Spotlight on Global Jihad (August 2-8, 2018)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Spotlight on Global Jihad (August 2-8, 2018) רמה כ ז מל ו תשר מה ו ד י ע י ן ה ש ל מ ( ( למ מ"ל Spotlight on Global Jihad August 2 -8, 2018 Main events of the week On August 2, 2018, the Syrian army and its allies completed the campaign to take over southern Syria. The campaign lasted for nearly three weeks, during which the Syrian army took over the areas of Daraa and the Syrian Golan Heights. In most cases, the rebel organizations preferred not to fight, and most of their control areas fell into the hands of the Syrian regime through local surrender arrangements in which the Russians played a central role. ISIS tried to stop the army’s advance, but the balance of power, which was clearly against it, rendered the fighting ineffective and the Yarmouk Basin was taken over relatively easily. In order to ease the pressure on the Yarmouk Basin, the ISIS enclave northeast of As- Suwayda initiated a deadly showcase attack against the Druze population in the city of As- Suwayda and its rural area (July 25, 2018). In addition, an attack was carried out against the Khalkhalah military airfield (about 40 km north of As-Suwayda). These attacks demonstrated the increase in the power and self-confidence of ISIS operatives and their becoming a threat, which is liable to cast a shadow over the achievements of the Syrian regime in southern Syria. This is apparently the background for Syria’s decision to take over the ISIS enclave northeast of As-Suwayda, even at the expense of a certain delay in the campaign to take over the Idlib area (for which preparations continue). In early August, reinforcements (consisting of several divisions) were transferred to the area east of As-Suwayda. On August 5, 2018, after a brief period of organizing its forces, the Syrian army, with air support, launched a ground operation aimed at taking over the ISIS enclave. The Syrian forces are now operating within ISIS’s control area and the battles continue. This week, suicide bombing attacks continued in ISIS’s Khorasan Province in Afghanistan. In the city of Jalalabad, an attack was carried out against the Afghan government institutions (15 fatalities); in the city of Gardez (south of Kabul), an attack was 199-18 2 carried out against worshippers at a Shiite mosque (around 40 fatalities). On the other hand, the Afghan army recorded an achievement when over 150 ISIS operatives surrendered in the Jawzjan Province in northern Afghanistan. The background for the mass surrender was a month-long period of fighting in the area between the Taliban and ISIS, in which the Taliban recorded achievements (more than 150 ISIS operatives were reportedly killed by the Taliban and more than 130 were taken prisoner). Many ISIS operatives apparently preferred to surrender to the forces of the Afghan government and not to the Taliban. Russian involvement in Syria Statement by a senior Russian diplomat about the presence of Iranian forces in Syria On July 30-31, 2018, the tenth round of talks in the Syrian peace process (the Astana Process) was held in Sochi, Russia. The round of talks was attended by Russia, Iran and Turkey, the guarantor countries for the peace process. The Russian delegation was headed by the Russian President’s Special Envoy to Syria Alexander Lavrentiev, who was interviewed by the Russian media at the end of the meetings. In the interview, Lavrentiev addressed the presence of Iranian forces in Syria, among other things. Lavrentiev said that the Iranian forces had retreated from the Syrian-Israeli border and that there were no Shiite militias in the area. He stressed, however, that there was a possibility that there were a number of Iranian advisors in the ranks of the Syrian army (located in southern Syria). In addition, Lavrentiev said that there was no [Iranian] heavy equipment and weapons, which could pose a threat to Israel, within 85 km of the Syrian-Israeli border. He noted that these statements were based on an agreement between the Russian and Iranian representatives, following the end of the operation against “terrorist operatives” in the area, and that there was no longer a need for the Iranian military presence in southern Syria. According to him, during the talks in Sochi, it was claimed that efforts should be made to fight against ISIS in other areas of Syria, such as the areas of Deir ez-Zor and Albukamal (TASS News Agency, August 1, 2018). 199-18 3 Right: The 85-kilometer range from the Israeli border, where Lavrentiev says there are no [Iranian] heavy equipment and weapons that could pose a threat to Israel (Syrian NORS Institute for Strategic Studies, August 2, 2018). Left: Russian President’s Special Envoy to Syria Alexander Lavrentiev, during the round of talks (Russian Foreign Ministry’s Twitter account, August 1, 2018) Syria End of the campaign in the Syrian Golan Heights Takeover of southern Syria by the Syrian army: Areas taken over by the Syrian army through local surrender agreements are marked in blue; Areas where (mostly low intensity) fighting took place are marked in purple; Areas which were under Syrian control even before the beginning of the campaign are marked in red (Khotwa, July 31, 2018) 199-18 4 Resumption of the UN forces’ activity on the Syrian-Israeli border under Russian sponsorship Sergei Rudskoy, Chief of the Main Operational Directorate of the Russian General Staff, said at a press conference that conditions were ripe for the resumption of the activity of the UN observation forces, which are deployed in the buffer zone between Israel and Syria, in accordance with the UN resolution from 1974. Rudskoy announced that on August 2, 2018, the UN forces, accompanied by the Russian Military Police, had visited the buffer zone for the first time in for six years.1 He added that in order to prevent “provocations” against UN positions, eight positions of the Russian Military Police would be set up along the Bravo Line (the Syrian border of the buffer zone). According to Rudskoy, when the situation in the area stabilizes, those positions will be handed over to the Syrian army (website of the Russian Defense Ministry, August 2, 2018). Right: Bullet-proof vehicle of the Russian Military Police leading a convoy of UN vehicles near the Syrian-Israeli border. Left: UN vehicles near the Syrian-Israeli border (Al-Quneitra Al-Youm, August 2, 2018) Sergei Kuralenko, deputy commander of the Russian forces in Syria, reported that units of the Russian Military Police assisted the UN forces in reopening the Quneitra crossing, which has been closed for the past six years (TASS, August 3, 2018). He noted that on August 3, 2018, the UN forces, assisted by the Russian Military Police, managed to move from Syria into Israeli territory for the first time since the beginning of the civil war in Syria (website of Zvezda Channel, owned by the Russian Defense Ministry, August 3, 2018). 1 The activity of the UNDOF forces in the buffer zone was stopped in 2012 for fear for their safety due to the Syrian Civil War. 199-18 5 Right: Syrian army soldiers opening the Quneitra crossing, with the Syrian flag waved above. Left: Members of the Russian Military Police, the UN and Syrian army soldiers near the Quneitra crossing (Al-Quneitra Al-Youm, August 2, 2018) Sergei Kuralenko also said that coordination was taking place with the UN with the aim of manning once again UNDOF positions in the Quneitra Province. According to Kuralenko, all UNDOF forces are due to return to their positions in late August 2018. He added that within a few days, a “settlement center” would be established in the Quneitra Province. At the center, Russian officers will try to solve problems of the residents in the “liberated villages” with the relevant elements (Al-Watan, July 30, 2018). Completion of the takeover of the Yarmouk Basin from ISIS On August 2, 2018, the Syrian regime announced that the Syrian army had completed the deployment of its forces in the area of the Yarmouk Basin (SANA, August 2, 2018). A day earlier, on August 1, 2018, the Syrian army took over the village of Qusayr, ISIS’s last remaining stronghold in the southern Syrian Golan Heights (Al-Manar, July 31, 2018). According to reports, only a few dozen ISIS operatives remained out of 1,000-1,500 who had previously held the Yarmouk Basin area. The remaining operatives are probably hiding near the Yarmouk Basin, in Syrian and Jordanian territory (Reuters, August 2, 2018). The army forces are searching the tri-border region to locate ISIS squads remaining in the area (Enab Baladi, August 5, 2018). 199-18 6 Right: Syrian army soldiers making the victory sign with the Yarmouk Basin in the background. Left: Syrian army soldiers looking at the Al-Wahda Dam in the Yarmouk Basin (SANA, August 2, 2018) The IDF kills an ISIS squad On the evening of August 1, 2018, an IDF aircraft attacked a squad of seven ISIS operatives in the southern Syrian Golan Heights. The operatives were seen walking at a distance of 200 meters from the border fence. The Israeli army soldiers found in their possession five Kalashnikov assault files and vests, with IEDs and hand grenades. In the ITIC's assessment, it was an ISIS squad whose operatives fled from the Syrian army rather than heading to carry out a terrorist attack in Israel. IMAGE Right: IDF forces searching the area where seven bodies of ISIS operatives were found in the southern Syrian Golan Heights. Left: Kalashnikov assault rifles, vest and equipment of ISIS operatives who were killed in the IDF attack (IDF Spokesperson’s Office, August 2, 2018) ISIS operatives killed by the Jordanian army On July 31 and August 1, 2018, the Jordanian army killed several ISIS operatives who had fled from the Syrian army and were getting close to the border between Syria and Jordan.
Recommended publications
  • REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA Received Little Or No Humanitarian Assistance in More Than 10 Months
    currently estimated to be living in hard to reach or besieged areas, having REGIONAL ANALYSIS SYRIA received little or no humanitarian assistance in more than 10 months. 07 February 2014 Humanitarian conditions in Yarmouk camp continued to worsen with 70 reported deaths in the last 4 months due to the shortage of food and medical supplies. Local negotiations succeeded in facilitating limited amounts of humanitarian Part I – Syria assistance to besieged areas, including Yarmouk, Modamiyet Elsham and Content Part I Barzeh neighbourhoods in Damascus although the aid provided was deeply This Regional Analysis of the Syria conflict (RAS) is an update of the December RAS and seeks to Overview inadequate. How to use the RAS? bring together information from all sources in the The spread of polio remains a major concern. Since first confirmed in October region and provide holistic analysis of the overall Possible developments Syria crisis. In addition, this report highlights the Map - Latest developments 2013, a total of 93 polio cases have been reported; the most recent case in Al key humanitarian developments in 2013. While Key events 2013 Hasakeh in January. In January 2014 1.2 million children across Aleppo, Al Part I focuses on the situation within Syria, Part II Information gaps and data limitations Hasakeh, Ar-Raqqa, Deir-ez-Zor, Hama, Idleb and Lattakia were vaccinated covers the impact of the crisis on neighbouring Operational constraints achieving an estimated 88% coverage. The overall health situation is one of the countries. More information on how to use this Humanitarian profile document can be found on page 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Good News & Information Sites
    Written Testimony of Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) National President Morton A. Klein1 Hearing on: A NEW HORIZON IN U.S.-ISRAEL RELATIONS: FROM AN AMERICAN EMBASSY IN JERUSALEM TO POTENTIAL RECOGNITION OF ISRAELI SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE GOLAN HEIGHTS Before the House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittee on National Security Tuesday July 17, 2018, 10:00 a.m. Rayburn House Office Building, Room 2154 Chairman Ron DeSantis (R-FL) Ranking Member Stephen Lynch (D-MA) Introduction & Summary Chairman DeSantis, Vice Chairman Russell, Ranking Member Lynch, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for holding this hearing to discuss the potential for American recognition of Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, in furtherance of U.S. national security interests. Israeli sovereignty over the western two-thirds of the Golan Heights is a key bulwark against radical regimes and affiliates that threaten the security and stability of the United States, Israel, the entire Middle East region, and beyond. The Golan Heights consists of strategically-located high ground, that provides Israel with an irreplaceable ability to monitor and take counter-measures against growing threats at and near the Syrian-Israel border. These growing threats include the extremely dangerous hegemonic expansion of the Iranian-Syrian-North Korean axis; and the presence in Syria, close to the Israeli border, of: Iranian Revolutionary Guard and Quds forces; thousands of Iranian-armed Hezbollah fighters; Palestinian Islamic Jihad (another Iranian proxy); Syrian forces; and radical Sunni Islamist groups including the al Nusra Levantine Conquest Front (an incarnation of al Qaeda) and ISIS. The Iranian regime is attempting to build an 800-mile land bridge to the Mediterranean, running through Iraq and Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • S/Res/2426 (2018)
    United Nations S/RES/2426 (2018) Distr.: General Security Council 29 June 2018 Resolution 2426 (2018) Adopted by the Security Council at its 8303rd meeting, on 29 June 2018 The Security Council, Noting with concern that the situation in the Middle East is tense and is likely to remain so, unless and until a comprehensive settlement covering all aspects of the Middle East problem can be reached, Having considered the report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (UNDOF) of 11 June 2018 (S/2018/550) and also reaffirming its resolution 1308 (2000) of 17 July 2000, Stressing that both parties must abide by the terms of the 1974 Disengagement of Forces Agreement between Israel and the Syrian Arab Republic and scrupulously observe the ceasefire, Concurring with the Secretary-General’s findings that the ongoing military activities conducted by any actor in the area of separation continue to have the potential to escalate tensions between Israel and the Syrian Arab Republic, jeopardize the ceasefire between the two countries, and pose a risk to the local civilian population and United Nations personnel on the ground, Expressing alarm that recent escalation of violence in the Syrian Arab Republic risks a serious conflagration of the conflict in the region Expressing grave concern at all violations of the Disengagement of Forces Agreement, Stressing that there should be no military forces in the area of separation other than those of UNDOF, Strongly condemning the continued fighting in the area of separation,
    [Show full text]
  • The Strategy Behind Israel's Attack on Iran And
    The Strategy Behind Israel’s Attack on Iran and Hizballah By Jonathan Cook Region: Middle East & North Africa Global Research, January 22, 2015 In-depth Report: IRAN: THE NEXT WAR? Jonathan Cook's Blog Israel’s claims of an imminent threat of Hizballah attack are not credible. More likely it wants to subdue the Lebanese militia so that it has a free hand to manipulate the Syrian battlefield to its advantage. Israel has good reason to fear that the Lebanese militia Hizballah and Iran’s Revolutionary Guard will seek dramatic revenge for the killing of 12 senior figures from the two organisations in an air strike in Syria on Sunday. Israel’s concerns were underscored on Wednesday by the decision of its military chief of staff, Benny Gantz, to cancel a trip to meet his European counterparts, as the Israeli army remained on high alert. Earlier, on Monday, Israel moved an Iron Dome anti-missile battery to the northern border, in case of rocket fire from Hizballah. That is precisely what Hizbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah had vowed only last week if Israel continued to launch attacks on Syrian soil. “We consider that any strike against Syria is a strike against the whole of the resistance axis, not just against Syria,” he said, adding that he had many long- range Iranian rockets that could reach deep into the Galilee. General Ali Jafari, commander of the Revolutionary Guard, echoed that warning on Tuesday, saying Israel should wait for “devastating thunderbolts”, and that Israel’s air strike had created “a new beginning point for the imminent collapse of the Zionist regime”.
    [Show full text]
  • Rebalancing Three UN Peacekeeping Missions by Assaf Orion
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 3051 The Big, the Small, and the Needless: Rebalancing Three UN Peacekeeping Missions by Assaf Orion Dec 14, 2018 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Assaf Orion Assaf Orion, a retired Israeli brigadier general and defense strategist whose broad research scope ranges from relations with China to Israel’s regional political-military strategy and policy, is the Liz and Mony Rueven International Fellow with The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis A former Israeli general explains why rethinking the missions is crucial to containing Iran’s proxies and reducing waste in international security expenditures. n recent weeks, Israel has sought to address Hezbollah cross-border attack tunnels, asked Washington to impose I sanctions on Beirut, and conferred with U.S. officials about countering precision missile production inside Lebanon. As tensions mount, one fact has become clearer than ever: the UN peacekeeping missions deployed around Israel are dangerously mismatched. To address this problem, the international community should substantially downsize UNIFIL, enhance UNDOF, and incorporate UNTSO into those two missions. UNIFIL: OVERSIZED T he current UN Interim Force in Lebanon mission (UNIFIL II) goes back to UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which ended the 2006 Lebanon war. Because that conflict was instigated by Hezbollah military actions emanating from south Lebanon, the resolution sought to avert another war by asserting Beirut’s monopoly over armed forces near Israel, with UNIFIL supporting the Lebanese Armed Forces in this vision. Moreover, given the war-torn theater it was entering and the weakness of its LAF partner, UNIFIL was granted a large land force (up to 15,000 troops), a significant Maritime Task Force to prevent seaborne weapons transfers, and a rich toolkit for civil engineering projects and civilian outreach.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 5 October 2000
    United Nations A/55/453 General Assembly Distr.: General 5 October 2000 Original: English Fifty-fifth session Agenda item 85 Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories Report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories Note by the Secretary-General* 1. The Secretary-General has the honour to transmit to the General Assembly the thirty-second report of the Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices Affecting the Human Rights of the Palestinian People and Other Arabs of the Occupied Territories, submitted pursuant to General Assembly resolution 54/76 of 6 December 1999. 2. This report should be considered together with the Special Committee’s periodic reports (A/55/373 and Add.1). * The footnote requested by the General Assembly in its resolution 54/248 was not included in the submission. 00-67563 (E) 261000 ````````` A/55/453 Contents Paragraphs Page I. Introduction .......................................................... 1–3 3 II. Mandate ............................................................. 4–12 3 A. General background ............................................... 4–9 3 B. General Assembly resolution 54/76 of 6 December 1999 ................. 10 4 C. Reports of the Special Committee .................................... 11–12 4 III. Organization of work .................................................. 13–31 4 A. Meetings ........................................................ 13–18 4 B. Nature of evidence ................................................ 19–25 5 C. Other aspects ..................................................... 26–31 5 IV. Observations and recommendations....................................... 32–144 6 A. Situation of human rights of the Palestinian people in the occupied territories: Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem ....................
    [Show full text]
  • The Situation of Workers of the Occupied Arab Territories
    REPORT OF THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL APPENDIX The situation of workers of the occupied Arab territories INTERNATIONAL LABOUR CONFERENCE 108th SESSION, 2019 ILC.108/DG/APP International Labour Conference, 108th Session, 2019 Report of the Director-General Appendix The situation of workers of the occupied Arab territories International Labour Office, Geneva ISBN 978-92-2-131718-0 (print) ISBN 978-92-2-131719-7 (Web pdf) ISSN 0074-6681 First edition 2019 The designations employed in ILO publications, which are in conformity with United Nations practice, and the presentation of material therein do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the International Labour Office concerning the legal status of any country, area or territory or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers. Reference to names of firms and commercial products and processes does not imply their endorsement by the International Labour Office, and any failure to mention a particular firm, commercial product or process is not a sign of disapproval. Information on ILO publications and digital products can be found at: www.ilo.org/publns. Formatted by TTE: Confrep-ILC108(2019)-DG-APPENDIX-[ROBEI-190415-1]-En.docx Printed by the International Labour Office, Geneva, Switzerland Preface In accordance with the mandate given by the International Labour Conference, I again sent this year a mission to prepare a report on the situation of workers of the occupied Arab territories. The mission visited the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, Gaza, Israel, and the occupied Syrian Golan. In addition, the mission leader met in Cairo with the League of Arab States and the Arab Labour Organization and in Damascus with constituents of the Syrian Arab Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Golan Heights: New Flashpoint in Syria War?
    Golan Heights: New flashpoint in Syria war? Following clashes at the Quneitra crossing in the Golan Heights, Syrian residents say they fear a spillover of violence. Patrick Strickland / Sep. 14, 2014 Quneitra crossing, occupied Golan Heights - In this area of Israeli-occupied Golan Heights, Salman Fakheraldeen stood atop an empty military bunker and watched from afar as a battle raged between Syrian government military forces and anti-regime rebel fighters on the other side of a demarcation barrier. "We have been hearing the bombing and the fighting for the last three years," said Fakheraldeen, a researcher at local human rights group, al-Marsad, on September 6. "But the last three weeks have been surreal. It has been constant. The fighting has never been this close [to the Golan Heights]." A largely unarmed uprising against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's government broke out in March 2011, yet it wasn't long before the conflict spiralled into sectarian violence. The United Nations' latest estimates place the death toll at more than 191,000 people. Born and raised in the nearby village of Majdal Shams, Fakheraldeen is one of the estimated 20,000 Syrians living in the 70 percent of the Golan Heights occupied by Israel during the 1967 war. Israel announced its annexation of the territory in 1981, but the international community and local Syrian residents reject this claim. The vast majority of Syrians in the Golan also turned down offers of Israeli citizenship, and instead, hold Israeli-issued travel documents. Today, about 21,000 Israelis also live in dozens of state-subsidised settlements dotted throughout the mountainous terrain, located in the southwestern part of Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Syria: a New Front for Israel? | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2380 Southern Syria: A New Front for Israel? by Michael Herzog Mar 2, 2015 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Michael Herzog Michael Herzog was appointed Israel's ambassador to the United States in 2021. Previously, he was an international fellow at The Washington Institute. Brief Analysis While strikes against ISIS are capturing the headlines, the United States and its international partners risk overlooking the potential strategic significance of developments in Syria's south. n early February, an alliance of Iran, the Syrian regime, and Hezbollah launched a major military offensive I against rebel groups in Syria's south, close to the borders of Israel and Jordan. This campaign bears potential strategic consequences for Israel and the Syrian theater, and calls for close U.S. and international attention. The War in the South S ome 4,000-5,000 troops have been massed for the offensive, which focuses on the provinces of Deraa, bordering Jordan, and Quneitra, bordering the Israel-controlled Golan Heights. Combatants include units from the Syrian army; the National Defense Forces, a government militia; an estimated 2,000 Hezbollah fighters, constituting a sizable portion of the group's forces in Syria; and, notably, Iranian military elements including advisors and senior officers. A website close to the Syrian regime posted a photo of Gen. Qasem Soleimani, commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps-Qods Force, visiting the area, signaling its importance to Iran. The attacking forces have experienced modest success overall thus far. After capturing several towns and villages and dominating hilltops in northwest Deraa, about twenty kilometers from the Israeli border, they encountered strong rebel opposition and adverse weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Syrian Army Raises National Flag on Quneitra Crossing
    Number of Water Poisoning Cases in Iraqi Basra Rises to 111,000 Thought for Today MOSCOW (Sputnik) – The number of people poisoned by polluted drinking water in the Iraqi southern Basra province has reached 111,000, media re- Unfortunate is he who cannot gain a few sincere ported citing a statement by UN Iraqi envoy Mehdi Tamimi. Media reported in friends during his life and more unfortunate is August that 17,000 people were admitted to hospitals over illnesses contracted from polluted water. Tamimi called on the central government and local au- the one who has gained them and then lost them thorities to adopt a clear position on the issue, according to the Al Sumaria broadcaster. Mass protests erupted in Basra in July, and finding a solution to (through his deeds). the water crisis was one of the demands of protesters, who also called on the government to address unemployment and the electricity shortage. Amir al-Momeneen Ali (AS) VOL NO: LV 10725 TEHRAN / Est.1959 Tuesday, October 16, 2018, Mehr 24, 1397, Safar 6, 1440 After Official Reopening Palestinian Shot Dead by Syrian Army Raises National Flag on Zionist Troops Quneitra Crossing crossing of students along the bor- der. In addition to Quneitra, Jordanian officials announced a day earlier the reopening of Naseeb crossing, Jordan’s main border crossing with Syria, after a three-year closure due to the presence of foreign-backed terrorists. In July, Syrian troops recaptured the crossing, which terrorists had seized in 2015, disrupting the ma- This file photo shows armed Zionist troops at a crossing point in oc- jor trade route between Syria and cupied territories on October 15, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2018 Forecast.Indd
    October 2018 Monthly Forecast 1 Overview Overview 1 In Hindsight: Emergence of the E10 3 Status Update since our In October, Bolivia assumes the presidency of they are being used for migrant smuggling or September Forecast the Council. Early in the month a Council visit- human trafficking. ing mission to the DRC is planned, focused on Additionally, in accordance with the 60-day 4 Democratic Republic of the Congo the upcoming elections. Following the return of reporting cycle, Yemen may be added to the pro- the Council delegation, there will be a briefing to gramme of work. 6 Libya the Council by the trip co-leads (Bolivia, Equato- Other African issues include: 7 Counter-Terrorism rial Guinea and France). Special Representative • Mali, on the activities of MINUSMA; 8 Syria of the Secretary-General Leila Zerrougui is also • the CAR, on the activities of MINUSCA; 10 UNDOF (Golan Heights) scheduled to brief on the activities of the UN mis- • Sudan (Darfur), on the activities of UNAMID 11 Sudan/South Sudan sion in the DRC. and the 1591 Sudan Sanctions Committee; Bolivia has chosen to hold a meeting on the • Western Sahara on the activities of MINURSO 13 Western Sahara role of natural resources as a root cause of conflict. and the adoption of a resolution renewing the 14 Israel/Palestine There will also be two open debates: one on wom- mission’s mandate; and 15 Mali en, peace and security, focused on the empow- • Sudan/South Sudan, on the activities of 16 Colombia erment of women in political processes; and the UNISFA and an adoption scheduled to renew regular quarterly open debate on Israel/Palestine.
    [Show full text]
  • Security Council Provisional Seventy-Fourth Year
    United Nations S/ PV.8495 Security Council Provisional Seventy-fourth year 8495th meeting Wednesday, 27 March 2019, 5.35 p.m. New York President: Mrs. Gueguen .................................. (France) Members: Belgium ....................................... Mr. Pecsteen de Buytswerve China ......................................... Mr. Wu Haitao Côte d’Ivoire ................................... Mr. Ipo Dominican Republic .............................. Mr. Trullols Yabra Equatorial Guinea ............................... Mr. Esono Mbengono Germany ...................................... Mr. Heusgen Indonesia. Mr. Syihab Kuwait ........................................ Mr. Alotaibi Peru .......................................... Mr. Meza-Cuadra Poland ........................................ Ms. Wronecka Russian Federation ............................... Mr. Safronkov South Africa ................................... Ms. Sabelo United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland .. Ms. Pierce United States of America .......................... Mr. Hunter Agenda The situation in the Middle East Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force (S/2019/248) . This record contains the text of speeches delivered in English and of the translation of speeches delivered in other languages. The final text will be printed in the Official Records of the Security Council. Corrections should be submitted to the original languages only. They should be incorporated in a copy of the record and sent under the signature of
    [Show full text]