 16 TA), file irregular routes, transporting: Used No. MC 107295 (Sub-No. 234 TA), filed October 31, 1969. Applicant: SERVIC: household goods, between points in Ing­ October 30, 1969. Applicant: PRE-FAB MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., Post Offic ham, Livingston, Eaton, Barry, Shiawas­ TRANSIT CO., 100 South Main Street, Box 36, Barrington, N.J. 08007. Authorit see, Clinton, Ionia, Kent, Montcalm, Farmer City, HI. 61842. Authority sought sought to operate as a contract carrie\ Gratiot, Midland, Kalamazoo, Calhoun, to operate as a common carrier, by motor oy motor vehicle, over irregular routes Jackson, Washtenaw, Oakland, and Ma­ vehicle, over irregular routes, transport­ transporting: Paper products, from Tall comb Counties, Mich., restricted to the ing: Paint and varnish (except in bulk), man- N.Y., to points in New Jersey, fc transportation of traffic having a prior or from Paterson, N.J., to points in Ohio, 180 days. Supporting shipper:. Interna subsequent movement in containers, and Kentucky, Tennessee, Indiana, Michigan, ttonal Paper Co., 220 East 42d Street, Ne further restricted to the performance of Wisconsin, Illinois, Minnesota, Iowa, pickup and delivery service in connection Missouri, and Arkansas, for 180 days. York, N.Y. 10017. Send protests to: Ray with packing, crating, and containeriza­ mond T. Jones, District Supervisor, In Supporting shipper: Frisch & Co., Inc., tion, or unpacking, uncrating, and de­ 88 East 11th Street, Paterson, N J. 07524. terstate Commerce Commission, Burea containerization of such traffic, for 180 Send protests to: Harold C. Jolliff, Dis­ J* Operations, 410 Post Office Buildini days. Supporting shippers: DeWitt trict Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Trenton, N.J. 08608. Freight Forwarding, 6060 North Figueroa Commission, Bureau of Operations,

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 18078 NOTICES

Room 476, 325 West Adams Street, by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, pervisor, Interstate Commerce Commis­ Springfield, HI. 62704. transporting: Tractor parts, loader sion, Bureau of Operations, Room 7708, No. MC 113908 (Sub-No. 202 TA), filed parts, tractor attachments, and loader Federal Building, 300 North Los Angeles October 30,1969. Applicant: ERICKSON attachments, and equipment materials Street, Los Angeles, Calif. 90012. TRANSPORT CORPORATION, 2105 and supplies used in the manufacture of No. MC 134114 TA (Amendment), filed East Dale Street, Box 3180, Springfield, the above-named commodities, (1) be­ October 20, 1969, published in the Fed­ Mo. 65804. Authority sought to operate tween Saginaw, Tex., and points within eral R eg ister, issue of October 28, 1969, as a common carrier, by motor vehicle, 4 miles thereof, and Chicago, HI., and and republished, this issue. Applicant: over irregular routes, transporting: Con­ points within 25 miles thereof, and the ELMER WILSON, doing business as crete admixtures, in bulk, in tank vehi­ storage and distribution facilities of the NEBRASKA BEEF EXPRESS, 8024 cles, from Springfield, Mo., to Dallas, Pettibone Mulliken Corp. at East State Street, Ralston, Nebr. 68051. Ap­ Tex., for 180 days. Supporting shipper: Rutherford, N.J., and (2) between the plicant’s representative: Kenneth P. Master Builders Division, Martin points described in (1) above, on the Weiner, 630 City National Bank Build­ Marietta Corp., 2490 Lee Boulevard, one hand, and on the other, points in the ing, Omaha, Nebr. 68102. Authority Cleveland, Ohio 44118. Send protests to: United States, except Alaska and Hawaii. sought to operate as a contract carrier, John V. Barry, District Supervisor, In­ Restriction: the operations authorized by motor vehicle, over irregular routes, terstate Commerce Commission, Bureau herein are limited to a transportation transporting: Meat, meat products, and of Operations, 1100 Federal Office Build­ service to be performed under a con­ meat byproducts, and articles distributed ing, 911 Walnut Street, Kansas City, tinuing contract, or contracts, with by meat packinghouses, as described in Mo. 64106. Pettibone Mulliken Corp. of Torrance, sections A and C of appendix I to the No. MC 118127 (Sub-No. 13 TA), filed Calif., for 180 days. N o t e : Applicant in­ report in Descriptions in Motor Carrier October 30, 1969. Applicant: HALE DIS­ tends to tack with MC 128648 Sub 1. Sup­ Certificates, 61 M.C.C. 209 and 766, from TRIBUTING COMPANY, INC., 914 porting shipper: Pettibone Westrac, a Omaha, Nebr., to points in Will, Cook, South Vail Avenue, Montebello, Calif. division of Pettibone Mulliken Corp., Du Page, and Kane Counties, HI., Cedar 90640. Authority sought to operate as a Post Office Box 4389, Fort Worth, Tex. Rapids, Iowa, and Milwaukee, Kenosha, common carrier, by motor vehicle, over 76107. Send protests to: Robert G. Harri­ Madison, and Green Bay, Wis., for 180 irregular routes, transporting: Frozen son, District Supervisor, Interstate Com­ days. Supporting shipper: J. F. O’Neill prepared foods, from Southboro, Mass., merce Commission, Bureau of Opera­ Packing Co., 3120 L Street, Omaha, to points in Los Angeles County, Calif., tions, Room 7708 Federal Building, 300 Nebr.; Geo. F. Kleine, Office Manager. North Los Angeles Street, Los Angeles, for 150 days. Supporting shipper: Ever- Calif. 90012. Send protests to: Keith P. Kohrs, Dis­ Freez Food Distributors, Inc., 904 West trict Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Whittier Boulevard, Montebello, Calif. No. MC 133154 (Sub-No. 3 TA), filed Commission, Bureau of Operations, 705 Send protests to: John E. Nance, District October 30,1969. Applicant: DICK BELL Federal Office Building, Omaha, Nebr. Supervisor, Interstate Commerce Com­ TRUCKING, INC., 16036 Valley Boule­ 68102. N o t e : The purpose of this re* mission, Bureau of Operations, Room vard, Fontana, Calif. 92335. Applicant’s publication is to redescribe the territorial 7708, Federal Building, 300 North Los representative: Ernest D. Salm, 3846 Evans Street, Los Angeles, Calif. 90027. description involved and to reflect a Angeles Street, Los Angeles, Calif. 90012. change in the time duration to 180 days No. MC 128648 (Sub-No. 4 TA), filed Authority sought to operate as a con­ October 28, 1969. Applicant: TRANS tract carrier, by motor vehicle, over in lieu of 150 days as previously UNITED, INC., Post Office Box 215, irregular routes, transporting: Mat­ published. South Gate, Calif. 90280. Applicant’s rep­ tresses and box springs, in packages, from Los Angeles, Calif., to Phoenix n-nd By the Commission. resentatives: Wm. J. Lippman and Tempe, Ariz., for 180 days. Supporting [ seal] H. N e il G arson, Arthur Bernstein, 1824 R Street NW., shipper: Ortho Mattress, 5431 West 104th Secretary. Washington, D.C. 20009. Authority Street, Los Angeles, Calif. 90045. Send [F.R. Doc. 69-13297; Filed, Nov. 6, 1969; sought to operate as a contract carrier, protests to: John E. Nance, District Su­ 8:45 a.m.]

FEDERAL REGISTER, VOL. 34, NO. 215— FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 1969 FEDERAL REGISTER 18079

CUMULATIVE LIST OF PARTS AFFECTED— NOVEMBER

The following numerical guide is a list of parts of each title of the Code of Federal Regulations affected by documents published to date during November

3 CFR 16 CFR Page 32A CFR Page E x e c u t iv e O r ders: 13______17868-17871,17950 FRS (Ch. XV): 8598 (revoked in part by PLO P roposed R u l e s Reg. V— —— ____—_ 17729 4724)______— 17773 423______, ______I— 17776 11398 (amended by EO 11492) _ 17721 33 CFR 11492 ______—_____ 17721 18 CFR 8______18034 5 CFR 2______17803 110______17770 213 ______-_____ 17724, 17774, 17797 P roposed R u l e s : 36 CFR 511...... — 17774 620______17730 531______17774 200______17879 550..______- 17775 20 CFR 37 CFR 602______17770 7 CFR 1______17772 70______1775,5 21 CFR 225______17797 41 CFR 17999 146a__ „I ______17725 301...... — 147______17725, 17726 1-1______— ______17953 354______18001 101-19______17954 18002 148k______17725 401______148q______17725 P roposed R u l e s : 728.______- 17757 148x— ______17725 50-204______18043 847______18002 P ropo sed R u l e s : 850.______17724 43 CFR 863...... 17797 120______17962 864.__.______17800 141______18045 P u blic L and O rders: 906 ______18002 320______18042 843 (revoked in part by PLO 907 ______17949 4723)______17773 910______17724 24 CFR 4582 (revoked in part by PLO 4723) 912______17725 5______17951 ______17773 984______17803 203_____ 17951 4722 ______17773 989.______18003 207_____ 17951 4723 _____ 17773 991______18003 17952 4724 ______17773 1427______213-____ 4725 ______17773 17725 221_____ 17952 1468______17803 232_____ 17952 4726 ______17774 1472______17768 234_____ 17952 4727 ______17774 Proposed R u les: 236_____ 17952 45 CFR 81______17731 242_____ 17952 301______18042 1000____ 17952 801______17954 777-______17730 1665____ 18030 909______17776 46 CFR 912______18043 29 CFR 272______18035 966____ 17955 683______18031 310______„_____ 17729 993______18043 P roposed R u l e s : 1011_____ 1500______— ___ 17804 17776 146______18046 1133...... 17960 P roposed R u l e s : 613______18044 9 CFR 616______18044 47 CFR 78... 688______18044 73 ______17873,17874,18036 112__ 690______18044 74 ______18041 113... 727______17732 83______17878 114__ 85______£______17878 31 CFR 203______17879 12 CFR 225______*______17953 P roposed R u l e s : Proposed R ules: 2______17916 217. 73 ______17916 32 CFR 74 ______18041 1 ______17880 81______17916 14 CFR 2 ______17888 39. _ 83______17916,17917 3 ______17889 85______17916 71.. 1 7 7 9 R 1 7Q4.Q 1 ROOS 4 ______17890 73...... 5 ______17890 49 CFR 6 ______17894 249.. 7 ______17895 1002______18041 8 ______17896 1033______17729, 17805 Proposed R ules: 1056______18041 3 9 - 9 ______17897 12______17899 P roposed R u l e s : *1---- 17750 17755 170A4 15______17904 195______17916 75__ 18______17912 1056______18046 19—______17912 15 CFR 24_____ 17912 50 CFR 10oo...... 17806 30 _— ______17912 32 ______17915,18041 1,50------239______18031 33 ______17952

government

Presents essential information about Government agencies (updated and republished annually). Describes the creation and authority, organization, and functions of the agencies in the legislative, judicial, and executive branches. This handbook is an indispensable reference tool for teachers, students, librarians, researchers, businessmen, and lawyers who need current official information about the U.S. Government. The United States Government Organization Manual is the official guide to the functions of the Federal Government, published by the Office of the Federal Register, GSA. 00 $3 per copy. Paperbound, with charts Order from Superintendent of Documents« U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402.