DOCSLIB.ORG

Rhetoric Across the Disciplines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rhetoric Across the Disciplines RHETORIC ACROSS THE DISCIPLINES: DEFINITIONS, PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPECTATIONS OF FACULTY WITHIN AND BEYOND RHETORIC AND COMPOSITION A Project Presented to the faculty of the Department of English California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in English (Composition) by Dakota Joseph Lenz SPRING 2018 © 2018 Dakota Joseph Lenz ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii RHETORIC ACROSS THE DISCIPLINES: DEFINITIONS, PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPECTATIONS OF FACULTY WITHIN AND BEYOND RHETORIC AND COMPOSITION A Project by Dakota Joseph Lenz Approved by: __________________________________, Committee Chair Hogan Hayes, Ph.D. __________________________________, Second Reader Tialitha Macklin, Ph.D. ____________________________ Date iii Student: Dakota Joseph Lenz I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the project. __________________________, Graduate Coordinator ___________________ Doug Rice, Ph.D. Date Department of English iv Abstract of RHETORIC ACROSS THE DISCIPLINES: DEFINITIONS, PERCEPTIONS, AND EXPECTATIONS OF FACULTY WITHIN AND BEYOND RHETORIC AND COMPOSITION by Dakota Joseph Lenz In the spring of the 2018 academic year, I examined what connections existed between composition instructors and disciplinary instructors at California State University, Sacramento (CSUS) regarding definitions, perceptions, and expectations of rhetoric, as well as willingness to engage in interdisciplinary efforts to teach rhetoric. I collected data via anonymous survey from faculty teaching composition courses and through semi-structured interviews with three disciplinary faculty, one each from the departments of communication studies, sociology, and civil engineering. I discovered that both composition and disciplinary faculty perceive audience awareness and genre awareness, which this study summarizes as rhetorical adaptability, to be the most important aspects of rhetoric for students to understand; however, disciplinary faculty have little confidence students will demonstrate rhetorical adaptability when entering their classrooms. In addition, the use of the term rhetoric and related terminology varied greatly, even among composition faculty. Almost all faculty were willing to engage in interdisciplinary efforts to improve the overall instruction of rhetoric. _______________________, Committee Chair Hogan Hayes, Ph.D. _______________________ Date v DEDICATION To Joseph and Michele, for building the ship. To Carol, for providing safe harbor. To Tialitha, Angela, and Hogan, for keeping the course. To Orion and Behemoth, for filling the sails with wind. And most of all, to Jocelynn, who, through storm and sun, keeps the whole voyage afloat. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Dedication ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Tables ........................................................................................................................ viii Chapter 1. COVER ESSAY .................................................................................................................. 1 2. STATEMENT OF TEACHING PHILOSOPHY ................................................................ 5 3. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY ................................................................................... 10 4. PUBLISHABLE DOCUMENT ........................................................................................ 31 Appendix A. Semi-Structured Interview Questions ............................................................ 76 Appendix B. Composition Faculty Survey Questions ......................................................... 77 Appendix C. Table 6 – Composition Courses Taught/Teaching .......................................... 79 Appendix D. Tables 7 & 8 – Definitions ............................................................................. 80 Appendix E. Table 9 – Comments on the Importance of Rhetoric ....................................... 86 Appendix F. Table 10 – Composition Faculty Expectations ............................................... 90 References ............................................................................................................................... 94 vii LIST OF TABLES Tables Page 1. A Cross Comparison for Defining Rhetoric ................................................................ 35 2. Likert Scale of Perceived Importance of Rhetoric ....................................................... 51 3. Frequency of Most Common Aspects of Rhetoric....................................................... 54 4. Faculty Perspectives on Rhetorical Instruction Beyond the Discipline ....................... 57 5. Likelihood of Composition Faculty Working with Disciplinary Faculty .................... 59 6. Composition Courses Taught/Teaching ....................................................................... 79 7. Faculty Definitions of Rhetoric ................................................................................... 80 8. Breakdown of Faculty Definitions of Rhetoric ............................................................ 82 9. Optional Comments for Importance of Rhetoric ......................................................... 86 10. Composition Faculty Expectations for Rhetorical Knowledge Transfer ..................... 90 viii 1 Chapter 1 COVER ESSAY This portfolio contains the product of countless hours of study, reflection, library trips, late nights, cups of coffee, discussions (see also: arguments), but most of all, collaboration. Yes, I put the proverbial pen to paper and generated the contents therein, but the ideas, concepts, reflections and new understandings these writings represent come from working with brilliant minds and ambitions. Most of the scholarship to which I reference was unfamiliar to me when entering the graduate program; I knew that I wanted to teach people how to express their ideas through writing, and I had some experience doing so, but to articulate and rationalize the instructional choices I was making, and to find paths for improving this instruction, required several steady hands and a willingness on my part to accept and adapt. Collaboration and adaptability are reflected immediately in Chapter 2, my teaching portfolio. I begin by describing an alteration to a previous draft. I believed (and still do) strongly in the community classroom. I wanted all students engaging with one another, exploring ideas, challenging positions, and creating knowledge together. But the more classes I had the privilege of teaching, the more I realized that I cannot expect this level of engagement from every class, for whatever reason. So, I learned to adapt. I found new ways of allowing students to engage in written expression and interact with one another. I observed and learned from all students, especially the ones faced with additional challenges, such as being tasked to write complex arguments in a language other than their first, or working with cognitive delays that required varying levels of 2 accommodation. I continue to work with writing centers, both at the four-year university and two-year college level, because that is where I believe I encounter as diverse a student population with as diverse a set of needs as possible. It is a test of my own agility as an instructor, and I want to keep my senses sharp. My teaching philosophy reflects this personal development, leading the reader to my current approaches to teaching, and the way in which I continue to practice my instructional adaptability. Chapter 3, the annotated bibliography, represents the areas of scholarship within rhetoric and composition that I have been drawn towards over the course of the graduate program and I use to inform my own praxis. Areas of interest include writing-across-the- curriculum/writing-in-the-disciplines (WAC/WID) programming and pedagogy, theories of transfer, and interdisciplinary writing collaboration. My own studies began outside of the rhetoric and composition and the English department. As an undergraduate, I was an oceanography major, specializing in ocean currents and sea cliff erosion - my backpack was as likely to be filled with sand than essays. This foundation is reflected in the focuses to which I was drawn – scholarship that considers writing beyond the writing classroom. My belief in classroom community extends to the idea of campus community. I believe that my own writing instruction needs to be informed by knowledge of other disciplinary writing expectations to better serve the large majority students who will leave our discipline and encounter writing contexts more applicable to their majors and careers. I am with these students in the concept of forward thinking: my own teaching methods and assignments are designed to continue to serve the students in their academic and 3 professional careers – in sum, the scholarship contained in the annotated bibliography looks at who the students can and will become as writers. The research project that comprises Chapter 4 takes the beliefs of the teaching philosophy, combines the scholarship that has influenced who I am as an educator, and introduces the aspect of writing that I believe is of most benefit for our students within and beyond academia: rhetoric. Rhetoric is everywhere and in everything. Language makes meaning,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reconceiving Curriculum: an Historical Approach Stephen Shepard Triche Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2002 Reconceiving curriculum: an historical approach Stephen Shepard Triche Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Triche, Stephen Shepard, "Reconceiving curriculum: an historical approach" (2002). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 495. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/495 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. RECONCEIVING CURRICULUM: AN HISTORICAL APPROACH A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of Curriculum and Instruction by Stephen S. Triche B.A., Louisiana State University, 1979 M.A.. Louisiana State University, 1991 August 2002 To my family for their love and support over the years as I pursue this dream and to the memory of my father. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The process of researching and writing this dissertation has brought many teachers into my life—those special people who have given me their time and unique talents. First, and foremost, I wish to thank Dr. William Doll for his unwavering confidence and determination to bring out the best that I could give. Without his wisdom and support this project could not have been accomplished.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetoric for Becoming Otherwise
    The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School College of the Liberal Arts RHETORIC FOR BECOMING OTHERWISE: LIFE, LITERATURE, GENEALOGY, FLIGHT A Dissertation in English by Abram D. Anders © 2009 Abram D. Anders Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2009 ii The dissertation of Abram D. Anders was reviewed and approved* by the following: Richard M. Doyle Professor of English and Science, Technology and Society Dissertation Advisor Chair of Committee Jeffrey T. Nealon Liberal Arts Research Professor of English Xiaoye You Assistant Professor of English and Asian Studies Robert A. Yarber, Jr. Distinguished Professor of Art Robert R. Edwards Edwin Erle Sparks Professor of English and Comparative Literature Department of English Graduate Director *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School. iii ABSTRACT Rhetoric for Becoming Otherwise begins with the Isocratean premise that thought, speech, writing are best understood as bridges between the already said of language and the emerging circumstances that are the occasions for their production. This argument is rehearsed across a variety of domains and instances following Isocrates exhortation that the rhetorician or practitioner of philosophia can only model the movement of discourse without expecting to provide any “true knowledge” or “absolute theory” for how to encounter the problematics of an endlessly deferred present. As a matter of rhetoric, becoming otherwise is the continually renewed task of creating something new from the resources of language and for the demands of an ever deferred present—Presocratics versus Classicists (Chapter 1). As a matter of health, becoming otherwise is the necessity of overcoming limitation and suffering in order to achieve new norms of health and pursue the ever changing opportunities of a self‐developing capacity for producing new capacities—Normativity versus Normalization (Chapter 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Student Success Skills: a Review of the Literature on Complex Communication
    MEASURING STUDENT SUCCESS SKILLS: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE ON COMPLEX COMMUNICATION March 31, 2020 Dr. Jeri Thompson National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment www.nciea.org TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...................................................3 DEFINITIONS ........................................................5 • What is Complex Communication as a Success Skill? ............................................... 5 • Are Communication Skills Generic or Discipline-Specific? ...................... 12 • What is the Relationship Between Communication and Other Success Skill Concepts? ............................... 12 DEVELOPMENT ..................................................13 • How Does Communication Develop? ....... 13 INSTRUCTION ....................................................15 • What Instructional Approaches are there for Teaching Complex Communication? .. 15 • What Do We Know About the Effects of Instruction on the Development of Communication Skills and 1. Center for Assessment completed this work on behalf of PBLWorks (Buck Institute for Student Achievement? ................................ 17 Education) in its effort to provide tools and resources to school and district partners as they assess student success skill performance MEASUREMENT/ASSESSMENT .........................18 in Gold Standard Project Based Learning. • How is Communication Typically Measured or Assessed? .............. 18 • What are the Measurement/Assessment 2. I acknowledge the terrific feedback on previous drafts from my
    [Show full text]
  • Stories, Traces of Discourse, and the Tease of Presence: Gertrude
    University of Wisconsin Milwaukee UWM Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations May 2013 Stories, Traces of Discourse, and the Tease of Presence: Gertrude Simmons Bonnin as Orator and Indigenous Activist Paige Allison Conley University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uwm.edu/etd Part of the Indigenous Studies Commons, Rhetoric Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Conley, Paige Allison, "Stories, Traces of Discourse, and the Tease of Presence: Gertrude Simmons Bonnin as Orator and Indigenous Activist" (2013). Theses and Dissertations. 675. https://dc.uwm.edu/etd/675 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by UWM Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UWM Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STORIES, TRACES OF DISCOURSE, AND THE TEASE OF PRESENCE: GERTRUDE SIMMONS BONNIN AS ORATOR AND INDIGENOUS ACTIVIST by Paige Allison Conley A Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English at The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee May 2013 ABSTRACT STORIES, TRACES OF DISCOURSE, AND THE TEASE OF PRESENCE: GERTRUDE SIMMONS BONNIN AS ORATOR AND INDIGENOUS ACTIVIST by Paige Allison Conley The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, 2013 Under the Supervision of Professor Alice M. Gillam An accomplished writer, editor, musician, teacher, organizer, lobbyist, and political reformer, Gertrude Simmons Bonnin worked tirelessly during the first half of the twentieth century to enhance opportunities for Native Americans. Literary texts authored by Bonnin (writing as Zitkala-Ša) are well known, but her legacy as an early twentieth- century orator and indigenous activist receives little critical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Inquiry: Attending to the Art of Discourse
    Narrative Inquiry: Attending to the Art of Discourse Carl Leggo University of British Columbia Storytelling is an attempt to deal with and at least partly contain the terrifyingly haphazard quality of life. (Fulford, 1999, 14) Every interpretation is a political move. (Marshall, 1992, 192) Here I am, at the border between story and history, personal desire and a shared reality over which I have no more power than I do over my dreams. (Keefer, 1998, 163) At least once a year, I teach a graduate course titled Narrative Inquiry. Students from many different disciplines, including education, health, nursing, creative writing, and psychology, register for the course with the anticipation that they will learn how to do narrative inquiry. At the beginning of the course I always inform students that they will not likely learn how to do narrative inquiry in the narrative inquiry course. Instead they will interrogate the strategies, purposes, practices, and challenges of narrative inquiry, and they will learn how complicated, even messy, the whole business of narrative inquiry really is. I organize the course around an investigation of three principal dynamics involved in narrative inquiry: story, interpretation, and discourse. I explain that story is what happened. Therefore, story can be researched by asking the journalist’s questions: who? what? when? where? why? how? Then, interpretation addresses the basic question of so what. In other words, what is the significance of the story? Finally, discourse is all about how we tell the story. Discourse refers to the rhetoric of story- telling, the art and science of shaping and constructing a story for communicating to others.
    [Show full text]
  • An Intersectional Excavation of the Literary Vampire in Neoliberal Discourse Jessica Elizabeth Birch Purdue University
    Purdue University Purdue e-Pubs Open Access Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2014 Blood, Tears, and Sweat: An Intersectional Excavation of the Literary Vampire in Neoliberal Discourse Jessica Elizabeth Birch Purdue University Follow this and additional works at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations Recommended Citation Birch, Jessica Elizabeth, "Blood, Tears, and Sweat: An Intersectional Excavation of the Literary Vampire in Neoliberal Discourse" (2014). Open Access Dissertations. 1483. https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/open_access_dissertations/1483 This document has been made available through Purdue e-Pubs, a service of the Purdue University Libraries. Please contact [email protected] for additional information. BLOOD, TEARS, AND SWEAT: AN INTERSECTIONAL EXCAVATION OF THE LITERARY VAMPIRE IN NEOLIBERAL DISCOURSE A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Purdue University by Jessica Elizabeth Birch In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2014 Purdue University West Lafayette, Indiana ii For Benjamin, who’s had my back since before I was born. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I’ve never been prone to public outpourings of emotion, even on Facebook, and that makes writing these acknowledgments is difficult. What makes writing these almost impossible is that there is no way to adequately thank the people who made it possible for me to complete this dissertation and my Ph.D. As you read these words of thanks, please remember that any limitation of gratitude is due to the limits of
    [Show full text]
  • Eric Voegelin and Giambattista Vico: a Rhetorical Reading by Giuseppe
    Eric Voegelin and Giambattista Vico: A Rhetorical Reading by Giuseppe Ballacci Department of Political Science and International Relations Universidad Autónoma de Madrid Prepared for delivery at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30th-September 2nd, 2007 Eric Voegelin Society DRAFT, PLEASE NOT QUOTE WITHOUT PERMISSION “It is difficult to tell the truth, because even if there is just one truth, it is alive and so it has a changing face” (Franz Kafka)∗ Introduction It is not so easy to understand, but indeed very appealing to research, the reasons why in a moment so interested in foundations and language as ours, thinkers as Giambattista Vico and Eric Voegelin, who left such profound and inspiring contributions on these topics, are not at the centre of the attention of scholars in the field of philosophy, and specifically of political philosophy (the discipline that should be most concerned with them). This paper is an attempt to contribute to the (to be sure, already sustained) effort to correct this deficiency, with a reflection on the works of these two great authors aimed to highlight their communalities and the potentiality that springs from such joined reading. Since the times of Plato and Aristotle, Modernity can be considered not only one of the most interested epoch in the theme of foundations but also, and above all, one of the most confident in its ability to find them1. In this respect, we can recall what Blumenberg once noticed: it is not very normal that an epoch put in question the legitimacy of its existence, or even more, that it comes to conceive itself as an “epoch” at all2.
    [Show full text]
  • Visualizing Words and Knowledge: Arts of Memory from the Agora to the Computer
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2015 Visualizing Words and Knowledge: Arts of Memory from the Agora to the Computer Seth D. Long Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Long, Seth D., "Visualizing Words and Knowledge: Arts of Memory from the Agora to the Computer" (2015). Dissertations - ALL. 222. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/222 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT This dissertation examines rhetoric’s fourth canon—the art of memory—tracing its development through the classical, medieval, and early modern periods. It argues that for most of its history, the fourth canon was an art by which words and knowledge were remediated into visual, spatial forms, either in the mind or on the page. And it was this technique of visualization, I argue, that linked the canons of memory and invention throughout history. In contemporary rhetorical theory, however, memory palaces and mnemonic imagery have been replaced with a conception of memory grounded in psychology and critique. I argue that this move away from memory as an artificial practice has obscured the classical art’s visual precepts, consequently severing the ancient link between memory and invention. I suggest that contemporary rhetorical theorists should return to visualization to revitalize the fourth canon in the twenty-first century. Today, digital tools that visualize words and knowledge are ubiquitous.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Inquiry: Attending to the Art of Discourse
    Narrative Inquiry: Attending to the Art of Discourse Carl Leggo University of British Columbia Storytelling is an attempt to deal with and at least partly contain the terrifyingly haphazard quality of life. (Fulford, 1999, 14) Every interpretation is a political move. (Marshall, 1992, 192) Here I am, at the border between story and history, personal desire and a shared reality over which I have no more power than I do over my dreams. (Keefer, 1998, 163) At least once a year, I teach a graduate course titled Narrative Inquiry. Students from many different disciplines, including education, health, nursing, creative writing, and psychology, register for the course with the anticipation that they will learn how to do narrative inquiry. At the beginning of the course I always inform students that they will not likely learn how to do narrative inquiry in the narrative inquiry course. Instead they will interrogate the strategies, purposes, practices, and challenges of narrative inquiry, and they will learn how complicated, even messy, the whole business of narrative inquiry really is. I organize the course around an investigation of three principal dynamics involved in narrative inquiry: story, interpretation, and discourse. I explain that story is what happened. Therefore, story can be researched by asking the journalist’s questions: who? what? when? where? why? how? Then, interpretation addresses the basic question of so what. In other words, what is the significance of the story? Finally, discourse is all about how we tell the story. Discourse refers to the rhetoric of story- telling, the art and science of shaping and constructing a story for communicating to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Music, Metaphor, and Ideology: Toward a Critical Theory of Forms in Music Education
    MUSIC, METAPHOR, AND IDEOLOGY: TOWARD A CRITICAL THEORY OF FORMS IN MUSIC EDUCATION (Spine Title: Music, Metaphor, and Ideology) (Thesis Format: Monograph) by Joseph Paul Louth Graduate Program in Music A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Western Ontario London, Ontario, Canada © Joseph Paul Louth 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-39299-7 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-39299-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non­ sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. this thesis. Neither the thesis Ni la these ni des extraits substantiels de nor substantial extracts from it celle-ci ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement may be printed or otherwise reproduits sans son autorisation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorical Theory Rhetorical Theory Is the Body of Thought About Human Symbol Use
    Rhetorical Theory Rhetorical theory is the body of thought about human symbol use. The term rhetoric, in its popular usage, typically has negative connotations. Rhetoric is contrasted with action; it is empty words, talk without substance, mere ornament. This contemporary understanding of rhetoric is at odds with a long history of rhetorical theory, dating back in the West to ancient Greece and Rome, that provides a long-standing foundation on which the contemporary discipline of communication is built. At the heart of theorizing about rhetoric, whether for the Greeks or contemporary scholars, is what came to be called by Lloyd Bitzer in 1968 the rhetorical situation. Rhetoric occurs in response to an exigence or some kind of urgency, problem, or something not as it should be. Another characteristic of the situation is the audience— those individuals capable of affecting the exigence in some way. In addition, there are constraints in the situation—positive and negative factors that hinder or enhance the possibility that the audience will be able to affect the exigence. Rhetoric comes into being, then, when a rhetor observes or creates an exigence and offers discourse designed to bring the interests of the audience to bear on it. In essence, then, rhetorical theorists address some or all parts of the rhetorical situation—the rhetor and the degree of agency available to him or her; the audience and the constraints available to them; the discourse, message, or symbols used to address the exigence; how the exigence itself is constructed, created, and addressed; and the larger contexts— historical, economic, cultural, and symbolic—in which the situation is playing out.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-Century American Colleges
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 263 600 CS 209 424 AUTHOR Berlin, James A. TITLE Writing Instruction in Nineteenth-Century American Colleges. Studies in Writing & Rhetoric. INSTITUTION Conference on Coll. Composition and Communication, Urbana, Ill. REPORT NO ISBN-0-8093-1166-6 PUB DATE 84 NOTE 126p.; Foreword by Donald C. Stewart. AVAILABLE FROMSouthern Illinois University Press, P.0 Box 3697, Carbondale, IL 62901 ($8.50). PUB TYPE Books (010) -- Reports - Descriptive (141)- Historical Materials (060) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC06 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS College English; *Educational History; *Educational Theories; Higher Education; *Rhetoric; Rhetorical Criticism; Writing (Composition); *Writing Instruction IDENTIFIERS *Nineteenth Century Rhetoric; *Rhetorical Theories ABSTRACT An examination of nineteenth century rhetoric is presented in this publication. The first chapter analyzesthree rhetorical systems of the nineteenth century: classical, psychological-epistemological, and romantic. The second chapter discusses the demise of the classical tradition, while the third chapter, "The Triumph of Eighteenth-Century Rhetoric," focuseson the rhetorical theories of George Campbell, Hugh Blair,and Richard Whately, exploring their influences on nineteenth century pedagogy and social thought. Chapter four describes American imitators of Campbell and Blair, specifically Samuel P. Newman andHenry Day, and chapter five deals with Ralph Waldo Emerson and romantic rhetoric. Chapter six examines aspects of the scientific approach--the managerial scheme of invention, arrangement, and style--and its consequences. Chapter seven presents the rhetoric of Fred Newton Scott as a new direction for college writing instruction, andthe final chapter considers three contemporary approachesto teaching writing. A twelve-page bibliography concludes thestudy. *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best thatcan be made * * from the original document.
    [Show full text]