DOCSLIB.ORG

From Womb to the Tomb: the Byzantine Life Course AD

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
From Womb to the Tomb: the Byzantine Life Course AD From Womb to the Tomb: The Byzantine Life Course AD 518 – 1204 By eve davies mphil ba hons AHEA Mount Athos, Monastery of Iveron, cod. 1, fol. 300r: the Dormition of the Virgin. 11th century. A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY VOLUME I i University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Status and gender studies are now well established paradigms of Byzantine social history. But academic enquiry has, so far, overlooked the significance of age. This is perhaps because most biographical accounts open with conception and birth, and move forwards to death, which seems so logical to us that the Life Course trajectory has not stood out as a defining characteristic of Byzantine biographical narratives. However, Byzantine authors do not present their characters as stagnant; characters are often shown to develop in persona across their lives. The study of age and life-stage is crucial to understanding the Byzantines’ evolving familial roles and societal responsibilities. This thesis deconstructs the Life Course patterns as presented to us by authors writing AD 518 to 1204, a critical period in the development of Byzantine culture. The start point is 518, the year that the Justinian dynasty commenced, a period characterised by a rich and abundant supply of evidence. The end point is 1204, the year that the Latins captured Constantinople and the sources distinctly change in style and influence. This thesis draws upon several types of evidence including literature, coins and tombstones in order to expose this hitherto unexploited but fundamental facet of Byzantine identity. ii For Reuben and Simon iii Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank Prof. Leslie Brubaker who has supported me from undergraduate level through to the present day. Her time, guidance and enthusiasm have been instrumental throughout the research and writing of this thesis. From the University of Birmingham, I would also like to thank Prof. Dimiter Angelov, Dr Chris Callow, Dr Archie Dunn, Dr Mary Harlow, Dr Ruth Macrides and Dr Steven Morewood. From the University of Oxford, I would like to thank Prof. Chris Wickham and from the University of Kent, I would like to thank Prof. Ray Laurence. I would like to extend my gratitude to fellow students and colleagues, including Dr Lisa Alberici, Andriani Georgiou, Rebecca Day, Daniel Reynolds, Dr Jonathan Shea, Dr Mike Saxby, Kyle Sinclair and Emma Southon, who have all provided a sounding board for ideas and sustained my enthusiasm. Research undertaken in this thesis would not have been possible without grants from the Arts and Humanities Research Council, the University of Birmingham, Queen’s University Belfast, the Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies and the Classical Association. Finally, I would like to thank all of my family and make a special mention of my husband, Simon, my mum, Angela, and my father-in-law, Keith, who have provided me with practical support and infinite encouragement. iv Contents List of Figures viii-xii List of Tables xiii-xiv List of Abbreviations xv-xvi Introduction 1-25 1. Conception to Childhood 26-57 1.1 Defining the Start of the Life Course 30-33 1.2 Conception 34-39 1.3 Pregnancy and Birth 40-53 1.4 Baptism and the Formation of Relationships 53-56 1.5 Conclusions 56-57 2. Childhood to Adolescence 58- 2.1 Defining the Start of Childhood 65-67 2.2 Relationships 68-76 2.3 Education and Training 76-82 2.4 Work and Economic Value 83-87 2.5 Conclusions 87-90 v 3. Adolescence to Maturity 91-131 3.1 Defining Adolescence 94-105 3.2 Relationships 105-112 3.3 New Responsibilities 112-119 3.4 Physicality and Physiognomy 120-124 3.5 Sexual Awakening 125-128 3.6 Conclusions 128-131 4. Maturity to Old Age 132-174 4.1 Defining Maturity 137-141 4.2 Physicality and Physiognomy 142-154 4.3 Consolidation of Personality 155-157 4.4 Relationships 157-172 4.5 Conclusions 172-174 5. Old Age to Death 175-211 5.1 Defining Old Age 181-188 5.2 Physicality and Physiognomy 189-196 5.3 Relationships with Other Generations 196-205 5.4 Dying and Death 205-208 vi 5.5 Conclusions 209-211 6. Tombstones: an Insight into Life and Death 212-248 6.1 Gender Data 219-227 6.2 Status Data 227-230 6.3 Age Data 231-246 6.4 Collective Burials 246-247 6.5 Conclusions 247-248 Conclusions 249-265 Appendix A: Images 266-317 Appendix B: Hagiographical Data 318-335 Appendix C: Translation of Epitaphs 336-347 Bibliography 348-435 Primary Sources 349-363 Secondary Sources 364-435 vii List of Figures Figure 1.1: Poreč, The Euphrasian Basilica. Mosaic: the Visitation. 6th century. Accessed online: http://www.icon-art.info/masterpiece.php?lng=en&mst_id=1545 (2/10/12). See: Prelog 1986. Figure 1.2: Paris, Bibliothèque Nationale de France, Paris Gregory, Gr. 510, fol. 3r: the Annunciation and the Visitation. 879-882. See: Brubaker, 1999. Figure 1.3: Mount Athos, Monastery of Dionysiou. Cod. 587m, fol. 117v: the Visitation. 11th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. Figure 1.4: Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana. Kynegetika Marc. Gr. Z 479, fol. 13v: a pregnant woman gazing at the statues of Castor, Hyacinthus, Narcissus and Nireus. c.1060. See: Spatharakis, 2004. Figure 1.5: Mount Athos, Monastery of Panteleimon. Cod. 2. Fol. 236r: the Visitation. 12th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. Figure 1.6: Kurbinovo, Church of Agios Georgios. Fresco: the Visitation. 1191. Accessed online: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Embrace_of_Elizabeth_and_the_Virgin_Mary.jp g (02/10/12). See: Chatzidakis 1994. Figure 1.7: Moscow, The Tretyakov Gallery, catalogue number 25539. Novgorod Icon: the Annunciation. c.1130-1140. See: Pentcheva 2007. Figure 1.8: Cyprus, Timios Stavros Church, 14th century. Fresco: the Visitation. Accessed online: http://creativecommons.org/ (13/05/10). Unpublished. Figure 2.1: Mount Athos, Monastery of Iveron, cod. 1, fol. 300r: the Dormition of the Virgin. 11th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. Figure 2.2: Mount Athos, Monastery of Dionysiou, cod. 588m, fol. 225v: Saint John the Evangelist dictating to Prochorus. End of 10th century or beginning of 11th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. Figure 2.3: Mount Athos, Monastery of Esphigmenou, cod. 19, fol. 1v: Saint John the Evangelist dictating to Prochorus. 11th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. Figure 2.4: Mount Athos, Monastery of Dionysiou, cod. 587m, fol. 1v: Saint John the Evangelist dictating to Prochorus. 11th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. Figure 2.5: Mount Athos, Monastery of Panteleimon, cod. 25. Fol. 143v: Saint John the Evangelist dictating to Prochorus. 12th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. viii Figure 2.6: Mount Athos, Monastery of Dionysiou, cod. 35, fol. 168v: Saint John the Evangelist dictating to Prochorus. 12th century. See: Christou, Kadas and Tsioumis Pelekanidis, 1974. Figure 2.7: Moscow, State Historical Museum, Khludov Psalter, Gr. 129, fol. 147v and 148r: Scenes from the life of David. 9th century. Accessed online: http://www.historyofscience.com/G2I/timeline/index.php?category=Survival+of+Infor mation (03/10/10). See: Ščepkina 1977. Figure 2.8: Istanbul, Great Palace, Mosaic: Boy feeding donkey. 6th century. Accessed online: www.dotjack.com/opq/opq20070401.htm (03/10/10). See: Cimok 2001. Figure 2.9: Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Kynegetika Marc. Gr. Z 479, fol. 2v: Children and adults hunting birds with reeds. c.1060. See: Spatharakis 2004. Figure 3.1: Mount Athos, Monastery of Agios Panteleimonon, Homilies of Gregory of Nazianzus, cod. 6, fol. 178r: Gregory with younger and older clerics. c.1080. Accessed online: http://www.macedonian-heritage.gr/HellenicMacedonia/media/original/d21e.jpg (15/06/10). See: Galavaris 1969. Figure 3.2: Mount Athos, Monastery of Agios Panteleimonon, Homilies of Gregory of Nazianzus, cod. 6, fol. 77v: Gregory and Julian the Apostate. c.1080. Accessed online: http://www.macedonian-heritage.gr/HellenicMacedonia/media/original/d26o.jpg (15/06/10). See: Galavaris 1969. Figure 3.3: Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Kynegetika Marc. Gr. Z 479, fol. 2r: fishing scene. c.1060. See: Spatharakis 2004. Figure 3.4: Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Kynegetika Marc. Gr. Z 479, fol. 3r: costume and equipment of the hunters. c.1060. See: Spatharakis 2004. Figure 3.5: Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Kynegetika Marc. Gr. Z 479, fol. 24v: a ploughman. c.1060. See: Spatharakis 2004. Figure 3.6: Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Kynegetika Marc. Gr. Z 479, fol. 17v: a hunter training his dog by burying a hare. c.1060. See: Spatharakis 2004. Figure 3.7: Venice, Biblioteca Nazionale Marciana, Kynegetika Marc. Gr. Z 479, fol. 18r: a dog looking for the trail and then moaning like a woman when he does not find it. c.1060. See: Spatharakis 2004. Figure 3.8: Ravenna, San Vitale, Mosaic: Justinian I and his entourage. 6th century. Accessed online: http://traumwek.standford.edu/philolog/Justinian.jpg (18/11/10). See: Barber 1990. Figure 3.9: Paris, Louvre, Harbaville Triptych: the deesis and saints.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Synopsis of Byzantine History, –
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-40474-8 - John Skylitzes: A Synopsis of Byzantine History, 811–1057 John Wortley Frontmatter More information JOHN SKYLITZES: A synopsis of Byzantine history, – John Skylitzes’ extraordinary Middle Byzantine chronicle covers the reigns of the Byzantine emperors from the death of Nicephorus I in to the deposition of Michael VI in , and provides the only surviving continuous narrative of the late tenth and early eleventh centuries. A high offi cial living in the late eleventh century, Skylitzes used a number of existing Greek histories (some of them no longer extant) to create a digest of the previous three centuries. It is with- out question the major historical source for the period, cited con- stantly in modern scholarship, and has never before been available in English. Th is edition features introductions by Jean-Claude Cheynet and Bernard Flusin, along with extensive notes by Cheynet. It will be an essential and exciting addition to the libraries of all historians of the Byzantine age. is Professor of History Emeritus at the University of Manitoba. He has published widely on the Byzantine era, and completed several translations to date, including Les Récits édifi - ants de Paul, évêque de Monembasie, et d’autres auteurs (), Th e ‘Spiritual Meadow’ of John Moschos, including the additional tales edited by Nissen and Mioni (), Th e spiritually benefi cial tales of Paul, Bishop of Monembasia and of other authors () and John Skylitzes: A Synopsis of Histories (AD –) , a provisional transla- tion published
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Conquests in the East in the 10 Century
    th Byzantine conquests in the East in the 10 century Campaigns of Nikephoros II Phocas and John Tzimiskes as were seen in the Byzantine sources Master thesis Filip Schneider s1006649 15. 6. 2018 Eternal Rome Supervisor: Prof. dr. Maaike van Berkel Master's programme in History Radboud Univerity Front page: Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas entering Constantinople in 963, an illustration from the Madrid Skylitzes. The illuminated manuscript of the work of John Skylitzes was created in the 12th century Sicily. Today it is located in the National Library of Spain in Madrid. Table of contents Introduction 5 Chapter 1 - Byzantine-Arab relations until 963 7 Byzantine-Arab relations in the pre-Islamic era 7 The advance of Islam 8 The Abbasid Caliphate 9 Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty 10 The development of Byzantine Empire under Macedonian dynasty 11 The land aristocracy 12 The Muslim world in the 9th and 10th century 14 The Hamdamids 15 The Fatimid Caliphate 16 Chapter 2 - Historiography 17 Leo the Deacon 18 Historiography in the Macedonian period 18 Leo the Deacon - biography 19 The History 21 John Skylitzes 24 11th century Byzantium 24 Historiography after Basil II 25 John Skylitzes - biography 26 Synopsis of Histories 27 Chapter 3 - Nikephoros II Phocas 29 Domestikos Nikephoros Phocas and the conquest of Crete 29 Conquest of Aleppo 31 Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas and conquest of Cilicia 33 Conquest of Cyprus 34 Bulgarian question 36 Campaign in Syria 37 Conquest of Antioch 39 Conclusion 40 Chapter 4 - John Tzimiskes 42 Bulgarian problem 42 Campaign in the East 43 A Crusade in the Holy Land? 45 The reasons behind Tzimiskes' eastern campaign 47 Conclusion 49 Conclusion 49 Bibliography 51 Introduction In the 10th century, the Byzantine Empire was ruled by emperors coming from the Macedonian dynasty.
    [Show full text]
  • Sex, Lies, and Mosaics: the Zoe Panel As a Reflection of Change in Eleventh-Century Byzantium*
    SEX, LIES, AND MOSAICS: THE ZOE PANEL AS A REFLECTION OF CHANGE IN ELEVENTH-CENTURY BYZANTIUM* Brian A. Pollick, University of Victoria Abstract The stereotype of Byzantine art as static and unchanging still compels Byzantine specialists to emphasize that change is readily evident in Byzantine art if one knows where and how to look for it. This paper is a case study about such change and how a unique set of social forces in the early eleventh century induced cultural change that resulted in new visual forms. The subject of this case study is the mosaic known as The Zoe Panel, located in the South Gallery of the Hagia Sophia in Constantinople. The panel depicts the Emperor Constantine IX presenting a bag of money to the enthroned Christ, while the Empress Zoe presents an imperial scroll probably signifying an ongoing grant. Although there has been much written about this mosaic, the fact that the moneybag and imperial scroll represent two new iconographic elements in imperial portraits has gone largely unnoticed. This study argues that the appearance of these new iconographic features is a direct reflection of the specific dynastic, economic and social circumstances in the Byzantine Empire in the early eleventh century. he stereotype of Byzantine art as static and unchanging still compels Byzantine specialists to emphasize that change is readily evident in Byzantine art if one knows where and how to look for it. This paper is a Tcase study about such change and examines how a unique set of political, economic and social forces in the early eleventh century induced socio-cultural change that resulted in new visual forms.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Icon in Byzantine Piety by LENNART RYDEN
    The Role of the Icon in Byzantine Piety By LENNART RYDEN In February 754, the bishops of the Byzantine Empire met in the imperial palace at Hiereia, a peninsula on the Asiatic side of the Sea of Marmora, not far from Chalcedon. The council had been convened by the Emperor Constantine V (741-75), who wanted the bishops to examine the scriptures and express their opinion on the "deceitful painting of likenesses, which draws away the human mind from the service which is sublime and befits the Divinity to the grovelling and material service of creatures"1. As the phrasing shows, the assembled bishops were not expected to discuss whether the making of icons2 was justified or not. The emperor had already examined this question and found that there was no such justification. The purpose of the council was rather to remove unorthodox elements from the emperor's argument, to give it a theological finish and to put it into a historical context. The proceedings lasted six months. In August a horos (definition) was approved, which may be summarized as follows3. In order to separate man from God, Lucifer made man worship the crea- ture rather than the Creator (cf. Rom. i,25). God, who wanted to save man, sent him the Law and the prophets. When man failed to return to his former state, God at last sent His own Son and Logos. Christ saved man from idolatry and taught him to worship in spirit and truth (cf. John iv ,24). The Christian apostles and teachers passed on the true faith to later generations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Developmentof Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrachs to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. The Development of Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrarchs to the Herakleian Dynasty General Introduction The emperor, as head of state, was the most important and powerful individual in the land; his official portraits and to a lesser extent those of the empress were depicted throughout the realm. His image occurred most frequently on small items issued by government officials such as coins, market weights, seals, imperial standards, medallions displayed beside new consuls, and even on the inkwells of public officials. As a sign of their loyalty, his portrait sometimes appeared on the patches sown on his supporters’ garments, embossed on their shields and armour or even embellishing their jewelry. Among more expensive forms of art, the emperor’s portrait appeared in illuminated manuscripts, mosaics, and wall paintings such as murals and donor portraits. Several types of statues bore his likeness, including those worshiped as part of the imperial cult, examples erected by public 1 officials, and individual or family groupings placed in buildings, gardens and even harbours at the emperor’s personal expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Persian Royal Ancestry
    GRANHOLM GENEALOGY PERSIAN ROYAL ANCESTRY Achaemenid Dynasty from Greek mythical Perses, (705-550 BC) یشنماخه یهاشنهاش (Achaemenid Empire, (550-329 BC نايناساس (Sassanid Empire (224-c. 670 INTRODUCTION Persia, of which a large part was called Iran since 1935, has a well recorded history of our early royal ancestry. Two eras covered are here in two parts; the Achaemenid and Sassanian Empires, the first and last of the Pre-Islamic Persian dynasties. This ancestry begins with a connection of the Persian kings to the Greek mythology according to Plato. I have included these kind of connections between myth and history, the reader may decide if and where such a connection really takes place. Plato 428/427 BC – 348/347 BC), was a Classical Greek philosopher, mathematician, student of Socrates, writer of philosophical dialogues, and founder of the Academy in Athens, the first institution of higher learning in the Western world. King or Shah Cyrus the Great established the first dynasty of Persia about 550 BC. A special list, “Byzantine Emperors” is inserted (at page 27) after the first part showing the lineage from early Egyptian rulers to Cyrus the Great and to the last king of that dynasty, Artaxerxes II, whose daughter Rodogune became a Queen of Armenia. Their descendants tie into our lineage listed in my books about our lineage from our Byzantine, Russia and Poland. The second begins with King Ardashir I, the 59th great grandfather, reigned during 226-241 and ens with the last one, King Yazdagird III, the 43rd great grandfather, reigned during 632 – 651. He married Maria, a Byzantine Princess, which ties into our Byzantine Ancestry.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomarbeit
    Diplomarbeit Titel der Diplomarbeit Stifter am Throne Christi: Das Mosaik von Zoë und Konstantin IX. Monomachos auf der Empore der Hagia Sophia in Istanbul Zoë 1028 - 1050, Christus und Konstantin IX. Monomachos 1042 - 1055 Verfasserin Maria Gabriele Schreidl-Rannegger angestrebter akademischer Grad Magistra der Philosophie (Mag. Phil.) Wien, 2012 Studienkennzahl A 315 Studienrichtung Kunstgeschichte Betreuerin Univ. -Prof. Dr. Lioba Theis Seite 2 1. Vorwort 5 2. Einleitung 7 3. Die Freilegung der Mosaiken in der Hagia Sophia im 20. Jahrhundert 11 3.1. Anbringungsort des Mosaiks in der Hagia Sophia 14 4. Historischer Hintergrund 16 4.1. Zoë und Romanos III. Argyros 16 4.2. Zoë und Michael IV. 17 4.3. Michael V. Kalaphates 18 4.4. Der Volksaufstand 19 4.5. Zoë und Theodora 20 4.6. Zoë und Konstantin IX. Monomachos 21 5. Der aktuelle Forschungsstand 24 5.1. Datierung und Inschriften des Mosaiks 24 5.2. Thomas Whittemore, 1942 26 5.3. Gyula Moravcsik, 1947 29 5.4. Thomas Whittemore, 1948 30 5.5. John Beckwith, 1961 33 5.6. Cyril Mango, 1967 36 5.7. Nicolas Oikonomides, 1978 38 5.8. Robin Cormack, 1981 44 5.9. Ioli Kalavrezou, 1994 48 5.10. Lynda Garland, 1994 56 5.11. Barbara Hill, Liz James und Dion Smythe, 1994 64 5.12. Barbara Hill, 1997 69 5.13. Barbara Hill, 1999 72 5.14. Robin Cormack, 2000 76 6. Bilddokumentation und Rekonstruktion des Mosaiks 79 6.1. Cyril Mango,1962 79 6.2. Natalia B. Teteriatnikov, 1998 80 6.4. Ioli Kalavrezou 82 6.4. Schreidl-Rannegger, 2012 83 6.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUSTINIAN CODE and ITS INFLUENCE (Justinian Ruled the Eastern Roman Empire 527 A.D - 565 A.D)
    THE JUSTINIAN CODE AND ITS INFLUENCE (Justinian Ruled the Eastern Roman Empire 527 A.D - 565 A.D) The Justinian Code and Its Influence Laws make up the foundation of modern society, by clearly stating what is and isn’t allowed and provide a set of the punishments that coincide with the crime that was committed. One of Rome’s greatest achievements was their judicial system. However, as the Roman Empire expanded they became ​ weak and were unable to maintain their borders. This ultimately led to the collapse of the Roman Empire and it was divided into the Eastern and Western Roman Empire. Like its former self the Western Empire also collapsed and all that remained was the Eastern Empire. As the Empires collapsed so did the legal system, after many years of corrupt officials making laws and the numerous controversial rulings by the roman court system, the ​ once proud and magnificent Roman law was left in shambles. Emperor Justinian I was the ruler of the Eastern Roman Empire, or the Byzantine Empire. Emperor Justinian saw the condition that the Roman law was in and set out to reform the Roman legal system by creating his own set of laws and interpretations based on the old roman laws. The purpose of these sets of laws was to create a universal set of laws that all of the Byzantine Empire could follow, and was given presidence over any local laws, preventing any contradictions in court rulings. This set of laws would be known as Corpus Juris Civilis, which translates to “Body of Civil Law” and would also be known as the Justinian Code.
    [Show full text]
  • Iconoclasm: a Christian Dilemma
    ICONOCLASM: A CHRISTIAN DILEMMA - A BYZANTINE CONTROVERSY By STEPHEN CHARLES STEACY •• Bachelor of Arts Oklahoma State University Stillwater, Oklahoma 1969 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS December, 1978 ICONOCLASM: A CHRISTIAN DILEMMA - A BYZANTINE CONTROVERSY Thesis Approved: '. ~- Dean of the Graduate College 1019541 ii P~F~E This thesis is concerned with Iconoclasm, the religious upheaval which troubled the Byzantine conscience for over a century. There have been numerous theories adduced by his­ torians to account for this phenomenon. It is the purpose of this study to view the varying interpretations, analyze their shortcomings, and to put forth a different view of the controversy, one that more adequately expresses the deeply rooted religious nature of the movement, a movement not only of the eighth and ninth centuries but an idea which was nurtured in fertile soil of the Old Testament and Apostolic Christianity. The author wishes to express heartfelt appreciation to his thesis adviser, Dr. George Jewsbury, whose unflagging solicitude, support, and inspiration were instrumental in the preparation of this work. A note of thanks is given to Mrs. Karen Hoyer, whose typing expertise, in the final analysis, made the difference between success and failure. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION AND HISTORIOGRAPHICAL ESSAY 1 II. THEOLOGICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL COURSES OF THE CONTROVERSY. • • . • . • • . • . 13 Genesis of the Cult of Icons .•.• 13 The Scriptures as the Foundation of Iconoclasm. 26 Precursors of ·the Iconoclast Movement . 30 Origen . 31 Eusebius .
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Collapse While the City of Constantinople—The Heart and Soul
    Byzantine Collapse While the city of Constantinople—the heart and soul of Byzantine culture—would remain in Byzantine hands until 1453, the empire as a whole began to collapse with the death of Basil II. Basil II was the last of the line of strong military and administrative leaders. Under his rule the empire was expanding once again. He capitalized on his military victories, especially those over the Bulgarians, and his firm grip on the army to institute internal reforms. In an effort to ease the burden of the small landholder, Basil II promulgated a contentious tax law to curb the growing power of the landowning elite. The law decreed that the large landholders had to make up any tax deficit out of their own pockets, by threat of eviction by imperial troops. This move exasperated the already present anti-military sentiment held by many members of the civil aristocracy. Lacking the same military might and administrative aptitude, Basil II’s successors faced political division at home, military losses in newly reconquered regions, and a final breakdown in relations with the west. In the period between Basil II’s death in 1025 and the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, the Byzantines lost their holdings in southern Italy to the Normans, confronted religious schism with the church in Rome, and lost control of Asia Minor to a new powerful Islamic force: the Seljuk Turks. After the Battle of Manzikert, the empire would consist of Constantinople and the areas immediately surrounding it. Byzantium would never recover. The growing split between the civil aristocracy and the military aristocracy had a marked influence on the fall of Byzantine dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nephew of Michael Cerularios , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 22:1 (1981:Spring) P.89
    SNIPES, KENNETH, A Letter of Michael Psellus to Constantine the Nephew of Michael Cerularios , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 22:1 (1981:Spring) p.89 A Letter of Michael Psellos to Constantine the Nephew of Michael Cerularios Kenneth Snipes N AN ARTICLE listing the unpublished letters of Michael Psellos, I Jean Darrouzes noted that a small group of six letters attrib­ uted to Psellos is found in three manuscripts: Athas, Mov~ Meyiar17c; Aavpac; 1721 (M 30) fols. 86-98; Bucharest, Academia Republicii Socialiste Romania 737 (587) fols. 214-49; and Cam­ bridge, Trinity College 1485 (0.10.33) fols. 192-203v. 1 In addi­ tion to the three manuscripts known to Darrouzes, these six letters are found also in Paris, Bibliotheque Nationale, Supplement grec 1334 fols. 108-23v.2 Three of the six (the first, fourth, and sixth) were correctly identified by Darrouzes as letters already published by Sathas or Kurtz-Drexl. 3 Darrouzes, followed by Paul Canart in a later, more comprehensive list of the unpublished letters of Psellos, 4 believed that the other three letters (the second, third, and fifth) had not yet been published. In the case of the third and fifth letters, however, both scholars have been misled by slight differ­ ences between the word order of their incipits and the incipits of letters 1 and 84 in the large collection of Psellos' letters edited by Sathas. 5 The fifth letter, for example, begins 'Eyw be qJf.11'/V, lepd Kai rpzn6(}1Jre Kerpa).lj, rather than 'Eyw tliv, w lepa Kai rpzn6()17re Kerpa).,~ as in the version in Parisinus gr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Byzantine State and the Dynatoi
    The Byzantine State and the Dynatoi A struggle for supremacy 867 - 1071 J.J.P. Vrijaldenhoven S0921084 Van Speijkstraat 76-II 2518 GE ’s Gravenhage Tel.: 0628204223 E-mail: [email protected] Master Thesis Europe 1000 - 1800 Prof. Dr. P. Stephenson and Prof. Dr. P.C.M. Hoppenbrouwers History University of Leiden 30-07-2014 CONTENTS GLOSSARY 2 INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER 1 THE FIRST STRUGGLE OF THE DYNATOI AND THE STATE 867 – 959 16 STATE 18 Novel (A) of Leo VI 894 – 912 18 Novels (B and C) of Romanos I Lekapenos 922/928 and 934 19 Novels (D, E and G) of Constantine VII Porphyrogenetos 947 - 959 22 CHURCH 24 ARISTOCRACY 27 CONCLUSION 30 CHAPTER 2 LAND OWNERSHIP IN THE PERIOD OF THE WARRIOR EMPERORS 959 - 1025 32 STATE 34 Novel (F) of Romanos II 959 – 963. 34 Novels (H, J, K, L and M) of Nikephoros II Phokas 963 – 969. 34 Novels (N and O) of Basil II 988 – 996 37 CHURCH 42 ARISTOCRACY 45 CONCLUSION 49 CHAPTER 3 THE CHANGING STATE AND THE DYNATOI 1025 – 1071 51 STATE 53 CHURCH 60 ARISTOCRACY 64 Land register of Thebes 65 CONCLUSION 68 CONCLUSION 70 APPENDIX I BYZANTINE EMPERORS 867 - 1081 76 APPENDIX II MAPS 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY 82 1 Glossary Aerikon A judicial fine later changed into a cash payment. Allelengyon Collective responsibility of a tax unit to pay each other’s taxes. Anagraphis / Anagrapheus Fiscal official, or imperial tax assessor, who held a role similar as the epoptes. Their major function was the revision of the tax cadastre. It is implied that they measured land and on imperial order could confiscate lands.
    [Show full text]