Horizontal Distribution, Feeding Rates and Prey Selectivity of the Littoral Predator, Polyphemus Pediculus
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
New and Previously Known Species of Copepoda and Cladocera (Crustacea) from Svalbard, Norway – Who Are They and Where Do They Come From?
Fauna norvegica 2018 Vol. 38: 18–29. New and previously known species of Copepoda and Cladocera (Crustacea) from Svalbard, Norway – who are they and where do they come from? Inta Dimante-Deimantovica1,4, Bjørn Walseng1, Elena S. Chertoprud2,3, and Anna A. Novichkova2,3 Dimante-Deimantovica I, Walseng B, Chertoprud ES and Novichkova A. 2018. New and previously known species of Copepoda and Cladocera (Crustacea) from Svalbard, Norway – who are they and where do they come from? Fauna norvegica 38: 18–29. Arctic landscapes are characterised by an immense number of fresh and brackish water habitats – lakes, ponds and puddles. Due to a rather harsh environment, there is a limited number of species inhabiting these ecosystems. Recent climate-driven regime shifts impact and change Arctic biological communities. New species may appear, and existing communities may become supressed or even disappear, depending on how ongoing changes match their ecological needs. This study provides data on presently existing and probably recently arrived fresh and brackish water microcrustacean species in the Norwegian High Arctic - Svalbard archipelago. The study focused on two taxonomic groups, Cladocera and Copepoda and altogether we found seven taxa new for Svalbard: Alona werestschagini, Polyphemus pediculus, Diaptomus sp., Diacyclops abyssicola, Nitokra spinipes, Epactophanes richardi and Geeopsis incisipes. Compared with an existing overview for the area, our study increased the number of species by more than 20 %, and some of the new species have never been found that far north. Finally, we present a complete and critically updated revised species list of fresh and brackish water cladocerans and copepods for Svalbard. -
A Revised Key to the Zooplankton of Lake Champlain
Plattsburgh State University of New York Volume 6 (2013) A Revised Key to the Zooplankton of Lake Champlain Mark LaMay, Erin Hayes-Pontius, Ian M. Ater, Timothy B. Mihuc (faculty) Lake Champlain Research Institute, SUNY Plattsburgh, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 ABSTRACT This key was developed by undergraduate research students working on a project with NYDEC and the Lake Champlain Monitoring program to develop long-term data sets for Lake Champlain plankton. Funding for development of this key was provided by, the Lake Champlain Basin Program and the New York Department of Environmental Conservation (NYDEC). The key contains couplet keys for the major taxa in Cladocera and Copepoda and Rotifer plankton in Lake Champlain. Illustrations are by Erin Hayes-Pontius and Ian Ater. Many thanks to the employees of the Lake Champlain Research Institute for hours of excellent work in the field and in the lab: especially Casey Bingelli, Heather Bradley, Amanda Groves and Carrianne Pershyn. Keywords: Lake Champlain; zooplankton; identification; key INTRODUCTION Lake Champlain is one of the largest freshwater bodies in the United States. The Lake Champlain drainage basin is bordered by the Adirondack Mountains of New York to the west and the Green Mountains of Vermont to the east. This unique ecosystem has a surface area of 1130 km2, a length of 200 km and a mean depth of 19.4 m. The lake shoreline extends from Quebec in the north, 200 km south to Whitehall, New York, where it connects to the Hudson-Champlain canal. Islands and man-made transport causeways divide the lake into several distinct parts: Main Lake, South Lake, and Northeast Arm including Missisquoi Bay, and Malletts Bay. -
Phylogeography of the Chydorus Sphaericus Group (Cladocera: Chydoridae) in the Northern Palearctic
RESEARCH ARTICLE Phylogeography of the Chydorus sphaericus Group (Cladocera: Chydoridae) in the Northern Palearctic Alexey A. Kotov1☯*, Dmitry P. Karabanov1,2☯, Eugeniya I. Bekker1☯, Tatiana V. Neretina3☯, Derek J. Taylor4☯ 1 Laboratory of Aquatic Ecology and Invasions, A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 2 Laboratory of Fish Ecology, I. D. Papanin Institute for Biology of Inland Waters of Russian Academy of Sciences, Borok, Yaroslavl Area, Russia, 3 White Sea Biological Station, Biological Faculty, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, 4 Department of Biological Sciences, The State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, United States of America a11111 ☯ These authors contributed equally to this work. * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS The biodiversity and the biogeography are still poorly understood for freshwater inverte- brates. The crustacean Chydorus sphaericus-brevilabris complex (Cladocera: Chydoridae) Citation: Kotov AA, Karabanov DP, Bekker EI, Neretina TV, Taylor DJ (2016) Phylogeography of is composed of species that are important components of Holarctic freshwater food webs. the Chydorus sphaericus Group (Cladocera: Recent morphological and genetic study of the complex has indicated a substantial species Chydoridae) in the Northern Palearctic. PLoS ONE diversity in the northern hemisphere. However, we know little of the geographic boundaries 11(12): e0168711. doi:10.1371/journal. of these novel lineages. Moreover, a large section of the Palearctic remains unexamined at pone.0168711 the genetic level. Here we attempt to address the biodiversity knowledge gap for the Chy- Editor: Michael Knapp, University of Otago, NEW dorus sphaericus group in the central Palearctic and assess its diversity and biogeographic ZEALAND boundaries. -
From Small Scales to Large Scales –The Gulf of Finland Science Days
Gulf of Finland Co-operation From small scales to large scales –The Gulf of Finland Science Days 2017 9th-10th October 2017 Estonian Academy of Sciences, Tallinn Photo: Riku Lumiaro Photo: Gulf of Finland Contents Co-operation ORAL PRESENTATIONS V. Andreeva, E. Voyakina* Phytoplankton structure in eastern part of Gulf of Finland A. Antsulevich*, S. Titov Development of the program for combined restoration of European pearl mussel (Margaritifera margaritifera) and salmonid fishes local populations in two rivers inflowing to the Gulf of Finland in nature protected areas of Leningrad Oblast. R. Aps*, M. Fetissov, F. Goerlandt, P. Kujala, A. Piel, J. Thomas Systems approach based maritime traffic safety management in the Gulf of Finland (Baltic Sea) J. Kotta*, R. Aps, M. Futter, K. Herkül Assessing the environmental impacts and nutrient removal potential of mussel farms in the northeastern Baltic Sea J. Björkqvist*, O. Vähä-Piikkiö, L. Tuomi, V. Alari A spatially extensive validation of three different wave models in the Helsinki coastal archipelago A. Ivanchenko, D. Burkov* The state and environmental consequences of pollution air pool of the Gulf of Finland transport emissions K. Rubtsova, T. Mironenko, E. Daev* Preliminary assessment of water and sediment pollutions in littoral zone of the Kotlin Island. P. Ekholm*, M. Ollikainen, E. Punttila, S. Puroila, A. Kosenius Reducing agricultural phosphorus load by gypsum: results from the first year after amendment M. Fetissov*, R. Aps, P. Heinla, J. Kinnunen, O. Korneev, L. Lees, R. Varjopuro Ecosystem-based Maritime Spatial Planning – impact on navigational safety from offshore renewable energy developments V. Fleming-Lehtinen*, H. Parner, J. -
Conservation Status of the American Horseshoe Crab, (Limulus Polyphemus): a Regional Assessment
Rev Fish Biol Fisheries DOI 10.1007/s11160-016-9461-y REVIEWS Conservation status of the American horseshoe crab, (Limulus polyphemus): a regional assessment David R. Smith . H. Jane Brockmann . Mark A. Beekey . Timothy L. King . Michael J. Millard . Jaime Zaldı´var-Rae Received: 4 March 2016 / Accepted: 24 November 2016 Ó The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Horseshoe crabs have persisted for more available scientific information on its range, life than 200 million years, and fossil forms date to 450 history, genetic structure, population trends and anal- million years ago. The American horseshoe crab yses, major threats, and conservation. We structured (Limulus polyphemus), one of four extant horseshoe the status assessment by six genetically-informed crab species, is found along the Atlantic coastline of regions and accounted for sub-regional differences in North America ranging from Alabama to Maine, USA environmental conditions, threats, and management. with another distinct population on the coasts of The transnational regions are Gulf of Maine (USA), Campeche, Yucata´n and Quintana Roo in the Yucata´n Mid-Atlantic (USA), Southeast (USA), Florida Atlan- Peninsula, Me´xico. Although the American horseshoe tic (USA), Northeast Gulf of Me´xico (USA), and crab tolerates broad environmental conditions, Yucata´n Peninsula (Me´xico). Our conclusion is that exploitation and habitat loss threaten the species. We the American horseshoe crab species is vulnerable to assessed the conservation status of the American local extirpation and that the degree and extent of risk horseshoe crab by comprehensively reviewing vary among and within the regions. -
Polyphemus Pediculus (L.) (Cladocera) As a Possible Indicator of Water Quality
Polyphemus pediculus (L.) (Cladocera) as a possible indicator of water quality Item Type monograph Authors Butorina, L.G. Publisher Freshwater Biological Association Download date 28/09/2021 12:57:09 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/1834/22777 POLYPHEMUS PEDICULUS (L) (CLADOCERA) AS A POSSIBLE INDICATOR OF WATER QUALITY by L G Butorina (Water Resources, Biological Institute, Academy of Sciences) Usually stenobiotic species are used as hydrobiological indicators of the degree of pollution in natural waters (Makrushin, 1976). Cladocera are eurybiotic organisms, therefore their role as specific indicators of the water quality is considered to be insignificant (Bening, 1941; Makrushin, 1976). If, however, we approach the evaluation of waters from the point of view of the method of Zelinka and Marvan (Zelinka M, Marvan P, 1961) which is based on the occurrence frequency of each of the detected species in various saprobic zones, the importance of Cladocera as the most numerous and widely spread species in the specification of waters greatly increases. On the basis of this method Cladocera at present are more and more often used as indicators of oligo- and mesosaprobic waters as well as of the presence of considerable amounts of easily degradable organic matter (Makrushin, 1976). Work over many years on the biology of Polyphemus pediculus, this striking representative of the order Cladocera, convinced us of the possibility of using this species not only as an indicator of water purity but also for the estimation of the degree of water pollution as well as of water characteristics such as colour, turbidity, oxgen content and chemical composition. -
Animals and Plants Described As New from Colorado in 1912, 1913, and 1914
Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU Co Bee Lab 6-1-1915 Animals and Plants Described as New from Colorado in 1912, 1913, and 1914 T. D. A. Cockerell University of Colorodo Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_co Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Cockerell, T. D. A., "Animals and Plants Described as New from Colorado in 1912, 1913, and 1914" (1915). Co. Paper 547. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/bee_lab_co/547 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Bee Lab at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Co by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reprinted from University of Colorado Studies, Vol. XI, No. 4, Boulder, Colo., June 1915 ANIMALS AND PLANTS DESCRIBED AS NEW FROM COLORADO IN 1912., 1913, AND 1914 BY T. D. A. COCKERELL The present list of new forms described from Colorado is in continu ation of that given in the University of Colorado Studi es, Vol. IX, May, 1912, pp. 75-89 . Every species described as new, the descrip tion based wholly or in part on Colorado specimens, is included. For the year 1914, it has seemed best to include everything in the volumes of periodicals bearing that date, although some of the last numbers were not actually issued until early in 1915. The abbreviations are the same as those of the former list; t. 1.= type locality, while extinct species are marked t. The size of the list is surprising, and shows the richness of Colorado in new materials, as well as the activity of workers. -
Littoral Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from the Altai Mountain Lakes, with Remarks on the Taxonomy of Chydorus Sphaericus (O.F
Arthropoda Selecta 12 (34): 171182 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 2003 Littoral Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) from the Altai mountain lakes, with remarks on the taxonomy of Chydorus sphaericus (O.F. Müller, 1776) Ëèòîðàëüíûå Cladocera (Crustacea: Branchiopoda) ãîðíûõ îçåð Àëòàÿ ñ òàêñîíîìè÷åñêèìè çàìåòêàìè î Chydorus sphaericus (O.F. Müller, 1776) Mariya A. Belyaeva Ì.À. Áåëÿåâà A. N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Leninsky prospekt 33, Moscow 119071 Russia. Èíñòèòóò ïðîáëåì ýêîëîãèè è ýâîëþöèè èì. À. Í. Ñåâåðöîâà ÐÀÍ, Ëåíèíñêèé ïð-ò, 33, Ìîñêâà 119071 Ðîññèÿ. e-mail: [email protected]. KEY WORDS: faunistics, Cladocera, Chydorus sphaericus, Altai, mountain lakes, littoral zone. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: ôàóíèñòèêà, Cladocera , Chydorus sphaericus, Àëòàé, ãîðíûå îçåðà, ëèòîðàëüíàÿ çîíà. ABSTRACT: The faunistic data on Cladocera (Crus- faunistic survey on Cladocera was made by Sars and tacea) of the Altai Mountains are summarized from published in two papers [Sars, 1903a, b]. There were published and the authors records. The latter include also a few studies on zooplankton, some of which data on 18 lakes situated between 450 and 2700 m a.s.l. contained occasional records of littoral species [Rylov, Of 22 species of littoral cladocerans, which are mostly 1949; Shipunova, 1991; Zuykova, 1998; Vesnina et al., eurytopic and widely distributed, five are recorded for 1999; Popov et al., 2003]. All the species so far recorded the region for the first time. Cluster analysis revealed from the Altai Mountains are widely distributed, occur- three groups of habitats that differ in their cladoceran ring in lowlands as well, and a sole species the species composition. -
Lineage Diversity, Morphological and Genetic Divergence in Daphnia Magna (Crustacea) Among Chinese Lakes at Different Altitudes
Contributions to Zoology 89 (2020) 450-470 CTOZ brill.com/ctoz Lineage diversity, morphological and genetic divergence in Daphnia magna (Crustacea) among Chinese lakes at different altitudes Xiaolin Ma* Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Songhu Road 2005, Shanghai, China Yijun Ni* Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Songhu Road 2005, Shanghai, China Xiaoyu Wang Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Songhu Road 2005, Shanghai, China Wei Hu Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Songhu Road 2005, Shanghai, China Mingbo Yin Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Science, Fudan University, Songhu Road 2005, Shanghai, China [email protected] Abstract The biogeography and genetic structure of aquatic zooplankton populations remains understudied in the Eastern Palearctic, especially the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Here, we explored the population-genetic di- versity and structure of the cladoceran waterflea Daphnia magna found in eight (out of 303 investigated) waterbodies across China. The three Tibetan D. magna populations were detected within a small geo- graphical area, suggesting these populations have expanded from refugia. We detected two divergent mi- tochondrial lineages of D. magna in China: one was restricted to the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and the * Contributed equally. © Ma et al., 2020 | doi:10.1163/18759866-bja10011 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the cc by 4.0 license. -
Crustacean Phylogeny…? Nauplius • First Larva Stage of Most “It Can Be Concluded That Crustacean Crustaceans
Bio 370 Crustacea Main arthropod clades (Regier et al 2010) Phylum Arthropoda http://blogs.discoverm • Trilobita agazine.com/loom/201 0/02/10/blind-cousins- Subphylum (or Class) Crustacea to-the-arthropod- • Chelicerata superstars/ Mostly aquatic, with calcified exoskeleton. • Mandibulata – Myriapoda (Chilopoda, Diplopoda) Head derived from acron plus next five segments- so primitively has 5 pairs of appendages: – Pancrustacea • Oligostraca (Ostracoda, Branchiura) -2 pair antennae • Altocrustacea - 1 pair of jaws – Vericrustacea - 2 pair of maxillae » (Branchiopoda, Decapoda) - usually a median (cyclopean) eye and – Miracrustacea one pair of compound eyes » Xenocarida (Remipedia, Cephalocarida) » Hexapoda Tagmosis of trunk varies in different taxa Crustacean phylogeny…? Nauplius • first larva stage of most “It can be concluded that crustacean crustaceans. phylogeny remains essentially unresolved. • three pairs of appendages • single median (naupliar) eye Conflict is rife, irrespective of whether one compares different morphological studies, molecular studies, or both.” Appendages: Jenner, 2010: Arthropod Structure & Development 39:143– -1st antennae 153 -2nd antennae - mandibles 1 Bio 370 Crustacea Crustacean taxa you should know Remipede habitat: a sea cave “blue hole” on Andros Island. Seven species are found in the Bahamas. Class Remipedia Class Malacostraca Class Branchiopoda “Peracarida”-marsupial crustacea Notostraca –tadpole shrimp Isopoda- isopods Anostraca-fairy shrimp Amphipoda- amphipods Cladocera- water fleas Mysidacea- mysids Conchostraca- clam shrimp “Eucarida” Class Maxillopoda Euphausiacea- krill Ostracoda- ostracods Decapoda- decapods- ten leggers Copepoda- copepods Branchiura- fish lice Penaeoidea- penaeid shrimp Cirripedia- barnacles Caridea- carid shrimp Astacidea- crayfish & lobsters Brachyura- true crabs Anomura- false crabs “Stomatopoda”– mantis shrimps Class Remipedia Remipides found only in sea caves in the Caribbean, the Canary Islands, and Western Australia (see pink below). -
Fossil Calibrations for the Arthropod Tree of Life
bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/044859; this version posted June 10, 2016. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. FOSSIL CALIBRATIONS FOR THE ARTHROPOD TREE OF LIFE AUTHORS Joanna M. Wolfe1*, Allison C. Daley2,3, David A. Legg3, Gregory D. Edgecombe4 1 Department of Earth, Atmospheric & Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK 3 Oxford University Museum of Natural History, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PZ, UK 4 Department of Earth Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK *Corresponding author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Fossil age data and molecular sequences are increasingly combined to establish a timescale for the Tree of Life. Arthropods, as the most species-rich and morphologically disparate animal phylum, have received substantial attention, particularly with regard to questions such as the timing of habitat shifts (e.g. terrestrialisation), genome evolution (e.g. gene family duplication and functional evolution), origins of novel characters and behaviours (e.g. wings and flight, venom, silk), biogeography, rate of diversification (e.g. Cambrian explosion, insect coevolution with angiosperms, evolution of crab body plans), and the evolution of arthropod microbiomes. We present herein a series of rigorously vetted calibration fossils for arthropod evolutionary history, taking into account recently published guidelines for best practice in fossil calibration. -
Field Guide to Aquatic Invasive Species
Field Guide to Aquatic Invasive Species Identification, collection and reporting of aquatic invasive species in Ontario waters Algae Plants Invertebrates Fishes Copyright © 2008, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada By: Keiko Lui Michael Butler Martha Allen Jessica da Silva Beth Brownson Cover Photographs (left to right): Top row - Peter W. Bergstrom, Wasyl Bakowsky, Donald Sutherland Middle row - Dale Westaby, Dave Britton, Steven Pothoven Bottom row - John Lyons, Michael Butler, David Riecks MNR # 52089 (lk P.R., 08 02 28) ISBN 978-1-4249-4380-7 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4249-7313-2 (PDF) Field Guide to Aquatic Invasive Species Identification, collection and reporting of aquatic invasive species in Ontario waters Contents Acknowledgements 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Using The Field Guide 1.1.1 Species identification 1.1.2 Collecting specimens, recording information and reporting 1.2 Additional Information 2.0 IDENTIFICATION Algae Plants Invertebrates Fishes 3.0 REPORTING PROCEDURE 3.1 Collecting A Specimen 3.1.1 Algae 3.1.2 Plants 3.1.3 Invertebrates 3.1.4 Fishes 3.2 Recording Information 3.3 Report The Sighting Literature Cited Photo Index to Species Acknowledgements Many people helped this field guide come together and we are grateful to every one. We attempt to acknowledge each person below and regret if we have omitted anyone. Thanks to the following for their help on assessing and prioritizing species for inclusion in the guide: Ken Allison, Eric Snyder, Claire Wilson (Canadian Food Inspection Agency, CFIA); Becky Cudmore, Nick Mandrak (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, DFO); Francine MacDonald, Heather Smith (Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, OFAH); and April Tranter (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, OMNR).