DOCSLIB.ORG

Evaluation Reports Local Activities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evaluation Reports Local Activities Evaluation Report – Graz local activities June 2006, Graz Trendsetter Report No 2005:15 Trendsetter External Deliverable No 4.4b Contract No: NNE-2001-00323 Contractors 1. City of Stockholm, Environment and Health Administration 2. City of Graz 3. Lille Metropole 4. City of Prague 5. Stockholm Transport 6. Spedition- und Internationale Transport GmbH 7. Swedish National Road Administration, Stockholm Region 8. Stockholm Real Estate and Traffic Administration 9. Public Transport Company of Graz 10. Taxi Group 878 Cityfunk Ltd 11. Styrian Transport Association, STVG Ltd 12. Erlach Consulting & Engineering 13. Province of Styria 14. Austrian Mobility Research 15. City of Pécs 16. Pecs Municipal Operations and Property Management Company 17. Syndicat Mixte des Transports 18. Statoil Detaljhandel AB 19. AGA Gas AB 20. Home 2 You AB 21. Project Coordination City of Stockholm, Environmental Health Administration, P. O. Box 380 24, SE-100 64 Stockholm, Sweden Contact information Project Coordinator Assistant Project coordinator E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Phone: +46 8 508 28 916 Phone: +46 8 508 28 946 Project website www.trendsetter-europe.org 2 PART A - Report summary ............................................................................................... 5 PART B – Common Trendsetter introduction ................................................................ 6 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 2 Overview of the Evaluation Framework.............................................................. 13 3 Trendsetter objectives.......................................................................................... 15 3.1 Trendsetter High level objectives ....................................................................................... 15 3.2 Demonstration objectives.................................................................................................... 17 3.3 Scientific and technical objectives...................................................................................... 18 4 Overview of city .................................................................................................... 19 4.1 Local context (Description of city) ..................................................................................... 19 4.2 Problems to be solved within city....................................................................................... 20 4.3 Local policies and actions on sustainable mobility............................................................. 23 4.4 Trendsetter in Graz ............................................................................................................. 23 4.5 Description of local consortium.......................................................................................... 34 4.6 Contact information ............................................................................................................ 34 PART C – Results and Analysis..................................................................................... 36 5 Indicators............................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Indicators and results .......................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Analysis of results on indicator level.................................................................................. 37 6 Fulfilment of objectives........................................................................................ 60 6.1 Achievement of city objectives........................................................................................... 60 6.2 Contribution to Trendsetter objectives................................................................................ 61 7 Results on city level ............................................................................................. 63 7.1 Common Core Indicators on City Level ............................................................................. 63 7.2 Potential up-scaling the measures....................................................................................... 64 7.3 Conclusions......................................................................................................................... 67 8 Economical aspects, cost benefit ....................................................................... 67 8.1 Per measure......................................................................................................................... 67 8.2 Conclusions......................................................................................................................... 71 9 Synergies between measures.............................................................................. 72 9.1 Overview of synergies within the city ................................................................................ 72 9.2 Conclusions......................................................................................................................... 72 10 Dissemination activities ....................................................................................... 72 10.1 Overview of dissemination activities.................................................................................. 72 10.2 Assessment of the dissemination activities ......................................................................... 73 11 Assessment of all measures................................................................................ 74 PART D - Conclusions and Recommendations ........................................................... 75 12 Lessons to consider for replication and take-up by other cities..................... 75 12.1 Technical issues .................................................................................................................. 75 12.2 Synergies............................................................................................................................. 75 12.3 Political and Administrative issues..................................................................................... 75 12.4 Economical issues............................................................................................................... 75 13 Recommendations to decision makers .............................................................. 76 Appendix 1 – List of Trendsetter measures ................................................................. 79 Appendix 2 – Wordlist .................................................................................................... 81 4 PART A - Report summary Graz is one of the five demonstration cities from the Trendsetter project – which is one of the four demonstration projects of the CIVITAS 1 initiative. From 2002 to 2005, Graz has implemented a range of projects in all 8 working fields of CIVITAS. This report describes the results of these measures. As the measures are very diverse, it is not possible to give a concise overview of the results – it is easy to find under the subheadings in the various chapters. On the whole, Trendsetter has been very successful in Graz. There were the usual problems and delays that come with a project of this size, but all measures have been implemented at least partly, most of them fully and some have even exceeded expectations. In a chapter 13 in the end of the report, there is a whole range of recommendations that also stem from the experience and conclusions that could be made in the Trendsetter-Graz projects. 5 PART B – Common Trendsetter introduction 1 Introduction 1.1 Background Satisfying mobility for both people and goods is essential for the vitality of our cities, and a well functioning transport system is vital for a good life in the city. However, increased traffic may actually decrease mobility when people and goods get stuck in congestion. Increasing emissions and noise levels threaten citizens’ health and make the cities less attractive. In the long term, the issues of climate change and energy scarcity also puts a demand to ameliorate the negative sides of traffic, while keeping the flow of people and goods high. The Trendsetter project – one of four projects financed by the Civitas I Initiative – has tackled these problems. By setting good examples, the five participating cities Graz, Lille, Pécs, Prague and Stockholm can inspire other cities and show them how to facilitate sustainable mobility. Trendsetter also shows that by following our examples, cities can meet the Kyoto and EU goals for emissions. Trendsetter has implemented 52 specific measures in different thematic areas that complement and reinforce each other. Advanced mobility management schemes and clean vehicle fleets are among these measures. The project has also promoted the use of public transport, other alternatives to private cars and showed new ways to improve goods logistics and efficiency. Furthermore, Trendsetter has increased the acceptance for bio-fuels among citizens and encouraged operators, politicians and social groups to use innovative, low-noise and low emission technology. Trendsetter and other European projects have shown efficient ways to reduce car use, introduce clean vehicles and make public transportation efficient and thus make European cities healthier, less energy demanding, less oil dependent and more attractive. There are immense
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Focus on European Cities 12 Focus on European Cities
    Focus on European cities 12 Focus on European cities Part of the Europe 2020 strategy focuses on sustainable and There were 36 cities with a population of between half a socially inclusive growth within the cities and urban areas million and 1 million inhabitants, including the following of the European Union (EU). These are often major centres capital cities: Amsterdam (the Netherlands), Riga (Latvia), for economic activity and employment, as well as transport Vilnius (Lithuania) and København (Denmark). A further network hubs. Apart from their importance for production, 85 cities were in the next tier, with populations ranging be- cities are also focal points for the consumption of energy and tween a quarter of a million and half a million, including other materials, and are responsible for a high share of total Bratislava, Tallinn and Ljubljana, the capital cities of Slova- greenhouse gas emissions. Furthermore, cities and urban re- kia, Estonia and Slovenia. Only two capital cities figured in gions often face a range of social difficulties, such as crime, the tier of 128 cities with 150 000 to 250 000 people, namely poverty, social exclusion and homelessness. The Urban Audit Lefkosia (Cyprus) and Valletta (Malta). The Urban Audit also assesses socioeconomic conditions across cities in the EU, provides results from a further 331 smaller cities in the EU, Norway, Switzerland, Croatia and Turkey, providing valuable with fewer than 150 000 inhabitants, including the smallest information in relation to Europe’s cities and urban areas. capital
    [Show full text]
  • Quality of Life in European Cities 2015
    FLASH EUROBAROMETER 419 QUALITY OF LIFE IN EUROPEAN CITIES 2015 JANUARY 2016 Regional and Urban Policy LEGAL NOTICE The content of this brochure does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institutions of the European Union. This survey has been contracted to TNS Opinion in the context of a Framework Contract with the Directorate-General for Communication (European Commission). The interpretations and opinions contained in it are solely those of the authors. This survey was conducted by TNS Opinion at the request of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy, and was co-ordinated by the European Commission, Directorate-General for Communication (“Eurobarometer» Sector) and Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (“Compe- tence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and Territorial Development”). The annexes can be consulted on the EUROPA website at: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/activity/urban/audit/index_en.cfm (INFOREGIO) or http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm (Flash Eurobarometer reports) This survey complements the work which is being carried out in the context of the European Urban Audit. For more information on the Urban Audit: http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/en/policy/themes/urban-development/audit/ Mailbox: [email protected] and [email protected] (statistical questions) Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). More information on the European Union is available on the internet (http://europa.eu).
    [Show full text]
  • PROF. CONNY WUNSCH, Ph.D. Faculty of Business and Economics
    PROF. CONNY WUNSCH, Ph.D. Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Basel Peter-Merian-Weg 6, CH - 4002 Basel, Switzerland Telephone: +41 61 267 3374 Email: [email protected] Homepage: http://wwz.unibas.ch/wunsch Born 1977 in Schwerin, Germany CURRENT POSITIONS Since 09/2013 Full Professor of Labour Economics, University of Basel Since 12/2013 Guest Professor of Economics, University of St. Gallen PREVIOUS POSITIONS 06/2011 – 08/2013 Associate Professor, VU University Amsterdam (part-time until 08/2012) 02/2009 – 06/2012 Assistant Professor of Economics, University of St. Gallen 05/2008 – 06/2012 Postdoctoral Fellow, Swiss Institute for Empirical Economic Research, University of St. Gallen EDUCATION 01/2003 - 02/2008 Ph.D. in Economics and Finance, University of St. Gallen (summa cum laude) 01/2003 - 02/2004 Swiss Program for Beginning Doctoral Students in Economics, Study Center Gerzensee 09/2001 - 12/2001 Australian Graduate School of Management, Sydney, Australia 10/1999 - 03/2002 M.A. in Economics (Lic. oec. HSG), University of St. Gallen 10/1996 - 09/1999 B.A. in Business Administration (Diplom-Betriebswirtin BA), University of Cooperative Education (Berufsakademie) Mannheim OTHER WORK EXPERIENCE 04/2000 - 04/2008 Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic Research, University of St. Gallen Research assistant to Prof. Dr. Michael Lechner 10/1996 - 03/2002 Commerzbank AG, Mannheim and Frankfurt/Main 10/1996 - 09/1999 Bank Trainee 01/2000 - 03/2002 Member and stipendiary of the Studienkreis 02/2000 - 03/2000 Credit Risk Analysis (Intern) 07/2001 - 08/2001 Economic Research (Intern) 1 AWARDS 2014 SNIS International Geneva Award for the paper „Evaluating Nationwide Health Interventions: Malawi's Insecticide Treated Net Distribution Programme“, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 177(2), 523-552 (with Eva Deuchert; 5’000 CHF) 2011 Latsis-Preis der Universität St.
    [Show full text]
  • K. Zatloukal Medical University of Graz, Austria Stakeholder Meeting Paris
    K. Zatloukal Medical University of Graz, Austria Stakeholder Meeting Paris, December 15th 2009 A new model of public-private-partnership to improve efficacy of biospecimen research for academia and industry • To generate best possible use of biological samples Specific medical/scientific expertise required for proper sample selection and data interpretation Standardized state of the art analysis platforms prerequisite for data sharing High level quality management is prerequisite for industry to trust in data generated in public environment • Alternative to sample shipment Opportunity for research collaborations with countries with export restrictions Improved access to industry Avoids impression of sample commercialisation Surgeons Pathologists ScientificSamples collaboration Radiologists Patient‘s Med. data Sample Industry Oncologists Med. data Patient Lab medicine Cost recovery etc. Problem if no scientific collaboration is possible since financial compensation is no reasonable incentive for contributors and not accepted by public Samples Samples Med. data Med. data Research data Expertise Expertise Expertise Hospital Expert Industry Biobank Centers Patients Cost recov. Data In-kind Cost recov. Cost recov. Public-Private Public pre-competitive Private – competitive (not-for-profit) (not-for-profit) (for-profit) Provides efficient access to samples, data and expertise Mutual benefit from expertise and in-kind contributions Reduces requirements for sample shipment Gateway for global collaborations Samples Samples Med. data Med. data Research data Expertise Expertise Expertise Hospital Expert Industry Biobank Centers Patients Data Data In-kind Cost recov. Cost recov. Cost recov. Public Private – competitive (not-for-profit) (for-profit) Provides efficient access to samples, data and expertise Mutual benefit from expertise and in-kind contributions Reduces requirements for sample shipment Gateway for global collaborations Samples Samples Processed Med.
    [Show full text]
  • Graz Declaration 2003 Forward from Berlin: the Role of the Universities
    EUA European University Association Association Européenne des Universités September | Septembre 2003 Graz Declaration 2003 Forward from Berlin: the Role of the Universities Déclaration de Graz 2003 L’après-Berlin: le rôle des universités Graz Erklärung 2003 Die Phase nach Berlin: die Rolle der Universitäten Declaración de Graz 2003 Después de Berlín: el papel de las universidades Graz Declaration 2003 Forward from Berlin: the Role of the Universities Déclaration de Graz 2003 L’après-Berlin: le rôle des universités Graz Erklärung 2003 Die Phase nach Berlin: die Rolle der Universitäten Declaración de Graz 2003 Después de Berlín: el papel de las universidades 2 3 3 5 INTRODUCTION Eric Froment, President 7 FORWARD FROM BERLIN: THE ROLE OF THE UNIVERSITIES TO 2010 AND BEYOND 11 L’APRÈS-BERLIN: LE RÔLE DES UNIVERSITÉS 2010 ET AU-DELÀ 15 DIE PHASE NACH BERLIN: DIE ROLLE DER UNIVERSITÄTEN DAS ZIEL 2010 UND DIE ZEIT DANACH 19 DESPUÉS DE BERLÍN: EL PAPEL DE LAS UNIVERSIDADES HASTA EL 2010 Y MÁS ALLÁ 5 INTRODUCTION The Graz Declaration is the major EUA policy of governments and what universities need document resulting from the 2nd Convention to do to ensure that they remain central to of European Higher Education Institutions the development of European society by: hosted by the three universities in Graz from • maintaining universities as a public 28-30 May 2003. Formally adopted by the responsibility, Council of the EUA at its 4th July meeting in • consolidating research as an integral part Leuven, it was transmitted to the meeting of of higher education, European Education Ministers in Berlin on 18- • improving academic quality by building 19 September 2003, the purpose of which is strong institutions, to agree on the priorities for the next phase • furthering mobility and the social dimen- of the Bologna Process.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracting in Urban Public Transport Appendix: Contract Tables
    Contracting in urban public transport Appendix: Contract Tables Submitted to EC – DG TREN by inno-V | KCW | RebelGroup | NEA | TØI | SDG | TIS Contracting in urban public transport (appendix: contract tables) Contracted by: European Commission – DG TREN Contractors: NEA (NL), inno-V (NL), KCW (D), Re- belGroup (NL), TØI (N), SDG (GB), TIS.PT (P) Project co-ordinator: inno-V (NL) Main report written by: Didier van de Velde, Arne Beck, Jan- Coen van Elburg, Kai-Henning Ter- schüren With further contributions of: Bård Norheim, Jan Werner, Christoph Schaaffkamp, Arthur Gleijm Contract tables provided by: Didier van de Velde, Arne Beck, Bård Norheim, Frode Longva, Tamás Dombi, Nicole Rudolf, Andrew Mellor, Daniela Carvalho, Rosário Macário, Kai-Henning Terschüren Layout: Didier van de Velde, Annemone Meyer, Arne Beck Disclaimer: This report was produced for DG En- ergy and Transport and represents the Consultants views. These views have not been adopted or in any way ap- proved by the Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission's or DG Energy and Transport's views, nor of the confor- mity of described practices with appli- cable Community law. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. File: contracting in urban public transport - contract tables (v4.2) pub.doc Date: Amsterdam, 14 January 2008 Contracting in urban public transport (appendix: contract tables) 2 Table of contents 1 TEMPLATE...........................................................................................................4 2 AMSTERDAM (NL): DIRECT AWARD WITH COMPETITIVE THREAT ..........................6 3 BARCELONA (E): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR........................................9 4 BRUSSELS (B): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR ..........................................11 5 BUDAPEST (H): DIRECT AWARD TO PUBLIC OPERATOR.......................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of Eureka
    1954 2020 U R E K A E HISTORY BI5 OF EUREKA SINCE 1954 Year Event notice: 1954 Establishment EUREKA, Brussels published „Moniteur belge“ N. 415 page 180 Inauguration of „Tantae Molis Erat“ - Knights of Belge as „Le Merite de l'invention; both on 22. January, 1954 60s around 300 inventions and 250 Innovators in average. 70s around 500 inventions and 300 Innovators in average at „Martini Building“ 1973 Exhibitions in Brussels President Eureka: Prof. José Loriaux New Logo: 80s around 1.100 inventions and 750 Innovators in average; still at Mar- tini Building. 1 1985 Initiative of France and Germany to build up Eureka funds. 90s together with EU Commission International Jury with: XXII together with „Organisation R.F. Mikhail Gorodissky PhD, Lawyer Sergey Dudush- Mondiale de la Presse Periodique“ kin, Partner „Gorodissky & Partner“China, President together with European Patent Zhank, China Science Ressources Austria, Senator Office Prof. Otto F. Joklik Belgium, George Asselberghs 1992 together with „Chambre Belge des Inventeurs“ and „Ministry of Eco- nomy“, Belgium Patronage King of Spain S.M. Juan Carlos I … as Grand Cross Officer „TME“ 1997 First time in „Les Pyramides“ Prof. Pierre Fumiere, President Int.Jury H.E. Guy Cudell Place the Rogier 2, 1210 Bruxelles Grandmaster of the Order T.M.E. previous Mayor of Participation of „RPS Innovative Brussels. Investment Banking“ Participation of „Russian Ministry of Defence“ 1998 Patronage of Kingdom of Morocco S.M. King Hassan II...as Grand Cross Officer T.M.E. 2 1999 Patronage of Kingdom of Belgium, HRH Prince Laurent as Grand Cross Officer T.M.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Vasileios Symeonidis, Msc Phd
    Vasileios Symeonidis, MSc PhD Personal Data Name Vasileios Symeonidis Date of birth October 26, 1990 Place of birth Thessaloniki, Greece Nationality Greek Professional status University assistant – Postdoctoral researcher Address University of Graz Institute of Education Research and Teacher Education Merangasse 70/II, 8010 Graz, Austria Telephone +43 (0)316 380 - 3849 Email [email protected] Main areas of research • Teacher education policy and practice: teacher competences, doctoral networks in teacher education, the professionalisation of teacher educators • International and comparative education: policy transfer, comparative case studies Education March 2016 – Feb. 2019 University of Innsbruck, Department of Teacher Education and School Research, Austria Graduated with a PhD in Education, graded “sehr gut” (excellent). PhD thesis: “Europeanisation in teacher education: Comparative case studies of teacher education policies and practices in Austria, Greece and Hungary”, supervised by Prof. Christian Kraler and Prof. Gábor Halász. Completed as a Marie Sklodowska Curie fellow in the framework of the European Doctorate in Teacher Education (EDiTE) – European Joint Degree, receiving a second PhD degree from the Eötvös Loránd University, Hungary and an EDiTE certificate by 5 universities. Feb. 2017 – June 2017 Eötvös Loránd University, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Hungary Mobility semester for 5 months in the framework of the European Doctorate in Teacher Education. Research internship at the Hungarian Association of Teacher Educators. Sept. 2013 – June 2015 Stockholm University, Institute of International Education, Sweden Graduated with the Master of Science in International and Comparative Education, graded with A (excellent). Master thesis: “Towards global citizenship education: A comparative case study of primary school policy and practice between Greece and Sweden”, supervised by Dr Mikiko Cars.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobility Management in Graz Gerhard Ablasser
    Mobility Management in Graz Examble Anton Paar Company Gerhard Ablasser, Stadtbaudirektion, Unit EU Programs and International Cooperation Cities for Mobility 7th World Congress Stuttgart 2nd June 2014 URBAN I: Wien / URBAN II: Wien / UPP elmas: Gran Canaria Vila do Conde Leon, Granada Bilbao Bordeaux Besancon Turin Neapel Mailand Brindisi Alexandropolis West-Athen Brüssel Dublin Leicester Huddersfield (Kirklees) Randers Utrecht Bremerhaven Friedrichshain (Berlin) Dortmund Leipzig / CIVITAS trendsetter: Stockholm Lille Prag Pecs / Guidemaps: Madrid Ille-de-France Cologne Brighton Surrey Essex Bochum Saarbrücken Erfurt Prag Brno Lundby Gävle Maribor Panorama / Tecnoman: Wien Thessaloniki Kalkidiki Pieria Chemnitz- Zickau Pilzen Ostrava Wroklow Belgrad / URB-AL Cultura: Buenos Aires Gent Criciúma Erechim Vitoria Santiago-La Pintana Cuenca Bilbao Valladolid / PIMMS: Frankfurt Serres Bromley Treviso Almada Stockholm Terrassa URBACT Chorus: Anderlecht, Bastia, Volos, Cosenza, Foggia, Napoli, Siracusa, Belfast, Krakau, Vila do Conde, Girona, Ourense und Toledo / URBACT Partners4action: Brüssel, Kopenhagen, Gera, Chemnitz, Liverpool, Nottingham, Lille, Nicosia, Riga, Amsterdam, Porto und Budapest / URBACT citiz@move: Charleroi Sambreville La Louviere Brüssel Aarhus Aalborg Gera CIVINET DSR London Valencienne Athen Cosenza Misterbianco Turin Siracusa German speaking Derry Sevilla Toledo Valencia Pecs / HistUrban: Kaufbeuren Regensburg Wismar Faenza Teramo Verona Salzburg Sanok Sopot AdArad OdOradea Pilzen / ASTUTE: LdLondon DbliDublin Siracusa
    [Show full text]
  • Arqus International Forum on Romance Studies
    Arqus International Forum on Romance Studies 1 About 1 2 Fact sheet 2 2.1 Structure/members 3 2.2 The AIFRS activities 3 2.3 Website 4 3 Details on already planned events/activities and outlook 5 3.1 Punctual events 5 3.2 Permanent activities 6 4 Types of events/activities 7 4.1 Punctual events 7 4.2 Permanent activities 8 https://www.arqus-alliance.eu/news/arqus-launches-forum-romance-studies Official website will launch in MAY 2021 1 About The Arqus International Forum on Romance Studies (=AIFRS) is open to all scholars from the Arqus Alliance (Granada, Graz, Leipzig, Padua, Vilnius, Bergen, Lyon1) whose research interests concern the Romance Languages. The AIFRS is designed as a long-term network that facilitates joint research and academic teaching at the Arqus universities and creates a matrix structure for this research while at the same time leaving the individual members maximum freedom and flexibility in developing their research and in planning joint activities that range from workshops and summer schools to permanent research groups. The forum's website (to go online in May 2021) will be the central organ of the AIFRS. It will make this joint research and teaching visible on an European scale and will make it easier to find new international partners for future collaborations. The website, hosted by the servers of the University of Granada, will consist of a central list of the participating scholars (from linguistics and literature/cultural sciences), which makes research on Romance Languages at the seven partner universities visible at a glance.
    [Show full text]
  • Info Sheet BLOC SUMMER Masters
    ORGANIZATION The International BLOC SUMMER Masters in Graz (AUT) is organized by Boulderverein Bloc House. Boulderverein Bloc House, Stefan Tscherner, Tel.: +43 699 11865436 Email: [email protected] Puchstr. 21, A-8020 Graz www.bloc-house.at THE VENUE: Mariahilferplatz Graz Google Maps https://www.google.com/maps/place/Mariahilferpl.,+8020+Graz/@47.0726515,15.4332234,109m/data=!3 m1!1e3!4m13!1m7!3m6!1s0x476e3582aca6ae39:0x4273fc1893735804!2sMariahilferpl.,+8020+Graz!3b1!8 m2!3d47.0725465!4d15.4338108!3m4!1s0x476e3582aca6ae39:0x4273fc1893735804!8m2!3d47.0725465!4 d15.4338108 TRAVELLING TO GRAZ IMPORTANT LINKS FOR INFORMATION ON TRAVELING TO AUSTRIA: https://www.austria.info/en/service-and-facts/coronavirus-information Please also have a look at the general Covid-Restrictions in Austria. By car: Graz is located at the highway A2 and easy to get to: about 2 hours from Vienna, 4 ½ hours from Munich (GER) and 3 hours from Udine (ITA). PARKING: There is only public parking in the centre of town. The close Parking Garage at the Museum of modern Art (“Kunsthaus”) is available for € 2,60,- per hour. The Venue is in Centre of Town and also easy reachable by public transport. Public Transport: https://www.verbundlinie.at/images/service/pdfs/liniennetz/graz.pdf By train: The main railway station in Graz is one of the most important railway stations in Austria. There are direct train and connections for example from Vienna, Salzburg, Linz, Innsbruck, Klagenfurt, Munich, Stuttgart and Frankfurt. You’ll find many other day and night connections and also special price offers on www.oebb.at. By plane: In recent years the modern airport of Graz has become a major transport hub.
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Cities Final Report
    Smart cities Ranking of European medium-sized cities Research Institute for Centre of Regional Department of Housing, Urban and Science (SRF) Geography Mobility Studies (OTB) Vienna University of University of Delft University of Technology Ljubljana Technology Final report, October 2007 Smart cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities General notes This report represents the final report of a research project sponsored by Asset One Immo- bilienentwicklungs AG, Kaiser- feldgasse 2, 8010 Graz. The project was elaborated from April to October 2007. This report was edited by the Centre of Regional Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology in October 2007. Contact: Rudolf Giffinger [email protected] www.srf.tuwien.ac.at Project team The research was carried out in collaborative work of persons from the Centre of Regional Science at the Vienna University of Technology (lead partner), the Department of Geography at University of Ljubljana and the OTB Research Institute for Housing, Urban and Mobility Studies at the Delft University of Technology. Rudolf Giffinger, Vienna UT Christian Fertner, Vienna UT Hans Kramar, Vienna UT Robert Kalasek, Vienna UT Nataša Pichler-Milanović, University of Ljubljana Evert Meijers, Delft UT Moreover thanks to Markus Petzl, Andreas Kleboth, Ernst Giselbrecht for participating contextually at the Kick-Off workshops. Project homepage www.smart-cities.eu © Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT, October 2007 1 Smart cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities 2 Smart cities – Ranking of European medium-sized cities Content 1 Background 5 1.1 Aim of the project 5 1.2 The role of city-rankings in regional competition 6 2 Objective 10 2.1 Defining smart city 10 2.2 Operationalizing smart city 11 3 Methodology 13 3.1 Selecting cities 13 3.2 Identifying indicators and data sources 14 3.3 Standardizing and aggregating data 14 4 Results and dissemination 15 4.1 Performance of 70 cities 15 4.2 City profiles 17 4.3 Dissemination 18 4.4 Outlook 18 5 Annex 21 Figures Fig.
    [Show full text]