Harnessing the Winds of Change

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Harnessing the Winds of Change TheSpring first 2008 in a series of Wharton Private Equity Reviews Wharton Private Equity Review HARNESSING T H E WINDS OF CH ANGE http://knowledge.wharton.upenn.edu SPONSORS PRIVATE EQUITY SERVICES Spring 2008 Wharton Private Equity Review HARNESSING T H E WINDS OF CH ANGE CONTENTS Following the Era of Large Buyouts, Private Equity Funds Find New Ways to Compete Page 2 Now that credit has dried up, the future of large private equity buyouts has become uncertain. Today, buyout firms are looking to compete in middle-market and foreign deals and, in many cases, are teaming up with strategic buyers and corporations in new types of transactions. According to PE firm partners and other industry experts, the economic downturn has also paved the way for a resurgence Executive Editors in distressed investing, as lenders and investors alike begin to adjust to new pricing realities. Teoman Ozsan (WG’09) Private Equity Abroad: Despite the Credit Crunch, Opportunities Manoneet Singh (WG’09) Page 6 Sumit Sinha (WG’08) in Developed Markets Are Waiting With the collapse of credit markets, private equity funds are increasingly willing to tread into unknown Marketing Team territory to find new deals abroad. While international buyers continue to increase their presence in the U.S., opportunities for investment in Europe and Asia are equally abundant, according to private Karina Danilyuk (WG’09) equity experts. Although individual markets have their inherent challenges, adopting a global strategy Dimple Khurana (WG’08) may be one approach to weathering the current economic slowdown. Advisory Board Will Changes in Taxation Affect the Competitiveness of U.S. Private Equity? Page 9 Michael Kopelman (WG’05) Principal, Edison Venture At the 2008 Wharton Private Equity Conference, the topic of taxes sparked a lively debate. According Dean Miller (WG’99) to a panel of private equity and legal experts, U.S. congressional proposals to raise taxes on the PE Managing Director, Novitas Capital industry could hurt it significantly, and perhaps even force it to move offshore. Given the forthcoming U.S. elections, the debate on carried interest may be moot for the time being, but the panelists agreed Vinay Nair Senior Fellow, Wharton Financial that it’s a hot-button issue. Institutions Center Stephen Sammut (WG’84) Setting up Shop: What Does It Take to Establish a Senior Fellow, Wharton Health Care Private Equity Firm in Today’s Market? Page 12 Systems and Lecturer, Wharton Entrepreneurial Programs and Venture Establishing a private equity fund as a founding partner is the objective of thousands of practitioners Partner, Burrill & Company across the industry. With the market continuing to mature, what are the hurdles, and what will it take Jason Wright (WG’00) to successfully start a private equity shop going forward? A leading private equity fundraising advisor Partner, Apax Partners and two leading investors with extensive experience advising and backing new private equity firms discussed these issues with members of the Wharton Private Equity Club (WPEC). Carlyle Group’s David Rubenstein: ‘The Greatest Period for Private Equity Is Probably Ahead of Us’ Page 18 David Rubenstein is co-founder and managing director of The Carlyle Group, the Washington, D.C.-based private equity firm with more than $70 billion in assets under management. In March, members of the Wharton Private Equity Club (WPEC) interviewed Rubenstein about the ongoing credit crisis, the industry outlook, the rise of sovereign wealth funds and why private equity is “one of the greatest exports of the United States.” Following the Era of Large Buyouts, Private Equity Funds Find New Ways to Compete Nothing symbolized the most recent the loans they did write. “The next $10 billion deal feels years away,” Daly said. private equity boom better than huge buyouts, deals so big that private equity sponsors teamed The only constant was sellers’ high expectations up to pull off the transactions in so-called about the value of their businesses, noted Daly, consortium — or “club” — deals that spurred talk who participated in a panel discussion about of $100 billion transactions. large buyouts at the 2008 Wharton Private Equity Conference. In the face of the current economic Now that credit has dried up, the future of large turmoil, however, those expectations have private equity buyouts has become uncertain. begun to drop. The buyout business is cyclical, Limited by the lack of available debt financing, he added, noting other industry boom-and-bust buyout firms are looking to compete in middle- periods — in the late 1980s, the late 1990s and market and foreign deals and, in many cases, again from 2002 through the end of 2007. The are teaming up with strategic buyers and public markets experience the same ups and corporations in new types of transactions. Not downs, he said. surprisingly, the economic downturn has also paved the way for a resurgence in distressed The latest boom came to an end in the usual way. investing, as lenders and investors alike begin to “What happened was that people got out of hand adjust to new pricing realities. with some of the valuations,” he said. Add to that the subprime meltdown and it signaled the end of the industry’s ability to digest deals like One major difference in the most Blackstone Group’s record $36 billion acquisition recent cycle was the amount of in 2006 of Equity Office, the Chicago-based capital raised. commercial real estate investment trust. One major difference in the most recent cycle was the amount of capital raised, Daly noted. According to Jack Daly, a managing director at The industry has raised about $750 billion Goldman Sachs focusing on large-cap leveraged since January 2006 — an amount which, when buyouts in the U.S. industrial sector, 2007 was a levered, would be enough to finance deals worth “tale of two markets.” In the first half of the year, a significant portion (15%-25%) of the Standard private equity sponsors enjoyed easy access & Poor’s 500. Buyout firms have remained to debt which led to previously unthinkable relatively flush. “There’s still a staggering amount discussions about deals valued at up to $100 of money sitting there,” said Daly, who added billion. By the end of the year, credit markets had that companies will find new ways to make deals contracted and the industry faced a $350 billion work even if there is less debt financing available overhang. Lenders were unable to provide large from lenders. “There is a tremendous amount financings and included extensive covenants on of opportunity. There are still going to be a lot of ways to make that capital work.” 2 Knowledge@Wharton Wharton Private Equity Review A Return to Fundamentals Greg Mondre, managing director of Silver Lake, the technology-focused buyout firm, pointed According to Perry Golkin, a partner at Kohlberg out that the downturn will make 2008 a more Kravis Roberts and a member of the firm’s difficult year to exit from investments. Managers financial services industry team, the markets of recently acquired companies will need to are clearly not deep enough to support pay close attention to operating fundamentals huge private equity deals. Instead, sponsors because those companies are carrying more should focus on smaller transactions, he said. leverage than in the past. One advantage for PricewaterhouseCoopers research shows that the private equity sponsors in this cycle, he added, volume of large buyouts fell off sharply in the is that most large-cap buyout firms have built second half of 2007, but that middle-market deals, up substantial operating groups with in-house valued at up to $1 billion, totaled $355 billion, or expertise to help companies move through the 23% of U.S. transaction volume. downturn. “Our ability to actually work with our Lenders are demanding changes in covenants, costs, restructure operations and drive value Golkin said, which represents a return to more is a huge added benefit going into a time of normal conditions after the boom period marked economic weakness.” by easy loan terms. The revised covenants do not represent “radical change” but do restrict private equity firms’ flexibility, he added. “We had some The largest limiting factor now is that luxury for a little time, but the reality is we will not have the flexibility we were able to negotiate sellers’ expectations have not caught for the last couple of years.” up with the new pricing realities. According to Golkin, rising capital costs will reduce asset prices, and the diminished role of securitized debt funds will also affect private Private equity sponsors also own better equity sponsors. “All of these things are going companies than they did in past downturns, to make it a little more difficult for a buyer, Mondre noted. During the most recent period or sponsor, to structure a deal in a way that’s of private equity expansion, sponsors were able comfortable. You become more nervous.” to acquire an increased number of large, stable The industry will return to fundamentals that companies with leading market positions than in prevailed three or four years ago, he added. the past. Those are the types of companies that “We’re not moving to the Stone Age.” are best able to weather a soft economy. “In any downturn, it is the leaders that come out with the The largest limiting factor now is that sellers’ highest market share and better margins,” he said. expectations have not caught up with the new “The weaker competitors fall by the wayside.” pricing realities. Golkin noted that as deals collapse in the changing financial environment, New Models and Markets the industry is wrestling with the question of what represents a material change in a business On the investing side of the business, a weak that might trigger a breakup fee.
Recommended publications
  • Sweat Equity As a Gift: Venture Capital Investments and Tax Law in Japan
    Proceedings from the 2009 Sho Sato Conference on Tax Law, Social Policy, and the Economy Sweat Equity as a Gift: Venture Capital Investments and Tax Law in Japan Zenichi Shishido Hitotsubashi University All rights reserved by the author. This paper was presented at a Sho Sato Conference held on March 9-10, 2009, under the auspices of the Institute for Legal Research and in cooperation with the Robbins Religious and Civil Law Collection, School of Law, University of California, Berkeley. 1 Proceedings from the 2009 Sho Sato Conference on Tax Law Sweat Equity as a Gift: Venture Capital Investments and Tax Law in Japan Zenichi Shishido1 I. Introduction We can observe a typical incentive bargain between human capital providers (entrepreneurs) and monetary capital providers (venture capitalists) in a venture company. If one party feels too much risk, she will hesitate to invest her capital. To maximize each party’s payoff, both parties need to bargain with each other to motivate each other to invest their respective monetary and human capital. It is a typical two-sided agency problem situation. The incentive bargain will be made on control sharing and value sharing. In Silicon Valley, such a two-sided agency problem is resolved by making entrepreneurs abandon control to venture capitalists and complementarily giving entrepreneurs additional cash-flow right as “sweat equity.” Japanese tax law is, however, hostile to the use of equity as an incentive. Particularly, the Japanese National Tax Agency might challenge the sweat equity practice as a gift and entrepreneurs would be required to pay gift tax. As a result, sharing cash-flow rights cannot be complementary to sharing of control, and the two-sided agency problem is not yet solved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Challenges Faced by Capital Markets in Handling Future Brownfield Investment By
    The Challenges Faced by Capital Markets in Handling Future Brownfield Investment by Jonathan A. Bedard B.S., Business Administration, 1992 Northeastern University Submitted to the Department of Architecture in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In Real Estate Development at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology September, 1997 @1997 Jonathan A. Bedard All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute Publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part. Signature of Author: 6 epartment of Architecture June 25,1997 Certified by: Lawrence S. Bacow Professor of Law and Environmental Policy Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Nz*William C. Wheaton Chairman, Interdepartmental Degree Program in Real Estate Development S;EP 161997 The Challenges Faced by Capital Markets in Handling Future Brownfield Investment by Jonathan A. Bedard Submitted to the Department of Architecture on June 25, 1997 in Partial Fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Real Estate Development ABSTRACT An unintended consequence of the industrialization of the United States has been the creation of an estimated 450,000 brownfields, or environmentally impaired properties. The U.S. Congress passed the Superfund Act of 1980 to attempt to clean up contaminated sites with money from the original polluters, but with limited success. Now the regulatory climate is changing to favor working with investors interested in buying and redeveloping these troubled properties. The investment opportunity is not of the same magnitude as that of distressed assets left over from the Savings and Loan crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Doing Business in France
    DOING BUSINESS IN FRANCE www.investinfrance.org FOREWORD This guide, Doing Business in France, written by the Invest in France Agency (IFA) in partnership with Deloitte, is intended to be a working reference guide to the business environment in France. It has been designed especially for foreign company directors who would like to invest in France, where more than 20,000 foreign companies are already established, running businesses under many different legal forms. In a fast-changing international environment, where being competitive is more than ever a priority, foreign companies choosing to set up business in France need be able to call upon experts that can offer them real growth opportunities. Working alongside the IFA is the Deloitte group, which has an extensive international presence in more than 150 countries, through which it can provide support to any foreign company in France. With around 15 international service groups based in France and around 10 abroad, Deloitte France is a unique and innovative organization that is fully dedicated to these issues. With its specialist country expertise, Deloitte France can provide assistance with your relocation and development projects in France and provide you with expert views from recognized audit, tax & legal, financial advisory, consulting and accounting experts. Today, France is a preferred destination for companies setting up business in Europe. It is a large economy within the euro zone, is open to foreign investment, and has supportive government policies to produce a well-qualified workforce and stimulate R&D, among other initiatives. France has many key strengths. While perusing the pages of this publication, we invite you to discover for yourself this environment stimulating entrepreneurial spirit, investment and innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • Simply FINANCE
    Simply FINANCE A comprehensive guide to the different options for financing a community enterprise 1st E dition J une 2011 Published by: Co­operatives UK Holyoake House Hanover S treet Manchester M60 0 AS Tel: 0 161 2 46 2900 Fax: 0 161 8 31 7684 email: [email protected] web: www.uk.coop © C opyright: Co­operatives U K 2011 Co­operatives U K i s t he national trade bo dy that campaigns for co­operation and w o r k s to promote, develop and unite co­operative e nterprises. Co­operatives UK aims to brin g together all those with a passion and interest in co­operative action. Design, artwork and illustration by www.wave.coop Printed on recycled paper You can get details of other publications from our website. This guide has been produced as part of the Making Local Food Work Project. ISBN: 978­0­9549677­8­9 2 Foreword Money may make the world go round, So often, people say ‘I am keen to be but if you are trying to make the world involved in community enterprise, but a better place it can seem to be notable I don’t know anything about finance / by its absence. So many would­be social money / economics’. This is a real entrepreneurs founder on this first step obstacle – it’s the one thing that every of securing the funds they need to launch person involved in the running of a a project. community enterprise does need to know a bit about. Let’s take the knowledge in this This guide will go some way towards guide and spread it around as widely as easing that difficulty.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldilocks Meets Private Equity: Taxing Carried Interest Just Right Donald Marron October 6, 2016 (Updated October 7, 2016)
    Goldilocks Meets Private Equity: Taxing Carried Interest Just Right Donald Marron October 6, 2016 (Updated October 7, 2016) ABSTRACT Controversy rages about how to tax carried interest—the profit shares received by managers of buyout funds, venture capital funds, and angel syndicates. Managers currently pay capital income taxes at effective rates of up to 25 percent on any long-term capital gains and qualified dividends they receive as carried interest. Many reformers believe this income—some received by exceptionally wealthy fund managers—is labor compensation and should be taxed at rates of up to 44 percent. Defenders of current practice argue that carried interest is capital income just like other returns from investing in business ventures, taking financial risk, and putting in sweat equity. I demonstrate that these two views—and a third that sees carried interest as a tax arbitrage between managers and tax-exempt investors—can be reconciled by reforming how both managers and investors are taxed. Current practice taxes carried interest too little. Treating it as labor income without other reforms would tax it too much when investors are taxable individuals. To tax carried interest just right, it should be labor income for managers and deductible against ordinary income for investors. This approach directs the favorable tax treatment of capital income entirely to the investors who provide capital and bear financial risk, rather than allowing some preference to be transferred to managers. This approach taxes carried interest as labor income yet protects the usual tax benefits for capital gains and dividends. One way to implement this approach is to treat funds as businesses and allow investors to deduct carried interest as a business expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Private Equity Chapter 1-R18
    1-5 GLOSSARY OF VENTURE CAPITAL § 1.02 § 1.02 Glossary of Terms -#- 401(K) Plan: A type of qualified retirement plan in which employees make salary reduced, pre-tax contributions to an employee trust. In many cases, the employer will match employee contributions up to a specified level. -A- “A” Round: A financing event whereby venture capitalists invest in a company that was previously financed by founders and/or angels. The “A” is from Series “A” Preferred stock. See “B” round. Accredited Investor: Defined by Rule 501 of Regulation D, an individ- ual (i.e., non-corporate) “accredited investor” is a either a natural person who has individual net worth, or joint net worth with the person’s spouse, that exceeds $1 million at the time of the purchase OR a natural person with income exceeding $200,000 in each of the two most recent years or joint income with a spouse exceeding $300,000 for those years and a reasonable expectation of the same income level in the current year. For the complete definition of accredited investor, see the SEC website. Accrued Interest: The interest due on preferred stock or a bond since the last interest payment was made. Acquisition: The process of gaining control, possession or ownership of a private portfolio company by an operating company or conglomerate. ACRS: Accelerated Cost Recovery System. The IRS approved method of calculating depreciation expense for tax purposes. Also known as Accel- erated Depreciation. Adjustment Condition: An adjustment condition occurs if the company does not close on an equity investment in the company for a minimum of $xxx, net of brokerage fees, on or before a series of other predetermined events, i.e., delivery of term sheet to preferred stockholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity Market Landscape
    JWBT775-c05 JWBT775-CAIA Printer: Courier Westford August 6, 2012 11:40 Trim: 7in × 10in CHAPTER 5 Private Equity Market Landscape he growing interest in private equity (PE) investing has arisen in part as a result of T its potential to earn superior long-term returns when compared to those of public equities and in part due to the diversification benefits it provides. Investments in PE funds offer access to privately held companies not available in the traditional investor landscape and to the expertise of intermediaries (the PE managers) in creating value by proactively influencing the management and operations of these companies. Institutional investors typically focus on the organized PE market, where pro- fessional management is provided by intermediaries. There is also an informal PE market, which is composed of angel capital and is, not without justification, often referred to as family, friends, and fools. Companies can also receive funding from the founder’s savings and efforts, commonly known as blood or sweat equity. The number of investments made in the informal PE market is probably several times larger than the number in the organized PE market; however, it is difficult for in- stitutional investors to gain the information and access necessary to invest in this informal market effectively. 5.1 MAIN STRATEGIES Private equity funds refer to a multitude of investment strategies with varying risk- return profiles (see Chapter 10) and liquidity profiles (see Chapter 14). The three primary, and most important, types of strategies are venture capital, buyout, and mezzanine. These strategies form the bulk of a typical institutional investor’s private equity portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • A Management Buyout – an Opportunity of a Lifetime
    Private Equity Partnership Means More Than Money A MANAGEMENT BUYOUT – AN OPPORTUNITY OF A LIFETIME Management teams who desire to own the businesses they run often come to KLH Capital for our capital and strategic help when they see an opportunity to buy the business from the owner and convert their sweat equity into real equity ownership. For retiring owners, selling the company to key managers is an attractive way to monetize the value of their business, preserve its legacy, and give back to those folks who helped them succeed. However, buying a business isn’t as simple as buying a house by taking out a mortgage. These transactions require significant amounts of capital, an amount that is often more than someone can save from their salary or risk in one investment. Likewise, finding a bank that will provide adequate financing is challenging. Buying a business requires an understanding of the financing options and complex buying process spanning four to six months of due diligence, financial analysis, negotiations, and legal agreements. But it can be done, typically with the help of professionals whose line of work is focused entirely on buying businesses. KLH Capital “sponsors” or partners with management teams to fully fund the purchase of the company and navigate the intricate process required to successfully complete the transaction. As an equity partner in the company, KLH has a vested interest in seeing a smooth transition of ownership to the management team and provides ongoing support to help management achieve success. Specifically,
    [Show full text]
  • Funding Startups
    Finance III Part 2: Funding startups Marc Goldchstein 1 funding growth CCF Venture Capitalst Business Angel Entrepreneur, 3 F’s time Sweat equity Seed money Start-up Expansion Concept Expansion regional know how Prototype Product time Product support market research Marketing segment proof of introduction engineering concept helpdesk prototype working product dev. management team 1st marketing capital maintenance plan business plan 1st personnel product production start marketing enhancements prototype marketing plan market studies 2 Source: Rudy Aernoudt (adapted BAN-V) 3 enfocus 1993-1997 4 enfocus 1998-2003 5 Enfocus 1993-2003 6 artwork systems 1993-1996 7 biotech and finance biotech company ‘regular’ company CCF ‘Regular’ Valley of Death Time biotech valley of death: best case scenario 8 9 capital needs of biotech firms seed round ($ 1st round ($ 2nd round ($ 3rd round ($ 4th round / IPO ($ millions) millions) millions) millions) mezzanine ($ millions) millions) range 2.5 – 7 1.4 – 17 4.5 – 13.6 8.6 – 17 5 – 37 10 – 65.7 average 5 7.5 8.6 13.4 18.5 29.3 total raised 53 prior to IPO 82 through IPO (average) 10 Conclusions • Many companies require capital to fund their startup • Size of the needs depends on many factors • Often related to the ‘business model’ of your project: Service company? Technology developer? Investment goods supplier? Component supplier? Economies of scale? • What enabling technology? What end-user industry? Pace of change in industry? • There are several potential sources for this funding • Your own resources
    [Show full text]
  • Equity Capital
    10 EQUITY CAPITAL Our combination of great research universities, a pro- risk business culture, deep pools of innovation-seeking equity capital and reliable business and contract law isdistribute unprecedented and unparalleled in the world. Marc Andreessen or Sweat equity is the most valuable equity there is. Mark Cuban I think this is also a great timepost, to invest in private equity, helping companies grow from the ground up. Jim Rogers CHAPTERcopy, LEARNING OBJECTIVES Upon completion of this chapter you will be able to List sources of equity financing notDiscuss which source of equity capital is appropriate for different ventures Define the role of angel investors Explain the role of venture capital firms in equity financing Do Describe the most common forms of equity instruments Evaluate which factors impact a company’s ability to raise capital 229 Copyright ©2019 by SAGE Publications, Inc. This work may not be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means without express written permission of the publisher. 230 Launching Successful Ventures EQUITY CAPITAL Equity capital is the basis of entrepreneurship. Equity investors are risk takers. Entrepreneurship is dependent on individuals and venture financing organizations that are willing to risk their financial capital intelligently by investing in new businesses. Without experienced risk takers, only entrepreneurs who have their own financial resources would ever bring a new business to market. The biggest test of an entrepreneur’s ability is to access and utilize financial resources that the entrepreneur neither possesses nor controls. The ability to attract and manage these scarce resources effectively to launch and grow the enterprise is the singular dis- tinguishing characteristic of the successful entrepreneur.
    [Show full text]
  • To the SEC Concept Release Comment Review Team
    To the SEC Concept Release comment review team: We’d like to sincerely thank the SEC for the opportunity to comment on the concept release and for making available to the public such key information about private markets. We apologize for the delay in submitting beyond the appointed deadline. This is our first communication with the SEC. We seek to develop a long-term relationship built on mutual understanding, clear communication, and prioritization of mission-driven outcomes. This reply was drafted together by Seth Wright and Dagan Bora, respectively the Chief Technology Officer and Chief Executive Officer of Leyline Corporation (www.leyline.io). We hold the somewhat unique position of being a startup that is developing software to empower people’s path to smart private investing. Our objective is to double the number of private market participants over the next 5-7 years. We are staunch supporters and advocates of the SEC’s mission, and plan to develop a path to sophistication for new private market entrants that prioritizes education, compliance, and access to high quality tools for individual investors. We hope you will find our insights helpful as you consider the best path forward, while safeguarding investor protections, facilitating capital formation, and ensuring the fair and efficient function of markets. Sincerely, Dagan Bora 6. How should we evaluate whether our existing exemptions appropriately promote efficiency, competition, and capital formation? For example, in evaluating our exempt offering market, should we consider whether investors have more opportunities to participate in exempt offerings? Investors and offerers need a “litmus” test to see if they are able to participate with each other.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerators in Silicon Valley: Building Successful Startups
    9789462987166 Accelerators in Silicon Valley: Building Successful Startups Accelerators in Silicon Valley: Building Successful Startups Searching for the Next Big Thing Peter Ester Amsterdam University Press This research was made possible by a grant from the Dutch Van Spaendonck Foundation. Cover design: Klaas Wijnberg Typesetting: Crius Group, Hulshout Amsterdam University Press English-language titles are distributed in the US and Canada by the University of Chicago Press. isbn 978 94 6298 716 6 e-isbn 978 90 4853 868 3 nur 800 doi 10.5117/9789462987166 © P. Ester / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2017 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owners and the authors of the book. You should start with the problem that you’re trying to solve in the world and not start with deciding that you want to build a company. Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook To all startups that contribute to a better society through their passion, ambition, and entrepreneurship Table of Contents Foreword 9 Acknowledgements 11 The Interviewees and their Accelerators 15 1 Silicon Valley 21 The DNA of an Entrepreneurial Region Introduction 21 Europe and Silicon Valley 22 Accelerators: Pillars of Silicon Valley’s startup support infra- structure 25 Accelerators: their role, research,
    [Show full text]