Selection of Sites Allocated for Development

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Selection of Sites Allocated for Development Matter 7 Hearing Statement – Selection of sites allocated for development Our ref 50765/JG/JCx Date 25 August 2017 Subject Leeds: Site Allocations Plan (SAP) - Public Examination Matter 7 Selection of Sites Allocated for Development - Hearing Statement on behalf of Persimmon Homes West Yorkshire Issue – For each Housing Market Characteristic area, are the individual sites selected sound? 1.0 Introduction 1.1 This Hearing Statement has been prepared by Lichfields on behalf of Persimmon Homes West Yorkshire (PHWY) and responds to all questions set by the Inspector in relation to Matter 7. In addition, it provides responses to site-specific questions in relation to the Outer South and Outer South East Housing Market Characteristic Areas (“HMCAs”). 2.0 Main Issue 1 – for each Housing Market Characteristic Area, are the individual sites selected sound? Q1 – Are the selected sites justified having regard to the site selection methodology and process, paying particular attention to the deliverability of the allocated sites? 2.1 For the most part, yes. Throughout the preparation of the SAP, the adopted methodology has continued to appraise and sift potential sites to ensure that the most suitable and appropriate allocations are taken forward. This process has been subject to scrutiny via public consultation, thus ensuring that it has been undertaken in a robust and objective manner. 2.2 As part of this process, the accompanying Sustainability Appraisal has considered alternative sites and strategies (also taking into account any potential scope for mitigation measures to be adopted), using a scoring mechanism in order to consider different sites against individual sustainability objectives in a consistent manner. This approach is considered to be entirely appropriate and one which has commonly been used by other Local Planning Authorities in the production of plans that have subsequently been identified as sound at Examination. 2.3 Notwithstanding the above, we consider that the deliverability of certain sites – an example being Site HSG-124 – have been appraised in an overly-optimistic manner. Our response to Matter 2 provides further details on this, with our recommendation being that further sites are allocated in order to ensure that the SAP is flexible and resilient enough should identified and / or allocated sites fail to deliver at the pace envisaged. Q2 – Are sufficient sites identified in the HMCA consistent with the CS? 2.4 No, we do not consider this to be the case. Whilst this is set out in further detail in our response to Matter 2, the HMCAs where there is currently a shortfall could be made consistent with the CS through the allocation of additional suitable and available housing sites. For example, Pg 1/10 Lichfields.uk 14709144v2 PHWY’s site at Barwick Road, Garforth (SHLAA ref. 2516, 1226, 3114 & 1165) has been identified as a site that is suitable and available for allocation within the Outer South East HMCA. Similarly, sites at Cemetery Lane, Lofthouse (SHLAA ref. 3085) and Warm Lane, Yeadon (SHLAA ref. 2162 & 1104) have been demonstrated as suitable and available for development within the Outer South and Aireborough HMCAs, respectively. Q3 – On identified sites where planning permission has expired, is there very convincing written or verbal evidence that the intentions of the owners/developers have changed? (Please see schedule 1) 2.5 Whilst schedule 1 does not provide a list of sites where planning permission has expired (rather, it provides a list of sites where no planning permission exists), we can confirm that all sites which are in control by PHWY are ones where housing is being proactively promoted and there is a clear intent for a future planning application for new housing development to be submitted. With reference to schedule 1, these sites include sites MX1-26 (East of Otley, Off Pool Road) and HG1-288 (East Leeds Extension). Q4 – Is the proposed mix of uses on mixed use allocated sites justified? 2.6 The only site within PHWY’s control that this question is relevant to is Site MX1-26 (East of Otley, Off Pool Road), where the latest masterplan for the site (see Annex 1) proposes the following mix of uses: • 550 dwellings; • Provision of a relief road (East Otley Relief Road); • Relocation and provision of sports pitches; • A new two-form entry primary school; • Elderly persons accommodation; • 5 hectares of employment land; and • Public open space. 2.7 PHWY’s masterplan therefore accords with the mix of uses identified within the SAP which, in turn, will ensure that a sustainable form of development is delivered on this strategic site. Q5 – Where the development of a site relies on the delivery of critical infrastructure (e.g. new roads, new water and waste water infrastructure, significant pre-commencement work), does the evidence support that the infrastructure will be in place to support the timely development of these sites? 2.8 Yes, in most cases. The East Otley Relief Road can be provided in a timely manner to support the planned delivery of the proposed East Otley (MX1-26) allocation and the park and ride infrastructure at Stourton which is required to enable the Haighside, Rothwell (HG2-173) site to come forward, is already in place. 2.9 The Northern Quadrant of the East Leeds Extension (HG1-288) is capable of being brought forward before the delivery of the East Leeds Orbital Route, as access could be achieved from the A58 as demonstrated in the current planning application (ref. 16/05095/FU). Pg 2/10 Lichfields.uk 14709144v2 2.10 However, there is an over-reliance on certain allocations coming forward when the implementation of these developments is subject to the delivery of critical infrastructure. The outcome of the highways modelling work for the Parlington and Stourton Grange allocations will not be available until October 2017 and therefore, the extent of the highways infrastructure required is not yet clear. As a result, additional flexibility needs to be built into the SAP in order to ensure that the type and amount of development anticipated within the CS is delivered, in the event that certain allocations don’t deliver either in full or in part during the plan period. Consequentially, additional sites need to be allocated in the Outer South East HMCA, such as at Barwick Road, Garforth (SHLAA refs. 2156, 1126, 3114 & 1165). Q6 – Are the identified Protected Areas of Search site justified? 2.11 To an extent, yes, as they help give much needed flexibility to the SAP, should the delivery of certain sites not be forthcoming in full or in part during the plan period. 2.12 As stated in our response to Matter 2, however, we have expressed concerns as to the deliverability of Sites HG-124 and MX-32 during the plan period. This is highly significant given that both of these sites make up the majority of the identified housing supply within their respective HMCAs. 2.13 Given the above concerns, it would be prudent for Site HG3-18 (Selby Road, Garforth) to be brought forward as a Phase 1 housing allocation within the outer south east HMCA, rather than held back as safeguarded land. 3.0 Main Issue 2: For each site, are the policies and specific site requirements sound? 3.1 Our response to the following questions reflects views on the sites within our client’s control (in whole or in part). These are listed in Table 1 as follows: Table 1 Proposed allocation sites controlled by PHWY HMCA Area Site Ref. Site Description Outer north west MX1-26 East of Otley, Off Pool Road East Leeds HG1-288 East Leeds Extension Outer north east HG2-226 Land to the east of Wetherby HG1-288 East Leeds Extension Outer south HG2-173 Haighside, Rothwell Outer south east HG3-18 Land south of Selby Road, Garforth Outer south west HG2-150 Churwell (land to the east of) LS27 HG2-149 Lane Side Farm, PAS Morley HG2-153 Albert Drive, Morley HG1-514 Albert Drive – Lower Moor Farm, Morley HG1-351 Owlers Farm PAS, Wide Lane, Morley Pg 3/10 Lichfields.uk 14709144v2 Q1 – Are the general policies and site requirements relating to all sites positively prepared, justified and effective (are they clearly expressed so that they can be applied in day to day decision-making?) and consistent with national policy? 3.11 Yes. These appear to be consistent with policies set out in the adopted Core Strategy. Given that the Core Strategy has been confirmed as sound at a separate Examination in Public, it follows that the general policies and site requirements within the SAP are also positively prepared, justified, effective and consistent with national policy. 3.12 Q2 – Are the site specific requirements relating to individual sites justified and effective (are they clearly expressed so they can be applied in day to day decision- making?) and consistent with national policy? 3.13 MX1-26 – we support the allocation of this site and consider it to be justified and effective on the basis that the site is suitable and available for development. 3.14 HG1-228 – we support the allocation of this site and consider it to be justified and effective on the basis that the site is suitable and available for development. 3.15 HG2-226 – the site requirements clearly express the need for a comprehensive development on this site. PHWY agree with this and the illustrative masterplan included in Annex 2 shows one such way that a comprehensive, sustainable development could be realised on the allocation site. To ensure its effectiveness, however, additional wording should be added to the site requirements of HG2-226, requiring a phasing plan to be agreed by all three landowners which ensures that the entirety of the site is delivered within the plan period in an appropriate and timely manner.
Recommended publications
  • Riding Yorkshire. 2002
    I? US lYE~ RIDING YORKSHIRE. 2002 ~PrrB:(.ICA!fS'-contituu:d. Whitehall fnn, WIILBerry,Whitehali~ Hfppl'rholme,Halifx White Hors&,.i'R'II, Joha H.~lg .. on, White Horse yd. Wakefid Wkitewelljamily hotel t ptJfltin{J ltouBeJ Willia.m Cowgil~ Whitt Horll!j.Jolm Lapish, 251 Meanwood toe.d, Leeds WbiwweU, Clitheroe, See adnrtisement WhittJ Hor~e, Josepb J..a.Yfield, 305 Hi~h street, Great Wkitt~W• hotel, Wm. Whittell, Common, Normanton H orton, JJradford Whitwell Main inn, Thomas Ward, St:~:eetbouse, Syndall!, White H ortu~, Robert Mackley, Mickley, Rip on Pontefract White Hurse,JJ&Rhna Naden, Finlde st, Knaresborough Wicker Brewery hotel, George Shepard, 70 & 72 Saville White Hors~, Edwin Pepper, Chapeltown, Sheffield street; Sheffle)~ White Horse, Gt"Orl{e Precioos~ Hi~rh t!treet, Wetherhy Wickham Arm~t in11., Wllliam Clayton. St. Peg lane, White Horse, William Prlestman, Ledston, Normanton Cleckh6aton, N ormanton White Horse, John Riley, Town street, Armley, Leedg Wila Boar, Thomas Machan, 343 Bolton road, Bradford White H8r&6, William Riley, Osmondtborpe, Leeds WildMfln; Henry Howartlt; 17 Quarry hill• J~eeds Whit,a HorS6J William Riley, York toad, Leeds Wild Man,l-Ienry J. Small wood, Street houses, Steeton, White Horse, G.Scholefield, HowdenClough, Birstal,Leeds T~dcaster White Uorse, Mrs. Hannah Sellars, Bramley lane~ Light• Williom I V. Briggs Atkinson, New Bridge, Cowick, Selby cliffe, Halifax WiUia'l'fl--th6 Fuut·th, John Deighton1 WiHia1n the Fourth White Horse, John ShaoJl, 70 Lowl'oad,HunsletiLeeds vard, 60 Briggate, Leedli White Horse, Frederick.Short, Copper street, Sheffield William IV. Robert Linfoot, Spofforth; Wetherby White Horae i1m, David Smith, NeW' Road llide, lngrow.
    [Show full text]
  • The London Gazette, Hth November 1976 15241
    THE LONDON GAZETTE, HTH NOVEMBER 1976 15241 CV10 9JD in the county of Warwick. Court—COVEN- Address and Description—Edwards, Elton Percy, 16, St. TRY (by transfer from High Court of Justice). No. of Owens Street, Hereford, Chartered Accountant. Date of Matter—48A of 1976. Trustee's Name, Address and Des- Certificate of Appointment—8th Nov., 1976. cription—Groseley, Reginald Keith, 37, Avenue Road, Rowley Regis, Warley, West Midlands, Chartered Account- BURGOYNE, David, an unemployed Labourer, residing ant. Date of Certificate of Appointment—5th Nov., 1976. at 10, Usk View, Govilon, Abergavenny in the county of Gwent, lately residing at 71, Rother Avenue, Aber- gavenny aforesaid and previously carrying on business BEARDSALL, Michael John, residing at 65, Marjorie Road, Chaddesden in the borough of Derby, Progress Chaser, at 15, Market Street, Abergavenny aforesaid, as a FISH formerly carrying on business under the name or style and CHIP SHOP PROPRIETOR. Court—NEWPORT of "Dale Fish Bar", from 119, Dale Road, Spondon in (GWENT). No. of Matter—48 of 1976. Trustee's the borough of Derby, FISH and CHIP SHOP Name, Address and Description—Halls Niged John, PROPRIETOR. Court—DERBY. No. of Matter—28 of Lennox House, Beaufort Buildings, Spa Road, Gloucester 1976. Trustee's Name, Address and Description— Chartered Accountant. Date of Certificate of Appoint- Gillanders, William, St. James's Chambers, St. James's ment—27th Oct., 1976. Street, Derby, Chartered Accountant. Date of Certificate RICKETTS, David John, of 13, Fraser Close, Cowes, of Appointment—9th Nov., 1976. Isle of Wight, occupation unknown, laltely residing at 33, Beatrice Avenue, East Cowes, Isle of Wight, and POLE, Hazel (married woman), care of 32, The Glebe, WINTER, Michael, of 12, High Street, Oakfield, Ryde, Tenby in the county of Dyfed and formerly of Ceinfan, Isle of Wight, Scaffolder, lately residing at 8, Argyll The Station, Narberth in the county of Dyfed.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mining in Morley
    BRITISH MINING No.87 COAL MINING IN MORLEY by JIM THORP O.B.E. MONOGRAPH OF THE NORTHERN MINE RESEARCH SOCIETY JUNE 2009 CONTENTS List of illustrations 4 Acknowledgements 5 Introduction 6 Not just a textile history 8 Rich coal seams 11 The Royal Commission for Women and Children 14 The Act - an inspector calls 18 The Act - the inspection 22 Morley Main and William Best 25 The Morley Main explosion 31 The inquest - identification 36 The inquest – evidence 39 The inquest – the professionals 44 Relief 47 More disasters 52 A heavy price 57 The pits go to law 62 Topcliffe and the Iron Man 67 Topcliffe and town gas 71 Pitmen- the owners 74 Pitmen - the miners 78 Disputes 81 Touching on finance 86 The end of the line 89 Appendix 1 - Lists of fatalities in major pit disasters 91 Appendix 2 - Frank Newby Wardell 92 Appendix 3 - Collieries and archival sources 93 Appendix 4 - mining geology of the Morley coalfield 96 Bibliography and sources of information 99 Index 102 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Page Frontispiece Morley coat of arms 5 Figure 1. Map showing the position of Morley within the W. Riding of Yorkshire 7 Figure 2. Undated photograph of Queen Street Morley and the Town Hall 10 Figure 3. Collieries in the Morley area 12 Figure 4. Coal cutting from the 1842 Children’s Employment Commission 15 Figure 5. Howley Park Colliery and the drawing shaft from the Middleton Seam 17 Figure 6. Hauling coal underground from the 1842 Children’s Employment Commission 19 Figure 7. Howley Park Colliery and the drawing shaft for the Silkstone Seam 21 Figure 8 The Plate Road, Morley, May 1960 23 Figure 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections Guide 9 Tithe
    COLLECTIONS GUIDE 9 TITHE Contacting Us What were tithes? Please contact us to book a Tithes were a local tax on agricultural produce. This tax was originally paid place before visiting our by farmers to support the local church and clergy. When Henry VIII searchrooms. abolished the monasteries in the 16th century, many Church tithe rights were sold into private hands. Owners of tithe rights on land which had WYAS Bradford previously belonged to the Church were known as ‘Lay Impropriators’. Margaret McMillan Tower Tithe charges were extinguished in 1936. Prince’s Way Bradford What is a tithe map? BD1 1NN Telephone +44 (0)113 535 0152 Disputes over the assessment and collection of tithes were resolved by the e. [email protected] Tithe Commutation Act of 1836. This allowed tithes in kind (wheat, hay, wool, piglets, milk etc.) to be changed into a fixed money payment called a WYAS Calderdale ‘tithe rent charge’. Detailed maps were drawn up showing the boundaries Central Library & Archives of individual fields, woods, roads, streams and rivers, and the position of Square Road buildings. Most tithe maps were completed in the 1840s. Halifax HX1 1QG What is a tithe apportionment? Telephone +44 (0)113 535 0151 e. [email protected] The details of rent charges payable for each property or field were written WYAS Kirklees up in schedules called ‘tithe apportionments’ . This part of the tithe award Central Library recorded who owned and occupied each plot, field names, the use to which Princess Alexandra Walk the land was being put at the time, plus a calculation of its value.
    [Show full text]
  • Churwell, Leeds
    CHURWELL, LEEDS BERKELEYDEVEER.CO.UK 1 2 HAMPTON GARDENS WELCOME TO HAMPTON GARDENS – 04 – INTRODUCTION – 06 – LOCATION – 08 – SPECIFICATION – 12 – ABOUT US – 14 – SITE PLAN – 16 – HOUSE TYPES – 28 – CONTACT BERKELEYDEVEER.CO.UK 3 HOMES THAT FEEL SPECIAL HAMPTON GARDENS IS A CHARMING COLLECTION OF 3 AND 4 BEDROOM NEW HOMES IN A SUPERB LOCATION. 4 HAMPTON GARDENS We build beautiful homes that create the perfect backdrop for a lifetime of treasured memories with loved ones. There’s something special about Hampton Gardens, and you can feel it the second you walk through the door. Every finish, appliance and thoughtful detail has been chosen to give you a home you can be proud of, whether you’re hosting family, entertaining friends or just enjoying everyday life in your spacious new home. BERKELEYDEVEER.CO.UK 5 MADE FOR LIFE CAREFULLY DESIGNED WITH MODERN LIFE IN MIND, THE HOMES AT HAMPTON GARDENS HAVE SOMETHING FOR EVERYBODY, AND ITS LOCATION MEANS IT WILL APPEAL TO YOUNG AND OLD ALIKE. 6 HAMPTON GARDENS HEADINGLEY This beautiful new development is located in the popular suburb of Churwell, Leeds. Perfectly situated to give easy access to the KIRKSTALL lively and bustling market town of Morley which hosts a leisure FARSLEY centre, train station and covered market, as well as various HAREHILLS schools, restaurants and shops.A1677 BURLEY A658 Public transport links include bus routes into neighbouring towns and villages. There is also nearby access to the M62, while Morley’s ring-road offers a simple route to the White Rose shopping centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Representations to Leeds SAP Remittal – Proposed Modifications to the Remitted Part of the Plan Site HG2-150 – Churwell, Leeds
    Representations to Leeds SAP Remittal – Proposed Modifications to the Remitted Part of the Plan Site HG2-150 – Churwell, Leeds FEBRUARY 2021 Q100198 Contents 1 Introduction ______________________________________________________________________ 1 2 Background to the Site Allocation, and the Context of Green Belt Release _____________________ 5 3 The Consequence of the Spatial Distribution on Housing Types_____________________________ 10 4 The Consequence of the Spatial Distribution on Affordable Housing _________________________ 13 5 The Consequence of the Spatial Distribution on Infrastructure Delivery _______________________ 15 6 The Specific Consequences for the Outer South West and the Appropriateness of Site HG2-150 ___ 16 Appendices Appendix 1 SHLAA Representations Quod | Site HG2-150 – Churwell, Leeds | Representations to Leeds SAP | February 2021 1 Introduction 1.1 Quod act on behalf of Munroe K Development Limited’s, as well as other third parties (Crowther and Brookes). These 3 parties own the land outlined in the Plan 1 below. Plan 1: Site Ownerships 1.2 The site is the subject of a landowner’s agreement which has been drawn up to facilitate the delivery of the White Rose Rail Station (“WRRS”) (see below). HG2-150 1.3 These three parties own a large part of land that was allocated for residential development (Site HG2-150) but has subsequently been reinstated in the Leeds Green Belt. The Site is shown on Plan 2 below. Quod | Site HG2-150 – Churwell, Leeds | Representations to Leeds SAP | February 2021 1 Plan 2: Site HG2-150 1.4 The remainder of the former allocation HG2-150 is owned by other parties including Barratts and Persimmon Homes. All parties with land ownership within this former allocation support its development for housing, and in that respect, it is available and deliverable.
    [Show full text]
  • Beeston Community Forum'
    Chair: Christine Thornton, 40 Cross Flatts Avenue, Beeston, Leeds, LS11 7BG. Tel 0113 270 0875 Secretary: Mr Robert Winfield,7 Allenby Gardens,Beeston,Leeds,LS11 5RW.Tel 0777 379 7820 E mail [email protected] Forum Website- www.beestonforum.btck.co.uk find us on Facebook at 'Beeston Community Forum' BEESTON COMMUNITY FORUM Let's make Beeston Better Writing the Beeston Plan Beeston Forum General Meeting - 9th May 2019 Agenda 1. Chairman's Opening Remarks 2. Apologies for absence 3. Minutes of the Forum meeting held on 4th April 2019 4. Police Report 5. The Beeston Plan 6. Report of the Committee meetings held on 21st March 2019 and 18th April 2019 7. Correspondence 8. Any Other Business Minutes of the meeting of the Beeston Community Forum held on 4th April 2019 Attendance:- Christine Thornton (in the chair) , Mr. R. Bell, Mr. W.J. Birch, Mrs J. Birch,.Mrs. M. Broadbent ,PC Cameron (West Yorkshire Police) Mr.S. Casserley, Mrs. R. Casserley, Mr. J. Cunningham , Mr. M. Day, Councillor A. Gabriel, Mrs. A. Gill, Mr. C. Hendrick Ward, Mr. K. Hewson, Mrs. P. Jones, Mr. E. Leathem, Mr. J. McGeevor, Mrs. P. McGeevor , Mrs. D.McGuigan, Mrs. M. Munro, Mr. M. Parry, Rev. L. Pearson, Mrs. J. Poulter, PCSO Robinson (West Yorkshire Police), Councillor A. Scopes, Mrs. M. Sharpe and Mr. R.J.W. Winfield 1. Chairman's Opening Remarks – Christine Thornton thanked the members present for their attendance and observed that it had been chilly during the day. She regretted to draw the attention to the meeting to the sudden death, at home, on 8th March of a former Forum Committee member, Pauline Johnson, who had undertaken various duties on behalf of the Forum over the years .
    [Show full text]
  • M a F F Ministry of I F I N I E Agriculture Fisheries and Food
    9© MAFF Ministry of IfiniE Agriculture Fisheries and Food AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION LEEDS UDP, TOPIC 487 & 547 CHURWELL, W. YORKSHIRE JUNE 1995 ADAS JobNo:- 110/95 Leeds Statutory Group MAFF Ref - EL 49/13 Commission No:- 1892 '^fcS 10^'^ Chunvell.doc/TA/sk SUMMARY A detailed agricultural land classification survey of 22.4 ha of land north of Churwell (ref Leeds UDP Topics 487 & 547) was carried out in June 1995. Soils on the site are developed from thinly bedded sandstones and shales and are slowly permeable. Profiles are generally soil wetness class III or IV. A colliery spoil heap occupies land in the south east of the site. 6.0 ha of land were Subgrade 3a, limited by soil wetness and workability problems. A further 5.3 ha of Subgrade 3b land were mapped. A more severe soil wetness problem occurs here. Grade 4 land (3.2 ha) was identified on the thin soils of the former spoil tip. Remaining land comprises Urban 2.9 ha, Non Agricultural 4.3 ha and Farm buildings 0.7 ha. Churwcll. doc/TA/sk CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS 2. AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION MAPS 1. AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION Chunvell.doc/TA/sk AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION REPORT ON LAND AT CHURWELL. W. YORKSHIRE: LEEDS UDP TOPIC 487 & 547 1. INTRODUCTION AND SITE CHARACTERISTICS 1.1 Location and Survey Methods The site lies about 4km south west of Leeds city centre to the north of Churwell and east of the M621 motorway. It has a centroid grid reference of SE 270 300 and measures 22.4 ha.
    [Show full text]
  • Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Matter 7
    Leeds City Council Site Allocations Plan Examination Matter 7: Selection of sites allocated for development – Outer South West: Main Issue 1 Main Issue 2 Additional site specific questions Doc No. M7/1j Leeds Local Plan Page 1 of 17 Main Issue 1: For each Housing Market Characteristic Area, are the individual sites selected sound? 1 Are the selected sites justified having regard to the site selection methodology and process, paying particular attention to the deliverability of the allocated sites? 1.1 Yes. The Council’s response to Matter 6 details the overall site assessment and selection process used for allocation of sites in the Plan. The Council considers that this approach is the most appropriate in terms of meeting CS aims and objectives for the MD as a whole and that the selection of sites is justified. This response to Matter 7 sets out how the overall methodology and process has applied in this HMCA. It highlights the specific characteristics of and evidence relating to Outer South West and notes whether there are any specific issues arising. 1.2 Further to paragraph 3.10 of the submission SAP CD1/1, Outer South West has a high Core Strategy target of 7,200 units which makes up 11% of the district total. The largest settlement in Outer South West is the town of Morley which is identified as a major settlement within the Core Strategy Settlement Hierarchy. Outer South West also includes the settlements of Drighlington, East Ardsley, Gildersome and TIngley/West Ardsley which are identified as smaller settlements within the Core Strategy and also have a history of coal mining.
    [Show full text]
  • 51 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    51 bus time schedule & line map 51 Meanwood <-> Moortown View In Website Mode The 51 bus line (Meanwood <-> Moortown) has 6 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Meanwood <-> Moortown: 6:46 AM (2) Moortown <-> Leeds City Centre: 7:42 PM (3) Moortown <-> Meanwood: 11:28 PM (4) Moortown <-> Morley: 5:30 AM - 10:46 PM (5) Morley <-> Leeds City Centre: 7:40 PM (6) Morley <-> Moortown: 5:25 AM - 10:46 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 51 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 51 bus arriving. Direction: Meanwood <-> Moortown 51 bus Time Schedule 15 stops Meanwood <-> Moortown Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday 6:46 AM Monday Not Operational Green Road, Meanwood Tuesday Not Operational Green View, Meanwood Green Crescent, Leeds Wednesday Not Operational Parkside Green, Meanwood Thursday Not Operational Church Lane, Leeds Friday Not Operational Parkside Road, Meanwood Saturday Not Operational Cardinal Heenan Sch, Meanwood Tongue Lane, Leeds St Urbans School, Meanwood 51 bus Info Direction: Meanwood <-> Moortown Saxon Road, Moortown Stops: 15 Trip Duration: 11 min Tynwald Hill, Moortown Line Summary: Green Road, Meanwood, Green View, Meanwood, Parkside Green, Meanwood, Parkside Scotland Wood Road, Moortown Road, Meanwood, Cardinal Heenan Sch, Meanwood, St Urbans School, Meanwood, Saxon Road, Deanswood Hill, Moortown Moortown, Tynwald Hill, Moortown, Scotland Wood Road, Moortown, Deanswood Hill, Moortown, Deanswood Hill, Leeds Cranmer Bank, Moortown, Moor Haven Court, Cranmer Bank, Moortown Moortown,
    [Show full text]
  • Back Matter (PDF)
    184^. LIST OF OFFICERS AND MEMBERS (geolofiiral antr polgtecftnic ^onetg WEST-RIDING OF YORKSHIRE. LIST OF OFFICERS AND MEMBERS OF THE CxEOLOGICAL & POLYTECHNIC SOCIETY OF THE smest'iattimg of mxUWtf 1ST MAY, 1842. OFFICERS. EARL FITZWILLIAM, F.R.S, VUtA rfsitrents. DUKE or NOKFOLK. REV. T. BARNES. EAUL OF EFFINGHAM. T. W, BEAUMONT, ESQ. EAKL OF DARTMOUTH, J. S. STANHOPE, Esa. LORD WHARNCLIFFE. R. O. GASCOIGNE, ESQ. LORD STOURTON. G. LANE FOX, Esa. VISCOUNT MILTON. J. W. CHILDERS, ESQ. M.P. VISCOUNT HOWARD, M.P. E. B. BEAUMONT, ESQ. HON. W. S. LASCELLES, M.P. G. WENTWORTH, ESQ. HON. J. S. WoRTLEY, M.P. W. BENNETT MARTIN, ESQ. SIR F. L. WOOD, BART. C. J. BRANDLING, ESQ. SIR W. B. COOKE, BART. J. G. MARSHALL, ESQ. REV. DR. SCORESBY. MICHAEL ELLISON, ESQ. REV. S, SHARP. T. D. BLAND, JUN. ESQ. (ffoitnctt. W. BILLINTON. H. HARTOP. J. BRAKENRIDGE. H. HOLT. H. BRIGGS. J. M. STANSFELD. J. C. D. CHARLESWORTH, C. MORTON. T. W, EMBLETON. REV. W. THORP. W.T.HALL. GEO. WILSON. Siecwtarg anir Crcasurcr. JOSEPH TRAVIS CLAY, Rastrick, Huddersfield. f^onorans Curatois. T. W. EMBLETON AND HENRY HOLT. Kestlrent (ffnrator. MARTIN SIMPSON, Museum, Westgate, Wakefield. aiilrttors. BENJ. BIRAM AND G. W. CHAMBERS, MEMBERS. Rev. C. E. Armstrong, Hemsworth, Pontefract. John Aldred, Rotherham. Dr. Wm. Alexander, Lord-street, Halifax. John Atkinson, Chesterfield. Wm. Aldam, Jun., M.P., Warmsworth, Doncaster. James Alexander, Doncaster. Edward N. Alexander, F.S.A., Halifax Edward Akroyd, Bank Field, Halifax. Henry Akroyd, Woodside, Halifax. Joseph Abbott, Normanton, Wakefield. T. W. Beaumont, Bretton Park, Wakefield, E. B. Beaumont, Finningley Park, Bawtry.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Our Brochure
    2021/22 Artwork by Glenn Hustler ∙ [email protected] ∙ hustlerbyname.co.uk Print & digital distribution serving Yorkshire. Local, independent, at the drop of a hat! 2 www.howdoyorkshire.com [email protected] Products & Services Brochure 2021 Contents 4 About us 16-17 North Yorkshire 5 Why work with us? 18 Manchester 6-7 Map overview 19 Lancashire 8-9 Bradford & district 20 Hand-to-hand promotions 10-11 Leeds & district 21 Poster distribution 12-13 Calderdale & Kirklees 22-23 Residential packages 14 Wakefield & district 24 Why to choose HowDo! 15 South Yorkshire 25 Website guide Get in touch For more information, contact Kerry Wadsworth Email: [email protected] 3 "Our team offers a collaborative, caring and flexible Follow @howdoyorkshire on Twitter to see us at work! service that is tailored to your campaign." Martyn Johnston, Director 4 www.howdoyorkshire.com [email protected] Products & Services Brochure 2021 About us HowDo?! Yorkshire started life as a printed magazine in 2011, providing a platform for creative organisations and individuals in Bradford to promote their activities. When HowDo?! Magazine came to an end in 2013, co-founder Martyn Johnston continued the work of promoting the positive things happening in Bradford and established Chapel Street Studio, a cooperative agency and creative workspace that would lay the foundations for a future relaunch of a city magazine. In 2014, Carl White joined the HowDo?! team as Distribution Manager, developing a regional print distribution service. Since then our team “HowDo?! Yorkshire are a of distribution staff have promoted countless arts and community events to thousands of community locations across Yorkshire.
    [Show full text]