DOCSLIB.ORG

Norske Skog I Annual Report I 2016 the MYTH: Electronic Communication Is More Environmentally Friendly Than Paperbased Communication

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

20 16 Norske Skog I Annual report I 2016 THE MYTH: Electronic communication is more environmentally friendly than paperbased communication THE FACT: Electronic communication also has environmental impacts The environmental impacts of our ever-increasing digital world “If compared with the electricity Each year, the electronic industry - cannot be ignored. The ICT industry demand of countries in the same one of the world’s largest and fastest accounts for approximately 2% year, the cloud would rank 6th in growing - generates up to 41 million of global emissions, on par with the world, with demand expected to tonnes of e-waste from goods such emissions from the global aviation increase 63% by 2020.” as computers and smart phones. sector. (GeSI SMARTer2020: (Greenpeace, 2014). (United Nations Environment The Role of ICT in Driving a Sustainable Programme (UNEP), 2015). Future, 2015 report). Design: pan2nedesign.no // Print: 07 Aurskog Paper: Norcote Trend 90 g/m2 - Norske Skog Photo and editor: Carsten Dybevig (Erik Sandersen page 13, Jens Borge page 33) All images are Norske Skog’s property and should not be used for other purposes without the consent of the communication department of Norske Skog Contents CORPORATE INFORMATION 4 Key figures 4 Norske Skog - The big picture 6 The history of Norske Skog 8 Norske Skog 2016 9 CEO’s comments 10 Short stories 12 Board of Directors 16 Corporate Management 17 Key figures related to shares 18 Shares and Share Capital 20 Corporate governance 22 Articles of Association for Norske Skogindustrier ASA 27 CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY 29 Key figures - employees 2016 34 Norske Skog and local communities 35 Paper production 36 Production capacity 36 Evaluation of our environmental performance 37 Sustainable raw materials 38 Energy consumption 40 Norske Skog’s greenhouse gas emissions 41 Our carbon footprint 42 Continuously improving our production processes 43 Water footprint 44 Emissions to air and discharge to water 46 Mill figures 48 Independent auditor’s report 50 Environment and corporate social responsibility reporting 50 REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS 51 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 59 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NORSKE SKOGINDUSTRIER ASA 115 Independent auditor’s report 134 Declaration from the board of directors and CEO 140 Alternative performance measures 141 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 3 NORSKE SKOG CORPORATE INFORMATION Key figures NOK MILLION 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 INCOME STATEMENT Operating revenue 11 849 11 538 12 150 13 339 16 592 18 904 18 986 20 362 Gross operating earnings 1 049 753 801 862 1 485 1 515 1 413 2 185 Operating earnings -1 065 -164 65 -1 111 -2 663 -2 701 -2 379 -1 325 Profit/loss 306 -1 526 -1 504 -1 844 -2 781 -2 545 -2 469 -1 400 Earnings per share (NOK) 1.17 -8.03 -7.92 -9.71 -14.63 -13.36 -12.97 -6.36 CASH FLOW Net cash flow from operating activities 230 -777 200 68 982 455 397 1 697 Net cash flow from investing activities -107 -206 48 -169 300 470 415 -587 Cash flow per share (NOK) 0.82 -4.09 1.06 0.36 5.18 2.40 2.09 8.95 OPERATING MARGIN AND PROFITABILITY (%) Gross operating margin 8.9 6.5 6.6 6.5 9.0 8.0 7.4 10.7 Return on capital employed 9.3 6.2 5.6 3.3 7.9 6.4 5.4 6.8 PRODUCTION / DELIVERIES / CAPACITY UTILISATION Production (1 000 tonnes) 2 506 2 444 2 612 3 039 3 555 3 832 3 998 3 895 Deliveries (1 000 tonnes) 2 520 2 432 2 616 3 050 3 588 3 857 4 013 3 894 Production / capacity (%) 93 85 88 88 88 87 89 79 31.12.2016 31.12.2015 31.12.2014 31.12.2013 31.12.2012 31.12.2011 31.12.2010 31.12.2009 BALANCE SHEET Non-current assets 7 162 9 473 10 686 10 611 11 393 15 803 19 271 23 546 Current assets 3 082 3 187 3 291 4 005 4 650 6 171 10 027 9 609 Total assets 10 244 12 660 13 977 14 617 16 043 21 974 29 297 33 155 Equity 184 -229 1 285 2 175 4 151 7 433 10 183 12 015 Net interest-bearing debt 6 302 8 523 7 387 6 817 6 021 7 863 8 889 9 595 Gearing 34.27 -37.15 5.75 3.13 1.45 1.06 0.87 0.80 For definitions of key figures, see Alternative performance measures on page 141. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 4 NORSKE SKOG CORPORATE INFORMATION OPERATING REVENUE GROSS OPERATING EARNINGS MNOK MNOK 20 000 2 000 15 000 18 904 1 500 5 5 16 592 1 51 1 48 13 339 10 000 8 1 000 53 12 150 11 849 11 1 049 3 862 801 5 000 500 75 0 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 NET INTEREST-BEARING DEBT MNOK 10 000 8 000 3 3 8 52 7 7 86 7 6 000 7 38 2 1 6 81 6 30 6 02 4 000 2 000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 ANNUAL REPORT 2016 4 NORSKE SKOG ANNUAL REPORT 2016 5 NORSKE SKOG CORPORATE INFORMATION CEO Sales in Sven Ombudstvedt 85 CFO COO SVP Rune Sollie Roar Ødelien Lars P. Sperre countries Corporate management Capacity utilisation 93% countries Skogn, Norway Saugbrugs, Norway Golbey, France 6 Bruck, Austria Albury, Australia Boyer, Australia Tasman, New Zealand MNI, Malaysia ANNUAL REPORT 2016 6 NORSKE SKOG CORPORATE INFORMATION PAPER 2 685 000 MILLS production capacity 8 2 520 000 Employees tonnes sold 2 462 2 506 000 11% female employees tonnes produced ANNUAL REPORT 2016 6 NORSKE SKOG ANNUAL REPORT 2016 7 NORSKE SKOG CORPORATE INFORMATION The history of Norske Skog Norske Skog was established in 1962, but several of our mills have been in operation much longer. Until the 1990s, the company grew in Norway, acquiring businesses in paper production, paper pulp and wood-based construction materials. Through the nineties, Norske Skog expanded internationally, first with the construction of a mill in France and later through acquisitions of other newsprint and magazine paper companies all over the world. The activities within other paper grades, market pulp and construction materials were sold off. In the last few years, the company has entered into several projects related to newsprint machine conversions, bio energy and bio composites. In recent years, Norske Skog has seen weaker results due to surplus capacity and lower prices for finished products, while prices for input factors have increased. As a result, it has been necessary to adapt capacity through shut-downs, comprehensive cost reductions and sale of assets to reduce debt. Today, Norske Skog has 8 wholly and partly-owned mills in 6 countries and is one of the world’s largest producers of publication paper to newspapers, magazines and publications for advertising purposes. Norske Skog is listed on the Oslo Stock Exchange and had about 2 500 employees at year-end 2016. Norske Skog was established by Norwegian forest owners. The purpose was to exploit timber 1962 resources in central Norway, and a newsprint mill was built in Skogn, starting production in 1966. Expansion in Norway, within other paper industry, paper pulp and wood-based construction materials. 1970-1990 Norske Skog merged with two other publication paper companies. 1992 Start-up of production in Golbey in France, our first business outside of Norway. 1996-1997 Purchase of paper mills in Austria and the Czech Republic. 1999 Global expansion: establishment of the joint venture PanAsia Paper. Sale of mass mills in Norway. Purchase of Fletcher paper in New Zealand, a firm that had business in 2000 Australasia, South America, Canada and Asia. Purchase of mills in Germany and the Netherlands. Comprehensive restructuring of the business, 2001 and divestment of activities outside the defined core area of newsprint and magazine paper. 2006 Five newsprint machines shut down, shares in the Canadian business sold. 2008 Sale of two mills in South Korea, sale of property, shut-down of two paper machines in Europe. 2009 Sale of two mills in China, shut-down of one paper machine in Europe. 2012 Sale of two mills in Chile and Netherlands, shut-down of Follum paper mill in Norway. 2013 Sale of two mills in Brazil and Thailand. Two machines idled at Tasman and Walsum. 2014 Ramp-up of a converted newsprint machine to LWC-products at Boyer in Australia. 2015 Discontinued operations at the Walsum mill in Duisburg, Germany. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 8 NORSKE SKOG CORPORATE INFORMATION Q1 Q3 First quarter Third quarter The financial results for 2015 was reported. Norske Skog’s Gross operating earnings for the second quarter was gross operating earnings in the fourth quarter of 2015 were NOK 335 million, which is the best gross operating earnings NOK 260 million, up from NOK 163 million in the third quarter. since the third quarter of 2012 and was mainly due to lower The gross operating earnings improved from the third quarter energy costs. Net earnings in the second quarter was due to higher sales volume and lower costs. NOK 229 million. A gain after the exchange offer exceeding one billion NOK in April was offset by material impairments of Norske Skog’s extraordinary general meeting was held on the asset portfolio of NOK 1.4 billion at the end of the quarter. 6 January 2016. The extraordinary general meeting elected Ms Joanne Owen and Mr Nils Ingemund Hoff as new shareholder- Norske Skog launched plans to build a biogas facility at elected members of Norske Skog’s board of directors.
Recommended publications
  • Project Capabilities

    Project Capabilities

    PROJECT CAPABILITIES BOILER CONVERSION TO BIOMASS BURNING Scope of Service Boiler owner/operators in recent years have been motivated to convert existing fossil fuel-fired boilers to burn some, or exclusively biomass fuels. Biomass fuels often provide lower fuel costs and lower flue gas emissions as well as being considered a “green” renewable resource. Whether the boiler currently burns exclusively fossil fuels or burns a combination of fossil and biomass fuels, JANSEN has the experience and capabilities to provide the necessary services to enhance biomass firing in most all boiler configurations. A recommended phased approach to fuel conversion projects is listed below: Initial assessment of feasibility and required modifications to generate early budgetary costs. Engineering evaluation of existing boiler to determine the unit’s capabilities when operating with the new fuel (pressure parts, auxiliary and air pollution control equipment). Definition engineering to develop +/- 10% accuracy cost estimate. Engineering design, fabrication, and materials supply. Installation. Operator training and start-up assistance. JANSEN has the capability and experience to carry out any or all of these steps. Selected References (see next page) C-01 1/15 Selected References AES Corporation - Lufkin, TX EPCOR Canada - Squamish, BC Escanaba Green Energy - Escanaba, MI Great River Energy - Elk River, MN Hu Honua Bioenergy LLC - Hilo, HI Minnesota Power - Duluth, MN New Ulm Public Utility - New Ulm, MN Packaging Corporation of America - Valdosta, GA ReEnergy Holdings - Fort Drum, NY Sonoco Products Co. - Hartsville, SC Springs Global US, Inc. - Lancaster, SC Turbine Diagnostics Services, Inc. - Forest City, NC Weyerhaeuser Paper Company - New Bern, NC C-01 1/15 PROJECT CAPABILITIES BIOMASS BOILER EVALUATIONS Capacity, Operational Performance, Fuel Economy, and Emissions Fuel economy, maximum availability, steam generating capacity, optimized emissions performance, and operating flexibility at the lowest cost are the key goals of biomass-fueled power boiler operation.
  • Catalyst Paper Generates Outstanding Savings and Improves Product Quality with Honeywell’S Advanced Control Solution

    Catalyst Paper Generates Outstanding Savings and Improves Product Quality with Honeywell’S Advanced Control Solution

    Catalyst Paper Generates Outstanding Savings and Improves Product Quality with Honeywell’s Advanced Control Solution “Investing in a state-of-the-art advanced control solution from Honeywell has permitted Catalyst Paper to gain increased control over our operating systems while saving millions of dollars each year in raw materials and energy. And we have been able to accomplish all this without sacrificing the high quality of the various products we produce.” Dwight Anderson, Senior Process Control System Specialist, Catalyst Paper Benefits Catalyst Paper sought to find ways for its thermo-mechanical pulp (TMP) process to reduce dependence on kraft consumption and improve process efficiency at its Canadian Elk Falls facility. In order to maintain the company’s high quality expectations, Catalyst wanted to find new, leading-edge ways to reduce kraft consumption, because of its expense, without sacrificing any of the mill’s end-product standards. To achieve cost savings without sacrificing product quality, The Elk Falls Division is located on the Pacific coast of British Columbia, Catalyst Paper called upon Honeywell to partner with them in Canada, near the city of Campbell River on Vancouver Island developing an advanced control solution to improve their pulp quality. Background Some of the benefits realized by Catalyst Paper after the Catalyst Paper Corp., as it has been known since 2005, was implementation of Profit Controller include: formed from the amalgamation of several predecessor companies and acquisitions—including British Columbia Forest • Improved pulp quality by decreasing pulp freeness variability Products, Fletcher Challenge Canada, Norske Skog and by 41% and pulp mean fiber length variability by 21%, Newstech Recycling—each with its own rich history.
  • Annual Report 2012 Annual Report

    Annual Report 2012 Annual Report

    ANNUAL REPORT 2012 Borregaard ASA Postboks 162 1701 Sarpsborg, Norway Telephone (+47) 69 11 80 00 Fax (+47) 69 11 87 70 ANNUAL REPORT 2012 email: [email protected] www.borregaard.com ANNUAL REPORT 2012 The Borregaard Group 4 Message from the CEO 7 The Board of Directors 8 Report of the Board of Directors 10 The Group Executive Board 16 Corporate Governance 18 Annual Financial Statements 2012 26 Historical Key Figures 76 Group Directory 78 4 THE BORREGAARD GROUP THE BORREGAARD GROUP THE BORREGAARD GROUP 5 Chair Jan A. Oksum, member of the board Terje Andersen, President & CEO Bente A. Landsnes, President & CEO Per A. Sørlie, CFO Per Bjarne Lyngstad, member of the board Kimberly Lein-Mathisen, SVP HR & Com- munication Dag Arthur Aasbø and Director of IR Jørn Syvertsen at the listing ceremony 18 October 2012. The Borregaard Group Borregaard operates one of the world’s most advanced biorefineries. By using natural, sustain- able raw materials, the Group produces advanced and environmentally friendly biochemicals, biomaterials and bioethanol that replace oil-based products. Borregaard also holds strong posi- tions in ingredients and fine chemicals. Borregaard is a supplier of specialised biochemicals for a customer base. At the end of 2012, the Group employed 1,025 global customer base. The Group’s main products are lignin- man-years. based products and specialty cellulose, but its product port- folio also extends to vanillin, bioethanol and fine chemicals. Borregaard is a competence-driven company with production, Borregaard’s niche products serve applications in a wide range research and development, and sales and marketing as core of global end-markets including construction, agriculture, food competencies.
  • Q2 2021 Presentation 16 July 2021

    Q2 2021 Presentation 16 July 2021

    Q2 2021 presentation 16 July 2021 Follow us on LinkedIn www.norskeskog.com Sustainable and innovative industry ENTERING Biochemicals 1,000 tonnes of 500 tonnes of 300 tonnes of ▪ Leading publication paper producer with five & materials biochemicals capacity1 CEBINA capacity CEBICO capacity (pilot) industrial sites globally Q1 2023 Q4 2021 ▪ Ongoing transition into higher growth and ENTERING higher value markets Renewable Interliner 760k tonnes of ~200k tonnes of ▪ Becoming a leading independent European packaging containerboard capacity Interliner capacity recycled containerboard company in 2023 Q4 2022 ▪ Packaging market growth and margin EXPANDING outlook strengthened since announcement Waste-to- Green bio- Sustainable energy plant mass energy ▪ High return waste-to-energy project +400 GWh of waste- ~425 GWh of wood ~28 GWh of biogas ~1,000 GWh of biomass energy based energy capacity pellets capacity energy capacity energy capacity2 improving green energy mix in Q2 2022 Q2 2022 ▪ Promising biochemicals and materials projects spearheaded by Circa PRESENT ▪ Industrial sites portfolio provide foundation for Publication 1,400k tonnes of 400k tonnes of 360k tonnes of further industrial development paper Newsprint capacity LWC capacity SC capacity Under construction Date Estimated start-up date 2 1) Norske Skog is the largest shareholder with ~26% ownership position in Circa; 2) Installed capacity for biofuel and waste from recycled paper of 230 MW Second quarter in brief Final investment decision made for Golbey conversion to containerboard
  • Results Driving

    Results Driving

    2014 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT Catalyst Paper Corporation 2nd Floor, 3600 Lysander Lane Richmond, B.C. V7B 1C3 604.247.4400 catalystpaper.com RESULTS DRIVING PRODUCTION NOTES PAPER FACTS The inside pages of this report are printed on Ascent Gloss Sage, Catalyst’s inside pages of report (101 g) coated three grade, produced at the Port Alberni mill. Its brightness, INPUTS superior opacity and excellent printability make it ideal for magazine, catalogue, high-end insert, commercial and direct-mail print applications Raw Fibre (g) 95 printed on heatset offset presses. % certified sources 100 Catalyst’s coated products are available under our Sage program, meaning Filler (g) 38 they are PEFC certified (Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification) as containing 100 per cent fibre from sustainably managed Water (L) 7.7 forests; that there were no net carbon emissions during their manufacture; Work (person secs) 1.0 and that detailed mill-level environmental performance data are available Energy (Cal) 536 via GreenBlue’s Environmental Paper Assessment Tool (EPAT). We also contribute $1 for every tonne of Sage product sold to support our % renewable 92 partner initiatives. EMISSIONS The Paper Facts label identifies the inputs and emissions associated with this Greenhouse gas (g) 9* specific grade of paper calculated on a per-report basis. Catalyst customers can use the online Paper Calculator at www.catalystpaper.com/calculator to Air Particulate (mg) 5 identify inputs and emissions associated with their own purchases and to Effluent BOD
  • Arbeidsgruppen for Treforedlingsindustrien Kartlegging Av Muligheter Og Rammevilkår for Treforedlingsindustrien

    Arbeidsgruppen for Treforedlingsindustrien Kartlegging Av Muligheter Og Rammevilkår for Treforedlingsindustrien

    Arbeidsgruppen for treforedlingsindustrien Kartlegging av muligheter og rammevilkår for treforedlingsindustrien 10.5.2012 1 Innhold 1. Innledning .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Bakgrunn for arbeidsgruppen .................................................................................. 3 1.2. Arbeidsgruppens mandat, sammensetning og arbeid ............................................ 4 2. Hovedtrekk i utviklingen i treforedlingsindustrien ....................................................... 5 2.1. Nærmere om treforedlingsindustrien ...................................................................... 6 2.2. Muligheter ved omstilling til ny produksjon og investeringer i nye produkter 11 3. Råvaresituasjonen og norsk skogpolitikk ..................................................................... 12 3.1. Tilgang, avsetningsvilkår og markedssituasjonen for tømmer og trevirke ....... 13 3.2. Innsatsfaktoren tømmer og effektive transporter er viktig for treforedlingsindustriens kostnadsmessige konkurransekraft ............................ 15 3.3. Regjeringens virkemidler som skal bidra til stabil og konkurransedyktig forsyning av trevirke ................................................................................................ 17 4. Rammevilkår innenfor områdene energi og miljø ....................................................... 18 4.1. Rammevilkår på energiområdet ............................................................................
  • Business Model, Businesses & Strategy

    Business Model, Businesses & Strategy

    Business model, businesses & strategy July 2021 Important notice This presentation is being made only to, and is only directed at, persons to whom such presentation may lawfully be communicated (’relevant persons’). Any person who is not a relevant person should not act or rely on this presentation or any of its contents. This presentation does not constitute an offering of securities or otherwise constitute an invitation or inducement to any person to underwrite, subscribe for or otherwise acquire securities in any company within the Borregaard Group. The release, publication or distribution of this presentation in certain jurisdictions may be restricted by law, and therefore persons in such jurisdictions into which this presentation is released, published or distributed should inform themselves about, and observe, such restrictions. This presentation includes and is based, inter alia, on forward-looking information and contains statements regarding the future in connection with the Borregaard Group’s growth initiatives, profit figures, outlook, strategies and objectives. All forward-looking information and statements in this presentation are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about global economic conditions, the economic conditions of the regions and industries that are major markets for the Borregaard Group and its lines of business. These expectations, estimates and projections are generally identifiable by statements containing words such as “expects”, “believes”, “estimates” or similar expressions. Important factors may lead to actual profits, results and developments deviating substantially from what has been expressed or implied in such statements. Although Borregaard believes that its expectations and the presentation are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that those expectations will be achieved or that the actual results will be as set out in the presentation.
  • 4.3 Optical Properties

    4.3 Optical Properties

    Summary Mechanical pulping is a process for production of wood pulp in papermaking. Thermomechanical Pulp (TMP) and Groundwood (GW) are historically the two production methods used for mechanical pulping. Because of high electrical prices and increasing requirements in pulp quality it is of interest to improve the mechanical pulping process. The Advanced Thermomechanical Pulp (ATMP) process is a development of the TMP process developed to reduce the electrical energy consumption in production of mechanical pulp. ATMP also has better strength properties and optical properties compared to TMP. Andritz, Paper and Fibre Research Institute (PFI) and Norske Skog together have developed this production method throughout several pilot plant trials with excellent results. Mechanical pre-treatment of wood chips with a screw press and chemical addition in a high intensity primary refining stage are the features of the ATMP process. This process has recently been described (Hill et al. 2009, Hill et al. 2010, Gorski et al. 2011 and Johansson et al. 2011). Improvements in the electrical energy efficiency in refining of up to 0,65 MWh/odt or 34 % as well as higher brightness and lower shive contents compared to reference TMP pulp were shown for spruce raw material (Gorski et al. 2011) To further understand what happens with the pulp in ATMP process compared to the TMP process different investigations were carried out. Methylene blue sorption were evaluated and used to measure the total amount of anionic groups on both ATMP and TMP produced pulps. ATMP produced pulps achieved a higher number of acidic groups compared to pulps without addition of chemicals for not only the whole pulp but also for three different fractions of each pulp.
  • ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1 Main Figures Per Area

    ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1 Main Figures Per Area

    NORSKE SKOG ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1 Main figures per Area 1997 1996 1995 1994 1993 1992 1991 1990 1989 Area Paper Operating revenue NOK million 9,284 9,493 8,066 5,831 4,731 4,773 5,855 6,733 5,768 Operating profit NOK million 1,134 2,078 1,708 454 469 95 656 721 398 Operating margin % 12.2 21.9 21.2 7.8 9.9 2.0 11.2 10.7 6.9 Area Fibre Operating revenue NOK million 1,376 1,222 2,171 1,498 1,052 1,202 1,247 1,709 2,025 Operating profit NOK million 49 -127 682 178 -187 -176 -164 327 615 Operating margin % 3.6 -10.4 31.4 11.9 -17.8 -14.6 -13.2 19.1 30.4 Area Building Materials Operating revenue NOK million 2,667 2,579 2,333 2,048 1,704 1,688 1,725 1,960 1,911 Operating profit NOK million -16 27 96 146 85 64 9 107 93 Operating margin % -0.6 1.0 4.1 7.1 5.0 3.8 0.5 5.5 4.9 Operating revenue per market Operating revenue per product Rest of Other world 8% 2% Pulp 8% Norway 23% Newsprint Special grades 1% USA 10% 40% SC magazine paper 20% Other Europe 25% Germany 15% LWC magazine paper 9% UK 11% France 8% Building materials 20% 2 NORSKE SKOG ANNUAL REPORT 1997 1997 Highlights Price decline caused weaker result Growth in sawn timber Expansion in Eastern Europe Prices of paper and pulp fell during the In September, Norske Skog took over In November, Norske Skog took over first quarter of 1997.
  • Catalyst Paper Corporation

    Catalyst Paper Corporation

    CATALYST PAPER CORPORATION ANNUAL INFORMATION FORM March 3, 2011 TABLE OF CONTENTS Documents Incorporated By Reference ............................................................................................... 1 Glossary Of Terms ............................................................................................................................... 1 Forward Looking Statements ............................................................................................................... 1 Incorporation ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Corporate Profile .................................................................................................................................. 4 Three Year History ............................................................................................................................... 5 Competitive Strengths ........................................................................................................................ 10 Business Strategy ............................................................................................................................... 12 Lines Of Business ............................................................................................................................... 12 Competition ........................................................................................................................................ 17 Fibre
  • From Waste to Value

    From Waste to Value

    4 New path development for forest- based value creation in Norway Antje Klitkou, Marco Capasso, Teis Hansen and Julia Szulecka 4.1 Introduction This chapter focuses on path development in the forest-based industries of Norway, based on the valorisation of side- streams and residues. Forest- based value creation is one of the main avenues for the emerging bioeconomy in Norway and the neighbouring Nordic countries Sweden and Finland. Historically, the forestry sector has been an important part of the Norwegian economy, both in terms of GDP and employment. The sector contributed 10.4% of Norwegian GDP in 1845 (Grytten, 2004, p. 254). After the discovery of oil and natural gas on the Norwegian shelf, the importance of the forestry sector has diminished. And over the last decade this negative trend has multiplied. For decades, the forestry- based industry in Norway has specialised in pulp and paper production, especially newsprint paper. Therefore, huge volumes of forest resources, including residues and side- streams, have been poured into this industry. However, due to changing global market conditions – the massive deployment of the Internet reducing demand for newspapers – and the rise of competitors in other parts of the world, European pulp and paper production has declined significantly in the last decade (Karltorp & Sandén, 2012). This development has had a tremendous impact on the market possib- ilities of forestry residues, since they can now be processed for pulp and paper to a much lesser degree. Nevertheless, other valorisation pathways exist besides pulp and paper production, such as the wooden construction industry, wooden furniture manufacturing, bioenergy – including solid bioenergy and liquid biofuels – and the production of lignocellulosic chemicals and mater- ials.
  • SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2020 We Create Green Value Contents

    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2020 We Create Green Value Contents

    SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2020 We create green value Contents SUMMARY Key figures 6 Norske Skog - The big picture 7 CEO’s comments 8 Short stories 10 SUSTAINABILITY REPORT About Norske Skog’s operations 14 Stakeholder and materiality analysis 15 The sustainable development goals are an integral part of our strategy 16 Compliance 17 About the sustainability report 17 Sustainability Development Goals overview 20 Prioritised SDGs 22 Our response to the TCFD recommendations 34 How Norske Skog relates to the other SDGs 37 Key figures 50 GRI standards index 52 Independent Auditor’s assurance report 54 Design: BK.no / Print: BK.no Paper: Artic Volum white Editor: Carsten Dybevig Cover photo: Carsten Dybevig. All images are Norske Skog’s property and should not be used for other purposes without the consent of the communication department of Norske Skog Photo: Carsten Dybevig SUMMARY BACK TO CONTENTS > BACK TO CONTENTS > SUMMARY Key figures NOK MILLION (UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED) 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 mills in 5 countries INCOME STATEMENT 7 Total operating income 11 132 11 852 11 527 12 642 12 954 9 612 Skogn, Norway / Saugbrugs, Norway / Golbey, France / EBITDA* 818 1 081 701 1 032 1 938 736 Bruck, Austria / Boyer, Australia / Tasman, New Zealand / Operating earnings 19 -947 -1 702 926 2 398 -1 339 Nature’s Flame, New Zealand Profit/loss for the period -1 318 -972 -3 551 1 525 2 044 -1 884 Earnings per share (NOK)** -15.98 -11.78 -43.04 18.48 24.77 -22.84 CASH FLOW Net cash flow from operating activities 146 514 404 881 602 549 Net cash flow